Flourishing through identification and engagement: Sustaining employee health and effectiveness
by
Sean Peter Tinker B App Sci, Health Promotion
B App Sci, Psychology (Honours)
Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of
Doctor of Philosophy
Deakin University
November 2014
Acknowledgements
My deepest gratitude goes to my family for believing in me. Your unqualified support at all times allowed me to break through each and every obstacle
along the way. Please share in this achievement with me.
To my son Jackson, you are a source of infinite pride and happiness. You brought light to bear whenever I could not see my way ahead.
Life after this thesis awaits both of us.
To my beautiful wife Soranee, you have been so generous with your love. Your strength and wisdom has brought peace to my life.
My heartfelt thanks and deepest love goes to you.
To my Mum and Dad, the support and love you have shown me will never be forgotten.
My aspiration is to be like you.
To my supervisor Professor Joe Graffam, thank you for your guidance and wisdom, but most of all, thank you for your faith.
This thesis is dedicated to my late grandmother, Elsie Tinker.
You taught me to be myself.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 1 of 280
Table of ContentsChapter 1 ............................................................................................................................. 15
Flourishing Workforces and Organisational Effectiveness ............................................ 15
1.1. Workforce as a sustainable, self-generating organisational resource .........16
1.2. Flourishing as Eudaimonic and Hedonic Well-being.................................33
1.3. Flourishing Workforces in Organisations...................................................42
1.4. Conclusion ..................................................................................................47
Chapter 2 ............................................................................................................................. 49
Workplace Identification and Resource Accumulation .................................................. 49
2.1. Introduction.................................................................................................49
2.2. Theories of Identification ...........................................................................51
Social Identity Theory .......................................................................................55
Self-Categorisation Theory ...............................................................................58
2.3. Identification in Organisations ...................................................................61
2.4. Resource Accumulation Related to Identification and Circumstances at Work 65
2.5. Conclusion ..................................................................................................69
Chapter 3 ............................................................................................................................. 73
Employee Health as a Sustainable Outcome of Identification and Flourishing............ 73
3.1. Introduction.................................................................................................73
3.2. Employee Health and the Relationship to Identification and Flourishing..77
3.3. Conclusion ..................................................................................................90
Chapter 4 ............................................................................................................................. 93
Study 1: A Model of Workforce Flourishing.................................................................... 93
4.1. Work Identification and Flourishing ..........................................................93
4.2. Identification and the Capacity to Flourish ................................................96
4.3. Exploring Two Model Variants of Workforce Flourishing......................103
4.4. Method......................................................................................................105
Workforce Flourishing Measures ....................................................................108
Employee Health Measures.............................................................................111
Work identification..........................................................................................112
4.5. Results.......................................................................................................115
4.6. Discussion.................................................................................................123
4.7. Conclusion ................................................................................................132
Chapter 5 ........................................................................................................................... 134
Study Two: Employee Engagement and the Construct of Engagement Climate........ 134
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 2 of 280
5.1. Employee Engagement .............................................................................135
5.2. Work Climate and Defining Engagement Climate...................................140
5.3. Engagement Climate Characteristics ........................................................142
5.4. Qualitative Study: Refining the Characteristics of Engagement Climate 145
5.5. Method......................................................................................................146
5.6. Results.......................................................................................................150
5.7. Qualitative Study Discussion....................................................................153
5.8. Quantitative Study: Further Examination of the Construct of Engagement Climate ................................................................................................................156
5.9. Method......................................................................................................157
5.10. Results...................................................................................................163
5.11. Quantitative Study Discussion ..............................................................168
5.12. General Discussion ...............................................................................169
5.13. Conclusion ............................................................................................172
Chapter 6 ........................................................................................................................... 174
Study 3: The Relationship between Engagement Climate, Identification, and Workforce Flourishing..................................................................................................... 174
6.1. Introduction...............................................................................................174
6.2. Method......................................................................................................178
Engagement Climate .......................................................................................179
Identification ...................................................................................................180
Workforce Flourishing Measures ....................................................................181
6.3. Results.......................................................................................................184
CFA of Workforce Flourishing .......................................................................189
6.4. Discussion.................................................................................................194
6.5. Conclusion ................................................................................................208
Chapter 7 ........................................................................................................................... 210
Thesis Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 210
7.1. Summary of Theoretical Implications ......................................................212
7.2. Workforce Flourishing through Work Identification ...............................218
7.3. Engagement Climate as Effective Organisation Practice .........................221
7.4. Final Comments........................................................................................223
References.......................................................................................................................... 226
Appendix A........................................................................................................................ 263
Appendix B ........................................................................................................................ 272
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 3 of 280
Table of Tables
Table 4.1. Factor Analysis Fit Indices for Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) of the Latent Factor of Workforce Flourishing..................................................115
Table 4.2. Confirmatory Factor Analysis Fit Indices for Employee Health, Including Model Re-specification. .................................................................................118
Table 4.3. Fit Indices for Workforce Flourishing and Employee Health Predicted by Work Group Identification.............................................................................119
Table 4.4. Correlations, Means, Standard Deviations, and Alphas for the Model of Workforce Flourishing Predicted by Work Group Identification..................120
Table 4.5. Fit Indices for Workforce Flourishing and Employee Health Predicted by Organisation Identification (theorised model). .............................................120
Table 4.6. Fit Indices for Workforce Flourishing and Employee Health Predicted by Organisation Identification (re-specified). ....................................................122
Table 4.7. Correlations, Means, Standard Deviations, and Alphas for the Model of Workforce Flourishing Predicted by Organisation Identification.................123
Table 5.1. Demographic Characteristics for Respondents answering each of Two Qualitative Questions.....................................................................................147
Table 5.2. Inter-rater Reliability Contingency Coding for the "Peoplewise" Question. ........................................................................................................151
Table 5.3. Inter-rater Reliability Contingency Coding for the "Belong" Question.152
Table 5.4. Fit Indices for Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) with Re-specification Iterations for the Latent Factor of Engagement Climate...............................164
Table 5.5. Engagement Climate CFA Re-specification Iterations, Changes Made, and Change Justification. ..............................................................................164
Table 5.6. Fit Indices for the CFA Models Involving Exhaustion and Cynicism for Convergent Validity of Engagement Climate. ...............................................167
Table 6.1. Structural Model Fit Indices for Engagement Climate in Relations to Two Identification Targets.....................................................................................186
Table 6.2. Correlations, Means, Standard Deviations, and Alphas for the Model of Engagement Climate and Work Group Identification. ..................................187
Table 6.3. Correlations, Means, Standard Deviations, and Alphas for the Model of Engagement Climate and Organisation Identification. .................................187
Table 6.4. Fit Indices for Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) of the Construct of Workforce Flourishing with a Second Sample...............................................189
Table 6.5. Correlations for Multiple Regression Analysis of Engagement Climate on Workforce Flourishing, Controlling for Organisation Identification............191
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 4 of 280
Table 6.6. Summary of Hierarchical Regression Analysis for Organisation Identification, Workforce Flourishing, and Engagement Climate.................192
Table 6.7. Correlations for Multiple Regression Analysis of Engagement Climate on Workforce Flourishing, Controlling for Work Group Identification.............193
Table 6.8. Summary of Hierarchical Regression Analysis for Work Group Identification, Workforce Flourishing, and Engagement Climate.................193
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 5 of 280
Table of Figures
Figure 4.1. Simplified Model of the Relationship Between Work Related Identification, Workforce Flourishing, and Employee Health.........................94
Figure 4.2. Full Model of Workforce Flourishing and Employee Health Predicted by Identification. ............................................................................................105
Figure 4.3. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) of the Latent Construct of Workforce Flourishing...................................................................................116
Figure 4.4. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) of the Latent Construct ofEmployee Health. ...........................................................................................118
Figure 4.5. Structural Model Relationships for Workforce Flourishing and Employee Health as Predicted by Work Group Identification. .....................119
Figure 4.6. Structural Model Relationships for Workforce Flourishing and Employee Health as Predicted by Organisation Identification (theorised model). ...........................................................................................................121
Figure 4.7. Structural Model Relationships for Workforce Flourishing and Employee Health as Predicted by Organisation Identification (re-specified model). ...........................................................................................................122
Figure 5.1. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) of the Latent Construct of Engagement Climate. .....................................................................................165
Figure 5.2. Convergent Validity Assessment using CFA of Engagement Climate and Exhaustion......................................................................................................167
Figure 5.3. Convergent Validity Assessment using CFA of Engagement Climate and Cynicism.........................................................................................................168
Figure 6.1. Structural Model for the Relationship between Engagement Climate and Work Group Identification.............................................................................186
Figure 6.2. Structural Model for the Relationship between Engagement Climate and Organisation Identification after Re-specification of the Model. ..................186
Figure 6.3. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) of the Latent Construct of Workforce Flourishing...................................................................................190
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 6 of 280
Abstract
This thesis examined the relationship of work identification with workforce
flourishing and employee health, engagement climate was added as an antecedent to
work identification. Identification affects people’s definitions of themselves in terms
of group memberships, which reconcile behaviours, values, and objectives that
guide activity at work. Therefore, identification has substantial bearing on important
organisational issues such as workforce flourishing and employee health.
Furthermore, a climate of engagement contributes positively to identification and
flourishing. This thesis applied quantitative and qualitative methods to examine
work identification and a sustainable approach to workforce flourishing.
Study one commenced by testing the workforce flourishing model, employing
an evolving approach to model development in this thesis. Structural equation
modelling (SEM) results demonstrated good model fit. However, re-specification of
the model was required when predicted by organisation identification, but not when
predicted by work group identification. The hypothesis that identification predicts
workforce flourishing was supported. Work group, rather than organisation
identification had a stronger association with workforce flourishing and health,
supporting the hypotheses two and three respectively.
Study two was undertaken in two stages; the first, a qualitative examination of
the newly proposed construct of engagement climate tested the theoretically derived
contribution of communication, feedback/recognition, participation, and
organisation support. Qualitative data was consistent with the four factors proposed,
and confirmatory factor analysis provided quantitative support in stage two of this
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 7 of 280
study. Results supported further examination of this construct in the development of
the model resumed in study three.
Study three used SEM analysis to test the veracity of the model found in study
one with a second data set, then test the relationship of engagement climate to model
constructs using regression analysis. The model in study one was replicated by the
data in study three. The hypothesis that engagement climate predicts identification
was supported. Engagement climate added additional predictive capacity towards
flourishing after controlling for identification, however, it was hypothesised that
identification would account for this relationship in full.
In terms of the theoretical aims of this thesis, workforce flourishing and
engagement climate, two newly introduced constructs, made important contributions
to the model of workforce flourishing. Furthermore, engagement climate provides a
non-competitive means to facilitate identification in the workplace that enables a
workforce to flourish. The relationships are also sustainable because they lead to
better health outcomes for employees. Results are discussed in terms of theoretical
and practical implication in this thesis.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 8 of 280
Introduction
This thesis proposed that the effectiveness of an organisation was largely
determined by the capacity of its workforce to function well. Optimal functioning
through a flourishing workforce was also argued to produce a sustainable approach
to organisation effectiveness because it leads to better employee health. Key to
workforce flourishing is the social environment in which activity takes place; and to
this extent social identification and the climate for engagement were found to make
important contributions to flourishing and health. In order to examine these
propositions, new constructs of workforce flourishing and engagement climate were
developed and tested, then applied to a model of workforce flourishing that was
evolved in this thesis.
Organisation effectiveness is a major concern for managers and leaders of
organisations for reasons that markets and opportunities rapidly change (Singh &
Singh, 2010), robustness is needed in the face of financial challenges (Prottas,
2013), and the need to maintain relevance over the long term (Senge, 2006). Other
stakeholders such as employees, local communities, and investors also have an
interest in the effectiveness of an organisation (Jaffe, 1995; Pfeffer, 2010; Wilson,
De Joy, Vandenberg, Richardson, & McGrath, 2004). However, the ways in which
effectiveness is understood, and therefore, influenced by organisation practice, can
vary among organisations.
Typically, financial turnover and profits are thought of as key indicators of
effectiveness (Pfeffer, 2010; Riordan, Vandenberg, & Richardson, 2005; Shoaf,
Genaidy, Karwowski, & Samuel, 2004). Demonstrations of the priority given to
financial indicators are the daily reports of stock market activity presented on each
regular news bulletin or broadcast. A different perspective of effectiveness is that of
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 9 of 280
sustainability, gaining interest in recent times in the context of organisation
effectiveness (e.g., De Joy & Wilson, 2003; Ertürk, 2010; Hobfoll, 2001; Pfeffer,
2010). Curiously, sustainability is also argued to lead to profitability and
productivity for organisations (Bakker & Schaufeli, 2008; Pfeffer, 2010; van den
Heuvel, Demerouti, & Bakker, 2014).
Sustainability for an organisation is often related to the impact an organisation
has on the physical environment (Pfeffer, 2010). However, Bakker and Schaufeli
(2008) and Pfeffer (2010) argued that the human or social dimensions of
sustainability have not received sufficient attention, representing a profound
opportunity to better enable organisations and employees to flourish. In these terms,
sustainability suggests that the human activity taking place in an organisation is
thought of as an eco-system with the goal of maintaining and preserving activity
within that system (Pfeffer, 2010). The literature reviewed, and the studies
conducted in this thesis examined how a workforce might function well through
identification and engagement climate. The role of workforce flourishing in
facilitating better employee health was also investigated with the purpose of
understanding how sustainable practice for organisation effectiveness might be
approached.
The thesis consists of three literature review chapters that provide information
and assessment of the constructs of flourishing, identification, and health. The
literature review chapters are followed by three studies that were used to develop the
constructs of workforce flourishing and engagement climate. The three studies also
contributed to the evolution of the workforce flourishing model. The description of
the method used for each of the studies was imbedded in each study chapter prior to
the results for reasons of continuity within each study.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 10 of 280
The first study in this thesis tested the relationship between work
identification, workforce flourishing, and employee health. After finding that these
constructs related well together, the second study addressed the development of
engagement climate as a new construct that provides a number of antecedents to
identification. Following this, engagement climate was examined against other
model constructs in study three, continuing the development of the workforce
flourishing model in this thesis. A brief introduction to the main arguments formed
from literature review and the findings from each of the three studies follows.
The literature review introduced organisations in terms of systems of activity
dependent on the contributions of the workforce (Wilson, et al., 2004). The capacity
of the workforce to function well was therefore proposed as a key resource for
effectiveness (Pfeffer, 2010). A number of constructs were considered that represent
workforce functioning (e.g., health, integrity, resiliency, dynamics) before
flourishing clearly stood out as the best fitting construct to examine the
psychological, social, and emotional resources that contribute to organisation
performance. In Chapter 2, work related identification was argued to lead to
personal and social resources that are consistent with workforce flourishing.
Therefore, the inclusion of identification in the model of flourishing was important.
The last of the three literature review chapters (Chapter 3) described how employee
health is positively affected by identification and workforce flourishing, primarily
through the psychological and social resources that are associated with flourishing
and identification (e.g., Dutton et al., 2010, 2011; Ryff, 2013). Overall, the literature
review proposed that the activity of the workforce is positively shaped by
identification, so that identification leads to workforce flourishing. Furthermore, a
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 11 of 280
flourishing workforce creates healthier outcomes for employees that, in turn, sustain
such activity in an organisation and generates further momentum for effectiveness.
The conclusions drawn from the literature review were tested in the first study
of this thesis (Chapter 4). The findings demonstrated that identification had a
significant association with workforce flourishing. Flourishing, in turn, related
positively to employee health. An assessment of the factorial structure of workforce
flourishing supported the three factor structure consisting of psychological, social,
and hedonic well-being.
The analysis of the model of workforce flourishing also included testing
variants of the model based on either organisation or work group identification.
Compared to organisation identification, the work group identification variant of the
model demonstrated a stronger and more complete relationship with flourishing and
employee health. Not all manifest variables of flourishing contributed when
organisation identification was used to predict flourishing and employee health.
Social well-being, one of three flourishing factors, only directly related to
flourishing when predicted by work group identification, but not organisation
identification. This was attributed to the capacity of work group identification to
initiate social interaction more so than organisation identification (van Knippenberg
& van Schie, 2000). However, both work group and organisation identification
contributed significantly to workforce flourishing. Therefore, the decision was made
to examine potential antecedents of identification in the next study of this thesis as
potential antecedents would have important benefits to organisation practice, such as
flourishing.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 12 of 280
Theories of social identification focus attention towards competition or
comparison with out-groups as the primary mechanism driving identification
(Rabinovich, Morton, Postmes, & Verplanken, 2012). However, competition
between groups within an organisation may have negative consequences towards
effectiveness such as withholding information or resources from rival groups. Study
two of this thesis drew from the literature on engagement (e.g., Bakker &
Demerouti, 2014) in order to develop a set of antecedents to identification that
would bypass the need for out-group comparisons or competition. The review of the
literature on engagement suggested that communication, recognition/feedback,
participation in decision making, and organisation support were good candidates for
construct development.
The new construct was named engagement climate. Qualitative data was
collected for the first stage in assessing and confirming the four factor construct
derived from the literature. The qualitative data was gathered from the same
municipal council involved in study one. Results from analysis of this data were
consistent with the four factors derived from the literature as representative of
engagement climate. Following this, quantitative data for the purpose of empirical
evaluation of the new construct was gathered from workers at an employment
agency operating throughout four states in Australia. Confirmatory factor analysis
revealed that the four factor structure of engagement climate was a good fit to data
collected. Therefore, the findings from study two supported the four factor construct
of engagement climate and its inclusion for testing against other variables in study
three in this thesis, continuing the development of the workforce flourishing.
Using data collected from the employment agency based in Australia, the third
study found that engagement climate had a significant relationship to both
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 13 of 280
organisation and work group identification. The fit found between engagement
climate and work group identification was excellent and did not require
modification. In contrast, the fit between engagement climate and organisation
identification did require some modification to find adequate fit with the data. The
modification involved the removal of the manifest variable of participation in
decision making from the latent construct of engagement climate. The factors of
engagement climate interact differently according to the identification foci involved.
With respect to organisation identification, engagement climate factors that promote
the exchange of information such as communication, recognition/feedback, and
organisation support seem to be particularly suited to identification with this group.
The effect may have also been enhanced by the characteristics of the organisation
involved, as there was an emphasis by this organisation on centralised issues in their
communications to promote unity in a geographically disperse organisation. In
contrast, the socially oriented engagement climate factor of participation was more
clearly related to work group rather than organisation identification.
A series of regression equations were also performed to assess the relationship
between engagement climate, workforce flourishing, and identification. Firstly, it
was found that identification had a similarly significant relationship with workforce
flourishing to that found in study one. Secondly, a hierarchical regression found only
three of the four engagement climate factors (communication, feedback/recognition,
and participation) to be significantly related to workforce flourishing when
organisation identification was entered at the first step. In contrast, all factors of
engagement climate were significant contributors to flourishing after controlling for
the effects of work group identification. It was concluded that work group
identification had a greater capacity than organisation identification to facilitate the
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 14 of 280
social aspects of engagement climate into workforce flourishing, suggesting it has
some advantage over organisation identification in relation to positive impact.
The outcomes of this thesis have a number of implication for theory relating to
self-categorisation theory (Turner, Hogg, Oakes, Reicher, & Wetherall, 1987),
eudaimonia and flourishing (Keyes, 2007; Ryan & Deci, 2001; Seligman, 2011),
conservation of resources (COR) theory (Hobfoll, 1989, 1998, 2011), and the
organisational literature in general (e.g., Bakker & Demerouti, 2008, 2014; Dutton et
al., 2010, 2011). The findings of the research undertaken in this thesis also have a
number of practical applications that may bring about sustainable and effective
outcomes for organisations through better leadership practices that address
engagement climate factors. This thesis presents an argument that sustainable
approaches to organisation effectiveness are possible through the implementation of
positive engagement climate practices that support identification, workforce
flourishing, and health. Therefore, this thesis makes a valuable contribution to both
theory and practice.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 15 of 280
Chapter 1Flourishing Workforces and Organisational Effectiveness
Organisations are systems of activity involving patterns of interdependence
that produce both intended and unintended outcomes (Senge, 2006; Wheatly, 2006).
Some outcomes, often the unintended ones, can diminish the capacity of a system
such as an organisation, to sustain activity into the future (Capra, 1997). Capra,
applied a systems approach to organisations, arguing that if the networks and
patterns of interdependence are ignored, system stocks and resources can be
depleted and lead undesirable or unsustainable outcomes. Organisations that place
all or most of their attention towards profitability and production may be at risk of
diminishing the very resources that maintain their ability to perform those functions
(Lutz, 2008; Senge, 2006).
The workforce is one such resource important to an organisation’s capacity to
function effectively and sustainably. As such, DeJoy & Wilson (2003), Pfeffer
(2010), Quick and Quick (2004), and Wilson et al. (2004) concluded that the fate of
an organisation is inextricably linked to the capacity of its employees to contribute
to the organisation. The objective of the research that follows was to examine the
capacity of the workforce to function in a manner that is likely to contribute to the
effectiveness of an organisation. However, the capacity of the workforce to function
as a resource for effectiveness must be approached with sustainability in mind if the
depletion of that resource is to be avoided. Sustainability in these terms relates to the
relationship between examined factors and the ability to maintain activity without
depleting important resources such as employees (Pfeffer, 2010).
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 16 of 280
According to Pfeffer (2010), the notion of sustainability complements
organisation effectiveness when applied to an organisation’s workforce.
Sustainability within the context of an organisation’s workforce shifts understanding
of the workforce more towards that of a resource for effectiveness and elevates the
importance of employee well-being as a key component of effectiveness. To
illustrate, the market place or social environment in which organisations exist is
constantly changing in terms of the demands organisations face and the
opportunities that arise for growth (Ertürk, 2010; Hart & Cooper, 2001). The
capacity of organisations to adapt and grow in response to challenges is largely
dependent on the workforce s’ ability to respond (Clark, 1962; Jaffe, 1995; Keller &
Price, 2011; McHugh, 2001). In this sense, Pfeffer (2010) argued that sustainability
is interwoven with workforce well-being, which helps determine the capacity for
mobilising resources to meet the demands of change. Similarly, Dutton et al. (2011),
Keyes (2007), and Ryan and Deci (2001) explained that well-being is not merely a
state of satisfaction, but is dependant largely on functional capacity, development,
and processes of self-actualisation. Presently, organisations are confronted by
unprecedented rates of change (Bhamraa, Daniab, & Burnard, 2011; Dewe &
Cooper, 2012), while at the same time their workforce is becoming more integral to
their capacity to respond and grow within a dynamic environment (Fredrickson &
Dutton, 2008). These trends are likely to continue, therefore, the need for research
that addresses sustainable workforce functionality is undeniable.
1.1. Workforce as a sustainable, self-generating organisational resource
A number of constructs have featured in organisational literature over the last
two to three decades that have attempted to capture elements of the workforce that
signify its properties as a resource. One of the more prominent of these constructs
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 17 of 280
has been organisational health (Cox, 1988; Cox & Howarth, 1990; Cotton & Hart,
2003; Quick, Macik-Frey, & Cooper, 2007; Pfeffer, 2010). However, other
constructs have also been described in terms that reflect a capacity of workers or the
workforce to become a resource for organisational effectiveness and performance.
Many of which have been defined in ways that are both adaptive and sustainable.
For example, Leroy, Palanski, and Simons (2012) and Young (2011) noted that
organisational integrity provides a force for coherency, consistency, and
commitment. Kay and Goldspick (2012) described organisational resiliency as a
capacity of an organisation to persist, adapt, and demonstrate agency over their
environment. Organisational dynamics is a term used to capture qualities of work
and the workforce that Ali, Peters, and Lettice (2012) argued was consistent with co-
ordination and learning capabilities within organisations. Another term that might be
applied to organisational contexts is flourishing. Flourishing was described by
Keyes (1998, 2007), Seligman (2011), and Dutton et al. (2011) as the social,
psychological, and emotional properties people experience that contribute to
sustainable, effective functioning, as well as engagement and overall well-being.
The following review argues that the construct of organisational health has
been applied ubiquitously to explain all manner of organisational phenomena
creating conjecture about what the term actually represents. While organisational
health has been successful in raising awareness of the importance of relationships
between organisational functioning and effectiveness, alternative constructs are
needed that will enable a sharper focus to be applied to issues of functionality in
organisations. Several constructs are reviewed briefly, specifically assessing the
elements of organisational functioning that each construct addresses.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 18 of 280
1.1.1. Organisational Health
Health generally denotes a state, or capacity, to function effectively and is
descriptive of entities such as organisations as well as individuals (Cotton & Hart,
2003; Cox, 1988; DeJoy, Wilson, Vandenberg, McGrath-Higgins, & Griffin-Blake,
2010; Shoaf et al., 2004; Jaffe, 1995). Shoaf et al. (2004) chronicled the
development of the construct of organisational health explaining how a humanistic
research focus shed light on the links between job content and individual well-being.
According to Shoaf et al., the common belief up until that point was that
organisational productivity and employee well-being were antagonistic, meaning
that gains in one would come at the expense of the other. Early studies into
organisational health such as Cooper and Williams (1994), Cox (1988) Cox and Cox
(1992), and Jaffe (1995), described functional benefits of organisational health such
as a more creative, committed, and enthusiastic workforce. However, Shoaf et al.
(2004) noted at the time that few studies had addressed the factors within an
organisation that manifest themselves as organisational health. Shoaf et al. cautioned
that any attempt to articulate the conditions that lead to organisational health should
move beyond the narrow spectrum of employee health and into the broader spectrum
of organisational activity. Despite an apparent relationship between employee health
and organisational health, they are not one in the same. Indeed, efforts to understand
the processes and impacts of organisational health have attracted many perspectives,
some quite diverse, that have featured in reported research.
The complexity now associated with the construct of organisational health is
largely associated with the use of the term health. Midway through the twentieth
century, the World Health Organisation (WHO) (1946) attempted to broaden
accepted understanding of the concept of health. Importantly, WHO challenged the
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 19 of 280
notion that health was exclusively a physical attribute. Health was described by the
WHO as the physical, mental, and psychological properties that act as a resource for
living rather than just as a goal to be attained. By defining health in this way, the
WHO had made a substantial paradigm shift in the way health is understood and
promoted. Defining health as a resource was an important shift in the way health
was thought and meant approaches to health would change. As a resource, health
suggested continual promotion and maintenance rather than sporadic attention in
order to maintain a homeostatic ideal as a remedy of a problem or negative event.
Sustainability and health were complimentary constructs under the WHO’s
definition. In addition, a broader understanding of health beyond that of a simple
physical dimension, that now included social and psychological dimensions, meant
that the application in research attracted many different interpretations of health in
an attempt to capture such sweeping dynamics.
As the number of dimensions included in descriptions of health became
greater, so too has the number of influential factors that are needed to explain how
each of these health dimensions vary. The effect has been that there are now a large
number of health definitions used in research that are focused primarily on the select
array of constructs of interest in the research. For example, applying Senge’s (2006)
and Wheatly’s (2006) systems perspectives to organisational health, the interactions
and interdependence within an organisation becomes a resource for health rather
than the health of employees per se. Similarly, DeJoy et al. (2010), Shoaf et al.
(2004), and Wilson et al. (2004) suggested that organisational health has more to do
with the structures and practices governing activity within an organisation than it
does with the level of health of any other factor. These systems based perspective
are in contrast to other researchers who have placed importance on particular factors
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 20 of 280
such as the health of employees (Jaffe, 1995), financial performance (Cooper &
Cartwright, 1994), or organisational norms, policies, and culture (Fallon, 2001).
Pfeffer (2010) claimed that organisational health is more likely to ensue when
a broad approach is taken towards the determinants of health. The interaction
between these elements is also important. However, the expansive catalogue of
potential determinants and consequences associated with organisational health
suggests that subjectivity would increase, and as a consequence, the level of
contentiousness is also likely to rise. The spiralling list of determinants and
relationships covering a diverse range of perspectives in relation to health creates
difficulty with decisions about the number of factors to include or exclude, which
relationships are a priority, and how to accurately represent each factor involved.
Conceptualisations of health have become increasingly diversified as a consequence
of the complexity now understood to determine health and related outcomes (Dewe
& Cooper, 2012). The benefit has been that deeper understanding of health has
extended our appreciation and acceptance of the diversity of factors that contribute
to health, which in short has advanced our understanding of health. However, the
consequence has been that applying this concept in research terms is now a complex
and treacherous enterprise.
Notwithstanding the idea of organisational health has merit when applied to
generating knowledge about effective organisational activity and employee well-
being, the term as a research construct has become too liberal and diversely defined
over time to adequately serve specific research agendas (cf, Cotton & Hart, 2003;
Cooper & Williams, 1994; Jaffe, 1995; Quick et al., 2007). Research can become
confounded when tailored definitions of organisational health are applied that align
with research objectives, and in so doing, neglect a myriad of alternative
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 21 of 280
conceptualisations. In contrast, a definition of organisational health that embraces
all that organisational health might be is very likely to become too generalised for
effective, focussed inquiry, except that regarding a basic overview. Therefore, for
the purpose of exploring the sustainable capacity of the workforce to function in a
manner, such that it is likely to add to organisational effectiveness, as well as
contribute to the well-being of employees, an alternative construct to organisational
health is more fitting for this thesis.
1.1.2. Organisational Integrity
According to business literature, the term integrity has been used to describe
organisational characteristics consistent with the capacity of the organisation to
foster functional assets or resources (Palanski, Kahai, & Yammarino, 2011; Petrick
& Quinn, 2001; Prottas, 2013). Drawing from the premise that integrity denotes a
quality akin to completeness, Palanski and Yammarino (2007) defined integrity as
the consistency of an entities words and actions. The potential of integrity to
function as a resource for organisations can be linked to trust within the working
environment and the positive attitudes and behaviours of the workforce that are
more likely to exist when trust and integrity are salient (Prottas, 2013). Similarly,
Palanski et al. (2011) found that consistency of communication in the form of
transparency from leaders was related to behavioural integrity, which was also
related to trust and performance in work teams. Therefore, Palanski et al. located the
source of integrity firmly within the domain of leadership.
While leader integrity or systemic integrity may well be an asset or resource
present within an organisation, it is one step removed from workforce performance,
and therefore, less informative of a workforces’ effectiveness in terms of their
capacity to gain further resources. For example, Young (2011) pointed out that the
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 22 of 280
context in which integrity is considered is relevant to understanding the potential
impact on an organisation. In relation to organisational effectiveness and employee
well-being, integrity might be equivocal in relation to exploring workforce
functionality. For example, one might reasonably argue that in times of change and
the need for innovation, ethical integrity may provide an effective framework for
successfully navigating such challenges. Alternatively, you might also reasonably
argue, that ethical integrity is independent of performance. For example, ethical
integrity might involve unconditional commitment regardless of convenience or
benefit (Maak, 2008). Under these circumstances, performance may be diminished
due to conflicted commitment or lack of personal benefit.
To summarise, the construct of integrity appears to represent a potential
resource to organisations, particularly in terms of structural integrity. However,
research in this area is directed almost exclusively to issues of leadership and
organisational processes (e.g., Petrick & Quinn, 2001; Quick & Goolsby, 2013;
Prottas, 2013) with only a few forays into workgroup integrity such as Palanski et
al.’s (2011) study of team behavioural integrity. The other dominant perspective of
integrity is ethical integrity, which can easily be independent of performance and
therefore, workforce functionality. The construct of integrity applied to workgroups
has some potential to inform and improve practice. However, due to a level of
ambiguity and imprecision between integrity and workforce functioning, other
constructs will be considered that may have a more discernible relationship between
the workforce and organisational effectiveness.
1.1.3. Organisational Resiliency
The term organisational resiliency has attracted an assortment of different
interpretations (Bhamraa et al., 2011; Kay & Goldspink, 2012). Kay and Goldspink
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 23 of 280
(2012) stated that much of the variation when defining organisational resiliency
relates to the contextual recognition required of the term. It also follows that a
generic definition would be limited and somewhat inappropriate, having cast off
reference to contextual relationships. Despite these limitations, there are some
common features about the way organisational resilience is understood. Firstly,
according to some researchers (e.g., Bhamraa et al., 2011; Kay & Goldspink, 2012;
Sutcliffe & Vogus, 2003), resilience is a capacity almost exclusively linked to a
response to some form of negative occurrence or threat. Secondly, it appears that the
primary aim of resiliency is to restore normal functionality to an organisation after
disruption (e.g., Kay & Goldspink, 2012; Powley, 2009; Sutcliffe & Vogus, 2003).
Drawing on contextual relationships, Powley (2009) and Powley and Powley (2012)
recently considered resiliency as a resource located within the network of social
relationships existing within a workforce. Powley and Powley (2012) proposed that
the socially enacted and embedded capacity for resilience, founded in social
relationships, has positive and promotional qualities that go beyond homoeostatic
abilities to return to normal functioning, such that the accumulation of further
resources and growth is made possible.
The positive properties attributed to organisational resiliency would suggest
that it has some potential to advance our understanding of sustainable action towards
promoting workplace functioning and also employee well-being. Knowledge
gathered about better functioning within organisations is similarly informative of
organisational effectiveness. However, in terms of resiliency, benefits related to
functioning and effectiveness may be confined to contexts of adversity while
neglecting circumstances that are positive or opportune. Taking a systems
perspective of organisations (e.g., Barnett & Pratt, 2000; Capra, 1996), not all forms
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 24 of 280
of disruption or instances of turmoil are damaging in the sense that they are threats
to existence (Wheatley, 2006). Indeed, from turbulence there can often emerge new
and creative solutions that enhance an entities capacity to thrive or flourish in the
aftermath of a challenging event (Capra, 1996; Wheatley, 2006). Adopting a
resiliency framework that aims to return to some previous state of activity, and to do
so through historically sourced solutions, may be in fact detrimental in the long term
through the failure to embrace the need for change. The need for change is often
signalled by the disruption that warrants the need for resiliency in the first instance.
Furthermore, there may be opportunities to change and grow that are not
accompanied by a threat or disaster. In such circumstances, there would be no
trigger to bring about a resilient response, the status quo would continue, and the
opportunity for change would pass.
1.1.4. Organisational Dynamics
The notion of dynamics has been applied to organisational contexts in order to
describe a form of organisational resource that promotes the maintenance of
viability, even in a changing environment (Lopez, 2005). Zollo and Winter (2002)
defined the resource that is dynamics as the capacity of an organisation to learn,
explaining that dynamic capabilities are stable patterns of collective activity through
which the organisation generates and modifies its operating routines systematically
in pursuit of improved effectiveness. Others have used similar descriptions, referring
to processes and strategies that support systematic learning within an organisation
(Ali et al., 2012; Romme, Zollo, & Berends, 2010). Variations of the theme of
dynamics can also be found. For example, Lamberg, Tikkanen, Nokelainen, and
Suur-Inkeroinen (2009) used the term competitive dynamics to describe adaption
and change, but with the objective of maintaining competitiveness rather than
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 25 of 280
effectiveness. Smith and Lewis (2011) employed the term dynamic equilibrium to
describe an organisation’s ability to maintain a balanced approach between imputed
paradoxical tensions such as learning and performing. Their conceptualisation of
dynamic equilibrium has much in common with a systems perspective of competing
outcomes.
Although the application of the term dynamics to organisational contexts
might vary according to the features of the context under examination, the consistent
theme to emerge when applied has been the description of organisational structural
issues. This places management, governance, and systems at the centre of
understanding dynamics, but often leaves the workforce on the periphery of
consideration. What seems apparent is that organisational dynamic capabilities,
particularly in relation to systemic approaches to learning, are indeed organisational
assets and resources. However, the term does not fit well with the intent of this
thesis to explore the resource potential of an organisation’s workforce. A more
suitable construct is required that is specific to the functionality of the workforce,
and also the prospects of that functionality translating into organisation
effectiveness.
1.1.5. Flourishing
Employee well-being enables the workforce to perform effectively at work
and contribute to the likelihood of organisational success (Harter, Schmidt, &
Keyes, 2003). The relationship between well-being and organisational success can
be explained through meaningful and challenging tasks that give rise to employees’
positive appraisals of work; thereby motivating their deeper involvement in the work
they do (Harter et al., 2003; Oishi, 2012; Quick & Macik-Frey, 2007; Slemp &
Vella-Brodrick, 2014). Recently, researchers have turned their attention toward a
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 26 of 280
new conceptual understanding of well-being referred to as flourishing (Huppert &
So, 2013; Keyes, 2007; Ryan & Deci, 2001; Seligman, 2011). Flourishing is a
relatively new construct to the domain of organisational research, the origins of the
concept emerged via attempts to understand well-being related to both positive
emotion and positive functionality, known respectively as hedonic and eudaimonic
well-being (Henderson & Knight, 2012). In particular, eudaimonic well-being
appears to have greater agency in relation to personal development and growth than
hedonic well-being, although both contribute to such outcomes (Keyes, 2007; Slemp
& Vella-Brodrick, 2014; Straume & Vittersø, 2012; Waterman, 2008).
In their editorial on the topic of flourishing within organisational contexts,
Fredrickson and Dutton (2008) proposed that there were three important domains
that are somewhat interdependent of each other that combine and contribute towards
a flourishing workforce. These domains are psychological and social functioning
(functioning synonymous with well-being), and emotional well-being (Dutton et al.,
2011; Fredrickson & Dutton, 2008; Ryan & Deci, 2001). Broadly, the domains of
psychological functioning and social functioning can be equated with eudaimonia,
because they are consistent with living true to one’s self, and suggest processes
moving toward personal growth and self-actualisation (Keyes, 2007; Ryan & Deci,
2001). Emotional well-being is associated with hedonic well-being, or a positive
state based on feelings of pleasure and satisfaction (Ryan & Deci, 2001).
The emphasis on eudaimonic well-being as an embodiment of high
functioning and engagement is noted here. Waterman, Schwartz, and Conti (2008)
explored the role of both eudaimonia and hedonia in intrinsic motivation and found
the addition of eudaimonic experiences was important to intrinsic motivation
because it enhanced feelings of self-realisation and competency through application
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 27 of 280
of skills and effort. Howell (2009) gathered data from around 400 undergraduate
psychology students, dividing them into those that were flourishing, moderately
mentally healthy, or languishers. Findings from this research revealed that
flourishing students (those high in psychological and social well-being -
eudaimonia) were better functionally in terms of mastery goal orientation, low
procrastination, high self-control, and higher self-reported grades relative to non-
flourishing students.
In terms of flourishing, the combination of hedonia and eudaimonia may be
necessary to achieve higher levels of overall well-being (Keyes & Simoes, 2012).
Indeed, Diener et al. (2010) operationalised flourishing as social-psychological
prosperity to complement measures of subjective well-being which captured hedonic
aspects of well-being. As Waterman et al. (2008) and Slemp and Vella-Brodrich
(2014) argued, hedonia alone is unlikely to lead to intrinsically motivated activity or
self-actualisation without the accompaniment of eudaimonic experience.
It would appear that hedonic well-being is an important component of
flourishing that complements functional well-being (eudaimonia) (e.g., Henderson
& Knight, 2012). Although, hedonic well-being has an important role towards
flourishing, the functional aspects may be the critical components. Researchers, such
as Keyes (2007) and Diener et al. (2010) take the view that functional well-being, is
essential to flourishing because it allows self-actualisation and personal growth to be
attained, more so than hedonic experiences. Still other researchers such as Seligman
(2011) have suggested additional elements might also contribute to flourishing such
as self-esteem, optimism, resilience, vitality, and self-determination, which he
collectively characterised as strengths and virtues. While the extent and nature of the
role strengths and virtues has in flourishing is yet to be fully determined, it would
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 28 of 280
seem more pragmatic as this point to address the three fundamentals of emotional,
social, and psychological well-being before pursuing any ancillary contributions.
Therefore, consistent with definitions of flourishing reported by Dutton et al. (2011);
Huppert and So (2013), and Keyes (2007), in this thesis workforce flourishing refers
to the positive functionality obtained from both social and psychological
experiences, in addition to the hedonic experience of satisfaction in relation to work.
According to Fredrickson & Dutton (2008), a key to flourishing at individual,
group, and organisational levels is the capacity for positive organising. They
described positive organising as a generative process that taps into individual or
group strengths in order to activate the energy and engagement of a workforce. By
targeting psychological, social, and emotional mechanisms in a constructive and
positive manner, the resources of individuals or collectives in the form of energy,
respect, optimism, and insight are cultivated and available. Furthermore, through
positive organisation, the resources developed at an individual and organisational
level are likely to be sustainable as a consequence of using past positive experience
to generate future positive experience (Quick & Macik-Frey, 2007). The self-
perpetuating nature of building resources of this nature within a workforce has
obvious benefits for organisational effectiveness.
In terms of psychological well-being, and the contribution to optimal
functioning, Quick and Macik-Frey (2007) and Slemp and Vella-Brodrich (2014)
highlighted the role that meaning and purpose plays in helping to connect
individuals’ to the activities they perform in the course of their work. Similarly,
Harter et al. (2003) described how meaning and purpose are important for
flourishing (as well-being) by way of increased engagement. Mastery goal
orientation has also been implicated as a contributing factor towards psychological
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 29 of 280
functioning and for flourishing in general (Seligman, 2011; Keyes, 1998; Diener et
al., 2010; Dutton et al., 2011). Psychological factors that promote flourishing in the
workplace, by means such as the focus on mastery orientation and creating a sense
of purpose and meaning related to work, may help to improve engagement with
work.
Meaning and purpose link work activities with the values held by individual
workers (May, Gilson, & Harter, 2004; Slemp & Vella-Brodrich, 2014) and this may
facilitate the internalisation of work activities by employees. In motivational terms,
the activity becomes more autonomously regulated as the link between work
activities becomes more imbedded in the identity of the employee (Ryan & Deci,
2000; Dutton et al., 2011). Furthermore, social identity theory (Tajfel & Turner,
1979) and self-categorisation theory (Turner et al., 1987) describe the process of
internalisation as one of group identification in which alignment between group and
individual values, norms, and goals occurs. Therefore, when psychological well-
being is enhanced, the increase in workforce flourishing is likely to produce
organisational resources in the form of motivated and engaged employees that have
heightened levels of identification related to their work.
In addition to psychological resources such as group identification, intrinsic
motivation, and engagement, the resources generated through a flourishing
workforce are likely to have a beneficial impact on social or interactive activity that
also promotes organisational effectiveness (Dutton et al., 2011). For example, Slemp
and Vella-Brodrich (2014) found that the need for relatedness is associated with
functional well-being. Dutton et al. (2011) proposed that higher levels of social
coherence, social actualisation, integration, acceptance and social contribution are
likely to contribute to workforce flourishing. Such pro-social behaviours are
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 30 of 280
instrumental in promoting persistence, performance, and productivity in an
organisation (Grant, 2008). Keyes (2007) reported that flourishing adults were
indeed more socially oriented in the form of psychosocial functioning such as their
closeness to others. Dutton et al. (2011) explained that pro-social orientations such
as engaging with and helping others have implications for self-actualisation and
promoting flourishing.
Furthermore, it is not just the sense of belonging that fosters well-being,
although this has a direct positive benefit (Diener & Seligman, 2004). Making a
contribution to the group through positive social functioning also plays a role in
promoting high levels of well-being or flourishing (Diener et al., 2010). The
relationship between flourishing and the effective social functioning of a workforce
appears to be straight forward. Organisations that promote a sense of belonging and
inclusion, that also includes opportunities for the group and individuals to contribute
to the social well-being of the group, are likely to establish a work environment in
which their workforce can flourish.
When a workforce is flourishing, positive emotions generated may help create
an additional form of resource that complements psychological and social
functioning (Dutton et al., 2011). Grant (2008) argued that positive emotional states
are related to intrinsic motivation as this form of motive is inherently focused on the
pleasure and enjoyment derived from performing a task. For example, intrinsic
motivation also leads to feelings of satisfaction and self-esteem (Kernis & Paradise,
2002) – equating to positive emotional states that can define the purpose for action
in their own right. Satisfaction with work can, as Harter et al. (2003) explained, lead
to increased positive functioning such as citizenship behaviour and increased job
performance. Indeed, Fredrickson’s broaden and build theory (Fredrickson, 1998,
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 31 of 280
2001; Fredrickson & Losada, 2005) describes how positive emotions extend
thought-action repertoires which contribute to building resources socially as well as
psychologically. Fredrickson and Losada (2005) found that the higher the ratio of
positive to negative emotions in workgroup activity, the better the workgroup was
able to function and the more likely individuals in the group were to flourish1.
Ryan and Deci (2000), using a self-determination theory framework,
suggested that attaining goals or meeting needs through eudaimonic living may
produce a hedonic or positive emotional response. Indeed, Slemp and Vella-
Brodrich (2014) found that intrinsic needs such as autonomy, competence, and
relatedness, that are associated with functional well-being or eudaimonia, were
related to subjective well-being (satisfaction and positive affect). Furthermore,
functional well-being was also found to be closely linked to subjective well-being.
Positive emotional outcomes then help to increase persistence with eudaimonic
practices, or in other words, provide positive feedback that reinforces the
relationship between positive functioning (eudaimonia) and hedonia. Positive
emotion or hedonia would appear to complement flourishing through enhancing the
functional domains of social and psychological well-being.
