+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

Date post: 07-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: evan-
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods Chapter 1 soft wheat quality
Popular Tags:
30
1 Soft Wheat Quality Edmund J. Tanhehco, Perry K.W. Ng CONTENTS 1.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Wheat Production, Classification, and Usage ................................................. 2 1.2.1 Texture ................................................................................................. 3 1.2.2 Color..................................................................................................... 3 1.2.3 Growth ................................................................................................. 3 1.3 Flour Milling................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Major Constituents of Soft Wheat Flour ......................................................... 5 1.4.1 Proteins ................................................................................................ 5 1.4.2 Starch ................................................................................................... 5 1.4.3 Pentosans.............................................................................................. 6 1.4.4 Lipids ................................................................................................... 7 1.5 Quality Evaluation of Wheat Grain and Flour................................................ 7 1.5.1 Wheat Grain......................................................................................... 8 1.5.1.1 Test Weight ............................................................................. 8 1.5.1.2 Experimental Milling ............................................................. 8 1.5.1.3 Break Flour Yield ................................................................... 8 1.5.1.4 Kernel Texture ........................................................................ 8 1.5.2 Wheat Flour ......................................................................................... 9 1.5.2.1 Moisture ................................................................................. 9 1.5.2.2 Ash ....................................................................................... 10 1.5.2.3 Protein .................................................................................. 10 1.5.2.4 Sprout Damage ..................................................................... 10 1.5.2.5 Damaged Starch ................................................................... 11 1.5.2.6 Polyphenol Oxidase.............................................................. 11 1.5.2.7 Alkaline Water Retention Capacity of Flour ....................... 11 1.5.2.8 Solvent Retention Capacity of Flour .................................... 11 1.5.3 Dough Rheology ................................................................................ 12 1.5.3.1 Alveograph ........................................................................... 13 1.5.3.2 Mixograph and Farinograph................................................. 14 1.5.4 Products Requiring Weaker Proteins................................................. 14 1.5.4.1 Cookies ................................................................................. 14 1.5.4.2 High-Ratio Cakes ................................................................. 16 1.5.5 Products Requiring Stronger Proteins ............................................... 16 1.5.5.1 Crackers ................................................................................ 16 1.5.5.2 Noodles................................................................................. 16 1.6 Effects of Flour Components on Cookies ..................................................... 17 1.6.1 Proteins .............................................................................................. 17 Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Transcript
Page 1: Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

1 Soft Wheat QualityEdmund J. Tanhehco, Perry K.W. Ng

Contents

1.1 Introduction.....................................................................................................21.2 WheatProduction,Classification,andUsage.................................................2

1.2.1 Texture.................................................................................................31.2.2 Color.....................................................................................................31.2.3 Growth.................................................................................................3

1.3 FlourMilling...................................................................................................31.4 MajorConstituentsofSoftWheatFlour.........................................................5

1.4.1 Proteins................................................................................................51.4.2 Starch...................................................................................................51.4.3 Pentosans..............................................................................................61.4.4 Lipids...................................................................................................7

1.5 QualityEvaluationofWheatGrainandFlour................................................71.5.1 WheatGrain.........................................................................................8

1.5.1.1 TestWeight.............................................................................81.5.1.2 ExperimentalMilling.............................................................81.5.1.3 BreakFlourYield...................................................................81.5.1.4 KernelTexture........................................................................8

1.5.2 WheatFlour.........................................................................................91.5.2.1 Moisture.................................................................................91.5.2.2 Ash....................................................................................... 101.5.2.3 Protein.................................................................................. 101.5.2.4 SproutDamage..................................................................... 101.5.2.5 DamagedStarch................................................................... 111.5.2.6 PolyphenolOxidase.............................................................. 111.5.2.7 AlkalineWaterRetentionCapacityofFlour....................... 111.5.2.8 SolventRetentionCapacityofFlour.................................... 11

1.5.3 DoughRheology................................................................................ 121.5.3.1 Alveograph........................................................................... 131.5.3.2 MixographandFarinograph................................................. 14

1.5.4 ProductsRequiringWeakerProteins................................................. 141.5.4.1 Cookies................................................................................. 141.5.4.2 High-RatioCakes................................................................. 16

1.5.5 ProductsRequiringStrongerProteins............................................... 161.5.5.1 Crackers................................................................................ 161.5.5.2 Noodles................................................................................. 16

1.6 EffectsofFlourComponentsonCookies..................................................... 171.6.1 Proteins.............................................................................................. 17

52748.indb 1 2/6/08 2:24:26 PM

Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC

Page 2: Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

� Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

1.6.2 Starch................................................................................................. 181.6.3 Pentosans............................................................................................ 191.6.4 Lipids................................................................................................. 19

1.7 EffectsofFlourComponentsonCakes........................................................201.7.1 FlourParticleSize..............................................................................201.7.2 Proteins..............................................................................................201.7.3 Lipids................................................................................................. 21

1.8 FlourChlorination......................................................................................... 211.8.1 Starch.................................................................................................221.8.2 Lipids.................................................................................................221.8.3 Proteins..............................................................................................231.8.4 AlternativestoChlorination..............................................................24

1.9 Conclusion.....................................................................................................24References................................................................................................................24

�.� IntroduCtIon

Thecategoryofsweetgoodsmadefromwheatflourencompassesawidevarietyofproductswithdifferentappearances,textures,flavors,nutritionalvalues,andshelflives.Theseincludedifferenttypesofcakes,cookies,doughnuts,pastries,andmanymoreitems.Thequalityofthesegoodsbeginswiththatofthesoftwheatflourusedtoproduce them.Flourquality is, in turn,affectedby thewheatgenotype,grow-ing environment, and processing. The genotype and growing environment deter-minetheamountandcharacteristicsofthewheatcomponents,includingproteins,carbohydrates, and lipids. To produce high-quality flour, wheat must be properlymilled;postmillingprocessingsuchaschlorinationisalsosometimesutilizedforitsbenefits.Qualitytestingassuresthataflourmeetsanynecessarystandardsandgivesvaluable information to thoseseekingto improve it.These tests include thedeterminationofproximatecompositionalongwithvariouschemical,rheological,andbakingtests.Thefollowingsectionsofthischapterdescribethemillingofsoftwheatintoflour,compositionofflour,qualitytesting,andhowflourpropertiesrelatetothequalityofproductssuchascookiesandcakes.

�.� WheatProduCtIon,ClassIfICatIon,andusage

Wheat isoneof themajorcropsgrown in theworld,withover620millionmet-rictons(MMT)producedworldwidein2005(USDAForeignAgricultureService2007).U.S.andCanadianwheatproductionaccountedforover57and26MMT,respectively.Commonwheat,Triticumaestivum,isusedforawiderangeofprod-uctsincludingbreads,cakes,cookies,crackers,noodles,breakfastcereals,andmuchmore.Whendescribingwheatvarieties,classificationcanbebasedontexture,color,andgrowthhabit.

1.2.1 TexTure

Wheatiscategorizedashardorsoftbasedonkerneltexture,oneofthemajordeter-minantsofenduse.Comparedtowheatwithasoftertexture,hardwheatrequires

52748.indb 2 2/6/08 2:24:27 PM

Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

UN

IVE

RSI

TI

MA

LA

YSI

A S

AB

AH

] at

01:

56 0

5 O

ctob

er 2

015

Page 3: Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

Soft Wheat Quality �

moreenergytobemilledintoflourandproducesacoarserflour,andalsoonewithmore starch damage. Conversely, wheat kernels with softer texture produce finerflourwithlessstarchdamage,bothimportantattributesofhigh-qualitysoftwheatflour.Themajority ofwheat grownworldwide is hard. In theUnitedStates, softwheataccountsforabout25%ofwheatproduction.

1.2.2 Color

Wheatcanalsobeclassifiedasredorwhitedependingonthecolorofthebrancover-ingthewheatkernel.Themajordifferencebetweenthetwo,otherthanappearance,isthegreatersusceptibilityofwhitewheattosproutingunderfavorable(moistandwarm)conditions.Thismakes theuseofwhitewheatundesirableforsomefood-processingapplicationssuchasthickening.However,thereareadvantagestowhitewheat,suchasthebranbeinglessbitterinflavor.Millingyields(orextractionrates)canalsobehigherinsomecasesbecausethebranofwhitewheatdoesnotdarkenflourasmuchasredwheatbran(LinandVocke2004).

1.2.3 GrowTh

Wheatplantedinthespringandharvestedinlatesummerinthesameyearisreferredtoasspringwheat.Winterwheatisusuallyplantedinlatesummerorearlyfallandharvested the followingsummer.Soft redwinterwheataccounts for themajorityof soft wheat planted in the United States. Major soft wheat producing areas liearoundtheMississippiRiver,Ohio,andsomeareasontheeastcoast(USDAEco-nomicResearchService2006).StatesthatgrowsoftwhitewheatincludethoseinthePacificNorthwest(Washington,Oregon,andIdaho),alongwithMichiganandNewYork.TheprovincesofOntarioandAlberta,Canada,accountformuchoftheCanadiansoftwheatproduction.

Hardwheatsaregenerallybredtohavehigherproteincontentthansoftwheats,althoughproteincontentandhardnessarenotnecessarilylinked.Thisreflectsthedifferentend-userequirementsofhard(>11%protein)andsoftwheatflours(8to10%protein).Themainuseofhardwheatfloursisinbread,wherestrongandhighlevelsofproteinareneeded.Softwheatfloursontheotherhandareusedinproductswhereweakerprotein (i.e.,weakerdough strengthandweakerviscoelasticproperties) isdesired,includingproductssuchascakesandcookies.However,softwheatfloursarealsousedforawiderangeofgoods,somerequiringhigherlevelsofproteins,althoughnotnecessarily“strong”proteins.Crackersandnoodlesfallintothiscategory.

�.� flourMIllIng

Themajorcomponentsofthewheatkernelaretheoutercoveringofbran,theembryoorgerm,andtheendosperm.Thegoalofflourmillingistoseparatethesethreeascleanlyaspossible,alongwithreducingtheendospermintoflourparticles.Higherextractionratesofflour,whileeconomicallydesirable,mayresultinflourwithexces-sivebrancontamination(andtherebyhigherashcontent)aswellasincreasedstarchdamage.Therefore,aproperbalanceneedstobeachieved,dependingonthedesiredenduseoftheflour.

52748.indb 3 2/6/08 2:24:27 PM

Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

UN

IVE

RSI

TI

MA

LA

YSI

A S

AB

AH

] at

01:

56 0

5 O

ctob

er 2

015

Page 4: Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

� Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

Aftercleaningthewheatofanydebris,thefirststepinmillingistheadditionofwater,referredtoastempering.Thepurposeoftemperingistotoughenthebran,keepingitinlargerflakes,therebyreducingtheamountofsmallbranparticleslatercontaminating the flour. An additional benefit of tempering is that it softens theendosperm, further reducingbreakageof thebranwhen it is crushed against theendospermduringmilling.Theamountofwateraddedintemperingvariesdepend-ingonthehardnessofthewheatandtheflourmillmachinerybeingused.Softwheatiscommonlytemperedtoaround14to15%moisture;hardwheatrequireshigherlevels.Thetimeneededfortemperingcanrangefromafewhoursupto24h,againdependingonthewheat.DetailedinformationonwheattemperingandpreparationforexperimentalmillingcanbefoundintheAmericanAssociationofCerealChem-istsInternational(AACCI)Method26-10A(AACCInternational2000).

Theproductionofflourisachievedthroughrollermillingwhichinvolvessetsoftwosteelrollsspinninginoppositedirections,betweenwhichthewheatfallstobeground.Theflourmilliscomposedoftwomainsystems:thebreakandthereduction.Thepurposeof thebreaksystemis to ripopen thewheatkernelandseparate the endosperm from the bran as cleanly as possible. This is achievedwithcorrugatedrollsturningwithadifferentialinspeed.Theslowerrollservestoholdthekernelwhilethefasterrollbreaksitopen.Multiplepassesthroughdif-ferentsetsofbreakrollswithdifferentgapsandcorrugationsareusedtoachieveagradualseparationofthebranandendosperm,whilekeepingthebranasintactaspossible.Inadditiontoseparatingthebranandendosperm,someflourisalsoproducedaftereachpassthroughthebreakrollsandissiftedout.Wheatwithasofterkerneltexturefracturesmoreeasilyandproducesmoreflourinthebreaksystemthandoeswheatwithahardertexture(Finney1989).Flourobtainedinthebreaksystemiscalled“breakflour”andhasasmallerparticlesizethantheflourproducedlateronduringmillinginthereductionsystem(i.e.,reductionflour).Theremainingendospermfreedbythebreakrollsrequiresfurthermillingandgoesontothereductionsystem.

