F.No.89-548/2009-Appeal NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION …ncte-india.org/appeal1/appeal...

F.No.89-548/2009-Appeal NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION

Hans Bhawan, Wing II, 1, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110 002 08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Akal College of Physical Education, Sangrur, Punjab dated 12/06/2009 is against the Order No. NRC/NCTE/F-7/PB-677/140 MEETING/2009/4147 - 48 dated 10/06/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting M.P. Ed course on the grounds “ 1) File can not be processed as per clause 8(2) of NCTE Regulation, 2007. 2) Reply of the institution is not satisfactory”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Akal College of Physical Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 12/06/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri S. Jaswant Singh, Secretary & Shri Amarjit Singh Principal, Akal College of Physical Education, Sangrur, Punjab presented the case of the appellant institution on 14.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that after appreciating the implications of the provisions of clause 8(2) of NCTE Regulation, 2007 they would like to seek recognition for introduction of M.P.Ed course only as they are already conducting C.P.Ed and B.P.Ed courses. The appellant also submitted that they hereby withdraw the proposals for grant of recognition for additional intake in B.Ed and introduction of M.Ed submitted by Akal College of Physical Education. AND WHEREAS after taking into account the above submissions of the appellant the Council came to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be accepted and the case be remanded to the NRC for processing the application on merits. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal and remand the case to NRC for further processing of the file based on merits, as per NCTE Regulations, after closing their files related to B.Ed additional intake and M.Ed course. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Akal College of Physical Education, Sangrur, Punjab to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.

(Hasib Ahmad) Member Secretary

1. The Secretary, Akal College of Physical Education, VPO - Mastuana Sahib,, Sangrur - , Punjab

2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Punjab, Chandigarh.

F.No.89-661/2009-Appeal

NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION Hans Bhawan, Wing II, 1, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110 002

08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Karnataka Grameen Vidya Abhivrudhi D.Ed College (Karnataka Grameen Vidya Abhivrudhi Sangha), Bijapur, Karnataka dated 13/07/2009 is against the Order No. F.SRC/NCTE/2009/D.Ed -Al/REF/14128 dated 25/06/2009 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.Ed (Addl.) course on the grounds “1) The total built up space of old building constructed in 2003-04 with 36274.40 sq. ft. as per building completion certificate and the management stated that 13051 sq. ft., earmarked for existing D.Ed and 23209 for proposed D.Ed Addl. Intake; whereas for the D.Ed 1000 sq. mtrs. and D.Ed Addl. intake another 500 sq. mtrs. are required as per norms and standards of D.Ed course. 2) As per certificate issued by Director, DSERT, Bangalore only 15 rooms are available for D.Ed addl. intake and D.Ed is managed in a portion of the building. 3) Hence, from the certificate issued by the DSERT and other information furnished by management, it is clear that the management is running other than Teacher Education courses also in the same building and has not disclosed the information to SRC, NCTE. 4) No exclusive built up space and infrastructural and instructional facilities are provided for proposed D.Ed - Additional Intake”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Karnataka Grameen Vidya Abhivrudhi D.Ed College (Karnataka Grameen Vidya Abhivrudhi Sangha) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 13/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Prakash S. Udupikar Member & Shri Somanagolda B. Patil, Karnataka Grameen Vidya Abhivrudhi D.Ed College (Karnataka Grameen Vidya Abhivrudhi Sangha), Bijapur, Karnataka presented the case of the appellant institution on 14.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that as per the details made available to the Southern Regional Committee (SRC), there is enough space for the existing D.Ed course as well as additional intake in this course for which recognition has been sought. The appellant also submitted a communication dated 08.05.09 from the Director, Research and Training, Bangalore to the effect that no other High School or course other than teacher education course are running in the proposed D.Ed college. AND WHEREAS the Council after going through the details of builtup space available as submitted by the appellant and also recorded by the visiting team in their report dated 14.03.09, came to the conclusion that there is adequate space vis-a-vis the prescribed norms and standards. In these circumstances, the appeal deserves to be accepted and the order of the SRC dated 25.06.09 set aside.

AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal and set aside SRC’s order dated 25.06.09. Accordingly, the appeal was accepted and SRC’s order dated 25.06.09 was set aside. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby reverses the Order appealed against.


1. The President, Karnataka Grameen Vidya Abhivrudhi D.Ed College (Karnataka Grameen Vidya Abhivrudhi Sangha), Hirur, Taluk - Basavan Bagewadi, Muddebihal, District , Bijapur - 586214, Karnataka 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, 1st Floor, CSD Building, HMT Post, Jalahali, Bangalore - 560 031. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Karnataka, Bangalore.

F.No.89-361/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Khwaja Nezam Ali College of Education, Rohtas, Bihar dated 19/05/2009 is against the Order No. ERC/7-93.6(II).13/2009/15802-(I) dated 23/03/2009 of the Eastern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.Ed course on the grounds “1) As per reply submitted by the institution one teacher namely Dr. Zafar Alam has left the institution and Mr. Ranjit Kumar Joined in place of the Dr. Zafar Alam. As per affidavit on Rs. 100/-stamp paper earlier submitted by the name of Mr. Ranjit Kumare not mentioned. So, on affidavit on Rs. 100/- stamp paper of the selection committee of all the teachers has not been submitted. 2) Those plot nos. mentioned in the land documents has not been mentioned in the building plan, completion certificate & affidavit. 3) As per the observations of the Council & notice dt. 14/12/2007 plot nos. in lease deed appears to be tampered. In this connection institution clarification/ supporting document has not been given. 4) Govt. Recommendation can only be sent on receipt of the letter for fulfillment of deficiencies by the institution”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Khwaja Nezam Ali College of Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 22/05/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Nezami, Chairman & Shri M.D. Gauhar, Member, Khwaja Nezam Ali College of Education, Rohtas, Bihar presented the case of the appellant institution on 14.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation claimed that the plot nos. have been mentioned in the land document and the affidavit. However, the appellant admitted in the course of personal presentation that the details of land documents had not been recorded on the building plan and completion certificate. As it is imperative that there should be no discrepancy in regard to land and buildings, the appellant undertook to furnish correct documents without any discrepancies. AND WHEREAS in view of the position stated above the Council came to the conclusion that the appellant may be allowed to submit corrected documents relating to land and buildings to the ERC, Meanwhile ERC to take immediate further action to cause the inspection of the institution within one month of issue of order. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal, set aside ERC’s order dated 23-03-09 and remand the case to ERC for causing inspection of the institution to ascertain the infrastructure and instructional facilities as

per NCTE norms within one month of issue of this order and thereafter pass appropriate order. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Khwaja Nezam Ali College of Education, Rohtas, Bihar to the ERC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Secretary, Khwaja Nezam Ali College of Education, Mohalla Kabir Ganj, P.O. Sasaram, , Rohtas - 821115, Bihar 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Eastern Regional Committee, 15, Neelkanth Nagar, Nayapalli, Bhubaneshwar - 751 012. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Bihar, Patna.

F.No.89-674/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Malbazar Primary Teachers' Training Institute, Jalpaiguri, West Bengal dated 14/07/2009 is against the Order No. ERC/7-95.8.56/2009/16582(1) dated 15/05/2009 of the Eastern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting PTT (D.Ed) course on the grounds “(i) The institution has submitted a notarised lease deed; photocopy execute on 21st Nov 2008 i.e. after the date of application and also after the date. (ii) Building Completion Certificate mentioning the total area, builtup area & plot no counter signed by the Govt. Engineer not submitted”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Malbazar Primary Teachers' Training Institute (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 14/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Sandip Khan, President, Malbazar Primary Teachers' Training Institute, Jalpaiguri, West Bengal presented the case of the appellant institution on 14.09.09. On perusal of the appeal and in the course of personal presentation made by the appellant it has transpired that the land for the institution in question has been taken on lease from a private party. According to the NCTE regulations 2007 the land for the institution, free from all encumbrances, should be either on ownership basis or on lease from Govt./ Govt. Institution. On being pointed out this lacuna, the appellant offered to get the land registered on ownership basis. AND WHEREAS since as on date the applicant did not fulfill the conditions relating to ownership of land, the Council came to the conclusion that the appeal deserved to be rejected and the order of the ERC dated 15.05.09 confirmed. The appellant is at liberty to apply afresh after fulfilling all the required conditions. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and ERC’s order dated 15.05.09 was confirmed.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The President, Malbazar Primary Teachers' Training Institute, Village & PO - Batabari, PS - Metelli, District, Jalpaiguri - 735206, West Bengal 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Eastern Regional Committee, 15, Neelkanth Nagar, Nayapalli, Bhubaneshwar - 751 012. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of West Bengal, Kolkata.

F.No.89-699/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Manurkar Maharaj Shikshan Prasarak Mandal (G.V.S.M College of Education {D.Ed College}), Beed, Maharashtra dated 17/07/2009 is against the Order No. WRC/APW06949/1222082/110th/VTR/2008/55694 dated 23/05/2009 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.Ed (M) Co. Ed. course on the grounds “The inspection of the institution was conducted on 25.10.08 and WRC considered the case of the institution in light of letters F.No. 46-3/2008/NCTE(N&S)/84003 dt 17, Sep, 2008, F.No. 49-27/20007/NCTE (N&S) dt. 1, Oct, 2008 and F.No 49/27/2007/NCTE (N&S) dt. 31 Oct, 2008 received from Member Secretary, NCTE, New Delhi and negative recommendation received from Maharashtra State Govt. in respect of D.Ed course. Keeping in view of the negative recommendation received from the Maharashtra State Government in respect of D.Ed course and directions received from NCTE Hqrs, the WRC decided that no further processing will be done in this case and communication to this effect to be made to this institution”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Manurkar Maharaj Shikshan Prasarak Mandal (G.V.S.M Collge of Education {D.Ed Collge}) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 17/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Prasham Kashinath Kolhe, Representative, Manurkar Maharaj Shikshan Prasarak Mandal (G.V.S.M College of Education {D.Ed College}), Beed, Maharashtra presented the case of the appellant institution on 14.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that all necessary infrastructural facilities had been provided by investing Rs 62 Lakhs and the order of the Regional Committee may be set aside. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that considering inter-alia the recommendations of some of the State Governments, including the State Govt. of Maharashtra not to further recognize/permit institutions for conducting B.Ed./D.Ed. course, a policy decision was taken and a public notice was issued by the NCTE on 2-10-08 through the newspapers to the effect that application for D.Ed. course for the academic session 2009-10 from the State of Maharashtra would not be considered and all such applications shall be returned to the institution alongwith the processing fee and documents. the Council also noted that the said step taken by the NCTE was a temporary measure for regulating the growth of teacher training institutions, pending state-wise assessment of the manpower requirement of teachers in the country. Accordingly, NCTE Hqrs. had vide its letters dated 1-10-2008 and 31-10-2008 directed all the Regional Directors of NCTE not to recognize/permit the institutions for conducting the specific teacher training course as specified in the

public notice issued by NCTE and to return all those applications which were received prior to issuance of public notice dated 2nd Oct, 2008. In view of this, the Council came to the conclusion that WRC was right in refusing the recognition to the institution for conducting D.Ed course by closing the file of the institution. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and WRC’s order dated 23.05.09 was confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The Secretary, Manurkar Maharaj Shikshan Prasarak Mandal (G.V.S.M Collge of Education {D.Ed Collge}), Gat No. 459, Village - Manur, District, Beed - , Maharashtra 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai.

F.No.89- 506/2009-Appeal


07/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Mohammadi Educational & Charitable Trust's Hussaini B.Ed College, Gulbarga, Karnataka dated 02/06/2009 is against the Order No. SRO/NCTE/B.ED/2009/11200 dated 02/04/2009 of the Southern Regional Committee, against recognition for conducting B.ED course on the grounds “ 1) The Lease land bearing Sy.No.87 measuring to the extent of 9 acres 14 Guntas situated at kapnoor village Tq and Gulbaraga Dt. as per lease deed and lease building lactated and constructed on Plot no.8 in Sy.No.2 of the Badepur, situated at Jail Garden, Opp City Bus stand, S.B.Temple Road, Super Market Road, Gulbarga as per approved building plan, building completion certificate and commission city corporation, Gulbarga approval certificate dt. 03/07/2006. The lease land and lease building situated at different Sy.Nos., address and not as per regulations of NCTE. 2) The build up space 14,990 sq.ft not adequate for proposed B.Ed. course. 3) The equipment in E.T. lab is not adequate”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Mohammadi Educational & Charitable Trust's Hussaini B.Ed College (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 02/06/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Abdul Gani, Chief Officer, Mohammadi Educational & Charitable Trust's Hussaini B.Ed College, Gulbarga, Karnataka Bihar presented the case of the appellant institution on 15.09.09, In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the land and building are located in one and the same place, which is taken on lease for a period of 30 years; The land area is around 30,000 Sq.ft. and upon which the built-up area of the building earmarked for B.Ed college is around 15,000 sq.ft and it is sufficient to run the proposed B.Ed course as per NCTE norms. That the land, which was shown to VT, was only to make them aware of their future plans. But that, they should not have submitted the record of the said land as they have already fulfilled the norms by taking the land and Building on lease basis, which was permitted at that time. In this context it was submitted that the aforesaid land and building and the land shown for future plans and developments are owned by the president of the trust. It was further submitted that on the direction of the appellate authority re-inspection of the institution was caused; Which indicated built-up area of 15,000 sq.ft. the built-up area of the building is 15000 Sq.ft which is sufficient to run B.Ed college; Equipment in E.T. Lab is adequate. They also mentioned that some additional space in the building is available, where they have located the society’s office. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that SRC caused re-inspection of the building and the inspection report indicated availability of 15000 sq. ft. of builtup area and

this area is not adequate as per norms. In view of this the Council came to the conclusion that there was no justification in accepting the appeal and that it should be rejected. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and SRC’s order was confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The Secretary, Mohammadi Educational & Charitable Trust's Hussaini B.Ed College, Pal Complex, S.B. Temple Road, Opp: City Bus Stand, Super Market, Gulbarga - 585101, Karnataka 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, 1st Floor, CSD Building, HMT Post, Jalahali, Bangalore - 560 031. 4. PS to Chairperso 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Karnataka, Bangalore.

F.No.89-656/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Rambachan Yadav Mahavidyalaya (Rambachan Yadav Mahavidyalaya Samiti), Azamgarh, Uttar Pradesh dated 10/07/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F-7/UP-1712/139th MEETING/2009/4100 dated 10/06/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds “CLU submitted is not on prescribed format of State Government”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Rambachan Yadav Mahavidyalaya (Rambachan Yadav Mahavidyalaya Samiti) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 10/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Ram Aasre Vishkaram, Coordinator, Rambachan Yadav Mahavidyalaya (Rambachan Yadav Mahavidyalaya Samiti), Azamgarh, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 14.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that in the letter dt. 17.04.09 issued by the NRC pointing out the deficiencies, the requirement of a CLU on prescribed format of State Govt. was not mentioned. The appellant enclosed “Aakrishit Praman Patra” issued during June-July 2009. However it is seen that it is not in the format prescribed under Section 143 of the relevant act/ rules. AND WHEREAS as the application of this institution has been closed by the NRC only on account of non-submission of CLU in the prescribed format, the Council came to the conclusion that the case deserves to be remanded to the NRC for conducting inspection of the institution with the condition that the appellant shall provide the CLU on the prescribed format to the visiting team. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and remand the case to NRC for causing inspection of the institution to ascertain the availability of infrastructure and instructional facilities as per NCTE norms within one month of issue of this order and thereafter pass appropriate order. Accordingly, the case was remanded back to NRC.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Rambachan Yadav Mahavidyalaya (Rambachan Yadav Mahavidyalaya Samiti), Azamgarh, Uttar Pradesh to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Manager, Rambachan Yadav Mahavidyalaya (Rambachan Yadav Mahavidyalaya Samiti), Bahauddinpur, Fulpur,, Azamgarh - , Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.

F.No.89-709/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Shree Saraswati Gyanpeeth Shiksha Mahavidyalaya (Shree Vidyadayani Maa Saraswati Shikshan Sanstha Samiti), Devas, Madhya Pradesh dated 21/07/2009 is against the decision of Western Regional Committee in its 121st meeting held on 8-9th July, 2009, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds “ Reply not received within stipulated time period. Hence application rejected file closed. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Shree Saraswati Gyanpeeth Shiksha Mahavidyalaya (Shree Vidyadayani Maa Saraswati Shikshan Sanstha Samiti) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 21/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Abhay Jain Coordinator, Shree Saraswati Gyanpeeth Shiksha Mahavidyalaya (Shree Vidyadayani Maa Saraswati Shikshan Sanstha Samiti), Devas, Madhya Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 14.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the appeal had been preferred on the basis of the information perused from the website and no notice was received from the NRC for which a reply could be sent. Appellant stating further that they have not admitted any student for the session 2007-08 the recognition for the institution may be restored from 2008-09. AND WHEREAS since this institution’s case is connected to Amrit Vidyapeeth Case which was considered by the Hon’ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh, the Council was of the opinion that the institution cannot be treated as a recognised institution during the academic session 2007-08. However, it would continue as a recognised institution from the session 2008-09 onward, as the inspection conducted by NCTE Hqrs, on the direction of Hon’ble Court on 10th jan’2009 indicated that the institution possess the required infrastructure i.e. 2582 sq. mts of land and 16,856 sq. ft. of builtup area. The staff in the institution has been appointed with the approval of the University. AND WHEREAS after perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, report of the inspection conducted by NCTE Hqrs in 2009 the Council came to the conclusion that the institution would remain in the category of Amrit Vidyapeeth and

would not be recognised institute during the session 2007-08 but would be a recognised institute from 2008-09 onward.


1. The President, Shree Saraswati Gyanpeeth Shiksha Mahavidyalaya (Shree Vidyadayani Maa Saraswati Shikshan Sanstha Samiti), 62, Laxman Nagar,, Devas - 455001, Madhya Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal.

F.No.89-705/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Shri Rajendra Katare Shiksha Mahavidyalaya, Shahdol, Madhya Pradesh dated 18/07/2009 is against the decision of Western Regional Committee in its 121st meeting held on 8-9th July, 2009, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds “Reply not received within stipulated time. Hence application rejected file closed”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Shri Rajendra Katare Shiksha Mahavidyalaya (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 20/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Vishwanath Katare, Secretary, Shri Rajendra Katare Shiksha Mahavidyalaya, Shahdol, Madhya Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 14.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the appeal had been preferred on the basis of the information perused from the website and no notice was received from the WRC for which a reply could be sent. It has been noted that the institution has been listed under Amrit Vidyapeeth in the order of the Hon’ble High Court of Jabalpur dated 13.3.2009 and hence a notice was given by the WRC to the institution. If they have any representation to make against this listing. Since the institution did not make any representation, their status would continued as such and they would not be treated as a recognised institution during academic session 2007-08, in view of their inclusion in the Amrit Vidyapeeth category. Institution also did not make any admission during 2007-08 and therefore their recognition will be operative from the year 2008-09. It was further stated that they have not admitted any student for the session 2007-08. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the inspection conducted by NCTE Hqrs. on 08.02.09 reported that the institution possess the required infrastructure as per NCTE norms, having 27000 sq. ft. of land and 17000 sq, ft, of builtup area. Moreover the staff has been appointed with the approval of the University and is as per NCTE/ University Norms. AND WHEREAS after perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, report of the inspection conducted by NCTE Hqrs in 2009, the Council came to the conclusion that the institution would remain in the category of Amrit Vidyapeeth and

would not be recognised institutioin during the session 2007-08, but would be a recognised institution from 2008-09 onward.


1. The Secretary, Shri Rajendra Katare Shiksha Mahavidyalaya, Plot No. 61, Behind Raghuraj School, , Shahdol - 484116, Madhya Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal.

F.No.89-698/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Shri Sant Bhagwanbaba Pratishthan (Sai Baba Adhyapak Vidhyalaya), Beed, Maharashtra dated 17/07/2009 is against the Order No. WRC/APW06609/1221976/110th/CVT/2008/55854 dated 27/05/2009 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.Ed (M) Co. Ed. course on the grounds “1) WRC considered the case of the institution in light of letters F.No.46-3/2008/NCTE(N&S)/84003 dt. 17. Sep, 2008 F.No. 49-27/2007/NCTE(N&S) dt. 1, Oct, 2008 and F.No. 49-27/2007/NCTE (N&S) dt 31, Oct, 2008 received from member Secretary, NCTE, New Delhi and negative recommendation received from Maharashtra State Govt. in respect of D.Ed course. keeping in view of the negative recommendations received from the Maharashtra State Govt. in respect of D.Ed course and directions received from NCTE Hqrs, the WRC decided that no further processing will be done in this case and communication to this effect to be made to this institution”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Shri Sant Bhagwanbaba Pratishthan (Sai Baba Adhyapak Vidhyalaya) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 17/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Khedkar Somnath Bappaji, President, Shri Sant Bhagwanbaba Pratishthan (Sai Baba Adhyapak Vidhyalaya), Beed, Maharashtra presented the case of the appellant institution on 14.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that all necessary infrastructural facilities had been provided by investing Rs 62 Lakhs and the order of the Regional Committee may be set aside. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that considering inter-alia the recommendations of some of the State Governments, including the State Govt. of Maharashtra not to further recognize/permit institutions for conducting B.Ed./D.Ed. course, a policy decision was taken and a public notice was issued by the NCTE on 2-10-08 through the newspapers to the effect that application for D.Ed. course for the academic session 2009-10 from the State of Maharashtra would not be considered and all such applications shall be returned to the institution alongwith the processing fee and documents. the Council also noted that the said step taken by the NCTE was a temporary measure for regulating the growth of teacher training institutions, pending state-wise assessment of the manpower requirement of teachers in the country. Accordingly, NCTE Hqrs. had vide its letters dated 1-10-2008 and 31-10-2008 directed all the Regional Directors of NCTE not to recognize/permit the institutions for conducting the specific teacher training course as specified in the public notice issued by NCTE and to return all those applications which were

received prior to issuance of public notice dated 2nd Oct, 2008. In view of this, the Council came to the conclusion that WRC was right in refusing the recognition to the institution for conducting D.Ed course by closing the file of the institution. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and WRC’s order dated 27-05-09 was confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The President, Shri Sant Bhagwanbaba Pratishthan (Sai Baba Adhyapak Vidhyalaya), Plot No. 888, Manur, Taluka - Shirur (Kasar), District, Beed - , Maharashtra 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai.

F.No.89-677/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Smt. Sarvamangala J.H. Patel College of Education (Bapuji Vidya Samsthe), Shimoga, Karnataka dated 10/07/2009 is against the Order No. F.SRC/NCTE/2009/B.Ed/REF/3458 dated 01/06/2009 of the Southern Regional Committee, against recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds “1) No exclusive land area and built up space are provided for proposed course; Whereas the Management is running an Running an Ayurvedic Medical College in the same building. It is against the regulations of Para 8 97) of NCTE Act. 2) The Books are not adequate as per reply and enclosed bills of books. 3) Exclusive infrastructural and instructional facilities are not provided for proposed B.Ed. course. Part of the existing Ayurvedic Medical College. 4) The Building is not exclusively constructed for proposed B.Ed. course as per building completion certificate submitted by the Management”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Smt. Sarvamangala J.H. Patel College of Education (Bapuji Vidya Samsthe) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 15/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Shashi Dharappa, Principal, Smt. Sarvamangala J.H. Patel College of Education (Bapuji Vidya Samsthe), Shimoga, Karnataka presented the case of the appellant institution on 14.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that it had not been denied that the management is running an Ayurvedic Medical College in the same building wherein it is proposed to conduct the proposed B.Ed course, which is a fact, as per the report of the visiting team also. AND WHEREAS in view of the above position and in the absence of any provision in the rules and regulation of the NCTE for running an institution in temporary/ shared accommodation, pending construction of a permanent building, the Council has come to the conclusion the appeal deserves to be rejected and the order of the SRC dated 1st June, 2009 confirmed. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and SRC’s order dated 01-06-09 was confirmed.



1. The President, Smt. Sarvamangala J.H. Patel College of Education (Bapuji Vidya Samsthe), Honnali, Sowlanga Road,, Shimoga - 577204, Karnataka 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, 1st Floor, CSD Building, HMT Post, Jalahali, Bangalore - 560 031. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Karnataka, Bangalore.

F.No.89-695/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Swami Samarth Adhyapak Vidyalaya (Shri Swami Samarth Seva Sanstha), Ahmadnagar, Maharashtra dated 17/07/2009 is against the Order No. WRC/APW06792/1222051/110th/VTR/2008/55685 dated 23/05/2009 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.Ed (M) Co. Ed. course on the grounds that WRC considered the case of the institutions in light of letters F.No. 46-3/2008/NCTE (N&S)/84003 dt. 17 Sep, 2008, F.No. 49-27/2007/NCTE (N&S) dt. 1 October, 2008 and F.No. 49-27/2007/NCTE (N&S) dt. 31 October, 2008 received from Member Secretary, NCTE, New Delhi and negative recommendation received from Maharashtra State Govt. in respect of D.Ed. Course. Keeping in view of the negative recommendation received from the Maharashtra State Government in respect of D.Ed. course and directions received from NCTE Hqrs, the WRC decided that no further processing will be done in this case. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Swami Samarth Adhyapak Vidyalaya (Shri Swami Samarth Seva Sanstha) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 17/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri P.K. Khadgir, Member & Shri B.V. Bhosale, Swami Samarth Adhyapak Vidyalaya (Shri Swami Samarth Seva Sanstha), Ahmadnagar, Maharashtra presented the case of the appellant institution on 14.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it has inter-alia been submitted that the entire infrastructure required for the D.Ed course was made available; an inspection of the institution was carried out and no lacuna were found, the requirement of teachers is increasing; there is no fault on the part of the petitioner institution; and in the circumstances the order of the WRC may be set aside. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that considering inter-alia the recommendations of some of the State Governments, including the State Govt. of Maharashtra not to further recognize/permit institutions for conducting B.Ed./D.Ed. course, a policy decision was taken and a public notice was issued by the NCTE on 2-10-08 through the newspapers to the effect that application for D.Ed. course for the academic session 2009-10 from the State of Maharashtra would not be considered and all such applications shall be returned to the institution alongwith the processing fee and documents. the Council also noted that the said step taken by the NCTE was a temporary measure for regulating the growth of teacher training institutions, pending state-wise assessment of the manpower requirement of teachers in the country. Accordingly, NCTE Hqrs. had vide its letters dated 1-10-2008 and 31-10-2008 directed all the Regional Directors of NCTE not to recognize/permit the institutions for conducting the specific teacher training course as specified in the

public notice issued by NCTE and to return all those applications which were received prior to issuance of public notice dated 2nd Oct, 2008. In view of this, the Council came to the conclusion that WRC was right in refusing the recognition to the institution for conducting D.Ed course by closing the file of the institution. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and WRC’s order dated 23-05-09 was confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The Secretary, Swami Samarth Adhyapak Vidyalaya (Shri Swami Samarth Seva Sanstha), Rajpur, Digambar Road, District, Ahmadnagar - 422604, Maharashtra 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai.

F.No.89- 738/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of AI-Momin Foundation Iqurs Education Society, Prakasam Dist., Andhra Pradesh dated 27/07/2009 is against the Order No. F.SRO/NCTE/2009-2010/14147 dated 24/06/2009 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B. Ed course on the grounds “1) The institution was accorded recognition on 03/07/2003 in a small rented and old house as a temporary accommodation with the condition to shift the B.Ed course to its own premises within three years time limit from the date of recognition; whereas, the institution has not constructed own/permanent building within three years time limit on land as per stipulated condition of recognition order. Hence, the institution is not eligible to continue in rented premises as per rules and regulation , Norms and standards of NCTE. 2) The institution is functioning in a small rented and old house which is not suitable to run the B.Ed course as per Norms and Standards. 3) The management has also agreed that the building is old and of very poor maintenance by the owner of the building. 4) the classrooms. Library, Labs, etc. were running in sheds roofed with asbestos sheets which is against the Rules and Regulation of NCTE. 5) The Built-up space including house and sheds amount to 5019 sq.ft. which is not adequate for B.Ed. Course; whereas 1500sq.mtrs. required as per norms and standards of B.Ed. course. The management has not provided any documentary evidence for completion of new building and also for shifting to own premises for the B.Ed. course. As per reply to the notice, the institution simply given vague statement that the building will be completed before July 2009; whereas the institution had already breached the condition of Recognition Order and also not followed the rules and Regulation , Norms and Standards of NCTE. 6) The management has not complied with the conditions of recognition order within the stipulated time i.e. 02/07/2006 and even after lapse of total six years. Now, the Management has not shifted the B.Ed college to own Premises. Therefore, the institution has violated the provisions contained under various sections of NCTE Act and Regulations thereunder”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, AI-Momin Foundation Iqurs Education Society (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 27/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri M.A. Akhib Ahmed Secretary & Shri Moyinuddin, AI-Momin Foundation Iqurs Education Society, Prakasam Dist., Andhra Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 14.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the rented building in which the course is being conducted is in a state of poor maintenance, at the time of granting recognition (03.07.2003) there were no specific rule regarding built-up space; at the time of visit

of expert team. The painting of ground floor was completed; the institution should have been inspected after shifting into the new premises; new building on the society’s land is now fully constructed; and in the mean time the order of SRC dated 25.06.09 may be set aside. AND WHEREAS the above position clearly indicates, failure of the institution in fulfilling the condition relating to shifting to own building within the stipulated time, but now, the institution has already shifted to the new premises, which has been fully constructed, the SRC, therefore, needs to conduct the inspection of the new building of the institution on payment of Rs. 40,000/- by the appellant institution and formally permit the shifting, if the new building conforms to the norms prescribed by the NCTE. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing the Council reached to the conclusion that the appeal may be accepted, the order of SRC dt 24.06.09 set aside and the case be remanded to SRC for inspection of the new building of the institution on payment of Rs 40,000 by the institution to ascertain whether the new building confirms to the NCTE norms and thereafter issue orders accordingly. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of AI-Momin Foundation Iqurs Education Society, Prakasam Dist., Andhra Pradesh to the SRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Secretary, AI-Momin Foundation Iqurs Education Society, Kandukur Revenue Division, Podili, , Prakasam Dist. - -, Andhra Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, 1st Floor, CSD Building, HMT Post, Jalahali, Bangalore - 560 031. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.

F.No.89- 740/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Guru Govind Singh College of Education (for Women), Muktsar-District, Punjab dated 26/07/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F-7/PB-681/141 Meeting/2009 dated 02/06/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting ETE (D.Ed) course on the grounds “1) The Building plan duly approved by the competent authority has not been submitted. 2) Building plan showing Course- wise demarcated area is not submitted. 3) FDRs of Rs.5.00 lacks and Rs.3.00 lacks are not submitted in original. 4) CLU is not issued by the competent authority. 5) The building plan is not approved by sarpanch and resolution of gram panchayat in respect of approval of building is not enclosed. 6) The building plan showing the Khasra NO. and total land area is not submitted”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Guru Govind Singh College of Education(for Women) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 27/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Vimal Kumar Lecturer, Guru Gobind Singh College of Education, Gurdaspur, Punjab presented the case of the appellant institution on 14.09.09. In the appeal it has been stated that the NRCs letter pointing out deficiencies in the application of the institution was dated 16.02.09 and the institution replied on 14.05.2009 which was received by NRC on 15.05.09. The appellant also claimed that all the requisite documents were sent with their letter dated 14.05.09. AND WHEREAS the Council noted from the records of the NRC that the letter pointing out the deficiencies issued to the institution is dt. 06.02.09 and not 16.02.09 as wrongly claimed by the institution. The reply of the institution has been sent after the prescribed time limit of 90 days. In the circumstances the Council has come to the conclusion that there are no grounds to interfere with the decision of the NRC and therefore the appeal deserves to be rejected and the order of the NRC dt 02.06.09 confirmed. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and NRC’s order dated 02.06.09 was confirmed.



1. The Chairperson, Guru Govind Singh College of Education(for Women), G.T.Road, Near Malwa School , Vill-Giddarbaha, Muktsar-District - -, Punjab 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Punjab, Chandigarh.

F.No.89- 755/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Hazrat Umer Farooque Urdu D.Ed. College , Washim Dist., Maharashtra dated 27/07/2009 is against the Order No. WRC/APW02206/122102 (Addl.)/122nd /SCN/2008/58319 dated 28.07.09 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.Ed (Marathi+Urdu) course on the grounds “File not to be processed further as per direction of the NCTE, New Delhi”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Hazrat Umer Farooque Urdu D.Ed. College (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 28/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Atur Rehman Khan Executive President & Shri Amber Qamruddin Sub- Representative, Hazrat Umer Farooque Urdu D.Ed. College, Washim Dist., Maharashtra presented the case of the appellant institution on 14.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the institution is already running D.Ed course in Urdu medium and the requested for an additional unit in Marathi medium. The appellant also pleaded that the institution being a minority institution should not be equated with non-minority institutions. AND WHEREAS the Council is of the opinion that the appellant society is a minority society their application for running D.Ed course in Marathi medium deserved to be considered as a minority institution and on merits. Accordingly the decision of WRC not to process the application of this institution is reversed with the direction to cause the inspection of the institution within one month of the issue of the order. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that the appeal may be accepted and case be remanded back to WRC for further processing of application on merits and cause inspection of the institution within one month of the issue of the order.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Hazrat Umer Farooque Urdu D.Ed. College , Washim Dist., Maharashtra to the WRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The President, Hazrat Umer Farooque Urdu D.Ed. College , Near Darwha Naka At karanja (LDD), , Washim Dist. - -, Maharashtra 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai.

F.No.89- 743/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Holy Angels College of Education for Women (Holy Angels Trust), Coimbatore Dist., Tamilnadu dated 23/07/2009 is against the Order No. F.SRC/NCTE/2009/B.Ed/REF/14568 dated 15.07.09 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds “The application has been received from the institution on 28.08.2008. whereas the management has submitted Land Scale Deed Sy.No.206 registered on 5.3.2009(Document No.1802/2009) without building, in response to the notice. As per para 8(7) of regulation of NCTE,2007, no institution shall be granted recognition under these regulation unless it was in possession of required land on the date of application. In view of the above regulation and because the land was registered and the document was submitted after submission of the application and the case is invalid”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Holy Angels College of Education For Women (Holy Angels Trust) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 28/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri V. Ruban Sukumar, Admin. Officer, Holy Angels College of Education For Women (Holy Angels Trust), Coimbatore Dist., Tamilnadu presented the case of the appellant institution on 14.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation in which a written submission was made on 14.09.09, it has been stated that even though much correspondence was exchanged between the institution and SRC and an inspection was conducted, in none of the communications the requirement of possession of land on ownership basis was mentioned. The appellant also submitted that in the building on the land taken on lease the trust has been running a diploma in teacher training course since 2006. In view of this and the proposed B.Ed course is meant for women only; the land on which the buildings are situated is now covered by an absolute sale deed of property dated 05.03.09; and the applicant fulfills all the necessary norms for recognition the appellant requested that the order appealed against may be set aside and appropriate relief granted. AND WHEREAS the Council appreciating the submissions made by the appellant, particularly the one relating to non-communication of the requirement of land on ownership basis to the appellant on 14.09.2009 and therefore came to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be accepted and the order of the SRC dt 15.07.09 reversed. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, VT Report, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the

Council reached the conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal and that it should be accepted. Accordingly, the appeal was accepted and SRC’s order dated 15.07.2009 was reversed within the direction that orders for recognition of the institution under clause 7(9) of the NCTE regulation be issued within 15 days of issue of this order. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby reverses the Order appealed against.


