+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2017/06/29  · Following this cover page are...

Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2017/06/29  · Following this cover page are...

Date post: 18-Aug-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
23
Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the selected date. The documents are displayed in no particular order. However, all of these documents are searchable. To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f (Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac); 2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the form field provided and press Enter or Return. In most applications, the first appearance of the index number, the word, or the phrase in the document will be highlighted. Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications, including browsers and PDF viewers.
Transcript
Page 1: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2017/06/29  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.

To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.

1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);

2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.

In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.

Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.

Page 2: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2017/06/29  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

F I L E DSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY :ASBESTOS LITIGATION :

JUN 2 92017COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK E

NYCALIndex No. 190055/11

This Document Relates To:

STANLEY S. BARASCH,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Viking Pump, Inc. (incorrectly sued herein as “ Viking Pump,

Inc., A Unit of IDEX Corporation” ), (hereinafter “ Viking Pump” ), hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing Plaintiffs’ complaint against Viking Pump, with prejudice, there being no opposition

thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Viking Pump, be and are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: 2017New York, York

uiYyk.

THE LANIER LAW FJAttorneys for Plainti126 East 56th Street, 6th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 421-2800

' jy****'

SO ORDERED

PLLCEdward P. Abbot, Esq.

/ HAWKINS PARNELLTHACKSTON & YOUNG LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Viking Pump, Inc.600 Lexington Avenue, 8th FloorNew York, New York 10022-7678(212) 897-9655

GEORi J. SILVERJ.S.C*

11047615v. l

JUS 23*011RECEIVED

JUN 2 62017

PART 10

Page 3: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2017/06/29  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

ANTHONY SABIN

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No.: 104096/99

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and

there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

Juistt- 13- , 2017

•Chftlog -tfafeuoon, Esq.SudWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-4925

"7Nicholas P. Eliades, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter,LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC225 Liberty Street, 36th FloorNew York, NeW York 10281

SO ORDERED,

GEORGE J. SU./ER JUH 2 3 2017

3118782

Page 4: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2017/06/29  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to: fVV.6°NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)Index No.: 109428/98

JOHN A. JADUS % 9^OFFICE

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and

there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

Ourw \% . 2017

Cpnrloofclrguaen, Esq.SlCgjcinKlC,Weitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-4925

Nicholas P. Eliades, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter,LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC225 Liberty Street, 36th FloorNew York, New York 10281

SO ORDERED,

iEORGE J. SILVERSZ3ea***J.S.C, 2 3 2017,

3118782

Page 5: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2017/06/29  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

F I L E DJUN 2 9 2017

COUNTY CLERK’S OFFICENEW YORK

Index No. 115218-03;25647-91

August 2010 FIFO ClusterWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

x

WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC sued herein as "Foster Wheeler

Corporation" hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendantFOSTER WHEELER LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

EDWARD T. PLANTZ,Plaintiffs,

v.

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al., includingFOSTER WHEELER LLC,

Defendants.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

x

Dated: New York, New York- WAY7

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor PIaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

SO ORDEREI

rfcs Hm

GE J. SILVERJ.5.C.

Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Tanenbaum Keale LLPAttorneys for Foster Wheeler LLC1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center, 16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102

JUN 2320».

Page 6: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2017/06/29  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

F I L E DSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

JUN 2.9 2017

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

x

CONSTANCE M. MONTGOMERY, Individually and as Index No. 102789/00;Personal Representative for the Estate of 122185-99;ROBERT MONTGOMERY, 111036-98;

Plaintiffs, 120917-97

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al., includingFOSTER WHEELER LLC,

Defendants.

August 2010 FIFO ClusterWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

x

WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC sued herein as "Foster WheelerCorporation" hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendantFOSTER WHEELER LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New York, New York

TtrMTXmizrE nAni TPf8U§ar\ DennisLVega, Esq. ^Frank M. Ortiz, Esq(

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

SO ORDERED;

l, p-c. /Dennis LVega, Esq.Tanenbaum Keale LLPAttorneys for Foster Wheeler LLC1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center, 16th FloorNjswark, NJ 07102

GEORGE J. SILVERJ.S.C.

JUN 2 3 2011

Page 7: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2017/06/29  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

F I L E DSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

x

JUN 2 97017

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

DEBORAH E. MAKOVITCH, as Personal Representativefor the Estate of THOMAS S. FESHOH and DEANNE M.WHITE, as Personal Representative for the Estate ofSUSAN FESHOH,

Plaintiffs,v.

Index No. 110744/06

February 2012 FIFO ClusterWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al., includingFOSTER WHEELER LLC,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC sued herein as "Foster WheelerCorporation" hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FOSTER

WHEELER LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and withoutcosts.