Thereductionsystemissimilartothebreaksystemwiththemaindifferencebeingthatthereductionrollsaresmooth.Multiplepassesthroughdifferentreduc-tionrollswithsievinginbetweeneachpassareusedtograduallyreducetheendo-spermtoflourofthedesiredparticlesize.Thisgradualreductionisdonetocontrolthelevelofstarchdamage.Adjustingthepressurebetweentherollsandchangingtheleveloftemperingcanalsohelptocontroltheamountofstarchdamageinthemilledflour.

Furtherdownstreaminthemillingprocess,ashcontentishigherduetoincreasesinfinebrancontamination,andstarchdamageishigherduetothenarrowerreduc-tion roll gaps.Therefore, thedifferent break and reductionflour streamsneed tobe selectively blended together to produce flour with the desired characteristics.Straight-gradefloursareacombinationofalloftheflourstreams.Patentflourscon-sistofhigher-gradestreamswithlessbran(lighterincolor)andconsequentlylessash,andclearflourshavehigherbrancontamination(darkerincolor)andhigherash.Detailedinformationregardingmillingcanbefoundintheliterature(PosnerandHibbs1997).

52748.indb 4 2/6/08 2:24:28 PM

Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

UN

IVE

RSI

TI

MA

LA

YSI

A S

AB

AH

] at

01:

56 0

5 O

ctob

er 2

015

Page 5: Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

Soft Wheat Quality �

�.� MajorConstItuentsofsoftWheatflour

Theconstituentsofwheatflourvaryduetothegenotypeandthegrowingenviron-ment.These, in turn,determine theend-usecharacteristics,withcertainvarietiesofwheatbeingbettersuitedtospecifictypesofproducts.Themostimportantflourconstituentsinrelationtoflourfunctionalityincludetheproteins,starches,pento-sans(thelargestportionofnonstarchpolysaccharides),andlipids.

1.4.1 ProTeins

Osborne(1907)fractionatedwheatproteinsintofourclassesbasedontheirsolubilityindifferentsolvents.Byhisclassification,albuminswereproteinssolubleinwater,andglobulinsweresolubleinsaltsolutions.Prolaminswerefoundtobesolublein70to85%ethanol,andglutelinsweresolubleindiluteacid.Overthedecades,fur-therworkwasdonetofractionatetheproteins,asthereissomeoverlapbetweenthedifferentclassesandbecausestillfurtherfractionationcanbedonewithdifferentsolvents(ChenandBushuk1970;Kreisetal.1985).

Wheatproteinshavetheuniqueabilitytoformaviscoelasticnetworkthatallowsfortheproductionofproductssuchasbread.Theproteinsmainlyresponsiblefortheviscoelasticpropertiesofflourarethegliadins(prolamins)andglutenins(glutelins).Gluteninsarelargepolymericproteinsheldtogetherbydisulfidebonds.Thesepro-teinsgivedoughstrengthandelasticity.Gliadinsaresmallermonomericproteinsthatareresponsiblefordoughextensibility.Togethertheseproteinsformtheglutenpro-teins.Boththequantity(amount)andquality(type)ofproteinareimportanttoflourcharacteristics.Thestrongglutenproteinsfoundinhardwheatflourareabletoformanetworkwithgoodgas-retainingpropertiesvitalforyeast-leavenedproducts.

Softwheatfloursaretypicallylowinproteincontent(8to10%)andtheproteinsareweakinstrength,characteristicsbettersuitedtomakingmoretenderproductssuchascakesandcookies.Most researchhasbeenfocusedonunderstanding themoreobvious roleofproteins inhardwheatproducts,with less focuson the roleofproteinsinsoftwheatproducts.However,studieshaveshownthatinadditiontoquantity,proteincompositionisimportantinsoftwheatproducts,makingitsstudynecessary(FinneyandBains1999;Houetal.1996a,1996b;Huebneretal.1999;Souzaetal.1994).

1.4.2 sTarCh

Ingeneral,wheatflourcontainsover70%starch (SollarsandRubenthaler1971)thatiscomposedofapproximately25%amyloseand75%amylopectin.Amyloseisaprimarilystraight-chainpolymerofα-1,4-linkedD-glucopyranosemolecules.Amylopectin isabranchedpolymerofα-1,4-linkedglucoseconnectedbyα-1,6-linkedbranchpoints.Amyloseandamylopectinareorganizedinstarchgranulesrangingfrom1to45µmindiameter.Wheatstarchgranulescomeintwoforms:ovaltypeAgranulesabout35µmindiameter,androundtypeBgranulesapproxi-mately3µmindiameter(Alexander1995).Oneofthemostimportantpropertiesofstarchisitsabilitytoswellandabsorbwaterwhenitisheatedinexcesswater.Asstarchgranulesswell,theycauseanincreaseintheviscosityofthestarch–water

52748.indb 5 2/6/08 2:24:28 PM

Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

UN

IVE

RSI

TI

MA

LA

YSI

A S

AB

AH

] at

01:

56 0

5 O

ctob

er 2

015

Page 6: Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

� Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

slurry,untileventuallythegranulesbreakdown,releasingprimarilyamylose,fol-lowed by amylopectin. Upon cooling, the starch molecules, especially amylose,canreassociate,formingagel.Theprocessesofgranuleswellingandbreakdownarereferredtoasgelatinizationandpasting,respectively,andcanbevisualizedinwheatflourbymeasuringtheviscosityofaflour–waterslurryasitisheatedandcooled(Figure1.1).Thesepropertiesofstarchareimportantinmanyaspectsrelat-ingtoflourqualitybecausetheyinfluencetheinteractionsofstarchandwaterinafoodsystem.

Starchgranulescanbephysicallydamagedduringflourmilling,increasingtheirwater-holdingabilityandsusceptibilitytoattackfromtheenzymeα-amylase.GreerandSteward(1959)foundthat2gofwaterwasabsorbedbyeachgramofdamagedstarch,comparedtoonly0.44gofwaterabsorbedbyeachgramofnativestarch.Softwheatflour, ingeneral, is lower indamaged starch content thanhardwheatflour,duetothesofterkerneltextureandhigherbreakflouryield.Inbreadflour,acontrolledamountofdamagedstarchisneededbecausetheenzymaticbreakdownof starch provides some food for the yeast. However, in soft wheat products, theincreasedwaterabsorptionassociatedwithincreasedlevelsofdamagedstarchcanbedetrimentaltoproductquality.

1.4.3 PenTosans

Pentosansarecarbohydratesofinterestduetotheirabilitytoabsorbtentimestheirownweightinwater(D’AppoloniaandKim1976;Kulp1968).Theyarefoundinthe

500

400

300

200

100

0

Temperature

Viscosity

Time (minutes)

Tem

pera

ture

(˚C

)100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

200 5 10 15 20

Visc

osity

(RV

U)

fIgure�.� RapidViscoAnalyzerpastingcurveof3.5gofsoftwheatflourin25mlofwater.(RVU:viscosityinRapidViscounits.)

52748.indb 6 2/6/08 2:24:34 PM

Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

UN

IVE

RSI

TI

MA

LA

YSI

A S

AB

AH

] at

01:

56 0

5 O

ctob

er 2

015

Page 7: Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

Soft Wheat Quality �

cellwallsofwheatendospermandbranandarecomposedmainlyofarabinoxylan,apolymerwithaβ-(1-4)-linkedD-xylopyranosebackboneandbranchesofL-arabino-furanoseresidues(Cole1967;Gruppenetal.1992;Perlin1951a,1951b;Wangetal.2006).Pentosansexistasbothwater-insolubleandwater-solubleforms,dependingonthedegreeofbranchingofthearabinosesidechains.Ahigherdegreeofarabi-nosesubstitutionisassociatedwithhigherwatersolubility(Hoseney1984;MedcalfandGilles1968;Wangetal.2006).Wangetal.(2006)measuredthetotalpentosancontentinsixvarietiesofhardspringwheatandfoundittorangefrom5.45to7.32%ofthewholegrainandfrom1.88to2.04%ofthestraight-gradefloursproducedfromthisgrain.Theratioofwater-solubletowater-insolublepentosansinthisflourwas0.36:0.37.Pentosancontentwasalsofoundtobehigherinthelower-gradestreamsofflour,animportantfacttoconsiderwhenblendingmillingstreams.Finnieetal.(2006)specificallymeasured thearabinoxylancontent insoftwhitewinterwheatflourandfoundvariationamongcultivarstobegreatestinthewater-solublefraction,rangingfrom3.23to5.74mgxyloseequivalentspergramsample.Water-insolublearabinoxylanrangedfromabout7to10andtotalarabinoxylanfromabout11to13.5mgxyloseequivalentspergramsampleofsoftwhitewinterwheatflour.

1.4.4 liPids

Flourlipidsareimportantforqualityattributesofsoftwheatproductssuchascookiespreadandcakevolume.Wholegrainwheatcontainsapproximately2 to4%andtheendospermabout1 to2%crudefat (Morrison1978a). Inflour, lipidsexistaseithernonstarchlipidsorstarchlipidsthatareheldinamylose-inclusioncomplexesin starch granules (Acker and Becker 1971). Starch lipids are deemed to be lessfunctionally important than nonstarch lipids due to their protected environment.Supporting evidence of this is that chlorination of flour (see Section 1.8) affectsnonstarchlipidsbutnotstarchlipids(Morrison1978b).Thenonstarchlipidscanbecharacterizedastwotypes:freelipidsextractablewithpetroleumordiethylether,andboundlipidsextractablewithcoldpolarsolventmixtures(Morrison1978a).Thefreelipidscanbefurtherfractionatedintononpolarlipids(triglycerides,diglycer-ides,monoglycerides,fattyacids,sterols,andhydrocarbons)andpolarlipids(gly-colipids and phospholipids). The bound polar lipids consist of phospholipids andglycolipids(Pomeranz1988).

�.� QualItyevaluatIonofWheatgraInandflour

Characterizationofwheatgrainandwheatflourisnecessaryforbothcommercialandresearchpurposes.Potentialbuyersneedtoknowifwhattheywillbegettingwillmeettheirneeds,andresearchersusethesemethodstobetterunderstandhowflouraffectsend-usequality.

Qualitytestsonwheatgrainincludedeterminingthetestweight,millingyield,andkernelhardness.Flouristypicallytestedforproximatecompositionalongwithvariouschemical,rheological,andbakingtests.

52748.indb 7 2/6/08 2:24:34 PM

Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

UN

IVE

RSI

TI

MA

LA

YSI

A S

AB

AH

] at

01:

56 0

5 O

ctob

er 2

015

Page 8: Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

� Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

1.5.1 wheaTGrain

�.�.�.� testWeight

Testweight isameasureof theweightofgrainperunitvolumeinkilogramsperhectoliter(kg/hl)orpoundsperbushel(lb/bu)(AACCIMethod55-10).Highertestweightsaregenerallycorrelatedwithgreatermillingflouryield;lowertestweightsresultingfromshriveledandlesssoundkernelsresultinlowerflouryields(Gainesetal.1997).

�.�.�.� experimentalMilling

Flouryieldisdependentontheamountofendosperminthekernelandhowwellit can be separated from the bran. As mentioned previously, flour yield must bebalancedwithflourqualitycharacteristicssuchasstarchdamageandashcontent.Themillingcharacteristicsofsmallquantitiesofwheat(<1kg)canbeevaluatedbylaboratoryscaleexperimentalmilling.AACCIMethods26-30A,26-31,and26-32describeprocedures formilling softwheatflourwith aBühlerMLU-202 experi-mentalmill(BühlerInc.,Uzwil,Switzerland).Thismillproducesthreebreakandthreereductionflourstreams.TheBrabenderQuadrumatJr.experimentalmill(C.W.BrabenderInstruments,Inc.,SouthHackensack,NJ)issuitedforsmallersamplesthantheBühlerMLU-202andproducesflourandbranafterpassingwheatthroughafixed setof threebreaks (AACCIMethod26-50).TheUSDA-ARSSoftWheatQualityLaboratoryinWooster,OH,hasalsodevelopedandmodifiedexperimentalmillingmethods tobetter evaluate themillingqualityof softwheat (Finney andAndrews1986;Gaines et al. 2000;Yamazaki andAndrews1982). In addition tovaluableinformationregardingmillingquality,theflourproducedbythesemillsisimportantforuseinflourqualityevaluation.

