Food and Agriculture · PDF fileFAO Country Programming Framework for Kenya 2014-2017 5 1....

Country Programming Framework for Kenya

Food and Agriculture Organization

2014-2017

FAO COUNTRY PROGRAMMING

FRAMEWORK

FOR KENYA

2014-2017

© FAO, 2014

FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way.

All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licence-request or addressed to [email protected].

FAO information products are available on the FAO website (www.fao.org/publications) and can be purchased through [email protected].

PHOTO CREDITSCover, pages viii, 12: ©FAO

Page 38: ©FAO/John NgatiaPage 4: ©ActionAid Kenya

Page 16: ©FAO/Sarah EliotPage x: ©FAO/Robert Allport

Pages vi, 6, 32, 36, 48: ©FAO/Eric KimaniPages 26, 34, 41: ©FAO/Christena Dowsett

ENDORSEMENT

FAO Country Programming Framework for Kenya 2014-2017

vii

LIST OF ACRONYMS........................................................................................................... ixEXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................................................................... 11. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................ 5

1.1 Background......................................................................................................................... 5

1.2 Developing the FAO Country Programming Framework for Kenya.................................... 5

2. SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS................................................................................................ 72.1 Importance of Agriculture to the Economy.......................................................................... 7

2.2 Review of Important Sub Sectors........................................................................................ 8

2.3 Challenges and Opportunities in the Agricultural Sector..................................................... 8

2.4 Agricultural Policy Frameworks........................................................................................... 10

3. FAO’S COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE AND PRIORITY AREAS.................................... 133.1 Mandate............................................................................................................................... 13

3.2 Statement of Capability...................................................................................................... 133.3 Accountability Commitments to Beneficiaries..................................................................... 143.4 Building on Past Experience................................................................................................ 14

4. PROGRAMMING FOR RESULTS.................................................................................... 174.1 County Engagement............................................................................................................ 17

4.2 Implementation.................................................................................................................... 17

4.3 Outcomes, Outputs and Activities....................................................................................... 25

5. RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS AND MOBILIZATION STRATEGY................................ 316. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CPF............... 337. MONITORING PERFORMANCE AND REPORTING....................................................... 35ANNEXES.............................................................................................................................. 37

Annex 1: CPF Alignment with Other Policy Documents and Frameworks ............................... 39

Annex 2: Results Matrix ........................................................................................................... 41

Annex 3: Resource Requirements and Gaps........................................................................... 47


ix

LIST OF ACRONYMS

AfDB African Development BankAIDS Acquired Immune Deficiency SyndromeARD Agriculture and Rural Development Donor GroupASALs Arid and semi-arid landsASDS Agricultural Sector Development Strategy 2010 - 2020ASCU Agriculture Sector Coordination UnitCAADP Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development ProgramCPF Country Programming FrameworkCPP Country Programme PaperDRM Disaster Risk ReductionEDE Ending Drought EmergenciesFAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United NationsFAPDA Food and Agriculture Policy Decision AnalysisFFS Farmer Field SchoolFFLS Farmer Field and Life SchoolGDP Gross Domestic ProductGIS Geographic Information SystemGoK Government of KenyaHoA Horn of AfricaIFAD International Fund for Agricultural DevelopmentIGAD Intergovernmental Authority on DevelopmentIPC Integrated Phase Classification SystemIPM Integrated Pest ManagementJFFLS Junior Farmer Field and Life SchoolJPFSN Joint Programme on Food Security and NutritionKAPS Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices SurveyKFSSG Kenya Food Security Steering GroupHa HectareHIV Human immunodeficiency virusMAFSAN Mapping Actions for Food Security and NutritionMT Metric tonneMTIP Medium Term Investment PlanNDMA National Drought Management AuthorityNGO Non-governmental organizationNMTPF National Medium Term Programming FrameworkOCHA United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian AffairsOECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and DevelopmentPCM Pesticide Cycle ManagementPLWHA People Living with HIV/AIDSSFM Sustainable Forestry ManagementSLM Sustainable Land ManagementSMAE Small- and medium-sized agricultural enterpriseUNDAF United Nations Development Assistance FrameworkUNICEF United Nations Children’s FundWFP United Nations World Food Programme


1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The FAO Country Programming Framework (CPF) for Kenya sets out priority areas to guide FAO’s partnership with and support to the Government of Kenya (GoK) at both national and county level, bringing together innovative international good practices and global standards with national and regional expertise for the next four years from 2014 to 2017. The CPF was prepared following extensive consultation with the GoK and Development Partners through both consultative workshops in 2011 and continuous bilateral discussion through 2012. In order to fully adapt to the devolved system of governance and incorporate emerging priorities, a further consultative workshop was held in early 2014 which resulted in the addition of an outcome on research, innovation and advocacy as well as better definition of outputs and activities throughout the document. The workshop also enabled FAO to clearly define a strategy for engaging with the counties. The CPF puts an immediate emphasis on reducing poverty and hunger in line with Millennium Development Goal 1 (MDG) 11 and building a more sustainable and competitive agricultural system that will contribute to the GoK’s goal of building a food secure and prosperous Kenya through a commercially-oriented and competitive agricultural sector. The impact of the CPF will be a more competitive and productive agricultural sector and increased food security for Kenyans which will contribute to the achievement of the overarching goal of the CPF which is the eradication of hunger, food insecurity and malnutrition in Kenya.

The priority areas outlined in the CPF are closely aligned with the priorities of the GoK as defined in the Medium Term Plan (MTPII) of Kenya’s Vision 2030 and have been tailored to contribute to the achievement of the United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF), building on FAO’s comparative advantages within the Agricultural and Rural Development sector. The five CPF priority areas, or outcomes, are also consistent with FAO’s sub-regional, regional and global priorities. Whilst the CPF sets out FAO’s strategic plan for Kenya, specific approaches and activities will be adapted depending on county level priorities and capacities.

The five major outcomes set out in this document have been developed to reflect and build upon FAO’s current programme in Kenya. Through all of its work in Kenya, FAO retains a focus on mainstreaming gender, HIV, nutrition and disaster risk management (DRM) issues all of which contribute to building resilience, closing the gender gap and improving the linkage between food production and adequate nutrition. These are reflected in each of the outcomes of the CPF, to ensure that sufficient resources are invested in these critical areas.

Outcome 1: Agricultural2-based livelihoods and sectors are supported by an enabling policy, strategy and investment environment that promotes equality and inclusivity

FAO will build on the wide range of expertise developed through the Monitoring African Food and Agricultural Policies (MAFAP) programme to support the Government of Kenya (at both National and County level) in the development, adoption and implementation of relevant policies, legislation, strategies and investment programmes. These elements represent the foundation to support agricultural producers through the provision of technical assistance for agricultural policy development, as well as fostering policy dialogue, institutional strengthening and generation of evidence to inform policy formulation. FAO will also provide support to the National and County Government in monitoring the impact of agricultural policies and programmes at both national and county level. In addition, FAO is supporting the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Program (CAADP) Compact Process implementation.

1 MDG 1: Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger.2 Agricultural refers to crops, livestock, fisheries and aquaculture, cooperatives, food security, nutrition, forestry, water, land and trade sectors.


2

Outcome 2: Productivity of medium- and small-scale agricultural producers increased, diversified and aligned to markets FAO will support the National and County Governments to enhance Kenya’s competitive position in the agriculture and rural development Sector. Kenya’s priorities are to ensure that there is a reduction in the country’s production costs, improved value addition and mechanization. FAO will focus on medium- and small-scale producers in the crop, fisheries and livestock sectors, enhancing their productive capacity, promoting diversification and inclusiveness, improving value addition while maintaining nutrition quality and ensuring that production meets market demand. In doing this, FAO will pursue a strategic engagement with Private Sector Actors and support Public Private Partnership (PPP). A particular emphasis will be put on the empowerment of women and youth and persons with special needs in all activities to improve their income and livelihoods.

Outcome 3: Improved management of land, water and other natural resources for enhanced food security and socio-economic development at national, county and community level

FAO has wide-ranging experience in implementing sustainable natural resource management and climate change mitigation/adaptation programmes to address challenges to the agricultural sector. This experience will be used to build capacity at community and national level in climate–smart agriculture, sustainable land management (SLM), agriculture and water management, soil and water conservation, sustainable forest management (SFM), sustainable rangeland management, sustainable fisheries and aquaculture production and fisheries management, integrated pest management (IPM) and pesticide cycle management (PCM). A structured framework for partnership with donors, UN agencies, international Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), research institutions, community groups and the private sector (which will be developed under outcome 1) will support improved coordination and the promotion of good practices in natural resource management.

Outcome 4: Improved livelihood resilience of targeted, vulnerable populations

Agriculture is arguably the sector most affected by climate change and people living in arid and semi-arid lands (ASALs) bear the brunt of its negative impacts. FAO will support Kenya to address challenges faced by vulnerable populations, including people living with HIV/Aids (PLWHA), men, women and youth (particularly those living in Kenya’s arid and semi-arid lands, or ASALs), through enhancing their productive capacity, increasing availability of livelihood options and improving their ability to prepare for and respond to shocks through DRM initiatives.

Outcome 5: Access to and use of information, innovation, a global pool of knowledge and expertise drives holistic growth in the agricultural sector

FAO will use the vast resources of available knowledge and experience to promote innovation and advocate for increased efficiencies in the agricultural sector.

By endorsing the CPF 2014–2017, the GoK is committed to providing its institutional capacity and resources to facilitate the achievement of the objectives and actions proposed in this document. The CPF will be implemented in partnership and alignment with the joint efforts of the GoK and the donor community for improved coordination and aid effectiveness.


5

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 BackgroundThe Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is a key stakeholder in the agricultural sector in Kenya. FAO has been working with the Government of Kenya (GoK) in all aspects of food security and agriculture for decades, even before the FAO country office was established in 1977.

The FAO Country Programming Framework for Kenya (CPF) 2014 - 2017 builds upon and replaces the National Medium Term Priority Framework (NMTPF). The CPF outlines FAO’s contribution to the achievement of national agricultural priorities and objectives as defined in key Government policy documents, in particular Kenya’s Agricultural Sector Development Strategy (ASDS) 2010-2020. The ASDS foresees a food secure and prosperous nation by 2020 and aims to achieve a paradigm shift from subsistence to business-oriented agriculture. The CPF has also been developed in alignment with the broader Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP), signed by Kenya in 2010.

The 2014 revision of the CPF further aligns FAO’s programme with the devolution process and will drive a much closer and more dynamic engagement with the county governments.The CPF reflects the priorities set out in the current United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF) 2014-2018 for Kenya and provides a solid basis for engagement with other UN agencies. The CPF will serve to increase the impact of FAO’s work in Kenya and provide a basis for additional resource mobilization and partnership opportunities.

Given FAO’s mandate and its expertise in agriculture and natural resource management in Kenya, the Organization is uniquely positioned to support the continued development of the agricultural sector in the country and therefore positively impact the lives and livelihoods of the majority of Kenyans.

1.2 Developing the FAO Country Programming Framework for Kenya

In developing the CPF, FAO has consulted widely with both the GoK and development partners. The process was initiated through priority-setting workshops which defined the areas of FAO’s comparative advantage and the five outcome areas of focus for the CPF. These outcome areas were then discussed with Government and other stakeholders for review to ensure alignment with national priorities.The CPF will adhere to the following principles:

• Accountability to beneficiaries, the GoK, donors and partners;

• Participation of beneficiaries and relevant stakeholders in project design and review;

• Partnership with the GoK, development partners and other actors, target communities and the private sector, ensuring active coordination of all interventions;

• Integration to ensure interventions work across sectors and disciplines, consider market-based approaches, look at managing natural resources in a holistic manner, and link short-term responses to longer-term, sustainable initiatives;

• Gender equality so that gender issues are integrated in policies, projects and programmes and capacity for gender mainstreaming among staff and partners is strengthened. Inclusion so that the needs and rights of the most vulnerable, such as the disabled, the elderly, and people with HIV/AIDS, are incorporated in all activities.

This CPF document reviews the status of agriculture in Kenya and provides an analysis of sector-specific challenges and opportunities. Suitable areas for FAO interventions are identified and justified in accordance with FAO’s comparative advantages, GoK priorities (including those defined in the Medium Term Plan II towards the achievement of Kenya’s Vision 2030), UNDAF outcomes and FAO Strategic Objectives. Finally, outcome areas are discussed in detail, culminating in a presentation of the elements of the implementation strategy. The document is supported by annexes, including: i) CPF alignment with other policy documents and frameworks; ii) a results matrix; and iii) a matrix showing resource requirements and gaps.

The CPF remains a working document and will be revised periodically in collaboration with key national and county stakeholders in order to keep pace with changing priorities and emerging issues affecting the agricultural sector.


7

2. SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS

2.1 Importance of Agriculture to the EconomyThe Agriculture sector continues to play a vital role in the rural economy. The sector was one of the first to fully devolve the function of service provision to the county governments underscoring the importance of County Governments role in ensuring food security. Agriculture is key to Kenya’s economy, contributing 26 per cent of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and another 27 per cent of GDP indirectly through linkages with other sectors. The sector employs more than 40 per cent of the total population and more than 70 per cent of Kenya’s rural people. Agriculture in Kenya is large and complex, with a multitude of public, parastatal, non-governmental and private actors. The sector accounts for 65 per cent of the export earnings, and provides the livelihood (employment, income and food security needs) for more than 80 per cent of the Kenyan population and contributes to improving nutrition through production of safe, diverse and nutrient dense foods. The sector is also the main driver of the non-agricultural economy with a multiplier effect of 1.643 including manufacturing, providing inputs and markets for non-agricultural operations such as building/construction, transportation, tourism, education and other social services. When the sector performs well, the entire economy performs well, with the converse equally true (Figure 1).

The dynamics of poverty within Kenya are changing and directly influence the country’s agricultural sector. Currently 46 per cent of the population live on less than 1 USD a day, 36.5 per cent are food insecure4 and 35 per cent of children under five are stunted (chronically malnourished) in Kenya³⁰. The country’s population has increased significantly (growing from 11 million in 1970 to 39.5 million in 20115) and at the current rate of growth , it will double in the next 27 years6, reaching 81 million by 2039. As a result of this rapid increase, land parcels in the areas of high agricultural potential (which represents 20 per cent of the country’s land surface) are decreasing in size, affecting food production. Farmers, who are used to rain-fed farming systems, are being pushed into dryer, more marginal areas where they become increasingly vulnerable to drought and the unpredictability of weather patterns resulting from climate change. The population increase, coupled with the expansion of agriculture into arid lands, has affected the dynamics of pastoralism, where increased competition for natural resources has sparked escalated conflict in some areas. Furthermore, there has been a marked increase in the numbers of people dropping out of the nomadic livelihood, often moving into settled communities which are heavily reliant on food aid.

Given the importance of agriculture in rural areas of Kenya where poverty is prevalent, the sector’s importance in poverty alleviation cannot be overstated. Strengthening and improving the performance of the agricultural sector and enabling the engagement of the poorest and most vulnerable in this process is therefore a prerequisite and a necessary condition for achieving recovery and growth in Kenya after recent years of drought and slow development.

3 Ministry of Agriculture, Strategic Plan 2008 – 2012, Short Version4 IFAD Rural Poverty Portal (http://www.ruralpovertyportal.org/)5 Kenya National Bureau of Statistics, Kenya Facts and Figures 20126 IFAD Rural Poverty Portal (http://www.ruralpovertyportal.org/)

Figure 1: Relationship between agricultural sector and economic growth

Source: Agricultural Sector Development Strategy (ASDS) 2010 – 2020


8

2.2 Review of Important Sub SectorsSmallholder farmingThe smallholder farming sub-sector, primarily comprised of mixed crop and livestock farms, accounts for 75 per cent of the total agricultural output and 70 per cent of marketed agricultural produce. Small-scale farmers produce over 70 per cent of the nation’s maize, 65 per cent of its coffee and 50 per cent of its tea7. Currently, the use of appropriate inputs such as hybrid seed, fertilizer and pesticides has been relatively low, resulting in declining yields.

