�
1 Soft Wheat QualityEdmund J. Tanhehco, Perry K.W. Ng
Contents
1.1 Introduction.....................................................................................................21.2 WheatProduction,Classification,andUsage.................................................2
1.2.1 Texture.................................................................................................31.2.2 Color.....................................................................................................31.2.3 Growth.................................................................................................3
1.3 FlourMilling...................................................................................................31.4 MajorConstituentsofSoftWheatFlour.........................................................5
1.4.1 Proteins................................................................................................51.4.2 Starch...................................................................................................51.4.3 Pentosans..............................................................................................61.4.4 Lipids...................................................................................................7
1.5 QualityEvaluationofWheatGrainandFlour................................................71.5.1 WheatGrain.........................................................................................8
1.5.1.1 TestWeight.............................................................................81.5.1.2 ExperimentalMilling.............................................................81.5.1.3 BreakFlourYield...................................................................81.5.1.4 KernelTexture........................................................................8
1.5.2 WheatFlour.........................................................................................91.5.2.1 Moisture.................................................................................91.5.2.2 Ash....................................................................................... 101.5.2.3 Protein.................................................................................. 101.5.2.4 SproutDamage..................................................................... 101.5.2.5 DamagedStarch................................................................... 111.5.2.6 PolyphenolOxidase.............................................................. 111.5.2.7 AlkalineWaterRetentionCapacityofFlour....................... 111.5.2.8 SolventRetentionCapacityofFlour.................................... 11
1.5.3 DoughRheology................................................................................ 121.5.3.1 Alveograph........................................................................... 131.5.3.2 MixographandFarinograph................................................. 14
1.5.4 ProductsRequiringWeakerProteins................................................. 141.5.4.1 Cookies................................................................................. 141.5.4.2 High-RatioCakes................................................................. 16
1.5.5 ProductsRequiringStrongerProteins............................................... 161.5.5.1 Crackers................................................................................ 161.5.5.2 Noodles................................................................................. 16
1.6 EffectsofFlourComponentsonCookies..................................................... 171.6.1 Proteins.............................................................................................. 17
52748.indb 1 2/6/08 2:24:26 PM
Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
� Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods
1.6.2 Starch................................................................................................. 181.6.3 Pentosans............................................................................................ 191.6.4 Lipids................................................................................................. 19
1.7 EffectsofFlourComponentsonCakes........................................................201.7.1 FlourParticleSize..............................................................................201.7.2 Proteins..............................................................................................201.7.3 Lipids................................................................................................. 21
1.8 FlourChlorination......................................................................................... 211.8.1 Starch.................................................................................................221.8.2 Lipids.................................................................................................221.8.3 Proteins..............................................................................................231.8.4 AlternativestoChlorination..............................................................24
1.9 Conclusion.....................................................................................................24References................................................................................................................24
�.� IntroduCtIon
Thecategoryofsweetgoodsmadefromwheatflourencompassesawidevarietyofproductswithdifferentappearances,textures,flavors,nutritionalvalues,andshelflives.Theseincludedifferenttypesofcakes,cookies,doughnuts,pastries,andmanymoreitems.Thequalityofthesegoodsbeginswiththatofthesoftwheatflourusedtoproduce them.Flourquality is, in turn,affectedby thewheatgenotype,grow-ing environment, and processing. The genotype and growing environment deter-minetheamountandcharacteristicsofthewheatcomponents,includingproteins,carbohydrates, and lipids. To produce high-quality flour, wheat must be properlymilled;postmillingprocessingsuchaschlorinationisalsosometimesutilizedforitsbenefits.Qualitytestingassuresthataflourmeetsanynecessarystandardsandgivesvaluable information to thoseseekingto improve it.These tests include thedeterminationofproximatecompositionalongwithvariouschemical,rheological,andbakingtests.Thefollowingsectionsofthischapterdescribethemillingofsoftwheatintoflour,compositionofflour,qualitytesting,andhowflourpropertiesrelatetothequalityofproductssuchascookiesandcakes.
�.� WheatProduCtIon,ClassIfICatIon,andusage
Wheat isoneof themajorcropsgrown in theworld,withover620millionmet-rictons(MMT)producedworldwidein2005(USDAForeignAgricultureService2007).U.S.andCanadianwheatproductionaccountedforover57and26MMT,respectively.Commonwheat,Triticumaestivum,isusedforawiderangeofprod-uctsincludingbreads,cakes,cookies,crackers,noodles,breakfastcereals,andmuchmore.Whendescribingwheatvarieties,classificationcanbebasedontexture,color,andgrowthhabit.
1.2.1 TexTure
Wheatiscategorizedashardorsoftbasedonkerneltexture,oneofthemajordeter-minantsofenduse.Comparedtowheatwithasoftertexture,hardwheatrequires
52748.indb 2 2/6/08 2:24:27 PM
Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UN
IVE
RSI
TI
MA
LA
YSI
A S
AB
AH
] at
01:
56 0
5 O
ctob
er 2
015
Soft Wheat Quality �
moreenergytobemilledintoflourandproducesacoarserflour,andalsoonewithmore starch damage. Conversely, wheat kernels with softer texture produce finerflourwithlessstarchdamage,bothimportantattributesofhigh-qualitysoftwheatflour.Themajority ofwheat grownworldwide is hard. In theUnitedStates, softwheataccountsforabout25%ofwheatproduction.
1.2.2 Color
Wheatcanalsobeclassifiedasredorwhitedependingonthecolorofthebrancover-ingthewheatkernel.Themajordifferencebetweenthetwo,otherthanappearance,isthegreatersusceptibilityofwhitewheattosproutingunderfavorable(moistandwarm)conditions.Thismakes theuseofwhitewheatundesirableforsomefood-processingapplicationssuchasthickening.However,thereareadvantagestowhitewheat,suchasthebranbeinglessbitterinflavor.Millingyields(orextractionrates)canalsobehigherinsomecasesbecausethebranofwhitewheatdoesnotdarkenflourasmuchasredwheatbran(LinandVocke2004).
1.2.3 GrowTh
Wheatplantedinthespringandharvestedinlatesummerinthesameyearisreferredtoasspringwheat.Winterwheatisusuallyplantedinlatesummerorearlyfallandharvested the followingsummer.Soft redwinterwheataccounts for themajorityof soft wheat planted in the United States. Major soft wheat producing areas liearoundtheMississippiRiver,Ohio,andsomeareasontheeastcoast(USDAEco-nomicResearchService2006).StatesthatgrowsoftwhitewheatincludethoseinthePacificNorthwest(Washington,Oregon,andIdaho),alongwithMichiganandNewYork.TheprovincesofOntarioandAlberta,Canada,accountformuchoftheCanadiansoftwheatproduction.
Hardwheatsaregenerallybredtohavehigherproteincontentthansoftwheats,althoughproteincontentandhardnessarenotnecessarilylinked.Thisreflectsthedifferentend-userequirementsofhard(>11%protein)andsoftwheatflours(8to10%protein).Themainuseofhardwheatfloursisinbread,wherestrongandhighlevelsofproteinareneeded.Softwheatfloursontheotherhandareusedinproductswhereweakerprotein (i.e.,weakerdough strengthandweakerviscoelasticproperties) isdesired,includingproductssuchascakesandcookies.However,softwheatfloursarealsousedforawiderangeofgoods,somerequiringhigherlevelsofproteins,althoughnotnecessarily“strong”proteins.Crackersandnoodlesfallintothiscategory.
�.� flourMIllIng
Themajorcomponentsofthewheatkernelaretheoutercoveringofbran,theembryoorgerm,andtheendosperm.Thegoalofflourmillingistoseparatethesethreeascleanlyaspossible,alongwithreducingtheendospermintoflourparticles.Higherextractionratesofflour,whileeconomicallydesirable,mayresultinflourwithexces-sivebrancontamination(andtherebyhigherashcontent)aswellasincreasedstarchdamage.Therefore,aproperbalanceneedstobeachieved,dependingonthedesiredenduseoftheflour.
52748.indb 3 2/6/08 2:24:27 PM
Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UN
IVE
RSI
TI
MA
LA
YSI
A S
AB
AH
] at
01:
56 0
5 O
ctob
er 2
015
� Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods
Aftercleaningthewheatofanydebris,thefirststepinmillingistheadditionofwater,referredtoastempering.Thepurposeoftemperingistotoughenthebran,keepingitinlargerflakes,therebyreducingtheamountofsmallbranparticleslatercontaminating the flour. An additional benefit of tempering is that it softens theendosperm, further reducingbreakageof thebranwhen it is crushed against theendospermduringmilling.Theamountofwateraddedintemperingvariesdepend-ingonthehardnessofthewheatandtheflourmillmachinerybeingused.Softwheatiscommonlytemperedtoaround14to15%moisture;hardwheatrequireshigherlevels.Thetimeneededfortemperingcanrangefromafewhoursupto24h,againdependingonthewheat.DetailedinformationonwheattemperingandpreparationforexperimentalmillingcanbefoundintheAmericanAssociationofCerealChem-istsInternational(AACCI)Method26-10A(AACCInternational2000).
Theproductionofflourisachievedthroughrollermillingwhichinvolvessetsoftwosteelrollsspinninginoppositedirections,betweenwhichthewheatfallstobeground.Theflourmilliscomposedoftwomainsystems:thebreakandthereduction.Thepurposeof thebreaksystemis to ripopen thewheatkernelandseparate the endosperm from the bran as cleanly as possible. This is achievedwithcorrugatedrollsturningwithadifferentialinspeed.Theslowerrollservestoholdthekernelwhilethefasterrollbreaksitopen.Multiplepassesthroughdif-ferentsetsofbreakrollswithdifferentgapsandcorrugationsareusedtoachieveagradualseparationofthebranandendosperm,whilekeepingthebranasintactaspossible.Inadditiontoseparatingthebranandendosperm,someflourisalsoproducedaftereachpassthroughthebreakrollsandissiftedout.Wheatwithasofterkerneltexturefracturesmoreeasilyandproducesmoreflourinthebreaksystemthandoeswheatwithahardertexture(Finney1989).Flourobtainedinthebreaksystemiscalled“breakflour”andhasasmallerparticlesizethantheflourproducedlateronduringmillinginthereductionsystem(i.e.,reductionflour).Theremainingendospermfreedbythebreakrollsrequiresfurthermillingandgoesontothereductionsystem.
Thereductionsystemissimilartothebreaksystemwiththemaindifferencebeingthatthereductionrollsaresmooth.Multiplepassesthroughdifferentreduc-tionrollswithsievinginbetweeneachpassareusedtograduallyreducetheendo-spermtoflourofthedesiredparticlesize.Thisgradualreductionisdonetocontrolthelevelofstarchdamage.Adjustingthepressurebetweentherollsandchangingtheleveloftemperingcanalsohelptocontroltheamountofstarchdamageinthemilledflour.
Furtherdownstreaminthemillingprocess,ashcontentishigherduetoincreasesinfinebrancontamination,andstarchdamageishigherduetothenarrowerreduc-tion roll gaps.Therefore, thedifferent break and reductionflour streamsneed tobe selectively blended together to produce flour with the desired characteristics.Straight-gradefloursareacombinationofalloftheflourstreams.Patentflourscon-sistofhigher-gradestreamswithlessbran(lighterincolor)andconsequentlylessash,andclearflourshavehigherbrancontamination(darkerincolor)andhigherash.Detailedinformationregardingmillingcanbefoundintheliterature(PosnerandHibbs1997).
52748.indb 4 2/6/08 2:24:28 PM
Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UN
IVE
RSI
TI
MA
LA
YSI
A S
AB
AH
] at
01:
56 0
5 O
ctob
er 2
015
Soft Wheat Quality �
�.� MajorConstItuentsofsoftWheatflour
Theconstituentsofwheatflourvaryduetothegenotypeandthegrowingenviron-ment.These, in turn,determine theend-usecharacteristics,withcertainvarietiesofwheatbeingbettersuitedtospecifictypesofproducts.Themostimportantflourconstituentsinrelationtoflourfunctionalityincludetheproteins,starches,pento-sans(thelargestportionofnonstarchpolysaccharides),andlipids.
