Date post: | 03-Jun-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | des-moines-public-schools |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 282
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
1/282
Think. Learn.Grow.
ADOPTED BUDGET & FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFISCAL YEAR 2015Des Moines Public Schools | Des Moines, Iowa 50309
Fiscal Year 2015 | Beginning July 1, 2014 | Ending June 30, 2015
www.dmschools.org | facebook.com/dmschools | twitter.com/dmschools
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
2/282
FISCAL YEAR 2015
ADOPTED BUDGET & FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBudget Adopted: April 1, 2014
May 20, 2014
BOARD OF DIRECTORSCindy Elsbernd, Chair
Bill Howard, Vice Chair
Rob X. BarronConnie Boesen
Teree Caldwell-JohnsonToussaint Cheatom
Pat Sweeney
Thomas M. Ahart, Superintendent
Report issued by the Office of Business and FinanceThomas Harper, Chief Financial Officer
(515) 242-7745
901 Walnut Street
Des Moines, Iowa 50309
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
3/282
.
The district extends special thanks to the budget development and design team:
Casaundra Christensen
Dave Kehm
Nick Lenhardt
Jessica Buchheit
Pam Gomez
Adam Rohwer
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
4/282
Table of Contents
Introduction & Overview
Superintendents Message ............................................................................................................................................... 1
The District & Community ............................................................................................................................................. 3A Focus on Progress ...................................................................................................................................................... 22
Fiscal Profile ...................................................................................................................................................................... 29
District Leadership ......................................................................................................................................................... 44
DMPS Schools .................................................................................................................................................................. 49
Financial Structure, Policy & Process
Fund Descriptions & Fund Structure .......................................................................................................................... 69
Fund Relationship ............................................................................................................................................................ 76
Basis of Budgeting ........................................................................................................................................................... 77
Financial Policies .............................................................................................................................................................. 80
Budget Process ................................................................................................................................................................ 87
Financial Summaries
Consolidated Financial Schedule .................................................................................................................................. 92
Three/(Four) Year Consolidated & Fund Financial Schedules .............................................................................. 93
Fund Balances ................................................................................................................................................................... 98
Revenues ......................................................................................................................................................................... 129
Long-Range Financial Plans .......................................................................................................................................... 147
Capital & Debt
Capital Expenditures .................................................................................................................................................... 152
Impact of Capital Investments on Operating Budget ............................................................................................ 166
Debt ................................................................................................................................................................................. 177
Departmental Information
Personnel ........................................................................................................................................................................ 185
Department Descriptions, Accomplishments & Goals ........................................................................................ 197
Appendix
FY 2015 Certified Budget ............................................................................................................................................ 250
CBAC Letter .................................................................................................................................................................. 257
EBAC Letter ................................................................................................................................................................... 260
Glossary .......................................................................................................................................................................... 262
Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................................................ 268
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
5/282
INTRODUCTION & OVERVIEWSECTION 1
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
6/282
2014-2015 ADOPTED BUDGET 1
Superintendents Message
March 6, 2014
Members of the Board
Cindy Elsbernd, Chair
Bill Howard, Vice Chair
Rob X. Barron
Connie Boesen
Teree Caldwell-Johnson
Toussaint Cheatom
Pat Sweeney
It is my pleasure to present the 2014-15 budget of Des Moines Public Schools.
This budget is the result of a collaborative effort on the part of every unit within the District, along
with the Citizens and Employees Budget Advisory Committees, to implement a financial map that
leads in the direction of our goals and priorities.
In most cases over the past several years, DMPS has been faced with significant unknowns at this
point in the budget process. From the level of State funding to our comprehensive agreements with
employees, we have had to plan our budget relying on predictions about some very significant items.
This year, we have much greater stability and knowledge as we moved forward with the 2014-15
budget process.
First, the District is in the middle of two-year collective bargaining agreements with employee
groups. Two-year agreements have allowed for better planning of staffing costs, which account for
more than 80% of our budget.
Second, the Iowa General Assembly last year approved legislation which set allowable growth for
two years, so we know what is expected in State funding.
These two factors have enabled DMPS to forecast with a greater degree of certainty our major
revenues and expenditures and enabled us to do an even better job of focusing resources on our key
mission: the education of more than 32,000 students.
From enrollment to proficiency to graduation, every key measure of the work of this District is
moving in the right direction: up. Our focus must be on not only on how we maintain those trends,
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
7/282
2014-2015 ADOPTED BUDGET 2
but doing so in a way that every student has the support they need to be ready for their next
stage in life.
This budget continues support for those things we know are contributing to success in the
classroom, while also taking steps to do even more, such as increasing the use of technology in
support of our curriculum; adding 30 new positions, the vast majority of which are within ourschools and classrooms; continuing implementation of a new grading system to replace what has
been in place for the past century; opening a brand new early childhood center in the heart of our
community; and completing a long-overdue realignment of our elementary school attendance areas
so that every child has a seat at his or her neighborhood school with access to a rich diversity of
learning experiences.
And this budget is based on the fact that we will continue to build on our record of efficiency, using
financial management, building and operation programs, and communications tools that have been
recognized across the state and nation for their excellence.
For the past decade, the Districts financial plan was developed in a political, economic, and budget
environment that was far from ideal. As a result, recent years have emphasized recovering from the
recent past. While this District and all of public education continues the need to address policy and
budget priorities at both the state and national level, at DMPS we are now looking forward, not
backward.
As Superintendent, I present this budget with the confidence that it is directing our resources to not
only continuing the progress we have seen in recent years but, more importantly, to making a
positive difference in the education, and the lives, of the students we all serve.
Sincerely,
Thomas M. Ahart
Superintendent
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
8/282
2014-2015 ADOPTED BUDGET 3
The District & Community
DES MOINES: A VIBRANT, INNOVATIVE, AND
DIVERSE CITY
As Iowas capital city, Des Moines is a hub of
government action, business activity, and cultural
affairs. The U.S. Census Bureau estimates that the Des
Moines city proper, comprised of 80.87 square miles of
land, is inhabited by approximately 207,000 people,
roughly 25% of whom are younger than 18. The
median household income (2008-2012) in Des Moines
was $44,862, and 17.7% of persons live below the
poverty line. With a metro population of 569,633, the
greater Des Moines community is a bustling
metropolis. Major industries in Des Moines are insurance, government, manufacturing, trade, and
health care services, and the Des Moines area businesses draw employees from a five-county area.
While there is big city bustle, the community is extremely proud of its small town atmosphere.
Throughout Des Moines are dozens of neighborhoods, each with its own personality and style. The
community offers superb schools, quality public services, and friendly neighborhoods.
Downtown Des Moines offers amenities usually found only in major cities: unique shopping in the
East Village; dining at world class restaurants; countless entertainment opportunities at Wells Fargo
Arena and the Civic Center; educational opportunities at the Science Center of Iowa, Downtown
Library, and Pappajohn Sculpture Park; and professional sporting events. The city boasts uniquehousing options at several lofts and townhome developments, has one of the nations largest
farmers markets, and is home to a top-ranked art festival. The community also has a vibrant
outdoor scene. One can listen to summer concerts along the banks of the Des Moines River or on
the steps of the State Capitol; take a leisurely stroll along the Principal Riverwalk; and the entire
metro area is connected by a series of parks and trails so one can enjoy a bike, walk, or run on a
warm summer day, under the colored leaves of autumn, or on a blanket of freshly fallen snow. In
fact, Des Moines Grays Lake Park was recognized as one of the nations best outdoor places, and
central Iowa is intertwined with more than a hundred miles of trails.
Heres what others have to say about Des Moines being a great place to live and work:
Des Moines is the #1 Wealthiest City in America TODAY show Des Moines is the #1 Best Medium-Sized Metro Area for Homeownership Nerdwallet Des Moines is the #1 Place for Business and Careers in 2013 Forbes Des Moines ranks #1 Best Cities for Families Kiplinger
As Iowas capital city, Des Moines is a hub
of government action, business activity,
and cultural affairs.
