+ All Categories
Home > Documents > FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

Date post: 18-Jan-2017
Category:
Upload: vucong
View: 232 times
Download: 6 times
Share this document with a friend
124
FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN CONSUMPTION AND AVAILABILITY IN TIMOR-LESTE National Directorate of Fisheries and Aquaculture Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries Supported by the Regional Fisheries Livelihoods Programme for South and Southeast Asia Timor-Leste 2011
Transcript
Page 1: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN CONSUMPTION AND AVAILABILITY IN

TIMOR-LESTE

National Directorate of Fisheries and Aquaculture Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries

Supported by the Regional Fisheries Livelihoods Programme for South and Southeast Asia Timor-Leste

2011

Page 2: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

2

REGIONAL FISHERIES LIVELIHOODS PROGRAMME

FOR SOUTH AND SOUTHEAST ASIA (RFLP)

FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN CONSUMPTION

AND AVAILABILITY IN TIMOR-LESTE (Activity Code 1.2.3; 2010-2011 work plan)

For the Regional Fisheries Livelihoods Programme for South and Southeast Asia

Prepared by

AMSAT INTERNATIONAL

June 2011

Page 3: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

3

Disclaimer and copyright

“This publication has been made with the financial support of the Spanish Agency of International Cooperation

for Development (AECID) through an FAO trust-fund project, the Regional Fisheries Livelihoods Programme

(RFLP) for South and Southeast Asia. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the opinion of

FAO, AECID, or RFLP.”

All rights reserved. Reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product for educational and

other non-commercial purposes are authorized without any prior written permission from the copyright holders

provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of material in this information product for resale or

other commercial purposes is prohibited without written permission of the copyright holders. Applications for

such permission should be addressed to:

Chief

Electronic Publishing Policy and Support Branch

Communication Division

FAO

Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy

or by e-mail to:

[email protected]

© FAO 2011

Bibliographic reference

For bibliographic purposes, please reference this publication as:

AMSAT International (2011). Fish and animal protein consumption and availability in Timor-Leste. Regional

Fisheries Livelihoods Programme for South and Southeast Asia (GCP/RAS/237/SPA) Field Project Document

2011/TIM/02.

Page 4: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

4

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ACKNOWLEDGMENT .................................................................................................................... 10

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ 11

1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 13 1.1 BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 13 1.2 OBJECTIVE ............................................................................................................................... 13 1.3 SURVEY LOCATIONS ................................................................................................................ 13 1.4 OUTPUT ................................................................................................................................... 14 1.5 STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT .................................................................................................... 14

2 METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................................................... 15 2.1 QUANTITATIVE SURVEY .......................................................................................................... 15

2.1.1 Selection of respondents .................................................................................................. 15 2.1.2 Sampling design ............................................................................................................... 16 2.1.3 Survey constraints in Oecussi .......................................................................................... 17 2.1.4 Respondents and their households ................................................................................... 17 2.1.5 Weightings........................................................................................................................ 18 2.1.6 Coastal, non-coastal and urban categories ..................................................................... 18

2.2 QUALITATIVE .......................................................................................................................... 19 2.3 ENUMERATORS ........................................................................................................................ 20 2.4 QUESTIONNAIRE ...................................................................................................................... 21 2.5 DATA ANALYSIS OF THE COLLECTIVE RESULT RELATED TO OECUSSI DISTRICT ..................... 21

3 DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE ...................................................................................................... 22 3.1 POPULATION PROFILE .............................................................................................................. 22 3.2 AGE DISTRIBUTION .................................................................................................................. 22 3.3 MARITAL STATUS .................................................................................................................... 23 3.4 HOUSEHOLD SIZE ..................................................................................................................... 24 3.5 GENDER DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION ................................................................................. 26 3.6 RELIGION ................................................................................................................................. 28 3.7 EDUCATION LEVEL .................................................................................................................. 28 3.8 OCCUPATION ........................................................................................................................... 31 3.9 OWNERSHIP OF CATTLE, BOATS AND GOODS .......................................................................... 33 3.10 MONTHLY INCOME ................................................................................................................ 34

4 ANIMAL MEAT OR FISH CONSUMPTION IN TIMOR-LESTE ....................................... 38 4.1 HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOUR ................................................................................ 38 4.2 FREQUENCY OF MEAT OR FISH CONSUMPTION ........................................................................ 39 4.3 TYPES OF PROTEIN CONSUMED ................................................................................................ 43 4.4 TYPES OF FISH/SEAFOOD USUALLY CONSUMED ...................................................................... 44 4.5 COOKING PREFERENCES FOR FISH/SEAFOOD ........................................................................... 46 4.6 REASONS FOR CONSUMING FISH/SEAFOOD .............................................................................. 47 4.7 REASONS FOR NOT CONSUMING FISH/SEAFOOD ...................................................................... 49 4.8 SOURCES OF FISH/SEAFOOD ..................................................................................................... 52 4.9 DISTANCE FROM SOURCES OF FISH/SEAFOOD.......................................................................... 53 4.10 PERCEIVED EASE OF ACCESS TO FISH/SEAFOOD .................................................................... 56 4.11 FISH BUYING VOLUME ........................................................................................................... 57 4.12 FREQUENCY OF BUYING FISH ................................................................................................ 59

Page 5: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

5

4.13 CONSUMPTION OF PROCESSED FISH ....................................................................................... 61 4.14 FISH AND ANIMAL MEAT CONSUMPTION ............................................................................... 63

4.14.1 Frequency of annual consumption per year .................................................................. 63 4.14.2 Weight of consumption per meal .................................................................................... 63 4.14.3 Final calculation of consumption per capita per year ................................................... 64 4.14.4 Average consumption ..................................................................................................... 64 4.14.5 Consumption by area ..................................................................................................... 66 4.14.6 Consumption by district ................................................................................................. 66 4.14.7 Fish and meat consumption by age ................................................................................ 67 4.14.8 Fish and meat consumption by marital status ............................................................... 68 4.14.9 Fish and meat consumption by level of education ......................................................... 69 4.14.10 Fish and meat consumption by level of income and family size .................................. 70 4.14.11 Meat consumption versus ownership of cattle and chicken ......................................... 71 4.14.12 Meat/fish consumption against reported preferences .................................................. 72 4.14.13 Fish supply and fish consumption ................................................................................ 72

4.15 PERCEIVED LEVEL OF CONSUMPTION .................................................................................... 73 4.16 SEASONAL AVAILABILITY OF FISH ........................................................................................ 75

5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................... 76 5.1 CONCLUSIONS ......................................................................................................................... 76 5.2 RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................... 78

6 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................. 80

APPENDIX 1. QUESTIONNAIRE .................................................................................................. 81

APPENDIX 2. LIST OF SURVEYED ALDEIAS (VILLAGES) ................................................ 112

APPENDIX 3. RESULTS OF FISH AND MEAT CONSUMPTION LEVELS ........................ 115

APPENDIX 4. FINDINGS OF FGD’S AND IDI’S IN 5 DISTRICTS ........................................ 118

Page 6: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

6

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1-1. 5 districts in Timor-Leste as target survey area (map source: United Nations

2008) ................................................................................................................................ 14

Figure 2-1. Sample distribution (%) ....................................................................................... 16

Figure 3-1. Age distribution of respondents ........................................................................... 22

Figure 3-2. Age distribution of respondents by district .......................................................... 23

Figure 3-3. Age distribution by urban-coastal categorisation ................................................. 23

Figure 3-4. Marital status of respondents. .............................................................................. 24

Figure 3-5. Marriage status of respondents by district ........................................................... 24

Figure 3-6. Percentage of respondents by household size (N = 820) ..................................... 25

Figure 3-7. Distribution of household size by total (left) and by district (right) ..................... 25

Figure 3-8. Household size of respondents based on urban-coastal-non-coastal categorisation

.......................................................................................................................................... 26

Figure 3-9. Age distribution of population by gender and by district .................................... 26

Figure 3-10. Percentage of schooling experience (N = 820) .................................................. 29

Figure 3-11. Level of education (N = 820) ............................................................................. 29

Figure 3-12. School experience of respondents by district ..................................................... 29

Figure 3-13. School experience of respondents by urban-coastal categorisation (excluding

Oecussi)............................................................................................................................ 30

Figure 3-14. Completion of school education......................................................................... 30

Figure 3-15. Percentage of drop-out status of respondents in the past ................................... 31

Figure 3-16. Percentage of work force (N = 820) ................................................................... 31

Figure 3-17. Ownership of goods, cattle and boats ................................................................. 33

Figure 3-18. Ownership of assets by district .......................................................................... 34

Figure 3-19. Respondents worked for money a month before the survey (by district) .......... 35

Figure 3-20. Respondents worked for money a month before the survey (by urban - coastal)

.......................................................................................................................................... 35

Figure 3-21. Monthly income (USD), by district ................................................................... 35

Figure 3-22. Income level groups versus type of main job ..................................................... 36

Figure 3-23. Average income groups by district .................................................................... 36

Figure 3-24. Average income groups by urban-coastal categorization .................................. 37

Figure 4-1. The way family members eat fish or seafood ...................................................... 38

Figure 4-2. Part of fish eaten by male and female members in the household ....................... 39

Figure 4-3. Part of fish eaten by age of respondent ................................................................ 39

Figure 4-4. When people have meal with fish or meat (by district and by urban-coastal) ..... 40

Figure 4-5. Frequency of consumption of meat/fish protein .................................................. 41

Figure 4-6. Past frequency of eating meat/fish by district (percent)....................................... 41

Figure 4-7. Frequency of animal protein consumption by area .............................................. 42

Figure 4-8. Frequency of animal protein consumption (by district) ....................................... 42

Figure 4-9. Types of animal protein consumed (by district) .................................................. 44

Figure 4-10. Species of fish/seafood consumed (% by area) .................................................. 46

Figure 4-11. Methods of preparing fish/seafood (by district) ................................................. 47

Page 7: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

7

Figure 4-12. Methods of preparing fish/seafood (by area) ..................................................... 47

Figure 4-13. What do you like about fish? (percentages based on all respondents = 100%) . 48

Figure 4-14. Reasons for consuming fish/seafood (%, by district)......................................... 48

Figure 4-15. Reasons for consuming fish/seafood (%, by area) ............................................. 49

Figure 4-16. What is disliked about fish (percentages based on all respondents = 100%)..... 49

Figure 4-17. What is disliked about fish (by urban-coastal) ................................................... 50

Figure 4-18. Reasons limiting consumption of fish/seafood .................................................. 51

Figure 4-19. Reasons for not eating fish or seafood (by urban-coastal) ................................. 51

Figure 4-20. Sources of fish/seafood (by district) .................................................................. 52

Figure 4-21. Sources of fish/seafood (by area) ....................................................................... 53

Figure 4-22. Distance/access to fish/seafood (by district) ...................................................... 54

Figure 4-23. Distance/access to salt water fish/seafood (by area) .......................................... 54

Figure 4-24. Availability of fish/seafood at the market the respondent goes to (by district) . 55

Figure 4-25. Availability of fish/seafood at the market the respondent goes to (by urban-

coastal) ............................................................................................................................. 56

Figure 4-26. Perceptions of ease/difficulty of access to fish/seafood (by district) ................. 56

Figure 4-27. Perceptions of ease/difficulty of access to fish/seafood (by area) ..................... 57

Figure 4-28. Volume of fish/seafood bought .......................................................................... 58

Figure 4-29. Volume bought (kg) everytime buying fish ....................................................... 58

Figure 4-30. Frequency of buying fish in general (percent) ................................................... 59

Figure 4-31. Frequency of buying fish by district .................................................................. 59

Figure 4-32. Frequency of buying fish/seafood by area ......................................................... 60

Figure 4-33. Frequency of buying fish/seafood with their weight.......................................... 60

Figure 4-34. Experience in buying processed fish/seafood .................................................... 61

Figure 4-35. Processed fish/seafood bought (by urban-coastal) ............................................. 62

Figure 4-36. Frequency of buying processed fish/seafood (by type)...................................... 62

Figure 4-37. Per-capita level of consumption of protein sources in 4 districts ...................... 65

Figure 4-38. Fish and animal meat consumption level (by urban-coastal) ............................. 66

Figure 4-39. Fish and animal meat consumption level (by district) ....................................... 67

Figure 4-40. Fish and meat consumption (g) by respondent's age .......................................... 68

Figure 4-41. Fish and meat consumption level (g) by marital status. ..................................... 69

Figure 4-42. Level of fish and meat consumption based on education level .......................... 69

Figure 4-43. Level of fish and meat consumption categorised by income level .................... 70

Figure 4-44. Fish and meat consumption level categorised by household size ...................... 71

Figure 4-45. Fish and meat consumed against livestock owned ............................................. 71

Figure 4-46. Levels of fish and meat consumption categorised by what was mostly consumed

.......................................................................................................................................... 72

Figure4-47. Fish supplyand consumption ............................................................................... 73

Figure 4-48. Perception on the quantity of fish consumed ..................................................... 74

Figure 4-49. Willingness to consume more fish if having more money ................................. 74

Figure 4-50. Fishing calendar 5 districts (source: RFLP Baseline Survey data, 2011) .......... 75

Page 8: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

8

LIST OF TABLES

Table 0-1. Per-capita consumption of fish and meat by urban-coastal categorisation and by

district .............................................................................................................................. 12

Table 2-1. Weight scores for district sampling ....................................................................... 18

Table 2-2. Locations and participants of FGDs and IDIs ....................................................... 19

Table 3-1. Population Profile (Census 2010) .......................................................................... 22

Table 3-2. Average household size by district (survey result and census) ............................. 25

Table 3-3. Gender comparison of population by age group and by district ........................... 27

Table 3-4. Distribution of gender in the sample ..................................................................... 27

Table 3-5. Meat or fish consumed grouped by religion of respondents ................................. 28

Table 3-6. Main job/occupation in respondent’s household (N = 528) .................................. 31

Table 3-7. Distribution of jobs in districts .............................................................................. 32

Table 4-1. Type of meal consumed......................................................................................... 43

Table 4-2. Type of animal protein consumed (urban, coastal and non-coastal areas) ............ 43

Table 4-3. Species of fish/seafood consumed by district (% within district) ......................... 44

Table 4-4. Species of fish/seafood consumed by area (% within area) .................................. 45

Table 4-5. Fish and animal meat consumption (summary)..................................................... 65

Page 9: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

9

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

1. Questionnaire

2. List of Aldeia

3. Result on fish and meat consumption level

4. Summary of key points from Focus Group Discussions and In Depth Interviews

LIST OF DATA

1. IDI and FGD Records

2. SPSS Database

3. Summary Excel Spreadsheet

LIST OF ACRONYMS

BPS Biro Pusat Statistik (Statistics Indonesia)

FAO Food and Agriculture Organization

FGD Focus Group Discussions

IDI In-Depth Interviews

JICA Japan International Cooperation Agency

MAF Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries

RFLP Regional Fisheries Livelihoods Programme

UNTL Universidade Nacional Timor Lorosa’e

LIST OF TERMS

Aldeia Timorese term for a sub-village grouping. In terms of size, an aldeia can be

equivalent to a dusun in Indonesia or a hamlet in English. Aldeias are not

formalized divisions with administrative authority. Timor-Leste has a total of 2,225

aldeias.

Animal protein

Protein sourced from animals including fish, other sea or freshwater animals.

Fish Fish and other sea or freshwater animals consumed as sources of animal protein.

Meat Non-sea or non-freshwater animal meat consumed as source of animal protein.

Suco Sucos are the smallest administrative division. A group of sucos creates a

subdistrict. According to the National Directorate of Statistics there are 442 sucos

in Timor-Leste. In terms of size a suco can be equivalent to a desa/kelurahan

(administrative village) in Indonesia.

Page 10: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

10

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This report has been prepared for the Regional Fisheries Livelihoods Programme (RFLP) of

the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) by AMSAT

INTERNATIONAL. This survey of fish and animal protein consumption and availability was

conducted in parallel with the Timor-Leste Baseline Survey under the RFLP programme.

This report was developed by a team led by project manager Dr. Linda Christanty. Frieda

Subrata, community development and nutrition specialist, led the field survey team which

consisted of: Risang Rimbatmaja as survey specialist, Andreas Medah as post-harvest and

marketing expert in agriculture and fisheries and Lamidi as expert in livelihoods

enhancement and diversification. Jim Travers coordinated the final report analysis and report

production working with the entire team. Rudy Purba assisted the team in the report analysis

and report writing. The team also thanks Dr. Paul McShane for reviewing the final analysis

and assisting in final editing work.

We would like to thank Don Griffiths, Chief Technical Advisor RFLP, for his continuing

support and guidance in finalizing the report. Also Dr. Enrique Alonso and Pedro Rodriques

of the RFLP office in Dili for their continuous support in every aspect of the survey at the

national and district level and specifically to Dr. Enrique Alonso for his comments and

feedback in finalizing this report.

We also thank the people who provided us with strong cooperation and assistance during the

field survey: Alexio Gusmao Correia from the District Fisheries Officer (DFO) in Baucau,

Junior Pascoal de Carvalho from the DFO in Bobonaro, Elsa de Carvalho from the DFO in

Covalima and Agustinho Lao from the DFO in Oecussi.

The survey included hundreds of respondents and covered large areas of five districts in

Timor-Leste (Baucau, Dili, Bobonaro, Covalima and Oecussi) and would have been

impossible without the strong cooperation and support of the Universidade Nacional de

Timor-Leste (UNTL). We thank UNTL professors for their comments on the survey

questionnaire and all senior students of the UNTL who became part of our team as

enumerators in the survey and who faced the challenges of the survey including bad weather,

rough seas, poor roads, accidents and inadequate facilities, with good spirits and

perseverance.

Lastly we thank FAO for the funding and we acknowledge the funding support of the Spanish

Agency for International Development (AECID) that made this survey and report writing

possible.

Page 11: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

11

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

A survey of fish and meat consumption and its availability in Timor-Leste was undertaken

during January 2011 in the five districts of Baucau, Dili, Bobonaro, Covalima and Oecussi.

The survey was conducted together with a baseline livelihoods survey for the Regional

Fisheries Livelihoods Programme (RFLP) in Timor-Leste. The RFLP is a 4-year programme

of the FAO with activities in Cambodia, Indonesia, the Philippines, Sri Lanka, Timor-Leste

and Viet Nam which is being implemented with financial support from Spain (US$19.4

million). The RFLP aims to “strengthen capacity among participating small-scale fishing

communities and their supporting institutions towards improved livelihoods and sustainable

fisheries resources management”. RFLP management is headquartered in the FAO in

Bangkok and has dedicated management staff based in Dili.

The survey included 820 randomly selected respondents in 80 aldeia (hamlets) in 55 suco

(villages) in 5 districts. A mixed method approach was used including household survey

(structured interviews), focus group discussions and in-depth interviews. Interviews were

conducted by enumerators recruited from the Universidade Nacional Timor Lorosa’e (UNTL)

who were trained and supervised by AMSAT International. The questionnaire was developed

by AMSAT International in collaboration with RFLP and five professors from the

Universidade Nacional de Timor Lorosa’e, and was field tested in Dili before the survey.

Respondents are grouped according to age, gender, household size, marital status, educational

achievement, occupation, asset ownership and monthly income. The consumption and

availability data collected have been analysed by district, and also by area, i.e. urban, non-

coastal and coastal.

Regional coverage was affected by difficulty of access to some targeted aldeias in Oecussi

(see section 2.1.3 below). Oecussi results are therefore only representative of 70% of

Oecussi’s total population, covering the Pante Makasar and Oesilo subdistricts.

As a consequence the Oecussi data has been excluded from the collective survey in relation

to district comparisons of fish and meat consumption levels. The results therefore reflect data

from Baucau, Dili, Bobonaro and Covalima districts. However, Oecussi data has been

included in the overall comparisons of urban, coastal and non-coastal areas, as these

comparisons are not based on districts. As its population representativeness was quite high

(70%) in many cases Oecussi results were also included in the overall, collective results and

collective analysis.

Key findings include:

Combined fish and meat consumption averages 19.4 kg/cap/year

Fish consumption was relatively low 6.1 kg/cap/year

There was significant variation in consumption of fish between districts ranging from

2.7 kg/cap/year in Bobonaro to 7.7 kg/cap/year in Dili.

Page 12: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

12

There was significant variation in consumption of fish between urban, non-coastal and

coastal areas with subsistence fishing and access to markets being considered as the

main factors that influenced the variation.

Average meat consumption was 13.3 kg/cap/year. Meat consumption was relatively

even across urban, coastal and non-coastal areas, but varied greatly between districts.

Table 0-1. Per-capita consumption of fish and meat by urban-coastal categorisation and by district

Area/District Consumption (kg/capita/year)

Fish Meat Total **)

By Area Type

Urban 6.0 19.1 25.2

Coastal 17.6 12.1 29.7

Non-Coastal 4.0 11.6 15.6

Mean *) 6.1 13.3 19.4

By District

Baucau 5.9 11.6 17.5

Dili 7.7 18.2 26.0

Bobonaro 2.7 7.0 9.6

Covalima 5.5 6.6 12.2

Mean *) 6.1 13.3 19.4

*) Mean was generated from 4 districts, excluding Oecussi

**) Values were rounded after calculating fish and meat combined

Note: In Oecussi (with data from Pante Makasar and Oesilo subdistricts only) the fish consumption level was

9.3 kg/capita/year and the meat consumption level was 22.3 kg/capita/year. Total fish and meat consumption

was 31.6 kg/capita/year.

Page 13: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

13

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background

With a coastline of approximately 700 km, there is considerable potential for fisheries to

provide valuable protein for the Timorese people. The Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries

(MAF) estimated that 5,265 fishers operate along the Timor-Leste coastline, conducting

mainly coastal fishing and harvest of intertidal resources. There is an opportunity to further

develop coastal fisheries to improve the nutrition and well being of the people of Timor-

Leste.

The fish and animal protein consumption and availability survey was one of the activities

required by the Regional Fisheries Livelihoods Programme (RFLP) in Timor-Leste. The

activity aimed to provide information about fish consumption (fresh and processed), together

with demand, supply, availability and market chains. This complements baseline information

on fishery product development, improving supply chains to market, and strengthening/

diversifying income opportunities of fisher families. Furthermore, a fish consumption survey

would fill a gap in regards to patterns of animal protein consumption in Timor-Leste.

1.2 Objective

The objectives of the survey were to estimate current levels of fish and meat consumption

and obtain related information on supply, demand and availability. The survey results are

expected to be used as the basis for the development of policies and strategies of Timor-

Leste’s fisheries and aquaculture sectors.

1.3 Survey locations

The survey was conducted in five districts (Figure 1-1):

1. Baucau

2. Dili (including Atauro)

3. Bobonaro

4. Covalima

5. Oecussi (an enclave within Indonesia).

Page 14: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

14

Figure 1-1. 5 districts in Timor-Leste as target survey area (map source: United Nations 2008)

1.4 Output

The outputs include information on:

Fish and meat consumption in general,

Fish consumption in coastal, non coastal and urban areas,

Fish consumption per district, and

Fish supply/availability.

1.5 Structure of the report

The report consists of five Sections.

Section 1 is the introduction, covering the background, the objective and the survey

locations. It also describes the broad structure of the report.

Section 2 describes the methodology of the survey.

Section 3 describes the general demographic features of the survey respondents.

Section 4 presents the results of the survey with comments and analyses where

appropriate.

Section 5 presents conclusions and recommendations.

Page 15: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

15

2 METHODOLOGY

The study employed a mixed-method of quantitative and qualitative survey, with quantitative

survey as the main focus. Data collection methods included:

Desk review of available secondary data sources e.g. official census, existing reports

and research,

Household survey (structured interview),

Focus group discussions (FGD), and

In-depth interviews (IDI).

Finding the level and patterns of consumption of fish and other animal protein sources was

the focus of the quantitative survey. The quantitative survey was also broadened to include

socio-economic aspects of fish or meat consumption. The qualitative survey targeted the

daily activities and socio-economic aspects of respondents that were relevant to fish or meat

consumption. The qualitative survey was expected to describe the influence of livelihoods on

the level of fish and meat consumption. Although there was some overlap in timing and

location between the quantitative and qualitative surveys, conducted by different enumerators

and/or field teams, generally the quantitative survey was conducted first followed by the

qualitative survey. The quantitative survey assisted in identifying good informants to

participate in the FGDs and the IDIs.

2.1 Quantitative survey

2.1.1 Selection of respondents

A random survey was conducted in five districts of Timor-Leste (namely Baucau, Dili,

Bobonaro, Covalima, and Oecussi). The total number of respondents was 820.

