for Measuring Child Well-being Outcomes of Indicators-English.pdfBy using the Compendium of...

Compendium of Indicators for Measuring Child Well-being Outcomes

AUGUST 2014

World Vision’s Compendium of Indicators for Child Well-being 2

Table of Contents Acronyms .......................................................................................................................... 3 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 4 2. About the Compendium ............................................................................................. 5

What is a compendium? ....................................................................................................................................... 5 What is its purpose? ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Why use the Compendium? ................................................................................................................................. 6 Are there globally mandated indicators? ............................................................................................................. 6 Who is this Compendium for? ............................................................................................................................. 7

3. The child well-being aspirations and outcomes .......................................................... 8 3.1 Including the most vulnerable children ......................................................................................................... 9 3.2 Ecological understanding of child well-being ............................................................................................... 10 3.3 Lifecycle stages .............................................................................................................................................. 11 3.4 Economic Development ............................................................................................................................... 11

4. Strategy ...................................................................................................................... 11 5. Partnership targets for child well-being .................................................................... 12 6. Development programmes ....................................................................................... 13

CWBO and logframe outcomes ........................................................................................................................ 13 Community led indicators .................................................................................................................................. 13 Where can I find the guidance and tools? ......................................................................................................... 14 Contribute to improving the Compendium ...................................................................................................... 14

7. The Compendium explained ..................................................................................... 15 7.1 Principles for using the Compendium of Indicators ................................................................................... 15 7.2 Types of indicators........................................................................................................................................ 15

Highly recommended indicators ................................................................................................................... 15 Standard indicators ........................................................................................................................................ 16 Additional indicators ...................................................................................................................................... 16

7.3 Selecting indicators ....................................................................................................................................... 16 What can be contextualised? ........................................................................................................................ 16

7.4 Process for selecting indicators ................................................................................................................... 16 8. Tools for measuring indicators ................................................................................. 19

The toolkit ........................................................................................................................................................... 19 Data collection in partnership ............................................................................................................................ 25 Feedback to and validation from the community ............................................................................................. 25 Data capture ........................................................................................................................................................ 26 Reporting ............................................................................................................................................................. 26

9. The Indicators ............................................................................................................ 26 Aspiration: Enjoy good health ........................................................................................ 28

Outcome: Children well nourished ................................................................................................................... 28 Outcome: Children protected from infection, disease and injury .................................................................. 32 Outcome: Children and their caregivers access essential health services ..................................................... 40

Aspiration: Educated for life .......................................................................................... 45 Outcome: Children read, write and use numeracy skills ................................................................................. 45 Outcome: Children make good judgements, can protect themselves, manage emotions and communicate ideas .............................................................................................................................................. 47 Outcome: Adolescents ready for economic opportunity ................................................................................ 49

Aspiration: Experience love of God and their neighbours ............................................ 51 Outcome: Children grow in their awareness and experience of God’s love in an environment that recognises their freedom .................................................................................................................................... 51 Outcome: Children enjoy positive relationships with peers, family and community members ................... 52 Outcome: Children value and care for others and their environment .......................................................... 53 Outcome: Children have hope and vision for the future ................................................................................ 54

Aspiration: Cared for, protected and participating....................................................... 55 Outcome: Children cared for in a loving, safe, family and community environment with safe places to play ................................................................................................................................................................... 55 Outcome: Parents or caregivers provide well for their children .................................................................... 61 Outcome: Children celebrated and registered at birth ................................................................................... 65 Outcome: Children are respected participants in decisions that affect their lives ........................................ 66


Appendix 1: Search Institute’s Developmental Assets for young people ..................... 68 Appendix 2: Education and Life skills ............................................................................. 70 Appendix 3: Feedback on the Compendium and tools ................................................. 71 Appendix 4: Frequently asked questions ....................................................................... 74 Appendix 5: Alternative approach to measuring ‘Children report increased levels of well-being’ ....................................................................................................................... 75

Acronyms ADP Area development programme CBO Community based organisation CWBO Child well-being outcomes CoP Community of practice DAP Development Assets Profile DHS Demographic Health Survey DME Design, monitoring and evaluation EGRA Early Grade Reading Assessment FANTA Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance FGD Focus group discussion FPMG Food Programming Management Group HEA Humanitarian and Emergency Affairs IDS Indicator detail sheets IPE Integrated Programming Effectiveness Team IPM Integrated programming model (now WV’s Development Programme Approach) LEAP Learning through Evaluation with Accountability and Planning MICS Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (UNICEF) MVC Most vulnerable children NGO Non-governmental organisation OVC Orphan and vulnerable child PEPFAR US President’s emergency plan for AIDS relief TDI Transformational development indicators UNAIDS The joint United Nations programme on HIV and AIDS UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund USAID United States Agency for International Development WHO World Health Organisation WV World Vision © World Vision International 2011. Updated March 2012 and August 2013. All rights reserved. No portion of this publication may be reproduced in any form, except for brief excerpts in reviews, without prior permission of the publisher.

Published by Integrated Ministry on behalf of World Vision International.


1. Introduction

Across the world, in different contexts and in different ways, World Vision, together with partners and communities, is working towards improving the lives of children, families and communities. World Vision has developed a set of child well-being outcomes (CWBOs) and aspirations to provide a practical definition of child well-being and a common language for World Vision staff across the Partnership. The framework has four aspirations for the well-being of all girls and boys and 15 child development outcomes that describe World Vision’s understanding of what a good life for children is. These outcomes express the organisation’s understanding of ‘life in all its fullness’. All the diverse contributions of World Vision entities to child well-being, across ministry streams and different projects are brought together into one Ministry Framework for one common goal:

Sustained well-being of children within families and communities, especially the most vulnerable

In order to measure WV’s unique contributions to the well-being of girls and boys in the communities where it works, and progress towards the ministry goal and strategies for child well-being, a common set of indicators is needed. In this Compendium of Indicators for Child Well-being, you will find a broad set of indicators for measuring each of the child well-being outcomes, which can be chosen according to what is in line with the national office strategy, relevant to the programme/project objectives and appropriate for the local context. The Compendium brings together tried and tested indicators from major agencies such as UNICEF and WHO, but also innovative indicators from within World Vision or from child well-being research institutions. The Compendium will be updated annually to ensure it remains up to date and in line with current developments in measuring child well-being. 10 Fast Facts

1. There are indicators for each of the 15 child well-being outcomes. 2. The Compendium has over 200 indicators for you to choose from. 3. Choose indicators according to what is relevant to the work planned, appropriate for the

local context and in line with strategy. 4. Choose indicators according to the project model you are using. 5. To help you choose, each child well-being outcome has at least one highly recommended

and/or standard indicator. 6. Highly recommended and standard indicators are important to measure if your

programme or project is contributing in a significant way to that child well-being outcome or Child Well-being Target.

7. Each indicator has an Indicator Detail Sheet with all the information you need to measure it. 8. The Compendium will soon be a searchable database in Horizon (formerly PMIS). 9. Indicators in the Compendium are for measuring at baseline and evaluation. Some can also

be monitored more frequently if necessary. 10. You can contribute! Send your feedback or new indicators and tools for the annual

updates. See ‘Appendix 3’ for more details. Acknowledgements This Compendium represents a huge collaborative effort between Global Centre technical teams within Integrated Ministry and with regional offices. This includes: Global Health, Education and Lifeskills, Child Development & Rights, Christian Commitments, as well as significant input from Food Programming and Management Group (FPMG), Humanitarian and Emergency Affairs (HEA) and Advocacy & Justice for Children. Thank you to all who reviewed and re-reviewed the Compendium, especially the technical specialists, Child Development and Programme Effectiveness (CDPE) Team and Global Programme Effectiveness Team (GPET) members from each region. A special thank you to all the DME staff in national offices and programmes who were willing to try out the draft Compendium before the tools and guidance were ready and provide their feedback and share their innovations.

“Our vision for

every child, life in

all its fullness

Our prayer for

every heart, the

will to make it so”


2. About the Compendium

What is a compendium? A compendium is a menu or list of items; this Compendium contains lists of indicators for measuring each of the child well-being outcomes (CWBOs). It builds on the learning from the global evaluation of measuring the Transformational Development Indicators (TDI). It includes indicators from each ministry stream and integrated technical teams. It also includes standard, internationally agreed indicators from respected agencies such as UNICEF. The Compendium represents a huge collaborative effort across the organisation to agree on how to measure child well-being. Using it will enable World Vision to measure the impact of programmes and projects on the well-being of children in the communities it seeks to serve.

What is its purpose? The purpose of developing a set of outcome indicators and tools for measuring child well-being is to enable World Vision to build an evidence-base to demonstrate its contribution to the well-being of children in the areas where WV and its partners intervene. Collecting data about the communities where WV works in a consistent and systematic way means that WV can report on progress towards child well-being outcomes, not just at programme or project level, as done before, but at national, regional and global level, across ministry streams. Knowing, and having the evidence of, WV’s impact as an organisation is an essential part of its work. It provides WV with information that can be used for the dual purposes of: learning what it does well, how to do better and if WV is doing the right things; and accountability to multiple stakeholders, including community members and children in the areas where WV works, and strengthens its legitimacy. By using the Compendium of indicators and tools for measuring child well-being outcomes, WV can know:

What was the status of children’s well-being when World Vision first began working with communities and partners in this area? Or at the point of redesign? This is the baseline measurement.

What real and lasting changes have occurred for child well-being? What was World Vision’s contribution to these changes? This is the evaluation.

Ministry Framework The Ministry Framework helps to illustrate how each ministry stream, sector and entity, in line with WV’s principles, and using the rich variety of approaches for different needs and contexts addresses child well-being priorities. In the Ministry Framework each entity can locate its contribution to the organisational goal. The indicators for child well-being provide the means for measuring this progress across the Partnership’s ministry. The Compendium of indicators and associated tools for measuring CWBO are relevant


for use across all types of projects and programmes1, and can enable each entity to measure progress towards the child well-being outcomes and aspirations in the ministry framework. Although approaches to long term development, HEA and Advocacy & Justice for Children programmes in different contexts necessarily differ, the aspirations and outcomes WV seeks as an organisation are aligned in its ministry goal.

Why use the Compendium? World Vision works in many different contexts and through many different approaches. Therefore the child well-being outcomes will differ from place to place. The needs identified by the community, World Vision and its partners, along the Critical Path will define which of the CWBOs that a project or programme is contributing to. In some areas the major risk to child well-being is malaria, in another it may be child trafficking, in yet another it may be lack of access to education. World Vision’s contribution to improving child well-being in these different areas will require different indicators. This means that World Vision needs a flexible system for selecting indicators in order to reflect these unique contexts and capture Partnership-wide, but diverse, contribution to the well-being of children. Based on the learning from the TDI evaluation, WV has learned that trying to measure a set of fixed indicators in every project, in every country and context does not necessarily enable staff members to learn from and improve their work, or make a logical link between programming and outcomes. We need a more flexible system to select indicators; one that takes into account the objectives of the programme or project, the local context and the national office strategy. Data collected for relevant and appropriate indicators, selected from within World Vision’s Compendium, can usefully inform decision making and reporting on child well-being. By using the Compendium, staff in programmes and projects can select and measure indicators that are appropriate for their particular context, as well as contribute to the organisation-wide measurement of CWBO. The benefits of using the Compendium include:

Knowing the difference WV is making in the lives of children.

No ‘re-inventing the wheel’ when completing the logframe.

Having a common language of indicators to measure CWBOs. Access to a resource of quality indicators.

Ability to contribute new and innovative indicators each year.

Enabling WV to measure it national, regional and global impact on child well-being.

Are there globally mandated indicators? There are no globally mandated indicators for measuring the child well-being outcomes. This is because there are very few, if any, indicators that are relevant to every programme type within World Vision or every country or cultural context. World Vision is a complex, multi-faceted organisation implementing a wide variety of programmes, which are tailored to each community context. This means that it is highly unlikely that WV can find indicators relevant to every programme and every country – but it can have an agreed set of highly recommended indicators for programmes and projects working towards a particular CWBO and a subset of standard indicators for measuring progress towards the child well-being targets. If your project or programme is contributing to a particular CWBO it is strongly recommended that at least one of these indicators (linked to the relevant CWBO) is selected and included in

1 With the exception of the first 90 days of rapid onset emergencies; which are necessarily focused on achieving outputs for immediate and urgent humanitarian assistance.


your measurement. If your project or programme is contributing towards a particular child well-being target, according to the national strategy, it is strongly recommended that you include the relevant standard indicators. In this way WV can capture the most important information from the relevant programmes. There is no integrity in measuring contribution to something WV is not actively contributing to. For example: A programme contributing to ‘children protected from infection, disease and injury’ could use this standard indicator: ‘% children vaccinated against measles and DPT3 before their 1st birthday’.