1. The Correspondent, Holy Angels College of Education For Women (Holy Angels Trust), S.F.205, Jadayampalayam Road, Jadayampalayam, Mettupalayam, , Coimbatore Dist. - 641302, Tamilnadu 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, 1st Floor, CSD Building, HMT Post, Jalahali, Bangalore - 560 031. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Tamilnadu, Chennai.

F.No.89- 737/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Institute of Science Poona's Swami Vivekanand College of Education, Pune District, Maharashtra dated 27/07/2009 is against the Order No.WRC/APWO025941/122433/119th/2009/56250 dated 06/06/2009 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.Ed (M) (CO-ED) course on the grounds “1) 1. Existing B.Ed Course is being conducted in the societies' Institute of Science. Area earmarked for B.Ed is insufficient. 2. Society is constructing building for proposed D.Ed Course. File is processed in office after submission of completion certificate, along with the other relevant documents by institution. 3. Number of books in the library are inadequate. 2) Reply of clarification letter No. WRC/APW02594/122433/104/2008/37704-37705 date 28/07/2008 not received from the Institution within stipulated date”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Institute of Science Poona's Swami Vivekanand College of Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 27/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri P.R. Patil Member & Shri N.K. Joshi, Director, Institute of Science Poona's Swami Vivekanand College of Education, Pune District, Maharashtra presented the case of the appellant institution on 14.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that recognition was refused and the file closed on the ground that the clarification sought in WRC letter dt. 28.07.08 was not received from the institution with in the stipulated time. He also stated that the said communication of WRC was received on 04.08.08 and a reply thereto was sent on 02.09.09 and in the circumstances the reply is deemed to have been sent within the stipulated time of 30 days. The records of WRC however do not contain the institution’s reply dated 02.09.08. AND WHEREAS the Council is of the opinion that the refusal order passed by the WRC should be rightly seen in the light of the requirements which have not been fulfilled by the institution to whom an opportunity was given to make a written representation before passing an order. From a perusal of the institutions reply dt 02.09.08 a copy of which has been enclosed to the appeal and which bears the stamp of WRC dated 03.09.08, admittedly the construction of the building was in progress at the time of the visit of the visiting team. Further it is mentioned therein that another building is being constructed for the college of education which will be completed by the next academic year. i.e. 2009-10. Rightly WRC in their refusal order dt 06.06.09 stated that the file will be processed after submission of completion certificate along with other relevant land documents by the institution .In view of the

above the Council came to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be rejected and the order of the WRC dt. 06.06.09 confirmed. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and WRC’s order dated 06.06.09 was confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The Director, Institute of Science Poona's Swami Vivekanand College of Education, Survey No.130, Mumbai Banglore Highway, Opp.Wakad Police Chowkey, Wakad, Pune District - 57, Maharashtra 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai.

F.No.89- 736/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Janki Prasad Chaudhary Mahila Mahavidyalay, Basti-Distt., Uttar Pradesh dated 24/07/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F-7/UP-3076/139 Meeting/2009 dated 28/05/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B. Ed course on the grounds “CLU is not submitted”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Janki Prasad Chaudhary Mahila Mahavidyalay (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 24/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Ram Charitra Chaudhary, Member & Shri Shailesh Kumar Treasurer, Janki Prasad Chaudhary Mahila Mahavidyalay, Basti-Distt., Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 14.09.2009. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that even though CLUs were submitted from time to time as and when asked for, by the NRC, but it could not be obtained from the proper and competent authority, but they have, since obtained the requisite certificate from the competent authority which was shown to the Council. AND WHEREAS in view of the position stated above that the Council came to the conclusion that the appeal deserved to be accepted and the case be remanded to NRC for causing an inspection of the institution. The appellant should submit the CLU issued in the prescribed form by the competent authority to the NRC before inspection. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal and affidavit after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and remand the case to NRC for causing inspection of the institution to ascertain the availability of infrastructure and instructional facilities as per NCTE norms and thereafter pass appropriate order. However CLU should be submitted by the institution/Society at the time of inspection alongwith the completion certificate. Accordingly, the case was remanded to NRC for causing inspection of the institution within one month of issue of the order and decide the matter accordingly.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Janki Prasad Chaudhary Mahila Mahavidyalay, Basti-Distt., Uttar Pradesh to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Manager/Secretary, Janki Prasad Chaudhary Mahila Mahavidyalay, Katoda Basti, Plot No.145-149,Vill. Kataudha,, Basti-Distt. - -, Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.

F.No.89- 730/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Manniya Kanshi Ram College of Education, Bulandshahr, Distt., Uttar Pradesh dated 24/07/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F-7/UP-3041/2009 - dated 31/08/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B. Ed course on the grounds “The deficiencies communicated to the Institution still exist”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Manniya Kanshi Ram College of Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 24/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Mulichand Verma, Chairman & Shri Dharamvir Singh, Secretary, Manniya Kanshi Ram College of Education, Bulandshahr, Distt., Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 14.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that in reply to the show cause notice (dated 22.06.09) a detailed reply was sent to NRC in their letter dt. 23.06.09 and the NRC without duly considering the same, refused grant of recognition on the ground that the deficiencies communicated to the institution still exist. AND WHEREAS the Council after going through the reply furnished by the appellant institution vis-a-vis the deficiencies pointed out, which related to title of books, facilities in labs and No. of computers including building not being disabled friendly, came to the conclusion that the institution has made up these facilities and therefore their appeal deserved to be accepted and the NRC order dt. 31.08.09 reversed. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, VT Report affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal and that it should be accepted. Accordingly, the appeal was accepted and NRC’s order dated 31.08.2009 was reversed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby reverses the Order appealed against.


1. The Secretary, Manniya Kanshi Ram College of Education, Vill-Netanagar, Annopshahr,, Bulandshahr, Distt. - , Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi.

3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.

F.No.89- 779/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Nand Kishore Singh Degree College,Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh dated 21/07/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/ NCTE/F-73/UP-2862/140 Meeting/2009 dated 10/06/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B. Ed course on the grounds “the Institute failed to submit the reply to the letter dated 19.2.2007 issued by the office, within the stipulated time”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Nand Kishore Singh Degree College (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 28/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Bhan Singh Manager & Shri Ashok Kumar Singh, Member, Nand Kishore Singh Degree College, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 14.09.09. In the appeal, written submission made on 14.09.09 and during personal presentation it has been submitted that no letter dt. 19.02.07 was issued to the institution by the NRC, but they have replied to a letter of the NRC dt 17.02.09 (which in fact was dated 17.01.09) regarding requirement of two passed out batches of graduation. The appellant has also submitted that they have fulfilled all the requirements of the NRC for grant of recognition. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the Govt. of UP no longer insists upon the requirement of two passed out batches of graduation and in the circumstances the ground cited by the NRC while refusing recognition is not valid. Hence, the Council came to the conclusion that appeal deserved to be accepted, the order of the NRC dated 10.06.09 set aside and the case remanded to NRC for further processing on merits. The Council also noted that the letter dt 19.02.07 was not found on the file of NRC, no such letter could also be issued as the application the institution dated 25.01.08. The inspection of the institution was conducted on 07.10.08. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal and that it should be accepted. Accordingly, the appeal was accepted and NRC’s order dated 10.06.2009 was set aside, with the direction that VT Report of the institution be placed before NRC for deciding the matter on merit.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby reverses the Order appealed against.


1. The Manager, Nand Kishore Singh Degree College , Dhanuha Chaka, Naini, , Allahabad - -, Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.

F.No.89- 754/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of New Era College of Education, Ghaziabad-Distt., Uttar Pradesh dated 20/07/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F-7/UP-3431/143rd Meeting/2009 dated 06/07/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B. Ed course on the grounds “Building Plan is not approved by competent authority”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, New Era College of Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 28/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Rajiv Malik, Vice- President, New Era College of Education, Ghaziabad-Distt., Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 14.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the building plan duly approved by the Gram Panchayat was submitted to NRC office on 23.04.09. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that a copy of the approved building plan is available in the file of NRC, Jaipur. The Council therefore came to the conclusion that the appeal deserved to be accepted and the case remanded to the NRC for causing an inspection of institution and taking further action thereafter. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal set aside NRC’s order dated 06.07.09 and to remand back the case to NRC for causing inspection of the institution to ascertain the availability of infrastructure and instructional facilities as per NCTE norms within a month of issue of this order and thereafter pass appropriate order. Accordingly, the case was remanded back to NRC. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of New Era College of Education, Ghaziabad-Disstt., Uttar Pradesh to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The President, New Era College of Education, No.616, Vill-Bhikkanpur, Ghaziabad-Disstt. - -, Uttar Pradesh

2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.

F.No.89- 745/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Raj Kishore Singh Mahavidyalaya, Ghaziabad-Dist., Uttar Pradesh dated 21/07/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/F-7/UP-3235/139 Meeting/2009 dated 29/05/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.P.Ed course on the grounds “1) CLU is not Submitted. 2) The building plan submitted is approved by Gram Pradhan without the resolution of Gram Panchayat. Further, the total area, built-up area, plot number and Khasra number are not mentioned. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Raj Kishore Singh Mahavidyalaya (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 28/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Upender Singh, Raj Kishore Singh Mahavidyalaya, Ghaziabad-Distt., Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 14.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the CLU was furnished with their letter dated 29.05.09 and they were never informed about the deficiencies in the building plan. The appellant enclosed certain documents to the appeal including a copy of a resolution stated to be from the Gram Panchayat which is dated 11.07.09. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that no document in the form of CLU has been submitted by the applicant and the reply relating to details of the building asked for by the NRC have also not been furnished. The Council therefore came to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be rejected and the order of the NRC dated 29.05.09 confirmed. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and NRC’s order dated 29-05-09 was confirmed NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The Secretary, Raj Kishore Singh Mahavidyalaya, VPO- Baruin, Tehsil-Zamania,, Ghaziabad-Disstt. - -, Uttar Pradesh


F.No.89- 751/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Sandeep College of Education (Late Sandip Sudhakar Sonje Shaikshanik Sevabhavi Sanstha), Nashik, Maharashtra dated 27/07/2009 is against the Order No.WRC/APW06175/1221800/110th/CVT/2008 dated 27/05/2009 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.Ed (M) (Co-Ed) course on the grounds that WRC considered the case of the institution in light of letters F.No.46-3/2008/NCTE(N&S)/84003 dt.17/09/2008, F.No.49-27/2007/NCTE(N&S) dt.01/10/2008 and F.No.49-27/2007/NCTE(N&S) dt.31/10/2008 received from Member Secretary, NCTE, New Delhi and negative recommendation received from Maharashtra State Govt. in respect of D.Ed.Course, Keeping in view of the negative Recommendation and directions received from NCTE Hqr., the WRC decided that no further processing will be done in this case and communication to this effect to made to this institution. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Sandeep College of Education (Late Sandip Sudhakar Sonje Shaikshanik Sevabhavi Sanstha) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 28/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Manoj B. Desai, Office Superintendent, Sandeep College of Education (Late Sandip Sudhakar Sonje Shaikshanik Sevabhavi Sanstha), Nashik, Maharashtra presented the case of the appellant institution on 14.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the institution has made investment as per NCTE norms and it is capable of running D.Ed. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that considering inter-alia the recommendations of some of the State Governments, including the State Govt. of Maharashtra not to further recognize/permit institutions for conducting B.Ed./D.Ed. course, a policy decision was taken and a public notice was issued by the NCTE on 2-10-08 through the newspapers to the effect that application for D.Ed. course for the academic session 2009-10 from the State of Maharashtra would not be considered and all such applications shall be returned to the institution alongwith the processing fee and documents. the Council also noted that the said step taken by the NCTE was a temporary measure for regulating the growth of teacher training institutions, pending state-wise assessment of the manpower requirement of teachers in the country. Accordingly, NCTE Hqrs. had vide its letters dated 1-10-2008 and 31-10-2008 directed all the Regional Directors of NCTE not to recognize/permit the institutions for conducting the specific teacher training course as specified in the public notice issued by NCTE and to return all those applications which were received prior to issuance of public notice dated 2nd Oct, 2008. In view of this, the

Council came to the conclusion that WRC was right in refusing the recognition to the institution for conducting D.Ed course by closing the file of the institution. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and WRC’s order dated 27-05-09 was confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The Secretary, Sandeep College of Education (Late Sandip Sudhakar Sonje Shaikshanik Sevabhavi Sanstha), Plot No.94, Zodage, Tal-malegaon,, Nashik - -, Maharashtra 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai.

F.No.89- 739/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Sant Lahanjui Maharaj College of Physical Education(Sant Lahanuji Maharaj Education and Cultural Society), Amravati Dist., Maharashtra dated 25/07/2009 is against the Order No.WRC/APW08023/124080/114061/121st/2009/57659 dated 15/07/2009 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting M.P.Ed course on the grounds that 1) Whereas in its 120th held on June 23-24,2009 the WRC after considering the report of the visiting team, perusal of videography as well as other relevant materials furnished by the applicant institution, is satisfied that the applicant institution does not fulfill the requirement and issued a notice on 04.07.2009 under provision to Section 15(3)(b) of NCTE, Act,1993, thereby giving an opportunity to said applicant institution to make a written representation in this behalf. The Applicant institution had submitted representation dated 03/07/2009 WRC, NCTE. The Said representation of the institution as well as videography were again duly considered by the WRC on July8-9,2009, which came to the conclusion that recognition/permission to the said institution be refused. 2) The Reply to the show cause notice does not fulfill NCTE requirements. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Sant Lahanjui Maharaj College of Physical Education(Sant Lahanuji Maharaj Education and Cultural Society) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 27/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Smt. Sunita Babasaheb Bahu President & Shri Pramod Sudhakarrao Lecturer, Sant Lahanjui Maharaj College of Physical Education(Sant Lahanuji Maharaj Education and Cultural Society), Amravati Dist., Maharashtra presented the case of the appellant institution on 14.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the institution has replied to all the deficiencies pointed out by the WRC in their show cause notice and requested that the order appealed against may be set aside. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the same submissions made in reply to the show cause notice have been mostly repeated in the appeal. The committee also noted that the visiting team that inspected this institution was not at all satisfied with the institution’s suitability for running M.P.Ed course in addition to the existing B.P.Ed Course. The Council therefore came to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be rejected and the order of the WRC dt 15.07.09 confirmed. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it

should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and WRC’s order dated 15-07-09 was confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The Secretary , Sant Lahanjui Maharaj College of Physical Education(Sant Lahanuji Maharaj Education and Cultural Society), Khasra No.83/2, Vill. Chnadurwadi,, Amravati Dist. - , Maharashtra 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai.

F.No.89- 728/2009-Appeal NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION

Hans Bhawan, Wing II, 1, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110 002

08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Shanti Verdhak D.Ed College (Swamy Vivekanand Education Society), Bidar-Dist, Karnataka dated 20/07/2009 is against the Order No. F.SRC/NCTE/2009/D.Ed/REF/14115 dated 25/06/2009 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.Ed course on the grounds “1) The Management has purchased land and building on 28.04.2009 after notice issued. It is not acceptable. As per Regulations para 8(7) of NCTE, 2007, no institution shall be granted recognition unless it is in possession of required land on the date of application. 2) The Management has not provided own land and building as per Regulations, Para8 (7) and 8(10) of NCTE, 2007”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Shanti Verdhak D.Ed College (Swamy Vivekanand Education Society) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 24/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Shivraj Gandhi, President & Shri Bandu Mallikujum, Vice-President, Shanti Verdhak D.Ed College (Swamy Vivekanand Education Society), Bidar-Dist, Karnataka presented the case of the appellant institution on 14.09.09. In the appeal dt 20.07.09, and a subsequent letter dated 11.09.09 and during personal presentation it was submitted that the management has taken the plot and building on lease for 30 years on 26.07.05 and on 28.04.09 they had purchased the said plot and building. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the appellant institution did not possess the land free from all encumbrances on ownership basis on the date of submission of application i.e. 30.10.08. In the circumstances the Council came to the conclusion that appeal deserves to be rejected and the order of SRC dt. 25.06.09 confirmed. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and SRC’s order dated 25-06-09 was confirmed.



1. The President, Shanti Verdhak D.Ed College (Swamy Vivekanand Education Society), H.No.4-7-114 Near IB Baswaveshwar Chowck Bhalki,, Bidar-Dist - 585328, Karnataka 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, 1st Floor, CSD Building, HMT Post, Jalahali, Bangalore - 560 031. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Karnataka, Bangalore.

F.No.89-643/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Shri Veerabhadreshwara Rural Teacher Training (D.Ed) Institution (Shri Shivanand Bharati Educational Society), Bellary, Karnataka dated 03/07/2009 is against the Order No. F.SRC/NCTE/2009/D.Ed-AI/14124 dated 25/06/2009 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.Ed (Addl.) course on the grounds that 1) As per VT report, the management is earmarked one block for existing and proposed D.Ed. Addl. Intake and two blocks for Hostel, Yoga purposes. The built-up space available in one block as per building plan is not adequate for existing and proposed course. 2) The existing books numbering 2471 and ordered books 550 are not adequate for existing D.Ed and proposed D.Ed. Addl. Intake. 3) The management building completion certificate shows that the two floors each of 22,337.76 and 22,337.76 building was constructed. As per building plan and reply given to notice, VT report indicates the three blocks are available and used for different purposes. 4) The management has not submitted a certificate from the Director, DSERT, Bangalore stating that there is no other college/courses being run in the same building except the D.Ed. College. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Shri Veerabhadreshwara Rural Teacher Training (D.Ed) Institution (Shri Shivanand Bharati Educational Society) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 08/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Vinay Mohan Admin. Officer & Shri D.B. Mallur Chairman, Shri Veerabhadreshwara Rural Teacher Training (D.Ed) Institution (Shri Shivanand Bharati Educational Society), Bellary, Karnataka presented the case of the appellant institution on 14.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it has been submitted that even the visiting team found that there were three blocks for the college which are sufficient for two sections; there are presently 3021 books and due to acute shortage of time given by the SRC, the institution initially submitted a certificate from the Principal DIET certifying there was no other institution running in the same campus and subsequently submitted a similar certificate from the DSERT. AND WHEREAS the Council after taking all aspects of the matter including the report of the visiting team into consideration is of the opinion that the appellant institution has requisite facilities for conducting D.Ed course with the additional intake of 50. In the circumstances the Council has come to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be accepted and the order of the SRC dt 25.06.09 reversed. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the

appeal, set aside SRC’s order dated 25.06.09. Accordingly the appeal was accepted and SRC’s order dated 25.06.09 was reversed, with the direction that order of recognition be issued by NRC within 15 days of issue of this order. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby reverses the Order appealed against.


1. The Chairman, Shri Veerabhadreshwara Rural Teacher Training (D.Ed) Institution (Shri Shivanand Bharati Educational Society), Halkundi, Bellary, Bangalore Highway, , Bellary - 583102, Karnataka 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, 1st Floor, CSD Building, HMT Post, Jalahali, Bangalore - 560 031. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government

F.No.89- 757/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Sri Kadasiddeshwara D.Ed. College (Sri Kadasiddesware Vidya Samsthe), Tumkur Dist., Karnataka dated 27/07/2009 is against the Order No. F.SRC/NCTE/2009/D.Ed/REF/14491 dated 08/07/09 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.Ed course on the grounds “ 1) The construction of the building is not complete. As per regulations, para8(10), at the time of inspection, the building of institution shall be complete in the form of permanent structure on the land possessed by the institution(D.Ed) College). The management is also running ITI, Primary School and High School. Exclusive land of 1500 sq.mtrs. area is not registered in the name of institution(D.Ed College) as per para 8(7) of regulations of NCTE,2007. 2) The books in Library and Lab. Equipment are not sufficient for proposed course”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Sri Kadasiddeshawara D.Ed. College (Sri Kadasiddesware Vidya Samsthe) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 29/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Ravi Administrative, Shri Nagendra Principal & ,Sri Kadasiddeshawara D.Ed. College (Sri Kadasiddesware Vidya Samsthe), Tumkur Dist., Karnataka presented the case of the appellant institution on 14.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that a new building has been constructed exclusively for D.Ed course with a built-up area of 12000 sq. ft., there are separate buildings for primary and High school and a separate building for I.T.I college; The building for D.Ed college has been newly constructed and therefore question of any other institution running in this new building did not arise; the management is ready to convert the land in the name of the college immediately after obtaining recognition to run the course; There are 2040 books in the library exclusively for D.Ed course and equipment for all laboratories have been procured. AND WHEREAS a perusal of the visiting team report indicates that the building has been constructed as per approved plans with a total built-up area of about 12500 sq. ft. and a completion certificate obtained. The report mention that construction of additional room is in progress which may be utilized in future depending upon the requirements. However the fact remains that the land and buildings are not in the name of the institution. This is contrary to the provisions of Clause 8 (7) of the NCTE Regulations, 2007. In view of the above major deficiency in respect of possession of land and completion of building the Council has come to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be rejected and the order SRC dated 08.07.09 confirmed.

AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and SRC’s order dated 08.07.09 was confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The Principal, Sri Kadasiddeshawara D.Ed. College (Sri Kadasiddesware Vidya Samsthe), S.No.484, Main Road, Hemavati Extension, Nonavinakere, Tiptur, , Tumkur Dist. - 572224, Karnataka 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, 1st Floor, CSD Building, HMT Post, Jalahali, Bangalore - 560 031. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Karnataka,

F.No.89- 503/2009-Appeal


07/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Yateemkhana & Madarsa Anjuman Khairul Islams, Mumbai, Maharashtra dated 01/06/2009 is against the Order No. WRC/APW05396/1221480/112th/2008/48990 dated 24/12/2008 of the Western Regional Committee, against recognition for conducting D.Ed. course on the grounds “The institution has not removed the deficiencies within the period of 90 days u/s 7.4 of NCTE Regulations 2005”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Yateemkhana & Madarsa Anjuman Khairul Islams (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 01/06/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Shabbir Shakir, Representative, Yateemkhana & Madarsa Anjuman Khairul Islams, Mumbai, Maharashtra was asked to presented the case of the appellant institution on 14.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the WRCs letter dt. 19.04.08 pointing out the deficiencies was received on 14.11.08; no personal hearing was given and being a minority institution it may be allowed to start the D.Ed course. In a letter dt 14.09.09 given during the course of hearing, the appellant, stating that they are submitting the information required by the WRC represented that a reply to the letters (dt. 04.03.08 and 19.09.08) from the WRC pointing out deficiencies could not be submitted in time as the officer handling the matter suddenly resigned and the General Secretary of the society was indisposed from 28.03.09 to 20.04.09 and thereafter the society was heavily occupied with administrative work of 40 institution. AND WHEREAS the Council is unable to appreciate the explanation given by the appellant for not replying to the two letters within the prescribed time and also his claim that the letter of the WRC dt. 19.04.08 was received only on 14.11.08. In these circumstances the Council has come to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be rejected and the order of the WRC dt. 24.12.08 confirmed. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and WRC’s order dated 24.12.08 was confirmed.



1. The General Secretary, Yateemkhana & Madarsa Anjuman Khairul Islams, AKI D.ED. College, Plot No.23 (A-4) Adarsh Nagar, Oshiwara, Jogeshwari (W) , Mumbai - 400102, Maharashtra 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Muna College of Education (Dr. Rahman's Trust), Cuddalore Dist., Tamilnadu dated 21/07/2009 is against the Order No. F.SRC/NCTE/2009/B.Ed/REF/14566 dated 15/07/2009 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds “1) The visiting team visited only one building as per inspection, VCD submitted by the Management. The Built up space 11,227 sq.ft. available in one building as per building completion and filled in questionnaire. The size of multi purpose hall 1291 sq.ft. is not adequate for proposed B.Ed Course. 2) The building is located in residential area and not suitable to run proposed B.Ed Course. 3) The Management has submitted only one building plan approved for Rahman Trust, education purposes in S.No.54/2A along with application with built up space 12,495 sq.ft. whereas along with notice reply, two building plans are submitted(contrary to the original application) approved for Munna college of education in RS No.54/2A and RS No.5/1. The team visited only one building for re-inspection as per VCD. The information provided through VCD and documents were not in conformity with the norms and the infrastructural and instructional facilities as per norms and standards for B.Ed.Course”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Muna College of Education(Dr. Rahman's Trust) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 28/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Abdul Rahman, Chairman & Shri Nissar Ahmad, Member, Muna College of Education(Dr. Rahman's Trust), Cuddalore Dist., Tamilnadu presented the case of the appellant institution on 14.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the second inspection team visited both the buildings; no physical measurement of the multipurpose hall was taken by the visiting team, the actual area of the multipurpose hall is 1512 sq. ft. carpet area; no reference to the inadequacy of 11,227 sq. ft. of built-up space in one building has been made anywhere; adjacent to the institution a matriculation higher secondary school and other institutions are being run for several years and in pursuance of rectification in the documents re-inspection was caused. The appellant also submitted that before passing the order, the Regional Committee has not given him an opportunity to represent against the grounds which were different from those mentioned in the notice. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the building plans and completion certificates in respect of two buildings are available in the Regional Committee’s file.

Further the second inspection team that conducted a re-inspection on 12.06.09 has confirmed the availability of two buildings for the B.Ed College with a builtup area of 23,722 sq. ft. the Council after taking into account all aspects of the matter into consideration has come to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be accepted and order of the SRC dated 15.07.09 reversed. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal and that it should be accepted. Accordingly, the appeal was accepted and SRC’s order dated 15.07.2009 was reversed, with the direction that order of recognition be issued within 15 days of issue of this order. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby reverses the Order appealed against.


1. The Secretary, Muna College of Education(Dr. Rahman's Trust), 12/19B, Gumathapalli Street, Parangipettai,, Cuddalore Dist. - 608502, Tamilnadu 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, 1st Floor, CSD Building, HMT Post, Jalahali, Bangalore - 560 031. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Tamilnadu, Chennai.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Chaudhary Tulsi Ram Yadav Mahavidyalaya, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh dated 19/07/2009 is against the Order No. NRC/NCTE/F-73/UP-2081/141st Meeting/2009/10276-10282 dated 10/09/09 issued in pursuance of decision of the NRC taken on 24/05/2009, refusing recognition for conducting B.P.Ed. course on the grounds “The List of appointed Faculty as per NCTE Norms has not been submitted till date”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Chaudhary Tulsi Ram Yadav Mahavidylaya (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 23/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Basudeo Yadav, Member, Chaudhary Tulsi Ram Yadav Mahavidyalaya, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 15-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that in response to the Conditional recognition order dated 14-11-06 issued by the NRC, Jaipur, the institution had furnished list of faculty members duly approved and selected by the affiliating university to the NRC vide fax dated 02-08-07. However, no copy of the same was available on the file. The representative of the institution could not show any copy of the said fax to the Council. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that conditional recognition order was issued to the institution on 14-11-06 subject to appointment of qualified staff through duly constituted Selection Committee as per the norms of NCTE/State Govt./Affiliating university. Since no list of qualified staff appointed was furnished by the institution, the NRC, Jaipur vide its letter dated 9-7-07 addressed to the institution asked the institution to furnish requisite documents namely (i) Advertisement notice (2) Consolidated staff list on the prescribed format dully approved by the affiliating body. (3) Proceedings of the Selection Committee alongwith the copy of the letter from the affiliating body nominating a member for the Selection Committee (4) Individual Bio-Data in respect of selected faculty and (5) Affidavit on Rs.10 stamp paper on the prescribed format within 21 days. The institution did not comply with the requirements and therefore the NRC vide its order dated 10-09-09 refused recognition to the institution for B.P.Ed. course. Therefore, the Council was of the view that the institution did not comply with the requirement to become eligible for recognition by the NCTE and the NRC rightly refused recognition to it and that there was no justification for accepting the appeal. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it

should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and NRC’s order dated 10-09-09 was confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The Secretary , Chaudhary Tulsi Ram Yadav Mahavidylaya, Village-Ghosra, Post- Nasarat, Allahabad - -, Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.

F.No.89 - 812/2009 - Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Dheerendra Pal Singh Institute of Higher Education, Mainpuri, Uttar Pradesh dated 01/08/2009 is against the Order No. NRC/NCTE/F-73/UP-2837/143rd Meeting/2009/7586-7592 dated 14/08/09 issued in pursuance of decision taken by the NRC in its meeting held on 27-29 June, 2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds that “Deficiencies pointed in the letter still exist”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Dheerendra Pal Singh Institute of Higher Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 06/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Suman Chauhan, Director and Shri. Rajiv Kumar Mishra, Director, Dheerendra Pal Singh Institute of Higher Education, Mainpuri, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 15-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that Letter of Intent prior to recognition was issued to the institution by the NRC on 23-01-09 directing the institution to submit the details of the faculty appointed alongwith other requisite documents in response to which the institution submitted the details vide its letter dated 10-02-09. Since the documents submitted were not found to be in order, the NRC, vide its letter dated 28-3-09, asked the institution to furnish requisite documents within 21 days. In response to that the institution vide its letter dated 14-05-09 sought extension of time for furnishing the requisite document as the affiliating university had not nominated its representative in the Selection Committee. Subsequently, the institution vide its letter dated 30-06-09 submitted all the requisite documents, while NRC, in its 140th meeting held on 27th to 29th June, 2009 decided to refuse recognition for the proposed B.Ed. course . AND WHEREAS the Council noted that in accordance with the letter of intent prior to recognition dated 23-01-09, the institution was required to appoint qualified faculty/staff selected by a duly constituted Selection Committee and thereafter furnish requisite documents to the NRC within 21 days for issue of formal recognition order. However, the documents furnished by the institution vide its letter dated 10-2-09 were not in order and therefore the NRC vide letter dated 28-03-09 asked the institution to make appointment of faculty in accordance with the procedure prescribed and submit the requisite document within a period of another 21 days. As the requisite documents were not furnished by the institution. The NRC in its 143rd meeting held on 27-29 June, 2009 decided to refuse grant of recognition for B.Ed. course to the institution and accordingly issued refusal order dated 14-8-09. the Council also noted that though the institution claimed that it furnished the requisite

details to the NRC vide its letter dated 30-6-09, but no copy of the same was available on the relevant file of the NRC. However keeping in view the fact that the institution sought extension of time in the context that matter regarding selection Committee was pending with the University, the Council felt that some more time could have been given to the institution, particularly when NRC asked for appointment of faculty with the approval of the University. As such there was enough justification to accept the appeal. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal and that it should be accepted. Accordingly, the appeal was accepted and NRC’s order dated 14-08-09 was reversed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby reverses the Order appealed against.


1. The Director, Dheerendra Pal Singh Institute of Higher Education, Power House Road, Agra Road, District, Mainpuri - 205001, Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.

F.No.89- 733/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Eklavya College (PVT), Nainital, Uttaranchal dated 24/07/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F-7/UP-229/143rd/Meeting/2009/5736 dated 08/07/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B. Ed course on the grounds “1) Building plan is not approved by competent authority. 2) Plot number/Khasra number is not mentioned on the building plan. 3) Land is not in the name of institution”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Eklavya College (PVT) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 24/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Deepak Balutia, Member, Eklavya College (PVT), Nainital, Uttaranchal presented the case of the appellant institution on 15-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the building plan was approved by the Hon’ble City Magistrate of Haldwani and that the land was in the name of the Society namely Padmeshwar Education & Welfare Society which would run the proposed Eklavya College. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the building plan submitted did not indicate plot No./khasra No. or the name of the proposed college and there was also no indication of approval by any competent authority on the building plan although a separate approval letter was submitted by the institution. Therefore, the Council, was of the view that the rejection of recognition to the institution was made by the NRC on valid grounds and thus there was no justification for accepting the appeal. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and NRC’s order dated 08-07-09 was confirmed.



1. The President, Eklavya College (PVT), Village- Damuwadhunga, Post-Kathgodam, Haldwani,, Nainital - -, Uttaranchal 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttaranchal, Dehradun.

F.No.89- 731/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Heritage Inter National Business School, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh dated 23/07/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F-7/UP-3104/141stMeeting/2009/5473 dated 03/07/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B. Ed course on the grounds “1) The land is not acquired by the institution from U.P. State Industrial Corporation Ltd., Kanpur. 2) The building plan is not approved by competent authority”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Heritage Inter National Business School (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 24/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. K.N. Varshney, Member and Shri. V.K. Chaudhary, Member, Heritage Inter National Business School, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 15-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the land in question belonged to the UPSIDC, Aligarh having its head office at Kanpur with regional office at Tala, Nagari, Aligarh and the Regional Manager of UPSIDC at Aligarh was fully competent and authorized to enter into lease agreement, approve the building plan under UPSIDC Act,1976 and to sign all papers on behalf of Head Office and there was no requirement for approval of the building plan by the Municipal Corporation, Aligarh or by Aligarh Development authority since the land was outside the Municipal limits as well as beyond the jurisdiction of the Aligarh Development Authority. It was also submitted that the building plan was approved by the Regional Manager of UPSIDC, Aligarh who was competent to approve the building plan. AND WHEREAS in the light of submission made by the institution the Council was of the view that the land given by UPSIDC on lease basis, can be accepted in the nature of lease from a Govt. Department. Since the competent authority for sanction of building plan on the land acquired by UPSIDC will be the corporation itself, the building plan submitted by the institute may be accepted and case my be remanded to the Regional Committee for causing inspection of the inspection. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal and after hearing oral arguments, advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and set aside the order of NRC dated 3.7.2009 and remand back the case to NRC for causing the inspection of the institution within one month of issue of this order to ascertain the availability of adequate infrastructure and other facilities as per NCTE norms and thereafter pass appropriate order. Accordingly, the case was remanded back to NRC for causing inspection of the institution.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Heritage Inter National Business School, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Secretary, Heritage Inter National Business School, Pl.No. SH-6, Tala Nagari, Pamghpat Road, UP Side Industrial Area, Tehsil-Koil,, Aligarh - -, Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.