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
9/282
2014-2015 ADOPTED BUDGET 4
Des Moines ranks No. 5 in Top 100 Best Cities for Families Parenting Magazine Greater Des Moines ranks #1 Best City for Young Professionals Forbes Des Moines ranks #2 Best Place for Business Forbes Des Moines is the #1 richest metro in the nation US News & World Report Des Moines is the #1 city in the US for home renters Time Magazine Iowa ranks #9 for best state for business CNBC Des Moines is the #4 city in the nation for doing business MarketWatch Des Moines ranks in the top 10 Best Cities for the Next Decade Kiplinger Des Moines ranks #1 as the Best Place for Business and Careers Forbes 2010 Des Moines is one of the 20 strongest-performing metro areas Brookings Des Moines living costs are 10 percent below the national average The Council for
Community and Economic Research
Des Moines is the #6 healthiest place to live Parenting MagazineABOUT DES MOINES PUBLIC SCHOOLS
District Goals
DMPS developed itsStudent ExpectationsandBoard
Beliefs, in part, through public input in a series of
Community Conversations. Student Expectations are
deliverables that address educational goals and desired
outcomes for students, while Board Beliefs emphasize
the governance of school operations and focus of the
districts work on behalf of the education of students.Together, the Mission, Student Expectations, and
Board Beliefs serve as the overarching district goals.
Mission StatementThe Des Moines Public Schools Exist So That
Graduates Possess the Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities
to Be Successful at the Next Stage of Their Lives.
Student Expectations1. Students demonstrate proficiency and understanding of a rigorous core curriculum.
Students demonstrate proficiency in reading, writing, speaking, and listening. Students demonstrate proficiency in mathematics, including algebra and geometry. Students demonstrate financial and economic literacy. Students demonstrate an understanding of the value of fine and performing arts. Students demonstrate proficiency in technological and information literacy. Students demonstrate proficiency in science, including life, earth, and physical science.
Des Moines Public Schools has focused on
providing more students with access to
college-level Advanced Placement courses.
AP enrollment at DMPS has quadrupled over
the past few years.
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
10/282
2014-2015 ADOPTED BUDGET 5
2. Students possess the knowledge and skills to be self-directed and autonomous.
Students demonstrate critical thinking and problem solving skills. Students exercise sound reasoning in making complex choices. Students exhibit creative, innovative, and entrepreneurial thinking. Students understand the attributes of physical and mental well-being.
3. Students have world awareness.
Students learn from and work with individuals representing diverse cultures and religionsin a spirit of mutual respect in school, work, and community.
Students understand the rights and obligations of citizenship at local, state, national, andglobal levels.
Students are actively engaged in community life. Students are exposed to languages and cultures of the world.
Board Beliefs
1. We believe in every child and, no matter their circumstance, will support them in achieving at their highest level. DMPS will work to ensure our students are career and post-secondary education ready.
2. We believe all students will have the best staff working to provide and support their education.
DMPS will be a best place to work, committed to recruiting, developing, retaining, andrecognizing high quality staff in a climate and culture where people are able to do theirbest work.
3. We believe in the full engagement of our parents and community in the support of our students education.
DMPS will commit to the support, training, and tools needed to maximize engagementopportunities with our parents and the entire community.
4. We believe, as a community, in providing the resources necessary to offer PK-12 education of the highest
quality.
DMPS will work, proactively and creatively, with the community to ensure the properinvestment in our commitment to our children.
5. We believe first-rate facilities are essential to quality education.
DMPS is committed to facilities, as centers of our community and neighborhoods,which offer safe, healthy, well-run, and creative learning environments.
6. We believe in a school district that operates with transparency, accountability, and efficiency at every level.
DMPS is committed to operating in an atmosphere of full-disclosure to ensuretransparency, accountability, and efficiency.District Strategies
Des Moines Public Schools has aggressively pursued academic excellence by implementing evidence-
based school improvement strategies in six areas identified as being the most critical to continuous
school system improvement, as published in the 2010 McKinsey & Company internationally-
benchmarked study. The six areas are: building technical skills of teachers and principals, improving
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
11/282
2014-2015 ADOPTED BUDGET 6
data systems, assessing student learning, revising curriculum and standards, ensuring an appropriate
reward and salary structure, and facilitating improvement through the introduction of policy
documents and education reform. These six strategies have been shown to serve as the foundation
of continuous improvement for high-performing districts. DMPS has made the commitment to
implement the strategies necessary to support a dynamic journey to excellence. By emphasizing these
evidence-based areas of focus, the district has been able to prioritize work and create actionablesteps that have been implemented in schools. After only one full year of implementation, the district
is realizing improvement in several performance indicators.
Embedded in these strategies is advancing the use of technology; technology must be integrated into
the everyday practice of schools to enhance the student experience. DMPS worked this year to
analyze current technology needs and is taking steps to develop and implement a comprehensive
information technology plan for the district; more information on this initiative is included in the
School Improvement Efforts section.
Evidence-Based School Improvement Strategies
Building
Technical
Skills of
Teachers and
Principals
Improving
Data
Systems
Assessing
Student
Learning
Revising
Curriculum
and
Standards
Ensuring an
Appropriate
Reward and
Salary
Structure
Facilitating
Improvement
Through the
Introduction
of Policy
Documents
and
Education
Reform
Advancing The Use Of Technology:
Enhancing the student experience by integrating technology into everyday instructional practices.
1:1 student to device ratio Visual & audio technology in every classroom Curriculum integrated with technology tools and best practices Technology training embedded in teacher development
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
12/282
2014-2015 ADOPTED BUDGET 7
Strategy Build Technical Skills of Teachers and Principals
DMPS Vision DMPS will help teachers and principals not only learn new skills but also develop new
insights into teaching and management strategies they can use in their own practice.
Background
Areas to Provide Support for Beginning Principals:o Creating and maintaining a climate that ensures a safe, cooperative, and productive
learning environment.
o Designing and implementing a vision of success for all students.o Improving instruction to enable teachers to teach at their best and student to learn to
their highest potential.
o Managing resources, data, and process to foster school improvement.o Demonstrating professionalism, integrity, and ethical conduct.
69% of new teachers indicated that their mentor impacted their decision to stay in theprofession. Source: 2012 NTC Induction Survey
Beginning Teacher Retention Rates:Cohort Year Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
2009-10 97% 88% 80%2010-11 91% 81% 80%
2011-12 88% 76% NA
2012-13 89% NA NA
Number of Users of Online Technology Training:Module Number of Users
Basic Technology Training 1,409
Document Cameras and Projectors 949
iPad Basics 1,409
Infinite Campus Gradebook 1,409
Current Progress Redesigned professional development systems to enhance support at the district and
school level, as well as the development of a system for teacher feedback.
Providing 90-minute 1:1 coaching sessions to new teachers on a weekly basis. Providing weekly mentoring and six additional professional development days to first and
second year principals.
Creating online technology and professional development training modules to supportindividual teachers needs in using technology in the classroom.
Next Steps
Access to online professional learning modules to increase individual teacher effectiveness. Adoption of an Instructional Framework to establish a common language of instructionacross the district to support effective teaching in every classroom. Develop training for teachers who aspire to become teacher leaders. Develop leadership pipeline for those who aspire to become principals. Undertake efforts to build managerial skills of principal supervisors who provide on-going
coaching and support to school leaders and reduce the span of control of K-5 Directors.
Provide additional support on areas that can divert focus from school improvement,teaching and learning, and human capital in schools.
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
13/282
2014-2015 ADOPTED BUDGET 8
Strategy Improve Data Systems
DMPS Vision DMPS will improve its ability to gather, analyze, and share data on district
performance. Additionally, the district will utilize these data to drive decision making
and resource allocation.
Background 49% of teachers and administrators indicated they would like to use online assessment
within Infinite Campus. Source: 2013 Staff Infinite Campus Survey
72% of teachers surveyed indicated they use a third party gradebook or assessment tooloutside of Infinite Campus. Source: 2013 Staff Infinite Campus Survey
Dashboards enable the district to complete sophisticated education analytics and sharefindings.
Current Progress
Continued collaboration with the Technology department for reporting and monitoring. Re-implementation of Infinite Campus (the districts online student information system) to
better utilize existing systems and integrate data into one system, reducing third partysystems.
Creating data dashboards to monitor school performance in the areas of mathematics,reading, and student behavior for use by building administrators.
Next Steps
Create professional development modules to support the increased use of InfiniteCampus as a data management system.
Facilitate increased access to Infinite Campus data to support teachers in analyzing studentdata to improve instruction.
Create data dashboards for teachers that provide information on all students to helpmanage academic performance and anticipate issues.
Develop common expectations and support structures for the use of data to improveinstruction.