LivestockPastoral production dominates the livestock sector, with 80 per cent of the country’s livestock produced in pastoral and agro-pastoral systems. The remaining livestock are primarily raised on mixed farms with the majority of excess milk sold in the informal market despite a strong dairy sector and an increase in the number of dairy cooperatives. A recent study conducted by the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) Livestock Policy Initiative (LPI) estimated that the contribution of livestock to national GDP is 13 per cent, or 43 per cent of agricultural GDP8. Improvements within the livestock sector therefore represent a major opportunity for agriculture in Kenya.

Fisheries and AquacultureThe fisheries and aquaculture sector is comprised of 4 different sub-sectors (Inland capture fisheries, marine capture fisheries, inland aquaculture and marine aquaculture) each playing an important role in the national economy, providing employment to at least 80,000 people directly (fisher folks and fish farmers) and a livelihood to about 2.3 million Kenyans involved in fish processing and trade9.

Annual fish production in Kenya was estimated at 160,000 metric tons in 2005 and valued at Ksh 13 billion in 2011 with the potential to double to an estimated Ksh 26 billion by 201510. The sector currently contributes about 0.5 per cent of the country’s GDP but has significant opportunity for growth. The sector is primarily limited by poor infrastructure, invasive weeds and the low adoption of aquaculture, which currently represents only one per cent of national fish production.

The Government of Kenya is highly committed to the development of Aquaculture, and since 2010 implemented one Economic Stimulus Program leading to the involvement of thousands smallholders of fish farming. Kenya government envisages the production of 450,000 MT valued at KShs 100 billion by the year 2030, meaning a growth from current 150,000 MT.

Forestry Kenya’s forestry resources are dwindling, with forests estimated to cover less than 3 per cent of the country’s total land area, against an internationally accepted norm of 10 per cent. One of the key reasons for this decline is the fact that forests provide wood and non-wood products to over 80 per cent of all households in the country11. Given this massive dependence on forestry products, coupled with the changing dynamics of pastoralism in the arid and semi-arid areas the diversification of livelihood strategies into the sustainable utilisation of forestry products increasingly offers an important opportunity both for the conservation of forests and for poverty reduction.

2.3 Challenges and Opportunities in the Agricultural SectorThe agricultural sector in Kenya is constrained by a variety of challenges. Low agricultural productivity and production is caused by low input use, unsustainable soil and water practices and the diminishing size of average land holdings. This problem is further exacerbated by a lack of water storage facilities and poor irrigation infrastructure, with only 105,800 ha under irrigation against an estimated potential of 539,000 ha. Poor market facilities and market arrangements, unacceptably high pre- and post-harvest losses, and low value addition contributing to an under-developed agro-industry also hinder the full potential of agriculture in Kenya. Cooperatives and farmer-based organizations performance has been on the decline and subsequently, affecting small-scale producers. The main challenges that these organizations face include governance and management, value addition of produce, and poor access to market information.7 ASDS 2010 – 20208 Behnke R. & Muthami D. (2011). Contribution of Livestock to the Kenyan Economy. IGAD LPI Working Paper No. 03 - 119 Kenya National Oceans and Fisheries Policy, September 200810 ASDS 2010 – 202011 ASDS 2010 - 2020


9

The natural resource base is the foundation of all production systems in Kenya. Years of exploitation, population growth, demand for fuel wood resources and unsustainable land use practices, exacerbated by a poor governance framework, have all contributed to the degradation of the natural environment. Sustainable natural resource management is therefore critical to Kenya’s continued economic growth. Climate change is considered one of the most serious threats to sustainable development globally. Studies have shown that about 90% of all natural disasters afflicting the world are related to severe weather and extreme climate change events. The evidence of climate change in Kenya is unmistakable; temperatures have risen, rainfall has become irregular and unpredictable and we see an increase in the incidence of extreme weather events. Impacts of climate change are already evident in many sectors such as environment, human health, food security, economic activities and natural resources.

The role of women in agriculture is of particular importance as they provide over 70 per cent of the workforce but are largely deprived of both decision-making powers and secure tenure to the land they work. Empowering women, and supporting the role they play in agricultural production, is therefore key to reducing poverty and building a competitive agricultural sector. Youth are in a similar position to women in that they are commonly marginalised from decision making and lack ownership of productive assets. With the average age of Kenyan farmers estimated at 55 years12 and the labour intensive production systems which predominate in the country, this is an important national concern.

The problems mentioned above are exacerbated in the ASAL areas, which make up more than 80 per cent of Kenya’s land mass. This is due to a number of factors including: insecurity, poor infrastructure, lack of services, low literacy levels, increasing competition for scarce resources and increasing variability of rainfall patterns. As a result, these areas are chronically food insecure with high levels of malnutrition.

Despite these challenges, abundant opportunities for the continued development of the agricultural sector in Kenya exist. There is strong political commitment as reflected in the GoK’s Vision 2030 and the new constitution, which will ensure that each county receives an equitable share of the national budget and is able to prioritize expenditure. Kenya possesses a skilled population with increasing access to modern information and communication technologies. Agro-ecological diversity coupled with a significant irrigation potential (80 per cent of which is untapped) allows Kenya to produce a wide range of produce year round. Domestic, regional and international markets are growing and increasing the demand for agricultural products. There is also a growing demand for high-value products from a more quality conscious middle class. The growth in Kenya’s middle class is driven by the country’s blossoming private sector. Whilst the private sector is no panacea for change within the agricultural sector, it does have the potential for adding value, for innovation and for risk-taking that is outside the mandate of the public sector.

The following key opportunities exist for the FAO Kenya Programme:

Water harvesting for irrigation, livestock and human use: The Government of Kenya has committed itself to supporting a massive expansion in the land area under irrigation. This represents a huge opportunity for improved food security. There are however numerous risks associated with such expansion (such as inefficient water usage, governance of tenure, competition for water between sectors and nutrient leaching) which could limit future success. FAO will work with the government to mitigate these risks so that the eventual gains in terms of food security are achieved.

Innovative technologies and approaches: The use of transformative agricultural technologies ranging from: hydroponics to metal silos, information technologies such as mobile phone systems, and radio based training coupled with tested approaches (Farmer and Pastoral field schools), represent a major opportunity for improved efficiencies in both agricultural production and extension.

Agribusiness: Kenya has an exceptionally active cooperative movement and one of the most innovative banking systems in the world, capable of offering micro loans in remote rural areas and enabling banking through mobile phones. FAO will work with this to leverage better access to credit and to establish more equitable linkages between producer groups and end markets.

12 The Young Agropreneur, September 2011


10

Management of dry land ecosystems: The Government of Kenya has developed a framework to set in place the foundations for development in the ASALs which recognises that improvements in agriculture and food security will not be possible without improvements in security, infrastructure, education and health. This revised focus offers a significant opportunity to make real progress in the ASALs and connect agricultural producers to the services and markets which are essential for long term improvements in food security. FAO will engage with producers in these areas but will also engage with county governments and traditional leadership structures to enable improvements in land governance, and natural resource management.

Management of key water towers: Opportunity for growth within the agriculture sector is closely tied to the management and conservation of a number of critical water towers. FAO will therefore engage with the relevant institutions to support the sustainable management and conservation of key water towers. FAO through the Agricultural Water Development for Africa (AgWA) interventions will also support the CAADP Country Process Implementation of Agricultural Water Development and Management.

Devolution and policy reform: 80% of the functions of the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries have been devolved to the counties. This means that the provision of agricultural services is likely to be much more responsive to the needs of target communities and represents a significant opportunity for agricultural growth. There are however a number of risks associated with this process (some of the most significant are related to differing county policies on the taxation of agricultural inputs and products). FAO will engage with counties to support an evidence based policy analysis in order to support the mitigation of such risks.

2.4 Agricultural Policy FrameworksThe change in government in early 2013 saw the establishment of the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries (effectively combining three ministries into one) The current devolution process has seen the responsibility for service delivery within the agricultural sector move from the National Government to the County Governments. The National Government now remains with the responsibility of coordination and the development of public policy and institutional frameworks. In June 2008, the GoK adopted Vision 2030 as a new blue print for Kenya’s development which provides a road map for the country’s economic and social development over the next two decades. It aims at transforming Kenya into “a newly industrialized, middle income country providing a high quality of life to all its citizens in a clean and secure environment”. In Vision 2030, agriculture is identified as a key sector in achieving the envisaged annual economic growth rate. This shall be achieved through the transformation of smallholder agriculture from subsistence to a modern, innovative and market-oriented part of Kenya’s economy.

Kenya’s Vision 2030 at the level of the agriculture sector will be implemented through the ASDS 2010 – 2020, and will be guided by the Agriculture and Fisheries Act of 2013. In order to enable coordination across counties, the National government has developed an intergovernmental agricultural coordination forum. This is chaired by the Cabinet Secretary (Ministry of Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries) and co-chaired by an elected member the county agriculture related ministries. The aim of the ASDS, which is aligned to both the Kenya Vision 2030, and the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Program (CAADP), is to realize increased sector productivity, commercialization and competitiveness, as well as the development and more effective and efficient management of key factors of production. The ASDS is implemented through three (3) year Medium Term Investment Plans (MTIP) that are linked to the national planning and budgeting process.

Kenya has also developed a Country Programme Paper (CPP) on Ending Drought Emergencies (EDE) as part of the IGAD Drought Disaster Resilience and Sustainability Strategy. The paper presents Kenya’s framework approach towards ending recurrent drought emergencies. Under the leadership of the National Drought Management Authority (NDMA) the paper has been translated into a medium term plan for implementing key components of the ASAL policy and Vision 2030’s strategy for the development of northern Kenya and other arid lands. The paper focuses on creating a more conducive environment for building drought resilience through building stronger foundations and institutions for development. FAO has renewed its commitment to the HoA initiative and will continue to partner with the NDMA in making a positive contribution towards enhancing resilience and sustainable growth in the ASALs.


13

3. FAO’S COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE AND PRIORITY AREAS

FAO’s comparative advantage is built upon the Organization’s mandate, position and capacity to act.

3.1 MandateFAO’s vision and global goals provide the mandate for the Organization to address hunger, poverty and sustainable management of natural resources. The Organization’s vision is:

[A] world free of hunger and malnutrition, where food and agriculture contribute to improving the living standards of all, especially the poorest, in an economically, socially and environmentally sustainable manner.

FAO’s global goals are:

a) reduction of the absolute number of people suffering from hunger, progressively ensuring a country in which all people at all times have sufficient, safe and nutritious food that meets their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life;

b) elimination of poverty and the driving forward of economic and social progress for all with increased food production, enhanced rural development and sustainable livelihoods; and

c) sustainable management and utilization of natural resources, including land, water, air, climate and genetic resources, for the benefit of present and future generations.

These goals are underpinned by FAO’s five Strategic Objectives: 1) Help eliminate hunger, food insecurity and malnutrition; 2) Make Agriculture, forestry and fisheries more productive and sustainable; 3) Reduce rural poverty; 4) Enable inclusive and efficient agricultural and food systems; 5) Increase the resilience of livelihoods from disasters. The above strategic objectives are supported by two cross cutting themes on Gender and Governance.

3.2 Statement of Capability

FAO has perhaps the widest pool of agricultural expertise available to any single organisation, anywhere in the world. This pool of expertise is used to provide technical oversight to all FAO programmes whether they are global, regional or national. FAO Kenya has a growing team of both local and international expertise, with over 75 technical and administrative officers currently (2014) stationed in the country. This capacity is further enhanced by the presence of three field offices, the FAO Regional Emergency Office for Eastern Africa and Central Africa and the Emergency Centre for Transboundary Animal Diseases. With this high level of in-country expertise and FAO’s pivotal role in supporting Government and UN-led coordination fora, the Organization is well placed to influence national development priorities, policies and programmes.

FAO has consolidated its mandate through its long-term support to the GoK in the development of policies and strategies for agricultural development. The most recent of these include: i) the Food and Nutrition Policy; ii) the UN Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF) in Kenya; and iii) the recently developed Country Programme Paper for Ending Drought Emergencies (CPP). FAO’s unique position as an independent UN agency which acts as a neutral partner to the Government on complex issues related to policies, institutions, legal and regulatory reform has contributed to the development of a significant convening power. This enables FAO to form a critical link between the government, development partners, NGOs, civil society organizations (CSOs) and the private sector. In engaging with, and bringing these actors together into consolidated forums, FAO is able to improve cohesiveness, allow different actors to define their comparative advantages and support the alignment of multi-sectoral programmes to Government strategies.


14

With this convening role, FAO acts as co-chair to the Agricultural and Rural Development Donor Working Group (ARD), which meets monthly, to ensure the alignment of donor funds within the ASDS. As this group only comprises of development actors and is limited to the agricultural sector, FAO has recently pioneered the development of an ASAL donor resilience coordination group. This cross-sectoral group includes multinational organizations as well as both humanitarian and development donors and aligns external support to the six priorities defined in the CPP. Furthermore, the group commits its members to three key principles of development: i) joint planning and assessment; ii) joint implementation; and iii) joint monitoring.

Overall, FAO’s programme portfolio in Kenya is steadily growing with an operational budget in 2014 of more than USD 35 million. The successful implementation of its programme has placed FAO at the forefront of both emergency and development assistance in agriculture and livestock. Aside from its mainstream work in agriculture, livestock, forestry and fisheries, FAO Kenya has identified a number of gaps, particularly in the dissemination of knowledge and the use of new technologies which it intends to address through outcome 5 (Access to and use of innovations, a global pool of agricultural knowledge and expertise drives holistic agricultural growth and innovation in the agricultural sector). The Organization is now taking the lead in a number of ground-breaking projects using radio, mobile phones, digital pens and satellite-derived data in order to collect and disseminate information. FAO will increasingly work with the private sector in promoting innovative information dissemination approaches.

3.3 Accountability Commitments to BeneficiariesFAO is committed to ensuring that it is accountable to all of its stakeholders, in particular its beneficiaries. These commitments are defined as follows:

strengthening leadership and governance to embed good practice within the organization’s management structures and to ensure that FAO’s staff and implementing partners deliver on its commitments;

greater and more routine transparency, two-way communication, and information provision for affected populations;

offer means for communities to provide feedback on programmes and to submit complaints, and to ensure that they receive a timely response;

enable fair and representative participation of all sections of affected populations, including the most vulnerable and marginalized;

mainstream Accountability for Affected Population (AAP) into needs assessment, design, monitoring, and evaluation activities, ensuring an appropriate focus on AAP, participation in processes and continuous learning and improvement;

prevent sexual exploitation and abuse (SEA) by FAO personnel and implementing partners and put in place adequate response mechanisms; and

collaborate with peers and partners to deliver on AAP commitments in a coordinated and coherent way.

3.4 Building on past experienceFAO has decades of experience both in Kenya and within the East African Region. This, coupled with publications from other organisations has culminated in a vast library of evidence based good practice and lessons learned, which forms an essential reference for any planned work in the agricultural sector. Outcome 5 of this CPF will ensure this considerable body of experience is utilised to best effect in promoting the achievement of all the other outcomes within the CPF.


17

4. PROGRAMMING FOR RESULTSThe overarching goal of FAO’s country programme is to contribute to the eradication of hunger, food insecurity and malnutrition in Kenya. This is aligned to clearly articulated government priorities13 and to FAO’s Strategic Objective 114. This objective will only be achieved through a collaborative, coordinated and programmatic approach.

The five (5) outcomes defined below are therefore interdependent and systemic in approach rather than linear. They have been designed to enable a transition of beneficiaries from the most vulnerable (targeted through outcome 4), through improved resource management (targeted through outcome 3) and agricultural capacities to engage with the commercial sector (in outcome 2). Outcomes 1 and 5 are cross cutting and support this process through the establishment of an enabling policy and investment environment (outcome 1) and the generation and transfer of knowledge (outcome 5). This transition in outcomes also reflects a transition of FAO’s support, from implementation in outcome 4 to a progressive engagement in more upstream interventions, such as improving institutional capacities, support to the formulation of policies and strategies, coordination and the alignment of programmes to government priorities.

Throughout the CPF, FAO retains a focus on mainstreaming gender, HIV, DRM and nutrition issues. This mainstreaming is reflected in each of the outcomes of the CPF, all of which contribute to building resilience, closing the gender gap and improving the linkage between food production and adequate nutrition.