F.No.89- 735/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS The appeal of Iqra Urdu D.Ed College, Beed -Dist, Maharashtra dated 24/07/2009 is against the Order No. No.WRC/APW07713/122443(B)/120th/DEF./2009/57044 dated 03/07/2009 of the Western Regional Committee, rejecting the application for recognition for conducting D.Ed(U) (CO-ED) course on the grounds “WRC considered the case of the institution in light of letters F.No.46-3/2008/NCTE(N&S)/84003 dt.17/09/2008, F.No.49-27/2008/NCTE(N&S)/84003 dt.01/10/2008 and F.No.49-27/2008/NCTE(N&S)/84003 dt.31/10/2008 received from Member Secretary, NCTE, New Delhi and negative recommendation received from Maharashtra State Govt. in respect of D.Ed Course. Keeping in view of the negative recommendation received from Maharashtra State Govt. in respect of D.Ed Course and directions received from NCTE Hqs, the WRC decided that no further processing will be done in this case and communication to this effect to be made to this institution”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Iqra Urdu D.Ed College (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 24/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shaikh Nizam Zainuddin, Secretary, Iqra Urdu D.Ed College, Beed -Dist, Maharashtra presented the case of the appellant institution on 15-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the institution was a minority institution and therefore the ban imposed by the Maharashtra State Govt. was not applicable in the case. AND WHEREAS the Council verified the document regarding minority status accorded to the institution and found that it was a minority institution. The Council was therefore of the view that the appeal of the institution should be accepted and the case be remanded back to WRC for processing the case on merit for getting it inspected and thereafter passing appropriate orders. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and set aside WRC’s order dated 03-07-09 and remand back the case to WRC for processing the case further for causing inspection of the institution to ascertain the availability of adequate infrastructural and other facilities as per NCTE norms and thereafter passing appropriate order. Accordingly, the case was remanded to WRC for causing inspection of the institution within one month of issue of this order.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Iqra Urdu D.Ed College, Beed -Dist, Maharashtra to the WRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Secretary, Iqra Urdu D.Ed College, Plot No.3385, Suy.No.45 Opp.Beed Market Committee, Baherwadi Tq. , Beed -Dist - , Maharashtra 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai.

F.No.89- 744/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Jogamaya Memorial B.Ed. College, Hooghly Dist., West Bengal dated 08/07/2009 is against the Order No. ERC/7-96.8.13/2009 dated 05/06/2009 of the Eastern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B. Ed course on the grounds “1) As per Gift Deed submitted land registered on 24.04.2009 i.e after the last date of submission of application. Earlier the institution had submitted lease deed from private party which was registered on Jan.2009. As per affidavit mode of possession not clearly given. Date of registration is that of private lease deed. 2) Certified copy of land document not submitted. Encls. Reg. Col.05 of affidavit is not submitted”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Jogamaya Memorial B.Ed. College (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 28/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Soumen Roy, Employee and Shri. Lutful Haque, Member, Jogamaya Memorial B.Ed. College, Hooghly Dist., West Bengal presented the case of the appellant institution on 15-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the ERC erred in rejecting the application of the appeallant as the entire land with structures thereupon was gifted to the institution and the same was duly accepted by the institution and that certified copy of the Gift Deed showing the absolute title and interest of the institution was submitted to the ERC on 21.04.2009 AND WHEREAS the Council noted that earlier the institution had submitted a lease deed from a private party which was registered on January 2009 which was not acceptable as per the Regulation 8(7) of the NCTE Regulations, which stipulated that no institution shall be granted recognition unless it was in possession of required land on the date of application free from all encumbrances either on ownership basis or on lease from Govt./Govt. institutions for a period of not less than 30 years. The application of the institution was submitted on 30-10-08 and therefore the institution did not fulfil the requirement of Regulation 8(7). The Council, was therefore, of the view that the recognition was refused to the institution by the ERC on valid grounds and, therefore, there was no justification for accepting the appeal. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and ERC’s order dated 05-06-09 was confirmed.



1. The Secretary, Jogamaya Memorial B.Ed. College, Vill/PO- Singur, Tehsil- Chandannagar, Hooghly Dist. - 712409, West Bengal 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Eastern Regional Committee, 15, Neelkanth Nagar, Nayapalli, Bhubaneshwar - 751 012. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of West Bengal, Kolkata.

F.No.89- 720/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Norma Frendrich D.Ed College (The Methodist Church in India), Bidar, Karnataka dated 17/07/2009 is against the Order No. F.SRO/NCTE/D.ED/2009/14379 dated 02/07/2009 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.Ed course on the grounds “1) The built-up space 743 sq.mtrs is not adequate whereas 1000 sq.mtrs. required for proposed D.Ed College. 2) The part of the building being used for Women's hostel and remaining space is not adequate for D.Ed Course. 3) Multipurpose hall, common room, faculty room, are not available for proposed D.Ed Course. 4) The computer lab. is not established. for D.Ed Course. 5) The management is running Pre-Primary to Degree classes in the same complex and a part of old building earmarked for D.Ed Course and the space is not sufficient. 6) The equipment in labs. are not adequate for proposed D.Ed Course. 7) The furniture in class room, hall labs, and faculty room are not adequate to run D.Ed Course. 8) The books in the Library numbering 1496 and Journals are not adequate for D.Ed course. 9) All the rooms are not electrified. The old building visited by the team is not usable and requires repair”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Norma Frendrich D.Ed College (The Methodist Church in India) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 22/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Naleen Kumar Samson, Principal & Correspondent, Norma Frendrich D.Ed College (The Methodist Church in India), Bidar, Karnataka presented the case of the appellant institution on 15-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the institution changed the complete building and now proposed to start D.Ed. course in a different spacious building available with 1015 Sq.mts. built-up area on a plot of land measuring 17.42 acres. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the institution was having built-up area of only 743 Sq.mts. at the time of inspection as against the requirement of a minimum of 1000 Sq.mts. required as per NCTE norms. Therefore, the Council, was of the view that the institution did not fulfil the requirements as per the NCTE norms and thus there was no justification for accepting the appeal and that since it now proposed to start the B.Ed. course at a different premises, it should submit separate application. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it

should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and SRC’s order dated 02-07-09 was confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The Principal, Norma Frendrich D.Ed College (The Methodist Church in India), Mangalpet,, Bidar - 585401, Karnataka 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, 1st Floor, CSD Building, HMT Post, Jalahali, Bangalore - 560 031. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Karnataka, Bangalore.

F.No.89- 724/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Rajashri Shahu Adhyapak Vidhyalaya (D.Ed. College), (Saraswati Bahuudeshiya Sevabhavi Sanstha), Via Karaddhed, Maharashtra dated 23/07/2009 is against the Order No. No.WRC/APW05620/1221549/110th/CVT/2008 dated 27/05/2009 of the Western Regional Committee, rejecting the application for recognition for conducting D.Ed (M) (Co-Ed) course on the grounds “WRC considered the case of the institution in light of letters F.No.46-3/2008/NCTE(N&S)/84003 dt.17/09/2008, F.No. 49-27/2007/NCTE(N&S) dt.01/10/2008 and F.No.49-27/2007/NCTE(N&S) dt.31/10/2008 received from Member Secretary, NCTE, New Delhi and negative recommendation received from Maharashtra State Govt. in respect of D.Ed Course. Keeping in view of the negative recommendation received from Maharashtra State Govt. in respect of D.Ed Course and directions received from NCTE Hqs, the WRC decided that no further processing will be done in this case and communication to this effect to be made to this institution. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Rajashri Shahu Adhyapak Vidhyalaya (D.Ed. College), (Saraswati Bahuudeshiya Sevabhavi Sanstha) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 23/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Patil Ramchandra Venkatrao, Joint Secretary and Shri. Hande Rajeshwar Sahram, Member, Rajashri Shahu Adhyapak Vidhyalaya (D.Ed. College), (Saraswati Bahuudeshiya Sevabhavi Sanstha), Via Karaddhed, Maharashtra presented the case of the appellant institution on 15-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted “the WRC failed to appreciate the fact that the D.Ed. college was being started by the appellant in the interest of the residents of the remote village of Markhl and had incurred lakhs of money in terms of the development of infrastructures including the relevant deposits under the provisions of the NCTE Act by submitting the proposal dated 29-01-07; The impugned order of the WRC was not tenable in the eyes of law in view of the fact that the Regional committees are expressly empowered by the NCTE Act to discharge and perform its functions under the provisions of the NCTE Act ; The NCTE, New Delhi nor the State Govt. could not subvert the statutory scheme provided under Section 20 r.w. Section 14,15 and 17 of the Act by issuing directions which would run to counter underline spirit of the Act and that the directives issued by the NCTE Hqrs or negative recommendations made by the Maharastra State Govt. ought not to have interfered in the functioning of the Western Committee under the provisions of the NCTE Act”. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that considering inter-alia the recommendations of some of the State Governments, including the State Govt. of

Maharashtra not to further recognize/permit institutions for conducting B.Ed./D.Ed. course, a policy decision was taken and a public notice was issued by the NCTE on 2-10-08 through the newspapers to the effect that application for D.Ed. course for the academic session 2009-10 from the State of Maharashtra would not be considered and all such applications shall be returned to the institution alongwith the processing fee and documents. the Council also noted that the said step taken by the NCTE was a temporary measure for regulating the growth of teacher training institutions, pending state-wise assessment of the manpower requirement of teachers in the country. Accordingly, NCTE Hqrs. had vide its letters dated 1-10-2008 and 31-10-2008 directed all the Regional Directors of NCTE not to recognize/permit the institutions for conducting the specific teacher training course as specified in the public notice issued by NCTE and to return all those applications which were received prior to issuance of public notice dated 2nd Oct, 2008. In view of this, the Council came to the conclusion that WRC was right in refusing the recognition to the institution for conducting D.Ed course by closing the file of the institution. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and WRC’s order dated 27-05-09 was confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The Secretary, Rajashri Shahu Adhyapak Vidhyalaya (D.Ed. College), (Saraswati Bahuudeshiya Sevabhavi Sanstha), Markhel, TQ.Degloor, Dist Nanded, , Via Karaddhed - 431718, Maharashtra 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Sachidanand Kala,Krida & Shikshan Mandal Society, Ahmednagar, Maharashtra dated 15/06/2009 is against the Order No. No. WRC/APW06972/1221091/110th/2008/54438 dated 21/04/2009 of the Western Regional Committee, rejecting the application for recognition for conducting D.Ed (M) (Girls) course and closing the file on the grounds “The inspection of the institution was conducted on 18.10.2008 and WRC considered the case of the institution in light of letters F.No.46-3/2008/NCTE(N&S)/84003 dt.31/10/2008 received from Member Secretary, NCTE, New Delhi and negative recommendation received from Maharashtra State Govt. in respect of D.Ed Course. Keeping in view of the negative recommendation received from Maharashtra State Govt. in respect of D.Ed Course and directions received from NCTE Hqs, the WRC decided that no further processing will be done in this case and communication to this effect to be made to this institution”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Sachidanand Kala,Krida & Shikshan Mandal Society (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 15/06/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Kolhe Sandip Raosahib, Member, Sachidanand Kala,Krida & Shikshan Mandal Society, Ahmednagar, Maharashtra presented the case of the appellant institution on 15-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was inter-aila submitted “ The refusal made by giving mere reference numbers of the letters bearing Ref. Nos. F.No.46-3/2008/NCTE(N&S)/84003 dated 17 Sep.08 and F.No.49-27/2007/NCTE (N&S) dated 1October, 2008 and F.No.49-27/2007/NCTE (N&S) dated 31st October, 2008 issued by the Member Secretary of NCTE, New Delhi: is not the perfect, complete and clear cause for refusal as nowhere the respondent has clarified that what are the contents of these letters and how those affect in negative in refusal of the recognition?; Respondent has to deal the cases filed u/s 14(3) of the Act on its own merits, no doubt of the guidelines issued by the Head office of the Council are material but still then it gives no right to reuse the recognition if all other things are present and the institution is not disentitled to commence the course but in the instant case no such application of mind is apparent from the impugned order as impugned order is neither reasoned order nor it is based on the ground of any specific violation of any of the guideline issued by the Council; The petitioner institution has made ready the entire infrastructure required for the D.Ed. course as the proposal of the petitioner was under the positive consideration of the Respondent Regional Committee and even inspection was also carried and nothing short is found but still then proposal is turned down and as such this latter refusal has adversely affected not only the petitioner but all the things and the concerned persons who are the part of the system of D.Ed. course. It was therefore prayed that

the order appealed against may be set aside and appropriate relief granted to the appellant”. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that considering inter-alia the recommendations of some of the State Governments, including the State Govt. of Maharashtra not to further recognize/permit institutions for conducting B.Ed./D.Ed. course, a policy decision was taken and a public notice was issued by the NCTE on 2-10-08 through the newspapers to the effect that application for D.Ed. course for the academic session 2009-10 from the State of Maharashtra would not be considered and all such applications shall be returned to the institution alongwith the processing fee and documents. the Council also noted that the said step taken by the NCTE was a temporary measure for regulating the growth of teacher training institutions, pending state-wise assessment of the manpower requirement of teachers in the country. Accordingly, NCTE Hqrs. had vide its letters dated 1-10-2008 and 31-10-2008 directed all the Regional Directors of NCTE not to recognize/permit the institutions for conducting the specific teacher training course as specified in the public notice issued by NCTE and to return all those applications which were received prior to issuance of public notice dated 2nd Oct, 2008. In view of this, the Council came to the conclusion that WRC was right in refusing the recognition to the institution for conducting D.Ed course by closing the file of the institution. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and WRC’s order dated 21-04-09 was confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The Secretary, Sachidanand Kala,Krida & Shikshan Mandal Society, Plot No.1747, Gat No.3601, At-Parner, Tal-Parner, , Ahmednagar - 414302, Maharashtra 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai.

F.No.89- 741/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Servjeet Kaushal Public Degree College, Sidharth Nagar-Distt, Uttar Pradesh dated 27/07/2009 is against the Order No.WRC/APW06972/1221091/110th/2008/54430 dated 21/04/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B. Ed course on the grounds “Demarcated built up area for different courses is not submitted”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Servjeet Kaushal Public Degree College (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 27/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Ravi Shanker, Member and Shri. Om Prakash Gupta, Member, Servjeet Kaushal Public Degree College, Sidharth Nagar-Distt, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 15-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the institution was never informed about the deficiency of demarcated built-up area for different courses. Further, when the entire building was built for B.Ed. course it was not necessary to mention demarcated built-up area. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that only B.Ed. course was proposed to be run by the institution as per the details given in application submitted. The committee, was therefore of the view, that there was adequate justification for accepting the appeal and remanding back the case to the NRC for further processing of the case for causing inspection and passing appropriate orders thereafter. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal, set aside NRC’s order dated 21-04-09 and remand back the case to NRC for processing the case on merits and causing inspection of the institution to ascertain the availability within one month of issue of this order of adequate infrastructural and other facilities as per NCTE norms and thereafter passing appropriate order. Accordingly, the case was remanded back to NRC.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Servjeet Kaushal Public Degree College, Sidharth Nagar-Distt, Uttar Pradesh to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The President, Servjeet Kaushal Public Degree College, VPO-Pedari Bujurg, Tehsil-Bansi,, Sidharth Nagar-Distt - -, Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.

F.No.89 - 759/2009 - Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Shri Balaji Maharaj Mahavidyalaya, Hathras, Uttar Pradesh dated 29/07/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F-7/UP-3053/139 Meeting/2009/3224 dated 30/05/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds “1) CLU is not submitted. 2) The built up area is not mentioned in the affidavit. 3) The building plan submitted is signed by Gram Pradhan without the resolution of Gram Panchayat. The Khasra number is not mentioned in the building plan. 4) As per the affidavit the total area is not per NCTE Norms for the proposed B.Ed Course”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Shri Balaji Maharaj Mahavidyalaya (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 29/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Dr. Adarsh Kumar Pathak, Secretary and Dr. Lokesh Kumar Sharma, Member, Shri Balaji Maharaj Mahavidyalaya, Hathras, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 15-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that CLU was submitted after receiving letter within the specified period; There was no para in affidavit to explain about built up area; Khasra No. was not mentioned in building plan because consolidation was going on and the institution followed full norms as per NCTE already be affidavit. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the deficiency letter was issued to the institution vide NRC’s letter dated 5-8-08 and as the deficiencies were not removed by the institution, a reminder was issued by the NRC on 7-11-08 asking the institution to furnish CLU and FDRs etc. within 21 days. The council also noted that the institution did not furnish the CLU within the prescribed time, khasra No. was not indicated in the building plan and the built-up area indicated was also inadequate as per the NCTE norms. Therefore, the Council was of the view that there was no ground to accept the appeal. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and NRC’s order dated 30-05-09 was confirmed.



1. The Secretary, Shri Balaji Maharaj Mahavidyalaya, Village - Nagla Garhu, Tehsil - Sasni, District - , Hathras - , Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.

F.No.89- 746/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Shri Jagajyothi Basaveshwar Vidya Vardhak Sangh, Bijapur Dist., Karnataka dated 23/07/2009 is against the Order No. F.SRC/NCTE/2009/B.Ed/REF/13257 dated 29/05/2009 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B. Ed course on the grounds “ 1) The available built up space as per building completion certificate, 8316 sq.ft. is not adequate for proposed B.Ed Course. 2) The Management has not earmarked the built-up space existing D.Ed course. 3) The portion of building is under construction as per VT report and VCD. The Management has properly replied to the deficiencies raised in the notice. 4) The books in the library are not adequate for both existing and proposed course as per documents. 5) The Management has not given information about other courses being run in the same building. 6) No exclusive infrastructural and instructional facilities are provided for proposed B.Ed Course”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Shri Jagajyothi Basaveshwar Vidya Vardhak Sangh (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 28/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Sharanappa Meti, Admn. Officer and Shri. Patil L.B. T.D.C., Shri Jagajyothi Basaveshwar Vidya Vardhak Sangh, Bijapur Dist., Karnataka presented the case of the appellant institution on 15-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the institution was having three storied building with a built-up area of 2520 Sq.mts. for running B.Ed. course and no other course was running; Only a small portion of the building was under construction at the time of inspection but the already constructed area available at the time of inspection was much more than what was required as per the NCTE norms; The institution was having 3039 books which was adequate as per NCTE norms and that infrastructure provided was exclusively proposed for B.Ed. course. It was further submitted that the D.Ed. course was being run out another premises one Km. away. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the VT report was positive and it indicated that adequate infrastructural and other facilities were available with the institution and no other course was being run in the building which was exclusively for the B.Ed. course. the Council was therefore of the view that there was adequate ground for accepting the appeal. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal and set aside SRC’s order dated 29-05-09 Accordingly, the appeal was

accepted and SRC’s order dated 29-05-09 was set aside, with direction to the SRC to grant recognition to the institution immediately, within 15 days of issue of this order. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby reverses the Order appealed against.


1. The President, Shri Jagajyothi Basaveshwar Vidya Vardhak Sangh, No.318/3, Pulakeshinagar, Talanagar, , Bijapur Dist. - 586109, Karnataka 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, 1st Floor, CSD Building, HMT Post, Jalahali, Bangalore - 560 031. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Karnataka, Bangalore.

F.No.89- 729/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Shri Mahipal Singh Mahavidyalaya, Hardoi, Distt., Uttar Pradesh dated 24/07/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/ NCTE/F-7/UP-3407/141 Meeting/2009 dated 23/06/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting M.Ed course on the grounds “1) CLU on prescribed format of State Govt. is not Submitted. 2) The submitted building plan is not approved by competent authority. Also the letter of approval of Building Plan from competent authority is not submitted”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Shri Mahipal Singh Mahavidyalaya (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 24/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Verendra Singh, Dy. Manager, Shri Mahipal Singh Mahavidyalaya, Hardoi, Distt., Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 15-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the institution was not given proper opportunity to remove the deficiencies and that no inspection of the institution was conducted before passing the refusal order. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that as per Regulation 7(1) of the NCTE Regulations 2007, an institution was required to furnish all the requisite documents alongwith the application and that the institution failed to submit CLU and proper approved building plan even after issue of a deficiency letter. Therefore, the Council was of the view that the application of the institution was incomplete and the file was closed by the NRC on valid grounds and that there was no justification for accepting the appeal. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and NRC’s order dated 23-06-09 was confirmed.



1. The Secretary, Shri Mahipal Singh Mahavidyalaya, Vill. Khumaripur, P.O. Baheta Sadhai, Hardoi, Distt. - , Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.

F.No.89 - 811/2009 - Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Smt. Janki Rampal Mahavidyalaya, Jaunpur, Uttar Pradesh dated 04/08/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F-7/UP-3359/142nd Meeting/2009/5633 dated 07/07/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds “1) Land Documents, Building Completion Certificate, Land Use Certificate, Copy of approved building plan, Affidavit of Rs.100/- stamp paper. 2) Deficiencies communicated in the deficiency letter issued by the office are not removed within stipulated period.” AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Smt. Janki Rampal Mahavidyalaya (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 04/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Om Prakash, Smt. Janki Rampal Mahavidyalaya, Jaunpur, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 15-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the institution had removed all the five deficiencies pointed out within the stipulated time. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the building plan submitted was not proper and it did not indicate the total area of the building proposed to be constructed, survey No/khasra No. etc. and thus it did not remove the deficiencies. the Council was of the view that the institution did not comply with the requirements and the NRC rejected the application and closed the file on valid grounds and that therefore there was no justification for accepting the appeal. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and NRC’s order dated 07-07-09 was confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The Manager, Smt. Janki Rampal Mahavidyalaya, Plot no. 155 & 157, Village - Bhannaur, PO - Bhannaur Bazar, District, Jaunpur - , Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi.


F.No.89- 719/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of V.P. College of Education, Karnal, Haryana dated 22/07/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F-7-3/HR-1573/2009 dated 22/06/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B. Ed course on the grounds “1) The Govt. recommendation is negative. 2) The land is not in the name of the institution. 3) CLU is not enclosed. 4) Building plan is not approved by competent authority. 5) Building completion certificate submitted is not enclosed. 6) Sufficient numbers of computers for 100 students is not there. 7) No supporting documents (photocopy of stock documents) for the entry of equipments of different laboratories. 8) No supporting document in respect of hardware and software for language lab”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, V.P. College of Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 22/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Mahesh Kumar, Member and Shri. Mahinder Singh, Accountant, V.P. College of Education, Karnal, Haryana presented the case of the appellant institution on 15-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the deficiencies communicated to the institution were replied within the stipulated period and that it did not receive the Show Cause Notice dated 25-3-09. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that approved building plan and building completion certificate were not submitted by the institution. The VT report also indicated that the built-up area available was 1023 Sq.mts. as against the requirement of 1500 Sq.mts. as per NCTE norms. the Council was therefore of the view that the institution did not fulfill the requirements and recognition to the institution was refused by the NRC on valid grounds and that there was no justification for accepting the appeal. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and NRC’s order dated 22-06-09 was confirmed.



1. The President, V.P. College of Education, Kaithal Road, Village-Karnal, Post-Karnal, Tehshil-Karnal, , Karnal - -, Haryana 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Haryana, Chandigarh.

F.No.89 - 783/2009 - Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Amity University (Department of Physical Education), Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh dated 22/07/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F73/UP-2051/141st Meeting/2009/5926 dated 09/07/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.P.Ed course on the grounds “The list of appointed faculty as per NCTE norms has not been submitted till date”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Amity University (Department of Physical Education) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 31/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Dr. Kalpana Sharma, Head and Shri. Ashish Singh, Dy. Registrar, Amity University (Department of Physical Education), Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 15-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was inter-alia submitted “ (1) The NRC vide its order no. F.NRC/NCTE/F-7/8314-8339 & 8371-8379 dated 14/11/2006 granted recognition to the Department of Physical Education (ASPESS), Amity University, Plot no. 4, Sector - 125, Noida, Gautam Budh Nagar for the B.P.Ed course with an intake of 50 students subject to the appointment of qualified staff through duly constituted selection committee. The copy of the grant of the recognition had been implemented. (2). Amity University Uttar Pradesh appointed the qualified staff as per the norms and conditions laid down and also communicated to the NCTE on the prescribed proforma. (3). It was surprising that after a period of more than two and half years, now the NCTE-NRC, Jaipur issued the impugned order no. F.NRC/NCTE/F73/UP-2051/141st Meeting/2009 dated 09/07/2009 issued with the following allegation: "The list of appointed faculty as per NCTE norms has not been submitted till date". During the course of presentation, the representative submitted a list of faculty which indicated that some teachers were appointed in the year 2003 and 2005 when the B.P.Ed. course was not existing in the university. The representative also informed that students were admitted by the university for B.P.Ed. course for the years 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09 and 2009-10. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the university was accorded the Conditional recognition for running B.P.Ed. course subject to appointment of qualified staff through duly constituted Selection Committee as per the norms of the NCTE /State Govt./Affiliating university and no formal order of affiliation was issued to the university under Section 14 of the NCTE Act, 1993. the Council also noted that formal recognition order was to be issued by the NRC after submission of requisite documents regarding appointment of qualified staff by the institution and that as

per the NCTE Regulations, an institution shall make admission only after it obtained unconditional recognition order from the regional committee concerned and the affiliation from the examining body. But, the institution admitted students without obtaining formal recognition from the NRC in accordance with the provisions in the NCTE Act/Regulations. However, the fact remains that though the institution was not granted formal recognition for B.P.Ed course and therefore, it was not eligible to admit students, yet the institution admitted students for the sessions 2006-07 to 2009-10 in violation of provisions in the NCTE Act/Regulations. Since recognition to the institution for B.P.Ed. had been refused by NRC vide its order dated 09-07-09, it would imply that the admission of students made during the session 2006-07 onward was illegal and therefore the interest of the students so admitted to the institution would be adversely affected, in as much as the degree, if any, awarded/to be awarded to them would become invalid. The Council was informed that students were admitted even for the academic year 2009-10. The Council also noted from the list of staff appointed by the University for B.P.Ed course that some teachers were appointed in the years 2003 and 2005 when the B.P.Ed course was not existing in the University. This raised doubt about the genuiness of the claims made by the University. In the circumstances, the Council of the view that in order to protect the interest of the students already admitted, the case should be remanded back to the NRC for issuing a revised order specifying the session from which the withdrawal of conditional recognition would be effective so that the interest of the students already admitted would not suffer. Since the withdrawal has to be from a prospective date, in this case, the withdrawal of recognition would be effective from the academic session 2010-11. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report, and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that the case should be remanded back to the NRC for issue of a revised order specifying that the withdrawal of conditional recognition accorded to the institution vide NRC’s order dated 14-11-06, would be effective from the academic session 2010-11. Accordingly, the case was remanded back to the NRC for issue of revised order NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Amity University (Department of Physical Education), Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Deputy Registrar (Projects), Amity University (Department of Physical Education), Plot No. 4, Sector - 125, Noida, District, Gautam Budh Nagar - , Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.

F.No.89 - 795/2009 - Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Chandrashekhar Gobbi Adhyapak Vidyalaya (SMSK Gramin Vikas Pratisthan), Sangli, Maharashtra dated 28/07/2009 is against the Order No. No. WRC/APW07304/123932/2009/156031 dated 03/06/2009 of the Western Regional Committee, rejecting the application for recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds “Deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 23.06.2008 and thereafter, WRC considered the case of the institution in light of letters F.No.49-27/2007/NCTE(N&S)/87096 dt.21/11/2008 received from Member Secretary, NCTE, New Delhi and negative recommendation received from Maharashtra State Govt. in respect of B.Ed Course. Keeping in view of the negative recommendation received from Maharashtra State Govt. in respect of B.Ed Course and directions received from NCTE Hqs, the WRC decided that no further processing will be done in this case and communication to this effect to be made to this institution”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Chandrashekhar Gobbi Adhyapak Vidyalaya (SMSK Gramin Vikas Pratisthan) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 03/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Chandrashekhar Gobbi, President, Chandrashekhar Gobbi Adhyapak Vidyalaya (SMSK Gramin Vikas Pratisthan), Sangli, Maharashtra presented the case of the appellant institution on 15-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted “The application for the recognition for B.Ed Course made by us by making huge investments in the infrastructural and instructional facilities. Our application is belonging to Minority Institutions and the application is in time and before issuing the any direction by NCTE, HQ and Govt. of Maharashtra. The appellant therefore prays that the order appealed against may be set aside and appropriate relief grants the appellant”. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the State Govt. of Maharashtra took a policy decision not to allow establishment of more B.Ed colleges in the State and at the instance of the State Govt., the NCTE Hqrs., asked the Western Regional Committee not to process applications for recognition of B.Ed colleges also from the State of Maharashtra. Since stopping of further processing of application of the institutions for B.Ed course in Maharashtra State and closing of the file was made by the WRC in accordance with the said policy decision of the State Govt. of Maharashtra and the directions issued by the NCTE Hqrs, the Council was of the view that there was no justification for accepting the appeal. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council

reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and WRC’s order dated 03-06-09 was confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The President, Chandrashekhar Gobbi Adhyapak Vidyalaya (SMSK Gramin Vikas Pratisthan), Gat No. 494, GPH No. 460, Tikondi, Tal. Jath, District, Sangli - 416412, Maharashtra 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai.

F.No.89 - 822/2009 - Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS The appeal of Dr. S. Radha Krishnan P.G. College (Dr. S. Radha Krishna Public School Samiti), Jhansi , Uttar Pradesh dated 06/08/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F-7/UP-3549/141st Meeting/2009/4566 dated 18/06/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds “1) The land is in the name of public school. 2) The land is mortgaged to the Bank as stated by the President of the society. 3) Building plan is not submitted at all”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Dr. S. Radha Krishnan P.G. College (Dr. S. Radha Krishna Public School Samiti) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 07/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. A. Ahmad, Manager, Dr. S. Radha Krishnan P.G. College (Dr. S. Radha Krishna Public School Samiti), Jhansi , Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 15-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the school land was in the name of the Public School Samiti and not in the name of Public School; A school building could be built by taking loan from the bank and building map and land documents were already mortgaged in the bank. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the NCTE Regulations 2007 stipulated that no institution shall be granted recognition under the Regulations unless it was in possession of required land on the date of application free from all encumbrances either on ownership basis or on lease from Govt./Govt. institutions. The institution did not fulfill the requirement as the land was not free from all encumbrances and therefore there was no justification for accepting the appeal. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and NRC’s order dated 18-06-09 was confirmed.



1. The President/Manager, Dr. S. Radha Krishnan P.G. College (Dr. S. Radha Krishna Public School Samiti), Deendayal Nagar, Sipri Bazar, District, Jhansi - , Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.

F.No.89 - 805/2009 - Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of I.P.J College (Manav Kalayan Shiksha Samiti), Rohtak, Haryana dated 03/08/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F-7-3/HR-1614/2009/3847-3854 dated 05/06/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting M.Ed course on the grounds “1) The land is not in the name of the institution. 2) CLU is not enclosed. 3) Building completion certificate is not issued by competent authority. 4) The built up area as per approved building plan for all the courses run by institution is far less than the area prescribed in NCTE norms. 5) As per essential data sheet of VT report, the dimensions of different rooms as mentioned in it did not tally with the dimensions as indicated in the submitted building plan. 6) AS per VT report, internet facility for students and teachers is not there. 7) AS per VT report, there is no language laboratory which is essential for B.Ed and D.Ed course. 8) the furniture is not sufficient as per VT report. 9) No supporting documents (Photocopy stock registers) foir the entry of equipments of different laboratories”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, I.P.J College (Manav Kalayan Shiksha Samiti) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 04/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Dr. Jogender Singh, Chairman, I.P.J College (Manav Kalayan Shiksha Samiti), Rohtak, Haryana presented the case of the appellant institution on 15-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the VT members had asked for money from the college which was not given and therefore the VT members had given a false report and that the Show Cause Notice reached the college late and so the reply given was submitted late. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the institution did not furnish point-wise reply to any of the grounds on which the recognition was refused to the institution and it simply stated that the VT members had asked for money. the Council also noted that the VT report was very negative and no complaint was made by the institution against the VT members before knowing that the report was negative. the Council was therefore of the view that there was no justification for accepting the appeal. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and NRC’s order dated 05-06-09 was confirmed.



1. The President, I.P.J College (Manav Kalayan Shiksha Samiti), VPO - Ismaila (Sampla), District, Rohtak - , Haryana 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Haryana, Chandigarh.

F.No.89 - 800/2009 - Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Maharaja Agarsain Institute of Teacher's Training (Maharaja Agarsain Educational Society), Narela, Delhi dated 03/08/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F73/DH-384/139 Meeting/2009/4618 dated 19/06/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting ETE course on the grounds “The institution failed to submit CLU i.e. conversion of the land for education purposes from the competent authority” AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Maharaja Agarsain Institute of Teacher's Training (Maharaja Agarsain Educational Society) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 04/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Dr. Aggarwal, Jt Secretary and Ms. Shelly Bhutani, Vice President, Maharaja Agarsain Institute of Teacher's Training (Maharaja Agarsain Educational Society), Narela, Delhi presented the case of the appellant institution on 15-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted “(1). Maharaja Agarsain Educational Society, Narela, Delhi is already running a Sr. Sec. School with Commerce and Arts Stream since 2005 onwards in part of the land/premises owned by the Educational Society. The Science Stream was introduced in the above school by order of Hon'ble L.G. dated 04/07/2008 vide case no. 48/2008-CA-Appeal under section 4(3) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 specially mentioning the use of this land for educational purpose in the rural area of Narela, Delhi. (2). Recently, CBSE, New Delhi has granted extension of affiliation to Maharaja Agarsain Public School, Narela, Delhi upto Sr. Sec. Standard for a further period of 5 years (i.e. upto 2013) vide CBSE affiliation branch letter no. CBSE/Aff./2730301/(Ex-00176-0910)2009/176843 dated 01/04/2009. (3). Maharaja Agarsain Educational Society has already written to Hon'ble L.G. Delhi and DDA Office, New Delhi vide letter no. MAP/08/1510/421A dated 15/10/2008. Regarding bonafide educational institutions rendering Educational Services, in existence prior to 01/01/2006(notified by DDA vide notification F.No.F20(19)(96)-MP dated 01/05/2008) for notifying the society land for Educational purposes”. During the course of hearing the representatives informed the Council that the agricultural land was not yet converted into institutional area and that they had applied for conversion. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the institution admitted that CLU was yet be obtained by it and therefore the application was rejected by the NRC on valid ground and thus there was no justification for accepting the appeal. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached

the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and NRC’s order dated 19-06-09 was confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The Joint Secretary, Maharaja Agarsain Institute of Teacher's Training (Maharaja Agarsain Educational Society), 24, Bawana Road,, Narela - , Delhi 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Delhi, New Delhi.

