+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final

Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final

Date post: 14-Apr-2017
Category:
Upload: arlene-larsen
View: 48 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
47
A Public Water System’s Perspective Lessons to be Learned April 6 th , 2016 Jesse Stewart: SLCDPU Water Quality Administrator Arlene Larsen: Regulatory Program Manager
Transcript
Page 1: Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final

A Public Water System’s Perspective

Lessons to be LearnedApril 6th, 2016

Jesse Stewart: SLCDPU Water Quality AdministratorArlene Larsen: Regulatory Program Manager

Page 2: Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final

What We Take For Granted

Page 3: Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final

What Does the Public Expect?

Page 4: Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final

Public Water Supply H2O Quality in Utah and the US Generally good Regulated by state and federal laws - Safe

Drinking Water Act (SDWA).-1974 Requirements:

Regulates drinking water quality of the public water supplies.

Public notification for violation of standards. Regulates operational requirements for treatment plants

and distribution systems. Publish Consumer Confidence Reports

Due diligence above and beyond Public health implications

Page 5: Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final

Agenda, Questions, Lessons?

Overview of Flint MI Lead sources Lead in drinking water - chemistry Monitoring and response Communication Public perception and trust

Page 6: Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final

Flint Summary April 2014 switched to Flint

River water. Color, taste, odor, rashes,

bacteria August/September 2014

Boil order for bacteria October 2014

General Motors stops using Flint water

January 2015 Detroit water offers to

reconnect waiving connection fee

Flint officials decline offer February 2015

Lead testing – 104 ppb (could be understated, EPA expert)

March and May 2015 Lead testing – 397ppb Consultant report – Flint

water meets standards

August 2015 Flint to optimize corrosion

control September 2015

Virginia Tech professor – corrosive Flint water is causing lead to leach from pipes

High levels of lead in children’s blood

October 2015 Flint city officials urge residents

to stop drinking municipal water Flint reconnects to Detroit water

December 2015 Flint adds additional corrosion

control Flint declares a State of

Emergency January 2016

President Obama declares a State of Emergency

Page 7: Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final
Page 8: Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final

Flint Summary (cont)SO WHERE DID THINGS GO WRONG? Change of water source “cost-saving”

Due diligence Corrosion control - orthophosphate? Protective coating on the lead pipes removed Old infrastructure

Customer calls: Residents observed a change in water quality

issues (e.g., red water, taste, odor, corrosion at GM)

Communication

Page 9: Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final
Page 10: Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final

Flint Summary (cont) Sampling and analysis

for a range of possible contaminants was performed by various entities (e.g., residents, universities, State).

Lead concentrations: Greater than 100-300 (ppb)

Protection Agency (EPA) action level (AL) is 15 ppb. The action level triggers further monitoring or actions. The AL is based on the

90th percentile level at tap water samples. An AL exceedance is not a violation but can trigger other requirements that included water quality parameters (WQP) monitoring, corrosion control treatment (CCT), source water monitoring/treatment, public education, and lead service line replacement (LSLR).

Reported inaction by agencies

Page 11: Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final

Lead Sources 3000 BC: first significant mining and refining of lead 500 to 100 BC: lead poisoning described, widespread use of lead in

utensils and cook ware 1400-1500: lead used as a poison 1620’s: lead first mined in North America 1850’s: Tetraethyl Lead (TEL) discovered 1880’s: US medical authorities diagnose child lead poisoning 1909: France, Belgium, Austria ban white-lead interior paint 1916-1922: Anti-knock research engines, Tetryethyl Lead research

1922 1922: League of Nations bans interior lead paint 1970: GM President promises “pollution-free” cars by 1980, urges

elimination of lead additives. 1980: EPA regulations to allow-phase out or leaded gasoline 1982: Reagan Administration reverses phase-out 1984: Chicago bans leaded gasoline (New York had ban in place

since 1928) 1986: “Lead-free” plumbing amendment to SDWA 1994: 78% decline in lead blood levels between 1978 and 1991

Page 12: Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final

Lead Sources It is a Neurotoxin –affects every system in the body.

Children (6 years and younger) most at risk Lead paint (cited as most common exposure)

First Regulation of Lead paint enacted in 1920’s. Leaded gasoline

1984 City of Chicago bans leaded gasoline, New York 1928 Lead in household plumbing materials

Lead Solder used by plumbers to connect copper plumbing Lead pipes in older homes Prohibition of lead in plumbing materials

1986: Solder and flux < 0.2% lead and Pipes < 8% 1996: plumbing fittings and fixtures (endpoint devices) 2011: lowering the maximum lead content of the wetted surfaces

from 8% to 0.25% Some exceptions – non-potable uses

Page 14: Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final

Lead Health EffectsNeurotoxin –affects every system in the body

Children (6 years and younger) most at risk

Page 15: Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final
Page 16: Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final
Page 17: Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final
Page 18: Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final

Can Lead Get in the Water?