�.�.�.� Breakflouryield

Thebreakflouryield,expressedasapercent, is theweightof theflourproducedbythebreakrollsrelativetotheweightofallproductsobtainedfromthecombinedbreakand reduction rolls (all streamsofflour,bran, andgerm). It is anexcellentindicatorofwheathardness,becausesofterwheatproducesmorebreakflour.Forsoftwheatproducts,higherbreakflouryieldsareparticularlyimportantbecauseofthedesireforflourwithfinerparticlesizeandlowerstarchdamage.TypicalbreakflouryieldsfromaBühlerexperimentalmillusedintheMichiganStateUniversityWheatQualityTestingProgram(millingsoftwhitewinterwheat)arearound30%ofthetotalproductsrecoveredfrommilling(Figure1.2;Ngetal.2007),withharderwheatsgivingalowerpercentageofbreakflour,typicallylessthan25%.

�.�.�.� Kerneltexture

Inadditiontocomparingbreakflouryieldsfrommilling,standardizedmethodsexisttomeasurekernelhardness.Particlesizeindex(AACCIMethod55-30)ismeasuredbyusingastandardizedgrindertomillgrainintomealfollowedbyweighingwhatmealpassesthroughaU.S.No.75sieve.Asofterwheatpassesmoreofthemeal

52748.indb 8 2/6/08 2:24:34 PM

Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

UN

IVE

RSI

TI

MA

LA

YSI

A S

AB

AH

] at

01:

56 0

5 O

ctob

er 2

015

Page 9: Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

Soft Wheat Quality �

throughthesieve.Anear-infrared(NIR)instrumentcanalsobecalibratedtomea-surehardnessofasampleofgroundwheat(AACCIMethod39-70A).

AmoreconvenientandincreasinglyutilizedwayofmeasuringkernelhardnessiswiththeSingleKernelCharacterizationSystem(SKCS;PertenInstruments,Huddinge,Sweden).Hardnessismeasuredbyassigningahardnessindexvaluetothesamplebasedontheforceneededtocrushtheindividualkernels(AACCIMethod55-31;Martinetal.1993).TherehasbeensomelimitedinformationreportedontheuseoftheSKCSforassessingsoftwheats.Gainesetal.(1996a)reportedarelationshipbetweenSKCShard-nessvaluesandsoftnessequivalent(whichisameasureofbreakflouryieldusedbytheUSDA-ARSSoftWheatQualityLaboratoryinWooster,OH)foragroupofsoftwheatcultivars.However,Hazenetal.(1997)didnotfindasignificantrelationshipbetweenSKCShardnessvaluesandsoftnessequivalentfortheirgroupoftestedsoftwheatcul-tivars.ThiscouldbeduetothefactthattheSKCSwasdevelopedinitiallyforahard-wheat-growingregionandperhapsthesensitivityofthemeasuredvaluesrequiressomeadjustmentforverysoftwheatcultivars.Nevertheless,itappearsthattheSKCScanstillbeusedwithsoftwheatsforevaluationofhardness,inrelativeterms.

1.5.2 wheaTFlour

�.�.�.� Moisture

The moisture content of flour is most easily determined from the difference inweightofasamplebeforeandafterdryinginanairoven(AACCIMethods44-15A

33

32

31

30

29

28

27

26

255 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

Hardness Index

Brea

k Fl

our Y

ield

(%)

fIgure�.� ScatterplotofhardnessindexmeasuredbytheSingleKernelCharacterizationSystemandbreakflouryieldofMichigansoftwhitewinterwheatmilledinaBühlerMLU-202flourmill.Wheatvarietiesweregrownintheyears2001to2005.

52748.indb 9 2/6/08 2:24:35 PM

Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

UN

IVE

RSI

TI

MA

LA

YSI

A S

AB

AH

] at

01:

56 0

5 O

ctob

er 2

015

Page 10: Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

�0 Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

and44-16).MoisturecontentcanalsobedeterminedwithaproperlycalibratedNIRspectrophotometerorwithmoisture-measuringinstrumentsmadebyvariousmanu-facturers.Resultsofflouranalysisareusuallyadjustedto14%moisturebasisasawayofexpressingresultsonaconstantsolidsbasisbetweensamplesthatmayhavedifferentmoisturecontents.

�.�.�.� ash

Ashormineralcontentofflourisoftenmeasuredasanindicatorofthequalityofmilling.As it ishigher in thebran than theendosperm,ashcontent indicates thedegreeofbrancontaminationinflour.However, itshouldbenotedthat theendo-spermashcontentvariesamongwheatgenotypes;therefore,ashlevelsmaynotcom-pletelycorrelatewiththedegreeofbrancontamination(Greffeuilleetal.2005).Ashcontentisalsoofinterestbecauseitiscorrelatedwithflourcolor(KimandFlores1999),anattributethataffectsmarketabilityofaflour.Flourashcontentsaretypi-callybelow0.5%andcanbedeterminedbyincineratingafloursampleinamufflefurnace,leavingonlytheash(AACCIMethods08-01and08-02).

�.�.�.� Protein

Proteincontentistypicallydeterminedindirectlythroughmeasuringnitrogencon-tentbymethodssuchasKjeldahl(AACCIMethod46-11A)andcombustion(AACCIMethod46-30).Acorrectionfactoraccountingforaminoacidcompositionandnon-proteinnitrogen(×5.7)isthenappliedtocalculatetheproteincontent.CalibrationofaNIRspectrophotometerusingeitherofthepreviouslymentionedmethodscanalsobedonetoprovidearapidwayofdeterminingproteincontentthatdoesnotrequirechemicalsorreagents(AACCIMethod39-11).

�.�.�.� sproutdamage

Sproutdamage,causedbyincreasedamountsofα-amylaseactivity,isaprobleminproductswhereahighhotpasteviscosityofthewheatflourisneeded,asinsoupthickeners.Highlevelsofα-amylasearefoundingrainthathasbeguntogerminatebecauseofexposuretomoisturebeforeharvest.Thisenzyme,whilenecessaryinagerminatingkernel,reducessoftwheatflourqualitybyhydrolyzingtheα-1,4-linkedglucosemoleculesofstarch.

Theα-amylaseactivity ingrainorflourcanbemeasuredcolorimetricallybyincubatingitwithdyedandcross-linkedamylosetablets(AACCIMethod22-05).Duetotheirease,however,methodsthatmeasuretheeffectsofα-amylaseactivityonheatedflour-waterslurriesaremorecommonlyused.TheFallingNumberSystem(PertenInstruments,Huddinge,Sweden)providesarapidmethodofassessingsproutdamagebymeasuringthetimeittakesforastirrertofallthroughaheatedwheatmealandwaterorflourandwatergel.Higherlevelsofα-amylasedecreasethevis-cosityofthegel,causingthestirrertofallfaster.WheatwithaFallingNumbervaluebelow300issuspectedtohavesomesproutdamage(KaldyandRubenthaler1987).

Instrumentsthatrecordviscositywhileheatingandstirringaflour–waterslurryincludetheAmylograph(C.W.BrabenderInstruments,Inc.,SouthHackensack,NJ)

52748.indb 10 2/6/08 2:24:36 PM

Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

UN

IVE

RSI

TI

MA

LA

YSI

A S

AB

AH

] at

01:

56 0

5 O

ctob

er 2

015

Page 11: Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

Soft Wheat Quality ��

and the Rapid Visco Analyzer (RVA; Newport Scientific Pty. Ltd., Warriewood,Australia)(AACCIMethods22-10and76-21,respectively).Higherα-amylaseactiv-ityresults inacurvewithlowerpeakviscosity.Theresultingcurvecanalsogiveinformationaboutstarchpastingcharacteristicsnotrelatedtosprouting.NoodlesareanexamplewheretexturehasbeencorrelatedwithAmylographandRVApastingproperties suchas thepasting temperatureandpeakviscosity (Bateyet al.1997;Morrisetal.1997;Odaetal.1980).

�.�.�.� damagedstarch

The level of damaged starch canbemeasuredby incubating aflour samplewithα-amylase,followedbymeasurementofthereducingsugarsorglucosethatarepro-duced (AACCI Methods 76-30A and 76-31). In soft wheat flour, damaged starchtypicallyisbelow3%.Levelsaslowaspossiblearepreferredduetotheincreasedsusceptibilityofdamagedstarchtotheactionofamylasesduringfoodprocessing.

�.�.�.� Polyphenoloxidase

Polyphenoloxidase (PPO), anenzyme that causes the formationof coloredcom-pounds(melanins)fromphenols(Bettge2004;Fuerstetal.2006),ismostlyremovedwiththebranduringmilling.However,somedoesmakeitswayinwiththeflour,especiallyathigherflourextractionrates.Thisenzymeactivityisespeciallydetri-mentaltothequalityofAsiannoodlesduetoitsdarkeninganddiscoloringeffects(Krugeretal.1992,1994).PPOhasalsobeenreportedtodiscolorbatters,piecrusts,andrefrigerateddoughs(Gajderowicz1979).LevelsofPPOinwheatdifferduetoboth genotype and growth environment (Baik 1994a; Park et al. 1997). AACCIMethod22-85wasdevelopedasarapidandsmall-scaletestforPPOactivitythatcanbeusedbybothbreedersand industry (Bettge2004).ThismethodmeasuresPPOactivitybyincubatingwheatorflourwithasubstrate(L-DOPA)andmonitoringthecolorchangespectrophotometrically.

�.�.�.� alkalineWaterretentionCapacityofflour

Alkalinewaterretentioncapacity(AWRC)isatestdevelopedtosimulatethealka-line conditions of the formula for evaluating sugar-snap cookie-making potentialofawheatflour(FinneyandYamazaki1953).Thetestisdefinedastheamountofalkalinewaterheldbytheflouragainstacentrifugalforce.Flourthatbindsalkalinewaterpoorlyisconsideredtobeofgoodquality(AACCIMethod56-10).Yamazaki(1953)foundanegativerelationshipbetweentheamountofalkalinewaterheldbythe flour and cookie diameter. However, the relationship is not as clear for morerecentlydevelopedsoftwheatvarieties(Finney1994)andfordistinguishingamongflourswithinasoftnessorhardnessclass(KittermanandRubenthaler1971).Breed-ers,though,arestillselectingforlowAWRCintheirsoftwheatlines.

�.�.�.� solventretentionCapacityofflour

Morerecently,amethodformeasuringthesolventretentioncapacity(SRC)ofwheatflourwasestablished topredictcommercialflourproperties (AACCIMethod56-

52748.indb 11 2/6/08 2:24:36 PM

Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

UN

IVE

RSI

TI

MA

LA

YSI

A S

AB

AH

] at

01:

56 0

5 O

ctob

er 2

015

Page 12: Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

�� Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

11).Thismethodusesfoursolventsindependently—water,50%sucrose,5%sodiumcarbonate,and5%lacticacid—andmeasuresaflour’sabilitytoholdthemaftercen-trifugation.Ingeneral,waterSRCisaffectedbyallflourconstituents,sucroseSRCisassociatedwithpentosancharacteristics,sodiumcarbonateSRCisassociatedwiththelevelofdamagedstarch,andlacticacidSRCisassociatedwithglutenincharac-teristics(Bettgeetal.2002;Gaines2000).

TheuseofdifferentsolventsforSRCallowstheseparationofeffectsofdiffer-entflourcomponents,andthecombinedpatternofthefourSRCprofilesprovidesapracticalflourquality assessment forpredictingbakingperformance (Bettge etal.2002;Guttierietal.2004;SladeandLevine1994).InacollaborativestudybyGaines(2000),lacticacidSRCwasfoundtocorrelatewithMixographnumber(pro-teincontentmultipliedbypeakheightandpeaktime),andsodiumcarbonateSRCwith damaged starch, softness equivalent, AWRC, and sugar-snap cookie spread.SucroseSRCcorrelatedwithdamagedstarch,AWRC,andcookiespread(Table1.1).SRCtestsarecurrentlyusedinanumberofsoftwheatbreedingprograms,includ-ingtheMichiganStateUniversityWheatQualityTestingProgram(Ngetal.2007).VariationsontheSRCmethodsusingsmallerquantitiesofmaterialandwheatmealinsteadofflourhavealsobeendeveloped,allowingforrapidscreeningofearlygen-erationbreederlinesofwheat(Bettgeetal.2002;Guttierietal.2004).

