Fit For WorkWork is good for health: a
musculoskeletal perspectiveProf Karen Walker-Bone, Director
Arthritis Research UK/MRC Centre for Musculoskeletal Health and Work
Plan• Work and health• Health-related work disability• Review of the evidence surrounding
effect of interventions to reduce work disability from MSDs
Work and health
• Work is central to human existence • It is the motive force for all economies
and provides structure and meaning to individuals and societies
• Good for health & well-being• Good for financial health• Good for families• Socially inclusive & a right
The effects of unemployment on health
• Associated with poorer health and wellbeing
• Worse levels of pain• Higher mortality : 5-10 years
reduced life expectancy• 2-3 fold higher risk of chronic disease• 3-fold risk of psychiatric morbidity• Higher medical consultation and
hospital admission rates
Source: OECD (2014), Mental Health and Work: United Kingdom, Paris: OECD Publishing. Courtesy Shruti Singh
New UK disability claims are among the highest in the OECDNew claims per 1,000 of the working-age population (inflow rates),
latest year available
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
OECD
average
UK: Disability burden and the benefit system
Earlier intervention could improve this
Musculoskeletal disorders become increasingly common with age
….and developed economies need
people to work to older ages..
Low back pain
Knee osteoarthritis
Palmer et al, systematic review• Found 42 studies including 34 RCTs • 27 assessed return to work, 21 duration of
sickness absence, and five job loss• MSDs studied:
– Half of studies focussed on the ‘low-back’– ‘Back’ (n=3)– Axial pain (back and neck, or back, neck and
shoulder) (n=5)– Neck (n=1)– Upper limbs (n=2)– Unspecified musculoskeletal pain (n=9)
Heterogeneous interventions• Prescribed exercises (n=30)• Promoted behavioural change (n=37)• 17 were at the patient’s workplace, and 10
provided additional services• Interventions were often applied in combination
– frequently an exercise (functional restoration) regimen combined with behavioural measures to improve compliance (e.g. prompts, encouragement).
• In 12 studies (29%), interventions were aimed both at personal exercise and behavioural change, and also included workplace adaptations or assessments.
Findings
• Studies were generally small in size • Median sample size 107 (IQR 77-
148) • Only 1 study >500 people and 6
studies >300• Median quality score 45% (IQR 27-
64%)• ‘Blinding’ patchy
Overall effects
• Most interventions were reported as beneficial
Outcome Median relative risk
IQR
Return to work 1.21 1.00-1.60
Avoiding MSD-related job loss
1.25 1.06-1.71
Sickness absence reduction
1.11 0.32-3.20
Summary
• Effects were smallest in the larger and better quality studies
• Publication bias• No one intervention was clearly
superior to any of the others• Effort-intensive interventions were less
effective than simple ones• No cost-benefit analyses established
statistically significant net economic benefits
Conclusion
• Work is generally good for us• MSDs contribute importantly to work
disability and this burden is likely to grow
• Rather poor evidence base underpinning interventions to reduce work disability caused by MSDs
• Doing something seems beneficial!
• ProfNigelArden
• DrNeilBasu• ProfSteveBevan• ProfMarijn deBruin• ProfAnthonyBull• ProfKimBurton• ProfSusanCartwright• ProfDavidCoggon• ProfCyrusCooper• MsStefania D’Angelo• DrLindaDean• MrMaciekDobras• ProfNicolaFear• MrStephenDuffield• ProfJohnGoodacre
• ProfRobMoots• MsLaKrista Morton• DrFehmidah Munir• MsGeorgiaNtani• DrEnrica Papi• ProfKatherinePayne• ProfKeithPalmer• DrYeliz Prior• DrRudresh Shukla• DrJuliaSmedley• DrMikeSmith• ProfDeborahSymmons• DrSuzanVerstappen• DrElaineWainwright• MrDanielWhibley• DrGwenWynne-Jones
• DrNickyGoodson• ProfAlisonHammond• DrClareHarris• ProfElaineHay• ProfMarkusHeller• DrPaulaHolland• DrKassimJavaid• MsCherylJones• DrGarethJones• DrCathyLinaker• ProfEwanMacdonald• ProfGaryMacfarlane• DrIraMadan• DrJaneMartindale• ProfAlisonMcGregor