In organisational contexts, job satisfaction is often used as an indicator of the
subjective assessment of work by employees or a workforce as a whole and is
consistent with the concept of hedonia (Wright & Cropanzano, 1997). Although
Wright and Cropanzano question the use of job satisfaction as a measure of work
1 A correction was made to the original Fredrickson and Losada (2005) paper based on the withdrawal of the modelling assumptions used in this paper to arrive at certain ratios of positive to negative emotions. However, the finding that positive ratios were significantly higher for flourishing individuals compared to non-flourishing individuals was affirmed - only the specific magnitude of the ratio was withdrawn based on incorrect modelling. (2013, September 16). Correction to Fredrickson and Losada (2005). American Psychologist.Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/a0034435
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 32 of 280
related affect, in an hedonic sense that involves subjective evaluations of work, job
satisfaction is consistent with hedonia (see, Diener, Sapyta, & Suh, 1998; Waterman
et al., 2008). According to Waterman et al. (2008), the presence of both hedonia (job
satisfaction) and eudaimonia (psychological and social well-being) would be an
indication of self-determined regulation of behaviour in the workplace which would
increase the likelihood of flourishing. It is also important to note that not all
eudaimonic pursuits bring a sense of satisfaction or positive emotional response
(Slemp & Vella-Broadrich, 2014). Fulfilment of needs or goal attainment may play a
facilitative role in this association (Ryan & Deci, 2001). Therefore, functional well-
being may be present, but it is the fulfilment of goals that helps generate positive
evaluations and emotions that help to create the reinforcing processes that are
associated with flourishing. The presence of positive emotions suggests that a state
of flourishing, inclusive of healthy social and psychological functioning, is more
likely to exist.
1.1.6. Summary of constructs representing sustainable organisational resources
In this chapter, a number of constructs were reviewed that have attracted some
attention in the literature due in some part to their capacity to facilitate effective
organisational practice. Organisational health has featured prominently in research
for a number of years (see Cox, 1988; Cox & Cox, 1992; Cooper & Williams, 1994;
Jaffe, 1995) and has been instrumental in drawing attention to a vast array of factors
that represent resources for organisational effectiveness. The reach of organisational
health, as an explanatory framework in organisational effectiveness, has culminated
in a large assortment of definitions and applications (cf, Cotton & Hart, 2003;
Cooper & Williams, 1994; Jaffe, 1995; Quick et al., 2007). Effectively, this has
reduced the precision with which organisational health can be applied in research. A
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 33 of 280
range of alternative constructs were assessed in this chapter with the goal of finding
a concept that would represent the capacity of a workforce to become a resource for
organisational effectiveness.
Concepts related to organisational effectiveness such as integrity, resiliency,
dynamics, and flourishing were explored as alternatives to organisational health.
Flourishing, or in this case, workforce flourishing, was argued to be the most
suitable representation of the workforce as a resource for organisational
effectiveness compared to the other constructs discussed. Flourishing represents
positive functioning in the form of psychological and social well-being (Fredrickson
& Dutton, 2008; Dutton et al., 2011; Huppert & So, 2013; Keyes, 2007). The
association of hedonic well-being with flourishing (Diener et al., 2010; Waterman et
al., 2008) also provides a mechanism by which a resource such as flourishing is
positively reinforced (Dutton et al., 2011) and thereby more sustainable. These
qualities attributed to flourishing and applied to the context of workforce flourishing
provide a grounded argument for the adoption of this construct to explore the
workforce as a resource for organisational effectiveness.
1.2. Flourishing as Eudaimonic and Hedonic Well-being
Flourishing has been associated with both eudaimonic and hedonic well-being
(Huppert & So, 2009; Keyes & Annas, 2009; Keyes & Simoes, 2012; Waterman,
2008). A more detailed examination of these dimensions of well-being will provide
further insight into the potential benefits that may result from a flourishing
workforce. Therefore, a review and explanation of eudaimonic and hedonic well-
being constructs follows.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 34 of 280
Research into hedonic well-being, including happiness and satisfaction, has
been well established (Henderson & Knight, 2012; Deci & Ryan, 2001). In general,
hedonia has been associated with the pursuit of pleasure (Ryan & Deci, 2001).
Waterman (2008) argued that subjective well-being (SWB) and hedonia were
essentially the same construct. Waterman’s conclusion was based on Kraut’s (1979)
definition of SWB as ‘the belief that one is getting the important things one wants,
as well as certain pleasant effects that go along with this belief’. Hedonia therefore,
is associated with pleasure and is subjectively interpreted.
Similar to hedonia, eudaimonia has also been described as a subjective state
which Waterman et al. (2008) referred to as the feelings present when one is moving
towards self-realisation, consistent with developing one’s potential and furthering
one’s purposes in living. However, Keyes and Annas (2009) had a different view
arguing that eudaimonia is not a state that arises in individuals, but instead describes
the activity one is engaged in. The two perspectives are not necessarily exclusive in
that eudaimonia embodies functional components of well-being such as interest and
inspiration that are distinct from hedonia (see Straume & Vittersø, 2012; Vittersø &
Søholt, 2011). Indeed, at a fundamental level, Keyes and Annas (2009) concluded
that the eudaimonic domains of psychological and social well-being are distinct
from hedonia in that they relate to functioning. Hedonia is identified more closely
with emotional outcomes such as feelings of pleasure and satisfaction. Similarly,
Ryan and Deci (2001) described eudaimonia as a fully functioning state involving
growth through autonomy, competency, and relatedness, or in other words, self-
actualisation. To summarise, the distinguishing feature of eudaimonia appears to be
the activity and well-being derived from the capacity to function well while hedonia
is more firmly associated with positive and pleasurable feelings.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 35 of 280
While the distinction between these sources of well-being seems reasonably
clear, Waterman et al. (2008) found correlations that ranged from .83 to .87 between
hedonia and eudaimonia in three samples of college students. The considerable
overlap between constructs was argued to relate to the degree of affect that each
form of well-being generates. For instance, Waterman (2008) stated that eudaimonia
is a subjective state, similar to that of hedonia in that it can give rise to positive
emotional states. However, the presence of positive emotions associated with
eudaimonia may not be a necessary condition in optimal functioning. Rather,
eudaimonia appears to be related, but not reliant on happiness per se (Ryan & Deci,
2001; Vittersø & Søholt, 2011) and has more in common with personal goal pursuits
and acting in accord with personal values (Waterman, 2008; Vittersø & Søholt,
2011) than solely as a pathway to happiness. Furthermore, Staume and Vittersø
(2012), Schueller and Seligman (2010), and Vittersø and Søholt (2011) found that
eudaimonic well-being (e.g., growth consisting of curiosity, absorption, complexity,
and competence) was not consistently predictive of states of happiness (hedonia).
Positive emotional states are central to hedonia but not necessary for eudaimonia.
In addition, researchers such as Vittersø and Søholt (2011) and Waterman
(2008) claimed that eudaimonia is a more robust predictor of overall well-being, in
terms of flourishing. However, considering eudaimonic and hedonic well-being
together appears to provide a more reliable means of predicting flourishing than
when accounting for these well-being dimensions separately (Henderson & Knight,
2012). In contrast, Kashdan, Biswas-Diener, and King’s (2008) claimed that
eudaimonia was not clearly defined and appeared to overlap with hedonia. They
therefore suggested that eudaimonia was effectively redundant. However, research
by Waterman et al. (2008), Vittersø and Søholt (2011), and Schueller and Seligman
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 36 of 280
(2010) had a different view of eudaimonia. According to these researchers, there is
an asymmetrical relationship in which eudaimonia offers distinctive insight into
states of well-being and ultimately flourishing, and complements hedonic
perspectives, despite high correlations that are often present between to two
constructs. The proposition that hedonic and eudaimonic well-being make unique
contributions to overall well-being or, in this case, flourishing was adopted here.
Therefore, both eudaimonic and hedonic well-being dimensions were adopted in this
thesis to examine flourishing and its relationship to other workforce variables that
are indicative of the capacity of an organisation to function effectively.
1.2.1. Hedonia
The hedonic perspective of well-being emerged out of lines of inquiry that
were essentially explorations of subjective well-being (SWB) (Keyes, Shmolkin, &
Ryff, 2002; Slemp & Vella-Brodrich, 2014; Waterman et al., 2010). Waterman
(2008) explained that happiness and pleasure are central to SWB and underpin what
is referred to as “a good life”. In reference to SWB research, happiness and pleasure
are described with the understanding that they are enduring characteristics more so
than fleeting experiences. Therefore, it follows that happy people are likely to
perceive events more positively than those low on happiness if such positive states
persist beyond brief momentary episodes (Diener et al., 1998; Fredrickson, 1998,
2001). Indeed, a dominant characteristic of subjective well-being is that it is
inherently subjective, and therefore, evaluative (Diener et al., 1998; Fredrickson,
1998, 2001; Keyes et al., 2002; Waterman et al., 2010).
Similar to SWB, hedonic well-being (HWB) is sometimes used to refer to
states of pleasure or happiness. Waterman (2008) argued strongly that HWB and
SWB were indeed conceptually equivalent and to avoid confusion, particularly
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 37 of 280
given the well-established research record of SWB, the term SWB should be
preferred. However, this should not preclude discussion of hedonic subject matter in
relation to SWB, and vice versa. As conceptual companions, it is also argued that
knowledge of one provides extensive knowledge of the other. Furthermore, in terms
of discussing the concept of flourishing, the two well-being domains most
consistently called upon are hedonic and eudaimonic well-being (Keyes, 2007;
Vittersø & Søholt, 2011; Waterman et al., 2010). Few researchers have adopted the
term SWB for use in developing an understanding of flourishing, despite it being
interchangeable with the concept of hedonia (see Waterman et al., 2010 for an
example of where SWB was used as the emotional component of flourishing). It
would seem that hedonia is preferred rather than SWB when research into
flourishing is undertaken. In this thesis, hedonia was used in reference to flourishing
to refer to states of happiness and satisfaction, although SWB may be used
interchangeably on occasion to maintain consistency with reported research.
According to Keyes and colleagues, SWB or hedonia has two apparent
features; happiness and satisfaction (Keyes et al., 2002; Keyes, 2007). Although,
Howell, Kern, and Lyubomirsky (2007) suggested that while these features of
hedonia (SWB in their research) may be distinguishable, they often correlated highly
and often yield a single higher order factor. In this regard, high levels of either
happiness or satisfaction would appear to indicate high levels of hedonia. Indeed,
there is a substantial record of accumulated research linking the presence of SWB, in
terms of happiness, satisfaction, or both, to beneficial outcomes (e.g., Kaplan,
Warren, Barsky, & Thoresen, 2009). In relation to flourishing, Tay and Diener
(2011) found SWB in the form of life satisfaction and positive/negative feelings to
be associated with satisfying needs such as social support, respect and pride,
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 38 of 280
mastery, and autonomy. Interestingly, in the same study, social need fulfilment
predicted SWB beyond individual need fulfilment indicating a desire of those in the
study to belong to flourishing communities, supporting the notion that social well-
being is an important aspect for flourishing at individual and group levels. In a meta-
analysis involving 212 samples, SWB (incorporating both positive emotion and
satisfaction) was found to be associated with a 14% increase in life expectancy for
individuals reporting high levels of SWB compared to their counterparts reporting
low SWB (Howell et al., 2007). In their analysis, SWB was found to associate most
strongly with short term health issues largely related to immune functioning and
pain tolerance. From the point of view that SWB or hedonia appears to capture
relationships between elements of well-being not captured by eudaimonia, and also
because of the strong links with health, the inclusion of hedonia is necessary in the
endeavour to fully understand workforce flourishing.
Another important reason for the inclusion of hedonia in flourishing was based
on Fredrickson’s broaden and build theory of the behavioural implications of
positive emotional states (see Fredrickson, 1998, 2001). Fredrickson (1998, 2001),
and Fredrickson and Branigan (2005), proposed that positive emotions broaden the
range of experience accessible to individuals in terms of their perception of events
and related behavioural response repertoires. In turn, these perceptions and
behavioural responses have a bearing on the accumulation of resources including
social and psychological resources. Ouweneel, Le Blanc, and Schaufeli (2011)
applied Fredrickson’s (1998, 2001) broaden and build theory of positive emotion to
the study of engagement of university students and found a positive gain spiral
existed between positive emotions, personal resources, and engagement. Positive
emotions allow a broader range of thoughts and potentialities to arise, which
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 39 of 280
contribute to the accumulation of resources such as self-efficacy, hope, and
optimism. Resources such as these may lead to engagement in the form of increased
vigour, dedication, and absorption. Reciprocally, increased engagement was linked
to a rise in positive emotion and thus a positive reinforcing cycle prevailed.
Clearly, findings for hedonia and SWB reported here suggest that the
emotionally based forms of well-being contribute to health and functioning.
Functioning is the signature feature of eudaimonic well-being and hedonia appears
to encourage further effective functioning (eudaimonia) through the accumulation of
resources and the fulfilment of needs. The proposition that hedonia is essential for
flourishing is adopted in this thesis, and is particularly relevant in terms of
sustainability. However, hedonia on its own is not sufficient to propagate flourishing
without the accompanying effects of eudaimonia. For organisations, there are
obvious advantages for a workforce where hedonia prevails. A workforce
characterised by hedonia is likely to accumulate addition resources in the domains of
social and psychological functioning to those predominantly gained through
eudaimonia. In this way hedonia would also effectively contribute to satisfying
important needs critical to personal growth and self-actualisation. Hedonia,
accompanied by eudaimonia, is likely to promote a positive gain spiral in which the
benefits of hedonia provide the means for further eudaimonic gains, for example,
towards employee engagement or identification.
1.2.2. Eudaimonia
Eudaimonia as a construct in science is undergoing a process of development
and exploration having emerged from conceptual origins as a philosophical
construct based on the Aristotelian idea of “a good life” (Henderson & Knight,
2012). Because the term is relatively new in scientific terms, some complexity and
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 40 of 280
difference remains regarding the interpretation of eudaimonia (Slemp & Vella-
Brodrick, 2014). Alan Waterman’s research began the translation of eudaimonia
from the field of philosophy to that of science, with the aim of including positive
functioning as a component of general well-being and an augmentation to hedonic
well-being (Waterman, 1993). Waterman described functional aspects of well-being
as psychological well-being. Later, in a review of well-being research, Ryan and
Deci (2001) introduced the term eudaimonic well-being to the scientific community
in reference to optimal functioning in groups or individuals. A large portion of the
complexity and uncertainty that arose after the introduction of the concept of
functional well-being centres on the relationship between eudaimonia and hedonia
(e.g., Kashdan et al., 2008; Slemp & Vella-Brodrick, 2014). For example, Ryan and
Deci (2001) based the value of eudaimonia to scientific inquiry on its ability to
explain the emergence of positive emotions similar to that of hedonia or SWB.
Alternatively, Huta and Waterman (2013) explained that many studies treat hedonia
as an emotional-cognitive experience while eudaimonia is approached as
psychological or social functioning. While these perspectives are not incompatible,
Huta and Waterman cautioned against confusing differences between the constructs
with differences in their symmetry, except where each is representing a different
aspect of a higher order construct. In this thesis the higher order construct would be
flourishing.
Eudaimonia may be closely related to hedonic outcomes. However,
eudaimonia remains sufficiently distinct from hedonia so that the unique
contributions of eudaimonia to well-being are evident. For example, Vittersø and
Søholt (2011) found that eudaimonia contributed to well-being directly in its own
right, and not just as a consequence of its contribution to hedonic outcomes. This
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 41 of 280
conclusion challenged Ryan and Deci’s (2001) understanding at the time that
eudaimonia was valuable because it explained hedonia. Despite the conjecture, the
conceptualisation of eudaimonia has progressed and is viewed by most to be distinct
from hedonia in that eudaimonia is fundamentally associated with functioning
whereas hedonia is more concerned with feelings or emotional states (Huppert & So,
2013; Keyes & Annas, 2009; Vittersø & Søholt, 2011; Waterman, 2008). On this
basis, both elements of well-being are acknowledged as making unique
contributions to flourishing, as well as acting synergistically to enhance further gains
in flourishing (Keyes, 2007; Keyes & Simoes, 2012; Waterman et al., 2010).
Therefore, the application of both hedonic and eudaimonic domains in the research
that follows represents a primary opportunity to understand with detail, the
relationship between flourishing and organisational effectiveness.
In terms of the commonality between hedonia and eudaimonia, Straume and
Vittersø (2012) explained that the positive feelings associated with both eudaimonia
and hedonia may be categorically different and impact behaviour in different ways.
For example, they found that the eudaimonic experience of inspiration increased
when task difficulty also increased, but that task difficulty had the opposite effect on
the hedonic experience of happiness. They suggested that conditions conducive to
eudaimonia, such as complexity and challenge at work, are more likely to result in
productivity improvements than would actions aimed at promoting happiness within
the workforce. Straume and Vittersø claimed that the balance of studies
investigating the premise of the happy - productive worker may indeed have
generally found equivocal findings primarily because they were pursuing the wrong
determinate. While Straume and Vittersø have instead argued for the virtues of the
eudaimonic – productive worker thesis, in this thesis the alternative theory may be
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 42 of 280
stated slightly more broadly as the flourishing – productive worker. This later
suggestion is an acknowledgement of the unique but complimentary roles of
eudaimonia and hedonia in producing a flourishing and effective workforce.
Not all well-being research into eudaimonia carries the argument that
functional well-being is superior to hedonia in terms of outcomes. For example,
Keyes and Simoes (2012) found that only when both eudaimonic and hedonic
aspects of flourishing were combined was the data able to predict mortality. In a
large sample in excess of 3000 adults, they found the likelihood of death increased
by 62% for those not flourishing over a period of 10 years. Furthermore, Waterman
et al. (2008) found that a combination of eudaimonic and hedonic factors increased
motivation for university and college students, strengthening their intrinsic
motivation beyond that incurred through hedonia (pleasure) alone. These findings
suggest that there is more benefit to workforce functionality and organisational
effectiveness by including both eudaimonic and hedonic well-being (SWB) as
flourishing. Waterman et al.’s (2010) findings provide supportive argument for the
use in this study of both constructs to research workforce flourishing as the basis for
organisational effectiveness. Waterman et al. found that eudaimonia benefits
psycho-social well-being to a greater extent than hedonia, whereas hedonia has a
greater impact upon the reduction of negative emotional states such as anxiety and
depression. Therefore, hedonia and eudaimonia appear to be complementary
elements of flourishing and may have mutually beneficial properties.
1.3. Flourishing Workforces in Organisations
The functional determinants in a flourishing workforce are more likely to
relate to eudaimonic factors, broadly categorised as social and psychological well-
being (Keyes, 2007; Ryan & Deci, 2001). In terms of social well-being, positive
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 43 of 280
identification can provide important resources within a workplace that enable
effective functioning to occur more consistently and frequently (Dutton, Roberts, &
Bednar, 2010). Positive identification for workers promotes prosocial behaviours
that build inter-connectivity in a workforce and thereby increase social resources
within that workforce. Work identification may also influence flourishing beyond
social well-being and social resources. Dutton et al. (2011) argued that positive work
identities enable flourishing because of the contribution to enhanced psychological
functioning, positive feelings, and social functioning, all key factors of flourishing.
Waterman’s eudaimonistic identity theory (Waterman, 1992, 2004) describes
how identity formation can be positively shaped when activities are pursued that are
associated with both eudaimonic and hedonic experience. Waterman et al. (2008)
argued that people come to associate those activities that embody eudaimonic and
hedonic experience with feelings of self-expressiveness. Identification is more
successfully established when people are able to engage in self-expressive activity,
which Waterman claimed are the processes of self-actualisation. Therefore,
workplace identification may be important to establishing a flourishing workforce
within an organisation. Not only is positive work identification likely to contribute
to social well-being and social resources, but it may also contribute to emotional and
psychological well-being. Furthermore, the environment in which a workforce
performs may impact on positive identification in so far as it encourages self-
expressiveness, or indeed, self-actualisation.
As well as the contribution workforce flourishing might make towards
organisational effectiveness through performance linked to functional well-being,
flourishing may also contribute to employee health by helping to sustain such
performance benefits. With the exception of Keyes & Simoes’ (2012) investigation
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 44 of 280
into mortality rates, very few studies have explored the link between flourishing and
health. Keyes and Simoes’ research assessed the relationship of emotional, social,
and psychological well-being to health. They found that each of the three factors that
together represent flourishing were not independently reliable predictors of health in
terms of mortality, however, when combined as a measure of flourishing they
predicted a 62% increase in mortality for non-flourishing participants. Eight out of
every ten participants in Keyes and Simoes’ sample of over 3000 adults from across
the United States were found to be non-flourishing and when considered against the
findings for increased mortality rates, flourishing would appear to play a prominent
role in health and related issues such as a reduction in functional capacity.
Therefore, the concept of flourishing warrants exploration in terms of employee
health and organisational effectiveness.
Other studies have examined components of flourishing such as the
relationship between eudaimonia and health. For example, Ryan and Fredrick’s
(1997) found that subjective vitality, a measure of eudaimonic well-being, co-varied
with reported physical health symptoms. Lewis, Kimiecik, Horn, Zullig, and Ward
(2013) assessed an intervention designed to improve eudaimonic well-being against
levels of physical activity. They found that increased eudaimonia corresponded with
increased physical activity, deemed to be indicative of a healthy lifestyle. Measures
of personal growth, subjective vitality, self-determination, and life engagement were
used as indicators of eudaimonia in the Lewis et al. (2013) study. Ryff (2013)
argued that if being the best we can is the right way to live, consistent with
eudaimonia, then it would be expected that other beneficial outcomes would occur,
including outcomes related to health.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 45 of 280
Ryff (2013) claimed that, as a consequence of the capacity to cultivate
positive aspects in one’s lives, eudaimonic well-being provides the psychological
and social resources that contribute to the promotion of health. Ryff’s argument is
illustrative of Hobfoll’s (1989, 1998, 2001) conservation of resources (COR) theory
that was first developed to explain variation in the occurrence and consequences of
stress. COR theory centres on the accumulation of personal and social resources that
buffer and remedy threats to health. The theory has been more broadly applied to a
range of different phenomena in recent years, including work engagement (Bakker,
Hakanen, Demerouti, & Xanthopoulou, 2007), self-belief (Llorens, Schaufeli,
Bakker, & Salanova, 2007), intent to leave (Halbesleban & Wheeler, 2008), self-
determination or autonomous motivation (Slemp & Vella-Brodrick, 2014), and
flourishing (Dutton et al., 2010). Although not directly referring to COR theory,
Fredriskson (1998, 2001), in her broaden and build theory of positive emotion,
describes a process of resource building through positive affect. Fredrickson and
Losada (2005) argued that these resources help foster flourishing. Therefore, it
would seem that different domains of well-being (emotional, social, and
psychological) that contribute to flourishing have an effect on health through the
accumulation of resources. These resources are likely to be congruent with certain
well-being domains, such as social resources for social well-being. The effect of
flourishing and the accumulation of resources, particularly in relation to eudaimonia,
appear to explain the relationship that may exist between flourishing and health.
However, there are few studies exploring these relationships and therefore, further
research is needed to make further contributions to our understanding of such
relationships.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 46 of 280
The relationship between hedonia (SWB) and health is more complex than the
relationship of eudaimonia to health according to Ryan and Deci (2001). In their
review of well-being, Ryan and Deci reported that studies often found people with
high levels of SWB were more likely to report poor health. They also claimed that in
other studies, low SWB was sometimes found to associate with better health. Ryan
and Deci concluded that the relationship between SWB (hedonia) and health was not
straight forward. While their conclusion might result in some researchers excluding
hedonic well-being from exploration of the link between flourishing and health,
other studies have shown a small but consistent relationship. Howell et al. (2007)
integrated the findings from 150 experimental, ambulatory, and longitudinal studies
that tested the impact of SWB on objective measures of health. They found
correlations of (r = .15) for short term outcomes, (r = .11) for long term outcomes, (r
= .13) for disease and symptom control, and (r = .14) for all health combined. At
first glance these relationships appear modest; however, small increases in the health
of employees can translate into marked improvement in organisational and
individual effectiveness through reduced absenteeism and improved productivity
(Diener & Seligman, 2004). It is also argued here that SWB or hedonia makes a vital
contribution to flourishing by rewarding or reinforcing eudaimonic achievement.
Such benefits warrant investigation of the role of hedonia with health despite the
uncertainty about the independent relationship with health. As Keyes and Simoes
(2012) revealed, the combination of emotional (hedonia), social, and psychological
well-being together seems to predict health outcomes more reliably than applying
each independently. Furthermore, the effect of hedonic well-being on health is likely
to have a similar health promotional effect to that of eudaimonia and is not merely
effective by reducing ill-health (Howell et al., 2007). Therefore, to understand the
effect of well-being as flourishing towards employees’ health, the inclusion of
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 47 of 280
hedonic well-being would contribute to the predictability of employee health
outcomes.
1.4. Conclusion
To summarise this chapter, an organisation is a dynamic system of activity and
interrelationships in which workforce flourishing is a key issue related to the ability
of the organisation to remain effective in a sustainable and self-perpetuating manner.
The ability of the workforce or organisation to function in optimal ways has
therefore become an important subject for organisational research. A number of
constructs have been the subject of inquiry into workforce or organisational
functionality, exploring such capacities as sustainability and adaptability, most of
which are consistent with a systems perspective of organisations. These constructs
having included organisational health, integrity, resilience, dynamics, and more
recently, flourishing.
Of the constructs reviewed in this chapter, workforce flourishing provides an
account of sustainable, optimal functioning through social and psychological well-
being (eudaimonia), as well as the contributing impact of emotional well-being that
enables a broader array of opportunities and behaviours to prevail. The opportunities
and positive behaviours arising from hedonia contribute further resources that
propagate optimal functioning. Workforce flourishing is also linked to employee
identification related to work, that helps develop social and psychological resources
within a workforce through eudaimonic experiences. Flourishing is also likely to
advance organisational effectiveness through improved employee health, which in
turn suggests improved functional capacity through sustainable and mutually
supportive reinforcing cycles. Therefore, in this thesis, the construct of workforce
flourishing was examined as a resource for organisational effectiveness, facilitated
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 48 of 280
through work related identification. The relationship of workforce flourishing to
employee health was also deemed to be indicative of the sustainability of the
functional capacity experienced through flourishing. To proceed, a review of social
identification and work related health literature was required for a more complete
understanding of the relationships both have with workforce flourishing. The next
chapter examines work related identification, highlighting the links with emotional,
social, and psychological well-being.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 49 of 280
Chapter 2Workplace Identification and Resource Accumulation
2.1. Introduction
Who we are and how we see ourselves has important implications for the way
we behave and our welfare in general. Put another way, identification has an
important impact on our ability to flourish or function optimally (Dutton et al., 2010,
2011). Much of the beneficial effect of identification in relation to flourishing is
based on the ability of identification to facilitate the accumulation of resources that
are complimentary to the circumstance of flourishing (Dutton et al., 2011).
Identification with a group such as an organisation helps to foster various forms of
behaviour or positive functioning that might support the group or organisation
(Haslam, 2014; Kim, Chang, & Ko, 2010). For example, Gecas (2001) suggested
that identification is a reflexive process that enables psychological resources in the
form of meaning and symbolism to emerge from social contexts. Tajfel and Turner’s
(1979) social identity theory accounts for how individuals come to incorporate
group values, norms, and goals as their own and thereby build social resources
through actions that are consistent and beneficial to the group. Identification at work
is likely to be associated with behaviours useful to group functioning as well as
individual functioning within the group and therefore, identification is associated
with resources for functioning and flourishing.
Tajfel’s (1982) description of the term identification included references to the
importance of evaluative and affective processes, so that identification is more likely
whenever people feel more positive about a particular group. Given a hedonic
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 50 of 280
perspective, positive feelings associated with identification are consistent with
Fredrickson’s (2001) broaden and build theory in which positive emotions enable
the accumulation of further resources. According to Fredrickson, positive feelings
such as interest, joy, and pride can foster a broader repertoire of responses towards
events, creating or enhancing the opportunities for resource gain. Taken together,
work identification is likely to contribute to the accumulation of psychological,
social, and hedonic resources that increase the capacity of individuals and groups to
flourish and be more effective in their organisation.
According to Tajfel (1981, 1982) and Tajfel and Turner (1979), identification
provides a sense of self reference to the social context. In other words, identification
involves the internalisation of social factors in a way that enables a person to make
sense of, and respond effectively to, social contexts (Turner et al., 1987). In this
regard, identification would appear to have a direct influence on flourishing due to
the capacity to increase positive functioning within a particular social context
(Dutton et al., 2011). From Dutton et al.’s perspective, the role of social
identification formation can have an impact on the ability of individuals and
workgroups to flourish through social resources. Haslam (2014) suggested that
identification is likely to bring about outcomes such as greater meaning, purpose,
and self-worth. These outcomes are all consistent with psychological resources for
flourishing.
Hobfoll (2001) states that resources are entities, valued in their own right for
their ability to facilitate desirable outcomes. Halbesleben, Neveu, Paustain-
Underdahl, and Westman (2014) helped to concentrate the understanding of
resources even further by suggesting that the desirable outcomes were valued goals.
As such, identification reflects a degree of congruence between a group and its
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 51 of 280
individual members that would seem to indicate elevated value of group related
activities directed towards important goal achievement (Bergami & Bagozzi, 2000;
Haslam, Eggins, & Reynolds, 2003). Identification would therefore evoke the
accumulation of resources valued by group members because they increase group
functioning, enable goals to be met, and contribute to the group’s ability to flourish.
Flourishing includes both functional and emotional elements that goal achievement
helps support (e.g., Ryan & Deci, 2001). Several theories exist that explain the
interaction between social context and identification and contribute to our
understanding of how psychological, social, and hedonic resources are gained.
These identification theories and the relationship to resource accumulation are
presented in the following sections.
2.2. Theories of Identification
Identification has often been defined in terms of a person’s cognitions
(Ashforth, Harrison, & Corley, 2008) that relate to internalisation of a group’s
values, norms, and goals (van Dick, Wagner, Stellmacher, & Christ, 2004).
Essentially, definitions of identification such as these describe the extent of
congruence between an individual’s values, norms, and goals with those of the
relevant group. However, Tajfel’s (1982) description of the term identification
included reference to evaluative and affective processes in addition to cognitive
processes. Ellemers, Kortekaas, and Ouwerkerk (1999) proposed that cognitive,
evaluative, and affective processes of identification act independently or co-vary in
some way to create greater diversity in the patterns of identification that might
occur. This, in turn, would have correspondingly diverse outcomes in terms of
behaviours and attitudes in response to social circumstances. For the purposes of this
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 52 of 280
thesis, identification is defined as an individual’s sense of unity with a group to the
extent that the group has personal value and emotional significance.
The concept of identification is linked to the concept of identity or identities
which Gecas & Mortimer (1987) described as specified entities that enable an
understanding of a given situation of context. Ramarajan (2014) defined identities as
subjective knowledge, meanings, and experiences that are self-defining. According
to Deaux (1992), identities provide flexibility and adaptability in social contexts
given the inherent dynamic nature typical of social contexts. Having self-defining
qualities and allowing adaptability in social contexts suggests that identities provide
a mechanism to find meaning within social contexts. Identification on the other hand
relates to the actual congruence between an individual and their cognitive,
evaluative, and emotional fit with the social context. Identities relate to the range of
self-referenced entities that individual’s may draw upon to help find such
congruence. Identities can be considered similar to the tools in a toolbox, whereas
identification is the application of those tools. Identities can also be considered as
components of an overall sense of self or self-concept (Gecas & Mortimer, 1987).
Therefore, the concepts of identification, identity, and self-concept can be
considered related but also distinct in terms that they each have their own specific
application to research. This thesis is concerned mainly with identification because it
captures how a person makes sense of a situation and arrives at a feeling of accord
with their circumstances. However, because identities and self-concept are
constructs related to identification, they are also informative and will be discussed
briefly although they are not central to this thesis.
Indeed, these terms can be closely mapped against theories related to
identification and a sense of self linked to social contexts. James (1892) and
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 53 of 280
Baldwin (1899) were among the first social scientists to propose theories of self that
reflect the importance of the social context. From the perspective of James (1892),
we have many selves that represent the many circumstances and people we
encounter in our day to day activities. This view aligns closely with concepts of
identification and identity. Identification is the extent of congruence between the
person and the context or circumstance. Identity is the array of different perspectives
of self that help one find a meaningful fit to each different context. Mead (1913,
1934) introduced a constructionist perspective in relation to the self within social
contexts to which the social context was a source of reflection for understanding the
self. From Mead’s (1934) perspective, people attribute different qualities about
themselves based on the information they receive or perceive in social contexts.
Mead’s perspective is one in which the focus is on self-concept, or a global sense of
self but also highlights how individual and contexts interact and shape meaning with
those contexts.
The initial attempts to explore the self in relation to social context by James
(1892) and Mead (1913, 1934) have helped to produce two distinct theoretical
pathways that have since been applied to understand behaviour in social contexts.
Gleason (1983) described the contrast between these two paradigms as the “unity of
self” debate. This debate centres on a conflict between understanding the self as a
single, unitary sense of self as opposed to a sense of self that is composed of many
versions of self. Although this distinction is noted here, the intention is not to engage
in a detailed, extensive review of the merits of each in this thesis. The purpose of
this thesis is to examine elements of the interaction between employees and their
work contexts that enable them to flourish and thereby function effectively. In this
regard, theories that are centred on identification and, to a lesser extent identities, are
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 54 of 280
more applicable to the intent of this thesis. However, self-concept and the
understanding of how individuals and context can shape meaning that is both
consistent (such as unity of self), or context specific (many selves), has implications
towards understanding functioning in social contexts and is therefore, briefly noted
here.
2.2.1. Social Identification – Theories of Social Behaviour
Two related theories have been most prominent in progressing our
understanding of identification, and of how groups and the social context shape
people’s behaviour. Tajfel and Turner’s (1979) social identity theory was the
product of Henry Tajfel’s earlier contemplation of prejudice and the cognitive and
social processes that create such devastating social divides (Tajfel, 1981). Turner et
al.’s (1987) self-categorisation theory was an extension of the earlier social identity
theory adding an explanation of the psychological processes that described
categorisation of the salient qualities of groups within the social context. These two
theories maintain that social behaviour results from an interaction between the social
context and the person and may result in varying levels of identification and
concordant group based behaviour.
In addition, two theories from the field of sociology are also worth mentioning
here for their contribution to understanding the impact of social contexts on people’s
behaviours. McCall and Simmons’ (1978) identity theory and Strykers’s (1980,
2002) role identity theory are founded on constructionist principles and informed by
the earlier work of Mead (1934). While these theories have much to offer to an
understanding of social behaviour, they are more oriented towards exploring issues
of self-concept rather than identification. However, both offer accounts of context
specific behaviour that help inform how people function well in social contexts
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 55 of 280
contributing to their ability to flourish. For example, within Stryker’s (2002) role
identity theory, he described circumstances in which people adopt different social
roles within groups thereby fulfilling functional niches within the group and
enabling optimal functioning of that group.
Both McCall and Simmons’ (1978) identity theory and Stryker’s (1980, 2002)
role identity theory emphasise the negotiation that takes place within a group that
shape behaviour. The negotiation is both implicit and explicit but helps to direct
behaviour towards group endorsed outcomes or goals. Therefore, describing a
negotiated process for resources that facilitate group functioning and potential
flourishing. In comparison, Tajfel and Turner’s (1979) social identity theory and
Turner et al.’s (1987) self-categorisation theory have a stronger emphasis on
context, these theories are more central to revealing the specifics of a particular
context such as work, that might facilitate resources that enable optimal functioning
and flourishing within a group. As such, an overview of both social identity theory
and self-categorisation theory follows.
Social Identity Theory
Social identity theory describes group-based behaviour as a product of
perceived similarities between group members and differences with out-group
members (Tajfel & Turner, 1979). Tajfel (1974) defined social identity as the part of
an individual’s self-concept that derives from knowledge of their membership in a
social group or groups, together with the emotional significant attached to that
membership. This comparative process is motivated by a need for a positive sense of
self and therefore, the extent to which an in-group enhances one’s self-concept will
help to determine the extent of identification with that group (Ellemers & Haslam,
2011). The more one identifies with a particular group, the more group identification
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 56 of 280
determines one’s inclination to act in accord with other group members (Ellemers et
al., 1999). In addition, identification with a particular group manifests by people
becoming active in maintaining their in-group’s distinctiveness (Haslam et al., 2003;
Turner & Haslam, 2001).
Actively enhancing one’s own group in contrast to other groups may be
motivated by a need to maintain the value of one’s group in terms of one’s sense of
self. For example, competition between groups may increase identification with
one’s own group and, as such, accentuate stereotypical judgements about the out-
group (Oakes, 1996; Tajfel & Turner, 1979). Virtues of one’s group are elevated, in
conjunction with the faults and failures of out-groups. This helps maximise the value
of one’s own group in comparison to other groups. Furthermore, people may act in
ways that advance their groups’ interests, with the consequence that perceived
differences with other groups are exaggerated (Haslam et al., 2003). Therefore, the
motive to enhance self-worth through group affiliation may drive people to act in
ways that not only distinguish their group from others, but also exaggerates these
differences to obtain greater benefit from their group alliances. In terms of resources
to meet goals and therefore, enhance effectiveness, the processes described suggest
that resources effective in maintaining conflict would be valued. However, it is
difficult to argue that such resources might lead to flourishing and well-being in a
workforce.
Social identity theory has a more general application of the qualities leading to
identification than primarily drawing on inter-group conflict (Turner & Haslam,
2001). For example, Amiot and Sansfaçon (2011) applied social identification and
self-determination theory (Deci & Ryan, 1985; Ryan & Deci, 2002) to explain both
positive and negative behaviours and the consequences arising from identification.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 57 of 280
They found support for the notion that when identification was motivated by
autonomous regulation, the outcomes or consequences of identification were more
likely to be positive, for instance, greater well-being. Workman (2001) used social
identity theory to examine group cohesion and suggested that the existence of group
cohesion reflects homogeneity of group members’ values and beliefs. Ellemers et al.
(1999) used social identity theory to examine a number of group related outcomes
such as self-esteem, self-categorisation, and group commitment. Ellemers and
Haslam (2011) concluded that the search for positive identification may involve
forms of social mobility and creativity as alternative pathways to that of competition
and conflict. In essence, social identity theory attempts to describe how group
values, norms, and goals contribute to the development of beliefs that become
shared between group members and impact on the behaviour of that group (Tajfel &
Turner, 1979). Therefore, while conflict might enhance group identification, there
are other aspects to identification that are similarly able to facilitate identification
although with more positive consequences, some of which may contribute to
flourishing.
In summary, social identity theory explains some important situational or
contextual characteristics that may lead to a predilection for one identity over
another based on in-group similarities and out-group differences. It has been
suggested that we judge both similarities and differences based on our motivation to
regard our self-concept positively. This motivation may also lead to exaggerating
similarities within the group and differences outside the group, culminating in
prejudice and even conflict. Such outcomes are not conducive to flourishing, nor are
they in the interests of organisations. However, social identity theory has been used
to explore more positive, affirmative outcomes such as cohesion and commitment
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 58 of 280
and can help explain how group membership can influence functionality and
therefore flourishing. As Amiot and Sansfaçon (2011) found, motives aligned with
autonomy and development rather than external control and ego defensive are more
strongly associated with positive outcomes from identification such as well-being.
However, social identity theory is not clear about how positive motives or goals
might be determined in shaping identification in ways that enhance the potential to
flourish. Another related theory, self-categorisation theory (Turner et al., 1987) is
more detailed about how people might begin to identify with particular groups and
how this might lead to flourishing.
Self-Categorisation Theory
The reliance of social identity theory on positive self-assessment as a driving
force for group membership has some limitations identified in the previous section
and a more elaborate explanation of the subjective processes leading to
identification was argued. Turner et al.’s. (1987) self-categorisation theory
attempted to pay closer attention to these subjective processes by incorporating a
cognitive explanation of the interaction between the environment and the person to
account for identification and social behaviour. This cognitive process relates to the
assimilation of group or category based norms, values, and goals with those norms,
values, and goals of individual group members. An individual becomes a group
member in psychological sense, a process Turner et al. (1987) termed
depersonalisation. Turner et al. described depersonalisation as the product of
circumstances by which group norms, values, and goals are shared throughout
membership within the group, thus leading to more uniform behaviours based on
these shared attributes. Such circumstances would seem to favour group functioning
and therefore, flourishing.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 59 of 280
Sharing group norms, values, and goals has a positive effect on group
functioning (Haslam, 2014; Ramarajan, 2014) and therefore, flourishing, however
there are multiple group with which identification can occur (Ramarajan, 2014). The
determination of which group or category might be evoked in a given context was an
important development in self-categorisation theory (Turner & Reynolds, 2011).
According to both self-categorisation theory (Turner et al., 1987) and social identity
theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1979), there is an interaction between the social context
and an individual that determines which group identification contributes best to
sense making in that context. However, self-categorisation theory extends this idea
by detailing cognitive processes that increase the likelihood of identification and the
impact that identification may subsequently have on social behaviour (Haslam,
Powell, & Turner, 2000; Hogg & Terry, 2000). One of the principle aspects of the
cognitive process of identification explained by self-categorisation theory is identity
saliency (Turner et al., 1987).
Self-categorisation theory links saliency to the notion of group selection based
on intra-group similarities and inter-group differences, and as such, is consistent
with social identity theory. However, self-categorisation theory offers far more
insight into the processes resulting in group saliency. According to Turner et al.
(1987), identity saliency occurs when group membership becomes cognitively pre-
potent in one’s self-concept. As mentioned, Turner and Reynolds (2011) state that
saliency varies as a process involving perceived similarity with members of a
category and differences with members of other categories. These perceived
similarities and differences are also known as the degree of fit with context and
expectation (Turner et al., 1987). Accordingly, the context determines the field from
which similarities and differences become perceptually available for evaluation. In
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 60 of 280
addition, accessibility or personally available schema help determine which groups
are applicable to the context. It follows that changes in context may result in a shift
in which identification is salient, and thereby cognitively dominant leading to
identification related behaviours. This process is important in the context of work
and organisations because the outcome behaviour of employees may vary depending
on what is happening in the work context at any given time. In addition, the
alignment of member expectations and perceive capacity of group membership to
meet expectations would also appear to be a critical transaction in the process of
identification.
In terms of flourishing, fluctuations in the saliency of some groups may have
corresponding effects on the level of identification and the capacity to accumulate
resources linked to optimal functioning and flourishing (Dutton et al., 2011). The
implication for flourishing suggested by variable group saliency highlights the
importance of processes by which saliency of groups is determined. Turner et al.
(1987) claimed that both fit and accessibility of a group category are instrumental in
determining group saliency. Turner and Reynolds (2011) refer to fit as the personal
relevance of a group category. The degree of fit may vary depending on the
demands of the context at the time. Millward and Haslam (2013) refer to
accessibility as the cognitive availability of a group or category and this may be
influenced by such things as expectations, past experience, and culture. As such,
identification with particular groups may enhance or diminish the capacity of a
group member to function effectively in a situation if the level of fit was low or
accessibility was not congruent with high identification groups. Therefore, in terms
of flourishing in the context of work and organisations, an understanding of
identification in work contexts is warranted.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 61 of 280
2.3. Identification in Organisations
Organisations are structured groups that also include smaller sub-groups such
as divisions, work units, or teams (Hogg & Terry, 2000; Riketta & van Dick, 2005).
Organisation based groups may also intersect with other work groups such as
professions or socio-demographic categories (e.g., Hogg & Terry, 2000; van Dick et
al., 2004). Regardless of the target group, identification with a group means that
within the group individuals perceives themselves in terms of the characteristics
they share with others in that group (Brickson, 2013; Turner et al., 1987). Brickson
(2013), Cole and Bruch (2006), Dutton, Dukerish, and Harquail (1994), Mael and
Ashforth (1992), and Riketta and van Dick (2005) proposed that organisational
identification is a form of psychological attachment that occurs when members of
the organisation group adopt the defining characteristics of the organisation as
similarly self-defining. According to Reade (2001), employees of an organisation
are likely to be members of at least two work groups, the organisation as a whole
and an organisational department or section. However, the potential number of
groups an employee may belong to in the workplace and therefore, evoke
identification with, are numerous (Hogg & Terry, 2000).
Variations in the level of identification with different work groups may be
explained by a desire to achieve or maintain positive self-esteem as well as a need to
confirm perceptions of self (self-verification) (Ashforth et al., 2008; Brickson, 2013;
Gecas, 2001). Ashforth et al. (2008) also suggested identification was motivated by
uncertainty reduction, or put another way, sense making. Differences in group
member’s level of identification may also be attributed to balancing the need to
belong with the need for individuality (Brewer, 1991, 2008). Millward and Haslam
(2013) argued that the self-esteem and self-verification motivations, manifest as fit
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 62 of 280
and accessibility, had greater explanatory ability than Brewer’s (1991, 2008, 2009)
optimal distinctiveness explanation. Brewer’s optimal distinctiveness theory predicts
that group size is a key aspect of identification. Groups that consist of just a few
members do not typically evoke a sense of belonging, as would a larger group. In
contrast, large groups reduce affirmations of individuality and are less often the
target of identification. In terms of identification in organisations, Brewer’s (1991,
2008, 2009) optimal distinctiveness theory would predict that work groups rather
than the organisation are likely to attract the highest levels of identification (see
Riketta & van Dick, 2005; van Knippenberg & van Schie, 2000).