1.5.3 douGhrheoloGy

Withregardtowheatflour,rheologyisthemeasureoftheflowanddeformationofdoughs.Thesedoughpropertiescanaffectproductqualitiessuchasgeometry(e.g., cookie spread or cake volume), texture, and handling during processing.Dough rheological instrumentswereoriginallydesigned forusewithmaterialssuchasbreaddoughs,wherestrengthandelasticityarevalued.Softwheatflourproducts, however, generally require doughs that are weaker. Results obtainedfromtheserheologicalinstrumentsshouldnotbeinterpretedusingthesamecri-

taBle�.�CorrelationCoefficientsbetweensolventretentionCapacityandvariousflourQualityParameters

Water �0%sucrose

�%sodiumCarbonate

�%lacticacid

Proteincontent 0.33a 0.39a 0.31a 0.39a

Damagedstarch 0.94a 0.77a 0.95a 0.23

Flouryield 0.51a 0.41a 0.54a –0.06

AWRC 0.97a 0.81a 0.97a 0.33a

SSCdiameter –0.88a –0.76a –0.86a –0.33a

Mixographnumber 0.50a 0.49a 0.43a 0.69a

Notes:AWRC,alkalinewaterretentioncapacity;SSC,sugar-snapcookie.a Significantatthe1%level.

Source:AdaptedfromGaines,C.S.,Cereal Foods World,45,303–306,2000..

52748.indb 12 2/6/08 2:24:36 PM

Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

UN

IVE

RSI

TI

MA

LA

YSI

A S

AB

AH

] at

01:

56 0

5 O

ctob

er 2

015

Page 13: Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

Soft Wheat Quality ��

teriaasresultsfromhardwheatflours,astherheologicalpropertiesofsoftandhardwheatfloursarenotsimplyopposites(Hoseneyetal.1988).Dough-formingpropertiesoffloursarecommonlyevaluatedusingtheAlveograph,Mixograph,andtheFarinograph.

�.�.�.� alveograph

The Alveograph (Chopin Technologies, Villeneuve-la-Garenne Cedex, France)measures air pressure inside of a dough bubble as it is inflated until it bursts(AACCIMethod54-30A).Thisbiaxialextensionismeanttosimulatethedefor-mationofadoughduringfermentationandovenspringduringbaking.Itallowsforthemeasurementofthemaximumoverpressure(P),whichrelatestotheresis-tanceofdough todeformation,and theaverage lengthof thecurvebaselineatrupture(L),whichisameasureofdoughextensibility.Thedeformationenergy(W)isameasureoftheenergyneededtoinflatethedoughandisderivedfromthe area under the curve. W is related to the flour strength (Faridi and Rasper1987).Bettgeetal.(1989)investigatedtheabilityoftheAlveographtoevaluatesoftwheatvarietiesforcookiesandfoundthattheparameterbestabletopredictcookie diameter was P in combination with the flour protein content. Nemethetal.(1994)foundthatPandP/Lweresignificantlycorrelatedwithsugar-snapcookiespreadandscore.Yamamotoetal. (1996)foundthatAlveographPwasnegativelycorrelatedandLpositivelycorrelatedwithJapanesespongecakevol-ume(Table1.2).

taBle�.�

CorrelationCoefficientsbetweenrheologicalPropertiesandQualitiesofjapanesespongeCakesandsugar-snapCookiesMadefromsoftWheatflourgrownintheunitedstates

QualityParameter japanesespongeCakevolume sugar-snapCookiediameter

P –0.639a ns

L 0.492b 0.522b

MPT ns 0.577b

MPH –0.692a –0.590b

FWA ns –0.667a

FPT –0.490b ns

Notes: P,Alveograph maximum overpressure; L,Alveograph length; MPT, Mixograph peak time;MPH, Mixograph peak height; FWA, Farinograph water absorption; FPT, Farinograph peaktime;ns,notsignificant.

a Significantatthe1%level.b Significantatthe5%level.

Source:AdaptedfromYamamoto,H.,Worthington,S.T.,Hou,G.,andNg,P.K.W.,Cereal Chemistry,73,215–221,1996.

52748.indb 13 2/6/08 2:24:37 PM

Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

UN

IVE

RSI

TI

MA

LA

YSI

A S

AB

AH

] at

01:

56 0

5 O

ctob

er 2

015

Page 14: Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

�� Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

�.�.�.� Mixographandfarinograph

TheMixograph(NationalManufacturing,Lincoln,NE)andFarinograph(C.W.Bra-benderInstruments,Inc.,SouthHackensack,NJ)arebothmixersthatrecordchangesindoughpropertiesover time(AACCIMethods54-40Aand54-21, respectively).These instruments are able to give information regarding optimum dough waterabsorption,strength,mixingtime,andtolerancetoovermixing.Themaindifferencebetweenthetwoisinthegeometryofthemixers.TheMixographusesverticallyori-entedpinsthatmoveinaplanetarymotion,andtheFarinographusessigmoid-shapedmixingpaddles.TheMixographwasdevelopedtoprovidethemoreintensivemixingthatNorthAmericanwheatsrequire.ItisthereforemainlyusedthereaswellasinAustralia.TheFarinographiswidelyusedaroundtheworld(Ingelin1997).Hazenetal.(1997)reportedsignificantrelationshipsbetweenwire-cutcookiediametersandMixographpeaktime,andpeakheight.Uriyoetal.(2004)foundsignificantnegativecorrelationsbetweenFarinographwaterabsorptionandcookiediameter,andwithcakevolume, inproductsmade fromsoft redwinterwheat.Cake tendernesswascorrelated with Farinograph departure time and mixing stability. Yamamoto andcoworkers(1996)alsoreportedanegativecorrelationbetweencookiediameterandFarinographwaterabsorptionalongwithanegativecorrelationofcookiediametertoMixographpeakheight(Table1.2);therewasapositivecorrelationbetweencookiediameterandMixographpeaktime.OtherworkershavealsocorrelatedFarinographandMixographmeasurementswithvariouscakeandcookiequalities(FinneyandBains1999;Nemethetal.1994;Uriyoetal.2004).

1.5.4 ProduCTsrequirinGweakerProTeins

Muchresearchinthepasthasbeenfocusedondevelopingproceduresforsoftwheatquality evaluation. However, no test has proven more satisfactory than a bakingtest,whichisanall-inclusivetest.MostU.S.Easternsoftwheatshavebeentestedforcakeandcookie-makingqualities.MostofthesetestshavefollowedstandardAACCImethods.

�.�.�.� Cookies

Thesugar-snapcookiebakingtest(AACCIMethod10-52)wasconsidered“thestan-dard”cookietestformanyyearsandhasbeenusedtoevaluateflourforproductssuchascookies,crackers,cakes,andpies(Gaines2004).Floursthatproducecookieswithlargerspreadandsoftertexturearefavored.Astherearefewersugar-snap-typecookiesonthemarket,thewire-cutcookiebakingtestwasdevelopedwhichutilizesacookieformulationthatmorecloselyreflectsthecommercialwire-cutcookiefor-mulation(AACCIMethod10-54;SladeandLevine1994)(Table1.3).Gainesetal.(1996b)comparedthesugar-snapandwire-cutcookieformulationsandfoundthateventhoughbothtestswerecapableofevaluatingspread,thewire-cutcookiesbet-terreflecteddifferencesincookietexturebasedoninstrumentalhardnessevaluatedusinganInstronuniversaltestingmachine.

52748.indb 14 2/6/08 2:24:37 PM

Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

UN

IVE

RSI

TI

MA

LA

YSI

A S

AB

AH

] at

01:

56 0

5 O

ctob

er 2

015

Page 15: Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

Soft Wheat Quality ��

�.�.�.� high-ratioCakes

Thehigh-ratio(moresugarthanflour,wt:wt)cakebakingtest(AACCIMethod10-90)iscommonlyusedtoevaluatesoftwheatfloursforcakeproducts.Theimportantcharacteristicoftheflourusedinthesecakesisthattheymustbeabletocarry1.3to1.4timestheirweightinsugar(seeTable1.4forformula).Toaccomplishthis,cakeflourischlorinatedtomodifytheflourcomponents.Bakedcakesarescoredbasedontheirvolume,contour(symmetry),cellstructure,grain,texture,color,andflavor.

taBle�.�

ComparisonofMicroWire-Cut(aaCCIMethod�0-��)andMicrosugar-snap(aaCCIMethod�0-��)Cookieformulations

formulation

Ingredient Wire-Cut(g) sugar-snap(g)

Sucrose 12.8 24

Brownulatedsugar 4.0 —

Nonfatdrymilk 0.4 1.2

NaCl 0.5 0.18

Sodiumbicarbonate 0.4 0.4

SolutionAa na 0.32

SolutionBb na 0.20

Shortening 16.0 12

High-fructosecornsyrup 0.6 —

Ammoniumcarbonate 0.2 —

Water Variable Variable

Flour 40.0(13%m.b.) 40(14%m.b.)a SolutionA:7.98%sodiumbicarbonateinwater.b SolutionB:10.16%ammoniumchlorideand8.88%NaClinwater.

taBle�.�

high-ratioWhitelayerCakeformulation(aaCCIMethod�0-�0)Ingredient Weights(g) WeightPercent(flourBasis)

Flour(14%m.b.) 200.0 100.0

Sugar 280.0 140.0

Shortening 100.0 50.0

Nonfatdrymilk 24.0 12.0

Driedeggwhites 18.0 9.0

NaCl 6.0 3.0

Bakingpowderandwater Variable Variable

52748.indb 15 2/6/08 2:24:38 PM

Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

UN

IVE

RSI

TI

MA

LA

YSI

A S

AB

AH

] at

01:

56 0

5 O

ctob

er 2

015

Page 16: Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

�� Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

1.5.5 ProduCTsrequirinGsTronGerProTeins

Crackersandnoodlesareeconomicallysignificantcategoriesofproducts thataremadewithsoftwheatflour,thoughtheyarenotsweetgoods.Crackersreferredtoin the followingsectionareproducedby fermentationwithyeast tomake saltineandsimilarcrackers.FlourqualityfornoodleproductionisespeciallyimportantforexportofwheattocountriesintheFarEast.

�.�.�.� Crackers

Crackersrequirestrongerglutenthanothersoftwheatproductsandareoftenmadefromblendsofbothhardandsoftwheatflours.Thisstrongerglutenisnecessarytogivestructuretocrackersastheyarefermentedandsheeted.Thereisstillnooffi-cial testmethod for evaluatingflours for cracker-bakingpotential, although therearepublishedproceduresusingatwo-stagespongeanddoughapproachtomakingcrackers(DoescherandHoseney1985;PizzinattoandHoseney1980).Thisinvolvesfermentationofasponge(containingyeast,water,and60to70%oftheflour)for16to18hfollowedbyadditionoftheremainingingredientsandfermentationofthedoughforanother6h(CreightonandHoseney1990;DoescherandHoseney1985;RanhotraandGelroth1988).However,durationofthesetestprocedureslimitsthenumberofsamplesthatcanbeevaluatedbyanoperatorinagiventime.Leeetal.(2002)developedapracticalone-stageprocedurethatenablesanoperatortoevalu-ate15samples,ascomparedtoabout6sampleswiththetwo-stageprocedures,ina48-hperiod.Althoughthetwotypesofproceduresyieldedslightlydifferentbakingresults,thetrendswerethesameforadiversegroupoffloursamplesexamined(Leeetal.2002).Strongerdoughsmadecrackersthatwerethicker,larger,andinhardertexturethancrackersmadefromweakerdoughs.

�.�.�.� noodles

Asiannoodlesareanotherproduct,oftenmadefromblendsofhardandsoftwheatflours,whichrequirestrongergluten.TherearetwobasickindsofAsiannoodles:whitesalted(Udon)andalkalinenoodles(Bettge2004).Udonnoodlesareusuallymadefromflourwith8to10%proteincontentandalkalinenoodles10.5to12%pro-tein(Junetal.1998).ThetextureofAsiannoodlesisrelatedtoflourproteincontentandstarchcharacteristics.TheproteincontentofflourwaspositivelycorrelatedwithnoodlechewinessinastudybyBaiketal.(1994b).Starchpastingpropertieshavebeenshowntoaffecttheoveralltextureofnoodles,includingsoftnessandelasticity(Bateyetal.,1997;Koniketal.1992).Anotherimportantnoodlequalitydetermi-nant,especiallywiththehigherpHofalkalinenoodles,isdiscolorationfromPPOactivity.TheWesternWheatQualityLaboratoryoftheUSDA-ARS(Pullman,WA)hasdevelopedmethodsfortestingalkalineandsaltedAsiannoodles.Noodlesareproducedonalaboratory-scalemachineandareevaluatedbasedoncolor,texture,andyield.