F.No.89- 789/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Patel College of Education, Jehanabad - Dist., Bihar dated 01/08/2009 is against the Order No. ERC/7-97.8.26/2009/894 dated 28/07/2009 of the Eastern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds “1) As per building completion certificate submitted by the institution, only ground floor is complete which is 7500 sq.ft. less than the required. Total area has not been given in Sq.mtr. As per the letter submitted from the Executive Magistrate.Municipal, Jehanabad dt.08.06.2009 the building is for (School bhavan) 2) The institution has not submitted certified copy of land document. 3) State Govt. has sent a letter pointing out the deficiencies and stating that on receipt of the proposal after compliance of the deficiencies it will be possible send any recommendation. No clarification in this regard not submitted by the institution”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Patel College of Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 03/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Anil Kumar Singh, Secretary, Patel College of Education, Jehanabad - Dist., Bihar presented the case of the appellant institution on 15-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that as per building completion certificate submitted on 8-6-09 the total built-up area of the institution was 1600 sq.mt. and Khata NO., Plot No., were mentioned in the certificate; certified copy was submitted on 7-4-09. It was further submitted that all the deficiencies pointed out by the ERC were removed by the institution within the prescribed period of 90 days. The documents submitted were also shown to the Council alongwith evidence of submission of the same. The Council noted that reply to the deficiency letter was furnished to the ERC and deficiency were removed within the prescribed time. AND WHEREAS the Council was therefore of the view that there was enough ground to accept the appeal and remand back the case to ERC for processing the case on merit for getting it inspected and thereafter passing appropriate orders. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal, set aside ERC’s order dated 28-07-09 and remand the case to ERC for causing inspection of the institution to ascertain the availability of adequate infrastructural and other facilities as per NCTE norms within a month of issue of this order and thereafter pass appropriate order. Accordingly, the case was remanded back to ERC.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Patel College of Education, Jehanabad - Dist., Bihar to the ERC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Secretary , Patel College of Education, St. Jehanabad, Vill-Patel Nagar,, Jehanabad - Dist. - 808408, Bihar 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Eastern Regional Committee, 15, Neelkanth Nagar, Nayapalli, Bhubaneshwar - 751 012. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Bihar, Patna.

F.No.89 - 797/2009 - Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Raja Bhoj D.Ed College of Education (Adarsh Raja Bhoj Shikshan Samiti), Betul, Madhya Pradesh dated 31/07/2009 is against the Order No. –WRC/APW07646/223769/121st/2009/58997 dated 11/08/09 of the Western Regional Committee, rejecting application for recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds “1) Land is meant for agriculture and not teacher education. 2) CLU not submitted. 3) Original FDRs for Reserve Fund not submitted. 4) FDR for endowment fund is only for 12 months. 5) Built-up area and Khasra number not mentioned in the affidavit”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Raja Bhoj D.Ed College of Education (Adarsh Raja Bhoj Shikshan Samiti) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 04/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Dr. R.S. Pawar, Vice-President, Raja Bhoj D.Ed College of Education (Adarsh Raja Bhoj Shikshan Samiti), Betul, Madhya Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 15-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the required documents were submitted by the institution within time; if the points on which the file was closed were mentioned to institution it would have fulfilled the same. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 19-2-09 asking it to remove the deficiencies within a period of 90 days which was not complied with by the institution. The council was therefore of the view that the application of the institution was rejected by the WRC on valid grounds and therefore there was no justification for accepting the appeal. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and WRC’s order dated 11-08-09 was confirmed.



1. The President, Raja Bhoj D.Ed College of Education (Adarsh Raja Bhoj Shikshan Samiti), Patel Ward, NH - 69, Bhopal Road, District, Betul - , Madhya Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal.

F.No.89 - 799/2009 - Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of RCPS Institute of Education (Noble Christian Educational & Religious Trust), Haridwar, Uttaranchal dated 04/08/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F-7/UP-128/141st Meeting/2009/4747 dated 22/06/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, rejecting application for recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds “1) Land is in the name of society/institution on ownership basis or Govt. lease/private party. 2) Land use certificate is not submitted. 3) FDR of Rs. Three lacs towards reserve fund is not submitted”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, RCPS Institute of Education (Noble Christian Educational & Religious Trust) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 04/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Dr. Aswini Kumar Choudhary, Managing Trustee and Shri. N.K. Chaudhary, Trustee, RCPS Institute of Education (Noble Christian Educational & Religious Trust), Haridwar, Uttaranchal presented the case of the appellant institution on 15-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the deficiency pointed out at s. no 1 was not clear inasmuch as the land was available in the name of the trust. It was also submitted that land use certificate and FDRs were submitted by the institution. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the institution had submitted the requisite papers to the NRC regarding removal of deficiencies pointed out. The council was therefore of the view that there was adequate justification for accepting the appeal and remanding the case back to the NRC for getting the institution inspected and thereafter taking appropriate decision. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal, set aside NRC’s order dated 22-06-09 and remand the case to NRC for causing inspection of the institution to ascertain the availability of adequate infrastructural and other facilities as per NCTE norms within one month of issue of this order and thereafter pass appropriate order. Accordingly, the case was remanded back to NRC.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of RCPS Institute of Education (Noble Christian Educational & Religious Trust), Haridwar, Uttaranchal to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Managing Trustee, RCPS Institute of Education (Noble Christian Educational & Religious Trust), Roorkee Dehradun Highway, Village - Kishanpur, Karondi, Roorkee, District, Haridwar - , Uttaranchal 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttaranchal, Dehradun.

F.No.89 - 801/2009 - Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS The appeal of S.K. Roy Memorial Institute of Education, Hailakandi, Assam dated 04/08/2009 is against the Order No. ERC/7.98.6(1).7/2009/880 dated 28/07/2009 of the Eastern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds “1) The institution has not appointed requisite number of teaching staff qualified as per NCTE norms. Principal is not Qualified as per norms. 2) Land & Building not as per norms. The institution submitted letter of the joint secretary to the Govt. Assam regarding allotment of land for three years. Legally valid land documents (English version of sale deed/Gift deed/Patta/Registered lease deed) in favour of the institution not submitted as per the NCTE norms”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, S.K. Roy Memorial Institute of Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 04/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Debojit Dey, Secretary and Dr. K.R. Paul, Member, S.K. Roy Memorial Institute of Education, Hailakandi, Assam presented the case of the appellant institution on 15-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the institution had appointed 8 teachers to run the course as against the requirement of seven teachers required as per the NCTE norms and that the principal appointed was qualified. It was also submitted was that institution had submitted required land documents issued by the State Govt. of Assam to the ERC. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that institution was issued letter of intent prior to recognition on 05.06.09 which was issued after satisfying that the institution fulfilled the requirement regarding infrastructural facilities etc. and therefore the ground of rejection cited at s. no. 2 namely land and building was not as per norms was not in order. Regarding appointment of qualified staff the Council noted that the principal appointed was not qualified as per the NCTE norms. However the representative of the institution informed the Council that the institution was prepared to appoint another incumbent of the post of principal as per the NCTE norms immediately. In view of the position explained by the institution the Council was of the view that the appeal should be accepted and the case should be remanded back to the ERC for granting extension of time to the institution to make appointment of qualified principal as per the NCTE norms and thereafter taking appropriate decision. AND WHEREAS After perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal, set aside ERC’s order dated 28-07-09 and remand back the case to ERC for allowing another opportunity to the institution to make appointment of qualified staff

and thereafter passing appropriate order. Accordingly, the case was remanded back to ERC. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of S.K. Roy Memorial Institute of Education, Hailakandi, Assam to the ERC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Secretary, S.K. Roy Memorial Institute of Education, PO - katlicherra, District, Hailakandi - 788161, Assam 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Eastern Regional Committee, 15, Neelkanth Nagar, Nayapalli, Bhubaneshwar - 751 012. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Assam, Dispur.

F.No.89 - 798/2009 - Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of S.V. Chaudhari College of Education (Late Sonaben Veljibhai Chaudhari Charitable Trust), Mehsana, Gujarat dated 16/07/2009 is against the Order No. No. WRC/APW00541/323156/120th/2009/57330 dated 09/07/2009 of the Western Regional Committee, withdrawing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds “Land documents submitted are not valid”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, S.V. Chaudhari College of Education (Late Sonaben Veljibhai Chaudhari Charitable Trust) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 04/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Ramesh P. Chaudhari, S.V. Chaudhari College of Education (Late Sonaben Veljibhai Chaudhari Charitable Trust), Mehsana, Gujarat presented the case of the appellant institution on 15-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the land on which the building of the institution was constructed was on 99 years lease, when recognition was granted to the institution and appellant since got the same registered and the lease was now for the period of 30 years. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the application of the institution was submitted on 30.12.2003 when as per the NCTE regulations 2002 which were in vogue, an applicant institution should have land and building either on ownership basis or on lease from Govt. / Govt. agencies only. However, an applicant institution which was having land on ownership basis could be allowed to run a teacher education course in a rented building for a period of three years only pending construction of own building as per the approved building plan on the land owned by the society/ trust/ institution. The institution was granted conditional recognition by the WRC vide its letter dt. 27.06.05 only for the year 2005-06 subject to appointment of qualified staff. The formal recognition order was to be issued by the WRC after the institution submitted the list of staff duly approved by the registrar of the affiliating university. However no list of qualified staff appointed was furnished by the institution to the WRC for issuance of formal recognition order and thus no formal recognition order was issued by WRC to the institution. Nevertheless the institution continued to make admission after obtaining affiliation from the affiliating university without obtaining formal recognition order from the NCTE in violation of the provision in the NCTE act/ regulation. the Council also noted that the affiliating university namely the Henchandraacharya North Gujarat University vide its letter dt 13.10.08 forwarded to the WRC a list of institutions which had not upgraded the facilities as per the NCTE regulations. The said list included the S.V. Chaudhari College of Education Mehsana, Gujarat. Accordingly the WRC got another inspection of the

institution conducted under Section 17 of the NCTE act and on the basis of the findings the recognition of the institution was withdrawn on the ground that the land documents submitted were not valid. As already stated as per the provisions in the NCTE Regulations, 2002 which were in vogue when the institution submitted the application, the institution should have land on ownership basis or on lease from Govt./Government agencies. The institution was not fulfilling the NCTE norms even at the time of recent inspection conducted by the affiliating university and the subsequent inspection conducted under Section 17 of the NCTE Act although, the NCTE Regulations stipulated that whenever there are changes in the norms and standard for the course or training in teacher education, the institution shall comply with the requirement laid down in the revised norms and standards immediately but not later than the date of commencement of the next academic session. The WRC was therefore justified in withdrawing the recognition of the institution under Section 17 of the NCTE Act from the academic session 2009-10. The orders of the WRC were upheld and the appeal was rejected. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and WRC’s order dated 09.07. 09 was confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The President, S.V. Chaudhari College of Education (Late Sonaben Veljibhai Chaudhari Charitable Trust), At & PO - Pamol, Tal.- Vijapur, District, Mehsana - , Gujarat 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Gujarat, Gandhinagar.

F.No.89 - 807/2009 - Appeal NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION


O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Shaheed Kashi Ram College of Physical Education, Mohali, Punjab dated 04/08/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F-7/PB-382/144th Meeting/2009/6791 dated 24/07/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.P.Ed course on the grounds that the reply of the Institution has not been received in the stipulated time. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Shaheed Kanshi Ram College of Physical Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 05/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Dr. Bhupinder Singh, Principal, Shaheed Kanshi Ram College of Physical Education , Mohali, Punjab presented the case of the appellant institution on 15-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the college was recognized by the State Govt. of Punjab and was running since 1979 i.e. prior to enactment of the NCTE Act. The institution had submitted an application for recognition of the B.P.Ed course by the NCTE on 02.05.06 but the application was not pursued by the institution with the NRC as the State Govt. of Punjab had been issuing notification from time to time to the effect that the colleges which were in existence before the enactment of the NCTE Act 1993, were not required to have recognition/ approval of the NCTE. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that, as per the provision in the NCTE Act, 1993, an institution already existing pri0r to the coming in to force of the NCTE Act, could continue the teacher education course for a period of six months after coming into force of the Act provided it had submitted application to the Regional Committee concerned of the NCTE for recognition of the particular teacher education course. the Council also noted that the notification issued by the Punjab State Govt. indicated that admission to BPEd course shall be allowed to only those institutes which were duly approved by the NCTE, and affiliated with the respective University; however, this condition would not be applicable to the institutes functioning/established before the enactment of the NCTE Act, 1993. In the circumstances, the Council was of the view that the case should be remanded back to the NRC for reconsideration of the application of the institution already submitted for recognition of B.P.Ed course, after taking a lenient view and allowing extension of time for submission of information/documents sought by the NRC. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council

reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal, set aside the NRC’s order dt 24.07.09 and remand back the case to NRC for processing the case after allowing extension of time for furnishing information documents sought by NRC and thereafter, passing appropriate orders within 30 days & issue of this order. Accordingly, the case was remanded back to NRC. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Shaheed Kanshi Ram College of Physical Education , Mohali, Punjab to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Chairman, Shaheed Kanshi Ram College of Physical Education , Bhagoo Majra, Kharar, Ropar, District, Mohali - 140301, Punjab 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Punjab, Chandigarh.

F.No.89- 732/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Shahid Captain Vijay Pratap Singh Mahavidyalaya, Chandauli, Uttar Pradesh dated 21/07/2009 is against the Order dated 14/06/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B. Ed course on the grounds “The deficiencies communicated to the institution still exist”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Shahid Captain Vijay Pratap Singh Mahavidyalaya (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 24/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. J.P. Singh, Manager, Shahid Captain Vijay Pratap Singh Mahavidyalaya, Chandauli, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 15-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the position regarding the deficiencies mentioned in the show cause notice was explained in the insituttion’s letter dated 20-6-09 wherein it was clearly indicated that more equipment in science lab and ET lab were provided and that perhaps the explanation in the letter dated 20-06-09 was not properly placed before the NRC resulting in passing the refusal order. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that VT report dated 10-04-09 was positive and it indicated that the institution was having adequate infrastructure and other facilities. Therefore, the Council was of the view that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal . AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal and set aside NRC’s order dated 14-06-09 Accordingly, the appeal was accepted and NRC’s order dated 14-06-09 was reversed, with direction to the NRC to issue Letter of Intent prior to recognition, within 15 days of issue of this order.



1. The Director, Shahid Captain Vijay Pratap Singh Mahavidyalaya, Awazpur, Tehsil- Sakaldiha,, Chandauli - -, Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Shri Ram D.Ed. College, Morena Dist., Madhya Pradesh dated 03/08/2009 is against the Order No. No.WRC/APWo8132/222518/121st/2009 dated 23/07/2009 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.ED course on the grounds “The CLU submitted by the institution is not valid”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Shri Ram D.Ed. College (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 03/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Ramesh Singh Sikarwar, Head Accountant, Shri Ram D.Ed. College, Morena Dist., Madhya Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 15-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the CLU submitted by the institution was issued by the concerned authority as per provisions prescribed under the MP Municipal Council Act and therefore there was no ground to invalidate the same. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that after reply dated 16-2-09 to the deficiency letter dated 19-01-09 was furnished by the institute, the WRC asked the instituton vide letter dated 05-06-09, to furnish CLU within 15 days and CLU dated 8-06-09 submitted was available on the file. The council, was therefore, of the view that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and remanding back the case to WRC for further processing of the case for causing inspection and thereafter passing appropriate order. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and set aside WRC’s order dated 23-07-09 and remand back the case to WRC for processing the case further for causing inspection of the institution to ascertain the availability of adequate infrastructural and other facilities as per NCTE norms within 30 days of issue of this order and thereafter pass appropriate order. Accordingly, the case was remanded back to WRC for further processing of the case on merits.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Shri Ram D.Ed. College, Morena Dist., Madhya Pradesh to the WRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Secretary, Shri Ram D.Ed. College, 516/Kathoda, Morena/Barriar, Choraha,, Morena Dist. - -, Madhya Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal.

F.No.89 - 760/2009 - Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Sri Amman College of Education (Sri Amman Educational And Charitable Trust) , Trichirapally, Tamilnadu dated 25/07/2009 is against the Order No. F.SRC/NCTE/2009/B.Ed/REF/14576 dated 15/07/2009 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds “1) As per visiting team report and physical verification, the building is under construction. The Flooring work of ground floor and first floor are not completed. The Doors and windows are not fixed. 2) The building is not completed at the time of re-inspection whereas, the building completion certificate issued by Govt. Engineer is submitted. The Management has provided misleading/false information for conducting inspection, without completion of building for proposed course. 3) The furniture are not suitable to run B.Ed Course. 4) The Electric fittings work is not completed. The Internet facility is not provided. 5) The Management has assured to complete the work preferably by September,2009 which is not acceptable as per regulation of NCTE”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Sri Amman College of Education (Sri Amman Educational And Charitable Trust) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 30/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. P. Selvay, Trustee, Sri Amman College of Education (Sri Amman Educational And Charitable Trust) , Trichirapally, Tamilnadu presented the case of the appellant institution on 15-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the building was complete with ground floor and first floor ready to use; building was completed at the time of inspection and the building completion certificate was submitted; all furniture was suitable and adequate to conduct the course; internet facility and electric facilities were already provided and as the building was completed there was no question of giving assurances to complete the building by September, 2009. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the VT report dated 12-6-08 was positive and it indicated availability of adequate infrastructure and other facilities. Therefore, the Council was of the view that the appeal should be accepted and the case be remanded to SRC, for issue of recognition order under clause 7(9) of the regulation. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and set aside SRC’s order dated 15-07-09 and remand back the case to SRC to issue

letter of intent prior to recognition under section 7(9) of the NCTE Regulation, within 15 days of issue of this order. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Sri Amman College of Education (Sri Amman Educational And Charitable Trust) , Trichirapally, Tamilnadu to the SRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Managing Trustee, Sri Amman College of Education (Sri Amman Educational And Charitable Trust) , 6/43, Koyya Thopu, Athavanthur (PO), Somarasampettai, , Trichirapally - 620102, Tamilnadu 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, 1st Floor, CSD Building, HMT Post, Jalahali, Bangalore - 560 031. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Tamilnadu, Chennai.

F.No.89- 790/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Swami Vivekanand Shikshan Sansthan, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh dated 03/08/2009 is against the Order No. No.WRC/APW07317/22516/223294/119th/2009 dated 03.06.09 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting M.Ed.(H/E)(Co.Ed) course on the grounds “The area earmarked for conducting both B.Ed and M.Ed Courses is insufficient”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Swami vivekanand Shikshan Sansthan (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 03/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Jitendra Joshi, Director, Swami Vivekanand Shikshan Sansthan, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 15-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that deficiencies pointed out in WRC’s letter dated 27-8-09 were removed and reply submitted to the WRC on 21-11-08 within the stipulated period of 90 days. It was also submitted that the institution was having a total built-up area of 3009 sq.mts. which was more than adequate as per the NCTE norms. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the deficiencies were removed by the institution within the prescribed time limit and therefore, the case remanded back to the WRC for further processing the case for causing inspection and thereafter passing appropriate order. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and set aside WRC’s order dated 03.06.09 and remand back the case to WRC for processing the case further for causing inspection of the institution to ascertain the availability of adequate infrastructural and other facilities as per NCTE norms within 30 days of issue of the order and thereafter pass appropriate order. Accordingly, the case was remanded back to WRC for further processing of the case on merits.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Swami vivekanand Shikshan Sansthan, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh to the WRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Principal, Swami vivekanand Shikshan Sansthan, 45 Vaishali, Kotra ,, Bhopal - 462003, Madhya Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Bagchi-Jamshedpur Namita Sankar B.Ed College, Nadia Dist. , West Bengal dated 11/08/2009 is against the Order No. ERC/7-99.6(1).23/2009/997 dated 04/08/2009 of the Eastern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B. Ed course on the grounds “ The requisite no. of teachers are not qualified as per NCTE norms. 3 lecturers are having fewer marks as SC candidates. The institution has not submitted the caste certificate of 3 lecturers for which relaxation in marks has been given by the institution”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Bagchi-Jamshedpur Namita Sankar B.Ed College (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 13/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Abul Hossain Biswas Member & Shri Sisir Sarkar, Secretary, Bagchi-Jamshedpur Namita Sankar B.Ed College, Nadia Dist. , West Bengal presented the case of the appellant institution on 16.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that even though three persons of SC category were appointed as lecturers by giving relaxation of 5 percent of marks, inadvertently their caste certificates were not submitted and the ERC without giving any reasonable opportunity to submit these documents refused recognition. The appellant now submitted the Scheduled caste certificates of all the three lecturers. AND WHEREAS in view of the position stated above the Council came to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be accepted and the order ERC dt. 04.08.09 refusing recognition reversed. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal and set aside ERC’s order dated 04.08.09. Accordingly, the appeal was accepted and ERC’s order dated 04.08.09. was reversed, with the direction to ERC to issue the recognition order to the institution within 15 days of issue of this order. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby reverses the Order appealed against.


1. The Secretary , Bagchi-Jamshedpur Namita Sankar B.Ed College, Vill-Bagchi Jamsherpur, Po-Jamsherpur, Plot No.305,, Nadia Dist. - 741122, West Bengal

2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Eastern Regional Committee, 15, Neelkanth Nagar, Nayapalli, Bhubaneshwar - 751 012. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of West Bengal, Kolkata.

F.No.89- 838/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of C.D.R. College of Education, Madurai Dist., Tamilnadu dated 03/08/2009 is against the Order No. F.SRC/NCTE/2009/B.Ed/REF/14574 dated 15/07/2009 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B. Ed course on the grounds that 1) The residential bungalow having small class rooms of 224 sq.ft., 204 sq.ft, 466 sq.ft., and 386 sq.ft. space each is not adequate and suitable to run the proposed B.Ed course. 2) The size of multipurpose hall 900 sq.ft. is not adequate as per norms and standards of NCTE. The classrooms/hall are located in the basement floor with little ventilation facility. 3) The management has provided instructional area 7251 sq.ft. and common/open space of 9432 sq.ft. for proposed course. The instructional space is not adequate as per norms and standards of NCTE. 4) The books in the library numbering 1570 are not adequate whereas 3000 books required for proposed B.Ed course. 5) The name of the college is exhibited on temporary board in the front of the building. No permanent arrangement is made for the proposed course. 6) The space for extra curricular activities and sports and games is not provided. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, C.D.R.College of Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 10/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri P.C. Varghese Principal & Shri D. Rajmohan, Trust Member, C.D.R. College of Education, Madurai Dist. , presented the case of the appellant institution on 16.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the institution is having a building exclusively constructed for B.Ed college with six classrooms of more than 500 sq. ft. of built-up area each; a multipurpose hall with 2219 sq. ft. which can accommodate more than 150 students; the total built-up area of the building is 16683 sq. ft. and not 7251 sq. ft., consisting of semi-ground floor, ground floor and first floor; books in the library are 3010 which were verified by the visiting team and there is an open space of 28249 sq. ft. for extra- curricular and sports activities. AND WHEREAS the Council observed from the essential data furnished by the institution to the visiting team the size of the classrooms is less than the area prescribed/ stipulated in the norms and standard and the size of the multipurpose hall is also not adequate for 100 students; further the completion certificate indicated a semi-ground floor in addition to ground and first floor. The appellant in the course of hearing admitted that there is no such semi-ground floor. Further the No. of books in the library as identified by the visiting team is also not adequate. In view of the above the Council came to the conclusion there was no justification in

accepting the appeal and it should be rejected and the order of the SRC dated 15.07.09 confirmed. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and SRC’s order dated 15.07.09 was confirmed NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The Correspondent / Secretary , C.D.R.College of Education, Karumathur, Usilampatty Taluk,, Madurai Dist. - 625514, Tamilnadu 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, 1st Floor, CSD Building, HMT Post, Jalahali, Bangalore - 560 031. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Tamilnadu, Chennai.

F.No.89- 821/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Chaudhary Ramchaitra Parmeshwar Parsad Mahavidyalaya, Basti-Distt., Uttar Pradesh dated 07/08/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F-7/UP-3358/140 Meeting/2009 dated 10/06/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B. Ed course on the grounds that 1) The building plan signed by Gram Pradhan but not approved. Further, the resolution of Gram Panchayat in respect of approval of building plan is not submitted. 2) CLU in proper format of State Govt. is not submitted. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Chaudhary Ramchaitra Parmeshwar Parsad Mahavidyalaya (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 07/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Ram Charitra Chaudhary Manager & Shri Shailesh Kumar Asst. Manager, Chaudhary Ramchaitra Parmeshwar Parsad Mahavidyalaya, Basti-Distt., Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 16.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that even though the institution earlier submitted a CLU, which was not from the proper authority, they were never informed that it should be from a competent authority. The institution has now submitted the land use certificate dated 03.08.09 issued by the competent authority under Section 143 and also building plan approved by the Gram Panchayat together with a resolution. AND WHEREAS in view of the above position the Council came to the conclusion that appeal deserves to be accepted and the case remanded to the NRC for causing an inspection and taking further action thereafter. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal, set aside NRC’s order dt 10.06.09 and to remand the case to NRC for causing inspection of the institution to ascertain the availability of infrastructure and instructional facilities as per NCTE norms and thereafter pass appropriate order.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Chaudhary Ramchaitra Parmeshwar Parsad Mahavidyalaya, Basti-Distt., Uttar Pradesh to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Manager, Chaudhary Ramchaitra Parmeshwar Parsad Mahavidyalaya, Kahsrano-150,152, Vill-Moondadiha khurd, PO-Puraina Mansoor,, Basti-Distt. - , Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.

F.No.89- 837/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Jai Arihant College of Teacher Eduction, Nainital, Uttaranchal dated 10/08/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F-7/UR-223/142RDMeeting/2009 dated 24/07/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds that Building plan is not approved by competent authority. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Jai Arihant College of Teacher Eduction (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 10/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Sanjay Jain, Joint Secretary, Jai Arihant College of Teacher Education, Nainital, Uttaranchal presented the case of the appellant institution on 16.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the area of the institution falls under the rural area and the concerned Gram Pradhan is competent to approve the building plan. He has also stated that the approved building plan has already been submitted to the NRC on 15.06.09. AND WHEREAS the Council after taking in to account all aspects of the matter into consideration came to the conclusion that the appeal deserved to be accepted and the case remanded to the NRC for causing inspection of the institution and taking further necessary action . AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate grounds to accept the appeal and remand back the case for inspection of the institution to ascertain availability of necessary infrastructure, instructional and other facilities in accordance with the norms prescribed by the NCTE within a month of issue of this order. Accordingly, the appeal was accepted, NRC order dated 24.07.09 was set aside and the case was remanded to the NRC for inspection of the Institution. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Jai Arihant College of Teacher Eduction, Nainital, Uttaranchal to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Joint Secretary , Jai Arihant College of Teacher Eduction, Dumka, Bangar, Bacchi, Dharma, Kalduchaur, , Nainital - , Uttaranchal

2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttaranchal, Dehradun.

F.No.89- 839/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Jai Maa Varahi Mahavidyalaya, Gonda Dist., Uttar Pradesh dated 10/08/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F-7/UP-3492/141st meeting/2009 dated 22/05/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B. Ed course on the grounds “ 1) Application on the prescribed form. & Copy of approved building plan. & Land documents and land use certificate. & FDR Rs.5 Lakhs and Rs.3 Lakhs. & Affidavit Rs.100 stamp paper. & Building completion certificate. 2) Deficiencies communicated in the deficiency letter issued by the office are not removed within stipulated period”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Jai Maa Varahi Mahavidyalaya (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 10/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Vinay Kumar Singh, Director, Jai Maa Varahi Mahavidyalaya, Gonda Dist., Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 16.09.09. In the appeal it has been merely stated that the deficiencies pointed out were removed and an affidavit regarding FDRs has been filed. AND WHEREAS the Council after perusing the records had come to the conclusion as the appellant has not fulfilled all the requirements and removed the deficiencies within the permissible time and therefore the appeal deserves to be rejected and the order of the NRC dt 22.05.09 confirmed. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and NRC’s order dated 22.05.09 was confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The Manager , Jai Maa Varahi Mahavidyalaya, Umri Begamagnj Gonda, ADD-Umri Begamganj, Plot No.704K 848, Vill/ Post -Umri Begamganj,, Gonda Dist. - , Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi.


F.No.89- 818/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Loknete Dr. J.D. Pawar College of Education (M.Ed) (Shree Gurudatta Shikshan Sanstha), Nasik Dist., Maharashtra dated 06/08/2009 is against the Order No. No. WRC/APW08264/125213/123679/121st/2009 dated 15/07/2009 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting M.Ed. (M)(Co-Ed) course on the grounds that The institution was not eligible to apply for M.Ed course as it was not running B.Ed course at the time of submission of application for M.Ed course. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Loknete Dr. J.D. Pawar College of Education (M.Ed) (Shree Gurudatta Shikshan Sanstha) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 06/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri B.N. Shinde Principal, Loknete Dr. J.D. Pawar College of Education (M.Ed) (Shree Gurudatta Shikshan Sanstha), Nasik Dist., Maharashtra presented the case of the appellant institution on 16.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it has been admitted by the appellant that the application for recognition of M.Ed course was submitted on 29.07.08 when their application for grant of recognition of B.Ed course was still pending and recognition thereto was granted only on 08.09.08. According to NCTE Regulations 2007 only institution running B.Ed programme are eligible to offer M.Ed course and the appellant institution was not running B.Ed course on the date of its application for introduction of M.Ed course. AND WHEREAS in view of the above position the Council came to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be rejected and the order of the WRC dt 15.07.09 confirmed. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and WRC’s order dated 15.07.09 was confirmed.



1. The Chairman, Loknete Dr. J.D. Pawar College of Education (M.Ed) (Shree Gurudatta Shikshan Sanstha), GUT No.220/1, Vill.Manur, Tal. Kalwan , Nasik Dist. - 423501, Maharashtra 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai.

F.No.89 - 768/2009 - Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Maa Vaishnav Devi Mahila Mahavidyalaya (Maa Vaishnav Devi Shikcha Samiti), Faizabad, Uttar Pradesh dated 30/07/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F-7/UP-2993/139 Meeting/2009/4101 dated 10/06/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds that 1) CLU submitted is not on prescribed format of State Govt. 2) The Building plan submitted is not approved by competent authority. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Maa Vaishnav Devi Mahila Mahavidyalaya (Maa Vaishnav Devi Shikcha Samiti) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 30/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Chedi Lal Verma Coordinator & Shri Jay Prakash Shukla, President, Maa Vaishnav Devi Mahila Mahavidyalaya (Maa Vaishnav Devi Shikcha Samiti), Faizabad, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 16.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the case of the institution was closed without conducting any inspection and the order is not based on the ground of any specific violation of the guidelines issued by the Council. The appellant now enclosed certain documents like Khatauni, Pramaan Patra signed by Tehsildar and a building plan which was approved by Gram Panchayat. However he has not submitted the CLU on the format prescribed by the State Govt u/S 143 of the relevant act. AND WHEREAS after taking into account all aspects of the matter into consideration the Council came to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be accepted and the case remanded to NRC for causing inspection after obtaining the CLU in the prescribed format from the appellant. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal, set aside NRC’s order dated 10.06.09 and remand back the case to NRC with the direction that the institution should be inspected to ascertain availability of necessary infrastructure, instructional and other facilities in accordance with the norms prescribed by the NCTE within one month of issue of this order. Accordingly, the Council remanded back the case to the NRC for inspection of the Institution and thereafter issue order accordingly.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Maa Vaishnav Devi Mahila Mahavidyalaya (Maa Vaishnav Devi Shikcha Samiti), Faizabad, Uttar Pradesh to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The President/Manager,, Maa Vaishnav Devi Mahila Mahavidyalaya (Maa Vaishnav Devi Shikcha Samiti), Siya Ram Nagar, Devorakot, PO - Gonwa, Sohawal, District, Faizabad - 224726, Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.

F.No.89- 815/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Matrushri Lalitba Soni Education Sansthan, Sabarkantha Dist., Gujarat dated 06/08/2009 is against the Order No. No.WRC/APW02720/323335/120th/2009/57352 dated 10/07/2009 of the Western Regional Committee, withdrawal recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds that 1) The institution does not have building as per the NCTE norms. 2) Principal not appointed. 3) CLU not submitted. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Matrushri Lalitba Soni Education Sansthan (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 06/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Ajay Kumar K. Patel, Matrushri Lalitba Soni Education Sansthan, Sabarkantha Dist., Gujarat presented the case of the appellant institution on 16.09.09. In the appeal it has been submitted that the construction of a building on land purchased is in progress; the college will shift to new building after permission is granted by the local authority and a Principal was appointed on 30.05.09 and the matter reported to WRC through their letter dt. 01.06.09. The appellant also submitted that when the students were allotted and he received the order of withdrawal of recognition he approached the Hon’ble High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad and the Hon’ble High Court in their order dt 27.07.09 granted a stay of the NCTEs, WRC’s order. In the course of personal presentation the appellant admitted that they had shifted to the new building. However, in a letter dt. 16.09.09 he has stated that now they will complete the process of shifting within a short time by submitting a fee of Rs 40000/- along with the required documents. AND WHEREAS the Council after taking all aspects of the matter into consideration came to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be accepted and the matter remanded to WRC for conducting a comprehensive inspection of the new building and other instructional/ infrastructural facilities matter on payment of Rs 40000/- by the institution, and take appropriate decision accordingly. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal set aside WRC’s order dt 10.07.09 and to remand the case to NRC for causing inspection of the new building of the institution to ascertain the availability of infrastructure and instructional facilities as per NCTE norms and thereafter pass appropriate order.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Matrushri Lalitba Soni Education Sansthan , Sabarkantha Dist., Gujarat to the WRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The President/Secretary, Matrushri Lalitba Soni Education Sansthan , 217, Manekba Socirty, RTO RD. AT& PO-Modasa, , Sabarkantha Dist. - -, Gujarat 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Gujarat

F.No.89- 817/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Model Divine Mahila College, Baghpat, Uttar Pradesh dated 06/08/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F-7/UP-3397/144th meeting/2009 dated 30/07/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B. Ed course on the grounds that The deficiency communicated to the institution still exists. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Model Divine Mahila College (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 06/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Arvind Kumar Secretary, Model Divine Mahila College, Baghpat, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 16.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the institution was issued a letter of intent on 17-5-09 prior to conduct of inspection subject to submission of resolution of Gram Panchayat regarding approval of building plan. He has also submitted that all the requisite documents including approved building plan from Gram Panchayat, Pilana, Baghpat were enclosed to the application and certain other details asked for by the NRC were also furnished on 08.04.09. He however admitted that inadvertently the resolution of Gram Panchayat was not enclosed. Alongwith the appeal the appellant submitted a copy of resolution dt 15.02.08 signed by Gram Pradhan. AND WHEREAS after taking in to account all aspects of the matter into consideration the Council came to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be accepted and the matter remanded to NRC for conducting an inspection and taking an appropriate decision in the matter. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal set aside NRC’s order dt 30.07.09 and to remand the case to NRC for causing inspection of the institution to ascertain the availability of infrastructure and instructional facilities as per NCTE norms within one month of issue of this order and thereafter pass appropriate order.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Model Divine Mahila College, Baghpat, Uttar Pradesh to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Secretary, Model Divine Mahila College, Khasrano-258,Po-Meerut Road, PO-Pilana, Baghpat - , Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.