However, Millward and Haslam (2013) predicted that when the culture of an
origination is predisposed to promoting accessibility of groups other than the work
group, then other work related targets of identification are likely to more applicable
within that work context. For example, they found that for organisations with a
culture of individualism in which team work was not emphasised, career
identification was higher than work group identification. This finding indicates that
the accessibility of a group for identification can be shaped by the work context, in
their example, work culture and values. As such, a culture in which work groups are
extremely permeable and fluid and in which a high priority is placed on the
organisation as unified group, the impact is likely to be that organisational
identification levels would be greater than levels of work group identification.
In contrast, other studies have typically found that work group identification is
generally higher than organisation identification (e.g., Riketta & van Dick, 2005;
van Knippenberg & van Schie, 2000). Indeed, Millward and Haslam (2013)
suggested that work group identification is normally at higher levels than
identification with other target group such as the organisation because work groups
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 63 of 280
are typically more salient within most work contexts. Notably, their argument for
greater saliency is premised on an argument drawing on accessibility and fit which
becomes a circular explanation. Nevertheless, in most typical work environments,
identification with the work group can be expected to be higher than identification
with the organisation (see Riketta & van Dick, 2005, for a meta-analysis of research
comparing the two identification foci).
Determining whether self-esteem (fit) and continuity (accessibility) are
primarily responsible for determining strength of identification, or alternatively, if
the balance of competing needs to belong and for individuality are more influential
is beyond the scope of this thesis. Rather, as Brickson (2013) states, the value of an
identification target relates to the ability of group membership to satisfy individual
identification motives. According to Brickson, such motives are to a large extent
idiosyncratic and likely to vary between members of a group. Although, for almost
all people, the motives for identification with a group are likely to have some
relationship to personal development, or more broadly stated as seeking positive
outcomes from current circumstances (Ramarajan, 2014). Amoit and Sansfaçon’s
(2011) research findings also support this assertion by showing that autonomy and
intrinsic motivation predicated positive outcomes from identification in the form of
greater well-being. As such, it is assumed that most employees wish to become
group members at work for positive reasons, although, it is accepted that on
occasions good intentions may have misguided consequences and diminish a
group’s capacity to function well and thereby flourishing. For the purpose of this
thesis, it was accepted that work group identification levels would be higher than
organisation identification. It was also anticipated that the difference between
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 64 of 280
identification targets would correspond to different patterns of resource availability
and accumulation, culminating in differences in flourishing.
Bartel (2001) and van Knippenberg (2000) explained that when identification
is at high levels, employees are more inclined to see their group’s interests (e.g.,
organisation and/or work group) as their own. This process of depersonalisation
increases the likelihood of behaving and thinking in terms of the interests aligned to
that group which may include protecting or defending the group’s image and values
(Turner et al., 1987; Ellemers & Haslam, 2011). Strength of identification has a
comparable effect on employees’ attitudes and behaviour linked to their membership
(Dutton et al. 1994; Ellemers & Haslam, 2011; van Knippenberg & van Schie,
2000). For example, Dukerich, Golden, and Shortell (2002) found that physicians
with high levels of identification were more likely to engage in co-operative and
citizenship behaviours. Bartel (2001) reported that when employees of an
organisation engaged in work outside of their organisation, identification with their
organisation was enhanced and was claimed to result in increased co-operation and
work effort. Work based identification, as an individual’s incorporation of group
characteristics as their own, suggests that the level of identification has a
commensurate effect on an individual’s behaviour consistent with the group.
Therefore, identification is an important construct when considering functioning and
flourishing in an organisation.
To date, only a few studies such as Dutton et al. (2010, 2011) and Waterman
(1992, 2004) have explored the link between identification and flourishing. The
likelihood that work group identification will be higher than organisation
identification, and thus have distinct effects on workforce flourishing, also opens a
new field of inquiry for social identification theories, as well as scholarship
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 65 of 280
surrounding flourishing and functional well-being. Dutton et al. (2011) explained
that identification may enhance employee’s capacity to accumulate important
psychological and social resources that help to create a state of flourishing. Given
that work group and organisation identification levels are likely to be weighted in
favour of work group identification, differences may exist between these two
identification targets with regards to facilitating workforce flourishing.
However, the capacity to facilitate flourishing may not be wholly attributable
to identification levels per se. Capacity to flourish may also depend on
characteristics of the identification group (Dutton et al., 2010), and also on the
context that helps facilitate the emergent behaviours and attitudes of identification
(Dutton et al., 2011). Identification, in partnership with the context at work, interacts
to shape resources that can enable flourishing within a workforce (Dutton et al.,
2010). To explore these relationships further, a discussion of the characteristics of
identification and work contexts that facilitate resource accumulation follows in the
next section.
2.4. Resource Accumulation Related to Identification and Circumstances at Work
Organisational identification, indicative of group membership, reflects
important dimensions of an organisation’s social environment in terms of the
cohesion among employees (Haslam, 2014; Reade, 2001). Cohesion arising from
identification may take the form of a shared understanding among group members
that includes goals, attitudes, and norms applicable to each foci of identification or
group (Turner & Reynolds, 2011). According to Tajfel (1981) and Ellemers and
Haslam (2011), members of a group, including work groups, will shape their
behaviour by what they deem appropriate within the social circumstances and
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 66 of 280
accompanying social parameters presented to them. How certain behaviours are
determined as appropriate is governed by the system of norms and values belonging
to that group and the level of identification attributed to that group at that moment in
time (Turner et al., 1987).
Identification not only involves a level of awareness of group norms and
values, but identification with an organisation or work group also means that
employees share that group’s goals or ambitions (Stryker, 1980, 2002). Therefore,
identification helps to bring a degree of consistency among members of an
organisation with respect to the norms, values, and goals that each member uses to
guide their behaviour in the context of the organisation’s day to day operations (Lee,
Farh, & Chen, 2011). However, for employees’ behaviour to be guided by the
norms, values, and goals of a work group, a certain threshold of cognitive awareness
needs to be meet (Ellemers & Haslam, 2011; Turner et al., 1987). In other words, an
employee needs to be thinking as a group member to act as a group member.
The cognitive activation of group membership, or identification, is necessary
to generate group related behaviours, however, this does not necessarily lead to
resource accumulation (van den Heuvel et al., 2014). Rather, van den Heuvel et al.
found that positive relations with leaders in an organisation were associated with
identification based resources than were group consistent behaviours, and that
relations with leaders contributed to effective adaptation to change. Dutton et al.
(2010) proposed that positive identification, in contrast to just identification, is a key
ingredient in resource accumulation leading to flourishing. Four mechanisms were
discussed by Dutton et al. as qualities of positive identification that facilitate
resource accumulation. These qualities were; when a group has virtue, or good
character; evaluations of the group result in perceptions of value; the group in
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 67 of 280
question is dynamic and capable of development and change; and lastly, when
identification is in harmony and consistent with other group memberships and
members self-concept. Accordingly, each of the four aspects contributes to
identification in ways that enable positive outcomes in the form of job resources.
Work engagement is also implicated in the accumulation of job resources
(Bakker & Demerouti, 2014; van den Heuvel, Demerouti, Schaufeli, Bakker, 2010).
Engagement at work is described by Schaufeli, Salanova, González-Roma, and
Bakker (2002) as a positive, fulfilling, work related state of mind characterised by
vigor, dedication, and absorption. Work engagement translates into positive
behaviours within the context in which the engagement occurs (Bakker &
Demerouti, 2008). In this regard, there are similarities with identification in that
both have effects on behaviour and both involve varying levels of cognitive
activation.
However, according to Bakker and Demerouti (2014) engagement is often the
outcome of job and personal resources, whereas Dutton et al. (2010) and van den
Heuvel et al. (2014) claimed that identification helps generate resources, especially
social and psychological resources. The effect of resource accumulation for both
identification and engagement is that in both instances the relationships may evolve
into a positive feedback or positive gain cycle. A positive gain cycle (Salanova,
Schaufeli, Xanthopoulou, & Bakker, 2010), with respect to engagement, implies that
initial engagement helps to build additional resources which adds further to levels of
engagement. A similar reciprocal relationship between identification and resources
may also exist. For example, Dutton et al. (2011) explained that valuing an identity
more or engaging in positive interactions associated with identification may increase
motivation for identification. Essentially, the generation of resources may create a
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 68 of 280
more positive work context in which further benefits arise that promote both
engagement and identification further. In one way or another, these positive gain
cycles seem to depend on the relationship of employees with their work being
positive in the sense that an employee is motivated by positive outcomes.
In Bakker and Demerouti’s (2008, 2014) job demand-resources theory, job
resources, and personal resources, have been argued to be important facilitators of
positive outcomes such as employee engagement. Job resources refer to physical,
social, and organisational aspects of the job that help reduce demands, add to
functional capacity to achieve goals, and stimulate personal growth (Bakker &
Demerouti, 2008). More recently, personal resources were included in the model of
job demands-resources (Bakker & Sanz-Vergel, 2013) and were used to describe
positive self-evaluations linked to resiliency, sense of control, and efficacy (Hobfoll,
Johnson, Ennis, & Jackson, 2003). Van den Heuvel et al. (2014) found that personal
resources in terms of self-esteem and meaning making enhanced the relationship
with organisation leadership adding further to personal resources. Although this
thesis is not concerned with distinguishing between the two resource domains, the
generation of resources in a work place provides a useful framework for explaining
how identification produces positive outcomes such as flourishing. Resources
generated by identification, such as extending social networks, trust, positive
emotions, social affirmation, personal-group congruency, communication (Dutton et
al., 2010), organisation based self-esteem, and meaning making (van den Heuvel et
al., 2014) all relate back to the work environment or work context. Therefore, the
key effect of identification in terms of flourishing and increased effectiveness is
likely to be via the impact of identification on the work context or environment,
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 69 of 280
aided by the resources generated through positive interaction within the work
environment.
2.5. Conclusion
Identification has an impact on people’s behaviour and their ability to function
optimally, or put another way, to flourish (Dutton et al., 2010). Identification
enables us to interpret social contexts in order that we respond effectively (Tajfel &
Turner, 1979). Responding to social contexts effectively is helpful with respect to
acquiring important resources (e.g. Hobfoll, 1998, 2001; van den Heuvel et al.,
2014) that can further strengthen identification and contribute to flourishing (Dutton
et al., 2011; Salanova et al., 2010; van den Heuvel et al., 2014). Two social
psychology theories, social identity theory and self-categorisation theory, have
provided useful frameworks from which to understand identification processes,
including how identification contributes to resources and positive outcomes from
group activity that sustain flourishing.
Tajfel and Turner’s (1979) social identity theory explains how behaviour can
be shaped by social contexts that evoke perceptions of group identification. Turner
et al.’s (1987) self-categorisation theory provides an understanding of the cognitive
processes that lead to group based behaviour that stems from personal adoption of
norms, values, and goals attributed to the group. Together, these theories offer an
outline of social processes that result in member perceptions of identification and
behaviours that advance the interests of the group and help build socially derived
resources for flourishing to emerge. The capacity of identification to enable effective
responses to social contexts, build important resources, and contribute to a state of
flourishing suggests that identification offers substantial utility in application to
work and organisational contexts.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 70 of 280
Identification in work contexts with groups such as the organisation or work
group has an impact on the effectiveness of such groups in the form of group
behaviour directed at promoting group benefit (Ashforth et al., 2008; Haslam, 2014;
Riketta & van Dick, 2005). In terms of flourishing, behaviour that follows from a
shared understanding of group goals, norms, and values is likely to make a positive
contribution to group and individual outcomes and build important work related
resources (Dutton et al., 2010; van den Heuvel et al., 2014). Much of the literature
on job and personal resources in the workplace has been focussed on employee
engagement and the job demands – resource model (e.g., Bakker & Demerouti,
2014; van den Heuvel et al., 2010). However, van den Heuvel et al. (2014) found a
positive relationship between identification based resources and adaptation during
organisation change. In the engagement literature, the accumulation of resources
related to work has a positive reinforcing impact on further engagement. Dutton et
al., (2010) proposed a similar reinforcing cycle between job resources and
identification. Such reinforcing cycles are also known as positive gain spirals (e.g.,
Salanova et al., 2013).
The positive gain spiral predicted by identification and the positive effect on
work related resources provides further justification for the research undertaken in
this thesis. The aim here is to advance understanding about the mechanisms by
which identification contributes to flourishing at work. The presence or potential for
a positive gain spiral between identification and work related resources would
arguably make a valuable contribution to the literature and practice given that
achieving high levels of identification would not require intergroup competition or
conflict. In such circumstances, the value of a positive cycle represents sustainability
for the strategies an organisation might engage in to promote flourishing through
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 71 of 280
identification. In a systems sense, Capra (1997) argued that the inter-relationships
that help to produce positive resources and build stocks should assume a level of
sustainability. Pfeffer (2010) claimed that practices contributing to workforce
functioning in a sustainable manner would also be contributing to organisational
outcomes in the long term. Identification, as a sustainable approach to workforce
flourishing through the accumulation of resources, is one such approach to ongoing,
sustainable effectiveness in organisations.
One resource that may be evident in terms of identification and flourishing is
employee health. Indeed, the World Health Organisation (WHO) (1986, 1997)
described health as a resource for everyday living. The notion that health is a
resource for living is consistent with Halbesleben et al.’s (2014) definition of a
resource as being something that is instrumental in achieving goals. For example,
Karasek (1979), Hobfoll (1989, 1998, 2001), and Bakker and Demerouti (2007,
2014) have argued that health, in terms of the absence of stress, enables employees
to perform more effectively and contribute to the social context that would include
work and the organisation.
Antonovsky (1987) outlined a sense of coherence theory in which the ability
to make sense of demands, the ability to make use of resources, and the level of
meaningfulness, in combination, enabled the development and maintenance of
health. Identification provides a sense of coherence to emerge within work contexts,
and therefore, contributes to the health of employees within that work context. For
example, Pahkin, Väänänen, Koskinen, Bergbom, and Kouvonen, (2011) found that
higher levels of coherence helped to protect employees’ mental health from the
negative consequences of an organisational merger. Antonovsky’s (1987) sense of
coherence theory would also suggest that functionality plays an important role in
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 72 of 280
promoting health as the criteria for coherence all involve a level of effectiveness
within a particular context. Therefore, it is likely that identification is associated
with a range of resources including employee health. Identification is likely to
facilitate health through the advantages gained in optimal functioning in the
workplace in terms of workforce flourishing. It is proposed that identification
contributes to workforce flourishing, and that flourishing through functionality,
promotes healthier outcomes for employees. A review of the employee health
literature in relation to work related resources and enhanced functioning is addressed
in the next chapter.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 73 of 280
Chapter 3Employee Health as a Sustainable Outcome of Identification and Flourishing
3.1. Introduction
Participation or involvement in the workplace indicates some level of
identification with groups associated with the work undertaken (Haslam, 2014).
Within an organisation, employee identification is an important component of a
healthy workforce (Jaffe, 1995; van den Heuvel et al., 2014). Identification with a
group related to the work being undertaken facilitates a sense of shared beliefs,
norms, and values for employees (Turner et al., 1987). These shared group
dimensions motivate individual workers to behave in group oriented ways, such as
considering and assisting others (Ashforth et al., 2008; Haslam, 2014; Haslam,
McGarty, & Turner, 1996; van Knippenberg, 2000). Croppanzano, Howes, Grandey,
and Toth (1997) suggested collaborative, supportive work environments provide
employees with resources that help deal with work demands, enabling greater
stability, and therefore predictability, in the work environment.
Greater stability related to work can also lead to a reduction in threats and
conflict. For example, van den Heuvel et al. (2014) found that identification related
resources such as meaning making and organisationally linked self-esteem provide
organisational stability through the capacity for successful adaption in the face of
change. In addition, identification helps ward off the experience of stress and
thereby improves psychological health (Jaffe, 1995). The benefits derived from
identification and cohesion in the workplace, such as those suggested by
Cropanzano et al. (1997) and van den Heuvel et al. (2014), support employee
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 74 of 280
functioning and their health. The relationship may be explained by the personal and
social resources that identification helps to build (Dutton et al., 2011; van den
Heuvel et al., 2014), as well as the sense of control over work demands that arises
(Karasek, 1979; Hobfoll, 2001; Hobfoll et al., 2003). Identification may also
contribute to better emotional health (Brotheridge & Lee, 2003) and to improved
general physical health (James, Lovato, & Khoo, 1994) and well-being (van den
Heuvel et al., 2014). In summary, increasing levels of identification within the
workplace may benefit the organisation in terms of increased productivity (Haslam,
2014) and flourishing (Dutton et al., 2010), and is also likely to have a positive
effect on employee health and well-being (e.g., Haslam, 2014; van den Heuvel et al.,
2014).
Past concepts of employee health, predominantly under the title of
occupational health, have tended to place work and health in juxtaposition (Cox &
Cox, 1992). Contemporary conceptualisations of health in an organisational context
have drawn mainly upon knowledge gained from research examining occupational
stress (Cotton & Hart, 2003; Cox & Cox, 1992; Shoef et al., 2004) that has
highlighted the effect that working environments have on employee health and an
employees’ ability to contribute productively to the organisation. According to
Dutton et al. (2010) and van den Heuvel et al. (2014), personal and social resources
are critical for both employee well-being and effectiveness. Indeed, Keyes and
Simoes (2012) found that functional well-being in the form of flourishing was linked
to health in terms of mortality. Although studies addressing flourishing and health
are scarce, Keyes and Simoes’ findings suggest that functionality or effectiveness
and health are not at odds but mutually beneficial.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 75 of 280
Access to resources through identification and flourishing that support both
functioning and health could explain the positive association between identification,
flourishing, and employee health (van den Heuvel et al., 2014; Dutton et al., 2011).
Hobfoll’s (1989, 2001) conservation of resources (COR) theory initially emerged as
an explanation of stress and has evolved to become an effective framework for
health and well-being in general. Hobfoll’s COR theory, with an emphasis on
positive gain cycles involving resources (e.g., Hobfoll, 2011), has provided as strong
argument for employee health to be understood as an asset to organisational
functioning. This view challenges perceptions that addressing employee health is a
drain on time and finances. For example, Bakker and colleagues (Bakker &
Demerouti, 2008, 2014; Schaufeli & Bakker, 2004) have adapted the principle of
resource accumulation to explain the phenomena of employee engagement. Dutton
et al. (2010, 2011) also applied the concept of resource accumulation to explain
advances in flourishing. Van den Heuvel et al. (2014) found personal resources were
associated with adaption to changes at work. Indeed, Hobfoll’s (1989, 2001) COR
theory has set the foundation for a much broader understanding of employee health
beyond the original focus that highlighted employee stress. Furthermore, the
fundamental principle that employees might have available personal and social
resources that help them engage in their activities with greater efficacy is a simple,
yet effective premise from which to understand employee health.
Indeed, as Hobfoll’s (1989, 2001) COR theory illustrates, the extent and
availability of resource an individual has to draw from is an important determinant
for outcomes such as health and well-being. Not only do resources enable better
health, Hobfoll (2011) and Salanova et al. (2010) claimed that resource gain enables
further resource accumulation. Hobfoll (2001) termed these reciprocal resource gain
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 76 of 280
cycles as “resource caravans”. As such, employee health becomes a resource in itself
and has a positive impact on further resource accumulation such as flourishing or
positive functionality (e.g., Dutton et al., 2011). In this thesis, both flourishing and
employee health are understood to be resources, enabled to some extent by the level
of identification employees have in association with work related groups. Therefore,
employee health is an indicator of the sustainable qualities of flourishing in a
process akin to Hobfoll’s (2011) resource caravans that involve a process of positive
gain cycles.
Flourishing may have an effect on employees’ health in a number of ways. For
example, Keyes and Simoes (2012) found flourishing was related to physical health
status in the form of better mortality or longer life expectancy, recording a 62%
increase over non-flourishing adults. Ryan and Fredrick (1997) and Lewis et al.
(2013) also found a relationship between aspects of flourishing (e.g., subjective
vitality) and physical health. Ryff (2013) suggested that flourishing would provide
psychological and social resources that would be expected to promote better health.
Indeed, specific resources like these may have specific effects on health such as
emotional health (e.g., Fredrickson & Losada, 2005) and psychological health (e.g.,
Hale, Hannum, & Espelage, 2005). In general, resources available to employees
enabled by flourishing may enhance employee physical, emotional, and
psychological health given flourishing encompasses similar domains. In addition,
identification aligned with work is likely to contribute to resource accumulation
through flourishing and thereby enhance employee health, physically, mentally, and
emotionally. Complementary and beneficial relationships between identification,
flourishing, and employee health suggest that strategies supporting these
relationships would also be sustainable. Reciprocal benefits such as these support
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 77 of 280
the pursuit of further knowledge through research into the relationships between
these constructs undertaken in this thesis.
3.2. Employee Health and the Relationship to Identification and Flourishing
Despite the potential for identification, flourishing, and health to associate
strongly, few studies have been undertaken to explore such relationships.
Researchers Keyes and Simoes (2012) examined the relationship between
flourishing and health (mortality rates). Ryan and Fredrick (1997) examined vitality,
a component of flourishing, in relation to physical health. Lewis et al. (2013)
examined eudaimonic well-being as a motivation for physical activity. Dutton et al.
(2010, 2011) has argued that identification, if positively constructed, would result in
flourishing. However, no studies are known to date that have bridged the
relationship between identification, flourishing, and employee health and done so
empirically as well as theoretically. As mentioned previously, the aim of this
research is to explore these constructs in a way that reveals their potential to
contribute to organisational effectiveness and the well-being of employees, and do
so sustainably. However, an overview of employee health, broadly conceptualised in
terms of psychological, physical, and emotional health, would make a worthwhile
extension to the research proposed here highlighting the relationship between
identification and flourishing.
3.2.1. Psychological Health
Within psychological health research centred on the workplace, stress research
has dominated, leading to the view that stress or distress is a primary factor leading
to mental disorders among employees (Nieuwenhuijsen, Bruinvels, & Frings-
Dresen, 2010; Szeto & Dobson, 2013). As such, the discussion of psychological
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 78 of 280
health in this thesis will be centred on a review of workplace stress. Few studies
have examined the role that organisation identification plays in workplace stress.
Despite this, some studies have found links between stress and an employees’
relationship with their work. For example, stress has been found to associate with
employees’ relationship with their leaders (Walsh, Dupré, & Arnold, 2014), as well
as cognitive alignment of interests and values with an organisation (Slemp & Vella-
Brodrick, 2014).
Identification captures an employee’s relationship with their work in which
high identification suggests concordance with organisational activities (Haslam,
2014). Concordance between employee norms, values, and goals and those of the
organisation enhances motivation and control by enhancing positive self-evaluations
(van den Heuvel et al., 2014). Sparks, Faragher & Cooper (2001) argued that when
an employee perceives himself or herself as choosing an activity, as opposed to
being directed to do so, they experience a greater sense of control over that action.
Having a sense of control is an important ingredient in reducing the impact of
environmental demands or stressors (Karasek, 1979). Identification implies that the
goals of a group, such as those in an organisation or workplace, have been
incorporated to some extent, and are consistent with an individual’s personally held
goals (Dutton et al., 2010; Turner et al., 1987). In such circumstances, identification
with a workplace group, including acting as a member of that group, is likely to
promote a greater sense of perceived control over such actions compared to those
with lower identification with that group.
Control over work demands is a key component of the job-demands- control
(JD-C) model of stress (Karasek, 1979). More recently, the JD-C model has evolved
into the job demand – resources model (JD-R) (Bakker & Demerouti, 2007;
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 79 of 280
Demerouti, Bakker, Nachneiner, & Schoufeli, 2001) in which resources are
dimensions linked to work activity that improve functioning, reduce demands, and
stimulate growth and development. Positive identification provides important
resources for employees that enhances their effectiveness in the workplace and
enables them to ward off negative outcomes from stress (Dutton et al., 2010).
Dollard and Bakker (2010) similarly reported that employee resources are linked to
better employee health. Furthermore, resources are also motivational, leading to
improved effectiveness through further resource gains (Hakanen, Perhoniemi, &
Toppinen-Tanner, 2008). Identification would appear to enable the acquisition of
resources such as control over work demands, which helps employees avoid the
negative consequences of stress (Bakker & Demerouti, 2007, 2014). Resources can
include those aspects of work that improve functionality (Asha, 2008) which in turn,
equates with a state of flourishing (Dutton et al., 2011). In this regard, flourishing is
both a resource for health, and an outcome of identification, as discussed previously.
The role of identification in the accumulation of resources that are consistent with
flourishing suggests that the social environment related to work has an important
role contributing to flourishing and employee health.
Theories of work related stress such as Karasek’s (1979) D-C model of stress,
Lazarus and Folkman’s (1984) cognitive appraisal model of stress, and Hobfoll’s
(1989, 1998, 2001) conservation of resources (COR) theory of stress, all draw upon
the social context or environment to some extent in the experience of stress. For
example, Karasek (1979) described the potential for stress as the interplay between
the demands of the environment and an employees’ ability to exert some control
over those demands. Lazarus and Folkman (1984) claimed that the potential for
work related stress arises firstly from an appraisal of the environment as either
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 80 of 280
threatening or beneficial, and secondly, from an assessment of coping strategies to
deal with these threats or benefits. COR theory (Hobfoll, 1989, 2001) states that the
work environment is critical to outcomes of resource gains or losses.
The prominence given to the working environment in assessing the potential
for stress is most notable in Hobfoll’s (1989, 1998) COR theory in which the
resources required to deal with work demands are largely determined by social
processes with a strong association with social norms, values, and goals. Hobfoll
(2011) introduced the term ecology to describe resource supportive environments
consisting of employee relationships with supervisors, co-workers, and sometimes
clients. According to Hobfoll, such ecologies (interchangeable with social
environments in this thesis) support positive gain spirals or resource caravans that
lead to effectiveness, productivity, and health through a reduction in employee
stress. Therefore, social dynamics such as group identification contributes to health
outcomes such as stress through resources. Furthermore, resources within a social
environment or ecology are determined by characteristics of that environment such
as norms, values, and goals that may or may not align with identification. Alignment
would likely lead to greater access to resources and a benefit in terms of health.
For example, organisational identification is quintessentially associated with
greater norm, value, and goal congruency between organisations and their
employees (Turner et al., 1987). Norm, value, and goal congruency is likely to
increase co-operation (Haslam et al., 2003) and contribute to predictability in a
working environment (Cropanzano et al., 1997). Working environments
characterised by co-operation and predictability are likely to facilitate an increased
sense of control through resources that improve the capacity to meet demands and
foster social support from collaboration (e.g., Sluss & Ashforth, 2007). Furthermore,
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 81 of 280
an employee’s adoption of organisational goals as their own, arising from
identification with the organisation, may contribute to greater employee efficacy and
better coping strategies through the reduction in role ambiguity, along with
increased certainty regarding agreed goals (Lazarus & Folkmen, 1984). In addition,
social support, another important workplace resource linked to employee stress in
the workplace (van der Doef & Maes, 1999), is likely to be more plentiful in
workplaces where levels of identification with an organisation or workgroup are
high and co-operation is common place.
Given the potential of work identification to have an impact on a number of
key components that associate with workplace stress, and its reduction, an
examination of identification in relation to workplace stress is warranted. In
organisations where employee identification with the organisation is heightened,
these employees are likely to be well resourced and flourishing (Dutton et al., 2010),
have a greater sense of control (Turner et al., 1987), and be more motivated for
further resource accumulation obtained through effective work practices (Dollard &
Bakker, 2010). The proposal presented here is that organisations characterised by
high levels of identification would demonstrate an inverse relationship between
identification and stress due to the effect of identification on flourishing and
associated resource ecologies.
3.2.2. Emotional Health
Workplace demands, like those associated with the potential to produce stress,
may involve the expression or suppression of particular emotions required by the
organisation in the course of workplace activities (Hochschild, 1979, 1983).
Expectations about the emotional displays desired of employees by their
organisations are conveyed by way of emotional norms (Hochschild, 1979).
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 82 of 280
Emotional norms are conveyed to employees during socialisation processes (Rafaeli
& Sutton, 1987) and, as such, socialisation processes, which may include
identification, contribute to emotional health in the workplace. The effort by
employees to comply with these emotional norms is termed by Hochschild (1983) as
emotional labour. As Sluss and Ashforth (2007) and Slemp and Vella-Brodrick
(2014) argued, identification helps motivate employees to be congruent with
organisational norms which would suggest they are likely to increase their efforts in
meeting emotional norms.
According to Adelmann (1995) emotional work may result in positive
outcomes for employees, such as increased financial rewards, feelings of happiness,
and greater efficacy. The last two of these outcomes are consistent with flourishing
(see Keyes & Annas, 2009). However, as Hochschild (1983) described, negative
consequences may also result from emotional labour, such as alcohol abuse,
increased experience of headaches, and more frequent absenteeism. Hochschild
(1983) described the state of disconnection between displayed emotion and felt
emotion as emotional dissonance.
Organisations may require employees to subscribe to certain emotional
expressions, or alternatively, emotional suppression, when performing their duties
for the organisation (Abraham, 1998; Hochschild, 1979; Morris & Feldman, 1996;
Rafaeli & Sutton, 1987). Requests for particular emotional conduct reflect the
organisation’s expectations of those emotional standards and therefore represent the
emotional norms associated with roles employees perform (Morris & Feldman,
1996; Rafaeli & Sutton, 1987). The ability to fulfil emotional requirements and the
impact of performing such emotional work on the emotional health of employees is
important to the way employees’ function, strongly suggesting that it effects
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 83 of 280
workforce flourishing (Bakker & Sanz-Vergel, 2013). Among the concepts used in
association with emotional health, emotional labour and emotional dissonance are
frequently used.
Rather than the amount of effort or emotional labour per se being responsible
for any adverse employee outcomes regarding compliance with emotional norms,
Morris and Feldman (1996) claimed that emotional dissonance was more likely to
explain adverse health outcomes. Dissonance in this instance is a conflict between
felt emotions and the emotional expectations conveyed through social norms.
According to Morris and Feldman (1996) and Rafaeli and Sutton (1987) emotional
dissonance reflects poor fit between employees’ personally held values and norms
and those values and norms of the organisation or institution. Such circumstances
are highly compatible with a lack of identification.
The organisation is a source of expectations regarding emotional expression
by their employees in the execution of their work roles. Organisational
identification, by definition, represents the degree to which employees’ values and
norms are congruent with those of the organisation (Turner et al., 1987) and may
therefore be a factor associated with employees’ experience of emotional
dissonance. Indeed, Brotheridge and Lee (2003) found that identification was
negatively correlated with employees acting out emotions they did not feel, with a
positive correlation found between emotional displays and felt emotions.
Furthermore, low identification that culminates in discord between felt and
expressed emotion is likely to contribute to an employee’s inability to function,
suggesting that flourishing may also be inversely related to emotional dissonance.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 84 of 280
Identification and workforce flourishing may therefore represent key elements
in the determination of positive or negative employee outcomes arising from their
emotional labours. Lower levels of organisational identification may create a greater
likelihood that employees’ emotional norms and values will not match those of the
organisation and consequently, emotional dissonance may result for these
employees. Similarly, flourishing, arising from identification and contributing to
better functioning (Dutton et al., 2011; Ryan & Deci, 2001; Seligman, 2011), may
help to reduce dissonance because flourishing also involves positive emotion or
hedonia (Hutta & Waterman, 2013). It is assumed that most emotional norms for
organisations involve the expression of positive emotion in which flourishing is
likely to assist and thereby reduce dissonance. Emotional expression, or labour
without dissonance, is likely to facilitate resource gains if supported by a positive
social ecology (see Hobfoll, 2011), or, in other words, if functioning through
flourishing is positive, resource gain is likely to result from emotional labour, further
enhancing health.
Positive outcomes for employees engaged in emotional labour were found by
Tidd and Lockard (1978). They reported that the better the smile displayed by
waitresses, the higher their monetary rewards received from customers in the form
of tips. Rafaeli and Sutton (1987) suggested that the successful accomplishment of
job related tasks aided by emotional labour may facilitate a sense of satisfaction as
well as protect workers from ill feeling in times where emotional neutrality is
needed in the carriage of their duties (e.g., health workers and social workers). In a
similar way, Bakker and Sanz-Vergel (2013) found that nurses performing
emotional work as an expectation of their work roles strengthened their engagement
with work and flourishing when emotional demands were high. When there is an
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 85 of 280
acceptance and embodiment of the emotional work within the role, consistent with
identification, then normative work such as emotional work can become positive and
affirming helping to produce outcomes such as flourishing.
Given the apparent importance of identification and flourishing in
determining the emotional health of employees, measurement of emotional health in
a multi-faceted measure of employee health is warranted. Exploring the
relationships of identification and workforce flourishing in relation to emotional
health will also contribute to our understanding of the social, psychological, and
functional prerequisites for improving employee health that will contribute to
effective organisational strategies.
The role of emotional labour in determining organisational health and
employee related outcomes is equivocal according to research findings. Ashforth
and Humphrey (1993) suggested that emotional labour may contribute to the
workplace becoming more predictable because an understanding of the expectations
associated with emotional labour means that situations are formalised, scripted, and
in time, practiced. A different perspective is offered by others such as Abraham
(1998), Adelmann (1995), Lewig and Dollard (2003), Morris and Feldman (1996),
Rafaeli and Sutton (1987), all of whom have argued that emotional labour per se is
not associated with negative outcomes; rather, it is emotional dissonance that may
be responsible for such adverse outcomes.
Indeed, Mishra and Bhatnagar (2010) reported that identification was
negatively related with emotional dissonance that, in turn, predicted turnover intent
and low emotional well-being. Furthermore, Abraham (1998, 1999), Morris and
Feldman (1996), and Lewig and Dollard (2003) found that employee’s emotional
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 86 of 280
dissonance was related to lower job satisfaction (hedonic well-being). Whereas,
Bakker and Sanz-Vergel (2013) found that a sample of nurses embraced emotional
demands as being consistent with the role of a nurse and, as such, the performance
of emotional work by these nurses helped to build personal resources and promote
flourishing. In this last study, it would appear that identification, to some extent,
helped align the emotional norms of these nurses with the emotion norms required at
work, reducing dissonance and contributing to functionality. Therefore, emotional
dissonance is likely to be an effective indicator of employee emotional health in the
context of identification and flourishing compared to emotional labour per se.
3.2.3. Physical Health
An organisation’s workplace environment, that includes the social dynamics
of that environment, contributes to the physical health of their employees (Asha,
2008; Cooper &Cartwright, 1994; James et al., 1994; Wilson et al., 2004). Theories
of social identification, and more specifically, organisational identification, help to
explain the social dynamics in organisational contexts and how such dynamic might
affect health. Haslam (2014) argued that, as humans are social by their nature,
identification with social group’s matters as a determinant of health. In other words,
identification is an important determinant of health. However, few studies have
examined the relationship between employees’ work based identification and their
health in general. Fewer studies have explored work based identification and
physical health specifically.
Of the few studies to explore identification and physical health (as well as
other health outcomes) was a combined qualitative and quantitative study by Tinker
and Moore (2002). In this study, support was found for an association between
identification and physical health in an analysis of responses to the question,
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 87 of 280
“discuss the main reasons you are in or remain in your current job”. Responses were
classified into either professional identity salient (emphasising group affiliations) or
self-identity salient (emphasising individual motivations). Participants classified into
the professional identity salient group reported significantly lower somatic
symptoms, less anxiety, and lower social dysfunction compared to the self-identity
salient group. While this research is less than definitive, the findings suggest the
further exploration of the relationship between identification, flourishing, and
employees’ physical health is warranted.
Despite a lack of research specifically examining the impact of work
identification on employee’s physical health, other fields of inquiry have explored
social supports, attachment, and belonging in relation to physical health outcomes.
For example, some studies have examined the relationship between physical health
and a sense of belonging (e.g., Begen & Turner-Cobb, 2011). Raque-Bogdan,
Ericson, Jackson, Martin, and Bryan, (2011) explored attachment in relation to
physical health. Hale et al. (2005) investigated various forms of social support in
relation to health outcomes comparing men and women. Studies adopting these
different perspectives of social connection and support suggest that work
identification is likely to have similar positive effects on physical health.
Related constructs to organisational identification, such as social support and a
sense of belonging, have been examined in relation to their effect on physical health.
For example, Leppin and Schwarzer (1990) and Janevic, Airouch, Merline,
Akiyama, and Antonucci (2000) found that the quality of social support was an
integral component associated with physical health outcomes. Hale et al., (2005)
found that of four dimensions of social support explored, a sense of belonging was
the only domain that directly predicted physical health for men and general health
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 88 of 280
perceptions for women. More recently, Holt-Lunstad, Smith, and Layton (2010), in a
meta-analysis of 148 studies, found a 50% increase in the likelihood of survival for
participants with strong social relationship, a finding that was consistent across both
age and gender. Furthermore, the magnitude of health differences found in the Hunt-
Lunstad et al. (2010) study was comparable to other established risk factors for
mortality such as obesity, lack of physical activity, alcohol consumption, and
cigarette consumption. A sense of belonging, strength of social relationships, and the
quality of social supports are all indicative of the level of identification a person may
experience with a social group. Therefore, it is likely that identification within the
work context will have a positive impact on employee’s physical health similar to
the other social constructs that have attracted some support in research.
The studies connecting social constructs with health outcomes are also
informative of the mechanisms by which health is affected. Thoits (2011) suggested
that social ties may have two pathways that impact on physical health outcomes; a
direct pathway, and an indirect pathway involving stress reduction. In terms of the
indirect pathway involving stress reduction, identification with an organisation can
become a means by which a greater sense of control is established for these
employees (Terry & Hogg, 1996). Identification may also facilitate problem
focussed rather than emotionally focussed coping in employees, and help promote a
greater sense of social support in the workplace (e.g., Dutton et al., 2010). Alarcon,
Edwards, and Menke (2011) found that students with high levels of social support
were more likely to use problem focussed coping than emotion focussed coping
when it came to dealing with study demands. They argued that social supports may
provide problem focussed solutions and the larger the network of support, the
greater the number of viable solutions to problems are likely to be available.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 89 of 280
Adaptive coping, of which problem focussed strategies are an integral part, were
found by Alarcon, Edwards, and Clark (2013) to be related to academic
performance. Results such as these suggest that social support, similar to arguments
made for identification, would positively affect flourishing by increasing functional
capacity, which in turn would benefit health including physical health.
Furthermore, problem focussed coping strategies help reduce workplace stress
(Terry & Jimmieson, 2003). Stress has been linked to poorer physical health
outcomes such as high blood pressure (Lazarus, 1984), higher incidence of cardio
vascular disease (Theorall & Karasek, 1996) and declines in general physical health
(Sparks & Cooper, 1999). Therefore, the relationship between identification and
physical health may emerge through the impact that identification has on both
flourishing (including functioning) and also reducing workplace stress that
contributes towards better physical health.
An organisation’s working environment can have wide ranging effects on
employees’ health, including their physical health, which may eventually lead to
reduced organisational effectiveness (Wilson et al., 2004). Healthy work
environments and organisational effectiveness are central to a flourishing workforce
(Dutton et al., 2010, 2011). Wilson et al. (2004) proposed that employees’ health is
influenced by the organisational climate, including perceptions of organisational
support, co-worker support, and the degree of participation and involvement in the
organisation. In other words, the social and interpersonal resources available within
an organisation are likely to have an impact on employees’ physical health through
improving functional capacity and also through stress reduction that contributes
towards better physical health.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 90 of 280
Functional qualities appear to be important to positive health outcomes.
However, few studies have examined the relationship between workforce flourishing
and employees’ physical health. Willson et al. (2004) examined aspects of
flourishing such as job satisfaction and found a negligible relationship with reported
physical health, although the study did not examine flourishing per se. There have,
however, been studies exploring such relationships in settings outside of the work
context. In a sample of adults from across Europe, Keyes and Simoes (2012) found
that non-flourishing respondents had a 62% increase in mortality over a 10 year
period. Similarly, Thoits (2011) reported that a range of factors including mastery,
belonging, support, self-esteem, and purpose and meaning have links to physical
health outcomes. Aspects of the social environment such as those featured in Thoits’
review are also fundamental to flourishing (see Keyes, 2007; Seligman, 2011).
While research linking employee physical health to workforce flourishing
maybe scarce, there are grounds to explore such a relationship based on the claimed
association between identification and flourishing discussed in the previous chapter.
Given that identification and flourishing are indeed associated, flourishing has been
found to positively relate to physical health outcomes (e.g., Keyes, 2007). Therefore,
physical health was also included as a component of employee health in this thesis
so that a comprehensive assessment of the relationship between identification,
flourishing, and health outcomes could be made.
3.3. Conclusion
Identification with a group is likely to contribute to productivity by way of
workforce flourishing (Dutton et al., 2010) and may also have a positive effect on
employee health (van den Heuval et al., 2014). One explanation for this association
is that identification generates resources, both social and personal, that benefit health
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 91 of 280
and reduce the impact of threats to health (see COR theory, Hobfoll, 1989, 2001).
Identification may also increase function of a workforce resulting in that workforce
flourishing, with flourishing having been shown to have a direct effect on health
(Keys, 2007; Keyes & Simoes, 2012). Similar to identification, flourishing may
enable resource gains that benefit health and protect against health threats (Ryff,
2013). Furthermore, health is likely to have a positive impact on employees’ ability
to function and therefore flourish (Dutton et al., 2011). The contribution of
employee health towards creating a positive gain cycle with flourishing, apart from
the obvious benefit of a healthier workforce, warrants that health is included in an
examination of identification and flourishing in this thesis.
Health is conceptualised in this thesis in terms of psychological, physical, and
emotional health. Consistent with demand oriented theories of stress and health
(e.g., Bakker & Demerouti, 2014; Hobfoll, 1989, 2001; Karasek, 1979), it is argued
here that identification and flourishing contribute to the capacity for meeting
demands and benefit psychological health through resource accumulation and
deployment to meet demands. Regarding emotional health, identification is likely to
increase knowledge and therefore, the predictability of emotional expectations
associated with social group activities. This would contribute to aligning personal
emotional norms with those expected at work (see Brotheridege and Lee, 2003) and
reduce dissonance (Mishra & Bhatnagar, 2010) and increase flourishing (Bakker &
Sanz-Vergel, 2013). Flourishing is also likely to be associated with positive
emotional outcomes that, in turn, would feedback positively to contribute further to
flourishing (Bakker and Sanz-Vergel, 2013). Studies linking identification to
physical health are rare and even more so in the context of work. Nonetheless,
studies examining social interactions or exchanges such as social supports (Hale et
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 92 of 280
al., 2005), attachment (Raque-Bogdan et al., 2011), and sense of belonging (Began
& Turner-Cobb, 2011) have found links to physical health. The evidence for a link
between flourishing and physical health is also scarce but an extensive study by
Keyes (2007) found significant inverse links to mortality rates.
The following sections of this thesis examine the relationship between the
constructs of identification, workforce flourishing, and employee health.
Identification was predicted to associate with workforce flourishing and, in turn,
workforce flourishing was predicted to associate with employee health. The
constructs of identification and workforce flourishing, that support the accumulation
and maintenance of resources contributing to health, were also explored in detail in
the following sections of this thesis.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 93 of 280
Chapter 4Study 1: A Model of Workforce Flourishing
According to Dutton et al., (2011), identification may have an effect on the
capacity of a workforce to flourish. Different groups represented within particular
work contexts may therefore have distinct effects on workforce flourishing. For
example, Brewer’s (1991, 2008) optimal distinctiveness theory suggests that
functioning, also a primary outcome from flourishing, is optimised when group
identification offers a balance between the need to belong and the need to maintain a
sense of individuality. Identification that culminates in workforce flourishing should
also contribute to employee health (Keyes & Simoes, 2012; Ryff, 2013) via positive
functionality (Ryff, 2013) adding to the sustainability of such circumstances. Two
variations of a model of workforce flourishing are presented in this study. Each
variation of the model is distinguished by different targets of identification, work
group or organisation, and each target is predicted to associate with flourishing in
different ways. The model variants will be compared in terms of their influence on
workforce flourishing and also their contribution to sustainable practice through
employee health.
4.1. Work Identification and Flourishing
As members of a workforce, individual employees may identity to varying
degrees with the different groups that embody work contexts (Haslam et al., 2000).
As conditions within the work context change, so too does the likelihood that
identification with certain groups will shift in order to make sense of that context
(Dutton et al., 1994; Ellemers et al., 1999). The capacity of identification to enable
sense making in a particular situations is also linked to the capacity to respond
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 94 of 280
effectively in these situations, including the workplace (Ashforth et al., 2008).
Therefore, a deeper understanding of the effect identification at work has on
workforce functioning, such as eudaimonic well-being or flourishing, will also
contribute to understanding the circumstances that may enhance organisational
effectiveness.
One way in which work related identities enable workers, and indeed a
workforce, to be more effective and to flourish is through the accumulation of social
resources (Dutton et al., 2010). Hobfoll’s (1989, 2001) conservation of resources
(COR) theory explains that social resources enable more positive functioning that
also promotes employee health. Furthermore, the joint promotion of employee
health and effectiveness in the workplace are positive outcomes that enhance the
sustainability of an identification approach to organisational performance (see
Scharmer & Kaufer, 2013). A model representing the relationship between work
related identities, effective workforce functioning through flourishing, and employee
health is presented in Figure 4.1. This model will form the basis of discussion and
testing of two model variants, each variant featuring a different work related
identity. Comparisons between the model variants featuring either work group
identification or organisation identification will be made in relation to workforce
flourishing and employee health.
