Flemish Regulations 2011 - Vlaanderen Intern · 2.1.1 RegulatoRY agenD a 2.0 on Friday 18 november,...

⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⠩⡳⡲⢖⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄

FlemishRegulations

2011

Flemish Regulations 2011

⠧⠇⠁⠁⠍⠎⠑

⠗⠑⠛⠑⠇⠛⠑⠧⠊⠝⠛

⠃⠚⠁⠚

In collaboration with:

Department of the services for the general government Policy, Chancellery DivisionFlemish Department of Foreign affairs, Foreign affairs DivisionPublic governance Department, Regulatory management unit

3 Table of contents

intRoDuCtion p. 5

1 QuantitatiVe inDiCatoRs p. 6

1.1 PuBliCation in the Belgian oFFiCial gaZette 2011 p. 7

1.2 RegulatoRY agenDa p. 10

1.3 Regulations unDeR DeVeloPment p. 15

1.4 RegulatoRY imPaCt analYsis p. 16

1.5 QualitY imPRoVement oF FoRms p. 18

1.6 aDministRatiVe BuRDen / BalanCe oF the ComPensation CReDit p. 20

1.7 notiFiCations RegaRDing aDministRatiVe simPliFiCation p. 25

1.8 legislatiVe tRaining p. 26

2 euRoPean inDiCatoRs p. 30

2.1 ConteXt p. 31

2.2 euRoPean inFRingement DossieRs p. 32

3 QualitatiVe inDiCatoRs oF Flemish Regulations p. 34

3.1 linguistiC anD legislatiVe QualitY oF Regulations p. 35

3.2 QualitY oF the RegulatoRY imPaCt analYsis p. 41

3.3 QualitY oF RegulatoRY DossieRs p. 47

4 Flemish Regulations 2012 p. 48

ColoPhon p. 51

4 Flemish Regulations 2011

⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎

⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋

⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬

⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩

⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀

⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧

⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯

⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻

⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣍

⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂

⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃

⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐

⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌

⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬

⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂

⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯

⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳

⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱

⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄

⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼

⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩

⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅

⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯

⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻

⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥

⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡

⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦

⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖

⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅

⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⠩⡳⡲⢖⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔

⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔

⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼

⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽

⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩

⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑

⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣳⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡽⣍

⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃

⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎

⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮

⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦

⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪

⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯

⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙

⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽

⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑

⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖

⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎

⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼

⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯

⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥

⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄

⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺

⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑

⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄

⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫

⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮

⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸

⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔

⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼

⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱

5 Introduction

introduction

how much economic clout does Flanders have? how competitive are our companies? Do citizens and organisations have confidence in the authorities?

the answer to these questions is partly determined by smart regulation that is simple and transparent. needless administrative burdens slow down economic growth. they harm the legal certainty and trust in the government.

in order to map out the results of the policy and monitor their evolution, some ten indicators were developed in 2004. this set of indicators provides information about the developments of, among other things, the reduction of administrative burdens, the quality of the Regulatory impact analyses and the regulations, and the transposition of european regulations.

each quarter, the Regulatory management unit sends out an electronic newsletter, which contains the indicators as a standard returning item. since 2006, a comparison to the average for Flanders of the indicators for each policy area is sent to all the senior civil servants of the government of Flanders in a personalised message.

the report in question provides a detailed overview of the indicators for each policy area and every minister in the year 2011. Chapter 1 describes a number of quantitative indicators of the regulatory process. using european indicators, Chapter 2 shows that the mandatory transposition of european Directives into the Flemish legal order requires a considerable effort. Chapter 3 compiles a number of quantitative indicators on Flemish regulations. Finally, Chapter 4 explains the Business information Programme of the government of Flanders, of which the indicators form part.

the government of Flanders is notified of the report; furthermore, the report is submitted to the Flemish Parliament, the senior civil servants of the government of Flanders and the units for Regulatory Quality.the report ‘Flemish Regulations 2011’ was drafted by the Departments of the services for the general government Policy (comprising three parties who lent their cooperation, namely the legal services team, the language advice team and the unit for support to the government of Flanders and Writ services), Flemish Foreign affairs (Foreign affairs Division) and administrative affairs (Regulatory management unit).

⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎

⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋

⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬

⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩

⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀

⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧

⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯

⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺

⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲

⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅

⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯

⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃

⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂

⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙

⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋

⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨

⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫

⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈

⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻

⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⠩⡳⡲⢖⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇

⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌

⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺

⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑

⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎

⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅

⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳

⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱

⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙

⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋

⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨

⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴

⣳⣯⣈⡺⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻

⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔

⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗

⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂

⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱

⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧

⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪

⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺

⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴

⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥

⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄

⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺

⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑

⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⡳

⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺

⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳

⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪

⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔

⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄

⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌

⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔

⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻

⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳

⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣗

⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮

⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸

⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔

⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼

⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍

Quantitative indicators

1

7 Quantitative indicators

1.1 PuBliCation in the Belgian oFFiCial gaZette 2011

as per tradition, the status quo of the Belgian official gazette is reviewed at the end of each year. at the same time, various media take a closer look at the total page volume of the gazette. one allegation suggested that the 2011 gazette was the third thickest ever (‘Belgian official gazette is not losing weight.’ De Standaard, 3 January 2011) and that the total number of lines had doubled since 1990 (‘another abundant year for the Belgian official gazette.’ De Tijd, 30 December 2012). however, the picture thus painted requires nuancing.

a first nuance is that overregulation cannot be measured from the gazette’s volume. after all: it also contains official announcements, resolutions of appointment, etc., as well as regulations amending or repealing existing rules.

a second nuance is that the quality of regulations is not determined by the number of pages.

a third nuance is that the Belgian official gazette contains the regulations of all the Belgian authorities, whereas the annual report only refers to the regulations of the government of Flanders.

in 2011, a total of 66 decrees (823 pages) and 372 decisions of the government of Flanders (14,756 pages) were published in the Belgian official gazette.

in 2010, a total of 52 decrees (1,538 pages) and 504 decisions (12,181 pages) were published in the Belgian official gazette.

in 2009, the total number of publications in the Belgian official gazette for both coalitions amounted to 109 decrees (3,449 pages) and 679 decisions of the government of Flanders (8,247 pages).

NUMBER OF DECREES OR DECISIONS IN THE BELGIAN OFFICIAL GAZETTE (per year)

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

DecisionDecree

2009

2010

2011


the table below shows an overview of the number of decisions and decrees for each minister over the calendar year 2011.

2011 – oVeRVieW PeR ministeR Decisions Decrees

Competent minister(s) no. of decisions

no. of pages

no. of decrees

no. of pages

minister-President and minister for economy, Foreign Policy, agriculture and Rural Policy

34 136 15 48

Vice-minister-President and minister for innovation, Public investment, media and Poverty Reduction

16 50 2 10

Vice-minister-President and minister for Public governance, local and Provincial government, Civic integration, tourism and the Vlaamse Rand

24 177 10 115

minister for Welfare, Public health and Family 41 249 4 14

minister for mobility and Public Works 51 574 3 11

minister for energy, housing, Cities and social economy 19 233 7 74

minister for Finance, Budget, Work, town and Country Planning and sport

51 361 8 356

minister for environment, nature and Culture 13 41 7 56

minister for education, Youth, equal opportunities and Brussels affairs 103 12.827 6 92

several ministers together 20 108 2 7

all 2 40

total 372 14.756 66 823


Belgisch Staatsblad beleeft opnieuw vet jaar (De Tijd - 30-12-2011)

net zoals in 2010 ongeveer 83.000 pagina’s

Sinds eind jaren 90 is het volume aan regels verdubbeld. De Belgische staat kreeg dit jaar op 6 december een federale regering, maar dat verhinderde de overheid niet om dit jaar voor 83.000 pagina’s wetten en reglementen uit te vaardigen en besluiten te nemen. het volume komt neer op 330 bladzijden per werkdag. en juridisch gezien wordt u verondersteld ze te kennen. op hoeveel pagina’s exact wordt afgeklokt, weten we vanavond, wanneer de allerlaatste edities (er zullen er meerdere zijn) van het jaar worden gedrukt. Die zullen onder meer de fel bevochten pensioenhervorming bevatten. Vorig jaar eindigde het staatsblad op 83.678 pagina’s, ook al een topjaar in lopende zaken. maar het absolute record dateert uit 2004, toen het staatsblad 87.430 bladzijden telde. Voor alle duidelijkheid: de 83.000 pagina’s zijn alleen de wetten, besluiten en officiële mededelingen van de Belgische overheid, in al haar vormen en gedaanten. aanbestedingen, faillissementen en statuten van vzw’s of vennootschappen worden ook officieel gepubliceerd, maar die zitten in de bijlagen, die een andere nummering hebben.