County EngagementOf the outcomes defined below, only outcomes 1 and 5 will have a primary focus on national and county level issues while the other outcomes will specifically target the counties (in line with the devolution process). Although this may involve a certain amount of coordination work and capacity development at the national level, at least 80% of funds targeting these outcomes will be spent in the counties.

This CPF has been developed through a consultative process, involving actors at all levels. With this programmatic framework comes a strong commitment to engage with the counties and establish the level of fit between this framework and county priorities. The CPF will remain an evolving document and further consultations are envisaged throughout the four year period.

The prioritization of target counties will be based on three key issues:

a) the synergies between county level priorities and the FAO programmatic framework;

b) the potential to eradicate hunger, malnutrition and food insecurity; and

c) the potential to increase agricultural production and productivity to create surpluses for income generation.

Implementation

This programme framework will be implemented through a series of yearly work plans which will be developed based on both national and county level consultation. Any findings from consultation will be captured in the work plans and incorporated into the CPF during the mid-term review period. The CPF implementation will be dependent on the resources available to FAO.

13 Kenya Vision 2030 and the Sustainable Development Goals14 FAO Strategic Objective 1 – Help eliminate hunger, food insecurity and malnutrition


18

Overall Goal: to contribute to the eradication of hunger, food insecurity and malnutrition in Kenya

The CPF has five main outcome areas:

Outcome 1: Agricultural15-based livelihoods and sectors are supported by an enabling policy, strategy and investment environment that promotes equality and inclusivity

FAO will support both the National and County governments in the development, adoption and implementation of relevant policies, legislation, strategies and investment programmes by providing technical assistance for agricultural policy development. FAO will also provide support to the National and County governments in monitoring the impact of agricultural policies and programmes. This will be achieved through the delivery of the following outputs:

Output 1.1 National level institutional capacities to formulate and implement policies, legislation, strategies and investment programmes for agriculture, food security and nutrition, and NRM strengthened:

At the national level, FAO will provide technical input to the formulation of key sector policies, strategies and investment plans, and will develop the capacity of technical staff and decision makers on cross-cutting issues such as gender, HIV, DRM and nutrition. This support will ensure that the MoALF is empowered to provide the leadership in policy and coordination necessary to effectively fulfill its function in the new devolved system of governance. This will be done through supporting :

• formulation, review and implementation of agricultural related policies, legal and regulatory frameworks and investment plans;

• monitoring, mapping and analysis of policies, programmes, legislations and investments related to food and agriculture;

• development of guidelines for devolution of food and agricultural policies and budgets to county governments;

• studies, programmes and policies designed to reduce the high cost of inputs;

• policies and programs designed to promote strategic partnerships across a number of value chains with private sector to enhance input supply, access to services, productivity and market access in order to enable greater returns to farmers;

• initiatives to monitor price trends and influence policies designed to reduce price volatility and uncertainty at both county and national level; and

• programmes and initiatives fostering economic cooperation and regional integration as a strategy for expanding local markets.

Output 1.2 County governments’ capacity to develop and implement appropriate policies, legislation, strategies and investment programmes in agriculture, food and nutrition security and NRM supported:

Following the devolution of major agricultural functions to the counties and the enactment of a number of county level policies which impact on agricultural production, FAO will re-orientate its policy and investment support to enable a strong focus on the impacts of county polices through the following interventions:

• build and strengthen policy analysis, formulation and programming capacities at county level including building knowledge and capacity to mainstream gender, HIV, DRM and nutrition issues;

• support the alignment and implementation of national policies, legislation, strategies and investment plans to county priorities; and

• support evidence-based policy analysis and planning at county level.

15 Agricultural refers to crops, livestock, fisheries, cooperatives, food security, nutrition, forestry, water, land and trade sectors.


19

Output 1.3: Strengthened government capacity to promote partnerships and coordinate action across actors and sectors involved in agriculture, food security and nutrition:

FAO recognizes that building the resilience of communities, improving the management of natural resources and increasing access to markets can only be achieved if there is significant synergy in both agricultural sector programmes and programmes which focus on other sectors, such as infrastructure, communication, finance and education. Success in achieving long term freedom from hunger, food insecurity and malnutrition is therefore heavily dependant on the coordination of support to different sectors. FAO will support this process through the following activities:

• support the mainstreaming of regional processes including AU, NEPAD, CAADP, COMESA, EAC, and IGAD;

• support National and County governments to establish or strengthen holistic, multi sector coordination structures that incorporate all stakeholders and will support the eventual achievement of food security and nutrition;

• facilitate the creation or the strengthening of multi-stakeholder mechanisms for policy dialogue between National and County Governments and Rural institutions, development partners and producer organizations, including cooperatives (agriculture, forestry and fisheries, as well as industry and entrepreneurship; and

• support development of and alignment to the GoK MTP/MTEF process.

Output 1.4 Increased capacities of agriculture sector stakeholders to mainstream gender and nutrition in policies and programmes related to Livestock, Crops, Fisheries and Forestry:

Women provide over 70% of the agricultural workforce in Kenya and are also largely responsible for day to day household chores. The amount of work facing rural women is therefore significant and is a major factor that limits increased production, and affects their ability to adequately care for children and themselves. Agriculture plays a vital role in improving nutrition through diversified food production, food safety, increasing incomes that affect access to safe water, health services and education. This outcome will build the capacities of agriculture sector stakeholders and ensure that future programmes are designed in a way that funds are attributed to addressing the gender issue. FAO will:

• carry out County level gender capacity needs assessment to inform targeting of interventions;

• build Capacity at National and County level to promote mainstreaming of gender, food safety and nutrition in food security initiatives, policies and legislation;

• strengthen collection and management of gender sensitive data to inform policy, programme formulation and gender and nutrition responsive budgeting; and

• support the establishment and strengthening of networks of gender and nutrition experts in Agriculture for advocacy, technical advice and capacity development.

Outcome 2: Productivity of medium and small-scale agricultural producers increased, diversified and aligned to markets

Under this outcome, FAO will focus on supporting medium and small-scale producers in the crop, livestock and fisheries sub-sectors, enhancing their productive capacity along the value chain, promoting diversification and sustainability of production, improving value addition, promoting access to financial services and ensuring that surplus is sold on markets. A particular emphasis will be put on the empowerment of women and youth in all activities. Partnerships will be developed with the private sector to enhance achievement of this outcome.


20

Output 2.1 Improved productive capacity and reduced risk of medium and small-scale producersIn order to increase the productive capacity of medium and small scale producers, FAO will support and enhance proven or potential approaches and interventions including extension methodologies such as Farmer and Pastoral Field Schools. These will be supported by innovative approaches using the local media, web based technologies and the engagement of the private sector. FAO will:

• support gender responsive climate change adaptation and mitigation through promotion of Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) and Good Agricultural Practices (GAP);

• support the national rehabilitation and expansion of irrigated land;

• promote strategic partnerships across a number of value chains with private sector to enhance input supply, access to services, productivity and market access;

• support small and medium producers in the adoption of good practices in post-harvest management to reduce losses and increase the sustainable availability of food;

• support fishery communities to adopt improved and more productive techniques concerning handling, storage and conservation of fishery products;

• support innovative initiatives by youth in livestock, crops, fisheries and management of natural resources production; and

• support the piloting and scale up of innovative participatory extension methodologies.

Output 2.2 Strengthened capacity to diversify production systems and products

This output will focus on promoting alternative and appropriate crop, fisheries, livestock and forest enterprises to improve household food and nutrition security and income through the following:

• promote production of targeted agricultural commodities with significant unmet market demand; and• support diversification and commercial production based on an economic evaluation of potential

enterprises.

Output 2.3 Improved agricultural market access and value addition along viable value chains

FAO will facilitate access to markets through improved quality of agricultural products, improved entrepreneurship of Famer based organizations and strengthened linkages to markets. Through this output, producers will be trained in post-harvest management, business management skills and support to the establishment of market-matching commodity exchange platforms. The capacity of National and County government as well as private sector technical staff and decision makers will also be developed in the subject areas. FAO will:

• support value addition of targeted commodities with significant unmet market demand;

• facilitate and promote networks and consultation mechanisms among different cooperatives and producer organizations that enhance access to markets;

• strengthen the capacity of cooperatives and producer organisations in agribusiness development and management;

• build capacity of producers to achieve acceptable food quality and safety standards for agri-business products;

• support strategies and programmes aimed at promoting inclusive commercialisation of agricultural production systems along agricultural value chains; and

• promote access to agricultural market information through the establishment of a market information system.

Output 2.4 Improved access to financial services and products

FAO will promote access to financial services and financial products as well as promote adoption of insurance services to reduce risk. This will be achieved through the provision of training to producers and producer organizations on the development and management of business plans. Technical capacities of both public and private Sector actors and decision-makers will also be enhanced in agricultural financing and linkages. FAO will:


21

• promote linkages of SMEs with financial service providers to increase access to affordable agricultural credit, development of innovative micro-finance products and insurance packages;

• support the growth and expansion of warehouse receipt systems, credit guarantee schemes and other innovative approaches to improve access to affordable and appropriate agricultural credit packages;

• support cooperatives and producer organizations on structured and functional social capital systems to promote savings (such as Village Community Banks) and asset building at farm level in order to improve access to credit;

• support capacity of farmer groups and associations to develop and manage business plans on identified areas of intervention in priority commodity value chains; and

• support development of business mentoring and incubation programmes.

Outcome 3: Improved management of land, water and other natural resources for enhanced food security and socio-economic development at national, county and community level

FAO has a wide-ranging knowledge and experience in implementing sustainable natural resource management and climate change mitigation/adaptation programmes to address challenges in the agricultural sector. This experience will be used to build institutional capacity at national, county and community level in sustainable land and water management (SLM), sustainable forest management (SFM), holistic natural resource management (HNRM), climate–smart agriculture, integrated pest management (IPM), Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) and pesticide cycle management (PCM). FAO will contribute to the development of a structured framework for partnership with national institutions, county governments, community groups, development partners and the private sector in order to support good practices in natural resource management.

Output 3.1 Institutional capacity for improved management and governance of land, fisheries, forests and other natural resources at national, county and community level strengthened

Capacity development under this output will target national, county and community level institutions involved in governance, management and utilization of the natural resources in line with the devolution of government functions and informed by the Voluntary Guidelines for the Responsible Governance of Tenure including methodologies for responsible gender-equitable governance. Under this output, FAO will:

• support responsible and equitable governance of tenure of land, fisheries and forests at national, county and community level;

• support integrated water resource management strategies including watershed conservation and water harvesting techniques;

• support community-based natural resource management and resource conflict resolution mechanisms;

• support county governments in strategies for sustainable forest management (SFM) to enhance tree cover, biodiversity and improve soil & water conservation;

• promote integrated management of invasive species in selected counties; and

• support initiatives and strategies that curb illegal unreported and unregulated (IUU) exploitation of natural resources.

Output 3.2 National and County level capacity for climate change adaptation and mitigation strategies strengthened

Capacity development under this output will be based on the National Climate Change Response Strategy and implementation plan. Under this output, FAO will:

• develop training tools to increase awareness and knowledge to minimize climate change impacts in agriculture;

• support the adoption of climate smart technologies for forestry and rangeland management;

• promote the adoption of sustainable bioenergy and energy-saving technologies; and

• support the development and implementation of Kenya National REDD+ Strategy.


22

Output 3.3 Bio-enterprises for sustainable socio-economic development in selected counties promoted

The development of bio-products from Non-Wood Forest Products and Services (NWFPS) is an emerging enterprise with a huge potential. FAO has knowledge and experience in development of marketable non-wood forest products and has previously supported the government of Kenya in piloting of gums and resins enterprises. Under this output, FAO will support relevant institutions at national and county level in creating awareness about the potential of non-wood forest products. The activities under this output include:

• establishing an inventory of information on NWFPS in Kenya and pilot an evidence based analysis of new and emerging opportunities for bio-products;

• improving market opportunities for organized producers of NWFP and promotion of business development approaches for the commercialization of NWFPs; and

• capacity development of national and county institutions to enable equitable access and benefit sharing of ecosystem goods and services (such as Payment for Ecosystem Services [PES]).

Outcome 4: Improved livelihood resilience of targeted, vulnerable populations

There are many households in Kenya that either have insufficient agricultural assets to produce adequate foods for consumption or are too remote from markets to engage in commercialised production. These households represent some of the most vulnerable in the country, particularly in areas where there are limited options for alternative livelihoods. Building resilience for these vulnerable communities calls for an integrated approach that requires a broad range of expertise and input from all stakeholders. This outcome will focus on mitigating the impact of shocks, increasing livelihood options and improving adaptive capacity. This will feed into the sustainable livelihoods component of the Medium Term Plan for Ending Drought Emergencies. The National Policy for Disaster Management in Kenya, 2012, recognizes the importance of Mainstreaming issues related to Women and Children in disaster management programmes. It stresses that Government, stakeholders and communities take positive cognizance of the excessive impacts which women and children undergo in any disaster. This outcome will therefore also support gender and nutrition initiatives that enhance protection, safety and other needs of women and children.

Output 4.1 Improved adaptive capacity, access to productive assets and stability of vulnerable communities

There are three critical pillars of resilience that can be influenced through agricultural based programmes. These include adaptive capacity (which reflects both mobility as well as alternative incomes), access to productive assets (this could be livestock, land, water, seeds or agricultural inputs) and stability (primarily influenced through resource use agreements and improved range management). Under this output, FAO will:

• support communities to analyze (through FFS / PFS / JFFLS) and adopt gender responsive diversified livelihood strategies that will increase dietary diversity and improve nutrition;

• support sustainable access to agricultural inputs and services, with a particular focus on labor saving technologies that will support women’s engagement in agriculture;

• support development of agricultural productive assets (through temporary employment in labour intensive schemes);

• support the development of shared resource use agreements for conflict mitigation and community risk management plans; and

• establish household commodity minimum basket for each county.

Output 4.2 National and county governments are capacitated to effectively respond to emergencies

Even with the best efforts in building resilience, shocks caused by drought, flood, disease and price fluctuations are inevitable. This output will increase national and county government capacities to respond to shocks and will go further to provide rapid, targeted assistance in order to reduce the erosive effect of emergencies on productive assets. This will be done through:


23

• support to increased county level capacity to comply with international best practice guidelines and standards (LEGS and SPHERE);

• support to the development and implementation of county integrated development plans as well as contingency plans;

• engaging in emergency response to shocks (droughts, floods, disease);

• support to national and county level coordination of emergency response;

• support to the review and re-formulation of safety net (social protection) policies and programmes; and

• support to the review and establishment of effective strategic reserves for emergency response.

Output 4.3 Good nutritional practises (including Food Safety), that build on existing local knowledge, attitudes and practises, are promoted

Despite decades of agricultural improvement programmes in Kenya, there has been little evidence connecting an increase in agricultural production to improved nutritional status. This output will ensure that all FAO activities take the extra step and link production to improved nutrition practices. FAO will:

• support nutrition-promoting farming systems, agronomic practices, crops and post-harvest supply chain management (e.g. micronutrient fertilizers, nutrient-preserving processing and packaging) – customized to local conditions;

• support the implementation of good agricultural practice which complies with international codes and standards for food safety;

• support the integration of nutrition in food security initiatives through capacity development and technical support, at the national and county levels;

• support nutrition and agriculture education in primary and secondary schools as well as the broader community including youth out of school through JFFLS and F/PFS;

• promote the dissemination of food and nutrition information from agricultural produce through the use of various platforms;

• support the roll out of the food security and nutrition policy and strategy at county level; and

• support the conservation and promotion of indigenous foods / breeds which support improved nutrition.

Outcome 5: Access to and use of information, innovation, a global pool of knowledge and expertise drives holistic growth in the agricultural sector

Knowledge is central to all aspects of FAOs programmes. FAO aims to effectively use its vast intellectual capital to support the CPF in achieving its objectives and results. This outcome will focus on knowledge generation through the use of innovative approaches, knowledge capture focusing on data collection and management, knowledge sharing through use of efficient and effective methodologies and technologies, knowledge application focusing on adaptive knowledge application and evidence based decision support.