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
14/282
2014-2015 ADOPTED BUDGET 9
Strategy Assess Student Learning
DMPS Vision DMPS will develop a system of assessment that accurately measures student mastery
of the Iowa Core Standards, which are essential skills for college and career
readiness.
Background Standards Referenced Grading condensed multiple grading scales that were used across
the district into one common grading scale.
Guiding Principles for Standards Referenced Grading:o A consistent 4-point interval grading scale is used.
o Letter grades, derived from the 4-point scale, are based sole on achievement ofcourse/grade level standards. Student participation, work completion, and ability
to work with others are reported separately using the DMPS Citizenship and
Employability Skills Rubric.
o Grades are based on a body of evidence.o Achievement is organized and reported by standard/learner objectives, which is
converted to a grade.
o Students have multiple opportunities to demonstrate proficiency.o Accommodations and modifications are provided to students with special needs. The DMPS Balanced Assessment System includes a balance of assessment types for all
content areas and assessment forms to monitor individual student progress and to
monitor the system.
o Assessment types include: project based, performance tasks, labs, constructedresponse, multiple choice, etc.
o Assessment forms include classroom unit/daily formative assessment, commonformative assessment, classroom/common summative assessment, district standards
based assessment, external interim assessment, and external summative assessments.
Current Progress
Partial implementation of Standards Referenced Grading in middle schools. Created tiered assessment for middle school courses to determine student performance
levels against existing standards.
Created a Balanced Assessment System to ensure there are multiple opportunities forstudents to demonstrate understanding, better explain the purpose of each assessment
type to various stakeholders, and to better understand who is responsible for creasing
each type of assessment.
Next Steps
Full implementation of Standards Referenced Grading practices in middle schools. Partialimplementation of Standards Referenced Grading practices in high schools (9th grade
courses). Create tiered assessments for high school (9th grade) courses to determine student
performance levels against existing standards.
Build a robust multi-tiered system of support to help students achieve mastery of contentstandards.
Create more opportunities for students to take assessments online. Implement a college and career readiness monitoring system to strengthen student skills
and evaluate the effectiveness of the Core Curriculum.
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
15/282
2014-2015 ADOPTED BUDGET 10
Strategy Revise Curriculum and Standards
DMPS Vision DMPS will define what students should know, understand, and be able to
demonstrate by adopting the Iowa Core, and the district will create the
accompanying teaching content.
Background Revised curriculum guides to align with Iowa Core Standards. The previous reading materials were not aligned to the Iowa Core Standards. A new set
of materials was created to align with these standards.
Iowa adopted the Common Core Standards into the Iowa Core on July 29, 2010. 45 states have adopted the Common Core Standards. Source: corestandards.org
Current Progress
Adopted new K-5 literacy materials aligned to the Iowa Core. Adopting new K-5 math materials aligned to the Iowa Core. Revised K-12 curriculum guides in core content areas to align with the Iowa Core.
Focus on analysis of student work to guide instruction.
Next Steps
Continue annual updates of curriculum guides and assessments. Increase knowledge of the use of formative assessments to guide and support instruction. Begin the curriculum adoption process for 6-8 math materials aligned to the Iowa Core. Provide professional development for the implementation of new K-5 math instruction
materials.
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
16/282
2014-2015 ADOPTED BUDGET 11
Strategy Ensure an Appropriate Reward and Salary Structure
DMPS Vision DMPS will attract new teachers and retain effective teachers by providing pathways
for career opportunities, offering competitive salaries, and promoting collaboration.
Background
36 hours of collaboration is required outside of the instructional school day for allteachers each year.
10.5 teachers were released to provide full-time mentoring to teachers new to theprofession in the 2013-14 school year. This will be increased to 15 FTE in FY 2015.
65 teachers enrolled in the Alternative Teacher Contract in 2013;76 enrolled in 2012Salary Schedule for 2013 New Teacher Hires:
Contract Years Regular Contract Alternative Teacher Contract
2013-14 $37,790
Teachers start at Step 3 on the salary
schedule and stay on this step for the
first three years of employment
$40,625
2014-15 $41,164
2015-16 $41,711
Current Progress
Implementing the Alternative Teacher Contract to provide additional professionaldevelopment opportunities through the school year and the attainment of a Masters
degree after eight years of employment.
Solicited proposals for partnerships for the Masters program for teachers on theAlternative Teacher Contract.
Completed a comprehensive compensation study by Fox Lawson & Associates tobenchmark district compensation schedules.
Next Steps
Create new opportunities for teacher leadership development. Increase the number of teachers who opt-in to the Alternative Teacher Contract. Create a system to monitor the effectiveness of the Alternative Teacher Contract. Select partners for the ATC Masters program. Utilize results of the Fox Lawson & Associates study to make adjustments to
compensation.
Utilize results of the Fox Lawson & Associates study to re-categorize positions. Utilize results of the Fox Lawson & Associates study to implement a systemic process for
new hires.
Continuous monitoring of position categorization and salary structures.
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
17/282
2014-2015 ADOPTED BUDGET 12
Strategy Facilitate Improvement Through the Introduction of Policy Documents and Education
Reform
DMPS Vision DMPS will facilitate the improvement journey by articulating the aspirations,
objectives, and priorities of the reform program
Background 6 DMPS schools have received School Improvement Grants. 397% increase in the number of ELL students in DMPS from 1992 through 2013.
Year DMPS State of Iowa
1992-93 1,101 4,575
2002-03 3,165 13,961
2013-14 5,467 23,820
Current Progress
Supported a bill passed by the Iowa Legislature to provide much-needed additionalsupport for ELL students.
Providing additional support/staff for the ELL program. Monitoring progress of the effectiveness of School Improvement Grants. Initiated peer review to support teachers in meeting their personal professional
development goals.
Next Steps
Provide additional training systems and practices for ELL students and other diverselearners for school leaders.
Complete applications for School Improvement Grants (Cohort 3) to support districtpriorities.
If SIG is funded, provide additional funding to expand the reach of SIG programming forup to three schools.
Create a robust peer review system based on teacher feedback. Identify programming and professional development structures for the lowest performing
schools.
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
18/282
2014-2015 ADOPTED BUDGET 13
DES MOINES PUBLIC SCHOOLS: IOWAS LEADER IN EDUCATIONAL INNOVATION
Des Moines Public Schools is home to more than 60 schools and support facilities, totaling nearly 6
million square feet. The district serves more than 32,400 students from preschool through high
school in every neighborhood throughout Iowas capital city.
Des Moines Public Schools may be the largest provider of public education in Iowa, but the district
takes anything but a one-size-fits-all approach to educating students. In fact, families in Des Moines
can find more educational options than anyplace in the state, including:
Advanced Placement.Central Academy, attended by students from 39 central Iowa middleand high schools, is Iowas top AP program, dedicated to providing a challenging
curriculum. The Belin-Blank Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development
placed Central Academy in a class by itself as a college preparatory school. In addition,
DMPS is in the midst of a significant expansion of AP course offerings throughout allfive comprehensive high schools, providing thousands of students access to rigorous and
advanced courses.
International Baccalaureate.Home to the only comprehensive IB program in Iowa, DMPSoffers this world-class educational opportunity at four elementary schools (Hubbell, Park
Avenue, Stowe, and Walnut Street) and five secondary schools (Brody, Goodrell,
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
19/282
2014-2015 ADOPTED BUDGET 14
Hoover, Meredith, and Merrill). In addition, Central Academy is the only school in Iowa
to offer the renowned International Baccalaureate diploma.
Career & Technical Institute.Located at Central Campus, CTI offers students learningopportunities in several high-skill areas, including graphic design, broadcasting & film,
culinary arts, fashion, and automotive technology. In addition, DMPS is home to one of
only three high school aviation programs certified by the FAA and has the largest marine
biology program of any non-coastal high school.
Higher Education Partnerships.The proximity to Drake University, Iowa State University,Des Moines Area Community College, and other Institutes of Higher Education have
created numerous partnerships and collaborative efforts that support students, teachers,
and administrators in Des Moines.
Downtown School.The Downtown School, located in a brand new home at CentralCampus, is a national model where students learn in multi-age classes. The school has
been nationally recognized for its innovative education program and as a great option for
working parents. Montessori.Cowles Montessori School is the only public Montessori program in Iowa,
serving students in grades K-8. Students learn in multiage classrooms, and the natural
curiosities of children are exploited to the fullest as they advance at their own pace.