VeRDuBBelDsinds eind jaren 90 is het volume aan regels in ons land verdubbeld. Dat komt in de eerste plaats omdat de parlementen en de regeringen in Vlaanderen, Brussel en de andere deelstaten eveneens volop beslissingen nemen. het verklaart waarom ook in de federale crisisjaren 2010 en 2011 het staatsblad zo dik is. een tweede trend is dat regeringen steeds meer gedetailleerde koninklijke of ministeriële besluiten uitvaardigen om wetten uit te voeren. en voor de volledigheid: ook de europese unie neemt verordeningen die in België van kracht zijn, maar die staan in het europese publicatieblad.

hete KoFFiehet leidt onvermijdelijk tot de vraag of we ten onder gaan aan regeldrift, met het staatsblad als stille getuige. een eerste nuance is dat je regulitis niet volledig kan meten aan de dikte van het officiële publicatieblad. alleen al om een oude wet af te schaffen, moet je een nieuwe publiceren. maar het is moeilijker dan dat. een klassiek voorbeeld is de casus waarbij mcDonald’s op een bekertje warme koffie de boodschap aanbrengt dat het bekertje warme koffie bevat. Doet mcDonald’s dat omdat er ergens een reguleringszieke ambtenaar dat zo gewild heeft? nee, de fastfoodgigant doet het uit schrik schadeclaims te krijgen van klanten die zich verbranden aan de warme drank. De wettekst waarop die klanten zich in België kunnen beroepen, is welgeteld één zin lang en staat in het befaamde artikel 1382 van het Burgerlijk Wetboek: ‘elke daad van de mens, waardoor aan een ander schade wordt veroorzaakt, verplicht degene door wiens schuld de schade is ontstaan, deze te vergoeden.’ aan de lengte van de wettekst ligt het dus niet altijd. maar goed. Boven op die zelfregulering zijn er dit jaar dus ook die 83.000 pagina’s staatsblad. ter vergelijking: alle kranten van De tijd waren dit jaar samen 7.950 bladzijden dik, bijlages niet inbegrepen. meer dan tien keer dunner dus, maar doorgaans vlotter geschreven.


1.2 RegulatoRY agenDa

every year, members of the government of Flanders submit one or more policy papers to the Flemish Parliament. since 2007, as a rule all policy papers are required to include a regulatory agenda.

a regulatory agenda is a publicly available list of planned new rules or amendments to existing rules.

it is a (unique) planning and reporting instrument for regulatory dossiers.

the regulatory agenda also strived for more policy coordination through early screening of application of the sectoral legislation tests and through early planning of cross-policy area consultations based on the regulatory agenda.

at the very least, the regulatory agenda contains the following initiatives.

• Allthedecrees;

• Allthe‘strategic’implementingdecisionsforwhich,inaccordancewiththesaC decree (strategic advice Councils), a formal advice has been requested from the relevant strategic advice Council;

• Alltheregulatorydossierswhose(partial)purposeisatranspositionofeuropean regulations.

ministers may, however, draw up a more detailed regulatory agenda.

all the regulatory agendas are available online at www.bestuurszaken.be/regelgevingsagenda.

2.1.1 RegulatoRY agenDa 2.0

on Friday 18 november, the government of Flanders adopted regulatory agenda 2.0.1

Regulatory agenda 2.0 is a first step towards implementation of the key project ‘smart regulation and administrative simplification’ within the multi-year programme ‘Decisive governance’.

the reform is based on principles of the strategic policy framework for smart regulation and administrative simplification 2009-2014.

the regulatory agenda has three objectives:

• Enhancedpolicycoordinationinthedraftingofregulations

• Improvedregulatoryplanning

• Moretransparencywithrespecttoplannedregulations.

(1) (VR 2011 1811 DOC.1140/1BIS)


2.1.2 uPDating

the regulatory agenda is updated at certain fixed moments during the year.

• October: Publication of regulatory agendas simultaneous with the submission of policy papers to the Flemish Parliament;

• January: Publication of the regulatory agendas after the end of the discussion of policy papers in the Flemish Parliament;

• April: semi-annual update of regulatory agendas by the government of Flanders.

this update includes a presentation of the status quo of planned new regulations. thus, an overview is available of:

• regulatorydossiersthathavenotyetbeenstarted;

• currentregulatorydossiersthatareinthe(formal)stageoftheapprovalprocedure;

• completedregulatorydossierswhoseapprovalprocedurehasbeenfinalised.

2.1.3 analYsis oF the RegulatoRY agenDa

since 2008, the Regulatory management unit prepares an analysis of the drafted regulatory agendas that accompany the policy papers and policy memoranda; it also carries out an analysis of the regulatory agendas after every update. the regulatory agendas provide a clear insight into the planned regulatory initiatives for every minister and for each policy paper or policy memorandum.

• Theregulatoryagendaaccompanyingthe30 policy papers created in 2011-2012 announced 401 initiatives.

• Theregulatoryagendaaccompanyingthe27 policy papers of 2010-2011 announced 338 initiatives.



2011-20122010-2011

34

304

25

253

27

338

30

401

2009-20142008-2009

HISTORICAL OVERVIEW OF THE NUMBER OF POLICY PAPERSMEMORANDA OR THE NUMBER OF INITIATIVES

Number of initiativesNumber of policy letters


Have the objectives of the regulatory agenda been achieved?

Planning - as an objective - has been achieveda total of 30 policy papers were submitted to the Flemish Parliament for the period 2011-2012. at the time of drafting of the regulatory agenda, 19 regulatory agendas were uploaded to the online database. three policy papers did not contain any regulatory initiatives, therefore no regulatory agenda. thus, eight regulatory agendas were missing at the drafting stage.

at the updating stage, 27 regulatory agendas were submitted to the Regulatory management unit.

at the drafting stage of the regulatory agenda, 401 separate initiatives were incor-porated. 597 initiatives were incorporated at the updating stage.

From a comparison with the number of decisions and decrees published in the Belgian official gazette, it appears that the regulatory agenda has achieved its objective of improved planning.

the graph compares the number of decisions and decrees that was published in the Belgian official gazette with the figures of the announced initiatives. the figu-res from 2010 and 2011 (see graph ‘Difference between the number of announced initiatives and the number of decrees and decisions published in the Belgian of-ficial gazette) show that progress is being made: at a total of 303, the difference between the number of announced initiatives and the number of decrees and decisions published in the Belgian official gazette was still quite considerable in 2010. in 2011, that number had reduced to 100.

there will always be a discrepancy between the number of planned initiatives and the number of published decrees and decisions, on the one hand because the regulatory agenda has a more limited scope and on the other hand because an initiative announced in the regulatory agenda need not necessarily be publis-hed in that same year.

401

597

INITIATIVES IN THE REGULATORY AGENDA

After updatingAttached to policy letter

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE NUMBER OF ANNOUNCED INITIATIVES ANDTHE NUMBER OF DECREES AND DECISIONS PUBLISHED IN THE BELGIAN OFFICIAL GAZETTE

0 100 200 300 400

2011

2010


still more transparency neededas far as the status quo of the regulatory dossier is concerned, information was amply provided.

additional information concerning the stages of the decision-making process, however, was provided to a lesser extent.

Policy coordination as an objective not (yet) achievedthe regulatory agenda offers the opportunity of attaining greater policy coordination at an early stage in the decision-making process. as a unique planning and report instrument for regulatory activities, the regulatory agenda has the potential of reducing the internal report burden to a minimum.

the government of Flanders avails of several cross-policy domain programmes that also cover the drafting of new or amending regulations. Because the regulatory agenda can serve as a reporting instrument for regulations within those programmes, a number of programmes were added to the agenda.

the analysis shows that this option is not being put to full use yet.

