Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.
To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.
1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);
2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.
In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.
Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK NYCAL
ÿX I.A.S.Part 50(Moulton,f)
XIndex No. 120765-1997
INRE:NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
RUTHMORACE, as Administratrix for the Estate ofRAYMONDMORACE, Individually, 105234-1998
111036-1998113279-2000Plaintiff,
-against- NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDERA.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING&
SUPPLY), et al.
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant PFIZER,INC.hereby requests summaryjudgment inthe above-
entitled case, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against
defendant PFIZER, INC. only with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant PFIZER, INC. only be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.O.Nicole A. Spence fRENZULLILAWFIRM,LLPWEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.O.
700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Telephone: (212) 558-5580Facsimile: (212) 344-5461Attorneys for PlaintiffEstate of RaymondMorace
81 Main Street, Suite 508White Plains,NY 10601
SEP 2 9 2015
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
Telephone: (914)285-0700'Facsimile: (914) 285-1213Attorneys for DefendantPfizer, Inc.
receivedrr r
NYS SUPREMe
SEpSO ORDERED,Tÿon. Peter H. Moulton
HON-ADMIN1E • J
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
InRe: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX NYCAL
I.A.S. Part >6X (Moulton, f.)
SUE ANN MORRIS as Administratrix for theEstate of RICHARD E, MORRIS, Index No.: 112359/2000
Plaintiffs,
vs.NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., etal.,
Defendants._X
WHEREFORE, defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION only with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION only be and the same are hereby dismissed
hhprejudice and without costs,
Justin We: Nicole A. Spence
filedSEP 29 lQ15
WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Telephone: (212) 558-5580Facsimile: (212) 344-5461Attorneys for PlaintiffEstate of Richard Morris
RENZULLILAW FfllOlJIIIffCLERK'S OFFICE81 Main Street, Suite 508 NEW YORKWhite Plains, NY 10601Telephone: (914) 285-0700Facsimile: (914)285-1213Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation
SO ORDERED,on. Peter Moulton
NYS SUPRERMeCTVaviL-lSTjD
ÿÿÿvTjudce
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF NEW YORK NYCAL
X I.A.S. Part 50, (Moulton, P.)INRE: NEW YORK CITY Index No- 190455/14
ASBESTOS LITIGATION,
This Document Relates to: NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY
DAVID GREENBERG and PATRICIA JUDGMENTGREENBERG, MOTION AND ORDER
X
WHEREFORE, defendant, CATERPILLAR INC., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, CATERPILLAR INC., with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against defendant, CATERPILLAR INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: Str?n>i& ÿ y ,2015
Michael P. Roberts, Esq.
nr.KVr, i .v .
fUl LEDWEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.CAttorneys for PlaintiffsDAVID GREENBEPATRICIA GREENBERG700 Broadway 2 9 2015New York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500 y GLtÿ'S 0FF1Cÿ914) 345-7301
NEW YORK * 1
ILL,O'BRIEN,DOHERTY & KELLY,P.C.Attorneys for DefendantCATERPILLAR INC.,530 Saw MillRiver RoadElmsford,New York 10523
FileNo.: 1028.98598
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter Moulton
{NY204495.1}
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
X NYCALIN RE: NEW YORK CITY I.A.S. Part 50, (Moulton, P.)
ASBESTOS LITIGATION, Index No: 153302/15
This Document Relates to:
NO OPPOSITIONLAWRENCE SERUYA, SUMMARY JUDGMENT
x MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, CATERPILLAR, INC., hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiff s complaint against defendant, CATERPILLAR, INC., with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, CATERPILLAR, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: ÿ ,2015
Kush Shukla, Esq.
WILENTZ GOLDMAN &SPITZER, PAAttorneys for PlaintiffLAWRENCE SEl|tU110 William Street - 26thNew York, New York 1(212) 267-3091
ÿrankT). Lombardi, Esq.
MARKS,O'NEILL,O'BRIEN,DOHERTY & KELLY,P.C.Attorneys for DefendantCATERPILLAR, INC.530 Saw Mill River Road
8 Elmsford, New York 10523(914)345-7301File No.: 1028.99224
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter Moulton
{NY204493.1}
/" ÿ ' 'rf' 'V
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEWYORK V V
ÿ " ,Vt '04' *
» *.« x '• "•
InRe: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
ROBERT FRIEDLANDER and ROSEFRIEDLANDER,
Index No.: 190283-14
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
Plaintiff,
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS,et al„*. **».• , /ÿ • «
~V ' y'* . " • c .... -i i
. 0 v Defendant(s).
WHEREFORE, defendant, INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY incorrectly sued herein as
U.S. PLYWOOD CORPORATION hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,
pursuant to CiviLPractice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff s complaint against:V' ' '
' ; V1?defendant, INTERNATIONAL PAPERc COMPANY , incorrectly sued -herein as U.S. PLYWOOD
" "* • ; ' ' V . ' .. ''CORPORATION,.with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to.all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant,
INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY incorrectly sued herein as U.S. PLYWOOD
CORPORATION, be and the same arqÿwre(ÿÿ|ismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: 5EfTCrtgER ?, JS/52 9
PeJgÿSmbini, E§qÿ .CoUN* 1 y0RK/EITZ & LUXENBERG, R:<E. ÿ
Attorneys forplaintiff(s)ÿ 'ÿ F700 Broadway fy ÿ •
New York, New Yofkl0003 it
(212) 558-5500 ' ... S "
SO ORDERED,
John/S. Rand, Esq. '
CLARK, GAGLIARDI & MILLER, P.C.Attorneys for DefendantINTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY99 Court StreetWhite Plains,New York 10601
F (914) 946-8900
Jddÿe Peter.H. Moulton
ÿi'M
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OFNEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEWYORK COUNTY NYCALASBESTOS LITIGATION L.A.S. Part 50 •
(Moulton, P.) '
IndexNo.: 190293/2014ALTON C. CHAPMANand FRANCISCHAPMAN
v
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Exxon Mobil Corporation ("Exxon Mobil"), hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Exxon Mobil with prejudice, and there
being no opposition thereto. ;.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant ExxonMobilbe and the same ate hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: I15Ne\v,Y©pkrNew-Y.ork /) ' // j) r)
_ 1
ÿ .
'Peter Tafnbini, Estrÿxÿ Jpÿeph P. La Sala, Esq.Weitz & Luxenhef&P.C, 'McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant ExxonMobil700 Broadway CorporationNew York, New York 10003 88 Pine Street, 24th Floor
New York, NewYork 10005
SO ORDERED,honorable PejgrUfrfrdoulton, J.S.C.
SEP
IS
2775979 1_CLeWSOFF>ce
couÿeNÿoRK-
f ,
ÿr
-X NYCALLA S..Part 50
-X (Moulton, P)
Index No. 190104/2015
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
SUPREME COURT OF THEÿSTATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
' :
INRE:NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
ARTHUR J. JACHOWSKI and MARIE JACHOWSKI,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al. „
Defendants.-----------------------------L............. ..... X.' . - '
v , if •. .•
WHEREFORE, defendant PFIZER INC. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-
entitled case, pursuant to ÿCÿP;L/R::'Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant
PFIZER INC. only with'prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all . claims and cross-claims against
defendant PFIZER INC. only be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
nvroiTDn pr ' 0WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.700 Broadway ..i
" ; •
New York, NY 10003ÿ1.Telephone: (212) 558-5580Facsimile: (212) 344-5461-Attorneys for PlaintiffsArthur and Marie Jachowski
Nicdle A/SpenceRENZULLI.LAW FIRM,LLP81,Main Street, Suite 508
ÿ Whit|Plains- NY 10601Telephone: (914) 285-O70OFacsimile: (914) 285-1213Attorneys for DefendantPfizer Inc.
i SlMRDERED,ÿHon. Peter H. Moulton
cooÿ.0ÿO' • RECEIVED
NYS SUPREME CT-CIVIL-1ST JD
SEP 2 2 2015 -HON. PETER H. MOULTONADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE
I?
':-T- 'TJA
CLB55569/legal/nosjm/JUNE20l2; • , ÿ
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK-------------------——------ XRAYMOND J. MOORE,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Index No.: 109851/03
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendant(s),
NYCALI.A.S. Partÿ6ÿ°
-X
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED; that upon notice to all co-defendants; all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the.same are hgjÿby-tfemi&sed with prejudice and
without cosp„.• A
Frank Ortiz, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway ANew York, New Yc wrr - '
* ShawnetteTluitt* Esq..'..AttorneySifor Defendant
.CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, FloorHew York, New'York 10006
.(212)313-3600
SO ORDERED,IIoh. Shcny Klun-IIciller
\r-r': "ÿ
HORPETERH.MOULTON•if
SEP ÿ4 2015
PART-50MVS S.UPREME.COURT - CIVIL
CLB56364/legal/nosjm/FEBRUARY 2012 * " "
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK-...........---..............------—— -XRENATO CHIRLES,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
Index No.: 104184/03
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,
Defendant(s),
NYCALI.A.S.Part yf CO
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
4>" 'fyf
5tP»9Frank Ortiz,Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway nFP\C&New York, New York 10QQ3rn 1EIRE'S u
ShawnetteAttorneys for DefendantCLEAVER BROOKS, INC.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
SO ORDERED,IIon. Qliuiy Kldil-IIcill'ut- ifa/is
HON.PETERH.MOULTONm ©
2*20sÿ£ZrI
FBW465l2/legai/nosjm/FEBRUARY 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEWCOUNTY OF ~~ '
RENATO CHIRLES,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
NOOPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
Index No.: 104184/03
A O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al„
Defendant(s),
NYCALI.A.S.Partÿÿ
WHEREFORE, defendants FULTONBOILER WORKS.hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants'FULTON BOILER WORKS with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without cos
Frank Ortiz,Esq. fuiAttorney for Plaintiff* ,r
Weitz & Luxenberg cc?700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
f#
ShawnetAttorneys for DefendantFULTON BOILER WORKSBarry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector.Street, 14th FloorNew. York, New York 10006(212)313-3600
SO ORDERED iks/iSBEOED¥ED
SEP 24 2015
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - crvn
ÿ2'. . ÿ
• ''\.'
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
CHRISTINE WHITEHEAD, as PersonalRepresentative for the Estate of ROBERT ANDERSEN,and CHRISTINE WHITEHEAD, as PersonalRepresentative for the Estate of DOROTHYANNE ANDERSEN,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO.,
Defendants.
Index No.: 124445/02
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
NYCALI.A. S.PartÿT SO
—x
WHEREFORE, defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant FULTON
BOILER WORKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
By:_SHAWNETTTA. FLUITT, ESQ.BARRY, MCTIERNAN & MOORE, LLCAttomey(s) for the DefendantFULTON BOILER WORKS, INC.2 Rector Street, 14th Floor
/PATTI BWRSHTYN, ESQ.f WEITZ MLUXENBERG, P.Attorney(s) for the PUintifCHRISTINE WHITE&feA®, aTPersonalRepresentative for the Estate of „ aROBERT ANDERSEN, an§£? * „ ..CHRISTINE WHITEHEAD, as Personal New York, New York 10006Representative for the Estateÿ Tel.: (212) 313 -3600DOROTHY ANNE Our FileNo.: FBW46428700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003Tel.: (212) 558 - 5500 "
SO ORDERED, ÿ2_Tien. Shorry Kleia Heitler
.ÿ6s/>S:h=h\v/ic;D
SEP 2 4 2015
PART 50
NYS SUPREME COURT
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
CHRISTINE WHITEHEAD, as PersonalRepresentative for the Estate of ROBERT ANDERSEN,and CHRISTINE WHITEHEAD, as PersonalRepresentative for the Estate of DOROTHYANNE ANDERSEN,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO.,
Defendants.
Index No.: 124445/02
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
NYCALI.A. S. Part Cb
WHEREFORE, defendant CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
{
AJXENBERG, P. C.tttorneyYs) for the Plaintiffs ,
CHRISTINE WHITBHEÿp.ÿeSRepresentative for theÿstaRe orROBERT ANDERSEN, and „ $CHRISTINE WHITEHEADS Personal -Representative for the Estate of .,c
DOROTHY ANNE ANDERSSStÿQVr700 Broadway Q,0ÿ ,
New York, New York 10003Tel.: (212) 558 - 5500
SHAWNETTE A. FLUITT, ESQ.BARRY, MCTIERNAN & MOORE, LLCAttorney(s) for the DefendantCLEAVER BROOKS, INC.2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006Tel.: (212) 313 -3600Our File No.: CLB55795
SO ORDERED,Jflon, Shelly kluii-lKiller
llas/lS.
HON.PETERH.MOULTONSEP 24 2015
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
ROBERT GUIDAL and GERALDINE GUIDAL,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY), et al.,
Defendants.
Index No.: 107102/02 &119104/02
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
NYCAL1. A. S. Part S~0
WHEREFORE, defendant, CLEAVER BROOKS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
ABy:-ÿ X.-A (,J
FRANK OlttlZ, ESQ. ÿ33-*WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. "WAttorney(s) for the PlaintiffsROBERT GUIDAL andGERALDINE GUIDAL700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003Tel.: (212) 558 - 5500
SO ORDERED.ejtuii. Oliuiy Kliiliwujeitler
HON.PETERH.MOULTON
without costs.
By:_SHAWNETÿMCLSTT, ESQ.BARRY, MCTIERNAN & MOORE, LLCAttorney(s) for the DefendantCLEAVER BROOKS, INC.2 Rector Street, 14lh FloorNew York, New York 10006Tel.: (212) 313 -3600Our File No.: CLB55045
|= ISEP
c°UNT;eif?0B°FF'C
i
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xROBERT GUIDAL and GERALDINE GUIDAL, Index No.: 107102/02 &
119104/02Plaintiffs,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY), etal.,
-againsl- NYCALI.A. S. Part,3<f S*3
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant, FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC.with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant FULTON
FRANK ORTIZ, ESQ.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C.Attorney(s) for the Plaintiffs
shawneTteÿÿiÿtvesq.BARRY, MCTIERNAN & MOORE. LLCBARRY, MCTIERNAN & MOORE. LLCAttorney(s) for the DefendantFULTON BOILER WORKS, INC.2 Rector Street, 14|«oc| g E PNew York, New Y§r!c 1®0€fLa E™ ™Tel.: (212) 313 -3600Our File No.: FBW457<j£p 2 9 2015
New York, New York 10003Tel.: (212) 558 - 5500
ROBERT GUIDAL andGERALDINE GUIDAL700 Broadway fthJoL E D
SO ORDEREDItShorry Klein Haitlet.
*7/d-S//<T COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEYL 7 ° Mt=\A/vr»QK
supreme
HON.PETERH.MOULTON
CLB55203/legal/nosjm/February 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
- xROBERT JOSEPH BLASO,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendant(s),
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
Index No.: 105626/03
NYCALI.A.S. Part
-X
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without coÿts.
ÿ—A\ C\" U-,„ V A- f J r
Joe Vasquez,Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway
Ft Shawnette Fl&mytsq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTieman & Moore/ \j\y iuvuvuivui wv
New York, New York 10003 . 2 Rector Street, 14th Floor
ccuÿfya* New York, New York 10006(212)313-3600
SO ORDERED,vtnn Sheny KleituHeitlfii
HON.PBT®H.MOIjLTOAf 2015
CLB55753/legal/nosjm/JUNE2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK--- . . XROY BOGGS,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Index No.: 127704/02
NYCALI.A.S. Part 5Tb
Defendant(s),
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without i
Frank Ortiz, EsqAttorney for Plain:Weitz & Luxenberg 1ÿ
700 Broadway \G£New York, New York lOOQTEÿÿ,/
t, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
SO ORDERED,SlTerry urem iicitlGt-
HON.PETERH.MOULTON
J) S 'ffiECEmmSEP 242015
jÿSSUPREMERC05URT-aviL
CI.B5MJ9/leenl/nosjm/MARCtl 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK.......- XSALVATORE BLANDO.
Plainliff(s).
-against-
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Index No.: 100725/03
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, ct al..
Defendant(s);
NYCALl.A.S. Part
-X
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER BROOKS. INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
i
• i .."N \> r i
Frank Ortiz,Esq.Attorney for PlaiWeitz & I.uxenberg700 BroadwayNew York. New York 10003
coo<%
• LU'rvTU.P ftShawnette Fluitt, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER BROOKS. INC.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street. 14lh FloorNew York. New York 10006(212)313-3600
SO ORDERED.TLoau Sherry Klein lloitlcr
"ON.PETERH.MOULTONd
supreme
f
CLB56056/legal/nosjm/FEBRUARY 2012SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
SILVIO CESTRA,
Plaintiff(s),
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
-against- Index No.: 104416/03
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al„ NYCALI.A.S. Part £O
Defendant(s),ÿX
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that uponnotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
ShawiWtÿluilOEsq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER BROOKS, INC.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212)313-3600
Frank Ortiz,Esq. y* \ "Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg ccp700 BroadwayNew York, New York 100(T
SO ORDERED,hn. Shorry Klciii-IIcitlu1
HON.PETERH.MOULTON
CLB553I l/legal/nosjm/JUNE2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.COUNTY OF NEW YORK
: XSTEPHEN P. MUXIE,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Index No.: 112084/03
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., NYCALI.A.S. Part S"0
Defendant(s),-X
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Frank Ortiz, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway ,New York, New York lQ0Q3oVt.ÿÿ
SO ORDERED,
OfflCt
Shawnette Fluitt,Esq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.
( 7
Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
•Hon. Sherry Kloin IIcitlcr
HON.PETERH.MOULTON o
SUPREME
f
FBW56513/50835/legal/nosjm/FEBRUARY 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
THOMAS FESHOH,
Plaintiff(s),
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
-against- Index No.: 110744/06
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al., NYCALi.a.s. Partytr
Defendant(s),X
WHEREFORE, defendants FULTONBOILER WORKS hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS with prejudice,
and there beingno opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that uponnotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants FULTONBOILER WORKS be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without casts
Shawnette FliutvEÿ.cc\C£- Attorneys for Defendant
°V FULTON BOILER WORKS
Frank Ortiz,Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New
FULTON BOILER WORKSBarry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
SO ORDERED,ÿEion. Qheii)' Klein-IIi
HON.PETERHMOI
ÿIuu. Gliui v~
supreme
20CLB565J*fiegal/nosjm/FEBRUARY 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
- - XTHOMAS FESHOH,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
Index No.: 110744/06
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,
Defendant(s),
NYCALIrA.S. Part 3/ÿD
-X
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.n-i v o
Frank Ortiz,Esq. (,rÿ>Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway gOÿÿIaCÿ VOÿNew York, New York 10(Jo5
Shawnette FTuifCEsq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER BROOKS, INC.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
SO ORDERED,/EfnrrShm'y KliinUIcitlcr
HON.PETERH.MOULTON m o
.. - T ...
X:/BLA3767<t.Aeeal/NOSJMMA Y2011
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW-YORK• COUNTY OF NEW YORK
ÿ ÿ
..' X! '
VICTOR W; MASELLI, •; « *'.\ - . - % ,*
•*'. : ÿ - Plaintiff(s), .T 1
* . t. » ÿ * >r " % V. . • * ' ÿ*4 '
\ ""-against-, l. "• v ÿ. '* "" "V;
ÿ
' A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS,'etal.; / « ,f a
vv ' / Defendants.
/WHEREFORE,'c" riT — —-
-X
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY «JUDGMENT MOTIONAND > rORDER v • -r.:
ÿ• ' * '« • * .J .
* **1
« »
Index No.: 119781/01& 111232/01 : .'
NYCAL.I.A.S. Part
. " • " 1 ' -v.-
v .y
3212, di
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, .ÿ : ' ')r
i j £\' - v « .» .. /> '** • " M ÿ
11 rÿ
" J V ty
'J ÿÿ
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against. *,*'ÿ
1.. *te „ ÿ *• • r- ' » •' j
.*i * ÿ • . ÿ" - ' V •• a
prejudice and without costs. • .
t-
6 "
. rrf >».
' ' Attorriey for Plaintiffs ÿ °Weitz & Luxenberg -ÿ'ÿ Nicole Pitti, Esq. £ .
700 Broadway • EÿS,pcE— - SUPPLY- -,c- u Barry McTiernan & Moore
ÿv New York, New , 2 Rector Street,ÿ4ÿ Floor - /; New York, New York 10006 .
' •- 'ÿ -(212) 313-3600 fl
SO ORDERED, _• • :?V_ ÿ
ÿ
v
"
. ; " V HON.PBTERH.MOULTON
. , *
asep 24r;«
supreme
i*- jrt- '
. rV
ÿ'•.•ÿÿ• ÿ <"ÿ ? . ».• , :- •;••••. ,• •
.ÿ. St *(
ÿ-. .v -
X.:/cases/FBW/45425/Cegal/NOSJM , .. --j V. v , ÿ ...SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK? ." -COUNTY OF NEW YORK
:: . . ÿ
—1----------------------------------------—X ' Index,No.: 124268/02JOHNSALTZER,
Plaintiff(s),
•ragainst-
A.C. & S., INC., et al.;
Defendant(s).
