+ All Categories
Home > Documents > First Year Experience Conference, 2014 Session 3.4: Valerie Burton and Shelly Kawaja, Memorial...

First Year Experience Conference, 2014 Session 3.4: Valerie Burton and Shelly Kawaja, Memorial...

Date post: 18-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: gervais-stanley
View: 216 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
17
First Year Experience Conference, 2014 Session 3.4: Valerie Burton and Shelly Kawaja, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada Monday 9 June, 2014
Transcript

First Year Experience Conference, 2014

Session 3.4: Valerie Burton and Shelly Kawaja, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada

Monday 9 June, 2014

www.mun.ca

We Built a First Year Success Programme, and we’re still lookingfor the students

www.mun.ca

PLEASE VIEW THIS VIDEO WHICH EXPLAINS THE BACKGROUND TO THE PROGRAM

https://vimeo.com/94705188

fysp2014

www.mun.ca

FYS Evaluation Committee

Centre for Institutional Analysis and Planning (CIAP)

The Evaluation

• Academic performance indicators• Pre-survey • Post-survey • Exit interviews • Student focus groups • Faculty and staff focus groups

A matched sample of 48 (1st cohort)56 (2nd cohort) students were identified based on key variables: gender, admission type, admission average and origin.

www.mun.ca

Did FYS makea difference?

Compared with the matched groups each cohort of FYS students had:higher semester aggregate averages;higher averages in individual courses;better passing rates;higher course completion rates;higher retention rates.

Academic Progress

Fall Semester Winter Semester0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Grade Average by Semester [All Courses]

First CohortComparison Group

Academic Progress

Fall Semester Winter Semester0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Percentage of Students in Clear Academic Standing

First CohortComparison Group

Academic Progress

All Registered Courses

Full Course Load All Registered Courses

Full Course Load0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Course Completion: % of students passing

First CohortComparison Group

Fall Semester Winter Semester

Persistence into Second Year

Cohort Comparison Group0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Persistence Fall 2012 to Fall 2013

Fall Semester Av-erage

Clear Academic Standing

Winter Semester Retention

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

First and Second Cohorts Compared

First CohortSecond Cohort

www.mun.ca

Academic Progress:

What happened to the Target Group?

In Fall 2012, 23% of students with admission averages less than 75% were able to achieve an average of 70% or higher.

In the comparison group, no students with admission averages less than 75% were able to achieve this average.

www.mun.ca

Did FYS makea difference?

Many students have indicated that they appreciated being able to identify with a small program in their first semester in University.

www.mun.ca

Did FYS makea difference?

Students attest to: • increased personal and academic

confidence • greater effectiveness in

communication

www.mun.ca

Did FYS makea difference?

Instructors report:• Increase in students’ critical

and analytical capabilities;• greater commitment to

team work;• Increased collegiality and

information exchange amongst faculty leading to better pedagogy.

But, what does this mean without large numbers?

www.mun.ca

Will we be able to win friends and influencepeople?

Tests of the market are readily applied in many areas of the university.

What do we have that our colleagues outside FYS and senior administrators will recognize as useful and important?

www.mun.ca

Thank You!

Valerie Burton and Shelly KawajaFirst Year Success Program

www.mun.ca/success


Recommended