Dili district: 332 respondents (33 aldeias)

Baucau district: 164 respondents (16 aldeias)

Bobonaro district: 134 respondents (13 aldeias)

Covalima district: 90 respondents (9 aldeias)

Oecussi district: 100 respondents (9 aldeias)

The sample distribution among the five districts was achieved based on the respective district

populations and is described below (Fig. 2-1):

Page 16: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

16

Figure 2-1. Sample distribution (%)

Dili had the largest sample size with 332 respondents (41%) followed by Baucau (164

respondents, 20%), Bobonaro (134 respondents, 16%), and Oecussi (100 respondents, 12%).

The district with the smallest sample size was Covalima with 90 respondents (11%).

2.1.2 Sampling design

The 820 respondents were selected randomly using a two-stage random sampling procedure1

at the aldeia level. Details of available aldeia for each suco were received from local

government offices and further verified in the field. Randomization was applied at aldeia

level. In total there were 80 aldeias selected across 55 sucos.

In each aldeia, 10 or 11 respondents were selected at random. The field team first created a

list of households based on official information from the head of the aldeia and this list was

then verified in the fieldwork process. In cases where lists of households were not available,

the field team derived these from visits to the aldeia and made a simple map in order to list of

households.

Randomisation was then achieved from the final list of households through a systematic

random process. First, the team selected a starting point using randomly selected tickets with

numbers corresponding to individual households in the aldeia. Next, households to be

interviewed were selected based on an interval number, which was calculated by dividing the

total number of all households by the target number in the actual survey, which varies from

10 to 20 per aldeia. (A list of surveyed aldeias and their corresponding subdistricts and

districts is presented in Table A in Appendix 2).

1 Sampling was designed using guidelines described in Magnani, R (1997). Sampling Guide. Food and Nutrition

Technical Assistance Project (FANTA). Washington: Academy for Educational Development.

20.0

40.5

16.311.0 12.2

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

BAUCAU DILI BOBONARO COVALIMA OECUSSI

Page 17: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

17

2.1.3 Survey constraints in Oecussi

The field surveys were conducted in January 2011, during the rainy season in Timor-Leste.

This compromised the survey in several areas of Oecussi district as some parts of the survey

area were inaccessible due to flash flooding and road closures during the survey period.

Random selection of aldeias was therefore conducted only in the accessible subdistricts.

Thus, the results for Oecussi do not fully cover the whole district area. Nonetheless, to allow

analysis with the predefined confidence level the sample size was maintained and

replacement aldeias were selected in Pante Makasar (70 respondents) and Oesilo (30

respondents) subdistricts. Based on the district and subdistrict population, the respondent

sample in Pante Makasar represented 54% of the district population (total population 65,524)

and the Oesilo respondent sample represented 16% of the district population2. Therefore the

Oecussi survey result could explain the condition and characteristics of 70% population of

the district.

Many of the aldeias in Pante Makasar (with 27 respondents) belong to coastal areas and are

located inside or close to the city of Pante Makasar whereas all Oesilo aldeias surveyed (with

30 respondents) were inland and are non-coastal. Two other subdistricts (Nitibe and Passabe)

were not surveyed given the above-mentioned constraints.

2.1.4 Respondents and their households

The sampling process used households as the sampling unit. Thus, the 820 respondents were

selected as representative of the whole population within five districts. Although the

households were selected randomly, most people responding to the questionnaires were the

wives of the heads of households. Women were generally the ones (99.3%) available for

interview at the time of survey and were knowledgeable about household consumption habits.

The per-person consumption data presented is based on the average consumption level of the

respondent. However this consumption level was also tested and checked to compare to the

average per-person consumption level of the members of the household that the respondent

represented (see section 4.1).

Overall, the survey design gained +/- 5% Confidence Interval (CI) at 95% Confidence Level

(CL) using 50% population parameter (assumed unknown). Confidence intervals for survey

data varied according to the sample size at district level (Dili = 8.1%; Oecussi= 13.8%;

Covalima = 14.4%; Baucau = 10.7%; Bobonaro =11.5%).

Although representativeness of the whole district was compromised by the exclusion of some

subdistricts, data for Oecussi were still constructed with random selection and are considered

valid since the size of sample was maintained in the survey. However data collected for

Oecussi are only representative of 70% of the population of whole district.

2 Based on Census 2010 data, the total population of Oecussi district was 65,524 which comprised the

population in Nitibe 11,414, Oesilo 10,717, Pante Makasar 35,159 and Passabe 8,234.

Page 18: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

18

2.1.5 Weightings

The weight applied to each respondent is calculated by:

[(district population) / (total population) ] x [ (total sample) / (district sample) ],

where total population = 561,189 and total sample = 820.

Table 2-1. Weight scores for district sampling

District

District

population

size

% district

population by total

population

Sample

size

% sample size by

total sample size Weight

(A) (B) (A x 1/B)

Baucau 111,484 19.8656781 164 20.0000000 0.99328390257

Dili 234,331 41.7561641 332 40.4878049 1.03132694573

Bobonaro 89,787 15.9994227 134 16.3414634 0.97906914751

Covalima 60,063 10.7028114 90 10.9756098 0.97514503432

Oecussi 65,524 11.6759238 100 12.1951220 0.95742575140

561,189 100 820 100

2.1.6 Coastal, non-coastal and urban categories

The respondent households were classified into three geographical types: coastal, non-coastal

and urban. The objective of this classification was to assess differences in food consumption

patterns among urban, coastal and non-coastal areas. Classification was applied at the scale of

the aldeia (i.e. not at the larger village or subdistrict scales). Based on RFLP guidelines the

three geographical types were defined as follows:

Urban represents a large city e.g. Dili. All aldeias within Dili city were classified as

urban (e.g. Caqueo Laran aldeia in Becora suco Cristo Rei subdistrict, Aimutin aldeia

in Comoro suco Dom Aleixo subdistrict).

Coastal represents aldeias that border directly with the sea. Thus, all aldeias in Dili

district (e.g. all aldeias surveyed in Atauro, Fatu Cama aldeia in Meti Aut suco Cristo

Rei subdistrict, Fatuisin aldeia in Camenasa suco Suai subdistrict). Most aldeias in

larger villages like Liquiça, Suai or Baucau were classified as coastal.

Non-coastal means aldeias that do not directly border the sea. This included all

aldeias randomly selected and surveyed in Bobonaro.

Based on this classification, of the 820 respondents, 151 were from urban aldeias, 117 were

from coastal aldeias, and 552 were from non-coastal areas (Table B in Appendix 2).

Data from Oecussi district, covering coastal and non-coastal areas, were included in the

analysis even though it did not cover the whole district due to the survey constraints for

Oecussi described in section 2.1.3. The area type comparison, based on urban/coastal/non-

coastal, describes the condition regardless of the districts. Therefore the Oecussi results were

still included in this area type analysis.

Page 19: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

19

2.2 Qualitative

The qualitative study was conducted in all districts: Dili, Baucau, Bobonaro, Covalima, and

Oecussi. It included two data collection methods: Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) and In-

depth Interviews (IDIs). The two methods were employed independently with some overlap

among participants.

The standard FGDs normally required 6-12 participants to discuss relevant issues facilitated

by a moderator and recorded by a dedicated note-taker. Participants had been selected from

respondents to questionnaires as being information rich. In two FGDs there were only 3-5

participants, but the participants were especially information rich. Typically each FGD lasted

1 to 1.5 hours with several short breaks to energise participants. FGDs included an

introductory session to arouse participation followed by easy-to-respond questions

(experiential questions). When all participants were comfortable, more analytical questions

were asked.

FGDs were undertaken in all districts. FGDs were held at community level (aldeia/suco) with

the teams facilitating 2-4 FGDs at each location. Most participants included lay persons and

poor families.

Although FGDs were only undertaken at aldeia/suco level, IDIs were conducted both at

community level and at decision-making (i.e. district) level. The study team completed four

IDIs in each district with selected FGD participants, local MAF/DFO (District Fishery

Office) and household members. For deeper understanding of salient issues, each informant

was interviewed several times with each session lasting 30 to 60 minutes. At community

level, some IDI informants were participants in FGDs who had demonstrated richer

knowledge on relevant issues, such as cultural matters regarding fish consumption. At

decision-making or district level, interviews were held with key informants at local offices

(District Fisheries Offices).

Topics of discussions in the FGDs were designed to support the topics of questions addressed

in the quantitative questionnaire, i.e. occupation; daily activities; daily household expenses;

daily menu; fish and meat consumption; aspects of culture, and traditions within communities

related to fish and meat consumption.

The locations, types and number of participants of FGDs and IDIs are shown in Table 2-2.

Table 2-2. Locations and participants of FGDs and IDIs

District Subdistrict Type Participants No. of

participants

Baucau Vemase FGD Male farmers 7

Buruma IDI Housewife, farmer 1

Dili Bidau Lisidere FGD Mainly housewives, adult females 10

Page 20: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

20

District Subdistrict Type Participants No. of

participants

Lisidere and

Capella FGD

Fishers, unemployed, retired person

and housewives 10

Comoro, Dili city IDI Housewife 1

Bidao, Dili city IDI Housewife of expatriate 1

Dili city IDI Housewife, restaurant owner 1

Cili city IDI Male expatriate, development

organisation 1

Bobonaro

Batugade, Balibo FGD Fishers (2 fisher groups) 14

n/a IDI Local staff of development

organisation 1

Covalima

Maudemo, Suai FGD Housewives, farmers 3

Cassa Bauk, Suai IDI Housewife, farmer, wife of teacher 1

n/a IDI Local staff of development

organisation 1

Oecussi

Oesono FGD Housewives, some fishing helpers

and reef gleaners 5

Oesilo IDI Camat (subdistrict head) 1

Pante Makasar IDI Housewife, fishing and farming 1

Oenoah, Bobometo,

Oesilo IDI

Housewife, farmer, wife of suco

chief 1

Hoineno,

Bobometo, Oesilo IDI Housewife, farmer 1

Noapai, Kunha,

Pante Makasar IDI Civil servant, wife 1

Bonemese,

Naimeco, Pante

Makasar

IDI Housewife, wife of suco chief 1

Baki, Naimeco,

Pante Makasar IDI Housewife, farmer 1

Bausiu, Nipani,

Pante Makasar IDI Housewife, wife of aldeia chief 1

Information gained from qualitative surveys, such as livelihood activities and other general

activities, reinforced the findings of the quantitative survey covering similar issues. Other

important issues from the FGDs and IDIs, although not directly linked to the quantitative

survey results, informed sources of variation on fish and meat consumption patterns within

households and communities.

2.3 Enumerators

The enumerator teams that conducted the field work consisted of students from Universidade

Nacional Timor Lorosa'e (UNTL) who spoke both Tetum and Bahasa Indonesia. Fluency in

Tetum was important because most respondents were more comfortable with this language.

Bahasa Indonesia was used in training sessions and in supervision because some field teams

came from Indonesia. The minimum education level of an enumerator was a diploma degree.

To ensure adequate skills for the survey activities, a two-day training course with practical

Page 21: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

21

sessions was conducted for the enumerators. This included training in the conduct of

interviews, random selection of respondents and survey coordination.

Quality Control was applied at several levels:

Observation during the enumerator training session to ensure level of skill (all

participants were observed);

Cross checking and spot checking during field work (10% of all questionnaires were

checked);

Checking of data entry (100% of completed filled questionnaires were checked); and

Double check of electronic database entries (10% of entries were checked).

2.4 Questionnaire

The questionnaire was developed by the consultant team and revised by RFLP together with a

research advisory board comprised of five selected UNTL professors. UNTL input into the

survey design was considered important as it was engaged as the principal education

organisation in country in the survey process to advise on particularities and potential

constraints while doing quantitative research in Timor-Leste. Before implementation of the

survey, the questionnaire was also tested through a pilot survey of 29 respondents in Dili to

check for appropriate wording and to ensure easy understanding of the questions by

respondents. On average, each interview took 60 to 90 minutes to complete. Respondents

were advised of the expected duration of interview before starting as part of the informed

consent part of the questionnaire. There were no objections regarding the duration of the

interview.

2.5 Data analysis of the collective result related to Oecussi district

During the initial analysis, it became apparent that the results from Oecussi were distorting

the average results of the survey for some issues. They were accordingly excluded from the

overall analysis of consumption levels. However due to the high representativeness (70%) of

Oecussi sample of total population of Oecussi district (see section 2.1.3), Oecussi district

results were included when generating a collective result in many cases. They are included in

the rest of the analysis where notice is given (patterns of consumption, type of animal protein

and others). However, caution must be used regarding the results from Oecussi in order to

avoid erroneous interpretations and extrapolations. When analysis uses categorisation of

urban/coastal/non-coastal the Oecussi results were included to generate the collective results

as the essence of the analysis lies in the characteristics of respondents, based on the area type,

not on the district where they live.

In this report, all collective results were generated mainly from 5-district results. Where 4-

district collective results are considered a more accurate interpretation on the subjects or the

variables, the exclusion of Oecussi is mentioned in the texts, figures and tables.

Page 22: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

22

3 DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE

This section describes the main demographic features of the surveyed respondents in terms of

age and gender distribution, household size and marital status, educational achievement,

occupation, asset ownership, and monthly income.

3.1 Population profile

The District of Dili had the greatest population density (479 people/km2) and Covalima

District the least (44 people/km2). Oecussi which is an enclave district separated from the

mainland of Timor-Leste had the smallest household size (4.7) of all Districts (Table 3-1).

Table 3-1. Population Profile (Census 2010)

District name Baucau Dili Bobonaro Covalima Oecussi

Number of subdistrict 6 6 6 7 4

Number of suco 59 31 50 30 18

Number of aldeia 281 241 193 147 61

Average household size

(number of people)

5.2 6.7 5.4 5.4 4.7

Number of household 21,439 34,975 16,627 11,123 13,941

Population size 111,484 234,331 89,787 60,063 65,524

Density (people/km2) 66.9 478.8 60.7 44.1 70.8

3.2 Age distribution

Most respondents (46.7%) were aged between 30–44 years and only a very small portion

(2.8%) were senior citizens (aged 65 or older) (Fig. 3-1). Some 22.1% were aged between 17-

29 years, and 28.4% were aged between 45 and 64 years. Younger respondents were more

prominent in Oecussi (26%), Dili (25%) and Bobonaro (24.6%) (Fig. 3-2).

Figure 3-1. Age distribution of respondents

22.1

46.7

28.4

2.8

0

10

20

30

40

50

17-24 Y 30-44 Y 45-64 Y 65+

Page 23: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

23

Figure 3-2. Age distribution of respondents by district

The greatest frequency of young respondents was in urban areas (Fig. 3-3).

Figure 3-3. Age distribution by urban-coastal categorisation

3.3 Marital status

Most respondents (85.7%) were married and only 6.5% were single. About 7.2% were

widows and 0.6% were divorcees. Oecussi had the largest percentage of married respondents

(96%) and Dili and Bobonaro had the lowest (83%) (Fig. 3-4).

12.8

25 24.6 20

26

45.7 46.1 44.8 48.9 51

36.6

26.5 29.1

26.7 22

4.9 2.4 1.5

4.4 1.0

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

BAUCAU DILLI BOBONARO COVALIMA OECUSSE

17-24 Y

30-44 Y

45-64 Y

65+

Page 24: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

24

Figure 3-4. Marital status of respondents.

The distribution based on urban-coastal-non-coastal classification reveals similar marital

status (Fig. 3-5).

Figure 3-5. Marriage status of respondents by district

3.4 Household size

Most respondents belonged to households of five members or greater (up to 22 members).

Only 22.6% of respondents came from small size households (1 – 4 persons) (Fig. 3-6).

85.7

6.5 0.6 7.2

MARRIED

NOT MARRIED/SINGLE

DIVORCE

WIDOW

Page 25: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

25

Figure 3-6. Percentage of respondents by household size (N = 820)

Across all districts there were a mean of 7.0 people per household, but Baucau and Dili were

positively skewed towards larger household sizes (Fig. 3-7).

Figure 3-7. Distribution of household size by total (left) and by district (right)

Among districts, the smallest household size was in Oecussi (5.6) and the highest was in Dili

(7.9) (Table 3-2). The mean household sizes showed a similar trend to Census 2010 data, but

were significantly higher than that of the Census data.

Table 3-2. Average household size by district (survey result and census)

Number of people Baucau Dili Bobonaro Covalima Oecussi Total

Mean 7.01 7.87 6.19 5.98 5.58 6.96

Std. Dev. 3.19 3.47 2.35 2.15 1.97 3.1

N 163 342 131 88 96 820

Average household size

(Census 2010) 5.2 6.7 5.4 5.4 4.7

The District of Dili, being urban, had large household sizes (> 7 members). Results for other

categories are shown in Figure 3-8. When coastal and non-coastal areas are compared, large

households, with more than 7 people, tended to exist more in the non-coastal area (36%).

22.6

39.6 37.8

1 - 4 persons 5 - 7 persons 8 persons or

more

Page 26: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

26

Figure 3-8. Household size of respondents based on urban-coastal-non-coastal categorisation

3.5 Gender distribution of population

The gender distribution in the 5 districts derived from Census 2010 shows males 51-52% of

the population in productive age groups. The percentage number of men was lower than

women for old age groups (> 65 years) (Fig. 3-9).

Figure 3-9. Age distribution of population by gender and by district

51%

52% 52%

49% 49%

48% 48%

51%

15-29 Y 30-44 Y 45-64 Y 65+

Male Female

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Mal

e

Fem

ale

Mal

e

Fem

ale

Mal

e

Fem

ale

Mal

e

Fem

ale

Mal

e

Fem

ale

Baucau Bobonaro Dili Covalima Oecussi

15-29 Y

30-44 Y

45-64 Y

65+

Page 27: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

27

Table 3-3. Gender comparison of population by age group and by district

District Gender Age Group

15-29 Y 30-44 Y 45-64 Y 65 +

Baucau Male 49% 49% 50% 48%

Female 51% 51% 50% 52%

Bobonaro Male 48% 49% 49% 50%

Female 52% 51% 51% 50%

Dili Male 53% 57% 55% 47%

Female 47% 43% 45% 53%

Covalima Male 48% 50% 51% 50%

Female 52% 50% 49% 50%

Oecussi Male 47% 48% 51% 50%

Female 53% 52% 49% 50%

When comparing the ratio between men and women in each age group among districts, the

percentage of women were slightly higher than that of men in the age group of 15-29 years

old, except for Dili where men were proportionally greater than women (Table 3-3).

Most of the respondents to the survey were women. In almost all cases, based on the

questionnaire test, they were considered more information rich than men in regards to food

consumption in the households. This was especially so for housewives, who formed the

majority in the women respondents, and traditionally undertake most of the household

activities related to cooking or preparing meals for their families. This was confirmed by

discussions and interviews within FGDs and IDIs. Therefore most women could be

considered to be knowledgeable of household food consumption patterns.

Table 3-4. Distribution of gender in the sample

Respondent categorisation Sex

Total Male Female

By District

Baucau 1 162 163

Dili 5 337 342

Bobonaro 0 131 131

Covalima 0 88 88

Oecussi 0 96 96

Total 6 814 820

By Area Type

Urban 0 156 156

Coastal 1 116 117

Non-coastal 5 542 547

Total 6 814 820

Page 28: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

28

Section 4.1 explains how the survey data was extrapolated to make women respondents

representative of the whole survey respondents for animal-protein consumption levels.

3.6 Religion

The distribution of religious affiliation of the respondents showed that all districts except Dili

were Catholic. Dili respondents were 97.7% Catholic, 1.5% Other Christian and 0.6%

Moslem.

As most respondents were Catholic, it was difficult to ascribe meat and fish consumption

patterns to religion. Most respondents ate chicken and marine (seawater/saltwater) fish.

Catholic and Christian respondents ate more pork than beef. A large number of respondents

also ate eggs (Table 3-5).

Table 3-5. Meat or fish consumed grouped by religion of respondents

Kind of meat or fish consumed

Total

Religion

Ch

ick

en

Lam

b/

go

at

Po

rk

Bee

f

Bu

ffal

o/b

eef

Fre

shw

ater

fis

h

Mar

ine

fish

Eg

gs

Dee

r

Do

g

Ho

rse

Dri

ed f

ish

Catholic 714 355 571 480 407 179 624 533 4 7 2 13 756

Christian 5 2 4 4 3 1 4 5 0 1 1 0 5

Moslem 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2

Other 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1

Total 722 360 576 485 411 180 631 539 4 8 3 13 764

3.7 Education level

At least 66% of the respondents that were interviewed attended school, whereas the rest

(34%) did not have any formal education3 (Fig. 3-10). Of those who had attended school,

39% went to elementary school, although only half of them (20%) graduated. Of those 36.8%

respondents who attended high school, 30.9% graduated (Fig. 3-11).

3 If Oecussi is excluded, the percentage of respondents that attended school is 67%, which is similar to the

average of 5 districts (66%).

Page 29: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

29

Figure 3-10. Percentage of schooling experience (N = 820)

Figure 3-11. Level of education (N = 820)

Among districts, Dili had the highest number of educated respondents (88%). As most

Oecussi respondents were located in the Pante Makasar subdistrict, where the capital city of

Oecussi is located, there is a relatively high proportion of school experience among

respondents (62%). The other three districts had similar proportions of schooling (56%) (Fig.

3-12).

Figure 3-12. School experience of respondents by district

66.0

34.0

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

YES NO

18.7

19.8

7.0

14.8

5.9

30.9

0.2

1.1

0.6

1.1

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

ELEMENTARY NOT COMPLETED

ELEMENTARY COMPLETED

JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL NOT COMPLETED

JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL COMPLETED

SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL NOT COMPLETED

SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL COMPLETED

DIPLOMA NOT COMPLETED

DIPLOMA COMPLETED

BACHELOR NOT COMPLETED

BACHELOR COMPLETED

Page 30: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

30

Urban-coastal classification (whilst excluding Oecussi) shows that non-coastal respondents

had the highest percentage of non-schooling (39%) followed by coastal respondents (32%)

(Fig. 3-13).

Figure 3-13. School experience of respondents by urban-coastal categorisation (excluding Oecussi)

In total only 31% of respondents completed high school and only 27% completed elementary

school. 19% of respondents did not complete or attend elementary school (Fig.3-14). These

percentages were almost equal to the averages of the 4 districts (excluding Oecussi district),

e.g. elementary school not completed 17%, junior high school completed 21% and senior

high school completed 32%.

Figure 3-14. Completion of school education

Page 31: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

31

When districts were compared, school-drop-out percentages were generally high in

elementary school. Drop-out rates declined from elementary to senior high school (Fig. 3-15).

It should be noted, however, that data reflect mainly adult women respondents.

Figure 3-15. Percentage of drop-out status of respondents in the past

3.8 Occupation

Most of the main income earners in the respondent households (64.4%) worked to earn their

living (Fig. 3-16), including occupations such as farmer (56.8%), shop/kiosk owner (10%),

and teacher (7.6%) (Table 3-6). Almost a half (48.9%) of those working had a second

occupation.

Figure 3-16. Percentage of work force (N = 820)

Table 3-6. Main job/occupation in respondent’s household (N = 528)

Occupation Percentage

Teacher 7.6

Lecturer 0.2

Director 0.4

Medical doctor/animal doctor 0.2

PNTL/F-FDTL employee 2.5

61%

43%

20%

0%

38%

27%

14% 20%

33%

53%

38%

25%

35%

21% 21%

0%

53%

33%

18%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Elementary S Junior HS Senior HS Diploma Bachelor

Schooling drop-out status of respondents (by district)

BAUCAU

DILI

BOBONARO

COVALIMA

OECUSSI

64.4

35.6

YES NO

Page 32: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

32

Occupation Percentage

Public servant 7.2

Farmer 56.8

Fisher 0.4

Farm worker 0.6

Market/shop worker 1.3

Building worker 0.9

Seller at market/mall/shop 1.3

Informal vendor 3.6

Kiosk/small shop owner 10.0

Seaweed farmer 0.2

Processed fish vendor/seller 0.2

Tailor 0.6

Home industry /handicraft 1.9

Staff at private company 2.8

In all districts farmer was the most common occupation within the households of respondents

(Table 3-7). There were very few fishers because the data reflect the survey areas, which

include non-coastal and urban, as well as coastal areas.