Figure 4.1. Simplified Model of the Relationship Between Work Related Identification, Workforce Flourishing, and Employee Health.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 95 of 280
A flourishing workforce is important to organisational effectiveness because
flourishing is positively associated with engagement, motivation, personal growth,
and learning (Dutton et al., 2011). Dutton et al. (2010) proposed that work related
identification contributes to workforce flourishing by building and developing
resources commensurate to the quality of relationships experienced at work.
Furthermore, such resources can facilitate the accumulation of other valuable
resources such as information, access, and trust, further extending the potential for a
gain in functioning and organisational effectiveness. Hobfoll (2001, 2011) proposed
that such positive gain spirals are motivational and are supported by positive work
ecologies, or in other words, work environments. It is suggested here that work
related identification is an important factor within the context of work that promotes
resource gain leading to optimal functioning at work.
According to Brewer (2009), optimal functioning is most likely to occur as a
member of a group. As a group member, a person has access to important social
resources rather than relying predominantly on their own capacities. However, being
a member of a group also has costs such as providing resources to others for their
benefit rather than one’s own benefit. Dutton et al. (2010) argued that identification
that achieves a balance in terms of meeting the contrasting needs for inclusion and
uniqueness is likely to be positive because it facilitates peak functionality thereby
helping employees to flourish. Bakker and Demerouti (2007, 2014) explained
functioning in terms of engagement proposing that resources are the key to meeting
demands and attaining positive outcomes through engagement. The relationship
between involvement at work such as engagement or identification with the capacity
to generate and maintain resources appear to play an important role in functioning at
work and employee effectiveness. Maintaining balance between the need to belong
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 96 of 280
and the need to be independent described by Brewer (1991, 2008) in her theory of
optimal distinctiveness, may contribute to the ability to accumulate and maintain
resources through identification, leading to workforce flourishing.
4.2. Identification and the Capacity to Flourish
An imbalance between the need to belong and the need for individuality
sparked by events such as feeling excluded, or feeling underappreciated, may initiate
the activation of responses to counter the imbalance. This would require the use of
an employee’s resources. For example, according to Brewer (2009), threats to a
person’s sense of belonging or self-worth are also indicative of potential threats to
their social resources and the capacity to build additional resources. In organisation
terms, the groups that facilitate flourishing, and therefore, optimal functioning, are
likely to be those groups most capable of balancing the two competing needs.
Brewer (1991, 2008, 2009) suggested that as the level of abstraction of a group
increases, finding a balance between competing needs of individuation and group
belonging becomes harder to reconcile. According to Brewer (2008), when the
number of members within a group becomes large, groups with smaller membership
numbers become more distinguishable from larger groups within that context. These
smaller groups have a greater capacity to facilitate group member bonds or inter-
personal connections between members of the group. As such, within organisations
of a certain size (Brewer suggests groups of 30 or more), the drive to form smaller
networks or groups to satisfy competing needs to belong while also maintaining a
sense of individuality becomes greater. Large organisations, therefore, should be
characterised by contrasts between larger group membership such as organisation
identification and smaller group memberships such as the work group. Smaller
groups, such as the work group, should also be better at facilitating the accumulation
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 97 of 280
and preservation of social resources that, according to Dutton et al. (2010), facilitate
flourishing in the workforce. A study examining the contrast between different
identification targets in the workplace with workforce flourishing outcomes has not
been undertaken to date.
4.2.1. Social Well-Being
Differences, and indeed similarities, between the capacity of organisation or
work group identification to promote workforce flourishing may be further
understood by considering the distinct components of flourishing; social,
psychological, and hedonic (emotional) well-being. Commencing with social well-
being, Brewer’s (1991) optimal distinctiveness theory contends that the level of
group abstraction has a direct relationship with the ability to accumulate social
resources. Social resources are akin to social well-being (Dutton et al., 2010) and
according to optimal distinctiveness theory should be more easily facilitated in a
work group as opposed to an organisation group.
Work group identification is more accessible and therefore has greater
influence over employee attitudes and behaviour compared to organisation
identification (van Knippenberg & van Schie, 2008). Van Knippenberg & van Schie
argued that employees are more likely to perceive work groups as more familiar and
attractive, having more in common on an individual employee level compared to the
organisation as a whole. In terms of social well-being, it would appear that for
reasons of optimal distinctiveness and accessibility work group identification may
facilitate social well-being, and therefore flourishing, more so than organisation
identification. In this regard, the contribution of social well-being to workforce
flourishing is expected to be greater in the model variant featuring flourishing
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 98 of 280
predicted by work group identification compared to the other model variant
featuring flourishing predicted by organisation identification.
4.2.2. Psychological Well-Being
The two identification foci of work group and organisation identification are
discussed here in relation to psychological well-being. Psychological well-being is a
functional resource described by Keyes (2007) and Seligman (2011) as signifying a
sense of meaning, commitment, and autonomy in relation to one’s endeavours.
Turner and Reynolds (2011) claimed that defining one’s self at different levels of
abstraction makes little difference to the meaningfulness of that social
categorisation. Identification is a process that links membership of a particular group
to the present context, generating a meaningful interpretation of that context through
the perspective of a particular foci of identification. Therefore, identification that
brings a meaningful understanding of a context and enables autonomous responses
to that context, and promotes further commitment, would appear to enhance
psychological well-being. Furthermore, the level of abstraction per se seems to have
little direct bearing on the capacity of identification to enable meaningful
interpretation of a context and therefore, enhance psychological well-being. Rather,
the correspondence between the identification target or foci and the context, and the
level of identification would be most influential in enhancing psychological well-
being.
The implication for psychological well-being and the different foci of
identification is that qualities such as meaningfulness appear to vary as a function of
saliency and context rather than the level abstraction per se (Thoits, 1992).
However, it is also acknowledged that identification via group saliency is more
likely for work groups compared to the organisation as a group because typical work
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 99 of 280
contexts are more frequently focussed on work group activity (Riketta & van Dick,
2005). Despite the likely prevalence of work group identification, situations may
occur in which organisation identification may influence meaningfulness or sense
making at an equal or greater extent to that of work group identification. For
example, meaningfulness might be associated with an organisation identity more so
than the work group when the organisation has a very dominant and highly salient
set of values such as an NGO or charity organisation.
Nevertheless, psychological well-being in terms of meaningfulness does not
appear to directly fluctuate with the level of group abstraction. Instead, context and
group saliency seem more likely to influence meaningfulness, and therefore
psychological well-being, which suggests predicting differences between work
group and organisation identities is less straight forward. However, the probability
within a typical work context is that work group identification is more likely to be
contextually salient than organisation identification and suggests that any difference
in psychological well-being may therefore favour work group identification.
Other contributing factors to psychological well-being such as commitment
and autonomy may similarly be linked to contextual factors rather than the level of
group abstraction. Positive attitudes towards a group and willingness to continue
involvement are aspects of commitment requiring an evaluative process in relation
to the context of a situation (Kalliath, O’Driscoll, & Gillespie, 1997). Autonomy,
according to Ryan and Deci (2000), is experienced when an internal locus of
causality or volition is perceived rather than feeling constrained to act by external
pressures. As such, autonomy involves an assessment of actions within a context.
Commitment and autonomy, components of psychological well-being, appear to be
more dependent on contextual features rather than group level abstraction.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 100 of 280
Keyes et al., (2002) and Vittersø and Søholt (2011) deemed that functional
well-being was predominantly an evaluative psycho-social processes. It follows that
if evaluations of contexts are at the centre of psychological well-being, then
different foci of identification may only demonstrate differences in the relationship
to psychological well-being if the particular foci are distinguished by their capacity
to facilitate an understanding of that context. Such processes are comparable to
meaningfulness in which an evaluation of the purpose of actions and the
contribution to goals takes place (Schueller & Seligman, 2010). Properties of
identification that help account for contextual features of work may assist the
evaluative process but these properties are not bonded to the level of group
abstraction. Therefore, it is expected that any difference between work group
identification and organisation identification associated with psychological well-
being will be due to the capacity to make sense or meaning from a situation, which
may also implicate identification saliency. In this study, there is unlikely to be
differences between the work group and organisation’s capacity to facilitate
workforce flourishing derived from psychological well-being.
4.2.3. Hedonic Well-Being
Evaluations related to hedonic well-being such as satisfaction with work, are
more ubiquitous than psychological well-being which is assessed on specific
qualities (Diener et al., 1998). Hedonic well-being in the workplace, represented by
job satisfaction, embodies a positive emotional evaluation of one’s work (Locke,
1976). According to Wright, Cropanzano, and Bonett (2007), job satisfaction is
probably the most common and one of the oldest operationalisations of workplace
‘happiness’ or hedonia. Job satisfaction is likely to arise when employees identify
strongly with groups within the workplace (van Dick et al., 2004). Identification
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 101 of 280
with a group such as an organisation or work group suggests that an employee is
likely to perceive that group more positively and therefore, form more favourable
evaluations of that group and associated activities. Van Dick, van Knippenberg,
Kerschreiter, Hertel, and Wieske (2008) tested the relationship of work group
identification and organisation identification to job satisfaction, exploring the
combined effect of both identification foci as well as comparing instances when only
one target was reported high. They argued that high levels of identification across
multiple work related group foci was likely to be associated with positive outcomes
such as job satisfaction. Results were consistent with their prediction, revealing that
the combination of high identification with both the work group and organisation
was a much better predictor of job satisfaction than when only one identification
foci was reported at high levels.
Indeed, job satisfaction was found to be unrelated to work group identification
when organisation identification was low. Furthermore, correlations in the van Dick
et al. (2008) study suggested that in their first study, work group identification
correlated with job satisfaction to a lesser extent than organisation identification (.34
and .43 respectively). In their second study, the emphasis was reversed with work
group identification demonstrating a higher correlation (.31 and .22 respectively).
Overall, the study by van Dick et al. indicates that work related identification is
associated with job satisfaction. However, the relationship does not appear to be
related to the level of abstraction of the target of identification as evident in the
contrast between correlations found in two studies by van Dick et al. Instead,
contextual differences may better explain variation in the findings of the two studies
featured in their research.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 102 of 280
Other studies have reported findings that also suggest the association between
identification and job satisfaction is shaped by context rather than the level of group
abstraction. Van Knippenberg and van Schie (2000) found that for a sample of local
government employees there was no significant difference between organisation
identification and work group identification in terms of predicting job satisfaction.
In the same study involving a sample of university employees, work group
identification was more strongly associated job satisfaction (t(151) = 3.39, p < .001).
The contrast between the groups in their study is consistent with the assertion that
context, more so than the degree of abstraction, determines how certain foci of
identification relate to hedonic well-being as represented by job satisfaction. In
addition, Harter et al. (2003) found a relationship between the level of success of a
work group and job satisfaction, with more successful work groups reporting greater
job satisfaction. These findings related to group success firmly implicate work
contexts in the relationship between identification and job satisfaction, and
therefore, hedonic well-being.
While work contexts may shape the relationship between identification and
hedonic well-being, identity saliency in typical work circumstances may favour
work groups over organisation identity in shaping hedonic well-being (Riketta &
van Dick, 2005). In relation to work contexts, the suggestion proposed here is that
work group identification may have a greater potential to provide a meaningful
interpretation of typical work contexts. Therefore, work group identification may be
superior to some extent compared to organisation identification in predicting job
satisfaction and hedonia in general. However, saliency is determined by context
(Randel, 2002) and it would be expected that circumstances may arise where
organisation identification is more frequently salient than work group identification.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 103 of 280
4.3. Exploring Two Model Variants of Workforce Flourishing
It would appear that identification in the workplace plays an important role in
driving workforce flourishing, for example, through opportunities for acquiring
social resources (Dutton et al., 2011). However, there are multiple group
memberships available within a work environment for employees to assent to and
apply in work situations (van Knippenberg & van Schie, 2000). These multiple
group targets differ by their capacity to facilitate the acquisition of social and
psychological resources in a given situation and can therefore, be distinguished by
the advantages they offer in enabling flourishing in those situations (Dutton et al.,
2010, 2011). Variation in the ability to facilitate flourishing may be done to the level
of abstraction in the case of social well-being, or due to context in terms of
psychological or hedonic well-being.
In this study, the relationship between work related identification and
workforce flourishing will be tested using two model variants. One model will
examine the relationship between work group identification and flourishing, and
another model will examine the relationship between organisation identification and
flourishing. Flourishing in both models will be represented by social, psychological,
and hedonic well-being. The following hypotheses are predicted;
Hypothesis 1: Work group and organisation identification will demonstrate a
positive relationship to workforce flourishing as represented by social,
psychological, and hedonic well-being.
Hypothesis 2: Compared to organisation identification, work group
identification will have a stronger association with workforce flourishing, manifest
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 104 of 280
predominantly through the association between work group identification and social
well-being.
4.3.1. A Sustainable Model of Workforce Flourishing through Employee Health
From a systems theory perspective, sustainability is closely linked to the
extent to which the activity of a system produces little waste or negative outcomes
(Scharmer & Kaufer, 2013). The less waste or negative outcomes, the more
sustainable the system is. Therefore, organisational activities that produce positive
outcomes rather than negative outcomes can be deemed more sustainable.
Flourishing, involving optimal functioning (Keyes, 2007) benefits employees by
promoting personal growth and self-actualisation (Ryan and Deci, 2001; Seligman,
2011), but also benefits the organisation through greater effectiveness (Dutton et al.,
2010; Keyes & Annas, 2009). Identification that leads to workforce flourishing
should also help facilitate better employee health (Keyes & Simoes, 2012; Ryff,
2013). The relationship between flourishing and better employee health is argued by
Ryff (2013) to occur through effective living practices involving the capacity to
cultivate successful and rewarding outcomes, in other words, positive functionality.
Bakker and Demerouti (2007, 2014) and Hobfoll (2001) argue that a
successful outcome in terms of meeting work demands is facilitated through
accumulated work resources. Keyes and Simoes (2012) found that when the three
components of flourishing were all in evidence (social, psychological, and hedonic),
flourishing demonstrated a positive relationship with lower mortality rates. Whereas,
when the three elements of flourishing were assessed independently, none of the
measures were separately predictive of mortality rates. Flourishing may therefore be
a resource for employee health. Given the earlier prediction (hypothesis 2) that work
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 105 of 280
group identification will have a more comprehensive, and therefore, stronger
relationship with workforce flourishing, a similar asymmetrical relationship with
employee health is likely when comparing the two flourishing model variants. The
following hypothesis is proposed;
Hypothesis 3: The model of workforce flourishing featuring work group
identification will have a stronger relationship with employee health than the variant
model featuring organisation identification.
A further aim will be to explore the underlying factorial composition of the
construct of work-force flourishing, specific to a work environment. Figure 4.2
shows the relationship between identification, workforce flourishing, and employee
health, and the manifest variables predicted to contribute to either workforce
flourishing or employee health. This model will be used to test the three hypotheses
argued in the first study of this thesis.
Figure 4.2. Full Model of Workforce Flourishing and Employee Health Predicted by Identification.
4.4. Method
4.4.1. Participants
Three hundred and sixty five questionnaires were provided to staff at a
municipal council in the outer suburbs of Melbourne, Australia. Of these, three were
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 106 of 280
provided via email and the remainder was handed out during team or management
meetings. In response, a total of 227 questionnaires were returned, 30 electronically
and 197 by mail or collection at the conclusion of team meetings, providing a
response rate of 61.7%. Three questionnaires were either blank or contained
insufficient data to be included in the analysis, giving a tally of 224 questionnaires.
A total of 153 respondents were female (68.3%) and 71 male (31.7%), with ages
ranging from 19 to 65 (M = 42.35, SD = 11.04). Number of children reported ranged
from 0 to 5 with 57.6% reporting having more than one child and 22.3% reporting
having more than two children. The average length of time with the organisation
was 7.92 years (SD = 7.30). Twenty five per cent were secondary school educated,
23.2% were educated to certificate level, 20.9% had done some university, 15.1%
had completed an undergraduate university course, 13.8% had completed a post
graduate university course, and 2.2% reported the category of other as their standard
of educational attainment.
4.4.2. Procedure and Design
The municipal council located in the eastern suburbs of Melbourne, Victoria,
was approached by mail and invited to participate in this study. The council agreed
to make their employees available through a series of team or management meetings
that are routinely conducted as normal business practice. To facilitate high response
rates and for participant’s convenience, a paper version and an electronic web based
version of the questionnaire were made available. Team leader meetings were small,
consisting of around 8-14 employees. At these meetings the research was introduced
and explained, and then employees were invited to voluntarily complete a
questionnaire either during the meeting or in their own time. Questionnaires
completed during meetings were collected at the end of the meeting. Questionnaire
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 107 of 280
completed at participant’s discretion were either posted back to the researcher or
sent to the researcher by email. Three participants were invited to complete a
questionnaire by email rather than at a team leader meeting due to the group’s small
size and infrequency of team meetings. All employees of the council were informed
that their participation was on a voluntary basis and that all responses were
confidential and only the analysed group results would be made available to the
council.
A cross sectional design was used in this study to assess the relationship
between work related identification, workforce flourishing, and employee health.
The dependent variables were workforce flourishing and employee health. Two
work related foci of identification formed the bases for the model variants of
workforce flourishing; one variant featuring work group identification, the other
featuring organisation identification. The construct of workforce flourishing was
composed of measurement items derived from scales that correspond to the three
components of flourishing; social, psychological, and hedonic well-being. Social
well-being was represented by items of organisational citizenship behaviour,
psychological well-being was represented by items from a measure of work
commitment, and hedonic well-being was represented by items belonging to a
measure of job satisfaction. Employee health was assessed using measures of
psychological health (e.g., anxiety and perceived stress), emotional health
(emotional dissonance), and physical health (somatic symptoms). The independent
variable was work identification as indicative of a sense of belonging to important
work related social groups, which included items measuring organisation
identification and work group identification. Ethics approval was granted to proceed
with this study.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 108 of 280
4.4.3. Questionnaire
Workforce Flourishing Measures
Hedonic well-being - Job satisfaction: Warr, Cook, and Wall’s (1979) 15 item
global job satisfaction scale formed the starting point towards deriving a measure of
hedonic well-being. The process to establish a set of items to represent each of the
three components of flourishing was the same in each instance. First, the scale was
assessed, and items selected based on face validity relative to construct being
explored, in this instance, hedonic well-being. Secondly, the selected items then
underwent reliability analysis to assess the contributions and cohesiveness of the
group of items. Selection, based on the reliability analysis followed Blunch’s (2013)
recommendations for such procedures in which the amount of variance represented
and vicinity of the mean to the mid-point in the scale range were used as criteria.
Items with larger variance and means close to the scale range midpoint were
selected. The rational provided by Blunch was that items with these statistical
properties contained more information (variance) by which relationships with other
variables can be assessed. Finally, Cronbach’s alpha was considered in order to
remove any remaining anomalous items.
Based on the above procedure, items 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 11, and 12 were selected
based on face value to represent hedonic well-being. Items 1, 2, 6, 8, and 14 were
removed because they displayed lower standard deviations than the remaining items.
The remaining items 4, 10, 11, and 12 provided a parsimonious measure of hedonic
well-being. Items were answered using a 7 point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not
satisfied) to 6 (completely satisfied). The four items used are listed below and for
each item, participants were asked to rate how satisfied they were with certain
aspects of their work. Cronbach’s alpha for items used in this study was .88. Mean
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 109 of 280
scores were used to represent each subscale. The items representing hedonic well-
being were linked by common inference to the value, or satisfaction with
organisational or management responses to activities that arguably promote
effectiveness in the organisation. This interpretation is consistent with the
description of hedonic well-being in relation to flourishing (e.g., Keyes & Simoes,
2012; Ryff & Keyes, 1995)
The recognition you get for good work (item 4).
Your chance of promotion (item 10).
The way your firm is managed (item 11).
The attention paid to suggestions you make (item 12).
Psychological well-being - Organisational commitment: Allen and Meyer’s
(1990) sub-scale for affective commitment provided the set of items from which a
measure of psychological well-being was obtained. The process used to derive a
measure of psychological well-being was the same used for hedonic well-being
described above. Inspection of the items for face validity in relation to psychological
well-being (i.e., related to psychological functioning) revealed a number of items
that have considerable similarity to the concept of identification and therefore these
items were removed. Items 1, 2, 7, and 4 (reversed) remained. After assessing item
variance, means, and reliability statistics item 4 was subsequently removed due to
poor loading. The three items used in this study to represent psychological well-
being are listed below. Items were measured on a seven point Likert scale ranging
from 1 = do not agree to 7 = strongly agree. Cronbach’s alpha for the three items
was .75. Summed and averaged scores were used to represent psychological well-
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 110 of 280
being. The three items used in this study are consistent with aspects reported to
associate with positive psychological functioning, namely; meaning, commitment,
and autonomy (see, Keyes, 2007; Ryff, 2013; Seligman, 2011).
I would be very happy to spend the rest of my career with this organisation (item 1 – commitment).
I enjoy discussing my organisation with people outside it (item 2 –autonomy).
This organisation has a great deal of personal meaning for me (item 7 –meaning).
Social well-being - Organisational citizenship behaviour (OCB): Smith,
Organ, and Near’s (1983) sub-scale of altruistic work behaviours formed the initial
item pool from which a measure of social well-being was obtained. The procedure
described earlier for selecting items used for hedonic and psychological well-being
was used once more. Based on face validity representing positive social interaction,
or social well-being, items 1, 3, 5, 7, and 13 were selected for further examination.
All remaining items had similar variance and means, however reliability analysis
showed that the removal of item 5 would improve Cronbach’s alpha and it was also
considered, on second inspection, that the item was somewhat ambiguously stated.
Item 5 was therefore removed. Items representing social well-being in this study are
listed below. Respondents were asked to think of an employee who worked or had
worked with them and to rate how characteristic each item was of that employee.
Scores are based on a 5 point Likert scale ranging from 1 = not characteristic to 5 =
totally characteristic. Cronbach’s alpha in the current study was .82. Items were
summed and averaged as a measure of social well-being, with each item sharing a
common theme of positive social functioning.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 111 of 280
Help others who have been absent (item 1).
Volunteers for things that are not required (item 3).
Helps others who have heavy workloads (item 7).
Makes innovative suggestions to improve department (item 13).
Employee Health Measures
Psychological Health: The Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen & Williamson,
1988) consisting of 14 items (e.g., “Felt nervous and stressed”) was used to
represent psychological health. Items were answered using a five-point Likert scale
ranging from 0 = never to 4 = always. Higher scores indicate a greater level of
psychological distress. All 14 items were assessed for factor contribution and only
those with high loading were used. Item 12 had a mean that was substantially higher
than other items, and item 4 negatively correlated with the scale (after being
reversed scored), therefore these two items were removed. To achieve a
parsimonious scale representing psychological health, the better loading items were
then selected. Six items from the original scale were used in the present study to
measure psychological health (items 1, 2, 3, 8, 11, and 14). Cronbach’s alpha was
.82 for the six items in the present study. Items were summed and averaged to
provide a single score measure of psychological health (employee stress).
Emotional health (emotional dissonance): Brotheridge and Lee’s (2003)
surface acting sub-scale from the Emotional Labour Scale (ELS) was used in the
present study to assess emotional health. The surface acting sub scale contains three
items and is indicative of emotional dissonance. Item examples include “how often
do you hide your true feeling about a situation” and “how often do you pretend to
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 112 of 280
have emotions that you don’t really have”. Items in the surface acting sub-scale were
scored on a 5-point Likert scale with the following anchors: never (1), rarely (2),
sometimes (3), often (4), and always (5). In the present study, Cronbach’s alpha was
.79 for the emotional dissonance subscale. Items were summed and averaged to
obtain a single score representing emotional health.
Physical health (somatic symptoms): The somatic health sub-scale of the
General Health Questionnaire – 28 (Goldberg & Hillier, 1979) was used to assess
physical health. Examples of questions include “been feeling run down and out of
sorts” and “felt that you are ill”. Items were answered using a four point Likert scale
ranging from 0 = better than usual to 3 = much worse than usual. High scores are
indicative of more symptoms and therefore, poorer physical health. Inspection of
item variance, means, and reliability statistics resulted in the removal of items 4, 6,
and 7. The reaming items (1, 2, 3, and 5) were used in this study to assess physical
health. Cronbach’s alpha was .78 for the four items. Items were summed and
averaged to obtain a single score for physical health.
Work identification
Two foci of identification were measured using Tropp and Wright’s (2001)
inclusion of in-group in the self (IIS) measure. The inclusion of in-group in self is
argued to represent norm, value, and goal congruency (Turner et al., 1987). The
scale features Venn diagrams to represent the level of identification with the
nominated group and responses were scored on a Likert response range from 0 = low
identification to 6 = high identification. As with Venn diagrams, the degree of
overlap between each pair of circles represents the extent to which an individual
(represented by one of the circles) perceive themselves as belonging to a group
(represented by the other circle). The more overlap the greater the level of
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 113 of 280
identification or sense of belonging is represented. The scale can be examined by
referring to the reproduced questionnaire in Appendix A. Respondents were asked to
indicate the pair of circles that “you feel best represents your own level of
identification with your group”. Because the IIS is a one item measure, internal
consistency could not be obtained, however, previous test-retest reliability measures
by Tropp and Wright over a period of one to three weeks revealed r (143) = .76, p<
.001. Other test-retest reliabilities for this measure ranged from .73 to .80 (Shamir &
Kark, 2004; Tropp & Wright, 2001). Higher scores indicated greater levels of
identification and incorporation of group characteristics (e.g., norms, values, and
goals) into one’s self-concept. The two targets of identification measured for this
study and forming the basis of the two model variants were organisation and work
group identification.
4.4.4. Data Preparation
Questionnaire data were screened using SPSS (v21.0) statistical software. A
small number of randomly distributed missing data were detected for some
questionnaire items. High instances of missing data related to demographic items
were for age (2.7% missing), years in role (2.7% missing), and number of children
(2.2% missing). Highest instances of missing data for model scale items were for
item three for the organisational citizenship behaviour (1.3%), and item 10 for the
job satisfaction scale (1.3% missing). These instances of missing data were
randomly distributed and of sufficiently low frequency to conclude there was little
likelihood of underlying problems arising from the missing data. Missing data that
were randomly distributed were replaced using the regression replacement technique
in SPSS.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 114 of 280
Univariate outliers were found for the number of hours worked, the number of
years in role, and the number of years at organisation. In all instances the number of
outliers was small and adjustments were made to these scores, modifying them to
three standard deviations from the mean of the respective measures. Skewness was
checked for each scale total, and two scales were found to exceed skewness ratio
criteria of seven. These scales were years in role and years in organisation. For years
in role and years in the organisation the skewed distributions were presumed to
reflect naturally occurring characteristics for the measure, and because they were
distinctly included for demographic profiling and were not central to the analysis,
these measures were not altered.
4.4.5. Analysis
The practical consequences of the model of workforce flourishing and
employee health, contrasted by either work group identification or organisation
identification as model variants is a priority for the analysis undertaken here. Testing
the factorial structures featured in the model of workforce flourishing preceded
hypothesis testing as the model and constructs featured in the model have been
theoretically rather than empirically derived. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of
the theoretical constructs (latent variables) of workforce flourishing and employee
health was undertaken to confirm the structure of each set of variables contributing
to their respective latent structures. The structural model of workforce flourishing
and employee health was then tested and the model variants compared using the data
set for this study. For both the factor analyses and model testing, structural equation
modelling with AMOS (v21.0) was used to determine the factorial fit and model fit
respectively. Parameter estimation in the structural equation modelling analysis was
based on maximum likelihood for both factor analyses and structural model testing.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 115 of 280
4.5. Results
4.5.1. Factor Analysis: Latent Construct of Workforce Flourishing
Measures contributing to the latent construct of workforce flourishing were
derived from a process of matching theoretical propositions to item content to arrive
at scales representing social, psychological, and hedonic well-being. The sets of
items representing each of the three components of workforce flourishing were then
assessed for the amount of variance, distribution around the scale midpoint, and item
and scale reliability. Items remaining from this process formed measures for social,
psychological, and hedonic well-being that combined, represented the latent factor
of workforce flourishing. To assess the contributions of the three scales to workforce
flourishing, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed (see Figure 4.3).
2 (41) = 56.25, p <
.057 (see table 4.1), with eigenvalues confirming a three factor solution to the data.
Inspection of standardised residual co-variances and modification indices did not
reveal aspects of the model that would improve data fit beyond marginal gain.
Table 4.1.
Factor Analysis Fit Indices for Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) of the Latent Factor of Workforce Flourishing.
df RMSEA RFI CFI TLI GFI NFI
56.248 41 1.372 .041 .933 .986 .981 .958 .950
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 116 of 280
Figure 4.3. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) of the Latent Construct of Workforce Flourishing.
4.5.2. Factor Analysis: Latent Construct of Employee Health
Measures theoretically consistent with the three health domains of
psychological, physical, and emotional health were used to form the latent factor of
employee health. Items representing each of the three measured health domains were
first subjected to an evaluation of the amount of variance, central tendency with
scale midpoint, and item and scale reliability. Items meeting these criteria formed
the measures of psychological, physical, and emotional health. A confirmatory
factor analysis (CFA) was performed for employee health. Table 4.2 summarises the
factor model fit indices for the initial factor model and each major re-specification
point.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 117 of 280
The items tested in the initial factorial model indicated the model was not a
2 (62) = 125.215, p < .000. Inspection of modification indices
revealed that items 11 and 14 for psychological health (stress) were cross loading
with emotional health (emotional dissonance). These items were removed
sequentially beginning with item 11, retesting the model after each item was
removed. After the items had been removed, standardised residual co-variances
revealed that item 2 of the general health questionnaire, an item referring to the need
for a ‘good tonic’ was sharing a large amount of variance with item two for
emotional health (emotional dissonance). On face value this item appeared to be out
dated and potentially ambiguous. The decision was made to remove this item and
the factor model was re-run. Results indicated that the data fit the re-specified model
well (see Table 4.3.). Figure 4.4 shows the correlations and item loadings for the
factorial model in step three of re-specification.
Comparison of the re-specified models at step two and step 3 indicated that the
later factor model was not statistically superior with improvement below
2 (9) = 14.641. However, the model in step 3 is a more
parsimonious factor solution than the model at step 2 and was therefore retained and
incorporated into the structural model in order to contrast and compare model
variants featuring work group and organisation identification’s relationship with
workforce flourishing and employee health.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 118 of 280
Table 4.2.
Confirmatory Factor Analysis Fit Indices for Employee Health, Including Model Re-specification.
Model 2 df 2/df RMSEA RFI CFI TLI GFI NFI
Initial 125.215 62 2.020 .068 .857 .938 .922 .938 .886
Step 2 (psych health items removed) 50.164 41 1.224 .032 .922 .989 .985 .962 .942
Step 3 (final model –GHQ item removed) 35.523 32 1.110 .022 .934 .995 .993 .971 .953
Figure 4.4. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) of the Latent Construct of Employee Health.
4.5.3. Structural Model Analysis: Model Variants of Workforce Flourishing
The principle purpose of the structural model analysis was to run the model
depicted in figure 4.1 for each variant of the model based on respective predictor
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 119 of 280
variables, either work group or organisation identification. The two model variants
were then compared regarding their contribution to workforce flourishing and
employee health. First, the model variant predicted by work group identification and
represented in Figure 4.5 was run using AMOS (v21.0). Results indicated the model
2 (13) = 13.435, p < .415, and fit indices supported a good
fitting model (see table 4.3).
Table 4.3.
Fit Indices for Workforce Flourishing and Employee Health Predicted by Work Group Identification.
2 df 2/df RMSEA RFI CFI TLI GFI NFI
13.435 13 1.033 .012 .937 .999 .998 .993 .961
Figure 4.5. Structural Model Relationships for Workforce Flourishing and Employee Health as Predicted by Work Group Identification.
The model of workforce flourishing predicted by work group identification
explained 43% of the variance in flourishing and 21% of the variance in employee
health. Work gr
Correlations for the work group identification variant model of flourishing are
presented in table 4.4.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 120 of 280
Table 4.4.
Correlations, Means, Standard Deviations, and Alphas for the Model of Workforce Flourishing Predicted by Work Group Identification.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 91. WG Identification 1
2. Workforce Flourishing .659 1
3. Employee Health .304 .461 1
4. Psychological Well-Being .432 .656 .302 1
5. Social Well-Being .331 .502 .232 .330 1
6. Hedonic Well-Being .525 .797 .367 .523 .400 1
7. Psychological Health .222 .337 .731 .221 .169 .268 1
8. Physical Health .212 .322 .698 .211 .162 .256 .510 1
9. Emotional Health .144 .219 .474 .143 .110 .174 .346 .331 1
M 4.22 3.11 2.49 3.49 1.67 1.02 1.57
SD 1.14 1.40 0.84 1.56 0.74 0.66 0.75
.75 .82 .88 .82 .78 .79
Next, the model variant featuring organisation identification predicting
workforce flourishing and employee health was tested (see Figure 4.6). Results
2 (13) = 45.177, p < .000, and only the
GFI (.944) of the fit indices showed modest fit of the data (see Table 4.5). Inspection
of the standardised residual co-variances indicated that social well-being and
hedonic well-being were sharing high levels of variance as was hedonic well-being
with emotional dissonance.
Table 4.5.
Fit Indices for Workforce Flourishing and Employee Health Predicted by Organisation Identification (theorised model).
2 df 2/df RMSEA RFI CFI TLI GFI NFI
45.177 13 3.475 .105 .815 .914 .861 .944 .885
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 121 of 280
Figure 4.6. Structural Model Relationships for Workforce Flourishing and Employee Health as Predicted by Organisation Identification (theorised model).
In response to the standardised residual covariance figures, hedonic well-being
was loaded onto the latent variable of employee health as well as workforce
flourishing. The model was re-tested. Modification indices for the model re-test
revealed that the model fit would improve if the parameter between social well-
being and hedonic well-being was included in the model. In other words, hedonic
well-being as a partial or full mediator of the relationship between the manifest
social well-being and the latent workforce flourishing would improve model fit.
Changes were made incrementally and data assessed before implementing each
change. After the two changes were made, the path from social well-being to
workforce flourishing was no longer significant and was therefore removed. This
additional change meant that the impact of social wellbeing was fully mediated by
hedonic well-being. The results for the respecified model indicated good fit to the
2 (12) = 16.158, p < .184, with other fit indices supporting the good fit of the
model (see table 4.6). Figure 4.7 shows the final model for workforce flourishing
predicted by organisation identification featuring correlations and explained
variance of latent variables.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 122 of 280
Table 4.6.
Fit Indices for Workforce Flourishing and Employee Health Predicted by Organisation Identification (re-specified).
2 df 2/df RMSEA RFI CFI TLI GFI NFI
16.158 12 1.347 .039 .928 .989 .981 .980 .959
Figure 4.7. Structural Model Relationships for Workforce Flourishing and Employee Health as Predicted by Organisation Identification (re-specified model).
The model of workforce flourishing predicted by organisation identification
explained 61% of the variance in flourishing2 and 12% of the variance in employee
Correlations are presented in table 4.7.
2 The latent construct of workforce flourishing was altered to enable model fit and therefore, represents a derivative of the construct and not the theorised construct per se.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 123 of 280
Table 4.7.
Correlations, Means, Standard Deviations, and Alphas for the Model of Workforce Flourishing Predicted by Organisation Identification.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 91. Org Identification 1
2. Workforce Flourishing .783 1
3. Employee Health .275 .351 1
4. Psychological Well-Being .648 .827 .290 1
5. Social Well-Being .211 .269 .169 .223 1
6. Hedonic Well-Being .478 .611 .382 .505 .441 1
7. Psychological Health .201 .257 .733 .213 .124 .280 1
8. Physical Health .191 .244 .695 .202 .117 .266 .509 1
9. Emotional Health .131 .167 .476 .138 .080 .182 .349 .331 1
M 3.57 3.11 2.49 3.49 1.67 1.02 1.57
SD 1.19 1.40 0.84 1.56 0.74 0.66 0.75
.75 .82 .88 .82 .78 .79
4.6. Discussion
The hypothesis that work group and organisational identification would
demonstrate a positive relationship to workforce flourishing was supported with
some qualification needed. In the model of workforce flourishing predicted by
organisation identification, social well-being loaded onto hedonic well-being rather
than directly onto the latent construct of workforce flourishing, thereby departing
from the theorised structure. Consequently, the hypothesis that work group
identification would have a stronger association with workforce flourishing than
organisation identification was also supported. The third hypothesis that work group
identification would have a stronger association with employee health than
organisation identification was also supported by the data. Identification with groups
within the workplace had an important role in enabling optimal functioning via
workforce flourishing, quite possibly made sustainable by the positive effect on
employee health that accompanies workforce flourishing.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 124 of 280
Comparing the two model variants of workforce flourishing, work group
identification showed distinct advantages over organisation identification in relation
to flourishing and employee health. For work group identification, the factorial
structure for flourishing proposed by Keyes and adopted by Dutton (Dutton et al.,
2011; Fredrickson & Dutton, 2008; Keyes, 2007; Keyes & Annas, 2009) that
included social, psychological, and hedonic well-being was consistent with the data.
The three components of workforce flourishing combined explained 17% of the
variance in employee health in relation to work group identification. This compares
to the model variant featuring organisation identification which did not demonstrate
the same three component structure for flourishing, and also explained a smaller
amount of variance in employee health (12%). The principal difference between
these model variants of workforce flourishing appears to be the relationship of social
well-being with flourishing. In the organisation identification variant of the model,
social well-being did not directly load onto the latent construct of workforce
flourishing. Instead, social well-being loaded onto hedonic well-being that, in turn,
contributed to both the latent constructs of flourishing and employee health directly.
The capacity of work group identification rather than organisation identification to
promote social well-being directly may be an inherent quality linked to the level of
group abstraction and having balance between group membership and individual
needs (Brewer, 1991, 2008, 2009).
According to Turner et al. (1987), group abstraction is associated with the
process of self-categorisation and refers to perceptions of inclusiveness. The higher
the level of group abstraction, the less concrete the group entity is and the more
diffused the sense of inclusiveness is likely to be. Larger, more abstract groups make
it more difficult to acquire social resources (Brewer, 1991). One explanation for this
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 125 of 280
difficulty is that the personal connections necessary to gather social resources such
as support, information exchange, and recognition are favoured when the group is
tangible rather than notional (van Knippenberg & van Schie, 2000). This line of
argument is consistent with the findings of this study. Work group identification
directly explained social well-being represented by pro-social citizenship
behaviours, whereas organisation identification did not directly explain social well-
being. One of the more prominent distinctions between work group and organisation
identification is the level of close interactions. While organisation identification may
entail a clearly defined and salient set of behaviours, values, and goals, pivotal in the
identification processes (Turner et al., 1987), the degree of social interaction capable
of fostering optimal functioning and flourishing is likely lower compared to work
group identification. Indeed, positive interpersonal interactions, most likely at the
level of work group, would seem vitally important for organisational effectiveness,
and therefore flourishing.
The findings from this study not only indicate the value of work group
identification in terms of effectiveness through flourishing, they also suggest work
group identification enhances sustainable practice through furthering employee
health. Although the amount of variance explained for employee health appeared to
be small (17% and 12%), the health of employees is both highly desirable and potent
in terms of organisation effectiveness. Organisations with an option to advance the
health of their workforce by a margin of 12-17% would hardly reject such outcomes,
particularly when the benefit is facilitated through a more effective workforce via
flourishing. An improvement in employee health is likely to have direct benefits to
an organisation in terms of a reduction in absenteeism brought about by illness and
also provide gains in productivity due to benefits related to physical and mental
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 126 of 280
capacities (Sparks, Faragher, & Cooper, 2001). As is the case for workforce
flourishing, work group identification appears to contribute more to employee health
than organisation identification, nevertheless, both of these identification targets are
supportive of sustainable approaches to organisation effectiveness.
Ryff (2013) suggested that flourishing generates better, more successful
outcomes compared to circumstances in which flourishing is absent. Ryff goes on to
claim that positive outcomes related to flourishing are, in turn, likely to contribute to
better health. This study assessed two variants of a model of flourishing and the
results are consistent with Ryff’s assertion. Flourishing, as determined by job
satisfaction (hedonic well-being), organisational commitment (psychological well-
being), and citizenship behaviours (social well-being), are all indicative of positive
work related outcomes that associate with better employee health according to the
findings of the current study. Functionality, in terms of flourishing, represented by
the well-being dimensions featured in this study, would seem to benefit
organisations directly through effective work behaviours and attitudes, as well as
indirectly through better employee health. Identification is a key component in
determining positive functioning in terms of flourishing in the workforce and
therefore, implores consideration for organisations wishing to address effectiveness
in a sustainable manner.
Furthermore, consistent with Keyes and Simoes (2012), the combination of
hedonic, psychological, and social well-being in this study was associated with
better health outcomes than compared to the organisational identification model
variant in which the three sources of well-being did not interact together. The
implication for organisational practice is that identification in the workplace
provides an effective means by which functioning in a workforce is positively
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 127 of 280
promoted through flourishing. Furthermore, the benefits of identification in the
workplace are sustainable because they profit employee health as a consequence of
the functionality inherent in a flourishing workforce. This suggests that
organisational initiatives that promote identification may have tremendous value to
organisations. However, before further consideration of the consequences of these
findings towards identification are considered, the theoretical implications of the
findings will be discussed.
4.6.1. Theoretical Implication for Identification, Flourishing, and Health
The relationship of different identity targets in the workplace to workforce
flourishing had not been investigated prior to this study. Brewer’s (1991, 2009)
optimal distinctiveness theory predicted that groups that best support competing
needs for individuality and belonging would enable members of that group to
function more effectively through the accumulation of personal and social resources.
The results of this study are consistent with Brewer’s theory and related assertions.
Work group identification, inclusive of more personal, interactive work activity,
demonstrated a greater capacity to produce favourable outcomes in the form of
flourishing and employee health. In response to van Knippenberg and van Schie
(2000) speculation as to which identities hold importance over others, the results of
this study would suggest that the work group is more influential in terms of
flourishing and employee health. However, both work group identification and
organisation identification demonstrated positive contributions to workforce
flourishing and employee health.
In the current study, work group identification had an association with all three
well-being dimensions of flourishing, adding further support for Brewer’s (1991,
2009) theory. Work groups, compared to the organisation as an identification target,
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 128 of 280
facilitate interpersonal interactions more often in line with arguments related to the
inherent level of abstraction of each identity (Brewer, 2009), and also the greater
frequency with which work groups are contextually relevant in the workplace (van
Knippenberg & van Schie, 2000). Both organisation and work group identification
were able to directly explain hedonic and psychological well-being. However the
third dimension of flourishing, social well-being, was directly related to flourishing
when predicted by work group identification, but not when predicted by organisation
identification.
The interpersonal capacity of work group identification appears to help
facilitate greater workforce flourishing and employee health compared to
organisation identification. In Brewer’s (1991, 2009) optimal distinctiveness theory,
the claim is made that some groups have a greater capacity to enable positive
outcomes and this seems to appropriate to apply to flourishing workforces.
Consistent with the claims made by Brewer (2009), Bakker et al. (2011), and Bakker
and Demeriouti (2008), stating that work group identification has a greater capacity
than organisational identification to build important social resources that enable
positive outcomes such as employee health to emerge. A healthier, better
functioning workforce is a highly sought after outcome for organisations.
Organisational strategies aimed at improving effectiveness in a sustainable manner
would benefit through attention to identification of their employees, and in
particular, identification with small interactive groups such as the work group. When
activity within the work group encourages identification with the group, employees
are more likely to function optimally (flourish) and be more healthy.
The results of the current study are also informative in terms of theory related
to both flourishing and health. For instance, Keyes’ (2007) and Keyes and Annas’
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 129 of 280
(2009) tri-dimensional construct of flourishing consisting of hedonic, psychological,
and social well-being was supported by the results of the current study. When all
three aspects of well-being were represented in workforce flourishing, the outcomes
in terms of employee health were of a greater magnitude, compared to the
organisation identification model variant. In the organisation identification variant of
the model, only hedonic and psychological well-being directly loaded onto
workforce flourishing. All three dimensions of flourishing appear to offer a unique
contribution to the construct of flourishing that suggests greater potential for
explanatory capacity, contrasted with previous research that predominantly focussed
on hedonic or satisfaction approaches to well-being (see Keyes et al., 2002; Ryan &
Deci, 2001; Waterman, 2008).
An example of a hedonic approach is the happy-productive worker thesis that
arose from the Hawthorn study (Roethlisberger & Dickson, 1939) and has been
revisited by Thomas Wright, Russell Cropanzano, and colleagues in recent times
(e.g., Wright & Cropanzano, 1997; Cropanzano & Wright, 1999; Wright,
Cropanzano, Dennly, & Moline, 2002). The happy-productive worker thesis initially
drew attention to satisfaction and hedonic well-being as a factor linked to effective
and productive employees. Wright, Cropanzano, and colleagues questioned the link
to satisfaction per se, suggesting that functionality and construct specificity for
satisfaction may be more related to effective and productive work outcomes. The
approach used here and the accompanying findings are consistent with this assertion.
Two forms of functionality, psychological and social well-being, were
incorporated in this study as well as the inclusion of hedonia, with measurement of
the functional well-being constructs aligned specifically to the work context. Studies
that seek to explore the role of well-being in the workplace, especially in terms of
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 130 of 280
organisational effectiveness, would be more capable of yielding information when
using a broader conceptualisation of well-being such as the use of flourishing
adopted in this study. The functional elements of psychological and social well-
being are argued here to add additional explanatory capacity above that of hedonic
approaches alone. Future studies may also reveal whether a synergistic effect occurs
when hedonic, psychological, and social well-being are present in unison (see Keyes
& Simoes, 2012), in contrast to an additive association between these dimensions of
well-being and flourishing, as this was not within the scope of this thesis.