Dated: New York, New YorkT- fr -77

•Ffatrk M, Oi Liz, Esq.^Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NYggJg)03^

K5SO ORDERED

ft^6UASOt\ Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Q Tanenbaum Keale LLP

Attorneys for Foster Wheeler LLC1085 Raymond Blvd.

tOne Newark Center, 16th Floorewark, NJ 07102

GEORGE J. SILVERJ.S.C.

M 2 3201783250869vl

Page 8: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2017/06/29  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

F I L E DSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JUN 2 9 2017

X

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONx

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

EDWARD T. PLANTZ,

Plaintiffs,v.

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et aL, includingFOSTER WHEELER LLC,

Defendants.

Index No. 115218-03;25647-91

August 2010 FIFO ClusterWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

x

WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC sued herein as "Foster WheelerCorporation" hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendantFOSTER WHEELER LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York.5V/-Y7

-toft rOrtizTBq -tffulri $ ftftfUSOfxWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

SO ORDERED,.

Newark, N.

Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Tanenbaum Keale LLPAttorneys for Foster Wheeler LLC1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center, 16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102

GEORGE J. SILVER JUN 232017,J.S.C.

Page 9: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2017/06/29  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

F I L E DSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW VORK JUN % 9 2017COUNTY OF NEW YORK

x COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NEW YORK

X

EILEEN HOULIHAN,Individually and as Proposed Index No. 108356-02Executrix for the Estate of ROBERT E. HOI/LIHAN,SR.,

August 2011FIFO ClusterWeitz & Luxenberg

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

x

Deceased

Plaintiffs,v.

A.C. & S, INC., etal.,Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant CBS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation,f/k/a Viacom Inc.,successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a WestinghouseElectric Corporation (hereinafter "CBS CORPRATION") hereby request summary judgment in theabove-entitled case,pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs7

complaint against defendant CBS CORPORATION with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto,

ORDERED,that upon notice to alt co-defendants,all claims and cross claims againstdefendant CBS CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New York, New York

5-y-/7

toftk-M.Ortiz,EsqCfWeitz & Luxenberg,P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York,NY 10003

FcrJJSon Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Tanenbaum Keale LLPAttorneys for CBS CORPORATION1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center, 16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102

SO ORDERED,

83250869vl

\U

GEORGE J.SILVER SSTiaagfc

Page 10: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2017/06/29  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

F I L E DSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JUN 2 9 2017

X

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORKx

EILEEN HOULIHAN, Individually and as Proposed Index No. 108356-02Executrix for the Estate of ROBERT E. HOgLIHAN, SR.,Deceased August 2011 FIFO Cluster

Plaintiffs, Weitz & Luxenberg

A.C. & S, INC., et al.,Defendants.

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

x

WHEREFORE, defendant CBS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc.,successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a WestinghouseElectric Corporation (hereinafter "CBS CORPRATION") hereby request summary judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'complaint against defendant CBS CORPORATION with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant CBS CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.

Dated: New York, New York5-y-/7

frank MrOrtit, Esq.(Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

SO ORDERED,

83250869v1

fcrj»lson Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Tanenbaum Keale LLPAttorneys for CBS CORPORATION1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center, 16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102

GEORGE J. SILVERJ.S.C.

JON 2

Page 11: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2017/06/29  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

x

F I L E DJUN 2 9 2017

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONx COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

NEW YORKCONSTANCE M. MONTGOMERY, Individually and asPersonal Representative for the Estate ofROBERT MONTGOMERY,

Plaintiffs,

Index No. 102789/00;122185-99;111036-98;120917-97

v.

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al., includingFOSTER WHEELER LLC,

Defendants.

August 2010 FIFO ClusterWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

x

WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC sued herein as "Foster WheelerCorporation" hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendantFOSTER WHEELER LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.

Dated: New York, New York

Frank M. Ortiz, EsqWeitz & LuxenbergAttorneysfor Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

ChMisfcrfyKnS, P.C. /

• .

<0-1^—Dennis tTViega, Esq.Tanenbaum Keale LLPAttorneys for Foster Wheeler LLC1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center, 16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102

SO ORDERED

GEORGE J. SILVERJ.S.C. M 2 3 2017.

Page 12: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2017/06/29  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

F I L E DSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JUN 2 9 2017

X

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORKx

DEBORAH E. MAKOVITCH, as Personal Representativefor the Estate of THOMAS S. FESHOH and DEANNE M.WHITE, as Personal Representative for the Estate ofSUSAN FESHOH,

Index No. 110744/06

February 2012 FIFO ClusterWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.

Plaintiffs,v. NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al„includingFOSTER WHEELER LLC,

WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC sued herein as "Foster Wheeler

Corporation" hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FOSTER

WHEELER LLC with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants,all claims and cross claims against

defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.Dated: New York, New York'T- &-/7

Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Tanenbaum Keale LLPAttorneys for Foster Wheeler LLC4085 Raymond Blvd.