52748.indb 16 2/6/08 2:24:38 PM

Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

UN

IVE

RSI

TI

MA

LA

YSI

A S

AB

AH

] at

01:

56 0

5 O

ctob

er 2

015

Page 17: Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

Soft Wheat Quality ��

�.� effeCtsofflourCoMPonentsonCooKIes

Flourproteins,starches,pentosans,andlipidsallaffectthesizeorspreadofcookiesaswellastheirtextureandappearance.Withthewidevarietyofcookiesproduced,thesecomponentsneedtobetakenintoaccountwhenselectingflour.

1.6.1 ProTeins

Softwheatflourwithlowproteincontentistypicallyusedintheproductionofcook-iesbecauseofthedeleteriouseffectsonqualityassociatedwiththehigherproteincontentinhardwheats.Sugar-snapcookiesmadefromhardwheatflourareusuallythicker,harderintexture,andhaveasmallerdiameter(MillerandHoseney1997).Sugar-snapcookiediameterperunitofflourproteinwasnegativelycorrelatedwithprotein content in a studybyYamamoto et al. (1996) (Figure1.3).Using awire-cutcookieformulation,Gainesetal.(1996b)foundanegativecorrelationbetweenproteincontentandcookiediameterandapositivecorrelationwithcookieheight(Table1.5). Harder texture was also positively correlated with increased proteincontentinthisstudy.Higherflourproteincontenthasbeencorrelatedwithreducedcookiespreadinotherstudiesaswell(Gaines1985;KaldyandRubenthaler1987).However,somestudieshavefoundapoorcorrelationbetweencookiequalityandproteincontent(Abboudetal.1985a;Yamazaki1954).

Cookie spread is a functionof the spread rate and the set time (Abboud et al.1985b;MillerandHoseney1997).Ascookiedoughisheated,thedecreaseinviscosity

1.4

1.3

1.2

1.1

1.0

0.96.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0

Protein (%)

Cook

ie D

iam

eter

(cm

) / F

lour

Pro

tein

fIgure�.� Relationship between protein content and sugar-snap cookie diameter perunitflourproteinincookiesmadefrom17softwheatcultivarsgrownintheUnitedStates.(AdaptedfromYamamoto,H.,Worthington,S.T.,Hou,G.,andNg,P.K.W.,Cereal Chemis-try,73,215–221,1996.)

52748.indb 17 2/6/08 2:24:39 PM

Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

UN

IVE

RSI

TI

MA

LA

YSI

A S

AB

AH

] at

01:

56 0

5 O

ctob

er 2

015

Page 18: Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

�� Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

allowsforthecookietospreaduntilitrisesinviscosityandsets.Althoughglutenisnotdevelopedduringmixing(MillerandHoseney1997),itsglasstransitiontemperatureplaysanimportantpartincookiesettime.Whentheglutenreachesitsglasstransitiontemperature,theviscosityofthedoughincreasesandspreadingstops(Doescheretal.1987;Milleretal.1996).MillerandHoseney(1997)examinedthesettimeofdiffer-enthardandsoftwheatfloursandfoundthatwithinagroupofhardorsoftwheats,proteincontentaffectedthesettime.However,thedifferencesinproteincontentalonewerenotenoughtofullyexplainthedifferencesbetweenthehardandsoftwheatflourgroups.Workhasalsobeendonetoidentifyspecificcomponentsofflourproteinsthatmay affect cookiequality.Huebner et al. (1999) fractionatedgliadins andgluteninsubunitsusingsize-exclusionhigh-performanceliquidchromatography(HPLC).Theyfoundthatflourswithgluteninsubunits5+10madebetter-qualitycookies.Souzaetal.(1994)foundthatthegluteninstrengthscore,developedbyPayneetal.(1987)toevalu-atebreadflours,wasnegativelycorrelatedwithcookiediameter.Houetal.(1996b)separatedthehigh(Asubunits)andlow(BandCsubunits)molecularweightgluteninsubunitsandfoundthattheratioofthequantitiesoftheBtoCsubunitswasrelatedtosugar-snapcookiediameterinflourfromsoftwhitewinterwheat.

1.6.2 sTarCh

Therateofspreadinghasbeenfoundtobefasterincookiesmadefromsoftwheatflourcomparedtocookiesmadefromhardwheatflour(Abboudetal.1985b;Milleretal.1996;MillerandHoseney1997).Afasterspreadrateallowsthecookietospreadtoalargerdiameterbeforesettingoccurs.MillerandHoseney(1997)measuredthespreadrateofcookiesmadefromsoftwheatflourtobe7.8mm/mincomparedto4.6mm/minincookiesmadewithhardwheatflour.Thehardwheatflourswerefoundtocontainhigherlevelsofsolublestarchthanthesoftwheatflours.Removalofthesolublestarchfromhardwheatfloursresulted indecreaseddoughviscositiesandincreasedcookiespreadrates.However,althoughtheamountofsolublestarchcouldexplain thedifferencebetween thehardandsoftwheatflourgroups, it couldnotfullyexplainthedifferenceinspreadrateswithinthegroups.Higherlevelsofdam-agedstarchinmilledhardwheatwerealsoattributedtobeingpartofthedifferenceinspreadratebetweenhardandsoftwheatfloursbyMillerandHoseney(1997).

taBle�.�

CorrelationCoefficientsbetweenflourProteinContentandWire-CutCookieQualityCharacteristics

Parameter CorrelationCoefficient

Diameter –0.57a

Height 0.64a

Hardness 0.79a

a Significantatthe5%level.

Source:AdaptedfromGaines,C.S.,Kassuba,A.,andFinney,P.L.,Cereal Foods World,41,155–160,1996.

52748.indb 18 2/6/08 2:24:39 PM

Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

UN

IVE

RSI

TI

MA

LA

YSI

A S

AB

AH

] at

01:

56 0

5 O

ctob

er 2

015

Page 19: Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

Soft Wheat Quality ��

During baking, minimal gelatinization of starch occurs due to the low watercontentofcookiedough,asshownbydifferentialscanningcalorimetry(AbboudandHoseney1984).However,damagedstarch,withitsgreaterwater-holdingcapability,isknowntonegativelyaffectcookiediameter.DonelsonandGaines(1998)increasedthedamagedstarchcontentofhardandsoftwheatfloursusedtomakesugar-snapcookiesthroughtheadditionofball-milledandpregelatinizedstarch.Forbothhardandsoftwheatflours,theadditionofdamagedstarchledtoanincreaseinalkalinewaterretentioncapacityandadecreaseincookiediameter.Theyalsomadecook-ieswith100%oftheflourreplacedbycombinationsofprimeanddamagedstarch.Thesoftwheatstarchproducedcookieswithlargerdiametersthanthehardwheatstarchatallofthedifferentlevelsofstarchdamagestudied.Additionally,thehardwheatstarchdoughshadgreaterstiffnessthanthosemadefromsoftwheatstarch.Theauthorsconcludedthatthereisafundamentaldifferencebetweenhardandsoftwheatstarchesthatleadstotheirdifferentperformancesincookiebaking.

1.6.3 PenTosans

With their ability to absorb large amounts of water, pentosans also affect cookiequality.Yamazaki(1955)foundthattheadditionofpurifiedstarchtailingsfractions,rich inpentosans, increased thehydration abilityof softwheatflour and reducedcookie spread.BettgeandMorris (2000)measured total,water-soluble,andgrainmembranepentosansin13softwheatfloursamples.Theamountoftotalpentosanshadthelargestnegativecorrelationwithsugar-snapcookiespreadfollowedbythewater-solubleandgrainmembranepentosans.Thegrainmembranepentosanswerealsohighlypositivelycorrelatedwithalkalinewaterretentioncapacity.Abboudetal.(1985a),ontheotherhand,reportedapoorcorrelationbetweenpentosancontentandcookiediameter.Sucrosesolventretentioncapacity,whichisassociatedwithpento-sans,wasnegativelycorrelatedwithsugar-snapcookiespreadbyGaines(2004),eventhoughintheirstudy,alkalinewaterretentioncapacitywasnot.Usingsucrosesol-ventretentioncapacityalongwithflourproteincontentandmillingsoftness,Gaines(2004)wasalsoabletogeneratearegressionequationtopredictcookiediameter.

1.6.4 liPids

Studiesinvolvingtheremovalandreconstitutionofflourlipidshaveshownthattheyareimportanttocookiespread,topgrain(an“islanding”patternformedonthesur-faceofsugar-snapcookies),andstructure.Coleetal.(1960)bakedcookieswithflourthathadbeenextractedwithwater-saturatedbutanolandfoundthatthecookieshaddecreaseddiameters.Whenthelipidswerereplaced,thecookiespreadwasreturnedtonormal.Kisselletal.(1971)extractedfreelipidsfromsoftwheatflourandfrac-tionatedthemintopolarandnonpolarfractions.Theywerethenreintroducedintotheflourandbakedintosugar-snapcookies.Toachievenormalcookiespreadandtop grain, both the polar and nonpolar fractions were needed. Interchanging thelipidsbetweendifferentvarietiesofwheatflourdidnotaffecttheresults,indicatingthatthepresenceofthemixedlipidsismoreimportantthanthesource.FractionationstudiesbyClementsandDonelson(1981),on theotherhand,determined that thepolarlipids(digalactosyldiglycerideandphosphytidylcholinealongwithglycolip-

52748.indb 19 2/6/08 2:24:40 PM

Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

UN

IVE

RSI

TI

MA

LA

YSI

A S

AB

AH

] at

01:

56 0

5 O

ctob

er 2

015

Page 20: Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

�0 Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

ids)weremoreimportanttosugar-snapcookiespreadthanthenonpolarlipids.Theinternalstructureofcookiesmadefromdefattedflour isalsonegativelyaffected;thesecookieshavelargercellsasopposedtothefinerandmoreuniformcellstruc-turefoundingood-qualitycookies(Clements1980).

�.� effeCtsofflourCoMPonentsonCaKes

Cakebattersareaeratedemulsionsoffatinwaterthatexpandduringbakingandsetintoasoft,porousgel(Mizukoshietal.1980;Shelkeetal.1990).Duringtheinitialphaseofbaking,thereisadropinbatterviscosityasshorteningmeltsandsugarsbecomedissolved.Thisisfollowedbyarapidriseinviscositywhenstarchbecomesgelatinized,absorbingfreewaterandsettingthecake(Howardetal.1968;Shelkeetal.1990).Flourproteinsandlipidsalongwiththeflourparticlesizealsoaffectcakequality.

1.7.1 FlourParTiClesize

Whenmeasuredbylaserdiffraction,softwheatflourhasbeenfoundtohaveamuchhigher percentage of particles below41µm in size than that of hardwheat flour(Hareland 1994). The particle sizes of various soft wheat flours have been nega-tivelycorrelatedtocakevolume(Yamamotoetal.1996;YamazakiandDonelson1972).Inadditiontovarietaldifferencesinparticlesizeproducedbynormalmill-ing,researchhasshownthatfurtherreductionofparticlesizethroughpostmillingprocessing(pin-millingandair-classification)canimprovethevolumeandqualityofcakes(Chaudharyetal.1981;GainesandDonelson1985a;Milleretal.1967).Althoughreducingparticlesizeisbeneficial,itisimportanttolimitstarchdamage,asdamagelevelsgreaterthan5%havebeennegativelycorrelatedwithcakequality(Milleretal.1967).

1.7.2 ProTeins

Higherproteincontentinflourisgenerallyassociatedwithpoorerqualityforcakebaking.AccordingtoKaldyandRubenthaler(1987),flourhighinproteinorwithstrongglutenresultsincakeswithlowervolumeandcoarsertextureduetoproteindisruptionofthefoamstructureincakebatter.IntheirstudyofCanadiansoftwhitewinterandspringwheats,theyfoundasignificantnegativecorrelationbetweenflourproteincontent,Japanesespongecakevolume,andoverallcakescore.Yamamotoetal. (1996)alsofoundanegativecorrelationbetweenflourproteinandJapanesesponge cake volume per unit protein (Figure1.4). Gaines and Donelson (1985b)found that thevolumeand tendernessofwhite layer cakeswerenot significantlyaffectedbyproteincontent,although thoseofangel foodcakeswere.However,adifferenceofover2%proteinwasneededtoseeaneffectintheangelfoodcakes.Althoughanexcessofproteinmayharmcakequality,solubleproteins(bothfromtheflourandfromothercakeingredients)arestillneededforthermalstabilityofthe cake foamstructure (Howardet al. 1968).Protein composition in addition tocontentwasshowntobeimportanttoJapanesespongecakevolumeinworkbyHouetal.(1996b).Thepresenceofhigh-molecular-weightglutenin(HMW-GS)subunit

52748.indb 20 2/6/08 2:24:40 PM

Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

UN

IVE

RSI

TI

MA

LA

YSI

A S

AB

AH

] at

01:

56 0

5 O

ctob

er 2

015

Page 21: Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

Soft Wheat Quality ��

1insoftwheatflourresultedinlargercakevolume,whilethepresenceofHMW-GSsubunit2*resultedinsmallervolume.