Keyes and Simoes (2012) and Ryff (2013) theorised that flourishing, by way
of enhanced functional capacity, should give rise to better health. The results of this
study are consistent with such a relationship. Functioning well in a workplace would
logically increase the frequency and magnitude of benefit such as the health of
employees, but also other benefits related to organisational effectiveness through
improved functioning. Functional well-being enables resources to be gained (Bakker
& Demerouti, 2008; Dutton et al., 2011) that Hobfoll’s (1989, 2001) COR theory
predicts should result in better health. Furthermore, resource gains are likely to
facilitate further resource gains that are hallmarks of a sustainable cycle or upward
spiral (Bakker & Demerouti, 2014; Hobfoll, 2011; Salanova et al., 2010).
The current findings are consistent with the premise that flourishing results in
better health and that it is likely that social resources are involved in this positive
relationship. The contrast between work group and organisational identification in
predicting flourishing and health in the current study was associated with differences
between model variants that involved the relationship with social well-being. Work
group identification demonstrated a more direct association with social well-being
than organisation identification. As such, the dynamics of work group identification
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 131 of 280
involving social resource gains offers a salient explanation that accounts for the
greater amount of variance in employee health found in the work group
identification model variant. Workforce flourishing and employee health are best
promoted through small group identification such as identification with a work
group as there is a greater likelihood of a more direct relationship with social
functioning and well-being.
4.6.2. Study Limitations
Some limitations can be identified in this study that should be considered in
relation to the current findings. The measures used to represent the construct of
flourishing were derived from scales that were designed for purposes other than their
use in this study. Items were selected based on face validity according to their
relevance to flourishing as a first step, then statistically assessed for their
contribution and formation of scales fit for the purpose of this study. As a
consequence, there is a possibility of some imprecision inherent in the measures as
representative of existing theory. However, there were two reasons to proceed with
the adaption of existing measures to the construct of flourishing. Firstly, the items
and scales used were consistent with the three dimensional structure of workforce
flourishing described in this thesis. These items also referred directly to work
contexts providing important and necessary specificity to enable an examination of
flourishing within organisation contexts. Secondly, there was not the scope within
this thesis to design a unique measure, as doing so would have impacted on the
ability to meet the principle aim of investigating sustainable relationships between
organisation’s and their employees that enhance effectiveness and employee health.
However, it is certainly acknowledged, particularly in light of the findings of this
first study, that development of a context specific measure of flourishing that refines
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 132 of 280
and expands on the three well-being dimensions is decidedly warranted beyond this
thesis. Until this study, the adoption of a context specific approach to the
measurement of flourishing had not been undertaken. The results of this study
should encourage future research to adopt a similar approach to advance
understanding of how flourishing may benefit organisations and employees alike.
Further limitations relate to the size of the sample in this study. Although the
sample size was sufficient for the number of parameters estimated in the structural
equation model, a larger sample size offers greater confidence in the statistical
relationships shown in the analysis. Another limitation related to the sample is that
the findings relate to one organisation only and therefore, may be unique to the
particular set of circumstances related to that organisation and the accompanying
data set. The issue of generalisability will be addressed later in the thesis to some
extent when the relationship between identification, flourishing, and health is tested
again using a different organisation from a different sector. Future studies that
examine these same constructs using different types of organisations will also help
to answer questions of generalisability of the relationships found in this research.
4.7. Conclusion
This study sought to explore the relationship between identification and
workforce flourishing, while also assessing issues of sustainability through the
potential benefit to employee health. The findings of the current study clearly
demonstrate that employee identification within the work context has an effect on
functioning through workforce flourishing, and that the relationship is made more
sustainable because it also has a positive effect on employee health. The relationship
of identification to workforce flourishing and employee health was found most
prominently in relation to work group identification compared to organisational
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 133 of 280
identification. Clearly, different targets of identification in the workplace hold
different relationships with flourishing and health, although strong identification in
general seems to positively contribute to both of these important outcomes.
Therefore, for organisations wishing to become more effective in terms of
functioning through a flourishing workforce, and to sustain such benefit by
simultaneously contributing to employee health, research should turn towards the
circumstances in which positive identification is nurtured. For this purpose, the next
study in this thesis focused attention on the antecedents that are likely to promote
positive and strong identification with an organisation or work group. After this
relationship was explored, the thesis returned attention to workforce flourishing and
explored how the antecedents of identification contribute to flourishing via work
related identification in subsequent chapters.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 134 of 280
Chapter 5Study Two: Employee Engagement and the Construct of Engagement Climate
The previous chapter found that identification at work is associated with
workforce flourishing and employee health. The findings of that study demonstrated
that two different targets of identification each made unique contributions to
workforce flourishing and employee health, although in general the two targets
made strong contributions to these outcomes. The suggestion put forth in relation to
these findings was that the circumstances in which identification can be fostered
within an organisation is an important field of inquiry to better understand how
workforce flourishing and employee health might be promoted. Therefore, before
continuing the exploration of workforce flourishing, this chapter will examine in
more detail employees relationship with their work.
Social identification research has provided insights into the mechanisms that
promote identification; however, much of this research has adopted the paradigm of
inter-group conflict and competition as the primary mechanism for strengthening
identification (e.g., Haslam et al., 1996; Randel, 2002). This emphasis has been
largely driven by the theoretical understanding of categorisation that suggests targets
of identification becomes salient when similarities of in-group members and
differences with out-group members are highlighted in a given context (Haslam,
2014; Turner et al., 1987; Oakes, Turner, & Haslam, 1991). The process of
categorisation may also evoke an exaggeration of similarities and differences to
strengthen identification with a valued group (Hogg & Terry, 2000). While not all
social identification research has focussed on intergroup conflict and competition as
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 135 of 280
the main mechanism to increase identification (e.g. Haslam et al., 2003), research
into engagement has provided a more positive insight into circumstances that
connect people to their work (e.g. Bakker, Albrecht, & Leiter, 2011). Therefore, this
chapter will explore the circumstances that are likely to promote identification in a
positive manner by drawing on research in the field of engagement. A brief review
of the literature addressing engagement and the characteristics of the work climate
that promote engagement follows. The propositions to emerge from this review in
relation to how the work climate effects engagement will be assessed qualitatively to
confirm which characteristics or constructs might have the potential to increase
identification. Following this, a factorial and validity assessment of these constructs
will be undertaken so that a measure of the climate for engagement can be tested in
relation to identification, workforce flourishing, and employee health later in this
thesis.
5.1. Employee Engagement
Kahn (1990) was among the first to use the term employee engagement,
defining it as the harnessing of employee’s selves to their work roles. Schaufeli and
Bakker (2004) defined engagement as a positive, fulfilling, work related state of
mind that is characterised by vigour, dedication, and absorption. Macey and
Schneider (2008) described engagement as a positive relationship with one’s work
where one has a sense of meaning, competence, and impact from one’s work. There
is a consistent theme among these descriptions of engagement in that like
identification, there are physical, cognitive, and emotional dimensions to
engagement. Kahn’s (1990) physical properties of engagement are in keeping with
descriptions of vigor and impact. Vigor is indicative of energy for work (Bakker et
al., 2007). Cognitive aspects of engagement also fit with absorption and meaning.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 136 of 280
Emotional properties of engagement are aligned with dedication and a sense of
competence. In addition, the behaviour, emotions, and thoughts associated with
engagement also help to determine an employee’s relationship to their work and
others in an organisation (Ashforth et al., 2008; Bakker et al., 2007). The physical,
cognitive, and emotional properties, that are the basis on which people relate more
closely to their work, are important to engagement, as they are to identification.
Therefore, in keeping with Kahn, employee engagement is defined here as the
harnessing of employees’ selves to their work roles so that the actions, emotions,
and thoughts of employees contribute to their relationship with work and also the
between the employee and their organisation and their colleagues. In this regard,
engagement not only has physical, cognitive, and emotional domains, it is also
largely social in nature.
Researchers Howe (2003), Luthans and Peterson (2001), Harter, Schmidt, and
Hayes (2002), Crabtree (2005), and Gubman (2004) have expressed employee
engagement as an employee’s connection or involvement with their work. However,
their descriptions of engagement offered in these studies do not move beyond the
tautological description of what it is to be engaged in one’s work. For example,
Howe (2003) suggested that engaged employees will say more positive things about
their work, are more likely to stay with their organisation, and are likely to strive for
organisation success. There is a lack of insight into what the seeds of engagement
might entail; rather, most studies only address what it is to be engaged
Instead, recent theoretical development in relation to employee engagement,
that closely link engagement to the accumulation of resources (Alarcon & Lyons,
2011; Bakker & Demerouti, 2007, 2014; Salanova et al., 2010), may have something
to offer in terms of antecedents of engagement. For instance, Hobfoll (2001, 2011)
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 137 of 280
suggested that the resources that support engagement are linked to positive work
ecologies or environments. Specifically, Salanova et al. (2010) found that positive
emotions were associated with resource gain that helped to promote employee
engagement. Furthermore, employee engagement was accompanied by positive
emotional responses that helped to encourage further resource gain. Employee
engagement in these terms is indicative of a sustainable, self-generating process that
captures positive aspects of employees experience at work through resources gain.
By drawing attention to engagement in terms of work ecologies, or as Bakker
et al. (2011) called it, a climate for engagement; a clear articulation of the conditions
that help promote the harnessing of an employee’s self to their work can be made.
Consistent with this approach, Bakker et al. (2011) explained that engagement is an
important mediating variable that helps explain how the work environment might
influence identification. Scrutiny of the characteristics within a climate that
encourage engagement and connection to work might therefore provide insight into
the circumstances that promote organisation and work group identification. This
framework seems useful in moving towards a more ecological based understanding
of how workforce flourishing and employee health can be enhanced through
increased identification and done so sustainably. Recent developments around
engagement that have linked the accumulation of resources to higher levels of
engagement (e.g., Schaufeli, Bakker, & van Rhenen, 2009; Xanthopoulou, Bakker,
& Fischbach, 2013) offer a means by which the antecedents of engagement and, by
extension, identification may be understood and subsequently applied.
Bakker and Demerouti (2007, 2014) stated that job resources are generally
grouped as physical, social, or organisational features of the work climate. To be
considered a resource, these physical, social, or organisational aspects of the work
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 138 of 280
environment should help reduce job demands, achieve work goals, or stimulate
personal growth. As such, these aspects of the work climate may help support the
physical, emotional, and cognitive characteristics of engagement described by Kahn
(1990) and create a closer bond between an employee and their work, contributing to
identification.
Evidence has been found that supports a resource based approach to
engagement that also links resources to the work climate. For example, van den
Broeck, Vansteenkiste, Witte, and Lens (2008) and Xanthopoulou, Bakker,
Demerouti, and Schaufeli (2009) found that characteristics of the working
environment, indicative of job resources, had an impact on employee engagement
through meeting, to some extent, employees’ need for autonomy, belonging, and
competency (efficacy). Autonomy, belonging, and competency are psychological
needs that have a positive effect on motivation (Deci, Vallerand, Pelletier, & Ryan,
1991; Ryan & Deci, 2001). Xanthopoulou et al., (2009) argued that the resources
that help meet such motivational needs are likely to compliment further resources
gain, engagement, and therefore motivation at work. In another study Bakker et al.
(2007) found that job resources such as job control, supervisor support, information,
organisation climate (support), innovation, and appreciation (recognition) all
contribute in some way to employee engagement and buffer the negative effects of
job demands. As such, job resources act as both facilitators of engagement and
buffers against the negative effects of work demands. Further, the work environment
appears pivotal in determining the availability of resources that help promote
engagement.
However, just as work climates may promote resources that encourage
engagement, work climates may also erode resources leading to disengagement and
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 139 of 280
poor functionality of workers (Xanthopoulou et al., 2013). Kahn (1990) defined
disengagement of employees as the uncoupling of selves from work roles resulting
in defensive responses towards their work. Defensive responses include withdrawal
of authentic views or feelings about their work when interacting with work
colleagues. Defensive responses may also involve limits to creative expression, and
withholding personal connection with others. Maslach, Jackson, and Leiter (1996)
described this process of withdrawal from others and one’s work as the
consequences of burnout. Disengaged or burnt-out employees are more likely to be
found where the work climate acts counter to establishing meaningful connections
or relationships between employees, fellow workers, and the organisation (Jaffe,
1995).
In summarising the argument so far, the characteristics of the work climate
that connect employees to their work, the organisation, and fellow workers are likely
to facilitate higher levels of identification. These characteristics are likely to have a
notable capacity to promote resources for employees to help meet demands, achieve
goals, and enhance personnel development. In other words, these characteristics
enable employees to function effectively and to flourish. Therefore, consideration of
the work climate would contribute to a better understanding of factors that promote
identification, and in turn, how to improve workforce flourishing. Furthermore, as
suggested by Bakker et al. (2011), a focussed approach that explored engagement
climate rather than the more generalised construct of work climate might add further
to our knowledge of engagement and conditions that support positive identification,
flourishing, and health. A construct such as engagement climate represents the
specific work conditions that might contribute to engagement and therefore
identification and workforce flourishing.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 140 of 280
5.2. Work Climate and Defining Engagement Climate
The climate belonging to work refers to the meaning employees associate with
their work environment (James & Jones, 1974). The term work climate has been
used so far in this thesis, however, the term psychological climate that is commonly
found in the literature (e.g., James et al., 2008) is considered interchangeable for the
purpose of this thesis. As such, the construct of work climate, similar to that of
psychological climate, is based on the subjective evaluations by individuals in
relation to their work environment. Employees are likely to evaluate their work
environment against a set of values that are integral to individual employees but also
shaped by the workplace (James et al., 2008). As our understanding of work
climates grows, so too does our understanding of the processes that effect employee
motivation and behaviour (Zhang & Lui, 2010). In this regard, the evaluative
processes involved in work climate are of importance here.
Work climate is a term used to describe a wide range of environmental
characteristics (Thumin & Thumin, 2011). O’Neill and Arendt (2008) proposed that
the work environment is representative of the structures, processes, and events that
occur in an organisation, which combined provide an employee’s perception of the
climate. Using Locke’s (1976) latent variable structure for personal, work related
values, James and James (1989) proposed there were four climate domains. The four
domains were: role stress and lack of harmony, job challenge and autonomy,
leadership facilitation and support, and work group cooperation. James et al. (2008)
summarised these domains as roles, jobs, leaders, and work groups. These domains
are subjective in that they are determined by the evaluation of an employee’s values
in relation to the work climate characteristics. In terms of examining the climate
conducive to engagement, and therefore identification, all domains may contribute;
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 141 of 280
however, the domains of roles and work group would appear stronger candidates on
face value.
There in an ongoing debate about the usefulness of generalised concepts of
climate as opposed to specifically targeted constructs that capture particular
characteristics of the work environment (Bakker et al., 2011). Schneider (1990)
made the distinction between the global, generalised climate on the one hand, and
specific, targeted characteristics of climate corresponding to particular areas of
inquiry on the other. For example, DeConinck (2011) used ethical climate
specifically to explore influences on salespersons’ organisation identification, trust,
commitment, and turnover intentions. Walumbwa, Hartnell, and Oke (2010) found
that procedural justice climate and service climate partially mediated the relationship
between servant leadership and organisational citizenship behaviour. Servant
leadership represents prioritising the welfare and benefit of others over a leader’s
self-interest. Consistent with a specified climate approach, Bakker et al. (2011)
called for future engagement related research to begin the process of establishing the
important characteristics that constitute an “engagement climate”. Rather than the
generalised approach used for work climate, a more specific, targeted approach will
be used in the present study. Engagement climate, defined as employees’
perceptions about workplace environmental factors that support engagement and
work identification, will be the focus of discussion and analysis in this chapter.
Employees roles and relationships with work group seems to be a good starting
point to establish an understanding of the important factors associated with
promoting engagement. The aim was to establish a set of engagement specific
climate characteristics that impact on identification, and therefore, workforce
flourishing and health.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 142 of 280
5.3. Engagement Climate Characteristics
5.3.1. Participation in Decision Making and Recognition/Feedback
Features of engagement climate that are good candidates to facilitate employee
engagement and therefore identification are likely to be characterised by their
relationship building and role defining capacity (DeConinck, 2011; Gubman, 2004;
Luthans & Peterson, 2004; May et al., 2004; Miles, 2001; Walumbwa et al., 2010).
Two characteristics of the work environment that have the potential to foster
positive relationships and knowledge about roles are participation in decision
making and feedback/recognition of contributions towards work objectives. Work
environments that facilitate the expression of employees’ competencies (Bakker et
al., 2007; Walumbwa et al., 2010) and a sense of shared direction in relation to goals
or objectives through participation are known to engage employees (Halbesleben &
Wheeler, 2008; Howe, 2003; van den Broeck et al., 2008; Walumbwa et al., 2011).
In addition to fostering a sense of shared direction (May et al., 2004), participation
allows a sense of influence in the workplace that conveys a message of being valued
by management and the organisation as a whole (Kahn, 1990). Participation also
helps to gain a sense of control over work demands and clarifies role expectations
(Maslach & Leiter, 2008).
Recognition of work performed can be both intrinsic through
acknowledgement (Vezina & St Arnaud, 1995) and extrinsic via rewards (Davis,
1999) and there is also a strong socialisation orientation or purpose associated
(Eisenberger, Fasolo, & Davis-LaMastro, 1990). The social orientation aspect of
feedback/recognition would enable and employee to connect their sense of self to
their work, a central process in engagement (Kahn, 1990). Likewise, feedback
serves a social integrative purpose through conveying feelings of being valued
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 143 of 280
(Kahn, 1990). Recognition and feedback, as representative of integrative
socialisation practices in response to employees’ work, are referred to jointly for the
purpose of this thesis. Affording employees dignity and respect through recognition
that their contributions are valuable is likely to generate meaningful relationships
between employees and their work and work groups such as the organisation (May
et al., 2004; van den Broeck et al., 2008). Similarly, feedback/recognition of work
performed and obstacles overcome can help foster feelings of being valued (Maslach
& Leiter, 2008).
It is argued here that feedback/recognition and participation in decision
making are likely to increase engagement through promotion of employees’ feelings
that they are making a valued contribution to the organisation. In essence,
recognition and participation build relationships between employees and the
organisation by fostering a shared sense of direction (common destiny) and
inherently conveying that an employees’ work makes a valued contribution to
mutual goals. In effect, feedback/recognition and participation are creating
conditions likely to facilitate engagement and identification. In turn, engagement
and identification are likely to result in positive functioning of employees consistent
with the concept of workforce flourishing (Dutton et al., 2010).
5.3.2. Open Communication
Employee engagement is more likely to occur where an organisation’s leaders
or management communicate more frequently and more openly to encourage
understanding and ownership of organisational objectives (Bakker et al., 2011;
Howe, 2003). Open, two way communication is recognised as one of the more
important factors in developing productive relationships in the workplace (Bakker et
al., 2011; Crabtree, 2005), as it contributes to greater accuracy in perceived
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 144 of 280
explanations for managerial actions (May et al., 2004; Miles, 2001). Communication
that is free flowing and more open also conveys an implicit message that the
organisation respects and values their employees as members of the organisation. As
such, feeling valued helps enhance engagement (Bakker & Xanthopoulou, 2013).
When communication in the organisation is poor, employees may not be clear about
what is expected of them and how their role relates to organisational objectives
(Greenfield, 2004) or the means by which they might contribute to such objective
(Maslach et al., 1996). Therefore, open communication in the workplace is one
aspect of the engagement climate that can enhance decision making capacity, a
sense of being valued, and congruency between employee and organisational
expectations. Congruency between employees and organisation expectations also
helps to align values and objective, creating an overall climate that facilitates
engagement and flourishing.
5.3.3. Organisation Support
Similar to open communication, organisation support is another indicator of
employees’ perceptions of the extent to which an organisation values their
contribution to the organisation (Eisenberger, Huntington, Hutchison, & Sowa,
1986). Eisenberger et al. defined organisation support as an employee’s perception
of the extent to which the organisation values their contributions and cares about
their well-being. Perceptions in this regard may emerge based on the organisation’s
behaviour towards the employee, including respect for employee-held values (Jones,
Flynn, & Kelloway, 1995). A supportive organisation is likely to be evaluated
positively, and as discussed by James et al. (2008) and Thumin and Thumin (2011),
engagement is an evaluative process. This suggests that organisation support
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 145 of 280
indicates how favourably resources that facilitate engagement are assessed by
employees.
Therefore, organisation support can be added to open communication,
participation, and feedback/recognition as characteristic of a positive engagement
climate. The capacity of organisation support to enhance an employees’ sense that
their work is valued suggests that this aspect of engagement climate is likely to
contribute to employee engagement (see Bakker & Demerouti, 2014). When there is
a lack of faith in the organisational processes to remedy wrongs, employees may
respond with increasing negative reactions to their work leading to disengagement
(Maslach and Leiter, 2008; Maslach, Schaufeli, & Leiter, 2001). Organisation
support is therefore important in a climate of engagement.
5.4. Qualitative Study: Refining the Characteristics of Engagement Climate
Four characteristics of an engagement climate were identified in the preceding
discussion that are likely to influence work identification and therefore, workforce
flourishing. These characteristics are participation in decision making,
feedback/recognition, open communication, and perceived organisation support. In
order to support the theoretical arguments presented here for the inclusion of
participation in decision making, feedback/recognition, open communication, and
organisation support as typifying engagement climate, a qualitative study was
conducted. The aim of the qualitative study was to explore employee insights into
factors that contribute to employee’s sense of belonging (identification) and the
practices organisations adopt that enable employees to be more effective and
optimally functional (be engaged) at work. Following a qualitative assessment of the
factors that contribute to engagement climate, the factors to emerge were tested
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 146 of 280
quantitatively to confirm factor structures and contributions in relation to the
construct of engagement climate.
The objective in the qualitative assessment was to freely capture employee’s
perspectives relating to the factors that contribute to engagement or identification at
work. When the range of participant perspectives had been collected and
categorised, comparison was made with theoretical perspectives to confirm
predictions about variables relating to engagement climate. The set of variables were
then factor analysed to arrive at a measure of engagement climate for use
empirically within a model of engagement climate, work identification, and
workforce flourishing. It was proposed that the four characteristics of engagement
climate discussed would be represented clearly by the qualitative assessment of
employee’s views on improving functionality and fit within an organisation.
5.5. Method
An outline of the method used for data collection and categorisation is
provided for the purpose of assessing the reliability and transparency of the
interpretations made of the data.
5.5.1. Participants
Participants in this study were self-selected from the same population of local
government (council) employees recruited for the first study in this thesis (see
Chapter 4). Two hundred and twenty four employees completed a questionnaire in
study one, either in paper based or electronic format. Demographic information for
the complete sample for study one can be found in Chapter 4. A total of 138
participants responded to the question regarding individual and group functionality
(peoplewise), which was 62% of those completing the questionnaire for the first
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 147 of 280
study. Table 5.1 displays demographic averages for those responding to the
functionality question. A total of 117 participants completed the question related to
their sense of belonging (belong) or fit with the organisation, which was 52% of the
total number of respondents to the questionnaire from study one. Thirty two
respondents answered only the “peoplewise” question, eleven answered only the
“belong” question, and 106 answered both questions. Table 5.1 displays the
demographic averages for those responding to the second qualitative question.
Table 5.1.
Demographic Characteristics for Respondents answering each of Two Qualitative Questions.
‘peoplewise’n = 138 (SD)
‘belong’n = 117(SD)
Average Age 42.6 (11.6) 42.37 (11.3)
Gender Female1 66.9% Female 68.4%
Years in role (ave yrs) 5.9 (6.6) 5.9 (6.4)
Years in organisation(ave yrs) 7.7 (7.1) 7.9 (7.2)
Number of Children
0 28.8% 35.0%
1 15.1% 11.1%
2 31.7% 29.1%
3 or more 23.7%2 24.8%
Education
Secondary School 16.5% 18.8%
TAFE 23.0% 20.5%
Some Uni or TAFE 22.3% 21.4%
Undergraduate Uni 18.0% 21.4%
Post Grad Uni 15.8%3,4 15.4%5,6
1 – 0.7% missing2 – 0.7% missing3 – 2.2% other4 – 2.2% missing5 – 1.6% other6 – 0.9% missing
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 148 of 280
5.5.2. Procedure
Questionnaires were made available to employees by contacting team leaders
and managers to arrange for the distribution of the questionnaires at the next
convenient team meeting. Questionnaires were subsequently handed out to members
of the team for completion. A small number of questionnaires were completed
online (17). Please see study one (Chapter 4 of this thesis) for more details regarding
data collection.
5.5.3. Materials
Two qualitative questions were proposed to participants. Both questions were
presented to participants at the end of the quantitative questionnaire that provided
data for study one in this thesis. The format of the questionnaire was predominantly
paper based with a small number of participants completing the questionnaire
online. Space was provided for both questions in the paper based and electronic
versions of the questionnaire for participants to write one or two short paragraphs.
The first question was designed to explore employee perceptions of what
engagement climate variables might make a contribution to the positive interactions
among staff to support functionality. Participants were asked the following question:
“What could be done peoplewise to make your organisation run more
smoothly?”
The second question was designed to examine employee perceptions of
engagement climate variables that contribute to their sense of belonging or
identification with an organisation. Participants were asked the following:
“What could/does your organisation do that would make you feel as if you
belonged more?”
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 149 of 280
5.5.4. Analysis of the statements
Independent t-tests were performed to assess if those respondents completing
each of the two qualitative questions differed in some way to those who did not
complete these questions. Comparisons were made on a range of demographic
variables including age, gender, average number of children, years in role, years in
organisation and two identification targets (organisation and work group
identification – see study one for detailed description). In all tests, for both sets of
respondents corresponding to the qualitative questions, there was no significant
difference in any demographic or identification measures. Therefore, the people
responding to the qualitative questions were representative of the larger sample
obtained in study one of this thesis.
Participant responses to the two questions were recorded and arranged in
separate tables, one table for each of the two questions. Within each table, responses
were coded according to the following categories derived from the literature
presented in the introduction of this chapter.
0 = No category (leave blank)
1 = Communication (open exchange of information)
2 = Recognition/feedback (e.g., thank you, understanding the work they do)
3 = Participation in decision making (Involvement in planning, design, strategies, management)
4 = Support (supervisor, manager, organisation)
A pilot coding exercise was undertaken with representative variations, or
manufactured examples of the actual data collected. The thesis author was one of the
coders; the other was an academic specialising in organisational behaviour and
holding a Ph.D. in the field of Business Studies. Each coder received 10 examples,
which were coded and then compared between coders. Coders then negotiated and
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 150 of 280
explained their coding rationale to help raise the level of consistency for
categorisation decisions made when the main data sets were categorised. The two
researchers undertook the task of coding the main data independent of each other to
establish inter-rater reliability measures for data categorisations. The following
instructions were used by each coder to achieve a consistent approach to the
categorisation of the data.
Please place the following statements, sentences, or phrases into one or more of the categories above. A brief description of the categories is provided but you are to use your best judgment independently to assign the data to categories.
Because many of the statements might contain references to more than one category, each case may have more than one category assigned but not for the same section of text. Once one part of the text is classified it cannot be given another classification. As a coder, you have to decide which category best fits the information provided by respondents, but only choose one category for each section of text. Do not refer to a category more than once for each case.
If statements cannot be categorised, leave them blank or assign ‘0’ as a classification.
5.6. Results
5.6.1. Peoplewise Question: Positive Functionality
A total of 188 classifications were made from 138 responses to the question
“what could be done peoplewise to make your organisation run more smoothly?”
The level of agreement between coders for th
.78). The highest number of categorisations for a single category agreed by coders
for “peoplewise” was 45 (24%) for the category of communication. Table 5.2
displays contingency categorisations for data coding related to the “peoplewise”
question.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 151 of 280
Table 5.2.
Inter-rater Reliability Contingency Coding for the "Peoplewise" Question.
Rater B
0 1 2 3 4R
ater
A
0 = No category 9 0 8 3 2 22
1 = Communication 1 45(24%) 0 2 1 49
2 = Recognition/feedback 2 0 30(16%) 0 0 32
3 = Participation 2 0 0 28(15%) 3 33
4 = Support 1 0 6 2 43(23%) 52
15 45 44 35 49 188
One hundred and eighty eight classifications obtained from 138 cases
Of all responses received in response to the question “what could be done
peoplewise…” 24% of respondents referred to communication, 23% referred to
managerial/supervisor support, 16% referred to recognition/feedback, and 15%
referred to participation in decision making. Across all statements made in reference
to the “peoplewise” question, 22% of these statements could either not be coded into
one of the four engagement climate categories, or coders did not concur with their
judgement about the classification of these statements. The results suggest that a
large proportion of the statements made in reference to “what could be done
peoplewise…” fit with at least one of the four engagement climate categories.
5.6.2. Belonging Question: Identification with the Organisation
There were 162 classifications made from 117 cases for the question “what
could/does your organisation do that would make you feel as if you belonged
more?” The level of inter-
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 152 of 280
.84). The highest number of agreed categorisations for a single category for the
“belong” question was 42 (26%) for the category of support. Table 5.3 displays
contingency categorisations for data coding related to the “belonging” question.
Table 5.3.
Inter-rater Reliability Contingency Coding for the "Belong" Question.
Rater B
0 1 2 3 4
Rat
er A
0 = No category 8 0 3 5 0 16
1 = Communication 1 24(15%) 0 1 0 26
2 = Recognition/feedback 3 0 26(16%) 1 0 30
3 = Participation 0 0 0 37(23%) 1 38
4 = Support 4 0 2 4 42(26%) 52
16 24 31 48 43 162
One hundred and sixty two classifications obtained from 117 cases
In reference to the question about “belonging more…” respondents raised
issues related to managerial/supervisor support in 26% of instances, participation in
decision making in 23% of instances, recognition/feedback in 16% of classifications,
and communication in 15% of rater classifications. Over all classifications made for
this question, 20% of the classifications were either not agreed between raters or
they were classified as not fitting one of the four engagement climate categories.
Similar to the “peoplewise” question, respondents to the “belonging” question made
statements in a majority of instances that are highly consistent with the four
engagement climate categories posed by this study.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 153 of 280
For both qualitative questions, it is notable that the greatest difficultly for
raters to reach agreement centred on the “0 = no category” classification. This is
indicated by the high figures for disagreement found within these sections of Tables
5.2 and 5.3. It is expected that interpretations between raters will differ mostly at the
edges of interpretation. That is, were an example may not be overtly identifiable
with the central tenets guiding interpretations. Therefore, it is expected that the “no
category” might attract the highest proportion of disagreement. As such, the pattern
of classifications and the high level of equivocality found for the “no category” are
deemed acceptable and are not viewed as problematic.
5.7. Qualitative Study Discussion
The construct of engagement climate is relatively new in terms of research and
discussion centred on the characteristics of a work environment that supports
engagement (Bakker et al., 2011). The qualitative study examined engagement
climate by asking respondents about the interactive (peoplewise) and associative
(belonging) characteristics that are argued to contribute to engagement. An
examination of the qualitative data collected revealed that all four nominated
engagement climate categories featured prominently in responses to the two
qualitative questions presented to study participants.
Although the four characteristics of engagement climate taken collectively
captured a similar percentage of mentions when the statements were considered for
both the “peoplewise” (78%), and “belong” (80%) questions, the distribution of
references for single engagement climate characteristics did vary between the two
questions. For the “peoplewise” question, communication was referred to most
frequently of the four engagement climate factors. In contrast, communication was
the least mentioned of the four engagement climate characteristics in relation to the
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 154 of 280
“belonging” question. The different results for the two questions suggest people may
view communication as a very important attribute enabling people to work well
together. However, in terms of what might encourage a sense of belonging, it would
appear that communication has a reduced level of importance in comparison with
the other engagement climate characteristics explored here in this study.
The pattern of results found for the “belonging” question suggest that support
such as from managers and supervisors is a priority compared to the other three
engagement climate characteristics. Participation in decision making was also
refered to often with regard to a sense of belonging. For the question related to
functioning “peoplewise”, participation was ranked highest out of the four
engagement climate characteristics. However, support had a similar frequency of
references made in relation to both the “belonging” and “peoplewise” question.
Taken together, these outcomes suggest that participation and a sense of managerial
support are important to generating a sense of belonging. In contrast,
communication and support are most applicable to people working together
effectively (peoplewise). It is important to note however, that communication,
recognition/feedback, participation, and organisation support provide a
comprehensive insight into the constituents of engagement climate.
Theoretically, the results found in this study support Kahn’s (1990) claim that
engagement depicts the harnessing of an organisation member’s self to their work
role and others within the organisation. The qualitative questions presented to
participants were specifically designed to capture employees’ impressions of the
sorts of things that promote a sense of belonging and effective interaction with
others. The strong representation of the four engagement climate characteristics in
the qualitative data suggest that all four characteristics are likely to facilitate
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 155 of 280
employees’ relationship with their work (belonging) and their effectiveness or
functionality in relation to each other (peoplewise). Furthermore, while there are
differences in the contribution of some of the engagement climate characteristics, all
four were strongly represented in responses to both of the qualitative questions and
this suggests all four are important contributors towards connecting people to their
work and enabling better functionality within the workplace.
The four engagement climate characteristics may be understood in terms of
job demand/resource theories of engagement (e.g., Alarcon & Lyons, 2011; Bakker
& Demerouti, 2007, 2014; Salanova et al., 2010) when highlighting the potential of
these characteristics to become resources that drive positive gain cycles. As levels of
communication, feedback/recognition, participation, and organisation support rise,
so too does the level of engagement, which is likely to lead to further enhancement
of the engagement climate (Bakker & Demerouti, 2007, 2014; Salanova et al.,
2010). As such, these engagement climate characteristics would appear to offer a
sustainable approach to creating opportunities for employees to have a closer
relationship with their work and to function more effectively with others in the
organisation.
The findings are also consistent with Bakker et al.’s. (2011) argument for
specific and contextualised work climate approaches to research. The rationale being
that a specific approach would be more theoretically revealing than applying
contextually generic constructs, despite the level of consistency with broad based
work climate offered. The strong representation of all four engagement climate
characteristics seems to provide evidence that there is value in taking Bakker et al.’s
approach.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 156 of 280
There are some limitations to this qualitative study, primarily concerning the
range of engagement climate characteristics used to code the qualitative data. It may
be argued that allowing engagement climate categories to freely emerge from an
analysis of the data would lead to a richer, more varied range of engagement climate
characteristics (see Stemler, 2001). However, the circumstances here were more
suited to an a priori coding given that there existed some research and considered
discussion on the topic of engagement climate, albeit from relatively recent and
emerging explorations. This study embraced the opportunity to gather some
preliminary data on speculative characteristics of engagement climate that were
drawn from the existing literature but had not yet been empirically tested. As a first
step toward empirical evaluation, qualitatively exploring the likelihood that
communication, feedback/recognition, participation, and support would make
meaningful contributions to the measurement of engagement climate was deemed a
prudent step to take. To follow on from this, the construct of engagement climate
was tested empirically and results are reported in the following sections of this
chapter.
5.8. Quantitative Study: Further Examination of the Construct of Engagement Climate
Consistent with the evolving model approach to model development used in
this thesis, the structure of the engagement climate construct found in the preceding
qualitative study will be tested quantitatively. It was found previously in this study
that engagement climate can be represented by employees’ perceived level of
participation in decision making (Harter et al., 2002; Howe, 2003), assessments of
open communication (dialogue) within the workplace (Howe, 2003),
feedback/recognition regarding work performance (Maslach et al., 1996), and beliefs
about the level of organisational support extended to them (Armeli, Eisenberger, &
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 157 of 280
Fasolo, 1998; Eisenberger et al., 1986). To continue to develop the construct of
engagement climate, these four characteristics of engagement climate were tested
empirically. The four characteristics were measured and their contribution to the
higher order factor of engagement climate assessed. A set of measures capturing
engagement climate allows this construct to be incorporated into the model of
workforce flourishing established earlier in this thesis.
The following hypotheses were tested;
Hypothesis 1a: The four factor structure for engagement climate consisting of
communication, participation, feedback/recognition, and perceived organisational
support found in the preceding qualitative study would be consistent with the
factorial outcome of confirmatory factor analysis.
Hypothesis 1b: The four factors representing engagement climate would
demonstrate convergent validity with measures of burnout.
5.9. Method
5.9.1. Participants
An employment service organisation with the central office located in
Melbourne, Australia was invited to participate in this study. The number of staff at
the employment agency totalled 320 and emails were sent from the Human
Resources Division to each of these staff members inviting participation through a
link to the web page hosting the survey. The survey and data repository were located
on Deakin University’s main computer drive. A total of 128 questionnaires were
lodged electronically, with a response rate of 40%. A total of 84 were female
(66.7%) and 41 were male (32.5%) with one respondent not indicating gender
(0.8%). Ages ranged from 18 to 67 (M = 40.11, SD = 10.46).
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 158 of 280
The number of children reported by participants ranged from zero to six, with
64 people (51.6%) indicating one or more children and 23 (19.1%) reporting more
than two children (one case had missing data, 0.8%). Average length of time with
the employment agency was 2.74 years (SD = 2.43). Fifteen point one per cent were
secondary school educated, 29.4% were educated to certificate level, 16.7% had
done some university study, 23.8% had completed an undergraduate university
degree, and 13.8% had completed a post graduate university qualification. Two
people (1.6%) did not respond to the question relating to educational level achieved.
5.9.2. Procedure and Design
A detailed overview of the study, study aims, and potential benefits to the
organisation that might stem from the information gathered were presented to
management of the employment agency. A number of telephone conversations and
meetings were held with the Director of Human Resources at this employment
agency to explain the research. Following this, a formal presentation was held with
management representatives to gather support for the research and to work out the
practicalities of making the survey available to all staff members. The agency agreed
to the study with the request that a measure of burnout be included as they were
interested in gaining some insight into levels of burnout among their staff.
The employment service agency helps disadvantaged and unemployed people
find work, and they have twenty nine offices located throughout the states of
Victoria, New South Wales, and Tasmania. Offices are spread throughout each of
these states in order to provide services in locations that are close to clients’
residencies. It was decided that because many of the agency staff may be involved
with a client consultation at any one time, the most prudent method of distributing
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 159 of 280
the survey was to do so online and invite participation via an email containing a link
to the survey.
A cross sectional design was used in the study to measure staff in terms of
engagement climate. The engagement climate variable included measures of
communication satisfaction, quality and occurrence of feedback/recognition,
participation in decision making, and perceptions of organisational support.
5.9.3. Materials
A questionnaire was provided to participants to complete online or in paper
format. A copy of the questionnaire can be found in Appendix B. The questionnaire
contained measures to capture the four characteristics of engagement climate,
namely; communication, participation, feedback/recognition, and organisation
support. Sub-scale measures of burnout were used as convergent validity measures.
Communication Effectiveness, a subscale of the job satisfaction survey
(Spector, 1985) that assesses employee satisfaction with organisational
communication was used. The sub-scale consists of four items measured on a seven
point Likert scale ranging from 0 = do not agree to 6 = totally agree. An example of
the questions asked is “the goals of this organisation are not clear to me” (reversed
scored). Reported Cronbach’s alpha for the original scale was .71. Centrality of item
means, item variance, and contribution to scale were assessed to evaluate scale
reliability. In the current study, all four items were retained with Cronbach’s alpha
.79.
Feedback/Recognition was measured using Sims, Szilagyi, and Keller’s
(1976) feedback subscale from the job characteristics inventory. The feedback sub-
scale consists of five items and was measured using a five point Likert scale ranging
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 160 of 280
from 0 = poor to 4 = excellent. The subscale items ask participants to rate a number
of statements for example, “the feedback from my supervisor on how well I am
doing”. Assessment of scale reliability statistics found that item two was accounting
for large amounts of variance, essentially rendering the other items redundant. The
decision was made to remove this item. Conducting CFA analysis using structural
equation modelling is made difficult if a factor is represented by only one manifest
item (Blunch, 2013). Cronbach’s alpha for the four items remaining in the present
study was .94.
Participation in Decision Making was measured using Vroom’s (1959)
psychological participation scale. The scale consists of four items scored on a five
point Likert scale ranging from 0 = none to 4 = a great deal. Test-retest reliability
over a seven month period was .63. An example question is “in general, how much
say or influence do you have on what goes on at work”? Response ranges from 0 =
never to 6 = all the time. Higher scores represent greater levels of participation. All
four items were retained for this study after scale reliability assessment was
completed. Cronbach’s alpha in the present study was .88.
Organisational Support was measured using ten items from the Survey of
Perceived Organisational Support (SPOS) (Eisenberger et al., 1986). Factor analysis
of SPOS items revealed only one factor (Armeli et al., 1998; Eisenberger et al.,
1986; Hutchison, 1997) with high internal reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = .97). For
the present study, and consistent with other studies using this scale (see, Rhoades &
Eisenberger, 2002), ten items were selected from the 36 items on the basis of their
higher factor loadings as reported in the Eisenberger et al. (1986) study. Items were
scored on a seven point Likert scale ranging from 0 = not at all to 6 = always.
Higher scores on the SPOS items reflect greater levels of organisational support.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 161 of 280
The 10 items were subjected to reliability assessment and two items were removed
for reasons of low SMC’s or low SD’s. Cronbach’s alpha for the eight items used in
the current study was .94.
Exhaustion and Cynicism subscales from the Maslach Burnout Inventory
General Survey (MBI-GS) (Maslach et al., 1996) were used for the purpose of
convergent validity assessment for engagement climate. The third sub-scale,
professional efficacy, was not used on the basis that the authors reported this sub-
scale had lower correlations with the exhaustion and cynicism sub-scales. Tests with
exhaustion and cynicism separately would provide adequate information about the
convergent validity for engagement climate. An example of a question from the
exhaustion sub-scale is “I feel emotionally drained from my work”. An example of a
question from the cynicism sub-scale is “I have become less enthusiastic about my
work”. Both the exhaustion and cynicism sub-scales have five items each and were
scored on a seven point Likert scale ranging from 0 = never to 6 = every day.
Respondents were asked to indicate the frequency of occurrence for the situation
featured in each of the questions. Reliability assessment of the two sub scales
resulted in a reduction of items for both exhaustion and cynicism. The remaining
items used from the MBI-GS for exhaustion was 1, 2, and 3. While the remaining
items used for cynicism were 8, 9, and 14. Cronbach’s alpha for the three items used
for exhaustion was .86, and for the three items for cynicism was .83.
5.9.4. Data Preparation
Questionnaire data were screened using SPSS (v21.0) statistical software.
Inspection of the data file revealed one case with only the responses to the
demographic questions recorded, all other questions (including complete scales)
were left blank and therefore, this case was deleted. Another case had only a portion
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 162 of 280
of the demographic data presented as well as less than half of the questionnaire
scales. This case was removed leaving a total of 126 cases in the data set. A scan for
missing data using SPSS revealed one item that had three missing values across all
cases (2.4%) which was the highest rate of missing data found. Other instances of
scale items with missing data were limited to only one or two cases. The rates for
missing data were low in terms of the percentage of cases and were therefore
considered random. Missing values were replaced using the SPSS regression
method.
The data was screened for outliers by checking upper and lower range for
items against ± 3.29 multiplied by the standard deviation for each item. Higher
numbers than this figure were deemed outliers. No outliers were present in the
measures used in this study. No instances of skewness or kurtosis were found.
5.9.5. Analysis
The development of the construct of engagement climate through CFA builds
on earlier research reported in this chapter. AMOS (v21.0) was used to assess CFA
of constructs developed for this study. AMOS was also used to assess convergent
validity for the construct of engagement climate.
The first step in analysis was to assess the factorial structure of the construct
of engagement climate, and also establish convergent validity for this new construct.
The purpose of developing the construct of engagement climate in this thesis was to
develop an understanding of circumstances or practices that may be adopted to
promote identification in a positive way within a work environment. As such, the
construct was explored here for the purpose of including it in the model of
workforce flourishing later in this thesis.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 163 of 280
5.10. Results
5.10.1. Factor Analysis: The Latent Structure of Engagement Climate
Measures contributing to the latent construct of engagement climate were
informed by theoretical sources such as Bakker and colleagues (Bakker et al., 2007;
Bakker et al., 2011, & Schaufeli & Bakker, 2010) and refined through qualitative
investigation featured earlier in this chapter. Scales were matched to the four
domains of communication, feedback/recognition, participation, and organisational
support that emerged from the theoretical and qualitative examination. Before the
CFA of engagement climate was undertaken, each measure representing one of the
four characteristics of engagement climate were scrutinised for variance captured,
distribution around the scale midpoint, and item and scale reliability (see Blunch,
2013). Items remaining formed measures for the four domains that combined,
represent the latent factor of engagement climate. Therefore, to assess the
contribution of the four scales to engagement climate, a confirmatory factor analysis
(CFA) was performed (see Figure 5.1).