1.4.1 ProTeins
Osborne(1907)fractionatedwheatproteinsintofourclassesbasedontheirsolubilityindifferentsolvents.Byhisclassification,albuminswereproteinssolubleinwater,andglobulinsweresolubleinsaltsolutions.Prolaminswerefoundtobesolublein70to85%ethanol,andglutelinsweresolubleindiluteacid.Overthedecades,fur-therworkwasdonetofractionatetheproteins,asthereissomeoverlapbetweenthedifferentclassesandbecausestillfurtherfractionationcanbedonewithdifferentsolvents(ChenandBushuk1970;Kreisetal.1985).
Wheatproteinshavetheuniqueabilitytoformaviscoelasticnetworkthatallowsfortheproductionofproductssuchasbread.Theproteinsmainlyresponsiblefortheviscoelasticpropertiesofflourarethegliadins(prolamins)andglutenins(glutelins).Gluteninsarelargepolymericproteinsheldtogetherbydisulfidebonds.Thesepro-teinsgivedoughstrengthandelasticity.Gliadinsaresmallermonomericproteinsthatareresponsiblefordoughextensibility.Togethertheseproteinsformtheglutenpro-teins.Boththequantity(amount)andquality(type)ofproteinareimportanttoflourcharacteristics.Thestrongglutenproteinsfoundinhardwheatflourareabletoformanetworkwithgoodgas-retainingpropertiesvitalforyeast-leavenedproducts.
Softwheatfloursaretypicallylowinproteincontent(8to10%)andtheproteinsareweakinstrength,characteristicsbettersuitedtomakingmoretenderproductssuchascakesandcookies.Most researchhasbeenfocusedonunderstanding themoreobvious roleofproteins inhardwheatproducts,with less focuson the roleofproteinsinsoftwheatproducts.However,studieshaveshownthatinadditiontoquantity,proteincompositionisimportantinsoftwheatproducts,makingitsstudynecessary(FinneyandBains1999;Houetal.1996a,1996b;Huebneretal.1999;Souzaetal.1994).
1.4.2 sTarCh
Ingeneral,wheatflourcontainsover70%starch (SollarsandRubenthaler1971)thatiscomposedofapproximately25%amyloseand75%amylopectin.Amyloseisaprimarilystraight-chainpolymerofα-1,4-linkedD-glucopyranosemolecules.Amylopectin isabranchedpolymerofα-1,4-linkedglucoseconnectedbyα-1,6-linkedbranchpoints.Amyloseandamylopectinareorganizedinstarchgranulesrangingfrom1to45µmindiameter.Wheatstarchgranulescomeintwoforms:ovaltypeAgranulesabout35µmindiameter,androundtypeBgranulesapproxi-mately3µmindiameter(Alexander1995).Oneofthemostimportantpropertiesofstarchisitsabilitytoswellandabsorbwaterwhenitisheatedinexcesswater.Asstarchgranulesswell,theycauseanincreaseintheviscosityofthestarch–water
52748.indb 5 2/6/08 2:24:28 PM
Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UN
IVE
RSI
TI
MA
LA
YSI
A S
AB
AH
] at
01:
56 0
5 O
ctob
er 2
015
� Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods
slurry,untileventuallythegranulesbreakdown,releasingprimarilyamylose,fol-lowed by amylopectin. Upon cooling, the starch molecules, especially amylose,canreassociate,formingagel.Theprocessesofgranuleswellingandbreakdownarereferredtoasgelatinizationandpasting,respectively,andcanbevisualizedinwheatflourbymeasuringtheviscosityofaflour–waterslurryasitisheatedandcooled(Figure1.1).Thesepropertiesofstarchareimportantinmanyaspectsrelat-ingtoflourqualitybecausetheyinfluencetheinteractionsofstarchandwaterinafoodsystem.
Starchgranulescanbephysicallydamagedduringflourmilling,increasingtheirwater-holdingabilityandsusceptibilitytoattackfromtheenzymeα-amylase.GreerandSteward(1959)foundthat2gofwaterwasabsorbedbyeachgramofdamagedstarch,comparedtoonly0.44gofwaterabsorbedbyeachgramofnativestarch.Softwheatflour, ingeneral, is lower indamaged starch content thanhardwheatflour,duetothesofterkerneltextureandhigherbreakflouryield.Inbreadflour,acontrolledamountofdamagedstarchisneededbecausetheenzymaticbreakdownof starch provides some food for the yeast. However, in soft wheat products, theincreasedwaterabsorptionassociatedwithincreasedlevelsofdamagedstarchcanbedetrimentaltoproductquality.
1.4.3 PenTosans
Pentosansarecarbohydratesofinterestduetotheirabilitytoabsorbtentimestheirownweightinwater(D’AppoloniaandKim1976;Kulp1968).Theyarefoundinthe
500
400
300
200
100
0
Temperature
Viscosity
Time (minutes)
Tem
pera
ture
(˚C
)100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
200 5 10 15 20
Visc
osity
(RV
U)
fIgure�.� RapidViscoAnalyzerpastingcurveof3.5gofsoftwheatflourin25mlofwater.(RVU:viscosityinRapidViscounits.)
52748.indb 6 2/6/08 2:24:34 PM
Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UN
IVE
RSI
TI
MA
LA
YSI
A S
AB
AH
] at
01:
56 0
5 O
ctob
er 2
015
Soft Wheat Quality �
cellwallsofwheatendospermandbranandarecomposedmainlyofarabinoxylan,apolymerwithaβ-(1-4)-linkedD-xylopyranosebackboneandbranchesofL-arabino-furanoseresidues(Cole1967;Gruppenetal.1992;Perlin1951a,1951b;Wangetal.2006).Pentosansexistasbothwater-insolubleandwater-solubleforms,dependingonthedegreeofbranchingofthearabinosesidechains.Ahigherdegreeofarabi-nosesubstitutionisassociatedwithhigherwatersolubility(Hoseney1984;MedcalfandGilles1968;Wangetal.2006).Wangetal.(2006)measuredthetotalpentosancontentinsixvarietiesofhardspringwheatandfoundittorangefrom5.45to7.32%ofthewholegrainandfrom1.88to2.04%ofthestraight-gradefloursproducedfromthisgrain.Theratioofwater-solubletowater-insolublepentosansinthisflourwas0.36:0.37.Pentosancontentwasalsofoundtobehigherinthelower-gradestreamsofflour,animportantfacttoconsiderwhenblendingmillingstreams.Finnieetal.(2006)specificallymeasured thearabinoxylancontent insoftwhitewinterwheatflourandfoundvariationamongcultivarstobegreatestinthewater-solublefraction,rangingfrom3.23to5.74mgxyloseequivalentspergramsample.Water-insolublearabinoxylanrangedfromabout7to10andtotalarabinoxylanfromabout11to13.5mgxyloseequivalentspergramsampleofsoftwhitewinterwheatflour.
1.4.4 liPids
Flourlipidsareimportantforqualityattributesofsoftwheatproductssuchascookiespreadandcakevolume.Wholegrainwheatcontainsapproximately2 to4%andtheendospermabout1 to2%crudefat (Morrison1978a). Inflour, lipidsexistaseithernonstarchlipidsorstarchlipidsthatareheldinamylose-inclusioncomplexesin starch granules (Acker and Becker 1971). Starch lipids are deemed to be lessfunctionally important than nonstarch lipids due to their protected environment.Supporting evidence of this is that chlorination of flour (see Section 1.8) affectsnonstarchlipidsbutnotstarchlipids(Morrison1978b).Thenonstarchlipidscanbecharacterizedastwotypes:freelipidsextractablewithpetroleumordiethylether,andboundlipidsextractablewithcoldpolarsolventmixtures(Morrison1978a).Thefreelipidscanbefurtherfractionatedintononpolarlipids(triglycerides,diglycer-ides,monoglycerides,fattyacids,sterols,andhydrocarbons)andpolarlipids(gly-colipids and phospholipids). The bound polar lipids consist of phospholipids andglycolipids(Pomeranz1988).
�.� QualItyevaluatIonofWheatgraInandflour
Characterizationofwheatgrainandwheatflourisnecessaryforbothcommercialandresearchpurposes.Potentialbuyersneedtoknowifwhattheywillbegettingwillmeettheirneeds,andresearchersusethesemethodstobetterunderstandhowflouraffectsend-usequality.
Qualitytestsonwheatgrainincludedeterminingthetestweight,millingyield,andkernelhardness.Flouristypicallytestedforproximatecompositionalongwithvariouschemical,rheological,andbakingtests.
52748.indb 7 2/6/08 2:24:34 PM
Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UN
IVE
RSI
TI
MA
LA
YSI
A S
AB
AH
] at
01:
56 0
5 O
ctob
er 2
015
� Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods
1.5.1 wheaTGrain
�.�.�.� testWeight
Testweight isameasureof theweightofgrainperunitvolumeinkilogramsperhectoliter(kg/hl)orpoundsperbushel(lb/bu)(AACCIMethod55-10).Highertestweightsaregenerallycorrelatedwithgreatermillingflouryield;lowertestweightsresultingfromshriveledandlesssoundkernelsresultinlowerflouryields(Gainesetal.1997).
�.�.�.� experimentalMilling
Flouryieldisdependentontheamountofendosperminthekernelandhowwellit can be separated from the bran. As mentioned previously, flour yield must bebalancedwithflourqualitycharacteristicssuchasstarchdamageandashcontent.Themillingcharacteristicsofsmallquantitiesofwheat(<1kg)canbeevaluatedbylaboratoryscaleexperimentalmilling.AACCIMethods26-30A,26-31,and26-32describeprocedures formilling softwheatflourwith aBühlerMLU-202 experi-mentalmill(BühlerInc.,Uzwil,Switzerland).Thismillproducesthreebreakandthreereductionflourstreams.TheBrabenderQuadrumatJr.experimentalmill(C.W.BrabenderInstruments,Inc.,SouthHackensack,NJ)issuitedforsmallersamplesthantheBühlerMLU-202andproducesflourandbranafterpassingwheatthroughafixed setof threebreaks (AACCIMethod26-50).TheUSDA-ARSSoftWheatQualityLaboratoryinWooster,OH,hasalsodevelopedandmodifiedexperimentalmillingmethods tobetter evaluate themillingqualityof softwheat (Finney andAndrews1986;Gaines et al. 2000;Yamazaki andAndrews1982). In addition tovaluableinformationregardingmillingquality,theflourproducedbythesemillsisimportantforuseinflourqualityevaluation.
�.�.�.� Breakflouryield
Thebreakflouryield,expressedasapercent, is theweightof theflourproducedbythebreakrollsrelativetotheweightofallproductsobtainedfromthecombinedbreakand reduction rolls (all streamsofflour,bran, andgerm). It is anexcellentindicatorofwheathardness,becausesofterwheatproducesmorebreakflour.Forsoftwheatproducts,higherbreakflouryieldsareparticularlyimportantbecauseofthedesireforflourwithfinerparticlesizeandlowerstarchdamage.TypicalbreakflouryieldsfromaBühlerexperimentalmillusedintheMichiganStateUniversityWheatQualityTestingProgram(millingsoftwhitewinterwheat)arearound30%ofthetotalproductsrecoveredfrommilling(Figure1.2;Ngetal.2007),withharderwheatsgivingalowerpercentageofbreakflour,typicallylessthan25%.
�.�.�.� Kerneltexture
Inadditiontocomparingbreakflouryieldsfrommilling,standardizedmethodsexisttomeasurekernelhardness.Particlesizeindex(AACCIMethod55-30)ismeasuredbyusingastandardizedgrindertomillgrainintomealfollowedbyweighingwhatmealpassesthroughaU.S.No.75sieve.Asofterwheatpassesmoreofthemeal
52748.indb 8 2/6/08 2:24:34 PM
Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UN
IVE
RSI
TI
MA
LA
YSI
A S
AB
AH
] at
01:
56 0
5 O
ctob
er 2
015
Soft Wheat Quality �
throughthesieve.Anear-infrared(NIR)instrumentcanalsobecalibratedtomea-surehardnessofasampleofgroundwheat(AACCIMethod39-70A).