Continuous Calendar Schools.Four elementary schools in Des Moines (Capitol View, RiverWoods, Moulton Extended Learning Center, Downtown School) offer an extended
school year with breaks spread throughout the year to better serve the educational needs
of their students and the scheduling needs of their families.
Traditional Programs.Jefferson and Phillips elementary schools have dress codes andfeature increased emphasis on basic academic skills. The schools also stress personal
respect, responsibility, and discipline as cornerstones of a place where academicachievement can be maximized.
Alternative Programs.Future Pathways, Scavo Alternative High School, Orchard Place,Des Moines Alternative, and Middle School Alternative offer programming for students
who may be struggling with attendance requirements at a comprehensive school or have
other personal issues and need alternative programming.
Ruby Van Meter and Smouse schools.Ruby Van Meter School (serving secondary-agechildren) and Smouse Opportunity School (serving elementary-age children) provide
high-quality, specialized instruction for physically and mentally disabled students.
Des Moines educators and staff are recognized as being among the very best in their fields. Theseare just some of the awards and honors they have earned in recent years:
2013, 2012, and 2010 state finalists for Presidential Award for Excellence in Mathematics andScience Teaching(mathematics).
2013 Trailblazing Teacher by The Center for Green Schools.
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
20/282
2014-2015 ADOPTED BUDGET 15
2013 Steve France Honor Award by the Iowa Association for Health, Physical Education,Recreation, and Dance.
2013 Rod Vahl Teacher of the Yearaward by the Iowa High School Press Association. 2013 Outstanding Middle School Art Educatorfrom Art Educators of Iowa.
2013 Outstanding Elementary Art Educatorfrom Art Educators of Iowa. 2013 Green Ribbon School Awardfor Des Moines Public Schools by the U.S. Department
of Education.
2013Excellence in Education Awardpresented by the Iowa State Education Association. 2013 Dr. Robert E. and Phyllis M. Yager Exemplary Teaching Recognition Award from
University of Northern Iowa.
2013 and 2012 Governors Iowa Environmental Excellence Award. 2013 and 2012 finalistsforIowa Teacher of the Year. 2013 and 2012 ENERGY STAR Partner of the Year from the Environmental Protection
Agency.
2013, 2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008, and 2007 Certificate of Excellence in Financial Reportingfrom the Association of School Business Officials Association for the school districts
comprehensive annual financial report.
2013, 2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008, and 2007 Certificate of Achievement for Excellence inFinancial Reportingfrom the Government Finance Officers Association for the school
districts comprehensive annual financial report.
2013 Distinguished Budget Presentation Award fromthe Government Finance OfficersAssociation.
2012 Phyllis Yager Memorial Commitment to Diversity Awardfrom the University of IowaCollege of Education.
2012 honoree as a Champion of Changein education from the White House. 2012 Green Ribbon School Awardfor Central Campus from the U.S. Department of
Education.
2012 Gary Hendrichs Memorial Awardfrom the Iowa School Counselor Association. 2012 finalistforAmerica History Teacherof the Yearfrom Iowa Preserve. 2012Education Support Personnel of the Yearfor the State of Iowa. 2011 Outstanding Secondary Art Educatorfrom the Art Educators of Iowa. 2011 Outstanding Iowa Biology Teacher of the Yearfrom the National Association of Biology
Teachers. 2011 nominee for U.S. History Teacher of the Yearfrom the Daughters of the American
Revolution.
2011Educator of the Yearfrom the Printing Industry of the Midwest. 2011 and 2009James Madison Fellowshipsfor the state of Iowa. 2010 runner-upforExcellence in Education Award.
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
21/282
2014-2015 ADOPTED BUDGET 16
2010 Presidential Award for Excellence in Mathematics and Science Teaching(mathematics). 2010James Bryant Conant Award in High School Teaching. 2010 Iowa School Social Worker of the Yearfrom the Iowa School Social Workers
Association.
2010 Iowa Financial Literacy Educator of the Year.
2010 honoree for the Teacher Programfrom Toyota International. 2010Edyth May Sliffe Award for Distinguished High School Mathematics Teachingfrom the
Mathematical Association of America.
2009 Presidential Award for Excellence in Mathematics and Science Teaching(science). 2009 Iowa Industrial Technology Education Middle School Teacher of Excellence. 2009Edyth May Sliffe Award for Distinguished Junior High/Middle School Mathematics Teaching. 2009Art Educator of the Yearfrom the Art Educators of Iowa.
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
22/282
2014-2015 ADOPTED BUDGET 17
Enrollment
For more 100 years, Des Moines Public Schools,
accredited by the North Central Association of
Secondary Schools and Colleges and the Iowa
Department of Education, has educated hundreds of
thousands of children in Iowas capital city. Peakenrollment occurred early in the 21st century in 2001-
02, followed by eight years of declining enrollment.
Since 2011, DMPS has experienced an increase in
enrollment, bucking the trend in urban districts
nationwide. Using a simple regression analysis, the
Iowa Department of Education projects district
enrollment for three years beyond the current school year. The Iowa DE projects that the districts
enrollment will surpass the FY 2002 peak in the next few years, as shown in the chart below.
In addition, the district commissioned Ochsner Hare & Hare (Kansas City, MO) to conduct a
Demographic Data and Projections Study and provide projections through 2018. This study projects
that the school age population in Des Moines will continue to increase, as shown in the table below.
The complete study can be found at http://www.dmschools.org/wp-
content/uploads/2012/02/Des-Moines-School-District-Demographic-Data-and-Projection.pdf/.
Demographic Trend Des Moines School District
Population by Age 2000 Census 2010 Census 2013 Estimate 2018 Projection
Age 0 to 4 14,838 16,198 16,314 16,836
Age 5 to 9 13,841 13,928 14,650 15,626
Age 10 to 14 13,029 13,082 13,335 14,663
Age 15 to 17 7,428 7,624 7,617 7,920
Source: Demographic Data and Projections Study, Ochsner Hare & Hare, 2013 Update.
29,000
29,50030,00030,50031,00031,50032,00032,50033,00033,50034,000
DMPS ENROLLMENT
Des Moines Public Schools is one of the
fastest growing school districts in Iowa, with
an enrollment increase of nearly 1,500
students over the past three years.
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
23/282
2014-2015 ADOPTED BUDGET 18
In addition to serving students in grades K-12, the district also has a robust Early Childhood
program, providing quality learning experiences to help promote growth of young children and
their families. This is done by offering free, quality preschool with several options to best meet the
needs of families, including a variety of locations, class times, and half- or full-day plans:
Universal Preschool: A state-funded program designed to provide voluntary, universal access tohigh-quality preschool education programs for the states 4-year-olds. This is the largest
DMPS preschool program, serving more than 1,200 children. Classrooms are located
neighborhood elementary schools, DMPS Education Centers, and partner locations.
Head Start: A federally-funded comprehensive child development program that servesincome-eligible children ages 3 to 5 and their families. The Des Moines Head Start program
is a delegate of the Drake University Head Start program and serves more than 400 children.
It is anticipated that 454 students will be served in Head Start in 2014-15.
Early Childhood Special Education (ECSE):Services are available for eligible children three tofive years of age. ECSE staff assist in the identification, assessment, and development of an
Individualized Educational Plan for eligible children. A continuum of services are available,
tailored to meet the individual needs of each student, including integrated classroom settings
with Head Start, Universal Preschool, and self-contained programming. ECSE classrooms
are located in neighborhood elementary schools and DMPS Education Centers.
Additional information about the DMPS preschool program, including a roster of all sites, can be
found at http://www.dmschools.org/departments/office-of-schools/early-childhood-education/.
As the chart below indicates, more than 1,800 students were enrolled in preschool programs through
a variety of funding sources in 2013-14.
Universal
Preschool,
1281
Head Start,
424
Prairie
Meadows,
36
Shared
Visions, 48
Early
Childhood
Iowa, 54
PRESCHOOL ENROLLMENT BYFUNDING SOURCE
2013-14
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
24/282
2014-2015 ADOPTED BUDGET 19
District Demographics
Low-Income Students: DMPS is an urban school district that serves an increasingly diverse student
population. Seventy percent of the students in the district are low-income, based on eligibility for
Free or Reduced-Price Lunch (FRPL). The percentage of Des Moines Public Schools students
enrolled in the FRPL program is substantially higher than the state average, and DMPS has the
highest poverty rate in Polk County (based on FRPL enrollment).