Who is this Compendium for? This Compendium is for use primarily by design, monitoring and evaluation staff (DME) but also for programme and technical staff involved in the design or redesign of a programme or project. DME staff, in close collaboration with technical staff, can use the Compendium to support programme or project staff in selecting the indicators that are most useful and important for measuring child well-being based on a particular context. It can also be used by technical specialists and strategy staff in different entities to select relevant indicators for strategy.

When to begin using it? You can begin using the Compendium of indicators when the:

1. national office strategy is focused on contributing to child well-being 2. project or programme is in design or redesign phase 3. logframe is developed through a participatory engagement process with community

members (including children) and local partners 4. logframe has at least one objective that directly contributes to a CWBO 5. funding for a baseline and evaluation measurement is included in the budget 6. DME capacity is in place and available to conduct an integrated programme baseline,

ongoing monitoring and eventual evaluation

What is an integrated baseline?

An integrated baseline is a measurement undertaken at the programme level, and includes

measurement of all the important indicators in each of the projects within that programme. This

means WV does not need to do a baseline or evaluation for each individual project. An

integrated measurement helps to analyse the inter-linking effects of our intervention on the

different aspects of children’s well-being. How did the nutrition project affect children’s overall

health or school attendance? How did a livelihoods programme impact access to health care or

children’s sense of hope and vision for their future?

Designing an integrated baseline means that technical staff and DME staff need to work together

to make sure the most relevant and useful indicators are included and combined into the same

tools for a combined measurement. For example; the household survey would include all the

relevant questions for the different projects like health, education, livelihoods and child

participation. Choosing tools that can measure multiple CWBOs at the same time will help to

keep the baseline manageable and cost effective. See below for more information on the tools.


3. The child well-being aspirations and outcomes World Vision focuses on improving children’s well-being through child-focused transformational development, disaster management and promotion of justice (advocacy). The child well-being aspirations and outcomes provide a practical definition of World Vision’s understanding of well-being for children. Our goal is ‘the sustained well-being of children within families and communities, especially the most vulnerable.’ World Vision views the well-being of children in holistic terms: healthy individual development (involving physical and mental health, social and spiritual dimensions), positive relationships and a context that provides safety, social justice and participation in civil society. The child well-being aspirations and outcomes are intended as a catalyst for dialogue, discussion and visioning as World Vision partners with children, parents, community partners, churches, governments and other organisations. World Vision does not proselytise nor does it impose its understanding on others. These aspirations and outcomes reinforce each other and enable an integrated, holistic approach to ministry. While WV’s active contribution to specific outcomes varies from context to context, the definition of ‘well-being’ remains holistic.

Goal Sustained well-being of children within families and communities, especially the most vulnerable

Aspirations

Girls & Boys:

Enjoy good health

Are educated for life

Experience love of God and their neighbours

Are cared for, protected and participating

Outcomes

Children are well nourished

Children read, write, and use numeracy skills

Children grow in their awareness and experience of God’s love in an environment that recognises their freedom

Children cared for in a loving, safe, family and community environment with safe places to play

Children protected from infection, disease, and injury

Children make good judgements, can protect themselves, manage emotions, and communicate ideas

Children enjoy positive relationships with peers, family, and community members

Parents or caregivers provide well for their children

Children and their caregivers access essential health services

Adolescents ready for economic opportunity

Children value and care for others and their environment

Children celebrated and registered at birth

Children access and complete basic education

Children have hope and vision for the future

Children are respected participants in decisions that affect their lives

Foundational Principles

Children are citizens and their rights and dignity are upheld (including girls and boys of all religions and ethnicities, any HIV status, and those with disabilities)

World Vision is a Christian relief, development and advocacy organisation dedicated to working with children, families and communities to overcome poverty and injustice. Motivated by our Christian faith, World Vision is dedicated to working with the world’s most vulnerable people. World Vision serves all people regardless of religion, race, ethnicity or gender


How does WV understand 'sustained' child well-being? A framework for sustainability: World Vision works with partners (including governments, churches and other faith-based organisations, NGOs, CBOs, businesses and others) towards sustained child well-being at four levels, in ways that build on efforts already underway and are appropriate to context:

1. Children: Empowering children - especially the most vulnerable - with good health, spiritual nurture, and the basic abilities and skills they need to be productive, contributing citizens and agents of change throughout their lives (including literacy, numeracy, life skills, and vocational/entrepreneurial training).

2. Households/families: Improving households' resilience, livelihood capacities and caregiving capacities (physical, psychosocial, spiritual, etc. - including issues of resource allocation and gender equity within households, to ensure that increased incomes/assets leads to improved child well-being for both boys and girls).

3. Community: Strengthening the resilience and capacity of communities and partners to respond to present and future challenges to child well-being, including disasters.

4. Enabling environment: Working to ensure that systems, structures, policies and practices (local, national, regional, and global) support and protect the well-being of children, especially the most vulnerable.

3.1 Including the most vulnerable children World Vision’s ministry goal has a special focus on the most vulnerable children (MVC). In measuring and reporting on the contribution to child well-being, WV needs to understand what kinds of vulnerability exist in the programme area, identify children who are most vulnerable and ensure they are included in programming and measurement of child well-being. Most vulnerable children are girls and boys whose quality of life and ability to fulfil their potential is most affected by extreme deprivation and violations of their rights. These children often live in catastrophic situations and relationships characterised by violence, abuse, neglect, exploitation, exclusion and discrimination. World Vision’s definition includes four vulnerability factors which can assist in understanding who the most vulnerable children are:

1. abusive or exploitative relationships: relationships which are characterised by violence or use of a child to benefit others sexually or commercially, or which consistently harm the child through intentional acts or negligence

2. extreme deprivation: extreme material poverty, or deprivation of caregivers 3. serious discrimination: severe social stigma which prevents children from accessing

services or opportunities essential to their protection or development 4. vulnerability to negative impact from a catastrophe or disaster: natural or

manmade events can seriously threaten the survival or development of a child and certain children are more likely to be affected negatively and less likely to be able to recover.

Discussion about the best way to measure the impact of WV’s programming with most vulnerable children is still ongoing and will emerge as it begins focusing more intentionally on the most vulnerable. Due to the very different types of vulnerability, which vary significantly by local context and can be layered (multiple vulnerabilities), there are lots of challenges with measuring the impact of WV’s work on MVC. In addition, it is often difficult to get a large enough sample of children from a particular group or type of vulnerability to be representative. There are two approaches to identifying and measuring MVC, one or both may be relevant: 1. Pre-identification: intentionally seeking out a particular group of most vulnerable children

to survey or conduct focus group discussions with them specifically. For example, street children.

2. Post-identification: analysing the findings from the household survey or Youth Healthy


Behaviour Survey and disaggregating by relevant MVC criteria to identify the proportion of MVC in the area or to learn of their unique experience in the programme or community, and their status in key indicators compared to their non-MVC counterparts; for example, extreme poverty, experiencing violence or abuse at home, orphans, disabled children or those from a marginalised people group.

At this stage, the following options are recommended: 1. Understand characteristics and identify the most vulnerable: with the community

with the starter group, as part of Steps 3-5 of the Critical Path (see the Good Practices for Putting Development Programmes into Action).

2. Collect data on the most vulnerable: Depending on the type of vulnerabilities identified

you may wish to do one or more of the following as part of your baseline or evaluation: a. Include certain indicators and questions into the caregiver (household) survey to identify

households where children are ‘most vulnerable’ according to the above definitions. This enables disaggregation of data by MVC and non-MVC households, as well as by gender, which is standard in the caregiver survey. It also helps WV to know what percentage of households in this community has vulnerable children and so to know if WV is intentionally including the most vulnerable.

b. If >5% of children do not live in conventional households, information about these children would not be captured in a household survey. Therefore, it would be preferable to do a separate survey (see below).

c. If >5% of children in the community are MVC, it is important to find out more about the situation of these children specifically and their well-being (or ill-being) status. In order to identify a sufficiently large group of most vulnerable children of a particular type, ‘snowball’ or ‘respondent driven’ sampling can be used to find a sufficiently large group of that type of MVC; for example, street children, child labourers, commercial sex workers, drug users or to survey children living in institutions. Although this approach is prone to bias, it would at least provide some useful information about the MVC in the community. Information could then be collected with these children through either a focus group discussion or by using the child well-being self-perception or Youth Healthy Behaviour Survey (see tools).

3. Community feedback: conduct focus group discussions with groups of MVC of a similar

‘type’ (gender differentiated) and separately with their parents where appropriate, to discuss and confirm the findings of the survey(s) and the barriers to well-being for the identified type of MVC in this community.

Further information on how to measure WV’s organisational impact on MVC will be forthcoming.

3.2 Ecological understanding of child well-being Children’s well-being is dependent on their relationships with others and the social, political, spiritual, physical and environmental contexts that they live in. This is called the ecology of the child or an ecological model. This theory helps WV to consider the different relationships, institutions, systems and structures that create an enabling environment where children can thrive. The theory shows the different levels and types of influence on the child’s development, from the closest (micro level, like families) to the farthest (macro level, like political or cultural). Children are unique and affected by their context in different ways. Who God made them to be, where they live and who they live with will affect how they deal with the risk factors in their lives. In the Compendium you will find indicators to help measure WV’s contribution to children’s well-being from different ecological perspectives. Whether the work being undertaken is directly with children, with parents/caregivers, with communities, or with the systems and structures which enable child well-being, there are indicators that can help to capture this contribution.


3.3 Lifecycle stages Child-focused programming takes into account that children develop rapidly through different life cycle stages. With each stage, from prenatal to five years, six to 11 years, and 12 to 18 years, WV recognises that there are specific survival, growth and development issues that should be prioritised. Designing programmes around life cycle stages enhances opportunities to improve spiritual, cognitive, social and physical development, while also building cumulative child development gains. A life cycle perspective also gives attention to the special needs of girls and boys at each stage of development.

In the Compendium you will find indicators that focus on each of these life cycle stages, with appropriate tools for capturing information about children at these different points in their lives. For example, to find out about the well-being of young children and even some information about children 6-11 years, their parents or caregivers will be able to tell WV a lot. For youth aged 12-18, they can tell WV themselves what they think about their own well-being, through self-assessment surveys or discussion groups.

3.4 Economic Development A regular household income strengthened by asset ownership is the foundation for household economic well-being and livelihood security. Sustained household economic well-being is necessary for sustained child well-being. Without it, families can not send children to school, take them for medical treatment or protect them from life's risks. While only two CWBOs explicitly refer to economic capacity (‘parents or caregivers provide well for their children’ and ‘adolescents ready for economic opportunity’), economic development is important for all the CWBOs. Therefore, economic development indicators have been mainstreamed in the Compendium. These indicators highlight not only child well-being today when World Vision is present, but whether children will continue to thrive after WV leaves. Example: A programme contributing to ‘children and their caregiver access essential health services’ could measure the indicator: ‘% parents or caregivers who are able to pay for their children's health costs without external assistance.’

4. Strategy The Compendium has been designed to align and integrate with World Vision’s approaches to developing, implementing and evaluating strategy. National office’s can include indicators from the Compendium in the strategy, to measure progress toward the strategic objectives for child well-being. At the programme or project level, national strategy is one of the three criteria used to select indicators. Indicators from the Compendium, included in strategy documents, can be clearly shown as important indicators for measurement within specific programme types in that country. A national can identify its strategic indicators within Horizon (PMIS), as the ‘preferred’ indicators for measurement within specific programme types in that country. National offices can require


programmes or projects working in a specific domain to include the relevant strategic indicator alongside other important indicators. In this way, national offices can develop an evidence base for the strategic indicators and the overall contribution towards child well-being, including the child well-being targets. This will assist DME and local level staff to select strategically aligned indicators. In general, the highly recommended and standard indicators for the child well-being targets may be the most useful to include in strategies (see below for more details). When using the Compendium for selecting indicators for strategy, the strategic objectives must be decided first. Strategy guides programming choices and programming guides the indicator choices.