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY. JUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
NYCALI.A.S. PartÿÿD
WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request• -r '
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
§3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against defendant FULTONBOILER WORKS
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
i—> V A ' ' ÿ
v.Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEIT'zll LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,_
Shawnette Fluitt, Esq.BARRY, MCTIERNAN & MOOREAttorneys for'DefendantFULTON BOILER WORKS2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
Hdrtrflliuiy KlciiMIutlu
.PETERH.MOULTON WiclwiB. SEP 24 2015
PART 50l__ÿVSÿUPREME COURT - CICIVIL
,-v
. ; -
CLB55 13 l/legal/nosjm/JUNE2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK.....-—— XJOSEPH A. MANCUSO,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Index No.: 107457/02
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendant(s),
NYCALI.A.S. Pari 3/
-X
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that uponnotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
(,ÿ \X .»ÿ*
y—"
Frank Ortiz, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
Shawnette Fluitt, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212)313-3600
StP % 9Uo»r-Sherry Klein-neitier
HON.PETERH.MOULTON
-—Sjssÿ/sSEP 242015
PART so.Ny?
-.'"T-cn/a
zoÿ
-X
CLB55599/legai/hbsjiri/JUNE2012SUPREME COURTOF THE STATE OF NEW YORK'COUNTY OF NEW YORK
JOSEPH E. BRUNS,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendant(s),
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Index No.: 110330/00
NYCALLA.S. Part
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil'Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,•
ÿ • ** 11O ••••"•«; ?:? - • ; :
•; i t* t »' ».-•dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all-claims*and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Frank Ortiz, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
Shawnette Fluitt, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
j 9'ÿ*Hun. Sliui\ IC1l.hi IIullui-
ÿ?hv- HON.PETERH.MOULTONcqvcS OF? *
• ''-rv CL£ÿ5,1"elf***
SEP 2 4 2015
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT CIVIL
- .. * _'t ÿ > />. " - o' *> »• -r2 TY.if'.yC ' .
CLB55045/lega!/nosjm/September 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE.STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XJOSEPH E. CARR,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendant(s),
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Index No.: 114016/02
NYCALI.A.S. Part yf & O
-X
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212.
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice.
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Attorney for Plaintiffiteeÿ2$$*enberg
0 Broadwayjj New ÿrÿglÿjp|?l®6rk 10003
SO ORDERED,
Shawnette 1Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS. INC.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14lh FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
I&S/Sm-Heitler
HON.PETERH.MOVLTON
m a24
.................• ' ' " • . ' • »" , -.*'••?/. . *!*ÿ•* ' '.1 - ÿ*' i't-ÿ
CLB56596/lcgal/hosjm/JUÿE2012V. . '. " , "•' '''ZuiZQ*?§;Y-SUPREME GOURT OF THE STATE OF NEW .YORK/ '
' 7 '.>/COUNTY OF NEW YORK ' •:
MARION MOULTRIE,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT
;MOTION AND ORDER
Index No.: 113756/04
A O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., NYCALw., ,LA:S. Part..#i
5 y* -j A V v 'r, > ÿ
Defendant(s), - v • -...................................—---— .....ÿ -ÿ •••' » —WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil'Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, .all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
t\
Frank OrtizhIjs(fcQ\5Attorn§£?orPlairitiffWeitz & Luxenbe;
'or|<yaÿ$York 10003
Shawnette Fluitt, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTiernan &.Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212.) 3 1-3-3600''
so ordered, ...ÿ Hon Shcijy Klciivlterrierÿ
HON.PETERH MOULTON
4feilis(ÿE©ED¥EO
SEP 242015PART 50
, MVS SUPREME g@URT - CIVIL
-------CLB/55777/legal/nosjm/FEBRUARY 20 12
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
MARTINARONSON
Plaintiff(s),
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION-AND ORDER
-against- Index No.:" 126686/02
A.C.&S. INC., et al., NYCALI.A.S. Part
Defendant(s),X
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without c@£j.s.
ShawnettÿluitÿEsql/Attorneys for Defendant
Frank ©rtiz.fiq.AttOTneyTor Plaintiff
Wei?p&<—rr\ri-mr
CLEAVER BROOKS, INC.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
SO ORDERED,Mull. Sherry Kldtl-hterttef-
S(-/PR£/Vff
HON.PETERH.MOULTON
"• .-v-w
CLB56030/legal/nosjm/jtlNE26l2ÿ •;"'. • t .
SUPREME GOURDE OF THE.STATE OF NEWCOUNTY.OF NEW YORK
------------------- ---------MICHAEL P. LONG,
-against-
Plaintiff(s),
-XNO OPPOSITION
• SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Index No.: 116680/06
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendant(s),
NYCALI.A.S. Part 0
-X
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitlied case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
r • •« » 1 • •• 1 - "•
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint-against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto, .....ÿ C"* . • v
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, allclaims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
v, ,TSH}--Frank OrtizÿÿsTÿ \_ .vAttorney for Plaintiff 'Weitz & LusfitWlKSOFFICE700 B£&TOy,£nN VOBKNew York, New York 10003
ShaWnette Fluitt, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212)313-3600
SO ORDERED,
fe*.
SEP *4 2015
Hon. Sheiiy'TGi in Hi itli i
HON.PETERH.MOULTON
* - 1 -rv ..i / •
---------------X.:/cases/FBW46431/FBW44362/legal/NOSJM )
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
..... xMICHAEL RICKARD,
Plaintiff(s),
Index No.: 101768/03
-against-
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
A.C. & S., INC., et al.;
Defendant(s).
NYCALI.A.S. Partyf *5*0
WHEREFORE, defendants FULTONBOILER WORKS hereby request
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
§3212, dismissing plaintiff s complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
ry
—4 ) . r\ ~4V—Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Shawnette Fjuitt, Ksq.BARRY, MCTIERNAN & MOOREAttorneys for DefendantFULTONBOILER WORKS2 Rector Street, 14,h FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
SO ORDERED,_»n. Sherry Klein-Huitlu
W>
ION.PETERH.MOULTON
SEP 19 20ÿ
GLEBE'S OFF\c£SEP 24 ?015
COURT .CIVIL
- ;:
A V-*: •..
.. • V.'n?' (<'• 'l '''ÿ'l1 c-''':. •
'
- i* -V ;5 -,-' „ • # * .'• '*
X.:/cases/CLB/55045/legal"/NOSJM - ÿ
• •
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK' ... ,
COUNTY OF NEW YORK'
• D f v P' V'v " '
'3 ÿ'
-------....— --------------T.„,------x Index No.: 101768/03MICHAEL RICKARD,
Plaintiff(s), NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND
-against- ORDER
A.C. & S., INC., et al.;
Defendant(s)..-. X
NYCALI.A S. Part y?f SO
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC.hereby request
summary judgment in the.above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
§3212, dismissing,plaintiffs complaint against defendant CLEAVER.BROOKS, INC.
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-ciaims against
defendantsCLEAVER BROOKS, INC.,be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
/V
V'Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
ss.-»y
SO ORDERED,
Shawnefte Fliiitt, Esq. ,
BARRY, MCTIERNAN& MOOREAttorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.2 Rector Street,1.4th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600 \
, <dTluii. Shui> KDilVifeitfcr
PETEfrtvMOULrDN
SEP 2 9 2015;
IcOUNTY CLERK'S.OFFICE!
NEW YORK ,
ÿB¥EIS)SEP 2420,5
nvssupr3I>°civil r-
\ ; .'.V ÿ "'• ' 7 '-V.r.
W?.*>ÿ
ÿT
CLB55754/lcgal/nosjm/JUNE2012 . . ' ••
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.. 'ÿ
COUNTY OF'NEW YORK—............ ...—...x;MILDRED STERMAN;
Plaintiff(s),-against-
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Index No.: 111496/03
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„
Defendant(s),
NYCAL _I.A.S. Partÿf S"C
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS; INC? hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,• ,>P •*' ' V"' .» i
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
"V;: jC"\ -.Jft—•• '7f'
Frank Ortiz, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
Shawnette Fluitt, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York .10006(212) 313-3600
SOfDRIHonSheriylUciii IIcitlut
SEP i9 20& iHQNÿÿ.PKERH MOULTON
Wh/S
SEP 24 2015
CIVIL
. C , V . , .. ÿ*, Sÿ
V;'A 't - A, - v .:=.!>* v- 1 / <,<= Ly -A: : 'V. A-
V- K- WW '•
ÿ' " •;.y« •~
StP
COV
CLB55767/le'gal/nbsjm/jUNE2bl2' "•ÿ•
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK :COUNTY OF NEW YORK
...-------......XNEIL BUGLIONE,'
Rlaintiff(s), -
-• NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
«?' .? * * Index No.: 118437/03
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et all,' \ • .
Defenÿant(s),
NYCALI.A.S. PartÿTS O
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs- complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
AY.' c—V% <t>
L CS ÿ
Frank Ortiz, Esq:Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
§0' ERED,>
2 9 20ft' I'Ui in ThilOrti
HON.PETERH.MOULTOI4
Shawnette Fluitt, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNewiYork, New York 10006(212)3 13-3600------ijdsh
ID)
ÿ\NIVOBK
aw o24
SUPREME COURT
*
CLB55045/legal/nosjm/JUNE2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XALBERT DUELL,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
Index No.: 110260/04
A O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendant(s),
NYCALI.A.S. Part ÿ6 SO
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs. •••ÿ
ÿ C\> \ } ,i.
__\ S A .f
ÿF&nlÿQrt1Attorney 1
/ÿ-
tlgfEsq.Torney for Plaintiff
Weÿ ftuiÿwberg70?)tBroadwayNew Yorÿÿg\0ÿrk 10003
SO ORDERED
Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
Hon. Sherry Js.lein-IIi!ilU.iv
HON.PETERH.MOULTON©
FDW/29885/legal/nosjm/January,2012 i
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
... xALEXANDER ZABLOZKI,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
Index No.: 119673/00
A.C. & S. INC.,et al., NYCALI.A.S. Part}6
Defendant(s),-X
WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants FULTON'BOILER WORKS with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants FULTONBOILER WORKS be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs-.,A /""X C
t.. V /*- ? - ,-f %
Phan Alvarado.Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
ShawHfftte fllj«ttrfc,sq.Attorneys for DefendantFULTON BOILER WORKSBarry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212)ÿ-ÿ00 _
LEDSO ORDERED, sm
SEP 2 9 2015—HlTTI—rShl" ÿ' V" TCh.ni-HfrilW •
COUNTYNHON.PETERH.MOULTON
CLB55045/legal/nosjm/January 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK.... XALEXANDER ZABLOZKI,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
Index No.: 119673/00
A C. & S. INC., et al., NYCALI.A.S. PartÿSTS
Defendant(s),-X
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.A \
* ' IA
*-v.JLki-
Phan Alvarado,Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
"NX Shawnette Fluitt, hSqAttorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS, INCBarry McTiernan & Bfeore2 Rector Street, 14lhÿloofNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600 SEP 2 9
EOm
SO ORDEREDHull. SlftiJiy K-teinnHeitler—
HON.PETERH.MOULTON
'16 ÿavyoRKOFRCEmvEo
SEP 24 2015
MVC-PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
......CLB56640/legal/nosjm/JUNE2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK....... XANTHONY G.CHESKA,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Index No.: 110259/04
A O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendant(s),
NYCALI.A.S. PartÿÿT}
-X
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment inthe above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs-.
* r~' vA ) i£\_
Cs ÿ
Frank Ortiz, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
Shawnette Fluitt, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BR0GMS6Barry McTiernan«UM|for<2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New Yoi$rH)0p6(212)313-3600 Z 9 2015
C0UNTZew%Isk0ff'oe
D
SO ORDERED,ÿHon. Sherry Klein-HeitLer
HON.PETERH.MOULTONm
X:/FBW46560./lceal/NOSJMQaober2009
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
-------------.. XCHARLES DIESSO,
Plaintiff(s),
- against -
A.C.&S: INC.,etal.;
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
Index No.: 100087/03
NYCAL ,< _I.A.S.PartÿfÿO
-X
WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Dated: New York, Ne v York
Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg180 Maiden LaneNew York, New York 10038
SuzanneHalbardier, Esq.Attorneys for FULTON BOILER WORKSBarry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New lfwik i00£)6(212) 313-3600 F
SO ORDERED,iy KfetTrtfeiTfer-
HON.PETERH.MOULTON
SEP 2 9 2015
SEP 24 2015
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
X:/«<fbw35S96leeal/Februarv 2011
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XEMILIO PAOLINI,
Plaintiff(s),
- against -
A.C. & S, Inc., et al.
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
Index No.: 101192/99 & 124397/02
NYCALI.A.S. PartÿS
X
WHEREFORE, defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
0 nyj/|,/r4pp 2 9 2015
Attorney for Plaintiffs 'Weitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-550
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFINEW YORK
Suzÿne Halbardier, Esq.Attÿrnÿys for FULTON BOILER WORKS
•ry McTiernan & Moore.ector Street, 14th Floor
New York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600 .
SO ORDERED,/Heth-Shcrry Kloin Ileillcr*
HON.PETERH.MOULTON ÿOSEP 24 2015
'
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
---JUL. 29. 2009 1 :07PM" NO. 81 P. 2
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEWYORK 'COUNTY OFNEWYORIC ;
----------- -----------xWILLIAM SLIGER;
Plaintiff(s),
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
- against -A.C.&S. INC.,et-al.;
Index No.: 105652/99
Defendants.
NYCALI.A.S.PartjjflfÿS'O
-X
WHEREFORE, defendants FULTONBOILER WORKS hereby request summary
judgment inthe above-entitled case, pursuant to CivilPractice Law andRules Section 3212,
dismissingplaintiffs1complaint against defendants FULTONBOILERWORKS with prejudice,
and there beingno opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that uponnotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants FULTONBOILERWORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed With prejudice
and without costs. - • •"
Dated: New Yprk, New York
MichaelFanelliÿEsq. ...Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz &Luxenberg .700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10007
Suzanne HgRjairdier, Esq.Attorneys for FULTONBOILERWORKSBarryMcTieman& Mobre2 Rector Street, 14*FloorNewYorkNewYork 10006(212) 313-3600
SO ORDERED,
M DmoultonSEP;2?9M15
SUPREME COURT
HON.
COUNTY.CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
ÿ
y;- ;S
.....r ' V::ÿV ÿÿÿÿÿ "''ÿÿÿ ÿ •*
•• V-; i&A- 'ÿ {..;; , -..* "J < • J * . 1
I"""?*"*•/'* *;'*r ,f *'« * 'X.:/cases/FBW43551/legal/NOSJM;- : -SUPREME COURT.OFTHE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK V. ÿ..................-------- .............-———X - IndexNo.: 111223/01 &THOMAS SHEEHAN, ,120770/01
-against- .
Plaintiffs), NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY. C JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
A.C. & S„ INC.
Defendant(s). ,
----- -X
NYCAL' I.A.S. Parted' 5"0 ,
WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request.. . «
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
§3212,'dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,5 - _
Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all.claims andcross-claims against
defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Frank Ortiz, Esq./jYvv: ( / (i, Suzanri£\M. Halbardier, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC. ' ' BARRYÿCTIERNAN& MOOREAttorneys for Plaintiff . Attorneys for Defendant180 Maiden Lane, , ,' • FULTON BOILER WORKSNew York, New.York 10038 2 Rector Street, 14- Floor(212) 558-5500 New York, New York 10006
(2-12) 313-3600
SO ORDEREDHoli. 31iehyKlein Heitlcr—
HON.PETERH.MOULTON
2*10
ÿCOV>* TV 6ÿ>KSOFOCe . :
m S
supreme
ÿM.
« • .. y • •
.« c ,*•' 'ÿjx* " - -C v y* 'ÿ ,• \
fi•'
i'V;V 1
COVJH
_ „y I v. 1•} :*••' V'
-A *«
X.:/cases/FBW422l5/legal/NOSJM ;i« ..', ' • •' . .SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ÿ :
"
COUNTY, OF NEW YORK.— ------....--------,...:—...i..——-X ' • Index No.: 104033/01 &LAWRENCE.LIGAMMARE, - 119382/00
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.C. & S., INC.
Defendant(s).-X
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
NYCALI.A.S. Partjti. S &
WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant .to Civil Practice Law and Rules. . " " ÿ
§3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant FULTON-BOILER WORKS
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,..
Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
A ÿ
w yS'*
V irV Kf J XFrank Ortiz, Esq....- '
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for.Plaintiff180 Maiden LaneNew.York, New York 10038(212) 558-5500'
(:
X''Samja Malikzay, Esq:LL.BARRY, MCTIERNAN & MOORE
Attorneys for DefendantFULTON BOILER WORKS2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew Yorit, New York 10006(212) 313-3600 V: \.
'
•••>•" '
IDlSfI, lea ÿdTcmrSticny Klein Ilditlei-
2 9 HON.PETERH.MOULTON
CUEBKSpFnce;>:NEW
f V
f
./k ÿ
- -V C r-
m d
*iAC v.e..C "f,
sq
GCtivjNTV1
* ..,-Xs •'
••. v' "V-v- >
"...
X:fbw42658./legaÿbSJMseptÿ2009 '
SUPREME CQUR$ OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK,
FLORENCE GRIFFIN,
Plaintiff(s),
• .r against -
A.C. & S., Inc., et al.;
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
Index No.:. 104566/01
NYCALI.A S, Part yf
Defendants.-X
WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC.. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. with
prejudice,',and there being no opposition thereto, . ' \
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Weitz & LuxenbergAttorney for Plaintiffs180 Maiden LaneNew York, New York 10038(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED
ia Malikzay, Esq. 1
Attorneys for Fulton Boiler WorPBarry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14lh FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
. : Fbri;.Sherry Klein-Helller
J.PErERH.MOULTON
2 ft Z015 ,
clERK'S OFFICE£\N vobk * .;
m a
• •• •
*;. • ÿf
.a' u** '3' '• L ••i\ i,-
f .. .;•<! ,,.:;5
CLB55045/legal/nosjm/Januafy2011
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
WILLIAM TAGLIAFERRI,NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDERPIaintiff(s),
-against- Index No.: 119610/01
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants),
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.hereby request summary
judgment inthe above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Frank Ortiz,Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
Shawnette Fluitt, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212)313-3600
SO ORDE]
HON.PETERH.MOULTON
cEp29 20\5
co4ÿOFBCE",s ÿwme'coSbt .CMl
SEP '
COONPÿ,
CLB55045/legaI/nosjm/Januaiy20n
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XSTEPHEN BOBROWICH,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
Index No.: 120388/01 &106318/02
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., NYCALI.A.S. Part 30*
Defendant(s),
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs..... i\ -4tr & /f .? n w1_ V,.....ÿ "1
Frank Ortiz,Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
V ShawnetteAttorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTiernan& Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212)313-3600
ERED,Hon, Sherry Kleinlie
_ V»s/,itler 7 '
ebksofbc£j VOftK
HON.PETERH.MOULTONm ©
F \s1
COUNT
X:cases\FBW39214\legal\rosjm
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XPETER J ACKERMAN,
PlaLntiff(s)
-against-
A.C & S. INC. et al.
Defendants.
Index No.: 104000/00
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
NYCALI.A.S. Partyf Sÿ
-X
WHEREFORE, defendant, FULTONBOILER WORKS, hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, FULTONBOILER WORKS ,with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, FULTONBOILER WORKS,be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
WEITZ & LUXENBEIAttorney for the700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
la Malikzay, Esq.arry, McTiernan & Moore
Attorneys for DefendantFULTON BOILER WORKS2 Rector Street, 14th floorNew York, NY 10006(212)313-3600
SO ORDERED,
lhoP i9
(cua*®0***aenn yob*
SEP 24 2015
C°URT -
'.Hon. Shci'iy Klein Iloitlci
HON.PETERH.MOULTON
X:cases\FBW45429\lcgal\NOSJM
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XJOSEPH E. DAVIS,
Plaintiff,
-against-
A.C & S. INC. et al.
Defendants.
Index No.: 108354/00,110105/00 & 121511/00
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
NYCALI.A.S. PartjKf S t)
n ---X
WHEREFORE; defendant, FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC.,hereby request
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, FULTON BOILER
WORKS, INC.,with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC.,be and the same are hereby dismissed
with prejudice and without costs.
Frut\K M-WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorney for the plaintiff180 Maiden LaneNew York, NY 10038
-tinia MalikzayTEsq.
BARRY, MCTIERNANÿSTMOOREAttorneys for DefendantFULTON BOILER WORKS, INC.2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, NY 10006
SO ORDEREJlon. Shtuÿ Kleiii-IItiilei ÿ
Hon.peterh.moulton
N
LpSCSOFf®6&SC0-
aw, D
SUPREME
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
TIMOTHY MEYER and KARENMEYER,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants.
-x rfboWIndex No.: .190119/12
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
NYCALI.A.S. Part yo 'S'O
WHEREFORE, defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FULTONBOILER
WORKS, INC. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant FULTONBOILER WORKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
BkBy:
;ana witnout costs.—BENJAMINDARCHE, ESQ.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P- C.Attorneys for the PlaintiffsTIMOTHY MEYER andKAREN MEYER700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003Tel.: (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
CHARLES NEAL, ESQ.BARRY, MCTIERNAN & MOORE, LLCAttorneys for the DefendantFULTON BOILER WORKS, INC.2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006Tel.: (212) 313 -3600Our FileNo.: FBW56503
Ft$£P 2 9
Hon. Sherry Klein..Heitler
h.moulton
COUNTY CLERKS OFFICENEW YORK
eiecebwedSEP 24 2015
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
------CLB55375/lega!/nosjm
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
— - XROBERT J. SCHMIDT,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et a].,
Defendant(s),
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Index No.: 125771/99 &104150/00
NYCALI.A.S. Part>Kf S"Q
-X
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that,upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
wna M. Northera&rEsq-Attomey for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
P\harcL<tO
ShaWnehe Fluitt,Esq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
fit0stP 19 10ft
11? <5J/s3_'
Hon. Sherry IClcin-IIcitlu
HON.PETERH.MOULTONSEP 24?oi5
NYSJOPRÿfCOURT. CIVIL
ÿSAP*
X./FBfV53600/lepal/A nril20j2 _ ; v,'.