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
FRPL RATES: DMPS vs. STATE OF IOWA
DMPS State of Iowa
DMPS AnkenyWest DesMoines
SoutheastPolk
Johnston UrbandaleBondurant Farrar
NorthPolk
Saydel
Total Enrollment 33,282 10,019 9,357 6,895 6,693 4,177 1,726 1,488 1,378
% FRPL 70.2% 13.4% 31.7% 28.8% 16.9% 25.5% 21.7% 12.3% 56.9%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
FRPL ENROLLMENT: POLK COUNTY DISTRICTS 2013-14
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
25/282
2014-2015 ADOPTED BUDGET 20
Minority Students: DMPS minority enrollment has steadily increased to 55% of all students. Latino
families are the fastest growing demographic segment of both the city and the schools.
English Language Learners: In the last decade, DMPS has experienced a 74% increase in the number of
students enrolled in English Language Learner (ELL) classes and a 424% increase in 20 years.
DMPS students speak more than 80 different native languages, and currently 19% of the entire
student body is ELL. Eighty-seven teachers, 44.5 bilingual community outreach workers, and six
additional support staff are necessary for the ELL program to operate. ELL sites are located in five
high schools, eight middle schools, 31 elementary schools, three Intensive English Language
Centers, and at Future Pathways. Funding for the ELL program is provided by the State through
supplemental weighted funding, and the district supports legislation to extend the weighted funding.
White
45.0%
Latino
23.5%
African
American
17.5%
Asian
6.9%
MultipleRaces
6.4%
NativeAmerican
0.5% Pacific
Islander
0.2%
ENROLLMENT BY RACE/ETHNICITY
2013-14
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
26/282
2014-2015 ADOPTED BUDGET 21
Special Education:Approximately 16% of DMPS students receive Special Education (SPED) services
for disabilities ranging from mild behavioral or learning disorders to severe and profound
disabilities. Enrollment in Special Education continues to be stable, as shown on the chart below.
The district will continue to provide quality services that families and students with disabilities have
come to expect from the district and as required by law. The district also receives weighted
enrollment funding for SPED students.
4,500
5,000
5,5006,000
6,500
7,000
7,500
8,000
8,500
SPECIAL EDUCATION ENROLLMENT
SPED-weighted enrollment SPED-headcount
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
27/282
2014-2015 ADOPTED BUDGET 22
A Focus on Progress
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT EFFORTS
Educational strategies implemented by the district are showing success toward improving studentachievement. While all resources are directed at school improvement, several important programs
and funding streamsincluding the Dropout Prevention Tax Levy, School Improvement Grants,
the High School Graduation Initiative Grant, the Instructional Framework, Standards Referenced
Grading, and K-5 Digital Adoptionare highlighted in this section.
Dropout Prevention Levy
State law allows districts to levy an amount equal to 5% of the cost per student for each student
enrolled in the district. The board has approved the maximum levy, which is anticipated to generate
$10.1 million for FY 2015. The district uses this funding to work with students at risk of dropping
out and re-engaged students. The funding is used to implement multiple dropout preventionstrategies and tools, including:
Early Indicator System DMPS has implemented an Early Indicator System (EIS) to help identify
students at risk of dropping out. An EIS Report is run every six weeks and tracks attendance,
grades, achievement, and discipline/behavior issues to identify students who exhibit dropout
indicators. Academic and/or social-emotional intervention strategies for identified students are
designed, based on the information from the EIS Report, to support or improve the students
academic performance in school. EIS data is re-analyzed every six weeks by Learning Services
staff to identify students in need, to determine the degree to which interventions are helping
students succeed, and to identify additional or alternative services from which the student/family
might benefit.
Academic Support Labs An extensive review of student progress toward graduation indicated
that a significant percentage of students in grades 9-12 were off-track or under-credited for
graduating with their four-year cohort. To address this issue, the district designed and
implemented Academic Support Labs in the five comprehensive high schools (East, Hoover,
North, Lincoln, and Roosevelt) to target students identified by the EIS as at risk of dropping
out. In the labs, students work toward earning credit toward graduation in an alternative
classroom using online and project based learning pathways. The Academic Support Lab
program expanded to Scavo Alternative High School in FY 2014. The teaching staff in the labs
are funded through Dropout Prevention, United Way of Central Iowa, and High School
Graduation Initiative Grant.
SUCCESS The SUCCESS Program is a school-based youth services program that provides
year-round services to meet students social, emotional, and behavioral needs to reduce/remove
barriers that hamper academic success and increase the risk of dropping out. SUCCESS Case
Managers identify students at risk of dropping out of school through the Early Indicator System.
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
28/282
2014-2015 ADOPTED BUDGET 23
Students who meet a minimum of two indicators on the dropout matrixfailing grades, poor
attendance, lack of connection to school, behavior problems, or low achievementare targeted
for intervention with the SUCCESS Program. Services are wrapped around, and participating
students and families are provided with case management services (e.g. assistance securing food,
shelter, clothing, or medical services), are referred to community partners (e.g. mental health
services), and are provided classes to meet identified needs (e.g. development of parenting skillsor social skills). Based on an educational risk-factor model, the school-based SUCCESS Program
removes barriers for children and families in need. SUCCESS collaborates with more than 20
agencies to provide a wide variety of support services to children and families. In all cases, the
collaborations serve to help remove barriers to a childs success in school.
Other dropout prevention strategies funded from the Dropout Prevention Levy include the re-
engagement/credit recovery program, middle school intensive reading, and literacy support in the
elementary schools.
School Improvement GrantsSince 2010, the Iowa Department of Education has awarded School Improvement Grant (SIG)
funding to six DMPS schools. Funding ended in FY 2013 for North, Hoyt, Weeks, and Edmunds.
The funding for two schools, Harding Middle and Findley Elementary, began in FY 2012 and
continues through FY 2014:
School FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Harding Middle 977,584 944,730 938,182 NA
Findley Elementary 784,641 781,572 778,503 NA
Total $5,312,225 $4,407,335 $1,716,685 $0
SIG funding support a range of programming and initiatives at schools to help raise student
achievement. Some examples include:
Ongoing, high-quality professional development for teachers. Using data to identify and implement research-based instructional interventions. Using student data to differentiate instruction to meet the academic needs of individual
students.
Establishing schedules and strategies that provide increased learning time.
School FRPL
Average
3 yearProficiency
2010-2012
ChangeProficiency
2010-2012
Average
3 yearProficiency
2011-2013
ChangeProficiency
2011-2013
Harding Middle 93.9% 47.34% (9.28%) 46.64% (2.55%)
Findley Elementary 93.4% 62.96% 15.48% 70.36 12.70%
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
29/282
2014-2015 ADOPTED BUDGET 24
The Iowa Department of Education is projected to award
three additional School Improvement Grants for Iowa
schools. A grant would be a three-year grant, with only
first-year funding guaranteed. Initial funding would be
available for use during the 2014-15 school year.
High School Graduation Initiative Grant
The federal government awarded the district $6.1 million
to be used over five years to increase the graduation rate,
while at the same time decreasing the related dropout
rate. DMPS is currently in year four of this grant project.
Project schools include East, Hoover, Lincoln, Roosevelt,
and Scavo high schools and McCombs and Meredith
middle schools. The intent of the grant is to expand upon
current effective educational programming and develop
and implement new educational programming, aimed at increasing the district graduation rate.Strategies being used by the seven schools include:
Staffing for academic support labs; school improvement leadership; additional assistance inliteracy, math, and technology; social/emotional support staff; and opportunities for
extending learning after-school, on weekends, and during the summer.
Conference attendance, site visits to exemplary schools in other districts, and otherprofessional development opportunities.
Student transportation so students can engage in community-based learning opportunities,extended learning opportunities, and college visits.
Curriculum-based materials, technology upgrades, writing skills, library adoptions, projectbased materials, differentiated instruction, and assessment software.
Instructional Framework
Implementation of an Instructional Framework is critical to strengthening core instruction. An
Instructional Framework provides a common definition of effective instruction, as well as
introducing a performance scale related to the instructional practices of teachers to help inform their
skill development. DMPS has worked with the Marzano Research Laboratory to develop and begin
to implement an Instructional Framework for Des Moines.
Standards Referenced GradingCore instruction will also be strengthened through the implementation Standards Referenced
Grading (SRG) practices in Des Moines. SRG gives students and teachers clear and consistent
expectations, promotes differentiation, and provides a platform for communicating progress to
stakeholders. Implementation of SRG began with middle schools in Fall 2013 and will expand to 9th
grade in Fall 2014. DMPS will provide coaching and support to build connections between the
Instructional Framework and SRG, building teacher capacity to improve student performance.