Table 3-7. Distribution of jobs in districts

Occupation Percentage per district

Baucau Dili Bobonaro Covalima Oecussi Total

Teacher 5.2 9.6 4.4 6.6 11.1 7.6

Lecturer - 0.5 - - - 0.2

Director - 1.0 - - - 0.4

Medical doctor/animal doctor 0.9 - - - - 0.2

PNTL/F-FDTL employee - 6.1 - 1.6 - 2.5

Public servant 5.2 13.2 2.2 3.3 3.2 7.2

Farmer 80.2 25.4 73.6 78.7 66.7 56.8

Fisher - 1.0 - - - 0.4

Farm worker 0.9 0.5 - - 1.6 0.6

Market/shop worker - 3.6 - - - 1.3

Building worker - 2.0 1.1 - - 0.9

Seller at market/mall/shop - 6.1 1.1 - - 1.3

Informal vendor 2.6 16.8 2.2 - 3.2 3.6

Kiosk/small shop owner 4.3 16.8 8.8 1.6 9.5 10.0

Seaweed farmer - 0.5 - - - 0.2

Processed fish vendor/seller 0.9 0.5 3.3 - - 0.2

Tailor*) - 1.5 - - - 0.6

Home industry /handicraft*) - 0.5 3.3 4.9 4.8 1.9

Staff at private company*) - 7.1 - 1.6 - 2.8

*): Other jobs collected during survey.

Of those earning relatively high incomes ($600 and $1,400), most were farmers, teachers and

public servants. However, owning a kiosk/small shop was a common second occupation

generating high income for the teachers.

Page 33: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

33

The documented occupations are probably not complete as other job categories were not

included in the questionnaire during the first survey trial. However occupations identified

during the survey included: tailor, home industry/handicraft and staff at a private company.

3.9 Ownership of cattle, boats and goods

Most respondents (>90%) owned their own homes. Many (75% of respondents) owned pigs

and chickens (Fig. 3-17).

Figure 3-17. Ownership of goods, cattle and boats

Ownership of livestock is common. However the survey did not quantify the numbers of

cattle and chickens owned and whether the cattle and chickens were consumed by the owners

or sold to generate income. The FGD/IDIs revealed that many respondents consumed meat

from their own livestock only when they held traditional family ceremonies. Some sold their

livestock to generate income and some sold them to pay back creditors or relatives from

which they had borrowed money.

Outside of Dili, most respondents (at least 83%) in the other 4 districts owned chickens and

pigs. In Dili only 52-58% owned chickens and pigs (Fig. 3-18).

13.3 20.7

4.5 0.7 0.5

35.1 34.1

22.8 18.5 14.0

8.8

62.3

91.5

27.4 35.7

76.0 76.8

2.0 0.2 2.2

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Page 34: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

34

Figure 3-18. Ownership of assets by district

In Bobonaro, Covalima and Oecussi districts more than half of the respondents surveyed

owned cows, whereas the proportion was lower in Dili (5%) and Baucau (20%) (Fig. 3-18).

More than 42% of respondents in the districts of Baucau, Bobonaro and Oecussi owned goats

or sheep (Fig. 3-18).

The percentage of boat owners across all districts is very low. In Bobonaro 5% of

respondents owned motorised boats. Covalima had 8% respondents who owned wooden row

boats. Only 1-2% of the respondents in all districts owned motorised boats, wooden sailboats

or wooden rowboats. These data reflected the survey areas, which were not only coastal, but

also non-coastal and urban.

3.10 Monthly income

Of all respondents, 64% worked for money in the month before the survey was conducted

(Fig. 3-19). This proportion was highest (69%) in non-coastal areas (Fig. 3-20).

6

48

92

20

49

93 96

14

77

87

5

20

52 58

6

60

93

54

43

93 85

4

60

97

54

31

91

83

2

42

97

53 59

91 91

9

62

91

27

36

76 77

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

TELEPHONE HANDPHONE OWN HOUSE COW GOAT/SHEEP PIG CHICKEN

Pe

rce

nt

Goods/house/animals/ownership

BAUCAU DILI BOBONARO COVALIMA OECUSSI All Districts

Page 35: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

35

Figure 3-19. Respondents worked for money a month before the survey (by district)

Figure 3-20. Respondents worked for money a month before the survey (by urban - coastal)

With the exception of Dili, more than 50% of respondents in each district lived on monthly

incomes of less than $100. Some 43% of respondents in Baucau lived on less than $50 per

month, as did 34% of respondents in Bobonaro and 28% of respondents in Covalima (Fig. 3-

21).

Figure 3-21. Monthly income (USD), by district

71%

59%

68% 68% 63%

29%

41%

32% 32% 37%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

BAUCAU DILI BOBONARO COVALIMA OECUSSI

Last month worked for money (by district)

YES

NO

56% 53%

69%

44% 47%

31%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

URBAN COASTAL NON COASTAL

Last month worked for money

YES

NO

43

10

34

28 24 24

30

17

35 33

38

27

20

34

19

28

23 27

7

25

8 9 13

15 14

4 2 2

7

0

10

20

30

40

50

BAUCAU DILI BOBONARO COVALIMA OECUSSI All Districts

Pe

rce

nt

Monthly income

<$50 $50-99 $100-199 $200-399 ≥$400

Page 36: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

36

When Oecussi is excluded from the collective results of the average percentages of 4 districts

were almost the same: 24% for income <$50, 25% for $50-99, 27% for $100-399, 16% for

$200-399 and 8% for ≥$400. They were thus not much difference between the average

percentages of all 5 districts.

A comparison of income against stated occupations of the main-income earners in the

households, revealed farming to be most important followed by owning a kiosk/small shop at

home (Fig.3-22).

Figure 3-22. Income level groups versus type of main job

As expected the highest income groups were mostly in Dili. The lowest income groups were

mostly found in Baucau (73%), followed by Bobonaro (68%) (Fig. 3-23).

Figure 3-23. Average income groups by district

43.3%

9.9%

33.3%

27.3% 24.0%

29.9%

16.9%

34.8% 33.0%

37.5%

11.0%

14.8%

10.6%

20.5% 18.8%

.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%

BAUCAU DILI BOBONARO COVALIMA OECUSSI

Average income groups ($) by district

below $50

$50 - $99

$100 - $149

$150 - $199

$200 - $249

$250 - $299

$300 - $349

$350 - $399

$400 or more

Page 37: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

37

The highest income groups occurred in urban areas and the lowest income groups occurred in

coastal and non-coastal areas (Fig. 3-24).

Figure 3-24. Average income groups by urban-coastal categorization

9.0%

19.7%

29.1%

15.5%

28.2%

29.6%

14.8%

20.5%

13.0%

17.4% 15.4%

10.4%

16.8%

5.1% 4.8%

.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

URBAN COASTAL NON COASTAL

Average income groups ($) by urban-coastal

below $50

$50 - $99

$100 - $149

$150 - $199

$200 - $249

$250 - $299

$300 - $349

$350 - $399

$400 or more

Page 38: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

38

4 ANIMAL MEAT OR FISH CONSUMPTION IN TIMOR-LESTE

This section presents the key findings of the survey, analysed by district and by type of area

category (urban, coastal, and non-coastal).

4.1 Household consumption behaviour

It was considered important in this study to extend the stated fish consumption patterns of the

respondent to other household members. The respondents surveyed were mostly woman and

were usually housewives. The predominance of women in the sample was mainly caused by

(i) them being the available adult at home during the day when the surveys were conducted

and (ii) them being nominated by the household as competent to answer the full range of

questions.

To achieve this broader understanding of household consumption, various questions were

asked concerning (i) meal time habits and organisation and (ii) part-of-fish preferences based

on gender/age. The volume and frequency of meat or fish consumed was related to a per-meal

consumption level. Importantly, nearly all respondents surveyed (98%) stated that all family

members in their households ate meat or fish. Though patterns of fish consumption varied

among family members there was no clear evidence that there was any significant imbalance

in consumption shares between household members. For eating order, various respondents

suggested instances where one group (older, head, child) regularly ate first. For quantities

eaten, only a few respondents considered that elder/men received larger portions, but these

results were generally below the confidence interval (Fig. 4-1).

Figure 4-1. The way family members eat fish or seafood

Page 39: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

39

Parts of the fish consumed (head, trunk, tail) varied among men and women, but there was no

evidence that the total volume consumed was differentiated (Fig. 4-2).

Figure 4-2. Part of fish eaten by male and female members in the household

Fish consumption patterns were similar, independent of age (Fig. 4-3); there were no

significant differences in the range 17 years to over 65 years of age. Based on the consistency

of the data (see chapter 4.1), similar consumption patterns could be attributed to children

under 17 years old.

Figure 4-3. Part of fish eaten by age of respondent

Thus the survey results, although based on consumption patterns stated mostly by women,

can be considered to be generally representative of consumption patterns for the rest of the

members of the household.

4.2 Frequency of meat or fish consumption

Among all districts surveyed, 77% (76% exclusive of Oecussi) of respondents stated that they

consumed animal protein at parties or at traditional events and 48% (44% exclusive of

Page 40: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

40

Oecussi) had fish or meat with everyday meals. This pattern varied among districts and

among categories (urban, coastal, non-coastal) (Fig. 4-4).

Figure 4-4. When people have meal with fish or meat (by district and by urban-coastal)

In general, 45.8% of all respondents ate meat or fish4 as part of their everyday meals. About

18% ate meat or fish once a week and 15.5% of respondents ate meat or fish occasionally

(Fig. 4-5). Some 12.2% of respondents stated that they ate no meat or fish and consumed only

vegetable-based protein (Fig. 4-5).

4“Meat or fish” means that consumption of at least one of them is considered as true (answer: Yes) for both meat

or fish. But the answer yes for “meat or fish” gives non information on either the quantity or which one is eaten

more than the other. The focus of the question was whether respondents or household members consumed any

source of animal protein.

Page 41: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

41

Figure 4-5. Frequency of consumption of meat/fish protein

These frequency data were also corroborated by responses to other questions related to

consumption habits.

Surprisingly, those reporting that they did not remember the last time they consumed meat or

fish was quite high (8% of all respondents) (Fig. 4-6).

Baucau showed the highest percentage where people did not eat meat or fish at all (Fig. 4-6).

Figure 4-6. Past frequency of eating meat/fish by district (percent)

Unsurprisingly, there was a significant difference in daily animal protein consumption pattern

between respondents in coastal areas (67.2%) compared with those in urban (51.7%) and

non-coastal areas (39.8%). More people in coastal areas included animal protein in their daily

consumption, because in addition to meat, fish was readily available (Fig. 4-7).

Consumption of animal meat in urban areas was higher than in non-coastal areas, because

respondents reported that it was easier to purchase meat/fish in urban markets (Fig. 4-7).

Access to markets was more limited in non-coastal areas.

45.8

18.2

3.0 5.3

15.5 12.2

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Everyday Weekly Twice a month Monthly Occasionally No meat/fish at all

Pe

rce

nt

17.7

3.0

7.5 6.7 8.2

15.6 14.9

12.5

26.7 24.6

42.7

53.7

45.0

56.7

50.8

12.5

20.9 22.5

10.0

16.4

11.5 7.5

12.5

BAUCAU DILI BOBONARO COVALIMA OECUSSI

WITHIN THE LAST 2 WEEKS WITHIN THIS MONTH

MORE THAN A MONTH AGO DO NOT REMEMBER

DO NOT EAT ANY MEAT/FISH

Page 42: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

42

Figure 4-7. Frequency of animal protein consumption by area

Figure 4-8. Frequency of animal protein consumption (by district)

Animal protein was consumed daily by 30-34% of respondents in Bobonaro and Covalima.

Consumption of animal protein was greater in Dili (49%), Oecussi (52%), and Baucau (54%)

(Fig. 4-8).

The percentage of respondents who did not eat animal protein was the lowest in Oecussi

(3%). However, survey results cannot be considered to be representative of the District as a

whole. Rather, the survey results reflected only Pante Makasar and Oesilo subdistricts.

Respondents from Oecussi reported a high frequency of animal protein consumption daily,

when compared with other districts. The aldeias of Oecussi surveyed represented mostly

coastal areas where most (67%) of respondents consumed both fish and meat every day.

FGD data from Oesilo subdistrict revealed that some communities in several aldeias (e.g.

Sifin aldeia in Usitasae suco, Kuibaselo aldeia and Tumun aldeia in Bobometo suco) did not

consume fish and other aquatic animals. This reflects cultural norms whereby respondents

believe that eating aquatic animals is harmful. Similarly, one community lineage (Manu clan)

abstained from consuming chicken and eggs because of perceived danger.

51.7

24.5

6.0 1.3

9.9 6.6

67.2

17.2

3.4 2.6 4.3 5.2

39.6

16.7

2.0 7.0

19.4 15.2

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

Everyday Weekly Twice a month

Monthly Occasionally Do not eat fish/ meat

Pe

rce

nt

URBAN COASTAL NON COASTAL

54.0

8.1 3.1

9.3

25.5

48.7

22.1

5.3 4.4

12.4

7.1

30.5

19.1

1.5

7.6

26.7

14.5

34.1

20.5

3.4 5.7

20.5

15.9

52.1

17.7

2.1

8.3

16.7

3.1

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

Everyday Weekly Twice a month

Monthly Occasionally Do not eat fish/meat

BAUCAU

DILI

BOBONARO

COVALIMA

OECUSSI

Page 43: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

43

4.3 Types of protein consumed

Chicken was the preferred meat consumed in Timor-Leste (54.1%), followed by saltwater

(marine) fish/other seafood (14.4%), eggs (11.9%), and pork (7.6%). Other sources of animal

protein were of less importance, i.e. below 5% of total animal meat consumed (Table 4-1).

Table 4-1. Type of meal consumed

Types of meal # of respondents

of 5 districts

% of 5 districts % of 4 districts

(exclusive Oecussi)

Chicken 413 54.1 58.0

Salt water fish/other seafood 110 14.4 14.1

Eggs 90 11.9 12.0

Pork 58 7.6 7.3

Beef 36 4.8 3.1

Buffalo (carabao)/beef 33 4.3 3.2

Fresh water fish 9 1.2 1.2

Lamb/goat 6 0.8 0.8

Others 3 0.4 0.5

Total 763 100.0 100.0

When analysed by areas (urban, coastal and non coastal), fish consumption was the highest in

coastal areas (45%), followed by chicken (32.4%), eggs (11.7%) and pork (6.3%). Chicken

was the preferred source of animal protein consumed in both urban (68.7%) and non-coastal

area (54.9%) (Table 4-2).

Table 4-2. Type of animal protein consumed (urban, coastal and non-coastal areas)

Protein Type Urban

(%)

Coastal

(%)

Non-Coastal

(%)

Weighted

Average

(%)

Chicken 68.7 32.4 54.9 54.4

Lamb/goat - 1.8 0.8 0.8

Pork 4.0 6.3 9.1 7.7

Beef 2.7 0.9 6.2 4.7

Buffalo 2.0 1.8 5.6 4.4

Fresh water fish (from river/lake) - - 1.8 1.2

Salt water fish and other seafood 6.7 45.0 10.1 14.5

Eggs 14.7 11.7 11.3 12.0

Others 1.3 - 0.2 0.4

Total 100 100 100 100

A comparison of consumption patterns among the five districts showed that chicken and pork

were the main source of animal protein, followed by beef and water buffalo. Other than

chicken, marine fish was favoured in Covalima (23%), followed by Dili (17%), Oecussi

(17%), Bobonaro (9%), with Baucau showing the lowest proportion (7%). People in Oecussi

consumed more pork, beef, and buffalo meat than other animal protein sources in Baucau,

Covalima, and Dili. Pork consumption (19%), however, was the highest in Bobonaro. Egg

consumption was lowest in Bobonaro (6%) compared with Covalima (10%), Oecussi (11%),

Page 44: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

44

Baucau (14%) and Dili (14%) (Fig. 4-9). Although very few respondents consumed them

“Others” included turtle, dog and horse meat.

Figure 4-9. Types of animal protein consumed (by district)

4.4 Types of fish/seafood usually consumed

The species or types of seafood most frequently consumed were: sardine (58%), longtail tuna

(36%), kombong/mackerel (23%), snapper (23%) and prawn (22%) (Table 4-3). Respondents

from Baucau and Bobonaro consumed relatively low amounts of snapper and mackerel. It is

not known whether this reflected the supply of fish at the time of the survey or the

preferences of the consumers in these districts (Table 4-3).

Table 4-3. Species of fish/seafood consumed by district (% within district)

Type Baucau Dili Bobonaro Covalima Oecussi All

Districts

4

districts

(excl.

Oecussi)

Sardina/Sardine 74.1 (1) 49.7 (1) 81.2 (1) 41.0 (2) 53.8 (2) 58.1 58.8

Longtail Tuna 44.4 (2) 31.8 (3) 42.6 (2) 32.8 (3) 37.4 (3) 36.3 36.1

Kombong/Mackerel 16.7 15.9 5.0 52.5 (1) 59.3 (1) 23.4 17.9

Snapper 10.2 36.1 (2) 5.0 8.2 19.8 22.5 23.0

Prawn 21.3 (3) 26.7 15.8 (3) 19.7 17.6 22.3 23.1

Daun/Long Tom 5.6 10.8 13.9 (3) 37.7 (2) 12.1 13.0 13.2

Squid 2.8 15.9 1.0 4.9 2.2 8.7 9.7

Terbang/Flying Fish 11.1 7.4 6.9 16.4 2.2 8.1 9.0

Crab 7.4 9.8 3.0 6.6 6.6 7.7 7.8

Koku/Bubara/Trevally 1.9 8.4 0.0 9.8 2.2 5.4 5.9

Kitan/Spinefoot 0.0 7.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 4.0

Tuna 0.9 6.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 3.8

59

3 7

1

9

1 7

14

0

60

0 3 2 2 0

17 14

1

56

0

19

8 2 2

9 6

0

48

0

7 4 1

6

23

10

0

31

1

11 16

11

1

17 11

0 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Pe

rce

nt

BAUCAU DILI BOBONARO COVALIMA OECUSSI

Page 45: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

45

Type Baucau Dili Bobonaro Covalima Oecussi All

Districts

4

districts

(excl.

Oecussi)

Snail 1.9 5.1 1.0 1.6 0.0 2.9 3.4

Goldfish 1.9 0.0 6.9 4.9 3.3 2.2 2.1

Anchovies 0.0 1.7 2.0 1.6 3.3 1.7 1.4

Catfish 5.6 0.0 4.0 1.6 0.0 1.6 1.9

Oyster/Clam 0.9 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 1.4

Grouper 0.9 1.4 1.0 0.0 1.1 0.5 0.5

Others 0.9 1.4 1.0 0.0 1.1 1.1 1.1

Note: Table is sorted based on collective results for all 5 districts. The ranks 1 to 3 given in parentheses are

based on the highest percentages (grouped approximately to closest values).

Sardines were the most consumed fish in Bobonaro, Baucau and Dili, whereas

mackerel/kombong (Scombridae) was the most consumed fish in Covalima and Oecussi

(Table 4-3). The percentage of respondents who consumed sardine and mackerel in Oecussi

was relatively high (54% and 60%, respectively). The percentage of respondents consuming

long tail tuna/tongkol was relatively high in all districts. Prawn consumption was quite high

in Baucau and Bobonaro (21% and 16% respectively).

Table 4-4. Species of fish/seafood consumed by area (% within area)

Type/Species Urban Coastal Non-Coastal Total

Sardina/Sardine 55.1 (1) 42.6 (1) 63.0 (1) 58.1

Kakap/Snapper 44.9 (2) 30.0 (2) 13.0 22.5

Kombong/Mackerel 16.7 34.3 (2) 23.1 (3) 23.4

Tongkol/Longtail Tuna 34.8 (3) 39.2 (1) 36.1 (2) 36.3

Terbang/Flying Fish 7.2 8.7 8.2 8.1

Kitan/Spinefoot 1.4 9.1 2.7 3.4

Daun/Long Tom 11.6 4.9 15.5 13.0

Tuna/Tuna 9.4 1.0 1.7 3.3

Kerapu/Grouper 1.4 0.0 0.2 0.5

Koku/Bubara/Trevally 5.1 15.7 3.0 5.4

Lele/Catfish 0.0 0.0 2.6 1.6

Teri/Anchovies 0.0 0.0 2.6 1.7

Ikan Mas/Goldfish 0.0 1.9 3.1 2.2

Prawn 30.4 (3) 38.6 (1) 15.6 22.3

Crab 8.0 15.9 5.5 7.7

Squid 18.8 21.0 (3) 2.2 8.7

Snail 0.7 12.1 1.5 2.9

Oyster/Clam 1.4 1.0 1.2 1.2

Other 0.7 1.0 1.2 1.1

Note: The ranks 1 to 3 given in parentheses are based on the highest percentages (grouped approximately to

closest values).

Page 46: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

46

Figure 4-10. Species of fish/seafood consumed (% by area)

A comparison of fish consumption patterns by areas within districts showed that sardines

were the most consumed fish in all three areas, with non-coastal as the highest (63%).

Snapper (kakap) consumption was highest in the urban area (Dili), whereas prawns were

consumed mostly by coastal and urban people (Fig. 4-10).

FGD respondents informed that squid, prawn and crabs were infrequently consumed because

of their high price in comparison to fish. Market availability was also stated as a factor

influencing consumption frequency.

In Dili, where most supermarkets offer imported frozen fish, one IDI respondent reported that

the price of frozen fish was lower than the price of fresh fish. The price of frozen fish also

varies according to supply and demand of fresh fish.

4.5 Cooking preferences for fish/seafood

There was little variation in cooking preferences among districts and area types. Deep frying

was the most popular way to cook fish/seafood in all districts, followed by grilling and

steaming (Fig. 4-11). Deep frying was also the preferred cooking method of respondents from

urban, coastal and non-coastal areas, followed by boiling and grilling fish/seafood (Fig. 4-

12).

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0

SARDINA

KOMBONG

TERBANG

DAUN

KERAPU

LELE

IKAN MAS

CRAB

SNAIL

Fish/seafood consumed in Urban, Coastal and Non Coastal Areas

NON COASTAL

COASTAL

URBAN

Page 47: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

47

Figure 4-11. Methods of preparing fish/seafood (by district)

Figure 4-12. Methods of preparing fish/seafood (by area)

4.6 Reasons for consuming fish/seafood

Most respondents (46%) reported the taste of fish as the main reason for consuming

fish/seafood (Fig. 4-13).

97.6 98.3 100.0 100.0 98.1

43.9 49.1

63.0 55.0

71.2

19.5 25.4

44.4 45.0

32.7

80.5

69.9 66.7

90.0

73.1

7.3 2.9

10.0

1.9 0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

BAUCAU DILI BOBONARO COVALIMA OECUSSE

Cooking methods (by district)

DEEP FRY

GRILL/BROIL

STEAM

BOIL

PUT IN OVEN/SMOKE

97.9

40.3

19.4

63.2

3.5

96.2

63.5

16.3

80.8

6.7

97.1

27.6

17.1

61.8

0.5

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

DEEP FRY GRILL/BROIL STEAM BOIL PUT IN OVEN/SMOKE

Cooking methods (by area)

URBAN

COASTAL

NON COASTAL

Page 48: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

48

Figure 4-13. What do you like about fish? (percentages based on all respondents = 100%)

This result was reflected by respondents in all districts (86-92%) who considered taste to be

the main reason for eating fish (Fig. 4-14).

Only 26% of respondents considered nutrition as a reason for preferring fish or seafood.

Similarly, only 14% of respondents chose to eat fish/seafood for health reasons (Fig. 4-14).

Figure 4-14. Reasons for consuming fish/seafood (%, by district)

92 86 86 89 90 88

12 17 16

11 7

14 10

33

21

30

21 26

3 4 5 3 3 7 9

5

18

8 4 2 2 4

7 6 6 5

51

40 39 38

63

45

0

20

40

60

80

100

BAUCAU DILI BOBONARO COVALIMA OECUSSI All Districts

Pe

rce

nt

Reasons for eating fish/seafood by Districts

THE TASTE FOR HEALTH NUTRITIOUS/HAVING PROTEIN INCREASE INTELLIGENCE

PRICE SMELL SHAPE FAMILY LIKES TO EAT IT

Page 49: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

49

Figure 4-15. Reasons for consuming fish/seafood (%, by area)

These consumption preferences were reflected in data from different areas (Fig. 4-15). Taste

and “family like to eat fish” were the primary reasons why people eat fish. Only respondents

from urban area (44%) chose fish because of its perceived nutrition/protein content (Fig. 4-

15).

4.7 Reasons for not consuming fish/seafood

Some 55% of all respondents declared they didn’t like the smell of the fish. Price was also

something that around 37% of respondents disliked (Fig. 4-16).