1.7.3 liPids

Lipidsmakeuponlyasmallfractionofflour;however,theyareimportanttocakevolumeandtexture.SpiesandKirleis(1978)foundthatextractionoffreeflourlipidsreducedvolumeandcausedpoorertextureincakesmadewithamodifiedwhitelayercakeformula.Reintroductionofthelipidsrestoredmostofthecakequalities.Inter-changingthelipidsbetweendifferentvarietiesofwheatdidnotaffect theresults,indicating that the presence of lipids is more important than the source. Takeda(1994) extracted free lipids fromflour, resulting in reduced sponge cakevolume.Thefreelipidswerealsofractionatedintopolarandnonpolarfractions.Reintroduc-tionofthepolarlipids(monogalactosylanddigalactosyldiglycerides)returnedthecakevolumetoitsnormalsize,whilethenonpolarfractionshadonlyminoreffects.SimilarresultswerereportedbySeguchiandMatsuki(1977a).

�.� flourChlorInatIon

Toproducegood-qualityhigh-ratiocakes,chlorinationofflourisnecessary.Cakesmadefromnonchlorinatedflourhavepoorvolume,contour,crumbgrain,andtex-ture(Donelsonetal.2000;Montzheimer1931;Smith1932).Chlorinetreatmentalsoimprovesmouthfeelofcakes,makingcakesdrierandlessstickyorgummy(Kis-

7.06.5 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0

180

170

160

150

140

130

120

Protein (%)

Cak

e Vo

lum

e (c

c) /

Flou

r Pro

tein

fIgure�.� RelationshipbetweenproteincontentandJapanesespongecakevolumeperunitflourprotein incakesmade from17softwheatcultivarsgrown in theUnitedStates.(AdaptedfromYamamoto,H.,Worthington,S.T.,Hou,G.,andNg,P.K.W.,Cereal Chemis-try,73,215–221,1996.)

52748.indb 21 2/6/08 2:24:41 PM

Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

UN

IVE

RSI

TI

MA

LA

YSI

A S

AB

AH

] at

01:

56 0

5 O

ctob

er 2

015

Page 22: Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

�� Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

sellandYamazaki1979;SeguchiandMatsuki1977b).ChlorinationisusuallydonewithchlorinegasandcanbemonitoredbyadropinpHofflour.FlouristypicallychlorinatedtoapHrangeofabout4.5to5.2(Goughetal.1978).Starch,lipids,andproteinsareallaffectedbyflourchlorination.

1.8.1 sTarCh

Fractionation,interchange,andreconstitutionstudiesofnonchlorinatedandchlori-natedflourshaveconfirmedthattheeffectsofchlorinationonstarchareimportantto cake quality. Cakes made from chlorinated flour with the starch interchangedwiththatfromnonchlorinatedflourhadsmallervolumesandpoorercakequalities(JohnsonandHoseney1979a;Sollars1958).Theoppositewastruewhenexchang-ingchlorinatedstarchintononchlorinatedflour.GainesandDonelson(1982)usedamodifiedViscographtoexaminetheviscosityofcakebattersmadewithchlorinatedandnonchlorinatedfloursduringheating.Theapparentviscosityofheatedbattersincreasedfasterinbattersmadefromchlorinatedflourcomparedtononchlorinatedflour.Chlorinatedflourbattersalsoshowedgreaterexpansionduringbaking.Theseresultswere inagreementwith results fromKulpetal. (1972).Accelerated thick-ening of batters allows for improved setting and retention of larger cake volume(Donelsonetal.2000).

Donelson(1990)fractionatedchlorinatedandnonchlorinatedfloursandfoundthatthechlorinatedstarchfractionhadincreasedalkalinewaterretentioncapacity.Theseresultswererelatedtodecreasedsugar-snapcookiespreadinhisexperiment.Inadditiontobindingmorewater,chlorinatedstarchbindsmoreoilasaresultofincreasedstarchgranulehydrophobicity(Seguchi1984).Theoxidativedepolymer-izationofstarchthatoccursduringchlorinationhasbeeninvestigatedasoneofthereasons for these changes in starch properties (Huang et al. 1982; Johnson et al.1980).Varriano-Marston (1985)hypothesized that theoxidativedepolymerizationincreased thecapillarysizeofstarchgranules, leading to the increasedabilityofchlorinatedstarchtobindwaterandoil.

1.8.2 liPids

Variousstudieshavedeterminedthattheeffectofchlorinationonlipidsisimportanttocakequality.Kisselletal.(1979)chlorinatedflourstopH5.2,4.8,and4.0andthenextractedthefreelipidswithhexane.Whitelayercakevolumewasreducedincakesbakedwithoutlipids;however,thenormalvolumewasrestoreduponreadditionoftheextractedlipids.FlourchlorinatedtopH4.8performedthebest.Byinterchang-inglipidsfromachlorinatedflourintoanonchlorinatedone,Donelsonetal.(1984)wereabletoincreasehigh-ratiocakevolumetothatofthechlorinatedflour.Incon-trast,Johnsonetal.(1979),afterconductingalipidinterchangestudy,cametotheconclusionthatalthoughthepresenceoflipidsisimportant,theeffectofchlorinationonthemisnotimportanttocakequalityincakesbakedusingKissell’sleancakeformulation(Kissell,1959).InthestudyofJohnsonetal.(1979),cakesbakedfrombothchlorinatedandnonchlorinatedflourswiththeirlipidsextractedhadpoorgrain.Byaddingeitherofthelipidfractionsbacktothechlorinatedflour,theywereabletorestorethebakingproperties.

52748.indb 22 2/6/08 2:24:41 PM

Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

UN

IVE

RSI

TI

MA

LA

YSI

A S

AB

AH

] at

01:

56 0

5 O

ctob

er 2

015

Page 23: Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

Soft Wheat Quality ��

1.8.3 ProTeins

ThefractionationandinterchangestudiesofSollars(1958)foundthatchlorinationofgluten and starchwasof almost equal importance for theproductionofwhitelayercakes.Chlorinationofglutenhadaneffectonyellowlayercakesaswell,buttoalesserextent.Tsenetal.(1971)reportedthatchlorinationofflourincreasestheextractabilityofproteinsbywaterandaceticacid,andthat this increasedproteinsolubilitymaybepartoftheimprovingeffectsofchlorinetreatmentonflour.Thechanges inprotein extractabilitywere attributed to the actionsof chlorinebreak-inghydrogenbonds,cleavingpeptidebonds,degradingaminoacids,andoxidizingsulfhydrylbonds.

Theeffectofchlorinationonincreasingthehydrophobicityofproteinsinfloursmayalsobeimportant.Seguchi(1985)foundthatchangesinthehydrophobicityofstarchgranuleswereduetoconformationalchangesinsurfaceproteinsofthestarchgranules,andlater,thatchlorinationalsoresultedinanincreaseintheamountofproteinextracted(Seguchi1990).Sinhaetal.(1997)extractedgliadinsfromflourchlorinatedtopH4.8and4.3;gliadinproteinhydrophobicity,asmeasuredbyfluo-rescence spectroscopy, increased with chlorination (Figure1.5). Reversed-phaseHPLCresultssuggestedthattheincreasesinhydrophobicitywereduetoconforma-tionalchangesintheproteins(Sinhaetal.1997).

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

NonchlorinatedpH 4.8pH 4.3

Caldwell Dynasty Frankenmuth Lewjain

Hyd

roph

obic

ity In

dex

x10

fIgure�.� Relative hydrophobicities of gliadins extracted from chlorinated and non-chlorinatedsoftwheatflours,measuredbyfluorescencespectroscopy.(AdaptedfromSinha,N.K.,Yamamoto,H.,andNg,P.K.W.,Food Chemistry,59,387–393,1997.)

52748.indb 23 2/6/08 2:24:42 PM

Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

UN

IVE

RSI

TI

MA

LA

YSI

A S

AB

AH

] at

01:

56 0

5 O

ctob

er 2

015

Page 24: Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

�� Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

1.8.4 alTernaTivesToChlorinaTion

Overtheyears,alternativestochlorinationhavebeenexploredasconcernfor thesafetyofchemicallyprocessedfoodshasgrown.RussoandDoe(1970)improvedcakevolumebyheatingnonchlorinatedflour;however, thisalsoresultedincakeswithpoortexture.Theadditionofingredientssuchasstarch,eggalbumin,xanthangum,L-cysteine,andhydrogenperoxideplusperoxidasehavealsobeentestedfortheirabilitiestocompensateforalackofchlorination(JohnsonandHoseney1979b;RussoandDoe1970;Thomassonetal.1995).Intheircakeformulation,Donelsonetal.(2000)replacednonchlorinatedflourwitheithercommercialhardwheatstarchoralaboratory-producedsoftwheatstarchatalevelequaltotheareaunderanRVApastingcurvemade fromchlorinatedflour.Thiswasdone to tryandachieve theviscosity-modifyingpropertiesnormallyassociatedwithchlorination.Eggalbumin,soy lecithin, andxanthangumwerealsoadded to their cake formula to improvetextureandcontour.Theresultsafterbakingvarioustypesofcakeswereequaltoorbetterthanthosemadewithchlorinatedflours.Mostimportantly,thecakeshadcrumbswithgoodtextureratherthanthegummytexturesofcakesmadewithnon-chlorinatedflour.Theozonetreatmentofflourhasalsorecentlybeeninvestigatedwithpromisingresults(ChittrakornandMacRitchie2006).

�.� ConClusIon

Thedifferentcomponentsofsoftwheatflourcollectivelyplayaroleinitsquality.Softerkerneltextureandlowerproteincontentaretypicallyfavoredforsoftwheatproducts.Starchesandlipidsserveimportantfunctionsinbakedproductssuchascakesandcookies.Understandingwheatflourcompositionandhowqualityismea-suredprovidesagoodbaseforfurtherresearchandstudyofsweetgoods.

referenCes

AACCInternational.2000.ApprovedMethodsoftheAmericanAssociationofCerealChem-ists,10thed.St.Paul,MN:AmericanAssociationofCerealChemists.

Abboud,A.M.andR.C.Hoseney.1984.Differentialscanningcalorimetryofsugarcookiesandcookiedoughs.Cereal Chemistry61:34–37.

Abboud,A.M.,G.L.Rubenthaler,andR.C.Hoseney.1985a.Effectoffatandsugarinsugar-snapcookiesandevaluationofteststomeasurecookieflourquality.Cereal Chemistry62:124–129.

Abboud,A.M.,R.C.Hoseney,andG.L.Rubenthaler.1985b.Factorsaffectingcookieflourquality.Cereal Chemistry62:130–133.

Acker,L.andG.Becker.1971.Recentstudiesonthelipidsofcerealstarches.Part2.Lipidsofvarioustypesofstarchandtheirbindingtoamylose.Die Stärke23:419–424.

Alexander,R.J.1995.Potatostarch:Newprospectsforanoldproduct.Cereal Foods World40:763–764.

Baik,B.K.,Z.Czuchajowska,andY.Pomeranz.1994a.ComparisonofpolyphenoloxidaseactivitiesinwheatsandfloursfromAustralianandUnitedStatescultivars.Journal of Cereal Science19:291–296.

Baik,B.K.,Z.Czuchajowska,andY.Pomeranz.1994b.Roleandcontributionofstarchandprotein contents and quality to texture profile analysis of oriental noodles. Cereal Chemistry71:315–320.

52748.indb 24 2/6/08 2:24:43 PM

Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

UN

IVE

RSI

TI

MA

LA

YSI

A S

AB

AH

] at

01:

56 0

5 O

ctob

er 2

015

Page 25: Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

Soft Wheat Quality ��

Batey,I.L.,B.M.Curtin,andS.A.Moore.1997.OptimizationofRapid-ViscoAnalysertestconditionsforpredictingAsiannoodlequality.Cereal Chemistry74:497–501.