Output 5.1 Available expertise, knowledge is consolidated and made available to support Kenya’s agricultural sector

FAO has perhaps the widest pool of agricultural expertise available to any single organisation, anywhere in the world. This global pool of expertise is supplemented by decades of experience, which has been captured through thousands of publications and reports, produced both by FAO and other institutions. However, this significant resource remains under-utilised at country level. The following activities will ensure that FAO in Kenya draws on this global knowledge bank to inform agricultural development in the country:

• support to Agriculture Information Resource Centre to review knowledge assets and catalogue existing literature that is relevant to Kenya’s agricultural sector;

• support the establishment of Kenya component of the regional network of experts;

• utilisation of South-South cooperation to provide targeted expertise to the agricultural sector; and

• identification of knowledge gaps and areas for further research.


24

Output 5.2 Targeted research, seasonal monitoring and the testing of new innovations contributes to planning and decision making processes

This output will focus on seasonal monitoring of food security and diseases as well as targeted research. The review of existing knowledge through output 5.1 will enable the identification of a number of knowledge gaps. These will be compared with government priorities in order to identify a number of critical areas where further research could influence strategies or polices at both national and county level. Research under this output will extend to a review of new and innovative approaches that could accelerate the achievement of Kenya’s agricultural goals. This will be done through support to:

• provision of timely, sex and age disaggregated and relevant food security, nutrition and livelihood information and analysis for national and county level planning processes;

• establishment of decision support tools at national and county levels;

• development of sex and age disaggregated baseline livelihood information and the analysis of resilience to inform the design and coordination of county / national government and multi donor resilience programmes;

• targeted research and development to fill knowledge gaps in areas prioritised by the government;

• identification and testing of new innovative approaches which will contribute to the eradication of hunger, malnutrition and food insecurity; and

• improved disease surveillance systems and prevention of shock associated disease epidemics such as Rift Valley Fever (RVF) and Pest des Petit Ruminants (PPR).

Output 5.3 National and county level policies and strategies are influenced by targeted advocacy through use of collated and synthesized information

One of the greatest comparative advantages of FAO is the fact that it is a technical agency. This means that it is well placed to provide advice and support, as well as to advocate from an entirely neutral position, informed only by available knowledge, information and technical expertise. Output 5.3 will leverage this comparative advantage through the following activities:

• in collaboration with government authorities, support early warning and information management systems as well as vulnerability mapping and analysis through Integrated Phase Classification (IPC) using appropriate technologies to improve planning and the timeliness of resource allocation;

• support knowledge sharing with stakeholders to improve uptake and advocacy through relevant platforms;

• the synthesis of information and the development and dissemination of targeted policy briefs to national and county offices;

• the publication of research papers in scientific journals and knowledge is produced;

• promotion of Accountability based on the principles of: Leadership, Governance and Staff Competencies; Transparency, Communication and Information Provision; Feedback and Complaints; Participation and Representation; Design, Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning; Protection against Sexual Exploitation and Abuse; Working with Partners and other Stakeholders; and

• advocacy for recognition of the impact of HIV and AIDS on the agricultural sector the need for the implementation of prevention, care and support as well as mitigation strategies.


27

RE

SU

LTS

AC

TIV

ITIE

SO

UT

CO

ME

1:

AG

RIC

UL

TU

RA

L-B

AS

ED

LIV

EL

IHO

OD

S A

ND

SE

CT

OR

S A

RE

SU

PP

OR

TE

D B

Y A

N E

NA

BL

ING

PO

LIC

Y, S

TR

AT

EG

Y A

ND

INV

ES

TM

EN

T E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

T T

HA

T P

RO

MO

TE

S E

QU

AL

ITY

AN

D IN

CL

US

IVIT

Y

1. N

atio

nal l

evel

inst

itutio

nal c

apac

ities

to fo

rmul

ate

and

impl

emen

t pol

icie

s, le

gisl

atio

n, s

trat

egie

s an

d in

vest

men

t pro

gram

mes

for

agri

cultu

re, f

ood

secu

rity

and

nut

ritio

n, a

nd N

RM

str

engt

hene

d

• S

uppo

rt th

e fo

rmul

atio

n, re

view

and

impl

emen

tatio

n of

agr

icul

tura

l rel

ated

pol

icie

s, le

gal a

nd re

gula

tory

fram

ewor

ks a

nd in

vest

men

t pl

ans.

• S

uppo

rt th

e m

onito

ring,

map

ping

and

ana

lysi

s of

pol

icie

s, p

rogr

amm

es, l

egis

latio

ns a

nd in

vest

men

ts re

late

d to

food

and

agr

icul

ture

.•

Sup

port

the

deve

lopm

ent o

f gui

delin

es fo

r dev

olut

ion

of fo

od a

nd a

gric

ultu

ral p

olic

ies

and

budg

ets

to c

ount

y go

vern

men

ts.

• S

uppo

rt st

udie

s, p

rogr

amm

es a

nd p

olic

ies

desi

gned

to re

duce

the

high

cos

t of i

nput

s.•

Sup

port

polic

ies

and

prog

ram

s de

sign

ed to

pro

mot

e st

rate

gic

partn

ersh

ips

acro

ss a

num

ber o

f val

ue c

hain

s w

ith p

rivat

e se

ctor

to

enha

nce

inpu

t sup

ply,

acc

ess

to s

ervi

ces,

pro

duct

ivity

and

mar

ket a

cces

s in

ord

er to

ena

ble

grea

ter r

etur

ns to

farm

ers.

•

Sup

port

initi

ativ

es to

mon

itor p

rice

trend

s an

d in

fluen

ce p

olic

ies

desi

gned

to re

duce

pric

e vo

latil

ity a

nd u

ncer

tain

ty a

t bot

h co

unty

and

na

tiona

l lev

el.

• S

uppo

rt pr

ogra

mm

es a

nd in

itiat

ives

fost

erin

g ec

onom

ic c

oope

ratio

n an

d re

gion

al in

tegr

atio

n as

a s

trate

gy fo

r exp

andi

ng lo

cal

mar

kets

.

2. C

ount

y go

vern

men

ts’ c

apac

ity to

dev

elop

and

im

plem

ent a

ppro

pria

te p

olic

ies,

legi

slat

ion,

st

rate

gies

and

inve

stm

ent p

rogr

amm

es in

ag

ricu

lture

, foo

d an

d nu

triti

on s

ecur

ity a

nd N

RM

su

ppor

ted

• B

uild

and

stre

ngth

en p

olic

y an

alys

is, f

orm

ulat

ion

and

prog

ram

min

g ca

paci

ties

at c

ount

y le

vel i

nclu

ding

bui

ldin

g kn

owle

dge

and

capa

city

to m

ains

tream

gen

der,

HIV

, DR

M a

nd n

utrit

ion

issu

es.

• S

uppo

rt th

e al

ignm

ent a

nd im

plem

enta

tion

of n

atio

nal p

olic

ies,

legi

slat

ion,

stra

tegi

es a

nd in

vest

men

t pla

ns to

cou

nty

prio

ritie

s.•

Sup

port

evid

ence

-bas

ed p

olic

y an

alys

is a

nd p

lann

ing

at c

ount

y le

vel.

3. S

tren

gthe

ned

gove

rnm

ent c

apac

ity to

pro

mot

e pa

rtne

rshi

ps a

nd c

oord

inat

e ac

tion

acro

ss a

ctor

s an

d se

ctor

s in

volv

ed in

agr

icul

ture

, foo

d se

curi

ty

and

nutr

ition

• S

uppo

rt th

e m

ains

tream

ing

of re

gion

al p

roce

sses

incl

udin

g A

U, N

EP

AD

, CA

AD

P, C

OM

ES

A, E

AC

, and

IGA

D.

• S

uppo

rt N

atio

nal a

nd C

ount

y go

vern

men

ts to

est

ablis

h or

stre

ngth

en h

olis

tic, m

ulti

sect

or c

oord

inat

ion

stru

ctur

es th

at in

corp

orat

e al

l st

akeh

olde

rs a

nd w

ill s

uppo

rt th

e ev

entu

al a

chie

vem

ent o

f foo

d se

curit

y an

d nu

tritio

n.•

Faci

litat

e th

e cr

eatio

n or

the

stre

ngth

enin

g of

mul

ti-st

akeh

olde

r mec

hani

sms

for p

olic

y di

alog

ue b

etw

een

Nat

iona

l and

Cou

nty

Gov

ernm

ents

and

Rur

al in

stitu

tions

, dev

elop

men

t par

tner

s an

d pr

oduc

er o

rgan

izat

ions

, inc

ludi

ng c

oope

rativ

es (a

gric

ultu

re, f

ores

try

and

fishe

ries,

as

wel

l as

indu

stry

and

ent

repr

eneu

rshi

p.

• S

uppo

rt de

velo

pmen

t of a

nd a

lignm

ent t

o th

e G

oK M

TP/M

TEF

proc

ess.

4.

Incr

ease

d ca

paci

ties

of a

gric

ultu

re s

ecto

r st

akeh

olde

rs to

mai

nstr

eam

gen

der

and

nutr

ition

in

pol

icie

s an

d pr

ogra

mm

es r

elat

ed to

Liv

esto

ck,

Cro

ps, F

ishe

ries

and

For

estr

y.

• C

arry

out

Cou

nty

leve

l gen

der c

apac

ity n

eeds

ass

essm

ent t

o in

form

targ

etin

g of

inte

rven

tions

. •

Bui

ld C

apac

ity a

t Nat

iona

l and

Cou

nty

leve

l to

prom

ote

mai

nstre

amin

g of

gen

der,

food

saf

ety

and

nutri

tion

in fo

od s

ecur

ity in

itiat

ives

, po

licie

s an

d le

gisl

atio

n.•

Stre

ngth

en c

olle

ctio

n an

d m

anag

emen

t of g

ende

r sen

sitiv

e da

ta to

info

rm p

olic

y, p

rogr

amm

e fo

rmul

atio

n an

d ge

nder

and

nut

ritio

n re

spon

sive

bud

getin

g.

• S

uppo

rt th

e es

tabl

ishm

ent a

nd s

treng

then

ing

of n

etw

orks

of g

ende

r and

nut

ritio

n ex

perts

in A

gric

ultu

re fo

r adv

ocac

y, te

chni

cal a

dvic

e an

d ca

paci

ty d

evel

opm

ent.


28

RE

SU

LTS

AC

TIV

ITIE

S

OU

TC

OM

E 2

: P

RO

DU

CT

IVIT

Y O

F M

ED

IUM

AN

D S

MA

LL

-SC

AL

E A

GR

ICU

LT

UR

AL

PR

OD

UC

ER

S IN

CR

EA

SE

D, D

IVE

RS

IFIE

D A

ND

AL

IGN

ED

TO

MA

RK

ET

S

1.

Impr

oved

pro

duct

ive

capa

city

and

red

uced

ris

k of

m

ediu

m a

nd s

mal

l-sca

le p

rodu

cers

• S

uppo

rt ge

nder

resp

onsi

ve c

limat

e ch

ange

ada

ptat

ion

and

miti

gatio

n th

roug

h pr

omot

ion

of C

limat

e S

mar

t Agr

icul

ture

(CS

A) a

nd G

ood

Agr

icul

tura

l Pra

ctic

es (G

AP

).•

Sup

port

the

ratio

nal r

ehab

ilita

tion

and

expa

nsio

n of

irrig

ated

land

.•

Pro

mot

e st

rate

gic

partn

ersh

ips

acro

ss a

num

ber o

f val

ue c

hain

s w

ith p

rivat

e se

ctor

to e

nhan

ce in

put s

uppl

y, a

cces

s to

ser

vice

s,

prod

uctiv

ity a

nd m

arke

t acc

ess.

•

Sup

port

smal

l and

med

ium

pro

duce

rs in

the

adop

tion

of g

ood

prac

tices

in p

ost-h

arve

st m

anag

emen

t to

redu

ce lo

sses

and

incr

ease

th

e su

stai

nabl

e av

aila

bilit

y of

food

.•

Sup

port

fishe

ry c

omm

uniti

es to

ado

pt im

prov

ed a

nd m

ore

prod

uctiv

e te

chni

ques

incl

udin

g ha

ndlin

g, s

tora

ge a

nd c

onse

rvat

ion

of

fishe

ry p

rodu

cts.

• S

uppo

rt in

nova

tive

initi

ativ

es b

y yo

uth

in li

vest

ock,

cro

ps, fi

sher

ies

and

man

agem

ent o

f nat

ural

reso

urce

s pr

oduc

tion.

• S

uppo

rt th

e pi

lotin

g an

d sc

ale

up o

f inn

ovat

ive

parti

cipa

tory

ext

ensi

on m

etho

dolo

gies

.

2.

Str

engt

hene

d ca

paci

ty to

div

ersi

fy p

rodu

ctio

n sy

stem

s an

d pr

oduc

ts•

Pro

mot

e pr

oduc

tion

of ta

rget

ed a

gric

ultu

ral c

omm

oditi

es w

ith s

igni

fican

t unm

et m

arke

t dem

and.

•

Sup

port

dive

rsifi

catio

n an

d co

mm

erci

al p

rodu

ctio

n ba

sed

on a

n ec

onom

ic e

valu

atio

n of

pot

entia

l ent

erpr

ises

.

3.

Impr

oved

agr

icul

tura

l mar

ket a

cces

s an

d va

lue

addi

tion

alon

g vi

able

val

ue c

hain

s

• S

uppo

rt va

lue

addi

tion

of ta

rget

ed c

omm

oditi

es w

ith s

igni

fican

t unm

et m

arke

t dem

and.

• Fa

cilit

ate

and

prom

ote

netw

orks

and

con

sulta

tion

mec

hani

sms

amon

g di

ffere

nt c

oope

rativ

es a

nd p

rodu

cer o

rgan

izat

ions

that

enh

ance

ac

cess

to m

arke

ts.

• S

treng

then

the

capa

city

of c

oope

rativ

es a

nd p

rodu

cer o

rgan

isat

ions

in a

grib

usin

ess

deve

lopm

ent a

nd m

anag

emen

t.•

Bui

ld c

apac

ity o

f pro

duce

rs to

ach

ieve

acc

epta

ble

food

qua

lity

and

safe

ty s

tand

ards

for a

gri-b

usin

ess

prod

ucts

.•

Sup

port

stra

tegi

es a

nd p

rogr

amm

es a

imed

at p

rom

otin

g in

clus

ive

com

mer

cial

isat

ion

of a

gric

ultu

ral p

rodu

ctio

n sy

stem

s al

ong

agric

ultu

ral v

alue

cha

ins.

• P

rom

ote

acce

ss to

agr

icul

tura

l mar

ket i

nfor

mat

ion

thro

ugh

the

esta

blis

hmen

t of a

mar

ket i

nfor

mat

ion

syst

em.

4.

Impr

oved

acc

ess

to fi

nanc

ial s

ervi

ces

and

prod

ucts

• P

rom

ote

linka

ges

of S

ME

s w

ith fi

nanc

ial s

ervi

ce p

rovi

ders

to in

crea

se a

cces

s to

affo

rdab

le a

gric

ultu

ral c

redi

t, de

velo

pmen

t of

inno

vativ

e m

icro

-fina

nce

prod

ucts

and

insu

ranc

e pa

ckag

es.

• S

uppo

rt th

e gr

owth

and

exp

ansi

on o

f war

ehou

se re

ceip

t sys

tem

s, c

redi

t gua

rant

ee s

chem

es a

nd o

ther

inno

vativ

e ap

proa

ches

to

impr

ove

acce

ss to

affo

rdab

le a

nd a

ppro

pria

te a

gric

ultu

ral c

redi

t pac

kage

s.

• S

uppo

rt co

oper

ativ

es a

nd p

rodu

cer o

rgan

izat

ions

on

stru

ctur

ed a

nd fu

nctio

nal s

ocia

l cap

ital s

yste

ms

to p

rom

ote

savi

ngs

(suc

h as

V

illag

e C

omm

unity

Ban

ks) a

nd a

sset

bui

ldin

g at

farm

leve

l in

orde

r to

impr

ove

acce

ss to

cre

dit.