Example: National strategy focus Improving education quality Indicator in strategy (Standard child well-being target indicator)

Proportion of children who are functionally literate: percent of children both in and out of school in programme impact areas who can read with comprehension at functional levels by the age when children are expected to have completed a basic education programme.

Projects / programmes required to measure it alongside other chosen indicators

All programmes with an education project

The Compendium is relevant for use in World Vision national office strategy development if:

strategic objectives are being developed or have been agreed

at least one strategic objective can be logically linked to a child well-being outcome.

5. Partnership targets for child well-being National strategies have been developed in every national office, many of which include targets in alignment with the child well-being outcomes. A Partnership strategy has been developed, which includes four targets, in alignment with the child well-being outcomes. Measuring progress towards child well-being targets will enable the WV Partnership to build an evidence base of its contribution to child well-being across the whole Partnership. However, due to the variety of programme types and contexts, care has been taken to ensure a range of targets are provided, that are broad enough for every national office to be able to contribute to at least one, in alignment with its strategy. Progress on the relevant child well-being targets will be reported on annually, as part of ongoing DME, using the child well-being target standard indicators and tools included in this Compendium. Annual reports will be make use of monitoring data from programmes, projects and sponsorship (revised child monitoring standards), any baselines, any evaluations and any other special studies or research conducted during the year. The targets will be measured as part of the broader process of measuring WV’s contribution to children’s well-being at the national, regional and global level. National offices do not need to contribute to all the Partnership targets, but they must contribute to at least one. Child well-being outcome targets:

Children report an increased level of well-being (12-18 years).

Increase in children protected from disease and infection (0-5 years). Increase in children well nourished (0-5 years).

Increase in children who can read by age 11. For details on how these targets will be measured, please see specific documentation on the targets on https://www.wvcentral.org/cwb/Pages/cwbtargets.aspx Remember that national offices do not need to measure all four targets. However, as child well-being is WV’s main goal across the Partnership, National offices will soon be expected to measure progress towards ‘child well-being target 1: children report an increased level of well-being’.

https://www.wvcentral.org/cwb/Pages/cwbtargets.aspx


6. Development programmes The indicators for CWBO are designed to be fully integrated with World Vision’s programme and project level DME (LEAP) and can be used by any WV project or programme, as appropriate (whether long-term development, advocacy or emergency relief programmes). However, please note that the indicators in the Compendium are not recommended for rapid onset emergencies, during the first 90 days; as such projects necessarily focus on immediate outputs to be monitored, rather than longer term outcomes to be evaluated. For long-term development programmes, the indicators can be used by programmes designed using WV’s Development Programme Approach, programmes redesigned through a participatory community engagement process focused on the well-being of children, and grant funded programmes and projects alike. The Compendium can be used during design or redesign phase, once the objectives of a programme or project have been agreed with partners. It is relevant for use in all World Vision programmes or projects:

during design or redesign phase

after objectives have been agreed upon with partners

where at least one objective can be logically linked to one child well-being outcome.

CWBO and logframe outcomes Linking communities’ views and statements on child well-being to the CWBOs helps WV to plan appropriate programmes with partners, and helps in WV’s design, monitoring and evaluation. The CWBOs are WV’s operational definition of child well-being and are used throughout the LEAP programme cycle. However, in the CWBOs, the term ‘outcome’ comes from the field of child development and refers to child developmental outcomes, such as social, emotional or cognitive outcomes. This is different than the term ‘outcome’ used in LEAP, whereby projects are designed with stakeholders to define contextually appropriate outcomes and goal statements. These objectives can then be linked to the appropriate CWBOs. Therefore, the CWBOs are not used directly in logframes.

Community led indicators A process to enable community members to develop their own simple, observable indicators for measuring improvements in child well-being is currently underway. This process aims to strengthen WV’s accountability to communities, and build ownership over the shared progress towards child well-being. These could be simple statements such as: ‘we know children are not hungry when they have energy to play everyday’. Such statements can be reviewed together annually to see if progress has been made and what the priorities for the next year should be.

What contributing to child well-being means: At least one objective will contribute directly to one child well-being outcome. For example if your project is focused on improving the quality of educational outcomes for children this can be directly linked to ‘children read, write and use numeracy skills’. What contributing to child well-being does not mean: No project or programme should try to contribute to all 15 child well-being outcomes or all four aspirations. Across the organisation, different types of projects and programmes are contributing to all 15 CWBO; this is WV’s broader impact to the well-being of children. You do not need to include indicators for all the CWBO into your logframe. Nor does every programme need to contribute to a CWBO from each of the aspirations. Programme or project outcomes and goals should not be worded exactly like a child well-being outcome. Outcomes and goals need to be expressed in a way that makes sense to the staff and partners, are relevant to the local context and fit logically with the overall goal of the programme.


Where can I find the guidance and tools? The guidance and tools are downloadable from the Guidance for Development Programmes website: www.wvdevelopment.org. The Compendium, tools and guidance will be available in Horizon (formerly PMIS). The Compendium in Horizon will be a searchable database, to help staff find the indicators they want using key words and other logical search criteria.

Contribute to improving the Compendium The Compendium will be updated annually, based on feedback and recommendations by the relevant Communities of Practice (CoP). If you would like to suggest an indicator for inclusion in the Compendium, please do so through the appropriate CoP. You can send your feedback on both the indicators and the process of selection/measurement. This will help to ensure that the process is a useful, usable, relevant and effective means of measuring World Vision’s plausible contribution to the well-being of children. Please direct your feedback to the Global Centre Evaluation & Research Unit, Global Knowledge Management (GKM). See Appendix 3 for more details.

Summary of key points

There are no globally mandated indicators. However, National Offices should plan to measure ‘CWB target 1: Children report an increased level of well-being’ in the near future.

Indicators are selected according to what is: relevant for the programme or project’s objectives, appropriate for the local context and in line with strategy – both national office and relevant sector strategy.

Measurement of indicators for CWBOs are fully integrated with the project or programme DME process (LEAP).

If you don’t find the outcome indicator needed for your logframe, you can include indicators not in the Compendium.

Some indicators can, or even need to be, amended for the national context.

Standard versions of tools (like questionnaires) are provided for you to adapt and use.


7. The Compendium explained The Compendium is organised by the 15 child well-being outcomes. Therefore, to select indicators you will need to know which of the 15 CWBOs the objectives in the logframe contribute to. The 15 outcomes are organised under four aspirations. In the boxes are examples of each category or type of indicator.

Aspirations In order to achieve the goal of the sustained well-being of children, World Vision has identified four aspirations. These represent the domains or dimensions of child well-being WV wants to see positively impacted, as a result of its interventions with partners. Note: Programmes or projects do not need to contribute to all four aspirations.

Child Well-being Outcomes There are 15 child well-being outcomes, three or four within each aspiration. The indicators in the Compendium are organised by these outcomes. Note: Programmes or projects do not need to contribute to all 15 CWBOs.

7.1 Principles for using the Compendium of Indicators 1. Do no harm: measurement activities and indicators do not harm to children

psychologically or physically. It does not undermine, compete for resources with or distract from local government responsibility for monitoring the well-being of children, as the duty bearer for child well-being.

2. Do it well: the necessary DME capacity is available to support programme staff in selecting indicators, adapting tools and undertaking a ‘good enough’ baseline. If in doubt, wait. It is better to delay than to make an inappropriate selection of indicators or conduct a poor quality measurement. Accurate measurement is essential to see change over time.

3. Develop the skills: strengthening DME competencies is crucial for conducting ‘good enough’ baselines and evaluations. Resources need to be invested in strengthening DME staff competencies. Skills are required not only for data collection, but in analysis, reporting and learning. Expectations for analysis and reporting are linked to current skills.

4. Keep it simple: a few, well chosen, outcome indicators that can measure change in the context are preferable to a long list. It is advisable to select indicators that fit onto a few tools, and tools that the staff members have the resources and capacity to use.

5. Resource it: it is essential that sufficient funds are budgeted for a baseline and evaluation. Costs will differ quite significantly by country and region, but an average baseline would cost around $10,000. Scheduling enough of the right staff members time is essential for measuring CWBOs. Planning, doing, analysing and using baseline data can take 4-8 weeks.

7.2 Types of indicators In the Compendium, there are three types of indicators:

Highly recommended indicators

For every CWBO there is at least one highly recommended indicator. The highly recommended indicator is broad enough to measure the child well-being outcome it is linked to, in almost any context or country. If a programme or project has identified that it is working towards a particular CWBO, the highly recommended indicator is essential to measure. If there is more than one highly recommended indicator, you must choose at least one, as relevant for the context and national strategy. Note: These are essential to measure for the relevant CWBO.

Enjoy good

health

Children

protected from

infection,

disease and

injury

% children

immunised

against measles

before their first

birthday


Standard indicators

Some indicators are highlighted as ‘child well-being target standard indicators’. These are highly recommended indicators, which have been identified as most relevant for measuring the particular target. These standard indicators can be selected and used to measure progress towards the child well-being targets selected, according to the national office strategy. Many standard indicators also act as highly recommended indicators and are essential to measure both for the relevant outcome and target. Note: These are used to measure child well-being targets.

Additional indicators

For every CWBO there is a menu of additional indicators to choose from. These indicators will be useful in some contexts (programmes, areas, national offices) but not in others. There are between 3 and 30+ additional indicators for each of the CWBOs.

7.3 Selecting indicators Who is involved? DME staff members lead the process, working closely with programme or project staff, and relevant technical staff. Indicators should be agreed upon together with partners. When to select indicators? During the design or redesign phase, after objectives are agreed.

What’s important to remember? There are three guiding factors to help select indicators from the Compendium. Indicators should be selected according to what is:

inline with strategy, including national office and sector strategy as appropriate

relevant to the work of the programme or project

appropriate for the local context.

What can be contextualised?

Indicators: in order to support existing data collection efforts, indicators can be adapted to match those used by the national government. For example, if the government measures educational outcomes with a particular age group of children, you can alter the age group. Definitions: some definitions of the indicators need to be adapted to be meaningful in the local and country context. For example, who represents a ‘skilled birth attendant’ in that country. Tools: the wording of questions or statements in the measurement tools should be altered so that the meaning is clearly understood by the respondent in that context. Guidance: national offices can amend guidance documents as appropriate for the context and strategy. For example, to reflect national protocols around data collection or highlight relevant partner research institution or universities with whom you can partner with.

7.4 Process for selecting indicators Before you start Engage in a participatory process with community members (including children) and local partners to develop a responsive design based on community-identified child well-being priorities. Remember to make the most vulnerable children part of the process. Agree on the objectives of the project or programme. Fill in the logframe as recommended in LEAP.

% households where

all children under 5

years slept under a

long lasting

insecticide-treated

net the previous night

% caregivers with

appropriate hand-

washing behaviour


Which CWBO does the project or programme contribute to? One project at a time, identify which of the CWBOs the project will contribute most to and make a note of these in the Programme Design Document (PDD). If relevant, note one or two other CWBOs the project will contribute to. Remember not to list all the CWBOs, only the ones that your work will contribute to most. This can be done by mapping the planned objectives onto the CWBOs. It may be logical to link each project to one CWBO, but some projects may contribute to two or three CWBOs. However, focus on the CWBO the project contributes to most. If it’s not obvious which CWBO the project contributes to, try this activity with the partners:

Write each of the CWBOs onto a sheet of flip chart or large sheets of paper, one per sheet and spread them across a table or wall. Add a blank sheet for any items which don’t seem to fit easily.

Give each pair or small group one section (outcome) of the project. Write each output (or even activity) below that outcome onto a sticky note or card (one per card).

Each group tries to place each output onto the CWBO it contributes to. If it contributes to more than one, draw a line or symbol to show this.

Stand back and look at the outcomes and outputs/activities. Discuss what you see – are the cards in the right place? Agree on any changes, and then count the number of cards/notes on each CWBO.

The sheets where most notes are located are the CWBOs that the project contributes to most. Make a note of these. This is ideally just one, but could be between 1 and 3 CWBOs, and perhaps some additional ones that are contributed to in a secondary way.

Repeat for each project in the programme, if relevant.

Select highly recommended and standard indictors One project at a time, look at the project goal and outcome statements. For each one,

start with the CWBO the goal or outcome statement contributes most to. Are there standard indicators suggested for the CWBO? Which one is relevant for your

work and inline with the national strategy? Select appropriate standard indicators.

