Fokker and Ecosystem - nag.aero€¦ · Multi-Functional Integrated Fuselage Overall objectives:...

The information enclosed is proprietary and is provided to you on a strictly confidential basis.

Overview

Fokker and EcosystemFrom suppliers to co-developers

Dr. Peter J. Kortbeek

2017

Fokker Technologies


Content

✓Introduction GKN

✓Fokker R&T structure

✓Fokker Value Chain

✓Example of collaboration

✓Challenge

Fokker Proprietary2


GKN: A global engineering group

Every day at

GKN…

We drive the wheels

of hundreds of

millions of cars…

We help

thousands

of aircraft to fly…

And we deliver the

power to harvest

crops and move

earth.

In numbers

56,000 employees

Locations in more than 30 countries

€10 billion sales

Sales by division

Driveline

(44%)

Aerospace

(35%)

Land Systems

(10%)

Powder Metallurgy

(11%)


Fuselage, wing, nacelle & pylon,

Inflight opening doors+ empennage

Static & rotating structures

Titanium engine inlet parts

Transparencies Ice protection systems

Light Weight Missile Canisters

AEROSTRUCTURES ENGINE SYSTEMS SPECIAL PRODUCTS

Helicopter Landing Gear

Composite load carrying landing gear components (drag brace)

Availability Services, MRO, Conversion and Completion for Mature and Legacy aircraft

LANDING GEARWIRING INTER-CONNECT SYSTEMS

GLOBAL SERVICES

GLOBAL NO. 2

GLOBAL NO. 2

GLOBAL NO. 1

GLOBAL NO. 8

GLOBAL NO. 3

Electrical Wiring Interconnection Systems (EWIS) for aircraft & aircraft engines

GLOBAL BRAND

GKN Aerospace-widest capabilities of any Tier 1


Time to market

Co

mp

lex

ity o

f th

e f

ina

l p

rod

uct

Limit of the ability tofollow an innovation

R. Stephan, Université de Compiègne, "Which practices for universities to enhance exchanges and transfer"

Aerospace business:

Opportunities and challenges

Combining longest ‘time-to-market’with highest complexity

Fokker Proprietary5

Aerospace business


10% 40% 50%

R&T costs

- 10 - 5 0 +5 +10 +30

Bu

dg

et

Développement

et adapation

des Technologies

Recherche

amont

Validation et

démonstration

Développement

Produit

10% 40% 50%

R&T

- 10 - 5 0 +5 +10 +30

Développement

et adapation

des Technologies

Recherche

amont

Validation et

démonstration

Développement

Produit

- 10 - 5 0 +5 +10 +30- 10 - 5 0 +5 +10 +30- 10- 10 - 5- 5 00 +5+5 +10+10 +30+30

Bre

ak-E

ven

Po

int

15

to

25

yea

rs

Développement

et adapation

des Technologies

Developmentand adaptation

of Technologies

Recherche

amontUpstream Research

Validation and Demonstrationof Technologies

ProductDevelopment

Programme Launching

Aviation RTDI spending

structure

Aviation long RTDI cycles

Aerospace developments take increasingly

more time and budget

Fokker Proprietary6

Aerospace business

Time


Overview

7

Trends in the Aerospace marketObservations

▪ Coming decade focus on incremental improvements of current

LCA platforms (NEO, MAX), driven by engine improvements

▪ New platforms like single aisles require disruptive solution (EIS > 2030)

▪ Spectacular developments in drones and personal aviation

▪China ?????

▪ Large internal market potential

▪Many parties active - including Russia

▪ Large pressure on:

▪Recurring cost (RC)

▪Non-Recurring (NR) cost and

▪ Time to market (TtM)


Overview

8

Trends in Aerospace Value Chain3 main streams

1/ Consolidation eg GKN - Fokker

▪ Only very large T1’s can invest and bear the risk to participate in high risk in high volume programs (eg B787: only 7 T1’s)

2/ Smart Engineering to meet lower NR cost and shorter TtM

▪ Requirement capture and Means of Compliance plan

▪ Engineering process flow

▪ More KBE

▪ Collaboration in the value chain (example RIAM – Parapy)

3/ More, disruptive innovation required

▪ Integration of functions▪ In fuselages: structures, electrical and non-electrical systems integration

▪ Additive Manufacturing

Key: Multi-Disciplinairy Development and Optimisation

▪ Role for value chain for lower TRL development


Integrating Systems & Structure

SuperTier 1The need for Innovation

9

Top level requirements, development and

optimization ; e.g. cost, fuel eff., aero,

S&C, mass properties, thermal, EMC, fire

etc.

