Date post: | 05-Apr-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | ahmer-iqbal |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 16
8/2/2019 fmev-chap7-GR
1/16
Chapter 7
Gamma Ray (GR) log
Lecture notes for PET 370
Spring 2012
Prepared by: Thomas W. Engler,Ph.D., P.E.
8/2/2019 fmev-chap7-GR
2/16
GR Log Uses
Estimate bed boundaries, stratigraphic correlations
Estimate shale content
Perforating depth control
Identify mineral deposits of potash, uranium, and coal
Monitor movement of injected radioactive material
8/2/2019 fmev-chap7-GR
3/16
GR Log Background
The Gamma Ray log is a continuous measurement of
the natural radioactivity emanating from the formations.
Principal isotopes emitting radiation are Potassium-40,Uranium, and Thorium (K40, U, Th)
Isotopes concentrated in clays; thus higher radioactivityin shales than other formations.
Sensitive detectors count the number of gamma rays perunit of time
Recorded in API Units which is 1/200th of the
calibrated, standard response.
8/2/2019 fmev-chap7-GR
4/16
GR Log General GR Response
8/2/2019 fmev-chap7-GR
5/16
GR Log Factors affecting tool response
(1). Radiation intensity of the formation
(2). Counters efficiency
(3). Time constant (rc)
(4). Logging speed
(5). Borehole environment
8/2/2019 fmev-chap7-GR
6/16
GR Log
Gamma Ray Logs never repeatexactly! The minor variations arestatistical fluctuations due to therandom nature of the radioactivepulses reaching the detector.
Typical ranges are 5 - 10 API Units inshales, and 2 - 4 units in cleanformations
Reduce statistical fluctuations byoptimizing the time constant andlogging speed.
Time constant/logging speed
8/2/2019 fmev-chap7-GR
7/16
GR Log
Effect of Time Constantand Logging Speed
on bed resolution
Time constant/logging speed
8/2/2019 fmev-chap7-GR
8/16
GR LogThe faster the logging speed, the less time the tool can sufficiently react and
properly count the radiation intensity.
Two effects:1. The tool response is shifted in the direction the tool is moving. This
lag or critical thickness (hc) is given by hc = n tc; where n is loggingspeed (ft/sec) and tc is the time constant (sec).
2. The log cannot properly respond when h < hc
Time constant/logging speed
8/2/2019 fmev-chap7-GR
9/16
GR Log
The time constant and logging speed are regulated so that the GR logis representative of the formation radioactivity.
1. By experience, hc = 1 ft., avoids excessive distortion of the GRcurve.
2. Common combinations are:
n (ft/hr) tc (seconds)
3,600 1
1,800 2
1,200 3
900 4
Time constant/logging speed
8/2/2019 fmev-chap7-GR
10/16
GR Log Borehole effects
Correction typically ignored except for quantitative analysis suchas shale volume calculations.
Function of tool type, borehole size, mud weight, eccentricity
8/2/2019 fmev-chap7-GR
11/16
GR Log
Examples:
(1). A GR-CNL-LDT combination is run eccentered. What is thecorrected response if the log response is 40 API units in a 9 hole
with 8.3 ppg mud? ...16 hole ...?
(2). A GR - BHC combination is run centered. What is the corrected
response if the log response is 40 API units in a 9 hole with 16 ppgmud? ....16 hole....?
Borehole effects
8/2/2019 fmev-chap7-GR
12/16
GR Log Vsh estimation
Vsh is the bulk volume of shale (precisely the volume of silt, dry
clay, and bound water) to bulk volume. Calculate shale index, IRA , by
where
RAmin is clean zone reading
RAsh is shale zone (max) reading
RA is reading in zone of interest
GR correlations based on:
shale distribution type age of shale (tertiary or older)
local area
Disadvantage: Contamination from non-shale radioactive sources.
minRA
shRA
minRARA
RAI
8/2/2019 fmev-chap7-GR
13/16
GR Log Shale Distribution
8/2/2019 fmev-chap7-GR
14/16
GR Log Vsh estimation
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
Radioactivity Index, IRA
ShaleVolume,Vsh
laminated
Clavier, et al
Larionov (older rocks)
Stieber
Larionov (tertiary rocks)
8/2/2019 fmev-chap7-GR
15/16
GR Log SP/GR Comparison
8/2/2019 fmev-chap7-GR
16/16
GR Log References
Bassiouni, Z: Theory, Measurement, and Interpretation of Well Logs, SPETextbook Series, Vol. 4, (1994)
Chapter 2, Sec 2.1 2.5
Chapter 7, Sec all
Schlumberger, Log Interpretation Charts, Houston, TX (1995)
Western Atlas, Log Interpretation Charts, Houston, TX (1992)