Where there are no standard indicators, look at the highly recommended indicator(s) for the CWBO. Which one is relevant for your work and in line with the national strategy? Select the appropriate highly recommended indicator(s).

View the standard or highly recommended indicators for any other CWBOs the project will contribute to. Select the appropriate one(s).

Remember it is important to include at least one standard or highly recommended indicator, which is relevant to your work. This will provide an evidence base on contribution to child well-being across national offices, regions and globally.

Pay special attention to relevant standard indicators for measuring the child well-being targets.

Search for and select additional indicators

Go back to the CWBO you started with.

Look through the additional indicators listed in the Compendium for that outcome.

Select any additional relevant indicators for your logframe to measure the project goal or outcomes.

Include any relevant indicators from the national strategy, paying special attention to the standard indicators for measuring CWB targets .

Project Models If you are using a project model, select the Compendium indicators recommended in the model. Check that these indicators are relevant for your programme or project objectives, appropriate for the local context and in line with national strategy. You may need to select additional indicators from the Compendium. Remember to add relevant monitoring indicators into your logframe and ensure all the indicators you select are also in the LEAP indicator tracking table.


Review the list of indicators Review and agree upon selected indicators with relevant partners and stakeholders. Check which measurement tools will be needed to measure your selected indicators on the indicator detail sheets. Check which indicators and tools are selected for the whole programme, as the baseline will be at the programme level (unless a grant funded project). It is important to check which indicators have been selected across the different projects within the programme to avoid duplication and ensure the indicators can all be measured by just two or three tools. Do you need to change or reduce the selection? Consider which indicators will tell you the most about the desired change in your context. Refine the selection of indicators, until a manageable number of indicators and tools remain. How many indicators? Between one and three outcome indicators are recommended for each programme outcome (project goal) and project outcome, unless the WV project model you are using recommends more. Remember that a few well chosen indicators are preferable to a long list. Select only indicators for data collection that you need information about and will use the information to inform decision-making and reporting, or which are strategically aligned.

Next steps 1. Read the indicator detail sheets for each indicator in Horizon. 2. Download the tools needed for your selected indicators – remember that two to three

tools are the maximum most projects or programmes can utilise affordably. 3. Include the selected indicators in your project design logframe and in the indicator

tracking table. 4. Ensure there is sufficient budget included in your programme or project for baseline and

evaluation measurements. 5. When you are ready to plan your baseline, refer to the baseline guidance.

Summary of key points

The Compendium is only for programmes and projects in the design or redesign phase.

Select only indicators that are relevant to the stated objectives.

Programmes do not need to contribute to all 15 CWBO and do not need to contribute to a CWBO in all four aspirations.

Objectives in the logframe should not be worded the same as a CWBO.

A few carefully selected indicators are better than a long list of indicators. If you cannot find the indicator needed in the Compendium, other indicators can be

added.

Monitoring indicators are not included here – although some indicators can be used for annual monitoring as well as at baseline and evaluation.

There is one integrated programme baseline and one integrated evaluation – not separate measurement for individual programmes.

Grant funded projects will need to follow donor protocols, but where possible can still incorporate relevant indicators from the Compendium.


8. Tools for measuring indicators The indicators for child well-being are measured as part of the programme or grant-funded project baseline and again at evaluation. The selected indicators are measured alongside any other relevant programme or project indicators at baseline and evaluation. As child well-being includes many different aspects, an integrated programme level baseline is preferable to a project specific baseline, which only considers one project. However, for grant funded projects, the baseline and evaluation will be at the project level and should include any indicators specified by the donor, alongside any relevant child well-being indicators. The same indicators and tools should be used at baseline, evaluation and any mid-term evaluation, in order to make a ‘before and after’ comparison. Where possible and appropriate, measurement of child well-being indicators, are to be undertaken in collaboration with government partners, as the duty bearers, and other local development partners contributing to specific projects. For example, health and nutrition surveys should be planned in collaboration with the local Ministry of Health and any surveys with school aged children should be planned in collaboration with the local Ministry of Education.

The toolkit A variety of tools are available for use for measuring different aspects of child well-being. The tools and the questions are linked to a particular indicator. The tools you will need to use will depend on which indicators you selected and what type of tool is most relevant. This ‘toolkit’ provides a range of tools to choose from, remembering that two to three tools is the maximum any project or programme should use. However, several of the tools can be combined. What are the main tools available?

1. Caregiver Survey – questions to be asked to the parents or caregiver of a child 2. Development Assets Profile (DAP) tool – a child-self perception survey for children aged 12-

18 to assess their own well-being 3. Youth Healthy Behaviour Survey (Youth Survey) – for children aged 12-18 years 4. Functional Literacy Assessment Tool (FLAT) - a set of reading assessment tools for children

who have or would be expected to have completed a basic education 5. Measuring Child Growth tool – to measure height and weight of children under five years.

These main tools are the tools used for measuring the child well-being targets.

More tools available 1. Health Facility Evaluation tool – for measuring access to health care and the effectiveness of

Citizen Voice and Action or other local level advocacy on health facilities 2. Early Grade Reading Assessment (EGRA) — a reading assessment for children in their second

year of learning or Grade 2 3. School Readiness Test for pre-school aged children 4. Concepts about Print 5. Lifeskills Observation tool – to observe and score the lifeskills development of children aged

6-18. 6. Foundational and Essential Life Skills Assessment (FELSA) - these measure the essential core

skills of critical thinking, communication skills and emotional management 7. Children’s Perspective of Spirituality and Well-being 8. Children’s Reflections on CWBA 3 and Fullness of Life Focus Group Discussions. 9. ‘Cared for, protected and participating’ Focus Group Discussion Guide.

Example Here are some examples of how the indicators for CWBO and tools link together:


CWBO Children well nourished Indicator selected % children aged 0-59 months who received one vitamin A capsule in the last

6 months preceding the survey, verified by health card

Tool Caregiver survey Question Within the last six months, was (name) given a vitamin A dose?

Yes________ No_______ Date of most recent Vitamin A capsule: DD/MM/YYYY

CWBO Children value and care for others and their environment Indicator selected Mean ‘Development Asset Profile’ score of adolescents aged 12-18 years in

the positive values asset category. Tool Child self-perceived well-being survey (DAP) Sample statements (several statements are relevant)

Rarely Sometimes Often Almost always I am helping to make my community a better place. I am serving others in my community.

Tool name Caregiver survey (household)

Type of tool Quantitative

Unit of measurement

Households

What does it measure

o Poverty and vulnerability level of the household

o Multiple CWBOs depending on the indicators selected

Which CWBOs? o Children well nourished; children protected from disease and injury; children and their caregivers access essential health services.

o Children access and complete basic education

o Children cared for in a loving, safe, family and community environment with safe places to play; parents or caregivers provide well for their children; children celebrated and registered at birth; children are respected participants in decisions that affect their lives.

Measures a highly recommended indicator? Yes – several

Measures the child well-being targets? Yes – several

Description This is a versatile household survey, which can be used to measure indicators across multiple CWBOs. The questions asked depend on the indicators selected and/or WV ‘good practice’ option. There is a fixed set of starting section to identify level of household poverty/vulnerability and demographics, but the rest of the survey can be customised according to the indicators chosen or to the project model, creating your own tailor made survey for your programme or grant funded project.

The beginning section assesses the level of poverty and vulnerability of the household. This is good practice in all development surveys and the questions are taken from UNICEF’s ‘Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys’ and DHS.

The questions you can add into the survey are organised into logical modules. You can pick questions from the modules as relevant to your baseline information needs:

Health (several modules)

Education


Child protection and participation

Food security

Economic development

Further modules can be added as the Compendium develops over time.

You can also add additional questions for any indicators added. You can amend the wording of the questions so the meaning is understood in the context. Some questions require the national office to agree on a definition before the tool can be used.

After analysis, it is important to organise a time in the community to share the findings of the survey and provide people with an opportunity to discuss, validate and interpret the results. See below feedback and validation.

Who? Primary caregiver of the children in the household, although it can still be used to ask questions in households where no children are present.

Where to find it www.wvdevelopment.org and Horizon.

Partnership target o Increase children protected from disease and infection (0-5 years)

Linked tools Can be used in conjunction with the child growth monitoring tool, if trained persons and necessary equipment are available.

Tool name Development Assets Profile

Type of tool Quantitative + qualitative feedback process

Unit of measurement

Child


Children’s perception of their own well-being. The Development Assets Profile (DAP) is based on validated scales of developmental assets, based on 20 years of research. This includes internal and external assets. For a list of the assets see Appendix 1.

Which CWBOs? o Children make good judgements, can protect themselves, manage their emotions, and communicate ideas; Children enjoy positive relationships with peers, family and community members; children value and care for others and their environment; children have hope and vision for the future.

o Children cared for in a loving, safe, family and community environment with safe places to play; children are respected participants in decisions that affect their lives.

Measures a highly recommended indicator? Yes – several

Measures the child well-being targets? Increased level of well-being

Description Self-perception surveys are now widely used with children aged 12-18 years old. It is a quantitative survey, so easy to score and aggregate, but collects information about very subjective issues, which can be difficult to measure on a large scale using more qualitative methods. Both tools measure children’s perceptions of their own well-being or subjective aspects of well-being. Both options are fixed surveys that require careful contextualisation and validation in each context. They cannot just be translated as phrases have different meanings to children. Once it has been adapted, it can be used in different projects across the country. For more details of measuring

http://www.transformational-development.org/integratedprogramming


subjective well-being read the ‘Discussion paper: Measuring Subjective Aspects of World Vision’s Child Well-being Outcomes’ on wvcentral.2

The DAP uses statements for children to respond to on a likert scale (for example, ‘always’, ‘sometimes’, ‘never’), which are correlated with developmental assets. It is based on positive statements about what a young person thinks he/she is, thinks and has. The survey can be used in schools, with children completing the surveys on their own. The surveys can also be used orally in areas of low literacy, one-to-one with an interviewer. Some sample statements are below:

I stand up for what I believe in.

I am included in family tasks and decisions.

I have parents who urge me to do well in school. http://www.search-institute.org/survey-services/surveys/developmental-assets-profile

After the analysis is done, it is important to organise a feedback session with the children and young people who participated. This is to share the findings, in a child friendly way (use pictures, games, discussion groups) but also to give the young people an opportunity to articulate what well-being means to them. Through discussion groups, the young people can explain, dispute or validate the findings and contribute their ideas to improve well-being in the community.

Who? Children aged 12-18 years old. Younger than 12 years it is cognitively more difficult and confusing for children to self-assess in this way, thus data is not as reliable.

Where to find it The DAP has to be adapted for each country context. You can find out here if there is a DAP already in your country from the transformational-development website. To develop a DAP, please contact: [email protected] and cc: [email protected].

Partnership target o Children report an increased level of well-being

Linked tools Can be used with education and life-skills tools or spiritual nurture tools for same age youth.

Children’s World Children’s World is an international survey on the well-being of children. This survey was developed through collaboration with WV Germany’s Research Institute and the International Society for Childhood Indicators. It is currently in a field testing phase. If you are interested in participating in this survey, more details can be found here: http://www.childrensworlds.org Tool name Measuring child growth tool

Type of tool Anthropometric

Unit of measurement

Child


Weight for age = underweight

Height for age = stunting

Height for weight = wasting

2

https://www.wvcentral.org/supportfunctions/gkm/re/Documents/Measuring%20subjective%20well%20being%20Discussion%20Paper1.pdf



http://www.search-institute.org/survey-services/surveys/developmental-assets-profile

http://www.search-institute.org/survey-services/surveys/developmental-assets-profile

mailto:[email protected]

http://www.childrensworlds.org/_




Which CWBOs? o Children well nourished

Measures a highly recommended indicator? Yes

Measures the child well-being targets? Yes

Description Anthropometric measurement for measuring the height for weight and age of children is recommended by the World Health Organisation. This tool should only be used by trained persons, as it is quite tricky to accurately measure young children’s height and weight, as they tend to move around so much. Even a small error in measurement can lead to a large miscalculation in stunting, wasting and underweight. This tool is best used in partnership with the local health clinic or Ministry of Health.

Who? Children aged 0-5 years


Partnership target o An increase in children well nourished (0-5 years)

Linked tool Caregiver Survey

Tool name Youth healthy behaviour survey


Unit of measurement

Child


Young people’s well-being; knowledge, attitudes and behaviours in relation to health, HIV, sex and relationships; experiences of violence and substance abuse.