AmoreconvenientandincreasinglyutilizedwayofmeasuringkernelhardnessiswiththeSingleKernelCharacterizationSystem(SKCS;PertenInstruments,Huddinge,Sweden).Hardnessismeasuredbyassigningahardnessindexvaluetothesamplebasedontheforceneededtocrushtheindividualkernels(AACCIMethod55-31;Martinetal.1993).TherehasbeensomelimitedinformationreportedontheuseoftheSKCSforassessingsoftwheats.Gainesetal.(1996a)reportedarelationshipbetweenSKCShard-nessvaluesandsoftnessequivalent(whichisameasureofbreakflouryieldusedbytheUSDA-ARSSoftWheatQualityLaboratoryinWooster,OH)foragroupofsoftwheatcultivars.However,Hazenetal.(1997)didnotfindasignificantrelationshipbetweenSKCShardnessvaluesandsoftnessequivalentfortheirgroupoftestedsoftwheatcul-tivars.ThiscouldbeduetothefactthattheSKCSwasdevelopedinitiallyforahard-wheat-growingregionandperhapsthesensitivityofthemeasuredvaluesrequiressomeadjustmentforverysoftwheatcultivars.Nevertheless,itappearsthattheSKCScanstillbeusedwithsoftwheatsforevaluationofhardness,inrelativeterms.
1.5.2 wheaTFlour
�.�.�.� Moisture
The moisture content of flour is most easily determined from the difference inweightofasamplebeforeandafterdryinginanairoven(AACCIMethods44-15A
33
32
31
30
29
28
27
26
255 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Hardness Index
Brea
k Fl
our Y
ield
(%)
fIgure�.� ScatterplotofhardnessindexmeasuredbytheSingleKernelCharacterizationSystemandbreakflouryieldofMichigansoftwhitewinterwheatmilledinaBühlerMLU-202flourmill.Wheatvarietiesweregrownintheyears2001to2005.
52748.indb 9 2/6/08 2:24:35 PM
Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UN
IVE
RSI
TI
MA
LA
YSI
A S
AB
AH
] at
01:
56 0
5 O
ctob
er 2
015
�0 Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods
and44-16).MoisturecontentcanalsobedeterminedwithaproperlycalibratedNIRspectrophotometerorwithmoisture-measuringinstrumentsmadebyvariousmanu-facturers.Resultsofflouranalysisareusuallyadjustedto14%moisturebasisasawayofexpressingresultsonaconstantsolidsbasisbetweensamplesthatmayhavedifferentmoisturecontents.
�.�.�.� ash
Ashormineralcontentofflourisoftenmeasuredasanindicatorofthequalityofmilling.As it ishigher in thebran than theendosperm,ashcontent indicates thedegreeofbrancontaminationinflour.However, itshouldbenotedthat theendo-spermashcontentvariesamongwheatgenotypes;therefore,ashlevelsmaynotcom-pletelycorrelatewiththedegreeofbrancontamination(Greffeuilleetal.2005).Ashcontentisalsoofinterestbecauseitiscorrelatedwithflourcolor(KimandFlores1999),anattributethataffectsmarketabilityofaflour.Flourashcontentsaretypi-callybelow0.5%andcanbedeterminedbyincineratingafloursampleinamufflefurnace,leavingonlytheash(AACCIMethods08-01and08-02).
�.�.�.� Protein
Proteincontentistypicallydeterminedindirectlythroughmeasuringnitrogencon-tentbymethodssuchasKjeldahl(AACCIMethod46-11A)andcombustion(AACCIMethod46-30).Acorrectionfactoraccountingforaminoacidcompositionandnon-proteinnitrogen(×5.7)isthenappliedtocalculatetheproteincontent.CalibrationofaNIRspectrophotometerusingeitherofthepreviouslymentionedmethodscanalsobedonetoprovidearapidwayofdeterminingproteincontentthatdoesnotrequirechemicalsorreagents(AACCIMethod39-11).
�.�.�.� sproutdamage
Sproutdamage,causedbyincreasedamountsofα-amylaseactivity,isaprobleminproductswhereahighhotpasteviscosityofthewheatflourisneeded,asinsoupthickeners.Highlevelsofα-amylasearefoundingrainthathasbeguntogerminatebecauseofexposuretomoisturebeforeharvest.Thisenzyme,whilenecessaryinagerminatingkernel,reducessoftwheatflourqualitybyhydrolyzingtheα-1,4-linkedglucosemoleculesofstarch.
Theα-amylaseactivity ingrainorflourcanbemeasuredcolorimetricallybyincubatingitwithdyedandcross-linkedamylosetablets(AACCIMethod22-05).Duetotheirease,however,methodsthatmeasuretheeffectsofα-amylaseactivityonheatedflour-waterslurriesaremorecommonlyused.TheFallingNumberSystem(PertenInstruments,Huddinge,Sweden)providesarapidmethodofassessingsproutdamagebymeasuringthetimeittakesforastirrertofallthroughaheatedwheatmealandwaterorflourandwatergel.Higherlevelsofα-amylasedecreasethevis-cosityofthegel,causingthestirrertofallfaster.WheatwithaFallingNumbervaluebelow300issuspectedtohavesomesproutdamage(KaldyandRubenthaler1987).
Instrumentsthatrecordviscositywhileheatingandstirringaflour–waterslurryincludetheAmylograph(C.W.BrabenderInstruments,Inc.,SouthHackensack,NJ)
52748.indb 10 2/6/08 2:24:36 PM
Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UN
IVE
RSI
TI
MA
LA
YSI
A S
AB
AH
] at
01:
56 0
5 O
ctob
er 2
015
Soft Wheat Quality ��
and the Rapid Visco Analyzer (RVA; Newport Scientific Pty. Ltd., Warriewood,Australia)(AACCIMethods22-10and76-21,respectively).Higherα-amylaseactiv-ityresults inacurvewithlowerpeakviscosity.Theresultingcurvecanalsogiveinformationaboutstarchpastingcharacteristicsnotrelatedtosprouting.NoodlesareanexamplewheretexturehasbeencorrelatedwithAmylographandRVApastingproperties suchas thepasting temperatureandpeakviscosity (Bateyet al.1997;Morrisetal.1997;Odaetal.1980).
�.�.�.� damagedstarch
The level of damaged starch canbemeasuredby incubating aflour samplewithα-amylase,followedbymeasurementofthereducingsugarsorglucosethatarepro-duced (AACCI Methods 76-30A and 76-31). In soft wheat flour, damaged starchtypicallyisbelow3%.Levelsaslowaspossiblearepreferredduetotheincreasedsusceptibilityofdamagedstarchtotheactionofamylasesduringfoodprocessing.
�.�.�.� Polyphenoloxidase
Polyphenoloxidase (PPO), anenzyme that causes the formationof coloredcom-pounds(melanins)fromphenols(Bettge2004;Fuerstetal.2006),ismostlyremovedwiththebranduringmilling.However,somedoesmakeitswayinwiththeflour,especiallyathigherflourextractionrates.Thisenzymeactivityisespeciallydetri-mentaltothequalityofAsiannoodlesduetoitsdarkeninganddiscoloringeffects(Krugeretal.1992,1994).PPOhasalsobeenreportedtodiscolorbatters,piecrusts,andrefrigerateddoughs(Gajderowicz1979).LevelsofPPOinwheatdifferduetoboth genotype and growth environment (Baik 1994a; Park et al. 1997). AACCIMethod22-85wasdevelopedasarapidandsmall-scaletestforPPOactivitythatcanbeusedbybothbreedersand industry (Bettge2004).ThismethodmeasuresPPOactivitybyincubatingwheatorflourwithasubstrate(L-DOPA)andmonitoringthecolorchangespectrophotometrically.
�.�.�.� alkalineWaterretentionCapacityofflour
Alkalinewaterretentioncapacity(AWRC)isatestdevelopedtosimulatethealka-line conditions of the formula for evaluating sugar-snap cookie-making potentialofawheatflour(FinneyandYamazaki1953).Thetestisdefinedastheamountofalkalinewaterheldbytheflouragainstacentrifugalforce.Flourthatbindsalkalinewaterpoorlyisconsideredtobeofgoodquality(AACCIMethod56-10).Yamazaki(1953)foundanegativerelationshipbetweentheamountofalkalinewaterheldbythe flour and cookie diameter. However, the relationship is not as clear for morerecentlydevelopedsoftwheatvarieties(Finney1994)andfordistinguishingamongflourswithinasoftnessorhardnessclass(KittermanandRubenthaler1971).Breed-ers,though,arestillselectingforlowAWRCintheirsoftwheatlines.
�.�.�.� solventretentionCapacityofflour
Morerecently,amethodformeasuringthesolventretentioncapacity(SRC)ofwheatflourwasestablished topredictcommercialflourproperties (AACCIMethod56-
52748.indb 11 2/6/08 2:24:36 PM
Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UN
IVE
RSI
TI
MA
LA
YSI
A S
AB
AH
] at
01:
56 0
5 O
ctob
er 2
015
�� Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods
11).Thismethodusesfoursolventsindependently—water,50%sucrose,5%sodiumcarbonate,and5%lacticacid—andmeasuresaflour’sabilitytoholdthemaftercen-trifugation.Ingeneral,waterSRCisaffectedbyallflourconstituents,sucroseSRCisassociatedwithpentosancharacteristics,sodiumcarbonateSRCisassociatedwiththelevelofdamagedstarch,andlacticacidSRCisassociatedwithglutenincharac-teristics(Bettgeetal.2002;Gaines2000).
TheuseofdifferentsolventsforSRCallowstheseparationofeffectsofdiffer-entflourcomponents,andthecombinedpatternofthefourSRCprofilesprovidesapracticalflourquality assessment forpredictingbakingperformance (Bettge etal.2002;Guttierietal.2004;SladeandLevine1994).InacollaborativestudybyGaines(2000),lacticacidSRCwasfoundtocorrelatewithMixographnumber(pro-teincontentmultipliedbypeakheightandpeaktime),andsodiumcarbonateSRCwith damaged starch, softness equivalent, AWRC, and sugar-snap cookie spread.SucroseSRCcorrelatedwithdamagedstarch,AWRC,andcookiespread(Table1.1).SRCtestsarecurrentlyusedinanumberofsoftwheatbreedingprograms,includ-ingtheMichiganStateUniversityWheatQualityTestingProgram(Ngetal.2007).VariationsontheSRCmethodsusingsmallerquantitiesofmaterialandwheatmealinsteadofflourhavealsobeendeveloped,allowingforrapidscreeningofearlygen-erationbreederlinesofwheat(Bettgeetal.2002;Guttierietal.2004).
1.5.3 douGhrheoloGy
Withregardtowheatflour,rheologyisthemeasureoftheflowanddeformationofdoughs.Thesedoughpropertiescanaffectproductqualitiessuchasgeometry(e.g., cookie spread or cake volume), texture, and handling during processing.Dough rheological instrumentswereoriginallydesigned forusewithmaterialssuchasbreaddoughs,wherestrengthandelasticityarevalued.Softwheatflourproducts, however, generally require doughs that are weaker. Results obtainedfromtheserheologicalinstrumentsshouldnotbeinterpretedusingthesamecri-
taBle�.�CorrelationCoefficientsbetweensolventretentionCapacityandvariousflourQualityParameters
Water �0%sucrose
�%sodiumCarbonate
�%lacticacid
Proteincontent 0.33a 0.39a 0.31a 0.39a
Damagedstarch 0.94a 0.77a 0.95a 0.23
Flouryield 0.51a 0.41a 0.54a –0.06
AWRC 0.97a 0.81a 0.97a 0.33a
SSCdiameter –0.88a –0.76a –0.86a –0.33a
Mixographnumber 0.50a 0.49a 0.43a 0.69a
Notes:AWRC,alkalinewaterretentioncapacity;SSC,sugar-snapcookie.a Significantatthe1%level.
Source:AdaptedfromGaines,C.S.,Cereal Foods World,45,303–306,2000..
52748.indb 12 2/6/08 2:24:36 PM
Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UN
IVE
RSI
TI
MA
LA
YSI
A S
AB
AH
] at
01:
56 0
5 O
ctob
er 2
015
Soft Wheat Quality ��
teriaasresultsfromhardwheatflours,astherheologicalpropertiesofsoftandhardwheatfloursarenotsimplyopposites(Hoseneyetal.1988).Dough-formingpropertiesoffloursarecommonlyevaluatedusingtheAlveograph,Mixograph,andtheFarinograph.