Cooperation with other policy areas and other ministers was not yet implemented adequately either. Policy coordination that transcends the administration level is of importance also. therefore, the regulatory agenda can also serve to monitor the origin of regulations. a study into how, in the future, the monthly reports on european dossiers can be synchronised with the reports on regulations of european or international origin will be carried out in collaboration with the Flemish Department of Foreign affairs. the transposition of european Directives is a mandatory field in the regulatory agenda, while a report

StAtuS

accompanying policy paper

after update

Completed (regulation published in the Belgian official gazette)

70 143

In progress (at least a fundamental decision/communication by the government of Flanders)

107 198

Not started (no decision from the government of Flanders yet)

222 251

no entry 2 5

total 401 597

PrOgrAmme NumBer

action plan for administrative simplification 32

european services Directive (eDRl) 12

implementation of the decree on planning burden 20

nnot completed 533

grand total 597


providing the monthly status quo of the european dossiers is available also.

in order to realise better and timely reports about and monitoring of planned regulations - and their impact - for certain target groups, a standardised overview of target groups is a necessary instrument.

the following graph shows how many times each target group is designated in the regulatory agenda. the total for the separate target groups exceeds the number of initiatives included, because either initiative may indicate several target groups. the government is the largest target group, but it should be noted that this also includes local administrations.

these figures demonstrate the need for further refinement into sub-target groups. such refinement also enables the monitoring of initiatives directed at these target groups and subsequent reporting in the scope of european programmes, such as initiatives targeted at smes in the framework of compliance with the european small Business act.

the next update therefore will focus on the further refinement into sub-target groups, and on programmes and collaboration with other policy domains and ministers.

0

200

400

CitizensOrganisationsCompaniesGovernment

332

216

264 253

TARGET GROUPS DESIGNATED IN THE REGULATORY AGENDA

ORIGINS OF REGULATION

0

200

400

600

No entryFlemishInternationalFederalEuropean

16

434

764

67


1.3 Regulations unDeR DeVeloPment

the regulatory process is a multi-step process. the stages in the approval procedure are as follows:

these stages have been detailed in a flow chart. the flow chart is a dynamic roadmap, showing users the way through the regulatory process. You can view the flow chart here: www.bestuurszaken.be/stroomschema.

‘Scorecards for regulations under development’ were kept since 2004. For every minister of the government of Flanders they contained an overview of decrees and decisions that were in the developmental stage.

Based on these scorecards, the following information was made available:

• Officialtitleoftheregulation;

• Currentstatusoftheapprovalprocedure;

• ReferencetothedocumentapprovedbytheGovernmentofFlanders.

Regular updating of the regulatory agenda (see www.wetsmatiging.be/regelgevingsagenda) has eliminated the need for these scorecards. after all: the regulatory agenda also keeps track of the decrees and decisions.

For this reason, updating the scorecards for regulation under development will be discontinued as of 2012. the archived scorecards may be viewed at www.wetsmatiging.be/rio.

the overview below provides an insight into the number of decrees and decisions that are included in the table ‘Regulations under development’ (RuD) for the years 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011.

1st fundamental approval

2nd fundamental approval

Final approval

Parliamentary discussion

Ratification gov’t of Flanders

Publication in Belgian official gazette

REGULATIONS UNDER DEVELOPMENT

BesluitDecree

2011

2010

2009

2008


the number of decrees and decisions included in the RuD database shows a remarkable decrease in 2010 and 2011. the same downward trend can be seen in the number of decrees and decisions in the Belgian official gazette over that same period.

1.4 RegulatoRY imPaCt analYsis

the regulatory Impact Analysis (Ria) has become compulsory on 1 January 2005.

Rias are structured analyses of the objectives and the anticipated positive and negative effects of a proposed regulation as compared to the alternatives.

active publication of Ria documents should increase the transparency of the Flemish Rias and of the regulatory process in itself. the Flanders social and economic Council and international organisations such as the oeCD and the european Commission state that the quality of the Ria will improve as a result. after all, it creates a better opportunity for quality control by external parties (civil society, academia, etc.).

With the approval of the Ria database, the government of Flanders decided to make more information available for the regulatory dossiers of 2009 for which an Ria was drawn up.

after the first fundamental approval of the dossier the government decision, the draft regulation and the associated Ria are made available in the Ria database. the documents relate to regulations ‘under development’, in other words: not to finally approved regulations.

the Ria database is available online at www.bestuurszaken.be/ria-databank and is updated weekly by the Regulatory management unit.

NUMBER OF DECREES AND DECISIONS INCLUDED IN THE RUD DATABASE (per year)

Belgian Official GazetteBelgian Official Gazette

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

2008 2009 2010 2011


numBeR oF Rias FoR eaCh ministeR

Vice-minister-President and minister for Public governance, local and Provincial government, Civic inte-gration, tourism and the Vlaamse Rand 4

minister-President and minister for economy, Foreign Policy, agriculture and Rural Policy 6

Vice-minister-President and minister for innovation, Public investment, media and Poverty Reduction 1

minister for Welfare, Public health and Family 11

minister for mobility and Public Works 3

minister for energy, housing, Cities and social economy 7

minister for Finance, Budget, Work, town and Country Planning and sport 4

minister for environment, nature and Culture 9

minister for education, Youth, equal opportunities and Brussels affairs 7

total 52

numBeR oF Rias PeR PoliCY Domain

services for the general government Policy

Public governance 3

Finance and Budget

Flemish Foreign affairs 2

economy, science and innovation 3

education and training 4

Welfare, Public health and Family 11

Culture, Youth, sports and media 8

Work and social economy 3

agriculture and Fisheries 1

environment, nature and energy 10

mobility and Public Works 3

spatial Development, housing Policy and immovable heritage 4

total 52


HISTORICAL OVERVIEW OF FORMS WITH AND WITHOUT A QUALITY LABEL

Forms with a quality labelForms without a label

0 500 1000 1500 2000

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

1.5. QualitY imPRoVement oF FoRms

the Flemish website for forms www.vlaanderen.be/formulieren went live in october 2006. the website provides easy access to the forms used within the government of Flanders. the forms are categorised into easily recognisable themes and target groups (citizens, companies, non-profit organisations, other authorities) and can also be searched using keywords.

a guideline for forms (from the language advice team), a forms checklist (from the Regulatory management unit) and a forms template were developed to help improve the quality of forms. an evaluation instrument makes sure that forms are being tested against a set of criteria. high-quality forms receive the quality label ‘simple form’.

in 2011, 77% of the forms were awarded the quality label.

the overview below shows the development of the number of forms and the number of forms carrying a quality label.


For each policy area, the following table gives an overview of the number of forms and the number of forms carrying a quality label.

numBeR oF FoRms FoR eaCh PoliCY aRea: status Quo DeCemBeR 2011

Policy area Forms Quality labels Percentage

services for the general government Policy 7 7 100%

Public governance 9 8 89%

Finance and Budget 22 21 95%

Flemish Foreign affairs 94 32 34%

economy, science and innovation 61 39 64%

education and training 417 407 98%

Welfare, Public health and Family 218 198 91%

Culture, Youth, sports and media 95 84 88%

Work and social economy 64 26 41%

agriculture and Fisheries 79 56 71%

environment, nature and energy 280 213 76%

mobility and Public Works 27 11 41%

spatial Development, housing Policy and immovable heritage 71 12 17%

other 1 1 100%

total 1445 1115 77%

FORMS WITH AND WITHOUT QUALITY LABEL, PER POLICY AREA OVER THE YEAR 2011

Forms without a labelQuality labels

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

Othe

r

Spat

ial D

evel

opm

ent,

Hous

ing

Polic

y an

d Im

mov

able

her

itage

Mob

ility

and

Pub

lic W

orks

Envi

ronm

ent,

Nat

ure

and

Ener

gy

Agric

ultu

re a

nd F

ishe

ries

Wor

k an

d So

cial

Eco

nom

y

Cultu

re, Y

outh

, Spo

rts a

nd M

edia

Wel

fare

, Pub

lic H

ealth

and

Fam

ily

Educ

atio

n an

d Tr

aini

ng

Econ

omy,

Sci

ence

and

Inno

vatio

n

Flem

ish

Fore

ign

Affa

irs

Fina

nce

and

Budg

et

Publ

ic G

over

nanc

e

Serv

ices

for t

he G

ener

al G

over

nmen

t Pol

icy


1.6 aDministRatiVe BuRDen / BalanCe oF the ComPensation CReDit

the government of Flanders keeps a watch on enlargement of the administrative burden via its compensation rule for administrative burdens.

this rule, which became mandatory on 1 January 2005, ordains that any increase of the administrative burden as a result of a new or amended regulation (decree, decision) must be countered by an equivalent decrease of the administrative burden elsewhere within the same policy area.

