+ All Categories
Home > Documents > First Results of Splice mapping in  the main circuits of Sector 12.

First Results of Splice mapping in  the main circuits of Sector 12.

Date post: 02-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: kyle-lara
View: 24 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
First Results of Splice mapping in  the main circuits of Sector 12. “Special” PLI2.s1 tests were done on RB.A12 and RQ.A12: RQD/RQF, 24/09/2009, 17h15-21h45; RB, 25/09/2009, 18h30-21h00; The current steps: 0,760A,1200A,1600A,2000A,…,0 (9 plateaus) The ramp rate: 10A/s - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
23
sults of Splice mapping in the main circuits of Sector 1 cial” PLI2.s1 tests were done on RB.A12 and RQ.A12: /RQF, 24/09/2009, 17h15-21h45; , 25/09/2009, 18h30-21h00; current steps: 0,760A,1200A,1600A,2000A,…,0 (9 plateaus) ramp rate: 10A/s plateau time: >10mins. 1 MP3, 30/09/2009, Z.Charifoulline
Transcript

MP3, 30/09/2009, Z.Charifoulline 1

First Results of Splice mapping in the main circuits of Sector 12.

“Special” PLI2.s1 tests were done on RB.A12 and RQ.A12:

-RQD/RQF, 24/09/2009, 17h15-21h45;- RB, 25/09/2009, 18h30-21h00;

The current steps: 0,760A,1200A,1600A,2000A,…,0 (9 plateaus) The ramp rate: 10A/sThe plateau time: >10mins.

MP3, 30/09/2009, Z.Charifoulline 2

nQPS layout for bus-bar protection – example (R.Denz, MP3, 19/08/2009)

• _SPLICE signals are sent directly to analysis tools via special subscription to QPS supervision signals (developing by Odd Andreassen, additional few weeks?)

• All signals are transferred to QPS supervision and TIMBER, certain status flags as well to LASER– All signals are recorded on change; dead-bands apply only to LSB

• LSB U_RES = 1.5 nV (24bit, ±12.5mV) • LSB U_MAG = 305 nV

MB.A9L2 MB.A10L2

DCBA.9L2.R DCBQ.9L2.R DCBB.10L2.R

DCBB.10L2.R:U_RESDCBB.10L2.R:U_MAGDCBB.10L2.R:U_MAG_SPLICE

DCBB.10L2.R:U_RES_SPLICE

DCBB.10L2.R:ST_BUSBAR_OK

DCBB.9L2.R DCBA.10L2.R

“U_MAG” – magnet signal, which is total voltage drop on the “reference” magnet;“U_RES = Ubus–α*U_MAG” - bus bar signal; α=93.0E-5 (dipoles) and α=51.0E-3 (quads) – defaults values for dI/dt compensation;

MP3, 30/09/2009, Z.Charifoulline 3

nQPS layout for bus-bar protection – example (R.Denz, MP3, 19/08/2009)

• _SPLICE signals are sent directly to analysis tools via special subscription to QPS supervision signals (developing by Odd Andreassen, additional few weeks?)

• All signals are transferred to QPS supervision and TIMBER, certain status flags as well to LASER– All signals are recorded on change; dead-bands apply only to LSB

• LSB U_RES = 1.5 nV (24bit, ±12.5mV) • LSB U_MAG = 305 nV

MB.A9L2 MB.A10L2

DCBA.9L2.R DCBQ.9L2.R DCBB.10L2.R

DCBB.10L2.R:U_RESDCBB.10L2.R:U_MAGDCBB.10L2.R:U_MAG_SPLICE

DCBB.10L2.R:U_RES_SPLICE

DCBB.10L2.R:ST_BUSBAR_OK

DCBB.9L2.R DCBA.10L2.R

“U_MAG” – magnet signal, which is total voltage drop on the “reference” magnet;“U_RES = Ubus–α*U_MAG” - bus bar signal; α=93.0E-5 (dipoles) and α=51.0E-3 (quads) – defaults values for dI/dt compensation;

U_RES_SPLICE(I) = U0 + Rbus*I + {∆α*U_MAG_SPLICE(I)};U_MAG_SPLICE(I) = U0 + Rmag*I;

MP3, 30/09/2009, Z.Charifoulline 4

A12.RQD/RQF: U_RES_SPLICE vs Time & I_MEAS vs Time

MP3, 30/09/2009, Z.Charifoulline 5

A12.RQD/RQF: U_RES_SPLICE vs Time & I_MEAS vs Time

MP3, 30/09/2009, Z.Charifoulline 6

A12.RQD/RQF: U_RES_SPLICE vs I_MEAS

MP3, 30/09/2009, Z.Charifoulline 7

A12.RQD/RQF: BusSegment Reistance vs nQPS Crate

MP3, 30/09/2009, Z.Charifoulline 8

A12.RQD/RQF: BusSegment Reistance vs nQPS Crate

MP3, 30/09/2009, Z.Charifoulline 9

A12.RQD/RQF: BusSegment Reistance vs nQPS Crate

MP3, 30/09/2009, Z.Charifoulline 10

A12.RQD/RQF: BusSegment Reistance vs nQPS Crate

MP3, 30/09/2009, Z.Charifoulline 11

A12.RQD/RQF: BusSegment Reistance vs nQPS Crate

MP3, 30/09/2009, Z.Charifoulline 12

A12.RQD/RQF: BusSegment Reistance vs nQPS Crate

MP3, 30/09/2009, Z.Charifoulline 13

A12.RQD/RQF: BusSegment Reistance vs nQPS Crate

8 83218 14

Thanks to C.Lorin, F.Bertinelli for Splice Num Mapping

MP3, 30/09/2009, Z.Charifoulline 14

A12.RQD/RQF: BusSegment Reistance vs nQPS Crate

8 83218 14

Thanks to C.Lorin, F.Bertinelli for Splice Num Mapping

MP3, 30/09/2009, Z.Charifoulline 15

A12.RB: BusSegment Reistance vs nQPS Crate (current flow)

MP3, 30/09/2009, Z.Charifoulline 16

A12.RB: BusSegment Reistance vs nQPS Crate (current flow)

Thanks to C.Lorin, F.Bertinelli for Splice Num Mapping

MP3, 30/09/2009, Z.Charifoulline 17

A12.RB: BusSegment Reistance vs nQPS Crate (current flow)

Thanks to C.Lorin, F.Bertinelli for Splice Num Mapping

MP3, 30/09/2009, Z.Charifoulline 18

32 splices

MP3, 30/09/2009, Z.Charifoulline 19

Sector A12, nQPS, Preliminary conclusion (29/09/2009):

- bus segments resistance measurement based on U_RES signals looks very promising;

- inductance compensation works well and almost done, there are few units to be fixed;

- next step will be to perform nQPS-IST and switch on the protection, I think;

- but, magnets resistance measurements based on U_MAG signals are noisy and not yet fully analyzed to be interpreted correctly;

MP3, 30/09/2009, Z.Charifoulline 20

A12.RB: Snapshots

MP3, 30/09/2009, Z.Charifoulline 21

A12.RB: Snapshots

MP3, 30/09/2009, Z.Charifoulline 22

A12.RQD/F: Snapshots

MP3, 30/09/2009, Z.Charifoulline 23

A12.RQD/F: Snapshots


Recommended