SUPREME-COURT OF.THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF'NEW YORK ÿ......l~. -~xJOSEPH MIRABILE.
Plaintiff(s),
against -
A.C. & S, Inc., etal.
Defendants. .
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
InclexNo.: 190176/09
ÿ NYCALI.A.S. Partprf)
-X
WHEREFORE; defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED,,that upon,notice to all co-defendants, Ml claims and cross claims against
defendant FULTON BOILER-WORKS be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs. : 1
ErrtrTaco~Bs(hsfcAttorney for Plaintift)Weitz & Likenbet*700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-550
SO ORDERED,/
e Halbardier, Esq.AttoRÿvsfor FULTON BOILER WORKSBarry McTicrnan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14ih FloorNew York, New York 1.0006(212)313-3600
Hon. SliCtry Rlem-Henler
Hon.peterh.moulton
[£s//s
SEP 2 9 2015
ITY CLERK'S OFFICE .NEW YORK
- * J. ; 1V vi ** - '
•'<o'r - •• • \u b: - ; ,
X:cases\FBW38613\legal\NOSJM .*.
SUPREME COURT (DF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK V
-XRICHARD BARTOLOMEO;
' -against-
A:C & S. INC. et al.
Plaintiff(s)
Defendants.
Index No.: 113040/99
ÿ NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
NYCALI.A.S. Part
WHEREFORE, defendant, FULTONBOILER WORKS, hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiff s complaint ajgainst defendant, FULTONBOILER WORKS ,with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, "
Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, FULTONBOILER WORKS, be and the same are.hereby dismissed with prejudice'
and without costs. "
fiyiK M. nWEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorney for the plaintiff180 Maiden LaneNew York, NY 10038
SO ORDERED,
>*i9 Z0A5
H&fÿ
' *1ÿon'--Sheny,-EQeinHHeitler .
HON.PETERH.MOULTON
'a Malikzay, Esq.iarry, McTiernan & Moore
Attorneys for DefendantFULTON.BOILER WORKS2 Rector Street, 14ÿ floorNew York, NY 10006(212) 313-3.600
3?$/is
owes0""
m D.
supreme
i.f ÿ' - ' ' t. U'5
XJKMA 41120./IetmI/NOSJM • ÿ ' ,
SUPREME-.GOURT. OF THESTATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY- OF.NEW YOflK 'v'W— . -xWALTER SIMONSON, > :
Plaintiff(s),
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
- - against,-j '
A.C.&S. INC., et al:;'" ÿ
IndexNo.: 121112/00
NYCAL. I.A.S.
Defendants.ÿ0
-x
WHEREFORE, defendants JOHN CRANE, INC.hereby request summary judgment in
the "above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendants JOHN CRANE, INC. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED; that 'upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants JOHN CRANE, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs. a
A Fiq . -,EsAttorney .forÿaintiffs' > ;Levy, Phillips &.K'oriigSberg360 Lexington Avenue .
" . ,
New Ybrk, New York 10017
Suzanne Halbpdier, Esq.Attorneys Tor JOHN CRANE, INC.Barry'McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th Floor '
New York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
SO. ORDERED,• / ÿ Moh. SNcffy KlcinHIcitlcF
irfON.PETERH.MOULTON ©>
SUPREME
4-'/
CLB55045/legal/nosjm/JUNE2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
- XRAYMOND E. KELLOGG,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
Index No.: 117869/03
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., NYCALI.A.S. PartX
Defendant(s),-X
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.-,,.rt •
/
9 20Vi ShawneWPluitt, Esq.
U~. A •'*" /
Frank Ortiz, Esq.Attorney for Plaintiff 3U ÿ
Attorneys for DefendantWeitz & Luxenberg oFFl£feAVER-BROOKS, INC.700 Broadway qoUHTÿ Barry McTiernan & MooreNew York, New York 10003 FlE 2 Rector Street, 14th Floor
New York, New York 10006(212)313-3600
SO ORDERED,ÿFIbn. Sherry Klein-Heitlec-
HON.PETERH.MOULTON D
>ÿ >ÿ;.» > ' • ' - 1 : ÿ stt"'
X.:/cases/FBW42206/legal/NOSJM ,/' •? , • . '
s
vÿ
SUPREME COURT;OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK .COUNTY OF;NEW/Y6rK:;, j
.
— ...............—„x ' IndexNo.: 119400/00,TERRY KESSLERl 101892/01 & 100787/03
Plaintiffs),
-against-
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
A.C. & S., INC.
Defendant(s).
NYCAL _. .
I.A.S. Part#' ÿ
WHEREFORE, defendants FULTONBOILERWORKS hereby request
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules
§3212, dismissing plaintiff s complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS
with prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto,
Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendants FULTONBOILERWORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs, /
Poÿ\<-
WEITZ &JLUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff180 MaidenLaneNewYork!New York 10038(212)558-5500
SO ORDERE
Suzajjnÿ M. Halbardi&E|Es®1.9 2015BARRY,.MCTTBRNAN-& MOOREAttorneys for gÿÿÿLERK'S OFFICEFULTONBOILER WfiffiKSORK2 Rector Street, 14th FlcwrNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
"Hon, Sherry KleinnHeitler
ttONiPETERH.MOULTON IB
This fax was sent.with GFI FÿXmaker fax server. For more information, visit: http://wwvy.gfi.com'• :;/*
"\-v - t ;
:'T : v W1- -7-U- < -< ÿ
ÿ
:• 'f.v f
•,.<>/ v
X:/RWB54180.Ae%al/NQSJM : 'VVSUPREME COURT OBTHE STATE OF NEW YORK VCOUNTY OF NEW YORK.—......—„— —.....—........—...xWILLIAM F. O'CONNELL and DIANEO'CONNELL '
Plaintiff(s),
-against—
A.C.&S. INC., et ah; ,
ÿ Defendants.-X
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
/.ao/oIndex No.: 19005/10-
NYCALI.A.S. Part So
WHEREFORE, defendants R.W. BECKETT CORPORATION hereby request summary
judgment inthe above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants R.W. BECKETT CORPORATION with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that uponnotice' to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants R.W. BECKETT CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs. ;ÿ
\SEP 2 9 Z015
Charles Feÿusonÿ&iÿTY QÿRK'S OFFICEAttorney for Plainufis 'NEW YORKWeitz & Luxenbergi700 Broadway .New York, New York 10003'
SO ORDERED/- , Huh. Slienÿ 'Klein'1Iloitlcr
ÿÿ
1" ;• - v
'
HOlVl.PBTERH.MOULTON
a,v- "f. :ÿ
Suzanne M. Hafbardier, Esq.Attorneys forgjlv. BECKETT CORP.
. Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector.Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006 ; .(212) 313-3600 '. :
m 0)
c ÿ
v >>
----------SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK ,
*
INRE:NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
WILLIAM V. KELLER,
Plaintiff(s),-against-
--X
-XIndex No.: 190033/2009
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, CO., et al.,
Defendants. Hon. Peter H.Moulton.....................—------— -------- - X
WHEREFORE, Defendant A.W. Chesterton Company hereby requests Summary
Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant A.W. Chesterton Company, with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims -against
Defendant, A.W. Chesterton Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs to either party, FILEDDated: New York, New York SEP 2 9 2015
- IPO COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE .• NEW YORK
WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C. SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY,LTD.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
MadinaAxelrod, Esq.Attorneys for Defendant850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022
SO ORDERED,HooÿPefer H: Moulton
WED)
"" . '' . ' '» "•, .:• :ÿ'• • " <' '•
ÿ - - -'ÿ* :-;V
•n —'fT-*r
«• • ':i?.
? .•
,-W f •• .ÿ?ÿAA-56644 .. T- \
SUPREME COURT OF TOE STATE OF NEW YORK .COUNTY.OFNEW YORK—---------------—--—-xFRANK DELISE, NO OPPOSITION
• SUMMARY JUDGMENTPlaintiffs), MOTIONAND ORDER
-against- IndexNo.: 190156/12(
A.O. SMITH-WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al,
Defendant(s),
NYCALI.A.S.Partytf gtV
-X
WHEREFORE, defendants ECR INTERNATIONAL i/k/aUTICA BOILERS,£-
INC.hereby request summary judgment inthe above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants
ECRINTERNATIONAL f/k/a UTICA BOILERS, INC. with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto;
ORDERED, that uponnoticeto all co-defendants,, all claims and cross claims
against defendants ECR INTERNATIONAL f/k/a UTICA BOILERS, INC. be and the
same are hereby dismispÿ\ÿth|preji|pee without costs.
-,-yjÿAJiPattiBurshtyn,Esq. ÿ
'
Attorney for Plaintiff/Weitz & Luxeriberg T700 BroadwayNew York, New York: 1,0003
,sOffice Me#KDi©ÿrio,ESq_ ÿ , Attorneys for DefendantVOBK - - '
UTICA BOILERS,,INC.Barry McTieman& Moore2 R.e;ctor Street, 14th FloorNew York,New York 10006(212) 313-3600
SO ORDERED, ....-Hytii. 31ietty klein-Jtieitler
HON.PETERH.MOULTON
wmftP 2 4 2015
pART SOMVS SUPREME COURT - "civil. '
"i
.... iff. *
.» . t '« ÿ;,It
V-"
Ctib&dSWSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
ABRAHAM SCARANGELLA andHARRIET SCARANGELLA,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS INC., et al„
Defendants.
Index No.: 190137/2012
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
NYCALI.A.S. Part
WHEREFORE, defendant CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CLEAVER BROOKS, INC.
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CLEAVER B Sr-INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
wit ' x-N QILLTAMS, ESQ. CHARLES NEAL, ESQ.
JOSEPH P. WIlXlXMS-&r- ÿ QaRRY,MCTIERNAN & MOORE, LLCASSOCIATES, P. C.ÿ ÿ%ttorneys for the DefendantAttorneys for the Plaintiffs CLEAVER BROOKS, INC.ABRAHAM SCARANGELLA o 9 2.0ft 2 Rector.Street, 14th Floorand HARRIET SCARANGELLA New York, New York 10006245 Park Avenue, 39th Floor OFffSr (212) 313 -3600New York, New YorkÿUÿ SfvOflK 0ur File No.: CLB56578Tel.: (212) 668 - 1122
SO ORDERED,ÿ-Hon, Sherry Klein"!Icitlcr
HON,PHTERII.MOULTON
ÿps//S
SEP 24 m«su 'mscCIVIL
'
ÿ'"ÿÿÿ *' 'Y; ;• v • V V. .". i-' • 5 •
? ;• ÿÿ . -V -. • •' :" :
"* -AV I "'
CLB56615/legal/nosjm/FEBRUARY,2012 1ÿ
'
.* , "ÿ v
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK '• •
COUNTY OF NEW YORK- XJOSEPH LUCENTE, JR.,
. NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiff(s), MOTIONAND ORDER
-against- Index No.: 190104/12
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al., NYCALI.A.S.Part 3jy 5 3
Defendant(s),--------_____ ~x
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER BROOKS. INC.be and the same are herehv dismissed with prejudice and
vÿMiout costs.. -'
. a • Shawnqtte-Fluitt,"Esq.'
AttomqYfor' Plaintiff . Attorneys.for DefendantWeitz &Xuxenberg ÿ CLEAVER BROOKS, INC.700 Broadway ' Barry McTiernan & MooreNew York, New YorkQ9u03 2 Rector Street, 14th Floor
New York, New York 10006-.(212) 313-3600
SO ORDERED, --- 3fdslfC-: Hon. Sherry IHThii-Hercter ' i
ÿÿÿ•S'Z ÿ » IHON:PETERH,MOULTON J S£p ÿ4ÿ ÿ /
ÿ
y ;;
:':Y vYv'Y- ,v: Y- * . • " s
ÿ Y - *ÿ . v
CLB56580/legal/n"osjm/- •/'. •" .SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK..........-----—. - xJOSEPH CARDACI, .. . NO OPPOSITION
"SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
Plaintiff(s),
-against- . Index No.: 190138/12
A.O: SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendant(s),
NYCALI.A.S. Part yf
-X
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs-'complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice. .
and there-being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED; that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKSUNGHae and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
JosajprMWiMiams; ---;J uw. .Attorney for PlaintiÿoOÿÿ \245 Park AvenueNew York,.New York 10167
ShawnetteTluitt, Esq..Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTierpan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew Y6rk,:NewYork 10006.(212) 313-3600 " v ,
so ordered;ÿMhri - Sherry y iÿrp-Pp.itlpr
peterh.MOULTONm
} l, Nys
.\
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION--— — x
FREDDY A. LALAMA, SR.,
Plaintiff :
- against - :
AFCO INDUSTRIES, INC.,ET AL., :
Defendants
Index No.: 190131/2015
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION
WHEREFORE, the defendant BOBST NORTHAMERICA, INC. (ImproperlyNamed Bobst Group USA, Inc.) hereby requests summary judgment inthe above-entitledcase, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'complaint against defendant BOBST NORTHAMERICA, INC. (Improperly NamedBobst Group USA,1Inc.) with prejudice, arid there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED,that uponnotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claimsagainst defendarit BOBST NORTHAMERICA, INC. (Improperly Named Bobst GroupUSA, Inc.) be and the same are hereby disriiissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
,2015
Mew YorK,
wFREDDY A. ;LAL:By his attorney,
Dated: Boston, Massachusetts
/2- ,2015
A'mSs4, V» BO.BST NORTHAMERICA, INC.n.c (Improperly Named BOBST GROUP
USA>
\(0ÿ _ÿ_
Bryan Belasky, Esquire /]~ /Michael B. Weinberg, Esquire
BELLUCK & FOX, LLP // LeClairRyan,A Professional Corporation546 5th Avenue -4th FloorNew York, NY 10036(212)681-1575
One International Place, 11th FloorBoston,MA 02110617-502-8200
So Ordered:ÿHon. Peter H. Moulton
9h$r//s
16557838.1
ÿE©ED¥EDSEP 25 2015
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK .y-U ,
'"
. ,.INRE: NEW YORK COUNTY; .-
ASBESTOS litigation. TNYCAL;. .
! I.A.S; Part 50_[ (Moultori, J?)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
RONEY TEMOR AND DIANE TEMOR,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL INC.,ET AL, ÿ'i. i "
I
Defendants. __J
Index No.: 190139/2015
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
"T
WHEREFORE, defendantKelly-Moore Paint Company hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law.and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant Kelly-Moore Paint Company without prejudice, and there
beingno opposition thereto, . ' v. •
' ,.S. .ÿ f.
.'* * ÿ *' " "• ' , ,ORDERED, that, upon notice to all co-defendants', all claims and cross claims against.
defendant Kelly-Moore Paint Company be and the same aire hereby dismissed without prejudice
and without costs.
k,Nev$YoDated: New
201£y
wa0-**lamsatthe\y M. Quirin, Esq, . " Jos
Hawkins ParnellThagkston& Young LLP THETWiLeIAMS LAW FIRM, P.C„Attorneys for Defendant Attorneys' for PlaintiffsKelly-Moore Paint Company Roney Teiiior and Diane Temor600 Lexington Avenue,:;8th Floor 245 Park Avenue, 39th FloorNew York, New York 10022 New York, NY 10167(212) 897-9655 ' ... (212)668-1122
SO ORDERED,_on. Peter H. Moulton
4 d; IflWED''SEP 2 2 2015
••• : ÿ ÿ
.' . .. ÿ ' • \
PART 50NYS SUPREME court-- civil
HARRIS BEACH 3Attorneys at Law
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
FREDDY A. LALAMA, SR.,
Plaintiff,
-vs.-
AFCO INDUSTRIES, INC.,et al.,
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION
Index No. 190131/2015"
WHEREFORE, defendant Plastics Engineering Company, by its attorneys, Harris
Beach PLLC, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint against defendant
Plastics Engineering Company with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that iipon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant Plastics Engineering Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs. •' >•••' •
Dated: (£Pi 2015
Bryan BelaskyBELLUCK & FOX, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff _546 FifthAvenue, 4th Floor Qff\CCNew York, New Ypfÿ%fyOB*(212)681-1575 C
Michael J. MasirHARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Defendant
Plastics Engineering Company99 Garnsey RoadPittsford, New York 14534(585)419-8800
SO ORDERED: JSHon. Peter H. Moulton
SEP 2 3 23,5-1-
ÿÿTcoLt-CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OFNEW YORK ..... x
InRe: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton,fP)
This Document Relates To:
DONNIE R. RUSSELL and DEBORAHJ. RUSSELL,HIS WIFE,
Plaintiffs,
- against -
AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, et al.
Defendants.
IndexNo.: 190127/15
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC., by its attorneys
Harris Beach PLLC, hereby/' requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint
against defendant ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC. with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant ARMSTRONG INTCRNATIQÿraÿL, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed
with prejudice and withoat $psfl
Dated:New York, New Yorkeÿ?
DavidA.TJnaMtoFrEstfQOUjÿÿÿl 'KARST & VON OISTE,LLP576 FifthAvenue, Suite 706New York, NY 10036ÿ830
Attorneysfor Plaintiffs
Robert A. Schaefer/ J/, Esq.HARRISBEACHPLLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005Attorneys For DefendantArmstrong International, Inc.
SO ORDERED;/ ,: Aj .»t-u.c.
Hon. Peter H.Moulton, J.S.CE1EQEHWED
SEP 23 2015
PART 50'OfVI
NVS SUPREME COURT ÿ CIVIL
A-.' .V ».*'ÿ? A3 j A'V-i""-
ÿ-a ' . • ÿ
.'ÿ3' ÿ•.'I. ÿ
* ' Si':; \'lC. , ÿ
:v, >,A [»)". •
ÿ ••• 4.- •' '.v rÿv-v-
v.' ; .ÿ •ÿ.
' • :>ÿ ..• - t
J--:SUPREME GGpRT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEWWORK - . , .
V V
INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
ANNE NOLAN,—x
Index No.: 190117/14
Plaintiffs,-against-
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
AERCO INTERNATIONAL, INC.,et. al. I.A.S. PartÿS"-3Hon. Shorry Ki Heitlcr_
Defendants.— -x
WHEREFORE, :GARDNER DENVER, INC. (hereinafter "Gardner Denver") hereby
requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules' '•! - .
Sections 3212, dismissing . plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant Gardner Denver, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, •:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant,.Gardner Denver, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs to either party.
0\C£CMS LAWÿimqÿoÿ
Attorneys for PlaintiflG*c_--ÿNÿ245 Park Avenue . .New York, New York 10167(212)668-1122 :
SO ORDERED;:ÿ». ' J
ÿJ-j/m ÿhnrrv K Hpitlpj-
HON.PETERH.MOULTOfif
Arlene GharabeigieÿBsq.SEGAL McCAMBRlDGE SINGER& MAHONEY, LTD. . .Attorneys'' for Defendant850 Third Avenue, Suite 1 1.00New York,- New York 10022(212) 651-7500:; •• >•
• ' ;'
tits9V O
•" '
• • •ÿ •• • • .- ÿ'
• . \ ' .., . .. ÿ . - r -V'E/.. -f'.' -
..............ÿ<' ! '' _ , • ,:'j, •• Vv.'V •.
•' • ' ' :.Vt» • ;
/ i ••
ÿ . <' •
•ÿ
• ' ' . . ;h/:' .SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK.....-.......-......-------i . xIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
"ÿn . '(..................—-—— - x
ROBERT KLATCH and:ANN MARIE KLATCH
Plaintiffs,-against- .
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, et. al
! Defendants.-----------------—------——— x
- />• r.ÿi;v;:
Index No.: 190312/14
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
l.A.S. Partÿ S°Hon. Shciiy K. Heitlci-
WHEREFORE, GARDNER DENVER, INC. (hereinafter "Gardner Denver") hereby
requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant Gardner Denver, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, Gardner Denver, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs to either party..
w York
jos/pywfHÿwfs, EsiN.tHeWilliams l-awItom;pc. paves <~>rr.i./i ,;Wcvÿ kAtÿFntys. for Plaintiff245 Park AvenueNew York, New York .10;167(212)668-1122
SO ORDERED; ;
' VAENN
brace E/Iang, Esq.S't-GAL.McCAMBRI& MAHONF.Y, LTD.Attorneys for Defendant850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022(212)651-7500
SINGER
Hon. Shorty K, Heitler
£ PETERH.MOULTON• ; i *
. . . .i
ÿ ' "" t ÿ . . < .* .
m m>.?a
V -< TV:*
ÿi ÿ W' \ÿ.:i-;;- ÿ
ÿ••
>ÿ.i- ÿ?
...>«v
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK .COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
JOHN P. RYAN and MARY C. RYAN,
-against-Plaintiffs,
Index No.: 190010/14
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
I.A.S. Partyti S"OHon.r-Sherry K. Iliitlu "
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, et. al.
Defendants.— — -X
WHEREFORE, MANNINGTON' MILLS, INC (hereinafter "Mannington Mills") hereby
requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant MANNINGTON MILLS,
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, MANNINGTON MILLS, be and the sbme are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs to either party.
Dated: New Y#gk, Nfevÿot
JosephWlrnflttis/tsqTHE MU/lAMS LAW,Attorneys for Plaintiff245 Park AvenueNew York, New York 10167(212)668-1122 <
SO ORDERED, .