Bettge,A.,G.L.Rubenthaler,andY.Pomeranz.1989.Alveographalgorithmstopredictfunc-tionalpropertiesofwheatinbreadandcookiebaking.Cereal Chemistry66:81–86.

Bettge,A.D.andC.F.Morris.2000.Relationshipsamonggrainhardness,pentosanfractions,andend-usequalityofwheat.Cereal Chemistry77:241–247.

Bettge,A.D.,C.F.Morris,V.L.DeMacon,andK.K.Kidwell.2002.AdaptationofAACCMethod56-11,solventretentioncapacity,foruseasanearlygenerationselectiontoolforcultivardevelopment.Cereal Chemistry79:670–674.

Bettge,A.D.2004.CollaborativestudyonL-DOPA—wheatpolyphenoloxidaseassay(AACCmethod22-85). Cereal Foods World49:338,340–342.

Chaudhary,V.K.,W.T.Yamazaki,andW.A.Gould.1981.Relationofcultivarandflourpar-ticlesizedistributiontocakevolume.Cereal Chemistry58:314–317.

Chen,C.H.andW.Bushuk.1970.Natureofproteinsintriticaleanditsparentalspecies.I.Solubilitycharacteristicsandaminoacidcompositionofendospermproteins.Cana-dian Journal of Plant Science50:9–14.

Chittrakorn,S.andF.MacRitchie.2006.Ozonationofcakeflourasanalternativetochlori-nation.Poster:WorldGrainsSummit:FoodsandBeverages.SanFrancisco,CA.

Clements,R.L.1980.Noteontheeffectofremovaloffreeflourlipidsontheinternalstructureofcookiesasobservedbyaresin-embeddingmethod.Cereal Chemistry57:445–446.

Clements, R.L. and J.R. Donelson. 1981. Functionality of specific flour lipids in cookies.Cereal Chemistry58:204–206.

Cole, E.W., D.K. Mecham, and J.W. Pence. 1960. Effect of flour lipids and some lipidderivatives on cookie-baking characteristics of lipid-free flours. Cereal Chemistry37:109–121.

Cole,E.W.1967.Isolationandchromatographicfractionationofhemicellulosesfromwheatflour.Cereal Chemistry44:411–416.

Creighton,D.W.andR.C.Hoseney.1990.UseofaKramershearcelltomeasurecrackerflourquality.Cereal Chemistry67:111–114.

D’Appolonia,B.I.andS.K.Kim.1976.Recentdevelopmentsinwheatflourpentosans.Bak-er’s Digest50:45–49,53–54.

Doescher,L.C.andR.C.Hoseney.1985.Saltinecrackers:Changesincrackerspongerheol-ogyandmodificationofacracker-bakingprocedure.Cereal Chemistry62:158–162.

Doescher,L.C.,R.C.Hoseney,andG.A.Milliken.1987.Amechanismforcookiedoughset-ting.Cereal Chemistry64:158–163.

Donelson,J.R.,W.T.Yamazaki,andL.T.Kissell.1984.Functionalityinwhitelayercakeoflipidsfromuntreatedandchlorinatedpatentflours.II.Flourfractioninterchangestud-ies.Cereal Chemistry61:88–91.

Donelson,J.R.1990.Flourfractioninterchangestudiesofeffectsofchlorinationoncookieflours.Cereal Chemistry67:99–100.

Donelson,J.R.,andC.S.Gaines.1998.Starch–waterrelationshipsinthesugar-snapcookiedoughsystem.Cereal Chemistry75:660–664.

Donelson,J.R.,C.S.Gaines,andP.L.Finney.2000.Bakingformulainnovationtoeliminatechlorinetreatmentofcakeflour.Cereal Chemistry77:53–57.

Faridi,H.andV.F.Rasper.1987.The Alveograph Handbook,28-33.St.Paul,MN:TheAmer-icanAssociationofCerealChemists.

Finney,K.F.andW.T.Yamazaki.1953.Analkalineviscositytestforsoftwheatflours.Cereal Chemistry30:153–159.

Finney,P.L.andL.C.Andrews.1986.Revisedmicrotestingforsoftwheatqualityevaluation.Cereal Chemistry63:177–182.

Finney,P.L. 1989.Softwheat:View from the easternUnitedStates.Cereal Foods World34:682,684,686–687.

52748.indb 25 2/6/08 2:24:43 PM

Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

UN

IVE

RSI

TI

MA

LA

YSI

A S

AB

AH

] at

01:

56 0

5 O

ctob

er 2

015

Page 26: Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

�� Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

Finney,P.L.1994.Grainquality:Millingandbakingrequirementsforsoftwheatproducts.InCookie Chemistry and Technology,Ed.K.Kulp,51–87.Manhattan,KS:TheAmericanInstituteofBaking.

Finney,P.L.andG.S.Bains.1999.ProteinfunctionalitydifferencesineasternUSsoftwheatcultivarsandinterrelationwithend-usequalitytests.Lebensmittel Wissenschaft und Technologie32:406–415.

Finnie, S.M., A.D. Bettge, and C.F. Morris. 2006. Influence of cultivar and environmentonwater-soluble andwater-insoluble arabinoxylans in softwheat.Cereal Chemistry83:617–623.

Fuerst,E.P.,J.V.Anderson,andC.F.Morris.2006.Delineatingtheroleofpolyphenoloxidaseinthedarkeningofalkalinewheatnoodles.Journal of Agricultural and Food Chem-istry54:2378–2384.

Gaines,C.S. and J.R.Donelson.1982.Cakebatterviscosity andexpansionuponheating.Cereal Chemistry59:237–240.

Gaines,C.S.1985.Associationsamongsoftwheatflourparticlesize,proteincontent,chlo-rine response,kernelhardness,millingquality,white layercakevolume,andsugar-snapcookiespread.Cereal Chemistry62:290–292.

Gaines, C.S. and J.R. Donelson. 1985a. Influence of certain flour quality parameters andpostmillingtreatmentsonsizeofangelfoodandhigh-ratiowhitelayercakes.Cereal Chemistry62:60–63.

Gaines,C.S.andJ.R.Donelson.1985b.Effectofvaryingflourproteincontentonangelfoodandhigh-ratiowhitelayercakesizeandtenderness.Cereal Chemistry62:63–66.

Gaines, C.S., P.F. Finney, L.M. Fleege, and L.C. Andrews. 1996a. Predicting a hardnessmeasurement using the single-kernel characterizaiton system. Cereal Chemistry73:278–283.

Gaines,C.S.,A.Kassuba,andP.L.Finney.1996b.Usingwire-cutandsugar-snapformulacookietestbakingmethodstoevaluatedistinctivesoftwheatfloursets:Implicationsforqualitytesting.Cereal Foods World41:155–160.

Gaines,C.S.,P.L.Finney,andL.C.Andrews.1997.Influenceofkernelsizeandshrivelingonsoftwheatmillingandbakingquality.Cereal Chemistry74:700–704.

Gaines, C.S. 2000. Collaborative study of methods for solvent retention capacity profiles(AACCMethod56-11).Cereal Foods World45:303–306.

Gaines, C.S., P.L. Finney, and L.C. Andrews. 2000. Developing agreement between veryshortflowandlongerflowtestwheatmills.Cereal Chemistry77:187–192.

Gaines,C.S.2004.Predictionofsugar-snapcookiediameterusingsucrosesolventretentioncapacity,millingsoftness,andflourproteincontent.Cereal Chemistry81:549–552.

Gajderowicz, L.J. 1979. Progress in the refrigerated dough industry. Cereal Foods World24:44–45.

Gough,B.M.,M.E.Whitehouse,andC.T.Greenwood.1978.Theroleandfunctionofchlo-rineinthepreparationofhigh-ratiocakeflour.CRC Critical Reviews in Food Science and Human Nutrition10:91–113.

Greer,E.N.andB.A.Steward.1959.Thewaterabsorptionofwheatflour;relativeeffectsofproteinandstarch.Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture10:248–252.

Greffeuille, V., J. Abecassis, C. Bar L’Helgouac’h, and V. Lullien-Pellerin. 2005. Differ-encesinthealeuronelayerfatebetweenhardandsoftcommonwheatsatgrainmilling.Cereal Chemistry82:138–143.

Gruppen,H.,R.J.Hamer,andA.G.J.Voragen.1992.Water-unextractablecellwallmaterialfromwheatflour.2.Fractionationofalkali-extractedpolymersandcomparisonwithwater-extractablearabinoxylans.Journal of Cereal Science16:53–67.

Guttieri,M.J.,C.Becker,andE.J.Souza.2004.Applicationofwheatmealsolventretentioncapacitytestswithinsoftwheatbreedingpopulations.Cereal Chemistry81:261–266.

52748.indb 26 2/6/08 2:24:43 PM

Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

UN

IVE

RSI

TI

MA

LA

YSI

A S

AB

AH

] at

01:

56 0

5 O

ctob

er 2

015

Page 27: Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

Soft Wheat Quality ��

Hareland,G.1994.Evaluationofflourparticle sizedistributionby laserdiffraction, sieveanalysis, and near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Journal of Cereal Science20:183–190.

Hazen,S.P.,P.K.W.Ng,andR.W.Ward.1997.Variationingrainfunctionalqualityforsoftwinterwheat.Crop Science37:1086–1093.

Hoseney,R.C.1984.Functionalpropertiesofpentosans inbakedfoods.Food Technology38:114–117.

Hoseney,R.C.,P.Wade,andJ.W.Finley.1988.Softwheatproducts.InWheat Chemistry and Technology Volume II,Ed.Y.Pomeranz,407–456.St.Paul,MN:AmericanAssocia-tionofCerealChemists.

Hou,G.,H.Yamamoto,andP.K.W.Ng.1996a.RelationshipsofquantityofgliadinsubgroupsofselectedU.S.softwheatflourstorheologicalandbakingproperties.Cereal Chem-istry73:352–357.

Hou,G.,H.Yamamoto,andP.K.W.Ng.1996b.RelationshipsofquantityofgluteninsubunitsofselectedU.S.softwheatflourstorheologicalandbakingproperties.Cereal Chem-istry73:358–363.

Howard,N.B.,D.H.Hughes,andR.G.K.Strobel.1968.Functionofthestarchgranuleintheformationoflayercakestructure.Cereal Chemistry45:329–338.

Huang,G.,J.W.Finn,andE.Varriano-Marston.1982.Flourchlorination.I.Chlorinelocationandquantitationinair-classifiedfractionsandphysiochemicaleffectsonstarch.Cereal Chemistry59:496–500.

Huebner,F.R.,J.A.Bietz,T.Nelsen,G.S.Bains,andP.L.Finney.1999.Softwheatqualityasrelatedtoproteincomposition.Cereal Chemistry76:650–655.

Ingelin, M.E. 1997. Comparison of two recording dough mixers: The Farinograph andMixograph.InThe Mixograph Handbook,Eds.C.E.Walker,J.L.Hazelton,andM.D.Shogren,5–10.Lincoln,NE:NationalManufacturingDivisionTMCO.

Johnson,A.C.andR.C.Hoseney.1979a.Chlorinetreatmentofcakeflours.III.Fractionationandreconstitution techniquesforCl2-treatedanduntreatedflours.Cereal Chemistry56:443–445.

Johnson,A.C.andR.C.Hoseney.1979b.Chlorinetreatmentofcakeflour.II.Effectofcertainingredientsinthecakeformula.Cereal Chemistry56:336–338.

Johnson,A.C.,R.C.Hoseney,andE.Varriano-Marston.1979.Chlorine treatmentofcakeflours.I.Effectoflipids.Cereal Chemistry56:333–335.

Johnson,A.C.,R.C.Hoseney,andK.Ghaisi.1980.Chlorinetreatmentofcakeflours.V.Oxi-dationofstarch.Cereal Chemistry57:94–96.

Jun,W.J.,P.A.Seib,O.K.Chung.1998.CharacteristicsofnoodlefloursfromJapan.Cereal Chemistry75:820–825.

Kaldy,M.S.andG.L.Rubenthaler.1987.Milling,baking,andphysical-chemicalpropertiesofselectedsoftwhitewinterwheatandspringwheats.Cereal Chemistry64:302–307.

Kim,Y.S.andR.A.Flores.1999.Determinationofbrancontaminationinwheatfloursusingashcontent,color,andbranspeckcounts.Cereal Chemistry76:957–961.

Kissell,L.T.1959.Alean-formulacakemethodforvarietalevaluationandresearch.Cereal Chemistry36:168–175.

Kissell,L.T.,Y.Pomeranz,andW.T.Yamazaki.1971.Effectsofflourlipidsoncookiequality.Cereal Chemistry48:655–662.