�.�.�.� alveograph
The Alveograph (Chopin Technologies, Villeneuve-la-Garenne Cedex, France)measures air pressure inside of a dough bubble as it is inflated until it bursts(AACCIMethod54-30A).Thisbiaxialextensionismeanttosimulatethedefor-mationofadoughduringfermentationandovenspringduringbaking.Itallowsforthemeasurementofthemaximumoverpressure(P),whichrelatestotheresis-tanceofdough todeformation,and theaverage lengthof thecurvebaselineatrupture(L),whichisameasureofdoughextensibility.Thedeformationenergy(W)isameasureoftheenergyneededtoinflatethedoughandisderivedfromthe area under the curve. W is related to the flour strength (Faridi and Rasper1987).Bettgeetal.(1989)investigatedtheabilityoftheAlveographtoevaluatesoftwheatvarietiesforcookiesandfoundthattheparameterbestabletopredictcookie diameter was P in combination with the flour protein content. Nemethetal.(1994)foundthatPandP/Lweresignificantlycorrelatedwithsugar-snapcookiespreadandscore.Yamamotoetal. (1996)foundthatAlveographPwasnegativelycorrelatedandLpositivelycorrelatedwithJapanesespongecakevol-ume(Table1.2).
taBle�.�
CorrelationCoefficientsbetweenrheologicalPropertiesandQualitiesofjapanesespongeCakesandsugar-snapCookiesMadefromsoftWheatflourgrownintheunitedstates
QualityParameter japanesespongeCakevolume sugar-snapCookiediameter
P –0.639a ns
L 0.492b 0.522b
MPT ns 0.577b
MPH –0.692a –0.590b
FWA ns –0.667a
FPT –0.490b ns
Notes: P,Alveograph maximum overpressure; L,Alveograph length; MPT, Mixograph peak time;MPH, Mixograph peak height; FWA, Farinograph water absorption; FPT, Farinograph peaktime;ns,notsignificant.
a Significantatthe1%level.b Significantatthe5%level.
Source:AdaptedfromYamamoto,H.,Worthington,S.T.,Hou,G.,andNg,P.K.W.,Cereal Chemistry,73,215–221,1996.
52748.indb 13 2/6/08 2:24:37 PM
Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UN
IVE
RSI
TI
MA
LA
YSI
A S
AB
AH
] at
01:
56 0
5 O
ctob
er 2
015
�� Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods
�.�.�.� Mixographandfarinograph
TheMixograph(NationalManufacturing,Lincoln,NE)andFarinograph(C.W.Bra-benderInstruments,Inc.,SouthHackensack,NJ)arebothmixersthatrecordchangesindoughpropertiesover time(AACCIMethods54-40Aand54-21, respectively).These instruments are able to give information regarding optimum dough waterabsorption,strength,mixingtime,andtolerancetoovermixing.Themaindifferencebetweenthetwoisinthegeometryofthemixers.TheMixographusesverticallyori-entedpinsthatmoveinaplanetarymotion,andtheFarinographusessigmoid-shapedmixingpaddles.TheMixographwasdevelopedtoprovidethemoreintensivemixingthatNorthAmericanwheatsrequire.ItisthereforemainlyusedthereaswellasinAustralia.TheFarinographiswidelyusedaroundtheworld(Ingelin1997).Hazenetal.(1997)reportedsignificantrelationshipsbetweenwire-cutcookiediametersandMixographpeaktime,andpeakheight.Uriyoetal.(2004)foundsignificantnegativecorrelationsbetweenFarinographwaterabsorptionandcookiediameter,andwithcakevolume, inproductsmade fromsoft redwinterwheat.Cake tendernesswascorrelated with Farinograph departure time and mixing stability. Yamamoto andcoworkers(1996)alsoreportedanegativecorrelationbetweencookiediameterandFarinographwaterabsorptionalongwithanegativecorrelationofcookiediametertoMixographpeakheight(Table1.2);therewasapositivecorrelationbetweencookiediameterandMixographpeaktime.OtherworkershavealsocorrelatedFarinographandMixographmeasurementswithvariouscakeandcookiequalities(FinneyandBains1999;Nemethetal.1994;Uriyoetal.2004).
1.5.4 ProduCTsrequirinGweakerProTeins
Muchresearchinthepasthasbeenfocusedondevelopingproceduresforsoftwheatquality evaluation. However, no test has proven more satisfactory than a bakingtest,whichisanall-inclusivetest.MostU.S.Easternsoftwheatshavebeentestedforcakeandcookie-makingqualities.MostofthesetestshavefollowedstandardAACCImethods.
�.�.�.� Cookies
Thesugar-snapcookiebakingtest(AACCIMethod10-52)wasconsidered“thestan-dard”cookietestformanyyearsandhasbeenusedtoevaluateflourforproductssuchascookies,crackers,cakes,andpies(Gaines2004).Floursthatproducecookieswithlargerspreadandsoftertexturearefavored.Astherearefewersugar-snap-typecookiesonthemarket,thewire-cutcookiebakingtestwasdevelopedwhichutilizesacookieformulationthatmorecloselyreflectsthecommercialwire-cutcookiefor-mulation(AACCIMethod10-54;SladeandLevine1994)(Table1.3).Gainesetal.(1996b)comparedthesugar-snapandwire-cutcookieformulationsandfoundthateventhoughbothtestswerecapableofevaluatingspread,thewire-cutcookiesbet-terreflecteddifferencesincookietexturebasedoninstrumentalhardnessevaluatedusinganInstronuniversaltestingmachine.
52748.indb 14 2/6/08 2:24:37 PM
Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UN
IVE
RSI
TI
MA
LA
YSI
A S
AB
AH
] at
01:
56 0
5 O
ctob
er 2
015
Soft Wheat Quality ��
�.�.�.� high-ratioCakes
Thehigh-ratio(moresugarthanflour,wt:wt)cakebakingtest(AACCIMethod10-90)iscommonlyusedtoevaluatesoftwheatfloursforcakeproducts.Theimportantcharacteristicoftheflourusedinthesecakesisthattheymustbeabletocarry1.3to1.4timestheirweightinsugar(seeTable1.4forformula).Toaccomplishthis,cakeflourischlorinatedtomodifytheflourcomponents.Bakedcakesarescoredbasedontheirvolume,contour(symmetry),cellstructure,grain,texture,color,andflavor.
taBle�.�
ComparisonofMicroWire-Cut(aaCCIMethod�0-��)andMicrosugar-snap(aaCCIMethod�0-��)Cookieformulations
formulation
Ingredient Wire-Cut(g) sugar-snap(g)
Sucrose 12.8 24
Brownulatedsugar 4.0 —
Nonfatdrymilk 0.4 1.2
NaCl 0.5 0.18
Sodiumbicarbonate 0.4 0.4
SolutionAa na 0.32
SolutionBb na 0.20
Shortening 16.0 12
High-fructosecornsyrup 0.6 —
Ammoniumcarbonate 0.2 —
Water Variable Variable
Flour 40.0(13%m.b.) 40(14%m.b.)a SolutionA:7.98%sodiumbicarbonateinwater.b SolutionB:10.16%ammoniumchlorideand8.88%NaClinwater.
taBle�.�
high-ratioWhitelayerCakeformulation(aaCCIMethod�0-�0)Ingredient Weights(g) WeightPercent(flourBasis)
Flour(14%m.b.) 200.0 100.0
Sugar 280.0 140.0
Shortening 100.0 50.0
Nonfatdrymilk 24.0 12.0
Driedeggwhites 18.0 9.0
NaCl 6.0 3.0
Bakingpowderandwater Variable Variable
52748.indb 15 2/6/08 2:24:38 PM
Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UN
IVE
RSI
TI
MA
LA
YSI
A S
AB
AH
] at
01:
56 0
5 O
ctob
er 2
015
�� Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods
1.5.5 ProduCTsrequirinGsTronGerProTeins
Crackersandnoodlesareeconomicallysignificantcategoriesofproducts thataremadewithsoftwheatflour,thoughtheyarenotsweetgoods.Crackersreferredtoin the followingsectionareproducedby fermentationwithyeast tomake saltineandsimilarcrackers.FlourqualityfornoodleproductionisespeciallyimportantforexportofwheattocountriesintheFarEast.
�.�.�.� Crackers
Crackersrequirestrongerglutenthanothersoftwheatproductsandareoftenmadefromblendsofbothhardandsoftwheatflours.Thisstrongerglutenisnecessarytogivestructuretocrackersastheyarefermentedandsheeted.Thereisstillnooffi-cial testmethod for evaluatingflours for cracker-bakingpotential, although therearepublishedproceduresusingatwo-stagespongeanddoughapproachtomakingcrackers(DoescherandHoseney1985;PizzinattoandHoseney1980).Thisinvolvesfermentationofasponge(containingyeast,water,and60to70%oftheflour)for16to18hfollowedbyadditionoftheremainingingredientsandfermentationofthedoughforanother6h(CreightonandHoseney1990;DoescherandHoseney1985;RanhotraandGelroth1988).However,durationofthesetestprocedureslimitsthenumberofsamplesthatcanbeevaluatedbyanoperatorinagiventime.Leeetal.(2002)developedapracticalone-stageprocedurethatenablesanoperatortoevalu-ate15samples,ascomparedtoabout6sampleswiththetwo-stageprocedures,ina48-hperiod.Althoughthetwotypesofproceduresyieldedslightlydifferentbakingresults,thetrendswerethesameforadiversegroupoffloursamplesexamined(Leeetal.2002).Strongerdoughsmadecrackersthatwerethicker,larger,andinhardertexturethancrackersmadefromweakerdoughs.
�.�.�.� noodles
Asiannoodlesareanotherproduct,oftenmadefromblendsofhardandsoftwheatflours,whichrequirestrongergluten.TherearetwobasickindsofAsiannoodles:whitesalted(Udon)andalkalinenoodles(Bettge2004).Udonnoodlesareusuallymadefromflourwith8to10%proteincontentandalkalinenoodles10.5to12%pro-tein(Junetal.1998).ThetextureofAsiannoodlesisrelatedtoflourproteincontentandstarchcharacteristics.TheproteincontentofflourwaspositivelycorrelatedwithnoodlechewinessinastudybyBaiketal.(1994b).Starchpastingpropertieshavebeenshowntoaffecttheoveralltextureofnoodles,includingsoftnessandelasticity(Bateyetal.,1997;Koniketal.1992).Anotherimportantnoodlequalitydetermi-nant,especiallywiththehigherpHofalkalinenoodles,isdiscolorationfromPPOactivity.TheWesternWheatQualityLaboratoryoftheUSDA-ARS(Pullman,WA)hasdevelopedmethodsfortestingalkalineandsaltedAsiannoodles.Noodlesareproducedonalaboratory-scalemachineandareevaluatedbasedoncolor,texture,andyield.
52748.indb 16 2/6/08 2:24:38 PM
Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UN
IVE
RSI
TI
MA
LA
YSI
A S
AB
AH
] at
01:
56 0
5 O
ctob
er 2
015
Soft Wheat Quality ��
�.� effeCtsofflourCoMPonentsonCooKIes
Flourproteins,starches,pentosans,andlipidsallaffectthesizeorspreadofcookiesaswellastheirtextureandappearance.Withthewidevarietyofcookiesproduced,thesecomponentsneedtobetakenintoaccountwhenselectingflour.
1.6.1 ProTeins
Softwheatflourwithlowproteincontentistypicallyusedintheproductionofcook-iesbecauseofthedeleteriouseffectsonqualityassociatedwiththehigherproteincontentinhardwheats.Sugar-snapcookiesmadefromhardwheatflourareusuallythicker,harderintexture,andhaveasmallerdiameter(MillerandHoseney1997).Sugar-snapcookiediameterperunitofflourproteinwasnegativelycorrelatedwithprotein content in a studybyYamamoto et al. (1996) (Figure1.3).Using awire-cutcookieformulation,Gainesetal.(1996b)foundanegativecorrelationbetweenproteincontentandcookiediameterandapositivecorrelationwithcookieheight(Table1.5). Harder texture was also positively correlated with increased proteincontentinthisstudy.Higherflourproteincontenthasbeencorrelatedwithreducedcookiespreadinotherstudiesaswell(Gaines1985;KaldyandRubenthaler1987).However,somestudieshavefoundapoorcorrelationbetweencookiequalityandproteincontent(Abboudetal.1985a;Yamazaki1954).