• S

uppo

rt ca

paci

ty o

f far

mer

gro

ups

and

asso

ciat

ions

to d

evel

op a

nd m

anag

e bu

sine

ss p

lans

on

iden

tified

are

as o

f int

erve

ntio

n in

pr

iorit

y co

mm

odity

val

ue c

hain

s.•

Sup

port

deve

lopm

ent o

f bus

ines

s m

ento

ring

and

incu

batio

n pr

ogra

mm

es.


29

RE

SU

LTS

AC

TIV

ITIE

S

OU

TCO

ME

3: I

MP

RO

VE

D M

AN

AG

EM

EN

T O

F LA

ND

, WA

TER

AN

D O

THE

R N

ATU

RA

L R

ES

OU

RC

ES

FO

R E

NH

AN

CE

D F

OO

D S

EC

UR

ITY

AN

D S

OC

IO-E

CO

NO

MIC

D

EV

ELO

PM

EN

T A

T N

ATI

ON

AL,

CO

UN

TY A

ND

CO

MM

UN

ITY

LE

VE

L

1.

Inst

itutio

nal c

apac

ity fo

r im

prov

ed m

anag

emen

t an

d go

vern

ance

of l

and,

fish

erie

s, fo

rest

s an

d ot

her

natu

ral r

esou

rces

at n

atio

nal,

coun

ty a

nd

com

mun

ity le

vel s

tren

gthe

ned

• S

uppo

rt re

spon

sibl

e an

d eq

uita

ble

gove

rnan

ce o

f ten

ure

of la

nd, fi

sher

ies

and

fore

sts

at n

atio

nal,

coun

ty a

nd c

omm

unity

leve

l.•

Sup

port

inte

grat

ed w

ater

reso

urce

man

agem

ent s

trate

gies

incl

udin

g w

ater

shed

con

serv

atio

n an

d w

ater

har

vest

ing

tech

niqu

es.

• S

uppo

rt co

mm

unity

-bas

ed n

atur

al re

sour

ce m

anag

emen

t and

reso

urce

con

flict

reso

lutio

n m

echa

nism

s.

• S

uppo

rt co

unty

gov

ernm

ents

in s

trate

gies

for s

usta

inab

le fo

rest

man

agem

ent (

SFM

) to

enha

nce

tree

cove

r, bi

odiv

ersi

ty a

nd im

prov

e so

il &

wat

er c

onse

rvat

ion.

• P

rom

ote

inte

grat

ed m

anag

emen

t of i

nvas

ive

spec

ies

in s

elec

ted

coun

ties.

• S

uppo

rt in

itiat

ives

and

stra

tegi

es th

at c

urb

illeg

al u

nrep

orte

d an

d un

regu

late

d (IU

U) e

xplo

itatio

n of

nat

ural

reso

urce

s.

2.

Nat

iona

l and

Cou

nty

leve

l cap

acity

for

clim

ate

chan

ge a

dapt

atio

n an

d m

itiga

tion

stra

tegi

es

stre

ngth

ened

• D

evel

op tr

aini

ng to

ols

to in

crea

se a

war

enes

s an

d kn

owle

dge

to m

inim

ize

clim

ate

chan

ge im

pact

s in

agr

icul

ture

. •

Sup

port

the

adop

tion

of c

limat

e sm

art t

echn

olog

ies

for f

ores

try a

nd ra

ngel

and

man

agem

ent.

• P

rom

ote

the

adop

tion

of s

usta

inab

le b

ioen

ergy

and

ene

rgy-

savi

ng te

chno

logi

es.

• S

uppo

rt th

e de

velo

pmen

t and

impl

emen

tatio

n of

Ken

ya N

atio

nal R

ED

D+

Stra

tegy

.

3.

Bio

-ent

erpr

ises

for

sust

aina

ble

soci

o-ec

onom

ic

deve

lopm

ent i

n se

lect

ed c

ount

ies

prom

oted

• E

stab

lish

an in

vent

ory

of in

form

atio

n on

NW

FPS

in K

enya

and

pilo

t an

evid

ence

bas

ed a

naly

sis

of n

ew a

nd e

mer

ging

opp

ortu

nitie

s fo

r bi

o-pr

oduc

ts.

• Im

prov

ing

mar

ket o

ppor

tuni

ties

for o

rgan

ized

pro

duce

rs o

f NW

FP a

nd p

rom

otio

n of

bus

ines

s de

velo

pmen

t app

roac

hes

for t

he

com

mer

cial

izat

ion

of N

WFP

s.•

Cap

acity

dev

elop

men

t of n

atio

nal a

nd c

ount

y in

stitu

tions

to e

nabl

e eq

uita

ble

acce

ss a

nd b

enefi

t sha

ring

of e

cosy

stem

goo

ds a

nd

serv

ices

(suc

h as

Pay

men

t for

Eco

syst

em S

ervi

ces

- PE

S).


30

RE

SU

LTS

AC

TIV

ITIE

S

OU

TCO

ME

4: I

MP

RO

VE

D L

IVE

LIH

OO

D R

ES

ILIE

NC

E O

F TA

RG

ETE

D V

ULN

ER

AB

LE P

OP

ULA

TIO

NS

1. I

mpr

oved

ada

ptiv

e ca

paci

ty, a

cces

s to

pr

oduc

tive

asse

ts a

nd s

tabi

lity

of v

ulne

rabl

e co

mm

uniti

es

• S

uppo

rt co

mm

uniti

es to

ana

lyze

(thr

ough

FFS

/ P

FS /

JFFL

S) a

nd a

dopt

gen

der r

espo

nsiv

e di

vers

ified

live

lihoo

d st

rate

gies

that

will

incr

ease

die

tary

div

ersi

ty a

nd im

prov

e nu

tritio

n.•

Sup

port

sust

aina

ble

acce

ss to

agr

icul

tura

l inp

uts

and

serv

ices

, with

a p

artic

ular

focu

s on

labo

r sav

ing

tech

nolo

gies

that

w

ill s

uppo

rt w

omen

’s e

ngag

emen

t in

agric

ultu

re•

Sup

port

deve

lopm

ent o

f agr

icul

tura

l pro

duct

ive

asse

ts (t

hrou

gh te

mpo

rary

em

ploy

men

t in

labo

ur in

tens

ive

sche

mes

).•

Sup

port

the

deve

lopm

ent o

f sha

red

reso

urce

use

agr

eem

ents

for c

onfli

ct m

itiga

tion

and

com

mun

ity ri

sk m

anag

emen

t pl

ans.

• E

stab

lish

hous

ehol

d co

mm

odity

min

imum

bas

ket f

or e

ach

coun

ty

2. N

atio

nal a

nd c

ount

y go

vern

men

ts a

re

capa

cita

ted

to e

ffec

tivel

y re

spon

d to

em

erge

ncie

s

• In

crea

sed

coun

ty le

vel c

apac

ity to

com

ply

with

inte

rnat

iona

l bes

t pra

ctic

e gu

idel

ines

and

sta

ndar

ds (L

EG

S a

nd

SP

HE

RE

).•

Sup

port

to th

e de

velo

pmen

t and

impl

emen

tatio

n of

cou

nty

inte

grat

ed d

evel

opm

ent p

lans

as

wel

l as

cont

inge

ncy

plan

s.•

Eng

age

in e

mer

genc

y re

spon

se to

sho

cks

(dro

ught

s, fl

oods

, dis

ease

).•

Sup

port

to n

atio

nal a

nd c

ount

y le

vel c

oord

inat

ion

of e

mer

genc

y re

spon

se.

• S

uppo

rt th

e re

view

and

re-fo

rmul

atio

n of

saf

ety

net (

soci

al p

rote

ctio

n) p

olic

ies

and

prog

ram

mes

.•

Sup

port

the

revi

ew a

nd e

stab

lishm

ent o

f effe

ctiv

e st

rate

gic

rese

rves

for e

mer

genc

y re

spon

se.

3. G

ood

nutr

ition

al p

ract

ises

(inc

ludi

ng

Food

Saf

ety)

, tha

t bui

ld o

n ex

istin

g lo

cal

know

ledg

e, a

ttitu

des

and

prac

tices

, are

pr

omot

ed

• S

uppo

rt nu

tritio

n-pr

omot

ing

farm

ing

syst

ems,

agr

onom

ic p

ract

ices

, cro

ps a

nd p

ost-h

arve

st s

uppl

y ch

ain

man

agem

ent

(e.g

. mic

ronu

trien

t fer

tiliz

ers,

nut

rient

-pre

serv

ing

proc

essi

ng a

nd p

acka

ging

) – c

usto

miz

ed to

loca

l con

ditio

ns.

• S

uppo

rt to

the

impl

emen

tatio

n of

goo

d ag

ricul

tura

l pra

ctic

e w

hich

com

plie

s w

ith in

tern

atio

nal c

odes

and

sta

ndar

ds fo

r fo

od s

afet

y.•

Sup

port

the

inte

grat

ion

of n

utrit

ion

in fo

od s

ecur

ity in

itiat

ives

thro

ugh

capa

city

dev

elop

men

t and

tech

nica

l sup

port,

at

the

natio

nal a

nd c

ount

y le

vels

.•

Sup

port

nutri

tion

and

agric

ultu

re e

duca

tion

in p

rimar

y an

d se

cond

ary

scho

ols

as w

ell a

s th

e br

oade

r com

mun

ity

incl

udin

g yo

uth

out o

f sch

ool t

hrou

gh J

FFLS

and

F/P

FS.

• P

rom

ote

the

diss

emin

atio

n of

food

and

nut

ritio

n in

form

atio

n fro

m a

gric

ultu

ral p

rodu

ce th

roug

h th

e us

e of

var

ious

pl

atfo

rms.

• S

uppo

rt th

e ro

ll ou

t of t

he fo

od s

ecur

ity a

nd n

utrit

ion

polic

y an

d st

rate

gy a

t cou

nty

leve

l.•

Sup

port

the

cons

erva

tion

and

prom

otio

n of

indi

geno

us fo

ods

/ bre

eds

whi

ch s

uppo

rt im

prov

ed n

utrit

ion.


31

RE

SU

LTS

AC

TIV

ITIE

SO

UTC

OM

E 5

: AC

CE

SS

TO

AN

D U

SE

OF

INFO

RM

ATI

ON

, IN

NO

VA

TIO

N, A

GLO

BA

L P

OO

L O

F K

NO

WLE

DG

E A

ND

EX

PE

RTI

SE

DR

IVE

S H

OLI

STI

C G

RO

WTH

IN T

HE

A

GR

ICU

LTU

RA

L S

EC

TOR

1.

Ava

ilabl

e ex

pert

ise,

kno

wle

dge

is c

onso

lidat

ed

and

mad

e av

aila

ble

to s

uppo

rt K

enya

’s a

gric

ultu

ral

sect

or

• S

uppo

rt A

gric

ultu

re In

form

atio

n R

esou

rce

Cen

tre to

revi

ew k

now

ledg

e as

sets

and

cat

alog

ue e

xist

ing

liter

atur

e th

at is

rele

vant

to

Ken

ya’s

agr

icul

tura

l sec

tor.

• S

uppo

rt th

e es

tabl

ishm

ent o

f Ken

ya c

ompo

nent

of t

he re

gion

al n

etw

ork

of e

xper

ts.

• U

tilis

atio

n of

Sou

th-S

outh

coo

pera

tion

to p

rovi

de ta

rget

ed e

xper

tise

to th

e ag

ricul

tura

l sec

tor.

• Id

entifi

catio

n of

kno

wle

dge

gaps

and

are

as fo

r fur

ther

rese

arch

.

2.

Targ

eted

res

earc

h, s

easo

nal m

onito

ring

and

the

test

ing

of n

ew in

nova

tions

con

trib

utes

to p

lann

ing

and

deci

sion

mak

ing

proc

esse

s.

• S

uppo

rt th

e pr

ovis

ion

of ti

mel

y, s

ex a

nd a

ge d

isag

greg

ated

and

rele

vant

food

sec

urity

, nut

ritio

n an

d liv

elih

ood

info

rmat

ion

and

anal

ysis

fo

r nat

iona

l and

cou

nty

leve

l pla

nnin

g pr

oces

ses.

•

Sup

port

esta

blis

hmen

t of d

ecis

ion

supp

ort t

ools

at n

atio

nal a

nd c

ount

y le

vels

.•

Sup

port

the

deve

lopm

ent o

f sex

and

age

dis

aggr

egat

ed b

asel

ine

livel

ihoo

d in

form

atio

n an

d th

e an

alys

is o

f res

ilien

ce to

info

rm th

e de

sign

and

coo

rdin

atio

n of

cou

nty

/ nat

iona

l gov

ernm

ent a

nd m

ulti

dono

r res

ilien

ce p

rogr

amm

es.

• Ta

rget

ed re

sear

ch a

nd d

evel

opm

ent t

o fil

l kno

wle

dge

gaps

in a

reas

prio

ritis

ed b

y th

e go

vern

men

t.•

Iden

tifica

tion

and

test

ing

of n

ew in

nova

tive

appr

oach

es w

hich

will

con

tribu

te to

the

erad

icat

ion

of h

unge

r, m

alnu

tritio

n an

d fo

od

inse

curit

y.•

Sup

port

impr

oved

dis

ease

sur

veill

ance

sys

tem

s an

d pr

even

tion

of s

hock

ass

ocia

ted

dise

ase

epid

emic

s su

ch a

s R

ift V

alle

y Fe

ver

(RV

F) a

nd P

est d

es P

etit

Rum

inan

ts (P

PR

).

3.

Nat

iona

l and

cou

nty

leve

l pol

icie

s an

d st

rate

gies

ar

e in

fluen

ced

by ta

rget

ed a

dvoc

acy

thro

ugh

use

of c

olla

ted

and

synt

hesi

zed

info

rmat

ion

• In

col

labo

ratio

n w

ith g

over

nmen

t aut

horit

ies,

sup

port

early

war

ning

and

info

rmat

ion

man

agem

ent s

yste

ms

as w

ell a

s vu

lner

abili

ty

map

ping

and

ana

lysi

s th

roug

h In

tegr

ated

Pha

se C

lass

ifica

tion

(IPC

) usi

ng a

ppro

pria

te te

chno

logi

es to

impr

ove

plan

ning

and

the

timel

ines

s of

reso

urce

allo

catio

n.•

Sup

port

know

ledg

e sh

arin

g w

ith s

take

hold

ers

to im

prov

e up

take

and

adv

ocac

y th

roug

h re

leva

nt p

latfo

rms.

• Th

e sy

nthe

sis

of in

form

atio

n an

d th

e de

velo

pmen

t and

dis

sem

inat

ion

of ta

rget

ed p

olic

y br

iefs

to n

atio

nal a

nd c

ount

y of

fices

.•

The

publ

icat

ion

of re

sear

ch p

aper

s in

sci

entifi

c jo

urna

ls a

nd k

now

ledg

e is

pro

duce

d.•

Pro

mot

e A

ccou

ntab

ility

bas

ed o

n th

e pr

inci

ples

of:

Lead

ersh

ip, G

over

nanc

e an

d S

taff

Com

pete

ncie

s; T

rans

pare

ncy,

Com

mun

icat

ion

and

Info

rmat

ion

Pro

visi

on; F

eedb

ack

and

Com

plai

nts;

Par

ticip

atio

n an

d R

epre

sent

atio

n; D

esig

n, M

onito

ring,

Eva

luat

ion

and

Lear

ning

; P

rote

ctio

n ag

ains

t Sex

ual E

xplo

itatio

n an

d A

buse

; Wor

king

with

Par

tner

s an

d ot

her S

take

hold

ers

• A

dvoc

ate

for r

ecog

nitio

n of

the

impa

ct o

f HIV

and

AID

S o

n th

e ag

ricul

tura

l sec

tor t

he n

eed

for t

he im

plem

enta

tion

of p

reve

ntio

n, c

are

and

supp

ort a

s w

ell a

s m

itiga

tion

stra

tegi

es.


33

5. RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS AND MOBILIZATION STRATEGY Over the past several years, FAO has benefitted from the large amount of humanitarian aid that has poured into Kenya in response to the recurrent drought emergencies and resulting food insecurity. These funds, channelled through humanitarian appeals overseen by the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), have provided FAO Kenya with a large component of its operational budget.