For this purpose and based on the Ria or the Ria category, the memorandum addressed to the government of Flanders includes an estimate of any increase or decrease in the administrative burden caused by the regulation that is submitted to the government of Flanders for first fundamental approval.

in case of an increase in the administrative burden for any specific regulatory dossier, indicating the method of compensation is not required: the balance of compensation credit is calculated for the entire policy area.

1.6.1. measuRement Results PeR PoliCY aRea

the measurement results in the scope of the compensation rule consist of the figures that, for new and amending regulations, in the fundamental approval stage are reported to the government of Flanders, either in the Regulatory impact analysis - if any -, or in the memorandum to the government.

as announced in the 2010 annual report, the Regulatory management unit carried out a validation of the measurement results of a number of regulatory dossiers for which the Standard Cost method had failed to either measure the changing administrative burden, or to measure it correctly.

the exercise was limited to the figures from the current coalition period 2009-2014. more information on the dossiers in question and the measurement reports can be found on the internet portal of administrative affairs, under the item regulatory management (www.bestuurszaken.be/meetbureau).

the tables reflect the total compensation credit per year and per policy area for the current coalition period (start of the third quarter 2009 up to and including 2011).


2009 third and fourth quarter (Peeters ii) – Policy area increase of the administrative burden

Decrease of the administrative burden

net burden

services for the general government Policy 0 0 0

Public governance 0 0 0

Finance and Budget 0 0 0

Flemish Foreign affairs 0 0 0

economy, science and innovation 0 0 0

education and training 0 0 0

Welfare, Public health and Family 295.633 0 295.633

Culture, Youth, sports and media 0 0 0

Work and social economy 0 0 0

agriculture and Fisheries 372.936 0 372.936

environment, nature and energy 0 - 71.667 - 71.667

mobility and Public Works 0 - 22.409 - 22.409

spatial Development, housing and immovable heritage 0 - 39.000 - 39.000

grand total (2009 Q3+Q4) 668.569 - 133.076 535.493

2010 – Policy area increase of the administrative burden


net administrative burden

services for the general government Policy 0 -3.461 -3.461

Public governance 0 -32.966 -32.966


Flemish Foreign affairs 0 -1.020 -1.020

economy, science and innovation 0 0 0

education and training 102.879 0 102.879

Welfare, Public health and Family 138.225 -1.509.120 -1.370.895

Culture, Youth, sports and media 39.008 -797.680 -758.672

Work and social economy 0 - 8.882.787 -8.882.787

agriculture and Fisheries 1.250.117 -1.748.934 - 498.817

environment, nature and energy 2.017.880 19.841.733 - 17.823.853

mobility and Public Works 0 0 0

spatial Development, housing and immovable heritage 90.424 - 22.151 68.273

grand total (2010) 3.638.533 - 32.839.852 - 29.201.320


2011 – Policy area increase of the administrative burden



services for the general government Policy 0 0 0

Public governance 0 755.468 -755.468


Flemish Foreign affairs 0 68.861 -68.861

economy, science and innovation 8.565 0 8.565

education and training 39 98.739 -98.700

Welfare, Public health and Family 104.668 1.192.131 -1.087.462

Culture, Youth, sports and media 91.221 967.935 -876.714

Work and social economy 0 673.478 -673.478

agriculture and Fisheries 19.992 12.896 7.096

environment, nature and energy 466.448 2.760.345 -2.293.898

mobility and Public Works 0 8.000 -8.000

spatial Development, housing and immovable heritage 232.548 6.254 226.294

grand total (2011) 923.481 6.544.107 -5.620.625

total Peeters ii (2009 (third + fourth quarter) – 2011)

increase of the administrative burden



services for the general government Policy 0 - 3.461 -3.461

Public governance 0 - 788.434 -788.434


Flemish Foreign affairs 0 - 69.881 -69.881

economy, science and innovation 8.565 0 8.565

education and training 102.918 - 121.148 -18.230

Welfare, Public health and Family 538.526 - 2.701.250 -2.162.724

Culture, Youth, sports and media 130.229 - 1.765.615 -1.635.386

Work and social economy 0 - 9.556.265 -9.556.265

agriculture and Fisheries 1.643.0445 - 1.761.830 -118.785

environment, nature and energy 2.484.328 - 22.673.746 -20.189.418

mobility and Public Works 0 - 8.000 -8.000

spatial Development, housing and immovable heritage 322.972 - 67.405 255.567

grand total (2009*-2011) 5.230.583 - 39.517.035 -34.286.452


1.6.2. measuRement Results PeR ministeR

the Regulatory management unit also produces an annual report about the balance of the Compensation Rule for administrative Burdens for every minister. the table below shows the 2011 increases and decreases per minister:

1.6.3 measuRement Results PeR taRget gRouP

Based on the evaluation of the compensation rule and at the request of the Board of senior officials, it was recommended to shift the focus of the compensation rule to compensation at the level of the target groups.

after all: for individual citizens, starting companies, youth organisations, etc., it does not matter which policy area imposes the obligation to inform. the individual target groups do not distinguish between the various policy areas, each of which regulates and imposes its own obligations. For this reason, the Regulatory management unit also clusters the increases and decreases of the administrative burden at a target group level, while distinguishing the following main categories: companies, citizens, organisations and (other) government authorities.

the table shows the impacts of the administrative burden for the different target groups during the current coalition period.

meASuremeNt reSultS Per mINISter (2011)

minister increase of the administrative burden


net administra-tive burden


28.557 81.757,00 -53.200


0 0 0

Vice-minister-President and minister for Public governan-ce, local and Provincial government, Civic integration, tourism and the Vlaamse Rand

0 511.753 -511.753

minister for Welfare, Public health and Family 104.668 1.192.131 -1.087.462

minister for mobility and Public Works 0 8.000 -8.000

minister for energy, housing, Cities and social economy 258.849, 2.499.825 -2.240.976


0 494.335 -494.335

minister for environment, nature and Culture 440.147 1.227.796 -787.649

minister for education, Youth, equal opportunities and Brussels affairs

91.260 528.510 - 437.250

grand total 923.481 6.544.107 -5.620.625


ComPensation Rule aDministRatiVe BuRDens: FoCus toWaRDs taRget gRouPs (PeeteRs ii)

2009 (from 3e quarter)

2010 2011 grand total

Companies + 333.936 -28.446.041 -2.106.735 -30.218.841

Citizens -94.076 -40.201 -192.002 -326.279

organisations + 295.633 -1.941.709 -936.243 -2.582.318

authorities + 1.226.632 -2.385.646 -1.159.014

total + 535.493 -29.201.319 -5.620.625 -34.286.452

For informational purposes, for the coalition period Peeters ii (from the third quarter 2009 through 2011) the impacts per target group are also clustered per policy area:

total (Peeters ii) / PD Bedrijven Burgers organisaties overheden eindtotaal

services for the general govern-ment Policy

-3.461 -3.461

Public governance -32.966 -755.468 -788.434

Finance and Budget

Flemish Foreign affairs -1.020 -68.861 -69.881

economy, science and innovation 8.565 8.565

education and training 70.730 -73.498 -15.463 -18.230

Welfare, Public health and Family -147.687 -1.625.481 -220.007 -1.993.175

Culture, Youth, sports and media -55.382 -55.382 -761.836 -762.786 -1.635.386

Work and social economy -9.556.265 -9.556.265

agriculture and Fisheries -121.078 2.292 -118.785

environment, nature and energy -20.455.682 -425.606 691.871 -20.189.418

mobility and Public Works -8.000 -8.000

spatial Development, housing Policy and immovable heritage

-39.000 240.687 -90.830 -24.839 86.018

grand total -30.218.841 -326.279 -2.582.318 -1.159.014 -34.286.452


1.7. notiFiCations RegaRDing aDministRatiVe simPliFiCation

Citizens, companies and/or organisations may report administrative burdens and complex rules and make suggestions for their simplification. the Regulatory management unit passes the notifications to be dealt with to the competent entities within the government of Flanders and monitors them closely.

notifications may be submitted to the Regulatory management unit via a web form that can be filled out at www.bestuurszaken.be/suggestieformulier.

notifications refer to general regulations or situations. notifications involving a federal competency are forwarded to the federal service for administrative simplification. notifications differ from complaints in that the latter involve a particular dossier. Complaints are submitted to the Flemish ombudsman.