Quantifiable assumptions for

components and their integration.

Budgeted downflowed requirements,

optimization and sensitivity analysis.

Standard Components (QPL or Prop.)

Aircraft

ArchitectureOEM

Components

Super Tier 1

Tier 1

Tier 2

Section

AssembliesSystems

Architectire

Component

IntegrationMajor Assemblies

Inte

gra

tor

Kn

ow

ho

w

Systems &

Structure Integration

Tier 3Co

mp

on

en

tA

rchitectu

re

UNCLASSIFIED, FE-GLOBAL_CE015-029{01}



What could be integrated?Aircraft Functions and Integration

10

Structural Complexity

Sys

tem

s

Co

mp

lex

ity

?

EIPS Electrical Ice Protection System

.

IceDetection

IntegratedAntennas

ElectricalIce

Protection


Wiringintegration


Wiring integration in an FML structure

11

Reduction of:- Volume

- Weight

- Assembly time

- Cost

To be solved:- Safety

- Cross talk

- EMP

- Lightning strike

- Robust connectors

- Maintainability

- ReparabilityCurrently at TRL 2

Lightning Transfer Function

Crosstalk



GLARE Electric Ice Protection Systems:

Aircraft Functions and Integration

12

▪ No bleed air required.

▪ Lower energy consumption due to optimal heat transfer

▪ Weight reduction, no ducting & valves for bleed air

▪ High power demand for anti-icing requires a detection

system to be developed which is the subject of research.

inside

outside

Heating Element

Minimize

heat lossMax

heat

transfer

Integration of functional and structural

materials




Structural Integration of AntennasAircraft Functions and Integration

13

These days a large number of antennas need to be installed on aircraft for

communication, navigation and surveillance:

CSeries FTV1 (Bombardier Aerospace)

SATCOM (Ku)

VHF

HF Slot & Couplers

GPS R & L

ATC/MODE S

TCAS

TCAS II

VOR

VHF

RA Tx/Rx

TCAS II

DME

MLS

ATC/MODE S

WEATHER RADAR, LOCALIZER, GLIDESLOPE

ADF L & R



Overview

14

Structure Integrated AntennasOpportunities

Tx/RxCoax.

State-of-art

VHF

Blade

Embedded

Int.

Tx/RxCoax.

Suppressed

Lower Drag (less fuel burn and emissions)

Direct Maintenance Cost reduction

— Ground handling & aircraft deicing damage

— Birdstrike & erosion

— Bonding

Increased safety

— Injury to ground crew

Recurring Cost reduction

— Mass/Cost of installed antenna

— Preflight check walk-around

Antennas performance

— Installed radiation pattern & collocation effects

Less Used Volume

Aesthetic


Overview

15

Multi-Functional Integrated Fuselage

Overall objectives:

• 1 ton weight reduction compared to fully integrated A320 barrel section

• Reduced total fuselage RC (-€ 1 M compared to fully integrated A320 barrel section)

• High move rate (>60 A/C per month)

The information enclosed is proprietary and is provided to you on a strictly confidential basis.Fokker Proprietary16

Aerospace Value Chain

Materials Equipment TestingKnow how

Passenger

Air cargo

Tier 1 supplier

AC OEM

Tier 2 supplier

Airline

UniversitiesResearch

Institutes

Air side

Infrastructure

Land side

Infrastructure

Airbus, Boeing, Comac, etc

TU Delft

U Twente

TU E

NLR

FMLC

TPRC

McNair, etc

TenCate

Cytec

Constellium

etc

Airborne, DTC, KVE, TFT, etc

RAMAL

Dutch Shape

etc

NLR

etc

Gulfstream, Dassault, Cessna, etc


Strategy to success and essential to stay in business

Fokker Proprietary17


Overview

Thank you for

Your attention

Date post:	26-Sep-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	4 times
Download:	0 times

Fokker and Ecosystem - nag.aero€¦ · Multi-Functional Integrated Fuselage Overall objectives:...

Documents