Cookie spread is a functionof the spread rate and the set time (Abboud et al.1985b;MillerandHoseney1997).Ascookiedoughisheated,thedecreaseinviscosity
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.0
0.96.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0
Protein (%)
Cook
ie D
iam
eter
(cm
) / F
lour
Pro
tein
fIgure�.� Relationship between protein content and sugar-snap cookie diameter perunitflourproteinincookiesmadefrom17softwheatcultivarsgrownintheUnitedStates.(AdaptedfromYamamoto,H.,Worthington,S.T.,Hou,G.,andNg,P.K.W.,Cereal Chemis-try,73,215–221,1996.)
52748.indb 17 2/6/08 2:24:39 PM
Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UN
IVE
RSI
TI
MA
LA
YSI
A S
AB
AH
] at
01:
56 0
5 O
ctob
er 2
015
�� Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods
allowsforthecookietospreaduntilitrisesinviscosityandsets.Althoughglutenisnotdevelopedduringmixing(MillerandHoseney1997),itsglasstransitiontemperatureplaysanimportantpartincookiesettime.Whentheglutenreachesitsglasstransitiontemperature,theviscosityofthedoughincreasesandspreadingstops(Doescheretal.1987;Milleretal.1996).MillerandHoseney(1997)examinedthesettimeofdiffer-enthardandsoftwheatfloursandfoundthatwithinagroupofhardorsoftwheats,proteincontentaffectedthesettime.However,thedifferencesinproteincontentalonewerenotenoughtofullyexplainthedifferencesbetweenthehardandsoftwheatflourgroups.Workhasalsobeendonetoidentifyspecificcomponentsofflourproteinsthatmay affect cookiequality.Huebner et al. (1999) fractionatedgliadins andgluteninsubunitsusingsize-exclusionhigh-performanceliquidchromatography(HPLC).Theyfoundthatflourswithgluteninsubunits5+10madebetter-qualitycookies.Souzaetal.(1994)foundthatthegluteninstrengthscore,developedbyPayneetal.(1987)toevalu-atebreadflours,wasnegativelycorrelatedwithcookiediameter.Houetal.(1996b)separatedthehigh(Asubunits)andlow(BandCsubunits)molecularweightgluteninsubunitsandfoundthattheratioofthequantitiesoftheBtoCsubunitswasrelatedtosugar-snapcookiediameterinflourfromsoftwhitewinterwheat.
1.6.2 sTarCh
Therateofspreadinghasbeenfoundtobefasterincookiesmadefromsoftwheatflourcomparedtocookiesmadefromhardwheatflour(Abboudetal.1985b;Milleretal.1996;MillerandHoseney1997).Afasterspreadrateallowsthecookietospreadtoalargerdiameterbeforesettingoccurs.MillerandHoseney(1997)measuredthespreadrateofcookiesmadefromsoftwheatflourtobe7.8mm/mincomparedto4.6mm/minincookiesmadewithhardwheatflour.Thehardwheatflourswerefoundtocontainhigherlevelsofsolublestarchthanthesoftwheatflours.Removalofthesolublestarchfromhardwheatfloursresulted indecreaseddoughviscositiesandincreasedcookiespreadrates.However,althoughtheamountofsolublestarchcouldexplain thedifferencebetween thehardandsoftwheatflourgroups, it couldnotfullyexplainthedifferenceinspreadrateswithinthegroups.Higherlevelsofdam-agedstarchinmilledhardwheatwerealsoattributedtobeingpartofthedifferenceinspreadratebetweenhardandsoftwheatfloursbyMillerandHoseney(1997).
taBle�.�
CorrelationCoefficientsbetweenflourProteinContentandWire-CutCookieQualityCharacteristics
Parameter CorrelationCoefficient
Diameter –0.57a
Height 0.64a
Hardness 0.79a
a Significantatthe5%level.
Source:AdaptedfromGaines,C.S.,Kassuba,A.,andFinney,P.L.,Cereal Foods World,41,155–160,1996.
52748.indb 18 2/6/08 2:24:39 PM
Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UN
IVE
RSI
TI
MA
LA
YSI
A S
AB
AH
] at
01:
56 0
5 O
ctob
er 2
015
Soft Wheat Quality ��
During baking, minimal gelatinization of starch occurs due to the low watercontentofcookiedough,asshownbydifferentialscanningcalorimetry(AbboudandHoseney1984).However,damagedstarch,withitsgreaterwater-holdingcapability,isknowntonegativelyaffectcookiediameter.DonelsonandGaines(1998)increasedthedamagedstarchcontentofhardandsoftwheatfloursusedtomakesugar-snapcookiesthroughtheadditionofball-milledandpregelatinizedstarch.Forbothhardandsoftwheatflours,theadditionofdamagedstarchledtoanincreaseinalkalinewaterretentioncapacityandadecreaseincookiediameter.Theyalsomadecook-ieswith100%oftheflourreplacedbycombinationsofprimeanddamagedstarch.Thesoftwheatstarchproducedcookieswithlargerdiametersthanthehardwheatstarchatallofthedifferentlevelsofstarchdamagestudied.Additionally,thehardwheatstarchdoughshadgreaterstiffnessthanthosemadefromsoftwheatstarch.Theauthorsconcludedthatthereisafundamentaldifferencebetweenhardandsoftwheatstarchesthatleadstotheirdifferentperformancesincookiebaking.
1.6.3 PenTosans
With their ability to absorb large amounts of water, pentosans also affect cookiequality.Yamazaki(1955)foundthattheadditionofpurifiedstarchtailingsfractions,rich inpentosans, increased thehydration abilityof softwheatflour and reducedcookie spread.BettgeandMorris (2000)measured total,water-soluble,andgrainmembranepentosansin13softwheatfloursamples.Theamountoftotalpentosanshadthelargestnegativecorrelationwithsugar-snapcookiespreadfollowedbythewater-solubleandgrainmembranepentosans.Thegrainmembranepentosanswerealsohighlypositivelycorrelatedwithalkalinewaterretentioncapacity.Abboudetal.(1985a),ontheotherhand,reportedapoorcorrelationbetweenpentosancontentandcookiediameter.Sucrosesolventretentioncapacity,whichisassociatedwithpento-sans,wasnegativelycorrelatedwithsugar-snapcookiespreadbyGaines(2004),eventhoughintheirstudy,alkalinewaterretentioncapacitywasnot.Usingsucrosesol-ventretentioncapacityalongwithflourproteincontentandmillingsoftness,Gaines(2004)wasalsoabletogeneratearegressionequationtopredictcookiediameter.
1.6.4 liPids
Studiesinvolvingtheremovalandreconstitutionofflourlipidshaveshownthattheyareimportanttocookiespread,topgrain(an“islanding”patternformedonthesur-faceofsugar-snapcookies),andstructure.Coleetal.(1960)bakedcookieswithflourthathadbeenextractedwithwater-saturatedbutanolandfoundthatthecookieshaddecreaseddiameters.Whenthelipidswerereplaced,thecookiespreadwasreturnedtonormal.Kisselletal.(1971)extractedfreelipidsfromsoftwheatflourandfrac-tionatedthemintopolarandnonpolarfractions.Theywerethenreintroducedintotheflourandbakedintosugar-snapcookies.Toachievenormalcookiespreadandtop grain, both the polar and nonpolar fractions were needed. Interchanging thelipidsbetweendifferentvarietiesofwheatflourdidnotaffecttheresults,indicatingthatthepresenceofthemixedlipidsismoreimportantthanthesource.FractionationstudiesbyClementsandDonelson(1981),on theotherhand,determined that thepolarlipids(digalactosyldiglycerideandphosphytidylcholinealongwithglycolip-
52748.indb 19 2/6/08 2:24:40 PM
Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UN
IVE
RSI
TI
MA
LA
YSI
A S
AB
AH
] at
01:
56 0
5 O
ctob
er 2
015
�0 Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods
ids)weremoreimportanttosugar-snapcookiespreadthanthenonpolarlipids.Theinternalstructureofcookiesmadefromdefattedflour isalsonegativelyaffected;thesecookieshavelargercellsasopposedtothefinerandmoreuniformcellstruc-turefoundingood-qualitycookies(Clements1980).
�.� effeCtsofflourCoMPonentsonCaKes
Cakebattersareaeratedemulsionsoffatinwaterthatexpandduringbakingandsetintoasoft,porousgel(Mizukoshietal.1980;Shelkeetal.1990).Duringtheinitialphaseofbaking,thereisadropinbatterviscosityasshorteningmeltsandsugarsbecomedissolved.Thisisfollowedbyarapidriseinviscositywhenstarchbecomesgelatinized,absorbingfreewaterandsettingthecake(Howardetal.1968;Shelkeetal.1990).Flourproteinsandlipidsalongwiththeflourparticlesizealsoaffectcakequality.
1.7.1 FlourParTiClesize
Whenmeasuredbylaserdiffraction,softwheatflourhasbeenfoundtohaveamuchhigher percentage of particles below41µm in size than that of hardwheat flour(Hareland 1994). The particle sizes of various soft wheat flours have been nega-tivelycorrelatedtocakevolume(Yamamotoetal.1996;YamazakiandDonelson1972).Inadditiontovarietaldifferencesinparticlesizeproducedbynormalmill-ing,researchhasshownthatfurtherreductionofparticlesizethroughpostmillingprocessing(pin-millingandair-classification)canimprovethevolumeandqualityofcakes(Chaudharyetal.1981;GainesandDonelson1985a;Milleretal.1967).Althoughreducingparticlesizeisbeneficial,itisimportanttolimitstarchdamage,asdamagelevelsgreaterthan5%havebeennegativelycorrelatedwithcakequality(Milleretal.1967).
1.7.2 ProTeins
Higherproteincontentinflourisgenerallyassociatedwithpoorerqualityforcakebaking.AccordingtoKaldyandRubenthaler(1987),flourhighinproteinorwithstrongglutenresultsincakeswithlowervolumeandcoarsertextureduetoproteindisruptionofthefoamstructureincakebatter.IntheirstudyofCanadiansoftwhitewinterandspringwheats,theyfoundasignificantnegativecorrelationbetweenflourproteincontent,Japanesespongecakevolume,andoverallcakescore.Yamamotoetal. (1996)alsofoundanegativecorrelationbetweenflourproteinandJapanesesponge cake volume per unit protein (Figure1.4). Gaines and Donelson (1985b)found that thevolumeand tendernessofwhite layer cakeswerenot significantlyaffectedbyproteincontent,although thoseofangel foodcakeswere.However,adifferenceofover2%proteinwasneededtoseeaneffectintheangelfoodcakes.Althoughanexcessofproteinmayharmcakequality,solubleproteins(bothfromtheflourandfromothercakeingredients)arestillneededforthermalstabilityofthe cake foamstructure (Howardet al. 1968).Protein composition in addition tocontentwasshowntobeimportanttoJapanesespongecakevolumeinworkbyHouetal.(1996b).Thepresenceofhigh-molecular-weightglutenin(HMW-GS)subunit
52748.indb 20 2/6/08 2:24:40 PM
Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UN
IVE
RSI
TI
MA
LA
YSI
A S
AB
AH
] at
01:
56 0
5 O
ctob
er 2
015
Soft Wheat Quality ��
1insoftwheatflourresultedinlargercakevolume,whilethepresenceofHMW-GSsubunit2*resultedinsmallervolume.