Jordan $eitz, Escjÿ-/ 'SEGAL McCAMBRlDGE SINGER& NfAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for Defendant850 Third Avenue,-Suite 1100NewTYork, New York i0022(212) 65 1-7500
W'44dn. Sherry K. Heitler
HON.PETERH.MOULTOMSEP 23 20b.
'
PART 50. 'jÿ.SUPREME'fcouRT - CIVIL
-tt-*T
ÿ
• " ÿvU, "ÿ ¥? p T
v-.V ,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK '
'------------------:.f.---:---r . X
INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION-.................-----—--------------ÿ----ÿ—xSTANLEY HOBISH and ROSLYN HOBISH,
Plaintiff(s),-against-
A.Q. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et. al.,
Index No.: 190389/13
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
Hon. Peter H. MoultonDefendants.---------,-------—:—------------------—------ —x .
WHEREFORE, Defendant GARDNER DENVER, INC., hereby requests Summary
Judgment in the above-entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant GARDNER DENVER, INC., with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, GARDNER DENVER, INC., be arid the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs to either'party.
Dated: New York, New York1/ 1 0ÿ2015
lam Drckslcy, Esq.WEITZ AND LUXENffERG, P.C.~ ÿ VAttorneys for Plaintiff cfP %
,0FÿCeAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003,w(212) 558-5500 c° ÿ
Kevin W. Turbert, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE SINGER& MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for Defendant,850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022(212)651-7500
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
SfP 2 3 w
J"Si- Z;'Z- '
' . • -J* ' - ;' '• - . • ;V - ÿ•
• ÿi /ÿ-- '
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCpUNTY OF NEW YORK \ '
—xIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOSLITIGATION- -..................-4-- ~ -JAMES J. BELL and MARGARET BELL
Index No.: 190379/2014
Plaintiffs.against-
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTmotion andorder
AO. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et. al I.A.S. Partÿ S O
ui1 1 Villi. 1 1 Y L, Ilullu
WH
Defendants.-----------—— - xEREFOREvMANNINGTON MILLS. INC. (hereinafter /'Mannington Mills") hereby
requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' . complaint against Defendant Mannington Mills, with
prejudice, and there being np opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all. claims,and cross claims against
Defendant, Mannington Mills, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs to either party.
Dated: NewYork, Nd
JosephWiIliams,lEsq.THE W4LL1AMS LAWAttorneys for Plaintiff245 Park Avenue.New York. New.York 10167(212)668-1122. 'ÿ
«of&ce-ÿ6
SO ORDERED,. >Tlon. Gliuiy IC. Ilcitlcr —>
V HGN;PBT01H.MOULTON
ÿordanJSeltz, Esq/SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE SINGER& MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for Defendant850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100.New York; New York 10022
£212) 651-7500 .
/is
S©il¥ipl,SEP 23 2015 -
wssupÿg°R--.n/n
P3-- • :>«.
SUPREME COURf Op,THE.STATE OF NEW YORK.COUNTY OF NEW YORK • **—......-......—-i-:— . xIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
LOUIS VOTTA,
Plaintiff(s),-against-
Indcx'Np.: 190098/15
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
AERCO INTERNATIONAL;.INC. et al.
Mon.'Peter H. MoultonDefendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant Gardner Denver, Inc., hereby requests .Summary Judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs
complaint against Defendant Gardner Denver, Inc., with.prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims a'nd cross claims against Defendant,
Gardner Denver, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with,prejudice and without costs to either
party.
Dated: New York, New York
SEP 2 9 2015flu6- i/STjJl j
countÿR<soff,c6
DanieNWassereerg; fcfeq. ,MEIROWITZ & WAalSiiRBERG, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs845 Third Ave., 11th.FloorNew York, NY 10022
qanT
BRIDGE SINGER &An
GALMcCAMAHONEY,L:Attorneys for Defendant850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022 '
SO ORDERED, ' , 'A
eny.ivu
amlis
WedSep 23 2015
.:Ctva !
W t v' « -
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEWYORK ' . ..A'H
INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION-X
-XIndex No.: 190071/15
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION
I.A.S.PartifHon. PeterTI. Moulton
-X
ROBERT KEITH,
Plaintiffs,
- against -
MANNINGTONMILLS, INC. et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant MANNINGTON MILLS, INC. (hereinafter
"MANNINGTON MILLS"), hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case,
<&
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against
Defendant MANNINGTONMILLS,with prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, MANNINGTON MILLS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs to/either party.
Dated:
'ÿASEP 2 9 2015 KatrinaH,;Murphy,' Esq!
SEGAL McCAMBRlDGEJoseph PyWIlliams, Esq., "XTHE WILLIAMS LAW Flfi®0®W«CLppi<-,c, aiiuajb iviccaividiuuujl .Attorneysfor Plaintiff . NEW YoRk°FF&®gEr & MAHONEY,LTD.245 Park Avenue, 39th Floor . Attorneysfor DefendantNew York, New York 10167 MariningtonMills;:Inc.(212)668-1122 . 850 Third Avenue, Suite. 1100 !
New York, New Y,ork 10022(212)651-7506
SO ORDERED,Hon;Peter H.Moulton
3hdisIflVED
SEP 2.3 2015
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT -'.CIVIL
i;.-:SUPREME COUÿT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK - •
'ÿÿ L- •:'
INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION-X
DONALD LOBO, Index No.: 190188/14
/
Plaintiff,
against -
AERCO INTERNATIONAL INC., et. al,
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION
I.A.S. PartedHon; Peter H. Moulton
-XWHEREFORE, Defendant GARDNER DENVER, ;INC. (hereinafter "GARDNER
DENVER"), hereby requests Summary Judgment in. the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant
GARDNER DENVER, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, GARDNER DENVER, be and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and
without costs to either party.
Dated: Qe± vo, .2015New York, New York FIIED
"SEP 2 9 2015Phan Alvafado, Esq. . ÿ p_ .f . Wffia SijTalÿfehi, Esq. .Attorneysfor Plaintiff /' UUN7Y CLERK'S OFRC#feGAL IÿIcCAMBRIDGEWEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC .
NEWyORK ;
SINGER & MAHONEY,LTD.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Attorneysfor Defendant ;•
Gardner Denver, Inc.:850 Third Averiuev'Suite 1.100New York, New York 10022 >
'
(212) 65 1-7500/ . >.•' ÿ
SO ORDERED,on. Peter Moulton
C- ÿ Q. IflVlÿ'/SEP 232015
. • ' ..L' PART 50 -" v-:f-LÿVS-5UPREME COURT - CIVIL
ri-' ' '
V-*,*
-----v.- •'/."ÿ
•.*:ÿ '. ÿ'• ?»'£.'ÿ• ;/'ÿ•- 'ÿ
••••••• ÿ•''
•. -
" '..:...iWVv :VJVC- •
SUPREME COURT OF THE.STATE OFHEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
-xIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
-xBEVERLY TARANTINO and RALPHTARANTINO,
Plaintiff(s),-against-
Index No.: 190143/13
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
A.O. SMITH CORPORATION, et al.
Defendants.Hon. Peter H. Moulton
WHEREFORE,, Defendant BW/IP, Inc., hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-
entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complainti ' • • i i
against Defendant BW/IP, Inc.,with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,/ ' v
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against Defendant,
BW/IP, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party.
. * I
Dated: New York, New York
SEP 2 9 2015
Gal1;N.ASSOCIATES, LLPAttoWys for Plaintiffs350 FifthAve., Suite 7.413New York, NY 10118
&NIY CLERK'S' RIPKA SHKOLNIKYC r'Guerriero,
EGXL McCAMBRIDGE SINGER &MAHONEY.LTb.; ' ".I •
Attorneys for Defendant850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York .10022
SO ORDERED,Hon.'Peter H. Moulton
m o
r ' -• . •-> ÿ>
...... ;; J
TNRErNEW YORKvCITYASBESTOS LITIGATION'
PQDHAJSKI.
-aga'ihst-PlainlifRsjj
lnd.ex No;: 190178*/r4
, NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
AERC© INTERNATIONAL;et al.
Hon. PetenH1. MouIton.Defendants.
VVHJElÿr.ORE., Defendant 'BAV/IP, Inc., hereby requests -Summary Judgment in the above-
entitled case, pursuant' to/Cjvil Practice Law and Rules Sections :3il-2i,"dismissing plaintifrs complaint
against-Defendant BW/1P, Int.;with prejudice, and there being no opposition theieto,
ORDERED, .that-.upoiKnqtiÿ all claimsjahd crosslclaims against-Defendant.
B.W/IP, Inc., be and tlve< same are hereby,dismissed witli-prejudice 'anÿ without costsTo either party.
.Dated;
SEP 2 9 2015fv*r>
Joseph'RTf(E>>4%rAMS LAW FIRM,PiCAttorneys forplaintiffs245..Park Ave:, 39th FloorNew York, NY 10.167 : *
ONTY CLERKS ...<£&miblEW yqÿ'TM- Guemerq, Esq.\ CCP.'AT \ /('/s'AA V/f DD T HYTC CISEGALMcCAMBRlDÿE,SINGER &
.Attb¥heyis?foEDeTen& 7850 'Ihtrd.Avenue, Suite 1100Nevv York, New'-tork 10022
SO ORDERED, _HomPfeterH- ÿoultpri
v. • ... • •>,<'l1
SUPREME COURTOF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK '
ÿ
INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
ALEXANDER S. PODHAJSKI
NYCAL
J. Peter H: Moulton
Index No.: 190178/14
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERWITHOUT PREJUDICE
No evidence has been adduced in the course of product identification discovery that plaintiff
Alexander S. Podhajski was exposed to an asbestos-containing product manufactured by Honeywell
International Inc., formerly known as AlliedSignal Inc., successor-in-interest to The Bendix Corporation
("Honeywell").'• ' ; ;V 1 . »
WHEREFORE, Defendant Honeywell hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled• • »; • >i
ÿ '' '' > ;
case, pursuant to Civil Practice Eaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against
Defendant Honeywell with' prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,ÿ ÿ' ; !'\y.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against Defendant
Honeywell, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: Nq*k 'ork„.New Yorkh .v), 2015 V: • .*ÿ;
#;1:L€0McDermott Will & Emery LE
SEP 2 9 2015 ::Donald R.340 Madison Avenue ;.;
New York, New York 10173.
>ÿ9- COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE .NEW YORK
llham
Avenue
Attorneysfor HoneywellInternationalInc.f/k/a AlliedSignal, Inc., successor-in-interest toThe Bendix Corporation .
SO ORDERED
New YbrkvNew Ydrk 10167 •
;-A /•
Attorneysfor Plaintijfs
Honorable Peter H; MoultonHw O
'<:ÿ •pai?tso"'-I NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK-------------—........————------—XINRE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :- X
EVELYNMATOS,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
AIR.& LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP., et al.,
Defendants.
IndexNo. 190375/14
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
-X
WHEREFORE, defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs
complaint against Georgia-Pacific LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby: .
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against Georgia-Pacific LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs. • ' . . '.
";
Dated: New York, New Yorkroric, New x
l/t+l'ZLEVY KONIGSBERG LLPAttorneys for PlainE
icholas E.Novae
LYNCHDASKALEMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC
£ÿ% Daniel Gagliardi, Esq.
800 Third Avenue, 264 West 40,h Street -
New York, New York .10022 SEP 2 9 201&ew York, New York 10018(212) 605-6200 -ÿ (212)302-2400
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEDated: New York, New York NEW Y0RK
SO ORDERED:Hon. Peter H.Moulton, J.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK •' 'Cr'
INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
KENNETHL.GUILE
x NYCAL
J. Peter H. Moulton
x Index No.:i90370/13|
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERWITHOUT PREJUDICE
No evidence has been adduced in the course of product identification discovery thÿt plaintiff
Kenneth L. Guile was exposed to an asbestos-containing product manufactured by Honeywell
International Inc., formerly known as AlliedSignal Inc., successor-in-interest to The Bendix Corporation
("Honeywell"). ... 1
WHEREFORE, Defendant Honeywell hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled
case, pursuant vto Civil -Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against. • i
Defendant Honeywell with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,• • • - ' ' »
.V . i
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against Defendant
Honeywell, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New Ygfr]?,New York
f ,2015
McDermott Will & Emery LLP__ _
.
filedDonald R. PuglfelfoÿÿBsq. " SEP .2 9 20)5340 Madison Avenue r.X' 245 Park Avenue -39thNew York, New York 1017SOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE New York, New York 10167
NEW YORK 'ÿ H'-Attorneysfor HoneywellInternationalInc. Attorneysfor Plaintiffsf/k/a AlliedSignal, Inc.:, successor-in-interest to -
The Bendix Corporation
Williams
SO ORDEREDHonorable Peter H. Moulton
nw o
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW-YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
WILSON ANDERSON
NYCAL
J. Peter H.Moulton
Index No.: 190135/14
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDERWITHOUT PREJUDICE
No evidence has been adduced in the course of product identification discovery that plaintiff
Wilson Anderson was exposed to an asbestos-containing product manufactured by Honeywell
International Inc., formerly known as AlliedSignal Inc., successor-in-interest to The Bendix Corporation
("Honeywell").
WHEREFORE, Defendant Honeywell hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled
case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against
Defendant Honeywell with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against Defendant
Honeywell, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: NewMori/New YorkHIl .2015
McDermott Will & Emery LLÿ— j ÿ The Wiiiiiamk LaWÿrmÿLc)SEP 2 9 2015
Donald R. Pugliesfeÿsq. ÿ Joj(eÿ)ÿÿilliamst~Esq.340 Madison Avenue COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE 245ÿ™Avenue -39th FloorNew York, New York 10173 NEW YORK NewYork, New York 10167
Attorneysfor Honeywell InternationalInc.f/k/aAlliedSignal, Inc., successor-in-interest toThe Bendix Corporation<
A ttorheysfor Plaintiffs
SO ORDERED ftHonorable Peter H. Moulton
/s
1©EI1¥ED)SEP '23 2015 "•
PART 50ftlYS. SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
'' y Hi' ÿ r1- f"Ti'
/ •• k:Lv f-ÿ
• . . * - * ,:V ' y• y • • .
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK'COUNTY OF.NEW YORK < ' V
INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JOHN A. WARKENTIN
NYCAL
J. Peter H. Moulton
Index No.: 190155/14
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERWITHOUT PREJUDICE
No evidence has been adduced in the course of product identification discovery that plaintiff John
A. Warkentin was exposed to an asbestos-containing product manufactured by Honeywell International
Inc., formerly known as AlliedSignal Inc., successor-in-interest to The Bendix Corporation
("Honeywell").
WHEREFORE, Defendant Honeywell hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled
case, pursuant do Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint againstÿ *1'ii
#. • vÿ
Defendant Honeywell with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against Defendant
Honeywell, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New Y/ffy.,/NewYork_, 2015
McDermott Will & EmerymSEP 2 9 2015
Donald R- Puglipÿ0Y|lÿGLERi<.s OFFICE340 Madison Avenueÿ • :vkicvA/ YORKNew York, New York 16173
Attorneysfor HoneywellInternationalInc.f/k/a AlliedSignal, Inc., successor-in-interest toThe Bendix Corporation
illiam
liams,24.<H*tfrk Avenue -
, New York, New York 10167
. Attorneysfor Plaintiffs
SO ORDERED /tHonorablÿreter H. Moulton
:• -J • f ,•/ÿ.-SEP 2 3 2015. -
k. ... PART 50:'nys supreme court - civil
* • •
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK ' < .
INRE: . NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JOHN P. RYAN
NYCAL
J. Peter H.Moulton
Index No.: 190010/14
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERWITHOUT PREJUDICE
No evidence has been adduced in the course of product identification discovery that plaintiff John
P. Ryan was exposed to an asbestos-containing product manufactured by Honeywell International Inc.,
formerly known as AlliedSignal Inc., successor-in-interest to The Bendix Coiporation ("Honeywell").
WHEREFORE, Defendant Honeywell hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled
case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against
Defendant Honeywell,withprejudice, and there being no opposition,thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against Defendant
Honeywell, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs:
Dated: New,t New York( ,2015
McDermott Will & Emery LLT IL_ REP 2:9 2015
The/Williams
By:_2JosDonald R. PuglieseÿE§q. ;';\3T
340 Madison Avenue ' COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE '245 Park Avenue -39th Floorrk 10173; NEW YORK New York, New York 10167.New York, New York 1.'
Attorneysfor HoneywellInternationalInc.f/k/aAlliedSignal, Inc., successor-in-interest toThe Bendix Corporation,
Attorneysfor Plaintiffs
SO ORDEREDHonorable Peter H. Moulton (FpOEIWED
SEP 23 2015
PART SOÿ NYS SUPREME COURT. - CIVIL
" • ?:.v ÿ n;i-v ' v"WV?$• /
ÿ r"'.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW'YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK ;• ÿ :
INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
x NYCAL
: J. Peter H. Moulton
x ' Index No.: 190159/14This Document Relates to:
ROLAND QUASHIE ;NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERWITHOUT PREJUDICE
X,
No evidence has been adduced in the course of product identification discovery that plaintiff
Roland Quashie was exposed to an asbestos-containing product manufactured by Honeywell International
Inc., formerly known as AlliedSignal Inc., successor-in-interest to The Bendix Corporation
("Honeywell").
WHEREFORE, Defendant Honeywell hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled
case, pursuant to Civil Practice. Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against
Defendant Honeywell with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against Defendant
Honeywell, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New Yo,
McDermott Will & Emery
SEP 2 9 2015
Donald R.Pugljesÿsa. clERK'S OFFICE340 MadisoniAyenue mca/u YORKNew YorkÿNew York ,10173
Tne Williams
By: , y;
JÿephjPÿylliams, Esq.ÿ .•24ÿ-Park Avenue -39th Floor
ÿ New:Yo'rlc; New,York 10167. '
Attorneysfor Honeywell InternationalInc.f/k/a AlliedSignal, Inc., successor-in-interest toThe Bendix Corporation
Attorneysfor Plaintiffs
SO ORDEREDHonorable Peter H.Moulton
ms.IHi©El¥ED
• • SEP 2,3 2015 •
. PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
* ! ÿ
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
EDMUNDROM,AND ANNMARIE ROM-WEISENBACH, AS Co-Executors FOR THEEstateof HERMANJ.ROM,andERIKAROM,Individually_
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No: 190101/14
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: NewYork, New Yorkl7ÿ? _
2015
SEP 2 9 2015
K'S OFFICE
WEITZ & LAttorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
CLERK'S C
UXENBERG,P.C. 0 0Judith A. Yavftz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212)452-5300
SO ORDERED,on. Peter H. Moulton SEP 2 3 201.5
CIVIL
.«
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
EDMUNDROM,AND ANNMARIE ROM-WEISENBACH, AS CO-EXECUTORS FOR THE
Estateof HERMANJ.ROM,andERIKAROM,Individually___
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No: 190101/14
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Amchem Products, Inc., with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Amchem Products, Inc.,be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York2015 SEP ÿ 9 2015
RK'S office
les Ferguson,WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Yavifz, Esq!DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212)452-5300
SO ORDERED,n. Peter H. Moulton
W/5 ÿECEDWmSEP 2 3 20,5
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
EDMUNDROM,AND ANNMARIE ROM-WEISENBACH, AS Co-Executors FOR THEEstateof HERMANJ.ROM,andERIKAROM,Individually_
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No: 190101/14
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant UnionCarbide Corporation, with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York2015
WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Att9Ppeÿ jfcÿjaintiffs700 Broadway
Judith A. Yayitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
~*ifdsjts fÿMSMiWEDSEP £ 3 :Ji5
PART soS SUPRgMg COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
CLIVE K.TAYLOR and CLARICE TAYLOR
NYCALI.A.S.Part 50(Moulton, .£)Index No: 190113/2015
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company
n/k/a Bayer Cropscience, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against
defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company n/k/a Bayer Cropscience,
Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company n/k/a Bayer Cropscience,
Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
.2015
fes M
/Efefattorneys ror Plaintiffs
J*,0003(212) 558-5500
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SO ORDERED,
gl'rfu.,. Esor iXv JcNBERG,P.C. & Y D
B. Kromberg, Esq.ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLP
Attorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212)452-5300
Fjxfn. Peter H.MoultonSbsjis m D
supreme
I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
CLIVE K.TAYLOR and CLARICE TAYLOR
NYCALI.A.S.Part 50(Moulton,P.)Index No: 190113/2015
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
.,2015
Charles M. Fergu£oil, Esq.' Jonatfran B. Kromberg, EsqWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 0 3 DARGER ERRANTE YAAttorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038(212) 558-5500
DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
Hoff. Peter H. Moulton
SEP 2 9 2015
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
/I'Vf
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
CLIVE K.TAYLOR and CLARICE TAYLOR
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, f.)Index No: 190113/2015
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Dana Companies, LLC with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Dana Companies, LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
_,2015
larles M. rci'gl/suii,EsqWEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
onatharuBfKromberg, Esq.'DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for Dana Companies, LLC116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO OEM
SEP 2 9 2015
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
Hon. Reter H. Moulton m ©
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
CLIVE K.TAYLOR and CLARICE TAYLOR
NYCALI.A.S.Part 50(Moulton,$)Index No: 190113/2015
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New Yorkÿ?//ÿ .2015
les M, Ferguson, Esq*— —> Jonathafyfe. Kfomberg, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C. U DARGERERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Union Carbide Corporation700 Broadway 116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10016(212)558-5500 (212)452-5300
Hoi/Peter H.Moulton
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
supreme
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S.Part 50(Moulton, P.)