F.No.89- 833/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of NKBR College of Education For Women , Meerut Dist., Uttar Pradesh dated 08/08/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F-7/UP-3190/142nd Meeting/2009 dated 23/06/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B. Ed course on the grounds that 1) Application on the prescribed form. 2) Copy of approved building plan. 3) Land documents and land use certificate. 4) FDR Rs.5 Lakhs and Rs.3 Lakhs. 5) Affidavit Rs.100 stamp paper. 6) Building completion certificate. 7) Deficiencies communicated in the deficiency letter issued by the office are not removed within stipulated period. 8) Application on the prescribed form. Copy of approved building plan. Land documents and land use certificate. FDR Rs.5 Lakhs and Rs.3 Lakhs. Affidavit Rs.100 stamp paper. Building completion certificate. 9) Deficiencies communicated in the deficiency letter issued by the office are not removed within stipulated period. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, NKBR College of Education For Women (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 10/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri B.L. Garg Chairman & Shri C.P. Garg CEO, NKBR College of Education For Women , Meerut Dist., Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 16.09.09. In the appeal as well as in letter dt 16.09.09 it has been submitted that as the building plan duly approved by the competent authority, namely, Meerut Development Authority was not received, the NRC was requested on 20.04.09 to give further time to remove deficiencies; the competent authority approved the building plan only on 16.06.09 and the NRC closed the case on 23.06.09 after approval of the building plan. The appellant has not submitted anything in regard to other deficiencies such as land documents, land use certificate, FDRs and affidavit in the appeal. However he has given certain details in this regard in his letter dated 16.09.09 submitted during the hearing. From a perusal of these details it is seen that deficiencies relating to fixed deposit have been removed as late as 15.09.09. In the course of personal presentation the appellant brought to the notice of the Council that the original documents relating to the land have been mortgaged to a bank., which indicates that the land is not free from all encumbrances., which is a violation of NCTE regulations 2007. AND WHEREAS in view of the position stated above the Council came to the conclusion that the appeal deserve to be rejected and the order of NRC dt 24.07.09 confirmed. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal and affidavit after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council

reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and NRC’s order dated 23/06/2009 was confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The President, NKBR College of Education For Women , L-823,Shastri Nagar, , Meerut Dist. - 250004, Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.

F.No.89- 831/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of NKBR College of Professional Studies, Meerut , Uttar Pradesh dated 08/08/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F-7/UP-2976/142nd meeting/2009 dated 24/07/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting M.Ed course on the grounds that Deficiencies communicated in the deficiency letter issued by the office are not removed within stipulated period. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, NKBR College of Professional Studies (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 10/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri B.L. Garg Chairman & Shri C.P. Garg CEO, NKBR College of Professional Studies, Meerut , Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 16.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that no letter pointing out any deficiencies was issued by the NRC but only a letter dt. 12.06.08 was issued by that office asking the appellant institution to clarify which course they would like to conduct, the appellant having applied for an additional intake in B.Ed course and for starting M.Ed course. The appellant stated that in their letter dated 23.06.08 informed NRC that they would seek recognition for M.Ed course from the session 2008-09and withdraw their application for additional intake in B.Ed for the session 2008-09 with option to submit a fresh application for additional intake in B.Ed from session 2009-10. He has further stated after opting for M.Ed Course no letter was received before NRC passed its order dt 24.07.09. In the course of personal presentation the appellant stated that the land on which the existing B.Ed course is being run has been mortgaged to State Bank of India, which indicates that the land is not free from all encumbrances and which is a violation of NCTE Regulations. AND WHEREAS in view of the position stated above the Council came to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be rejected and the order of NRC dated 24-7-09 confirmed. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and accordingly the appeal was rejected and NRCs order dated 24.07.09 was confirmed.



1. The Chairman, NKBR College of Professional Studies, Meerut-Hapur Road, Phaphunda,, Meerut - 245206, Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.

F.No.89- 829/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Pt.Jagnarayan Shukla Gramoday Mahavidyalaya, Gonda Dist., Uttar Pradesh dated 10/08/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F-7/UP-3429/141st meeting/2009 dated 09/07/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.P.Ed course on the grounds “1) Application on the prescribed form. & Copy of approved building plan. & Land documents and land use certificate. & FDR Rs.5 Lakhs and Rs.3 Lakhs. & Affidavit Rs.100 stamp paper. & Building completion certificate. 2) Deficiencies communicated in the deficiency letter issued by the office are not removed within stipulated period”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Pt.Jagnarayan Shukla Gramoday Mahavidyalaya (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 10/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Vinay Kumar Singh, Director, Pt. Jag Narayan Shukla Gramodaya Mahavidyalaya, Gonda Dist., Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 16.09.09. In the appeal it had been merely stated that all requisite documents were available before the order dt. 09.07.09 was passed and an affidavit was filed before the NRC inter-alia undertaking to furnish FDRs at the time of visit. AND WHEREAS the Council after perusing the records has come to the conclusion that as the appellant has not fulfilled all the requirements and removed the deficiencies within the permissible time the appeal deserves to be rejected and the order of the NRC dt 09.07.09 confirmed. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and NRC’s order dated 09.07.09 was confirmed NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The Manager, Pt.Jagnarayan Shukla Gramoday Mahavidyalaya, Ranipur, Plot No-2121, 247, vill-Ranipur Pahari, Post-Dhrjanpur, , Gonda Dist. - , Uttar Pradesh


F.No.89- 836/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Pushkar Foundation, Pune, Maharashtra dated 10/08/2009 is against the Order No. No.WRC/APW06786/1222045/119th/LIP/2008/56544 dated 12/06/2009 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.Ed. (E) (Co-Ed.) course on the grounds that WRC in its 119th meeting considered the case of the institution in light of letters F.No.46-3/2008/NCTE(N&S)/84003 dt.17/09/2008, F.No.49-27/2008/NCTE(N&S)/ 84003 dt.01/10/2008 and F.No.49-27/2008/NCTE(N&S)/84003 dt.31/10/2008 received from Member Secretary, NCTE, New Delhi and negative recommendation received from Maharashtra State Govt. in respect of D.Ed Course. Keeping in view of the negative recommendation received from Maharashtra State Govt. in respect of D.Ed Course and directions received from NCTE Hqs, the WRC decided that no further processing will be done in this case and communication to this effect to be made to this institution. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Pushkar Foundation (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 10/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Gulab D. Neharkar, President, Shri Rahul R. Khokale, Pushkar Foundation, Pune, Maharashtra presented the case of the appellant institution on 16.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the appellant had submitted all the relevant papers along with the appeal and the order appealled against may be set aside. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that considering inter-alia the recommendations of some of the State Governments, including the State Govt. of Maharashtra not to further recognize/permit institutions for conducting B.Ed./D.Ed. course, a policy decision was taken and a public notice was issued by the NCTE on 2-10-08 through the newspapers to the effect that application for D.Ed. course for the academic session 2009-10 from the State of Maharashtra would not be considered and all such applications shall be returned to the institution alongwith the processing fee and documents. the Council also noted that the said step taken by the NCTE was a temporary measure for regulating the growth of teacher training institutions, pending state-wise assessment of the manpower requirement of teachers in the country. Accordingly, NCTE Hqrs. had vide its letters dated 1-10-2008 and 31-10-2008 directed all the Regional Directors of NCTE not to recognize/permit the institutions for conducting the specific teacher training course as specified in the public notice issued by NCTE and to return all those applications which were received prior to issuance of public notice dated 2nd Oct, 2008. In view of this, the

Council came to the conclusion that WRC was right in refusing the recognition to the institution for conducting D.Ed course by closing the file of the institution. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and WRC’s order dated 12-06-09 was confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The Principal, Pushkar Foundation, A/P-Yedgaon, Tal-Jnnar, , Pune - 410504, Maharashtra 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai.

F.No.89- 848/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Babu Jai Shanker Gaya Prasad Mahavidyalaya, Unnao, Uttar Pradesh dated 11/08/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/ NCTE/F-7/UP-2971/141 Meeting/2009/5741 dated 08/07/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.P.Ed. course on the grounds that 1) CLU submitted is not on prescribed format of State Government. 2) The building plan submitted is signed by Gram Pradhan without the resolution of Gram Panchayat. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Babu Jai Shanker Gaya Prasad Mahavidyalaya (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 11/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Lal Bahadur, Manager, Babu Jai Shanker Gaya Prasad Mahavidyalaya, Unnao, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 16.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that CLU issued by the SDM of area and building plan approved by the Gram Panchayat as the institution is situated in rural area have been submitted to the NRC who have overlooked the same. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the institution has sent a letter dt 23.07.09 to the NRC explaining the position regarding CLU and also resolution of the Gram Panchayat. In view of the position stated above the Council came to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be accepted and the matter remanded to NRC for causing inspection and taking further action in the matter . The visiting team any obtain all the requisite documents from the institution at the time of inspection. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal, set aside NRC’s order dated 08.07.09 and to remand the case to NRC for causing inspection of the institution within a month of issue of this order, to ascertain the availability of infrastructure and instructional facilities as per NCTE norms and thereafter pass appropriate order.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Babu Jai Shanker Gaya Prasad Mahavidyalaya, Unnao, Uttar Pradesh to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Manager, Babu Jai Shanker Gaya Prasad Mahavidyalaya, Village - Chhachhi - Rai, Post - Sumerpur, Tehsil - Bighapur, District - , Unnao - , Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.

F.No.89-716/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Brightland College of Education, Rewari, Distt, Haryana dated 07/07/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F73/HR-1100/2009 dated 23/04/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds “ 1) CLU is not issued by the competent authority on the prescribed format. 2) In response to our letter, the State Govt. recommendation is negative”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Brightland College of Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 22/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Baljeet Singh Officer-in-charge & Smt. Sangeeta Sharma, President, Brightland College of Education, Rewari, Distt, Haryana presented the case of the appellant institution on 16.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that since the institution was not informed about the format and authority in which CLU is to be obtained, the institution obtained an NOC for consideration of B.Ed. College from the District Town Planner, Rewari, Haryana. This NOC is dated 11th October, 2007 i.e. subsequent to this, a clarification has also been submitted from the same office on 12th May, 2009 that the village under reference in district Rewari falls outside the controlled area / urban area declared so by the District Town Planner, Rewari. As such, no CLU permission is required for establishing an educational institution in this area. The Council felt that this certificate by the District Town Planner, Rewari may be considered as sufficient in lieu of CLU. AND WHEREAS the Council perused the letter dated 6th May, 2008 sent by the Higher Education Commissioner regarding the recommendation of the State Government, Panchkula, Haryana stating that the State has got 300 colleges and therefore no more application for opening of B.Ed. colleges for the state of Haryana may be entertained. This recommendation could not have been accepted by NRC firstly because it came after the prescribed 60 days from the date of reference made to the State Government and also because the recommendation is of a very general nature and does not give any specific rationale as to why this particular institution should not be established. This needs to be seen in the context that many other institutions were being granted recognition in the state of Haryana. AND WHEREAS in view of the above, the Council was of the view that there was enough justification to accept the appeal of the institution and set aside the NRC’s order dated 23rd April, 2009 of NRC refusing the recognition and remand back the case for consideration of the case on merit on the basis of inspection reports already

conducted in case of this institution. The same needs to be done within 15 days of issue of this order. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT report and considering the facts that the inspections of the institution has been conducted twice the Council reached the conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal, set aside NRC’s order dated 23rd April, 2009 and remand back the case to NRC for deciding the case on merit with 15 days of issue of this order. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Brightland College of Education, Rewari, Distt, Haryana to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The President, Brightland College of Education, VPO- Jant Sayarwas, Rewari, Distt - -, Haryana 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Haryana, Chandigarh.

F.No.89- 856/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of DIPS College of Education (Sahibzada Ajit Singh Educational Trust), Hoshiyarpur, Punjab dated 13/08/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F-3/PB-539/144 Meeting/2009/7294-7300 dated 31/07/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B. Ed course on the grounds that: (1) The reply of the Institution has not been received in the stipulated time. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, DIPS College of Education (Sahibzada Ajit Singh Educational Trust) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 13/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri B.S. Bal General Manager & Shri Naveen Narang, Accounts Manager, DIPS College of Education (Sahibzada Ajit Singh Educational Trust), Hoshiyarpur, Punjab was asked to present the case of the appellant institution on 16.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that after receiving conditional recognition from the NRC the process of appointment was initiated and Punjab University was requested for appointment of a Panel of Experts/ Subject Experts on the selection committee and a letter appointing the experts was issued by the University only on 13.07.09. The appellant also stated that they requested the NRC on 18.06.09 for some more time for appointment of staff and in the mean time interviews were held and selected staff joined with effect from 27.07.09. Taking into account the delay which has occurred in the appointment of academic staff which was on account of belated nomination of experts by Punjab University, grant of recognition for B.Ed course may be considered sympathetically. AND WHEREAS taking all aspects matter into consideration the Council has come to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be accepted and the matter remanded to NRC who may examine the profile of the academic staff selected and appointed vis-à-vis the relevant norms and standards and take an appropriate decision in the matter. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal, reverse NRC’s order dated 23-04-09 with the direction to NRC to immediately issue the order of recognition to the institution, as the staff as per NCTE norms has already been appointed by the institution.



1. The Chairman, DIPS College of Education (Sahibzada Ajit Singh Educational Trust), Rarra Morr, Jalalpur, Tanda Urmur, Tehsil - Dasuya, , Hoshiyarpur - , Punjab 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Punjab, Chandigarh.

F.No.89 - 804/2009 - Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Dr. Ambedkar D.Ed College (Rashtriya Anusuchit Jati Jamati Alpasankhyak Gramin Vikas Mandal), Aurangabad, Maharashtra dated 03/08/2009 is against the Order No.WRC/APW07388/1222178 (Court Case)/119th/2009/56098 dated 04/06/2009 of the Western Regional Committee, against recognition for conducting D.Ed (M) (Co. Ed) course on the grounds that Staff not qualified as per NCTE norms. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Dr. Ambedkar D.Ed College (Rashtriya Anusuchit Jati Jamati Alpasankhyak Gramin Vikas Mandal) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 04/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Ratnakar Raghuji Khandale Secretary, Dr. Ambedkar D.Ed College (Rashtriya Anusuchit Jati Jamati Alpasankhyak Gramin Vikas Mandal), Aurangabad, Maharashtra presented the case of the appellant institution on 16.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that after conducting an inspection of institution, giving an opportunity to make a written representation with regard to certain requirements which have not been fulfilled and on receipt of a reply, the WRC in their letter dt. 9th & 13th April, 09 informed the institution to submit details / information regarding appointment of faculty/staff and launching of a website before granting formal recognition under regulation 7(11). AND WHEREAS the Council noted that considering inter-alia the recommendations of some of the State Governments, including the State Govt. of Maharashtra not to further recognize/permit institutions for conducting B.Ed./D.Ed. course, a policy decision was taken and a public notice was issued by the NCTE on 2-10-08 through the newspapers to the effect that application for D.Ed. course for the academic session 2009-10 from the State of Maharashtra would not be considered and all such applications shall be returned to the institution alongwith the processing fee and documents. the Council also noted that the said step taken by the NCTE was a temporary measure for regulating the growth of teacher training institutions, pending state-wise assessment of the manpower requirement of teachers in the country. Accordingly, NCTE Hqrs. had vide its letters dated 1-10-2008 and 31-10-2008 directed all the Regional Directors of NCTE not to recognize/permit the institutions for conducting the specific teacher training course as specified in the public notice issued by NCTE and to return all those applications which were received prior to issuance of public notice dated 2nd Oct, 2008. In view of this, the Council came to the conclusion that WRC was not right in refusing the recognition to the institution for conducting D.Ed course only on the ground that the staff was not

qualified as per NCTE norms. if not for this the institution was even otherwise not eligible for recognition. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and WRC’s order dated 04-06-09 was confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The Secretary, Dr. Ambedkar D.Ed College (Rashtriya Anusuchit Jati Jamati Alpasankhyak Gramin Vikas Mandal), Plot no. 339, Pimpalgaon (Walan), Post - Wanegaon, Tal. - Phulambri, District, Aurangabad - , Maharashtra 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai.

F.No.89- 780/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS The appeal of Guru Gobind Singh College of Education, Gurdaspur, Punjab dated 28/07/2009 is against the Order F.NRC/NCTE/F-7/PB-582/141 Meeting/2009 dated 03/06/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B. Ed course on the grounds “1) The submitted CLU is signed but without any stamp. So it is not valid. 2) The building plan showing the Khasra No., Built up area and total land area is not submitted. 3) The building plan is signed but not approved by Sarpanch and the resolution of Gram Panchayat in respect of approval of Building Plan is not enclosed. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Guru Gobind Singh College of Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 31/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Anand Thaman Office Superintendent, & Shri Harvinder Singh Member, Guru Gobind Singh College of Education, Gurdaspur, Punjab presented the case of the appellant institution on 16.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that all the documents regarding land conversion certificate and approved building plan with the resolution of the Panchayat were submitted on 03.02.09 and again on 12.05.09. However, from a perusal of the records it is seen that information regarding khasra no., builtup area and total land area has not been indicated in the building plan; approval of Sarpanch is not recorded on the building plan. AND WHEREAS in view of the position stated above the Council came to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be rejected and the order of the NRC dt 03.06.09 confirmed. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and NRC’s order dated 03.06.09 was confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The Secretary, Guru Gobind Singh College of Education, Fateh nangal, 24-Model Town, Tehsil- Dhariwal, Gurdaspur - -, Punjab

2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Punjab, Chandigarh.

F.No.89- 787/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Indira Institute of Professional Studies, Morena Dist., Madhya Pradesh dated 31/07/2009 is against the Order dated 09/07/2009 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.Ed. (H) (CO-Ed) course on the grounds that Reply not received within stipulated time. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Indira Institute of Profesional Studies (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 03/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Mathura Rawat, Secretary & Shri Badshah Meena, Member, Indira Institute of Professional Studies, Morena Dist., Madhya Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 16.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the institution did not receive any letter after submission of the application and address of the institution written on the NCTE website is not as per the address given by the institution in their application. From the application form submitted by the institution it is seen but two address were given one that of the applicant society and the other that of the institution. The address of the institution on the NCTE website is a mixture of both the address, which appears to be the cause for the alleged non-receipt of the letter of WRC. AND WHEREAS the Council after taking in to account all aspects of matter has come to the conclusion that appeal deserves to be accepted and the matter remanded to the WRC for sending the deficiency letter to the correct address of the institution giving a fresh opportunity to the latter to remove the deficiencies. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal, to remand the case to WRC for sending the deficiency letter to the correct address of the institution giving a fresh opportunity to the latter to remove the deficiencies. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Indira Institute of Profesional Studies, Morena Dist., Madhya Pradesh to the WRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Manager/Secretary, Indira Institute of Profesional Studies, 224, Lashkar Sunhara sabalgarah Morena, , Morena Dist. - , Madhya Pradesh

2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal.

F.No.89- 786/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Jhambaba Degree College , Ambedkar Nagar, Uttar Pradesh dated 03/08/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F-7/UP-1614/141Meeting/2009 dated 09/07/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.P.Ed. course on the grounds “ The list of appointed faculty as per NCTE norms has not been submitted till date”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Jhambaba Degree College (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 03/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Dinesh Singh Principal & Shri Sanjay Agnihotri, Jhambaba Degree College, Ambedkar Nagar, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 16.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that approved list of staff had been forwarded to the NRC with their letter dt 08.10.08 and without affording any opportunity the impugned order has been passed. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that this institution was granted recognition for conducting B.P.Ed course with effect from the session 2006-07 and therefore the case becomes one of withdrawal and not refusal as stated in the order of the NRC. In the circumstances the Council came to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be accepted and the matter remanded to the NRC for issuing a show cause notice before issuing a final order. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal, set aside NRC’s order dt 09.07.09, for issuing a show cause notice, before passing a final order. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Jhambaba Degree College , Ambedkar Nagar, Uttar Pradesh to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Manager, Jhambaba Degree College , VPO-Surajupur, , Ambeddkar Nagar - -, Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi.


F.No.89- 767/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of M.J.R.P. College of Education, Jaipur, Rajasthan dated 28/07/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F-7/RJ-2246/141 Meeting/2009 dated 01/06/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting M.Ed course on the grounds “1) CLU is not submitted. 2) Building Plan is signed by Gram Pradhan but not approved. The resolution of Gram Panchayat is respect of approval of building plan is not submitted. 3) The land is not in the name of the institution”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, M.J.R.P. College of Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 30/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Abha Sharma Principal & Shri B.C. Sahu, Director, M.J.R.P. College of Education, Jaipur, Rajasthan presented the case of the appellant institution on 16.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment Corporation (RIICO), a Rajasthan Govt. Undertaking has allotted 48.36 acres to Anandi Devi Memorial Charitable Trust on the condition that it will be used for establishment of educational institutions and not for any other purposes and a copy of the relevant communication from the RIICO has been submitted to NRC. The appellant also stated that the building plan signed by Sarpanch and approved by competent authority has also been sent to NRC on 8th May, 2009 AND WHEREAS in view of the position stated above the Council has came to the conclusion that the appeal deserved to be accepted and the matter remanded to NRC for causing an inspection of the institution and taking appropriate action thereafter. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal set aside NRC’s Order dated 01.06.09 and to remand the case to NRC for causing inspection of the institution within a month of issue of this order to ascertain the availability of infrastructure and instructional facilities as per NCTE norms and thereafter pass appropriate order.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of M.J.R.P. College of Education, Jaipur, Rajasthan to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Chairman/Managing Trustee, M.J.R.P. College of Education, NH-8, New Delhi Road Jaipur, Vill-Kant, Post-Achrol, Jaipur - , Rajasthan 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Rajasthan,

F.No.89- 844/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Pt. Jag Narayan Shukla Gramodaya Mahavidyalaya, Gonda Dist., Uttar Pradesh dated 10/08/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/ NCTE/F73/UP-2034/141 Meeting/2009/5904 dated 09/07/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds “The list of appointed faculty as per NCTE norms has not been submitted till date”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Pt. Jag Narayan Shukla Gramodaya Mahavidyalaya (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 10/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Vinay Kumar Singh Director & Shri Shailender Kumar Singh, Pt. Jag Narayan Shukla Gramodaya Mahavidyalaya, Gonda Dist., Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 16.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the list of faculty is available with the Regional Committee. On 18.09.09 the appellant has given some documents relating to appointment of academic staff. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the institution was granted conditional recognition, one of the conditions being that qualified staff selected by duly constituted selection committee should be available before commencement of the course. Since NRC claims that list of appointed faculty as per NCTE norms has not been submitted till date and the appellant has not given any proof of his having furnished these details to NRC, the Council has come to the conclusion that the appellant may be directed to furnish copies of the relevant communication to the NRC afresh for re-examination of the matter. Accordingly the case may be remanded to the NRC for further action. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal, set aside NRC’s order dt 09.07.09 and remand the case to NRC, to direct the appellant to furnish copies of the relevant communication to the NRC afresh for re-examination of the matter.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Pt. Jag Narayan Shukla Gramodaya Mahavidyalaya, Gonda Dist., Uttar Pradesh to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Manager, Pt. Jag Narayan Shukla Gramodaya Mahavidyalaya, Ranipur Pahari, Tarabganj, , Gonda Dist. - , Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.

F.No.89- 766/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Shri Gauri Shankar Sanskrit Mahavidyalaya, Jaunpu-Dist., Uttar Pradesh dated 30/07/2009 is against the Order dated 14/08/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B. Ed course on the grounds “The list of appointed Faculty as per NCTE norms has not been submitted till date”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Shri Gauri Shankar Sanskrit Mahavidyalaya (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 30/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Jay Prakash Tiwari Principal & Shri Jitendra Singh Assistant, Shri Gauri Shankar Sanskrit Mahavidyalaya, Jaunpu-Dist., Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 16.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the staff profile approved by the Registrar, Sampornanand Sanskrit University, Varanasi was sent to the Regional Director, NRC Jaipur through a Registered post dated 20th Feb, 2008. The appellant has shown proof for his having sent that letter to NRC. From the details of staff selected, which have been furnished along with the appeal, it is seen that they are qualified and also approved by the University. AND WHEREAS in view of the position stated above the Council came to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be accepted and the order of the NRC dt. 14.08.09 reversed. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal and that it should be accepted. Accordingly, the appeal was accepted and NRC’s order dated 14.08.2009 was reversed with a direction to NRC to issue recognition order to this institution within 15 days of issue of this order.. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby reverses the Order appealed against.


1. The Manager, Shri Gauri Shankar Sanskrit Mahavidyalaya, P.O. Balwarganj, Sujanganj, Jaunpu-Dist. - -, Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi.


F.No.89-782/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Shri Ram Dnyan Shikshan Prasarak, Aurangabad Dist. , Maharashtra dated 31/07/2009 is against the Order No. No.WRC/APW06812/123843 (M)/2009 dated 03/06/09 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed (Co-Ed) course on the grounds "And whereas, the inspection of the institution was conducted on 17/12/2008 and WRC considered the case of the institution in light of letters F.No. 49-27/2007/NCTE(N&S)Part/87096 dated 21/11/2008 received from Member Secretary, NCTE, New Delhi and negative recommendation received from Maharashtra State Government in respect of B.Ed Course. Keeping in view of the negative recommendation received from the Maharashtra State Government in respect of B.Ed course and directions received from NCTE Hqrs., the WRC decided that no further processing will be done in this case and communication to this effect to be made to this institution." AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Shri Ram Dnyan Shikshan Prasarak (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 31/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Shinde Nanadkumar Chairman & Shri Sanad Sanjay Employee, Shri Ram Dnyan Shikshan Prasarak, Aurangabad Dist. , Maharashtra presented the case of the appellant institution on 16.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the appellant submitted all the required documents to WRC Bhopal, an inspection of the institution has been conducted and the institution has built infrastructure, purchased books, computers and laboratory instruments etc. AND WHEREAS the council noted that the State Govt. of Maharashtra took a policy decision not to allow establishment of more B.Ed colleges in the State and the recommendation of the State Govt., was accepted by NCTE Hqrs., which decided that the Western Regional Committee will not process applications for recognition of B.Ed colleges, from the State of Maharashtra. Since stopping of further processing of application of the institutions for B.Ed course in Maharashtra State and closing of the file was made by the WRC in accordance with the said decision taken by NCTE Hqrs in consultation with the State Govt. of Maharashtra, the council was of the view that there was no justification for accepting the appeal. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and WRC’s order dt. 03.06.09 was confirmed.



1. The Principal, Shri Ram Dnyan Shikshan Prasarak, Aghur Vaijapur, Station Road Aurangabad, , Aurangabad Dist. - -, Maharashtra 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai.

F.No.89- 781/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Unity Degree College, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh dated 29/07/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F73/UP-2269/139 meeting/2009 dated 10/06/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting M.Ed course on the grounds “The institution did not remove the deficiencies in stipulated time”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Unity Degree College (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 31/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Sayed Mohd Ali Taqvi, Incharge, Unity Degree College, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 16.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that grounds on which NRC refused recognition for conduct of M.Ed course, namely (i) negative Govt. recommendation; (ii) land being in the name of the society but not in the name of Institution and (iii) books for M.Ed course are not added are not valid grounds as the details of State Govt. negative recommendation have not been made known to the applicant; the college got the land transferred in its name from the society on 17.07.09. and adequate number of books have been further purchased after inspection. The appellant also stated the question of granting permanency for B.Ed course, the University completed inspection of the college and a report is awaited. AND WHEREAS the Council after taking all aspects of the matter into consideration came to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be accepted and the order of the NRC dt 10.06.09 reversed. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal and reverse NRC’s order dated 10.06.09. Accordingly, the appeal was accepted and NRC’s order dated 10.06.09 was reversed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby reverses the Order appealed against.


1. The Director, Unity Degree College, Post- Barawan Kalan, Kakori, , Lucknow - -, Uttar Pradesh


F.No.89- 847/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Zulekha P.G. College of Education (Zed Vocational Training & General Central Shikshan Sanstha), Nagpur, Maharashtra dated 10/08/2009 is against the Order No. WRC/APW07510/125185/122/2009/58288 dated 27/07/2009 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting M.Ed (E) (Co-Ed) course on the grounds “Three (3) staff members (S.no.3,4&5) are not having Ph.D qualification as required”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Zulekha P.G. College of Education (Zed Vocational Training & General Central Shikshan Sanstha) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 11/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Zakir Shaifullah Khan Administrator, Zulekha P.G. College of Education (Zed Vocational Training & General Central Shikshan Sanstha), Nagpur, Maharashtra presented the case of the appellant institution on 16.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the show cause notice has not mentioned the requirement of Ph.D clearly and as such they did not have a chance to fulfill the requirement. The appellant has stated that they have since appointed 3 staff members possessing Ph.D qualification and intimated the same to the WRC on 25.07.09. AND WHEREAS the Council noting that the deficiency pointed out by the WRC has since been removed by the appellant, the appeal deserves to be accepted and the order of the WRC dt. 27.07.09 reversed. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal and reverse WRC’s order dated 27.07.09 Accordingly, the appeal was accepted and WRC’s order dated 27.07.09 was reversed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby reverses the Order appealed against.


1. The Secretary, Zulekha P.G. College of Education (Zed Vocational Training & General Central Shikshan Sanstha), 38, 39, Shanti Nagar, District, Nagpur - 440002, Maharashtra

2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Bardhaman College of Education, Burdwan, West Bengal dated 12/08/2009 is against the Order No. ERC/7-97.8.1/2009/856(1) dated 27/07/2009 of the Eastern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds “The institution has not submitted land documents for the proposed teachers training institution. As per land documents the land has been allotted for training college for handicapped persons but the institution want to use it for B.Ed college. The land has been leased out for 30 years for construction of training centre for physically handicapped person from May, 1999”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Bardhaman College of Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 12/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Indrajit Roy, Member, Bardhaman College of Education, Burdwan, West Bengal presented the case of the appellant institution on 17-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the lease deed had been executed between the Governor of West Bengal and Burdwan Disabled Welfare Society, which was proposing to run the Bardhaman College of Education as it was intending to start the Secondary Teachers Education Programme so as to meet the local requirement of Disabled as well as general persons and that the Society obtained an “NOC” dt.25/05/2009 to use the land for running of a new B.Ed college. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the land had been leased out by the State Govt. of West Bengal to the Society for 30 years for construction of a training center for Physically handicapped persons, and therefore, use of the said land for any other purpose was untenable without making suitable amendment to the lease deed. The council was therefore of the view that the recognition was refused by the ERC to the institution on valid grounds and therefore there was no grounds to accept he appeal. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and ERC’s order dated 27-07-09 was confirmed.



1. -, Bardhaman College of Education, Burdwan Disabled Welfare Society's, Vill Malkita, PO Vita School, Town Burdwan, Distt. Burdwan, West Bengal , Burdwan - 713102, West Bengal 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Eastern Regional Committee, 15, Neelkanth Nagar, Nayapalli, Bhubaneshwar - 751 012. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of West Bengal, Kolkata.

F.No.89-880/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Desh Bhagat Pandit Chetan Dev Government College of Education, Faridkot, Punjab dated 10/08/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F-3/PB-216/144 MEETING/2009/6609 dated 22/07/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting M.Ed. course on the grounds “The reply of the Institution has not been received in the stipulated time”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Desh Bhagat Pandit Chetan Dev Government College of Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 18/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Jai Pal and Dr. Darshan Singh, Associate Professor, Desh Bhagat Pandit Chetan Dev Government College of Education, Faridkot, Punjab presented the case of the appellant institution on 17-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the intuition had received a letter dt.01/12/2008 and compliance was made by the institution vide dt.16/12/2008. It was also submitted that the institution was sanctioned the M.Ed Course with an intake of 15 students only as against the standard unit of 25 students as per NCTE norms and the proposal of the institution was for increase of student intake from the existing 15 to 25. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the standard unit for M.Ed course was 25 students as per the NCTE norms and therefore it was of the view that there was adequate justification for accepting the appeal to allow increase of the intake for M.Ed. course from the existing 15 students to 25 students. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal and set aside NRC’s order dated 22-07-09 Accordingly, the appeal was accepted and NRC’s order dated 22-07-09 was set aside, with direction to the NRC to grant recognition to the institution immediately by increasing the intake of students from the existing 15 students to 25 students for M.Ed. course, within 15 days of issue of this order.



1. -, Desh Bhagat Pandit Chetan Dev Government College of Education, Desh Bhagat Pandit Chetan Dev Government College of Education, Faridkot, Punjab, Faridkot - 151203, Punjab 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Punjab, Chandigarh.

F.No.89-861/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Gangadharpur Sikshan Mandir , Howrah, West Bengal dated 10/08/2009 is against the Order No. ERC-7-98.6(ii).2/2009/888(1) dated 28/07/2009 of the Eastern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting M.Ed. course on the grounds “1) The land is taken on lease from the Trust and is registered on 19/06/2009. As per NCTE regulation "land on lease from Govt./Govt. Institution is only permissible, lease from private party is not permissible. 2) Dr. Bhagabat Panigarhi in its letter has mentioned that he has resigned from the post of Reader from the institution due to his health problem”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Gangadharpur Sikshan Mandir (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 13/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Mohanlal Halder, Secretary and Shri. Alok Kr. Das, Member, Gangadharpur Sikshan Mandir , Howrah, West Bengal presented the case of the appellant institution on 17-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that at the time of submission of application by the institution the land was on lease but within 3 months from the date of issue of ERC letter dt.05/06/2009 the lease deed was converted into sale deed on 06/08/2009. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that Regulation 8(7) of NCTE Regulations, 2007 stipulated that no institution shall be granted recognition under the regulations unless it was in possession of required land either on ownership basis or on lease from Govt./Govt. Agencies only. Since, the land was on lease from a private party at the time of submission of application of the institution, the institution did not fulfill the condition of Regulation 8(7) and therefore, the Council was of the view that the recognition was refused by the ERC to the institution on valid grounds and there was no justification for accepting the appeal. The committee further noted that even the sale deed executed on 06/08/2009 was in the name of the individual and not in the name of institution. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and ERC’s order dated 28-07-09 was confirmed.



1. -, Gangadharpur Sikshan Mandir , Gangadharpur Sikshan Mandir, Vill & PO. Gangadharpur, Distt. Howrah, West Bengal, Howrah - 711302, West Bengal 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Eastern Regional Committee, 15, Neelkanth Nagar, Nayapalli, Bhubaneshwar - 751 012. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of West Bengal, Kolkata.