Which CWBOs? o Children protected from infection, disease and injury.

o Children make good judgements, can protect themselves, manage their emotions and communicate ideas; adolescents ready for economic opportunity.

Measures a highly recommended indicator? Yes

Measures the child well-being targets? Yes (alternative approach)

Description This is a survey for young people to complete anonymously. It covers a range of topics important from a HIV prevention and a lifeskills perspective. This survey can be measured in conjunction with or instead of the child self-perception survey (DAP) for any children aged 12-18 years or older. This survey is based on the standardised indicators and questions from PEPFAR and UNAIDS.

Who? Children and young people aged 12-18 years


Partnership target o Children report an increased level of well-being (alternative approach) See Appendix 5.

Linked tools Self-perception survey, spiritual development survey for same age youth.




Tool name Functional Literacy Assessment Tool (FLAT)


Unit of measurement

Child


The tool provides critical information about children’s foundational and functional reading skills. The objective of the tool is to find out the highest level of reading children can perform comfortably. Based on their performance they are grouped into six categories: those who cannot read, those who can read only letters, those who can read words, those who can read a paragraph, those who can read and comprehend a story, and those who can read and comprehend authentic local material needed to function in everyday life (a notice, newspaper, bulletin, simple instruction manual, letter, an advert, an e-mail and more).

Which CWBOs? o Children access and complete basic education

o Children read, write and use numeracy skills

Measures the child well-being targets? Yes

Description The Functional Literacy and Assessment (FLAT) tool is a simple, quick, cost-effective tool, originally developed and tested by Pratham, a local NGO in India. The Pratham-Aser tool is designed to measure foundational reading skills for children aged 6-15. The tool has been adapted by WV to include a test for measuring functional literacy levels of children that have completed a basic education. The tool is referred to internally as the FLAT.

Who? The FLAT is appropriate to use with children ages 5-16 in the household. 11-13 year olds are the target group for this high-level indicator.


Partnership target o Increase in children who can read by age 11 (or age appropriate for post-primary school)

Linked tools Life skills tool, spiritual development tool, reading assessment, math assessment for same age children.

Tool name Lifeskills Observation tool


Unit of measurement

Child


Lifeskills - communication structure, critical thinking, emotional management

Which CWBOs? o Children make good judgments, can protect themselves, manage emotions and communicate ideas

Description During the different life cycle stages, each child and adolescent develops their own communication structure, which is integrated by the comprehension, emotional management and self expression processes.

This is a quick and simple tool to get an understanding of which life skills or competencies WV needs to strengthen in children and adolescents. This information helps to plan the education strategy such as planning a remedial

http://www.wvdevelopment.org/


strategy to use with children or adolescents that are having learning problems.

It is designed for use with children aged 6-18 years. The Facilitator Instructions and the Observation and Scoring tool are separated by two age groups: 6-9 years and 10-18 years. Since these two groups are at different stages of development, it would be inaccurate to measure them using the same scale.

Precursor the FELSA (Foundational and Essential Life Skills Assessment) tool, which is still under development.

Who? o Children who are 6-18 years old


Linked tool Math assessment, life skills tool, critical thinking tool for same age youth.

Coming soon: more education and lifeskills tools, including mathematics and economic

readiness (like digital and financial literacy).Data collection in partnership It is important to remember that duty-bearers are primarily responsible for collecting information: schools, clinics, government, and police etc. World Vision’s data collection should compliment and support this where possible, for example by collecting data in collaboration and/or sharing findings with duty bearers. If WV is collecting information on schooling, this can be done in partnership with the District Ministry of Education or local school. If WV is collecting information on health, this can be done in partnership with the District Ministry of Health or local clinics. Where important information is already available from secondary sources or from the assessment/design process, it is not necessary to collect it again. For example if reliable local data is available at the clinics in the impact area on child nutrition, births in a medical facility and vaccination coverage, this information can be used without further surveying. Baseline and evaluation measurements should be planned, undertaken, analysed and used in full collaboration with partners.

Feedback to and validation from the community Sharing WV’s findings with the community so that they can be discussed, disputed or validated, is an essential part of the measurement process.

Community members have a right to know what the results are.

It is part of WV’s accountability to the people it seeks to serve.

It provides community members with an opportunity to dispute or validate the results.

It helps WV to better understand and interpret the findings.

It can strengthen ownership of the programme and increase motivation to be a part of the change process, through community monitoring and actions.

After feedback, the work that World Vision and its partners are doing may begin to make more sense to the wider community...

There are a variety of suggested tools that can be used for this. Ideally, this should include a process during data collection to find out how community members would like to receive this information afterwards. Do not assume that by informing a community leader, this task has been done. Consider using information boards or public meetings with visual representations of the findings. Focus group discussions are also an important means of helping facilitate discussions, but also consider using drawings to express the findings or large visual representations in charts. See Baseline Guidance for more details.

Action: schedule a day after baseline findings have been analysed to share findings with community members, including children.

http://www.wvdevelopment.org/


Action: develop a Fact Sheet that summarises the findings of the baseline for programme staff.

Data capture For entering and storing data, you can use the programme that staff are most familiar with. It is recommended that quantitative data be captured at the programme level using the latest version of Epi-Info or SPSS, which can be used for more sophisticated analysis. However, if neither of these is available or staff do not have skills in using these programmes, Excel provides sufficient functionality for basic analysis. Each region has been provided with a copy and licence for use of SPSS. Epi-info can be downloaded for free from here: http://wwwn.cdc.gov/epiinfo/html/downloads.htm. The data files can be stored in Horizon and important baseline and evaluation values entered into the Indicator Tracking Table also in Horizon. Action: Store data files (Excel, SPSS, Epi-Info or other) on Horizon with baseline report,

terms of reference for the baseline, alongside other key programme documents.

Reporting

After community feedback and validation, the findings from the baseline or evaluation are ready to be reported, using LEAP templates. In progress reports, it is really important to analyse the data you have collected and think critically about your findings - why those changes did or didn’t occur, taking into account changes in the environment, national policies, technology, economy and political situation, and any complimentary work by other agencies or the national government, whether or not these entities are partnering with World Vision directly.

Reporting negative or unexpected changes is also very important; there is much to be learned from this. By acknowledging failures and analysing why things did not go as planned, WV can understand what to do better next time. It is crucial to try to analyse and reflect critically on why things happened the way they did. This helps WV to improve its work and ultimately contribute more effectively to the well-being of children.

At the national level, baseline and evaluation reports can be used, alongside monitoring reports and sponsorship data, to create an overall summary report, built around the national office strategic objectives, of World Vision’s contribution to child well-being in that country, including the child well-being targets. This can include all reports from projects and programmes across all ministry streams. Be sure to include relevant advocacy work through Child Health Now and the Citizen Voice and Action (CVA) project model. Using a process of summary reporting reports can be analysed for emerging themes, trends and changes in child well-being, taking into account the other actors and factors that also contributed to change (or lack thereof). In the same way, regional offices can produce summary reports on child well-being and a global report will be produced. Our existing programmes are already contributing to the well-being of children, and there is already a lot of information being collected in World Vision programmes and projects. This process aims to make better use of information collected and ensure alignment with strategy. For more information, please see the Guidance on Reporting.

Important points to consider in evaluation

Relevance: did the project or programme respond to the community’s real needs?

Effectiveness: did the programming approach work well?

Efficiency: a cost-benefit analysis of how much it cost to achieve the objectives

Sustainability: what are the lasting changes? Impact: what broader changes happened? What long-term changes happened?

9. The Indicators In this section, the indicators are listed with a few key points, such as when and how it is measured. The majority of the indicators are standardised and come from UNICEF, WHO,

http://wwwn.cdc.gov/epiinfo/html/downloads.htm


FANTA or another international agency. Where there is no international standard, World Vision’s work in measuring these aspects is contributing to an emergent field of measuring children’s well-being. Some of the indicators are relevant only for baseline and evaluation, whilst others can be included in regular monitoring, for example those around changes in knowledge, attitudes and behaviour. Some aspects of child well-being are better measured by proxy indicators, for example Vitamin A deficiency is very hard to measure, but whether a child received a Vitamin A capsule in the last six months can easily be verified.

Partnership Targets Standard indicators, used for measuring progress on the child well-being targets are at the beginning of each relevant section, under the heading ‘Child well-being target standard indicators’.

Indicator detail sheets For each indicator there is an ‘indicator detail sheet’. This provides a detailed description of the indicators, how to measure it, how to calculate it, where the indicator originated etc. They are now only available in Horizon.

Disaggregation Almost all indicators involving children can and should be disaggregated by gender; this is built into the tools for measurement and is essential information to collect. Other disaggregation categories can be added as relevant to the national office strategy or programme focus. Suggested disaggregation categories are recommended for each indicator in the indicator detail sheets; for example, MVC / OVC, disability and the lifecycle stage.

Adding new indicators Every year new indicators can be added to the Compendium. Please discuss new indicators with your Community of Practice (CoP) and submit new indicators through your CoP in the 3rd Quarter of the Financial Year. See Appendix 3 for details of what is required. Use the hyperlinks to navigate to the indicators you want to see

Enjoy good health Educated for life

Experience love of God and their neighbours

Cared for, protected and participating

Asp

irati

on

: En

joy g

oo

d h

ealt

h

Ou

tco

me: C

hild

ren

well n

ou

rish

ed

Ch

ild

we

ll-b

ein

g t

arg

et

stan

da

rd i

nd

icato

r D

efi

nit

ion

T

oo

l N

ote

s

Pre

vale

nce

of

stu

nti

ng i

n

ch

ild

ren

un

de

r fi

ve y

ears

of

age

Pe

rce

nt

of

child

ren

age

d 0

-59

mo

nth

s w

ho

se h

eig

ht-

for-

age

is

be

low

min

us

two

sta

nd

ard

de

via

tio

ns

fro

m t

he

me

dia

n (

or

less

th

an

tw

o s

tan

dard

de

via

tio

ns

be

low

th

e

me

dia

n)

as

de

term

ine

d b

y th

e WH

O C

hil

d G

row

th

Sta

nd

ard

s.

Me

asu

rin

g C

hil

d

Gro

wth

To

ol, a

s p

art

of

Care

giv

er

surv

ey;

Ch

ild

an

thro

po

me

try

mo

du

le

To

be m

easu

red

by

train

ed

p

ers

on

nel

on

ly.

Pre

vale

nce

of

un

de

rwe

igh

t in

ch

ild

ren

un

de

r fi

ve y

ears

o

f age

Pe

rce

nt

of

ch

ild

ren

age

d 0

-59

mo

nth

s w

ho

se w

eig

ht

for

age

is

less

th

an

min

us

two

sta

nd

ard

de

viati

on

s fr

om

th

e

me

dia

n (

WA

Z)

for

the

in

tern

ati

on

al r

efe

ren

ce

po

pu

lati

on

age

s 0

–59

mo

nth

s.

Me

asu

rin

g C

hil

d

Gro

wth

To

ol, a

s p

art

of

Care

giv

er

surv

ey;

Ch

ild

an

thro

po

me

try

mo

du

le

To

be m

easu

red

by

train

ed

p

ers

on

nel

on

ly.

Th

is i

nd

icato

r m

ay b

e

seaso

nall

y v

ari

ab

le.

Pre

vale

nce

of

wast

ing i

n

ch

ild

ren

un

de

r fi

ve y

ears

of

age

Pe

rce

nt

of

ch

ild

ren

age

d 0

-59

mo

nth

s w

ho

se w

eig

ht

for

he

igh

t is

le

ss t

han

min

us

two

sta

nd

ard

de

via

tio

ns

fro

m

the

me

dia

n (

WH

Z)

for

the

in

tern

ati

on

al

refe

ren

ce

p

op

ula

tio

n a

ge

s 0

–59

mo

nth

s.

Me

asu

rin

g C

hil

d

Gro

wth

To

ol, a

s p

art

of

Care

giv

er

surv

ey;

Ch

ild

an

thro

po

me

try

mo

du

le

To

be m

easu

red

by

train

ed

p

ers

on

nel

on

ly.

Th

is i

nd

icato

r m

ay b

e

seaso

nall

y v

ari

ab

le.