Des Moines Public Schools has seen a
steady increase in the percent of
students who graduate, which is at
its highest level since Iowa began using
its new graduation rate formula five
years ago.
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
30/282
2014-2015 ADOPTED BUDGET 25
K-5 Digital Adoption
Des Moines Public Schools will upgrade K-5
mathematics instructional materials for the 2014-15
school year. The 17 members of the selection committee
voted to adopt the Houghton Mifflin GO Math
comprehensive mathematics program that offers manyopportunities to utilize technology. GO Math provides a
host of digital resources to meet the needs of teachers
and students. A completely digital path engages students
with exciting content and provides rich support for
teachers in a 21st-century learning environment.
The district will provide an interactive whiteboard and
six digital devices for each K-5 core content classroom to
support the implementation of GO Math. The intention
is to provide elementary students with a blended learning experience. Blended learning involves aninstructional shift in some portion of the day to an online environment. This shift is intended to
make learning more productive by giving teachers better tools, more time, and informative data.
Goals for this implementation include:
1. Support students in obtaining the Common Core Mathematics Standards throughtechnology based instruction.
2. Utilize the GO Math materials upgrade to design a blended learning environment thatprovides teachers with better tools, more time, and informative data.
3. Provide students with personalized instruction, practice, and formative feedback thatsupport a competency based system.
Technology Blueprint
Des Moines Public Schools is in the process of revising and implementing a comprehensive
information technology plan for the district. Information technology must continuously be aligned
with the districts vision for instruction, immediate instructional needs, and business needs.
Education in Des Moines is entering an exciting timea time of great change and challenge that
focuses on student-centered decision making, blended learning, mobile technology, and flipped
classrooms. In the past, many school districts acquired technology systems for specific functions in a
piecemeal way, rather than in a coordinated effort that allows for across-the-board integration and
consistency. The ultimate goal of a coordinated technology effort is to improve student learning andoperational efficiency in Des Moines Public Schools. DMPS will work with CELT to plan, design,
and implement a cutting edge, integrated information technology system based on an enterprise-
wide approach to information technology.
Des Moines Public Schools is home to
some of the top educators in the state
and nation, including recent finalists for
Iowa Teacher of the Year and the
Presidential Award for Excellence in
Math and Science Teaching.
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
31/282
2014-2015 ADOPTED BUDGET 26
IMPACT ON STUDENTS
Graduation and Dropout Rates
School improvement efforts across the district are having a real impact in Des Moines Public
Schools. Beginning with the graduating class of 2009, graduation rates in Iowa have been calculated
with a new formula established by the U.S. Department of Education. Unique student identificationnumbers are assigned to ninth-grade students, allowing school districts to carefully account for
students as they move through high school. At the state level, the method helps determine when a
student graduates, even if the student has moved to a different district in Iowa during high school.
Des Moines Public Schools has achieved increases in both the 4-year and the 5-year graduation
rates, as well as a decrease in the dropout rate.
The graduation rate for Des Moines has increased nearly seven percent since the State of Iowa first
started using this formula for the Class of 2009. DMPS has also seen a 6 percentage point increase in
the five-year graduation rate since 2009. The Des Moines Public Schools Class of 2013 had a
graduation rate of 79.36%, an increase of 0.21% over the previous year and the highest since Iowabegan using its current graduation rate formula in 2009. DMPS also saw an increase in the five-year
graduation rate to 82.89% for the Class of 2012, up from 81% for the Class of 2011.
Des Moines Public Schools saw a decline in the dropout rate last year. The grade 7-12 dropout rate
for 2013 was 4.16%, down from 4.73% the previous year. The grade 9-12 dropout rate for 2011-12
was 6.3%, down from 7.05% in 2012 and the lowest dropout rate at DMPS under the new formula.
DMPS Dropout Rate 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
Grade 7-12 Rate 5.10% 4.80% 4.80% 4.73% 4.16%
Grade 9-12 Rate 7.60% 7.00% 7.20% 7.05% 6.26%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Class of 2009 Class of 2010 Class of 2011 Class of 2012 Class of 2013
FOUR AND FIVE YEAR GRADUATION RATES
Four-Year Rate Five-Year Rate Linear (Four-Year Rate)
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
32/282
2014-2015 ADOPTED BUDGET 27
Grades 3-5 Grades 6-8 Grades 9-11
2012 60.2% 56.1% 60.1%
2013 61.3% 57.6% 60.3%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
MATHEMATICS: PERCENT PROFICIENT ON THE IOWAASSESSMENTS
Student Proficiency and Growth on the Iowa Assessments
DMPS experienced an overall increase in proficiency in mathematics on the Iowa Assessment at all
grade levels from Spring 2012 to Spring 2013. Elementary grade levels (grades 3-5) experienced a
1.1% increase in mathematics proficiency rate. Middle school grade levels (grades 6-8) experienced
the largest increase in proficiency with a 1.5% increase in mathematics proficiency rate. High school
grade levels (grades 9-11) experienced a 0.2% increase in mathematics proficiency rate.
Des Moines Public Schools also experienced an overall increase in proficiency in reading on the
Iowa Assessment at all grade levels from Spring 2012 to Spring 2013. Elementary grade levels
(grades 3-5) experienced a 1.1% increase in reading proficiency rate. Middle school grade levels
(grades 6-8) experienced a 0.6% increase in reading proficiency rate. High school grade levels (grades
9-11) experienced a 1.1% increase in reading proficiency rate.
Grades 3-5 Grades 6-8 Grades 9-11
2012 59.1% 47.9% 63.9%
2013 60.2% 48.5% 65.0%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
READING: PERCENTPROFICIENT ON THE IOWA ASSESSMENTS
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
33/282
2014-2015 ADOPTED BUDGET 28
Iowa Assessments enable growth to be measured by using
vertically scaled (or articulated) scores, called standard
scores. These scores plot out all students, regardless of
grade level, on a continuum of student achievement.
Standard scores describe a students location on an
achievement continuum. Using standard scores, theprogress students make from year to year is evident.
Developers of the Iowa Assessments have established
typical growth for students, which is the amount the
average student increases in standard score points from
year to year. The percent of students who are indicated as
making typical growth on the charts below are the students
who have met or exceeded the standard score gain from
year to year needed for typical growth. By definition, 50%
of students nation-wide make typical growth each year.
Grades 4-5 Grades 6-8 Grades 9-11
2013 48.2% 55.0% 55.4%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
MATHEMATICS: PERCENT OF STUDENTS MAKING TYPICALGROWTH ON THE IOWA ASSESSMENTS
Grades 4-5 Grades 6-8 Grades 9-11
2013 53.4% 47.7% 61.5%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
READING: PERCENT OF STUDENTS MAKING TYPICALGROWTH ON THE IOWA ASSESSMENTS
Des Moines Public Schools provides
students with a range of activities
outside of the classroom. The East
Scarlets has competed in the state girls
basketball championship four out of
the past five years.
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
34/282
2014-2015 ADOPTED BUDGET 29
Fiscal Profile
BUDGET OVERVIEW
The schedules below delineate the districts revenues and expenditures for all appropriated funds.