Figure 4-16. What is disliked about fish (percentages based on all respondents = 100%)

75.6

13.5

44.2

4.5 6.5 2.6 5.2

36.5

83.8

17.2 22.2

0.9 1.7 6.8

47.9

68.2

9.7 14.1

1.8 7.1

1.3 3.5

33.8

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

Reasons for eating fish in Urban, Coastal and Non Coastal Area

URBAN

COASTAL

NON COASTAL

Page 50: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

50

The criteria that respondents disliked about the fish were largely similar across urban, coastal

and non-coastal areas (Fig. 4-17).

Figure 4-17. What is disliked about fish (by urban-coastal)

However, when respondents are asked about the reasons for not consuming fish, the smell is

disregarded as a reason. On the contrary, price and availability remained consistently reported

as reasons limiting the consumption of fish and seafood. This result was corroborated in

FGDs and in in-depth interviews with qualitative survey respondents.

Some 53% of Bobonaro respondents considered fish/seafood to be too expensive, as did 43%

of Covalima respondents and 41% of Baucau respondents (Fig. 4-18).

At least 39% in each district of Baucau, Bobonaro and Covalima considered fish/seafood

availability in the market to be a constraint in consuming fish/seafood.

Distance to market was a negative factor influencing 16% of Covalima respondents in

consuming fish/seafood (Fig. 4-18).

Page 51: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

51

Figure 4-18. Reasons limiting consumption of fish/seafood

When tabulated against area categorisation it is obvious that availability in the market (56%)

was a bigger constraint in non-coastal areas than in urban and coastal area areas. This result

was also likely affected by the distance between home and market (12%). People in the urban

(94%) and coastal (94%) areas reported that the price prohibits consumption of fish/seafood

(Fig. 4-19). Surprisingly, respondents from coastal area also reported price as a negative

factor. Thus, levels of supply and market locations could still be limiting for people from

coastal areas. Dili was the district where many respondents (14%) avoided eating fish

because of negative perceptions of freshness (Fig. 4-19).

Figure 4-19. Reasons for not eating fish or seafood (by urban-coastal)

41%

35%

53%

43%

21%

39%

11%

40% 39%

29%

1% 1%

6% 3% 2%

13%

% 2% 5% 7%

16%

BAUCAU DILI BOBONARO COVALIMA OECUSSI

Reasons why people do not eat fish/seafood

EXPENSIVE

NOT AVAILABLE IN MARKET/NO ONE SELLS

DO NOT LIKE

DIFFICULT TO COOK

TASTE NOT GOOD

NOT FRESH

NOT GOOD FOR CHILDREN’S HEALTH

BRING BAD LUCK

FAR FROM MARKET/PASAR

Page 52: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

52

Results of FGDs and IDIs suggested that participants avoid processed fish because of

concerns of allergies and high blood pressure. It was unclear from the qualitative surveys if

these concerns were species specific. One case from an IDI showed a respondent who

avoided kombong (Scombridae/mackerel) fish even when fresh and even though the allergies

did not occur when she consumed frozen kombong.

It was quite common that older people reported avoiding fish consumption because they

believed that it would exacerbate high blood pressure. High blood pressure was also reported

as a reason for avoiding consumption of meat. However, it was unclear from the qualitative

surveys as to how widespread these health concerns were and whether they were a significant

deterrent to fish/meat consumption.

There are some customary/traditional practices governing the catching and consumption of

fish. Some groups in Oecussi, such as the Tano, Elo, Abi, Nusin, Nono and Abi Siki, avoid

fish because they believe that eating fish will bring them negative consequences. Some

respondents adhere strictly to this tradition, whereas others compromise by cooking fish

outside the house and/or not keeping the utensils used to cook fish in the house.

4.8 Sources of fish/seafood

Most respondents (72%, or 73% excluding Oecussi district) purchased fish/seafood at local

markets. 28% respondents purchased fish/seafood from peddlers. Many also indicated that

they purchased seafood through fish auctions (21%) and directly from fishers (20%).

However, because there were no fish auctions in Timor-Leste at the time of this survey, it

was likely that the respondents understood a fish auction to be a fish market where only fish

and other seafood were sold. It could also be understood to be a landing centre, where fishing

boats arrive and where respondents can buy fish from small traders or directly from fishers

(Fig. 4-20).

Figure 4-20. Sources of fish/seafood (by district)

12

35

14

2

15 21 22

7

30

9

29

16 20 21

89

64

74 78

65 72 73

1 5

0 0 0 2 3 1 8

2 8 5 5 6 5 6

2 7 4 5 5

0 6

0 1 0 3 3

16

27 34

22

47

28 25

BAUCAU DILI BOBONARO COVALIMA OECUSSI All 5 districts 4 districts (excl. Oecussi)

Pe

rcen

t

Where people source their fish/seafood

AT FISH AUCTION/LANDING CENTRE/COASTAL FISH MARKET DIRECT FROM FISHERMEN

AT THE MARKET AT FOOD VENDORS

FROM NEIGHBOURS FROM MY OWN CATCH AS FISHERMAN

BUY AT FOOD STALL (READY TO EAT) PEDDLERS

Page 53: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

53

Figure 4-21. Sources of fish/seafood (by area)

People from urban areas (i.e. Dili) bought their fish at the market (62%) and at the fish

auction/fish landing centre/coastal market (49%) (Fig. 4-21). People from coastal areas

bought fish directly from fishers (64%), but many (48%) reported that the market was also a

source of fish (Fig. 4-21). Most people (79%) from non-coastal areas bought fish from the

market. Small/mobile vendors were a significant source of seafood in all types of area serving

26-28% of respondents (Fig. 4-21).

4.9 Distance from sources of fish/seafood

Across all respondents, access to sources of fish/seafood was relatively evenly divided in

terms of ease and distance. Respondents having the best access, with sources nearby or within

30 minutes walk/ride, were those from Dili (49%) and Oecussi (40%). This high percentage

of Oecussi’s likely reflected respondents who lived closer to coastal areas and also close to

the capital city of Oecussi in Pante Makasar. Other districts were in the range 24-32% (Fig. 4-

22). Respondents having the greatest constraints of access to seafood were from Bobonaro,

where journeys of greater than one hour by public transport (40%) or by walking/bike (18%)

were required to buy fish from the market (Fig. 4-22).

49.0

21.8

62.2

5.2 5.2 5.2 9.0

26.5

6.8

64.1

47.9

0.9

15.4 12.8

2.6

28.2

15.9 10.1

79.0

1.6 3.3 3.3

0.5

27.7

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

Where do people source their fish/seafood (by area)

URBAN

COASTAL

NON COASTAL

Page 54: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

54

Figure 4-22. Distance/access to fish/seafood (by district)

Predictably, people in coastal areas bought fish very near to their home i.e. close by/next door

(36%), walk less than 30 minutes (29%), and walk between 30-60 minutes (21%) (Fig. 4-23).

This situation was similar in urban areas i.e. close by/next door (26%), walk less than 30

minutes (30%), and walk between 30-60 minutes (15%).

Those respondents living in non-coastal areas varied in access to fish/seafood. About half had

reasonable access i.e. close by/next door (16%), walk less than 30 minutes (10%), and walk

between 30-60 minutes (19%). But significant numbers reported difficulty in accessing

seafood, requiring travel by public transport for 30-60 minutes (17%) or more than one hour

(22%) (Fig. 4-23).

Figure 4-23. Distance/access to salt water fish/seafood (by area)

By district, 47% respondents in Dili reported that fish was always available in their market.

Daily availability of seafood in Covalima (20%) and Oecussi (19%) was much higher than

7

24 25

24 24

21

17

25

2

8

16 16

27

15

10 11

33

18 17

5

18

6 5

10

13

2

6 6

17

13

4

25

12 14

16

6

40

26

3

15

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

BAUCAU DILI BOBONARO COVALIMA OECUSSI All Districts

Pe

rce

nt

Distance from sources of fish/seafood (by district)

CLOSE BY/NEXT DOOR WALK/BICYCLE LESS THAN HALF AN HOUR

WALK/BICYCLE 30 – 60 MINUTE WALK/BICYCLE MORE THAN ONE HOUR

PUBLIC TRANSPORT LESS THAN 30 MINUTE PUBLIC TRANSPORT 30 – 60 MINUTES

PUBLIC TRANSPORT MORE THAN ONE HOUR

26.0 29.9

14.9

3.2

16.9

9.1

35.6

28.8

21.2

4.8 1.0

3.8 4.8

16.1

10.3

18.7

12.1

4.5

16.8

21.5

0.0 5.0

10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0

Distance from sources of fish/seafood (by area)

URBAN

COASTAL

NON COASTAL

Page 55: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

55

that of Baucau (10%) and Bobonaro (6%) (Fig. 4-24). Although Bobonaro had the lowest

daily availability of seafood, respondents from this district also reported irregular availability

(82%). Respondents from Oecussi reported weekly availability (18%), but this could reflect

the respondents’ locations, which were close to its capital city (Fig. 4-24).

Figure 4-24. Availability of fish/seafood at the market the respondent goes to (by district)

The three areas (urban, coastal and non coastal) showed a similar trend in factors influencing

purchase/consumption (Fig. 4-25). However many respondents (about 55%) reported that the

availability of fish in the market was uncertain and irregular and that this influenced their

buying behaviour (Fig. 4-25). Improvements in market availability should be made on a

priority basis in non-coastal areas.

Page 56: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

56

Figure 4-25. Availability of fish/seafood at the market the respondent goes to (by urban-coastal)

4.10 Perceived ease of access to fish/seafood

In addition to reported distance and transport issues, subjective perceptions of ease/difficulty

of access to fish/seafood were examined. Overall 52% of respondents rated access to seafood

as fairly or very difficult, whereas 28% rated access as very or quite easy. 20% were neutral

(Fig. 4-26).

Figure 4-26. Perceptions of ease/difficulty of access to fish/seafood (by district)

4

14

1

12

7 9

5

26

7

13

41

19 16

28

6

13

27

20

40

25

36

24 23

29

35

8

49

37

2

23

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

BAUCAU DILI BOBONARO COVALIMA OECUSSI All Districts

Pe

rce

nt

Perceived access to fish/seafood (by district)

VERY EASY QUITE EASY MEDIUM FAIRLY DIFFICULT VERY DIFFICULT

Page 57: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

57

Access was easiest for those living in Oecussi and Dili, as many respondents lived close to

cities, but significantly more difficult in Baucau, Bobonaro and Covalima (Fig. 4-26).

Figure 4-27. Perceptions of ease/difficulty of access to fish/seafood (by area)

Perceptions of ease/difficulty of access across urban, coastal and non-coastal areas were quite

clear. Urban and coastal respondents indicated generally easy/moderate access. However, this

was not so in non-coastal areas, where there was a strong indication of difficult access (Fig.

4-27).

4.11 Fish buying volume

About 62% of respondents bought less than 1 kg of fish per purchase, 29% purchased more

than 1 kg but less than 2 kg, and only 9% bought more than 2 kg of fish per purchase (Fig. 4-

28).

18.7

29.7

25.8 23.2

2.6

25.0

33.6

25.0

8.6 7.8

2.9

12.8

17.7

35.5

31.1

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

40.0

VERY EASY QUITE EASY MEDIUM FAIRLY DIFFICULT VERY DIFFICULT

Perceived access to buy fish/seafood in urban, coastal and non coastal areas

URBAN

COASTAL

NON COASTAL

Page 58: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

58

Figure 4-28. Volume of fish/seafood bought

The average volume of fish in each purchase varied by district, but in general most

respondents only bought less or equal to 1 kg per purchase (Fig. 4-29). About 41%

respondents in Dili bought between 1 kg and 2 kg each purchase. This finding could reflect

larger household sizes in Dili compared with other districts or can be considered a reflection

of the higher purchasing power and access to electricity, and fridges/freezers of the urban

respondents (Fig. 4-29).

Figure 4-29. Volume bought (kg) everytime buying fish

Even so, respondents from the surveyed areas of Oecussi showed a high percentage of buying

more than 2 kg (22%), even though household sizes were generally lower than other districts.

This finding could reflect the relatively high per-person fish consumption in Oecussi,

however, methodological constraints must be considered as stated above.

63.4

41.3

63.0 66.7

52.9

24.4

40.7

25.9

33.3

25.5

7.3

16.9 11.1

21.6

4.9 1.2

BAUCAU DILI BOBONARO COVALIMA OECUSSI

LESS OR EQUAL TO 1 KG

MORE THAN 1 KG, LESS THAN 2 KG

MORE THAN 2 KG

OTHERS

Page 59: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

59

4.12 Frequency of buying fish

Fewer than 5% of all respondents bought fish more than once per day/every day. About 17-

18% bought fish several times a week, once a week, and several times a month. 31.2%

bought fish once a month and 6% of respondents reported that they did not remember how

often they bought fish (Fig. 4-30).

Figure 4-30. Frequency of buying fish in general (percent)

More than 50% of respondents in Bobonaro and Covalima bought fish only once a month. In

contrast, respondents from Dili were more likely to buy fish several times a week compared

with other districts (Fig. 4-31).

Figure 4-31. Frequency of buying fish by district

By urban/coastal/non-coastal categorisation, coastal people (14%) bought fish/seafood more

frequently in daily purchase (once or more in a day) compared to urban people (5%) and non-

coastal people (5%) (Fig. 4-32). This was also the case for frequency within a week (once to

several times in a week) where coastal people (57%) bought most frequently from all

categories. As availability and distance to market were some of the main constraints, non-

coastal people purchased fish/seafood very rarely with almost a half (41%) buying

fish/seafood only once in a month.

4.9

1.1

17.9 17.0 18.1

31.2

6.0

MORE THAN ONCE PER DAY

ONCE A DAY/EVERYDAY

SEVERAL TIMES IN A WEEK

ONCE A WEEK SEVERAL TIMES IN A MONTH

ONCE A MONTH OR LESS

DO NOT REMEMBER

Frequency of buying fish

7 10 15

23

30

14

4 1

32

19 18 22

4 1 2

19 14

57

7

1

12 10 16

59

2

18

3

17 22 24

13

2

MORE THAN ONCE PER DAY

ONCE A DAY/EVERYDAY

SEVERAL TIMES IN A WEEK

ONCE A WEEK SEVERAL TIMES IN A MONTH

ONCE A MONTH OR LESS

DO NOT REMEMBER

Frequency of buying fish per district

BAUCAU DILI BOBONARO COVALIMA OECUSSI

Page 60: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

60

Figure 4-32. Frequency of buying fish/seafood by area

When frequency of buying fish is cross-tabulated against the volume of fish purchased, the “1

kg or less” occurred mostly in the multiple buying per day (94%) category. Buying between 1

and 2 kg took place mostly at the category of “several times in a week” (41%) or several

times in a month (36%). Buying more than 2 kg at a time was reported mostly at the category

of “once a day/every day” (44%) (Fig. 4-33).

Figure 4-33. Frequency of buying fish/seafood with their weight

Page 61: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

61

4.13 Consumption of processed fish

From 657 respondents who indicated consuming processed fish, 31% preferred dried

fish/seafood or grilled fish/seafood (17%) (Fig. 4-34).

Figure 4-34. Experience in buying processed fish/seafood

Only urban respondents from Dili consumed the four main types of processed fish in amounts

significantly higher than those consumed by people living in coastal and non-coastal areas:

dried (52%), salted (37%), grilled (37%) and fried (27%) (Fig. 4-35). Dried fish/seafood was

popular in coastal (49%) and non-coastal (45%) areas. Surprisingly, respondents from coastal

areas did show higher consumption rates of processed fish products than non-coastal areas

(Fig. 4-35). Based on the data, the consumption of dried fish (the most common processing in

the country) was not significantly different in the coastal and non-coastal areas. It has to be

noted that a part of the dried fish available is imported fish from Nusa Tenggara Timur (East

Nusa Tenggara) and other parts of Indonesia, while the remainder is captured in Timor-Leste.

Page 62: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

62

Figure 4-35. Processed fish/seafood bought (by urban-coastal)

Dried fish products (22%-25%) and salted (12%-19%) fish/seafood were purchased more

frequently (once to several times a week) than other processed fish products (Fig. 4-36).

Smoked (47%) and boiled/steamed (17%) fish/seafood were the least frequently (> 1 month)

purchased processed fish products (Fig. 4-36).

Figure 4-36. Frequency of buying processed fish/seafood (by type)

5% 2%

4% 6%

10%

3%

6%

10%

21%

14% 13%

22%

12%

28%

15%

28%

33%

25%

19% 19% 18%

21%

6%

20% 22% 20%

21%

2%

19%

23%

11% 12%

7%

47%

6%

15%

8% 6%

17%

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

0.5

SMOKED DRIED SALTED GRILLED FRIED BOIL/STEAM

Frequency of buying processed fish/seafood

several times a day everyday several times a week

once a week several times a month once a month

> 1x a month

Page 63: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

63

4.14 Fish and animal meat consumption

Respondents were questioned on their consumption of (i) marine fish and (ii) freshwater fish.

Meat consumed was recorded as either: chicken, beef (cow), pork, buffalo meat, goat meat

and lamb. Eggs were also presented as a food choice.

Fish and meat consumption from a specific protein source (e.g. chicken, beef, pork,

freshwater fish, and sea fish) was calculated from two variables, which were recorded in the

survey questionnaires:

Frequency (of meals with fish or meat per interval time; e.g. day, week, month, year)

converted to an annual rate.

Weight (of fish or meat consumption per one-time consumption or per meal [in

grams]) obtained by multiplying the fish size consumed (most of the time based on

sample tools used by the enumerators) with the number of pieces or slices, unless the

respondent answered with a specific weight in grams.

The total consumption per year per respondent was obtained by multiplying the annual

frequency by the weight.

4.14.1 Frequency of annual consumption per year

The conversion to annual frequency was defined based on the time-interval frequency

answered by the respondents (selection of 1 or 2 or 3 below is used only if consumed every

day):

3 x a day = 3 x 365 = 1,095 times

2 x a day = 2 x 365 = 730 times

1 x a day = 365 times

Several times per week = 96 times

Once a week = 48 times

Several times per month = 24 times

Once a month = 12 times

Several times a year = 4 times

Very rarely = 2 times.

4.14.2 Weight of consumption per meal

Where the respondent did not explicitly answer in grams or kg, the weight was derived from

basic conversion based on sample tools which the interviewer showed to the respondent e.g.

½ of the size of the fish sample, 1 small piece of chicken, 1 large piece of meat.

The conversion of the fish samples to grams was:

½ of fish = 40 g

1 whole piece = 80 g

1 small piece = 35 g

1 medium piece = 75 g

Page 64: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

64

1 big piece = 115 g.

The basic conversion of the meat samples to grams was:

Meat Small (g) Medium (g) Large (g)

Chicken 35 55 75

Goat/lamb 20 40 60

Pork 30 50 80

Beef 15 35 55

Water buffalo 15 35 55

Example calculation of what one specific respondent ate per meal:

Chicken “small piece” with quantity = 2, then per meal he/she ate 35 g x 2 = 70 g, and

if he/she also ate;

Pork “medium size” with quantity = 3 then per meal he/she ate 50 g x 3 = 150 g, and

if s/he also ate;

Marine (saltwater) fish “whole piece” with quantity = 1 then per meal he/she ate 80 g

x 1 = 80 g.

4.14.3 Final calculation of consumption per capita per year

The averages of grams or kg consumed/capita/year per specific group in question (e.g.

fish/beef/chicken/egg, urban/coastal/non-coastal, 5 districts) were obtained as weighted

means that were based on the number of respondents in that specific group (area category,

district).

4.14.4 Average consumption

The aggregate and average results calculated from the survey data were based on samples

from four districts: Baucau, Dili, Bobonaro and Covalima. Data from Oecussi were excluded

in the calculation of total mean but are presented for district comparison.

Of all protein sources, chicken was the most consumed with 8.3 kg/capita/year followed by

pork (2.2 kg/cap/year). Marine (seawater) fish was consumed at 5.8 kg/cap/year. Egg

consumption was relatively high at 4.8 kg/cap/year. Total meat consumption was 13.3

kg/cap/year and total fish consumption was 6.1 kg/cap/year (Fig. 4-37).

Page 65: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

65

Figure 4-37. Per-capita level of consumption of protein sources in 4 districts

Of four districts surveyed inTimor-Leste 19.4 kg/capita/year of fish and animal meat was

consumed. This is comprised of 6.1 kg/capita/year fish and 13.3 kg/capita/year of meat.

Further details on consumption rates per district with their sum values and standard

deviations of the means are presented in Appendix 3 (Fish and meat consumption levels).

Table 4-5. Fish and animal meat consumption (summary)

Area/District Consumption (kg/capita/year)

Fish Meat Total **)

By Area type

Urban 6.0 19.1 25.2

Coastal 17.6 12.1 29.7

Non-Coastal 4.0 11.6 15.6

Mean *) 6.1 13.3 19.4

By District

Baucau 5.9 11.6 17.5

Dili 7.7 18.2 26.0

Bobonaro 2.7 7.0 9.6

Covalima 5.5 6.6 12.2

Mean *) 6.1 13.3 19.4

*) Mean was generated from 4 districts, excluding Oecussi

**) Values were rounded after calculating fish and meat combined

In Oecussi, where data only includes Pante Makasar and Oesilo subdistricts, the fish

consumption level was 9.3 kg/capita/year and the meat consumption level was 22.3

kg/capita/year. Total fish and meat consumption was 31.6 kg/capita/year. These results are

Page 66: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

66

not included in the table and the average calculations, since they have to be considered with

caution.

There was a significant correlation between levels of meat consumption and levels of fish

consumption (Pearson correlation 0.275 with p significance <0.001, 2-tailed). This one-to-

one correlation could be explained by single or multiple factors that can be further

investigated based on multivariate relationships on variables such as age and income, which

are described in the following sections.

4.14.5 Consumption by area

As expected, coastal communities consumed more fish (17.6 kg/cap/year) than meat (12.1

kg/cap/year). In contrast, non-coastal communities consumed almost three times more meat

(11.6 kg/cap/year) than fish (4.0 kg/cap/year) reflecting difficulty in regularly accessing

convenient, fresh product. Urban communities consumed much more meat (19.2 kg/cap/year)

than fish (6.0 kg/cap/year) (Fig. 4-38).

Figure 4-38. Fish and animal meat consumption level (by urban-coastal)

The relatively high fish consumption by coastal people reflected the availability of fish and

access to markets. Some respondents also caught fish and therefore did not need to spend

their limited incomes to buy fish. For urban and non-coastal people, who were mostly non-

fishers, fish could only be obtained by purchasing, and their level of consumption was

influenced by income. The existence (or lack of) of suitable infrastructure for transporting

fish in usable condition from coastal areas to non-coastal areas was a significant factor

affecting fish consumption by non-coastal people.

4.14.6 Consumption by district

Total fish and animal meat consumption varied markedly across the four surveyed districts,

exclusive of Oecussi, in the range 9.7 - 25.9 kg/cap/year (Fig. 4-39).

19.2

12.1

11.6

6.0

17.6

4.0

0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0

URBAN

COASTAL

NON COASTAL

Fish and Meat consumption (kg/capita/year)

Total Meat

Total Fish

Page 67: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

67

Figure 4-39. Fish and animal meat consumption level (by district)

Fish consumption in Bobonaro district was very low (2.7 kg/cap/year) compared to other

districts. The highest level of fish consumption occurred in Dili (7.7 kg/cap/year), which is

almost 3 times greater than fish consumption in Bobonaro (Fig. 4-39).

In addition to being the consumers of fish, the people of Bobonaro were also the second

lowest meat consumers among districts of Timor-Leste. (Fig. 4-39).

Based on only Pante Makasar and Oesilo subdistricts, Oecussi people had relatively high

rates of meat consumption (22.3 kg/cap/year) and high rates of fish consumption (9.3

kg/cap/year), however, as explained above this cannot be considered as representing all the

district and as such must be considered with caution.

One study on social structural influences on meat consumption (Gossard and York, 2003)

found that meat consumption could be affected by several factors: gender, race, ethnicity,

location (urban-non-urban), social class and physiological variables (e.g. body weight, age).

A similar study could be applied and adjusted for meat and fish consumption in Timor-Leste

to identify sources of variation.

Factors such as age, education level, marital status and income level are discussed in the

following sections.

4.14.7 Fish and meat consumption by age

Fish and meat consumption levels decline with the age of respondent. This trend was stronger

for meat compared with fish (Fig. 4.40).