Besides web form notifications, the Regulatory management unit also receives notifications through:

- the email address [email protected];- the federal Kafka reporting desk.

a total of 28 suggestions were submitted in 2011.

COmPeteNt POlICy AreA NumBer Of rePOrtS







spatial Development, housing Policy and immovable heritage 10

none 1

grand total 28

NOTIFICATIONS ACCORDING TO COMPETENT POLICY AREA

None (4%)

Spatial Development, Housing Policy and Immovable heritage (36%)

Mobility and Public Works (3%)

Environment, Nature and Energy (7%)

Welfare, Public Health and Family (11%)

Education and Training (21%)

Economy, Science and Innovation (11%)

Flemish Foreign Affairs (7%)7%

11%

21%

11%7%3%

36%

4%


1.8. legislatiVe tRaining

in 2006, the Regulatory management unit of the Public governance Department and the agency for government Personnel started providing a legislative training programme which has been expanded and intensified ever since.

modules of the legislative training programme

• LegislativetrainingA1-Regulation:procedureandtechnique&LegislativetrainingA2-Regulation:procedureandtechniquethis module involves basic training; after completion the trainee will demonstrate sufficient elementary knowledge of the nature, the coming into being and the quality of rules of law.

• LegislativetrainingB-Competenciesandtechnique;advancedprogrammethis module provides advanced knowledge and skills for civil servants involved in lawmaking in a selection of important legal areas.

• LegislativetrainingC-Language,enforcementandEuropeanlawthis module provides advanced knowledge and skills for civil servants involved in lawmaking in a selection of important linguistic and legal areas: • language and legislation; • InternationalTreatiesandcooperationagreements;• Legalcontrolofregulations;• ImplementationofEuropeanlaw;• sanctions and enforceability.

• LegislativetrainingD1-RegulatoryImpactAnalysisandadministrativeburdensmodule D1 is a basic training course intended for employees with an interest in the principles of the Regulatory impact analysis and measurement of the administrative burden.

• LegislativetrainingD2-Consultationandimpactanalysisthis module addresses interdisciplinary themes with concrete importance for civil servants with policy-making and lawmaking responsibilities. the module focuses on transferring knowledge and skills that are of importance in the concrete application of Regulatory impact analysis in everyday practice.


training number of sessions

number of participants

module a1 - Regulation: procedure and technique 2 27

module a2 - Regulation: procedure and technique 2 21

module B - Competencies and technique; advanced training

1 6

module C - language, enforcement and european law 1 9

module D1 - Regulatory impact analysis and administrative burdens

1 10

module D2 - Consultation and impact analysis 1 6

total 8 79

8 different modules were organised in 2011 for a total of 79 participants.

in 2011, the Regulatory management unit and the agency for government Personnel seized the opportunity to subject the existing training programmes to a thorough evaluation and review for improvement. as a result, only the key courses could take place in 2011. this explains the downward trend in the number of sessions and participants.

the evaluation resulted in a new public contract between the Regulatory management unit and the agency for government Personnel on the one hand and the interuniversitary Centre for legislation and the european institute of Public administration on the other.

at the end of 2012, an open offer of the following training programmes will become available:

- Policy & regulation: an introduction;- Drafting and monitoring regulatory dossiers;- Regulatory impact analysis as a process;- Drafting rules of law.

the training programmes will have a more practical approach, with particular focus on the daily workings within the government of Flanders. in addition, a plan for customised in-house training programmes, current affairs meetings and workshops will be worked out in more detail in 2012.

PERCENTAGE OF PARTICIPANTS IN 2011 FOR EACH MODULE

Module D2 (8%)

Module D1 (13%)

Module C (11%)

Module B (8%)

Module A2 (26%)

Module A1 (34%)

34%

26%

8%

11%

13%

8%


the offer of training programmes is open to all the policy staff involved in policy-making and lawmaking. in addition, in accordance with the Draft interinstitutional agreement on Regulatory impact analysis, it is also open to participation from employees of the Flemish Parliament and the strategic advice Councils.

the following graphs show the evolution in time with respect to the numbers of participants and sessions.

NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS

0 20 40 60 80

Number of sessions 2011Number of sessions 2010Number of sessions 2009

Module D2

Module D1

Module C

Module B

Module A2

Module A1

NUMBER OF SESSIONS

Number of sessions 2011Number of sessions 2010Number of sessions 2009

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

ModuleD2

Module D1

Module C

Module B

Module A2

Module A1


⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎

⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋

⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫

⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂

⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪

⣫⣬⣭⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔

⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂

⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯

⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻

⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩

⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯

⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃

⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂

⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙

⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋

⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨

⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫

⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈

⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻

⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⠩⡳⡲⢖⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇

⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌

⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄

⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺

⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑

⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖

⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩

⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈

⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩

⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁

⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙

⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫ ⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍

⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱

⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦

⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖

⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭

⠬⠫⠪⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫

⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂

⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙

⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋

⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺

⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄

⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄

⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺

⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑

⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⡳

⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺

⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳

⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪

⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔

⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄

⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌

⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔

⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻

⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳

⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣗

⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮

⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸

⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔

⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼

⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍

european indicators

2

31 European indicators

2.1 ConteXt

the compulsory transposition of european Directives into the Flemish legal order requires a considerable effort in the field of proper regulation.

the government of Flanders wants to have more influence on european decision-making. this requires more proactive monitoring of european policies and regulations. as early as during the preparation of european regulations, a well-coordinated and coherent Flemish standpoint must be available to anticipate the european decision-making process. this will result in better and faster transposition and application of european regulations.

legislation is the main policy-implementing method used by the european union and the european legislative body is therefore substantial. Realisation of european legislative measures largely depends on the effective application of Community law in the member states. legislative and/or administrative actions are required from each member state in the implementation of both primary european law (the european treaties) and secondary european law (Regulations, Directives and Decisions). the aggregate of legislative and administrative actions carried out by member states in the implementation of their obligations with respect to european law, is termed ‘implementation of european Community law into the national legal order’.

EuropeanDirectives constitute a special legislative instrument. article 288 of the tFeu describes the Directive as binding as regards the intended result; however, the member states are free to choose the format and tools used to implement this obligation. this means that european Directives do not have any consequences until they have been transposed into national law by the member states involved . a so-called transposition term, applicable for each Directive, determines when the member states must have adopted the necessary transposition measurements.

in a Belgian context, european Community law must be implemented not only by the Federal government, but also by the communities and regions insofar as their internal competencies are involved.

the government of Flanders makes a due effort to ensure timely and correct implementation of european law. if an infringement procedure nonetheless is initiated by the european Commission as a result of late or incorrect implementation, the government will attempt to solve the problem as soon as possible.

the Flemish Representation at the Belgian Permanent Representation to the eu (PR) and the euro-coordinator of the Flemish Department of Foreign affairs play a key role in this respect.

the euro-coordinator keeps a list of the european Directives that need to be transposed by Flanders and of the infringement procedures initiated against Flanders by the european Commission . these lists form part of a regular report about european developments submitted to the government of Flanders as a Communication.2 (1) Treaty on the Functioning of the

European Union.

(2) Although transposition and implementation are often used

interchangeably, they do not mean the same thing. Implementation is much broader than the mere

transposition of Directives. Transposition of Directives forms

part of the implementation of European Community Law.

(3) This requires nuancing. Based on the principle of vertical

direct effect, under certain circumstances private individuals may invoke Directives against the

government in a court of law.

(4) Strictly speaking, infringement procedures may be initiated

against Belgium - as an EU Member State - even if the

infringement originates from a Flemish community or region.