/vark Center, 16th Floor

Attorneysfor Plaintiff(s)700 Broadway

:,NJ 07102

GEORGE J. SILVERJ.s.c.

83250869v1JUM 2 3 2011

Page 13: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2017/06/29  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

X:cases\KMA40058\dismissals\nosjmSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

ANTHONY POLITANO,

-against-

A.C & S. INC. et ai.

Plaintiff(s)

Defendants,

Index No.: 106583/00

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50

-X

WHEREFORE, defendant, JOHN CRANE INC., hereby request summary judgment in

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant, JOHN CRANE INC., with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, JOHN CRANE INC., be and the same hanby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs. ^ ®

.McTiemar/& Moore. 6rneysfor JOHN CRANE INC,

f Rector Street, 14th FloorNefr York, NY 10006

. Esq.Jo C. Dearie & AssociatesAttorney for the Plaintiff515 Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, NY 100

SO ORDERED,

GE GE J:SILVERto 2 9 2017

&& ,

^ y.0G

I

Page 14: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2017/06/29  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 50 ' / J

(Moulton, J.) ^0THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

JOHN M. WARD

X

1F&

Index No. 190261/2010

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

x

WHEREFORE, Defendant Kewaunee Scientific Corporation hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Kewaunee Scientific Corporation withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims againstdefendant Kewaunee Scientific Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York(p jt.<r , 2017

Chris Romanelli, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)John Ward700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

m/ w-

GE GEJ. .SILVER

David H. Jones, Esa^MALABY & BRADLEY, LLCAttorneys for DefendantKewaunee Scientific Corporation150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038(212) 791-0285

'fife:

{00058201.}

Page 15: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2017/06/29  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

XThis document relates to:

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Hon. Moulton, P.)

Index No.: 190116/2008

JOHN R. DRAPER and GENEVIEVE DRAPER,

Plaintiff,

-against-

KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.

Defendant.X

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY

WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant

KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.Dated: Wo/J <2 k / <£017

Harrison, New York

[suzann£ Rjptcliffe, Esq.IWEITZ &/LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorney# for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500

S DERED:

GEORGE X SILVER

JUN 2 9 2017

Russell S. Jamison, Esc/MARIN GOODMAN, /LLp.Attorneys for Defendant i

KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151

f \ \-£° RECEIVEDC0<^

0fp\c£ JUN 2 8 2017

PART 10

Page 16: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2017/06/29  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION-X

-X Index No.: 190237-11WILLIAM T. CRUGER and ALEXIS CRUGER,

-against-Plaintiffs,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al. I.A.S. Part 30Hon. Peter H. Moulton

Defendants.X

WHEREFORE, Defendant COMPUDYNE CORPORATION, Individually, and as

Successor to York Shipley, Inc. (hereinafter “ COMPUDYNE CORPORATION” ), hereby requests

Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections

3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against Defendant COMPUDYNE CORPORATION, with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, COMPUDYNE CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs to either party. This stipulation may be filed without further notice with the Clerk

of the Court. This No Opposition Summary Judgment Motion may be signed in separate

counterparts and facsimile or PDF signatures shall be deemed to be original signatures for all

purposes of this motion.

Dated: "fUno ^ } 2016New Yofk, New York

Matthew McIntyre, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENAttorneys for Plainly700 BroadwayNew York, New Yor(212) 558-5500

Katrina H. Murphy, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDG]

SINGER & MAHONEYj

SO ORDERED,

JUN 2 9 2017

Page 17: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2017/06/29  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

X:/DUN5S322.AeeaVNOSJMFEBRUARY 2011

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

PEDRO FRANCESCHI,

Plaintiffs),NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

- against - Index No.:103959/04

A.C.&S. INC., etal.;Defendants.

NYCALI.A.S. Part 30

xWHEREFORE, defendants ECR INTERNATIONAL f/k/a DUNKIRK RADIATOR CORP.

hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and

Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants ECR INTERNATIONAL

f/k/a DUNKIRK RADIATOR CORP. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants ECR INTERNATIONAL f/k/a DUNKIRK RADIATOR CORP. , be and the same are

hereby d&nisfeed tvitii prdudice and without costs,

/ / 11-Bormtfc'Sidfa'rfdfAifo *3CX&A.V\ * Suzfarthe Halbardier, Esq.Attorney f< rPMMffs Attdfneys for ECR INTERNATIONAL f/k/aBelluck \gt/ DUNKIRK RADIATOR CORP.546 Finfc'A venue Barry McTieman & MooreNew York,|New York 10036 2 Rector Street, 14th Floor

New York, New York 10006# (212)^13-3600

SC^R^tEi

GEORGE J. SILVERM 29 201?