11.6

18.2

7.0

6.6

5.9

7.7

2.7

5.6

0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0

BAUCAU

DILI

BOBONARO

COVALIMA

Fish and Meat consumption (Kg/capita/year)

Total Meat

Total Fish

Page 68: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

68

Figure 4-40. Fish and meat consumption (g) by respondent's age

Some FGD results revealed that older people (>55 years of age) consumed relatively little

meat, preferring vegetables. Meat was reportedly not eaten because it was considered hard to

chew and to cause health problems related to high blood pressure. Similarly, fish was avoided

because of perceived negative effects related to high blood pressure. Contrary to the

consideration that adults and elders eat more proteins, it seems that the data shows that

younger people (children are excluded, but there is evidence of a similar consumption

patterns –see chapter 4.1) have the highest consumption.

4.14.8 Fish and meat consumption by marital status

There was no significant difference between single (not married) and married respondents in

the level of consumption of meat. However single respondents ate fish more than married

respondents (Fig. 4-41), in accordance with the age-consumption trend mentioned above.

Page 69: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

69

Figure 4-41. Fish and meat consumption level (g) by marital status.

Divorcees and widows ate less animal protein than married or single respondents.

4.14.9 Fish and meat consumption by level of education

There was a significant correlation between fish consumption level and education level

(Pearson correlation 0.11 with p significance <0.01 2-tailed).

Figure 4-42. Level of fish and meat consumption based on education level

Page 70: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

70

Educated persons (Bachelor degree) ate comparatively higher levels of fish and meat (Fig. 4-

42) which may reflect increased purchasing power and nutritional awareness.

4.14.10 Fish and meat consumption by level of income and family size

Income correlated positively only with the level of meat consumption (Pearson correlation

0.125, p <0.001 2-tailed), but not with fish consumption level (Fig. 4-43). Thus, other factors

such as access to market or fish availability and education of respondents could serve to

increase fish consumption levels.

Figure 4-43. Level of fish and meat consumption categorised by income level

There was no correlation between the per capita consumption of meat or fish and household

size (Fig. 4-44).

Page 71: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

71

Figure 4-44. Fish and meat consumption level categorised by household size

4.14.11 Meat consumption versus ownership of cattle and chicken

Only pig and chicken owners, who were also categorised mainly as farmers, reported high

levels of pork and chicken meat consumption when compared to other types of meat

consumed (Fig. 4-45). Most chicken and pig owners consumed their own livestock. In

contrast, FGDs and IDIs results show that most cow and goat/lamb owners did not consume

their own livestock. Rather, their livestock was mostly sold to generate income, to repay debt,

or to educate their children.

Figure 4-45. Fish and meat consumed against livestock owned

Page 72: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

72

4.14.12 Meat/fish consumption against reported preferences

Levels of fish and meat consumption were compared with stated preferences (Fig. 4-46). The

results show a close correlation with the exception of pork (Fig. 4-46). This could be because

pork eaters also ate chicken throughout the year and chicken was preferred to pork.

Figure 4-46. Levels of fish and meat consumption categorised by what was mostly consumed

4.14.13 Fish supply and fish consumption

In previous studies, fish supply5 in Timor-Leste was calculated based on secondary data from

FAO (2005)6 as 0.3 kg/cap/year, and using tertiary data

7 as 3.03 kg/cap/year. Both these

supply levels are significantly lower than the per capita fish consumption rates for Indonesia

(20.5 kg/cap/year), the average for Asian countries (17.8 kg/cap/year) and the world average

(16.4 kg/cap/year) (Fig. 4-47).

5The data on fish supply in Timor-Leste shows a positive trend from 2005-2009. However, the data on which

the other studies are based is different. The data was mostly from estimations of fish catch reported by the

National Directorate of Fisheries and Aquaculture (NDFA) of the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, which

at that time of collection were unreliable. 6FAO: Yearbook of Fishery and Aquaculture 2007.

7JICA 2009: Interim Report of the Study on Project for Promotion of Agribusiness in Timor-Leste.

Page 73: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

73

Figure4-47. Fish supplyand consumption

The survey results show that per capita levels of fish consumption in Timor-Leste are lower

than the world per capita fish supply level, the Asian fish supply level and the level of fish

supply in East Nusa Tenggara province (Indonesia) which borders with Timor-Leste (Fig. 4-

47). In 2007 the fish supply in East Nusa Tenggara reached 14 kg/cap/year8.

Only in the coastal areas of Timor-Leste was fish consumption (17.6 kg/cap/year) similar to

Asian countries (17.8 kg/cap/year) and to world averages (16.4 kg/cap/year). In non-coastal

and urban areas, per capita fish consumption was well below world per capita consumption

rates. However, in all areas (urban: 6.0, coastal: 17.6 and non-coastal: 4.0) per capita fish

consumption significantly exceeds current estimates of domestic per capita fish supply (3

kg/cap/year).

4.15 Perceived level of consumption

About half (49.8%) of all respondents reported that they did not eat enough fish (Fig. 4-48).

8 BPS: NTT dalam Angka (ENT in Numbers), 2009

6.1

3

0.3

20.5

17.8

16.4

14

0 5 10 15 20 25

Timor Leste 2011 (RFLP Survey)

Timor Leste 2009 (Tertiary Data)

Timor Leste 2005 (FAO, 2007)

Indonesia 2005 (FAO, 2007)

Asian countries 2005 (FAO, 2007)

World 2005 (FAO, 2007)

NTT Province / Indonesia 2007 (BPS, 2009)

kg/capita/year

Fish Supply Fish Consumption

Page 74: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

74

Figure 4-48. Perception on the quantity of fish consumed

However, many respondents (71%) who did not consume fish would purchase fish if funds

permit. This trend was similar in all urban (84%), coastal (62%) and non-coastal (70%) areas.

The willingness to consume more fish was lower in coastal areas than in the other areas,

which was consistent with the greater availability of fish and also the higher frequency of fish

in their meals compared with non-coastal areas (Fig. 4-49).

Figure 4-49. Willingness to consume more fish if having more money

Page 75: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

75

4.16 Seasonal availability of fish

Almost all fish caught in Timor-Leste by small-scale fishers was consumed inside the

country. Thus, the availability of fresh fish was dependent on seasonal variations in weather

and sea conditions. From the results of the RFLP Baseline Survey, conducted together with

this Fish and Animal Protein Survey, fishing activity in Oecussi and Bobonaro is greatest in

March-October, but then decreases because of adverse weather between November-February.

In Covalima, where fishing areas are situated on the southern side of Timor island, fishing

activity is at its lowest level in March-June, increasing between June-February and peaks in

September-October and in January-February. There is a slight decrease in fishing activity

between October-January during the rainy season (Fig. 4-50).

Figure 4-50. Fishing calendar 5 districts (source: RFLP Baseline Survey data, 2011)

Changes in the total fish catch were perceived last year (2010/2011) with 40% of fishers in

Oecussi and Bobonaro noting a decrease in fish catch, whereas 51% of fishers in Dili, Baucau

and Covalima districts reported no change in the total fish catch. Reported factors influencing

catch rates were bad weather and high waves, inadequate fishing gear and competition among

fishers.

%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

MAR APR MAY JUN JULY AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB

Fishing calendar from March to February in 5 districts

Baucau Dili Bobonaro Covalima Oecussi Average

Page 76: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

76

5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 Conclusions

1. Animal protein (fish/meat) was an important component of the daily diet of 45.8% of

respondents in the five districts of Timor-Leste. Among those who ate fish/meat less

frequently 18% ate fish/meat once a week, 16% ate fish/meat occasionally, 5% ate

fish/meat once a month and 3% ate fish/meat twice a month.

2. There was a significant difference in daily animal protein consumption patterns

between respondents in coastal areas (67%) - which includes urban/small urban

settings such as Suai, Baucau or Liquiça - compared with those respondents from

urban (52%) and non-coastal areas (40%).

3. Consumption of animal protein in urban areas was higher than in non-coastal areas,

because it was easier to purchase fish/meat in urban markets. In particular, the urban

areas of Dili are located close to the coast with access to fresh fish markets. Access to

markets is more limited in non-coastal areas.

4. Animal protein was consumed daily by 30-34% of respondents in Bobonaro and

Covalima. Consumption of animal protein was greater in Dili (49%), Oecussi (52%),

and Baucau (54%).

5. Traditional ceremonies are the main occasions when animal protein is consumed in

the districts outside of Dili, including all of Oecussi’s surveyed area. In the districts of

Baucau, Bobonaro and Covalima an average of 89% of respondents ate animal protein

during traditional ceremonies, while 29% declare they eat animal protein in every day

meals. In Dili respondents take animal protein both during ceremonies and daily

meals in the same percentages.

6. The percentage of respondents who did not eat animal meat and fish was the lowest in

Oecussi (3%), which reflects local circumstances where fish are sold direct to

consumers and taking into account that the locations where data gathering was carried

out were close to Pante Makasar, the capital city of Oecussi district.

7. Chicken remained the preferred form of animal protein consumed in Timor-Leste

(54.1%), followed by marine (seawater) fish/other seafood (14.4%), eggs (11.9%) and

pork (7.6%). Other sources of animal protein were of less importance, i.e. below 5%

of total meat and fish consumed.

8. Consumption patterns between the five districts show that chicken was the main

source of meat in all districts. Other than chicken, marine (marine/seawater) fish was

favoured in Covalima (23%) followed by Dili (17%), Oecussi (17%), Bobonaro (9%)

with Baucau showing the lowest proportion (7%) of marine fish in diets. People in

Oecussi consumed more pork, beef, and buffalo meat compared with those meat

sources in Baucau, Covalima, and Dili. Pork consumption (19%), however, was the

highest in Bobonaro. Egg consumption was lowest in Bobonaro (6%) compared with

Covalima (10%), Oecussi (11%), Baucau (14%) and Dili (14%).

9. Of the fish consumed in Bobonaro, Baucau and Dili, sardines were preferred, whereas

mackerel/kombong (Scombridae) was the most consumed fish in Covalima and

Oecussi. The percentage of sardine and mackerel consumed in Oecussi was relatively

Page 77: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

77

high (54% and 60%, respectively). The percentage of long tail tuna/tongkol consumed

was relatively high in all districts. Prawn consumption was the highest in Baucau

(21%) and Bobonaro (16%).

10. Deep frying was the most popular way to prepare fish/seafood in all districts,

followed by grilling and steaming. Deep frying was also preferred by urban, coastal

and non-coastal people, followed by boiling and grilling.

11. Across all districts, respondents consistently (86-92%) considered taste to be the main

reason for eating fish.

12. Price and availability were consistently reported as the main reasons limiting the

consumption of fish and seafood. Many (53%) Bobonaro respondents considered

fish/seafood to be too expensive, as did 43% of Covalima respondents and 41% of

Baucau respondents.

13. Most (71%) respondents purchased fish/seafood at local markets. Significant numbers

also purchased from peddlers (28%) and through fish auctions/fish coastal market/fish

landing centres (21%) and directly from fishers (20%).

14. Respondents having the best access to fish/seafood, with sources nearby or within 30

minutes walk/ride, were those from Dili (49%) and surveyed areas of Oecussi (40%).

Respondents having the greatest constraints were from Bobonaro, where journeys of

greater than one hour by public transport (40%) or by walking/bicycle (18%) were

required. Predictably, people in coastal areas buy fish very near to their home i.e.

close by/next door (36%) walk less than 30 minutes (29%), and walk between 30-60

minutes (21%).

15. Those respondents living in non-coastal areas had varied access to fish/seafood.

About half had reasonable access i.e. close by/next door (16%), walk less than 30

minutes (10%), and walk between 30-60 minutes (19%). But many respondents

reported difficult access requiring travel by public transport for 30-60 minutes (17%)

or more than one hour (22%).

16. Overall 52% of respondents rated access to fish/seafood as fairly or very difficult.

Access was easiest for those living in Oecussi (mainly because Pante Makasar and

Oesilo subdistricts are close to the district capital city) and in Dili, but much more

difficult in Baucau, Bobonaro and Covalima districts.

17. Perceptions of ease/difficulty of access across urban, coastal and non-coastal areas

were quite clear. Urban and coastal respondents reported easy/moderate access in

contrast to those respondents from non-coastal areas.

18. In four districts (Baucau, Dili, Bobonaro and Covalima) people consumed an average

of 19.4 kg/capita/year of fish and animal meat (6.1 kg/capita/year fish protein and

13.3 kg/capita/year of meat protein).

19. Coastal communities consumed more fish (17.6 kg/cap/year) than meat (12.1

kg/cap/year). In contrast, non-coastal communities consumed much more meat (11.6

kg/cap/year) than fish (4.0 kg/cap/year) because of difficulty of access to convenient

fresh product. Urban communities ate more meat (19.2 kg/cap/year) than fish (6.0

kg/cap/year).

Page 78: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

78

20. Fish consumption in Bobonaro district was very low (2.7 kg/cap/year) compared with

other districts. The highest level of fish consumption occurred in Dili (7.7

kg/cap/year.

21. Fish and particularly meat consumption levels declined with age.

22. Fish consumption was positively correlated with education level.

23. Income level was positively correlated with meat consumption, but not with fish

consumption level.

24. The mean per-capita level of fish consumption in Timor-Leste (6.1 kg/cap/year) was

significantly lower than the World value (16.4 kg/cap/year).

25. Only in the coastal areas of Timor-Leste did fish consumption (17.6 kg/cap/year)

approximate Asian fish consumption level (17.8 kg/cap/year).

26. More than half (57.5%) of respondents ate together and divided the fish equally

among family members. When it comes to order, only 26.8% gave priority to

men/head of households, whereas 21.4% gave priority to children, allowing them to

eat before adults. When referred to the quantity, there is not significant evidence of

differences between members of the households in the share of the proteins

consumed.

27. Perceived changes in the total fish catch were associated with bad weather and high

waves, inadequate fishing gear and competition among fishers.

28. Customary /traditional rules affect consumption of fish in some areas. Some believe

that eating fish will bring bad luck. Some respondents adhered strictly to this

tradition, while others compromised by cooking fish outside the house and/or not

keeping the utensils used to cook fish within the house.

5.2 Recommendations

1. This survey has provided a good snapshot of fish and meat consumption patterns in

Timor-Leste. The survey should be repeated at a suitable interval to determine

changes in behaviours particularly those influenced by custom, market access, and

particularly income.

2. Fish supply in Timor-Leste had variously been estimated at 0.3 and 3.0 kg/cap/year.

Given the different methodologies used there is a great divergence from the current

estimate; additional research should be undertaken to determine the current fish

supply in Timor-Leste and sources of variation in this supply.

3. Given the very low levels of fish consumption in non-coastal areas due to distance

and access issues, a clear opportunity exists for increasing the quality of the diets of

inland communities while increasing the incomes of coastal fishers. Investment in

improved cold chain facilities and distribution systems is recommended particularly in

those areas remote from Dili and other large towns.

4. Consumption avoidance, reflecting traditional and “supernatural” beliefs in the

communities, could be addressed with targeted community education programmes.

These programmes could emphasise the nutritional benefits of eating fish in particular

and stimulate growth in the seafood industry of Timor-Leste. Perceptions relating to

Page 79: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

79

poor product quality could also be addressed by improved supply chain management

and processing facilities. This could serve to further develop the seafood industry of

Timor-Leste and potentially develop export markets with obvious economic and

social benefits.

Page 80: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

80

6 REFERENCES

AMSAT International (2011), Notes on the Focus Group Discussions and In-Depth

Interviews for the Fish and Animal Protein Consumption Survey. Canberra: Amsat

International.

Biro Pusat Statistik of Indonesia (2009). NTT dalam Angka (East Nusa Tenggara in

Numbers).

Do Amaral, J.X. (2010), Current Fisheries and Aquaculture Policies Relevant to RFLP in

Timor-Leste. Dili: FAO-RFLP.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2007). Yearbook of Fishery

and Aquaculture 2007.

Gossard, M.H. and R. York (2003). Social Structural Influences on Meat Consumption.

Human Ecology Review, Vol. 10 (No.1), page 9.

Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) (2009): Interim Report of the Study on

Project for Promotion of Agribusiness in Timor-Leste.

Magnani, R (1997). Sampling Guide. Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance Project

(FANTA). Washington: Academy for Educational Development.

Page 81: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

81

APPENDIX 1. QUESTIONNAIRE

KUESIONER SURVEI KONSUMSI DAGING DAN KETERSEDIAAN IKAN –

TIMOR-LESTE 2011

NO PERTANYAAN JAWABAN RESPONDEN KE

GAMBARAN UMUM

A1 JENIS KELAMIN LAKI-LAKI .................................................................................... 1

PEREMPUAN .............................................................................. 2

A2 Berapa usia Ibu/ Bapak?

PERHATIKAN SITUASI

TAHUN

A3 Kapan Ibu/ Bapak lahir?

PERHATIKAN SITUASI

BULAN - TAHUN

A4 Berapa orang tinggal di

rumah ini? SIAPAPUN, ASALKAN

SEHARI-HARI TIDUR DI RUMAH

YANG DIWAWANCARA,

TERMASUK PEMBANTU

ORANG

1. DISTRIK: __________________________________ 2. SUB DISTRIK : __________________________________

3. SUKO : _______________________________ 4. ALDIEA: ________________________________

5. NOMOR RUMAH: ____________ 6. NAMA KEPALA RUMAH TANGGA: _____________________________________

NO KUESIONER :

PEWAWANCARA:

INFORMED CONSENT – WAJIB DIBACAKAN

Selamat pagi/siang/sore, saya ................ Kami dari Program Mata Pencaharian Perikanan Daerah

sedang melakukan survei rumah tangga yang berhubungan dengan konsumsi ikan dan daging. Hasil

survai ini akan dimanfaatkan pemerintah untuk menyusun program-program. Informasi dari Ibu/ Bapak

bersifat rahasia dan tidak diberikan pada orang lain. Lama wawancara sekitar 30 menit. Sifatnya sukarela,

tidak ada paksaan dan kami tidak memberi bantuan apapun. Apakah kami boleh mewawancarai Ibu/

Bapak?

LANJUTKAN HANYA BILA JAWABANNYA YA

Page 82: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

82

A5 Agama yang Ibu/ Bapak

anut?

KATOLIK ...................................................................................... 1

KRISTEN ..................................................................................... 2

ISLAM .......................................................................................... 3

HINDU .......................................................................................... 4

BUDHA ........................................................................................ 5

LAINNYA (TULISKAN)_______________________________ ... 6

A6 Apakah Ibu/ Bapak menikah? MENIKAH ..................................................................................... 1

BELUM MENIKAH ....................................................................... 2

DUDA/ JANDA KARENA CERAI.................................................. 3

DUDA/ JANDA KARENA DITINGGAL MATI ................................ 4

LATAR BELAKANG SOSIAL EKONOMI

B1 Apakah Ibu/ Bapak pernah

bersekolah?

YA ................................................................................................ 1

TIDAK .......................................................................................... 2

B3

B2 Tingkat pendidikan apa yang

diselesaikan?

SD TIDAK SELESAI ..................................................................... 1

SD SELESAI ................................................................................ 2

SMP TIDAK SELESAI .................................................................. 3

SMP SELESAI ............................................................................. 4

SMA TIDAK SELESAI .................................................................. 5

SMA SELESAI ............................................................................. 6

D3 TIDAK SELESAI ..................................................................... 7

D3 SELESAI................................................................................. 8

S1 TIDAK SELESAI ..................................................................... 9

S1 SELESAI ............................................................................... 10

LAINNYA, TULISKAN_____________________________ ....... 11

Page 83: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

83

B3 Apakah Ibu/ Bapak atau

orang di rumah ini memiliki

barang-barang sbb?

MOHON SOPAN. BILA

MERASA KURANG

NYAMAN, LOMPATI

SEMENTARA ATAU

LAKUKAN OBSERVASI

(BUAT CATATAN BILA

OBSERVASI)

SEPEDA ..................................................................................... A

SEPEDA MOTOR ....................................................................... B

MOBIL ........................................................................................ C

MOBIL PICK UP ......................................................................... D

TRUK .......................................................................................... E

RADIO/ TAPE ............................................................................. F

TV ............................................................................................... G

PARABOLA ................................................................................ H

DVD/ VCD/CD PLAYER ............................................................... I

KULKAS ...................................................................................... J

TELEPHONE .............................................................................. K

HANDPHONE ............................................................................. L

RUMAH SENDIRI ....................................................................... M

SAPI/ KERBAU .......................................................................... N

KAMBING/ DOMBA ................................................................... O

BABI ........................................................................................... P

AYAM ......................................................................................... Q

KAPAL MOTOR ......................................................................... R

PERAHU LAYAR ........................................................................ S

PERAHU DAYUNG .................................................................... T

B4 Dalam sebulan terakhir,

apakah Ibu/ Bapak bekerja

untuk mendapatkan uang?

YA ........................ 1

TIDAK .................. 2

B6

B5 Apa

pekerjaan

utama

Ibu/

Bapak ?

GURU ........................................................ 11

DOSENTE .................................................. 12

DIRETOR ................................................... 13

MENISTRU MEMBRU PARLEMENTU ...... 14

DOKTER UMUM/ HEWAN ......................... 15

FUNGSIONARIA PNTL/ F-FDTL ............... 21

FUNGSIONARIO EMPRESARIU ............... 22

NELAYAN/ PESKADOR ............................ 23

PETANI ...................................................... 24

BURUH NELAYAN/ PESKADOR ............... 31

BURUH TANI .................................................. 32

PELAYAN PASAR/ TOKO .............................. 33

BURUH BANGUNAN ...................................... 34

PEDAGANG PASAR/ PERTOKOAN .............. 41

PEDAGANG DI TEMPAT INFORMAL ............ 42

PUNYA KIOS .................................................. 43

PENGEPUL/PEMBELI IKAN DARI PESKADOR

................................................................... 51

PETANI BUDIDAYA RUMPUT LAUT ............. 52

PENGOLAH HASIL IKAN/ LAUT .................... 53

PENGUMPUL IKAN DLL DI SAAT AIR SURUT

........................................................................ 54

LAINNYA (TULISKAN)_________________ . 55

Page 84: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

84

B6 Apa kerja

lain yang

Ibu/

Bapak

lakukan

untuk

mendapt

kan

uang?

GURU ......................................................... A

DOSENTE ................................................... B

DIRETOR .................................................... C

MENISTRU MEMBRU PARLEMENTU ....... D

DOKTER UMUM/ HEWAN .......................... E

FUNGSIONARIA PNTL/ F-FDTL ................ F

FUNGSIONARIO EMPRESARIU ............... G

NELAYAN/ PESKADOR ............................. H

PETANI ........................................................ I

BURUH NELAYAN/ PESKADOR ................ J

BURUH TANI ................................................... K

PELAYAN PASAR/ TOKO ................................ L

BURUH BANGUNAN ....................................... M

PEDAGANG PASAR/ PERTOKOAN ............... N

PEDAGANG DI TEMPAT INFORMAL ............. O

PUNYA KIOS ................................................... P

PENGEPUL/PEMBELI IKAN DARI PESKADOR

.................................................................... Q

PETANI BUDIDAYA RUMPUT LAUT .............. R

PENGOLAH HASIL IKAN/ LAUT ..................... S

PENGUMPUL IKAN DLL DI SAAT AIR SURUTT

LAINNYA (TULISKAN)_________________ .. U

B7 Apa pekerjaan anggota

rumah tangga yang lain untuk

mendapatkan uang?

GURU ......................................................................................... A

DOSENTE ................................................................................... B

DIRETOR .................................................................................... C

MENISTRU MEMBRU PARLEMENTU ....................................... D

DOKTER UMUM/ HEWAN .......................................................... E

FUNGSIONARIA PNTL/ F-FDTL ................................................ F

FUNGSIONARIO EMPRESARIU ................................................ G

NELAYAN/ PESKADOR ............................................................ H

PETANI ......................................................................................... I

BURUH NELAYAN/ PESKADOR ................................................ J

BURUH TANI .............................................................................. K

PELAYAN PASAR/ TOKO ........................................................... L

BURUH BANGUNAN .................................................................. M

PEDAGANG PASAR/ PERTOKOAN .......................................... N

PEDAGANG DI TEMPAT INFORMAL ........................................ O

PUNYA KIOS .............................................................................. P

PENGEPUL/ PEMBELI IKAN DARI NELAYAN/ PESKADOR... Q

PETANI BUDIDAYA RUMPUT LAUT ........................................ R

PENGOLAH HASIL IKAN/ LAUT ............................................... S

PENGUMPUL IKAN DLL DI PANTAI SAAT AIR SURUT ......... T

LAINNYA (TULISKAN)_______________________________ .. U

B8 Apakah ada perempuan yang

menjadi nelayan/ peskador

(menangkap ikan di laut)?

BILA YA, siapakah dia?

