FNDS 6010 Dr. Shumack Spring 2010

Team Members

Introduction

Syllabus

Visual Model

Delivery Methods

Course Management

Options

Online Course◦Content vs. Technical Environment

Course Management System◦Function vs. Features

Instructor◦Processes vs. Abilities

Students◦Pedagogy vs. Andragogy

Putting it all together

WEEK DATE TOPIC LECTURE READ PROJECTS DUE DATES

1 5/31

Intro & Ed -Philosophy

Video

~ Create Blog, www. blogspot.com~ Join Class Wiki

Jun. 6, 10

2 6/7Lesson Plan

Video Text~ Create daily lesson plan-Team Discussion

Jun. 13, 2010

3 6/14Class-room Mgmt

Video Two Articles

~ Create WikiPage~ Download Jing

Jun. 20, 10

WEEK DATE TOPIC LECTURE READINGS PROJECTS DUE DATES

4 6/21Class-roomMgmt

VideoTwo Articles

~ Create ClassroomMgmt Plan~ Team Disc

Jun. 27, 10

5 6/28 VideoTwo Articles ~ Integrated

Unit Plan ~ Overview Jing Project

Jun. 12, 10

6 7/12Unit Plan-ning

VideoTwo Articles

~ Jing Presenta-tion

Jul. 18, 10

WEEK DATE TOPIC LECTURE READINGS PROJECTS DUE DATES

7 7/19

Teach-ing Philoso- phy

Video

~Redefine TeachingPhiloso-phy~ 10 hr Ob due

Jul. 25, 10

8 7/26

~ Annota-ted Bibliog-raphy Due~ Final Exam

Jul. 30, 10

Cam Studio (asynchronous)

Echo 360 (asynchronous)

Wimba (synchronous)

Blackboards largest competitor

Collaboration and Communication are key

Has discussion boards, chats, email

State of Alabama uses program for high school ACCESS

www.desire2learn.com

Free Course Management System

Designed with pedagogy as main focus

Has blogs, forums, and moodle-docs

Has free demonstration page to experiment with program

www.moodle.com

BIBLIOGRAPHY REFERENCES

  ACCESS: Alabama connecting classroom, educators, & students statewide. Retrieved February 20, 2010, from https://access.desire2learn.com/   Desire 2 learn: innovative learning technology. Retrieved February 20, 2010, from http://www.desire2learn.com/   Moodle. Retrieved February 20, 2010 from http://moodle.com/   Bird, L. (2007). The 3 ‘C” design model for networked collaborative e-learning: a tool for novice designers. Innovations in Education and Teaching

International, 44(2), 153-167. Retrieved February 8, 2010, from ProQuest Education Journals.   Brinkerhoff, J., & Koroghlanian, C.M. (2007). Online students’ expectations: enhancing the fit between online students and course design. J. Educational

Computing Research, 36, (4), 383-393. Retrieved February 15, 2010 from http://www.ebscohost.com   Carmean, C., & Haefner, J. (2002). Mind over Matter: Transforming course management systems into effective learning environments. EDUCAUSE Review, 37

(6), 26-34.   Green, J. (1998). Andragogy: Teaching adults. In B. Hoffman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Educational Technology. Retrieved February 1, 2010, from

http://coe.sdsu.edu/eet/Articles/andragogy/start.htm   Kidney, G., Cummings, L., & Boehm, A. (2007). Toward a Quality Assurance Approach to E-Learning Courses. University of Houston-Clear Lake, USA.

International JI. On E-Learning, 6(1), 17-30.   Kim, K. J. & Bonk, C. J. (2006). The Future of Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Educause Quaterl,y, 4, 22-30.   Krumsvik, R. J. (2008). Situated learning and teachers’ digital competence. Education Information Technology, 13, 279-290. doi: 10.1007/s10639-00809069-5   Lane, L.M. (2009). Insidious pedagogy: how course management systems impact teaching. First Monday, 14, (10). Retrieved February 14, 2010 from

http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewarticle/2530/2303   Lane, L. (2008). Toolbox or Trap? Course Management Systems and Pedagogy. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 31 (2), 4-6.  

Malikowski, S. R. (2008). Factors related to breadth of use in course management systems. Internet and Higher Education, 11 (2), 81-86.

  Meyer, K., & Smart, K. (2005). Changing Course Management Systems: Lessons Learned. EDUCUASE Quarterly, 28 (2), 68-

70   Oblinger, D. G. & Hawkins, B. L. (2006). The Myth about Online Course Development. Educause Review, January &

February, 14-15.   Rughooputh, S., & Santally, M.I. (2009). Integrating text to speech software into pedagogically sound teaching and

learning scenarios. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 57 (1), 131-146. Retrieved February 16, 2010, from ProQuest Education Journals.

    Seok, S. (2008). Teaching aspects of e-learning. International Journal on ELearning, 7(4), 725-741. Retrieved February 8,

2010, from ProQuest Education Journals.   Swinglehurst, D., Russell, J., & Greenhalgh, T. (2008). Peer observation of teaching in the online environment: An action

research approach. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(5), 383-393. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00274.x.   Tastle, W.J., White, B. A., & Shackleton, P. (2005). E-learning in higher education: the challenge, effort, and return on

investment. International Journal on ELearning, 4, (2), 241-251. Retrieved February 8, 2010, from ProQuest Education Journals.

  Williams, V. (2004). Teachnology: web-based instruction’s dual environment. International Journal on ELearning, 3, (4), 15-

21. Retrieved February 8, 2010, from ProQuest Education Journals.