OFFICERECEIVED

PART ^

Page 18: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2017/06/29  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

'th.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

GEORGE A. PAINTER and BETTY G. PAINTER,-X

40-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al„

Defeat^ -X

Index No.: 190344/2009

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, Defendant A.W. Chesterton Company hereby requests Summary Judgment in

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs

complaint against Defendant A.W. Chesterton Company, with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against Defendant,

A.W. Chesterton Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to

either party. This stipulation may be filed without further notice with the Clerk of the Court. This No

Opposition Su/rfijnary Judgment Motion may be signed in separate counterparts and facsimile or PDF

signatures shallfceileeped to be original signatures for all purposes of this motion.

Dated: 2017N York

Jordan Fok, msjjtlBELLUCKMFOX, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

SO ORDERED,

NisftiaS. Lakham/Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & PHONEYAttorneys for DefendantA.W. Chesterton Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100

ew Y ew York 10022

ORGE J. SILVER

AIN ?S 2m p/28 -

Page 19: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2017/06/29  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK __

Index No.: 109983/08In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NORMA SAEVA, as Executrix of the Estate ofJOSEPH SAEVA, NO OPPOSITION

SUMMARY JUDGMENTPlaintiffs), MOTION

- against -A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.

Defendants.

I.A.S. Part 50Hon. Peter H. Moulton

WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs

to either party.

Datedu /M AJ/ V?7 , 2017|\Te\v|/ork, New York

Jordan ClBE LLUGtt &M)X, LLPAtt )rneysItor^Plaintiff546\Emh Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036(212) 681-1575

SO ORDERED,

^/ 4JUh!

£o*>20»

ORGE J. SILVER

eat]SEGAL McCAMBRroeESINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, NY 10022212^4-7500

Esq

RECEIVEDJUN 2 8 2017

' /I r"l : •

•- f ' 'ts

I'JBS 79 201?

Page 20: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2017/06/29  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

Index No.: 100406/08In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NANCY ROURKE, Executrix of the Estate ofHUGH MCMUNN and DOROTHY MCMUNN,Individually,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION

Plaintiffs),

- against -I.A.S. Part 50Hon. Peter H. Moulton

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs

tn pithpr nnrtv

546 Fifth /yvejiue, 4thNew York, NY 10036(212) 681-1575 '

Weil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100

New York, NY 10022(212) 651^500 n rRECEIVED

* SO ORDERED, JUN 282017JUN 2 9 2017

Page 21: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2017/06/29  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

Index No.: 111711/04In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

MARY M. KING, As Fiduciary of the Estate ofJOHN J. KING and MARY M. KING,Individually,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION

Plaintiffs),

- against -I.A.S. Part 50Hon. Peter H. Moulton \

AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., et al.

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being noopposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs

to eithe

Attome546 FifNew York, NY 10036(212) 681-1575

Dated:

JordanBELLI SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE

SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain850 Third Avenue. Suite 1100

SO ORDEREE

JUN 2 3 2017

Page 22: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2017/06/29  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION :

This Document Relates To:x

GLORIA F. CASSANO, Individually and asExecutrix of the Estate of RICHARD M. CASSANO,deceased,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION

Plaintiffs), INDEX No.: 190234/2011

i

84 LUMBER COMPANY, et al.Defendants).— x

WHEREFORE, defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY hereby requests summary judgmentin the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’complaint against defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims againstdefendant, FORD MOTOR COMPANY be ^9^the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.

Dated: NewY New ork

%v. &CL 201 a*

LP

10036

By: lordsBELLUCi546 5thNew Yorl212-681-1'Counsel for: Plaintiffs

SO ORDERED:

By: Adam L. Sandler, Esq.AARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN &DEUTSCH, LLPAttorneys for DefendantFord Motor Company600 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10016T: 212-593-6700F: 212-593-6970

t

GEORGE J. S1LVFPJUN 2 9 2017 :1

s.

RECEIVEDJUN 2 8 2017

10{01781948.DOCX }

Page 23: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2017/06/29  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION :

This Document Relates To:x

ELIZABETH J. COONS, Individually and asExecutrix of the Estate of VINCENT W.COONS, Deceased,

Plaintiff(s),

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION

INDEX NO.: 190138/09

- against - !

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,

Defendants).x

WHEREFORE, defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY hereby requests summary judgmentin the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’complaint against defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims againstdefendant, FORD N^pTOR COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.

Dated: NewYoi

3M.A>i

WiYork

» 2(M6&- & ,3

pFl.

036 *5OG

By: Jordan FoBELLUCK &|Fj546 5th AveniNew York,212-681-1575Counsel for: Plaintiffs

SO ORDERED:tA

FORCE J. SILVERM 2 S Z017

By: Adam L. Sandler, Esq.AARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN &DEUTSCH, LLPAttorneys for DefendantFord Motor Company600 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10016T: 212-593-6700F:!212-593-6970

RECEIVEDJUN 2 8 2017

PART 10{01782267.DOCX }


Recommended