ISTRI KEPALA KELUARGA ....................................................... A

ANAK KEPALA KELUARGA ....................................................... B

TIDAK ADA ____________________________ ....................... C

LAIN-LAIN, TULIS ____________________________ .............. D

B9 Kira-kira, dalam sebulan berapa banyak uang yang

dihasilkan Ibu/ Bapak dan anggota rumah tangga ini?

RUJUK BULAN TERAKHIR

.............................$

KONSUMSI IKAN

Page 85: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

85

C1

Hari ini atau kemarin, apakah

Ibu/ Bapak memakan daging

atau ikan?

BILA DI TANYA, JELASKAN,

DAGING APA SAJA: IKAN,

AYAM, SAPI, KAMBING,

BABI, DLL

YA ................................................................................................ 1

TIDAK .......................................................................................... 2

C4A

C2 Dalam seminggu terakhir? YA ................................................................................................ 1

TIDAK .......................................................................................... 2

C4A

C3 Kapan Ibu/ Bapak terakhir

makan daging/ikan?

DALAM DUA MINGGU INI ........................................................... 1

DALAM SEBULAN INI ................................................................. 2

LEBIH DARI SEBULAN LALU...................................................... 3

TIDAK INGAT............................................................................... 4

TIDAK MAKAN DAGING/IKAN APAPUN ..................................... 5

C5

C4 Apakah semua anggota

keluarga di sini makan

daging/ikan?

YA ................................................................................................ 1

TIDAK .......................................................................................... 2

C5

C4b Kapan biasanya keluarga

makan daging/ ikan?

DI WAKTU PESTA ...................................................................... A

DI WAKTU MAKAN SEHARI-HARI ............................................. B

LAINNYA ______________________________________ ........ C

C6

C6

C6

C5 Kenapa Ibu/ Bapak/ anggota

keluarga di sini tidak makan

daging/ikan?

MAHAL ........................................................................................ A

TIDAK ADA DI PASAR/ TIDAK ADA YANG JUAL ...................... B

TIDAK SUKA ............................................................................... C

SUSAH MEMASAK ..................................................................... D

RASA TIDAK ENAK .................................................................... E

TIDAK SEGAR ............................................................................ F

TIDAK BIASA .............................................................................. G

LAINNYA, TULISKAN_________________________________ H

MAKAN TELUR SAJA ATAU YANG LAIN __________________I

C21

C21

C21

C21

C21

C21

C21

C21

C21

C6 Daging/ikan apa saja yang

Ibu/ Bapak/ anggota keluarga

makan?

GALI, ada lagi? BILA

MENJAWAB IKAN, ikan apa?

AYAM .......................................................................................... A

KAMBING/ DOMBA .................................................................... B

BABI ............................................................................................ C

SAPI ............................................................................................ D

KERBAU ..................................................................................... E

IKAN DARAT/AIR TAWAR .......................................................... F

IKAN LAUT ................................................................................. G

TELUR ........................................................................................ H

LAINNYA, TULISKAN_____________________________ .......... I

Page 86: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

86

C7A Dari daging-daging/ikan yang

Ibu/ Bapak makan itu

SEBUTKAN JAWABAN

PERTANYAAN DI ATAS

mana yang paling sering Ibu/

Bapak makan?

AYAM ........................................................................................... 1

KAMBING/ DOMBA ..................................................................... 2

BABI ............................................................................................. 3

SAPI ............................................................................................. 4

KERBAU ...................................................................................... 5

IKAN DARAT/AIR TAWAR ........................................................... 6

IKAN/ BINATANG LAUT .............................................................. 7

TELUR ......................................................................................... 8

LAINNYA, TULISKAN_____________________________ ......... 9

C7B Seberapa sering Ibu/ Bapak

memakan daging/ikan-ikan

itu?

1 = 3 x sehari

2 = 2 x sehari

3 = 1 x sehari

4 = beberapa kali per minggu

5 = seminggu sekali

6 = beberapa kali sebulan

7 = sekali sebulan

8 = beberapa kali dalam setahun

9 = sangat jarang

A) AYAM ..................................

B) KAMBIING/ DOMBA ...........

C) BABI ...................................

D) SAPI ....................................

E) KERBAU .............................

F) IKAN DARAT/AIR TAWAR .

G) IKAN/ BINATANG LAUT ....

H) TELUR ................................

1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7 – 8 – 9

1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7 – 8 – 9

1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7 – 8 – 9

1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7 – 8 – 9

1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7 – 8 – 9

1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7 – 8 – 9

1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7 – 8 – 9

1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7 – 8 – 9

C7C Seberapa banyak yang Ibu/

Bapak makan setiap kali

makan?

AYAM

1 – Satu potong kecil

2 – Satu potong besar

KAMBING – KERBAU

1 – Satu potong kecil

2 – Satu potong besar

IKAN (=C15)

1 - ½ EKOR

2 - 1 EKOR UTUH

3 - 1 POTONG KECIL

4 - 1 POTONG SEDANG

5 - 1 POTONG BESAR

A) AYAM ..................................

B) KAMBING/ DOMBA ............

C) BABI ...................................

D) SAPI ....................................

E) KERBAU .............................

F) IKAN DARAT/AIR TAWAR .

G) IKAN/ BINATANG LAUT ...............................................................

H) TELUR ...........................................................................................

JENIS POTONGAN ......., JUMLAH ......

JENIS POTONGAN ......., JUMLAH ......

JENIS POTONGAN ......., JUMLAH ......

JENIS POTONGAN ......., JUMLAH ......

JENIS POTONGAN ......., JUMLAH ......

JENIS POTONGAN ......., JUMLAH ......

JENIS POTONGAN ......., JUMLAH ......

JENIS POTONGAN ......., JUMLAH ......

C8 Apakah Ibu/ Bapak pernah

makan ikan/ hewan laut?

JELASKAN HEWAN LAUT

ADALAH SPT IKAN LAUT,

UDANG, CUMI, TIRAM,

KEPITING DLL

YA ................................................................................................ 1

TIDAK .......................................................................................... 2

C21

Page 87: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

87

C9 Kapan terakhir kali Ibu/

Bapak/ anggota keluarga

rumah di sini makan ikan/

hewan laut?

KEMARIN ..................................................................................... 1

DALAM MINGGU INI ................................................................... 2

DALAM DUA MINGGU INI ........................................................... 3

DALAM SEBULAN INI ................................................................. 4

LEBIH DARI SEBULAN LALU...................................................... 5

TIDAK INGAT............................................................................... 6

LEBIH DARI SETAHUN TIDAK MAKAN IKAN/ BINATANG LAUT

................................................................................................ 7

C11

C11

C10

LALU

KE

C21

C10 Kenapa Ibu/ Bapak tidak/

jarang makan ikan/ hewan

laut?

MAHAL ........................................................................................ A

TIDAK ADA DI PASAR/ TIDAK ADA YANG JUAL ...................... B

TIDAK SUKA ............................................................................... C

SUSAH MEMASAK ..................................................................... D

RASA TIDAK ENAK .................................................................... E

TIDAK SEGAR ............................................................................ F

KURANG BAIK UNTUK KESEHATAN ANAK ............................. G

BAWA SIAL ................................................................................. H

LAINNYA, TULISKAN_____________________________ .......... I

C11 Biasanya, seberapa sering

Ibu/ Bapak makan ikan/

hewan laut?

HATI-HATI PERHATIKAN

KONSISTENSI JAWABAN

C9

LEBIH DARI SEKALI DALAM SEHARI ........................................ 1

SEKALI SEHARI/ SETIAP HARI .................................................. 2

BEBERAPA KALI DALAM SEMINGGU ....................................... 3

SEKALI SEMINGGU .................................................................... 4

BEBERAPA KALI DALAM SEBULAN .......................................... 5

SEBULAN SEKALI ATAU LEBIH JARANG ................................. 6

TIDAK INGAT............................................................................... 7

C12 Ikan/ hewan laut apa saja

yang biasanya Ibu/ Bapak

makan?

IKAN, TULIS NAMA IKAN _____________________________A

IKAN, TULIS NAMA IKAN _____________________________B

IKAN, TULIS NAMA IKAN _____________________________C

UDANG .................................................................................... D

KEPITING ................................................................................ E

CUMI ......................................................................................... F

SIPUT ..................................................................................... G

KIMA/TIRAM ............................................................................ H

LAINNYA, TULISKAN ______________________________ .... I

Page 88: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

88

C13 Ikan/ hewan laut apa yang

paling Ibu/ Bapak sukai?

IKAN, TULIS NAMA IKAN _____________________________ A

IKAN, TULIS NAMA IKAN _____________________________ B

IKAN, TULIS NAMA IKAN _____________________________ C

UDANG ....................................................................................... D

KEPITING ................................................................................... E

CUMI ........................................................................................... F

SIPUT ......................................................................................... G

KIMA/TIRAM ............................................................................... H

LAINNYA, TULISKAN ____________________________ .......... I

C14 Untuk kebanyakan anggota

keluarga, ikan/ hewan laut

apa yang paling disukai?

IKAN, TULIS NAMA IKAN _____________________________ A

IKAN, TULIS NAMA IKAN _____________________________ B

IKAN, TULIS NAMA IKAN _____________________________ C

UDANG ....................................................................................... D

KEPITING ................................................................................... E

CUMI ........................................................................................... F

SIPUT ......................................................................................... G

KIMA/ .......................................................................................... H

LAINNYA, TULISKAN ______________________________ ....... I

C15 Berapa besar biasanya yang

dimakan orang di rumah ini?

TUNJUKKAN ALAT BANTU

UKURAN 1 : ½ EKOR ................................................................ 1

UKURAN 2 : 1 EKOR UTUH ........................................................ 2

UKURAN 3 : 1 POTONG KECIL .................................................. 3

UKURAN 4 : 1 POTONG SEDANG ............................................. 4

UKURAN 5 : 1 POTONG BESAR ................................................ 5

C16 Mana saja bagian dari ikan

yang dimakan anggota rumah

tangga ini? TUNJUKKAN

GAMBAR

KEPALA ...................................................................................... A

PERUT ........................................................................................ B

BUNTUT ..................................................................................... C

KULIT .......................................................................................... D

TELUR ........................................................................................ E

TULANG ..................................................................................... F

LAINNYA, TULISKAN ______________________________ ..... G

C17

a Bagaimana biasanya ikan/

hewan laut itu dimasak?

DIGORENG................................................................................. A

DIBAKAR/ DIPANGGANG ......................................................... B

DIKUKUS .................................................................................... C

DIREBUS .................................................................................... D

DIOVEN/DIASAP ........................................................................ E

LAINNYA, TULISKAN_____________________________ ...... F

Page 89: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

89

C17

b Bagaimana biasanya

keluaraga memakan ikan?

ORANG YANG BERUSIA TUA MEMAKAN LEBIH DAHULU... A

KEPALA KELUARGA MAKAN TERLEBIH DAHULU ............... B

PEREMPUAN MAKAN BELAKANGAN .................................... C

ANAK-ANAK MAKAN BELAKANGAN ..................................... D

ORANG BERUSIA TUA DAPAT LEBIH BANYAK .................... E

KEPALA KELUARGA DAPAT LEBIH BANYAK ....................... F

PEREMPUAN DAPAT LEBIH SEDIKIT ..................................... G

ANAK-ANAK DAPAT LEBIH SEDIKIT ...................................... H

LAINNYA ____________________________________ .............. I

LAINNYA ____________________________________ ............. J

C18

a Setiap kali membeli,

biasanya, berapa banyak

yang Ibu/ Bapak beli? GALI

berapa kilo? BILA UKURAN

ADALAH BEBERAPA EKOR

IKAN/ HEWAN, BANTU

UNTUK MENGHITUNG KE

KG

KURANG ATAU SAMA DENGAN 1 KG ....................................... 1

LEBIH DARI 1 KG, KURANG DARI 2 KG .................................... 2

LEBIH DARI 2 KG ........................................................................ 3

LAINNYA, TULIS___________________________________ .... 4

C18

b Apakah Ibu/ Bapak pernah

membeli ikan sudah diolah?

Apakah Ibu/ Bapak pernah

membeli yang...?

TIDAK ......................................................................................... A

DIASAP ....................................................................................... B

DIKERINGKAN ........................................................................... C

DIASINKAN ................................................................................. D

DIBAKAR .................................................................................... E

DIGORENG................................................................................. F

DIREBUS/ DIKUKUS .................................................................. G

C18

c Seberapa sering

biasanya Ibu/ Bapak

membeli ikan di atas?

1 = beberapa kali

sehari

2 = setiap hari

3 = beberapa kali

seminggu

4 = seminggu sekali

5 = beberapa kali

sebulan

6 = sebulan sekali

7 = > 1x sebulan

TIDAK ............................

DIASAP ..........................

DIKERINGKAN ..............

DIASINKAN ...................

DIBAKAR .......................

DIGORENG ...................

DIREBUS/ DIKUKUS .....

1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7

1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7

1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7

1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7

1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7

1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7

1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7

Page 90: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

90

C19 Apa yang Ibu/ Bapak sukai

dari makanan ikan/ hewan

laut?

BILA DIJAWAB MANFAAT,

GALI APA MANFAATNYA?

RASANYA ................................................................................... A

MANFAATNYA, TULIS________________________________ B

MANFAATNYA, TULIS________________________________ C

HARGANYA ................................................................................ D

BAUNYA ..................................................................................... E

BENTUKNYA .............................................................................. F

KELUARGA SUKA MEMAKANNYA ........................................... G

LAINNYA, TULISKAN ______________________________ ..... H

C20 Apa yang Ibu/ Bapak kurang

atau tidak disukai dari

makanan ikan/ hewan laut?

RASANYA ................................................................................... A

HARGANYA ................................................................................ B

BAUNYA ..................................................................................... C

BENTUKNYA .............................................................................. D

KELUARGA TIDAK SUKA MEMAKANNYA ................................ E

BAWA SIAL ................................................................................. F

MENGURANGI KESEHATAN ..................................................... G

LAINNYA, TULISKAN ______________________________ ..... H

C21 Di mana orang-orang di

lingkungan sini mendapatkan/

membeli ikan / hewan laut?

BILA PERLU JELASKAN

KEMBALI MACAM-MACAM

IKAN/ HEWAN LAUT

BELI DI PELELANGAN IKAN...................................................... A

BELI DI NELAYAN LANGSUNG ................................................. B

BELI DI PASAR........................................................................... C

BELI DI SUPER MARKET .......................................................... D

BE LI DI TETANGGA ................................................................... E

MENGAMBIL SENDIRI/ SAYA NELAYAN .................................. F

BELI DI WARUNG (JADI/ SIAP SANTAP) .................................. G

LAINNYA, TULISKAN ______________________________ ..... H

C25

C22 Biasanya, seberapa sering

Ibu/ Bapak membeli ikan/

hewan laut?

LEBIH DARI SEKALI DALAM SEHARI ........................................ 1

SEKALI SEHARI/ SETIAP HARI .................................................. 2

BEBERAPA KALI DALAM SEMINGGU ....................................... 3

SEKALI SEMINGGU .................................................................... 4

BEBERAPA KALI DALAM SEBULAN .......................................... 5

SEBULAN SEKALI ATAU LEBIH JARANG ................................. 6

TIDAK INGAT............................................................................... 7

C23 Berapa jauh jaraknya untuk

mencapai tempat itu? AMBIL

YANG TERDEKAT SAJA

GALI, naik apa? Berapa

lama?

DEKAT SAJA/ DI SEBELAH RUMAH .......................................... 1

JALAN KAKI/ SEPEDA KURANG DARI SETENGAH JAM .......... 2

JALAN KAKI/SEPEDA 30 – 60 MENIT ....................................... 3

JALAN KAKI/SEPEDA LEBIH DARI SEJAM ............................... 4

NAIK KENDARAAN UMUM KURANG DARI 30 MENIT .............. 5

NAIK KENDARAAN UMUM 30 – 60 MENIT ............................... 6

NAIK KENDARAAN UMUM LEBIH DARI SEJAM ........................ 7

Page 91: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

91

C24 Apakah ikan/ hewan laut

selalu tersedia di tempat-

tempat itu?

YA SELALU TERSEDIA SETIAP HARI ...................................... 1

TERSEDIA BEBERAPA KALI SEMINGGU ................................ 2

TERSEDIA SEMINGGU SEKALI ................................................ 3

TERSEDIA BEBERAPA KALI DALAM SEBULAN .................... 4

TIDAK TERATUR, KADANG ADA, KADANG TIDAK ................ 5

C25 Menurut Ibu/ Bapak,

seberapa mudahkah orang-

orang di sini mendapatkan

ikan/ hewan laut?

SANGAT MUDAH ........................................................................ 1

CUKUP MUDAH .......................................................................... 2

BIASA SAJA ............................................................................... 3

CUKUP SULIT ............................................................................. 4

SANGAT SULIT ........................................................................... 5

C26 Apakah Ibu/ Bapak merasa

jumlah ikan/ hewan laut yang

dimakan keluarga sudah

cukup?

BERLEBIH ................................................................................... 1

CUKUP ........................................................................................ 2

SEDANG-SEDANG SAJA ........................................................... 3

KURANG ..................................................................................... 4

SANGAT KURANG ..................................................................... 5

C27 Andaikan di masa datang Ibu/

Bapak mendapat uang,

apakah Ibu/ Bapak

berkeinginan untuk makan

lebih banyak ikan/ hewan

laut?

YA ................................................................................................ 1

TIDAK .......................................................................................... 2

TIDAK TAHU ............................................................................... 3

PENGGUNAAN SUMBER DAYA LAUT > KHUSUS UNTUK NELAYAN/PESKADOR

D1 Apakah Ibu/ Bapak

mengambil menangkap ikan

atau binatang atau tumbuhan

laut untuk penghidupan?

YA ................................................................................................ 1

TIDAK .......................................................................................... 2

E1

D2a Apa saja yang Ibu/ Bapak

ambil dari laut?

IKAN ............................................................................................ A

UDANG ....................................................................................... B

KEPITING ................................................................................... C

CUMI ........................................................................................... D

RUMPUT LAUT ........................................................................... E

SIPUT ......................................................................................... F

KIMA / TIRAM ............................................................................. G

HASIL LAIN, TULISKAN ______________________________ . H

D2b Jenis ikan apa saja yang

diambil?

BANTU DENGAN GAMBAR

TULIS

TULISKAN ____________ /NAMA LOKAL________________

TULISKAN____________ /NAMA LOKAL________________

TULISKAN____________ / NAMA LOKAL________________

TULISKAN____________ / NAMA LOKAL_________________

TULISKAN___________ / NAMA LOKAL _________________

Page 92: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

92

D3 Seberapa sering Ibu/ Bapak

pergi melaut/ ke laut?

SETIAP HARI .............................................................................. A

DUA HARI SEKALI ..................................................................... B

TIGA HARI SEKALI ..................................................................... C

SEKALI SEMINGGU ................................................................... D

LAINNYA, TULIS ......................................................................... E

LAINNYA, TULIS ......................................................................... F

D4 Di mana biasanya Ibu/ Bapak

menangkap ikan/ binatang/

tumbuhan laut?

BERIKUTNYA SEBUT

BINATANG/ TUMBUHAN

LAUTNYA

PANTAI/ PESISIR ....................................................................... A

DAERAH KARANG ..................................................................... B

LAUT DALAM.............................................................................. C

LAINNYA, TULIS ________________________________ ........ D

LAINNYA, TULIS ________________________________ ........ E

D5 Berapa jauh itu letaknya dari

pantai?

Berapa jam perjalanan ke

tempat itu?

Berapa lama perjalanan dari

rumah ke pantai?

BANTU KONVERSIKAN KE

SATUAN TERCANTUM

DAN BILA DIJAWAB

DALAM RANGE AMBIL

YANG

TERJAUH/TERLAMA

A) ...... METER - ........... METER - ............. METER-............

METER

B) ........MENIT...............MENIT- ............... MENIT -

..............MENIT

C) ............... MENIT

D6 Berapa lama biasanya Ibu/

Bapak gunakan sekali melaut/

ke laut?

KURANG DARI 6 JAM ................................................................. 1

6 – 12 JAM ................................................................................... 2

12 – 24 JAM ................................................................................. 3

1 – 2 HARI ................................................................................... 4

3 – 5 HARI ................................................................................... 5

6 – 10 HARI ................................................................................. 6

LEBIH DARI 10 HARI ................................................................... 7

Page 93: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

93

D7 Pada bulan-bulan apa saja

Bapak/ Ibu melaut/ ke laut?

JANUARI ..................................................................................... A

FEBRUARI .................................................................................. B

MARET ....................................................................................... C

APRIL .......................................................................................... D

MEI .............................................................................................. E

JUNI ............................................................................................ F

JULI ............................................................................................ G

AGUSTUS ................................................................................... H

SEPTEMBER ................................................................................ I

OKTOBER ................................................................................... J

NOPEMBER................................................................................ K

DESEMBER .................................................................................. I

D8 Dalam beberapa bulan

terakhir, sekali melaut/ ke

laut, biasanya berapa banyak

tangkapan/ hasil laut yang

Ibu/ Bapak dapatkan?

A) IKAN, TULIS_____________ : ______EKOR; ______EMBER

IKAN, TULIS_____________ : ______EKOR; ______EMBER

IKAN, TULIS_____________ : ______EKOR; ______EMBER

IKAN, TULIS_____________ : ______EKOR; ______EMBER

IKAN, TULIS_____________ : ______EKOR; ______EMBER

B) NON IKAN :

TULIS _______; ____KG; _____EKOR;_____IKAT; ___EMBER

TULIS _______; ____KG; _____EKOR; ____ IKAT ;___EMBER

TULIS _______; ____KG; _____EKOR; ____ IKAT; ___EMBER

TULIS _______; ____KG; _____EKOR; ____ IKAT;___EMBER

TULIS _______;____KG; _____EKOR; ____ IKAT;____EMBER

D9 Biasanya berapa banyak hasil

tangkapan/ hasil laut yang

Ibu/ Bapak makan untuk

keluarga sendiri?

A) IKAN, TULIS_____________ : ______EKOR; ____EMBER

IKAN, TULIS_____________ : ______EKOR; ____EMBER

IKAN, TULIS_____________ : ______EKOR; ____EMBER

IKAN, TULIS_____________ : ______EKOR; ____EMBER

IKAN, TULIS_____________ : ______EKOR; ____EMBER

B) NON IKAN :

TULIS _______; _____KG;____EKOR;_____IKAT; ___EMBER

TULIS _______; _____KG; ___ EKOR;_____IKAT; ___EMBER

TULIS _______; _____KG;____EKOR; _____IKAT; ___EMBER

TULIS ______; _____KG; ____EKOR;_____IKAT;____EMBER

TULIS ______; _____KG;____EKOR; _____IKAT;____EMBER

D10 Apakah jumlah hasil

tangkapan/ hasil laut yang

didapat berubah dari tahun ke

tahun?

YA, MENURUN ............................................................................ 1

TETAP SAJA ............................................................................... 2

YA, BERTAMBAH ....................................................................... 3

YA, IKAN MENURUN DAN NON IKAN BERTAMBAH ............... 4

YA, IKAN BERTAMBAH DAN NON IKAN MENURUN ............... 5

Page 94: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

94

D11 Sejak kapan Ibu/ Bapak

mengalaminya?

SETAHUN TERAKHIR ................................................................. 1

2 TAHUN TERAKHIR ................................................................... 2

3 – 4 TAHUN TERAKHIR ............................................................. 3

LEBIH DARI 5 TAHUN LALU ....................................................... 4

D12 Kira-kira, apa penyebabnya?

CUACA BURUK/ OMBAK BESAR .............................................. A

KAPAL RUSAK/ KURANG BAGUS ............................................ B

ALAT TIDAK MEMADAI .............................................................. C

MODAL KERJA KURANG .......................................................... D

PERSAINGAN ANTARNELAYAN/ PESKADOR ......................... E

IKAN BERKURANG .................................................................... F

LAINNYA, TULISKAN ________________________________ . G

LAINNYA, TULISKAN ________________________________ . H

D13 Kira-kira apa yang perlu

dilakukan agar hasil yang

didapat lebih banyak?

