+ All Categories
Home > Documents > FireMAFS project: Gomez- Dans , Spessa , Wooster, Lewis

FireMAFS project: Gomez- Dans , Spessa , Wooster, Lewis

Date post: 23-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: alyson
View: 36 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Assessment and optimisation of SPITFIRE using EO data, and Bayesian probability and Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) techniques. FireMAFS project: Gomez- Dans , Spessa , Wooster, Lewis. *. *. LPJ: Lund Potsdam Dynamic Vegetation Model - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
7
Assessment and optimisation of SPITFIRE using EO data, and Bayesian probability and Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) techniques FireMAFS project: Gomez-Dans, Spessa, Wooster, Lew
Transcript
Page 1: FireMAFS  project:  Gomez- Dans ,  Spessa , Wooster, Lewis

Assessment and optimisation of SPITFIRE using EO data, and Bayesian probability and Markov

Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) techniques

FireMAFS project: Gomez-Dans, Spessa, Wooster, Lewis

Page 2: FireMAFS  project:  Gomez- Dans ,  Spessa , Wooster, Lewis

*

*

*

*

*

* By-passing the vegetation dynamics and soil hydrology

components of LPJ.

LPJ: Lund Potsdam Dynamic Vegetation Model

SPITFIRE: Spread and Intensity of Fire and Emissions

Model

LPJ SPITFIRE… Above-ground fuel load.

SPITFIRE LPJ… Post-fire plant mortality and above-

ground biomass unburnt.

Page 3: FireMAFS  project:  Gomez- Dans ,  Spessa , Wooster, Lewis
Page 4: FireMAFS  project:  Gomez- Dans ,  Spessa , Wooster, Lewis

Improved PFT densities and distribution

Page 5: FireMAFS  project:  Gomez- Dans ,  Spessa , Wooster, Lewis

Improved fuel load magnitudes and distribution

Page 6: FireMAFS  project:  Gomez- Dans ,  Spessa , Wooster, Lewis

uncalibrated

calibratedMODISsatellite

Page 7: FireMAFS  project:  Gomez- Dans ,  Spessa , Wooster, Lewis

White = 0% disparity

Light pink ~ 1% disparity

Dark red ~ 20% disparity

This gives a basis to further investigate structural and parameterisation problems with the fire model without having to worry too much about errors emanating from the vegetation model itself.


Recommended