1.7.3 liPids
Lipidsmakeuponlyasmallfractionofflour;however,theyareimportanttocakevolumeandtexture.SpiesandKirleis(1978)foundthatextractionoffreeflourlipidsreducedvolumeandcausedpoorertextureincakesmadewithamodifiedwhitelayercakeformula.Reintroductionofthelipidsrestoredmostofthecakequalities.Inter-changingthelipidsbetweendifferentvarietiesofwheatdidnotaffect theresults,indicating that the presence of lipids is more important than the source. Takeda(1994) extracted free lipids fromflour, resulting in reduced sponge cakevolume.Thefreelipidswerealsofractionatedintopolarandnonpolarfractions.Reintroduc-tionofthepolarlipids(monogalactosylanddigalactosyldiglycerides)returnedthecakevolumetoitsnormalsize,whilethenonpolarfractionshadonlyminoreffects.SimilarresultswerereportedbySeguchiandMatsuki(1977a).
�.� flourChlorInatIon
Toproducegood-qualityhigh-ratiocakes,chlorinationofflourisnecessary.Cakesmadefromnonchlorinatedflourhavepoorvolume,contour,crumbgrain,andtex-ture(Donelsonetal.2000;Montzheimer1931;Smith1932).Chlorinetreatmentalsoimprovesmouthfeelofcakes,makingcakesdrierandlessstickyorgummy(Kis-
7.06.5 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0
180
170
160
150
140
130
120
Protein (%)
Cak
e Vo
lum
e (c
c) /
Flou
r Pro
tein
fIgure�.� RelationshipbetweenproteincontentandJapanesespongecakevolumeperunitflourprotein incakesmade from17softwheatcultivarsgrown in theUnitedStates.(AdaptedfromYamamoto,H.,Worthington,S.T.,Hou,G.,andNg,P.K.W.,Cereal Chemis-try,73,215–221,1996.)
52748.indb 21 2/6/08 2:24:41 PM
Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UN
IVE
RSI
TI
MA
LA
YSI
A S
AB
AH
] at
01:
56 0
5 O
ctob
er 2
015
�� Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods
sellandYamazaki1979;SeguchiandMatsuki1977b).ChlorinationisusuallydonewithchlorinegasandcanbemonitoredbyadropinpHofflour.FlouristypicallychlorinatedtoapHrangeofabout4.5to5.2(Goughetal.1978).Starch,lipids,andproteinsareallaffectedbyflourchlorination.
1.8.1 sTarCh
Fractionation,interchange,andreconstitutionstudiesofnonchlorinatedandchlori-natedflourshaveconfirmedthattheeffectsofchlorinationonstarchareimportantto cake quality. Cakes made from chlorinated flour with the starch interchangedwiththatfromnonchlorinatedflourhadsmallervolumesandpoorercakequalities(JohnsonandHoseney1979a;Sollars1958).Theoppositewastruewhenexchang-ingchlorinatedstarchintononchlorinatedflour.GainesandDonelson(1982)usedamodifiedViscographtoexaminetheviscosityofcakebattersmadewithchlorinatedandnonchlorinatedfloursduringheating.Theapparentviscosityofheatedbattersincreasedfasterinbattersmadefromchlorinatedflourcomparedtononchlorinatedflour.Chlorinatedflourbattersalsoshowedgreaterexpansionduringbaking.Theseresultswere inagreementwith results fromKulpetal. (1972).Accelerated thick-ening of batters allows for improved setting and retention of larger cake volume(Donelsonetal.2000).
Donelson(1990)fractionatedchlorinatedandnonchlorinatedfloursandfoundthatthechlorinatedstarchfractionhadincreasedalkalinewaterretentioncapacity.Theseresultswererelatedtodecreasedsugar-snapcookiespreadinhisexperiment.Inadditiontobindingmorewater,chlorinatedstarchbindsmoreoilasaresultofincreasedstarchgranulehydrophobicity(Seguchi1984).Theoxidativedepolymer-izationofstarchthatoccursduringchlorinationhasbeeninvestigatedasoneofthereasons for these changes in starch properties (Huang et al. 1982; Johnson et al.1980).Varriano-Marston (1985)hypothesized that theoxidativedepolymerizationincreased thecapillarysizeofstarchgranules, leading to the increasedabilityofchlorinatedstarchtobindwaterandoil.
1.8.2 liPids
Variousstudieshavedeterminedthattheeffectofchlorinationonlipidsisimportanttocakequality.Kisselletal.(1979)chlorinatedflourstopH5.2,4.8,and4.0andthenextractedthefreelipidswithhexane.Whitelayercakevolumewasreducedincakesbakedwithoutlipids;however,thenormalvolumewasrestoreduponreadditionoftheextractedlipids.FlourchlorinatedtopH4.8performedthebest.Byinterchang-inglipidsfromachlorinatedflourintoanonchlorinatedone,Donelsonetal.(1984)wereabletoincreasehigh-ratiocakevolumetothatofthechlorinatedflour.Incon-trast,Johnsonetal.(1979),afterconductingalipidinterchangestudy,cametotheconclusionthatalthoughthepresenceoflipidsisimportant,theeffectofchlorinationonthemisnotimportanttocakequalityincakesbakedusingKissell’sleancakeformulation(Kissell,1959).InthestudyofJohnsonetal.(1979),cakesbakedfrombothchlorinatedandnonchlorinatedflourswiththeirlipidsextractedhadpoorgrain.Byaddingeitherofthelipidfractionsbacktothechlorinatedflour,theywereabletorestorethebakingproperties.
52748.indb 22 2/6/08 2:24:41 PM
Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UN
IVE
RSI
TI
MA
LA
YSI
A S
AB
AH
] at
01:
56 0
5 O
ctob
er 2
015
Soft Wheat Quality ��
1.8.3 ProTeins
ThefractionationandinterchangestudiesofSollars(1958)foundthatchlorinationofgluten and starchwasof almost equal importance for theproductionofwhitelayercakes.Chlorinationofglutenhadaneffectonyellowlayercakesaswell,buttoalesserextent.Tsenetal.(1971)reportedthatchlorinationofflourincreasestheextractabilityofproteinsbywaterandaceticacid,andthat this increasedproteinsolubilitymaybepartoftheimprovingeffectsofchlorinetreatmentonflour.Thechanges inprotein extractabilitywere attributed to the actionsof chlorinebreak-inghydrogenbonds,cleavingpeptidebonds,degradingaminoacids,andoxidizingsulfhydrylbonds.
Theeffectofchlorinationonincreasingthehydrophobicityofproteinsinfloursmayalsobeimportant.Seguchi(1985)foundthatchangesinthehydrophobicityofstarchgranuleswereduetoconformationalchangesinsurfaceproteinsofthestarchgranules,andlater,thatchlorinationalsoresultedinanincreaseintheamountofproteinextracted(Seguchi1990).Sinhaetal.(1997)extractedgliadinsfromflourchlorinatedtopH4.8and4.3;gliadinproteinhydrophobicity,asmeasuredbyfluo-rescence spectroscopy, increased with chlorination (Figure1.5). Reversed-phaseHPLCresultssuggestedthattheincreasesinhydrophobicitywereduetoconforma-tionalchangesintheproteins(Sinhaetal.1997).
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
NonchlorinatedpH 4.8pH 4.3
Caldwell Dynasty Frankenmuth Lewjain
Hyd
roph
obic
ity In
dex
x10
fIgure�.� Relative hydrophobicities of gliadins extracted from chlorinated and non-chlorinatedsoftwheatflours,measuredbyfluorescencespectroscopy.(AdaptedfromSinha,N.K.,Yamamoto,H.,andNg,P.K.W.,Food Chemistry,59,387–393,1997.)
52748.indb 23 2/6/08 2:24:42 PM
Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UN
IVE
RSI
TI
MA
LA
YSI
A S
AB
AH
] at
01:
56 0
5 O
ctob
er 2
015
�� Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods
1.8.4 alTernaTivesToChlorinaTion
Overtheyears,alternativestochlorinationhavebeenexploredasconcernfor thesafetyofchemicallyprocessedfoodshasgrown.RussoandDoe(1970)improvedcakevolumebyheatingnonchlorinatedflour;however, thisalsoresultedincakeswithpoortexture.Theadditionofingredientssuchasstarch,eggalbumin,xanthangum,L-cysteine,andhydrogenperoxideplusperoxidasehavealsobeentestedfortheirabilitiestocompensateforalackofchlorination(JohnsonandHoseney1979b;RussoandDoe1970;Thomassonetal.1995).Intheircakeformulation,Donelsonetal.(2000)replacednonchlorinatedflourwitheithercommercialhardwheatstarchoralaboratory-producedsoftwheatstarchatalevelequaltotheareaunderanRVApastingcurvemade fromchlorinatedflour.Thiswasdone to tryandachieve theviscosity-modifyingpropertiesnormallyassociatedwithchlorination.Eggalbumin,soy lecithin, andxanthangumwerealsoadded to their cake formula to improvetextureandcontour.Theresultsafterbakingvarioustypesofcakeswereequaltoorbetterthanthosemadewithchlorinatedflours.Mostimportantly,thecakeshadcrumbswithgoodtextureratherthanthegummytexturesofcakesmadewithnon-chlorinatedflour.Theozonetreatmentofflourhasalsorecentlybeeninvestigatedwithpromisingresults(ChittrakornandMacRitchie2006).
�.� ConClusIon
Thedifferentcomponentsofsoftwheatflourcollectivelyplayaroleinitsquality.Softerkerneltextureandlowerproteincontentaretypicallyfavoredforsoftwheatproducts.Starchesandlipidsserveimportantfunctionsinbakedproductssuchascakesandcookies.Understandingwheatflourcompositionandhowqualityismea-suredprovidesagoodbaseforfurtherresearchandstudyofsweetgoods.
referenCes
AACCInternational.2000.ApprovedMethodsoftheAmericanAssociationofCerealChem-ists,10thed.St.Paul,MN:AmericanAssociationofCerealChemists.
Abboud,A.M.andR.C.Hoseney.1984.Differentialscanningcalorimetryofsugarcookiesandcookiedoughs.Cereal Chemistry61:34–37.
Abboud,A.M.,G.L.Rubenthaler,andR.C.Hoseney.1985a.Effectoffatandsugarinsugar-snapcookiesandevaluationofteststomeasurecookieflourquality.Cereal Chemistry62:124–129.
Abboud,A.M.,R.C.Hoseney,andG.L.Rubenthaler.1985b.Factorsaffectingcookieflourquality.Cereal Chemistry62:130–133.
Acker,L.andG.Becker.1971.Recentstudiesonthelipidsofcerealstarches.Part2.Lipidsofvarioustypesofstarchandtheirbindingtoamylose.Die Stärke23:419–424.
Alexander,R.J.1995.Potatostarch:Newprospectsforanoldproduct.Cereal Foods World40:763–764.
Baik,B.K.,Z.Czuchajowska,andY.Pomeranz.1994a.ComparisonofpolyphenoloxidaseactivitiesinwheatsandfloursfromAustralianandUnitedStatescultivars.Journal of Cereal Science19:291–296.
Baik,B.K.,Z.Czuchajowska,andY.Pomeranz.1994b.Roleandcontributionofstarchandprotein contents and quality to texture profile analysis of oriental noodles. Cereal Chemistry71:315–320.
52748.indb 24 2/6/08 2:24:43 PM
Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UN
IVE
RSI
TI
MA
LA
YSI
A S
AB
AH
] at
01:
56 0
5 O
ctob
er 2
015
Soft Wheat Quality ��
Batey,I.L.,B.M.Curtin,andS.A.Moore.1997.OptimizationofRapid-ViscoAnalysertestconditionsforpredictingAsiannoodlequality.Cereal Chemistry74:497–501.
Bettge,A.,G.L.Rubenthaler,andY.Pomeranz.1989.Alveographalgorithmstopredictfunc-tionalpropertiesofwheatinbreadandcookiebaking.Cereal Chemistry66:81–86.
Bettge,A.D.andC.F.Morris.2000.Relationshipsamonggrainhardness,pentosanfractions,andend-usequalityofwheat.Cereal Chemistry77:241–247.
Bettge,A.D.,C.F.Morris,V.L.DeMacon,andK.K.Kidwell.2002.AdaptationofAACCMethod56-11,solventretentioncapacity,foruseasanearlygenerationselectiontoolforcultivardevelopment.Cereal Chemistry79:670–674.