While the euro-coordinator plays a role in the implementation stage and policy-correction stage of the european decision-making process, the so-called Flemish PR is a key figure during policy preparations and negotiations. the attaches of the Flemish PR take part in the negotiations within the eu Council and monitor the european developments with relevance for their policy area.

By keeping a close watch on the european agenda, Flemish regulations can anticipate on the obligations that are to be expected from the eu. every six months, the government of Flanders receives a summary of the eu dossiers with priority for Flanders.

the euro-coordinator prepares a script for the implementation of european regulations in Flanders. this script, which contains a systematic description of the procedure for Directives, helps the Flemish administrations in conducting a proactive policy. the script for the implementation of european regulations in Flanders also aims at providing a solution for the existing backlog in transposing european Directives into Flemish regulations.

2.2 euRoPean inFRingement DossieRs

the government of Flanders tries in several ways to ensure timely and correct implementation of european Community law in order to avoid initiation of infringement procedures by the european Commission.

in accordance with articles 258 and 260 of the tFeu, the Commission initiates an infringement procedure when a member state has ‘failed to fulfil an obligation under the treaties’. this provision thus pertains to non-compliance of any type of Community law whatsoever with binding force for the member states. in short, infringement of european law can take three possible forms:

- Failure of or late transposition of Directives: this involves transposition into national regulations outside the set transposition period;

- incorrect transposition of Directives: this relates to Directives that, albeit in a timely fashion, were transposed incorrectly;

- incorrect application of Community law in general (european treaties; Regulations; Decisions, etc.): this occurs when, regardless of the transposition of european Directives, a member state in its administrative practice or adopted regulations, violates european Community law.

33 European indicators

On31/12/2011,therewere20infringementfiles:

• 9 of which involved late transposition of Directives;

• 7 of which involved incorrect transposition of Directives; and

• 4 of which involved incorrect application of other sources of european law

(treaties, Regulations, Decisions, etc.).

a summons was issued in 2 of these dossiers.

inFRingement DossieRs PeR PoliCY aRea

Policy arealate transposition

incorrect trans-position of Directives

incorrect appli-cation of other sources of european law total

services for the general government Policy 1 1

Public governance 3 3

Finance and Budget 1 1

Flemish Foreign affairs 2 2

economy, science and innovation

education and training

Welfare, Public health and Family

Culture, Youth, sports and media 2 2

Work and social economy 1 1

agriculture and Fisheries

environment, nature and energy 1 5 6

mobility and Public Works 4 4


total 9 7 4 20

inFRingement DossieRs PeR ministeR

Per ministerlate transpo-sition

incorrect transposition of Directives

incorrect appli-cation of other sources of european law total


2 2


1 1

minister of mobility and Public Works 4 4

minister for energy, housing, Cities and social eco-nomy

2 2


3 3

minister for environment, nature and Culture 1 5 6


2 2

total 9 7 4 20

⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋

⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃

⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑

⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄

⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫

⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮

⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸

⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔

⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼

⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍

⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⠩⡳⡲⢖⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⢹

⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲

⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐

⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍

⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮

⣋⣌⣍⣎⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖

⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔

⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑

⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍

⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬

⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂

⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳

⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦

⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪

⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈

⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗

⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡

⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺

⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐

⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣍⣎⣏

⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯

⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⠩⡳⡲⢖⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃

⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙

⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⣏⣐

⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯

⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻

⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑

⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭

⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸

⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇

⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺

⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐

⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌

⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈

⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫

⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣍⣎

⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂

⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃

⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏

⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮

⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩

⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇

⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋

⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙

⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼

⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼

⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑

⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⡳

⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺

⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳

Qualitative indicators of flemish regulations

3

35 Qualitative indicators

on 7 november 2003, the government of Flanders adopted eight characteristics of good regulation. these characteristics are as follows:

good regulation is:

1 necessary and effective,2 efficient and carefully considered,3 feasible and maintainable,4 legitimate,5 coherent,6 simple, clear and accessible,7 with the necessary support and following consultation,8 permanently relevant.

the government of Flanders thus avails of a benchmark for quality improvement of Flemish regulations.

however, the mere adoption of these characteristics is not enough to improve the quality of regulations: this also requires alignment with existing structures, processes, instruments and guidelines.

Within the government of Flanders, monitoring the quality of Flemish regulations takes place via legislative advice, consisting of:

- linguistic advice;- legislative advice;- advice in the context of the Regulatory impact analysis.

on Friday 17 July 2009, the government of Flanders adopted the renewed circular letter VR 2009/4 on legislative techniques.

3.1 linguistiC anD legislatiVe QualitY oF Regulations

During the year of operation 2011, the legal services team and the language advice team of the Chancellery Division issued 524 opinions.

these can be categorised as follows:the average figure shown in the table represents the number of opinions in this category for the period between 2001 and 2010.

Decrees Decisions ministerial Decisions other total

2011 average 2011 average 2011 average 2011 2011 average

84 61 318 345 108 132 14 524 552


3.1.1 oVeRVieW oF legislatiVe anD linguistiC aDViCe FoR DeCRees, DeCisions anD ministeRial DeCisions

Below is an overview per minister of the number of legislative and linguistic opinions issued in 2011 by the legal services team and the language advice team of the Chancellery Division for decrees, decisions of the government of Flanders and ministerial decisions.

ministeR no. of decrees

no. of decisions

no. of ministerial decisions

minister-President and minister for economy, Foreign Policy, agricul-ture and Rural Policy

7 23 41

Vice-minister-President and minister for innovation, Public invest-ment, media and Poverty Reduction

2 2 1


14 25 12

minister for Welfare, Public health and Family 9 54 15

minister of mobility and Public Works 8 5 2

minister for energy, housing, Cities and social economy 7 28 6


9 24 5

minister for environment, nature and Culture 8 50 14


14 83 8

sum for several ministers 6 24 4

all 0 0 0

total 84 318 108


3.1.2 ReQuests FoR legislatiVe anD liguistiC aDViCe aCCoRDing to oRigin

the following is an overview of the requests for legislative and linguistic advice according to the policy area of the applicant (the person submitting the request for advice). the overview is not based on authors of the documents in question, as these cannot be traced from the request for advice in itself.

applicant – policy area number of requests for

advice

services for the general government Policy 13

Public governance 41

Finance and Budget 13





Culture, Youth, sports and media 35

Work and social economy 16

agriculture and Fisheries 53




68

Cabinets 6

total 524


3.1.3 QualitY oF legislatiVe anD linguistiC aDViCe

the legal services team and the language advice team of the Chancellery Division check the legislative and linguistic quality of the regulations submitted for advice. Based on these checks, both teams give a rating between 0 and 3 in accordance with the number of mistakes found in the texts.

it is important to note that this procedure involves mistakes found in texts submitted for advice. these are mistakes which, as a result of the compulsory legislative and linguistic advisory services, are removed from the relevant regulations before the latter are placed on the agenda of the government of Flanders and therefore, basically should not occur in regulations that have gone through the entire regulatory process, of which legislative and linguistic advice forms a mandatory part.

legislative quality

For the grand total of 524 issued opinions, the results are as follows:

the following shows the results categorised per policy area. (again, documents are categorised according to the person who has transmitted the request for advice. in other words: the categorisation is not based on authors, as these cannot be traced from the request for advice in itself.).

there are four categoriesn:

‘3’ rating: excellent

‘2’ rating: good

‘1’ rating: moderate

‘0’ rating: poor

Policy area/Cabinets excellent (3) good (2) moderate (1) Poor (0)

services for the general government Policy 0 6 7 0

Public governance 0 1 32 8

Finance and Budget 0 1 10 2

Flemish Foreign affairs 0 1 11 0

economy, science and innovation 0 1 14 1

education and training 5 11 65 17

Welfare, Public health and Family 2 9 68 3

Culture, Youth, sports and media 0 5 23 7

Work and social economy 1 1 13 1

agriculture and Fisheries 2 10 39 2

environment, nature and energy 0 2 47 7

mobility and Public Works 0 2 11 2


1 11 49 7

Cabinets 0 0 4 2

total 11 61 393 59


Percentage of good (‘2’ rating) and excellent (‘3’ rating) texts from a legislative point of view:

Policy area/Cabinets average % excellent/good

2006/2010

% excellent/good 2011

services for the general government Policy 36.2 46.1

Public governance 19.75 2.4

Finance and Budget 12.3 7.7

Flemish Foreign affairs 30 8.3

economy, science and innovation 15.2 6.25

education and training 21.8 16.3

Welfare, Public health and Family 24.5 13.4

Culture, Youth, sports and media 20.8 14.3

Work and social economy 12.7 12.5

agriculture and Fisheries 26.4 22.6

environment, nature and energy 19.7 3.6

mobility and Public Works 11.5 13.3


13.9 17.6

Cabinets 16 0

total average: 20 % average: 13.2 %

taalkundige kwaliteit

For the grand total of 524 issues opinions, the results are as follows: score 3 (43), score 2 (187), score 1 (262) en score 0 (32).

the diagram below shows the results per policy area and based on applicant (the person submitting the request). in other words: the categorisation is not based on authors of the documents, as these cannot be traced from the request for advice in itself.