Page 19: Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final
Page 21: Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final

Lead Flow Diagram

Page 22: Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final

Corrosion Due to pH, alkalinity and hardness. For water corrosion will be minimal at

pH near neutral Alkalinity > 30 mg/L Hardness > 50 mgL

Addition of orthophosphate reduces corrosion. Simplest source – Phosphoric acid Reaction with lead pipe to form a Lead Phosphate

complex to form a barrier.

Page 23: Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final

How Do We Compare?

Page 24: Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final
Page 25: Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final

Water Hardness

Page 26: Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final
Page 28: Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final

Hard vs Soft Water

Page 31: Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final

Use of Polyphosphates Added to some wells as a sequestering

agent. Combines a chelating agent and metal ions

(calcium and iron) to form a soluble complex. Interferes with crystal growth. Retards scale formation. Type of polyphosphate used depends on pH

Neutral pH: Sodiumhexametaphosphate (SMPH) Alkaline: pyrophosphate and polyphosphate

Page 32: Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final

Alkalinity Defined as its capacity to neutralize acid Due to the presence of one or more of a

number of ions. Hydroxides Carbonates Bicarbonates

Moderate concentrations are desirable to balance corrosive effect.

Page 33: Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final

Langelier Index The Langelier Index is an approximate indicator of the

degree of saturation of calcium carbonate in water. Calculated using pH, alkalinity, calcium concentration,

total dissolved solids, and water temperature of a water sample collected at the tap.

Langelier Index is negative – Under-saturated with calcium carbonate Tend to be corrosive in the distribution system

Langelier Index is positive – Over saturated with calcium carbonate Tend to deposit calcium carbonate forming scales in the distribution

system If Langelier Index is close to zero –

then the water is just saturated with calcium carbonate and will neither be strongly corrosive or scale forming.

Page 35: Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final

SLC Chemistry Ranges pH: 7.5 - 8.3 Alkalinity: 124 - 303 mg/L Calcium: 33.1 - 126 mg/L TDS: 192 - 756 mg/L Temperature: varies seasonally Calcium Hardness:

132– 478 mg/L 7.7 – 27.9 grains /gallon

Page 37: Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final

Where Did Things Go Wrong?

Page 38: Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final

Monitoring, Response, and Communication

SLCDPU protocols Water sources Changes to water sources Infrastructure, line breaks Testing, 170 compounds, > 16,000 tests

Langlier Index monitoring Response to customer complaints

Page 39: Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final

SLCDPU Overview State and Federal

Regulation SLC’s 3-phase approach

Source Protection Surface water and groundwater

Treatment Distribution

All-Phases – Routine monitoring for

potential contaminants, including Pb and Cu

Public health implications

Page 40: Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final

Water Sources Majority from snow melt flowing in our mountain streams. Deep wells are added during summer months to supplement

demand.

Page 41: Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final

Rigorous Monitoring Salt Lake City – meets or exceeds all EPA

requirements. Watershed Treatment plants, wells and reservoirs Distribution system

Page 42: Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final

Lead and Copper Results

Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities 2015 Lead and Copper Sampling First Draw After Flushing First Draw After Flushing

 Lead

AL of 15 ppbLead

AL of 15 ppbCopper

AL of 1300 ppb Copper

AL of 1300 ppb

count 57 57 57 57

Concentration (ppb) at 90th Percentile

6.80 1.26 243.40 59.24

Ave (<1.00 calculated as 1.00)

(ppb) 3.01 1.16 114.19 28.46

Min (ppb) <1.00 <1.00 4.72 2.71

Max (ppb) 21.90 6.02 706.00 110.00

Lead and Copper Rule Monitoring Every three years90th percentile below 15 ppb EPA Action LevelIn-line with other Utah PWSs

Page 43: Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final

What You Can Do

Water testing Local laboratories

Run the cold water “lead-free” plumbing Maintain home treatment systems

Page 44: Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final

Public Perception and Trust

Page 45: Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final

Public Perception and Trust

Education and interactions

Public notice Customer inquiries Customer complaints Consumer

Confidence Reports Community Council

meetings

Page 46: Flint - A PWS Perspective AWWA Mid-Year 2016 Final

Questions???

We Take it for Granted


Recommended