F.No.89-882/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Institute of Management Education & Technology., Sardhana, Uttar Pradesh dated 18/08/2009 is against the Order No. – F.NRC/F-7/UP-3505/142nd Meeting/2009 dated 09.09.09 of the Northern Regional Committee, rejecting the application for recognition for conducting B.Ed. course on the grounds “Deficiencies communicated in the deficiency letter issued by the office are not removed within stipulated period”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Institute of Management Education & Technology. (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 18/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Mohdzafar, Manager, Institute of Management Education & Technology., Sardhana, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 17-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that no deficiency letter was received by the institution and only the refusal letter dt.09/09/2009 was received by the institution. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that FDR was not submitted by the institution alongwith the application. But, since, the deficiency letter was not received by the institution and normally such deficiencies were being conveyed to the institution allowing 90 days time to remove the deficiencies. The Council was of the view that the case should be remanded back to the NRC for processing the case further and taking appropriate decision after issuing a deficiency letter through registered post/speed post. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal, set aside NRC’s order dated 09.09.09 and remand back the case to NRC for processing the case on merits and passing appropriate order after issuing deficiency letter, through registered post/speed post with acknowledgement. Accordingly, the case was remanded back to NRC.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Institute of Management Education & Technology., Sardhana, Uttar Pradesh to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. -, Institute of Management Education & Technology., Institute of Management Education & Technology, Majeedia Society, Sardhana, Khasara No. 705, 706,707 Village Sardhana, Distt. Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, Sardhana - 250342, Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.

F.No.89- 742/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Lala Amichand Monga Memorial Education Trust, Ambala Dist., Haryana dated 27/07/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/F-7/142/HR-382/2009 dated 16/07/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B. Ed course on the grounds “1) As per affidavit submitted by the Institution, the institution has taken affiliation from Kurukshetra University without the recognition by the NCTE. 2) False affidavit regarding recognition of B.Ed course by NCTE has been submitted. 3) The college is being run without the recognition by NCTE. 4) The Institution has contravened the NCTE Act”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Lala Amichand Monga Memorial Education Trust (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 28/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri S.K. Sharma, Administrator and Dr. N.S. Mavi, Professor, Lala Amichand Monga Memorial Education Trust, Ambala Dist., Haryana presented the case of the appellant institution on 17-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the institution was granted conditional recognition by the NRC on 27/08/2006 and Staff list was submitted by the institution to NRC by January, 2008. It was also submitted that the institution did not furnish any false affidavit to the Kurukshetra University for obtaining affiliation and it only indicated that it was “duly recognized” instead if indicating “conditionally recognized”. It further submitted that institution did not contravene the NCTE Act. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the NRC, vide its order dated 27.8.06 issued conditional recognition to the institution subject to appointment of staff by a duly constituted Selection Committee and inform the Regional Committee. As the requirement was not complied with by the institution, NRC issued a reminder to the institution vide letter dated 3.11.07. Subsequently, the institution, vide its letter dated 4.2.08 furnished the details. Thereafter, the NRC, vide its letter dated 13.05.2009 called for copy of University letter nominating the expert on he selection committee, minutes of the selection committee , the degree certificates and mark-sheet in respect of the appointed teaching staff within 21 days. The said documents were submitted to the NRC by the institution vide its letter dated 9.6.09, which was received in NRC office on 15.06.09. After consideration of the case in the 143rd meeting of NRC held on 27th to 29th June, 2009, recognition was refused to the institution by NRC vide order dated 16-07-2009 against which the present appeal was filed by the institution.

AND WHEREAS the Council further noted that though there was delay in appointing qualified staff, the conditions stipulated in the conditional recognition order were complied with by the institution and, therefore, the Council was of the view that in order to protect the interest of the students already admitted, the appeal should be allowed and the order of NRC should set aside with direction to the NRC to issue recognition to the institution in continuation of the conditional recognition order. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report, and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that the appeal should be accepted. Accordingly, the appeal was accepted, order dated 16.07.09 of the NRC set aside with direction to the NRC to grant recognition to the institution, in continuation to the earlier recognition order dt 27.08.06, within 15 days of issue of this order. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby reverses the Order appealed against.


1. The Chairman, Lala Amichand Monga Memorial Education Trust, VPO-Ugala, Tehsil- Barara,, Ambala Dist. - , Haryana 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Haryana, Chandigarh.

F.No.89-887/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Lala Jagat Naryan Education College, Ferozepur, Punjab dated 17/08/2009 is against the Order No. NRC/NCTE/F-7/PB-686/146 meeting/2009 - dated 13.08.09 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting M.Ed. course on the grounds “The reply to the Show Cause Notice has not been received in stipulated time”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Lala Jagat Naryan Education College (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 18/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Dr. S.S. Dhaliwal, Principal and Shri. Jagjeet Singh, O.S., ,Lala Jagat Naryan Education College, Ferozepur, Punjab presented the case of the appellant institution on 17-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that it was not possible to complete selection process of qualified faculty by duly constituted selection committee with the nominee of the affiliating University within 21 days. It was also submitted that institution had applied to the Panjab University, Chandigarh for their representation in the selection committee but due to the election in the state clearance from the election commission was also involved causing delay and that the institution appointed faculty and sent the details of the same to NRC on 04/09/2009.

AND WHEREAS the council noted that the NRC vide its letter dated 7-7-09 sought certain clarifications within 21 days stating clearly that in case no reply was received within 21 days it would be presumed that the institution had not created the required infrastructure and instructional facilities and accordingly no further processing of the case would be done. The Council however noted that appointment of faculty involving university is not possible within 21 days. The Council therefore was of the view that there was enough justification for accepting the appeal. Since the delay in submission of reply was due to delay by the University and since the institution submitted reply subsequently, the same can be considered by the NRC now. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was enough justification in accepting the appeal and remand back the case to NRC to considered there reply dt 04.09.09 on merit. Accordingly, the appeal was accepted NRC order dt 13.08.09 was set aside and the case was remanded back to NRC for deciding the case on merit after considering the institution, reply dated 04.09.09

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Lala Jagat Naryan Education College, Ferozepur, Punjab to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. -, Lala Jagat Naryan Education College, Lala Jagat Naryan Education College, Village Chak Araian Wala, Mukatasar Road, Jalalabad (W), Tehsil Jalalabad, West, Distt. Ferozepur, Punjab., Ferozepur - -, Punjab 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Punjab, Chandigarh.

F.No.89-845/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Late Ramraoji Dudhe D.Ed. College (Anglo Vernacular Education Society), Yavatmal, Maharashtra dated 11/08/2009 is against the Order No. No.WRC/APW06548/122234(Addl)(B)/116th/2009/58415 dated 29/07/2009 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.Ed. course on the grounds “WRC considered the case of the institution in its 110th Meeting held on November 12-14, 2008, in light of letters F.No. 46-3/2008/NCTE(N&S)/84003 dt. 17 Sep, 2008, F.No. 49-27/2007/NCTE(N&S) dt. 1 October, 2008 and F.No. 49-27/2007/NCTE(N&S) dt. 31 October, 2008 received from Member Secretary, NCTE, New Delhi and negative recommendation received from Maharashtra State Govt. in respect of D.Ed. Course. Keeping in view of the negative recommendation received from the Maharashtra State Government in respect of D.Ed. course and directions received from NCTE Hqs, the WRC decided that no further processing will be done in this case and communication to this effect to be made to this institution. As per decision of WRC the said institution was informed vide letter no. WRC/APW06548/122234(ADDL.)(B)/110th/LIP/2008/52407 dated 07/03/2009 ” . AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Late Ramraoji Dudhe D.Ed. College (Anglo Vernacular Education Society) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 11/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Dr. Sandeep R. Dudhe, President, Late Ramraoji Dudhe D.Ed. College (Anglo Vernacular Education Society), Yavatmal, Maharashtra presented the case of the appellant institution on 17-09-09 . In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted “ 1). Anglo Vernacular Education Society, Darwha Distt., Yavatmal (Maharashtra) submitted proposal for additional intake on dated 20/04/2007. Inspection of the institution was conducted on dated 03/05/2008. NCTE WRC withdrawal recognition on dated 29/07/2009. (2). Institute fulfills all NCTE norms. Institute has its own land, Building and all other infrastructure. We have already kept all these things inform of visiting team. They had seen all things. Now we have every thing as per NCTE norms. And WRC Bhopal had given many permission to start new colleges now as per point 5. We had submitted appeal to NCTE, Delhi and they have given decision in favour of our institution. There was only misunderstanding that's why WRC, Bhopal withdraw the recognition of our institute. Now as per order of NCTE's appeal committee NCTE, Bhopal will send their visiting team to us. Because of having all things we are confident that the WRC, Bhopal will give recognition to our institute. The order copy of NCTE's appeal committee in enclosed herewith”. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that considering inter-alia the recommendations of some of the State Governments, including the State Govt. of

Maharashtra not to further recognize/permit institutions for conducting B.Ed./D.Ed. course, a policy decision was taken and a public notice was issued by the NCTE on 2-10-08 through the newspapers to the effect that application for D.Ed. course for the academic session 2009-10 from the State of Maharashtra would not be considered and all such applications shall be returned to the institution alongwith the processing fee and documents. the Council also noted that the said step taken by the NCTE was a temporary measure for regulating the growth of teacher training institutions, pending state-wise assessment of the manpower requirement of teachers in the country. Accordingly, NCTE Hqrs. had vide its letters dated 1-10-2008 and 31-10-2008 directed all the Regional Directors of NCTE not to recognize/permit the institutions for conducting the specific teacher training course as specified in the public notice issued by NCTE and to return all those applications which were received prior to issuance of public notice dated 2nd Oct, 2008. In view of this, the Council came to the conclusion that WRC was right in refusing the recognition to the institution for conducting D.Ed course by closing the file of the institution. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and WRC’s order dated 29-07-09 was confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The President, Late Ramraoji Dudhe D.Ed. College (Anglo Vernacular Education Society), Near State Bank of India, Darwha, Distt., Yavatmal - 445202, Maharashtra 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai.

F.No.89-878/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Millat Teachers' Training , Bhowara, Bihar dated 18/08/2009 is against the Order No. ERC/7-99.6(I)(1S)17/2009/1113 dated 05/08/2009 of the Eastern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.P.Ed. course on the grounds “1) On the basis of the testimonials submitted in respect of the HOD appointed, the person does not posses experience as per NCTE norms. 2) The institution not submitted downloaded copies of the website showing that all the documents has been uploaded in the website of the institution as per NCTE Rulees & Regulation. 3) As per details submitted by the institution, the built up area of the institution is 26897 sq.ft. The institution has submitted affidavit exclusively for B.P.Ed course the built up area is 10100 sq.ft. The institution not submitted the land & Building area as per the NCTE norms”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Millat Teachers' Training (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 18/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Dr. F. Ahmad, Representative and Dr. S.K. Mishra, Authorised Signatory, Millat Teachers' Training , Bhowara, Bihar presented the case of the appellant institution on 17-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that all the requisite documents in regard to the selection committee were forwarded to the ERC and all the faculty including HOD were qualified as per the NCTE Norms. It was also submitted that the institution was having the requisite land and built up area on ownership basis as per the NCTE norms. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the deficiencies pointed out were removed by the institution vide its letter dated 27-9-09 and as per the papers available on the file the new HOD appointed was qualified. It was also noted that since Letter of Intent prior to recognition (conditional recognition) was supposed to be granted by the Regional committee only after satisfying that the institution concerned fulfilled the prescribed norms regarding availability of adequate infrastructure facility and therefore once the letter of intend prior to recognition was issued, it was not open to the regional committee to raise the issue of inadequacy in infrastructure facility as a ground for rejection of recognition. It was further noted from the minutes from 98th meeting of the ERC held on 15th to 16th July, 2009, decision to accord formal recognition to the institution was taken. Since, the institution removed the deficiency regarding the HOD on 27/07/2009, the new HOD was qualified as per NCTE norms and the institution fulfilled other requirements, the Council was of the view that there was adequate justification to accept the appeal.

AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal and reverse ERC’s order dated 05-08-09 Accordingly, the appeal was accepted and ERC’s order dated 05-08-09 was reversed, with direction to the ERC to grant recognition to the institution immediately, within 15 days of issue of this order. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby reverses the Order appealed against.


1. -, Millat Teachers' Training , Millat Teachers' Training, Village Bhowara, Madhubani, Rahika, PO - Bhowara, Bihar, Bhowara - 847212, Bihar 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Eastern Regional Committee, 15, Neelkanth Nagar, Nayapalli, Bhubaneshwar - 751 012. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Bihar, Patna.

F.No.89-864/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Nalanda M.Ed. College (Gram Nirman Kelavni Mandal), Bharuch, Gujarat dated 12/08/2009 is against the Order No. WRC/APWO7738/32146/323031/123rd /2009 dated 8/08/09 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting M.Ed. course on the grounds “1) As per the approved building plan, the college building should be having two floors whereas the photographs show that the college is housed in a tin shed, only on the ground floor. Hence, infrastructural facilities remain to be inadequate. 2) Work completion certificate is for school purpose”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Nalanda M.Ed. College (Gram Nirman Kelavni Mandal) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 13/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Mansinh H. Mangrola, Secretary and Shri. Jayesh Patel, I/C Principal, Nalanda M.Ed. College (Gram Nirman Kelavni Mandal), Bharuch, Gujarat presented the case of the appellant institution on 17-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the Nalanda M.Ed college was having separate RCC Building on Ground floor and it was not housed in tin shed and that the completion certificate was issued for the Institution and not for the school purpose. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the recognition was refused to the institution by WRC on valid grounds and therefore, there was no justification for accepting the appeal. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and WRC’s order dated 08-08-09 was confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The Secretary, Nalanda M.Ed. College (Gram Nirman Kelavni Mandal), PO. Thava, Ta. Valia, Distt., Bharuch - 393135, Gujarat

2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Gujarat, Gandhinagar.

F.No.89-876/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of R.P. Yadav Mahavidyalaya, Kabir Nagar, (NA) dated 18/08/2009 is against the Order No. NRC/NCTE/UP-2769/139th meeting dated 06/07/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed. course on the grounds “1) CLU submitted is not on prescribed format of State Govt. 2) The building plan submitted is signed by Gram Pradhan without the resolution of Gram Pa.nchayat”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, R.P. Yadav Mahavidyalaya (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 18/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Mahendra Singh, Office Incharge and Shri. K.C. Yadav, Officer, R.P. Yadav Mahavidyalaya, Kabir Nagar, (NA) presented the case of the appellant institution on 17-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that all the deficiencies pointed out were removed by the institution within the stipulated period. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the CLU from the competent authority was submitted by the institution on 30/06/2009 and the same was from the competent authority. Therefore, the Council was of the view that the case should be remanded back to the NRC for reconsideration and further processing of the case for conducting inspection and taking appropriate decision thereafter. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal, set aside NRC’s order dated 06-07-09 and remand back the case to NRC for further processing the case for causing inspection of the institution to ascertain the availability of adequate infrastructural and other facilities as per NCTE norms within one month of issue of this order and thereafter pass appropriate order. Accordingly, the case was remanded back to NRC.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of R.P. Yadav Mahavidyalaya, Kabir Nagar, (NA) to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. -, R.P. Yadav Mahavidyalaya, R.P. Yadav Mahavidyalaya, Mahult Bazar, Sant Kabir nagar, Uttar Pradesh, Kabir Nagar - -, (NA) 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of (NA), .

F.No.89-889/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of S.G.R. Mahavidyalaya, Talgram, Uttar Pradesh dated 10/08/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F-7/UP-3219/140 MEETING/2009/5120 dated 25/06/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed. course on the grounds “1) Resolution of Panchayat regarding approving of building plan is not submitted. 2) CLU is not submitted”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, S.G.R. Mahavidyalaya (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 18/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Ajaiy Pal Singh, Manager, S.G.R. Mahavidyalaya, Talgram, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 17-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that all the requisite documents were submitted to the NRC and resolution regarding approved building plan was not demanded earlier and therefore non submission of resolution of Panchayat could not be a ground for rejection of recognition. It was also submitted that CLU was submitted earlier but CLU from the competent authority in the prescribed performa was obtained by the institution later. AND WHEREAS in the circumstances the Council was of the view that the case should be remanded back to NRC for reconsideration and further processing of case for conducting inspection and passing appropriate orders as the institution submitted a supplementary document from “UP-Sanchalak, Chakabandi, Kannauj, UP with regard to land conversion issue. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal, set aside NRC’s order dated 25-06-09 and remand back the case to NRC causing inspection of the institution to ascertain the availability of adequate infrastructural and other facilities as per NCTE norms within 30 days of issue of this order and thereafter passing appropriate order. Accordingly, the case was remanded back to NRC.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of S.G.R. Mahavidyalaya, Talgram, Uttar Pradesh to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. -, S.G.R. Mahavidyalaya, S.G.R. Mahavidyalaya, Yaduvansh Nagar, Talgram, Distt. Kannauj, Talgram - , Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.

F.No.89-877/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Sardar Patel Samarak Degree College, Ambedkar Nagar, Uttar Pradesh dated 12/08/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F73/UP-1826/141st MEETING/2009/6436 dated 21/07/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed. course on the grounds “The list of appointed faculty as per NCTE Norms has not been submitted till date”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Sardar Patel Samarak Degree College (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 18/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Kamla Prasad Verma, Manager, Sardar Patel Samarak Degree College, Ambedkar Nagar, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 17-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the institution had forwarded the approval letter issued by the affiliating university to the NRC through registered post. AND WHEREAS AND WHEREAS the Council noted that conditional recognition was issued to the institution by the NRC vide its order dated 8-11-06 subject to appointment of qualified staff through duly constituted Selection Committee as per norms of NCTE/State/Govt./Affiliating University before commencement of the course. As no information regarding appointment of qualified staff was received from the institution, the NRC, vide its letter dated 9-7-07 issued a reminder to the institution to furnish requisite papers regarding advertisement notice, consolidated staff list on the prescribed format duly approved by affiliating body, proceedings of the Selection Committee alongwith letter from affiliating university nominating a member in the Selection Committee, bio-data of selected faculty etc. within 21 days. As the requisite paper were not submitted, the NRC refused recognition to the institution vide its order dated 21-07-09. The Council also noted that appellant after following the due procedure laid in the norms, appointed the faculty and the faculty list approved by the University was sent to NRC by registered post on 20.09.08. the Council therefore felt that there was delay in appointing qualified staff, the conditions stipulated in the conditional recognition order were complied with by the institution and, therefore, the Council was of the view that in order to protect the interest of the students already admitted, the appeal should be allowed, the order of NRC set aside with direction to the NRC to issue recognition to the institution in continuation of the conditional recognition order. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report, and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the

appeal set aside the NRC’s order dated 21.07.09 with direction to the NRC to grant recognition to the institution. Accordingly the appeal was accepted and the order of SRC set aside with direction with NRC for grant of recognition to the institution immediately, within 15 days of issue of this order. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby reverses the Order appealed against.


1. -, Sardar Patel Samarak Degree College, Sardar Patel Samarak Degree College, Village & Post Larpur, Ambedkar Nagar, Uttar Pradesh., Ambedkar Nagar - 224186, Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.

.No.89-879/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS The appeal of Shams-Ul-Uloom College of Education, Prakasam, Andhra Pradesh dated 30/07/2009 is against the Order No. F.SRO/NCTE/2009-10/4520 dated 13/07/2009 of the Southern Regional Committee, withdrawing recognition for conducting B.Ed. course on the grounds “1) The newly constructed building have built up area of 10,000 sq.ft. not adequate for B.Ed Course. The building is under construction. 2) The work experience & Art materials are not adequate. 3) The management was accorded recognition on 29/07/2005 in the rented building and not constructed new permanent building with adequate space within 3 years of recognition. Further, the constructed building not adequate to run B.Ed course. 4) the management has shifted without permission from SRC to the building where inadequate built up space available to run B.Ed course. Therefore, the Council decided to call for explanation for non-construction of the building within 3 years and for inadequate built up space for running B.Ed course. 5) The institution has to submit approved faculty list approved by the affiliating body for all existing teacher education course with details of each faculty member in the format prescribed. 6) The Management has to pay the fee of Rs. 40,000/- for causing inspection for shifting and verification of infrastructural and instructional facilities, within 15/05/2009. 7) The management has to explain why recognition of B.Ed Course be not withdrawn for non-fulfillment of condition of shifting college to own premises within 3 years as per NCTE norms”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Shams-Ul-Uloom College of Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 18/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. M. Shamsheer Ali, Correspondent and Shri. S.A.K. Mynoddin, Representative, Shams-Ul-Uloom College of Education, Prakasam, Andhra Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 17-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the institution was having a built up space of 1520 sq.mtrs. for B.Ed course which was adequate as per NCTE norms; it was having sufficient work experience and arts materials as per NCTE norms; the management of the institution constructed a new building and shifted the college to new building within stipulated period of 3 years from the date of recognition; list of faculty approved by the appropriate body was submitted to the SRC and the Vice-Chancellor of Acharaya Nagarjuna University had appointed inspection commission for extension of affiliation for academic year 2009-10 to 2010-11. The commission inspected the institution and recommended to extend the affiliation for 2009-10 to 2010-11. The representative also submitted that the intuition was having all the requisite infrastructure and other facilities as per NCTE norms and this could be verified by conducting another inspection. the Council noted that the institution was

granted recognition by SRC, vide order dated 29-05-05 for running B.ed. course in a rented building for a maximum period of 3 years subject to the usual condition of shifting the college to its own building before expiry of the three years i.e. by 28-5-08. the VT report dated 23-12-08 conducted under Section 17 of the NCTE Act inter-alia indicated that (i) the institution was functioning in rented building; (ii) own building (first floor was under construction; and (iii) all equipments moved to the new premises. In the light of VTR dated 23-12-08, a report of the Expert Committee and certain complaints received regarding the inspection, the SRC issued a show cause notice dated 4-4-09 asking the institution to furnish reply within 21 days. In its reply dated 20-4-09, the institution claimed to have 1520 sq.mts. of built-up area in the new premises. In response to that the SRC sent a letter to the institution on 4-6-09 asking it to submit a DD for Rs. 40,000/- documents in respect of own land and building, approved building plan, building completion certificate etc. by 15-6-09. While the management informed that it would pay Rs. 40,000 for carrying out inspection, it did not furnish the DD and the SRC vide its order dated 13-7-09 withdraw the recognition. AND WHEREAS in the light of submissions made by the institution, the Council was of the view that since the institute has shifted to the new building, it needs to be inspected on payment of Rs 40,000 by the institution, to ascertain whether it conforms to the Norms prescribed by NCTE. As such there was enough justification to accept the appeal set aside the orders of the SRC dt 13.07.09 and remand back the case to SRC for causing inspection of the new building on payment of Rs 40,000/- by the institution AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and remand back the case to SRC for inspection of the new building of the institution, to ascertain availability of necessary infrastructure, instructional and other facilities in accordance with the norms prescribed by the NCTE. Accordingly, the appeal was accepted, SRC order dated 13.07.09 was set aside and the case was remanded to the SRC. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Shams-Ul-Uloom College of Education, Prakasam, Andhra Pradesh to the SRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. -, Shams-Ul-Uloom College of Education, Islamic Educational & Cultural Society, Prakasam Distt. Andhra Pradesh, Prakasam - 523240, Andhra Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, 1st Floor, CSD Building, HMT Post, Jalahali, Bangalore - 560 031. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Sri Venkateshwara College of Education (Sree Venkateshwara Technical Educational Trust), Kanchipuram, Tamilnadu dated 12/08/2009 is against the Order No. F. SRO/NCTE/B.Ed./2009-2010/14920 dated 31/07/2009 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed. course on the grounds “1) The available built up space (Ground Floor and First Floor is 13743 sq. ft.) is not adequate for both existing D.T.Ed and proposed B.Ed course. 2) The second floor of the building is under construction as per VCD and available evidences. The Management has not submitted fresh proof along with notice reply for conducting D.T.Ed course in separate building and completion of second floor of the building. 3) The management has produced the Building Completion Certificate before inspection with three floor and along with reply to notice also submitted Building Completion Certificate with three floors. 4) The building completion certificates are misleading to the SRC for consideration of the proposal”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Sri Venkateshwara College of Education (Sree Venkateshwara Technical Educational Trust) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 18/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. G. Selva Kumar, Secretary, Sri Venkateshwara College of Education (Sree Venkateshwara Technical Educational Trust), Kanchipuram, Tamilnadu presented the case of the appellant institution on 17-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the institution was having built-up area of 20601 sq.ft. exclusively for proposed B.Ed course and that the D.T.Ed course was being run in separate building elsewhere; At the time of inspection construction of building was also complete and only fixing of Doors was being done at that time; and building completion certificate from competent authority was submitted. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that there were inconsistencies in the information provided by the institution at different point of time. While the institution claimed availability of a total built-up area of 20601 Sq.ft. in 3 floors (6867x3), the report of the VT dated 17-4-09 indicated that the building was only 2 storied which implied that only a built-up area of 13734 Sq.ft. was available which was inadequate as per the NCTE norms. The council was therefore of the view that recognition was

refused to the institution by the SRC on valid grounds and therefore there was no grounds to accept the appeal. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and SRC’s order dated 31-07-09 was confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. The Secretary, Sri Venkateshwara College of Education (Sree Venkateshwara Technical Educational Trust), No. 81, Kamaraj Salai, Kanchipuram, Tamil Nadu, Kanchipuram - 631501, Tamilnadu 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, 1st Floor, CSD Building, HMT Post, Jalahali, Bangalore - 560 031. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Tamilnadu, Chennai.

F.No.89-873/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Teerthanker Mahaveer Institute of Mngt. & Tech., Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh dated 17/08/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F73/UP-2103/141st Meeting/2009/8911 dated 27/08/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting M.Ed. course on the grounds “The list appointed faculty as per NCTE Norms has not been submitted till date”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Teerthanker Mahaveer Institute of Mngt. & Tech. (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 18/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Rajesh Verma, Director and Shri. S.C. Sharma, Officer, Teerthanker Mahaveer Institute of Mngt. & Tech., Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 17-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the institution had submitted the list of appointed faculty as per the NCTE norms along with all relevant documents vide its letter dt.18/07/2007 through speed post. The postal receipt was also shown to the Council. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the institution was issued conditional recognition on 14-11-2006 subject to appointment of qualified faculty staff. The list of staff appointed was verified by the Council and it was found to be as per the NCTE norms. Therefore the Council was of the view that there was adequate grounds to accept the appeal. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal and set aside NRC’s order dated 27-08-09 Accordingly, the appeal was accepted and NRC’s order dated 27-08-09 was set aside, with direction to the NRC to grant recognition to the institution immediately, within 15 days of issue of this order.



1. -, Teerthanker Mahaveer Institute of Mngt. & Tech., Teerthanker Mahaveer Institute of Mngt. & Tech., Delhi Road, Moradabad, Moradabad - 244001, Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.

F.No.89-842/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Vidyarthi Snatak Mahavidyalaya, Kushi Nagar, Uttar Pradesh dated 07/08/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F73/UP-2135/141st MEETING/2009/6845 dated 24/07/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting M.Ed. course on the grounds “The list of appointed faculty as per NCTE norms has not been submitted till date”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Vidyarthi Snatak Mahavidyalaya (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 10/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Jagdish Prasad Pandey, Manager, Vidyarthi Snatak Mahavidyalaya, Kushi Nagar, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 17-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the institution had submitted the list of teaching staff in NRC on 12/02/2008. However, no copy of the list was available with the representative AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the letter of intend prior to recognition was issued by the NRC to the institution on 27/06/2007 asking the institution to appoint suitable teaching staff through duly constituted selection committee and furnish the detail to the NRC for issuing formal recognition letter before commencement of academic session. The institution did not fulfill the requirement and therefore the Council was of the view that the recognition was refused by NRC on valid grounds and therefore there was no ground to accept the appeal. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and NRC’s order dated 24-07-09 was confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. -, Vidyarthi Snatak Mahavidyalaya, Vidyarthi Snatak Mahavidyalaya, Jagdishpur, Bardeha, , Post - Jagadishpur, Dharmadani, Kushinagar, Uttar Pradesh., Kushi Nagar - 274149, Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi.


F.No.89-883/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Vijay Memorial College of Education, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh dated 07/08/2009 is against the Order No. NRC/NCTE/F-7/HP-205/143 MEETING/2009/6049 dated 10/07/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting ETT course on the grounds “CLU is not Submitted”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Vijay Memorial College of Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 18/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Gaurav Marwah, Chairman, Vijay Memorial College of Education, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 17-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the Patwari was duly empowered to record the change in the nature of land and he could issue necessary certificate regarding conversion of agriculture land to non agriculture land. The institution had applied for grant of CLU, which was to be issued by Sub-Divisional Officer on the basis of certificate issued by Pawari. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that CLU from the competent authority was not submitted and therefore the Council was of the view that the recognition was refused by the NRC on valid ground and therefore there was no ground of accepting the appeal. The committee also noted that State Govt. of Himachal Pradesh informed that it was not in favour of grant of recognition for anymore E.T.T course in the state and it had given specific reasons for not recommending setting up of more colleges for running ETT course in the state. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and NRC’s order dated 10-07-09 was confirmed. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.


1. -, Vijay Memorial College of Education, Wisdom Education Society, Ner Chowk,Tehsil Sadar Distt. Mandi, Himachal Pradesh., Mandi - -, Himachal Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi.

3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla.

F.No.89- 860/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Aakansha College, Muzaffar Nagar, Uttar Pradesh dated 13/08/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F-7/UP-3370/145 Meeting/2009 dated 09.09.09 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds that “The reply of the institution has not been received in the stipulated time”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Aakansha College (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 13/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. R.P. Singh, Chairman and Shri. Vijay Singh, Administrative Officer, Aakansha College , Muzaffar Nagar, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 17-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the deficiency letter dt.26/02/2009 purported to have been sent was not received by the institution obliviously because the address indicated was incorrect. However a copy of the same was collected by the institution and reply was furnished to the NRC on 14/05/2009 that is within the prescribed time limit and the receipt by the NRC was also shown to the Council. The representative also alleged that the dealing hand namely Mr.Ashok in the NRC had informed him that the deficiency letter was received back in the NRC office due to incorrect address indicated on the letter but he declined to handover the same to him and gave only a photocopy of the deficiency letter. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that reply to the deficiency letter was given by the institution to the NRC on 14/05/2009 i.e. within the stipulated time after obtaining a photocopy from the NRC office and therefore there was adequate justification for accepting the appeal and remanding back the case to NRC for further processing of the case for conducting inspection and thereafter taking appropriate decision on merit. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal, set aside NRC’s order dated 09.09.09 and remand back the case to NRC for processing the case on merits and causing inspection of the institution to ascertain the availability of adequate infrastructural and other facilities as per NCTE norms within one month of issue of this order and thereafter passing appropriate order. Accordingly, the case was remanded back to NRC.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Aakansha College , Muzaffar Nagar, Uttar Pradesh to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Chairman, Aakansha College , Village - Rasulpur, Post Office - Meerapur, District, Muzaffar Nagar - , Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.

F.No.89-866/2009-aPPEAL


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Gandhi Faiz-e-Aam College, Shahjahanpur, Uttar Pradesh dated 13/08/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F73/UP-2026/141th MEETING/2009/5266 dated 18/08/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed. course on the grounds “The list of appointed faculty as per NCTE Norms has not been submitted till date”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Gandhi Faiz-e-Aam College (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 16/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. S.N. Agnihotri, Representative of President, Gandhi Faiz-e-Aam College, Shahjahanpur, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 17-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the institution conducted successfully three session from 2006-07 to 2008-09 after getting permanent affiliation from U.P Govt. and Mahatma Jyotiba Phulle Rohikhand University, Barielly. It was also submitted that no show cause notice was issued by NRC before withdrawal of recognition of the institution. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the institution was given conditional recognition vide NRC’s order dated 14-11-06 subject to the condition of appointment of qualified staff through duly constituted Selection Committee as per the NCTE/State Govt./Affiliating University and formal order of recognition was to be issued separately. As information regarding appointment of staff was not furnished by the institution NRC issued reminder on 6-7-07 to furnish the same within 21 days. the Council also noted that the NRC, vide its order dated 27.8.06 issued conditional recognition to the institution subject to appointment of staff by a duly constituted Selection Committee and intimation to the Regional Committee. As the requirement was not complied with by the institution, NRC issued a reminder to the institution vide letter dated 3.11.07. Subsequently, the institution, vide its letter dated 4.2.08 furnished the details. Thereafter, the NRC, vide its letter dated 13.05.2009 called for copy of University letter nominating the expert on he selection committee, minutes of the selection committee , the degree certificates and mark-sheet in respect of the appointed teaching staff within 21 days. The said documents were submitted to the NRC by the institution vide its letter dated 9.6.09, which was received in NRC office on 15.06.09. After consideration of the case in the 143rd meeting of NRC held on 27th to 29th June, 2009, recognition was refused to the institution by NRC vide order dated 18-08-2009. against which the present appeal was filed by the institution. the Council therefore felt that there was delay in appointing qualified staff, the conditions stipulated in the conditional recognition order were complied with by the institution and, therefore, the Council was of the view that in order to protect the

interest of the students already admitted, the appeal should be allowed, the order of NRC set aside with direction to the NRC to issue recognition to the institution in continuation of the conditional recognition order. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report, and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that the appeal should be accepted. Accordingly, the appeal was accepted, order dated 18-08-09 of the NRC reversed with direction to the NRC to grant recognition to the institution in continuation to conditional recognition order dt 14.11.06 so as to restore the recognition of the institution. This needs to be done within 15 days of issue of this order. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby reverses the Order appealed against.


1. -, Gandhi Faiz-e-Aam College, Representative Mananging Committee, Shahjahanpur, Uttar Pradesh, Shahjahanpur - 242001, Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.

F.No.89- 884/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Shine-Abdur Razzaque Ansari Institute of Health Education & Research Centre, Ranchi, Jharkhand dated 17/08/2009 is against the Order No. ERC/7-99.6(1).10/2009/1139(1) dated 06/08/2009 of the Eastern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B. Ed course on the grounds “Built up area cannot be determined. The institution has not submitted the Building Completion Certificate”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Shine-Abdur Razzaque Ansari Institute of Health Education & Research Centre (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 18/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. Arif Ahmed Ansari, Secretary and Salamul Ansari, Co-ordinator, Shine-Abdur Razzaque Ansari Institute of Health Education & Research Centre, Ranchi, Jharkhand presented the case of the appellant institution on 17-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the certificate from the competent authority that is State Govt. Jr.Engineer, Architect concerned, Secretary of the institution had been submitted AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the institution was issued Letter of Intent prior to recognition conditional recognition on 30-6-09. As conditional recognition is issued by the Regional Committee after satisfying that the institution fulfilled all conditions relating to infrastructural and instructional facilities required for proper functioning of the institution, and therefore, once LOI prior to recognition was issued it was untenable to raise the issues of inadequate infrastructure as a ground for refusal of recognition. The Council was, therefore of the view that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and remand back the case to the ERC for issue of recognition under clause 7(11) of the NCTE regulations 2007 as the institution submitted details of appointment of faculty. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal, set aside ERC’s order dated 06-08-09 with direction to the ERC to issue the recognition order after verifying appointment of qualified staff within 15 days of issue of this order. Accordingly the appeal was allowed, ERC’s order dt. 06.08.09 reversed for issue of recognition order under clause 7(11) of the NCTE Regulations 2007, as the institution has already submitted the detailed staff profile.



1. The Secretary, Shine-Abdur Razzaque Ansari Institute of Health Education & Research Centre, Village & PO - Irba, District - , Ranchi - 835238, Jharkhand 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Eastern Regional Committee, 15, Neelkanth Nagar, Nayapalli, Bhubaneshwar - 751 012. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi.