___________________________________________________A

___________________________________________________B

___________________________________________________C

___________________________________________________D

PENGAMATAN

E1 LIHAT DINDING UNTUK

MENENTUKAN TIPE RUMAH

SECARA UMUM

PERMANEN (SEMEN, BATA, BATAKO) ..................................... 1

SEMI PERMANEN (SETENGAH TEMBOK) ................................ 2

TIDAK PERMANEN (BAMBU, PAPAN, GEDEK DLL) ................. 3

E2 LIHAT WILAYAH TERBANYAK

BAHAN LANTAI RUMAH

TANAH ......................................................................................... 1

BAMBU ........................................................................................ 2

PAPAN ......................................................................................... 3

SEMEN ........................................................................................ 4

UBIN ............................................................................................ 5

KERAMIK ..................................................................................... 6

LAINNYA (TULIS) ______________________ ........................... 7

E3 NILAI KONDISI VENTILASI SECARA SUBYEKTIF. CUKUP =

TIDAK TERASA SUMPEK = TERASA ADA ANGIN

CUKUP ................................... 1

TIDAK CUKUP ....................... 2

E4 LOKASI

ALDEA

BERBATASAN DENGAN PANTAI ................................................................................. 1

BERBATASAN DGN ALDEA YG DIPINGGIR PANTAI ................................................. 2

JAUH DARI PANTAI ...................................................................................................... 3

E5 LIHAT KONDISI JALAN DEPAN

RUMAH

TANAH ......................................................................................... 1

DI ASPAL/ SEMEN/ PAVING BLOCK .......................................... 2

E6 ALAT TRANSPORTASI DARI

IBU KOTA DISTRIK KE ALDEA

ADA TRANSPORTASI UMUM ..................................................... 1

TIDAK ADA TRANSPORTASI UMUM ......................................... 2

Page 95: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

95

E7

JARAK

DARI IBU

KOTA

DISTRIK

KE ALDEA

KURANG DARI 1/2 JAM DENGAN KENDARAAN BERMOTOR ................................... 1

½ - 1 JAM DENGAN KENDARAAN BERMOTOR.......................................................... 2

LEBIH DARI 1 JAM DENGAN KENDARAAN BERMOTOR ........................................... 3

LAINNYA, TULISKAN_________________________________________ ................... 4

E8 ONGKOS DARI IBUKOTA

DISTRIK KE ALDEA

KURANG DARI $3 (MURAH) ....................................................... 1

ANTARA $3-5 (SEDANG) ............................................................ 2

LEBIH DARI $5 (MAHAL) ............................................................ 3

E9 SAMPAH

SAMPAH IKAN/ HASIL LAUT .................................................................... A

SAMPAH HASIL PENGOLAHAN IKAN/ HASIL LAUT ............................... B

SAMPAH DI DALAM RUMAH .................................................................... C

SAMPAH DI HALAMAN RUMAH ............................................................... D

SAMPAH DI LUAR RUMAH ....................................................................... E

E10

KONDISI INFRASTRUKSTUR

PERIKANAN YANG ADA (BAIK,

RUSAK RINGAN, RUSAK

BERAT), BERFUNGSI ATAU

TIDAK

TEMPAT PELELANGAN IKAN, TULIS__________ .................................. 1

TEMPAT PENDARATAN KAPAL, TULIS ______________ ...................... 2

COLD STORAGE, TULIS____________________ ................................... 3

TEMPAT PENJEMURAN IKAN, TULIS __________ ................................. 4

TEMPAT PENGOLAHAN IKAN, TULIS __________ ................................ 5

LAINNYA, TULISKAN__________________ ............................................ 6

____________________________________ ........................................... 7

____________________________________ ........................................... 8

Page 96: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

96

ENGLISH TRANSLATION

QUESTIONNAIRE ON FISH/ANIMAL PROTEIN CONSUMPTION AND

FISH AVAILABILITY SURVEY – TIMOR-LESTE 2011

NO QUESTIONS RESPONDENT ANSWERS TO

GENERAL ILLUSTRATION

A1 SEX

(DON’T ASK JUST WRITE)

MALE .............................................................................. 1

FEMALE ......................................................................... 2

A2

How old are you?

PLEASE BE POLITE AND

LOOK AT THE SITUATION

YEAR

A3 When is your birthdate?

PLEASE BE POLITE AND

LOOK AT THE SITUATION

MONTH - YEAR

1. DISTRICT: __________________________________ 2. SUB-DISTRICT: ___________________________________

3. SUCO: _______________________________ 4. ALDEIA: _________________________________________

5. HOUSE NO: ____________ 6. NAME OF HOUSEHOLD HEAD: _____________________________________

QUESTIONNAIRE NO:

INTERVIEWER:

INFORMED CONSENT – MUST READ

Good Morning/ Afternoon/Evening. My name is ..........................., I am from the Regional Fisheries

Livelihood Program. We are currently conducting a survey to identify and obtain understanding on

Community’s knowledge, understanding and perception on various aspects of fish consumption and

animal protein consumption. The results of this survey will be used as inputs to develop programs on

the above aspects. All information will be kept as confidential and for the purpose of our survey only.

Are you willing to participate in this survey?

CONTINUE ONLY IF THE ANSWER IS YES

Page 97: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

97

NO QUESTIONS RESPONDENT ANSWERS TO

A4 How many people live in this

house?

ANYBODY, AS LONG AS THE

PERSON STAYS/SLEEPS IN THE

HOUSE, INCLUDING SERVANTS.

A5 What is your religion? CATHOLIC ..................................................................... 1

CHRISTIAN .................................................................... 2

MOSLEM ........................................................................ 3

HINDU ............................................................................ 4

BUDDHIST ..................................................................... 5

OHTER, WRITE_______________________________ 6

A6 What is your marriage status? MARRIED ....................................................................... 1

NOT MARRIED/SINGLE ................................................ 2

DIVORCE 1 (BY DIVORCE) ........................................... 3

DIVORCE 2 (BY DEATH) ............................................... 4

SOCIOECONOMIC BACKGROUND

B1 Have you attended school? YES ................................................................................ 1

NO .................................................................................. 2

B3

B2 What level has been

completed?

ELEMENTARY NOT COMPLETED ............................... 1

ELEMENTARY COMPLETED ........................................ 2

JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL NOT COMPLETED ................ 3

JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL COMPLETED ......................... 4

SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL NOT COMPLETED ................ 5

SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL COMPLETED ........................ 6

DIPLOMA NOT COMPLETED........................................ 7

DIPLOMA COMPLETED ................................................ 8

BACHELOR NOT COMPLETED .................................... 9

BACHELOR COMPLETED .......................................... 10

OTHERS, WRITE_____________________________ 11

Page 98: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

98

NO QUESTIONS RESPONDENT ANSWERS TO

B3 Are you or those living in this

house own the following

goods?

PLEASE TRY TO BE REAL

POLITE AND IF FEEL THAT

YOU STILL FEEL AWKWARD,

DO AN OBSERVATION ONLY

(MAKE A NOTE IF YOU DO

OBSERVATION ONLY) AND

MOVE TO THE NEXT

QUESTIONS.

BICYCLE ........................................................................A

MOTORBIKE ..................................................................B

CAR ............................................................................... C

CAR PICK UP................................................................ D

TRUK ..............................................................................E

RADIO ............................................................................ F

TV ................................................................................. G

PARABOLE ................................................................... H

DVD/ VCD/CD PLAYER .................................................. I

REFRIGERATOR ........................................................... J

TELEPHONE ..................................................................K

HANDPHONE................................................................. L

OWN HOUSE ................................................................ M

COW/KERBAU .............................................................. N

GOAT/SHEEP ............................................................... O

PIG .................................................................................P

CHICKEN ...................................................................... Q

MOTORISED BOAT ...................................................... R

WOODEN SAILBOAT ....................................................S

WOODEN ROW BOAT .................................................. T

B4 In the last month, did you work

for money?

YES ................................................................................ 1

NO .................................................................................. 2

B6

Page 99: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

99

NO QUESTIONS RESPONDENT ANSWERS TO

B5 What is your main

job/occupation?

TEACHER .................................................................... 11

LECTURER .................................................................. 12

DIRETOR ..................................................................... 13

MENISTRU MEMBRU PARLEMENTU ........................ 14

MEDICAL DOCTOR/ANIMAL DOCTOR ...................... 15

FUNGSIONARIA PNTL/ F-FDTL .................................. 21

FUNGSIONARIO EMPRESARIU ................................. 22

FISHERMAN ................................................................ 23

FARMER ...................................................................... 24

FACTORY WORKER ................................................... 31

FISH WORKER ............................................................ 31

FARM WORKER .......................................................... 32

MARKET/SHOP WORKER .......................................... 33

BUILDING WORKER ................................................... 34

SELLER AT MARKET/MALL/SHOP ............................. 41

INFORMAL VENDOR ................................................... 42

OWN KIOSK/SMALL SHOP AT HOME ........................ 43

FISH COLLECTOR ...................................................... 51

SEAWEED FARMER ................................................... 52

COLLECT FISH/MARINE BIOTA

DURING LOW TIDE .......................................... 53

PROCESSED FISH VENDOR/SELLER ....................... 54

OTHER, WRITE______________________________ 55

B6

B7

What other job do you do to

make money?

What is the other family

member job to make money?

B6

B7

Page 100: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

100

NO QUESTIONS RESPONDENT ANSWERS TO

TEACHER ......................................................................A

LECTURER ....................................................................B

DIRETOR ..................................................................... C

MENISTRU MEMBRU PARLEMENTU ......................... D

MEDICAL DOCTOR/ANIMAL DOCTOR ........................E

FUNGSIONARIA PNTL/ F-FDTL .................................... F

FUNGSIONARIO EMPRESARIU .................................. G

FISHERMAN/ PESKADOR ........................................... H

FARMER ......................................................................... I

FISH WORKER/ PESKADOR ........................................ J

FARM WORKER ............................................................K

MARKET/SHOP WORKER ............................................ L

BUILDING WORKER .................................................... M

SELLER AT MARKET/MALL/SHOP .............................. N

INFORMAL VENDOR .................................................... O

OWN KIOSK/SMALL SHOP AT HOME ..........................P

FISH COLLECTOR/BUYER FROM FISHER /

PESKADOR .............................................................. Q

SEAWEED FARMER .................................................... R

PROCESSED FISH VENDOR/SELLER .........................S

COLLECT FISH/MARINE BIOTA DURING LOW TIDE/

REEFGLEANER ........................................................ T

OTHER, (WRITE)_____________________________ U

B6 IF RESPONDENT IS NOT

HEAD OF HOUESEHOLD

(SEE A7) What is the head of

household job/occupation?

GOVERNMENT CIVIL SERVANT ................................ 11

POLICE/ARMY ............................................................. 12

ENTREPRENEUR ........................................................ 13

PROFESSIONAL (LAWYER/DOCTOR ETC) .............. 14

EMPLOYEE (MANAGERIAL/CLERICAL) .................... 15

FISHERMAN ................................................................ 21

FARMER ...................................................................... 22

FACTORY WORKER ................................................... 31

FISH WORKER ............................................................ 32

FARM WORKER .......................................................... 33

MARKET/SHOP WORKER .......................................... 34

BUILDING WORKER ................................................... 35

SELLER AT MARKET/MALL/SHOP ............................. 41

INFORMAL VENDOR ................................................... 42

OWN WARUNG/SMALL SHOP AT HOME .................. 43

FISH COLLECTOR ...................................................... 44

SEAWEED FARMER ................................................... 45

PROCESSED FISH VENDOR/SELLER ....................... 46

OTHER, WRITE______________________________ 47

Page 101: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

101

NO QUESTIONS RESPONDENT ANSWERS TO

B8 Is there a woman in the house

working as fisher/peskador? IF

YES, who is she?

WIFE HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD ......................................A

DAUGHTER HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD ...........................B

NONE ____________________________ ................... C

OTHER, (WRITE) ____________________________ . D

B9 What is the average income

received by you and your family

in a month? REFER TO LAST

MONTH

.............................

FISH CONSUMPTION

C1

Today or yesterday, do/did you

eat meat or fish?

IF ASKED, EXPLAIN ANY

KIND OF MEAT: CHICKEN,

PORK, BEEF, LAMB, FISH

ETC

YES ................................................................................ 1

NO .................................................................................. 2

C4A

C2 In last week? YES ................................................................................ 1

NO .................................................................................. 2

C4A

C3 When was the last time you eat

meat/fish?

WITHIN THE LAST 2 WEEKS ........................................ 1

WITHIN THIS MONTH ................................................... 2

MORE THAN A MONTH AGO........................................ 3

DO NOT REMEMBER .................................................... 4

DO NOT EAT ANY MEAT/FISH ..................................... 5

C4

C4

C4

C5

C4 Do all family members in the

house eat meat/fish?

YES ................................................................................ 1

NO .................................................................................. 2

C5

C4b When do your family usually

eat meat/fish?

AT PARTY .....................................................................A

EVERYDAY MEAL .........................................................B

OTHER, WRITE ______________________________ C

C6

C6

C6

C5 Why don’t you/family member

in this house do not eat

meat/fish?

EXPENSIVE ...................................................................A

NOT AVAILABLE IN THE MARKET/NO ONE SELL ......B

DO NOT LIKE ................................................................ C

DIFFICULT TO COOK ................................................... D

TASTE NOT GOOD .......................................................E

NOT FRESH ................................................................... F

NOT REGULAR FOOD ................................................. G

OTHERS, WRITE______________________________H

ONLY EAT EGG OR OTHERS ___________________ . I

C21

C21

C21

C21

C21

C21

C21

C21

C21

Page 102: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

102

NO QUESTIONS RESPONDENT ANSWERS TO

C6 What kind of meat/fish do you

have for meal?

EXPLORE, any other? IF

ANSWER FISH, what kind of

fish?

CHICKEN .......................................................................A

LAMB/GOAT ..................................................................B

PORK ............................................................................ C

BEEF ............................................................................. D

KERBAU/BEEF .............................................................E

FISH (FROM RIVER/LAKE) ........................................... F

FISH (FROM SEA) ........................................................ G

EGG ............................................................................. H

OTHERS, WRITE_____________________________ .. I

C7A From the meat/fish that you eat

(READ ANSWERS FROM THE

ABOVE QUESTION), which is

the most often you have during

meal?

CHICKEN ....................................................................... 1

LAMB/GOAT .................................................................. 2

PORK ............................................................................. 3

BEEF .............................................................................. 4

KERBAU/BEEF .............................................................. 5

FISH (FROM RIVER/LAKE) ........................................... 6

FISH (FROM SEA)/OTHER SEAFOOD ......................... 7

EGG ............................................................................... 8

OTHERS, WRITE_____________________________ . 9

C9

C7B How frequent do you eat those

meat/fish?

1 = 3 x a day

2 = 2 x a day

3 = 1 x a day

4 = several times per week

5 = once a week

6 = several times per month

7 =once a month

8 = several times a year

9 = very rarely

A) CHICKEN ........................................

B) LAMB/GOAT ...................................

C) PORK .............................................

D) BEEF ..............................................

E) KERBAU/BEEF ...............................

F) FISH (FROM RIVER/LAKE) ............

G) FISH (FROM SEA)/OTHER

SEAFOOD ......................................

H) TELUR ............................................

1–2–3–4–5–6–7–8–9

1–2–3–4–5–6–7–8–9

1–2–3–4–5–6–7–8–9

1–2–3–4–5–6–7–8–9

1–2–3–4–5–6–7–8–9

1–2–3–4–5–6–7–8–9

1–2–3–4–5–6–7–8–9

1–2–3–4–5–6–7–8–9

Page 103: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

103

NO QUESTIONS RESPONDENT ANSWERS TO

C7C How much/size of the fish

you/family members usually eat

at a meal? SHOW

EXAMPLE/TOOLS

CHICKEN

1 – One small piece

2 – one big piece

LAMB - BEEF

1 – One small piece

2 – one big piece

FISH (=C15)

1 - ½ OF FISH

2 - 1 WHOLE FISH

3 - 1 SMALL PIECE

4 - 1 MEDIUM PIECE

5 - 1 BIG PIECE

A) CHICKEN ..............................................

B) LAMB/GOAT .........................................

C) PORK ...................................................

D) BEEF ....................................................

E) KERBAU/BEEF .....................................

F) FISH (FROM RIVER/LAKE) ..................

G) FISH (FROM SEA)/OTHER SEAFOOD

.............................................................

H) TELUR ..................................................

SIZE ....., QUANTITY .....

SIZE ....., QUANTITY .....

SIZE ....., QUANTITY .....

SIZE ....., QUANTITY .....

SIZE ....., QUANTITY .....

SIZE ....., QUANTITY .....

SIZE ....., QUANTITY .....

SIZE ....., QUANTITY .....

C8 Have you eaten fish/other

seafood? EXPLAIN SEAFOOD

ARE INCLUDING FISH,

PRAWN,SQUID,OYSTER,CRA

B ETC

YES ................................................................................ 1

NO .................................................................................. 2

C21

C9 When was the last time

you/family member here ate

fish/seafood?

YESTERDAY .................................................................. 1

WITHIN THIS WEEK ...................................................... 2

WITHIN THE LAST TWO WEEKS ................................. 3

WITHIN THIS MONTH ................................................... 4

MORE THAN A MONTH AGO........................................ 5

DO NOT REMEMBER .................................................... 6

MORE THAN A YEAR DO NOT EAT FISH/SEAFOOD . 7

C11

C11

C10, THEN

TO

C21

C10 Why do you not eat

fish/seafood?

EXPENSIVE ...................................................................A

NOT AVAILABLE IN MARKET/NO ONE SELLS ............B

DO NOT LIKE ................................................................ C

DIFFICULT TO COOK ................................................... D

TASTE NOT GOOD .......................................................E

NOT FRESH ................................................................... F

NOT GOOD FOR CHILDREN’S HEALTH .................... G

BRING BAD LUCK ...................................................... H

OTHERS, WRITE______________________________ I

Page 104: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

104

NO QUESTIONS RESPONDENT ANSWERS TO

C11 Usually, how often do you eat

fish/seafood?

BE CAREFUL, SEE ANSWER

NO C9

MORE THAN ONCE PER DAY ...................................... 1

ONCE A DAY/EVERYDAY ............................................. 2

SEVERAL TIMES IN A WEEK........................................ 3

ONCE A WEEK .............................................................. 4

SEVERAL TIMES IN A MONTH ..................................... 5

ONCE A MONTH OR LESS ........................................... 6

DO NOT REMEMBER .................................................... 7

C12 What kind of fish/seafood do

you usually eat?

FISH, WRITE THE NAME _______________________ A

FISH, WRITE THE NAME _______________________ B

FISH, WRITE THE NAME _______________________C

PRAWN ......................................................................... D

CRAB .............................................................................E

SQUID ........................................................................... F

SNAIL ........................................................................... G

OYSTER/CLAM ............................................................. H

OTHERS, WRITE ______________________________ I

C13 Which fish/seafood is your

favourite or you like most?

FISH, WRITE THE NAME _______________________ A

FISH, WRITE THE NAME _______________________ B

FISH, WRITE THE NAME _______________________C

PRAWN ......................................................................... D

CRAB .............................................................................E

SQUID ............................................................................ F

SNAIL ........................................................................... G

OYSTER/CLAM ............................................................. H

OTHERS, WRITE ______________________________ I

C14 For other family members,

which fish/seafood are their

favourite or they like most?

FISH, WRITE THE NAME _______________________ A

FISH, WRITE THE NAME _______________________ B

FISH, WRITE THE NAME _______________________C

PRAWN ......................................................................... D

CRAB .............................................................................E

SQUID ............................................................................ F

SNAIL ........................................................................... G

OYSTER/CLAM ............................................................. H

OTHERS, WRITE ______________________________ I

C15 How much/size of the fish

you/family members usually eat

at a meal? SHOW

EXAMPLE/TOOLS

SIZE 1 : ½ OF FISH ..................................................... 1

SIZE 2 : 1 WHOLE FISH ................................................ 2

SIZE 3 : 1 SMALL PIECE ............................................... 3

SIZE 4 : 1 MEDIUM PIECE ............................................ 4

SIZE 5 : 1 BIG PIECE ..................................................... 5

Page 105: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

105

NO QUESTIONS RESPONDENT ANSWERS TO

C16 What part of the fish do you

eat? SHOW PICTURE

HEAD .............................................................................A

FILLET/MIDDLE .............................................................B

TAIL OR FINS ............................................................... C

SKIN .............................................................................. D

EGG ...............................................................................E

BONES .......................................................................... F

OTHER, WRITE ______________________________ G

C17a How do you cook the

fish/seafood?

DEEP FRY .....................................................................A

GRILL/BROIL .................................................................B

STEAM .......................................................................... C

BOIL .............................................................................. D

PUT IN OVEN/SMOKE ...................................................E

OTHER, WRITE_____________________________ .... F

C17b How do family usually eat

fish/seafood?

OLDER MEMBER OF THE FAMILY EAT

FIRST/PRIORITY ......................................................A

HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD EAT FIRST/PRIORITY ...........B

WOMEN EAT LATER .................................................... C

CHILDREN EAT LATER ................................................ D

OLDER MEMBER OF THE FAMILY GET BIGGER

PORTION ..................................................................E

HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD GET BIGGER PORTION ....... F

WOMEN GET SMALLER PORTION ............................. G

CHILDREN GET SMALLER PORTION ......................... H

OTHER, WRITE _______________________________ I

OTHER, WRITE _______________________________J

C18a Everytime you buy, how much

do you usually buy?

EXPLORE, how many kilos? IF

ANSWER BY

QUANTITY/PIECE, HELP

CONVERT TO KG

LESS OR EQUAL TO 1 KG ............................................ 1

MORE THAN 1 KG, LESS THAN 2 KG .......................... 2

MORE THAN 2 KG ......................................................... 3

OTHERS, WRITE______________________________ 4

C18b Have you ever bought

processed fish/seafood?

Have you ever bought

fish/seafood that.......?

NO ..................................................................................A

SMOKED ........................................................................B

DRIED ........................................................................... C

SALTED ........................................................................ D

GRILLED ........................................................................E

FRIED ............................................................................. F

BOIL/STEAM ................................................................. G

Page 106: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

106

NO QUESTIONS RESPONDENT ANSWERS TO

C18c How frequent do you usually

buy the above processed fish?

1 = several times a day

2 = everyday

3 = several times a week

4 = once a week

5 = several times a month

6 =once a month

7 = > 1x a month

NO .......................................................

SMOKED .............................................

DRIED ................................................

SALTED ..............................................

GRILLED .............................................

FRIED ..................................................

BOIL/STEAM .......................................

1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7

1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7

1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7

1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7

1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7

1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7

1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7

C19 What do you like from

fish/seafood?

IF ANSWER IS BENEFIT,

EXPLORE WHICH BENEFIT

THE TASTE ....................................................................A

THE BENEFIT, WRITE__________________________B

THE BENEFIT, WRITE__________________________C

PRICE ........................................................................... D

SMELL ............................................................................E

SHAPE ........................................................................... F

FAMILY LIKES TO EAT IT ............................................ G

OTHER, WRITE ______________________________ H

C20 What don’t you like or not really

like from fish/seafood?

THE TASTE ....................................................................A

PRICE ............................................................................B

SMELL ........................................................................... C

SHAPE .......................................................................... D

FAMILY DOES NOT LIKES TO EAT IT ..........................E

OTHER, WRITE _______________________________F

C21 Where do people in this area

get/buy fish/seafood? IF

NEEDED, EXPLAIN AGAIN

TYPES OF FISH/SEAFOOD

AT FISH AUCTION .........................................................A

DIRECT FROM FISHERMEN.........................................B

AT THE MARKET .......................................................... C

AT FOOD VENDORS .................................................... D

FROM NEIGHBOURS ....................................................E

FROM MY OWN CATCH AS FISHERMAN .................... F

BUY AT FOOD STALL (READY TO EAT) ..................... G

OTHER, WRITE ______________________________ H

C25

C22 How often do you buy

fish/seafood?

MORE THAN ONCE PER DAY ...................................... 1

ONCE A DAY/EVERYDAY ............................................. 2

SEVERAL TIMES IN A WEEK........................................ 3

ONCE A WEEK .............................................................. 4

SEVERAL TIMES IN A MONTH ..................................... 5

ONCE A MONTH OR LESS ........................................... 6

DO NOT REMEMBER .................................................... 7

Page 107: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

107

NO QUESTIONS RESPONDENT ANSWERS TO

C23 How far is the place to buy/get

your fish/seafood? TAKE THE

CLOSEST ONE

EXPLORE, how? How long?

CLOSE BY/NEXT DOOR ............................................... 1

WALK/BICYCLE LESS THAN HALF AN HOUR............. 2

WALK/BICYCLE 30 – 60 MINUTE ................................ 3

WALK/BICYCLE MORE THAN ONE HOUR .................. 4

PUBLIC TRANSPORT LESS THAN 30 MINUTE ........... 5

PUBLIC TRANSPORT 30 – 60 MINUTES .................... 6

PUBLIC TRANSPORT MORE THAN ONE HOUR ......... 7

C24 Are fish/seafood always

available in those places?