Ad

dit

ion

al in

dic

ato

r D

efi

nit

ion

T

oo

l N

ote

s

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ch

ild

ren

re

ceiv

ing V

itam

in A

cap

sule

s

Per

cent

of

child

ren a

ged

6-5

9 m

ont

hs w

ho r

ecei

ved

one

vita

min

A

cap

sule

s in

the

las

t 6

mo

nth

s pr

eced

ing

the

surv

ey, ve

rifie

d b

y hea

lth

card

.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey; 6-

23

mo

nths

and

24-5

9 m

onth

s m

odul

es

Pro

xy

for

vita

min

A d

efic

ienc

y w

hic

h is

har

d t

o m

easu

re.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f h

ou

seh

old

s co

nsu

min

g a

de

qu

ate

ly

iod

ise

d s

alt

Per

cent

of

house

ho

lds

cons

umin

g sa

lt io

dis

ed a

t 15-

40

par

ts p

er

mill

ion (

ppm

) as

mea

sure

d u

sing

Rap

id T

est

Kits

(RT

K)

acco

mpa

nie

d b

y a

qual

ity

assu

ranc

e su

bsa

mpl

e.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey;

rapi

d te

st k

its;

titr

atio

n m

etho

d (in

subs

ampl

e); H

ealt

h

If la

ck o

f io

dis

ed s

alt

is k

no

wn

to b

e a

pro

blem

in t

he a

rea,

sa

lt t

esting

is r

eco

mm

ended

ra

ther

than

sel

f re

port

ing.

Wo

rld V

isio

n’s

Co

mpen

dium

of In

dic

ato

rs f

or

Chi

ld W

ell-

bein

g 29

dem

ogr

aphic

s m

odule

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ch

ild

ren

u

nd

er

2 y

ears

re

ce

ivin

g

earl

y i

nit

iati

on

of

bre

ast

fee

din

g

Per

cent

of

mo

ther

s o

f ch

ildre

n a

ged

0-2

3 m

ont

hs, w

ho p

ut t

he

new

bo

rn inf

ant

to t

he

brea

st w

ithi

n 1 h

our

of bir

th.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey;

Wo

men

mo

dule

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ch

ild

ren

e

xclu

sive

ly b

reast

fed

un

til 6

m

on

ths

of

age

Per

cent

of

infa

nts

age

d 0

–5 m

onth

s w

ho w

ere

fed

excl

usi

vely

w

ith

bre

ast

milk

duri

ng t

he e

ntire

day

pri

or

to inte

rvie

w.

Exc

lusi

ve b

reas

tfee

ding

(EB

F) m

eans

the

baby

has

not

rece

ived

an

y o

ther

flu

ids

(no

t ev

en w

ater

) o

r fo

ods,

wit

h t

he

exce

ptio

n o

f o

ral re

hyd

rati

on s

olu

tio

n, d

rops

and s

yrups

(vitam

ins,

min

eral

s,

med

icin

es).

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey; 0-

5

mo

nth

s m

odul

e

Thi

s is

a p

roxy

indi

cato

r fo

r ex

clusi

ve b

reas

t-fe

edin

g to

av

oid

pro

blem

s w

ith

reca

ll.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ch

ild

ren

age

d

6-2

3 m

on

ths

rece

ivin

g

co

nti

nu

ed

bre

ast

fee

din

g

Per

cent

of

child

ren a

ged

6-23

mo

nths

rec

eivi

ng

brea

st m

ilk in t

he

pre

vio

us 2

4 ho

urs

. C

areg

iver

surv

ey; 6-

23

mo

nths

mo

dule

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ch

ild

ren

giv

en

ap

pro

pri

ate

fe

ed

ing d

uri

ng

illn

ess

Per

cent

of

child

ren a

ged

0-59

mo

nths

who w

ere

sick

in t

he

pre

vio

us 2

wee

ks (

diar

rho

ea, fe

ver,

co

ugh

) an

d w

ho h

ad

incr

ease

d br

east

feed

ing

and/

or

fluid

s an

d/o

r co

ntinue

d fo

ods,

as

appro

pri

ate.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey; 0-

5

mo

nth

s, 6

-23

mo

nth

s, a

nd

24-5

9 m

onth

s m

odul

es

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f yo

un

g

ch

ild

ren

re

ceiv

ing a

m

inim

um

me

al fr

eq

uen

cy

Per

cent

of

bre

astf

ed a

nd n

on-b

reas

tfed

chi

ldre

n a

ged

6–23

mo

nth

s w

ho r

ecei

ved s

olid

, sem

i-so

lid, o

r so

ft fo

ods

(inc

ludin

g m

ilk f

eeds

for

non-b

reas

tfed

chi

ldre

n)

the

min

imum

num

ber

of

tim

es o

r m

ore

dur

ing

the

prev

ious

day

.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey; 6-

23

mo

nths

mo

dule

Min

imum

num

ber

of

tim

es:

o

2 x

fo

r bre

astf

ed c

hild

ren

6–8 m

ont

hs

o

3 x

fo

r bre

astf

ed c

hild

ren

9–23

month

s o

4 x

fo

r no

n-bre

astf

ed

child

ren 6

-23 m

ont

hs.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ch

ild

ren

co

nsu

min

g (

dail

y) i

ron

-ric

h

or

iro

n-f

ort

ifie

d f

oo

ds

Per

cent

of

child

ren a

ged

6-59

mo

nths

who r

ecei

ved a

ny o

f th

e fo

llow

ing

dur

ing

the

pre

vio

us d

ay: ir

on-r

ich

foo

d o

r ir

on-f

ort

ified

co

ndi

men

ts; fo

od t

hat

is e

spec

ially

des

igne

d fo

r in

fants

and

yo

ung

child

ren a

nd

was

fo

rtifi

ed w

ith iro

n; foo

d th

at is

fort

ified

in

the

ho

me

with a

pro

duct

tha

t in

clud

ed iro

n.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey; 6-

23

mo

nths

and

24-5

9 m

onth

s m

odul

e

Incl

udes

co

mm

erci

ally

or

hom

e-fo

rtifi

ed foo

ds

incl

udin

g sp

rinkl

es.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ch

ild

ren

re

ceiv

ing m

inim

um

die

tary

Per

cent

of

child

ren a

ged

6-23

mo

nths

who r

ecei

ved

foo

d fr

om

at

leas

t fo

ur

foo

d g

roups

duri

ng

the

pre

vio

us d

ay.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey; 6-

23

mo

nths

mo

dule

Li

st o

f fo

od

type

s pr

ovi

ded

, in

clud

ing

mac

ro a

nd

mic

ro

Wo

rld V

isio

n’s

Co

mpen

dium

of In

dic

ato

rs f

or

Chi

ld W

ell-

bein

g 30

div

ers

ity

nut

rien

ts.

Pre

vale

nce

of

an

aem

ia in

ch

ild

ren

un

de

r 5

ye

ars

Per

cent

of

child

ren a

ged

6-5

9 m

ont

hs w

ith

anae

mia

(H

aem

ocu

e H

b <

11g

/dL

).

Rap

id h

aem

ogl

obin

te

st (

like

Hem

ocu

e),

as p

art

of

Car

egiv

er

surv

ey; C

hild

an

thro

pom

etry

m

odule

Pre

vale

nce

of

an

aem

ia in

w

om

en

of

rep

rod

ucti

ve a

ge

w

ith

ch

ild

ren

un

de

r 5

ye

ars

Per

cent

of

non-p

regn

ant

wo

men

who

are

mo

ther

s of ch

ildre

n

und

er 5

yea

rs w

ith

anae

mia

(H

aem

ocu

e H

b <

12

g/dL

).

Rap

id h

aem

ogl

obin

te

st (

like

Hem

ocu

e),

as p

art

of

Car

egiv

er

surv

ey; W

om

en

anae

mia

mo

dule

Pre

vale

nce

of

an

aem

ia in

p

regn

an

t w

om

en

Per

cent

of

preg

nant

wo

men

with a

nae

mia

(H

aem

ocu

e H

b <

11g

/d

L).

Rap

id h

aem

ogl

obin

te

st (

like

Hem

ocu

e),

as p

art

of

Car

egiv

er

surv

ey; W

om

en

anae

mia

mo

dule

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f w

om

en

wh

o

had

acce

ss t

o i

ron

/fo

late

d

uri

ng p

revi

ou

s p

regn

an

cy

Per

cent

of

mo

ther

s o

f ch

ildre

n a

ged

0-2

3 m

ont

hs, w

ho h

ad

acce

ss t

o 9

0 o

r m

ore

iro

n/fo

late

supp

lem

ents

/tab

lets

dur

ing

thei

r m

ost

rec

ent

preg

nancy

.

Car

egiv

er S

urv

ey;

Wo

men

mo

dul

e

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f w

om

en

wh

o

too

k i

ron

/fo

late

du

rin

g

pre

vio

us

pre

gn

an

cy

Per

cent

of

mo

ther

s o

f ch

ildre

n a

ged

0-2

3 m

ont

hs, w

ho c

onsu

med

90

or

mo

re iro

n/fo

late

sup

ple

men

ts/t

able

ts d

urin

g th

eir

mo

st

rece

nt

pre

gnan

cy.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey;

Wo

men

mo

dule

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f w

om

en

wh

o

incr

ease

d f

oo

d c

on

sum

pti

on

d

uri

ng m

ost

re

cen

t p

regn

an

cy

Per

cent

of

mo

ther

s o

f ch

ildre

n a

ged0

-23

mo

nths

, w

ho r

epo

rt

incr

easi

ng t

he

num

ber

of m

eals

or

snac

ks d

urin

g pre

gnan

cy.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey;

Wo

men

mo

dule

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f p

regn

an

t w

om

en

wh

o c

on

sum

ed

iro

n-

rich

fo

od

in

pre

vio

us

24

h

ou

rs

Per

cent

of

preg

nant

wo

men

who

co

nsum

ed a

ny

of

the

follo

win

g dur

ing

the

prev

ious

day

: iro

n-r

ich fo

od o

r ir

on-

fort

ified

co

ndi

men

ts; fo

od t

hat

was

fo

rtifi

ed w

ith

iro

n; foo

d th

at w

as

fort

ified

in

the

hom

e w

ith a

pro

duc

t th

at inc

luded

iro

n.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey;

Wo

men

mo

dule

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ch

ild

ren

wh

o

Per

cent

of

child

ren a

ged

6-59

mo

nths

who r

ecei

ved

iro

n s

yrup

or

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey; 6-

Wo

rld V

isio

n’s

Co

mpen

dium

of In

dic

ato

rs f

or

Chi

ld W

ell-

bein

g 31

receiv

ed

an

iro

n s

yru

p d

ose

o

r ta

ble

t in

th

e l

ast

wee

k

table

t in

the

last

wee

k.

23

mo

nth

s an

d 2

4-5

9 m

onth

s m

odul

es

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ch

ild

ren

u

nd

er

five a

tte

nd

ing G

row

th

Mo

nit

ori

ng a

nd

Pro

mo

tio

n

Per

cent

of

child

ren a

ged 0

-59

mo

nths

who a

tten

ded

Gro

wth

M

onito

ring

and P

rom

oti

on in

the

pre

vio

us

thre

e m

onth

s (v

erifi

ed

wit

h G

row

th C

ard).

Car

egi

ver

surv

ey; 0-

5

mo

nth

s, 6

-23

mo

nth

s, a

nd

24-5

9 m

onth

s m

odul

e

Rec

ord

num

ber

of tim

es

atte

nded

GM

P in

pre

vio

us 6

m

ont

hs.

Impo

rtan

t to

co

llect

thi

s in

form

atio

n es

pec

ially

for

suppo

rtin

g th

e Sp

ons

ors

hip

mo

nito

ring

of ch

ildre

n un

der

five

.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ch

ild

ren

p

art

icip

ati

ng i

n p

osi

tive

d

evi

an

ce n

utr

itio

nal

pro

ject

(P

D H

eart

h)

wh

ose

yo

un

ge

r si

bli

ng i

s n

orm

al

we

igh

t fo

r age

Per

cent

of

child

ren w

ho h

ave

par

tici

pat

ed in P

D/H

eart

h w

hose

yo

ung

er s

iblin

g ag

ed 0

-59

mo

nths

has

wei

ght

for

age

≥ 2

z-s

core

s.

Mea

suri

ng

Child

G

row

th T

oo

l, as

par

t o

f C

areg

iver

surv

ey;

Child

anth

ropo

met

ry

and h

ealt

h

dem

ogr

aphic

s m

odule

s

To

be

mea

sure

d by

trai

ned

med

ical

per

sonne

l onl

y. W

hen

m

easu

ring

hei

ght

and w

eigh

t fo

r ag

e of ch

ildre

n un

der

5, as

k w

het

her

the

child

has

a s

iblin

g w

ho

was

par

t o

f th

e PD

Hea

rth

pro

ject

.