F.No.89-895/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Shri Guru Ram Rai (PG) College, Dehradun, Uttaranchal dated 18/08/2009 is against the Order dated 15.09.09 of the Northern Regional Committee, withdrawing recognition for conducting B.Ed. course on the grounds “1) On comparing the CD submitted by the institution in reply to the show cause notice and the CD submitted by the VT members, the building seems to be different. 2) The information as required per NCTE regulation, 2007 is not available on the college website”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Shri Guru Ram Rai (PG) College (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 18/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. V.A. Boman, Principal, Dr. S.P. Singh, Sr. Lecturer, Shri Guru Ram Rai (PG) College, Dehradun, Uttaranchal presented the case of the appellant institution on 17-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the building was absolutely the same and some extra facilities like playgrounds, indoor games, canteen, etc were shared by the faculty and that information as required as per NCTE Regulations was available on college website. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the institution was running B.Ed since 2006-07 and inspection was carried out u/s17 on 13.06.09 and the report was positive. The Council was therefore of view that there was adequate grounds for accepting the appeal. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal and set aside NRC’s order dated 15.09.09 Accordingly, the appeal was accepted and NRC’s order dated 15.09.09 was reversed, with direction to the NRC to grant recognition to the institution within 15 days of issue of this order NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby reverses the Order appealed against.


1. -, Shri Guru Ram Rai (PG) College, Shri Guru Ram Rai (PG) College, Pathribagh, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, Dehradun - , Uttaranchal


F.No.89- 894/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Shri Guru Ram Rai (PG) College , Dehradun, Uttaranchal dated 18/08/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/ NCTE/F73/UP-119/142nd Meeting/2009/7598 dated 04/08/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting M.Ed course on the grounds “The minutes of the selection committee and University letter regarding nomination of experts on the selection committee of this institution have not been submitted in stipulated time”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Shri Guru Ram Rai (PG) College (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 18/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. V.A. Rourai, Principal and Dr. S.P. Singh, Sr. Lecturer, Shri Guru Ram Rai (PG) College , Dehradun, Uttaranchal presented the case of the appellant institution on 17-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the minutes of the selection committee and university letter regarding nomination of experts of selection committee was dispatched on 31/03/2009 vide letter no. M.ED 2008/09/505 to the NRC. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal and that it should be accepted. Accordingly, the appeal was accepted and NRC’s order dated 04.08.2009 was reversed, with direction to NRC issue the order of recognition within 15 days. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby reverses the Order appealed against.


1. The Principal, Shri Guru Ram Rai (PG) College , Dehrakhas, Pathribagh, District, Dehradun - , Uttaranchal 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttaranchal, Dehradun.

F.No.89- 885/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Sri Sitheswarar College of Education (Shree Sitheswarar Educational Trust), Vellore, Tamilnadu dated 10/08/2009 is against the Order No. F.SRO/NCTE/B.Ed/2009-2010/14899 dated 30/07/2009 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B. Ed course on the grounds “1) The management is running Polytechnic college in the same building and the same land and building is proposed for existing D.T.Ed and proposed B.Ed course. As per regulation para 8(7) exclusive own registered land is required for B.Ed Course. 2) The books in the library are not adequate for existing D.T.Ed and proposed B.Ed course. The reference books, journals, educational encyclopedia are not available in the library. 3) The equipment and materials in psychology, E.T, And Science Labs, are not adequate for existing D.T.Ed and proposed B.Ed course. 4) The library and labs are not properly maintained for existing D.T.Ed course and proposed B.Ed course. 5) The sports materials are not adequate for existing and proposed course. 6) The available built up space 18,000 sq.ft. is not adequate for polytechnic college, D.T.Ed and Proposed B.Ed course. 7) Exclusive infrastructural and instructional facilities are not available for teaching Education courses”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Sri Sitheswarar College of Education (Shree Sitheswarar Educational Trust) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 18/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri. M.C. Hari Babu, A.O., and Shri. Abraham, Assistant, Sri Sitheswarar College of Education (Shree Sitheswarar Educational Trust), Vellore, Tamilnadu presented the case of the appellant institution on 17-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the appellant has complied with all the requirements. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that report of the V.T dt.11/07/2009 is totally negative Therefore, the Council of the view that there was no justification to accept the appeal. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and SRC’s order dated 30-07-09 was confirmed.



1. The Chairman, Sri Sitheswarar College of Education (Shree Sitheswarar Educational Trust), Kalavai Road, Poongodu, Arcot, , Vellore - 632503, Tamilnadu 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, 1st Floor, CSD Building, HMT Post, Jalahali, Bangalore - 560 031. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Tamilnadu, Chennai.

F.No.89- 868 - 872/2009-Appeal NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION


O R D E R

WHEREAS Teerthanker Mahaveer University Moradabad, U.P. a Private University established by State Legislation applied for starting B.Ed course, one each with a basic unit of 100 seats in the following institutions:- (i) Teerthanker Mahaveer University's College of Education

Village - Hashampur Gopal, PO - Pakbara, Moradabad - Uttar Pradesh (File no. 89 – 869/2009 – Appeal)

(ii) Teerthanker Mahaveer University's College of Education

Village - Bakainia, SEZ Road, Moradabad - Uttar Pradesh (File no. 89 – 868/2009 – Appeal)

(iii) College of Education Teerthanker Mahaveer University

Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Bagarpur, Delhi Road, Moradabad Moradabad - - Uttar Pradesh (File no. 89 – 870/2009 – Appeal)

(iv) College of Education Teerthanker Mahaveer University

Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Plot No. 286 A&B Min, Village Bagarpur, Delhi Road, District Moradabad, Moradabad - - Uttar Pradesh (File no. 89 – 871/2009 – Appeal)

(v) Girls College of Education

Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Plot No. 100, Village Bakainia, SEZ Road, District Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh (File no. 89 – 872/2009 – Appeal)

AND WHEREAS Regional Director, NRC, vide its letter dated 09/07/2009 sought clarification from NCTE Hqrs, whether Private University can start constituent colleges in its campus as the University has proposed establishment of above five institution as constituent colleges of the University. NCTE Hqrs, vide its letter dated 13/07/2009 made following observations, in the context of the clarification sought by the Regional Committee.

(i) The university claims that it has powers to establish ‘Constituent Colleges’ although no definition of the Constituent College has been given in the Act. Section 7(b) of the Act empowers the university to promote only ‘in-campus center’. However, the extract submitted by the university from its ‘First Statutes & Ordinance of the university’ indicates under section 7(iv) that the university can establish a Department or School in and out of the University Campus, which prima-facie is in contradiction to the provisions of the Act.

(ii) The University Grants Commission (Establishment and Maintenance of standards in Private Universities), Regulations, 2003, issued by the UGC provides that ‘off-campus center’ by a private university established under a State Act, can be allowed only in exceptional circumstances and that too after five years of existence of the university and with the approval of the UGC. Since the university was established in the year 2008 and no such approval has been given by the UGC, the university is not entitled to establish off-campus ‘Constituent College’.

(iii) The proposal of the university to establish one ‘in-campus’ teacher training institution and four ‘off-campus centers’ needs to be seen in the above context. The NRC may therefore consider the case of the university for establishment of only one teacher training institution, which is within the campus of the university, in case they do not have an existing teacher education institution in the campus.

(iv) In so far as the application for other four teacher training institutions proposed outside the campus are concerned, the centers will have to get themselves affiliated with some other university in the state of UP having the territorial jurisdiction over the place, where the institutions are proposed as independent institutions to be run by management(s) other than that of the University in question.

AND WHEREAS the NRC considered the matter in its 146th Meeting held on 05th to 7th, August 2009 and decided to close the applications of T.M. University in respect of all the five proposed institutions on the following grounds:

1) FDRs of Rs. 5 lacs and Rs. 3 Lacs are not submitted. 2) The land is not in the name of Institution. 3) CLU is not submitted. 4) Letter regarding approval of building plan from Gram Pradhan is not

submitted. 5) In the application the affiliating university mentioned as Teerthanker

Mahaveer University Moradabad but in the representation dt.06/08/2009 the affiliating university mentioned is M.J.P. Ruhelkhad University, Bareilly. This application in the context of representation cannot be accepted.

AND WHEREAS Shri. Rajesh Verma, Director and Prof. R.K. Mittal, Vice Chancellor, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh presented

the case of the above mentioned appellant institutions on 17-09-09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the endowment fund of Rs.5 lakh & Rs.3 lakh per unit of approved intake had to be maintained in the form of fixed deposit and therefore the question of submission of FDRs of Rs.5 lakh & Rs.3 lakh would arise only after the intake is approved by NCTE ; the university was in possession of adequate land for the proposed college on ownership basis ; CLU was available ; building plan of the institution was duly approved by Gram Pradhan and the same was submitted to the NCTE along with application.

AND WHEREAS the Council noted that no deficiency letter was issued to the institution by the NRC in this case although normally deficiency letter is issued in other cases. It was also noted that the question of obtaining affiliation from the examining body would come after recognition is granted to an institution by NCTE. In the present case the university was itself an affiliating body for one of the proposed institution, falling within the campus of the institution whereas for other proposed institution cannot be recognized as constituted college of the University. Nevertheless, the University, as a society, can establish teacher training institution like any other society and may take affiliation from other university, having territorial justification at the place. The Teerthanker Mahaveer University in the context of proposed affiliation of its other four proposed teacher training institution from Rohilkhand University, Bareilly. The Council, was therefore, of the view that the case be remanded back to the NRC for processing the case as per usual practice and procedure.

AND WHEREAS the Council was therefore of the view that the grounds on which the applications of the teacher training institutions proposed by the university has been rejected are in a way the letter of deficiency, on which the representative the university has given satisfactory reply. They hold the land on ownership basis, CLU has been submitted, Building plan is affirmed by Gram Pradhan/Panchayat. The institution may be asked to deposit FDR & Rs 5 lakhs and 3 lakhs in respect of each institution. As such, the Council felt that an inspection of the proposed institution be conducted by NRC within one month, to ascertain the availability of infrastructure and instructional facilities available in each of the five proposed institutions and take further necessary action thereafter.

AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal, set aside NRC’s order dated 17-08-09 and remand back the case to NRC for processing the case on merits and thereafter passing appropriate order. Accordingly, the cases in respect of each of the five teacher training institutions proposed by the University was remanded back to NRC.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Teerthanker Mahaveer University's College of Education, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Vice Chancellor, Teerthanker Mahaveer University's College of Education, Village - Hashampur Gopal, PO - Pakbara,, Moradabad - , Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Aster College of Education, Noida, Uttar Pradesh dated 21/08/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F-73/UP-2604/141st Meeting/2009/6810 dated 24/07/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, Refusing recognition for conducting M.Ed. course on the grounds “The list of appointed Faculty as per NCTE norms has not been submitted till date”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Aster College of Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 21/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri H.S. Sharma. Chairman & Shri V.K. Sharma, Aster College of Education, Noida, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 18.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that even though Choudhary Charan Singh University was requested on 12.05. 08 to nominate experts, they nominated only on 1st January, 2009 and interviews could not be conducted before 1st March, 2009 and thereafter the proceedings were sent to C.C.S university. The appellant also stated that in the absence of approval of faculty by the competent authority it was not possible for them to appoint the staff and submit the details to NRC. In the course of personal presentation it was submitted that the approval of the University was received on 14.09.09. The appellant admitted that during all this period they have not kept the NRC informed about the developments and also did not endorse a copy of a list of the selected staff, seeking extension of time to submit the approved list. AND WHEREAS the Council taking into account all aspects of the matter into consideration, particularly the steps taken by the appellant to recruit the faculty, has come to the conclusion that the appeal deserved to be accepted and the order of the NRC dt 24.07.09 reversed. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal and set aside NRC’s order dated 24.07.2009. Accordingly, the appeal was accepted and NRC’s order dated 24.07.2009 was set aside, with direction to NRC to issue the recognition order within 15 days of issue of this order.



1. -, Aster College of Education, Smt. Angoori Devi Educational & Cultural Society, J-1, Silver Oak Estate, Delta - II, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, Noida - , Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.

F.No.89 - 919/2009 - Appeal


0810/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Bhagwat Dutt Balika Mahavidyalaya, Partapgarh, Uttar Pradesh dated 20/08/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F-7/UP-3372/141st Meeting/2009/4703 dated 22/06/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.P.Ed. course on the grounds “1) CLU is not in proper format of State Government. 2) Building Plan in signed but not approved. Also the resolution of Gram Panchayat is not submitted”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Bhagwat Dutt Balika Mahavidyalaya (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 21/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Prakash Chandra Mishra, Shri Prasha Kumar Shukla, Bhagwat Dutt Balika Mahavidyalaya, Partapgarh, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 18.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the land use certificate under the provisions of section 143 of UPZA & LR Act has been issued on 15.02.09 and building plan was got duly verified and signed by the concerned Gram Pradhan and Tehsildar. The appellant enclosed both the documents to the appeal. AND WHEREAS in view of the position stated above the Council came to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be accepted and the case remanded to NRC for causing inspection and taking further necessary action thereafter. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal, set aside NRCs order dt 22.06.09 and to remand the case to NRC for causing inspection of the institution to ascertain the availability of infrastructure and instructional facilities as per NCTE norms within 30 days of issue of this order and thereafter pass appropriate order. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Bhagwat Dutt Balika Mahavidyalaya, Partapgarh, Uttar Pradesh to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Manager, Bhagwat Dutt Balika Mahavidyalaya, Ajhara Lalganj, District, Partapgarh - , Uttar Pradesh


F.No.89-940/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Bhilai Mahila Mahavidyalaya, Bhilai, Chhatisgarh dated 04/06/2009 is against the Order No. WRC/APW04300/723108/117th/2009/54758 dated 29/04/2009 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed(Girls) course on the grounds “The institution failed to submit reply within the stipulated time given in the order no. F.WRC/NCTE/2006-2007/723108/C-25677-25379 dated 01/01/2008”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Bhilai Mahila Mahavidyalaya (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 09/06/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Zehra Hasan, Principal, Bhilai Mahila Mahavidyalaya, Bhilai, Chhatisgarh presented the case of the appellant institution on 18.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the delay in submission of the details to WRC in pursuance of the conditional recognition granted on 1st January, 2008 was neither deliberate nor willful and it was due to certain other circumstances. In explanation the appellant stated that in the first instance he tried to secure the annexures as mentioned in the WRCs letter dt 01.01.09, which were not provided and could not be located even on the website. However the appellant commenced the recruitment process earlier and in pursuance of offers issued to 8 teacher five of them joined during the period 16.11.07 to 19.06.08 and all of them are continuing on the rolls of the college. The appellant submitted that through his letter dt. 02.04.2009 he had furnished all the requisite information to the WRC before the meeting of the held on 20-21.04.2009. He also stated that Pt. Ravi Shankar Shukla University, Raipur granted affiliation on 10.06.08 for the academic session 2008-09. In a letter submitted on 18.09.09 by the appellant, it has been stated that the college has advertised for filling of 1 post of HOD and 2 posts of lectures. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the appellant’s letter dt. 02.04.09 was infact received by WRC on 11.04.09, since appellant institution has taken all necessary steps for appointment of staff and duly informed the WRC, the Council has come to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be accepted and the order of WRC dt 29.04.09 reversed. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal and set aside WRC’s order dated 29.04.09. Accordingly, the appeal was accepted and WRC’s order dated 29.04.09 was set aside, with direction to WRC to restore the recognition of institution within 15 days of issue of this order .



1. The Principal, Bhilai Mahila Mahavidyalaya, Hospital Sector, Bhilai Nagar, District, Bhilai - 490009, Chhatisgarh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Chhatisgarh, Raipur.

F.No.89-921/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Dr. S.P. Singh College of Teacher Education, Champaran, Bihar dated 19/08/2009 is against the Order No. ERC-7-99.6(ii).6/2009/1112 dated 05/08/2009 of the Eastern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed. course on the grounds “Requisite no. of teaching staff not appointed as per the NCTE norms. The Principal is above 65 years age. His experience Certificate is not clear as it is in Nepali Language. In case a retired person has been appointed on contractual basis, information regarding his status at the time of retirement not given. In this regard, the institution stated that the Principal has been appointed on contractual basis for till he completes his 65 years i.e. on 04/01/2010 which is not as per NCTE Regulation”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Dr. S.P. Singh College of Teacher Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 21/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Prakash Arun Executive Director, Dr. S.P. Singh College of Teacher Education, Champaran, Bihar presented the case of the appellant institution on 18.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that they have appointed requisite no. of teaching staff which includes a Principal and 8 lecturers and the Principal will complete the age of 65 years on 04.01.2010 According to the details furnished all the staff members joined on 19.05.09. AND WHEREAS according to the norms and standards for B.Ed course, in the event of non-availability of suitable candidate for appointment as Principal/Head, it would be permissible to appoint retired Professor/ Head in education on contract basis for a period not exceeding one year at the time till the candidate completes 65 years of age. The appellant has submitted the Principals experience certificate in English. the Council after taking into account all aspects of the matter into consideration has came to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be accepted and the order of the ERC dt 05.08.09 reversed. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal and set aside ERC’s order dated 05.08.09 Accordingly, the appeal was accepted and ERC’s order dated 05.08.09 was set aside, with direction to ERC to restore the recognition of the institution within 15 days of issue of this order.



1. -, Dr. S.P. Singh College of Teacher Education, Vill Laxmipur, PO Shankar Saraiya City- Motihari, Distt. East Champaran, Bihar, Champaran - -, Bihar 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Eastern Regional Committee, 15, Neelkanth Nagar, Nayapalli, Bhubaneshwar - 751 012. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Bihar, Patna.

F.No.89-901/2009/NCTE/Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Guru Nanak Khalsa College, Yamuna Nagar, Haryana dated 19/08/2009 is against the Order No. F. NRC/NCTE/F-7/HR-440/142/2009/6211 dated 16/07/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, Refusing recognition for conducting C. P. Ed. course on the grounds “Building Plan approved by competent authority is not submitted”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Guru Nanak Khalsa College (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 19/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Rajbir Singh Advisor & Shri Amrita Pritam Lecturer, Guru Nanak Khalsa College, Yamuna Nagar, Haryana presented the case of the appellant institution on 18.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the application of the institution is complete in all aspects and the Municipal Committee had approved all the building plans and issued a common letter mentioning that the college is situated in Urban area. The appellant also submitted that the institution has a total area of 14 acres of which 8 acres are meant for C.P.Ed course. AND WHEREAS the Council after taking into account all aspects of the matter into consideration has come to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be accepted and the case remanded to NRC for causing an inspection and taking appropriate action thereafter AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate grounds to accept the appeal and remand back the case for inspection of the institution to ascertain availability of necessary infrastructure, instructional and other facilities in accordance with the norms prescribed by the NCTE within 30 days of issue of this order. Accordingly, the appeal was accepted, NRC order dated 16.07.09 was set aside and the case was remanded to the NRC for inspection of the Institution.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Guru Nanak Khalsa College, Yamuna Nagar, Haryana to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Principal , Guru Nanak Khalsa College, Near Fountain Chowk, Yamuna Nagar, Haryana., Yamuna Nagar - 135001, Haryana 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Haryana, Chandigarh.

F.No.89-897/2009/Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Harish Chandra Vidyalaya, Ghazipur, Uttar Pradesh dated 19/08/2009 is against the Order No. F. NRC/NCTE/F-7/UP/-3390/141 Meeting /2009/5098 dated 25/07/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed. course on the grounds “Deficiencies communicated in the deficiency letter issued by the office are not removed within stipulated period”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Harish Chandra Vidyalaya (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 19/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Ramashray, Sub- Secretary, Harish Chandra Vidyalaya, Ghazipur, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 18.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that he has not received the letter dt 06.02.09 from the NRC pointing out deficiencies in his application and he did not received any reply from the NRC for two letters sent by Registered post. He has also pointed out in the rejection order the district in which the appellant institution is situated has been shown incorrectly as Ghaziabad instead of Ghazipur. AND WHEREAS on the perusal of the records of the NRC the Council noted that the deficiency letter dt. 06.02.09 was correctly sent by registered post/ speed post to the same address given in the application. However, as the appellant claimed that he did not receive any reply to his various letters written to NRC. The Council is of the view that the appellant may again send all his earlier letter to the NRC with a request to make a copy of the deficiency letter dt . 02.06.09 available to them. On receipts of such a request the NRC may provide a copy of their deficiency letter and grant appropriate time for furnishing a reply. To this extent the appeal deserves to be accepted on the condition that further necessary action as suggested herein is taken. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate grounds to accept the appeal, set aside NRCs order dt 25.07.09 and remand back the case to NRC for providing a copy of the deficiency letter giving mandatory period for submission of the reply and thereafter processing of the case may be carried out on merit.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Harish Chandra Vidyalaya, Ghazipur, Uttar Pradesh to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Secretary, Harish Chandra Vidyalaya, Khasrando-135, P.O. Maudhiya, Tehsil Jakhaniya, Ghazipur - -, Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.

F.No.89-908/2009/Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS The appeal of Indian Institute of Progressive Studies and Development, Haridwar, Uttaranchal dated 17/08/2009 is against the Order No. NRC/NCTE/F-3/UR-05/2009/7973-79 dated 13/08/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, withdrawal recognition for conducting B.Ed. Course on the grounds “1) The Faculty is not appointed through duly constituted selection committee as per NCTE norms. 2) There is no teacher to teach Methods of Teaching English, Economics, etc. 3) More journals and encyclopedia are to be purchased. 4) CLU is not submitted. 5) Multipurpose Hall is small. 6) The built up area is not as per NCTE norms for B.Ed and B.P.Ed. 7) Language learning facilities are not available. 8) The information regarding objectives, equipments available in different laboratories, the B.Ed curriculum, minimum percentage of marks required for admission in Management quota, etc. are not given. Thus, the information as required per NCTE Regulation, 2007 is not available on college website. 9) The number of titles in the library is not as per NCTE norms. 10) The list of students admitted under Management quota has not been given”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Indian Institue of Progressive Studies and Development, (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 20/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Smt Kuldeep Kaushik Chairman & Shri Kusum Lata Agrawal, Principal, Indian Institute of Progressive Studies and Development, Haridwar, Uttaranchal presented the case of the appellant institution on 18.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the faculty was appointed by duly constituted selection committee. In the meantime out of the selected teaching staff some of the teachers were appointed in the State service now the university has re advertised for filling up of vacant post; The institution has teachers for inspecting education in the required methodology and it has 16 periodic journals; CLU was submitted to the NRC already and it was issued by Collector Haridwar; The size of the Multipurpose hall was 12000 sq. ft. and it has 2994 sq. mts. of builtup area; Library has 1017 titles and 7086 books; The institution had forwarded the list of admitted candidate approved by the University merit wise and category wise to NCTE. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the teaching faculty was appointed through University since 2004 and it was qualified as per norms. It further noted that CLU was issued by competent authority and the institution was having adequate land and builtup area as per norms; Library and language lab was adequately

equipped. In view of the above the Council came to the conclusion that there was enough justification in accepting the appeal. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal and that it should be accepted. Accordingly, the appeal was accepted and NRC’s order dated 13.08.2009 was reversed, with direction to NRC to issue the recognition, order within 15 days of issue of this order. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby reverses the Order appealed against.


1. The Chairman, Indian Institue of Progressive Studies and Development, , Landhora Railway Station, Landhora, Roorkee,, Haridwar - -, Uttaranchal 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttaranchal, Dehradun.

F.No.89-913/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Institute of Educational Research and Studies Primary Teachers' Training Institute., Kolkata, West Bengal dated 18/08/2009 is against the Order No. ERC/7-99.4(I).3/2009/940(1) dated 31/07/2009 of the Eastern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.Ed. course on the grounds “1) The institution has not submitted the list of teaching/non teaching staff as per the prescribed formats of Affidavits. It has also been noted that as per the documents submitted by the institution regarding staff the teaching staff do not possess qualifications as per the NCTE norms. 2) Downloaded copies of website as per letter dated 05/06/2009 not submitted by the institution”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Institute of Educational Research and Studies Primary Teachers' Training Institute. (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 20/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Kamruz Zaman, Authorised, Institute of Educational Research and Studies Primary Teachers' Training Institute., Kolkata, West Bengal presented the case of the appellant institution on 18.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that on the basis of recommendation of duly constituted selection committee, he institution has appointed teaching and non-teaching staff and affidavits with attested testimonials and certificates and downloaded copies of the supporting documents have been submitted to ERC. The Council was shown the staff list which indicates that the staff was qualified. AND WHEREAS in view of the position stated above the Council came to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be accepted and the order of the ERC dt. 31.07.09 reversed AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal and that it should be accepted. Accordingly, the appeal was accepted and ERC’s order dated 31.07.2009 was reversed, with direction to RD,ERC to issue the recognition order, within 15 days of issue of this order.



1. -, Institute of Educational Research and Studies Primary Teachers' Training Institute., 4/1, Swinhoe Street, Kolkata , Kolkata - 700019, West Bengal 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Eastern Regional Committee, 15, Neelkanth Nagar, Nayapalli, Bhubaneshwar - 751 012. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of West Bengal, Kolkata.

F.No.89-906/NCTE/Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Institute of Progressive Studies and Development., Haridwar, Uttaranchal dated 20/08/2009 is against the Order No. F. NRC/NCTE/F-7/UR-192/144 TH Meeting /2009/7972 dated 13/08/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting M.Ed. Course course on the grounds “1) CLU is not submitted 2) Building plan is not approved by competent authority. 3) Plot number/Kharsa number is not mentioned on the building plan. 4) Land is not in the name of institution”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Institute of Progressive Studies and Development. (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 20/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri R. Kathruel Chairman, Shri S. Gopala Krishnan, Institute of Progressive Studies and Development., Haridwar, Uttaranchal presented the case of the appellant institution on 18.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the land has been leased by the State Govt.; building plan has been approved by the Gram Panchayat Khasra No. has been indicated in the building plan and land has not been allotted to Manav Vikas Charitable Manch which is the managing society of the appellant institution. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the institution has sent a letter to NRC on 23.05.09 giving the information required by them well before the meeting of the NRC held on 12-14. 07.09, but this was not considered. Since the institution has given detailed reply the Council therefore has come to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be accepted and the case be remanded to NRC for causing an inspection and taking further action thereafter. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal, set aside NRC’s order dated 13.08.09 and remand back the case to NRC with the direction that the institution should be inspected to ascertain availability of necessary infrastructure, instructional and other facilities in accordance with the norms prescribed by the NCTE within 30 days of issue of this order. Accordingly, the Council remanded back the case to the NRC for inspection of the Institution immediately and thereafter, to issue order accordingly.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Institute of Progressive Studies and Development., Haridwar, Uttaranchal to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Chairman, Institute of Progressive Studies and Development., Landhora Railway Station, Landhora, Roorkee, , Haridwar - -, Uttaranchal 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttaranchal, Dehradun.

F.No.89-900/NCTE/2009/Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of J. K. Pre-School Teacher Education. (Trust) Vedasanthur Rajathiammal and Rengasamy Chettiar., Dindigul, Tamilnadu dated 10/08/2009 is against the Order No. SRO/NCTE/C.Ed/2009-2010/14969 dated 04/08/2009 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting C. Ed. Course course on the grounds “1) The Management has to submit Land documents of the building/location for having own land in the name of the institution as per regulations of NCTE, 2007. 2) Building Plan of the building duly approved by the Government Authority to be submitted for proposed C.Ed course. 3) The details of built up space available for existing D.T.Ed. and other teacher education courses and proposed C.Ed course to be submitted. 4) The infrastructural and instructional facilities to be provided as per enclosed norms and standards of C.Ed course. 5) Building Completion Certificate from PWD Engineer in the prescribed format to be submitted. 6) Land usage Certificate from the concerned Government Authorities stating that the land is exclusively permitted/sanctioned for Teacher Education purposes only should be submitted. 7) Encumbrance certificate from the competent Government should be submitted. 8) Fixed Deposit Receipt of Rs. 5 lakhs towards Endowment Fund and Rs. 3 lakhs towards Reserve Fund kept in Nationalized Bank for a period of 5 years should be submitted. 9) Certificate of Registration/Bye-Law of the society/trust should be submitted”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, J. K. Pre-School Teacher Education. (Trust) Vedasanthur Rajathiammal and Rengasamy Chettiar. (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 10/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri R. Kathurvel, Chairman & Shri S. Gopala Krishnan Assistant, J. K. Pre-School Teacher Education. (Trust) Vedasanthur Rajathiammal and Rengasamy Chettiar., Dindigul, Tamilnadu presented the case of the appellant institution on 18.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the impugned order had been passed without application of mind and the Regional Committee pre-judged the issue before following the guidelines issued by the NCTE Act. The application was submitted as early as on 19/12/2005 and it was delayed till March, 2009 and only after that deficiency notice was sent on 08/04/2009. The Appellant had submitted all the documents mentioned in the compliance letter dated 24/04/2009 addressed to the Regional Committee on 17/07/2009. It was also submitted that though the cut-off date for granting recognition is 31/07/2009, the Regional Committee had deliberately delayed in processing the application for recognition and had hurriedly conducted the inspection on 09/07/2009 and issued a name same notice dated 17/07/2009 which was received by the Appellant on 22/07/2009 and the Appellant sent a compliance letter dated 23/07/2009 itself. The

Regional Committee in its 179th Meeting had taken a decision to reject the application for recognition and thus Regional Committee has pre-judged the grant of recognition without giving any reasonable opportunity to the Appellant. It is seen from the records that the Regional Committee has hurriedly taken a decision to pass an order before the cut off date and thus give a go by to the rules and regulations as contemplated under Section 14(3)(b) of the compliance but in this case, the letter dated 17/07/2009 which was belatedly sent to the Appellant which was received by the Appellant 22/07/2009 to give a reply. But however, the Appellant gave a reply on 23/07/2009 on the date in which the NCTE had convened the 179th Meeting and taken a decision to reject the application for recognition, thus violating all norms prescribed under the NCTE Act. AND WHEREAS after taking into account all aspects of the matter into consideration has come to the conclusion that the case deserves to be remanded to SRC who may re-examine the matter duly considering the reply of the institution dt 23.07.09 and take an appropriate decision thereafter. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and remand the case to SRC for re-examination of the matter duly considering the reply of the institution dt 23.07.09 and take an appropriate decision thereafter within 15 days of issue of this order. Accordingly, the case was remanded to SRC. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of J. K. Pre-School Teacher Education. (Trust) Vedasanthur Rajathiammal and Rengasamy Chettiar., Dindigul, Tamilnadu to the SRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Chairman, J. K. Pre-School Teacher Education. (Trust) Vedasanthur Rajathiammal and Rengasamy Chettiar., No. 4/360, J.K. Nagar. Dindigul-624001., Dindigul - 624001, Tamilnadu 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, 1st Floor, CSD Building, HMT Post, Jalahali, Bangalore - 560 031. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Tamilnadu, Chennai.

F.No.89-909/2009/Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Jai Narayan Smarak Degree College., Karchhana, Uttar Pradesh dated 17/08/2009 is against the Order No. F. NRC/NCTE/F-7/UP-2001/141 Meeting /2009/5890 dated 09/07/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed. Course on the grounds “The list of appointed faculty as per NCTE norms has not been submitted till date”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Jai Narayan Smarak Degree College. (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 20/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Amit Kumar Singh & Shri Jeetendra Kumar, Assistant, Jai Narayan Smarak Degree College., Karchhana, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 18.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the institution was under process of affiliation by CSAM University, Kanpur and approval of appointed stamp could not be completed within the prescribed time. The appellant enclosed to the appeal approvals of the faculty issued by the University on 23.07.08, 12.11.08 and 13.01.09. Referring to the condition laid down in the letter of intent dt. 14.11.06 that the list of appointed staff should be available before the commencement of the course the appellant had stated the course has not commenced yet and the institutions affiliation file is under consideration of UP Govt. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that at no point of time the appellant institution intimated NRC about the delay in the selection/appointment of staff and has not even sent the list of staff for which he got approval from the University during 2008-09. In the circumstances the Council has came to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be rejected and the order of NRC dt 09.07.09 confirmed. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and NRC’s order dated 09-07-09 was confirmed.



1. The Manager, Jai Narayan Smarak Degree College., Sehra, Karchhana, , Karchhana - -, Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.

F.No.89-910/2009/Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Pailan College of Education., Kolkata, West Bengal dated 19/08/2009 is against the Order No. ERC/7-99.6(1).(15) 2/2009/1133 dated 06/08/2009 of the Eastern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed. Course on the grounds “1) Requisite no. of teaching staff not appointed as per the NCTE norms. It is not clear that the teachers are appointed on permanent basis or temporary basis. 2) The institution has submitted agreement of sale deed but registered document in the name of institution not submitted by the institution”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Pailan College of Education. (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 20/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Partha Sarathi Chakraborty, Principal & Shri Mahasweta Pandan CRM, Pailan College of Education., Kolkata, West Bengal presented the case of the appellant institution on 18.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that a declaration by the managing trustee and notarised declaring that all the staff are permanent, their names are in permanent payroll has been given to ERC on 24.07.09, which was duly acknowledged by that office and a registered sale deed has also been submitted to ERC on 28.07.09 which was also acknowledge by that office. In a letter dt. 18.09.09 the appellant re-affirmed that the recruited staff were selected on the basis of an open advertisement and selection by a committee which included Dean, Education, Calcutta University. The letter also affirms that the ownership of land and building lies with Pailan College of Education solely. AND WHEREAS the Council after taking into account all aspects of the matter into consideration and also the report of the visiting team that inspected the institution on 23.05.09 has come to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be accepted and the order of the ERC dt. 06.08.09 reversed. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal and set aside ERC’s order dated 06.08.09, with direction to RD,ERC to issue the order of recognition to the institution, within 15 days of issue of this order.



1. Parthasarathi Chakraborthy, Principal , Pailan College of Education., Village - Kulerdari Gram Pancharyat, P.O. -Joka, Plot No. 226, , Kolkata - 700104, West Bengal 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Eastern Regional Committee, 15, Neelkanth Nagar, Nayapalli, Bhubaneshwar - 751 012. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of West Bengal, Kolkata.