YES, ALWAYS EVERYDAY ........................................... 1

AVAILABLE SEVERAL TIMES A WEEK ........................ 2

AVAILABLE ONCE A WEEK .......................................... 3

AVAILABLE SEVERAL TIMES A MONTH ..................... 4

NOT ALWAYS, SOMETIMES AVAILABLE,

SOMETIMES NOT..................................................... 5

C25 In your opinion, how easy the

people in this area obtain

fish/seafood?

VERY EASY ................................................................... 1

QUITE EASY .................................................................. 2

MEDIUM ......................................................................... 3

FAIRLY DIFFICULT ........................................................ 4

VERY DIFFICULT .......................................................... 5

C26 Do you feel that the quantity of

fish/seafood eaten by family

members is enough?

MORE THAN ENOUGH ................................................. 1

ENOUGH ........................................................................ 2

JUST RIGHT/MEDIUM ................................................... 3

NOT ENOUGH ............................................................... 4

VERY LESS .................................................................. 5

C27 If in the near future you have

more money, are you

planning/willing to eat more

fish/seafood?

YES ................................................................................ 1

NO .................................................................................. 2

DO NOT KNOW ............................................................. 3

SEA RESOURCES UTILISATION ---SPECIAL FOR FISHERMEN

D1 Do you catch fish/other marine

resources for a living?

YES ................................................................................ 1

NO .................................................................................. 2

E1

Page 108: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

108

NO QUESTIONS RESPONDENT ANSWERS TO

D2a What sea resources/animal do

you utilise from the sea?

FISH ...............................................................................A

SHRIMP/PRAWN ...........................................................B

CRAB ............................................................................ C

SQUID ........................................................................... D

OYSTER .........................................................................E

SEAWEED ..................................................................... F

SNAIL ........................................................................... G

OYSTER/CLAM ............................................................. H

OTHER, WRITE _______________________________ I

D2b What kind of fish do you catch?

HELP WITH TOOL/PICTURE

WRITE______________ /LOCAL NAME_____________

WRITE______________ /LOCAL NAME_____________

WRITE______________ /LOCAL NAME_____________

WRITE______________ /LOCAL NAME_____________

WRITE______________ /LOCAL NAME_____________

D3 How frequent do you go to the

sea/fishing?

EVERYDAY ....................................................................A

ONCE EVERY TWO DAYS ............................................B

ONCE EVERY THREE DAYS ...................................... C

ONCE A WEEK ............................................................ D

OTHER, WRITE .............................................................E

OTHER, WRITE ............................................................. F

D4 Where do you usually fish?

FOR FOLLOWING

QUESTIONS, SAY THE SEA

ANIMAL/RESOURCES

ALONG THE COAST .....................................................A

IN THE REEF AREA ......................................................B

DEEP SEA .................................................................... C

OTHER, WRITE ______________________________ D

OTHER, WRITE ______________________________ .E

D5

How far is it from coast?

How long does it take to get there??

How long does it take from your house to coast?

HELP CONVERT WITH THE DESIGNATED

MEASUREMENT AND IF ANSWER IN RANGE

WRITE THE FARTHEST/LONGESTTIME

A) ............... METRE

B) ............... MINUTES

C) ............... MINUTES

D6 How long usually one fishing

trip takes?

LESS THAN 6 HOURS ................................................... 1

6 – 12 HOURS ............................................................... 2

12 – 24 HOURS (1/2-1 DAY) ......................................... 3

2 DAYS ........................................................................... 4

3 – 5 DAYS ..................................................................... 5

6 – 10 DAYS ................................................................... 6

MORE THAN 10 DAYS .................................................. 7

Page 109: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

109

NO QUESTIONS RESPONDENT ANSWERS TO

D7 Which month of theyear do you

usually go fishing?

JANUARY .......................................................................A

FEBRUARY ....................................................................B

MARCH ......................................................................... C

APRIL ............................................................................ D

MAY ................................................................................E

JUNE .............................................................................. F

JULY ............................................................................. G

AUGUST ....................................................................... H

SEPTEMBER .................................................................. I

OCTOBER ...................................................................... J

NOVEMBER ...................................................................K

DECEMBER ................................................................... L

D8 In the last few months,

everytime you go fishing, how

much do you catch per trip?

A) FISH : ______KG; ______PIECE; ____PILE;

______BUCKET

B) NON FISH : ____KG; _____PIECE; ____PILE;

______BUCKET

D9 Usually, how much of your

catch do you consume for

yourself/family?

A) FISH : ______KG; ______PIECE; ____PILE;

______BUCKET

B) NON FISH : ____KG; _____PIECE; ____PILE;

______BUCKET

D10 Is there a change in the amount

of fish you catch over the year?

YES, DECREASING ....................................................... 1

THE SAME ..................................................................... 2

YES, INCREASING ........................................................ 3

YES, FISH DECREASING AND NON FISH

INCREASING ............................................................ 4

YES,FISH INCREASING AND NON FISH

DECREASING ........................................................... 5

E1

D11 Since when have you

experienced it?

WITHIN THE LAST YEAR .............................................. 1

THE LAST TWO YEARS ................................................ 2

THE LAST THREE – FOUR YEARS .............................. 3

MORE THEN FIVE YEARS AGO ................................... 4

D12 What do you think the reason

for this?

BAD WEATHER/HIGH WAVE ........................................A

BOAT TROUBLE/NOT GOOD .......................................B

FISHING GEAR NOT ADEQUATE ................................ C

CAPITAL NOT ENOUGH .............................................. D

COMPETITION AMONG FISHERS ................................E

FISH DECREASING ....................................................... F

OTHER, WRITE ______________________________ G

OTHER, WRITE ______________________________ H

Page 110: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

110

NO QUESTIONS RESPONDENT ANSWERS TO

D13 What needs to be done to get

more income?

____________________________________________ A

____________________________________________ B

____________________________________________ C

____________________________________________ D

OBSERVATIONS

E1 SEE HOUSE WALL TO DETERMINE

TYPE OF HOUSE

PERMANENT (CEMENT, BRICK, CONBLOCK) ...................... 1

SEMI PERMANENT (HALF CEMENT) ..................................... 2

NON PERMANENT (BAMBOO, WOOD ETC) .......................... 3

E2 SEE THE DOMINANT FLOORING IN

THE HOUSE

GROUND ................................................................................. 1

BAMBOO ................................................................................. 2

WOOD ..................................................................................... 3

CEMENT .................................................................................. 4

CEMENT FLOORING .............................................................. 5

CERAMIC ................................................................................ 6

OTHER, WRITE _________________________________ ...... 7

E3 OBSERVE VENTILATION CONDITION

SUBJECTIVELY. MEDIUM = FEEL

THE BREEZE, HOT= NOT ENOUGH

MEDIUM .................................................................................. 1

NOT ENOUGH ......................................................................... 2

E4 LOCATION OF ALDEA RIGHT BY THE COAST ................................................. 1

NEXT TO ALDEA BY THE COAST ............................... 2

FAR FROM COAST ....................................................... 3

E5 CONDITION OF ROAD IN FRONT

OF HOUSE

GROUND ....................................................................... 1

ASPHALT/ CEMENT/ PAVING BLOCK ......................... 2

E6

MODE OF TRANSPORTATION

FROM DISTRICT CAPITAL TO

ALDEA

PUBLIC TRANSPORT ................................................... 1

NO PUBLIC TRANSPORT ............................................. 2

E7 DISTRANCE FROM DISTRICT

CAPITAL TO ALDEA

LESS THAN 1/2 HOUR BY MOTORISED VEHICLE ..... 1

1/2-1 HOURS BY MOTORISED VEHICLE ..................... 2

MORE THAN 1 HOUR BY MOTORISED VEHICLE ....... 3

OTHERS, WRITE ___________________________ .... 4

E8 FARE FROM DISTRICT CAPITAL

TO ALDEA

LESS THAN $ 3 (CHEAP). ............................................ 1

AROUND $ 3-5 (MEDIUM) ............................................. 2

MORE THAN $ 5 (EXPENSIVE) .................................... 3

Page 111: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

111

NO QUESTIONS RESPONDENT ANSWERS TO

E9 GARBAGE

FISH/SEA PRODUCT GARBAGE ..................................A

GARBAGE FROM FISH/SEA PRODUCT

PROCESSING ...........................................................B

GARBAGE INSIDE HOUSE .......................................... C

GARBAGE IN THE YARD ............................................. D

GARBAGE OUTSIDE HOUSE .......................................E

E10

CONDITION OF EXISTING

INFRASTRUCTURE (GOOD,

LIGHTLY DAMAGE, SEVERELY

DAMAGE), FUNCTIONAL OR

NOT

FISH AUCTION, WRITE_________________________1

BOAT PARKING LOCATION,WRITE ______________ 2

COLD STORAGE,WRITE_______________________ . 3

FISH DRYING PLACE, WRITE ___________________ 4

FISH PROCESSING PLACE, WRITE ______________ 5

OTHER, WRITE_______________________________ 6

OTHER, WRITE_______________________________ 7

OTHER, WRITE_______________________________ 8

Page 112: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

112

APPENDIX 2. LIST OF SURVEYED ALDEIAS (VILLAGES)

A. List of Subdistricts and Aldeias in the Questionnaire Survey

No. District Subdistrict # Aldeia

1 BAUCAU Venilale 1 Venilale

2 2 Betu Nau

3 3 Cai Hula

4 Baucau 4 Ague

5 5 Macadai Desima

6 Laga 6 Boleha

7 7 Larifano

8 8 Lari Ledana

9 9 Alasafa

10 10 Iasula

11 Quelicai 11 Sialimo

12 12 Caranu

13 13 Tabere

14 14 Waule

15 15 Lebenei

16 16 Telah

17 DILI Atauro 1 Lliticaraquia

18 2 Ilimanu

19 Cristo Rei 3 Toko Baru II (Antigo ASLS)

20 4 Darlau

21 5 Caqueo Laran

22 6 Hali Dolar

23 7 Lacoto

24 8 Tancae

25 9 Namalai

26 10 Terminal

27 11 Fatu Cama

28 Dom Aleixio 12 Zero Um

29 13 Fuslam

30 14 Hale Mutin

31 15 Laloran

32 16 Frecat

33 17 5 De Outubro

34 18 Hamahon

35 19 Naroman B.T

36 20 Aimutin

Page 113: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

113

No. District Subdistrict # Aldeia

37 21 Anin Fuic

38 22 Terra Santa

39 23 Badiak

40 Metinaro 24 Behocir

41 Nain Feto 25 Donoge

42 26 Baba Liu Rai Oeste

43 27 Becoe

44 28 Lecidere

45 Vera Cruz 29 Terus Nain

46 30 Sacoco

47 31 Fatu Naba

48 32 Fila Beba Tua

49 33 Coalu II

50 BOBONARO Atabae 1 Lolocolo

51 2 Fatu Rasi

52 3 Rai Robu

53 4 Mohac

54 Bobonaro 5 Gumer

55 6 Atu-Manaro

56 7 Butuk

57 Cailaco 8 Biateho

58 9 Bereleu

59 Lolotoe 10 Tepa

60 11 Gole

61 12 Rai Mean

62 Maliana 13 Moleana

63 COVALIMA Maukatar 1 Soga

64 2 Loloba

65 Suai 3 Fatuisin

66 4 Mane Icun

67 5 Bibi Atan

68 Tilomar 6 Halamean

69 7 Nikir

70 Zumalai 8 Bau Lolo

71 9 Mape Canua

72 OECUSSI Oesilo 1 Oenoah

73 2 Webaha

74 3 Osapikolen

75 Pante

Makasar 4 Tulaica

76 5 Nefobai

Page 114: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

114

No. District Subdistrict # Aldeia

77 6 Noafafo

78 7 Noeninen

79 8 Baqui

80 9 Teinae

B. List of Aldeias grouped in Category [Urban/Coastal/Non-coastal]

Page 115: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

115

APPENDIX 3. RESULTS OF FISH AND MEAT CONSUMPTION LEVELS

A. Fish and Meat Consumption per District and Total

Total KG

Total KG Total KG of Fish +

DISTRICT of Fish of Meat Meat

________ __________ __________ __________

BAUCAU

Sum 963.724 1883.266 2846.990

Mean 5.916 11.561 17.477

N 163 163 163

StdDev 19.221 30.052 38.064

DILI

Sum 2648.994 6243.695 8892.689

Mean 7.737 18.235 25.972

N 342 342 342

StdDev 17.782 31.297 40.464

BOBONARO

Sum 350.732 914.862 1265.594

Mean 2.673 6.973 9.647

N 131 131 131

StdDev 7.930 11.721 15.218

COVALIMA

Sum 487.299 583.068 1070.368

Mean 5.552 6.644 12.196

N 88 88 88

StdDev 19.472 15.267 26.973

OECUSSI

Sum 886.366 2138.324 3024.690

Mean 9.258 22.334 31.592

N 96 96 96

StdDev 13.744 46.476 53.854

Grand Total 5 Districts

Total KG

Total KG Total KG of Fish +

DISTRICT of Fish of Meat Meat

________ __________ __________ __________

Sum 5337.115 11763.215 17100.330

Mean 6.509 14.345 20.854

N 820 820 820

StdDev 16.760 30.226 38.382

Page 116: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

116

Grand Total 4 Districts (excluding Oecussi)

Total KG

Total KG Total KG of Fish +

DISTRICT of Fish of Meat Meat

Sum 4450.749 9624.891 14075.641

Mean 6.145 13.289 19.435

N 724 724 724

StdDev 17.094 27.240 35.651

B. Meat and Fish Consumption per Urban-Coastal-Non Coastal and Total

Consumption Level

by

Urban-Coastal-Non Total (Kg)

Coastal (5 Total (Kg) Total (Kg) of Fish +

districts) of Fish of Meat Meat

_________________ __________ __________ __________

URBAN

Sum 937.239 2984.299 3921.538

Mean 6.018 19.163 25.182

N 156 156 156

StdDev 8.877 27.923 32.320

COASTAL

Sum 1988.395 2201.849 4190.244

Mean 17.026 18.854 35.880

N 117 117 117

StdDev 30.079 44.973 58.562

NON COASTAL

Sum 2411.481 6577.067 8988.548

Mean 4.405 12.013 16.418

N 547 547 547

StdDev 13.372 26.524 33.348

Grand Total 5 Districts

Sum 5337.115 11763.215 17100.330

Mean 6.509 14.345 20.854

N 820 820 820

StdDev 16.760 30.226 38.382

Page 117: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

117

Consumption Level by

Urban-Coastal-Non Total (Kg)

Coastal (4 Total (Kg) Total (Kg) of Fish +

districts) of Fish of Meat Meat

_________________ __________ __________ __________

URBAN

Sum 937.239 2984.299 3921.538

Mean 6.018 19.163 25.182

N 156 156 156

StdDev 8.877 27.923 32.320

COASTAL

Sum 1601.289 1103.892 2705.181

Mean 17.609 12.139 29.749

N 91 91 91

StdDev 33.154 22.903 43.016

NON COASTAL

Sum 1912.221 5536.700 7448.921

Mean 4.004 11.593 15.597

N 478 478 478

StdDev 13.444 27.560 34.563

Grand Total 4 Districts (excluding Oecussi)

Sum 4450.749 9624.891 14075.641

Mean 6.145 13.289 19.435

N 724 724 724

StdDev 17.094 27.240 35.651

Page 118: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

118

APPENDIX 4. FINDINGS OF FGD’S AND IDI’S IN 5 DISTRICTS

Findings of FGDs and IDIs for Fish and Animal Protein Consumption and Availability Survey

BAUCAU

FGD Aldeia/suco/sub district

Occupations

Family status Key findings Note

Vemase Farmers -- Most of the respondents planted corn and rice. Just very few of the farmers

also fished to the sea.

Daily family expenses ranged from $0.25 to $3 per day, but they still could

have 3 times meals per day. Weekly income in average $60 although some could earn below that.

Fish and meat consumed if they had extra money left. If they don't eat

meat/fish they only eat dry rice or rice with vegetables.

Although fish was available in the area everyday but the price was still

considered expensive. Types of fish available usually koku/trevalli, sardines, layang and daun/long tom.

Respondents would like to have government assistance in farming fresh

water fish in their local areas. The assistance was in the form of providing the farmers with fries ("nener") of Bandeng fish. This fish farming activity helped increase the farmers' income in the past in the Indonesian time.

Page 119: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

119

DILI

FGD Aldeia/suco/sub district

Occupations

Family status Key findings Note

Women Bidau Lisidere Mainly

housewives Families with 4 up to 17 family members. Average around 7 people per household.

In average daily expenses per family was around $5. Majority consumed vegetables everyday but meat or fish or egg or sausages (sosis) were consumed only around 1-2 times per week. Some households did not consume fish or meat. Some respondents consumed tahu (tofu) and tempe (fermented soy beans).

Fish commonly consumed were sardines and combon/kembung/mackerel.

Squid, prawn and craps were considered expensive.

The main obstacle why not consuming fish was because it was considered

expensive. Small fish such as sardine already cost them $5 per one time buying for one family and bigger fish were usually more expensive.

Mixed Lecidere and Capella

Housewives, fisher, unemployed and pensioners

Families and single persons.

Families usually had 4-7 people per household. The housewives in the FGD respondents were mostly quite old and they seldom ate meat.

Fish was considered expensive. In average 1x per week fish consumption.

Only buying fish when they think they have money left. Price of fish ranged from $6-15 per kilo.

Mostly women respondents avoided eating meat because they think meat

can increase their blood pressure.

Fish types consumed by the respondents were sardines,

kombong/mackerel, daun/long tom, tongkol/tuna.

Page 120: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

120

IDI Aldeia/suco/sub district

Occupations

Family status Key findings Note

1 Dili Housewife

and a hotel owner

Family with 8 members

Almost everyday the family could eat meat/fish/chicken. Fish consumed 3x per week.

As a restaurant owner, the fish consumed is assumed from the fresh fish supplied to the restaurant

Priority of choice to consume: chicken first, then fish and then meat. This

was based on the availability of the products.

Consumed all sorts of fish. Frozen fish consumed, especially

kombong/mackerel to avoid problems with fish allergies.

Availability and price of fish were depending on the fishing seasons.

2 Dili Man, ex-

patriate Did not consume fish in Dili because restaurants he visited do not provide

fish in the menu.

Actually he preferred to eat fish rather than meat, but the availability was the

main obstacle. He also complained that price of food in Dili was very expensive.

BOBONARO

IDI Aldeia/suco/sub district

Occupations

Family status Key findings Note

1 Bobonaro Staff of

Nutrition department of NGO CARE

-- The organisation provided assistance to give additional food or nutrition to children under 5 years old, to pregnant women and to women who were still breastfeeding. Especially targeting those who were malnourished.

Target areas were Atabae and its coastal areas due to frequent failures in

farming harvest in those areas. NGO CARE considers that poverty is common in the coastal areas of Atabae and also in mountain areas.

Page 121: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

121

COVALIMA

FGD Aldeia/suco/sub district

Occupations

Family status Key findings Note

Housewives Maudemo Suai. A farming area

Housewives

-- People generally consumed meat or fish 1 or 2 times per week. The main constraint to buy fish was the price (considered expensive).

The head of the village (aldeia) is also a woman.

Meat and eggs were more easily available in the area where respondents

lived because the area was mostly used for farming and breeding stock.

The women groups in the area were trained how to plant vegetables for their

daily needs.

IDI Aldeia/suco/sub district

Occupations

Family status Key findings Note

1 Covalima Staff of

Nutrition department of NGO CARE

-- The organisation provided assistance to give additional food or nutrition to children under 5 years old, to pregnant women and to women who were still breastfeeding. Especially targeting those who were malnourished.

Target areas were Suai and its coastal areas due to frequent failures in

farming harvest in those areas. NGO CARE considers that poverty is common in Covalima, especially in the mountain areas.

2 Cassa Bauk Suai Housewife Consumed fish 1-2 times per week. Fish was bought from the fish peddlers

who walked around the village. Location of the area is far from the sea. People in the area are mostly farmers. They mostly consume rice, corn and vegetables.

Source of protein was eggs as she was a farmer and owning chickens and

pigs. Respondent is active in the village organisation.

Weekly market in the area did not always provide fish to buy. Fish was

considered expensive and only buying when there was extra money left in the family.

Page 122: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

122

OECUSSI

FGD Aldeia/suco/sub district

Occupations

Family status Key findings Note

Fishers' wives Oesono suco, Costa Oecusse

Housewives

Types of fish caught mostly sardines, kombong/mackerel, tongkol/tuna, ikan merah, ikan parang. Fish was consumed by the families and also sold.

The women had ever been trained by the government to produce (post-

harvest) fish balls, fish “abon”, salty fish, but they became not enthusiastic to do the activities as they did not know where to sell the products and also because the amount of fish they caught was not economical enough.

Monthly income of the families was in average $180.

Several days in week the families consumed fish. The amount of fish caught was usually not enough if they wanted to process the fish for other products.

Page 123: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

123

IDI Aldeia/suco/sub district

Occupations

Family status Key findings Note

1 Bobometo, Usitasae, Usitakeno

Subdistrict head

7 children (9 members)

Majority of people in the area were farmers. Also cattle farmers of cows, pigs and buffaloes. Main staple food was rice and corn. The wealth of the people was considered quite good as they were farmers and they owned land. People in some aldeias did not consume fish, such as in aldeias: Sifin in Usitasae suco; Kuibaselo, Usapikelen, Tumun in Bobometo suco. They didn't eat any animal that live in water. Also Manu tribe could not consume chicken and eggs.

2 Sakato, Pante Makasar

Housewife, a fisher's wife

5 members Beside fisher, they were also doing farming and breed cows, pigs and chickens. The husband, a fisherman went to the sea fishing everyday. Monthly income from fishing was around $150. With income from farming, total monthly income could be $240. Fish usually caught: kombong/mackerel, sardines, terbang/flying fish, young tongkol/tuna, ekor kuning/yellow tail, delolo. At the time of interview the family daily expenses were considered quite high due to high prices. Fish was consumed 3x per week.

3 Oenoah, Bobometo, Oesilo

Housewife and wife of chefe suco

6 members Consumed mostly pork for meat and also eggs once a week. The family did not consume fish because of traditional believe on legends inherited generation to generation in the family and in some other tribes (Tano, Elo, Abi, Nusin) that if they consume fish they will get problems (e.g. becoming ill, having accidents, cattle will die, etc.). So far being aware of, there had not been a counselling done about fish consumption in the suco.

4 Hoineno, Bobometo, Oesilo

Housewife and farmer

6 members Fish sellers were seldom coming to the aldeia, even difficult to have fish consumed once in a month. Supply of meat was considered better in the aldeia as they were farmers. In fact the family's preference was to consume fish rather than meat. Thus supply was the problem. The family usually consumes fish when there were traditional ceremonies.

5 Noapai, Kunha, Pante Makasar

Civil servant

4 members Meat consumed: chicken and pork. Meat consumption was at least once per month. Family consumed fish quite often (more than twice a week). In Kunha suco there were more people consuming fish rather than not.

6 Bonemese, Naimeco, Pante Makasar

Housewife and wife of chefe suco

8 members The family (due to husband's belief) did not eat fish because of the traditional believe based on a mythology story/legend. Had ever broken the belief of her husband and consumed fish and got a goat from their cattle died. Thus the belief became stronger. Consumed meat: pork, chicken, beef and goat. Although there was a government counselling about fish consumption she still would not consume fish because of fear on the implications.

Page 124: FISH AND ANIMAL PROTEIN IN TIMOR LESTE

124

7 Baki, Naimeco, Pante Makasar

Housewife and farmer

8 members The family did not consume fish because of the traditional belief. The tribe name is Nono. Uniquely the children were allowed to eat fish until they get married. When they got married then they must stop eating fish. In several tribes such as Abi Siki, a cultural wisdom had been agreed toward this traditional belief that when someone consumes fish and gets a problem (accident, ill, etc.) then the person has to stop consuming fish but if not then the person can continue eating fish. This wisdom was brought due to the influence of Catholic teaching to the people. The respondent did not receive any counselling from the government regarding fish consumption.

8 Bausiu, Nipani, Pante Makasar

Housewife and chefe aldeia

8 members Fish consumption at least once a week. Also consumed other seafood. Before married actually the respondent believed in the traditional (mythology) legend not to eat fish/seafood. The husband actually did not have traditional belief against fish consumption. To compromise they still could eat fish, but the cooking and preparation were done outside the house and after cooking all cooking gears should be washed clean before bringing them into the house. Fishing gears also could not be brought into the house. In term of taste the family preferred fish than meat. They also sold grilled fish at the market. They seldom ate meat unless there were traditional ceremonies.


Recommended