Throughout this time however, FAO has maintained a focus on longer-term programming, promoting sustainable livelihoods and commercialization in line with Kenya’s ASDS 2012 – 2020. FAO is therefore well placed to adapt to the changing resource environment which shows a gradual reduction of humanitarian assistance to Kenya16 and a renewed focus on a long-term resilience-building approach, both in Kenya and the region.

While FAO remains a key humanitarian and development actor in Kenya, its mandate, with its unique approach to supporting resilience and livelihoods, is gaining more attention. Furthermore, FAO will need to leverage its considerable technical expertise to support county capacities in areas that have been neglected by development partners, such as natural resource management, forestry and fisheries, in order to attract additional resources. FAO will also need to explore expansion of joint programming (e.g., with IFAD and WFP) to attract more funding from resource partners interested in seeing more efficient and synergistic collaborative approaches among agencies.

In terms of potential resource partners, FAO will continue to depend on traditional donors familiar with its work and mandate for most of its support over the next five years. These include the main OECD donors, including the European Union, Germany, Sweden, United Kingdom and United States, among others. Emerging donors will likely continue to favour bilateral support to the GoK, including technical assistance and training. Countries such as China are still hesitant to provide voluntary contributions to multilateral institutions and favour a bilateral approach where they can obtain special incentives from the GoK.

A resource requirement table (see annex 3) outlines resource requirements across CPF outcomes and outputs. This will underpin a more elaborate analysis of potential resource partners and drive the development of a resource mobilization action plan around the CPF with the guidance of FAO’s Resource Mobilization and Operations Support Service. This resource mobilization action plan is aligned with GoK priorities (as outlined in the ASDS and the MTPII for Vision 2030), CAADP, UNDAF, and FAO resource mobilization priorities at global, regional and sub-regional levels. As part of an overall CPF monitoring and evaluation plan, resource mobilization strategy, action plan and targets will undergo periodic review and adjustment in accordance to changing conditions in the resource environment.

16 The Kenya Emergency Humanitarian Response Plan (EHRP), a multi-year inter-agency strategy which aims to outline and prior-itize humanitarian response activities and to mobilize the required resources, will conclude at the end of 2013


35

6. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CPF The FAO Representative in Kenya (FAOR) will be responsible for the implementation of the CPF, in partnership with County Governments, National Government, Development Partners , Research Institutions, and other National and International organizations. Selection of implementing partners will be guided by criteria which include institutional and technical capability; comparative advantage; sound financial management and accountability; and past experience in implementing similar programmes and projects. Whenever synergies allow, FAO will work with other UN agencies through joint programme initiatives.A CPF Steering Committee (SC) will be established to review, provide feedback, endorse and monitor the implementation of the annual work plan and budget for the CPF. The main partners in the agriculture sector will have a chair on the SC. The SC will meet to review performance and achievements over the previous year and define the work plan for the following year, highlighting areas for cooperation with GoK and development partners. The SC will also seek to align the work plan and budgeting process with UNDAF annual planning.


37

7. MONITORING PERFORMANCE AND REPORTING A robust M&E System is in place to monitor the performance of the CPF towards achieving its objective. Baseline information for all CPF indicators will be obtained from existing credible sources including the MTP II Indicator hand book and other agriculture sector data. Where existing data is limited, FAO and partners will organize surveys to establish baseline values. Process Monitoring will be done on-site for all ongoing activities; monthly by FAO and jointly with partners on a quarterly basis. This will enhance contact with beneficiaries, gauge progress, ensure implementation is ongoing as planned, and identify any corrective measures that need to be addressed in order to ensure outputs are being achieved within the approved timelines.

Outcome monitoring, led by FAO and supported by partners, will be done to measure progress in achievement of set outcomes and track impact. Mid–term review will be jointly carried out by FAO and the various levels of Government. Self-Evaluations/reviews will be done during the programme period. Models for innovation testing will be closely monitored and evaluated. Lessons drawn from self-evaluations, reviews and models will help improve the programme design and inform expansion. Impact evaluation for the programme will be done at the end of the CPF period. The evaluation will examine the impacts on food security, poverty levels, nutrition, household income, gender equality, inclusivity and livelihood strategies.

ANNEXES


41

CP

F O

UTC

OM

E A

RE

AS

RE

LEV

AN

T N

ATI

ON

AL

SE

CTO

R

PR

IOR

ITIE

S (A

SD

S)

RE

LEV

AN

T U

ND

AF

(201

4 –

2017

) PR

IOR

ITIE

SFA

O S

UB

-RE

GIO

NA

L (S

FE) P

RIO

RIT

IES

FAO

RE

GIO

NA

L IN

ITIA

TIV

ES

FAO

STR

ATE

GIC

O

BJE

CTI

VE

S/P

RIO

RIT

IES

Out

com

e 1:

Agr

icul

tura

l17

-bas

ed li

velih

oods

and

sec

tors

ar

e su

ppor

ted

by a

n en

ablin

g po

licy,

Stra

tegy

and

inve

stm

ent

envi

ronm

ent t

hat p

rom

otes

eq

ualit

y an

d in

clus

ivity

Lega

l, R

egul

ator

y an

d In

stitu

tiona

l Ref

orm

s

Out

com

e 3.

1 B

usin

ess

Env

ironm

ent

(By

2015

, Ken

ya h

as a

bus

ines

s en

viro

nmen

t tha

t is

refo

rmed

and

de

sign

ed to

effe

ctiv

ely

nurtu

re

loca

l cap

aciti

es, a

ttrac

t int

erna

l and

ex

tern

al in

vest

men

ts a

nd p

rom

ote

equi

ty, o

wne

rshi

p, in

nova

tion

and

entre

pren

eurs

hip

for p

eopl

e-ce

nter

ed

bene

fits)

Cro

ss-C

uttin

g S

trate

gic

Func

tions

(pol

icy

supp

ort

and

advo

cacy

, pro

mot

ion

of

know

ledg

e m

anag

emen

t, in

form

atio

n an

d di

ssem

inat

ion)

1: R

enew

ed P

artn

ersh

ip fo

r U

nifie

d A

ppro

ach

to E

nd H

unge

r in

Afri

ca b

y 20

15 u

nder

the

fram

ewor

k of

the

CA

AD

P

FAO

Stra

tegi

c O

bjec

tive

1:

Hel

p E

limin

ate

Hun

ger,

Food

In

secu

rity

and

Mal

nutri

tion

4: E

nabl

e in

clus

ive

and

effic

ient

ag

ricul

tura

l Sys

tem

s

Ou

tco

me

2: P

rodu

ctiv

ity

of m

ediu

m a

nd s

mal

l-sc

ale

agri

cultu

ral p

rodu

cers

in

crea

sed,

div

ersi

fied

and

alig

ned

to m

arke

ts

Agr

ibus

ines

s, A

cces

s to

M

arke

ts, V

alue

Cha

in

Dev

elop

men

t and

Val

ue

Add

ition

Out

com

e 3.

2: P

rodu

ctiv

e se

ctor

s an

d Tr

ade

(By

2018

, Ken

ya P

rodu

ctiv

e an

d se

rvic

es s

ecto

rs (a

gric

ultu

re,

man

ufac

turin

g, e

xtra

ctiv

e in

dust

ry, t

rade

) an

d th

eir v

alue

-cha

ins

are

in tr

ansi

tion

tow

ards

gre

en e

cono

my,

par

ticip

ator

y,

envi

ronm

ent f

riend

ly, d

iver

sifie

d,

tech

nolo

gica

lly in

nova

tive,

exp

ort

orie

nted

, and

com

petit

ive

on n

atio

nal,

regi

onal

and

glo

bal m

arke

ts) O

utco

me

2.2:

WA

SH

, Foo

d A

vaila

bilit

y &

nut

ritio

n an

d he

alth

Agr

icul

tura

l pro

duct

ivity

and

va

lue

addi

tion

impr

oved

2: S

usta

inab

le p

rodu

ctio

n in

tens

ifica

tion

and

com

mer

cial

izat

ion

FAO

Stra

tegi

c O

bjec

tive

2:

Mak

e A

gric

ultu

re, F

ores

try a

nd

Fish

erie

s m

ore

prod

uctiv

e an

d su

stai

nabl

eFA

O S

trate

gic

Obj

ectiv

e 4:

E

nabl

e in

clus

ive

and

effic

ient

ag

ricul

tura

l Sys

tem

s

Out

com

e 3:

Impr

oved

m

anag

emen

t of l

and,

wat

er

and

othe

r nat

ural

reso

urce

s fo

r en

hanc

ed fo

od s

ecur

ity a

nd

soci

o-ec

onom

ic d

evel

opm

ent a

t na

tiona

l, co

unty

and

com

mun

ity

leve

l.

Sus

tain

able

land

an

d na

tura

l res

ourc

e m

anag

emen

t

Out

com

e 4.

1: P

olic

y &

Leg

al

Fram

ewor

ks (B

y 20

16, K

enya

has

in

tegr

ated

and

coo

rdin

ated

resp

onse

s th

at li

nk h

uman

sec

urity

and

resi

lienc

e to

the

chal

leng

es o

f env

ironm

enta

l su

stai

nabi

lity,

dis

aste

r ris

k re

duct

ion,

cl

imat

e ch

ange

and

land

man

agem

ent)

Sus

tain

able

nat

ural

reso

urce

s m

anag

emen

t pra

ctic

es a

dopt

ed

2: S

usta

inab

le p

rodu

ctio

n,

inte

nsifi

catio

n an

d co

mm

erci

aliz

atio

n

FAO

Stra

tegi

c O

bjec

tive

2:

Mak

e A

gric

ultu

re, F

ores

try a

nd

Fish

erie

s m

ore

prod

uctiv

e an

d su

stai

nabl

e

Ann

ex 1

: CP

F A

lignm

ent w

ith O

ther

Pol

icy

Doc

umen

ts a

nd F

ram

ewor

ks

17 A

gric

ultu

ral r

efer

s to

cro

ps, l

ives

tock

, fish

erie

s, c

oope

rativ

es, f

ood

secu

rity,

nut

ritio

n, fo

rest

ry, w

ater

, lan

d an

d tra

de s

ecto

rs.


42

CP

F O

UTC

OM

E A

RE

AS

RE

LEV

AN

T N

ATI

ON

AL

SE

CTO

R

PR

IOR

ITIE

S (A

SD

S)

RE

LEV

AN

T U

ND

AF

(201

4 –

2017

) PR

IOR

ITIE

SFA

O S

UB

-RE

GIO

NA

L (S

FE) P

RIO

RIT

IES

FAO

RE

GIO

NA

L IN

ITIA

TIV

ES

FAO

STR

ATE

GIC

O

BJE

CTI

VE

S/P

RIO

RIT

IES

Out

com

e 4:

Impr

oved

live

lihoo

d re

silie

nce

of ta

rget

ed v

ulne

rabl

e po

pula

tions

Food

and

nut

ritio

n se

curit

y

Out

com

e 4.

2: S

yste

ms

for C

omm

unity

S

ecur

ity &

Res

ilien

ce (B

y 20

18,

coun

ties

and

com

mun

ities

are

ab

le to

ant

icip

ate,

pre

vent

and

re

spon

d ef

fect

ivel

y to

dis

aste

rs a

nd

emer

genc

ies.

)

Dem

ocra

tic g

over

nanc

e an

d hu

man

righ

ts in

clud

ing

gend

er

equa

lity

prog

ress

ivel

y en

hanc

ed3:

Res

ilien

t Liv

elih

oods

in A

frica

FAO

Stra

tegi

c O

bjec

tive

3:

Red

uce

Rur

al P

over

tyFA

O S

trate

gic

Obj

ectiv

e 5:

In

crea

se th

e re

silie

nce

of

livel

ihoo

ds fr

om d

isas

ters

Out

com

e 5:

Acc

ess

to a

nd u

se

of in

form

atio

n, in

nova

tion,

a

glob

al p

ool o

f kno

wle

dge

and

expe

rtise

driv

es h

olis

tic g

row

th

in th

e ag

ricul

tura

l sec

tor.

Out

com

e 3.

2: P

rodu

ctiv

e se

ctor

s an

d Tr

ade

(By

2018

, Ken

ya P

rodu

ctiv

e an

d se

rvic

es s

ecto

rs (a

gric

ultu

re,

man

ufac

turin

g, e

xtra

ctiv

e in

dust

ry,

trade

) and

thei

r val

ue-c

hain

s ar

e in

tra

nsiti

on to

war

ds g

reen

eco

nom

y,

parti

cipa

tory

, env

ironm

ent f

riend

ly,

dive

rsifi

ed, t

echn

olog

ical

ly in

nova

tive,

ex

port

orie

nted

, and

com

petit

ive

on

natio

nal,

regi

onal

and

glo

bal m

arke

ts)

1: R

enew

ed P

artn

ersh

ip fo

r a

Uni

fied

App

roac

h to

End

Hun

ger

in A

frica

by

2015

und

er th

e Fr

amew

ork

of th

e C

AA

DP

FAO

Stra

tegi

c O

bjec

tive

1:

Hel

p E

limin

ate

Hun

ger,

Food

In

secu

rity

and

Mal

nutri

tion

FAO

Stra

tegi

c O

bjec

tive

4:

Ena

ble

incl

usiv

e an

d ef

ficie

nt

agric

ultu

ral S

yste

ms

Ann

ex 1

: CP

F A

lignm

ent w

ith O

ther

Pol

icy

Doc

umen

ts a

nd F

ram

ewor

ks (c

ont.)


43

Ann

ex 2

: Res

ults

Mat

rix

RE

SU

LTS

IND

ICA

TOR

AS

SU

MP

TIO

NS

Out

com

e 1:

Agr

icul

tura

l -ba

sed

livel

ihoo

ds a

nd s

ecto

rs a

re

supp

orte

d by

an

enab

ling

polic

y, S

trate

gy a

nd in

vest

men

t en

viro

nmen

t tha

t pro

mot

es

equa

lity

and

incl

usiv

ity

Cha

nge

in in

vest

men

ts in

agr

icul

ture

sec

tor b

y na

tiona

l ,co

unty

gov

ernm

ents

and

dev

elop

men

t par

tner

s (T

arge

t Inc

reas

e in

inve

stm

ents

; Sou

rce

Nat

iona

l and

Cou

nty

Gov

ernm

ent b

udge

ts, D

onor

inve

stm

ents

m

appi

ng)

Nat

iona

l and

Cou

nty

Gov

ernm

ents

com

mitm

ent t

o fo

rmul

atio

n an

d im

plem

enta

tion

of p

olic

ies

is s

usta

ined

Cap

acity

bui

ldin

g ac

tiviti

es w

ill e

nsur

e th

e 1/

3 ge

nder

requ

irem

ent

is m

et.