Results revealed a poor fit for the data 2 (164) = 350.13, p < .000 (see table
5.4), however eigenvalues indicated there were four factors in the solution to the
data. A series of model re-specifications were required to achieve a fit to the data
and form a solution that expressed the four factors to emerge from earlier qualitative
and theoretical exploration. Each step of the re-specification of the model is
summarised in tables 5.4 and 5.5. Table 5.5 lists the rational for each iteration of re-
specification in the factor analysis of the construct of engagement climate. After the
eighth iteration of re-specification acceptable model fit was found, 2 (59) = 76.56, p
< .062. Factor analysis in SPSS (v21.0) of the remaining items for the constructs of
engagement climate revealed Kaiser-Meyer-Olin sampling adequacy was excellent
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 164 of 280
(.894), and Bartlett’s test of sphericity was significant, p = .000. However, the
eigenvalue for the fourth factor was just below the standardised level of one with the
three other factors above the eigenvalues of one accounting for 72.78% of the
variance in the data. Scree plot examination indicated a single factor might better
explain the data, which was interpreted as the potential presence of the higher order
factor of engagement climate. Therefore, a test of the higher order factor structure
for engagement climate was conducted, and results indicated there was no
improvement of the factorial model of engagement climate (see table 5.4).
Table 5.4.
Fit Indices for Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) with Re-specification Iterations for the Latent Factor of Engagement Climate.
Step 2 df 2/df RMSEA RFI CFI TLI GFI NFI
1 350.132 164 2.135 .095 .820 .910 .895 .787 .844
2 290.114 146 1.987 .089 .840 .926 .914 .809 .864
3 251.988 129 1.953 .087 .853 .934 .922 .825 .876
4 188.795 113 1.671 .073 .875 .955 .946 .853 .896
5 152.039 98 1.551 .066 .887 .965 .957 .873 .908
6 121.079 84 10441 .059 .897 .973 .966 .890 .917
7 101.889 71 1.435 .059 .903 .975 .969 .900 .925
Final 76.564 59 1.298 .049 .919 .985 .980 .919 .939
Higher Order 84.876 61 1.391 .056 .914 .980 .974 .911 .932
Table 5.5.
Engagement Climate CFA Re-specification Iterations, Changes Made, and Change Justification.
Step Changes made before next step Justification for changes
1 Item 7 for organisational support removed High SRC and MI
2 Item 1 for organisational support removed High SRC and MI
3 Item 4 for feedback/recognition removed High MI
4 Item 4 for participation removed High MI
5 Item 10 for organisational support removed High MI
6 Item 2 for organisational support removed High MI
7 Item 4 for communication removed High MI
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 165 of 280
Figure 5.1. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) of the Latent Construct of Engagement Climate.
The four factor structure of engagement climate was retained for further
analysis in this study based on the theoretical and qualitative support for the four
components. While the data suggests that a three factor solution may improve the
factor model, examination of correlations in the components matrix in SPSS did not
provide an articulate arrangement consistent with a three factor solution. These
results are based on a small sample size, which may present some difficulty in
parcelling out variance to form a clear factorial structure for engagement climate.
The three factor solution is somewhat equivocal and therefore, the four factor
solution will be applied. The next step in analysis was to test the convergent validity
of engagement climate in relation to measures consistent with engagement.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 166 of 280
Exhaustion and cynicism from the MBI-GS (Maslach et al., 1996) were selected as
suitable measures for this purpose.
5.10.2. Engagement Climate Convergent Validity
To test the convergent validity of the engagement climate structure two CFAs
were conducted, one with the MBI-GS subscale of exhaustion, and the other with
the sub-scale cynicism, also from the MBI-GS. The two sub-scales are measures of
burnout, which is a condition that negatively effects peoples’ capacity to perform at
their work and is interpreted as the opposite of engagement (Maslach et al., 1996).
Engagement climate should demonstrate a negative relationship to both exhaustion
and cynicism for evidence of convergent validity.
The CFAs for each of the comparison constructs were conducted separately to
help overcome the limitation of small sample size when analysis using SEM
techniques. The fit for the CFA model of engagement climate and exhaustion was
good, 2 (13) = 23.11, p < .040. The fit for the CFA model of engagement climate
and cynicism was moderate but acceptable, 2 (13) = 28.01, p < .009. Table 5.6
displays the fit indices for both CFA models and figures 5.2 and 5.3 display manifest
factor loadings and latent factor correlations demonstrating convergent validity of
the construct of engagement climate. Convergent validity was found to be of a
reasonable magnitude for exhaustion and in the expected negative direction (r = -
.61). Convergent validity for cynicism was also good and in the expected direction
(r = -.67). For the engagement climate and cynicism CFA, modification indices were
showing that item 14 of the cynicism scale was cross loading with the manifest
variables of organisational support and communication. Item 14 relates to cynicism
about whether an employee perceives that their work contributes to anything.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 167 of 280
Adjustment was not made to the CFA model as the purpose was foremost to assess
the convergent validity of the engagement climate construct.
Table 5.6.
Fit Indices for the CFA Models Involving Exhaustion and Cynicism for Convergent Validity of Engagement Climate.
CFA Model 2 df 2/df RMSEA RFI CFI TLI GFI NFI
Exhaustion 23.109 13 1.778 .079 .912 .975 .959 .975 .945
Cynicism 28.008 13 2.154 .096 .905 .967 .947 .940 .941
Figure 5.2. Convergent Validity Assessment using CFA of Engagement Climate and Exhaustion.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 168 of 280
Figure 5.3. Convergent Validity Assessment using CFA of Engagement Climate and Cynicism.
5.11. Quantitative Study Discussion
The hypothesis stating that the four factor structure of engagement climate
consisting of communication, participation, feedback/recognition, and perceived
organisational support will be consistent with results of CFA analysis was supported
by the data. The hypothesis that the four factors representing engagement climate
will demonstrate convergent validity with measures of burnout was also supported.
The results of this study indicate that engagement climate demonstrates very good
construct traits. The results of the CFA and convergent validity analysis also
confirm the conclusions and forecasts drawn from the qualitative study reported
earlier in this chapter. These findings in relation to the tested hypotheses will be
discussed in detail within the general discussion that follows along with theoretical
implications in the domain of psychological climate.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 169 of 280
5.12. General Discussion
The four factor structure for engagement climate that was informed by the
qualitative study early in this chapter was supported by the data after sequenced re-
specification was performed. Most of the re-specification required to attain a good
factor model fit to the data involved items from Eisenberger et al.’s (1986) perceived
organisational support (POS) scale. A common theme in the four remaining items
that represented organisational support was that the organisation cared about or
helped employees in their work. Items containing inferences about appreciation,
consideration, and disregard did not fit well with the construct of organisational
support in the context of engagement climate.
Schaufeli and Bakker (2010) distinguished engagement from the similar
construct of job involvement by suggesting the former involved behavioural and
emotional expressions while the later was a cognitive judgement. The items that
comprised organisational support in the current study referred to either help, or
caring, or both, and are consistent with Schaufeli and Bakker’s (2010) description of
behavioural or emotional elements of engagement. Furthermore, the items removed
during CFA re-specification that referred to appreciation, consideration, and
disregard appear to align with cognitive judgments about work, which may explain
their poor fit with the CFA. The theme of cognitive judgement in the items that were
removed suggest that engagement climate is best represented by behavioural and
emotional aspects of work. Indeed, the CFA results demonstrated that along with the
behavioural and emotional items in organisational support, the constructs of
participation, feedback/recognition, and communication, represent workplace
behaviours and appear to combine well as a representation of engagement climate.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 170 of 280
The factor structure for engagement climate found in the current study was
consistent with the theoretical arguments and qualitative results reported earlier in
this chapter. The correlations between the four contributing variables of
communication, feedback/recognition, organisational support, and participation
suggest a cohesive construct of engagement climate exists that describes conditions
within a work environment argued to promote engagement. None of the correlations
were found to be below r = .51 (communication and participation the lowest), which
is indicative of a robust relationship between the constructs examined here.
Furthermore, none of the correlations exceeded r = .72 (communication and
organisational support), which is not of a magnitude to warrant concerns about
redundancy between constructs. There was also good support found for convergent
validity, when comparisons were made with the constructs of exhaustion and
cynicism from the Maslach et al. (1996) burnout inventory. Therefore, the construct
of engagement climate appears to be captured well by the four components of
commitment, feedback/recognition, organisational support, and participation and
provides grounds for future consideration in research.
The four factor structure of engagement climate provides a framework that
may also benefit interventions that aim to enhance organisational effectiveness and
harness the potential of employees. These proposals were further advanced further in
the next chapter when engagement climate was tested for its relationship with
organisation and work group identification and also the contribution made to work
force flourishing.
5.12.1. Theoretical implications
The findings of this study have implications for theory related to psychological
climate (e.g., James & Jones, 1974). Researchers such as Bakker et al., (2011) have
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 171 of 280
argued that generalised conceptualisations of psychological work climate may have
limited usefulness, proposing instead that targeted approaches may yield more
useful information. Specific approaches to psychological work climate have been
used to explore ethics (DeConinck, 2011) and procedural justice and service
climates (Walumbwa et al., 2010). This study now adds engagement climate to those
studies exploring targeted aspects of psychological climate. In the first part of this
chapter, four characteristics of engagement climate were proposed, and later,
support for the four components were found using qualitative and quantitative
analysis. The findings of this study have contributed to understanding of the
structural characteristics of engagement climate through qualitative analysis, CFA,
and convergent validity testing. The factorial structure found in this study was
consistent with the hypothesised structure derived from the qualitative analysis and
all factorial indicators suggest a robust structure for engagement climate was found.
5.12.2. Study Limitations
A number of limitations to the current study have been identified in relation to
the findings. Notably, the fixed array of engagement climate characteristics used as
coding categories in the qualitative study in this chapter. This matter was discussed
earlier at the end of the qualitative study and will not be discuss gain here. However,
the four categories used were able to account for a large percentage of the qualitative
data collected.
Further limitations relate to the size of the sample for CFA analysis. However,
obtaining a larger sample was not possible with the organisation involved on this
occasion. Importantly in this instance, the relationships implicated by theory and
qualitative analysis were effectively explored in the CFA and validity assessment
involving the smaller sample. A related limitation was that the sample used in this
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 172 of 280
study for CFA and convergent validity analysis was representative of one
organisation. Therefore, in relation to findings involving the quantitative assessment
of engagement climate in particular, further research would enhance generalizability
of the CFA findings. Interestingly, the qualitative study and the CFA were
conducted with separate samples, from different organisations, with strong support
from the CFA study for the earlier qualitative findings. This helps in some way to
support generalizability. The evidence from two different organisational
populations, one from local government, and the other from an employment services
organisation supports claims about the robustness of the construct of engagement
climate without being conclusive.
5.13. Conclusion
This study sought to examine and develop a measureable construct of
engagement climate beginning with the qualitative analysis. The four component
structure of engagement climate featuring communication, participation,
feedback/recognition, and organisational support was found to provide a good fit for
the data in this study. The construct of engagement climate also demonstrated
excellent convergent validity with the burnout subscales of exhaustion and cynicism
(see Maslach et al. 1996). Taken together, the results featured in this chapter support
the theoretical arguments for engagement climate and the factorial structure
speculated from the literature. Application of the construct of engagement climate in
further research was therefore a justified step to take next.
The advantage of engagement climate in organisational research is that it
provides direct insight into the strategic application of such a construct for
improvement of effective practice and interventions. In terms of furthering research
in this area, engagement climate presents a straight forward approach to enhancing
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 173 of 280
employee identification in a way that promotes organisational effectiveness through
workforce flourishing. Therefore, the next chapter re-visited the model of workforce
flourishing established earlier in this thesis and continued the evolution of this
model by integrating the construct of engagement climate.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 174 of 280
Chapter 6Study 3: The Relationship between Engagement Climate, Identification, and Workforce Flourishing
6.1. Introduction
Employee engagement is expressed in terms of an employee’s relationship
with their work role (Kahn, 1990). A closely related construct, engagement climate,
relates to employee perceptions of the working environment that foster the
relationship with work roles (Bakker et al., 2011). The approach adopted in this
thesis is to evolve a model of workforce flourishing that includes employees’
relationship with their work. Therefore, the structure of engagement climate found
in the preceding study will be assessed in relation to work group and organisation
identification, as well as workforce flourishing.
Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was applied in the previous chapter to
help define the attributes of engagement climate that exist within the work
environment. Evaluating the relationship between engagement climate and
workforce flourishing by controlling for the effects of identification will help to
reveal if positive work conditions lead to positive functioning in the workplace.
Furthermore, this study will assess the importance of the need for employees to
connect personally with their work, and how this facilitates a relationship between
work environments and flourishing.
In contrast to disengaged employees, engaged employees are an asset to an
organisation as they have an increased likelihood of contributing to organisational
goals (Howe, 2003; Langford, 2009; May et al., 2004; Schaufeli & Bakker, 2010).
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 175 of 280
Engaged employees also develop positive relationships with co-workers and
supervisors within the organisation (Luthan & Peterson, 2001; Robertson & Cooper,
2010). Engaged employees also have more positive attitudes and behaviours that
contribute to organisational effectiveness (Howe, 2003; Kahn, 1990; Langford,
2009; Demerouti & Cropanzano, 2010). Engaged employees would appear to
function in a positive manner in the course of their work consistent with the concept
of flourishing (Dutton et al., 2011). Engaged employees would also be more likely
to have high levels of identification as a consequence of positive relationships with
co-workers and supervisors (Dutton et al., 2010). Positive relationships are
underscored by positive attitudes and behavioural displays, or in other words, they
would be more likely to flourish (e.g., Keyes, 2007; Seligman, 2011).
However, in the current study, engagement climate is a more expedient
construct to adopt compared to employee engagement per se, because the later has
strong similarity with the construct of identification and could therefore confound
relationships between the constructs. Engagement climate helps shift focus from
exploring the connection between an employee and their work environment, to the
conditions that may facilitate a connection such as this. Engagement climate
consisting of participation in decision making, communication,
feedback/recognition, and perceived organisational support is distinct from the
construct of identification.
Identification refers to incorporation of group values, beliefs, and goals as
one’s own (Haslam, 2014; Turner et al., 1987), whereas engagement climate is an
antecedent, a pre-condition, which promotes identification. According to Bakker et
al. (2011), employee perceptions specific to aspects of their work environment are
important for promotion of close psychological relationships with their work.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 176 of 280
Therefore, employee perceptions play an important role in linking an employee with
their work, considered to be the foundations of engagement climate. As such,
engagement climate involves an assessment of condition at work with the potential
to increase identification with work related groups as a consequence, including work
groups and the organisation as a whole. To assess the relationship of employees to
their work and the effects of the work environment on these relationships, the
association of engagement climate to work group and organisation identification will
be explored.
Brewer’s (1991, 2008) optimal distinctiveness theory, and the findings from
the first study in this thesis, suggest that engagement climate may have a different
impact on identification according to the degree of abstraction of the target group. In
the first study of this thesis, it was found that work group identification predicted
workforce flourishing and employee health to a greater degree than organisation
identification. The difference was attributed to the capacity of work group
identification to foster more frequent and more personalised interaction with other
workers compared to organisation identification. It was therefore argued that work
group identification has a greater relationship with social well-being, which results
in enhanced workforce flourishing.
Positive interactions associated with identification may occur according to
conditions present within an engagement climate (see Dutton et al., 2010).
According to van Knippenberg and van Schie (2000), work group identification,
rather than organisation identification, is the more likely circumstance in which
employee interactions occur. Therefore, engagement climate, inclusive of activities
such as participation in decision making, communication, and feedback/recognition
are more likely to occur at the level of work group rather than the organisation
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 177 of 280
(Brewer, 2008; van Knippenberg & van Schie, 2000). Organisational support, the
fourth component of engagement climate, is likely to be evenly perceived at both
work group and organisation identification levels. Therefore, there is unlikely to be
differences in organisational support for each target of identification.
In terms of organisational support, the lack of predicted preference in the
relationship between either work group or organisation identification is attributed to
how these identification targets relate to the interaction between employees’ and
their supervisor/manager. According to Eisenberger, Stinglhamber, Vandenberghe,
Sucharski, and Rhoades (2002), the supervisor/manager represents an organisation
more so than most others within that organisation. However, the supervisor/manager
is also representative of the work group that they lead. Therefore, predicting which
of the two targets of identification might be influenced through perceptions of
organisational support is complex and provincial. Nevertheless, participation in
decision making, communication, and feedback/recognition all appear to have a
clear association with interpersonal interaction and, as such, are predicted to
associate with work group identification more so than organisation identification.
Consistent with this premise, work group identification was predicted to have
superior explanatory capacity regarding the effect of engagement climate on
flourishing, compared to organisation identification.
Hypothesis 1: Engagement climate will have a significant positive
relationship with work group and organisation identification. However, work group
rather than organisation identification will demonstrate a greater relationship with
engagement climate based on the greater likelihood of positive social interaction
with work group identification.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 178 of 280
Hypothesis 2a: Similar to study one in Chapter 3 of this thesis, identification
will be positively associated with workforce flourishing. Work group identification
compared to organisation identification will demonstrate a greater relationship with
workforce flourishing.
Hypothesis 2b: Engagement climate will have a positive association with
workforce flourishing.
Hypothesis 2c: The effect of engagement climate on flourishing will be
explained by identification. Therefore, when the effects of identification are
controlled, engagement climate will not significantly contribute to workforce
flourishing beyond the effects of identification. The effect of engagement climate on
workforce flourishing is more likely to be explained by work group rather than
organisation identification.
6.2. Method
6.2.1. Participants
Participants and the organisation involved in this study were the same as the
quantitative study in the previous chapter. Details about participants and the
organisation can be found there.
6.2.2. Procedure and Design
Procedure details are the same as the quantitative study in the previous
chapter. Details about procedures can be found there. The following is a description
of the design for the current study.
A cross sectional design was used in the study to measure staff in terms of
engagement climate, identification, and flourishing. The dependant variables at
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 179 of 280
different stages in the analysis were work group and organisation identification and
workforce flourishing. Workforce flourishing contained measures of psychological
well-being, social well-being, and hedonic well-being. Independent variables at
different stages of the analysis included engagement climate, work group
identification, and organisation identification. The engagement climate variable
included measures of communication satisfaction, quality and occurrence of
feedback/recognition, participation in decision making, and perceptions of
organisational support.
6.2.3. Materials
A questionnaire was provided to participants to complete online or in paper
format. A copy of the questionnaire can be found in Appendix B.
Engagement Climate
Details about the measures used for engagement climate can be found in the
quantitative study in the previous chapter. A brief summary of each measure is
provided here for convenience.
Communication Effectiveness, a subscale of the job satisfaction survey
(Spector, 1985) that assesses employee satisfaction with organisational
communication was used.
Feedback/Recognition was measured using Sims et al.’s (1976) feedback
subscale from the job characteristics inventory.
Participation in Decision Making was measured using Vroom’s (1959)
psychological participation scale.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 180 of 280
Organisational Support was measured using ten items from the Survey of
Perceived Organisational Support (SPOS) (Eisenberger et al., 1986).
Identification
Work group and Organisation Identification were measured using van Dick
et al.’s (2004) dimensional measure of identification. The scale was designed to
explore different foci of identification on four dimensions including cognitive,
affective, evaluative, and behavioural. Although the dimensions of identification
was not of interest in the current study, the clear distinction of identification targets
for respondents and the range of items for each target of identification was assessed
as desirable above that of the single item measure used in the first study of this
thesis. The scale consists of seven items for each foci of identification and was
scored using a Likert response style ranging from 0 = low identification to 6 = high
identification.
The scale is presented to participants in the form of a table or grid with the
first column representing each of the questions, then subsequent columns for each of
the identification foci with space underneath to enter scores for the seven questions
running in rows across the table. Participants were asked to enter a score for how
true each question or statement was with respect to each of the identification target
groups. An example of a question is “Being a member of my [team/work group]
reflects my personality well”. Cronbach’s alpha in the van Dick et al. (2004) study
ranged from .80 to .84. Both work group and organisation identification measures
were assessed for reliability separately. For the work group identification measure,
items four through to seven were removed on account of their poor contribution to
the scale. Cronbach’s alpha for the remaining three item measure of work group
identification was .86. For the organisation identification measure, reliability
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 181 of 280
assessment resulted in the removal of the same items as per the work group
identification measure (i.e., 4, 5, 6, & 7). Cronbach’s alpha for the remaining three
item measure of organisation identification was .84.
Workforce Flourishing Measures
Hedonic well-being - Job satisfaction: Warr et al.’s (1979) 15 item global job
satisfaction scale formed the starting point towards deriving a measure of hedonic
well-being. Repeating the same procedure used in the first study of this thesis the
scale was assessed, and items selected, based on face validity relative to construct of
hedonic well-being. Therefore, items 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 11, and 12 that were
determined in study one of this thesis also formed the starting point for scale
assessment in the current study. Secondly, the selected items then underwent
reliability analysis to assess contributions and cohesiveness of the group of items
(see Chapter 4 for a more detailed description of item selection priorities). In the
current study items 1, 2, and 6 were removed because of comparatively poor
contribution to the scale compared to the other items. The items remaining included
item 4, 10, 11, and 12 used in study one of this thesis and also items 8 and 14.
However, to maintain consistency with the first study, and for reasons of parsimony,
only items 4, 10, 11, and 12 were retained for analysis. Items were answered using a
7 point Likert scale ranging from 0 = not satisfied to 6 = completely satisfied. The
four items used are listed in Chapter 4. Cronbach’s alpha for remaining four items
used in this study was .90. The items representing hedonic well-being were linked
by common inference to the value, or satisfaction, with organisational or
management actions that arguably promote effectiveness in the organisation.
Psychological well-being – In the absence of the organisational commitment
scale by Allen and Meyer (1990) used in the first study of this thesis, the cynicism
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 182 of 280
sub-scale form the Maslach Burnout Inventory General Survey (MBI – GS)
(Maslach et al., 1996) was used. As the sub-scale of cynicism was used to assess the
convergent validity of engagement climate in the previous chapter, scale reliability
had already been performed. Three items were retained from the original five.
Remaining items were 8, 9, and 14 of the MBI-GS and are listed below. The three
items used in this study are consistent with aspects reported to associate with
positive psychological functioning (see, Keyes, 2007; Ryff, 2013; Seligman, 2011).
According to the authors of this scale, cynicism reflects indifference or distant
attitudes towards work. This scale therefore captures the negative end of the
spectrum of psychological well-being reflecting psychological states of mind that
impact on functioning at work such as interest, enthusiasm, and cynicism. Responses
to questions were scored on a seven point Likert scale ranging from 0 = never to 6 =
every day. Respondents were asked to indicate the level of frequency of occurrence
for each of the questions. Scores for items were reversed to maintain consistency
with the positive orientation of other measures of workforce flourishing as well as
the premise that flourishing is measured in positive terms. The items remaining are
listed below and Cronbach’s alpha was .83 for the three items.
I have become less interested in my work since I started this job (item 8 - reversed).
I have become less enthusiastic about my work (item 9 – reversed).
I have become more cynical about whether my work contributes anything (item 14 – reversed)
Social well-being was measured using items from Smith et al.’s (1983)
Organisational Citizenship Behaviour (OCB) scale, following the same procedure
for selecting items as that was used for hedonic and psychological well-being
measures. Based on face validity of items as representing positive social interaction,
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 183 of 280
or social well-being, items 1, 3, 5, 7, and 13 were selected for further consideration,
as was done for the first study in this thesis. Assessment of scale reliability showed
that all items had similar variances and means. However, item five was removed to
maintain consistency with the items used in the first study representing social well-
being. Items representing social well-being were 1, 3, 7, and 13 and are listed in
Chapter 4. Respondents were asked to think of an employee who worked or had
worked with them and to rate how characteristic each item was of that employee.
Scores are based on a 5 point Likert scale ranging from 1 = not characteristic to 5 =
totally characteristic. Cronbach’s alpha in the current study was .81. Each item
shared a common theme of positive social functioning.
6.2.4. Data Preparation
A description of data preparation for this data set was reported in the previous
chapter in the quantitative study. A brief overview is provided here for convenience.
Questionnaire data were screened using SPSS (v21.0) statistical software. Two cases
were removed due to large amounts of missing data leaving a total of 126 cases.
Other missing data were at low rates (below 2.5%) and considered random. Missing
data was replaced using the SPSS regression method. No outliers were present in the
measures used in this study. No instances of skewness or kurtosis were found.
6.2.5. Analysis
The aim of developing the construct of engagement climate in this thesis was
to advance understanding of circumstances or practices that promote identification
in a positive way within a work environment. Often efforts to promote identification
involve direct competition and result in conflict and negativity towards out-groups
(Hogg & Terry, 2000; Tajfel & Turner, 1979). Therefore, within an organisation,
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 184 of 280
competition therefore has the potential for undesirable side effects (Hogg & Terry,
2000).
The next step in analysis was to test the construct of engagement climate in
relation to each of two identification targets - work group and organisation
identification. The final aspect of analysis undertaken was to assess the relationship
between engagement climate, identification, and workforce flourishing by exploring
the mediating properties of identification.
6.3. Results
6.3.1. Structural Model Analysis: Engagement Climate’s relationship with Work group and Organisation Identification
The aim of the structural model analysis was to explore the potential effect of
engagement climate on two different identification targets; the work group and the
organisation. Increasing levels of identification is often approached in ways that
evoke inter-group rivalry and competition (see, Hogg & Terry, 2000; Tajfel &
Turner, 1979; van Dick et al., 2004; van Knippenberg & Ellemers, 1993).
Engagement climate represents an approach to identification that is sustainable and
without the negative side-effects of rivalry and competition.
Using AMOS (v21.0), the model of engagement climate and work group
identification was the model examined first. An excellent fit to the data was found,
2 (13) = 16.304, p < .233, and fit indices added further support for the model’s good
fit (see table 6.1). Loadings for latent variables, correlations, and explained variance
for the model are displayed in Figure 6.1 and correlations, means, and standard
deviations are displayed in Table 6.2.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 185 of 280
The model of engagement climate and organisation identification was run
next, also using AMOS (v21.0). The model was not supported by the data, 2 (13) =
40.990, p < .000, although some fit indices indicated a marginal degree of fit (see
table 6.1). Inspection of standardised residual covariances and modification indices
suggested that the manifest variable of participation in decision making was cross
loading with item one of organisation identification. This item asks if people think it
is true that they identify with the organisation. Participation in decision making was
also cross loading with feedback/recognition in the same latent construct of
engagement climate. It would seem that in terms of organisation identification,
participation is closely intertwined with a state of identification and also the
feedback/recognition one gets at work. This may account for the high degree of
shared variance between these variables. To achieve model fit the manifest variable
of participation was removed from the construct of engagement climate and the
model re-run. The re-specified model of engagement climate and organisation
identification was a good fit to the data, 2 (8) = 16.066, p < .041, and fit indices
added further support (see table 6.1). Loadings for latent variables, correlations, and
explained variance for the model are displayed in Figure 6.2 and correlation, means,
and standard deviations are displayed in Table 6.3. Despite the model of engagement
climate and organisation identification displaying moderate fit after re-specification,
the model of engagement climate and work group identification demonstrates
superior fit to data in this study.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 186 of 280
Table 6.1.
Structural Model Fit Indices for Engagement Climate in Relations to Two Identification Targets.
Model 2 df 2/df RMSEA RFI CFI TLI GFI NFI
Work group 16.304 13 1.254 .045 .937 .992 .987 .962 .961
Organisation - Step 1 40.990 13 3.153 .131 .845 .931 .889 .921 .904
Organisation - Step 2 16.066 8 2.008 .090 .911 .975 .953 .964 .953
Figure 6.1. Structural Model for the Relationship between Engagement Climate and Work Group Identification.
Figure 6.2. Structural Model for the Relationship between Engagement Climate and Organisation Identification after Re-specification of the Model.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 187 of 280
Table 6.2.
Correlations, Means, Standard Deviations, and Alphas for the Model of Engagement Climate and Work Group Identification.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1. Engagement Climate 1
2. Work group Identification .617 1
3. Feedback/Recognition .805 .496 1
4. Participation .729 .449 .587 1
5. Communication .679 .419 .547 .495 1
6. Organisational Support .776 .478 .625 .565 .527 1
7. W-Group ID Item 1 .528 .856 .425 .384 .358 .409 1
8. W-Group ID Item 2 .499 .809 .402 .363 .339 .387 .693 1
9. W-Group ID Item 3 .495 .803 .399 .361 .336 .384 .687 .650 1
M 4.71 2.47 3.32 3.83 3.36 4.78 4.45 4.90
SD 1.14 1.04 1.26 1.40 1.67 1.28 1.38 1.19
.86 .93 .83 .75 .93
Table 6.3.
Correlations, Means, Standard Deviations, and Alphas for the Model of Engagement Climate and Organisation Identification.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1. Engagement Climate 1
2. Organisation Identification .739 1
3. Feedback/Recognition .678 .501 1
4. Communication .717 .530 .486 1
5. Organisational Support .854 .631 .579 .612 1
6. Organisation ID Item 1 .583 .789 .395 .418 .498 1
7. Organisation ID Item 2 .638 .864 .433 .457 .545 .682 1
8. Organisation ID Item 3 .534 .723 .362 .383 .457 .571 .625 1
M 4.33 2.47 3.83 3.36 4.32 4.03 4.65
SD 1.20 1.04 1.40 1.67 1.35 1.44 1.35
.84 .93 .75 .93
6.3.2. Hierarchical Regression Analysis: Effects of Engagement Climate on Flourishing after controlling for Identification.
The final process in analysis for this study was to examine the relationship
between engagement climate and flourishing while controlling for the effects of
identification. The two targets of identification were of interest here to assess how
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 188 of 280
each might interact with engagement climate and affect the relationship with
flourishing. Hierarchical multiple regression was used in this instance because the
small sample total was not compatible with a structural equation approach given the
number of parameters involved. The number of parameters that would be freely
estimated in such a model compared to the number of cases was below the 10:1 ratio
recommended by Blunch (2013). Tabachnick and Fiddel (2014) recommend a
formula for regression analysis that calculates sample size according to the number
of independent variables used in the equation. The sample of 128 in the current
study exceeds the forecast number of 90 obtained by applying the Tabachnick and
Fiddel equation.
However, before the regression analysis was conducted, a CFA of the
construct of workforce flourishing was conducted in order to justify the calculation
of a composite mean score for the construct and apply this in regression analysis.
Because the measure of psychological well-being in this study was different to the
measure used in the first study (Chapter 4), a CFA analysis was important in order to
assess the validity of the new combination of measures.
The next step involved was to run separate hierarchical regression equations,
one each for work group and organisation identification. The identification measure
was entered into the equation in the first step. For the second step, the four
components of engagement climate; participation, communication,
feedback/recognition, and organisational support were entered into the analysis.
Results of the hierarchical regression for each target of identification are reported
below.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 189 of 280
CFA of Workforce Flourishing
The measures of emotional (hedonic) well-being and social well-being used in
study one of this theses were found to combine well and contribute to the construct
of workforce flourishing. The measure of emotional (hedonic) well-being was drawn
from Warr et al.’s (1979) global satisfaction scale. The measure of social well-being
was drawn from Smith et al.’s (1983) measure of organisational citizenship
behaviour. The same set of items used in study one for these two measures were
used again in this study to provide manifest variables of their respective constructs
comprising workforce flourishing. The third measure, psychosocial well-being, was
measured using items from the cynicism sub-scale of Maslach et al.’s (1996) MBI-
GS. Three items formed the manifest indicators of the psychological well-being
component of workforce flourishing; scores for these items were reversed to reflect
a positive contribution to workforce flourishing.
To assess the contributions of the three scales to workforce flourishing, a
confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed (see Figure 6.3). Results revealed
a good fit for the data, 2 (41) = 55.134, p < .069 (see table 6.4), with eigenvalues
confirming a three factor solution to the data. Inspection of standardised residual co-
variances and modification indices revealed that the model might benefit from re-
specification, particularly in relation to item four of the job satisfaction scale;
however, for reasons of maintaining consistency with the factor model found in
study one of this thesis, no further changes were made.
Table 6.4.
Fit Indices for Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) of the Construct of Workforce Flourishing with a Second Sample.
2 df 2/df RMSEA RFI CFI TLI GFI NFI
55.134 41 1.345 .053 .909 .981 .975 .926 .932
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 190 of 280
Figure 6.3. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) of the Latent Construct of Workforce Flourishing.
Two hierarchical multiple regressions with workforce flourishing as the
dependent variable were the next steps undertaken in analysis. The regression
analyses involving organisation identification, engagement climate, and workforce
flourishing was conducted first. Organisation identification was entered at the first
step of the regression to control for the effects of identification in the relationship
between engagement climate and workforce flourishing. At stage two the variables
communication, feedback/recognition, participation, and organisational support
were entered as representative of engagement climate. Correlations between the
regression variables are reported in Table 6.5. Regression statistics are displayed in
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 191 of 280
Table 6.6. The results of the hierarchical regression for organisation identification,
engagement climate, and workforce flourishing showed that organisation
identification explained a significant amount of variance in workforce flourishing F
(1, 124) = 44.190, p < .000. Organisation identification explained 26.3% of the
variance in workforce flourishing. Introducing the engagement climate set of
variables in stage two of the regression analysis explained an additional 41.0% of
the variance in workforce flourishing F (4, 120) = 37.538, p < .000. When
organisation identification and the four engagement climate variables were included
in the regression model only participation, communication, and
feedback/recognition remained significant predictors of workforce flourishing.
Altogether, the five variables accounted for 67.3% of the variance in workforce
flourishing.
Table 6.5.
Correlations for Multiple Regression Analysis of Engagement Climate on Workforce Flourishing, Controlling for Organisation Identification.
1 2 3 4 5 6
1. Workforce Flourishing 1
2. Organisation Identification .513 1
3. Feedback/Recognition .695 .386 1
4. Communication .658 .507 .520 1
5. Participation .654 .369 .643 .447 1
6. Organisational Support .658 .584 .593 .587 .554 1
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 192 of 280
Table 6.6.
Summary of Hierarchical Regression Analysis for Organisation Identification, Workforce Flourishing, and Engagement Climate.
Variable t sr2 R R2 2
Step 1 .513 .263 .263
Org Identification .513 6.65* 0.26
Step 2 .820 .673 .410
Org Identification .093 1.41NS 0.01
Participation .239 3.35* 0.03
Org Support .146 1.87NS 0.01
Communication .275 3.99* 0.04
Feedback/recognition .275 3.67 0.04
N= 126, *p < .001, NS = Not significant
The hierarchical regression for work group identification, engagement climate,
and workforce flourishing was conducted next. Work group identification was
entered at the first step of the regression to control for the effects of this target of
identification in the relationship between engagement climate and workforce
flourishing. At stage two, the variables communication, feedback/recognition,
participation, and organisational support were entered as representative of
engagement climate. Correlations between the regression variables are reported in
Table 6.7. Regression statistics are displayed in Table 6.8. The results of the
hierarchical regression for work group identification, engagement climate, and
workforce flourishing showed that work group identification explained a significant
31.4% of the variance in workforce flourishing, F (1, 124) = 56.696, p < .000.
Introducing the engagement climate set of variables in stage two of the regression
analysis explained an additional 37.8% of the variance in workforce flourishing F
(4, 120) = 36.850, p < .000. When work group identification and the four
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 193 of 280
engagement climate variables were included in the regression model all variables
made a significant contribution to workforce flourishing. Altogether, 69.2% of the
variance in workforce flourishing was explained by work group identification and
the four engagement climate variables.
Table 6.7.
Correlations for Multiple Regression Analysis of Engagement Climate on Workforce Flourishing, Controlling for Work Group Identification.
1 2 3 4 5 6
1. Workforce Flourishing 1
2. Work group Identification .560 1
3. Feedback/Recognition .695 .469 1
4. Communication .658 .412 .520 1
5. Participation .654 .369 .643 .447 1
6. Organisational Support .658 .464 .593 .587 .554 1
Table 6.8.
Summary of Hierarchical Regression Analysis for Work Group Identification, Workforce Flourishing, and Engagement Climate.
Variable t sr2 R R2 2
Step 1 .560 .314 .314
WG Identification .560 7.53* 0.31
Step 2 .832 .692 .378
WG Identification .187 3.12* 0.03
Participation .237 3.43* 0.03
Org Support .146 2.03b 0.01
Communication .272 4.14* 0.04
Feedback/recognition .227 3.05a 0.02
N= 126, *p < .001, a p < .005, b p < .05
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 194 of 280
6.4. Discussion
The prediction in hypothesis one that engagement climate would have a
significant positive relationship with work group and organisation identification was
supported by the data. Results also supported the prediction that engagement climate
would have a stronger relationship with work group identification rather than
organisation identification. The structural model for engagement climate and work
group identification fit the data well without the need for modification. Whereas the
model featuring engagement climate and organisation identification required some
re-specification before adequate fit could be found and fit indices were uniformly
lower than the model featuring work group identification. A greater amount of
variance was explained when organisation identification was considered compared
to work group identification. However, work group identification as a dependent
variable was a better fit to the data.
Results for hypotheses 2a, 2b, and 2c that employed hierarchical regression
analysis were generally as predicted with hypothesis 2c the exception. Work group
identification had higher regression weights and percentage of variance explained
for workforce flourishing than organisation identification indicating hypothesis 2a
was supported. Hypothesis 2b predicting engagement climate would have a positive
effect on work force flourishing was also supported in hierarchical regression
analysis. However, hypothesis 2c predicting that the positive effects of engagement
climate on workforce flourishing would be explained by identification were not
supported for either work group or organisation identification.
Once engagement climate was entered into the hierarchical regression,
organisation identification became a non-significant contributor to workforce
flourishing. In contrast, work group identification remained significant after the
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 195 of 280
entry of the engagement climate variables at the second step of the regression
analysis. These findings suggest that engagement climate explains the association of
organisation identification with workforce flourishing more completely than when
work group identification and workforce flourishing are considered.
Considering the results of the hypotheses tested, engagement climate relates
highly with identification as well as explaining additional variance in workforce
flourishing to that of work group identification. The results support forecasts made
at the conclusion of Chapter 5 suggesting engagement climate is an important
contributor to both identification and workforce flourishing. These findings in
relation to the tested hypotheses will be discussed in detail below along with
implications for engagement, identification, and flourishing (well-being) theories.
6.4.1. Engagement Climate
Engagement climate was found to have a positive relationship with both work
group and organisation identification and provides insight into the potential agency
of engagement climate in terms of organisational interventions. The four
components of engagement climate examined here provide excellent reference for
the formulation of strategies to promote identification within an environment such as
an organisation. In terms of work group identification, all four elements of
engagement climate related to this identification target explaining a significant
proportion of the variance in work group identification. Similarly, engagement
climate explained a large amount of variance in organisation identification;
however, this was only after participation in decision making was removed to obtain
acceptable fit to the data.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 196 of 280
Two issues are raised by these results. The first involves an explanation of the
difference in variance explained by the two targets of identification. The second
highlights the difference in the array of constructs representing engagement climate
that were necessary to find a fit with the data. Both issues have a relationship to the
formulation of strategies designed to enhance employee identification with their
work, and the subsequent benefits that increased identification offers such as
workforce flourishing.
These two issues are likely to have a common origin in that the configuration
of engagement climate constructs differs according to the target of identification,
and therefore, one might expect differences in variance explained. The greater
amount of variance explained in organisation identification compared to work group
identification can be attributed to differences in the way these identification targets
are related to the work environment. Evidence for this argument is found by
examining each of the engagement climate factor configurations predicting their
respective identification targets. Organisation identification was predicted by three
of the four components of engagement climate; communication,
feedback/recognition, and organisational support. In contrast, work group
identification was predicted by all four components of engagement climate,
including participation. Putting aside the differences in configuration of engagement
climate for the moment, the components of engagement climate that were found in
common may not effect different identification targets in the same way. The
different effects may therefore result in different amount of variance being explained
for each target. Communication, feedback/recognition, and organisational support
may have more in common with organisation level identification and facilitate this
relationship more so than work group identification.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 197 of 280
This line of argument would appear to contradict arguments by Brewer (2008),
and van Knippenberg and van Schie (2000), that interactions such as
communication, feedback/recognition, and organisational support are more effective
at promoting work group rather than organisation identification. However, it is
possible that the nature or subject matter that is the focus of such interactions is
more consistent with organisation identification than work group identification. This
may be particularly evident for the organisation under examination here. For
example, if the content of communication is centred on organisational issues more
so than issues pertaining to the work group, aspects important to identification such
as meaning are more likely to be forged at the organisational level (Macy &
Schneider, 2008). In other words, expressions of engagement are likely to be
consistent with the meaning and significance generated during work activity (see
Kahn, 1990). This line of argument runs counter to Brewer’s (2008) and van
Knippenberg and Schie’s (2000) claim that the ability to interact and share
knowledge determines effectiveness, and therefore, work groups are likely to be
prominent in terms of effectiveness. Instead, the combination of opportunities to
interact, such as through communication and feedback, in addition to the focus or
nature of those interactions and the meaning they generate also appears to be
important to identification and effectiveness through flourishing.
The difference between the configurations of engagement climate that explain
each of the two targets of identification for the model variations is the other issue
raised by the findings. Work group identification was predicted by engagement
climate, inclusive of communication, feedback/recognition, organisation support,
and participation. In contrast, organisation identification was predicted by three of
the four components of engagement climate, but not by participation. Consistent
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 198 of 280
with the preceding argument, the nature of the relationship between variables may
offer an explanation for the findings. For example, participation in decision making
might only relate to work group identification if the nature of the decision being
made is directed predominantly at the work group activities and not at organisational
levels. There may arguably be a necessity to match actions undertaken through
engagement climate with the activity normally occurring within a particular
identification group.
Greenfield (2004) suggested that participation in decision making raises
awareness and knowledge about the values that underpin decisions being made.
Knowledge and awareness of values is also an important aspect of identification and
is specific to the target of identification (Tajfel & Turner, 1979; Turner et al., 1987).
If participation in decision making is practiced in relation to decisions about the
work group, then work group values are likely to become more salient and promote
work group identification as a result. This explanation is compatible with the
findings of the research presented here. It appears that engagement climate helps
enhance the level of identification experienced; however, the nature of the
interactions occurring within the climate of engagement also helps to determine the
target of identification that is most likely to be most affected.
6.4.2. Workforce Flourishing
Reflecting the factor structure for workforce flourishing that was found in
Chapter 4 of this thesis; a similar three factor structure was found for workforce
flourishing in this study. Correlation patterns between the factors were also
consistent with those found in Chapter 3 with hedonic well-being and psychological
well-being demonstrating the highest correlation level. These two variables were
also found to have the highest correlation between variables in the study reported in
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 199 of 280
Chapter 4. The lowest correlation was between social well-being and psychological
well-being and this was also consistent with earlier findings. Fit indices of the CFA
model in this study and the study in Chapter 3 were also of similar magnitude.
However, the model in the current study showed slightly reduced levels of fit across
the spectrum of indices compared to the earlier study, although differences were
marginal.
Comparison of the CFA results for workforce flourishing in this study and the
study in Chapter 4 suggest the factorial consistency for the construct demonstrates
stability across the two different samples. Furthermore, the replacement of items of
organisational commitment used earlier with items of cynicism from Maslach et al.’s
(1996) burnout inventory in this study appears not to have modified the factorial
structure of workforce flourishing. The construct of workforce flourishing is argued
to be reliably represented by hedonic, social, and psychological well-being and
presents a context specific approach to the investigation of flourishing.
The relationship of work group and organisation identification to workforce
flourishing was tested in the current study; with current results reiterating the
relationship found between these two variables in study one of this thesis. Extending
the model, engagement climate was included to provide insight into the relationship
between work environments (engagement climate), employee characteristics
(identification), and effectiveness through functionality (workforce flourishing).
A hierarchical regression analysis was chosen in preference to structural
equation modelling (SEM) on the basis that the sample size in the current study may
have generated unstable parameter estimates by using SEM given the number of
variables of interest (see Blunch, 2013). Hierarchical regression analysis showed
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 200 of 280
that for step one, organisation identification explained a significant proportion of the
variance in workforce flourishing. The amount of variance explained was lower than
that found in Chapter 4 of this thesis. In relation to work group identification, the
hierarchical regression analysis showed that at the first step a significant amount of
variance was also explained in workforce flourishing. However, this was also lower
than the amount of variance found in Chapter 4. For the organisational population
represented in this study, identification appears to account for a notable portion of
the variance in workforce flourishing, albeit of reduced magnitude, compared to the
earlier study in this thesis. The pattern of relationships found here is consistent with
the earlier study in Chapter 4 of this thesis. In addition, the current study found that
when organisation identification and work group identification were controlled, the
inclusion of engagement climate explained additional variance in workforce
flourishing.
In terms of organisation identification, the addition of engagement climate into
the regression equation resulted in organisation identification no longer contributing
significantly to workforce flourishing. Instead, participation, communication and
feedback/recognition were the only significant contributions to workforce
flourishing after all variables were entered. In contrast, when all variables had been
entered into the hierarchical regression equation involving work group
identification, all four components of engagement climate were found to be
significant contributors to workforce flourishing. Furthermore, work group
identification remained a significant contributor to workforce flourishing after all
variables had entered the regression equation. These findings demonstrate that for
this sample the relationship between engagement climate and workforce flourishing
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 201 of 280
involves a broader composition of factors when work group identification is
concerned compared to organisation identification.
Taken together, the results of the two regression analyses suggest that the
social environment is instrumental in contributing to the functional capacity of a
workforce and organisation in the form of workforce flourishing. Communication,
participation, and recognition seem particularly important to workforce flourishing
regardless of the focus of identification. However, strong work group identification
appears to contribute additional predictive capacity for flourishing beyond that of
engagement climate alone. In addition, work group identification appears to affect
perceptions of organisational support in a way that helps link such support with
flourishing that was not evident when organisation identification was considered.
Work group identification involves a greater degree of social interaction
compared to organisation identification (van Knippenberg & van Schie, 2000).