Policy area/Cabinets excellent (3) good (2) moderate (1) Poor (0)

services for the general government Policy 2 4 6 1

Public governance 1 10 24 6

Finance and Budget 1 6 4 2

Flemish Foreign affairs 2 7 3 0

economy, science and innovation 0 6 10 0

education and training 10 39 45 4

Welfare, Public health and Family 7 26 46 3

Culture, Youth, sports and media 1 11 21 2

Work and social economy 1 9 6 0

agriculture and Fisheries 8 26 17 2

environment, nature and energy 0 18 35 3

mobility and Public Works 0 4 6 5


10 20 35 3

Cabinets 0 1 4 1

total 43 187 262 32

legislative and linguistic quality

the following overview provides a general assessment of legislative and linguistic quality, based on the individual ratings given by both the legal services team and the legal services team (see above), which are combined into a joint rating (where 6 = excellent and 0 = poor).

again, it is important to note that this procedure involves mistakes found in texts submitted for advice; mistakes which, as a result of the compulsory legislative and linguistic advisory services, are removed from the relevant regulations before the latter are placed on the agenda of the government of Flanders and which therefore, basically should not occur in regulations that have gone through the entire regulatory process, of which legislative and linguistic advice forms a mandatory part.

the overview shows the results per policy area and based on applicant (the person submitting the request). in other words: the categorisation is not based on authors of the documents, as these cannot be traced from the request for advice in itself.


Policy area/Cabinets '6' rating '5' rating '4' rating '3' rating '2' rating '1' rating '0' rating


0 2 2 4 4 1 0

Public governance 0 0 2 8 20 9 2

Finance and Budget 0 1 0 4 6 2 0

Flemish Foreign affairs 0 0 2 8 2 0 0

economy, science and innovation

0 0 1 5 9 1 0

education and training 3 3 14 26 39 10 3

Welfare, Public health and Family

1 3 6 27 39 6 0

Culture, Youth, sports and media 0 0 4 9 15 6 1

Work and social economy 1 0 1 8 5 1 0

agriculture and Fisheries 2 2 11 20 15 2 1

environment, nature and energy 0 0 1 18 28 8 1

mobility and Public Works 0 0 2 2 5 5 1


0 5 9 19 26 9 0

Cabinets 0 0 0 1 2 3 0

total 7 16 55 159 215 63 9

3.2 QualitY oF the RegulatoRY imPaCt analYsis

3.2.1 RegulatoRY imPaCt analYsis

as from 1 January 2005, application of the Regulatory impact analysis (Ria) has become mandatory within the government of Flanders.

Rias are structured analyses of the objectives and anticipated positive and negative effects of proposed regulations compared to their alternatives.

Rias are mandatory for all regulations that have a regulatory effect on citizens, businesses or non-profit organisations, included in preliminary drafts of decrees and drafts of decisions.


een rIA bevat de volgende negen onderdelen:

1 title

a brief description of the proposed regulation.

2 the reason behind the purpose

Which social problem is being tackled? What is the objective of the proposed regulation? What are the intended effects?

3 Options

What are the most relevant options for achieving the set objective?

4 effects

analysis of the expected advantages and disadvantages of each option.

5 Development,implementationandadministrativeburden,enforcement and evaluations

a description of how the chosen method will be detailed, implemented, enforced and evaluated. the administrative burden of the chosen option is calculated here as well.

6 Consultation

a description of consultations and their results.

7 Other information for the finance Inspectorate

any information for the Finance inspectorate that was not dealt with in other chapters of the Ria,is described in this chapter.

8 Summary

summary of the arguments in favour of the chosen option.

9 Contacts

name and contact details of the person who is available to answer questions about the impact analysis or the proposed regulation.

rIAs comprise the following nine components:


in principle, a well-substantiated configuration of the individual components of a Ria will result indrafting regulations that meet the eight characteristics of good regulation. Careful preparation of the regulation helps to avoid substantive shortcomings.

the government of Flanders seeks to use the Regulatory impact analysis to invest in the drafting of regulations that meet the eight characteristics of good regulation.

the Regulatory management unit provides a manual including guidelines for carrying out a Regulatory impact analysis. While taking the reader through the entire Ria process, these guidelines also involve drawing up a Ria document. the manual comes with a template for drafting a Regulatory impact analysis.

3.2.2 Ria aDViCe

legislative advice is compulsory for all preliminary drafts of decree and drafts of decision that are placed on the agenda of the government of Flanders for first fundamental approval. it comprises:

- linguistic and legislative advice for the regulation - Ria advice.

in the Ria advice, the Regulatory management unit provides an opinion on:

- the Ria document attached as an appendix to the memorandum addressed to the government of Flanders;

- the Ria category in the memorandum addressed to the government of Flanders.

the regulatory dossier is then adjusted according to the Ria advice and placed on the agenda of the government of Flanders.

3.2.3 QualitY oF the RegulatoRY imPaCt analYsis

after having been placed on the agenda of the government of Flanders, the Ria documents are evaluated once again by the Regulatory management unit and given a rating.

the Regulatory management unit rates the quality of the Rias attached to the regulatory dossiers that are placed on the agenda according to a specific set of criteria.

Fundamental assessment of Rias

a Ria quality assessment follows a minimum quality standard. each Ria must at least contain the following aspects:


1 reason and purpose

- it is clear what the real problem is.- the free legal scope for policy-making is described sufficiently. - the desired consequences or intended effects to solve the

problem are clear. - the political free legal scope for policy making is described

sufficiently. - the objectives or intended policy effects are described without

assumptions as to the use of resources.

2 Options

- all relevant options are listed. - the main fundamental objectives of the options are listed. - the description is limited to the options; possible effects have

been left out.

3 Effects&choiceofoption

- all the relevant target groups and parties involved have been listed or taken into account.

- all the relevant effects are detailed per target group. - the effects of the zero option as basis for comparison with the

other options have been indicated unambiguously. - the effects are described in a structured and transparent manner. - any other, sector-related effects (child impact, local authorities,

Brussels test, etc) have been listed. - the final choice of the option is well-substantiated.

4. Development,implementation,enforcementandevaluation

- the Ria states how and when the regulation will be implemented and whether additional initiatives are required for the actual application of the new regulation (implementing orders, it support, manuals, training, etc.).

- the administrative burdens (simplifications) have been described. - the administrative burdens (simplifications) have been measured. - a clear indication of how the relevant proposal will be enforced is

included. - target group sanctioning methods have been indicated clearly.

5. Samenvatting

- the summary reflects the content of the Regulatory impact analysis.


A good regulatory Impact Analysis:

• Reflectsthestudyofhowthesocialproblemcouldbesolvedviaa range of options;

• Containstheargumentationleadingtothefinalchoiceofacertain option;

• Is,intermsofdepthandvolume,inproportiontotheimportanceof the regulation and the expected extent of the impact (principle of proportionality);

• Usesthebestavailableinformationfortheempiricsupportoftheassessment process;

• Containsadiscussionofalltherelevantcostsandbenefits,together with an analysis of other important effects, and uses that information to provide a comparison of the options;

• Ishonestandopenaboutestimates,uncertaintiesandlacunaeinthe presentation of problems, costs, benefits and effects;

• Hasbeendiscussedwiththestakeholdertargetgroupsandotherpolicy domains.

overview of Ria quality per minister and per policy area

the Regulatory management unit monitors the quality of the Rias by using the indicator ‘Ria Quality’: the average percentage of the quality assessment of the Rias.