Out

put 1

.1 N

atio

nal l

evel

in

stitu

tiona

l cap

aciti

es to

form

ulat

e an

d im

plem

ent p

olic

ies,

legi

slat

ion,

st

rate

gies

and

inve

stm

ent

prog

ram

mes

for a

gric

ultu

re, f

ood

secu

rity

and

nutri

tion,

and

NR

M

stre

ngth

ened

Pro

gram

mes

and

inve

stm

ents

in th

e A

gric

ultu

re s

ecto

r are

alig

ned

to p

olic

y pr

iorit

ies

(Sou

rce:

Pol

icy

docu

men

ts, M

TP, G

over

nmen

t prin

ted

Est

imat

es)

Num

ber o

f tec

hnic

al s

taff

and

deci

sion

mak

ers

in li

ne m

inis

tries

and

key

sta

keho

lder

s tra

ined

on

polic

y an

d st

rate

gy fo

rmul

atio

n, im

plem

enta

tion

and

anal

ysis

(T

arge

t 200

; Sou

rce

Trai

ning

repo

rts, F

AO

)

Num

ber o

f pol

icie

s/le

gisl

atio

n/st

rate

gies

form

ulat

ed o

r rev

iew

ed o

r im

plem

ente

d (T

arge

t 4 p

olic

ies;

Sou

rce

Pol

icy

docu

men

ts a

nd re

ports

, GoK

)

Out

put 1

.2 C

ount

y go

vern

men

ts’

capa

city

to d

evel

op a

nd im

plem

ent

appr

opria

te p

olic

ies,

legi

slat

ion,

st

rate

gies

and

inve

stm

ent

prog

ram

mes

in a

gric

ultu

re, f

ood

secu

rity

and

nutri

tion

and

NR

M

supp

orte

d

Pro

porti

on o

f cou

nty

polic

ies

in s

elec

t cou

ntie

s a

ligne

d to

nat

iona

l pol

icie

s, le

gisl

atio

n, s

trate

gies

and

in

vest

men

t pla

ns

(Tar

get 5

0%; S

ourc

e P

olic

y an

alys

is re

ports

, FA

O)

Out

put 1

.3 S

treng

then

ed

gove

rnm

ent c

apac

ity to

pro

mot

e pa

rtner

ship

s an

d co

ordi

nate

ac

tions

acr

oss

acto

rs a

nd

sect

ors

invo

lved

in a

gric

ultu

re,

food

sec

urity

and

nut

ritio

n (a

nd

betw

een

the

natio

nal a

nd c

ount

y go

vern

men

ts)

Exi

sten

ce o

f mec

hani

sms

and

stru

ctur

es fo

r ope

ratio

nal c

oord

inat

ion

of p

rogr

amm

es in

agr

icul

ture

, foo

d se

curit

y an

d nu

tritio

n (T

arge

t 3 in

ter-

min

iste

rial,

inte

r-go

vern

men

tal [

betw

een

the

natio

nal a

nd c

ount

y go

vern

men

ts) a

nd M

ulti-

sect

oral

/mul

ti st

akeh

olde

r stru

ctur

es];

Sou

rce

Gov

ernm

ent r

epor

ts a

nd m

inut

es o

f the

mee

ting

held

)

All

acto

rs a

re c

omm

itted

to s

uppo

rt G

over

nmen

t coo

rdin

atio

n an

d pa

rtner

ship

bui

ldin

g ef

forts

Pro

porti

on o

f don

or fu

nds

alig

ned

to g

over

nmen

t prio

ritie

s in

food

sec

urity

(T

arge

t 100

%; S

ourc

e B

iann

ual r

epor

ts s

how

ing

perc

enta

ge o

f don

or fu

nds

alig

ned

to s

peci

fic G

oK

prio

ritie

s, F

AO

)

Out

put 1

.4 In

crea

sed

capa

citie

s of

ag

ricul

ture

sec

tor s

take

hold

ers

to

mai

nstre

am g

ende

r and

nut

ritio

n in

po

licie

s an

d pr

ogra

mm

es re

late

d to

live

stoc

k, c

rops

, fis

herie

s an

d fo

rest

ry

Pro

porti

on o

f agr

icul

ture

sec

tor p

olic

ies

and

prog

ram

mes

with

gen

der a

nd n

utrit

ion

mai

nstre

amed

(T

arge

t 50%

; Sou

rce

Pol

icy

docu

men

ts a

naly

sis

repo

rts, F

AO

)P

arad

igm

shi

ft in

sta

keho

lder

s pe

rcep

tion

of g

ende

r and

nut

ritio

n se

nsiti

ve a

gric

ultu

re

Num

ber o

f gov

ernm

ent o

ffice

rs a

nd k

ey s

take

hold

ers

at n

atio

nal a

nd c

ount

y le

vel t

rain

ed o

n m

ains

tream

ing

gend

er a

nd n

utrit

ion

in fo

od s

ecur

ity in

itiat

ives

(Tar

get 3

400,

200

at n

atio

nal l

evel

and

320

0 at

cou

nty

leve

l, 20

trai

ners

per

cou

nty

in th

e fir

st y

ear w

ho w

ill

train

200

peo

ple;

trai

ning

will

be

done

the

1st a

nd 3

rd y

ear;

Sou

rce

Trai

ning

repo

rts, F

AO

)

FAO Country Programming Framework for Kenya 2014-2017A

nnex

2: R

esul

ts M

atri

x (c

ont.)

RE

SU

LTS

IND

ICA

TOR

AS

SU

MP

TIO

NS

Out

com

e 2:

Pro

duct

ivity

of

med

ium

and

sm

all-s

cale

ag

ricul

tura

l pro

duce

rs in

crea

sed,

di

vers

ified

and

alig

ned

to m

arke

ts

Cha

nge

in in

com

e fo

r tar

gete

d ho

useh

olds

( se

greg

ated

by

sex

and

age

of h

ouse

hold

hea

d)

(Tar

get 5

0% in

crea

se; S

ourc

e O

utco

me

mon

itorin

g re

ports

, FA

O)

Pro

duce

rs w

illin

gnes

s to

ado

pt n

ew te

chno

logi

es a

nd p

rofit

able

en

terp

rises

Pro

porti

on o

f tar

gete

d ho

useh

olds

eng

aged

in a

ltern

ativ

e/ne

w a

nd p

rofit

able

agr

o en

terp

rises

(T

arge

t 50%

; Sou

rce

Out

com

e m

onito

ring

and

proj

ect r

epor

ts, F

AO

)

% C

hang

e in

Vol

ume

sold

by

targ

eted

hou

seho

lds

(Tar

get %

incr

ease

; Sou

rce

Per

form

ance

mon

itorin

g an

d P

roje

ct re

ports

)

Out

put 2

.1 Im

prov

ed p

rodu

ctiv

e ca

paci

ty a

nd re

duce

d ris

k of

m

ediu

m a

nd s

mal

l-sca

le p

rodu

cers

% c

hang

e in

tota

l cro

p an

d liv

esto

ck p

rodu

ctio

n fo

r tar

gete

d ho

useh

olds

(T

arge

t 25%

incr

ease

Sou

rce

Out

com

e m

onito

ring

and

proj

ect r

epor

ts, F

AO

)

Pro

porti

on o

f tar

gete

d ho

useh

olds

ado

ptin

g at

leas

t one

new

inno

vativ

e pr

oduc

tion

tech

nolo

gy(T

arge

t 50%

; Sou

rce

Pro

ject

mon

itorin

g re

ports

)

% c

hang

e in

tota

l pos

t har

vest

loss

es fo

r tar

gete

d ho

useh

olds

(T

arge

t 25%

dec

reas

e S

ourc

e P

erfo

rman

ce m

onito

ring

and

pro

ject

repo

rts, F

AO

)

Out

put 2

.2 S

treng

then

ed c

apac

ity

to d

iver

sify

pro

duct

ion

syst

ems

and

prod

ucts

Ana

lysi

s on

eco

nom

ic a

nd c

omm

erci

ally

via

ble

agric

ultu

ral e

nter

pris

es in

sel

ect c

ount

ies

in p

lace

for d

ecis

ion

mak

ing

and

advo

cacy

(Tar

get I

nfor

mat

ion

in re

port

form

ava

ilabl

e by

cou

nty;

Sou

rce

Ana

lysi

s re

port,

FA

O)

Agr

icul

ture

ent

erpr

ises

at C

ount

ies

leve

l are

info

rmed

by

the

findi

ngs

of c

ount

y sp

ecifi

c ec

onom

ic a

naly

sis

of

the

viab

le e

nter

pris

es w

ith u

nmet

mar

ket d

eman

ds

Pro

porti

on o

f tar

gete

d ho

useh

olds

eng

agin

g in

div

ersi

fied

pro

duct

ion

syst

em o

r at

leas

t one

of t

he id

entif

ied

viab

le a

gric

ultu

ral e

nter

pris

es w

ith u

nmet

mar

ket d

eman

d (T

arge

t 50%

; Sou

rce

Pro

ject

repo

rts, F

AO

)

Out

put 2

.3 Im

prov

ed a

gric

ultu

ral

mar

ket a

cces

s an

d va

lue

addi

tion

alon

g vi

able

val

ue c

hain

s

Cha

nge

in fa

rmer

s pr

ofit

mar

gins

(T

arge

t % in

crea

se; S

ourc

e P

erfo

rman

ce m

onito

ring

and

Pro

ject

repo

rts)

Pro

porti

on o

f tar

gete

d pr

oduc

ers

addi

ng v

alue

to th

eir a

gric

ultu

ral c

omm

oditi

es

(Tar

get 2

0%; S

ourc

e P

erfo

rman

ce m

onito

ring

and

Pro

ject

repo

rts)

Num

ber o

f pro

duce

r org

aniz

atio

ns fo

rmed

/stre

ngth

ened

to s

uppo

rt va

lue

addi

tion

and

mar

ket a

cces

s (T

arge

t 235

; Sou

rce

Pro

ject

repo

rts, F

AO

)

Out

put 2

.4 Im

prov

ed a

cces

s to

fin

anci

al s

ervi

ces

and

prod

ucts

Pro

porti

on o

f ta

rget

ed p

rodu

cer h

ouse

hold

s w

ith a

cces

s to

fina

ncia

l ser

vice

s an

d pr

oduc

ts a

nd a

gric

ultu

ral

rela

ted

insu

ranc

e(T

arge

t 50%

; Sou

rce

Pro

ject

repo

rts, F

AO

)

Fina

ncia

l env

ironm

ent r

emai

ns s

tabl

e

Pro

porti

on o

f bus

ines

ses

men

tore

d an

d in

cuba

ted

that

are

func

tiona

l (T

arge

t 60%

of t

arge

ted;

Sou

rce

Pro

ject

repo

rts)

Num

ber o

f tar

gete

d fa

rmer

s an

d ac

tors

in th

e va

lue

chai

ns e

stab

lishi

ng p

rofit

able

or i

mpr

ovin

g ex

istin

g ag

ribus

ines

ses

to p

rofit

abili

ty u

sing

acq

uire

d fin

anci

al p

rodu

cts

(Tar

get 1

0% o

f tho

se w

ho a

cces

s fin

anci

al p

rodu

cts;

Sou

rce

pro

ject

repo

rts)


45

Ann

ex 2

: Res

ults

Mat

rix

(con

t.)

18 C

ompo

sitio

n of

the

com

mun

ity s

houl

d be

fact

ored

in th

e re

porti

ng i

nclu

ding

wom

en/m

inor

ity g

roup

s in

volv

emen

t in

deci

sion

mak

ing

proc

esse

s.19

Qua

lity

and

quan

tity

of n

atur

al c

apita

l

RE

SU

LTS

IND

ICA

TOR

AS

SU

MP

TIO

NS

Out

com

e 3:

Impr

oved

m

anag

emen

t of l

and,

wat

er

and

othe

r nat

ural

reso

urce

s fo

r en

hanc

ed fo

od s

ecur

ity a

nd s

ocio

-ec

onom

ic d

evel

opm

ent a

t nat

iona

l, co

unty

and

com

mun

ity le

vel

Are

a pr

otec

ted,

reha

bilit

ated

or a

ffore

sted

(Hec

tare

s)

(Tar

get 1

00,0

00 H

A; S

ourc

e P

roje

ct re

ports

)N

atio

nal a

nd c

ount

y G

over

nmen

ts c

omm

itmen

t to

supp

ort n

atur

al

reso

urce

s re

late

d in

itiat

ives

Num

ber o

f tar

get c

omm

uniti

es w

ith s

ecur

ed a

cces

s to

land

and

oth

er n

atur

al re

sour

ces

thro

ugh

neg

otia

ted

proc

esse

s fo

r com

mun

ity N

R m

anag

emen

t (T

arge

t At l

east

10

com

mun

ities

; Sou

rce

Pro

ject

repo

rts)

Num

ber o

f com

mun

ities

that

hol

d le

gal t

itle

deed

s in

reco

gniti

on fo

r co

mm

unal

land

s &

NR

righ

ts

(Tar

get

At l

east

5 c

omm

uniti

es h

old

lega

l titl

e de

eds

Sou

rce

proj

ect d

ocum

ents

, GoK

land

regi

strie

s)

Cha

nge

in th

e nu

mbe

r of n

atur

al re

sour

ce b

ased

con

flict

in th

e ta

rget

are

as

(Tar

get %

redu

ctio

n; S

ourc

e N

LC a

nd c

ount

y re

ports

)

Out

put 3

.1 In

stitu

tiona

l cap

acity

fo

r im

prov

ed m

anag

emen

t and

go

vern

ance

of l

and,

fish

erie

s,

fore

sts

and

othe

r nat

ural

reso

urce

s at

nat

iona

l, co

unty

and

com

mun

ity

leve

l stre

ngth

ened

Num

ber o

f cou

ntie

s w

ith 1

. equ

itabl

e re

gula

tions

and

2. n

atur

al re

sour

ce m

anag

emen

t stra

tegi

es in

pla

ce

(Tar

get A

t lea

st 5

cou

ntie

s; S

ourc

e P

roje

ct re

ports

, FA

O)

Num

ber o

f Cou

nty

Land

Man

agem

ent B

oard

s (C

LMB

) est

ablis

hed

& f

unct

iona

l (T

arge

t At l

east

7 c

ount

ies;

Sou

rce

regi

stry

land

reco

rds,

pro

ject

repo

rts)

Num

ber o

f Com

mun

ities

18 a

war

e of

thei

r rig

hts

(and

dut

ies)

and

are

inv

olve

d in

dec

isio

n m

akin

g pr

oces

ses

(Tar

get A

t lea

st 5

0 co

mm

uniti

es, S

ourc

e ev

alua

tion

repo

rts)

Cha

nge

in th

e nu

mbe

r of i

ncid

ence

s of

po

achi

ng r

epor

ted

as re

sult

of c

omm

unal

wild

life

reso

urce

m

anag

emen

t (T

arge

t % re

duct

ion

of p

oach

ing

inci

denc

es re

porte

d in

at l

east

2 w

ildlif

e re

serv

es a

nd 4

com

mun

ities

; S

ourc

e pr

ojec

t rep

orts

)O

utpu

t 3.2

Nat

iona

l and

Cou

nty

leve

l cap

acity

for c

limat

e ch

ange

ad

apta

tion

and

miti

gatio

n st

rate

gies

stre

ngth

ened

Pro

porti

on o

f tar

gete

d ho

useh

olds

who

hav

e ad

opte

d cl

imat

e sm

art e

nerg

y sa

ving

tech

nolo

gies

and

Clim

ate

Sm

art A

gric

ultu

re

(Tar

get 8

0% o

f tar

gete

d ho

useh

olds

; Sou

rce

Pro

ject

repo

rts)

Num

ber o

f Cha

rcoa

l Pro

duce

r Ass

ocia

tions

(CP

A) a

dopt

ing

clim

ate

smar

t ch

arco

al p

rodu

ctio

n te

chni

ques

(T

arge

t 120

; Sou

rce

Pro

ject

repo

rts)

MR

V p

repa

redn

ess

for R

ED

D+

in p

lace

, leg

al re

com

men

datio

ns fo

r RE

DD

+ ad

opte

d (T

arge

t MR

V m

echa

nism

s in

pla

ce b

y 20

16; S

ourc

e M

EW

NR

repo

rts, U

N-R

ED

D re

ports

)

Are

a un

der S

usta

inab

le F

ores

t Man

agem

ent i

n d

ry la

nd fo

rest

(T

arge

t 30

,000

HA

; Sou

rce

KFS

, FA

O re

ports

)O

utpu

t 3.3

Bio

-ent

erpr

ises

for

sust

aina

ble

soci

o-ec

onom

ic

deve

lopm

ent i

n se

lect

ed c

ount

ies

prom

oted

Inve

ntor

y on

Non

woo

d fo

rest

pro

duct

s an

d se

rvic

es b

y co

unty

in p

lace

(Tar

get I

nven

tory

and

map

for a

t lea

st 5

cou

ntie

s av

aila

ble

and

acce

ssib

le; S

ourc

e In

vent

ory

repo

rts)

Num

ber o

f pro

duce

r an

d m

arke

ting

for N

WFP

s g

roup

s b

enef

ittin

g fro

m P

aym

ent f

or E

cosy

stem

Ser

vice

s (P

ES

) (T

arge

t 10

grou

ps e

ach;

Sou

rce

Pro

ject

repo

rts)

Nat

iona

l and

Cou

nty

regu

lato

ry fr

amew

orks

for P

aym

ent f

or E

cosy

stem

Ser

vice

s (P

ES

) in

plac

e (T

arge

t Dra

ft by

late

201

5; S

ourc

e D

raft

regu

lato

ry fr

amew

ork)

Cha

nge

in P

rodu

ctiv

ity19

of s

elec

ted

NW

FPS

(T

arge

t 20%

incr

ease

; Sou

rce

Out

com

e m

onito

ring,

FA

O)


46A

nnex

2: R

esul

ts M

atri

x (c

ont.)