This Document Relates to: Index No: 190104/2015
ARTHUR J. JACHOWSKI and MARIEJACHOWSKI
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company
n/k/a Bayer Cropscience, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against
defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company n/k/a Bayer Cropscience,
Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company n/k/a Bayer Cropscience,
Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
.2015
Charles M.Fciguson, IÿqtjLftA>vWEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.
Jonapdn B. Kromberg, Esq.PÿRGER ERRANTE YA1PaRGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
FHon. Pdter H. Moulton
SUPREME
sCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
NEW YORK .
------. >• .-
SUPREME COURT OF THE?STATE OF NEW-YORKCOUNTY OF:NEW YORK -
INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION;.........=—. xThis Document Relates To:
VENETIA KONTOGOURIS, as Administratrixfor the Estate of ZORAN DJOKIC, andVENETIA KONTOGOURIS, Individually,
Plaintiffs),
-against- , .
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,r\
Defendants".
NYCAL •.I.A.S. Part 50 ÿ
(Hon. Peter H. Moulton)
Index No.: 190397/2014/
ÿ < . «
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, Defendant "CRANE ,CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the'* T /'-«•*. ' .. *'• ..'7 ' ' \
; .........' / " A' '
ÿabove-entitled '
'case, pursuant to Civil Practice. Lavÿand Rules Section 3212, dismissing
* |*. A ""'- f
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no• ' * - -v*v . „ *. . . } _ • • - ' s1. . ÿ
f
.• ...* > - •• J-- . • •
opposition thereto, * . „ ' SL- .
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:New York, New York
Danny R. Kraft,WEITZ & LUXENBIAttorneys'" for Plaint700 Broadway .
hLmfurv, ' •-.•tutirirryj ÿ jf
SEP 2 9 2015SO ORDERED,£
KirstenfAlford-Kneis, Esq.K&L/GATES LLPAttorneys for DefendantCRANE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900
ÿBS /COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE Hoh. Peter H. Moulton
NEW.YORK
m o
SUPREME-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK CITY. ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
RAYMONDFLOODAND CARLEENFLOOD,
-X
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
Index No.: 190147-15
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Pneumo Abex LLC,successor in interest to Abex Corporation,
incorrectly sued herein as "PNEUMO ABEX LLC,successor-interest to ABEX
CORPORATION, f/k/a PNEUMO ABEX," (hereinafter "Abex"), hereby requests summary
judgment inthe above-entitled case, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Abex, with prejudice, there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Abex, be and are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated, 22*2015fork, New York
jaaiei P.Blouin,Es«ÿ-ÿ"SIMMONS HANLEY CONROY LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs112 MadisonAvenueNew York, NY 10116-7416(212) 784-6400
FILEDSE%& &$Mred,_
rente, Esq.HAWKINS-PARNELL
THACKSTON & YOUNG LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Pneumo Abex LLC, Successor ininterestto Abex Corporation600 LexingtonAvenue, 8th FloorNew York, New York 10022-7678(212) 897-9655
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
iojiTpiHon/Peter H. Moulton
1104761Sv.l
m n
SUPREME COURT OFTHE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OFNEW YORK
| nycalMARIE CITRONE, as Administratrix for the Estate of JOSEPH I J.A.S. Part 50M. CITRONE, and MARIE;CITRONE, Individually, j :(Hon. Peter H, Moulton)
Plaintiff, ::
- against -
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY., et al;,
Defendants.
j Index No.: 190266/14
j NO OPPOSITION:SUMMARY JUDGMENTI MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE Defendant TACO. INC. hereby requests summary judgment in the above
entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing1Plaintiffs complaint
against DefendantTACO,INC.withprejudice inthis action; and there beingno oppositionthereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant TACO, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: White Plains,New York
,201.5
lichelle Grady, Esq.Attorneyfor DefendantTACO, INC.EckertSeamans Cherjn & Mellott,LLC10.Bank Street, Suite 700White Plains,New York 10606(914) 949-2909
Charles Ferguson,Esq.Attorneyfor PlaintiffMARIECITRONE,.ASADmNISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATEOFJOSEPH,Mi CITRONE, AND MARIECITRONE,Individually
WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.700.BroadwayNew York, NewYork 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED . ÿF| I fPIÿHon..Peter H,Moulton
SEP 2 9 2015
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
{S0011889.1}
m
SUPREME.COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OFNEW YORK
VINCENT FERRAIOLI and JOHANNA FERRAIOLI,
Plaintiff,
- against -
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION., et al.,
Defendants.
: NYCALi I.A.S. Part 50
(Hon. Peter H. Moulton)
j Index No.: 190243/13. i
; NO OPPOSITIONi SUMMARY JUDGMENT• MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE Defendant TACO, INC. hereby requests summary judgment in the above
entitled case, pursuant,to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint.
against Defendant TACO, INC.withprejudice inthis action, andthere beingno oppositionthereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant TACO, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice arid without costs.
Dated: White Plains,New York
,2015
rLllll(/Michelle Grady, Esq:Attorneyfor DefendantTACO, INC.EckertShamans Cherin&MELLorr,LLC10 Bank Street, Suite 700White Plains,:New York 10606(914) 949-2909
Charles.Ferguson,•
Attorneyfor PlaintiffsVINCENTFERRAIOLIANDJOHANNA FERRAIOLIWEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.700 BroadwayNewYork, New York 10003(212) 558-5500;
SO ORDERED,Hon. Pete
y, J»l»6...w CtEBÿ.,°F0C£
SEP 23Wi
2015NYS p4RT So
court . CIVIL{S0011890.1}:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONx
X
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
JOHN S. BOWER and KATHLEEN BOWER,
Plaintiff (s) ,
Index No. : 13/19020793/13215593/106484
-against-
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al .,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Defendants .x
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), named herein as LONG ISLAND LIGHTING
COMPANY, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: Npw YotIc . Wpu Vm-k
John J.CullenAttormnation;
44 Wall Street
Jrfp*-Matthew Maclntyre, EsqffRATION LLC
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for PlaintiffsWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 Broadway
iw York, NY 10003: 12) 558-5500New York, NY 10
(212) 732-2000
SO ORDERED,
supreme
o.ÿ
. .ÿ ;*/ '•
. • . /-; - f '•' = ''
\ . " -r/., 1 :V ."L
. . - -.c- ÿ -A- ÿ' ÿ ÿ'.' . ÿ
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEWYORK
-i- "--XNew York AsbestosLitigation (NYCAL)
INRENEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION Index No.: 190131/2009
-XJUDITH KALLESTENOAKLEY, Individually, and asADMINISTRATOR of the Estate of SPENCER OAKLEY,
Plaintiff(s),
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
-against-
ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY,"et al.
Defendants.-X
WHEREFORE, defendant, NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to the Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs Complaint against defendant, NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., with.
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant, NISSANNORTH AMERICA, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Dated: New.York New York2015
BERG,NE & D SIPIO LEVYLAVIN,OÿNEIL
By:Tintottrvid. JVggHvffih.iLsa:i
NISSANNORTH AMERICA, INC.420 LexingtonAvenue, §gptÿ3ÿ2015New York, New York 10170% ,
(212)319-6898 G0UNJY CLERK'S OFFICEOur File No.:06087-009rtÿ9YORKAttorneysfor Defendant —
jchplas Novack, Esq.Levy Konigsberg, LLPAttorneys, for Plaintiffs800Third AvenueNew York, New York 10022Attorneysfor Plaintiff
SO-ORDERED 9'hslis*IOto.PETQUf>MOULTON
H¥ebSEP 22 2015
PART 50V. • NYS supreme COURT
(ft
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKINRE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
FRANCES OLEXA, Individually and as PersonalRepresentative for the Estate of JOSEPH P. OLEXA,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A.C. and S., INC., (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY), et al.,
Defendants.
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
Index No. 106209/2001
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERAS TO DEFENDANTKAISER GYPSUM COMPANY. INC.
WHEREFORE, defendant, KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC.,with
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant KAISER GYPSUM COftfSkNWINC.,'\
prejudice and without cos
trsuivi Lui«wvi>wfir
\ V*be and the same are hereby dismissed with
Dated: New York, New York
ÿftr. id-Steven T. Corbin, Esq.Attorney for DefendantKaiser Gypsum Company, Inc.Lewis BrisboisBisgaard& SmithLLP77 Water Street, 21st FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 232-1300File No. 29510.647
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsEstate of Joseph P. OlexaWeitz & Luxenberg,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDEREDHon. Peter H. Moulton
4845-8144-7720.1
©
** m
S3
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
JOSEPH D; WHITE AND DORENE J. WHITE,
£ a
PLAINTIFF(S),
: NYCAL| I.A.S. Part 50j (Moulton, P)
j Index No.: 126937/02, 105581/03
j NO OPPOSITIONi SUMMARY JUDGMENTi MOTIONAND ORDER AS TOj PEERLESS INDUSTRIES. INC.: ONLY
-AGAINST-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.
DEFENDANTS. j
WHEREFORE, defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil.Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiff s complaint against defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., with prejudice in this
action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED that upon notice to all co-defendants, all .claims and cross claims against
defendant PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INCÿbe and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Jesse Rogers, Esq.Attorney for Defendant
Industries, Inc.Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard& Smith LLP77 Water Street, Suite 2100New York, New Yprkfl:0005: :: ~ •
(646) 666-76751863.8575 A ..
SO ORDERED,
uzanne MJRatcliffe, Esq.AttomeyQj/rPlaihtiff(s)Joseph D. White and Dorene J. WhiteWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Hon. Peter J. Moulton
BECEIWEDSEP 23 2015
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
4822-8768-7973.1
'SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK #COUNTY OF NEW YORK
O
MARIE MAYER, as Administratrix for the Estate ofJOSEPH MAYER andÿVlARIE MAYER, Individually,
Plaintiff(s),-against- .
.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.
Defendants.
NYCAL :I.A.S. Part:50(Moultoh, p)
Index No.: 190362/10
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTmotionAnd Order as toPEERLESS INDUSTRIES.INC.ONL?Y'-
WHEREFORE, defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., hereby requests summary-
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant, PEERLESS'INDUSTRIES,INC.,with prejudice in this
action, and there being no opposition thereto, ..»/"* y y
ORDERED that upon notice to all co-defendants, All /claims and cross claims against
defendant PEERLESS INDUS.TRIESÿbÿÿ be and th'e same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs. ÿ
Dated: New York, New York
lodgers, Esq.Atÿfney for Defendant &
Pÿrless Industries, Inc. -fLewis Brisbois Bisgaard& SmithLLP77 Water Street, Suite 2100 . . -V>New York, New York 10005, .. ' U *
'
(646) 666-7675'
'
1863.27333 " '
SO ORDERED,HortrPeter J. Moulton
Suzanne M. ftatcjiffe, Esq.AttorneyAoryPlaintifffs)Marie Nyy£r, asiAdministratrix for the Estate of JosephMayer and Marie'Mayer, IndividuallyWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500 ; sXN
05
4 5' • »s
4838-2534-7876.1
4U' V-V -. j
TMMcC:gy8/25/15
Our FileNo.S-6069-02
SUPREME COURT ©EiTHE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OFNEW tORKINRE: NEW YOUR COUNTY -
ASBESTOS LITIGATION,
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:NORBERT KACZ
> :
DAVID H.5fU70iv.
mCA% SEP (H P 1; 2UI.A.S. Part 50 = . .(Moyll'DnpÿATED EDiSO'rl w.
©F NEW YOKK. INC.
INDEXNO.106709/02 ' f*S" .'•«* . . ÿ*»
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitle case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, Consolidated Edison Company of New York,
Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
. • * tj'\r 'defendant, Consolidated Edison.Company of New York, Inc;,,be arid the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs. ',•
ÿ • . • l;r.
Dated: New York, New YorkAugust 25, 2015
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq. ' ÿWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. .Attorneys for Plaintiff ÿ -700 Broadway, , '
,
New York; New York 10007
TimothyM.jMcCann, Esq.DAVID MÿGANTORO, ESQ.Attorney for Defendant . _ •'
Consolidated Edison CompanyofNew York, Inc.
4 IrvingPlace• New York', New York 10003-3598
SO ORDERED: ,<7 ---HÿfrPeferff Moulton
aw ©
supreme court
TMMcC:gy8/25/15 .
ÿ' a1''.-'V'-
Our File No.S-4642-99
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW .YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKINRE: NEW YOUR COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION,
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:HENRY MIKA
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton,fy . , v.,-.
INDEXNO.100029/99
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitle case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, Consolidated Edison Company of New York,
Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.; be and the same are hereby dismissed with
i'i "• ' ÿ
prejudice and without costs. 'ÿ v V, '*
Dated: New York, New York y '
August 25, 2015
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq. '
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. ÿ GÿC$v ÿ
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003'-
SO ORDERED:
Timothy M.JjlfcCann, Esq.\pAyroW,santoro,esq..Attprrieyrer DefendantConsolidated Edison Company
ofNew York, Inc.4 IiyingPlace '
•New York, New York 10003-3598'
on. Peter;fjMoulton EQE&ED.SEP 23 2015
.. . . PAftTSOV ÿIMYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
:Y>
TMMcC.gy8/25/15
Our FileNo.S-4002-09
. ..i;ÿ ....
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK:INRE: NEW YOUR COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION,
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:JOHN R.DRAPER
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P)
INDEX-NO.190116/08
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Consolidated -Edisori Company of New York, Inc. hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitle case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, Consolidated Edison Company of New York,
Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant, Consolidated Edison Company of;New York, Inc., be' ahd the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs; Y.
Dated: - New York, New York "
August 25, 2015
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P C?Attorneys for Plaintiff700 Broadway '
New York, New York : 10003' .> t'
SO ORDERED:
m-: Timothy M.McCann, Esq.
DAVID MJ/aHTORO, ESQ.;/ Attorney for Defendant
Consolidated Edison Company/" . of New York, Inc.
Tlrving Place. New York, New York 10003-3598
Hon; Peter fjMoulton
SEP 23 20]5
TMMcC:gy.8/25/15
SUPREME COURT/pF THE STATE OF NEW YORKcounty OFNEWrybfe ÿ • '' " y, '•INRE: NEW YOUR COUNTY "T~ ~] NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION, I.A.S. Part 50 >(Moulton,fy) >
ÿ
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: INDEXNO.EDWINC. WILSON . 107222/02
,:•. 't' •ÿ1
ÿ
'
" . NO OPPOSITION'• SUMMARY JUDGMENT
' MOTIONAND ORDER "
Our File No.:S-7879-02
WHEREFORE, defendant, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitle case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section*"'s • , 7...... ,
3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, Consolidated Edison Company of New York,
Inc.with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.ibe and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs. .
Dated: New York, New YorkAugust 25, 2015
Matthew Maelntyre, Esq. Timothy M/MQCann,Esq. .... , .• ;.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. ÿ DAVID M.ÿNTORO, ESQ. - :
Attorneys for Plaintiff " ÿ .« .. T 7AttorneyTor Defendant700 Broadway ; \ ÿ ' .Consolidated Edison Company.New York, New York 1Q003 J- !bfNeW*York,Tnc.
4" IrvingPlace. . Nÿw York,New York 10003-3-598.'
SO ORDERED:'Hon. Peter jf Moulton
©
/'V'
TMMcC:gy8/25/15
Our File No.:S-6597-00
t-• •' fI'y'fi- ÿ ÿ.:*
ÿ ;• -v? 4: .. . '»
. l' ÿ ÿ
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OFCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
•f ÿ
YORK' * Fi
INRE: NEW YOUR COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION,
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:WILLIE J. HAMILTON
NYCAL.I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, f.)
INDEXNO.106178/00
NO OPPOSITIONsummary JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitle case, pursuantto,Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, Consolidated Edison Company of New York,
Inc.with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, ,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkAugust 25, 2015
Matthew.Maclntyre, Esq. - ~WE1TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. ÿ
rjc- ÿ Timothy M.jMcCann, Esq:
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 Broadway -ol
New York, New York 10003
; •" ?V M- SÿNTORO,y • ''::> Attomey for Defendant
.ÿ.1 » ' 1 'Am 1« /Irtt-rtj4 L /Iina i1
ofr ÿ>
p.* ÿ
Consolidated Edison Company..ofNew York, Inc.
4 IrvingPlaceNew York, New York 10003-3598
SO ORDERED:/:' ,'
_'f Horn Peter pjMoulton
k
' V.
OWBIDv
' -.'SEP' 2,ÿ.-015r PART.50 .
NVP SUPREME. COURT - i
vt-V:ÿ ' t '
ÿAl'/':
ÿ i"ÿ
TMMcC:gy8/25/15,
-•,< , v'VT ' VtfeT; ' •ÿ •' .. •• ' - . " •'
"V-Hi • • . 1 "'ÿ: ' ÿ
ÿ• '
•/"S* ÿÿ>' . •• '•'
-v-: ..J* . • .
ÿÿÿ- 'ÿ
ÿ 'yv
COUNTY OF NEW YORKINRE: NEW YOUR COUNTY 1 ..... NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION, I.A.S. Part 50' *
ÿ "r (Moultonÿ /?)
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ;' . INDEX NO.JOHN:J,DUFFY
'<- . 190467/11
- * ÿ
• " ' •; NO OPPOSITION. «• • V • SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
H! • V•
.WHEREFORE, defendant, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby
requests sumiinary judgment in the above-entitle case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing plaintiff s complaint against defendant, Consolidated Edison Company of New York,
Inc.with prejudice, and there being no opposition therptb, .
ORDERED, that upon notice to ail,co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant, Consolidated Edison Company of New/York, fncÿ bevand the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs. ' \
Dated: New'York, New York .August 25, 2015
%w -Matthew MacIntyre'ÿEsq.WEITZ.& LUxiNBERG,P.C. ,.j
' jÿÿnsiÿÿed Edisÿ;Companyk '• -J?'- \r~j, t__
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 Broadway • '
New York, New York 10003
cCanri, Esq.ANTORO,ESQ.
J'Vi ;.•
''';J,dfNew York, Ine.4 IrvingPlace ; . y,,...,.'...New York, New YprkP 10003-3598
SOiORDERED: ,%ÿ
... Hon. Peter j/Moulton
Our File No.:S-4037-11
k- • SEP23 2GI5.v
/ÿ v:4/t;
,'VSSUPREMS COURT - CIVIL--...f ft,1, ,'}Vt • 'v.-: W.,.:v.
"V'..'iTv i.v:r*.
TMMcC'gy8/25/15
Our File No.:•S-4796-96
'ÿ li: : .
•w ',hW:- . .*• :• .:t\
U " -/V
.-.'.a; •
Vi
• . . . • . ' -v.. ,r-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE QF NEW YORCOUNTY OF NEW YORK :ÿ
INRE: NEW YOUR COUNTYASBESTOS' LITIGATION,
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:LAVERNEEDWARD.HEARBURG
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, ft)
INDEXNO.115306/96
NO OPPOSITION VSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
. WHEREFORE, defendant, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitle case,1 pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant) Consolidated Edison Company of New York,
• ' :.. . ' ./i , ,ÿ J
Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, • . .*
V1 ÿ V. ; , A
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York * ; . , , .August 25, 2015 '/
x ÿÿ
cCann, Esq.Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff .700 Broadway cPÿ ÿNew York, New York 10003
SO ORDERED:
Timothy lyt.Nÿ DAVIDMsSANTORO, ESQ.
ÿ Attorney for Defendant" )ÿ. r ConsolidatedEdison Company;V 'ÿnv-j/T'ÿ'foflÿeW'Ypfk, Inc..• • "/< 4 IrvingPlace
New York, New York 10003-3598
Hon. Peter ft Moulton
.a -ÿ ÿ v
©
.V .V
TMMcC:gy:.8/25/1fl
i\. •,: . ,;'P«
COUNTY OF NEW YORKINRE: NEW YOUR COUNTY U,
ASBESTOS LITIGATION, V
NYCAL . ."•ÿÿ4I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, ft)
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: INDEX NO.ROSARIA D.MUSCHTER 190347/10 ÿ
NO OPPOSITION1
.1 - ÿ/ ÿ p- .SUMMARY JUDGMENT
•'
" 1' ' . ''
MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.,hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitle case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant, Consolidated Edison Company of New York,
Inc.with prejudice, and there being no opposition theretop " 'P - '
ORDERED, that .'upon,notice to ali co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant, Consolidated/Edison'Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without cost's. ', : / ...Dated: • New York, New York ÿ
'
,ÿ
ÿAugust 25, 2015
Matthew MacIntyre, Esqr, \ ÿ Timothy M. McCafm, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG- P.C. <$? 1 ,
;: ÿÿUAVID M. SANJORO, ESQ.
Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorney for Defendant7Q0 Broadway • ; Consolidated Edison CompanyNew York, New York 10003 ÿOr of New York, Inc:
ÿ
' 4 Irving.Place ... j .New York, Ngw York 1.0003-3598
=yfi£ -SO ORDERED:Hon. Peter ff.Moulton
Our File No.:S-4147-10
50C°PRT .QVjl
TMMcC:gy'8/25/15
Our File No.;
S-6951-02
-ÿ 3 - •: V',-,s .l9'.
SUPREME COURT OFTHE STATE OF NEWYORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK "
inre: newYour county . - •' '
'
ASBESTOS LITIGATION,
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:LESLIE FABER '
• t;
• ÿ)' ' *v ÿ
• ,• f 1ÿ . * "*
. , ,.• • 1• \> '
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, f.)