Kissell,L.T.andW.T.Yamazaki.1979.Cakebakingdynamics:Relationofflour-chlorinationratetobatterexpansionandlayervolume.Cereal Chemistry56:324–327.

Kissell,L.T.,J.R.Donelson,andR.L.Clements.1979.Functionalityinwhitelayercakeoflipids from untreated and chlorinated patent flours. I. Effects of free lipids. Cereal Chemistry56:11–14.

Kitterman, J.S. and G.L. Rubenthaler. 1971. Assessing quality of early generation wheatselectionswithmicroAWRCtest.Cereal Science Today16:313–314,316,328.

52748.indb 27 2/6/08 2:24:44 PM

Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

UN

IVE

RSI

TI

MA

LA

YSI

A S

AB

AH

] at

01:

56 0

5 O

ctob

er 2

015

Page 28: Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

�� Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

Konik, C.M., D.M. Miskelly, and P.W. Gras. 1992. Contribution of starch and non-starchparameterstotheeatingqualityofJapanesewhitesaltednoodles.Journal of the Sci-ence of Food and Agriculture58:403–406.

Kreis,M.,P.R.Shewry,B.G.Forde,J.Forde,andB.J.Miflin.1985.Structureandevolutionofseedstorageproteinsandtheirgeneswithparticularreferencestothoseofwheat,barleyandrye.InOxford Surveys of Plant and Molecular Cell Biology,Ed.B.J.Miflin,253–317.London:OxfordUniversityPress.

Kruger,J.E.,D.W.Hatcher,andR.Depauw.1992.Acomparisonofmethodsforthepredic-tionofcantonesenoodlecolour.Canadian Journal of Plant Science72:1021–1029.

Kruger,J.E.,D.W.Hatcher,andR.Depauw.1994.AwholeseedassayforpolyphenoloxidaseinCanadianprairiespringwheatsanditsusefulnessasameasureofnoodledarkening.Cereal Chemistry71:324–326.

Kulp,K.1968.Penstosansofwheatendosperm.Cereal Science Today.13:414–417,426.Kulp,K.,C.C.Tsen,andC.J.Daly.1972.Effectofchlorineonthestarchcomponentofsoft

wheat-flour.Cereal Chemistry49:194–200.Lee,L.,P.K.W.Ng,andJ.F.Steffe.2002.Amodifiedprocedure(one-stagefermentation)for

evaluatingflourcracker-makingpotential.Food Engineering Progress6:201–207.Lin,W. andG.Vocke. 2004. Hardwhitewheat at a crossroads/WHS-04K-01, Electronic

Outlook Report from the Economic Research Service,U.S.DepartmentofAgriculture(December):www.ers.usda.gov/publications/whs/dec04/whs04K01/whs04K01.pdf.

Martin,C.R.,R.Rousser,andD.L.Barbec.1993.Developmentofasingle-kernelwheatchar-acterizationsystem.Transactions of the ASAE36:1399–1404.

Medcalf, D.G. and K.A. Gilles. 1968. Structural characterization of a pentosan from thewater-insolubleportionofdurumwheatendosperm.Cereal Chemistry45:550–556.

Miller,B.S.,H.B.Trimbo, andK.R.Powell. 1967.Effectsofflourgranulation and starchdamageonthecakemakingqualityofsoftwheatflour.Cereal Science Today12:245–247,250–252.

Miller, R.A., R. Mathew, and R.C. Hoseney. 1996. Use of a thermo mechanical analyzertostudyapparentglasstransitionincookiedough.Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry47:1329–1338.

Miller,R.A.andR.C.Hoseney.1997.Factors inhardwheatflour responsible for reducedcookiespread.Cereal Chemistry74:330–336.

Mizukoshi,M.,H.Maeda,andH.Amano.1980.Modelstudiesofcakebaking.II.Expansionandheatsetofcakebatterduringbaking.Cereal Chemistry57:352–355.

Montzheimer, J.W. 1931. A study of methods for testing cake flour. Cereal Chemistry8:510–517.

Morris,C.F.,G.E.King,andG.L.Rubenthaler.1997.Contributionofwheatflourfractionstopeakhotpasteviscosity.Cereal Chemistry74:147–153.

Morrison,W.R.1978a.Wheatlipidcomposition.Cereal Chemistry55:548–558.Morrison,W.R.1978b.Stabilityofwheatstarchlipidsinuntreatedandchlorine-treatedcake

flours.Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture29:365–371.Nemeth,L.J.,P.C.Williams,andW.Bushuk.1994.Acomparativestudyofthequalityofsoft

wheatsfromCanada,Australia,andtheUnitedStates.Cereal Foods World39:691–694,696–698,700.

Ng,P.K.W.,L.Siler, andE.Tanhehco. 2007.MSU wheat quality testing program report,DepartmentofFoodScienceandHumanNutrition,MichiganStateUniversity,EastLansing,MI.

Oda,M.,Y.Yasuda,S.Okazaki,Y.Yamauchi,andY.Yokoyama.1980.AmethodofflourqualityassessmentforJapanesenoodles.Cereal Chemistry57:253–254.

Osborne,T.B.1907.Theproteinofthewheatkernel.Publication No. 84.CarnegieInstitute:Washington,DC.

52748.indb 28 2/6/08 2:24:44 PM

Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

UN

IVE

RSI

TI

MA

LA

YSI

A S

AB

AH

] at

01:

56 0

5 O

ctob

er 2

015

Page 29: Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

Soft Wheat Quality ��

Park,W.J.,D.R.Shelton,C.J.Peterson,T.J.Martin,S.D.Kachman,andR.L.Wehling.1997.Variationinpolyphenoloxidaseactivityandqualitycharacteristicsamonghardwhitewheatandhardredwinterwheatsamples.Cereal Chemistry74:7–11.

Payne,P.I.,M.A.Nightingale,A.Krattiger,andL.M.Holt.1987.TherelationshipbetweenHMW-glutenin subunit composition and the bread-making quality of British-grownwheatvarieties.Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture40:51–56.

Perlin,A.S.1951a.Isolationandcompositionofthesolublepentosansofwheatflour.Cereal Chemistry28:370–381.

Perlin, A.S. 1951b. Structure of the soluble pentosans of wheat flours. Cereal Chemistry28:382–393.

Pizzinatto, A. and R.C. Hoseney. 1980. A laboratory method for saltine crackers. Cereal Chemistry57:249–252.

Pomeranz,Y.1988.Softwheatproducts.InWheat Chemistry and Technology Volume II,Ed.Y.Pomeranz,219–370.St.Paul,MN:AmericanAssociationofCerealChemists.

Posner,E.S.,andA.N.Hibbs.1997.Wheat Flour Milling.St.Paul,MN:AmericanAssocia-tionofCerealChemists.

Ranhotra,G.andJ.Gelroth.1988.Solubleandinsolublefiberinsodacrackers.Cereal Chem-istry65:159–160.

Russo,J.V.andC.A.Doe.1970.Heat treatmentoffloursasanalternative tochlorination.Journal of Food Technology5:363–374.

Seguchi,M.andJ.Matsuki.1977a.Studiesonpan-cakebaking.II.Effectoflipidsonpan-cakequalities.Cereal Chemistry54:918–926.

Seguchi,M.andJ.Matsuki.1977b.Studiesonpan-cakebaking.I.Effectofchlorinationofflouronpan-cakequalities.Cereal Chemistry54:287–299.

Seguchi,M.1984.Oil-bindingcapacityofprimestarchfromchlorinatedwheatflour.Cereal Chemistry61:241–244.

Seguchi,M.1985.Modelexperimentsonhydrophobicityofchlorinatedstarchandhydropho-bicityofchlorinatedsurfaceprotein.Cereal Chemistry62:166–169.

Seguchi,M.1990.Studyofwheatstarchgranulesurfaceproteinsfromchlorinatedwheatflours.Cereal Chemistry67:258–260.

Shelke,K.,J.M.Faubion,andR.C.Hoseney.1990.Thedynamicsofcakebakingasstudiedbyacombinationofviscometryandelectricalresistanceovenheating.Cereal Chem-istry67:575–580.

Sinha,N.K.,H.Yamamoto,andP.K.W.Ng.1997.Effectsofflourchlorinationonsoftwheatgliadins analyzed by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography, dif-ferential scanning calorimetry and fluorescence spectroscopy. Food Chemistry59:387–393.

Slade,L.andH.Levine.1994.Structure-functionrelationshipsofcookieandcrackeringre-dients.InThe Science of Cookie and Cracker Production,Ed.H.Faridi,23–141.NewYork:ChapmanandHall/AVI.

Smith,E.E.1932.Reportofthesubcommitteeonhydrogen-ionconcentrationwithspecialreferencetotheeffectofflourbleach.Cereal Chemistry9:424–428.

Sollars,W.F.1958.Cakeandcookiefractionsaffectedbychlorinebleaching.Cereal Chem-istry35:100–110.

Sollars,W.F.andG.L.Rubenthaler.1971.Performanceofwheatandotherstarchesinrecon-stitutedflours.Cereal Chemistry48:397–410.

Souza,E.,M.Kruk,andD.W.Sunderman.1994.Associationofsugar-snapcookiequalitywithhighmolecularweightgluteninallelesinsoftwhitespringwheats.Cereal Chem-istry71:601–605.

Spies,R.D.andA.W.Kirleis.1978.Effectoffreeflourlipidsoncake-bakingpotential.Cereal Chemistry55:699–704.

52748.indb 29 2/6/08 2:24:45 PM

Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

UN

IVE

RSI

TI

MA

LA

YSI

A S

AB

AH

] at

01:

56 0

5 O

ctob

er 2

015

Page 30: Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

�0 Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods

Takeda,K.1994.Effectsofvarious lipid fractionsofwheatflouronexpansionof spongecake.Cereal Chemistry71:6–9.

Thomasson,C.A.,R.A.Miller,andR.C.Hoseney.1995.Replacementofchlorinetreatmentforcakeflour.Cereal Chemistry72:616–620.

Tsen,C.C.,K.Kulp,andC.J.Daly.1971.Effectsofchlorineonflourproteins,doughproper-ties,andcakequality.Cereal Chemistry48:247–255.

Uriyo,M.B.,W.E.Barbeau,C.A.Griffey,andJ.Rancourt.2004.Examinationofrelation-shipsbetweentherheologicalpropertiesandbakingperformanceofselectedsoftwheatflours.Journal of Food Quality27:239–254.

USDAEconomicResearchService.UpdatedJuly21,2006.Wheat:Background.www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/Wheat/background.htm#classes.

USDA Foreign Agriculture Service. 2007. World Wheat Production, Consumption, andStocks. Foreign Agricultural Service’s Production, Supply and Distribution (PSD)onlinedatabase.www.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/psdHome.aspx.

Varriano-Marston,E.1985.Flourchlorination:Newthoughtsonanoldtopic.Cereal Foods World 30:339–343.

Wang, M., H.D. Sapirstein, A. Machet, and J.E. Dexter. 2006. Composition and distribu-tion of pentosans in millstreams of different hard spring wheats. Cereal Chemistry83:161–168.

Yamamoto,H.,S.T.Worthington,G.Hou,andP.K.W.Ng.1996.RheologicalpropertiesandbakingqualitiesofselectedsoftwheatsgrownintheUnitedStates.Cereal Chemistry73:215–221.

Yamazaki,W.T.1953.Analkalinewaterretentioncapacitytestfortheevaluationofcookiebakingpotentialitiesofsoftwinterwheatflours.Cereal Chemistry30:242–246.

Yamazaki,W.T.1954.Interrelationsamongbreaddoughabsorption,cookiediameter,pro-teincontent,andalkalinewaterretentioncapacityofsoftwinterwheatflour.Cereal Chemistry31:135–142.

Yamazaki,W.T.1955.Theconcentrationofafactorinsoftwheatfloursaffectingcookiequal-ity.Cereal Chemistry32:26–37.

Yamazaki,W.T.andD.H.Donelson.1972.Relationshipbetweenflourparticlesizeandcake-volumepotentialamongeasternsoftwheats.Cereal Chemistry49:649–653.

Yamazaki,W.T.andL.C.Andrews.1982.Experimentalmillingofsoftwheatcultivarsandbreedinglines.Cereal Chemistry59:41–45.

52748.indb 30 2/6/08 2:24:45 PM

Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

UN

IVE

RSI

TI

MA

LA

YSI

A S

AB

AH

] at

01:

56 0

5 O

ctob

er 2

015


Recommended