DES MOINES PUBLIC SCHOOLS
2014 - 2015 BUDGET
SUMMARY ALL FUNDS
FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Actual Actual Re-estimated Budget
Revenues
Property Taxes$ 116,058,903 $ 113,584,295
$ 118,391,468 $ 114,763,973Utility Replacement Tax 4,291,855 4,269,105 3,830,291 4,203,470
Mobile Home Taxes 132,227 123,031 115,769 113,619
State Foundation Aid 163,593,289 174,578,921 186,175,860 196,425,902
AEA Flow Through 11,699,768 12,235,407 13,086,762 14,889,851
Teacher Quality Act 21,215,397 22,002,282 22,772,107 23,867,136
Universal 4 Year Old Preschool 3,926,903 3,342,557 3,920,501 4,303,416
Other State Sources 2,132,629 1,946,191 2,635,775 1,467,051
Chapter 1 Grants 15,992,540 12,272,208 10,111,267 9,500,000
Other Federal Sources 44,661,995 39,034,833 36,813,269 35,673,326
Tuition/Transportation Fees 6,750,348 6,219,856 5,975,000 5,975,000
Earnings on Investments 62,636 376,321 234,980 246,302
Student Activities 2,787,497 2,914,551 2,886,900 2,886,900
Nutrition Program Sales 2,894,345 2,950,693 3,060,046 2,276,041
Sales and Use Tax 26,045,238 27,364,977 26,496,978 28,184,046
Other Revenue from Local Sources 18,967,728 16,740,858 17,008,464 16,125,100
Revenue from Intermediary Sources 380,240 540,171 555,721 555,000
Other Financing Sources 1,392,822 655,769 553,000 553,000
General Long-Term Debt Proceeds 75,223,759 - 70,000,000 -
Proceeds from Fixed Asset Disposition 21,150 107,648 12,000 12,000
Transfers In 6,008,000 12,340,673 13,313,057 18,062,619
Total Revenues 524,239,269 453,600,346 537,949,216 480,083,752
Continued on next page
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
35/282
2014-2015 ADOPTED BUDGET 30
Continued from previous page
Expenditures
Instruction 242,646,198 248,850,561 259,497,223 265,677,091
Student Support Services 20,447,634 20,677,284 21,601,039 22,029,894
Instructional Staff Support 11,497,451 12,199,079 12,731,850 12,986,487
General Administration 4,691,758 5,325,980 5,610,016 5,714,354
Building Administration 18,905,852 19,140,850 19,997,791 20,394,536
Business and Central Administration 11,001,226 9,164,635 9,564,348 9,755,315
Plant Operation & Maintenance 32,987,675 34,137,543 36,465,459 36,895,627
Student Transportation 10,984,864 11,176,088 11,687,080 11,927,166
Non-Instructional Expenditures 19,701,236 21,221,876 22,436,485 23,536,629
Facilities Acquisition & Construction 45,240,752 53,511,190 46,455,000 46,510,000
Debt Service 6,008,000 12,158,244 12,631,366 18,062,619
Other Financing Uses - - - -
AEA Support 11,699,768 12,235,407 13,086,762 14,889,851
Transfers Out 6,008,000 12,340,673 13,313,057 18,062,619
Total Expenditures 441,820,414 472,139,410 485,077,476 506,442,188
Excess of Revenues over
Expenditures 82,418,855 (18,539,064) 52,871,740 (26,358,436)
Beginning Fund Balance 109,889,379 192,308,234 173,769,170 219,720,911
Ending Fund Balance $ 192,308,234 $ 173,769,170 $ 226,640,910 $193,362,475
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
36/282
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
37/282
2014-2015 ADOPTED BUDGET 32
SHORT-TERM BUDGETARY FACTORS
Though the national and state economy continues to grow, activity remains modest. The economy
has yet to fully overcome the legacies of the dramatic downturn and financial crisis that began in
2008, and while Iowas economic recovery stands on firmer ground today than it did after the start
of the economic collapse in 2008, the lingering impacts can still be felt across the state. According toa report issued by the Iowa Legislative Services Agency (LSA), Iowa general fund tax receipts totaled
$3.1 billion between July 1 and December 31, 2013. This was down 1.5% compared to the same
period a year ago. Additionally, the LSA reported that December 2013 net general fund revenue was
$98.3 million, which is 17.4% lower when compared to December 2012 (LSA, January 2014).
However, during the height of the recession, the unemployment rate topped 6.4%. Iowas seasonally
adjusted unemployment rate was 5.0% December 2012 and fell to a post-recession low of 4.2% in
December 2013, a positive sign of recovery (Iowa Workforce Development, January 2014).The
restructuring process from the credit and housing boom and bust will continue to take time. A full
recovery continues to be hindered by several factors, such as household balance sheet, repair, and
labor market restructuringall of which add to the high levels of uncertainty regarding futureeconomic activity. Many businesses and households are holding back on spending, investing, and
hiring decisions. The district continues to recover from the most challenging economic conditions in
more than a generation.
For several years, the state legislature did not established State Foundation Aid and Allowable
Growth in a timely manner. However, the legislature set Allowable Growth for FY 2014 and FY
2015 in the 2013 legislative session. This enabled the district to make more accurate assumptions for
FY 2015. However, there is no indication that the legislature will set Allowable Growth for FY 2016
of later in the 2014 legislative session.
State Foundation Aid is funding paid by the state to school districts to provide equitable funding on
a per pupil basis. It is a significant component of the District Combined Cost, the first major
element of a districts Spending Authority. The State Foundation Aid formula also funds other
special programsalso known as weighted funded programsbased on enrollment adjusted by a
weighting factor, then multiplied by the cost per student. These programs include Special Education,
Shared Programs, English Language Learners, Gifted and Talented, At-Risk programming, and
Home School Instruction.
This budget document, similar to prior years, incorporates financial assumptions. Assumptions are
used to ensure that revenues and expenditure projections are credible. The assumptions highlighted
below, as required by Board adopted Management Limitation 2.5(4), were used to develop the
Certified Budget:
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
38/282
2014-2015 ADOPTED BUDGET 33
Topic Assumption for FY 2015
Law; Policy Governance;Board Budget Parameters
Will follow budget law, policy governance management limitations, andboard budget parameters.
Generally AcceptedAccounting Principles
Budget will be in accordance with Generally Accepted AccountingPrinciples.
Allowable Growth (AG) 4% AG the increase in the cost per student for current year.
Certified Enrollment 32,413; 351 more students, which is a 1% increase over the prior year.
Cost per Student $6,434 a 4% increase over the prior year and fully funded.
Property valuations Estimates indicate general taxable property valuations will decrease1.1% and PPEL taxable valuations will decrease 1.8%.Final valuations not available until June 2014.
State property tax relief Will continue to receive increased state aid to replace property taxesand thereby reduce property taxes applicable to the district, per statelaw.
Cash Reserve Levy Recommend maintaining current level.
Statewide Penny Will parallel modeling and Department of Revenue projections.
Short-term investment rates Forecasted to be less than 1% in FY 2015.
State Aid - Certified Budget Based on receipt of full funding of each student at a district cost perstudent of $6,434, a 4% increase.
Weighted funding Funding is based on weighting factors as defined by law for HomeSchool, ELL, SPED, At-Risk programming, and Regional programming.Does not include preschool.
Certain State grants Funding for state grants is same as the current year.
Microsoft Settlement funding Will be spent on various technology initiatives.Funding ends 6/30/2014; however, the last of the reimbursement claimswill be received in FY15.
Compensation Includes a conservative estimate of the possible results of collectivebargaining.Health insurance premiums will increase 4%. Compensationsalaries
and benefitsin the General Fund represents 83% of overallexpenditures.Impact of transitional fees associated with the Affordable Health Carecost.
Utilities costs Energy conservation efforts will continue to offset increased utilitycosts; however, cannot allow for unknown weather factors.
Early retirements 100 early retirement slots were opened, 99 filled for FY 2014 and anadditional 100 slots were opened for FY 2015.The Board will evaluate the early retirement program for continuancein FY 2016.
Balanced budget Resources will cover expenditures, as required by law.
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
39/282
2014-2015 ADOPTED BUDGET 34
The district developed the following balanced budget scenario to aid in budget planning.
Calculation/Component
DescriptionBudget @ 4%
AllowableGrowth
District Cost Per
Student
Amount set by the state sets the cost per student at
prior year + Allowable Growth $ 6,434
x EnrollmentDistrict enrollment on October 1, 2013;351 students more than October 1, 2012
32,413.20
= FY 2015 DistrictCombined Cost
Equal to cost per student x enrollment 208,546,529
- FY 2014 DistrictCombined Cost
Prior years cost per student x prior year enrollment -198,432,337
= Increase (Decrease) inDistrict Combined Cost
Assumes full funding of the proposed AllowableGrowth and increased enrollment
10,114,192
+ Funds for SpecialPrograms
Some state educational programs require state fundingbe matched with state foundation aid ex. SPED; ELL;Gifted and Talented.
-685,554
= Increase (Decrease) infunding
Also commonly referred to as New Money or(Reduction in New Money)
9,428,638
+ Built in Revenuechanges
Decreased tax revenue due to decreased valuations;and adjustments to the cash reserve levy, adjusted fortax relief built into state foundation aid formula
-1,777,874
- Built in Expenditurechanges
Compensation increases, inflation for utilities, supplies,equipment, etc.