However, further research is required in order to support the claim that social
interaction is responsible for promoting a broader array of engagement climate
factors that facilitate workforce flourishing. The results presented here are
nevertheless consistent with idea that the added interactional opportunities
associated with work group identification contribute to workforce flourishing. In
conclusion, the relationship of engagement climate to workforce flourishing that
included work group identification accounted for a richer array of work related
factors and was a better fit to the data than the relationship involving organisation
identification. For the organisation represented in this study, work group
identification provides a focal point that better represents links between the
environment (engagement climate) and the potential effectiveness of the
organisation through workforce flourishing.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 202 of 280
6.4.3. Theoretical implications
The findings of this study have implications for theory related to psychological
climate (e.g., James & Jones, 1974). Researchers such as Bakker et al., (2011) have
argued that generalised conceptualisations of psychological work climate may have
limited usefulness, proposing instead that targeted approaches may yield more
information. Specific approaches to psychological work climate have been used to
explore ethics (DeConinck, 2011) and procedural justice and service climates
(Walumbwa et al., 2010). This study now adds engagement climate to those studies
exploring targeted, specific aspects of psychological climate that relate to
engagement. In Chapter 5 of this thesis, four components related to engagement
climate were proposed, and later, support for the four components was found using
qualitative analysis and CFA. The current study has advanced both the
understanding and utility of engagement climate through SEM and regression
analysis.
Evidence was found in this study linking engagement climate to both work
group and organisation identification. Results such as these demonstrate the
potential of the engagement climate construct in helping to understand and influence
work related behaviour and organisational effectiveness. Assessment of engagement
climate revealed that all four components of engagement climate helped explain a
significant amount of variance in work group identification. In comparison, only
communication, feedback/recognition, and organisational support of the engagement
climate construct made a significant contribution to organisation identification.
Given that organisation identification and work group identification have
demonstrated differences in their relationship with employee effectiveness
(flourishing), knowledge about the engagement climate factors that facilitate these
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 203 of 280
different identification targets has both utility and value. More generally, insights
such as these demonstrate the advantages of investigating specific aspects of the
psychological climate, that can then be compared to outcomes such as identification
and flourishing.
Social identification theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) also provides a framework
with which to assess the relationship between engagement climate and both work
group and organisation identification. According to social identity theory,
identification with a group suggests that people become active in maintaining their
group’s distinctiveness in relation to other groups (e.g., Haslam, 2014; Haslam et al.,
2003). As a consequence, competition (Oakes, 1996), and underrating and devaluing
the worth of other groups (Haslam, 2014; Haslam et al., 2003) can become the
default pathway or strategy for increasing levels of identification within a group.
The results of this study provide evidence that less destructive means are available
to enhance identification in the workplace. Engagement climate that includes
communication, participation, feedback/recognition, and organisational support does
not target outside groups in negative ways for the purpose of enhancing
identification. Instead, engagement climate provides a positive contribution to
identification and workforce flourishing that does not undermine the capacity of
rival groups to function well also.
Brewer’s (1991, 2008) optimal distinctiveness theory also received some
support by the findings of the current study. Optimal distinctiveness theory posits
that identification with a group that balances the need for distinctiveness and the
competing need to belong will be more likely to strengthen identification. In terms
of work related identification, the work group rather than organisation is most likely
to balance these competing needs. The work group therefore, is more likely to
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 204 of 280
become the predominant target of identification and associate more naturally with
the work environment. In the current study, it was found that engagement climate
and work group identification was a better fit to the data than engagement climate
and organisation identification. Although the percentage of variance explained for
organisation identification was greater than that for work group identification, fewer
components of engagement climate contributed to explaining organisation
identification. The model found to fit the data for organisation identification is
certainly a more parsimonious solution compared to work group identification.
However, it is unlikely that the need for identification can be reduced to that which
is most simple to achieve. The contrast between model configurations also
highlights potential differences in antecedents for each target of identification.
Further study would be required to determine if this pattern of associations is
generalizable beyond the organisation in this study.
Hierarchical regression analysis demonstrated that work group identification
remained a significant contributor to workforce flourishing after engagement climate
was entered into the second step of the analysis. In contrast, organisation
identification did not continue to contribute significantly to workforce flourishing
after engagement climate was entered into the regression equation. Furthermore,
after controlling for work group identification, all four components of engagement
climate remained significant contributors to workforce flourishing. In other words,
in addition to work group identification, the engagement climate components of
communication, feedback/recognition, participation, and organisational support all
made significant contributions to workforce flourishing.
Compared to organisation identification, when engagement climate was added
to the equation, in this instance only communication, feedback/recognition, and
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 205 of 280
participation remained significant predictors of workforce flourishing. Comparing
these different outcomes suggests that work group identification provides a sense
making perspective that draws more broadly on environmental aspects of work to
promote effective functioning (workforce flourishing). This result is not surprising
given that there is a greater potential for social interaction at the level of work group
identification than organisational identification (van Knippenberg & van Schie,
2000).
Only for work group identification did organisational support and the target of
identification itself remain significant contributors to workforce flourishing after
entering engagement climate into the regression equation. Brewer (2009) stated that
people are motivated within a given context to adopt a target of identification that
enables the need to belong to be balanced with the need for distinctiveness. Work
group identification appears to enable this balance to be reached more so than
organisation identification. The effect of achieving such balance may be that the
target of identification becomes associated with flourishing directly by
demonstrating a relationship with flourishing beyond that explained by engagement
climate.
Furthermore, work group identification evokes a relationship between
perceptions of support (organisational support) and workforce flourishing (well-
being) that was overshadowed by other engagement climate variables when
organisation identification was the focus. To return to an earlier point, this is one
instance where parsimony is less desirable than the alternative diversity in social
environment determinants. Work group identification accounts for the complexity in
engagement climate, better than organisation identification. According to Brewer
(2009) in circumstances where identification leads to a balance between belonging
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 206 of 280
and distinctiveness needs, perceptions of trust and security are more likely,
facilitating pro-social interactions. In this study, work group identification, rather
than organisation identification may help in the sense making capacity of employees
to help reach an understanding of their environment and respond more effectively,
including balancing the needs for belonging and distinctiveness. Greater
effectiveness in such circumstances may foster more pro-social actions that together
help explain workforce flourishing as it occurs in natural settings.
Additional theoretical implication of the current study relate to the emerging
field of research into flourishing and functional well-being (Keyes, 2007; Ryff &
Singer, 2008; Seligman, 2011). Keyes (2007) approach to flourishing involved a
number of measures, however, they were categorised into three basic forms of well-
being; hedonic (or emotional) well-being, psychological well-being, and social well-
being. The factor structure found in the current study provides confirmation of the
association between these three sources of well-being. Furthermore, the three factor
structure of workforce flourishing found in this study replicated the same factorial
and correlational relationships that were found from CFA reported in Chapter 4.
These results endorse workforce flourishing as a construct with promising
consistency in its structure. Workforce flourishing has also been found to relate as
theorised to identification in both the current study and the previous study found in
Chapter 4. These findings that include confirmation of the three component structure
of flourishing and the predicted relationship of flourishing with identification and
engagement climate support further exploration of the flourishing construct.
Previous studies with a focus on identification and flourishing in the
workplace have been mostly speculative (e.g., Dutton et al., 2010, 2011). Some
studies, such as van Dick et al. (2008) have examined the relationship between job
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 207 of 280
satisfaction (Hedonic well-being) and identification finding correlations of r = .34
and r = .31 for work group identification and r = .43 and r = .22 for organisation
identification. Correlations with workforce flourishing found in this study were r =
.51 for organisation identification, and r = .56 for work group identification.
Following on from the Dick et al. (2008) study, the addition of functional well-being
to that of hedonic well-being, consistent with the approach in this study, appears to
offer additional explanatory potential, particularly in relation to identification in the
workplace. Flourishing is both theoretically and pragmatically important to
understanding and promoting organisation effectiveness.
6.4.4. Study Limitations
A number of limitations to the current study have been identified in relation to
the findings. Similar to the study in Chapter 3 of this thesis, the measures used to
represent the latent construct of flourishing were adopted based on their availability
rather than developed as new measures. Constructing new measures was beyond the
scope of this study given the primary concern was to investigate engagement climate
in relation to identification and workforce flourishing. The items used to represent
hedonic, psychological, and social well-being as factors of workforce flourishing
were obtained from measures of job satisfaction, cynicism, and citizenship
behaviours and performed similarly to the measures and selected items used in the
Chapter 4 study. Certainly, the relationships that were found in this study involving
work group and organisation identification support the use of the measures adopted
to represent the three components of workforce flourishing used here. However,
future research might endeavour to explore alternative measures to improve
explanatory capacities for workforce flourishing.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 208 of 280
Further limitations relate to the size of the sample. More elaborate analysis
between the variables of interest in this study may have been possible with a larger
sample size. However, this was not possible with the organisation involved on this
occasion. Importantly, the relationships implicated by theory and the presented
arguments underpinning this study were all explored. Furthermore, the analyses
undertaken were within the recommended parameters for sample size suggested by
Blunch (2013).
A related limitation was that the sample in this study was representative of one
organisation, and in relation to findings involving engagement climate in particular,
further research would enhance generalizability of the findings. The structure of
engagement climate that was supported by the data derived from qualitative analysis
of statements from employees in a local government organisation. The structure was
confirmed with data from a different organisation, associated with the employment
sector, and this goes in some way to support generalizability of findings for
engagement climate. In addition, the structural form of workforce flourishing found
in this study, was consistent with the structure found in an earlier study of this thesis
and reported in Chapter 4. Two different organisational populations, one from local
government, the other from an employment services organisation, were very similar
in terms of the structure found for the construct of workforce flourishing and this
also goes some way towards assessing generalizability of the findings for this
construct also.
6.5. Conclusion
This study sought to introduce and explore the relationship of engagement
climate with identification and workforce flourishing, of which the last two
constructs were examined earlier in this thesis. When engagement climate was tested
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 209 of 280
in two separate SEMs; as a predictor of work group identification in one, and as a
predictor of organisation identification in the other - engagement climate explained
significant amounts of variance in both targets of identification. The results endorse
the agency of the construct of engagement climate in promoting the personal
integration (identification) and optimal functioning (flourishing) within a work
environment.
The advantage of engagement climate in organisational research is that it
provides direct insight into strategic application that might stem from knowing how
other constructs are affected. For example, with respect to the current study and
thesis, engagement climate presents a straight forward approach to enhancing
employee identification in a way that promotes organisational effectiveness through
workforce flourishing. Furthermore, the results in this study, in relation to the
structure and relationships associated with workforce flourishing, were found to be
consistent with findings reported earlier in this thesis related to a sample of
employees from a local government organisation. These findings underscore the
importance of flourishing in organisational contexts and point towards future
research opportunities that will make an additional contribution to understanding
organisational and employee effectiveness through the lens of flourishing and well-
being.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 210 of 280
Chapter 7Thesis Conclusion
This thesis has involved construct testing and model development. The aim
has been to examine workforce functioning in relation to sustainable organisation
effectiveness, with the underlying intention to contribute to better organisational
practices. Theoretical contributions from this thesis are highlighted by the
introduction of a new construct in engagement climate and a variation on another
construct from flourishing to workforce flourishing. This thesis makes a further
theoretical contribution by demonstrating that social identification can be promoted
in positive, non-competitive ways to the mutual benefit of both group and
individual. Theoretical contributions were also made to the field of study centred on
flourishing and eudaimonia by demonstrating the explanatory advantages of the
eudaimonic-hedonic approach to flourishing and the application of a context specific
approach to flourishing in workforce flourishing. The context specific approach is a
departure from the mainstream that has taken a more holistic approach to
flourishing, conceptualised as a general state not tethered to the particulars of a
context. In addition, this thesis presented evidence for improved organisational and
leadership practices that produce sustainable and positive outcomes, notably in
relation to employee identification and engagement climate. The theoretical value of
the findings reported in this thesis and the main practical implications that are drawn
from the results are presented in this chapter.
As a means of exploring employee functionality, the construct of flourishing
was developed and tested. Consequently, a new variation of the construct in terms of
workforce flourishing was selected for this thesis to represent the dynamics of
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 211 of 280
functionality within the workforce. In early development of this thesis, the construct
of organisational health was adopted as a framework to examine employee
functioning. However, organisational health as an applied construct had a number of
limiting features, namely, the difficulty obtaining a consistent and manageable
definition. For example, organisational health may suggest employee health is at
optimum levels (Jaffe, 1995), or alternatively, it may indicate the functional capacity
of an organisation’s structures and governing practices (DeJoy et al., 2010).
Considerable contrasts between how the term organisational health is understood
render the use of the term problematic. Selecting one interpretation of organisational
health will rightly attract criticism that important elements have been ignored, and
with such variation in the way in which organisational health has been defined,
pursuit of this construct can become a cul de sac of semantics.
This thesis scrutinised the role of the workforce in relation to organisation
effectiveness and therefore, application of organisational health as a theoretical
framework was too expansive for such a purpose. Alternatively, flourishing, and
specifically, workforce flourishing is a construct that can be assigned to groups and
individuals, expressing effectiveness and functionality (Seligman, 2011). For the
purpose of this thesis, theory related to flourishing provided an informative
framework with which to better understand how a workforce might contribute to
organisation effectiveness and do so in a sustainable manner through a positive
association with employee health.
Flourishing encapsulates hedonic and eudaimonic well-being in which both
the emotional and functional come together to enable a healthy, effective, and
sustainable state of being (Huppert & So, 2013). In terms of functional well-being,
the distinction is made between psychological and social functioning (Dutton et al.,
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 212 of 280
2011; Ryan & Deci, 2001) which together equate to eudaimonia (Keyes, 2007; Ryan
& Deci, 2001). The blend of both hedonia and eudaimonia seem necessary to
achieve optimal functioning (Keyes & Simoes, 2012), and this was demonstrated in
the model developed in this thesis. These starting principles provided some initial
structure to the examination of workforce functioning in this thesis. Not only was it
shown that hedonic, psychological, and social elements of flourishing combine well
to articulate a well-functioning workforce; all three in combination were superior
when predicting health outcomes and support the instalment of flourishing as an
important organisational objective.
7.1. Summary of Theoretical Implications
Workforce flourishing, as explored in this thesis across two separate samples,
demonstrated promising consistency with theorised structure (e.g., Dutton et al.,
2011; Keyes, 2005). The three factor structure consisting of hedonic, psychological,
and social well-being was also shown to have a greater impact on employee health
when all three elements contributed significantly. However, the value of the
construct of workforce flourishing is not just inherent in its ability to draw together
hedonic, psychological, and social factors to explain outcomes. The greater value of
the construct of workforce flourishing, and flourishing in general, is the explanatory
framework it offers to describe positive gains that result in outcomes exceeding the
sum of parts (see Keyes & Simoes, 2012). The positive gain cycle is an example, in
which outcomes such as healthier employees result in an increased capacity to
function more effectively, contributing to further health benefits. Flourishing allows
growth in the very same attributes, behaviours, or habits that in turn, allow further
gains in flourishing.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 213 of 280
In research by Keyes and Simoes (2012), they found that only when hedonic,
psychological, and social well-being were considered in combination, rather than
separately, was a significant relationship with mortality found. Similarly, in the
research undertaken here, when all three aspects of workforce flourishing were
involved, better employee health outcomes were reported. For some time, theory and
research has endeavoured to understand how positive circumstances or
environments contribute to human enterprise. Theoretically, workforce flourishing
explains how positive circumstances can become self-sustaining as well as how
hedonic, psychological, and social elements come together to facilitate positive
outcomes and optimal functioning. Workforce flourishing may represent a new
perspective on the familiar dilemma of the happy - productive worker and help
explain optimal effectiveness in the workplace.
Considerable and sustained interest in the conditions that drive human
productivity and effectiveness emanated from the Hawthorn studies conducted in the
1920’s (Roethlisberger & Dickson, 1939). Essentially, the Hawthorn studies
highlighted that employees’ interpretations of their surrounds has an impact on their
effectiveness. From the debates initiated through these studies, a movement emerged
advocating the importance of social relationships, satisfaction, and self-actualization
as means to organisation effectiveness (Ledford, 1999). However, much of the
research conducted was less about the social and developmental aspects of work,
and more about employee emotion (Ryan & Deci, 2001). The concept of the happy-
productive worker is an example, describing the role of happiness or satisfaction of
employees as arguably leading to more productive and engaged activity (Staw,
1986). Workforce flourishing and the findings presented in this thesis would tend to
suggest there is more to productivity than employee happiness.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 214 of 280
Around a decade ago, Russell Cropanzano, Thomas Wright, and colleagues
(Wright & Cropanzano, 1997; Wright et al., 2002) argued that the accumulated
research findings for the happy-productive worker theory were somewhat equivocal,
suggesting also that the conceptualisation of happiness as satisfaction (usually job
satisfaction) was responsible for the mixed support for the link with productivity.
Wright and Cropanzano (2004) and Wright et al. (2002) proposed instead that
hedonia (psychological well-being as they described it) was more consistent with the
theory that happiness leads to performance. However, more recently Straume and
Vittersø (2012) have argued and found evidence that eudaimonic (functional) well-
being may be the foundations for heightened hedonic well-being. Therefore,
psychological and social well-being (eudaimonia) may be the necessary ingredient
for effectiveness that is heightened further in the presence of hedonia. Straume and
Vittersø found that meaning, interest, and social efficacy, all aspects of eudaimonia,
lead to higher levels of satisfaction when goals are achieved or positive outcomes
attained. In other words, strong eudaimonic links to activity results in richer rewards
in terms of hedonia (e.g., satisfaction, pleasure, happiness). Findings such as these,
along with the findings presented in this thesis, make an important contribution to
understanding the conditions that sustain employee effectiveness. Given the findings
reported here, rather than a happy-productive paradigm for organisational
effectiveness, a flourishing-productive agenda may be more accurate and worthy of
future exploration. Happiness per se is not the dominant driver of productive work.
Functional well-being or eudaimonia, when contributing to positive emotional states
consistent with hedonia (e.g., happiness), is likely to be more reliably associated
with productive work than when hedonia is absent.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 215 of 280
The extent to which the work environment might impact on the capacity of a
workforce to flourish was implied by the findings in study one that demonstrated a
strong link between identification and workforce flourishing. Identification with a
group such as those typically found within a workplace involves interpretive
processes that help an employee to understand their surrounds such that they are
able to respond effectively within that environment (Turner & Reynolds, 2011).
Once a link between identification and flourishing was found, it was deemed both
relevant and potentially valuable to explore the conditions that promote
identification within a workplace. Employee engagement and work climate literature
implied that certain practices and perceptions present in the workplace may help
promote high levels of identification (see Chapter 5). The conditions reported in this
thesis that impact on identification at work included participating in decision
making, feedback/recognition, open communication, and organisational support.
These findings have implications toward the way social identification theories are
understood. Firstly, on the basis that identification has a potentially beneficial effect
on well-being and health. Secondly, because engagement climate represents a
framework for encouraging identification without the need to solicit intergroup
competition and the negative side effects that might follow.
In relation to identification and health, the literature that contributed both
directly and indirectly to this thesis contained little empirical examination of the
health and well-being outcomes arising from work identification. Dutton et al.’s
(2010, 2011) papers come close but are not empirically based, although they offer
considered argument for the link between identification and well-being. Findings
from this thesis offer empirical evidence for contemporary understanding about how
an employee’s relationship with their work impacts on their health and well-being.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 216 of 280
Identification represents an important and potentially powerful resource at work that
unlocks the capacity of the workforce to be highly productive in terms of
flourishing. Furthermore, identification and flourishing are sustained by enhanced
employee health. Theoretically, identification might now be conceptualised beyond
an explanation of certain behaviours centred on conformity. Identification, and the
way employees’ relate to their work, can now be understood as an asset to
organisational enterprise through the mutual investment in the development of both
employee and organisation.
As an organisation moves towards holding employee development and
flourishing as a high priority, in turn an employee is more likely to hold the interests
of the organisation as their priority based on the consequences of higher levels of
identification. Identification, as a target or objective to achieve workforce
flourishing, represents a powerful combination that lays the foundations for a
sustainable ecology within the organisation. Sustainability arises in the sense that
identification linked to flourishing has a positive relationship with employee health.
Enhanced employee health, as an outcome of flourishing, adds further to the
capacity of a workforce to function well. Essentially, it is a positive gain spiral that
provides its own momentum for sustaining and enhancing positive outcomes for the
organisation and employees. Comparisons can be made to a healthy ecology where
activities and outcomes are beneficial and balanced so that the system is self-
supporting and sustainable.
Rabinovich et al. (2012) claimed that the content of identification (e.g., norms,
values, goals) is understood in reference to comparisons with other groups or out-
groups. However, the findings presented in this thesis in relation to engagement
climate suggest that non-comparative means are available from which to construct
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 217 of 280
an understanding of identification in terms of norms, values, and goals. Social
identification theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and self-categorisation theory (Turner
et al., 1987) may now generate fresh interest and new application in partnership with
positive psychology, explaining non-competitive forms of identification that are
based on resource building, flourishing, and self-actualisation. The reported findings
in this thesis related to engagement climate demonstrate non-competitive approaches
to enhancing identification, which circumvents the potential negative consequences
of competition between groups within an organisation. As will be discussed in the
following sections of this chapter, the factors explored and found to contribute to
engagement climate represent effective organisational and leadership strategies that
would improve identification and facilitate positive outcomes such as flourishing
and health.
Theoretically however, engagement climate and the literature on engagement
(e.g., Bakker & Demerouti, 2008, 2014; and Hobfoll’s COR theory; Hobfoll, 1989,
1998, 2011) can be applied to the field of social identification and group dynamics
in the workplace. In particular, the concept of resources and resource caravans
(positive gain spirals) (Hobfoll, 2011) can be overlayed with the outcomes of
engagement climate featured in this thesis. Engagement climate, as a setting for
generating resources, helps to promote identification through the acquisition of those
resources. Additional contributions towards building a better understanding of group
functioning in the workplace is likely if future research is directed towards applying
these theoretical frameworks to issues of organisational effectiveness. Engagement
climate contributes in this regard and opens up a conversation that is likely to
advance our applied knowledge for dealing with issues of workforce effectiveness.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 218 of 280
7.2. Workforce Flourishing through Work Identification
Full and effective functioning is a core characteristic of flourishing (Huta &
Waterman, 2013) and suggests that organisations would benefit through the pursuit
of a flourishing workforce. Identification in the workplace helps members of a
workforce make sense of their surrounds and respond effectively (Ashforth et al.,
2008). Therefore, identification and flourishing have a common orientation towards
functionality. Identification was found in this thesis to relate strongly to workforce
flourishing, and represents an excellent candidate for organisational strategies that
aim to promote flourishing within their workforce. The link between identification
and workforce flourishing suggests that when employees’ find a degree of fit
between personal and organisational held norms, values, and goals, positive
outcomes such as flourishing are more likely. The benefits are more pronounced
when high levels of identification are associated with a work group, team, or unit as
opposed to a super-ordinate group such as the organisation.
Identification enables an environment to be more predictable (Millward &
Haslam, 2013), become a source of personal endorsement (Dutton et al., 2010;
Hogg, Hains, & Mason, 1998), and a source of social support (Amiot & Sansfaçon,
2011). These benefits contribute to the ability of workers to function effectively in
their environment and enable workforce flourishing. Focussing organisation
strategies towards increasing predictability, self-development and actualisation, and
social support therefore, has value for organisations through supporting greater
workforce flourishing. Findings from this thesis provide direction towards how this
can be achieved.
Studies undertaken in this thesis demonstrated that both work-group and
organisation identification relate well to workforce flourishing. However, work
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 219 of 280
group identification has a greater effect on the social aspects of flourishing.
Therefore, while organisations may invest in activities that promote identification at
the organisation level (e.g., highlighting company success, community work,
company logos or icons), promoting identification at the work group level is
warranted in order to address social well-being and more fully realise the
workforces’ potential to flourish.
One of the keys to work group identification is leadership and associated
leadership practices. For example, Cottrill, Lopez, and Hoffman (2014) found that
authentic leadership style is associated with inclusive environments, which increased
the likelihood of stronger identification (Leroy et al., 2012). A leader who also
meets the expectations of the work group in terms of demonstrating behaviours to
which the work group is also expected to conform, will also enhance identification
within that group (Hogg et al., 1998). To meet expectations, it is argued here that
effective forms of communication and involvement in shaping group activity are
required to form accurate perceptions of group expectations. According to Leroy et
al. (2012), authentic leadership embodies behavioural integrity and would therefore
seem to be a style of leadership that would enhance work group identification and
impact positively on flourishing.
Prottas (2013) argued that a leader’s behavioural integrity relates to a
member’s engagement in their work, and that several leadership styles foster
behavioural integrity along with authentic leadership. Servant and transformative
leadership are examples of the leadership styles synonymous with behavioural
integrity but also with the notion that such behaviours should lead to positive
outcomes for employees. Workforce flourishing and employee health were found to
relate to identification in this thesis, results that are entirely consistent with the
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 220 of 280
positive outcomes for employees that are a trademark of inclusive and engaging
leadership styles. In light of the potential for outcomes such as flourishing and
employee health, effective leadership skills at all levels within and organisation
should be a priority. This is particularly relevant to leadership at middle and lower
levels of an organisation as identification at work group level has a stronger
association with the positive outcome of flourishing. A general message to take from
the findings within this thesis is that leadership at the work group level attuned to
inclusive and supportive practices will have a greater impact on workforce
flourishing and health than the same leadership activities conducted at the
organisation level. Therefore, leadership styles are a priority for all levels of
organisational activity because of the positive impact on employee effectiveness
through identification and flourishing. In particular, there are advantages for
leadership at the work group level that embodies the skills and competencies capable
of facilitating employee identification with their work.
The inability of an organisation to develop leadership qualities that promote
employee identification and flourishing at all levels of operations is likely to be
costly to that organisation in terms of their workforce performance. Alternatively,
organisations that value the development of their leaders’ capabilities stand to
prosper from enhanced workforce performance. This is particularly impelling when
leadership development has a reach extending throughout the ranks of the
organisation and is oriented towards fostering integrity and inclusiveness. In today’s
competitive global environment, harnessing the full capabilities of the work force in
a manner that contributes positively to employee health and well-being represents a
strategy that is difficult to ignore. Leadership that embraces the types of practices
that enable identification is what organisations require if they are to perform
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 221 of 280
optimally and sustainably. To this end, engagement climate, and the practices it
encapsulates, makes a valuable contribution to our understanding of what effective
leadership practices might be. Therefore, a discussion follows on the capacity of
engagement climate to shape leadership and organisational strategies in the pursuit
of increasing workforce effectiveness through flourishing and health.
7.3. Engagement Climate as Effective Organisation Practice
The construct of engagement climate stemmed from the literature on work
engagement. The developed construct was verified through a qualitative study and
factor analysis undertaken in this thesis. Four characteristics or factors of
engagement climate were proposed and subsequently found to combine well as
engagement climate. Participation in decision making, feedback/recognition of work
performance, communication, and organisational support were four factors found to
characterise the construct of engagement climate. Following this, it was found that
engagement climate related strongly with both organisation and work group
identification. Engagement climate, and the four factors found to represent the
construct provide a basis by which leadership and organisational practices can be
understood in terms of facilitating greater levels of employee identification,
workforce flourishing, and employee health.
Feedback/recognition, communication, and organisational support are
effective in encouraging organisation and work group identification. Participation in
decision making seems more effective in supporting work group identification than
organisation identification. As organisations seek to compete effectively given the
demands of their day to day circumstances, enabling the workforce to function at
their best through a positive engagement climate is both highly desirable and
valuable. Practices such as feedback/recognition, participation, communication, and
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 222 of 280
organisation support are not optional for an organisation seeking optimal
functioning. They are argued here to be central to effective organisation and
leadership practice that support high level functioning.
Engagement climate impacts on identification in two notable ways. The first is
the social, interactive nature of the factors underlying engagement climate. Work
groups are more likely to facilitate social interactions compared to organisation
groups (van Knippenberg & van Schie, 2000), as such, engagement climate has
greater impact on work group identification than it does organisation identification.
The second pathway occurs through knowledge sharing associated with factors such
as feedback/recognition, participation, and communication. Information exchange
within a work context is likely to be more applicable to an organisation’s norms,
behaviours, and goals than it would apply to the work group. A reason for this is that
the central purpose for activity within the organisation is to fulfil the needs of the
organisation first, with units or work group performing particular functions as a
contribution to such organisational needs. This would explain why the information
exchange factors of engagement climate associate more strongly with organisation
identification than work group identification.
To make a contrast, albeit a highly exaggerated one, social interactions
facilitate work group identification and informational exchanges support
organisation identification - although these mechanisms are not exclusively
associated with these particular identification foci. However, awareness of these
differences, even though subtle, enables leaders and organisations to target
identification with specific strategies to meet their particular needs. Adopting either
social or informational strategies would have a positive effect on work group or
organisation identification respectively but not exclusively. Knowing how certain
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 223 of 280
engagement practices influence different targets of identification can help achieve
greater levels of flourishing and health within the workforce, benefiting
organisational effectiveness. For example, it was demonstrated in this thesis that the
social factors associated with engagement climate are more likely to promote
workforce flourishing through work group identification, more so than organisation
identification. In comparison, informational factors were found to have a stronger
association to flourishing in the context of organisation identification. A considered
engagement climate strategy should aim for a comprehensive approach so that
flourishing is achieved through different targets of identification.
Leadership practices that embrace engagement climate strategies would appear
to gain agency through the effect towards employees’ relationship with their work,
namely, identification. Furthermore, interventions or strategies that address
engagement climate are likely to be sustainable approaches for organisational
effectiveness because they contribute to employee health (Study 1 & 3) and
workforce flourishing (Study 3). The benefit of such leadership practices would be
both self-perpetuating through sustainability and highly functional via a flourishing
workforce, not to forget employee-organisation concordance through identification.
Given the advantages stated, organisations stand to prosper through leadership and
organisation practices that encourage a climate of engagement and employee
identification with work groups and the organisation.
7.4. Final Comments
This thesis contributes towards understanding how work environments impact
effectiveness within an organisation through workforce flourishing. The constructs
of engagement climate and workforce flourishing are unique to this thesis but
importantly, they demonstrate strength in their capacity to explain how work
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 224 of 280
environments enable organisational effectiveness. The findings presented in this
thesis further advance arguments for promoting well-being within an organisation,
as they demonstrate that employee health is enhanced in the presence of flourishing.
Improving employee health can be achieved simultaneously to raising workforce
effectiveness through flourishing and strongly indicates that the pursuit of workforce
flourishing is a sustainable and worthy course for organisations to pursue.
Practically, the research findings in this thesis demonstrate how strategies
based upon engagement climate promise much in the way of effective and
sustainable organisational practice. For example, the effectiveness of leaders would
improve when practices consistent with fostering an engagement climate are
adopted. A clear association between the work environment, employees’
interpretation of the environment, and manifest well-being and health was
incrementally pursued and demonstrated in the studies undertaken in this thesis. As
a starting point, engagement climate sets the conditions in which employees might
connect their work environment to their sense of self through identification. Next,
the degree of identification manifests as hedonic, psychological, and social well-
being, or in other words, workforce flourishing. These relationships are then likely
to be enriched and sustained by the positive contribution to employee health.
The health and well-being of employees is evidently associated with the nature
of activity undertaken in the workplace, largely associated with the capacity to
interpret or find practical meaning from such activity (identification and
flourishing). As such, health and well-being are influenced by the way employees
relate to themselves and each other, in addition to the activities they perform in
fulfilling their work requirements. When engagement and belonging through
identification are the guiding values determining the way employees work together,
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 225 of 280
these work climates enable employees to flourish. This thesis contributes to an
understanding of organisational effectiveness that can be applied in the design of
sustainable and well-functioning systems of work. A system of organisational
practice, which captures the qualities of a sustainable, efficient, and balanced
ecology, and supports employee growth and development without negative
consequences, is surely an imperative for any organisation.
“I know that I know when I develop the capacity to create the results I really care
about – when what you know allows you to create” – Peter Senge
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 226 of 280
ReferencesAbraham, R. (1998). Emotional dissonance in organizations: Antecedents,
consequences, and moderators. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology, 124, 229-
246.
Abraham, R. (1999). The impact of emotional dissonance on organizational
commitment and intention to turnover. The Journal of Psychology, 133, 441-455.
Adelmann, P. K. (1995). Emotional labor as a potential source of job stress. In
S. L. Sauter & L. R. Murphy (Eds.), Organizational risk factors for job stress (pp.
371-381). Washington D C: American Psychological Association.
Alarcon, G. M., & Lyons, J. B. (2011). The relationship of engagement and
job satisfaction in working samples. The Journal of Psychology, 145, 463-480.
Alarcon, G. M., Edwards, J. M., & Clark, P. C. (2013). Coping strategies and
first year performance in postsecondary education. Journal of Applied Social
Psychology, 43, 1676–1685.
Alarcon, G. M., Edwards, J. M., & Menke, L. E. (2011). Student Burnout and
Engagement: A Test of the Conservation of Resources Theory. The Journal of
Psychology, 145, 211-227.
Ali, S., Peters, L. D., & Lettice, F. (2012). An organizational learning
perspective on conceptualizing dynamic and substantive capabilities. Journal of
Strategic Marketing, 20, 589-607.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 227 of 280
Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of
affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of
Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18.
Amiot, C. E., & Sansfaçon, S. (2011). Motivations toiIdentify with social
groups: A look at their positive and negative consequences. Group Dynamics:
Theory, Research, and Practice, 15, 105–127.
Antonovsky, A. (1987). Health promoting factors at work: the sense of
coherence. In R. Kalimo, M. A. El-Batawi & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Psychological
Factors at Work and Their Relation to Health (pp. 153-167). Geneva: World Health
Organization.
Armeli, S., Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Lynch, P. (1998). Perceived
organizational support and police performance: The moderating influence of
socioemotional needs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 288-297.
Asha, S. (2008). Organisational climate and employee health. The ICFAI
Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 7, 62-66.
Ashforth, B. E., & Humphrey, R. H. (1993). Emotional labor in service roles:
The influence of identity. Academy of Management Journal, 18, 88-115.
Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. (2008). Identification in
organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of
Management, 34, 325-374.
Bakker, A. B., Albrecht, S. L., & Leiter, M. P. (2011). Key questions
regarding work engagement. European Journal of Work and Organizational
Psychology, 20, 4-28.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 228 of 280
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands-Resources model:
state of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 309-328.
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work
engagement. Career Development International, 13, 209-223.
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2014). Job demands-resources theory. In P.
Y. Chen & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Work and Wellbeing: A complete reference guide
(Vol. III, pp. 37-64). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Bakker, A. B., Hakanen, J. J., Demerouti, E., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2007). Job
resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. Journal
of Educational Psychology, 99, 274-284.
Bakker, A. B., & Sanz-Vergel, A. I. (2013). Weekly work engagement and
flourishing: The role of hindrance and job challenge job demands. Journal of
Vocational Behavior, 83, 397-409.
Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2008). Positive organizational behavior:
Engaged employees in flourishing organizations. Journal of Organizational
Behavior, 29, 147-154.
Bakker, A. B., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2013). Creativity and charisma among
female leaders: The role of resources and work engagement. The International
Journal of Human Resource Management, 24, 2760-2779.
Baldwin, J. M. (1899). Social and ethical interpretations in mental
development. New York: Macmillan.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 229 of 280
Barnett, C. K., & Pratt, M. G. (2000). From threat-rigidity to flexibility:
Toward a learning model of autogenic crisis in organizations. Journal of
Organizational Change Management, 13, 74-88.
Bartel, C. A. (2001). Social comparisons in boundary-spanning work: Effects
of community outreach on members' organizational identity and identification.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 379-413.
Begen, F. M., & Turner-Cobb, J. M. (2011). The need to belong and
symptoms of acute physical health in early adolescence. Journal of Health
Psychology, 17, 907–916.
Bergami, M., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2000). Self-categorisation, affective
commitment and group self-esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the
organisation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 555-577.
Bhamraa, R., Daniab, S., & Burnard, K. (2011). Resilience: The concept, a
literature review and future directions. International Journal of Production
Research, 49, 5375–5393.
Blunch, N. J. (2013). Introduction to Structural Equation Modelling Using
IBM SPSS Statistics and AMOS (Second ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the
same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475-482.
Brewer, M. B. (2008). Social identity and close relationships. In J. P. Forgas
(Ed.), Social Relationships: Cognitive, Affective and Motivational Processes (pp.
167-183). Hoboken: Taylor & Francis.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 230 of 280
Brewer, M. B. (2009). Motivations underlying ingroup identification: Optimal
distinctiveness and beyond. In S. Otten, K. Sassenberg & T. Kessler (Eds.),
Intergroup Relations: The Role of Motivation and Emotion (pp. 3-22). Hoboken:
Taylor and Francis.
Brickson, S. L. (2013). Athletes, best friends, and social activists: An
integrative model accounting for the role of identity in organizational identification.
Organization Science, 24, 226-245.
Brotheridge, C. M., & Lee, R. T. (2003). Development and validation of the
emotional labour scale. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,
76, 365-379.
Capra, F. (1996). The web of life: a new scientific understanding of living
systems. New York: Anchor Books.
Clark, J. V. (1962). A healthy organisation. California Management Review, 4,
16-30.
Cohen, S., & Williamson, G. M. (1988). Perceived stress in a probability
sample of the United States. In S. Spacapan & S. Oskamp (Eds.), The social
psychology of health(pp. 31-67). Newbury Park: Sage.
Cole, M. S., & Bruch, H. (2006). Orgnizational identity strength,
identification, and commitment and their relationships to turnover intention: Does
organizational hierarchy matter? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 585-605.
Cooper, C. L., & Cartwright, S. (1994). Healthy mind; healthy organization: A
proactive approach to occupational stress. Human Relations, 47, 455-471.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 231 of 280
Cooper, C. L., & Williams, S. (1994). Conclusions to creating healthy work
organisations. In C. L. Cooper & S. Williams (Eds.), Creating healthy work
organizations (pp. 243-245). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Cotton, P., & Hart, P. M. (2003). Occupational wellbeing and performance: A
review of organisational health research. Australian Psychologist, 38, 118-127.
Cottrill, K., Lopez, P. D., & Hoffman, C. C. (2014). How authentic leadership
and inclusion benefit organizations. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An
International Journal, 33, 275-292.
Cox, T. (1988). Editorial: Organizational health. Work & Stress, 2, 1-2.
Cox, T., & Cox, S. (1992). Occupational health: Past, present and future. Work
& Stress, 6, 99-102.
Cox, T., & Howarth, I. (1990). Editorial comment: Organizational health,
culture and helping. Work & Stress, 4, 107-110.
Crabtree, S. (2005). Engagement keeps the doctor away: A happy employee is
a healthy employee. [Online]. Gallup Management Journal, 1-4.
Cropanzano, R., & Wright, T. A. (1999). A 5 year study of change in the
relationship between well-being and job performance. Consulting Psychology
Journal: Practice and Research, 51, 252-265.
Cropanzano, R., Howes, J. C., Grandey, A. A., & Toth, P. (1997). The
relationship of organizational politics and support to work behaviours, attitudes, and
stress. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 159-180.
Davis, E. (1999). Does your life work? Management Today, 48-55.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 232 of 280
Deaux, K. (1992). Personalizing identity and socializing self. In G. M.
Breakwell (Ed.), Social psychology of identity and the self-concept (pp. 9-33).
London: Surrey University Press.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and selfdetermination
in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991).
Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational
Psychologist, 26, 325-346.
DeConinck, J. B. (2011). The effects of ethical climate on organizational
identification, supervisory trust, and turnover among salespeople. Journal of
Business Research, 64, 617-624.
DeJoy, D. M., & Wilson, M. G. (2003). Organizational health promotion:
Broadening the horizon of workplace health promotion. American Journal of Health
Promotion, 17, 337-341.
DeJoy, D. M., Wilson, M. G., Vandenberg, R. J., McGrath-Higgins, A. L., &
Griffin-Blake, C. S. (2010). Assessing the impact of healthy work organization
intervention. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 139-165.
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The
jobs demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 499-
512.
Demerouti, E., & Cropanzano, R. (2010). From thought to action: Employee
work engagement and job performance. In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 233 of 280
Engagement: A Handbook of Essential Theory and Research (pp. 147-163).
Hoboken: Psychology Press.
Dewe, P., & Cooper, C. L. (2012). Well-being and work: Towards a balanced
agenda. Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.
Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Beyond money: Toward an economy
of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 1-31.
Diener, E., Sapyta, J. J., & Suh, E. (1998). Subjective well-being is essential to
well-being. Psychological Inquiry, 9, 33-37.
Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D. W., Oishi, S., &
Biswas-Diener, R. B. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess
flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97, 143-
156.
Dollard, M. F., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Psychosocial safety climate as a
precursor to conducive work environments, psychological health problems, and
employee engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,
83, 579–599.
Dukerich, J. M., Golden, B. R., & Shortell, S. M. (2002). Beauty is in the eye
of the beholder: The impact of organizational identification, identity, and image on
the cooperative behaviors of physicians. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 507-
533.
Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational
images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239-263.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 234 of 280
Dutton, J. E., Roberts, L. M., & Bednar, J. (2010). Pathways for positive
identity construction at work: Four types of positive identity and the building of
social resources. Academy of Management Review, 35, 265-293.
Dutton, J. E., Roberts, L. M., & Bednar, J. (2011). Prosocial practices, positive
identity, and flourishing at work. In S. I. Donaldson & M. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.),
Applied positive psychology: Improving everyday life, health, schools, work, and
society (pp. 155-170). New York: Psychological Press.
Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). Perceived
organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 51-59.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived
organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500-507.
Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I. L., &
Rhoades, L. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived
organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87,
565–573.
Ellemers, N., & Haslam, S. A. (2011). Social identity theory. In P. A. M. Van
Lange, A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of Theories of Social
Psychology (pp. 379-398). London: Sage.
Ellemers, N., Kortekaas, P., & Ouwerkerk, J. W. (1999). Self-categorisation,
commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of
social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 371-389.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 235 of 280
Ertürk, A. (2010). Exploring predictors of organizational identification:
Moderating role of trust on the associations between empowerment, organizational
support, and identification. European Journal of Work and Organizational
Psychology, 19, 409–441.
Fallon, B. J. (2001). The loves of our lives - home and work: How can we keep
them in perspective? Paper presented at the 1st Australasian Psychology of
Relationships Conference, Melbourne, Australia.
Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of
General Psychology, 2, 300-319.
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive
psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American
Psychologist, 56, 218-226.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Branigan, C. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the
scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 313-
332.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Dutton, J. E. (2008). Unpacking positive organizing:
Organizations as sites of individual and group flourishing. The Journal of Positive
Psychology, 3, 1-3.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Losada, M. F. (2005). Positive affect and the complex
dynamics of human flourishing. American Psychologist, 60, 678–686.
Gecas, V. (2001). The self as a social force. In T. J. Owens, S. Stryker & N.
Goodman (Eds.), Extending self-esteem theory and research: Sociological and
psychological currents (pp. 85-100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 236 of 280
Gecas, V., & Mortimer, J. T. (1987). Stability and change in the self-concept
from adolescence to adulthood. In T. Honess & K. Yardley (Eds.), Self and identity:
Perspectives across the lifespan (pp. 265-286). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Gleason, P. (1983). Identifying identity: A semantic history. The Journal of
American History, 69, 910-931.
Goldberg, D. P., & Hillier, V. F. (1979). A scaled version of the general health
questionnaire. Psychological Medicine, 9, 139-145.
Grant, A. M. (2008). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire?
Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 48-58.
Greenfield, W. M. (2004). Decision making and employee engagement.
Employee Relations Today, 31, 13-24.
Gubman, E. (2004). From engagement to passion for work: The search for the
missing person. Human Resource Planning, 27, 42-46.
Hakanen, J. J., Perhoniemi, R., & Toppinen-Tanner, S. (2008). Positive gain
spirals at work: From job resources to work engagement, personal initiative and
work-unit innovativeness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73, 78-91.
Halbesleben, J. R. B., Neveu, J. P., Paustian-Underdahl, S. C., & Westman, M.
Getting to the “COR”: Understanding the role of resources in conservation of
resources theory. Journal of Management, 40, 1334-1364.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 237 of 280
Halbesleben, J. R. B., & Wheeler, A. R. (2008). The relative roles of
engagement and embeddedness in predicting job performance and intention to leave.
Work & Stress, 22, 242-256.
Hale, C. J., Hannum, J. W., & Espelage, D. L. (2005). Social support and
physical health: The importance of belonging. Journal of American College Health,
53, 276-284.
Hart, P. M., & Cooper, C. L. (2001). Occupational stress: Toward a more
integrated framework. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. K. Sinangil & C.
Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial, Work and Organizational Psychology
(Vol. 2, pp. 93-114). London: Sage.
Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business unit level
relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business
outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 268-279.
Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Keyes, C. L. M. (2003). Well-being in the
workplace and its relationship to business outcomes: A review of the Gallup studies.
In C. L. M. Keyes & J. Haidt (Eds.), Flourishing: Positive psychology and the life
well lived (pp. 205-224). Washington D C: American Psychological Association.
Haslam, S. A. (2014). Making good theory practical: Five lessons for an
applied social identity approach to challenges of organizational, health, and clinical
psychology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53, 1-20.