Bettge,A.D.2004.CollaborativestudyonL-DOPA—wheatpolyphenoloxidaseassay(AACCmethod22-85). Cereal Foods World49:338,340–342.
Chaudhary,V.K.,W.T.Yamazaki,andW.A.Gould.1981.Relationofcultivarandflourpar-ticlesizedistributiontocakevolume.Cereal Chemistry58:314–317.
Chen,C.H.andW.Bushuk.1970.Natureofproteinsintriticaleanditsparentalspecies.I.Solubilitycharacteristicsandaminoacidcompositionofendospermproteins.Cana-dian Journal of Plant Science50:9–14.
Chittrakorn,S.andF.MacRitchie.2006.Ozonationofcakeflourasanalternativetochlori-nation.Poster:WorldGrainsSummit:FoodsandBeverages.SanFrancisco,CA.
Clements,R.L.1980.Noteontheeffectofremovaloffreeflourlipidsontheinternalstructureofcookiesasobservedbyaresin-embeddingmethod.Cereal Chemistry57:445–446.
Clements, R.L. and J.R. Donelson. 1981. Functionality of specific flour lipids in cookies.Cereal Chemistry58:204–206.
Cole, E.W., D.K. Mecham, and J.W. Pence. 1960. Effect of flour lipids and some lipidderivatives on cookie-baking characteristics of lipid-free flours. Cereal Chemistry37:109–121.
Cole,E.W.1967.Isolationandchromatographicfractionationofhemicellulosesfromwheatflour.Cereal Chemistry44:411–416.
Creighton,D.W.andR.C.Hoseney.1990.UseofaKramershearcelltomeasurecrackerflourquality.Cereal Chemistry67:111–114.
D’Appolonia,B.I.andS.K.Kim.1976.Recentdevelopmentsinwheatflourpentosans.Bak-er’s Digest50:45–49,53–54.
Doescher,L.C.andR.C.Hoseney.1985.Saltinecrackers:Changesincrackerspongerheol-ogyandmodificationofacracker-bakingprocedure.Cereal Chemistry62:158–162.
Doescher,L.C.,R.C.Hoseney,andG.A.Milliken.1987.Amechanismforcookiedoughset-ting.Cereal Chemistry64:158–163.
Donelson,J.R.,W.T.Yamazaki,andL.T.Kissell.1984.Functionalityinwhitelayercakeoflipidsfromuntreatedandchlorinatedpatentflours.II.Flourfractioninterchangestud-ies.Cereal Chemistry61:88–91.
Donelson,J.R.1990.Flourfractioninterchangestudiesofeffectsofchlorinationoncookieflours.Cereal Chemistry67:99–100.
Donelson,J.R.,andC.S.Gaines.1998.Starch–waterrelationshipsinthesugar-snapcookiedoughsystem.Cereal Chemistry75:660–664.
Donelson,J.R.,C.S.Gaines,andP.L.Finney.2000.Bakingformulainnovationtoeliminatechlorinetreatmentofcakeflour.Cereal Chemistry77:53–57.
Faridi,H.andV.F.Rasper.1987.The Alveograph Handbook,28-33.St.Paul,MN:TheAmer-icanAssociationofCerealChemists.
Finney,K.F.andW.T.Yamazaki.1953.Analkalineviscositytestforsoftwheatflours.Cereal Chemistry30:153–159.
Finney,P.L.andL.C.Andrews.1986.Revisedmicrotestingforsoftwheatqualityevaluation.Cereal Chemistry63:177–182.
Finney,P.L. 1989.Softwheat:View from the easternUnitedStates.Cereal Foods World34:682,684,686–687.
52748.indb 25 2/6/08 2:24:43 PM
Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UN
IVE
RSI
TI
MA
LA
YSI
A S
AB
AH
] at
01:
56 0
5 O
ctob
er 2
015
�� Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods
Finney,P.L.1994.Grainquality:Millingandbakingrequirementsforsoftwheatproducts.InCookie Chemistry and Technology,Ed.K.Kulp,51–87.Manhattan,KS:TheAmericanInstituteofBaking.
Finney,P.L.andG.S.Bains.1999.ProteinfunctionalitydifferencesineasternUSsoftwheatcultivarsandinterrelationwithend-usequalitytests.Lebensmittel Wissenschaft und Technologie32:406–415.
Finnie, S.M., A.D. Bettge, and C.F. Morris. 2006. Influence of cultivar and environmentonwater-soluble andwater-insoluble arabinoxylans in softwheat.Cereal Chemistry83:617–623.
Fuerst,E.P.,J.V.Anderson,andC.F.Morris.2006.Delineatingtheroleofpolyphenoloxidaseinthedarkeningofalkalinewheatnoodles.Journal of Agricultural and Food Chem-istry54:2378–2384.
Gaines,C.S. and J.R.Donelson.1982.Cakebatterviscosity andexpansionuponheating.Cereal Chemistry59:237–240.
Gaines,C.S.1985.Associationsamongsoftwheatflourparticlesize,proteincontent,chlo-rine response,kernelhardness,millingquality,white layercakevolume,andsugar-snapcookiespread.Cereal Chemistry62:290–292.
Gaines, C.S. and J.R. Donelson. 1985a. Influence of certain flour quality parameters andpostmillingtreatmentsonsizeofangelfoodandhigh-ratiowhitelayercakes.Cereal Chemistry62:60–63.
Gaines,C.S.andJ.R.Donelson.1985b.Effectofvaryingflourproteincontentonangelfoodandhigh-ratiowhitelayercakesizeandtenderness.Cereal Chemistry62:63–66.
Gaines, C.S., P.F. Finney, L.M. Fleege, and L.C. Andrews. 1996a. Predicting a hardnessmeasurement using the single-kernel characterizaiton system. Cereal Chemistry73:278–283.
Gaines,C.S.,A.Kassuba,andP.L.Finney.1996b.Usingwire-cutandsugar-snapformulacookietestbakingmethodstoevaluatedistinctivesoftwheatfloursets:Implicationsforqualitytesting.Cereal Foods World41:155–160.
Gaines,C.S.,P.L.Finney,andL.C.Andrews.1997.Influenceofkernelsizeandshrivelingonsoftwheatmillingandbakingquality.Cereal Chemistry74:700–704.
Gaines, C.S. 2000. Collaborative study of methods for solvent retention capacity profiles(AACCMethod56-11).Cereal Foods World45:303–306.
Gaines, C.S., P.L. Finney, and L.C. Andrews. 2000. Developing agreement between veryshortflowandlongerflowtestwheatmills.Cereal Chemistry77:187–192.
Gaines,C.S.2004.Predictionofsugar-snapcookiediameterusingsucrosesolventretentioncapacity,millingsoftness,andflourproteincontent.Cereal Chemistry81:549–552.
Gajderowicz, L.J. 1979. Progress in the refrigerated dough industry. Cereal Foods World24:44–45.
Gough,B.M.,M.E.Whitehouse,andC.T.Greenwood.1978.Theroleandfunctionofchlo-rineinthepreparationofhigh-ratiocakeflour.CRC Critical Reviews in Food Science and Human Nutrition10:91–113.
Greer,E.N.andB.A.Steward.1959.Thewaterabsorptionofwheatflour;relativeeffectsofproteinandstarch.Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture10:248–252.
Greffeuille, V., J. Abecassis, C. Bar L’Helgouac’h, and V. Lullien-Pellerin. 2005. Differ-encesinthealeuronelayerfatebetweenhardandsoftcommonwheatsatgrainmilling.Cereal Chemistry82:138–143.
Gruppen,H.,R.J.Hamer,andA.G.J.Voragen.1992.Water-unextractablecellwallmaterialfromwheatflour.2.Fractionationofalkali-extractedpolymersandcomparisonwithwater-extractablearabinoxylans.Journal of Cereal Science16:53–67.
Guttieri,M.J.,C.Becker,andE.J.Souza.2004.Applicationofwheatmealsolventretentioncapacitytestswithinsoftwheatbreedingpopulations.Cereal Chemistry81:261–266.
52748.indb 26 2/6/08 2:24:43 PM
Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UN
IVE
RSI
TI
MA
LA
YSI
A S
AB
AH
] at
01:
56 0
5 O
ctob
er 2
015
Soft Wheat Quality ��
Hareland,G.1994.Evaluationofflourparticle sizedistributionby laserdiffraction, sieveanalysis, and near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Journal of Cereal Science20:183–190.
Hazen,S.P.,P.K.W.Ng,andR.W.Ward.1997.Variationingrainfunctionalqualityforsoftwinterwheat.Crop Science37:1086–1093.
Hoseney,R.C.1984.Functionalpropertiesofpentosans inbakedfoods.Food Technology38:114–117.
Hoseney,R.C.,P.Wade,andJ.W.Finley.1988.Softwheatproducts.InWheat Chemistry and Technology Volume II,Ed.Y.Pomeranz,407–456.St.Paul,MN:AmericanAssocia-tionofCerealChemists.
Hou,G.,H.Yamamoto,andP.K.W.Ng.1996a.RelationshipsofquantityofgliadinsubgroupsofselectedU.S.softwheatflourstorheologicalandbakingproperties.Cereal Chem-istry73:352–357.
Hou,G.,H.Yamamoto,andP.K.W.Ng.1996b.RelationshipsofquantityofgluteninsubunitsofselectedU.S.softwheatflourstorheologicalandbakingproperties.Cereal Chem-istry73:358–363.
Howard,N.B.,D.H.Hughes,andR.G.K.Strobel.1968.Functionofthestarchgranuleintheformationoflayercakestructure.Cereal Chemistry45:329–338.
Huang,G.,J.W.Finn,andE.Varriano-Marston.1982.Flourchlorination.I.Chlorinelocationandquantitationinair-classifiedfractionsandphysiochemicaleffectsonstarch.Cereal Chemistry59:496–500.
Huebner,F.R.,J.A.Bietz,T.Nelsen,G.S.Bains,andP.L.Finney.1999.Softwheatqualityasrelatedtoproteincomposition.Cereal Chemistry76:650–655.
Ingelin, M.E. 1997. Comparison of two recording dough mixers: The Farinograph andMixograph.InThe Mixograph Handbook,Eds.C.E.Walker,J.L.Hazelton,andM.D.Shogren,5–10.Lincoln,NE:NationalManufacturingDivisionTMCO.
Johnson,A.C.andR.C.Hoseney.1979a.Chlorinetreatmentofcakeflours.III.Fractionationandreconstitution techniquesforCl2-treatedanduntreatedflours.Cereal Chemistry56:443–445.
Johnson,A.C.andR.C.Hoseney.1979b.Chlorinetreatmentofcakeflour.II.Effectofcertainingredientsinthecakeformula.Cereal Chemistry56:336–338.
Johnson,A.C.,R.C.Hoseney,andE.Varriano-Marston.1979.Chlorine treatmentofcakeflours.I.Effectoflipids.Cereal Chemistry56:333–335.
Johnson,A.C.,R.C.Hoseney,andK.Ghaisi.1980.Chlorinetreatmentofcakeflours.V.Oxi-dationofstarch.Cereal Chemistry57:94–96.
Jun,W.J.,P.A.Seib,O.K.Chung.1998.CharacteristicsofnoodlefloursfromJapan.Cereal Chemistry75:820–825.
Kaldy,M.S.andG.L.Rubenthaler.1987.Milling,baking,andphysical-chemicalpropertiesofselectedsoftwhitewinterwheatandspringwheats.Cereal Chemistry64:302–307.
Kim,Y.S.andR.A.Flores.1999.Determinationofbrancontaminationinwheatfloursusingashcontent,color,andbranspeckcounts.Cereal Chemistry76:957–961.
Kissell,L.T.1959.Alean-formulacakemethodforvarietalevaluationandresearch.Cereal Chemistry36:168–175.
Kissell,L.T.,Y.Pomeranz,andW.T.Yamazaki.1971.Effectsofflourlipidsoncookiequality.Cereal Chemistry48:655–662.
Kissell,L.T.andW.T.Yamazaki.1979.Cakebakingdynamics:Relationofflour-chlorinationratetobatterexpansionandlayervolume.Cereal Chemistry56:324–327.