Wo

rld V

isio

n’s

Co

mpen

dium

of In

dic

ato

rs f

or

Chi

ld W

ell-

bein

g 32

Ou

tco

me: C

hild

ren

pro

tecte

d f

rom

in

fecti

on

, d

isease

an

d i

nju

ry

Ch

ild

we

ll-b

ein

g t

arg

et

stan

da

rd i

nd

icato

r D

efi

nit

ion

T

oo

l

No

tes

Co

ve

rage

of

ess

en

tial

vacci

ne

s am

on

g c

hild

ren

P

erc

en

t o

f ch

ild

ren

age

d 1

2-5

9 m

on

ths

wh

o h

ave

co

mp

lete

d 3

rd D

PT

do

se p

lus

me

asl

es

vacci

nati

on

, ve

rifi

ed

by v

acci

nati

on

card

an

d m

oth

er'

s re

call.

Care

giv

er

surv

ey;

6

-23

mo

nth

s an

d

24

-59

mo

nth

s m

od

ule

s

In c

ou

ntr

ies

wh

ere

vaccin

ati

on

card

s are

ke

pt

at

the

cli

nic

an

d n

ot

by

care

giv

ers

, th

is i

nfo

rmati

on

can

be o

bta

ine

d a

t th

e

clin

ic i

nst

ead

.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ch

ild

ren

u

nd

er

5 w

ith

dia

rrh

oe

a w

ho

re

ceiv

ed

co

rre

ct

man

age

me

nt

of

dia

rrh

oe

a

Pe

rce

nt

of

pare

nts

or

care

giv

ers

of

child

ren

age

d 0

–59

m

on

ths

wit

h d

iarr

ho

ea i

n t

he

past

tw

o w

ee

ks

wh

o r

ep

ort

th

at

the

ch

ild

re

ceiv

ed

ora

l re

-hyd

rati

on

th

era

py (

OR

T)

an

d i

ncre

ase

d b

reast

fee

din

g a

nd

/or

flu

ids

an

d/o

r co

nti

nu

ed

fo

od

s, a

s ap

pro

pri

ate

.

Care

giv

er

surv

ey;

0

-5 m

on

ths,

6-2

3

mo

nth

s an

d 2

4-5

9

mo

nth

s m

od

ule

s

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ch

ild

ren

u

nd

er

5 w

ith

pre

sum

ed

p

neu

mo

nia

wh

o w

ere

tak

en

to

ap

pro

pri

ate

he

alt

h

pro

vid

er

Pe

rce

nt

of

child

ren

age

d 0

–59

mo

nth

s w

ith

a ‘

pre

sum

ed

p

neu

mo

nia

’ (A

RI)

ep

iso

de

in

th

e p

ast

tw

o w

ee

ks

that

we

re t

ak

en

to

an

ap

pro

pri

ate

he

alt

h-c

are

pro

vid

er.

Care

giv

er

surv

ey;

0

-5 m

on

ths,

6-2

3

mo

nth

s an

d 2

4-5

9

mo

nth

s m

od

ule

s

Use

clin

ic d

ata

fo

r avail

able

fo

r co

mp

ari

son

.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f h

ou

seh

old

s w

he

re a

ll c

hild

ren

un

de

r 5

ye

ars

sle

pt

un

de

r a lo

ng-

last

ing i

nse

ctic

ide

-tre

ate

d

ne

t (L

LIN

) th

e p

revi

ou

s n

igh

t

Pe

rce

nt

of

pare

nts

or

care

giv

ers

wit

h c

hil

dre

n 0

-59

m

on

ths,

wh

o r

ep

ort

th

at

all

ch

ild

ren

0-5

9 m

on

ths

in t

he

h

ou

seh

old

sle

pt

un

de

r an

LL

IN t

he

pre

vio

us

nig

ht.

Care

giv

er

surv

ey;

H

ealt

h

de

mo

gra

ph

ics

mo

du

le

A l

on

g-l

ast

ing i

nse

cti

cid

al

net

(LL

IN)

is a

n i

nse

cti

cid

e

tre

ate

d n

et

that

do

es

no

t n

ee

d t

o b

e r

etr

eate

d

becau

se t

he i

nse

cti

cid

e h

as

bee

n i

nco

rpo

rate

d i

nto

th

e

fib

res

that

make

up

th

e

net.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f w

om

en

wh

o

we

re o

ffe

red

an

d a

cce

pte

d

co

un

sell

ing a

nd

te

stin

g f

or

HIV

du

rin

g m

ost

re

ce

nt

pre

gn

an

cy,

an

d r

ece

ive

d

the

ir t

est

re

sult

s

Pe

rce

nt

of

wo

me

n w

ho

we

re o

ffe

red

vo

lun

tary

HIV

te

stin

g d

uri

ng a

nte

nata

l ca

re f

or

the

ir m

ost

re

cen

t p

regn

an

cy,

acc

ep

ted

an

off

er

of

test

ing,

rece

ived

th

eir

te

st r

esu

lts

an

d r

ece

ived

co

un

sellin

g o

f all

wo

me

n w

ho

w

ere

pre

gn

an

t at

an

y t

ime

in

th

e t

wo

ye

ars

pre

ce

din

g

the

su

rve

y.

Care

giv

er

surv

ey;

W

om

en

mo

du

le

Use

clin

ic d

ata

fo

r co

mp

ari

son

.

Wo

rld V

isio

n’s

Co

mpen

dium

of In

dic

ato

rs f

or

Chi

ld W

ell-

bein

g 33

Hig

hly

re

co

mm

en

de

d

ind

icato

r D

esc

rip

tio

n

To

ol

No

tes

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ch

ild

ren

u

nd

er

5 w

ith

dia

rrh

oe

a w

ho

re

ceiv

ed

eff

ect

ive

tre

atm

en

t o

f d

iarr

ho

ea

Per

cent

of

pare

nts

or

care

give

rs o

f ch

ildre

n ag

ed 0

–59

mo

nths

w

ith

dia

rrho

ea in

the

past

tw

o w

eeks

who

rep

ort

tha

t th

e ch

ild

rece

ived

low

-osm

ola

rity

ora

l reh

ydra

tio

n sa

lts

(OR

S), zi

nc a

nd

incr

ease

d br

east

feed

ing

and/

or

fluid

s an

d/o

r co

ntin

ued

foo

ds, as

ap

pro

pri

ate.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey; 0-

5

mo

nth

s, 6

-23

mo

nths

an

d 2

4-59

mo

nths

m

odule

s

7-1

1 in

dic

ato

r to

mea

sure

ef

fect

iven

ess

of hea

lth

pro

gram

min

g in

terv

enti

on/

hea

lth p

olic

y ch

ange

.

Ad

dit

ion

al in

dic

ato

r D

efi

nit

ion

T

oo

l N

ote

s

Pre

vale

nce

of

dia

rrh

oe

a i

n

ch

ild

ren

un

de

r 5

Per

cent

of

child

ren a

ged 0

–59

mo

nths

who

hav

e su

ffer

ed f

rom

a

dia

rrho

ea e

pis

ode

anyt

ime

in t

he

past

tw

o w

eeks

.

Dia

rrho

ea is

def

ined

as

thre

e o

r m

ore

wat

ery

sto

ols

pas

sed

in a

24-h

our

peri

od.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey; 0-

5

mo

nth

s, 6

-23

mo

nths

an

d 2

4-59

mo

nths

m

odule

s

Pre

vale

nce

of

acu

te

resp

irato

ry i

nfe

ctio

n i

n

ch

ild

ren

un

de

r 5

Per

cent

of

child

ren a

ged 0

–59

mo

nths

who

had

acu

te r

espi

rato

ry

infe

ctio

n o

r ‘p

resu

med

pneu

mo

nia’

in

the

pas

t tw

o w

eeks

.

Pre

sum

ed p

neum

onia

is

defin

ed a

s fa

st b

reat

hin

g ra

te, i

n-d

raw

ing

ribs,

and n

asal

fla

re a

nd

coug

h.

Car

egiv

er s

urve

y; 0

-5

mo

nth

s, 6

-23

mo

nths

an

d 2

4-59

mo

nths

m

odule

s

Pre

vale

nce

of

feve

r in

ch

ild

ren

un

de

r 5

Per

cent

of

child

ren a

ged 0

–59

mo

nths

who

had

a fev

er e

pis

ode

in

the

past

tw

o w

eeks

. C

areg

iver

surv

ey; 0-

5

mo

nth

s, 6

-23

mo

nths

an

d 2

4-59

mo

nths

m

odule

s

May

be

seas

onal

ly v

aria

ble.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ch

ild

ren

u

nd

er

5 w

ith

fe

ver

wh

o w

ere

ap

pro

pri

ate

ly t

reate

d

Per

cent

of

child

ren a

ged 0

–59

mo

nths

wit

h a

feve

r in

the

past

tw

o w

eeks

who w

ere

seen

by

an a

ppro

pri

ate

med

ical

pro

vide

r w

ithi

n 24 h

ours

and t

reat

ed fo

r m

alar

ia a

s ap

pro

pri

ate.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey; 0-

5

mo

nth

s, 6

-23

mo

nths

an

d 2

4-59

mo

nths

m

odule

s

Use

clin

ic d

ata

for

com

pari

son

wher

e av

aila

ble

.

May

be

seas

onal

ly v

aria

ble.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ch

ild

ren

u

nd

er

5 w

ith

fe

ver

wh

o w

ere

te

ste

d f

or

mala

ria

Per

cent

of

child

ren a

ged 0

–59

mo

nths

wit

h a

feve

r in

the

past

tw

o w

eeks

who h

ad a

fin

ger

or

hee

l stick

fo

r m

alar

ia t

esti

ng.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey; 0-

5

mo

nth

s, 6

-23

mo

nths

an

d 2

4-59

mo

nths

m

odule

s

Co

ve

rage

of

lon

g l

ast

ing

inse

cti

cid

e-t

reate

d n

ets

(L

LIN

) at

the

ho

use

ho

ld

Per

cent

of ho

use

hold

s w

ith c

hild

ren

aged

0-5

9 m

ont

hs, w

here

th

e pa

rent

or

care

give

r re

po

rts

the

pres

ence

of at

lea

st t

wo

long-

last

ing

inse

ctic

idal

net

s (L

LIN

s) fo

r m

alar

ia p

reve

ntio

n a

re in

use

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey;

Hea

lth d

emo

grap

hic

mo

dule

A lo

ng-

last

ing

inse

ctic

idal

net

(L

LIN

) is

an

inse

ctic

ide

trea

ted

net

that

do

es n

ot

need

to b

e re

trea

ted

beca

use

the

Wo

rld V

isio

n’s

Co

mpen

dium

of In

dic

ato

rs f

or

Chi

ld W

ell-

bein

g 34

leve

l in

the

hous

eho

ld.

inse

ctic

ide

has

been

in

corp

ora

ted in

to t

he fib

res

that

mak

e up t

he

net

.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f p

regn

an

t w

om

en

wh

o s

lep

t u

nd

er

a

lon

g-l

ast

ing i

nse

ctic

ide

-tr

eate

d n

et

(LL

IN)

the

p

revi

ou

s n

igh

t

Per

cent

of

preg

nant

wo

men

who

rep

ort

hav

ing

slep

t un

der

a LL

IN t

he p

revi

ous

nig

ht.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey;

Wo

men

mo

dule

A lo

ng-las

ting

inse

ctic

idal

net

(L

LIN

) is

an

inse

ctic

ide

trea

ted

net

that

do

es n

ot

need

to b

e re

trea

ted b

ecau

se t

he

inse

ctic

ide

has

been

in

corp

ora

ted in

to t

he fib

res

that

mak

e up t

he

net

.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f h

ou

seh

old

s u

sin

g a

n i

mp

rove

d d

rin

kin

g-

wate

r so

urc

e

Per

cent

of

house

ho

lds

usi

ng

a pr

ote

cted

wat

er s

ourc

e.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey;

WA

SH m

odu

le

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f h

ou

seh

old

s w

ith

su

ffic

ien

t d

rin

kin

g

wate

r fr

om

an

im

pro

ved

so

urc

e

Per

cent

of

hous

eho

lds

spen

din

g up

to

30

min

ute

s to

co

llect

wat

er

fro

m a

n im

pro

ved s

ourc

e.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey;

WA

SH m

odu

le

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f h

ou

seh

old

s u

sin

g u

nim

pro

ved

dri

nk

ing

wate

r w

ho

use

an

ap

pro

pri

ate

tre

atm

en

t m

eth

od

Per

cent

of

house

ho

lds

usi

ng

unim

pro

ved

dri

nki

ng

wat

er w

ho

pra

ctic

e co

rrec

t use

of

reco

mm

ende

d h

ous

eho

ld w

ater

tr

eatm

ent

tech

no

logi

es.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey;

WA

SH m

odu

le

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f h

ou

seh

old

s u

sin

g s

afe

wate

r st

ora

ge

co

nta

ine

rs

Per

cent

of

hous

eho

lds

sto

ring

trea

ted w

ater

in s

afe

sto

rage

co

nta

iner

s.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey;

WA

SH m

odu

le

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f h

ou

seh

old

s u

sin

g i

mp

rove

d s

an

itati

on

fa

ciliti

es

(fo

r d

efe

cati

on

)

Per

cent

of

house

ho

lds

usi

ng

an im

pro

ved s

anit

atio

n fa

cilit

y,

typic

ally

a lat

rine

or

toile

t fo

r def

ecat

ion.