F.No.89-924/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Ram Lalit Singh Mahavidyalaya, Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh dated 21/08/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F-7/UP-3353/141st Meeting/2009/5679 dated 07/07/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, Refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed. course on the grounds that 1) Building Plan is not approved by Competent Authority. 2) The land is in the name of society but no institution. 3) CLU is not submitted. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Ram Lalit Singh Mahavidyalaya (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 21/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Ram Lal Singh, President & Shri H.K. Kaushik Member, Ram Lalit Singh Mahavidyalaya, Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 18.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that in compliance to the directions of NRC dt. 06.02.09 he has submitted all the desired documents on the 29.04.09 and also obtained a receipt. AND WHEREAS from the records of the NRC it is seen that the building plan was approved by Gram Panchayat and the CLU submitted earlier by the appellant was from the Tehsildar which is dt. 22.04.09, However, the appellant has now submitted a proper CLU issued by u/S 143 by ADM on 29.05.09. The Council therefore came to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be accepted and the case remanded to NRC for causing inspection and taking further action thereafter. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal, set aside NRC’s order dated 07-07-09 and remand back the case to NRC for causing inspection of the institution to ascertain the availability of infrastructure and instructional facilities as per NCTE norms within 30 days of issue of this order and thereafter pass appropriate order.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Ram Lalit Singh Mahavidyalaya, Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. -, Ram Lalit Singh Mahavidyalaya, Vill Kailhat, PO Pachver, Ditt. Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Mirzapur - -, Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.

F.No.89-904/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS The appeal of Sardar Ajeet Singh Memorial College (Shree Guru Hargovind Society), Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh dated 18/08/2009 is against the Order No. No. WRC/APW08160/222519/121st/2009/58339 dated 28/07/2009 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.Ed course on the grounds “CLU submitted is not valid”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Sardar Ajeet Singh Memorial College (Shree Guru Hargovind Society) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 20/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Harpreet Singh Secretary, Sardar Ajeet Singh Memorial College (Shree Guru Hargovind Society), Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 18.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the CLU submitted by them has been issued by the office of the Joint Director Town and Country Planning, Bhopal and a diversion letter from SDM, Bhopal has also been issued for educational purposes. AND WHEREAS the Council noting that both the above mentioned documents are available on the records of the WRC has come to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be accepted and the case remanded to the WRC for causing an inspection and taking further action thereafter. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal, set aside WRC’s order dated 28-07-09 and remand back the case to WRC for causing inspection of the institution to ascertain the availability of infrastructure and instructional facilities as per NCTE norms within 30 days of issue of this order and thereafter pass appropriate order NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Sardar Ajeet Singh Memorial College (Shree Guru Hargovind Society), Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh to the WRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Secretary, Sardar Ajeet Singh Memorial College (Shree Guru Hargovind Society), Gram - Adampur Chawni, Raisen Road, District, Bhopal - , Madhya Pradesh


F.No.89-905/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Shri Sai Institute of Technology (Maa Sharda Uchha Shiksha Samiti), Ratlam, Madhya Pradesh dated 18/08/2009 is against the Order No. WRC/APW08175/222554/122nd/2009/58976 dated 11/08/2009 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.Ed course on the grounds “1) Approved building plan not as per the NCTE norms. 2) CLU not submitted. 3) Building Completion is not issued from the competent authority. 4) Land is not as per NCTE Regulations 2007 sub-clause 8(7). 5) FDRs for the existing course not maintained jointly”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Shri Sai Institute of Technology (Maa Sharda Uchha Shiksha Samiti) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 20/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Vimpy Chhabra Treasure & Shri Ajeet Chhabra, Member, Shri Sai Institute of Technology (Maa Sharda Uchha Shiksha Samiti), Ratlam, Madhya Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 18.09.09. In the appeal as well as in a written explanation given on 18.09.09 and during personal presentation it was submitted that the approved building plan comprises of 1522.1 sq. mts of builtup area consisting two numbers, one multipurpose hall, one multipurpose room, a seminar room one library and others for administrative staff; CLU issued by the SDM, District Raltam was furnished to WRC on 16.04.09; building completion certificate has been obtained; the land has been purchased for the institution and its transfer is under process and the necessary FDRs were submitted to WRC. AND WHEREAS the Council after taking into account all aspects of the matter into consideration came to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be accepted and the case remanded to WRC for causing inspection and taking further action thereafter. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal, set aside WRC’s order dated 11-08-09 and remand back the case to WRC for causing inspection of the institution to ascertain the availability of infrastructure and instructional facilities as per NCTE norms within 30 days of issue of this order and thereafter pass appropriate order.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Shri Sai Institute of Technology (Maa Sharda Uchha Shiksha Samiti), Ratlam, Madhya Pradesh to the WRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Principal, Shri Sai Institute of Technology (Maa Sharda Uchha Shiksha Samiti), Jaoro Road, Near RTO Office, District, Ratlam - 457001, Madhya Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal.

F.No.89-916/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Ahimsa Teacher Education and Training Institute for Women, Delhi, Delhi dated 30/07/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F-7/DH-426/143 meeting/2009 dated 08/07/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, Refusing recognition for conducting ETE course on the grounds that File submitted by the institution is not complete as required under clause 7(1) of the Regulations 2007. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Ahimsa Teacher Education and Training Institute for Women (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 20/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Veenu Makol, Office Admin & Shri Rina Lal, Faculty, Ahimsa Teacher Education and Training Institute for Women, Delhi, presented the case of the appellant institution on 18.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it has been stated that after the submission of their application on 16.09.08 the institution has not received any communication written or verbal from NRC regarding the status of the application or any deficiencies therein. It has also been mentioned that despite numerous efforts on the part of the institution no response was available from NRC. AND WHEREAS in view of the position stated above the Council has came to the conclusion that appeal deserves to be accepted and the case remanded to NRC with the direction that they may immediately issue a letter to the applicant pointing out deficiencies in their application if any, giving adequate time for reporting compliance. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal and set aside NRC’s order dated 08.07.09 and remand the case to NRC for issuing a letter to the applicant pointing out deficiencies in their application if any, giving adequate time for reporting compliance and thereafter pass appropriate orders.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Ahimsa Teacher Education and Training Institute for Women, Delhi, Delhi to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. -, Ahimsa Teacher Education and Training Institute for Women, Shankar Road, New Rajendra Nagar, Delhi, Delhi - 110060, Delhi 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Delhi, New Delhi.

F.No.89-935/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Arigner Anna Teacher Training Institute (Aringner Anna Educational & Charitable Trust), Thiruvannamalai, Tamilnadu dated 18/08/2009 is against the Order No. F.SRO/NCTE/D.T.Ed/2009 - 2010/14941 dated 31/07/2009 of the Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.T.Ed. course on the grounds “1) The management is running ITI in the same complex and there is no exclusive land earmarked for proposed D.T.Ed Course. 2) The Management has submitted registered land deed of gift executed on 20.07.2009 in the name of the institution. It is not acceptable as per para 8(7) of regulations of NCTE, 2007. There is no exclusive land on the date of application for proposed course”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Arigner Anna Teacher Training Institute (Aringner Anna Educational & Charitable Trust) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 24/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri S. Arubachalam, Chairman ,Arigner Anna Teacher Training Institute (Aringner Anna Educational & Charitable Trust), Thiruvannamalai, Tamilnadu presented the case of the appellant institution on 18.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it has been submitted that the land has been clearly earmarked for the D.T.Ed course; approved building plan was again submitted to SRC on 11.05.09 wherein the entire area details of ITI buildings and proposed Teacher Training Institute building were indicated with building completion certificate issued by PWD Engineer. The appellant also submitted that an area of 1.87 acres of land for teacher training institute was got registered on 20.07.09 and copies of the documents submitted to SRC. AND WHEREAS in view of the position stated above the Council came to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be accepted and the order of the SRC dt 31.07.09 reversed. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal and set aside SRC’s order dated 31.07.09 Accordingly, the appeal was accepted and SRC’s order dated 31.07.09 was set aside, with direction to RD, SRC to issue the order of recognition to the institution within 15 days of the issue of this order.



1. The Managing Trustee, Arigner Anna Teacher Training Institute (Aringner Anna Educational & Charitable Trust), Veerambakkam Post, Cheyyar Taluk, District, Thiruvannamalai - 604408, Tamilnadu 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, 1st Floor, CSD Building, HMT Post, Jalahali, Bangalore - 560 031. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Tamilnadu, Chennai.

F.No.89- 764/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Baba Parvat Nath Mahavidyalaya, Sant Kabir Nagar, Uttar Pradesh dated 30/07/2009 is against the Order dated 10.09.09 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.P.Ed course on the grounds “The list of appointed faculty as per NCTE norms has not been submitted till date”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Baba Parvat Nath Mahavidyalaya (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 30/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Uday Pratap Narayan, Secretary & Shri Manoj Kumar Member, Baba Parvat Nath Mahavidyalaya, Sant Kabir Nagar, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 18.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it has been submitted that the list of faculty members which was approved by the Deen Dayal Gorakhpur University on 24.06.06 was submitted to NRC on 07.11.06. The appellant has also shown proof of the receipt of this letter by the NRC. AND WHEREAS in view of the above position the Council has come to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be accepted and the order of the NRC dt. 10.09.09 reversed. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal and set aside NRC’s order dated 10.09.09 Accordingly, the appeal was accepted and NRC’s order dated 10.09.09 was set aside, with direction to RD, NRC to issue the order of recognition to the institution within 15 days of the issue of this order. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby reverses the Order appealed against.


1. The Manager, Baba Parvat Nath Mahavidyalaya, Parwata Vishawnathpur, District, Sant Kabir Nagar - -, Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi.


F.No.89-934/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Bhagawan Budh Primary Teacher's Education College, Siwan, Bihar dated 20/08/2009 is against the Order No. ERC/7-99.6(I).21/2009/974 dated 04/08/2009 of the Eastern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting BTC course on the grounds “1) Requisite no. of teaching staff possessing qualifications as per NCTE norms has not been appointed. 2) Built up area is less than the requirement of the NCTE norms. The institution has not submitted the building completion certificate duly approved by the competent authority and signed by the Govt. Engineer. The Building completion certificate submitted by the Jr. Engineer does not contain details. 3) The institution has not submitted downloaded copies of the website showing that all the documents has been uploaded in the website of the institution as letter as per para 7(9) of the NCTE Rules & Regulations”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Bhagawan Budh Primary Teacher's Education College (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 24/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Krishna Kumar Tiwary Adminstrative Oficer & Shri Kishore Kumar Pandey, Vice- Principal, Bhagawan Budh Primary Teacher's Education College, Siwan, Bihar presented the case of the appellant institution on 18.09.09.. In the appeal and during personal presentation it has been submitted that the institution has requisite number of faculty members who possess the prescribed educational qualification and the same was intimated to ERC on 18.07.09; the institution has sprawling campus with more than 1500 sq. mts of built up area and since the building is situated in a rural area no completion certificate is required to be issued by the Govt. but still the institution got completion certificate issued by executive engineer, Siwan. AND WHEREAS the Council perused the documents submitted by the appellant and found that the staff selected and appointed is in order and the completion certificate is also is acceptable. In the circumstances the Council came to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be accepted and the order of ERC dt 04.08.09 reversed. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal and set aside ERC’s order dated 04.08.09 Accordingly, the appeal was accepted and ERC’s order dated 04.08.09 was set aside, with direction to RD, ERC to

issue the order of recognition to the institutions within 15 days of the issue of this order. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby reverses the Order appealed against.


1. The Secretary, Bhagawan Budh Primary Teacher's Education College, Village/PO - Bajarahian, PS = Gautam Budh Nagar, Via - Maharaj Ganj, District, Siwan - 841238, Bihar 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Eastern Regional Committee, 15, Neelkanth Nagar, Nayapalli, Bhubaneshwar - 751 012. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Bihar, Patna.

F.No.89 - 923/2009 - Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Dev Sanskriti Vishwavidyalaya, Dehradun, Uttaranchal dated 21/08/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F-7-3/UR-226/140 Meeting/2009/5066 dated 25/06/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds “ 1) CLU is not submitted. 2) Land is in the name of Trust. 3) FDR is not submitted”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Dev Sanskriti Vishwavidyalaya (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 21/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Karmyogi Registrar & Shri Kiran Kapoor, Dev Sanskriti Vishwavidyalaya, Dehradun, Uttaranchal presented the case of the appellant institution on 18.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it has been submitted that a CLU has been enclosed to the application; land is in the name of the trust and it will be converted in the name of the institution and FDR in original has already been submitted. The appellant, with his letter dt. 17.09.09 has enclosed another land use certificate form Tehsildar, Rishikesh dt. 16.09.09. AND WHEREAS in view of the above position the Council has come to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be accepted and the case remanded to NRC for causing inspection and taking further necessary action. This is subject to the condition that before or at the time of inspection the applicant should produce a proper land use certificate as per section 143 of the relevant State Act. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal, set aside NRCs order dt 25.06.09 and to remand the case to NRC for causing inspection of the institution to ascertain the availability of infrastructure and instructional facilities as per NCTE norms within 30 days of issue of this order and thereafter pass appropriate orders. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Dev Sanskriti Vishwavidyalaya, Dehradun, Uttaranchal to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Registrar, Dev Sanskriti Vishwavidyalaya, Haripur Kalan,, Dehradun - , Uttaranchal


F.No.89-931/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of G.S. Mahavidyalaya, Basti, Uttar Pradesh dated 24/08/2009 is against the decision of NRC in its 144th Meeting of held on 12th to 14th July, 2009 of the, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds “The deficiencies communicated to the institution still exist”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, G.S. Mahavidyalaya (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 24/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Surya Narayan, Manager & Shri Manoj Kumar, Member, G.S. Mahavidyalaya , Basti, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 18.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it has been submitted that he has furnished detailed replies to all the points mentioned in the show cause notice, and the NRC has not considered his submissions before refusing grant of recognition. AND WHEREAS from a perusal of the refusal order, the Council noted that the NRC did not specify which are the deficiencies that still exists on the basis of which they took a decision to refuse recognition. In the circumstances the Council came to the conclusion that the case deserves to be remanded to NRC, who may re-examine the matter taking into account the replies furnished by the appellant and take further action. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate grounds to accept the appeal and remand back the case for re-examination of the matter taking into account the replies furnished by the appellant and take further action. Accordingly, the appeal was accepted, NRCs decision dated 12th to 14th July, 2009 was set aside and the case was remanded to the NRC for further necessary action.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of G.S. Mahavidyalaya , Basti, Uttar Pradesh to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Manager, G.S. Mahavidyalaya , Village - Jamdeeh, District, Basti - , Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.

F.No.89-920/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Holy Child B.Ed. College, malda, West Bengal dated 17/08/2009 is against the Order No. ERC/7-99.6(II).2/2009/1119 dated 06/08/2009 of the Eastern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.Ed. course on the grounds “The individual affidavit of teachers not submitted by the institution”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Holy Child B.Ed. College (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 21/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Debashis Sarkar Secretary & Shri S.N. Prvsty Member, Holy Child B.Ed. College, Malda, West Bengal presented the case of the appellant institution on 18.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it has been submitted that the affidavits of four staff members were submitted to ERC on 21.05.09 and the affidavits of one lecture and the principal were submitted on 15.07.09. AND WHEREAS since the requirement of submission of individual affidavits of teaching staff has been completed the Council came to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be accepted order ERC dt. 06.08.09 reversed. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal and that it should be accepted. Accordingly, the appeal was accepted and ERC’s order dated 06.08.2009 was reversed with direction to RD, ERC to issue the order of recognition to the institution within 15 days of the issue of this order. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby reverses the Order appealed against.


1. -, Holy Child B.Ed. College, Vill Kazigram Gram Panchayat, Distt. Malda, West Bengal, malda - 732101, West Bengal 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Eastern Regional Committee, 15, Neelkanth Nagar, Nayapalli, Bhubaneshwar - 751 012. 4. PS to Chairperson

5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of West Bengal, Kolkata.



O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of L.P. Shahi Institute of Teacher Education (Shahi Foundation), Muzaffarpur, Bihar dated 06/07/2009 is against the Order No. ERC/7-95.8.60/2009/16719(1) dated 19/05/2009 of the Eastern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds “1) As per the remarks of the institution all the information of Col. 6.1 regarding building under clause 8 of NCTE Regulations are under process. 2) The land documents is in the name of Director, Shahi Foundation. As per provisions under Regulation 8(7) of NCTE (Recognition Norms & Procedure) Regulations, 2007 regarding possession of land by the institutions, the land should be in the name of institution concerned either on ownership basis or on lease basis from the Govt./Govt. Institution for a period not less than 30 years and it is free from all encumbrances. 3) Building Completion Certificate where the proposed B.Ed Course will be opened with Plot no., Khata no., Total Area, Built up area, Khasra No. etc. from the Competent State Govt. Authority. 4) Approved Building Plan where the proposed B.Ed Course will opened with Plot no., Khata no., total area, built up area, khasra no., etc. from the competent state Govt. Authority”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, L.P. Shahi Institute of Teacher Education (Shahi Foundation) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 17/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS the appeal of this institution was considered by the appeal committee on 22nd August 2009. As the appellant failed to substantiate his claim regarding land and buildings which supporting documents in original, he sought another date. Accordingly he was given another opportunity to present his case on 18.09.09. AND WHEREAS Shri Krishna P.D. Singh Director & Shri Shailendra Kumar Member, Presented the case of the appellant institution on 18.09.09 and showed the original documents to the Council. the Council found that an area of 2 acres is held on ownership basis in the name of the trust and 14000 sq. ft. has been builtup. In the circumstances the Council came to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be accepted and the case remanded to ERC for causing a inspection and taking further action thereafter. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal, set aside ERC’s order dated 19.05.09 and remand back the case to ERC with the direction that the institution should be inspected to ascertain availability of

necessary infrastructure, instructional and other facilities in accordance with the norms prescribed by the NCTE within 30 days of issue of this order. Accordingly, the Council remanded back the case to the ERC for inspection of the Institution immediately and thereafter, to issue order accordingly. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of L.P. Shahi Institute of Teacher Education (Shahi Foundation), Muzaffarpur, Bihar to the ERC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Secretary, L.P. Shahi Institute of Teacher Education (Shahi Foundation), Village - Dighra, PS - Town, District, Muzaffarpur - 842001, Bihar 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Eastern Regional Committee, 15, Neelkanth Nagar, Nayapalli, Bhubaneshwar - 751 012. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Bihar, Patna.

F.No.89 - 840/2009 - Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Maharaja College (Guru Gobind Singh Tri Centenary Education Society), Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh dated 08/08/2009 is against the decision of the Western Regional Committee in its 116th meeting held on April 3rd -5th ,2009 refusing recognition for conducting D.Ed course on the grounds “Deficiency not removed within stipulated time period”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Maharaja College (Guru Gobind Singh Tri Centenary Education Society) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 10/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Dinesh C. Randhar, Director, Maharaja College (Guru Gobind Singh Tri Centenary Education Society), Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 18.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that they have not received any deficiency letter from the WRC and despite repeated efforts they could not get any reply from that office. AND WHEREAS the Council has come to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be accepted and the case remanded to WRC for sending a copy of the deficiency letter to the appellant institution for doing the needful within a reasonable period. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal, set aside WRCs decision in respect of this institution and remand back the case to WRC, for sending a copy of the deficiency letter to the appellant institution and cause the inspection of the institution within 30 days of issue of this order. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Maharaja College (Guru Gobind Singh Tri Centenary Education Society), Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh to the WRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Chief Executive Officer, Maharaja College (Guru Gobind Singh Tri Centenary Education Society), Dewas Road, Near Abhilasha Colony, District, Ujjain - 456010, Madhya Pradesh


F.No.89-918/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Markandey Mahavidyalay, Chandauli, Uttar Pradesh dated 21/08/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F-7-3/UP-3380/141st Meeting/2009/5103 dated 25/06/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed. course on the grounds “1) CLU is not submitted 2) The building plan is signed by Gram Pradhan but not approved. Also the Gram Panchayat resolution in respect of approval of building plan is not submitted. 3) Affidavit on stamp paper of Rs.100/- is not filled completely”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Markandey Mahavidyalay (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 21/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Kailash Yadav Manger & Shri Balachnad Yadav, Office Superintendent, Markandey Mahavidyalay, Chandauli, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 18.09.09. It has been stated that in the appeal, as well as in a letter dt. 18.09.09 and during hearing that the CLU from the revenue authorities, building plan and the affidavit have been submitted to the NRC on 01.05.09. AND WHEREAS the Council noted that the documents were available in the records of NRC. When it was pointed out to the appellant that the CLU submitted by them is not on the prescribed format under Section 143 of the relevant State Act, he informed that they have applied for the certificate under this section which has not yet been received. AND WHEREAS the Council therefore came to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be accepted and the case remanded to NRC for causing inspection and taking further necessary action. This is subject to the condition that the appellant shall furnish CLU in the prescribed format before or at the time of inspection. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal, set aside NRC’s order dated 25-06-09 and remand back the case to NRC for causing inspection of the institution to ascertain the availability of infrastructure and instructional facilities as per NCTE norms within 30 days of issue of this order and thereafter pass appropriate order

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Markandey Mahavidyalay, Chandauli, Uttar Pradesh to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. -, Markandey Mahavidyalay, Khasra No. 00203, 00197, 00164, Vill Tarapur, Tehsil Sakaldiha, Distt. Chandauli, Uttar Pradesh, Chandauli - , Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh,

F.No.89-933/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of MKR PG Institute of Technology, Baghpat, Uttar Pradesh dated 24/08/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F-7/UP-2804/139th MEETING/2009/7513 dated 04/08/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds “ 1) CLU is not submitted. 2) Land is in the name of Society but not institution”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, MKR PG Institute of Technology (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 24/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Sanjeev Yadab Secretary, MKR PG Institute of Technology, Baghapat, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 18.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it has been submitted that they have not received the deficiency letter due to mistake in the correspondence address. He however submitted that CLU was enclosed to the application and the land which is in the name of society has been registered as rent deed for 30 years in the name of the institution. The appellant also submitted a copy of the land use letter under section 143 issued by SDM Baghpat. From the records of the NRC, the Council noted that in the deficiency letter the State has been shown as Haryana instead of U.P. AND WHEREAS the Council after taking into account all aspects of the matter has came to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be accepted and Case remanded to NRC for causing an inspection of the institution and taking further action thereafter. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal, set aside NRC’s order dated 04-08-09 and remand back the case to NRC for causing inspection of the institution to ascertain the availability of infrastructure and instructional facilities as per NCTE norms and thereafter pass appropriate order.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of MKR PG Institute of Technology, Baghapat, Uttar Pradesh to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Secretary, MKR PG Institute of Technology, Hassanpur Mussoorie, Khekra, , Baghapat - , Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.

F.No.89-930/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Modern Institute of Teacher Education, Kohima, Nagaland dated 21/08/2009 is against the Order No. ERC/7-99.6.16/2009/1056(1) dated 05/08/2009 of the Eastern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds “1) As per VT report the building is under construction partially. 2) As per building completion certificate built up area is less than the requirement. 3) The instructional materials and furniture are not available. 4) The facilities of Library are not available. 5) The facilities of Education Technology Lab are not available. 6) The arrangement of practice teaching facilities is not available. 7) Affidavit of Rs.100/- and Rs.10/- regarding appointment of staff are not submitted by the institution. The institution not submitted the list of teaching staff. The teaching and non-teaching staff is not yet appointed”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Modern Institute of Teacher Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 24/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri S. Hekha MA, Chaiman & Mrs. A. Kaisa, Member,Modern Institute of Teacher Education, Kohima, Nagaland presented the case of the appellant institution on 18.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it has been submitted that the institution was given just seven days time to submit a representation to the show cause notice, there is poor connectivity between Bhubneshwar and Kohima and despite shortage of time a representation by email was sent to the ERC. The appellant further stated that the deficiencies pointed out are being attended to, the building will be completed by October 2009 and in another two months things will be in place. AND WHEREAS the Council appreciating the submissions made by the appellant has come to the conclusion that a re-inspection of the institution may be conducted. For this purpose the institution should make a request and deposit the requisite fee of Rs 40,000/ -. In the circumstances the case be remanded to ERC for causing re-inspection of the institution. This has been recommended as a special case in view of the requirement of NE States and this should not be quoted as a precedent. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal, set aside ERC’s order dated 05-08-09 and remand back the case to ERC for causing re-inspection of the institution to ascertain the availability of staff in

particular and other facilities as per NCTE norms after obtaining a payment of Rs 40000/- and thereafter pass appropriate order NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Modern Institute of Teacher Education, Kohima, Nagaland to the ERC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Chairman, Modern Institute of Teacher Education, Village - Dziiviirii Area, District, Kohima - 797001, Nagaland 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Eastern Regional Committee, 15, Neelkanth Nagar, Nayapalli, Bhubaneshwar - 751 012. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Nagaland, Kohima.

F.No.89 - 928/2009 - Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Nalanda Science & Commerce College (Takshshila Education Society), Katni, Madhya Pradesh dated 20/08/2009 is against the Order No. No.WRC/APW07425/223753/121st/2009/58964 dated 11/08/2009 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds “Land is not on Lease for 30 years which is required as per NCTE norms as per NCTE norms”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Nalanda Science & Commerce College (Takshshila Education Society) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 24/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Ajay Singh Lecturer & Shi Ram Sujan Tiwari, UDC, Nalanda Science & Commerce College (Takshshila Education Society), Katni, Madhya Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 18.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it has been submitted that the Takshila Education Society which is running Nalanda Science and Commerce College has the ownership and title of the land and the WRC has erred in rejecting the application. AND WHEREAS in view of the above position the Council has come to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be accepted and the case remanded to WRC for causing an inspection of the institution and taking further necessary action. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal, set aside WRC’s order dated 11-08-09 and remand back the case to WRC for causing inspection of the institution to ascertain the availability of infrastructure and instructional facilities as per NCTE norms and thereafter pass appropriate order NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Nalanda Science & Commerce College (Takshshila Education Society), Katni, Madhya Pradesh to the WRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Secretary, Nalanda Science & Commerce College (Takshshila Education Society), Plot no. 29/46, Village - Jhinhari/Katni,, Katni - , Madhya Pradesh


F.No.89- 763/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Pt. Ambika Pratap Narayan Degree College, Sant Kabir Nagar, Uttar Pradesh dated 30/07/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F-73/UP-2076/141st Meeting/2009/9911 dated 31/08/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.P.Ed course on the grounds “The list of appointed faculty as per NCTE Norms has not been submitted till date”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Pt. Ambika Pratap Narayan Degree College (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 30/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Girijsesh Kumar Member & Shri Uday Pratap Chaturvedi Member, Pt. Ambika Pratap Narayan Degree College, Sant Kabir Nagar, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 18.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it has been submitted that the staff for the institution has been duly approved by Deen Dayal Upadhaya Gorakhpur University on 09.06.06 and intimation thereof has been furnished to NRC on 07.11.06 and the same was duly received. The appellant has furnished copies of the communication from the university and his letter to NRC alongwith the appeal. AND WHEREAS in view of the above position the Council has come to the conclusion the appeal deserve to be accepted and the order of the NRC dt 31.08.09 reversed with a direction to the appellant to upgrade the faculty as per the existing norms and appraise the NRC within one month. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal and set aside NRC’s order dated 31.08.09. Accordingly, the appeal was accepted and NRC’s order dated 31.08.09 was set aside, with a direction to the appellant to upgrade the faculty as per the existing norms and appraise the NRC within one month.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Pt. Ambika Pratap Narayan Degree College, Sant Kabir Nagar, Uttar Pradesh to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Manager, Pt. Ambika Pratap Narayan Degree College, Gomti Nagar, Dumari, Hariharpur,, Sant Kabir Nagar - 272175, Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.

F.No.89 - 922/2009 - Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Ram Subhag Kisan College, Azamgarh, Uttar Pradesh dated 21/08/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F-7-3/UP-3314/141st Meeting/2009/5680 dated 07/07/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds “1) CLU is not on proper format of State Govt. 2) The building plan is signed by Gram Pradhan but not approved. Also the resolution of Gram Panchayat in respect of approval of building plan is not submitted”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Ram Subhag Kisan College (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 21/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Diwj Ram Yadav, President & Shri Shailendra Kumar, Lecturer, Ram Subhag Kisan College, Azamgarh, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 18.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it has been submitted that the appellant was not given any instruction about the CLU as required in the State Govt. format and in the circumstances the certificate issued by SDM was furnished to the NRC Similarly the building plan duly signed by the Gram Pradhan was submitted. AND WHEREAS in view of the position stated above the Council has come to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be accepted and the case remanded to NRC for causing inspection and taking further necessary action. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal and affidavit after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal, set aside NRC’s order dated 07-07-09 and remand back the case to NRC for causing inspection of the institution to ascertain the availability of infrastructure and instructional facilities as per NCTE norms within 30 days of issue of this order and thereafter pass appropriate order.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Ram Subhag Kisan College, Azamgarh, Uttar Pradesh to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The Manager, Ram Subhag Kisan College, Khasra No. 2165/1.391, PO - Jagdishpur, Tehsil - Nizamabad, District - , Azamgarh - , Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.

F.No.89-932/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Saifia College of Science & Education (Saifia Education Society), Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh dated 21/08/2009 is against the Order No. F.WRC/APW04231/225043/121st/2009/58045 dated 24/07/2009 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting M.Ed. (Co. Ed) course on the grounds “Reply not submitted within stipulated time of 30 days”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Saifia College of Science & Education (Saifia Education Society) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 24/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Syed Nasir Ali, Director, Saifia College of Science & Education (Saifia Education Society), Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 18.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation as well as in the written explanation dt. 16.09.09 the appellant explained the various steps taken for selection of faculty members after conditional recognition was granted by the WRC on 04.01.08. According to the appellant the delay occurred on account of correspondence with Barkatullah University Bhopal and the code of Conduct that came into force on account of election and which ended on 16.05.09. In the written explanation it has been stated that the selection committee meeting was held on 16.05.09 and the list of selected candidates was submitted to the University on 18.05.09. It is further stated therein that the staff members were appointed and individual profiles of the staff along with the affidavits were submitted to WRC on 07.07.09. The staff profile was seen by the Council and found to be in order . AND WHEREAS in view of the position stated above the Council has come to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be accepted and the order of the WRC dt 24.07.09 reversed. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal and set aside WRC’s order dated 24.07.09. Accordingly, the appeal was accepted and WRC’s order dated 24.07.09 was set aside, with direction to RD,WRC to issue the recognition order to the institution within 15 days of issue of this order.



1. The Principal, Saifia College of Science & Education (Saifia Education Society), Saifia College Road, , Bhopal - 462001, Madhya Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal.

F.No.89- 727/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Shri Lalmani Physical Education College, Panchmahal, Gujarat dated 23/07/2009 is against the Order No. No.WRC/NCTE/APW07238/324157/117th/2009 dated 06/05/2009 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting C.P.Ed (Guj.) (Co-Ed) course on the grounds “1) At the time of application land was not on the name of Society. 2) Building plan is under construction”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Shri Lalmani Physical Education College (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 23/07/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Patel Vimal Kumar, President, Shri Lalmani Physical Education College, Panchmahal, Gujarat presented the case of the appellant institution on 18.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it has been stated that the grounds on which the application has been rejected have never been raised earlier. He further stated that at the time of submission of the application it was permissible to open a college on leased land/building; when the change in the rules took place the appellant submitted the documents concerning the land it had purchased for the institution to the WRC. AND WHEREAS From the records it is observed the institution on its own wrote to the WRC on 10.03.08 stating that they had purchased 8 acre of land for construction of college and hostel building. The inspection team that inspected the institution on 29.01.09 recorded that the institution has only skeleton of the building and nothing else. It is therefore clear that on the date of application the institution was not in possession of land in its name and further no worth while building has come up for the institution. In the above circumstances the Council has come to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be rejected and the order of the WRC dt 06.05.09 confirmed. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and WRC’s order dated 06.05.09 was confirmed.



1. The Secretary, Shri Lalmani Physical Education College, Village-Nanisarasan, Taluqa- Santrampur, , Panchmahal - 289230, Gujarat 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Gujarat, Gandhinagar.

F.No.89-912/2009-Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Shri Madhav College of Education & Technology, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh dated 19/08/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F-73/UP-2405/141st Meeting/2009/9918 dated 31/08/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, Refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed (Addl.) course on the grounds that Permission from competent authority to run the college in the building which is approved to run school only is not submitted. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Shri Madhav College of Education & Technology (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 20/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri Rajkripal & Shri Manmohan Garg, Secretary, Shri Madhav College of Education & Technology, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh was asked to present the case of the appellant institution on 18.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it has been submitted that consent and approval of the competent authority has been sent to NRC on 29.04.08 with a request to grant unconditional recognition for additional intake in B.Ed course. The appellant has enclosed copy of his letter referred to above with the appeal. AND WHEREAS the Council after consideration of all aspects of the matter came to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be accepted and the order of NRC dt 31.08.09 reversed. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT Report and after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was enough ground to accept the appeal and set aside NRC’s order dated 31.08.09. Accordingly, the appeal was accepted and NRC’s order dated 31.08.09 was set aside, with direction to RD, NRC to issue the order of recognition within 15 days of issue of this order. NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby reverses the Order appealed against.


1. The Secretary, Shri Madhav College of Education & Technology, Keshav Nagar, Modinagar Marg, Hapur, District, Ghaziabad - , Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi.


F.No.89 - 927/2009 - Appeal


08/10/2009

O R D E R WHEREAS the appeal of Waltech College of Education (D.S. Memorial Educational Trust), Meerut, Uttar Pradesh dated 24/08/2009 is against the Order No. F.NRC/NCTE/F-7/UP-3014/141st Meeting/2009/7428 dated 31/07/2009 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed course on the grounds “Deficiencies communicated in the deficiency letter issued by the office are not removed within stipulated time”. AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Waltech College of Education (D.S. Memorial Educational Trust) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 24/08/2009 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order. AND WHEREAS Shri R.S. Chauhan, President & Shri Rambir Singh, Officer (Admin), Waltech College of Education (D.S. Memorial Educational Trust), Meerut, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 18.09.09. In the appeal and during personal presentation it has been submitted that the appellant fulfilled all the requirements and the compliance reported to NRC though a letter dt. 09.09.08 which was received by NRC on 10.09.08. AND WHEREAS from a perusal of the NRC letter dt. 31.07.09 deciding to close the file it is observed that a deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 10.11.08 pointing out two deficiencies namely absence of land use certificate and copy of approved building plan. The appellant has not stated anything about the reply to this letter. However from the records it is seen along with the letter dt. 09.09.08 the appellant has forwarded an approved building plan together with a resolution of Gram Panchayat. In the course of hearing on 18.09.09 a CLU issued by SDM Meerut on 26.06.09 under section 143 of the relevant State Act has been furnished by the appellant. AND WHEREAS in view of the position stated above the Council has come to the conclusion that the appeal deserves to be accepted and the case remanded to NRC for causing inspection of the institution and taking further necessary action. AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal and affidavit after hearing oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal, set aside NRC’s order dated 31-07-09 and remand back the case to NRC for causing inspection of the institution within 30 days of the issue of this order to ascertain the availability of infrastructure and instructional facilities as per NCTE norms and thereafter pass appropriate order

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Waltech College of Education (D.S. Memorial Educational Trust), Meerut, Uttar Pradesh to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.


1. The President, Waltech College of Education (D.S. Memorial Educational Trust), Village - Uidepur, District, Meerut - , Uttar Pradesh 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, A-46, Shantipath, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan. 4. PS to Chairperson 5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.

Date post:	18-May-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	tranlien
View:	248 times
Download:	5 times