RE

SU

LTS

IND

ICA

TOR

AS

SU

MP

TIO

NS

Out

com

e 4:

Impr

oved

live

lihoo

d re

silie

nce

of ta

rget

ed v

ulne

rabl

e po

pula

tions

Res

ilien

ce s

core

(T

arge

t >0.

05; S

ourc

e R

esili

ence

ana

lysi

s re

ports

, FA

O)

Sus

tain

ed c

once

rted

effo

rts b

y al

l sta

keho

lder

s in

clud

ing

com

mun

ities

tow

ards

impr

ovin

g liv

elih

ood

resi

lienc

e

Out

put 4

.1 Im

prov

ed a

dapt

ive

capa

city

, acc

ess

to p

rodu

ctiv

e as

sets

and

sta

bilit

y of

vul

nera

ble

com

mun

ities

Cha

nge

in th

e nu

mbe

r of H

H re

quiri

ng e

mer

genc

y fo

od a

nd c

ash

assi

stan

ce(T

arge

t 9%

redu

ctio

n; S

ourc

e Fo

od s

ecur

ity a

sses

smen

t, G

OK

)

Cha

nge

in th

e nu

mbe

r of s

ourc

es o

f inc

ome

for t

arge

ted

hous

ehol

ds

(Tar

get i

ncre

ase;

Sou

rce

perfo

rman

ce m

onito

ring

repo

rts)

Pro

porti

on o

f tar

gete

d H

H re

mai

ning

sta

ble

(no

chan

ge in

the

lifes

tyle

, HH

exp

endi

ture

, sch

ool f

ees

etc.

) fo

r at

leas

t 6 m

onth

s in

a y

ear f

rom

the

onse

t of t

he s

hock

(T

arge

t 50%

; Sou

rce

Per

form

ance

mon

itorin

g re

ports

and

Pro

ject

repo

rts)

Num

ber o

f tar

gete

d vu

lner

able

hou

seho

lds

bene

fittin

g fro

m th

e pr

oduc

tive

asse

ts /i

nfra

stru

ctur

e (e

.g.

reha

bilit

atio

n of

irrig

atio

n sc

hem

es(T

arge

t 20,

000

HH

; Sou

rce

Pro

ject

repo

rts)

Out

put 4

.2 N

atio

nal a

nd c

ount

y go

vern

men

ts a

re c

apac

itate

d to

ef

fect

ivel

y re

spon

d to

em

erge

ncie

s

Num

ber o

f cou

nty

tech

nica

l offi

cers

and

dec

isio

n m

aker

s tra

ined

on

resp

onse

and

goo

d pr

actic

es g

uide

lines

an

d st

anda

rds

(Tar

get 5

00; S

ourc

e tra

inin

g re

ports

)

Num

ber o

f cou

ntie

s w

ith a

t lea

st o

ne s

afet

y ne

t mec

hani

sm

(Tar

get 2

3 co

untie

s; S

ourc

e C

ount

y re

ports

)

Pro

porti

on o

f hou

seho

lds

bene

fittin

g fro

m s

afet

y ne

ts b

y co

unty

(Tar

get 2

0,00

0; S

ourc

e P

roje

ct re

ports

, FA

O)

Cha

nge

in th

e tim

e ta

ken

by ta

rget

cou

ntie

s to

resp

ond

to e

mer

genc

ies

(Tar

get:

Red

uctio

n in

the

num

ber o

f day

s)

Out

put 4

.3 G

ood

nutri

tiona

l pr

actis

es (i

nclu

ding

Foo

d S

afet

y), t

hat b

uild

on

exis

ting

loca

l kno

wle

dge,

atti

tude

s an

d pr

actis

es, a

re p

rom

oted

Num

ber o

f sch

ools

with

func

tiona

l JFF

LS 2

. Num

ber o

f fun

ctio

nal F

FLS

and

PFS

at c

omm

unity

leve

l (T

arge

t 500

0 pr

imar

y sc

hool

s an

d 40

00 F

FLS

and

PFS

; Sou

rce

Pro

ject

repo

rts, F

AO

)C

omm

uniti

es a

re w

illin

g to

ado

pt g

ood

nutri

tiona

l pra

ctic

es

Pro

porti

on o

f tar

gete

d H

H c

onsu

min

g hi

gh v

alue

indi

geno

us fo

ods

(Tar

get 5

0%; S

ourc

e P

erfo

rman

ce m

onito

ring

repo

rts)

Pro

porti

on o

f tar

gete

d H

H a

nd s

choo

ls a

dopt

ing

good

nut

ritio

nal a

nd a

gric

ultu

ral p

ract

ices

(dis

aggr

egat

ed b

y se

x of

hou

seho

ld h

ead

for H

Hs)

(Tar

get 5

0% e

ach;

Sou

rce

Pro

ject

repo

rts, F

AO

)


47

Ann

ex 2

: Res

ults

Mat

rix

(con

t.)

RE

SU

LTS

IND

ICA

TOR

AS

SU

MP

TIO

NS

Out

com

e 5:

Acc

ess

to a

nd u

se o

f in

form

atio

n, in

nova

tion,

a g

loba

l po

ol o

f kno

wle

dge

and

expe

rtise

dr

ives

hol

istic

gro

wth

in th

e ag

ricul

tura

l sec

tor

Crit

ical

dec

isio

n m

aker

s20 in

the

agric

ultu

re s

ecto

r acc

ess

and

use

info

rmat

ion

in N

atur

al re

sour

ce

man

agem

ent,

lives

tock

, cro

ps ,

fishe

ries,

food

sec

urity

, ear

ly w

arni

ng, p

repa

redn

ess,

resp

onse

and

re

silie

nce

for d

ecis

ion

mak

ing.

(Tar

get A

ll C

ritic

al d

ecis

ion

mak

ers,

bot

h at

cou

nty

and

natio

nal l

evel

, are

acc

essi

ng a

gric

ultu

ral i

nfor

mat

ion

and

usin

g it

for d

ecis

ion

mak

ing21

; Sou

rce

Out

com

e M

onito

ring,

FA

O)

Dec

isio

n m

aker

s an

d ot

her s

take

hold

ers

have

the

mea

ns to

acc

ess

the

avai

labl

e in

form

atio

n

Out

put 5

.1: A

vaila

ble

expe

rtise

an

d kn

owle

dge

is c

onso

lidat

ed

and

mad

e av

aila

ble

to s

uppo

rt K

enya

’s a

gric

ultu

ral s

ecto

r

Cat

alog

ue a

nd re

posi

tory

on

agric

ultu

ral i

nfor

mat

ion

, tha

t use

s ef

ficie

nt a

nd c

ost e

ffect

ive

tech

nolo

gy22

for

acce

ssin

g in

form

atio

n, i

n pl

ace

and

acc

essi

ble

to G

OK

, do

nors

, far

mer

s, a

nd N

GO

’s.

(Tar

get F

unct

iona

l sys

tem

in p

lace

; Sou

rce

Rep

osito

ry s

yste

m)

Reg

iona

l net

wor

k of

exp

erts

in p

lace

(T

arge

t Fun

ctio

nal n

etw

ork

in p

lace

; Sou

rce

Net

wor

k m

eetin

g m

inut

es/re

ports

)

Doc

umen

tatio

n of

Kno

wle

dge

gaps

for f

urth

er re

sear

ch in

pla

ce a

nd

Em

ergi

ng g

aps

in th

emat

ic a

reas

or s

ubje

cts

addr

esse

d by

nat

iona

l /re

gion

al n

etw

ork

of e

xper

ts

(Tar

get I

nfor

mat

ion

on k

now

ledg

e ga

ps th

at re

quire

furth

er re

sear

ch in

pla

ce a

nd in

form

s fu

rther

rese

arch

; S

ourc

e FA

O p

ublic

atio

ns, s

cien

tific

pub

licat

ions

, Int

erne

t, pr

int a

nd e

lect

roni

c m

edia

)

Cha

nge

in th

e tim

e of

resp

onse

to s

ervi

ce d

eliv

ery

as a

resu

lt of

impr

oved

acc

essi

bilit

y to

info

rmat

ion

and

tech

nica

l exp

ertis

e in

agr

icul

tura

l sec

tor

(Tar

get R

educ

tion

in ti

me

of d

eliv

ery;

Sou

rce

Pro

ject

repo

rts)

Out

put 5

.2 T

arge

ted

rese

arch

, se

ason

al m

onito

ring

and

the

test

ing

of n

ew in

nova

tions

co

ntrib

utes

to p

lann

ing

and

deci

sion

mak

ing

proc

esse

s.

Num

ber o

f cou

nty

gove

rnm

ents

und

erta

king

food

sec

urity

ass

essm

ent a

nd u

sing

the

find

ings

for p

lann

ing

and

resp

onse

(T

arge

t 23;

Sou

rce

Cou

nty

food

sec

urity

ass

essm

ent r

epor

ts)

Bas

elin

e on

live

lihoo

d in

form

atio

n an

d re

silie

nce

anal

ysis

in p

lace

for a

dvoc

acy

and

deci

sion

mak

ing

(Tar

get 1

bas

elin

e re

port;

Sou

rce

Bas

elin

e re

port,

FA

O/G

OK

)

Num

ber o

f res

earc

h a

nd in

nova

tion

pape

rs 1

.pro

duce

d an

d 2.

Pub

lishe

d (T

arge

t at l

east

one

rese

arch

pap

er fo

r eac

h kn

owle

dge

gap

iden

tifie

d; S

ourc

e re

sear

ch p

aper

s, F

AO

)

Num

ber a

nd n

ame

of n

ew in

nova

tive

appr

oach

es id

entif

ied,

test

ed a

nd a

dopt

ed(T

arge

t TB

D; S

ourc

e In

nova

tion

repo

rts)

Cha

nge

in li

vest

ock

mor

talit

y ra

tes

as a

resu

lt of

effi

cien

t and

effe

ctiv

e na

tiona

l pas

sive

sur

veill

ance

sys

tem

(%

redu

ctio

n)(S

ourc

e P

roje

ct a

nd G

OK

rep

orts

)O

utpu

t 5.3

: Nat

iona

l and

cou

nty

leve

l pol

icie

s an

d st

rate

gies

are

in

fluen

ced

by ta

rget

ed a

dvoc

acy

thro

ugh

use

of c

olla

ted

and

synt

hesi

zed

info

rmat

ion

Tim

ely

diss

emin

atio

n of

ear

ly w

arni

ng in

form

atio

n as

per

ceiv

ed b

y st

akeh

olde

rs

(Tar

get S

atis

fact

ory;

Sou

rce

Mon

itorin

g re

ports

)C

ount

y an

d N

atio

nal G

over

nmen

t use

info

rmat

ion

diss

emin

ated

th

roug

h ta

rget

ed a

dvoc

acy

Num

ber o

f pol

icy

brie

fs p

rodu

ced

and

diss

emin

ated

thro

ugh

inno

vativ

e an

d ac

tiona

ble

appr

oach

of

info

rmat

ion

dis

sem

inat

ion

(pol

icy

brie

fs, S

MS

, sha

mba

sha

pe u

p, ro

ad s

how

s)(T

arge

t TB

D; S

ourc

e P

olic

y br

ief,

FAO

)P

ropo

rtion

of b

udge

t Allo

cate

d to

miti

gate

HIV

& A

IDs

impa

ct in

agr

icul

ture

sec

tor

(Tar

get %

incr

ease

; Sou

rce,

GO

K re

ports

)

20 F

arm

ers,

dev

elop

men

t par

tner

s, n

atio

nal a

nd c

ount

y go

vern

men

t etc

21 G

over

nmen

t, pa

rtner

s ar

e pr

ogra

mm

ing

usin

g in

form

atio

n ac

cess

ed, t

his

can

be v

erifi

ed th

roug

h th

eir b

udge

ts22

Mig

ratio

n fro

m c

ompu

ter t

o cl

oud

base

d se

rver

s in

AR

C


49

CP

F R

ES

ULT

SFU

ND

RE

QU

IRE

ME

NT

AV

AIL

AB

LE F

UN

DIN

GR

ES

OU

RC

E

MO

BIL

IZA

TIO

N

TAR

GE

T

FUN

DIN

G R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

T P

ER

YE

AR

2014

2015

2016

2017

US

DK

ES

US

DK

ES

US

DK

ES

US

DK

ES

US

DK

ES

US

DK

ES

US

DK

ES

Out

com

e 1:

A

gric

ultu

ral1

-ba

sed

livel

ihoo

ds

and

sect

ors

are

supp

orte

d by

an

enab

ling

polic

y, S

trat

egy

and

inve

stm

ent

envi

ronm

ent

that

pro

mot

es

equa

lity

and

incl

usiv

ity

10,4

31,6

0190

1,60

3,23

963

4,84

654

,869

,740

7,96

4,38

568

8,36

1,79

61,

390,

880

120,

213,

765

2,08

6,32

018

0,32

0,64

82,

781,

760

240,

427,

530

4,17

2,64

036

0,64

1,29

5

Out

com

e 2:

P

rodu

ctiv

ity o

f m

ediu

m a

nd

smal

l-sca

le

agri

cultu

ral

prod

ucer

s in

crea

sed,

di

vers

ified

an

d al

igne

d to

m

arke

ts

71,4

43,6

876,

174,

877,

834

11,0

10,0

2095

1,59

6,02

959

,416

,876

5,13

5,40

0,63

49,

525,

825

823,

317,

045

14,2

88,7

371,

234,

975,

567

19,0

51,6

501,

646,

634,

089

28,5

77,4

752,

469,

951,

134

Out

com

e 3:

Im

prov

ed

man

agem

ent o

f la

nd, w

ater

and

ot

her

natu

ral

reso

urce

s fo

r en

hanc

ed

food

sec

urity

an

d so

cio-

econ

omic

de

velo

pmen

t at

nat

iona

l, co

unty

and

co

mm

unity

le

vel

16,3

97,6

641,

417,

250,

066

5,85

4,61

950

6,01

4,72

09,

382,

993

810,

972,

085

2,18

6,35

518

8,96

6,67

53,

279,

533

283,

450,

013

4,37

2,71

037

7,93

3,35

16,

559,

065

566,

900,

026

Out

com

e 4:

Im

prov

ed

livel

ihoo

d re

silie

nce

of ta

rget

ed

vuln

erab

le

popu

latio

ns

37,8

02,9

593,

267,

309,

765

17,3

00,2

861,

495,

263,

719

22,5

18,4

621,

946,

270,

636

5,04

0,39

543

5,64

1,30

27,

560,

592

653,

461,

953

10,0

80,7

8987

1,28

2,60

415

,121

,184

1,30

6,92

3,90

6

Out

com

e 5:

A

cces

s to

an

d us

e of

in

form

atio

n,

inno

vatio

n,

a gl

obal

poo

l of

kno

wle

dge

and

expe

rtis

e dr

ives

hol

istic

gr

owth

in th

e ag

ricu

ltura

l se

ctor

13,9

24,0

901,

203,

459,

097

517,

681

44,7

43,1

6913

,294

,819

1,14

9,07

1,20

61,

856,

545

160,

461,

213

2,78

4,81

824

0,69

1,81

93,

713,

091

320,

922,

426

5,56

9,63

648

1,38

3,63

9

Tota

ls15

0,00

0,00

012

,964

,500

,000

35

,317

,452

3,05

2,48

7,37

611

2,57

7,53

59,

730,

076,

357

20,0

00,0

001,

728,

600,

000

30,0

00,0

002,

592,

900,

000

40,0

00,0

003,

457,

200,

000

60,0

00,0

005,

185,

800,

000

*UN

exc

hang

e ra

te A

pril

2014

(86.

43)

Ann

ex 3

: Res

ourc

e Re

quir

emen

ts a

nd G

aps

CONTACT:FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONSFAO REPRESENTATION IN KENYAP.O. BOX 30470, 00100 GPO, NAIROBITEL: +254-20-7625920 | EMAIL:[email protected]

Date post:	09-Mar-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	phungminh
View:	213 times
Download:	1 times