INDEXNO.10998//02
?NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER-
WHEREFORE, defendant, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitle case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing plaintiffs-complaint against defendant,' Consolidated Edison Company of New York,
Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,• • . • *:•?• . I*'
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant, Consolidated Edison Company of New'York, Inc.,be and the.same are hereby dismissed withÿ : ' \ .• : '
'
• • ÿÿ ' ' • «•
• • • •
prejudice and without costs. • ,
Dated: , ;New York, New YorkAugust 25, 2015
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.; cC?WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P C.Attorneys for Plairitiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
-\yV® TimothV:Mf McCairin, Esq.- %h'"'ft. DAYityM. SANTORO, ESQ.
SO ORDERED: •ÿ"r •
ÿ/ .r Attorney for Defendant• Consolidated Edison Company
' of New York, Inc.i
4 IrvingPlace , •
'*ÿ New York, New York 10003-3598 ÿs
' Hon. Peter J/MoultonBEOEBVED.
SEP 2 3 2015V- ;• V
• -V>' ' PART '50ÿNYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
TMMcC:gy8/25/15
ÿ: ÿ '. .• •' -• 11/
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE.OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKINRE: NEW YOUR COUNTY
ÿASBESTOS LITIGATION,
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:PETER TADDEO
NYCALLA.S, Part 50(Moulton, f)
t
INDEXNO.120778/96 &
119618/02
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitle case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, Consolidated Edison Company of New York,
Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, '
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against, ' ÿ.,«<
1 *ii * . .defendant, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with..... > ..prejudice and without costs. •
Dated: New York, New YorkAugust 25, 2015
Our File No.S-5209-96
cpp o 3ÿ2015 .Timothy IÿM/Cann,Esq.'
= ÿ/D/tyroM santoro,esq.Matthew Maclntyre, Esq. .
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff eRK'S 6FFlCÿttorhey for>Defendant .700 Broadway COUN
Ncv/uyORK. .ÿConsolidated Edison CompanyNew York, New York 10003 "N''.. . Ty-f- . ofNew York,.Inc.,
. ,4 IrvingPlace..' '' V ' ,N:eyv York, New York. 10003-3:598
t ,
SO ORDERED: '
Hon. Peter}jMoulton
CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK _
InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATIONIndex No.: 190185/11
HERMANVISGER,
- against -
AURORA PUMP COMPANY, et al„
Plaintiff(s),
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION
WHEREFORE, Defendant AURORA PUMP COMPANY hereby requests Summary
Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Aurora Pump Company with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, Aurora Pump Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without Costs to either party.
Dated:New York. New York
ÿ ;Matthew Maclntyre, Esq. £>v5ÿÿ?ÿsKatrina H. Murphy, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.CÿAttorneys for Plaintiff ÿ
700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED, .
SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY,LTDAttorneys for DefendantAurora Pump Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100
New York, NY 10022 •. •
(212)651-7500 .
Hon. Peter H. Moulton/is m
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATIONIndex No.: 190131/09
SPENCER OAKLEY,
t against -
AURORA PUMP COMPANY, et al.,
Plaintiff(s),
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION
WHEREFORE, Defendant AURORA PUMP COMPANY hereby requests Summary
Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Aurora Pump Company with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, Aurora Pump Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs to either party.
q/n0Dated: _, 2015
Nicholas Novae]
LEVY,PHILLIPS &KONIGSBERG,LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff800 Third Avenue, 1ltiNew York, NY 10003(212) 605-6200
SO ORDERED,
SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY,LTD.Attorneys for DefendantAurora Pump Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100
New York, NY 10022(212)651-7500
Hon. Peter H.MoultonICEBWED
SEP 23 2015
PART SONYS supreme COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK __
InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATIONIndex No.: 190406/10
PATRICK T. SLEVIN,
- against -
AURORA PUMP COMPANY, et al.,
Plaintiff(s),
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION
WHEREFORE, Defendant AURORA PUMP COMPANY hereby requests Summary
Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Aurora Pump Company with prejudice, and
there beingno opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, Aurora Pump Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs to either party. *
Dated: _, 2015
Tolas NovacK, Esq.
LEVY,PHILLU»S\ ÿ ÿKONIGSBERGOLLP
Q VAttorneys for.Plaintiff ,800 Third Avenue, 11thFloorÿÿ.rÿNew York, NYT0003(212)605-6200 . .
SO ORDERED,
<C*
,Esq.ÿ 'SEGAL MctfAMBRIDGE
SINGER & MAHONEY,LTD.Attorneys for DefendantAurora Pump Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100
New York, NY 10022(212)651-7500
Hon. Peter H. Moulion m &
\-MV .:\>"<»'? V - '
.; • ÿ V'
'V
SUPREME COURT-OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK ÿ
' :
INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
JOANNE DYER, Individually and as Proposed Executrixof the Estate of SAM GULL, Index No.: 1900(ÿ/09
Plaintiff(s),-against-
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND order
AMERICAN:STANDARD,.INC., et al.I.A.S. Part-50 . ÿ
Hon. Peter H. MoultonDefendants. ......
. v.t;. . .--------------------—,---------;— ....---X-
WHEREFORE, Defendant GARDNER DENVER, .INC. (hereinafter "GARDNER
DENVER"), hereby requests .Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant
GARDNER DENVER, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon •notice to all co-defendants, .all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, GARDNER DENVER, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs to either party.v
/ Dated: New
aÿNovack, Efÿ V ' AÿreWjW. Dehn, Esq.Levy Konigsberg, LLP , c<£> < ÿ>1 Segal McCambridge Singer & Mahoney, Ltd.Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendants800 Third AvenueNew York; New..York.;1Q.|(212)605-6200 V >'
850 Third Avenue, Ste 1100New York, New York 10022
• (212)651-7500 . U ; '
SO ORDERED,_on. Peter H. Moulton
P
' ,-/L.ÿ t rV-:
---'ci r! .
V';A'-SANSS''ÿ ÿ'."V >£•'
COUNTY OFNEW YORK v
INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
-xMILTON 0. KARL, Individually and as Administrator of ÿ \
Index No.: 190002/09 .
' A Plaintiff(s),- -against,-
ABEX CORPORATIONÿ al.,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
LAVS.;Part 50"Hon..Peter H. Moulton
Defendants.
----------------r------------— X
WHEREFORE, Defendant GARDNER DENVER, INC. (hereinafter "GARDNER
DENVER"), hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaihftffs" .Complaint against Defendant
GARDNER DENVER, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all ÿco-defendants, all/claims and cross claims against
Defendant,; GARDNER DENVER, be and the same,are hereby dismissed with prejudice and .ÿÿ•A
without costs to either party.
Dated:.NewYf
drev/"ucnolas Novae.ÿ ÿ
Levy.Konigsberg,' LLP cÿ" ,Attorneys for Plaintiff ~800 Third Avenue ANew York, New York:1OOÿDÿ A;(212)605-6200 '
; iA V V;V"
Segal MQCampfidge Singer & Mahoney, Ltd.Attorneys for, Defendants850 Third AyeriueÿSte; 1100NewApfk,;Ne\ÿlÿ A
(2i2)651-75001
\ '. "A-- .; r . —
SO ORDERED;. 9ms/MHon. Peter H. Moulton
A'
SEP 2 3 2015
/r.i -ÿ v<v,r . , > ÿ; \.V'i-Vv-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK : '
COUNTY OFNEW•YORK .•......—- x
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
--X
WARREN W. TAVENIERE,
-against-
Index No.: 107016/08 .Plaintiffs), NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
AMERICAN EXPORT LINES f/k/a Farrell LinesIncorporated, et 'aU
l.A.S. Part 1J6Hon. Peter H. Moulton
Defendants......................———-v.—— — -xWHEREFORE, Defendant GARDNER DENVER, INC. (hereinafter "GARDNER
DENVER"), hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant
GARDNER DENVER, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all) claims and cross claims againstm • ÿ. ••• ./ '.y •
: '• • •
Defendant, GARDNER ' DENVER; be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
V • •
without costs to either party.
Dated: NewÿÿrkÿNew York
Esq. :
LEVY KONIGSBERG,.LLP oÿA0 '
Attorneys for Plaintiff800 Third AvenueNewWork, New York 10022
cF
LSimone Nicholson, Esqv. •
SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE SINGER& MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for Defendant850 Third' Avenue, Suite 1100NeW York, New York: 10022(212) 651-7500 \ L ; \ . -
SO ORDERED,"fion. Peter H. Moulton
WdjZ:% 'J'1;'-
& O
SUPREME court
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK _In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
Index No.: 190285/11
ALEXANDER PARENTE,
- against -
AURORA PUMP COMPANY, et al„
Plaintiff(s),NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant AURORA PUMP COMPANY hereby requests Summary
Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Aurora Pump Company with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against f
Defendant, Aurora Pump Company be and the sage aEÿkereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs to either party. | I
££P 2 9 2015Dated: 0 1/0°! .,2015
New York, New York
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
coÿS'"9-Katrina H. Murphy, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY,LTDAttorneys for DefendantAurora Pump Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100
New York, NY 10022(212)651-7500
Hon. Peter H. Moulton
m a
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK _ "
InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATIONIndex No.: 190165/11
ARNOLD GORDON,
J - against -
AURORA PUMP COMPANY, et al„
Plaintiff(s),
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION
WHEREFORE, Defendant AURORA PUMP COMPANY hereby requests Summary
Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Aurora Pump Company with prejudice, and 1
there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, Aurora Pump Company be ancLjbe affile are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs to either party.
Q "VQ C\ t 2015 SfcP % ÿ ÿDated:
New York, New Yorkcoÿssr?lattnew Maclrltyfe,
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 Broadway •New York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
Katrina H.Murphy, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY,LTD.Attorneys for DefendantAurora Pump Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100
New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500
Hon. Peter H. Moulton
ÿecebvedSEP 23 2015
'
PART 50NYS SUPREMg.COURT - CIVIL
rSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
InRe:NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATIONIndex No.: 190503/11
RAYMOND CAPPO,
Plaintiff(s),
- against -
AURORA PUMP COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION
WHEREFORE, Defendant AURORA PUMP COMPANY hereby requests Summary
Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Aurora Pump Company with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED,--that-upon-notice-to-alLco-defendantsr-ali-claims-and-cross-claims-against-
Defendant- Aurora Pump Company be and thÿame are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs to either party ÿDated:,
New York, New YorkrP!W Ynrt b<--.c
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.•
WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500 ,
SO ORDERED,HotiÿPeter H. Moulton
KatrinaH.Murphy, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY,LTD.Attorneys for DefendantAurora Pump Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100
New York, NY 10022(212)651-7500
jasps
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK _InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
IndexNo.: 190214/09
OTIS CORTHELL, •;
Plaintiff(s),
- against -
AURORA PUMP COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION
WHEREFORE, Defendant AURORA PUMP COMPANY hereby requests Summary
Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Aurora Pump Company with prejudice, and
there beingno opposition theretoj
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants; all claims and cross claims against
Defendant/ Aurora Pump Company be and Ihe same are hereby dismissed with prejudice arid
without costs to either pÿjjy. 4 ÿV*
Dated:
ofÿc£
Jicholas Novack, Esq;LEVY,PHILLIPS &KONIGSBERG,LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff800 Third Avenue, 11thFloorNew York, NY 10003(212)605-6200 V
Nisha/S". LakttqnjLfcsq./SEGAL McCAMBRlDGESINGER & MAHONEY,LTD.Attorneys for DefendantAurora Pump Company850ThirdAvenue,Suite 1100'
New York, NY 10022(212)651-7500 / / /c$)
SO ORDERED, _on. Peter H.Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK _- . . ,
InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATIONIndex No,: 190011/09
SAM GULL,
• - against -
AURORA PUMP COMPANY, et al.,
PlaintifF(s),
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION
WHEREFORE, Defendant AURORA PUMP COMPANY hereby requests Summary
Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practicev Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Aurora Pump Company with prejudice, and
there beingno opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, Aurora Pump Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs to either party.
Dated:
DNew
Nicholas Novack,LEVY,PHILLIPS &
KONIGSBERG.LÿAttorneys for PlfifrtW800 Third Avenue, 11thFloorNew York, NY 10003(212)605-6200
SO ORDERED,
Ni#/a S. LakHÿ,Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY,LTDAttorneys for DefendantAurora Pump Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100
New York, NY 10022(212)651-7500 .
W//SIon. Peter H. Moulton
IFSEOEIIVEDSEP 23 2015
PART 50 ÿ
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF.NEW YORK
Index No.: 190115/10InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
JAMES RICHARD SMITH, '
Plaintiff(s),NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION
- against -
AURORA PUMP COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant AURORA PUMP COMPANY hereby requests Summary
Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Aurora Pump Company with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, Aurora Pump Company be and the same are hereby dismissed, with prejudice and
without costs to either party.
Dated: 2015
ÿisffaS. Lakh/Mi, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE
NichdasNovack,E&?KONIGSBERG,litAttorneys for EMrluffi
SINGER & MAHONEY,LTD.
800 Third Avenue, 11thFloorNew York, NY 10003(212)605-6200
Attorneys for DefendantAurora Pump Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
New York, NY 10022(212)651-7500
r « ' 1 >X ' /i-ÿr
'. , ' - ÿ•>'-' . :»;ÿ. ;v• ' : ÿÿÿ; • pvp -..
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF SEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCAL
This Document Relates To:
ANTHONY KAIDER and BARBARA KAIDER,;
Plaintiffs,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION
, 1 . against
AMERICAN STANDARD, INC.,et al.,
Defendants.
IndexNo.; 107339/04
-X
WHEREFORE, defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY,hereby requests summary judgmentin the above-entitled'case;;pursuant to Civil Practice Law and ,Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'complaint against defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims againstdefendant, FORD' MOTOR COMPANY be and the samd'are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.
Dated: New York, New York
By: Robert Koihitor,,Kq.«LEVY KONIGS®(fLlt800 Third Averiulv I3tn FloorNew York, New YorkÿpiCounsel for PLAINTI
<S
AARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN &DEUTSCH, LLPAttorneys for DefendantrFord Motor,Company
, 600 Third Avenue ,y/;. ,New York, New York 10016
: T 212-593-6700 '• :F- 212-593-6970
SO ORDERED:h6n.peTerTh.moulton'
{01688892.DOCX > v;
. v ÿ; '
vij . •;;p. , ,ÿ f m
0SEP, 2 3 2015
PART 50L ÿYS ?upREME COURT - CIVIL
- • ..SUPREME.feonRT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.COUNTY OF NEW YORK
-x.NYCAL
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION
Index No.: 190214/09
INRE: NEW YORK CITY.'ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
CYNTHIA MAGILL, Individually and DENNISPLUMPTON, ias trustee on the behalfof the OTISCORTHELL'2008 FAMILY TRUST,
PIaintiff(s),
-against-
A.O..SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, ET AL„
Defendants).
WHjEREFORE, defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY hereby request summary judgment inthe above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'complaint against defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant,FORD MOTOR COMPANY be!and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
,2015
CL
By: Robert Kbmitor, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERQ, L800 Third AÿeMlÿO'New York, NfvY$k 10022 >Counsel for: PLAINÿFKfi$ W*
By: Oded Burger, Esq.AARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN &DEUTSCH, LLP:Attorneys for Defendant
•'EdiÿMotor Company '
60,0 Third AvenueNew'York,New York 10016T: 212-593-6700F: 212-593-6970
SO ORDERED:PETER H. MOULTON
SEP ÿ3?Wis®Mis
{01501066.DOCX -J • v NYS, partsupreme socourt . CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
HOWARD J. WALDMAN and FRANCINEWALDMAN,'
Plaintiffs,
against
AMERICAN BftAfcE SHOE, CO., et al.,
Defendants.
NYCAL
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT.MOTION
IndexNo.: 101219/2001
WHEREFORE, defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY hereby requests summary judgmentin the aBoye-erititled case; pursuant to Civil Practice Law.'and'Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'complaint againÿt*defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY withprejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto,
ORDERED, , that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims againstdefendant, FORD MOTOR COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.
Dated: New York, New York
?W.2«:s
By: Robert Kpmitpa EstftsLEVY KCÿfp ; '
800 ThirdJw&uep3tH?FlbqLNew York, NewÿwtalfyO'feuÿCounsel for PL/&NTIFFS _c
SO ORDERED:
By:x©ded Burger, EsqJAARONS&N RAPPAPORT FEINSTEINMDEUfSCH, LLP-Attorneys for Defendant
.. FordMotor Cqnijpany600 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10016T: 212-593-6700F: 212-593-6970
Hon.peter h.moulton
{01688899.DOCX >
mmSEP !Jw
NVSSIlPDCMAr-RIÿ°SUPREME COURT
ÿ
ÿÿ • ÿÿÿÿi'-ÿ
. -Av ÿ "-
-I v
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK ÿ----------~i—-------------- - —-X
INRE: NEW YORK CITY' : ÿ NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
RICHARD WILLINS,'
Plaintiff,
against
AFiFITSflA GROUP, as Successor-in-interest toRAYBESTOS BRAKES, et al.,
Defendants,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION
IndexNo.s 190364/10
WHEREFORE, defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY hereby requests summaryjudgment in:; the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims againstdefendant, FORDMOTOR COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs;
Dated: New York, New York
ÿU 2015(irfr fC
By: Robert Komitor, Es<ÿ,LEVYKONJGSBffllG,SOOÿirdjÿdnÿ'ildlii FloorNew YprlcÿNew YorkCounsel for PL./
o'lfp\c£
BÿvOdedBurger,"AARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN&DEUTSCHELLPAttorneys for DefendantFord;Motor Company600 Third AvenueNew York; New York 10016T: 212-593-6700F:212-593ÿ970
SO ORDERED:Jt6N. PETER H.MOULTON
{01688901.DOCX 1
m
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
ANNA O'NEILL, as Executrix for the Estate of PATRICK J.O'NEILL, and ANNA O'NEILL, Individually,
Plaintiff,
- against -A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants.
IndexNo.: 112263/07
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
NYCALI.A.SPart 50
Hon. Peter H.Moulton
WHEREFORE, Defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs to either party.
Dated: New York, New York
SgMoer <33,2015
Matthew Mcjgtyrn,JAttorneyforvthirfyfWEITZ &LUXENBERG,P£-oa\C700 Broadway qpp % ÿ
Mew York, MY IUUUJ cp\C£(212) 558-5500 ,ruFBÿS°
ccuH*aftof«SO ORDERED,
LaqaÿB, Hollrnan,eSAttorneyfor DefendantECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN& MF.IJ.nTT,LLC10Bank StreetWhite Plains,New York 10606(914) 949-2909
Hon. Peter H.Moulton, J.S.C.
m D
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OFNEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
JOSEPHNAIMOLIand CARMELA NAIMOLI,
Plaintiff,
- against -A.O. SMITHWATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„
Defendants.
Index No.: 190405/11
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
NYCALI.A.S Part 50
Hon. Peter H. Moulton
WHEREFORE, Defendant A. 0. Smith. Water Products Company, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs to either party.
Dated: New York, NewYork
3d ,2015
Matthew McM&ireÿsiAttorneyfor Pmintiffweitz &luxenbe;700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003 r\£ÿS,T(212) 558-5500G°u
LauraB. Hollnjan,Esq.Attorneyfor DefendantEckert Seamans Cherin&Mellott,LLC10 Bank StreetWhite Plains,New York 10606(914) 949-2909
SO ORDERED, .
foon. Peter H.Moulton, J.S.C
mSEP 23
'•JRt .
O
"Ss»<Zso
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
JUDINELSON as the Proposed Executrix for the Estate ofROSARIA MUSCHTER,
Plaintiff,
- against -A.O. SMITHWATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants.
Index No.: 190347/10
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
NYCALI.A.S Part 50
Hon.Peter H.Moulton
WHEREFORE, Defendant A; 0. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs to either party.
Dated: New York, New York
S<yk &A 2oi5
M.J*Matthew MclntyrasggpqAttorney ifer fylaintij&s*wErai& %dMberg,p.c.700 fftoadway q.New YorkcJgÿF %3o03 ÿ(212) 558-?500 - 0FÿC
SO ORDERED,_
LauraB.HoUmajyEsq.Attorneyfor DefendantEckertSeamans Cherin&Mellott,LLC10 Bank StreetWhite Plains,New York 10606(914) 949-2909
Hon. Peter H.Moulton, J.S.C.j:
~)°S)>S
m
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
HENRY MIKA and ESTHER MIKA,
Plaintiff,
against -
A.C. and S., Inc. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY),et al.,
Defendants.
Index No.: 100029-99
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
NYCALI.A.S Part 50
Hon. Peter H. Moulton
WHEREFORE, Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests
summary(judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs to either party.
Dated: New York, New York
September A*). 2015
Matthe\ Jm*
Attorns&forWlaintiffWEITZ&LUXENB£J§jI$B700 Broadwaÿ? ** cr:\Gÿ-New York, NY 10003 mS0V(212) 558-550CU,c0oÿVs0
ÿ•LauraB.Hpflfntan, Esq.Attorneyfor DefendantEckertSeamans Cherin&Mellott,LLC10Bank StreetWhite Plains,NewYork 10606(914)949-2909
SO ORDERED, .Hon.Peter H.Moulton, J.S.C.