-8,797,642
+ Other ongoing savingfrom previous years anduse of additional fundingsources
Cumulative on going savings from previous reductionsin budget and use of other funding sources such asreserves and deferred revenues.
3,205,282
= Revenues in excess ofExpenditures Budget Gap amount revenues exceed expenditures 2,058,404
- AdditionalExpenditures
Anticipated district-recommended expenditures -2,058,404
= A Balanced Budget Expenditures = Revenues $ 0
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
40/282
2014-2015 ADOPTED BUDGET 35
PRIORITIES & ISSUES
School District Priorities
The School Board set the following parameters for FY 2015 budgetary planning:
Meet and stay within Board Management Limitations.
Maintain financial health; provide a balanced budget. Keep DMPS Student Expectations and Board Beliefs at the forefront. Review status of all levies; make strategic adjustments as needed. Seek input from the Citizens Budget Advisory Committee (CBAC) on budget priorities. Seek input from the Employees Budget Advisory Committee (EBAC) on budget priorities. Continue to seek operational efficiencies and improve operational effectiveness. Continue to focus on drop-out prevention and graduation rate improvement strategies. Focus on strategies to close the achievement gap. Focus on parent engagement strategies that promote the belief in parents/families as assetsto improved student achievement and as partners/co-teachers in their childs educational
experience.
Improve ELL programming. Continue to assess needs and evaluate programming to:
o Create innovative programs to meet unmet needs.o Maintain or grow programs that are demonstrating success.o Strategically abandon programs that do not demonstrate value.
The district plan for FY 2015 is tied to the Board Budget Parameters, as well as the CBAC and
EBAC recommendations, which are included in the Appendix. In addition, the budget will fundeffective programming and initiatives aimed at improving student performance, growth, and
achievement. Within the FY 2015 budget, the district will:
Maintain all programs and services. Hire 30 FTE to be allocated by the staffing formula district-wide. Transfer funds, amount yet to be determined due to final budget approvals and availability,
from unrestricted funds to committed funds for technology improvements.
Invest $8 million in FY 2014 and FY 2015 on a K-5 digital adoption. Invest $1.5 million to further develop the district Wellness Program with the expectation of
a $3.24 return on each dollar spent.
Invest $500,000 to further develop the middle school activities program. Set the Solvency Ratio at 15% Target Rate. Continue to seek operational efficiencies and savings district-wide.
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
41/282
2014-2015 ADOPTED BUDGET 36
Update on Key FY 2014 Priorities
Focus on K-3 Education:The district has/will continue to make improvements in the K-3 arena:
Of the 119 teachers that were added in FY 2014, 76 were in elementary schools. Selected schools were targeted for a Reading Recovery program for K-2 students, based on
current reading assessments. System 44 was piloted as a Tier 3 intervention for students in grades 3-5 who have
significant gaps in their foundational skill knowledge.
Reading and math support positions were incorporated into the classroom. Selected the new elementary math adoption, including digital components.
In FY 2015, the district will continue to support K-3 education by continuing the efforts of FY 2014
and accomplishing the following objectives:
Fully implement the new math adoption and install all digital components. Adopt the FAST Assessment, which is a new state assessment for reading, for K-3 students. Implement a comprehensive counseling program, aligned with the ASCA Model, to promote
academic and social-emotional development of students in eight PLAS elementary schools.
Build Sustainable Staff back into Buildings:In FY 2014, the district restored the following positions:
119 teachers 64 middle school coaches (stipend positions) 19 specialists (majority directly involved with education) 1 administrator to oversee the Office of Schools
During FY 2015, the district plans to restore up to 30 positions, with many directly impacting
classrooms. The district is also looking to expand middle school activities.
Invest in Technology to Improve Instructional and Business Functionality:The district made several
investments in technology infrastructure in FY 2014. Investments included hardwaresuch as
computers, digital projectors, and security camerasto update classroom access to technology and
to improve building safety; softwaresuch as Achieve 3000 and System 44to improve education
interventions; and solutionssuch as the employee reimbursement web form, dashboards, and the
student activities moduleto improve organizational efficiency and facilitate more effective
communication. The district will maintain these efforts and continue to improve technology
hardware, software, and solutions in a comprehensive method, using the technology blueprint.
Improve Internal and External Communication:A concentrated effort was put into place to do a better job
of communicating to parents, taxpayers, and other constituents through billboard messaging,
developing a smartphone app, and enhancing the districts TV station and Web site. The Human
Resources department is also transforming to provide better communication for staff. The district
will continue to undertake efforts to improve communication.
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
42/282
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
43/282
2014-2015 ADOPTED BUDGET 38
Unspent Spending Authority Ratio:The unspent spending authority ratio is a measure of the districtsunbudgeted authorized spending capacity (not cash reserves) and is defined as the districts unspent
spending authority divided by the districts maximum budget authority. It should be noted that
reaching the maximum budget authority level would require the board to authorize and levy
additional property taxes. The IASB recommends this ratio be in the target range of 10 - 20%. The
Board adopted guidelines in FY 2012 setting the minimum Unspent Spending Authority Ratio at
10%. The unspent spending authority balance ratio for FY 2013 was 17.2%, up from 17.0% for the
prior year. However, it is anticipated that the final unspent spending authority ratio for FY 2014 will
be lower than FY 2013, due to declining federal revenues.
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
SOLVENCY RATIO
Solvency Ratio Target Solvency Ratio
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
20%
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Inmillions
SPENDING AUTHORITY / CASH RESERVES
Cash Reserves Spending Authority (FY 14 unaudited) Target Spending Authority
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
44/282
2014-2015 ADOPTED BUDGET 39
Staffing Levels and Employee Compensation:Staffing is a top priority to improve education. Purposeful,
long term planning is necessary in order to build and maintain the additional classrooms and staffing
levels long term. Compensation costs represent 83% of the districts General Fund budget.
Components of compensation include salary (including base pay, steps, and longevity), teacher salary
supplements, health insurance, payroll taxes, retirement (IPERS or DMTRS), dental and vision
insurance, and long-term disability. Ideally, staffing would be in the range of 75 - 82% of totalGeneral Fund expenditures. Accordingly, the district is investing $1.5 million in initiatives to address
health care costs.
As the chart below demonstrates, the compensation package for DMPS teachers was slightly above
the statewide average package in FY 2008, FY 2009, FY 2010, FY 2013, and FY 2014. (Given
teachers comprise 50% of the DMPS workforce, that employee group is used for illustration
purposes.) Also included is the Allowable Growth, which is provided for demonstration purposes.
Compensation Package: Teachers (DMEA)
Year State Average District Package Allowable Growth
2008 4.75% 4.77% 4.00%
2009 4.50% 5.00% 2.59%
2010 3.59% 3.65% 2.00%
2011 2.87% 1.98% 2.00%
2012 3.33% 3.11% 0.00%
2013 3.71% 3.95% 2.00%
2014 3.90% 3.98% 2.00%
2015 TBD 4.09% 4.00%
While adequate compensation is always the minimum standard, it is difficult to sustain when state
funding is insufficient and grows at historically low rates. In recent years, negotiated increases in
compensation packages have been more than the increases in State Foundation Aid, measured by
the rate of Allowable Growth, thus creating a growing budget gap from one year to the next.
3.55%
2.40%
4.30%4.70% 4.77%
5.00%
3.65%
1.98%
3.11%
3.95% 3.98% 4.09%
2.00% 2.00%
4.00% 4.00% 4.00%
2.59%2.00% 2.00%
0.00%
2.00% 2.00%
4.00%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
ALLOWABLE GROWTH vs. COMPENSATION SETTLEMENTS
DMEA Teacher Settlement State Allowable Growth
8/12/2019 Fiscal Year 2015 Adopted Budget and Financial Statements
45/282
2014-2015 ADOPTED BUDGET 40
Valuations and Tax Rate:The Polk County Assessor is anticipating overall property assessments used
to determine tax collections for FY 2015 will decrease. Total property valuations multiplied by the
tax rate equals the total taxes assessed. The rollback percentage applied to residential property may
help; however, taxes garnered from commercial property may significantly decrease due to the
decrease in valuations in the future.
Property Tax Rates & Valuations
FY 2014 FY 2015
Regular Valuation (with Utilities) 2.37% -1.07%
TIF Valuation 4.71% -7.64%
Regular and TIF Valuation 2.61% -1.75%
GENERAL
Regular Program 9.82952 9.67930
Instructional Support 1.73065 1.79157
Dropo