For voluminous decrees and decisions of the government of Flanders, it can happen that several Rias are being drafted for each fundamental theme. thus several decrees or decisions of the government of Flanders may be submitted for approval in one single regulatory dossier. the above explains the discrepancy between the number of regulatory dossiers, the number of decisions and decrees and the number of Rias.

in 2010 werden 29 Ria’s beoordeeld.


Ria QualitY FoR eaCh ministeR

minister gem. Ria-kwaliteit

number of Rias


76.50% 4

minister-President and minister for economy, Foreign Policy, agriculture and Rural Policy 66.08% 6


50.50% 1

minister for Welfare, Public health and Family 61.89% 11

minister for mobility and Public Works 65.57% 3

minister for energy, housing, Cities and social economy 67.66% 7

minister for Finance, Budget, Work, town and Country Planning and sport 64.04% 4

minister for environment, nature and Culture 68.04% 9

minister for education, Youth, equal opportunities and Brussels affairs 72.76% 7

totaal 67.06% 52

Ria QualitY PeR PoliCY Domain

Beleidsdomein gem. Ria-kwaliteit

number of Rias

services for the general government Policy 0

Public governance 84.10% 3

Finance and Budget 0

Flemish Foreign affairs 69.92% 2

economy, science and innovation 59.83% 3

education and training 70.45% 4

Welfare, Public health and Family 61.89% 11

Culture, Youth, sports and media 70.61% 8

Work and social economy 57.10% 3

agriculture and Fisheries 77.13% 1

environment, nature and energy 67.83% 10

mobility and Public Works 65.57% 3

spatial Development, housing Policy and immovable heritage 64.85% 4

total 67.06% 52


3.3 QualitY oF RegulatoRY DossieRs

the legislative, linguistic and Ria quality give an indication of the quality of regulations. the Regulatory management unit keeps an indicator called ‘regulatory dossier quality’. this indicator reflects the percentage of the regulatory dossiers for which a legislative and linguistic advice was requested and whose Ria quality assessment was positive (at least 50%).

REguLAtORyDOssIERquALItyfOREAChmInIstER

minister Ria required, for-mally oK and > 50%

%


4 op 4 100,00%


5 op 6 83,33%


1 op 1 100,00%

minister for Welfare, Public health and Family 9 op 11 81,82%

minister for mobility and Public Works 3 op 3 100,00%

minister for energy, housing, Cities and social economy 7 op 7 100,00%

minister for Finance, Budget, Work, town and Country Planning and sport 4 op 4 100,00%

minister for environment, nature and Culture 8 op 9 88,89%

minister for education, Youth, equal opportunities and Brussels affairs 7 op 7 100,00%

total 48 op 52 92,31%

REguLAtORyDOssIERquALItypERpOLICyAREA

Beleidsdomein Ria required, for-mally oK and > 50%

%


Public governance 3 of 3 100.00%

Finance and Budget

Flemish Foreign affairs 2 of 2 100.00%

economy, science and innovation 2 of 3 66.67%

education and training 4 of 4 100.00%

Welfare, Public health and Family 9 of 11 81.82%

Culture, Youth, sports and media 8 of 8 100.00%

Work and social economy 3 of 3 100.00%

agriculture and Fisheries 1 of 1 100.00%

environment, nature and energy 9 of 10 90.00%

mobility and Public Works 3 of 3 100.00%

spatial Development, housing Policy and immovable heritage 4 of 4 100.00%

total 48 of 52 92.31%

⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍

⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬

⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂

⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳

⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊

⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖

⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅

⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳

⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱

⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡

⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺

⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫

⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂

⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉

⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹

⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈

⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻

⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙

⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍

⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃

⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑

⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬

⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⠩⡳⡲⢖⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽

⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁

⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⣍⣎⣏

⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔

⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖

⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑

⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬

⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔

⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔

⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍

⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃

⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐

⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲

⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍

⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺

⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔

⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥

⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄

⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺

⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑

⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄

⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫

⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮

⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸

⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔

⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼

⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱

⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳

⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗

⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚

⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺

⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲

⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍

⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭

⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔

⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳

⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇

⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧

4flemish regulations 2012

49 Flemish Regulations 20114 on 17 December 2010, the government of Flanders principally adopted the 2009-2014 strategic policy framework for qualitative regulation and administrative simplification. this policy framework comprises a renewed confirmation of the general principles and priorities in terms of adjustment of Flemish regulatory management toolst.

these tools include:

• the Regulatory impact analysis (Ria);• Compensation Rule for administrative Burdens;• units for Regulatory Quality;• Regulatory agenda;• Quality improvement of forms.

the new strategic policy framework is based on the evaluation results of the existing instruments of Flemish regulatory policy.

the concrete implementation of this strategic policy framework will be rolled out by the Regulatory management unit in 2011-2012. this includes a review of the indicators as part of the programme ‘Business information government of Flanders’ of the Public governance Department.

this programme aims at offering integrated information for, about and by the government of Flanders:

- For the management (top and middle management) and their internal supporting divisions (e.g. hR divisions) and for the political level (government of Flanders, Flemish Parliament), hence indirectly also for society;

- about the policy themes of administrative affairs: personnel, business development, it, e-government, facility management, real estate, public procurement and regulatory management.

the website portal www.bestuurszaken.be biedt geïntegreerde informatie over deze beleidsthema’s aan, onderbouwoffers integrated information about these policy themes, substantiated by a strong statistical section. the section ‘Business information government of Flanders (www.bestuurszaken.be/bedrijfsinformatie) offers figures as well as definitions, details, analyses, etc., about all the indicators.

For indeed: the indicators on regulatory management constitute a valuable instrument for communicating the results in this field. the figures also create awareness and help senior civil servants in controlling the policy on high quality regulations and administrative simplification.

in 2012, the ‘Business information government of Flanders’ – tailored to the management of the government of Flanders by using dashboards – will be supplemented with new themes and additional statistics.

⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎

⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋

⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬

⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩

⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀

⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧

⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯

⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻

⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣍

⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂

⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃

⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐

⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌

⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬

⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂

⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯

⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳

⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱

⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄

⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼

⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩

⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅

⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯

⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻

⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥

⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡

⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦

⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖

⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅

⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⠩⡳⡲⢖⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔

⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔

⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼

⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽

⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩

⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑

⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣳⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡽⣍

⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃

⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎

⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮

⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦

⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪

⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯

⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙

⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽

⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑

⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖

⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎

⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼

⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯

⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥

⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄

⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺

⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑

⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄

⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫

⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮

⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸

⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔

⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼

⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱

Colophon

Publisher

government of Flanders

luc lathouwerssecretary generalPublic governance DepartmentBoudewijngebouwBoudewijnlaan 30 P.o. box 30B-1000 Brussels

editing

Regulatory management unit(Public governance Department)Foreign affairs Division(Flemish Department of Foreign affairs)Chancellery Division - language advice team, legal services team and the unit support to the government of Flanders and Writ services(Department of the services for the general government Policy)

Contact details

Public governance DepartmentRegulatory management unit [email protected] 553 17 11

Catalogue number

D/2012/3241/080

Ordering

[email protected]/wetsmatiging

edition

may 2012

⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⠩⡳⡲⢖⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄⡡⠼⠙⡥⢱⣗⣻⣴⣳⣯⣈⡺⠅⠩⡳⡲⢖⢻⢺⢹⢔⡯⡋⡌⠧⠂⠄⠇⠉⡔⣳⣂⡸⡔⠯⠮⠭⠬⠫⠪⠩⠄⠨⠧⠦⡊⡋⡱⡲⡳⢙⢚⣀⣁⣂⣃⣩⣪⣫⣬⣭⣮⣋⣌⣍⣎⣏⣐⣑ ⢝⣃⡺⡼⡽⣍⢄

FlemishRegulations

2011

Date post:	28-Sep-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	1 times
Download:	0 times

Flemish Regulations 2011 - Vlaanderen Intern · 2.1.1 RegulatoRY agenD a 2.0 on Friday 18 november,...

Documents