Haslam, S. A., Eggins, R. A., & Reynolds, K. J. (2003). The ASPIRe model:
Actualizing social and personal identity resources to enhance organizational
outcomes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 83-113.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 238 of 280
Haslam, S. A., McGarty, C., & Turner, J. C. (1996). Salient group
memberships and persuasion. In J. L. Nye & A. M. Brower (Eds.), What's social
about social cognition?: Research on socially shared cognition in small groups (pp.
29-56). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Haslam, S. A., Powell, C., & Turner, J. C. (2000). Social identity, self-
categorization, and work motivation: Rethinking the contribution of the group to
positive and sustainable organisational outcomes. Applied Psychology: An
International Review, 49, 319-339.
Henderson, L. W., & Knight, T. (2012). Integrating the hedonic and
eudaimonic perspectives to more comprehensively understand wellbeing and
pathways to wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 2, 196-221.
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at
conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44, 513-524.
Hobfoll, S. E. (1998). Stress, culture, and community: The psychology and
philosophy of stress. New York: Plenum Press.
Hobfoll, S. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self
in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied
Psychology: An International Review, 50, 337-369.
Hobfoll, S. E. (2011). Conservation of resource caravans and engaged settings.
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84, 116-122.
Hobfoll, S. E., Johnson, R. J., Ennis, N., & Jackson, A. P. (2003). Resource
loss, resource gain, and emotional outcomes among inner city women. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 632–643.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 239 of 280
Hochschild, A. R. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure.
American Journal of Sociology, 85, 551-575.
Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human
feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hogg, M. A., Hains, S. C., & Mason, I. (1998). Identification and leadership in
small groups: Salience, frame of reference, and leader stereotypicality effects on
leader evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1248-1263.
Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization
processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25, 121-140.
Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., & Layton, J. B. (2010). Social relationships and
mortality risk: A meta analytic review. Public Library of Science: Medicine, 7, 1-20.
Retrieved from
http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.100
0316
Howe, C. (2003). What makes an organisation a great place to work? A
special report to the international foundation gives Canadian perspective. Employee
Benefits Journal, 28, 41-43.
Howell, A. J. (2009). Flourishing: Achievement-related correlates of students’
well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 1-13.
Howell, R. T., Kern, M. L., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2007). Health benefits: Meta-
analytically determining the impact of well-being on objective health outcomes.
Health Psychology Review, 1, 83-136.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 240 of 280
Huppert, F. A., & So, T. T. C. (2013). Flourishing across Europe: Application
of a new conceptual framework for defining well-being. Social Indicators Research,
110, 837–861.
Huta, V., & Waterman, A. S. (2013). Eudaimonia and its distinction from
hedonia: Developing a classification and terminology for understanding conceptual
and operational definitions. Journal of Happiness Studies.
Hutchison, S. (1997). Perceived organizational support: Further evidence of
construct validity. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 57, 1025-1034.
Jaffe, D. T. (1995). The healthy company: Research paradigms for personal
and organizational health. In S. L. Sauter & L. R. Murphy (Eds.), Organizational
Risk Factors for Job Stress (pp. 13-39). Washington D C: American Psychological
Association.
James, K., Lovato, C., & Khoo, G. (1994). Social identity correlates of
minority workers' health. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 383-396.
James, L. A., & James, L. R. (1989). Integrating work environment
perceptions: Explorations into the measurement of meaning. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 74, 739-751.
James, L. R., Choi, C. C., Ko, C. H. E., McNeil, P. K., Minton, M. K., Wright,
M. A., et al. (2008). Organizational and psychological climate: A review of theory
and research. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17, 5-32.
James, L. R., & Jones, A. P. (1974). Organizational climate: A review of
theory and research. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 1096-1112.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 241 of 280
James, W. (1892). Principles of psychology (Abridged version ed.). New
York: Henery Holt.
Janevic, M. R., Ajrouch, K. J., Merline, A., Akiyama, H., & Antonucci, T. C.
(2000). The social relations-physical health connection: A comparison of elderly
samples from the United States and Japan. Journal of Health Psychology, 5, 413-
429.
Jones, B., Flynn, D. M., & Kelloway, E. K. (1995). Perception of support from
the organization in relation to work stress, satisfaction, and commitment. In S. L.
Sauter & L. R. Murphy (Eds.), Organizational Risk Factors for Job Stress (pp. 41-
52). Washington D C: American Psychological Association.
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and
disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692-724.
Kalliath, T. J., O'Driscoll, M. P., & Gillespie, D. F. (1997). Organizational
commitment: an antidote to burnout. Paper presented at the Second Biennial
Australian Industrial and Organisational Psychology Conference, Melbourne,
Victoria, Australia.
Kaplan, S. A., Warren, C. R., Barsky, A. P., & Thoresen, C. J. (2009). A note
on the relationship between affect(ivity) and differing conceptualizations of job
satisfaction: Some unexpected meta-analytic findings. European Journal of Work
and Organizational Psychology, 18, 29-54.
Karasek, R. A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain:
Implications for job re-design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 285-309.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 242 of 280
Kashdan, T. B., Biswas-Diener, R., & King, L. A. (2008). Reconsidering
happiness: The costs of distinguishing between hedonics and eudaimonia. Journal of
Positive Psychology, 3, 219-233.
Kay, R., & Goldspink, C. (2012). Patterns of prediction: The basis of resilient
organisations. Keeping Good Companies, 64, 588-592.
Keller, S., & Price, C. (2011). Organizational health: The ultimate competitive
advantage. McKinsey Quarterly (June), 94-107.
Kernis, M. H., & Paradise, A. W. (2002). Distinguishing between fragile and
secure forms of high self-esteem. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of
Self-Determination Research (pp. 339-360). New York: University of Rochester
Press.
Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61,
121-140.
Keyes, C. L. M. (2007). Promoting and protecting mental health as
flourishing: A complementary strategy for improving national mental health. The
American psychologist, 62, 95-108.
Keyes, C. L. M., & Annas, J. (2009). Feeling good and functioning well:
distinctive concepts in ancient philosophy and contemporary science. The Journal of
Positive Psychology, 4, 197-201.
Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being:
The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 82, 1007–1022.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 243 of 280
Keyes, C. L. M., & Simoes, E. J. (2012). To flourish or not: Positive mental
health and all-cause mortality. American Journal of Public Health, 102, 2164-2172.
Kim, T., Chang, K., & Ko, Y. J. (2010). Determinants of organisational
identification and supportive intentions. Journal of Marketing Management, 26,
413-412-427.
Kraut, R. (1979). Two conceptions of happiness. Philosophical Review, 88,
167-197.
Lamberg, J.-A., Tikkanen, H., Nokelainen, T., & Suur-Inkeroinen, H. (2009).
Competitive dynamics, strategic consistency, and organizational survival. Strategic
Management Journal, 30, 45–60.
Langford, P. H. (2009). Measuring organisational climate and employee
engagement: Evidence for a 7 Ps model of work practices and outcomes. Australian
Journal of Psychology, 61, 185-198.
Lazarus, R. S. (1984). Puzzles in the study of daily hassles. Journal of
Behavioral Medicine, 7, 375-389.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New
York: Springer.
Ledford Jr, G. E. (1999). Comment: Happiness and productivity revisited.
Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 25-30.
Lee, C., Farh, J.-L., & Chen, Z.-J. (2011). Promoting group potency in project
teams: The importance of group identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior,
32, 1147–1162.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 244 of 280
Leppin, A., & Schwarzer, R. (1990). Social support and physical health: An
updated meta-analysis. In L. R. Schmidt, P. Schwenkmezger & S. Maes (Eds.),
Theoretical and applied aspects of health psychology (pp. 185-202). Chur: Harwood
Academic Publishers.
Leroy, H., Palanski, M. E., & Simons, T. (2012). Authentic leadership and
behavioral integrity as drivers of follower commitment and performance. Journal of
Business Ethics, 107, 255–264.
Lewig, K. A., & Dollard, M. F. (2003). Emotional dissonance, emotional
exhaustion and job satisfaction in call centre workers. European Journal of Work
and Organizational Psychology, 12, 366-392.
Lewis, P., Kimiecik, J., Horn, T., Zullig, K. J., & Ward, R. M. (2013). Can
becoming my self influence my health?: Exploring the effects of a eudaimonic-
enhancement process on psychological indicators of well-being and physical activity
[Press release]. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11482-013-9263-5
Llorens, S., Schaufeli, W., Bakker, A., & Salanova, M. (2007). Does a positive
gain spiral of resources, efficacy beliefs and engagement exist? Computers in
Human Behavior, 23, 825-841.
Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D.
Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 1297-
1349). Chicago: Rand McNally.
Lopez, S. V. (2005). Competitive advantage and strategy formulation: The key
role of dynamic capabilities. Management Decision, 43, 661–669.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 245 of 280
Luthans, F., & Peterson, S. J. (2001). Employee engagement and manager
self-efficacy: Implications for managerial effectiveness and development. Journal of
Management Development, 21, 376-387.
Lutz, M. A. (2008). The 'dismal science' - still? Economics and human
flourishing. Review of Political Economy, 20, 163-180.
Maak, T. (2008). Undivided Corporate Responsibility: Towards a Theory of
Corporate Integrity. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 353–368.
Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee
engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 3-30.
Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test
of the reformulated model of organisational identification. Journal of
Organizational Behavior, 13, 103-123.
Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E., & Leiter, M. P. (1996). The Maslach burnout
inventory (3rd ed.). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2008). Early predictors of job burnout and
engagement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 498-512.
Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual
Review of Psychology, 52, 397-422.
May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological
conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the
human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77,
11-37.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 246 of 280
McCall, G., & Simmons, J. L. (1978). Identities and interactions: An
examination of human associations in everyday life (Revised ed.). New York:
Collier Macmillan.
McHugh, M. (2001). Employee absence: An impediment to organisational
health in local government. The International Journal of Public Sector Management,
14, 43-58.
Mead, G. H. (1913). The social self. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology, and
Scientific Methods, 10, 374-380.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society: From the standpoint of a social
behaviourist. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Miles, R. H. (2001). Beyond the age of Dilbert: Accelerating corporate
transformations by rapidly engaging all employees. Organizational Dynamics, 29,
313-321.
Millward, L. J., & Haslam, S. A. (2013). Who are we made to think we are?
Contextual variation in organizational, workgroup and career foci of identification.
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86, 50–66.
Mishra, S. K., & Bhatnagar, D. (2010). Linking emotional dissonance and
organizational identification to turnover intention and emotional well-being: A study
of medical representatives in India. Human Resource Management, 49, 401– 419.
Morris, J. A., & Feldman, D. C. (1996). The dimensions, antecedents, and
consequences of emotional labor. Academy of Management Journal, 21, 986-1010.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 247 of 280
Nieuwenhuijsen, K., Bruinvels, D., & Frings-Dresen, M. (2010). Psychosocial
work environment and stress-related disorders, a systematic review. Occupational
Medicine, 60, 277-286.
Oakes, P. (1996). The categorization process: Cognition and the group in
social psychology of stereotyping. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Social groups and
identities: Delivering the legacy of Henri Tajfel (pp. 95-119). Oxford: Butterworth-
Heinemann.
Oakes, P. J., Turner, J. C., & Haslam, S. A. (1991). Perceiving people as group
members: The role of fit in the salience of social categorizations. British Journal of
Social Psychology, 30, 125-144.
Oishi, S. (2012). Individual and societal well-being. In K. Deaux & M. Snyder
(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology (pp. 597-622).
New York: Oxford University Press.
O'Neill, B. S., & Arendt, L. A. (2008). Psychological climate and work
attitudes: The importance of telling the right story. Journal of Leadership &
Organizational Studies, 14, 353-370.
Ouweneel, E., Le Blanc, P. M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2011). Flourishing
students: A longitudinal study on positive emotions, personal resources, and study
engagement. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6, 142–153.
Pahkin, K., Väänänen, A., Koshinen, A., Bergbom, B., & Kouvonen, A.
(2011). Organizational change and employees’ mental health: The protective role of
sense of coherence. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 53, 118-
123.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 248 of 280
Palanski, M. E., Kahai, S. S., & Yammarino, F. J. (2011). Team virtues and
performance: An examination of transparency, behavioral integrity, and trust.
Journal of Business Ethics, 99, 201-216.
Palanski, M. E., & Yammarino, F. J. (2007). Integrity and leadership: Clearing
the conceptual confusion. European Management Journal, 25, 171–184.
Petrick, J. A., & Quinn, J. F. (2001). Integrity capacity as a strategic asset in
achieving organizational excellence. Measuring Business Excellence, 5, 24-30.
Pfeffer, J. (2010). Building sustainable organizations: The human factor.
Academy of Management Perspectives, 24, 34-45.
Powley, E. H. (2009). Reclaiming resilience and safety: Resilience activation
in the critical period of crisis. Human Relations, 62, 1289–1326.
Powley, E. H., & Powley, W. (2012). Building strength and resilience: How
HR leaders enable healing in organizations. People & Strategy, 35, 42-47.
Prottas, D. J. (2013). Relationships among employee perception of their
manager’s behavioral integrity, moral distress, and employee attitudes and well-
Being. Journal of Business Ethics, 113, 51–60.
Quick, J. C., & Goolsby, J. L. (2013). Integrity first: Ethics for leaders and
followers. Organizational Dynamics, 42, 1-7.
Quick, J. C., & Macik-Frey, M. (2007). Healthy, productive work: Positive
strength through communication competence and interpersonal interdependence. In
D. L. Nelson & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Positive Organizational Behavior (pp. 25-38).
London: Sage Publications.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 249 of 280
Quick, J. C., Macik-Frey, M., & Cooper, C. L. (2007). Managerial dimensions
of organizational health: The healthy leader at work. Journal of Management
Studies, 44, 189-205.
Quick, J. C., & Quick, J. D. (2004). Healthy, happy, productive work: A
leadership challenge. Organizational Dynamics, 33, 329-337.
Rabinovich, A., Morton, T. A., Postmes, T., & Verplanken, B. (2012).
Collective self and individual choice: The effects of inter-group comparative context
on environmental values and behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51,
551–569.
Rafaeli, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1987). Expression of emotion as part of the work
role. Academy of Management Journal, 12, 23-37.
Ramarajan, L. (2014). Past, present and future research on multiple identities:
Toward an intrapersonal network approach. The Academy of Management Annals, 8,
589-659.
Randel, A. E. (2002). Identity salience: A moderator of the relationship
between group gender composition and work group conflict. Journal of
Organizational Behavior, 23, 749-766.
Raque-Bogdan, T. L., Ericson, S. K., Jackson, J., Martin, H. M., & Bryan, N.
A. (2011). Attachment and mental and physical health: Self-compassion and
mattering as mediators. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58, 272-278.
Reade, C. (2001). Dual identification in multinational corporations: Local
managers and their psychological attachment to the subsidiary versus the global
organization. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12, 405-424.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 250 of 280
Riketta, M., & Van Dick, R. (2005). Foci of attachment in organizations: A
meta-analytic comparison of the strength and correlates of workgroup versus
organizational identification and commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67,
490–510.
Riordan, C. M., Vandenberg, R. J., & Richardson, H. A. (2005). Employee
involvement climate and organizational effectiveness. Human Resource
Management, 44, 471-488.
Robertson, I. T., & Cooper, C. L. (2010). Full engagement: The integration of
employee engagement and psychological well-being. Leadership and Organization
Development Journal, 31, 324-336.
Roethlisberger, F. J., & Dickson, W. J. (1939). Management and the worker.
Oxford: Harvard University Press.
Romme, A. G. L., Zollo, M., & Berends, P. (2010). Dynamic capabilities,
deliberate learning and environmental dynamism: A simulation model. Industrial
and Corporate Change, 19, 1271–1299.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self determination theory and the
facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American
Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A
review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of
Psychology, 52, 141-166.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 251 of 280
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An
organismic dialectical perspective. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of
Self-Determination Research (pp. 3-33). New York: University of Rochester.
Ryan, R. M., & Frederick, C. (1997). On energy, personality, and health:
Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. Journal of Personality, 65,
529-565.
Ryff, C. D. (2013). Eudaimonic well-being and health: Mapping consequences
of self-realization. In A. S. Waterman (Ed.), The best within us: Positive psychology
perspectives on eudaimonia (pp. 77-98). Washington, DC: American Psychological
Association.
Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-
being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719-727.
Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are:
A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies,
9, 13-39.
Salanova, M., Schaufeli, W. B., Xanthopoulou, D., & Bakker, A. B. (2010).
The gain spiral of resources and work engagement: Sustaining a positive worklife.
In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential
theory and research (pp. 118-131). East Sussex: Psychology Press
Scharmer, C. O., & Kaufer, K. (2013). Leading from the Emerging Future.
San Francisco: Berrett-Koeler Publishers.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 252 of 280
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and
their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of
Organizational Behavior, 25, 293-315.
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Defining and measuring work
engagement: Bringing clarity to the concept. In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.),
Work Engagement: A Handbook of Essential Theory and Research (pp. 10-24).
Hoboken: Psychology Press.
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & van Rhenen, W. (2009). How changes in
job demands and resources predict burnout, work engagement, and sickness
absenteeism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 893-917.
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002).
The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor
analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92.
Schneider, B. (1990). The climate for service: An application of the climate
construct. In B. Schneider (Ed.), Organisational Climate and Culture (pp. 383-413).
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Schueller, S. M., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2010). Pursuit of pleasure,
engagement, and meaning: Relationships to subjective and objective measures of
well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5, 253-263.
Seligman, M. (2011). Flourish: A new understanding of happiness and well-
being. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning
organisation. Sydney: Random House.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 253 of 280
Shamir, B., & Kark, R. (2004). A single item graphic scale for the
measurement of organisational identification. Journal of Occupational and
Organizational Psychology, 77, 115-123.
Shoaf, C., Genaidy, A., Karwowski, W., & Samuel, H. H. (2004). Improving
performance and quality of working life: A model for organisational health
assessment in emerging enterprises. Human Factors and Ergonomics in
Manufacturing, 14, 81-95.
Sims, H. P., Szilagyi, A. D., & Keller, R. T. (1976). The measurement of job
characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 19, 195-212.
Singh, A. K., & Singh, A. P. (2010). Role of stress and organizational support
in predicting organizational citizenship behavior. IUP Journal of Organizational
Behavior, 9, 7-25.
Slemp, G. R., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2014). Optimising employee mental
health: The relationship between intrinsic need satisfaction, job crafting, and
employee well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 957–977.
Sluss, D. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (2007). Relational identity and identification:
Defining ourselves through work relationships. Academy of Management Review,
32, 9-32.
Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship
behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 653-663.
Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A
dynamic equilibrium model of organising. Academy of Management Review, 36,
381-403.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 254 of 280
Sparks, K., & Cooper, C. L. (1999). Occupational differences in the work-
strain relationship: Towards the use of situation specific models. Journal of
Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 219-229.
Sparks, K., Faragher, B., & Cooper, C. L. (2001). Well-being and occupational
health in the 21st century workplace. Journal of Occupational and Organizational
Psychology, 74, 489-509.
Spector, P. E. (1985). Measurement of human service staff satisfaction:
Development of the job satisfaction survey. American Journal of Community
Psychology, 13, 693-713.
Staw, B. M. (1986). Organizational psychology and the pursuit of the
happy/productive worker. California Management Review, 28, 40-53.
Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment,
Research & Evaluation, 7. Retrieved: February 22, 2012 from
http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=17.
Straume, L. V., & Vittersø, J. (2012). Happiness, inspiration and the fully
functioning person: Separating hedonic and eudaimonic well-being in the
workplace. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7, 387-398.
Stryker, S. (1980/2002). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version.
California: Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company.
Sutcliffe, K. M., & Vogus, T. J. (2003). Organizing for resilience. In K. S.
Cameron, J. E. Dutton & J. F. Quinn (Eds.), Positive Organizational Scholarship
(pp. 94-110). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 255 of 280
Szeto, A. C. H., & Dobson, K. S. (2013). Mental disorders and their
association with perceived work stress: An investigation of the 2010 Canadian
community health survey. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18, 191-197.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2014). Using Multivariate Statistics (Sixth
ed.). Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and ingroup behaviour. Social Science
Information, 13, 65-93.
Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social
psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of
Psychology, 33, 1-39.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In
W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations
(pp. 33-47). Monterey: Brooks Cole Publishing Company.
Tay, L., & Diener, E. (2011). Needs and subjective well-being around the
world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 354–365.
Terry, D. J., & Hogg, M. A. (1996). Group norms and the attitude-behavior
relationship: A role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychology
Bulletin, 22, 776-793.
Terry, D. J., & Jimmieson, N. L. (2003). A stress and coping approach to
organisational change: Evidence from three field studies. Australian Psychologist,
38, 92-101.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 256 of 280
Theorell, T., & Karasek, R. A. (1996). Current issues relating to psychosocial
job strain and cardiovascular disease research. Journal of Occupational Health
Psychology, 1, 9-25.
Thoits, P. A. (1992). Identity structures and psychological well-being: Gender
and marital status comparisons. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55, 236-256.
Thoits, P. A. (2011). Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical
and mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 52, 145–161.
Thumin, F. J., & Thumin, L. J. (2011). TheMeasurement and Interpretation of
Organizational Climate. The Journal of Psychology, 145, 93-109.
Tidd, K. L., & Lockard, J. S. (1978). Monetary significance of the affiliative
smile: A case for reciprocal altruism. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 11, 344-
346.
Tinker, S. P., & Moore, K. A. (2002). Professional and self identity saliency:
Key relationship factors influencing health. Paper presented at the 2nd Australasian
Psychology of Relationships Conference, Melbourne, Australia.
Tropp, L. R., & Wright, S. C. (2001). Ingroup identification as the inclusion of
ingroup in the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 585-600.
Turner, J. C., & Haslam, S. A. (2001). Social identity, organizations, and
leadership. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at Work: Theory and Research (pp. 25-
65). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 257 of 280
Turner, J. C., & Reynolds, K. J. (2011). Self-Categorization Theory. In P. A.
M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of Theories of
Social Psychology (pp. 399-417). London: Sage.
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S.
(1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil
Blackwell.
Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., De Witte, H., & Lens, W. (2008).
Explaining the relationships between job characteristics, burnout, and engagement:
The role of basic psychological need satisfaction. Work & Stress, 22, 277-294.
van den Heuvel, M., Demerouti, E., & Bakker, A. B. (2014). How
psychological resources facilitate adaptation to organizational change. European
Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23, 847-858.
van den Heuvel, M., Demerouti, E., Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2010).
Personal resources and work engagement in the face of change. In J. Houdmont & S.
Leka (Eds.), Contemporary Occupational Health Psychology: Global Perspectives
on Research and Practice (Vol. 1, pp. 124-150). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
van Der Doef, M., & Maes, S. (1999). The job demand-control (-support)
model and psychological well-being: A review of 20 years of empirical research.
Work & Stress, 13, 87-114.
van Dick, R., van Knippenberg, D., Kerschreiter, R., Hertel, G., & Wieseke, J.
(2008). Interactive effects of work group and organizational identification on job
satisfaction and extra-role behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 388-399.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 258 of 280
van Dick, R., Wagner, U., Stellmacher, J., & Christ, O. (2004). The utility of a
broader conceptualization of organizational identification: Which aspects really
matter? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 171-191.
van Knippenberg, A., & Ellemers, N. (1993). Strategies in intergroup
relations. In M. A. Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.), Group motivation: Social
psychological perspectives (pp. 17-32). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
van Knippenberg, D. (2000). Work motivation and performance: A social
identity perspective. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 357-371.
van Knippenberg, D., & van Schie, E. C. M. (2000). Foci and correlates of
organizational identification. Journal of Occupational and Organizational
Psychology, 73, 137-147.
Vezina, M., & St Arnaud, L. (1995). Work organisation and related
psychological disorders. In P. Cotton (Ed.), Psychological health in the workplace:
Understanding & managing occupational stress (pp. 111-126). Carlton: Australian
Psychological Society.
Vittersø, J., & Søholt, Y. (2011). Life satisfaction goes with pleasure and
personal growth goes with interest: Further arguments for separating hedonic and
eudaimonic well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6, 326-335.
Vroom, V. H. (1959). Some personality determinants of the effects of
participation. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 322-327.
Walsh, M., Dupré, K., & Arnold, K. A. (2014). Processes through which
transformational leaders affect employee psychological health. German Journal of
Research in Human Resource Management, 28, 162-172.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 259 of 280
Walumbwa, F. O., Hartnell, C. A., & Oke, A. (2010). Servant leadership,
procedural justice climate, service climate, employee attitudes, and organizational
citizenship behavior: A cross-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95,
517-529.
Walumbwa, F. O., Mayer, D. M., Wang, P., Wang, H., Workman, K., &
Christensen, A. L. (2011). Linking ethical leadership to employee performance: The
roles of leader–member exchange, self-efficacy, and organizational identification.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 204-213.
Warr, P., Cook, J., & Wall, T. (1979). Scales for the measurement of some
work attitudes and aspects of psychological well-being. Journal of Occupational
Psychology, 52, 129-148.
Waterman, A. S. (1992). Identity as an aspect of optimal psychological
functioning. In G. R. Adams, T. Gullota & R. Montemayor (Eds.), Identity
formation during adolescence: Advances in adolescent development (Vol. 4, pp. 50-
72). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal
expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 64, 678-691.
Waterman, A. S. (2004). Finding someone to be: Studies on the role of
intrinsic motivation in identity formation. Identity: An International Journal of
Theory and Research, 4, 209–228.
Waterman, A. S. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: a eudaimonist’s
perspective. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 234–252.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 260 of 280
Waterman, A. S., Schwartz, S. J., & Conti, R. (2008). The implications of two
conceptions of happiness (hedonci enjoyment and eudaimonia) for understanding of
intrinsic motivation. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 41-79.
Waterman, A. S., Schwartz, S. J., Zamboanga, B. L., Ravert, R. D., Williams,
M. K., Agocha, B. V., . . . Donnellan, B. M. (2010). The questionnaire for
eudaimonic well-being: Psychometric properties, demographic comparisons, and
evidence of validity. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5, 41–61.
Wheatley, M. J. (2006). Leadership and the new science: Discovering order in
a chaotic world. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Wilson, M. G., DeJoy, D. M., Vandenberg, R. J., Richardson, H. A., &
McGrath, A. L. (2004). Work characteristics and employee health and well-being:
Test of a model of healthy work organization. Journal of Occupational and
Organizational Psychology, 77, 565-588.
Workman, M. (2001). Collectivism, individualism, and cohesion in a team
based occupation. Journal of vocational behavior, 58, 82-97.
World Health Organisation. (1946, 19-22 June). Preamble to the constitution
of the World Health Organization. Paper presented at the International Health
Conference, New York.
World Health Organisation. (1986, 21st of November). Ottawa Charter for
Health Promotion. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Health
Promotion, Ottawa.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 261 of 280
World Health Organisation. (1997, 21 - 25 July). Jakarta declaration on
leading health promotion into the 21st century. Paper presented at the Fourth
International Conference on Health Promotion: New Players for a New Era, Jakarta.
Wright, T. A., & Cropanzano, R. (1997). Well-being, satisfaction and job
performance: Another look at the happy/productive worker thesis. Academy of
Management Proceedings, 364-368.
Wright, T. A., & Cropanzano, R. (2004). The role of psychological well-being
in job performance: A fresh look at an age-old quest. Organizational Dynamics, 33,
338-351.
Wright, T. A., Cropanzano, R., & Bonett, D. G. (2007). The moderating role
of employee positive well-being on the relation between job satisfaction and job
performance. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12, 93-104.
Wright, T. A., Cropanzano, R., Denney, P. J., & Moline, G. L. (2002). When a
happy worker is a productive worker: A preliminary examination of three models.
Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 34, 146-150.
Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009).
Work engagement and financial returns: A diary study on the role of job and
personal resources. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 82, 183-
200.
Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., & Fischbach, A. (2013). Work engagement
among employees facing emotional demands. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 12,
74-84.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 262 of 280
Young, R. B. (2011). The Virtues of Organizational Integrity. New Directions
for Student Services, Fall 2011 (135), 5-15.
Zhang, J., & Liu, Y. (2010). Organizational Climate and its Effects on
Organizational Variables: An Empirical Study. International Journal of
Psychological Studies, 2, 189-201.
Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of
dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13, 339-351.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 263 of 280
Appendix AStudy One Questionnaire
Please respond to the questions that follow by inserting an answer, or circling a number, as appropriate.
Please note that there are no right or wrong answers. We are interested in a range of responses for different people.
Your age: (years)
Gender: Female / Male (circle)
Number of Children:
Number of hours worked per week on average:
Profession or trade:
Current role/position:
Number of years in current role/position:
Number of years with organisation:
Education level attained (please tick one):
Secondary School/College TAFE/Certificate course
Some University/TAFE Post Graduate University
Undergraduate University Other ___________________
The following questions refer to your work and the groups to which you belong at your work. Please answer the questions while keeping in mind how much you identify with the groups mentioned.
Which work group or department do you work in?
What profession or trade is related to the work you do?
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 264 of 280
The following three questions relate to how much you identify with certain groups related to your work or employment. To answer these questions, imagine that one of the circles represents you and the other circle represents the work related group as indicated. The more the circles overlap, the more you identify with the group.
Place a cross or a tick in the box that best represents how much do you identify with your organisation?
Place a cross or a tick in the box that best represents how much do you identify with your work group or department.
Please circle your option.
Do
not a
gree
Agr
ee a
litt
le
Som
etim
es a
gree
Agr
ee o
n av
erag
e
Mos
tly a
gree
Alm
ost a
lway
s agr
ee
Tot
ally
agr
ee
You would be very happy to spend the rest of your career with this organisation.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
You enjoy discussing your organisation with people outside it.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
You really feel as if this organisation’s problems are your own.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
You think that you could easily become as attached to another organisation as you are to this one.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 265 of 280
Please circle your option.
Do
not a
gree
Agr
ee a
litt
le
Som
etim
es a
gree
Agr
ee o
n av
erag
e
Mos
tly a
gree
Alm
ost a
lway
s agr
ee
Tot
ally
agr
ee
You do not feel like part of the family at your organisation.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
You do not feel emotionally attached to this organisation.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
This organisation has a great deal of personal meaning for you.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
You do not feel a strong sense of belonging to your organisation.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
You are not afraid of what might happen if you quit your job with-out having another one lined up.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
It would be very hard for you to leave your organisation right now, even if you wanted to.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Too much in your life would be disrupted if you decided you wanted to leave your organization now.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
It wouldn’t be too costly for me to leave my organisation now.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Right now, staying with your organisation is a matter of necessity as much as desire.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
You feel that you have too few options to consider leaving this organisation.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
One of the few serious consequences of leaving this organisation would be the scarcity of available alternatives.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
One of the major reasons you continue to work for this organisation is that leaving would require considerable personal sacrifice – another organisation may not match the overall benefits you have here.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
You think that people these days move from company to company too often.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 266 of 280
Please circle your option.
Do
not a
gree
Agr
ee a
litt
le
Som
etim
es a
gree
Agr
ee o
n av
erag
e
Mos
tly a
gree
Alm
ost a
lway
s agr
ee
Tot
ally
agr
ee
You do not believe that a person must always be loyal to the organisation.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Jumping from organisation to organisation does not seem at all unethical to you
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
One of the major reasons you continue to work for this organisation is that you believe that loyalty is important and therefore feel a sense of moral obligation to remain.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
If you got another offer for a better job elsewhere you would not feel it was right to leave your organisation.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
You were taught to believe in the value of remaining loyal to one organisation.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Things were better in the days when people stayed with one organisation for most of their careers.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
You do not think that wanting to be a ‘company man’ or ‘company woman’ is sensible anymore.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
How much do the following comments generally describe the behaviours of those with whom you work
Not
Cha
ract
eris
tic
Slig
htly
Cha
ract
eris
tic
Abo
ut A
vera
ge
Ver
yC
hara
cter
istic
Tot
ally
Cha
ract
eris
tic
Helping others who have been absent. 0 1 2 3 4
Punctuality. 0 1 2 3 4
Volunteering for things that are not required. 0 1 2 3 4
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 267 of 280
How much do the following comments generally describe the behaviours of those with whom you work
Not
Cha
ract
eris
tic
Slig
htly
Cha
ract
eris
tic
Abo
ut A
vera
ge
Ver
yC
hara
cter
istic
Tot
ally
Cha
ract
eris
tic
Taking undeserved breaks. 0 1 2 3 4
Orienting new people even though it is not required. 0 1 2 3 4
Attendance at work is above norm. 0 1 2 3 4
Helping others who have heavy work loads. 0 1 2 3 4
Coasting towards the end of the day. 0 1 2 3 4
Giving advanced notice if unable to come to work. 0 1 2 3 4
Great deal of time spent with personal phone conversations. 0 1 2 3 4
Do not take unnecessary time off work. 0 1 2 3 4
Assisting the supervisor with his or her work. 0 1 2 3 4
Making innovative suggestions to improve the department. 0 1 2 3 4
Do not take extra breaks. 0 1 2 3 4
Attend functions not required by that help company image.
0 1 2 3 4
Do not spend time in idle conversation. 0 1 2 3 4
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 268 of 280
Please indicate how satisfied you are with the following.
Not
Sat
isfie
d
A L
ittle
Sat
isfie
d
Som
etim
es S
atis
fied
50%
Sat
isfie
d
Oft
en S
atis
fied
Mos
tly S
atis
fied
Com
plet
ely
Satis
fied
The physical work conditions. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
The freedom to choose your own method of working. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Your fellow workers. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
The recognition you get for good work. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Your immediate boss. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
The amount of responsibility you are given. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Your rate of pay. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Your opportunity to use your abilities. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Industrial relations between management and workers in your firm. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Your chance of promotion. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
The way your firm is managed. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
The attention paid to suggestions you make. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Your hours of work. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
The amount of variety in your job 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Your job security 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 269 of 280
During the past month you have…….
Nev
er
Rar
ely
Som
etim
es
Alm
ost a
lway
s
Alw
ays
Been upset because of something that happened unexpectedly? 0 1 2 3 4
Felt that you were unable to control the important things in your life? 0 1 2 3 4
Felt nervous and stressed? 0 1 2 3 4
Dealt with irritating life hassles? 0 1 2 3 4
Felt that you were effectively coping with important changes that were occurring in your life? 0 1 2 3 4
Felt confident about your ability to handle your personal problems? 0 1 2 3 4
Felt that things were going your way? 0 1 2 3 4
Found that you could not cope with all the things you had to do? 0 1 2 3 4
Been able to control irritations in your life? 0 1 2 3 4
Felt that you were on top of things? 0 1 2 3 4
Been angered because of things that happened that were outside of your control? 0 1 2 3 4
Found yourself thinking about things that you have to accomplish? 0 1 2 3 4
Been able to control the way you spend your time? 0 1 2 3 4
Felt difficulties were piling up so high that you could not overcome them? 0 1 2 3 4
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 270 of 280
On an average day at work, how frequently do you………. Nev
er
Rar
ely
Som
etim
es
Oft
en
Alw
ays
Resist expressing my true feelings? 0 1 2 3 4
Pretend to have emotions that you don’t really have? 0 1 2 3 4
Hide your true feelings about a situation? 0 1 2 3 4
Make an effort to actually feel the emotions that you need to display to others? 0 1 2 3 4
Try to actually experience the emotions that you must show? 0 1 2 3 4
Really try to feel the emotions you have to show as part of your job? 0 1 2 3 4
Over the past few weeks you have………. Not
at a
ll
A li
ttle
A lo
t
Ver
y m
uch
Been feeling perfectly well and in good health? 0 1 2 3
Been feeling in need of a good tonic? 0 1 2 3
Been feeling run down and out of sorts? 0 1 2 3
Felt that you are ill? 0 1 2 3
Been getting any pains in you head? 0 1 2 3
Been getting a feeling of tightness or pressure in your head? 0 1 2 3
Been having hot or cold spells? 0 1 2 3
Lost much sleep over worry? 0 1 2 3
Had difficulty in staying asleep once you are off? 0 1 2 3
Felt constantly under strain? 0 1 2 3
Been getting edgy and bad tempered? 0 1 2 3
Been getting scared or panicky for no good reason? 0 1 2 3
Found everything getting on top of you? 0 1 2 3
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 271 of 280
Over the past few weeks you have………. Not
at a
ll
A li
ttle
A lo
t
Ver
y m
uch
Been feeling nervous and strung up? 0 1 2 3
Been managing to keep your self busy and occupied? 0 1 2 3
Been taking longer over the things you do? 0 1 2 3
Felt on the whole you were doing things well? 0 1 2 3
Been satisfied with the way you’ve carried out your tasks? 0 1 2 3
Felt that you are playing a useful part in things? 0 1 2 3
Felt capable of making decisions about things? 0 1 2 3
Been able to enjoy you normal day to day activities? 0 1 2 3
What could be done peoplewise to make your organisation run more smoothly?
What could/does your organisation do that would make you feel as if you belonged more?
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 272 of 280
Appendix B
Study Three Questionnaire
Please respond to the questions that follow by inserting an answer, or circling a number, as appropriate.Please note that there are no right or wrong answers. We are interested in a range of responses for different people.
Your age: (years)
Gender: Female / Male (circle)
Number of Children:
Number of hours worked per week on average:
Profession, trade or occupation:
What division do you work in (please tick one):
Employment Services Clean Force
Strategy & Alliance ELS
Corporate Services Other ___________________
Name the site you work at:
Name the program you are working on:
What level are you (please tick one):
Senior Management
Front Line Management
Staff
Job Title:
Number of years in current role/position:
Number of years with WISE:
Education level attained (please tick one):
Secondary School/College TAFE/Certificate course
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 273 of 280
Some University/TAFE Post Graduate University
Undergraduate University Other ___________________
Which best describes your previous employment or working background (please tick one):
Private Sector Employment Services
Community Sector Other ___________________
Government (please specify)
___________________
Please indicate with numbers from 0 to 6 whether the statement is true for yourself.
0 = Not at all true
6 = Totally trueC
aree
r
Org
anis
atio
n
Team
/Wor
k G
roup
I identify myself as a career oriented person or as a member of the organisation or team/workgroup respectively.
Being career oriented or a member of the organisation or team/workgroup reflects my personality well.
I like to work for my career, organisation or team/work group.
I think reluctantly of my career, organisation or team/work group.
Sometimes I’d rather not say that I am career oriented or a member of the organisation or team/work group
My career, organisation or team/work group is positively judged by others.
I work for my career, organisation or team/work group above what is absolutely necessary.
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 274 of 280
Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the following.
Do
not a
gree
Agr
ee a
litt
le
Som
etim
es a
gree
Agr
ee o
n av
erag
e
Mos
tly a
gree
Alm
ost a
lway
s agr
ee
Tot
ally
agr
ee
Communications seem good within this organisation. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
The goals of this organisation are not clear to me. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
I often feel that I do not know what is going on with the organisation. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Work assignments are often not fully explained. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
How much do the following comments generally describe the behaviours of those with whom you work
Not
Cha
ract
eris
tic
Slig
htly
Cha
ract
eris
tic
Abo
ut A
vera
ge
Ver
y C
hara
cter
istic
Tot
ally
Cha
ract
eris
ticHelping others who have been absent. 0 1 2 3 4
Punctuality. 0 1 2 3 4
Volunteering for things that are not required. 0 1 2 3 4
Taking undeserved breaks. 0 1 2 3 4
Orienting new people even though it is not required. 0 1 2 3 4
Attendance at work is above norm. 0 1 2 3 4
Helping others who have heavy work loads. 0 1 2 3 4
Coasting towards the end of the day. 0 1 2 3 4
Giving advanced notice if unable to come to work. 0 1 2 3 4
Great deal of time spent with personal phone conversations. 0 1 2 3 4
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 275 of 280
How much do the following comments generally describe the behaviours of those with whom you work
Not
Cha
ract
eris
tic
Slig
htly
Cha
ract
eris
tic
Abo
ut A
vera
ge
Ver
y C
hara
cter
istic
Tot
ally
Cha
ract
eris
tic
Do not take unnecessary time off work. 0 1 2 3 4
Assisting the supervisor with his or her work. 0 1 2 3 4
Making innovative suggestions to improve the department. 0 1 2 3 4
Do not take extra breaks. 0 1 2 3 4
Attend functions not required by that help company image. 0 1 2 3 4
Do not spend time in idle conversation. 0 1 2 3 4
Please indicate how satisfied you are with the following.
Not
Sat
isfie
d
A L
ittle
Sat
isfie
d
Som
etim
es S
atis
fied
50%
Sat
isfie
d
Oft
en S
atis
fied
Mos
tly S
atis
fied
Com
plet
ely
Satis
fied
The physical work conditions. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
The freedom to choose your own method of working. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Your fellow workers. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
The recognition you get for good work. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Your immediate boss. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
The amount of responsibility you are given. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Your rate of pay. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Your opportunity to use your abilities. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 276 of 280
Please indicate how satisfied you are with the following.
Not
Sat
isfie
d
A L
ittle
Sat
isfie
d
Som
etim
es S
atis
fied
50%
Sat
isfie
d
Oft
en S
atis
fied
Mos
tly S
atis
fied
Com
plet
ely
Satis
fied
Industrial relations between management and workers in your firm.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Your chance of promotion. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
The way your firm is managed. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
The attention paid to suggestions you make. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Your hours of work. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
The amount of variety in your job 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Your job security 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Rate the following……….
Poor
Bel
ow A
vera
ge
Ave
rage
Goo
d
Exc
elle
nt
The feedback from my supervisor on how well I’m doing. 0 1 2 3 4
The opportunity to find out how well I am doing on my job. 0 1 2 3 4
Knowing whether I am performing my job well or poorly. 0 1 2 3 4
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 277 of 280
Consider the following questions and indicate the extent to which they occur in your workplace.
Nev
er
Rar
ely
Som
etim
es
Oft
en
Alw
ays
To what extent do you find out how well you are doing on the job? 0 1 2 3 4
To what extent do you receive information from your supervisor on your job performance?
0 1 2 3 4
Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the following.
Nev
er
Har
dly
ever
Les
s tha
n av
erag
e
Ave
rage
Abo
ve a
vera
ge
Mos
t of t
he ti
me
All
the
time
In general, how much say or influence do you have on what goes on at work? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Do you feel you can influence the decisions of your immediate supervisor regarding things about which you are concerned?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Does your immediate supervisor ask your opinion when a problem comes up which involves you work?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the following.
Impo
ssib
le
Diff
icul
t
Not
ver
y ea
sy
Ave
rage
Pret
ty e
asy
Har
dly
a pr
oble
m
Nev
er a
pro
blem
If you have a suggestion for improving the job or changing the setup in some way, how easy is it for you to get ideas across to your immediate supervisor?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 278 of 280
Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the following.
Do
not a
gree
Agr
ee a
litt
le
Som
etim
es a
gree
Agr
ee o
n av
erag
e
Mos
tly a
gree
Alm
ost a
lway
s agr
ee
Tot
ally
agr
ee
The organisation fails to appreciate any extra effort from me. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
The organisation strongly considers my goals and values. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
The organisation disregards my best interests when it makes decisions that affect me.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Help is available from the organisation when I have a problem. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
The organisation really cares about my well-being. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
The organisation is willing to extend itself in order to help me perform my job to the best of my ability.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Even if I did the best job possible, the organisation would fail to notice. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
The organisation cares about my general satisfaction at work. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
The organisation shows very little concern for me. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
The organisation cares about my opinions. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Please indicate the level of agreement with the following.
Do
Not
Agr
ee
Agr
ee a
Litt
le
Som
etim
es A
gree
Agr
ee o
n A
vera
ge
Mos
tly A
gree
Alm
ost A
lway
s Agr
ee
Tot
ally
Agr
ee
I feel attached to this organisation 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
It would be difficult for me to leave this organisation 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 279 of 280
Please indicate the level of agreement with the following.
Do
Not
Agr
ee
Agr
ee a
Litt
le
Som
etim
es A
gree
Agr
ee o
n A
vera
ge
Mos
tly A
gree
Alm
ost A
lway
s Agr
ee
Tot
ally
Agr
ee
I’m too caught up in this organisation to leave 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
I feel tied to this organisation 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
I simply could not leave the organisation that I work for 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
It would be easy for me to leave this organisation 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
I am tightly connected to this organisation 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Please indicate the level of agreement with the following.
Nev
er
A fe
w ti
mes
a y
ear
or le
ss
Onc
e a
mon
th o
r le
ss
A fe
w ti
mes
a m
onth
Onc
e a
wee
k
A fe
w ti
mes
a w
eek
Eve
ry d
ay
I feel emotionally drained from my work 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
I feel used up at the end of the workday 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
I feel tired when I get up in the morning and have to face another day on the job 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Working all day is really a strain for me 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
I can effectively solve the problems that arise in my work
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
I feel burned out from my work 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
I feel I am making an effective contribution to what this organization does 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
I have become less interested in my work since I started this job
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
I have become less enthusiastic about my work
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Sean Tinker – Thesis: Flourishing through Identification and Engagement
Page 280 of 280
Please indicate the level of agreement with the following.
Nev
er
A fe
w ti
mes
a y
ear
or le
ss
Onc
e a
mon
th o
r le
ss
A fe
w ti
mes
a m
onth
Onc
e a
wee
k
A fe
w ti
mes
a w
eek
Eve
ry d
ay
In my opinion, I am good at my job 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
I feel exhilarated when I accomplish something at work
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
I have accomplished many worthwhile things in this job
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
I just want to do my job and not be bothered 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
I have become more cynical about whether my work contributes anything 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
I doubt the significance of my work 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
At my work, I feel confident that I am effective at getting things done
0 1 2 3 4 5 6