Kissell,L.T.,J.R.Donelson,andR.L.Clements.1979.Functionalityinwhitelayercakeoflipids from untreated and chlorinated patent flours. I. Effects of free lipids. Cereal Chemistry56:11–14.
Kitterman, J.S. and G.L. Rubenthaler. 1971. Assessing quality of early generation wheatselectionswithmicroAWRCtest.Cereal Science Today16:313–314,316,328.
52748.indb 27 2/6/08 2:24:44 PM
Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UN
IVE
RSI
TI
MA
LA
YSI
A S
AB
AH
] at
01:
56 0
5 O
ctob
er 2
015
�� Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods
Konik, C.M., D.M. Miskelly, and P.W. Gras. 1992. Contribution of starch and non-starchparameterstotheeatingqualityofJapanesewhitesaltednoodles.Journal of the Sci-ence of Food and Agriculture58:403–406.
Kreis,M.,P.R.Shewry,B.G.Forde,J.Forde,andB.J.Miflin.1985.Structureandevolutionofseedstorageproteinsandtheirgeneswithparticularreferencestothoseofwheat,barleyandrye.InOxford Surveys of Plant and Molecular Cell Biology,Ed.B.J.Miflin,253–317.London:OxfordUniversityPress.
Kruger,J.E.,D.W.Hatcher,andR.Depauw.1992.Acomparisonofmethodsforthepredic-tionofcantonesenoodlecolour.Canadian Journal of Plant Science72:1021–1029.
Kruger,J.E.,D.W.Hatcher,andR.Depauw.1994.AwholeseedassayforpolyphenoloxidaseinCanadianprairiespringwheatsanditsusefulnessasameasureofnoodledarkening.Cereal Chemistry71:324–326.
Kulp,K.1968.Penstosansofwheatendosperm.Cereal Science Today.13:414–417,426.Kulp,K.,C.C.Tsen,andC.J.Daly.1972.Effectofchlorineonthestarchcomponentofsoft
wheat-flour.Cereal Chemistry49:194–200.Lee,L.,P.K.W.Ng,andJ.F.Steffe.2002.Amodifiedprocedure(one-stagefermentation)for
evaluatingflourcracker-makingpotential.Food Engineering Progress6:201–207.Lin,W. andG.Vocke. 2004. Hardwhitewheat at a crossroads/WHS-04K-01, Electronic
Outlook Report from the Economic Research Service,U.S.DepartmentofAgriculture(December):www.ers.usda.gov/publications/whs/dec04/whs04K01/whs04K01.pdf.
Martin,C.R.,R.Rousser,andD.L.Barbec.1993.Developmentofasingle-kernelwheatchar-acterizationsystem.Transactions of the ASAE36:1399–1404.
Medcalf, D.G. and K.A. Gilles. 1968. Structural characterization of a pentosan from thewater-insolubleportionofdurumwheatendosperm.Cereal Chemistry45:550–556.
Miller,B.S.,H.B.Trimbo, andK.R.Powell. 1967.Effectsofflourgranulation and starchdamageonthecakemakingqualityofsoftwheatflour.Cereal Science Today12:245–247,250–252.
Miller, R.A., R. Mathew, and R.C. Hoseney. 1996. Use of a thermo mechanical analyzertostudyapparentglasstransitionincookiedough.Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry47:1329–1338.
Miller,R.A.andR.C.Hoseney.1997.Factors inhardwheatflour responsible for reducedcookiespread.Cereal Chemistry74:330–336.
Mizukoshi,M.,H.Maeda,andH.Amano.1980.Modelstudiesofcakebaking.II.Expansionandheatsetofcakebatterduringbaking.Cereal Chemistry57:352–355.
Montzheimer, J.W. 1931. A study of methods for testing cake flour. Cereal Chemistry8:510–517.
Morris,C.F.,G.E.King,andG.L.Rubenthaler.1997.Contributionofwheatflourfractionstopeakhotpasteviscosity.Cereal Chemistry74:147–153.
Morrison,W.R.1978a.Wheatlipidcomposition.Cereal Chemistry55:548–558.Morrison,W.R.1978b.Stabilityofwheatstarchlipidsinuntreatedandchlorine-treatedcake
flours.Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture29:365–371.Nemeth,L.J.,P.C.Williams,andW.Bushuk.1994.Acomparativestudyofthequalityofsoft
wheatsfromCanada,Australia,andtheUnitedStates.Cereal Foods World39:691–694,696–698,700.
Ng,P.K.W.,L.Siler, andE.Tanhehco. 2007.MSU wheat quality testing program report,DepartmentofFoodScienceandHumanNutrition,MichiganStateUniversity,EastLansing,MI.
Oda,M.,Y.Yasuda,S.Okazaki,Y.Yamauchi,andY.Yokoyama.1980.AmethodofflourqualityassessmentforJapanesenoodles.Cereal Chemistry57:253–254.
Osborne,T.B.1907.Theproteinofthewheatkernel.Publication No. 84.CarnegieInstitute:Washington,DC.
52748.indb 28 2/6/08 2:24:44 PM
Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UN
IVE
RSI
TI
MA
LA
YSI
A S
AB
AH
] at
01:
56 0
5 O
ctob
er 2
015
Soft Wheat Quality ��
Park,W.J.,D.R.Shelton,C.J.Peterson,T.J.Martin,S.D.Kachman,andR.L.Wehling.1997.Variationinpolyphenoloxidaseactivityandqualitycharacteristicsamonghardwhitewheatandhardredwinterwheatsamples.Cereal Chemistry74:7–11.
Payne,P.I.,M.A.Nightingale,A.Krattiger,andL.M.Holt.1987.TherelationshipbetweenHMW-glutenin subunit composition and the bread-making quality of British-grownwheatvarieties.Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture40:51–56.
Perlin,A.S.1951a.Isolationandcompositionofthesolublepentosansofwheatflour.Cereal Chemistry28:370–381.
Perlin, A.S. 1951b. Structure of the soluble pentosans of wheat flours. Cereal Chemistry28:382–393.
Pizzinatto, A. and R.C. Hoseney. 1980. A laboratory method for saltine crackers. Cereal Chemistry57:249–252.
Pomeranz,Y.1988.Softwheatproducts.InWheat Chemistry and Technology Volume II,Ed.Y.Pomeranz,219–370.St.Paul,MN:AmericanAssociationofCerealChemists.
Posner,E.S.,andA.N.Hibbs.1997.Wheat Flour Milling.St.Paul,MN:AmericanAssocia-tionofCerealChemists.
Ranhotra,G.andJ.Gelroth.1988.Solubleandinsolublefiberinsodacrackers.Cereal Chem-istry65:159–160.
Russo,J.V.andC.A.Doe.1970.Heat treatmentoffloursasanalternative tochlorination.Journal of Food Technology5:363–374.
Seguchi,M.andJ.Matsuki.1977a.Studiesonpan-cakebaking.II.Effectoflipidsonpan-cakequalities.Cereal Chemistry54:918–926.
Seguchi,M.andJ.Matsuki.1977b.Studiesonpan-cakebaking.I.Effectofchlorinationofflouronpan-cakequalities.Cereal Chemistry54:287–299.
Seguchi,M.1984.Oil-bindingcapacityofprimestarchfromchlorinatedwheatflour.Cereal Chemistry61:241–244.
Seguchi,M.1985.Modelexperimentsonhydrophobicityofchlorinatedstarchandhydropho-bicityofchlorinatedsurfaceprotein.Cereal Chemistry62:166–169.
Seguchi,M.1990.Studyofwheatstarchgranulesurfaceproteinsfromchlorinatedwheatflours.Cereal Chemistry67:258–260.
Shelke,K.,J.M.Faubion,andR.C.Hoseney.1990.Thedynamicsofcakebakingasstudiedbyacombinationofviscometryandelectricalresistanceovenheating.Cereal Chem-istry67:575–580.
Sinha,N.K.,H.Yamamoto,andP.K.W.Ng.1997.Effectsofflourchlorinationonsoftwheatgliadins analyzed by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography, dif-ferential scanning calorimetry and fluorescence spectroscopy. Food Chemistry59:387–393.
Slade,L.andH.Levine.1994.Structure-functionrelationshipsofcookieandcrackeringre-dients.InThe Science of Cookie and Cracker Production,Ed.H.Faridi,23–141.NewYork:ChapmanandHall/AVI.
Smith,E.E.1932.Reportofthesubcommitteeonhydrogen-ionconcentrationwithspecialreferencetotheeffectofflourbleach.Cereal Chemistry9:424–428.
Sollars,W.F.1958.Cakeandcookiefractionsaffectedbychlorinebleaching.Cereal Chem-istry35:100–110.
Sollars,W.F.andG.L.Rubenthaler.1971.Performanceofwheatandotherstarchesinrecon-stitutedflours.Cereal Chemistry48:397–410.
Souza,E.,M.Kruk,andD.W.Sunderman.1994.Associationofsugar-snapcookiequalitywithhighmolecularweightgluteninallelesinsoftwhitespringwheats.Cereal Chem-istry71:601–605.
Spies,R.D.andA.W.Kirleis.1978.Effectoffreeflourlipidsoncake-bakingpotential.Cereal Chemistry55:699–704.
52748.indb 29 2/6/08 2:24:45 PM
Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UN
IVE
RSI
TI
MA
LA
YSI
A S
AB
AH
] at
01:
56 0
5 O
ctob
er 2
015
�0 Food Engineering Aspects of Baking Sweet Goods
Takeda,K.1994.Effectsofvarious lipid fractionsofwheatflouronexpansionof spongecake.Cereal Chemistry71:6–9.
Thomasson,C.A.,R.A.Miller,andR.C.Hoseney.1995.Replacementofchlorinetreatmentforcakeflour.Cereal Chemistry72:616–620.
Tsen,C.C.,K.Kulp,andC.J.Daly.1971.Effectsofchlorineonflourproteins,doughproper-ties,andcakequality.Cereal Chemistry48:247–255.
Uriyo,M.B.,W.E.Barbeau,C.A.Griffey,andJ.Rancourt.2004.Examinationofrelation-shipsbetweentherheologicalpropertiesandbakingperformanceofselectedsoftwheatflours.Journal of Food Quality27:239–254.
USDAEconomicResearchService.UpdatedJuly21,2006.Wheat:Background.www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/Wheat/background.htm#classes.
USDA Foreign Agriculture Service. 2007. World Wheat Production, Consumption, andStocks. Foreign Agricultural Service’s Production, Supply and Distribution (PSD)onlinedatabase.www.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/psdHome.aspx.
Varriano-Marston,E.1985.Flourchlorination:Newthoughtsonanoldtopic.Cereal Foods World 30:339–343.
Wang, M., H.D. Sapirstein, A. Machet, and J.E. Dexter. 2006. Composition and distribu-tion of pentosans in millstreams of different hard spring wheats. Cereal Chemistry83:161–168.
Yamamoto,H.,S.T.Worthington,G.Hou,andP.K.W.Ng.1996.RheologicalpropertiesandbakingqualitiesofselectedsoftwheatsgrownintheUnitedStates.Cereal Chemistry73:215–221.
Yamazaki,W.T.1953.Analkalinewaterretentioncapacitytestfortheevaluationofcookiebakingpotentialitiesofsoftwinterwheatflours.Cereal Chemistry30:242–246.
Yamazaki,W.T.1954.Interrelationsamongbreaddoughabsorption,cookiediameter,pro-teincontent,andalkalinewaterretentioncapacityofsoftwinterwheatflour.Cereal Chemistry31:135–142.
Yamazaki,W.T.1955.Theconcentrationofafactorinsoftwheatfloursaffectingcookiequal-ity.Cereal Chemistry32:26–37.
Yamazaki,W.T.andD.H.Donelson.1972.Relationshipbetweenflourparticlesizeandcake-volumepotentialamongeasternsoftwheats.Cereal Chemistry49:649–653.
Yamazaki,W.T.andL.C.Andrews.1982.Experimentalmillingofsoftwheatcultivarsandbreedinglines.Cereal Chemistry59:41–45.
52748.indb 30 2/6/08 2:24:45 PM
Copyright 2008 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
UN
IVE
RSI
TI
MA
LA
YSI
A S
AB
AH
] at
01:
56 0
5 O
ctob
er 2
015