4hshs
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OFNEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
FINNIKOBLER, Individually and HEIDIJEAN COLAN andLORIANN ELLEGATE as Co-Adminstratrices for the Estate ofROBERT BURNS KOBLER,
Plaintiff,
ÿ against -A.C. and S„ Inc. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING& SUPPLY),etal.,
Defendants.
Index No.: 121894/98
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
NYCALI.A.S Part 50
Hon.Peter H.Moulton
WHEREFORE, Defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company with
prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs to either party.
Dated: New York,New York
Matthew Mmhtyre,Esq.iff/ivMzJD -friv PlsiivfUSrc *Attorneyfor Plair(t0 * c\Q&-WEITZ &LUXENBERG,P.C. ÿc,700 Broadway ÿNew York, N
(212) 558-55ÿ0
SO ORDERED, . H6nfp§ÿH.MoultonThSXr
/ ._ALÿurar'B?Hoflman,/Egqt'Attorneyfor DefgfmantEckertSeamans Cherin&Mellott,LLC10 Bank StreetWhite Plains,New York 10606(914) 949-2909
'»sh5
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OFNEW YORK
NORBERT KACZ and AUDREY KACZ, IndexNo.: 106709/02;115543/02
Plaintiff,
- against -NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
A.C. and S., Inc. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY)et al. NYCAL
I.A.S Part 50Hon.Peter H.MoultonDefendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests
summaryjudgment inthe above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company with
prejudice, andthere beingno oppositionthereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs to either party.
Dated: New York, New York
2015
LauraB. Hollman,/E/q.Attorneyfor Defe/taant
Matthew flCSntÿe,ÿ
AttorneyfopPlaintiff _ a iJiVXttLUIW VY
*-lS
AttorneyfovPlaintiff .aÿWEITZ&LUXENÿLG?P.C. ÿ\Gÿ EckertSeamans Cherin&Mellott,LLC
10 Bank StreetWhite Plains,NewYork 10606(914) 949-2909
SO ORDERED,PeterH, Moulton, J.S.C.
supreme
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEWYORK
DAVIDR. HIGGINS and VERONICA HIGGINS, IndexNo.: 107737/99;101139/07
Plaintiff,
- against - ÿ
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
A.C. and S., Inc. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING& SUPPLY),et al., NYCAL
I.A.S Part 50Hon.Peter H.MoultonDefendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests
summary judgment inthe above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company with
prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs to either party.
Dated: New York, New York
]
Attorneyfor PlaintiffWE1TZ &LUXENBERG,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
/ , --7&-_LauraB.Hollman,EsqfAttorneyfor DefendantEckertSeamans Cherin&Mellott,LLC10Bank StreetWhite Plains,New York 10606(914) 949-2909
<c Nÿ2
JHon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEWYORKCOUNTY OFNEW.YORK
SHEILA HAMILTON, as Administratrix for the Estate of WILLIEJ. HAMILTON,
Plaintiff,
against ÿ
A.C. and S., Inc. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING& SUPPLY),et al., ,
Jj
Defendants.
IndexNo.: 121991/99,106178/00
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
NYCALI.A.S Part 50
Hon.Peter H.Moulton
WHEREFORE, Defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests
summary judgment inthe above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company with
prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs to either party.
Dated: New York, New York
2015
T-Matthew Kq.AttorneyfcWEITZ &luxenbeÿG£p:c. ÿ700 Broadway ÿ
New York, NY 10003 GVÿoÿ(212)558-5500nÿÿ
-*ÿ" ~ - «-- ,//
&
<P
SO ORDERED,
LauraB.Hollman, Esq:/Attorneyfor DefendantEcicertSeamans Cherin&Mellott,LLC10 Bank StreetWhite Plains,NewYork 10606(914) 949-2909
'Hon. Peter H.Moulton, J.S.C. IB)
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OFNEW YORK
MARY T. GOODBAR, Individually and as Executrix forthe Estate ofMILTONGOODBAR,
Plaintiff,
- against -A.O. SMITHWATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants.
IndexNo.: 1900.09/12
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
NYCALI.A.S Part 50
Hon. Peter H.Moulton
WHEREFORE, Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests
summary.'judgment inthe above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company with
prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto, 1
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs to either party.
Dated: New York, NewYork
2015
Matthew MclntyrÿAttorneyforWEITZ &LUÿNBERG,P£a tW*700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003 Ov(212) 558-5500
CP
LauraB.Hollman,Esq/Attorneyfor DefendantEckert Seamans Cherin&Mellott,LLC10Bank StreetWhite Plains,New York 10606(914) 949-2909
SO ORDERED, .ÿ"Hon. Peter H.Moulton,J.S.C
m. ©
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
FRANCES GOES and SENTA GOES IndexNo.: 100904/03105028/03, 190413/11
Plaintiff,
against -NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„
Defendants.NYCAL
I.A.S Part 50Hon. Peter H. Moulton
WHEREFORE, Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests
summary.judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company with
prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs to either party.
Dated: New York, New York
2015
LauraB. Hollman,Esÿ.-/"
SO ORDEFffiB,
Matthew Mclntyre,i&%r'AttorneyfoxPmntifrweuÿliÿMergj700 Btmciway «ÿNew York,NY$)0b3(212) 558-5500 ÿ
irH.Moulton, J.S.C.
Attorneyfor DefendantEckertSeamans Cherin&Mellott,LLC10Bank StreetWhite Plains,New York 10606(914) 949-2909
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PRISCILLA KOENIG as Executrix for the Estate of LESLIEFABER, and PRISCILLA KOENIG as Executrix for theEstate of MARGARET L.FABER,
Plaintiff,
against -
A.C. and S„ Inc. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY),et al.,
Defendants.
IndexNo.; 109988-02
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
NYCALI.A.S Part 50
Hon. Peter H.Moulton
WHEREFORE, Defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests
summary judgment inthe above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company with
prejudice, andthere being no oppositionthereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs to either party.
Dated: New York; New York
2015
Matthew MsclnAttorrÿsfoÿPlaintiffWE1TZ wc LUXE700 BroadwaJJÿ " c.0ÿNewYork,NY 10003ÿ-ÿu(212) 558-5500-H,
Ooÿv
LauraB. Hollmarj£>sq.Attorneyfor DefendantEckertSeamans Cherin&Mellott,LLC10Bank StreetWhite Plains,NewYorlc 10606(914) 949-2909
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H.Moulton,J.S.C,
fjs>rsjis;U¥ED>
SEP 23 2015
"vssuÿuVCIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
JOHNR. DRAPER and GENEVIEVE DRAPER,
Plaintiff,
- against -
A.O. SMITHWATER PRODUCTS, et al.,
Defendants.
IndexNo.: 190116/08
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
NYCALI.A.SPart 50
Hon.Peter FI. Moulton
WHEREFORE, Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests
summary/judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint, against Defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company with
prejudice, andthere beingno opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company/be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs to either party.
Dated: New.York,New York
,2015
Matthew MjclntyiAttome$fort$faintiJf ,
&\uxenbÿg?p.c.700 Broadway ÿ\PNew York,W 10003,c,°V(212) 558-5500 rvÿ
cP ÿÿ
SO ORDERED,
Laura B. Hollman/ÿstpAttorneyfor DefendantEckert Seamans Cherin&Mellott,LLC10Bank StreetWhite Plains,New York 10606(914) 949-2909
Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C7
wedSEP 23?oi5
NYS PART 50lUP*EME COURT CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
ROSEMARJEDEMAURO, as Administratrix for the Estate ofJOSEPHMDEMAURO, and ROSEMARJEDEMAURO,Individually,
Plaintiff,
- against -A.C. and S., Inc. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY)et al.,
Defendants.
IndexNo.: 104731/00
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
NYCALI.A.S Part 50
Hon.Peter H.Moulton
WHEREFORE, Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests
summary judgment inthe above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company with
prejudice, andthere beingno opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs to either party.
Dated: New York, New York
%ylwherQ,2015
Matthew McIntyrlsEsq.Attorneyfor PlaintiffWEITZ &LUXENBERG,RCi700 BroadwayNew York,NY 10003(212) 558-5500 G° ÿ
SO ORDERED,
Lÿura¥. Hollman,ÿSq.% <£>0ÿ Attorneyfor Defendant
EckertSeamans Cherin&Mellott,LLC10Bank StreetWhite Plains,NewYork 10606(914) 949-2909
Hon. Peter H, Moulton, J.S.C. m
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OFNEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
ANNE COGHLAN, Individually and as Executrix for the Estate ofEDWARD COGHLAN,
Plaintiff,
- against -
A.O. SMITHWATER PRODUCTS CO. et al.,
Defendants.
IndexNo.: 118952/00
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
NYCALI.A.S Part 50
Hon. Peter H. Moulton
WHEREFORE, Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests
summary judgment inthe above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company with
prejudice, and there beingno oppositionthereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs to either party.
Dated: New York, NewYork
,2015
Matthew McjgKyreffis _Attorneyfor PlaintiffWEITZ &LUXENBEfcGÿ.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003 .GÿjOÿ
-5500(212) 558-G°
LauraB. Hollmah,-Esq.Attorneyfor DefendantEckertSeamans Cherjn&Mellott,LLC10Bank StreetWhite Plains,NewYork 10606(914)949-2909
SO ORDERED, .Hon. Peter H.Moulton, J.S.C.
W 0
supreme
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PHILLIPMOHR, as Executor of the Estate ofROBERTBURTON, andLORETTA BURTON, Individually,
Plaintiff,
- against -
A.O. SMITHWATER PRODUCTS CO. et al.,
Defendants.
IndexNo.: 190219/11
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
NYCALI.A.S Part 50
Hon. Peter H.Moulton
WHEREFORE, Defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company with
prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs to either party.
Dated: New York, New York
j 2015
Matthew McAttorneyfor PlwnUWEITZ &LUXENBERGjÿCr700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003 .0ÿ1°(212) 558-5500 ÿ
SO ORDERED,
r ,r , .LauraB.Hollman,Esq'.Attorneyfor DefendantEckertSeamans Cherjn&Mellott,LLC10 Bank StreetWhite Plains,New York 10606(914) 949-2909
"Hon. Peter H.Moulton, J.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
EDWARD BIENZ, as Administrator for the Estate of WILLIAMP. BIENZ, and CLAIRICE BIENZ, Individually,
Plaintiff,
- against -
A.C. and S. INC., (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY)et al.,
Defendants.
IndexNo.: 126172/93,126168/93
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
NYCALI.A.S Part 50
Hon. Peter H.Moulton
WHEREFORE, Defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests
summary judgment inthe above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company with
prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice andwithout costs to either party.
Dated: NewYork, New York
! 2015Jiykmb?/ &>.
NewYork,NY 10003 w700 BroadwayNewYork, NY(212) 558-5500
Cherin&Mellott,LLC10Bank StreetWhite Plains,NewYork 10606(914) 949-2909
SO ORDERED, .Hon. Peter H.Moulton, J.S.C. ==—5/ÿs//s
1ÿE©EII¥ED)SEP 23 2015
PART 50'
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEWYORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
VINCENT BOYLE and ELLENBOYLE,
Plaintiff,
- against -
A.C. and S., Inc. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY)et al.,
Defendants.
IndexNo.: 116426/01; .111219/01
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
NYCALI.A.S Part 50
Hon. Peter H.Moulton
WHEREFORE, Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests
summary judgment inthe above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company with
prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs to either party.
Dated: New York, New York
Stplwber2d4m.5
Matthewd$ph%re, ESd.Attorney PlaintiffWEITZ &LUXENÿBRG,P.C.ÿc,0700 BroadwayNewYork, NY 10(m
(212) 558-550gjCT ÿ
LauraB. HoUmajaÿEsq.Attorneyfor DefendantEckertSeamans Cherin&Mellott,LLC10Bank StreetWhite Plains,NewYork 10606(914) 949-2909
SO ORDERED, .Hon. Peter H.Moulton, J.S.C
IW ©
supreme court
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
CHARLOTTE F. OCZEK, Individually and as Executrix ; IndexNo.: 101162/99for the Estate of ALOISIUS J. OCZEK, ;
Plaintiff,NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
- against -
A.O. SMITHWATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,NYCAL
I.A.S Part 50Hon. Peter H.Moulton
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests
summary judgment inthe above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company with
prejudice, and there beingno oppositionthereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs to either party.
D
Matthew Mclntyre,Esq.ÿ
Attorneyfor Plaintiff -q CV .ÿirCTrTir7 PrTTTVTTVPD'Er'D vC-N*
Matthew Mclntvre.Esa.ÿ ÿcA>°./ LaUrÿBTTlollman,Attorneyfor DefendantEckertSeamans Chebun&Mellott,LLC10Bank StreetWhite Plains,New York 10606(914) 949-2909
Matthew Mclntyre,Esq.Attorneyfor PlaintiffWEITZ &LUXENBERG_P!ÿv700 Broadway UNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,ORDERED,Zuion. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JAMES JOERGER,as Executor for the
Estateof AUSTIN C.JOERGER,and
THERESA JOERGER, INDIVIDUALLY
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50
(Moulton, P.)
Index No: 106973/08
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York,.New York4(rr .2015
Matthew Maclntyre,Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBAttorneys for Plai700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Jonatfÿf B.Kromberg, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLP
£ Attorneys for Union Carbide Corporation,o V ÿ\° 116 East 27th Street, 12th Floor
New York, NY 10016(212)452-5300
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
m a
supreme
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
MARK V. SLEVIN, as Executor of the Estate ofPATRICK T. SLEVIN
NYCALI.A.S.,Part 50(Moulton,Jv)
Index No: 190406/2010
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFQRE, defendant Dai-Tile Corporation (sued herein;ask Dal Tile Cprporatioh,
Individually and as successor to American Olean Tile Company, Inc.) (hereinafter "Dai-Tile")
hereby requests summary judgrnent in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law' O' ÿ f p
ÿ • 1 v
and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffst complaint against defendant Dai-Tile with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Dai-Tile be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.* • ; ' *ÿ
f
Dated: New York, New York
_ 1$. ' ,2015 .
rcy Porlman Raphael?LEVY KONIGSRgjl&LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff800 Third Avenue, 11,h F.ÿ ~ ,New York, NY 10022 ,v,
'
(212) 605-6290 ÿ ...Mi 1L-4ÿ>
Judith A: YavitzVEsq. ' .DARGER ERR/ANTE YAV1TZ & BLAULLP-• '
—r----- ---Tl----• --, — •--• : --v
iv Attorneys for Dai-Tile Corporation \
116 East 27th Street, 12th Floor.New York,.NY 10016(212)452-5300
SO ORDERED,on! Peter H. Moulton m
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
RAYMONDBAKERAND DORISBAKER
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)Index No: 111414/98
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Qlfc' .2015 &
Matthew Maclntyre/Esq.ÿWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038(212) 558-5500
Jonathan E(/k.romberg, Esq.DARGjLR ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212)452-5300
SO ORDERED,Tlon. Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION- >This Document Relates To:
CONO AMILO MASCARELLA,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moulton)
Index No.: 109071/2000
A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
SUPPLY), et al., JUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendÿm all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the sam£ ate hÿgby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:New York, New York
lan Alvarado, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
Alford Kneis, Esq.GATES LLP
torneys for DefendantCRANE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900
Hon. Peter H.Moulton
SEP 24 2015part 50NYS supreme court - CIVIL
.•v=: v
SUPREME COURT QF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
V- ;:.INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION"
This Document Relates To:
WILLIAM V. KELLER,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„• • ? -3.g.
Defendants. .
V4:, "
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moulton) .
Index No.: 190033/2009'
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, Defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the• j *'<•' • ÿ
t! y ÿ
above-entitled case, pursuant -to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section- 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE GO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.• ' Y" • " Sw- .,
Dated: Un/'TNew York, New York
WEITZ &'LUXENB,ERGÿ-P.c: .<$* ' \<bOyAttorneys for Plaintiff(s) C-700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
A:1ford Kiieis, Esq.. ••.GATES:LLP
, o>L Attorneys for DefendantÿCRANE CO,ÿ
,0ÿ ÿ 599 Lexington AvenueNew York; NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900
Peter H. Moulton
m D
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO
x NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
RAYMOND BAKER and DORIS BAKER Index No. : 98/11141498/111050
Plaintiff (s)
-against- '
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al.,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Defendants .x
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
John J. Fanniaÿr lyql _ ÿCullen and DykjÿmÿLMEAttorney for Qefe&cm&tNATIONAL GRID GElSWtATIONÿ44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212) 732-2000 CP
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDEREDon. Peter H. Moulton
~—9jÿJis
!ÿÿco5uRt.civil
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
JAMES C. DEAN as Executor for the Estateof KARIN R. DEAN,
Index No. : 05/101521
Plaintiff (s)
-against -
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al . ,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Defendants .x
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New .York, Npu Vnrlc1NCW | im «— w
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq. t
<ÿ WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
John J. Fanning, H|Cullen and Dykma®Attorney for DeftyNATIONAL GRID GENE!44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212) 732-2000
SO ORDEREDHon. Peter H. Moulton
supreme
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK--x
IN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONx
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
MARGARET F. DUFFY, Individually and asExecutrix for the Estate of FRANK DUFFY,
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against-
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al . ,
Defendants .
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No. : 99/107994
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
'GRID ( "NATIONAL GRID" ) , sued herein- as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all cÿpjLtmÿÿindA. aÿe
\Gÿ
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be angtÿtfa ÿ
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York!(/ 2015
John J. Fanning,Cullen and Dykm,Attorney for DeNATIONAL GRID G44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212) 732-2000
SO ORDERED,
«<>$**•
Hon. Peter H. Moulton
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq. .WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500 f— r~ ______
ffi(E€EDWEDSEP 24 2015
PART 50SUPREME COURT - dVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE • OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
- _x
IN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONx
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
HENRY D. HOLKA and BARBARA A. HOLKA,
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against -
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al.,
Defendants .
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 02/11430002/107404
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID .("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the aÿe
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without cost
Dated:_Neyi York, New YorkIif , 2015
John J. Fannin?Cullen and Dyl<Attorney forNATIONAL GRID GE1)44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212)732-2000
riON LLC
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,ÿfton . Peter H. Moulton KiOEDVi©
SEP 24 2015
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
• xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
JAMIE ELAINE FELICIA, as Executrix for theEstate of JAMES E. MCCABE, and JAMIE ELAINEFELICIA and STEPHANIE TOBIN, as Co-Executricesfor the Estate of SHIRLEY A. MCCABE,
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against-
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al . .
Defendants .
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 02/11307302/106579
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ( "NATIONAL GRID" ) , sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f /k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the satfiÿal
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.ÿ
Dated: New York. New York11 2015
John J. FannincCullen and Dy)<Attorney forNATIONAL GRID44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212) 732-2000
SO ORDERED,
*ITION LLC
Matthew .MacIntÿQÿ Eÿq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Hon. Peter H. Moulton 3j?s//s beceiwedSEP 24/015
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
- xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
- xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
LINDA MOSSOW as Administratrix for theEstate of LYLE V. MOSSOW,
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against -
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al .,
Defendants .
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No. : 02/11228002/105718
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
-x
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkIt/, 2015
John J. FanningXEsoÿCullen and Dykrpin mLPAttorney for DffemiantNATIONAL GRID $E1®RADEON LLC44 Wall StreetNew York, NY lOOOT(212) 732-2000
Mattnew Maclnt}ÿ „
WEITZ & LUXE1ÿ®SÿÿÿPV."C.Attorneys £&r Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
WILLIAM NORTON and IRENE NORTON,
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against -
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al.,
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No. : 11/19013409/190225
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Defendants .x
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing -plaintiffs' complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkII l, 2015
John J. FanningCullen and DykiAttorney for D<NATIONAL GRID GEN44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212) 732-2000
Matthew MacWtyffe, EsWEITZ & LUXEWBERGÿÿl»e.Attorneys for PlS&ntiffsÿc,®700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003WÿH°
558-5500 0\5ÿ(212 ;
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
ÿEQEBWEDSEP 24 2015
WS SUPRemAEC0,1pt .CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY. OF NEW YORK------xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
- xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO :
FRANCES OLEXA, Individually and asPersonal Representative for the Estateof JOSEPH P. OLEXA,
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against-
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al .,
Defendants .
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 03/10078101/10620900/119373
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
-x
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ( "NATIONAL GRID" ) , sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York2015
John J. Fanning, ÿsq.Cullen and Dykmam LLIAttorney for DefendantNATIONAL GRID GENEr/tIONJBLC44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212) 732-2000
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.CAttorneys for Plaintf700 Broadway ÿNew York, NY L00\3 c(212) 558-55ÿ * cv
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton cP° sff2 4 3315
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
-----: xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
FRANKLIN POTTER and BONNIE POTTER,
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against-
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al.,
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 97/12108898/10522198/11104000/102788
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Defendants .----------x
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), named herein as LONG ISLAND LIGHTING
COMPANY, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with prejudice,
and there being, no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: ÿJew, York, New York* fmwv U/, 2015
John J. Fanning, ECullen and Dykman MhPAttorney for DefeiidanNATIONAL GRID GENE,44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212)732-2000
SO ORDERED,jflion . Peter H. Moulton
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.. C .Attorneys for Plaintÿfes700 BroadwayNew York, NY 1000!(212) 558-5ÿpoVd> <•
n, I Ld?9/95/1®' - -ÿ*>t OWEDSEP 24 2015
PART «5DNTS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY- OF NEW YORK----------- x NYCALIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 50--------------------------------------__x (Moulton, P.)THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
JAMES SABADASZ , as Administrator for the Index No. : 00/109782Estate of ROBERT S. SABADASZ, 99/122191
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against-NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a MOTION AND ORDERNATIONAL GRID, et al. ,
Defendants .-------- - x
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
U/ , 2015
John J. Fanning, ECullen and Dykman JLLPAttorney for DefendantNATIONAL GRID GENERATI44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212) 732-2000
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintii700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-550&
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
T>hsjis ©& ÿ4/015
COURT
-----NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No. : 08/190024
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
'• WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONALi*
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
4 above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
- - xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION--x
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
ALICE MAY SAMUELS, as Administratrix forthe Estate of SEYMOUR SAMUELS, and ALICEMAY SAMUELS, Individually,
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against-
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et ad.,
Defendants.x
New ,York, New YorkIMCW [IUIA, new
John J. Fanning, E&. fCullen and DykmanJliLÿAttorney for DefendantNATIONAL GRID GENERA'tg44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212) 732-2000
SO ORDEREDHon. Peter H. Moulton
PART 50MVS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
-----SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY, OF NEW YORK------------------------, xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION----------•,-----------------_x
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
JAMES RAYMOND WACHOWICZ, as Executor forthe Estate of RAYMOND MICHAEL WACHOWICZ,and RUTH WACHOWICZ, Individually,
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No. : 00/10713599/125770
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against -
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al. ,
Defendants .
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
-x
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONALt
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: _New York, New York\U > 2015
John J. Fanning, ECullen and DykmanÿLP,Attorney for DefendantNATIONAL GRID GENERAFION44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212) 732-2000
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10005(212) 558-5500a
VSO ORDERED,
£ Hon. Peter H. Moulton
cP I SEP 24 2015
PART 50nys supreme COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK---xIN" RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
EDWARD BIENZ as Administrator for theEstate of WILLIAM P. BIENZ, and CLAIRICEBIENZ, Individually,
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against-
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al.,
Defendants .x
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 93/12617293/126168
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), named herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212 -,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby . dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New,York, New York* (MMV \U , 2015
John J. Fanning, EBq.Cullen and DykmanILLAttorney for DefendantNATIONAL GRID GENERA'44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212)732-2000
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME court
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONx
x NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
ANNE COGHLAN, Individually and as Executrixfor the Estate of EDWARD COGHLAN,
Index No. : 00/118952
Plaintiff (s)
-against-
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al .,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Defendants .x
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN ENERGY, hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint
against defendant NATIONAL GRID with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New .York, New YorkINCW 11UI.Ji f 1MCW X UX JS.
sqffitovu" — -
John J. Fanning, a=sq7~ #Cullen and Dykman fcLPi MAttorney for DefendanjtfNATIONAL GRI44 Wall StreNew York, NY(212) 732-200
Mauuiicw i'iauxiiuy -l.c , £.04 .WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs
SO ORDERED
700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Hon. Peter H. Moulton
----SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION---- xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
ROSEMARIE DE MAURO, as Administratrixfor the Estate of JOSEPH M. DE MAURO, andROSEMARIE DE MAURO, Individually,
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No. : 00/10473199/125781
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against -
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a-NATIONAL GRID, et al.,
Defendants ,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
-x
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
ÿdismissing, plaintiff ' s complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: NewÿYorJc, Nqw York2015
Matthew MacIntyre, Esq.WEITZ &. LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for PlaintJj700 BroadwayNew York, NY 100(
(212) 558-5500
John J. Fanning, E#qCullen and Dykman IIAttorney for DefendsNATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212) 732-2000
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
242015NYS<
CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK .COUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
JOHN R. DRAPER and GENEVIEVE DRAPER,
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against -
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al . .
Defendants .
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No. : 08/190116
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice/ and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:,-lJew| Yoi;k, New York
'iiI, 2015
John J. Fanning,Cullen and DykmaAttorney for DefenNATIONAL GRID GENERA"44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212) 732-2000
SO ORDERED,
Matthew Maclntyre, EsqWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.CAttorneys for Plaintiff.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003ÿ 1(212) 558-5500 \
Hon. Peter H. Moulton ofsteiBm>24m5
tO(jR7 .civil
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
. xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
: : xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
PRISCILLA KOENIG as Executrix for theEstate of LESLIE FABER, and. PRISCILLA KOENIGas Executrix for the Estate of MARGARET L. FABER
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No. : 02/109988
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against -
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al .,
Defendants ,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-
entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs,
Dated: New, York, New YorkMX U U1, 2015
John J. Fanning, EsCullen and Dykman LAttorney for DefendanNATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212)732-2000
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.WEITZ &. LUXENBERG, P .C .Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
he
tME COURT - CIVIL
-------------SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK------------- - - x NYCALIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 50
x (Moulton, P.)THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
SHERRY M. GARLAND, as Executrix for the Index No. : 92/29846Estate of HORACE L. GARLAND, and SHERRY M. 06/102333GARLAND, Individually,
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against-NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a MOTION AND ORDERNATIONAL GRID, et al.,
Defendants .__ —-----; x
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Ruies § 3212,
dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:_New, York, New York
ÿqOTMiLiu.' 2015
John J. Fanning, EsCullen and Dykman LITAttorney for DefendanNATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212) 732-2000
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P .C.Attorneys for Plainti700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003'(212) 558-5500 ,
SO ORDERED, ©Hon. Peter H
«vssuPREMfTC05°_
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
SHEILA HAMILTON, as Administratrix for theEstate of WILLIE J. HAMILTON,
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against -
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al .,
Defendants .
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No. : 00/10617899/121991
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: Yo,rk, New York2015
—New York, New Y
Xjfcmfor tu .John J. Fanning, EsCullen and Dykman LAttorney for DefendaNATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212) 732-2000
>V ÿ-'kQT.j ManTnhirva XT' c /~rÿ
SO ORDERED,
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P A
Attorneys for Plaint&f&s700 BroadwayNew York, NY 1000:(212) 558-55C0V
Hon. Peter H. Moulton wmsupreme
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
SCOTT HEARBURG as Executor for the Estateof LAVERNE EDWARD HEARBURG, and GRETCHENHEARBURG, Individually,
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against -
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al.,
Defendants .
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No. : 98/11106897/11328096/115306
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
-x
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New, York, New York
XfraU/ Hi ' 2015
John J. FanningÿCullen and DykjAttorney forNATIONAL GRID44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212) 732-2000
?ION LLC
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintÿffifs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 100(
(212) 558-5500ÿÿ
ÿf!
SO ORDERED,Hon.. Peter H. Moulton m D
supreme
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF. NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
ÿ xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
DAVID R. HIGGINS and VERONICA HIGGINS,
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against-
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al.,
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 07/10113999/107737
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Defendants .- x
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ( "NATIONAL GRID" ) , sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, ' and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:c_Nevy York, New York2015
l: New YorK, New Y
i(j.
John J. Fanning sqCullen and Dykm*n L:Attorney for DefendantNATIONAL GRID GBNE44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212) 732-2000
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 100a3ÿÿ(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton D)
$»SSr
---' ' i '
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
-------.------, --------xIN RE NEW YORK' COUNTY. ASBESTOS LITIGATION
- --xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO :
JIM HNISDO as Proposed Executor for theEstate of HOWARD HNISDO,
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against-
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al.,
Defendants .
NYCALI.A. S . Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No. : 07/11723298/11107495/11599694/12401394/123989
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ( "NATIONAL GRID" ) , named herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION. LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY and LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY,
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant
to '•ÿ"Civil 'Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiff's
complaintaagairist defendant NATIONAL GRID with prejudice, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:ÿew |York, New York
'\kmM i(J, 2015
John J. FannincCullen and DykijAttorney for D§
NATIONAL GRID GENl44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212)732-2000
SO ORDERED,
JN LLC
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plain700 BroadwayNew York, NY 100(212) 558-550
Hon. Peter H. Moultona
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
NORBERT KACZ and AUDREY KACZ,
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against-
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al.,
Defendants .
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 02/11554302/106709
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests . summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, - and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York, 2015
John J. FanningCullen and DykiAttorney for DNATIONAL GRID.44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212) 732-2000
SO ORDERED,
attLew Maclntyre, Esq.WEITZ Sc LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Hon. Peter H. Moulton S%ÿ0f5
COURT
SUPREME, COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
- -IN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
- xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
HENRY MIKA and ESTHER MIKA,
Plaintiff (.s) ,
-against -
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al .,
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 99/100029
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Defendants .x
- WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ( "NATIONAL GRID" ) , sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and .there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkJVteF l(i , 2015
John J. Fannin'Cullen and Dykman LAttorney for DefentNATIONAL GRID GEN44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212) 732-2000
SO ORDERED,
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Hon. Peter H. Moulton9/?s/a-
240CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION- xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
ARLENE W. MORROW, Individually and asExecutrix for the Estate of ROBERT J. MORROW,
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No. 02/127034
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against -
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al .,
Defendants ,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
-x
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New,York, New York
John J. Fanniifc, ECullen and Dykman 15LPAttorney for Defend..NATIONAL GRID GENEfSfTION LLC44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212) 732-2000
SO ORDERED,
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500,
£5jibHon. Peter H. Moulton
V ÿ
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
- - xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
JUDI NELSON, as the Proposed Executrixfor the Estate of ROSARIA MUSCHTER,
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 10/190347
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against-
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al . ,
Defendants .
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
-x
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New .York, New YorkINCW i1ULJV f 1Mcyv
11/
John J. Fanning,Cullen and DykmaAttorney for DefdNATIONAL GRID GENERAT44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212)732-2000
SO ORDERED,
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Hon. Peter H. MoultonVEP
<-0(JRT
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
ANNA O'NEILL, as Executrix for the Estateof PATRICK O'NEILL, and ANNA O'NEILL,Individually,
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against-
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al.,
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No. : 07/112263
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Defendants .x
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiff ' s complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New. York, New York
Iff 2015
John J. Fanning,Cullen and Dykman'Attorney for Defend,
NATIONAL GRID GENE44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212) 732-2000
SO ORDERED,
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 Broadway —,New York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500 ÿ ÿ
MoultonHon. Peter H
¥supreme
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
JOHN W. REDDEN, as Administrator for theEstate of SHARON M. REDDEN, and JOHN W.REDDEN, Individually,
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 00/11374800/108388
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against -
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al .,
Defendants ,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
-x
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New.York, New Yew York201
John J. Fanning, EsCullen and Dykman LiAttorney for DefendanNATIONAL GRID GENERATI44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212) 732-2000
Matthew Maclntyre, EsqWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
qjasl/s "x*>7
O
UPRBME COURT
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
- xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO.:
CHARLES F. SYLVIA and LAVINA R. SYLVIA,
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against-
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al.,
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No. : 98/11309298/111046
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Defendantsx
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
uÿ 2015
John J. Fanning, EsqCullen and Dykman LLAttorney for DefendsNATIONAL GRID GENERATION44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212) 732-2000
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,MoultonPeter H
w,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
- xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
DOUGLAS TADDEO as Administrator for theEstate of PETER TADDEO,
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against -
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al .,
Defendants ,
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No. : 02/11961898/11106597/11328196/120778
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
-x
. WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), named herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: (-tjew. York, New YorkI• ÿ«j 1L/J- Jv f 1MCW lUÿ .if f ' *
John J. Fanning, ÿsq.Cullen and Dymaÿ LLPiAttorney forÿemendamtNATIONAL GRIDNGa£PÿVriON LLC44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212) 732-2000
Matthew Maclntyre,WEITZ & LUXENBERG,Attorneys for Plain700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
tiffs
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton 0
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
- xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
:__xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
JANE DISALVO, as Executrix for the Estateof EDWIN C. WILSON, and ANNE WILSON/Individually,
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No. : 02/11360902/107222
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against -
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al .,
Defendants .
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
-x
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: .New,York, New YorktitmY li/, 2015
John J. FannAg, SfKq-Cullen and DFkmajÿLLPAttorney for DewendariNATIONAL GRID GtNEj44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212) 732-2000
[ON LLC
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff%700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
\<$T PART 50MYSSUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT. OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO
NYCALI.A .S . Part 50(Moulton, P.)
GENEVIEVE ZIOBRO, as Executrix for theEstate of STANLEY ZIOBRO, and GENEVIEVEZIOBRO, Individually,
Index No.: 98/122881
Plaintiff (s)
-against-
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al . ,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Defendants .x
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
John J.CullenAttornenation;
44 WallNew York, NY 10005(212) 732-2000
Dated:
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attori700 B]
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attori700 B]
New Yc(212)
SO ORDEREDHon. Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION----------------.---------xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
CHARLES BAGGIANO 'and LOUISE BAGGIANO,
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against -
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al.(
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No. : 08/10038793/13216793/106480
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Defendants .- x
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID" ), named herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY and LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY,
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant
to 'Civil Practice Law arid Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with prejudice, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims arid
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New,York, New York2015
John J. FanningCullen and DykAttorney for DNATIONAL GRID GE144 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212) 732-2000
SO ORDERED,
ION LLC
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P .C .Attorneys for ÿ Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003ÿ(212) 558-5500
Hon. Peter H. Moul'tori 91ÿÿ5
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW- YORKCOUNTY OF NEW. YORK--------------;---_______ _ _ _ _ _
ÿ
_x
IN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION----------------
________x
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
FLOYD C .BOWDISH and DOROTHY BOWDISH,
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against-
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al .,
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50.(Moultori, P.)
Index No.: 02/11757002/107099
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Defendants ,
-----------__.--------•__---- x
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
•GRID ( "NATIONAL GRID" ) , sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID With
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, . that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. '
Dated: New York, New York\{f , 2015
John J. FanninCullen and DykAttorney for Def\NATIONAL GRID GE44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212) 732-2000
SO ORDERED,
?ION LLC
Matthew Maclntyre,. Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Hon. Peter H. Moulton
©
&ssupreme
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE 'OF NEW YORK .COUNTY OF NEW YORK
--xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
------- xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
LOIS CARLSEN, as Executrix for the Estateof CARL T. CARLSEN, and LOIS CARLSEN,Individually,
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No. : 07/11674792/34783
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against -
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al .,
Defendants .
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
-x
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests, summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New; York, New York1U , 2015
John J. Fann.Cullen andAttorney forNATIONAL GRID44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212)732-2000
SO ORDERED,
RATION LLC
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(2.12) 558-5500
Hon. Peter H. Moulton ©
(Supreme
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW. YORK
IN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
MATTHEW J. CARR as Executor for theEstate of JAMES WILLIAM CARR, and MATTHEWJ. CARR as Executor for the Estate ofJANET A. CARR,
Index No. : 02/111089
Plaintiff (s)
-against-
.NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a.NATIONAL GRID, et al . .
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Defendants .x
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New. York, New York
'"E0CT'John J. FannCullen and DAttorney forNATIONAL GRI
Maclnt:yre, Esq.ÿLUXENBERG, P.C.
r P 7 a inf- i•F'Fc:
New York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212) 732-2000
SO ORDEREDHon. Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE' OF NEW YORK *
COUNTY OF NEW YORK------_____- _x
IN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONx
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS. TO:
DOUG CHAPPLE and HELEN CHAPPLE,
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against-
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al. ,
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No. : 09/19000799/12371898/11144098/111050
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Defendants .x
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ( "NATIONAL GRID" ) , sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing'plaintiffs' complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice.,>and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: jJew,Yopk, New York2015
John J. FanniCullen and Dykma;Attorney for DeNATIONAL GRID GE44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212)732-2000
SO ORDERED,
ION LLC
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Hon. Peter H. Moultonÿs/sx\[jfmgtEtlWED
COURT - CIVIL
:-
e. f<$ir*-tvJ&S* • v « V*i vi»'lv,» ;£>vsv.\v J«i*
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK-------------------:____ ----X
IN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION- - x
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
WILLIAM A. ESPOSITO JR., as Administratorfor the Estate of WILLIAM C. ESPOSITO,
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against-
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al. ,
Defendants .
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No. : 04/11629103/100234
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: _New York, N§w York2015
New York/ New Y
U ÿ
John J. Fannimg, EsCullen and Dykman ALPAttorney for DefemdaiNATIONAL GRID GENE ION LLC44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212) 732-2000
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton m
COURT
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
SYLVIA FUGATE, as Proposed Executrix forthe Estate of FRANKIE FUGATE, and SYLVIAFUGATE, Individually,
Index No.: 09/190137
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against -
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al .,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Defendants .x
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ( "NATIONAL GRID" ) , sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.VWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003ÿ \)(212) 558-5500 ÿ
John J. Fannhfig, Msq.mCullen and Dykmaii LL#Attorney for Dependent
NATIONAL GRID GSÿRATION LLC44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212) 732-2000
supreme
SO ORDEREDHon. Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK---: _
xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
WILLIAM E. JOYCE and MARIE JOYCE,
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against-
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al.,
Defendants .x
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No. 09/19017202/11784399/10967598/11106997/11328096/111191
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
ÿWHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID. ( "NATIONAL GRID"), named herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY and LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY,
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant
to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with prejudice, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, 'that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: -New, York, New York: JJew York, New Y<gur-U/. 2015
John J. FanniiCullen and D]Attorney for DefendantNATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212) 732-2000
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED, £prl/s-Hon. Peter H. Moulton
wCOURT
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
FRANCES MAZZA, Individually and asAdministratrix for the Estate of RAYMOND A.MAZZA,
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against-
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al. ,
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 08/10091601/10909198/11107694/134985
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Defendants ,
x
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New. York, New York11/ . 2015
John J. FanniiCullen and DAttorney for DeNATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212) 732-2000
so ordered;
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 100Oj(212) 558-5500
o
Hon. Peter H. Moulton
MF
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK ' ;
xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
RALPH A. MENENDEZ and MARJORIE A. MENENDEZ,
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against -
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al.
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No. : 00/10720899/125766
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Defendants .x
WHEREFORE, . defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing 'plaintiffs ' complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, -and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID.be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New. York, New York11/ . 2015
John J. Fanning, EtfqCullen and DykmanMjLAttorney for Defe%d£ tNATIONAL GRID GEN44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212) 732-2000
TION LLC .
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton & 0
ÿWpreme
ÿÿv.aÿ ?
r ÿ ' y - ""i-• •VV-y ';. ÿ •—ÿ
*C>;'*V *•«ÿ"?ÿ v ;-:;yV ' v .. ,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
ÿ
---- X-
IN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION- x
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS . TO:
ARNETTA PATTERSON, as Administratrix forthe Estate of JOHN P. PATTERSON, SR.,
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against-
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a.NATIONAL GRID, et al .,
Defendants .
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(MoUlton, P.)
Index No.: 02/11552702/106709
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ( "NATIONAL GRID" ) , sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: JSfew. York, New YorkÿtetehLL.. 2015
John J. Fanning,ÿsqCullen and Dykmajf LLAttorney for DefBend&itNATIONAL GRID GENSfSYTION LLC44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212)732-2000
SO ORDERED,.
Matthew Maclntyre; Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C'.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
,<2SUpd.
Hon. Peter H. Moulton
"V v V 1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK------ÿ---------.-----------._
r --------ÿ
xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION_ÿ xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO-:
EILEEN REILLY, as Administratrix for theEstate of WALTER REILLY, and EILEEN REILLY,Individually,
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No .
Plaintiff (s) ,
08/10091798/11104195/11599894/12437494/124356
-against-
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al .,
Defendants .
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
-x
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), named herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY and LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY,
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant
to CiviT:rPractice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiff's
complaint, against defendant NATIONAL GRID with prejudice, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: ÿJeW; Yoÿk, New York
UJ , 2015.
John J. FanninaCullen and DykfiAttorney for DeferNATIONAL GRID GENE!44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212)732-2000
?ION LLC
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P .C .Attorneys for Plaintÿ700 BroadwayNew York, NY 1000:(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. MouTCOn-—ÿ
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONx
x NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
EUGENE SCHNETTLER, as Executor for theEstate of ROY F. SCHNETTLER,
Index No. : 08/101812
Plaintiff (s)
-against-
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al. ,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Defendants .x
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs
John J. Fannd#g, #!sq Matthew Maclntyre, Esq. SCullen and Dfkmafi LLP# WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorney for Defendant Attorneys for PlaintiffsNATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC 700 Broadway44 Wall Straffl" Npw .Ynrk. MY 10001]
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
o
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK ---xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY .ASBESTOS LITIGATION
xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
NELSON A. STRAUCH and PATRICIA STRAUCH,
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against -
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al.,
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No. : 99/105671
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Defendants .x
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, . and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York\U , 2015
John J. FanningCulleh and DykrAttorney for DefeNATIONAL GRID44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212)732-2000
SO ORDERED,
?ION LLC
Matthew .Maclntyre, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Hon. Peter H. Moulton2 5//S
SUPREME COURT OF THE -STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK r. .
~
------------------------= .---_ _ÿ ---_x :
IN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION: x
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO : •
KAREN ANNE KELLY as Administratrix for theEstate of JOSEPH P. SWIADOWSKY,
Plaintiff (s) ,
-against -
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al. ,
Defendants.
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No. : 01/11563301/111218
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ( "NATIONAL GRID" ) , sued herein as' KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: ,Nev\{ Yojrk., New York2015
l: New YorK., New Y
.§ÿ/viw> iu.
John J. FannjCullen and DjAttorney for DefiNATIONAL GRID GEI44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212) 732-2000
SO ORDERED,.
ION LLC
Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P .C .Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
\
Hon. Peter H. Moulton°lhsll5
11M&NYS ' *URT. CIVIL