An im

pro

ved

sani

tatio

n

faci

lity

is o

ne

that

hyg

ienic

ally

sep

arat

es h

um

an e

xcre

ta fro

m

hum

an c

onta

ct.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey;

WA

SH m

odu

le

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f h

ou

seh

old

s th

at

have

eff

ecti

ve o

pti

on

s fo

r so

lid

wast

e t

reatm

en

t

Per

cent

of

hous

eho

lds

serv

iced

wit

h re

gula

r so

lid w

aste

tr

eatm

ent

& d

ispo

sal,

incl

udin

g re

cycl

ing

and c

om

po

stin

g o

ptio

ns.

C

areg

iver

Surv

ey;

WA

SH m

odu

le

Wo

rld V

isio

n’s

Co

mpen

dium

of In

dic

ato

rs f

or

Chi

ld W

ell-

bein

g 35

an

d/o

r d

isp

osa

l

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ch

ild

ren

wh

o

receiv

ed

an

an

tih

elm

inth

ic

(de

wo

rmin

g t

reatm

en

t) i

n

the

past

six

mo

nth

s

Per

cent

of

child

ren a

ged 1

2–5

9 m

ont

hs w

ho inge

sted

an

anti

hel

min

thic

in t

he

past

six

mo

nths

to

tre

at in

test

inal

wo

rms,

fo

llow

ing

nat

iona

l tr

eatm

ent

guid

elin

es.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey; 6-

23

mo

nths

and

24-5

9 m

onth

s m

odul

es

The

age

rang

e ca

n be

adap

ted

as a

ppro

pri

ate

to m

atch

nat

ional

hea

lth p

olic

y.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f w

om

en

wh

o

receiv

ed

an

an

tih

elm

inth

ic

(de

wo

rmin

g t

reatm

en

t)

du

rin

g p

revi

ou

s p

regn

an

cy

Per

cent

of

mo

ther

s o

f ch

ildre

n a

ged

0-2

3 m

ont

hs w

ho ing

este

d an

ant

ihel

min

thic

(de

wo

rmin

g tr

eatm

ent)

fo

r in

test

inal

hel

min

thic

in

fect

ion

duri

ng

a re

cent

pre

gnan

cy, f

ollo

win

g nat

iona

l tre

atm

ent

guid

elin

es.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey;

Wo

men

mo

dule

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f p

are

nts

or

care

giv

ers

wit

h a

pp

rop

riate

h

an

d-w

ash

ing b

eh

avi

ou

r

Per

cent

of

pare

nts

or

care

give

rs w

ith

child

ren

aged

0-5

9 m

onth

s w

ho

rec

all pr

actisi

ng h

and-w

ashi

ng u

sing

an e

ffec

tive

pro

duct

, su

ch a

s so

ap o

r as

h, a

t le

ast

two

out

of fo

ur

critic

al t

imes

dur

ing

the

past

24 h

our

s (a

fter

def

ecat

ion,

aft

er c

lean

ing

bab

ies'

bo

tto

ms,

bef

ore

fo

od p

repar

atio

n, b

efo

re fee

din

g ch

ildre

n).

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey;

Hea

lth d

emo

grap

hics

m

odule

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f h

ou

seh

old

s w

ith

a d

esi

gn

ate

d p

lace

fo

r h

an

dw

ash

ing w

he

re w

ate

r an

d s

oap

are

pre

sen

t

Per

cent

of

hous

eho

lds

wit

h a

desi

gnat

ed p

lace

fo

r ha

ndw

ashin

g w

her

e w

ater

and

so

ap a

re p

rese

nt.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey;

Hea

lth d

emo

grap

hics

m

odule

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f p

are

nts

or

care

giv

ers

wit

h c

hild

ren

0–

23

mo

nth

s w

ho

re

po

rt t

hat

the

ir c

hil

d's

sto

ols

are

safe

ly

dis

po

sed

of

Per

cent

of

pare

nts

or

care

give

rs w

ith

child

ren a

ged 0

–23

mo

nths

w

ho

rep

ort

that

thei

r ch

ild's

lat

est

sto

ol w

as d

ispo

sed

of sa

fely

an

d t

he

ho

me

area

is

free

fro

m f

aeca

l co

ntam

inat

ion, v

erifi

ed b

y o

bse

rvat

ion.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey;

Hea

lth d

emo

grap

hics

m

odule

Dis

aggr

egat

e by

type

of

sanitat

ion fac

ility

.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ult

s w

ho

k

no

w t

he

th

ree

mo

de

s o

f m

oth

er

to c

hild

tr

an

smis

sio

n o

f H

IV

Per

cent

of

adult

s ag

ed 1

8–49

year

s w

ho k

now

that

HIV

can

be

tran

smit

ted

fro

m a

n H

IV-p

osi

tive

mo

ther

to

her

unborn

chi

ld

dur

ing

pre

gnan

cy, du

ring

deliv

ery

and

thro

ugh b

reas

t-fe

edin

g.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey;

Adul

t H

IV/A

IDS

mo

dule

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ult

s aw

are

o

f m

eth

od

s o

f p

reven

tin

g

mo

the

r-to

-ch

ild

tr

an

smis

sio

n

Per

cent

of

adult

s ag

ed 1

8–49

year

s w

ho

co

rrec

tly

resp

ond

to

pro

mpt

ed q

uest

ions

abo

ut p

reve

nting

mat

erna

l-to

-chi

ld

tran

smis

sio

n o

f H

IV t

hro

ugh

anti

-ret

rovi

ral th

erap

y.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey;

Adul

t H

IV/A

IDS

mo

dule

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f w

om

en

wh

o

Per

cent

of

preg

nant

wo

men

and

mo

ther

s o

f ch

ildre

n ag

ed 0

–23

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey;

Wo

rld V

isio

n’s

Co

mpen

dium

of In

dic

ato

rs f

or

Chi

ld W

ell-

bein

g 36

kn

ow

at

least

tw

o d

an

ge

r si

gn

s o

f p

regn

an

cy

mo

nth

s w

ho k

now

at

leas

t tw

o d

ange

r si

gns,

or

com

plic

atio

ns,

dur

ing

pre

gnan

cy.

Wo

men

mo

dule

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f w

om

en

wh

o

kn

ow

at

least

th

ree

po

st-

part

um

dan

ge

r si

gn

s

Per

cent

of

preg

nant

wo

men

and

mo

ther

s o

f ch

ildre

n ag

ed 0

–23

mo

nth

s w

ho k

now

at

leas

t th

ree

dange

r si

gns

in t

he m

oth

er

dur

ing

the

peri

od im

med

iate

ly a

fter

del

iver

y.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey;

Wo

men

mo

dule

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f w

om

en

wh

o

kn

ow

at

least

th

ree

ne

on

ata

l d

an

ge

r si

gn

s

Per

cent

of

preg

nant

wo

men

and

mo

ther

s o

f ch

ildre

n ag

ed 0

–23

mo

nth

s w

ho k

now

at

leas

t th

ree

neo

nata

l da

nge

r si

gns.

C

areg

iver

surv

ey;

Wo

men

mo

dule

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts

wh

o p

ract

ice

go

od

pe

rso

nal

h

ygie

ne

Per

cent

of

yout

h ag

ed 1

2-1

8 ye

ars

who

cle

an t

heir

tee

th a

t le

ast

once

per

day

Y

out

h h

ealt

hy

beh

avio

ur

surv

ey;

Kee

ping

cle

an

mo

dule

Thi

s su

rvey

fo

cuse

s on

adole

scen

t’s

know

ledg

e,

atti

tude

s an

d b

ehav

iour.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts

usi

ng i

mp

rove

d s

an

itati

on

fa

ciliti

es

(fo

r d

efe

cati

on

)

Per

cent

of

ado

lesc

ents

age

d 1

2-1

8 ye

ars

usin

g an

im

pro

ved

sani

tatio

n fa

cilit

y at

ho

me,

typ

ical

ly a

latr

ine

or

toile

t fo

r def

ecat

ion.

An im

pro

ved

sanit

atio

n fac

ility

is

one

that

hyg

ienic

ally

se

para

tes

hum

an e

xcr

eta

fro

m h

uman

co

nta

ct.

Yo

uth h

ealt

hy

beh

avio

ur

surv

ey;

Kee

ping

cle

an

mo

dule

Thi

s su

rvey

fo

cuse

s on

adole

scen

t’s

know

ledg

e,

atti

tude

s an

d b

ehav

iour.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts

wit

h a

pp

rop

riate

han

d-

wash

ing b

eh

avi

ou

r

Per

cent

of

ado

lesc

ents

age

d 1

2-1

8 ye

ars

who

rec

all p

ract

isin

g han

d-w

ashi

ng u

sing

an e

ffec

tive

pro

duct

, su

ch a

s so

ap o

r as

h, a

t le

ast

two

cri

tica

l tim

es d

urin

g th

e pas

t 24

ho

urs

.

Yo

uth h

ealt

hy

beh

avio

ur

surv

ey;

Kee

ping

cle

an

mo

dule

Thi

s su

rvey

fo

cuse

s on

adole

scen

t’s

know

ledge

, at

titu

des

and b

ehav

iour.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts

wit

h a

cce

ss t

o i

mp

rove

d

san

itati

on

facilit

ies

at

sch

oo

l

Per

cent

of sc

hoo

l-go

ing

ado

lesc

ents

age

d 1

2-18

year

s us

ing

an

impro

ved

sanitat

ion fac

ility

at

thei

r sc

hoo

l, ty

pica

lly a

latr

ine

or

toile

t fo

r def

ecat

ion.

Yo

uth h

ealt

hy

beh

avio

ur

surv

ey;

Kee

ping

cle

an

mo

dule

Thi

s su

rvey

fo

cuse

s on

adole

scen

t’s

know

ledg

e,

atti

tude

s an

d b

ehav

iour.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts

wh

o r

ep

ort

sm

ok

ing

cig

are

tte

s re

gu

larl

y

Per

cent

of

ado

lesc

ents

age

d 1

2–1

8 ye

ars

who

rep

ort

sm

oki

ng

ciga

rett

es a

t le

ast

once

a w

eek.

Y

out

h h

ealt

hy

beh

avio

ur

surv

ey;

Smo

king

and a

lco

hol

mo

dule

Thi

s su

rvey

fo

cuse

s on

adole

scen

t’s

know

ledg

e,

atti

tude

s an

d b

ehav

iour.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts

wh

o r

ep

ort

dri

nkin

g a

lco

ho

l re

gu

larl

y

Per

cent

of

ado

lesc

ents

age

d 1

2–1

8 ye

ars

who

rep

ort

dri

nki

ng

alco

ho

l at

leas

t o

nce

a w

eek.

Y

out

h h

ealt

hy

beh

avio

ur

surv

ey;

Smo

king

and a

lco

hol

Thi

s su

rvey

fo

cuse

s on

adole

scen

t’s

know

ledg

e,

atti

tude

s an

d b

ehav

iour.

Wo

rld V

isio

n’s

Co

mpen

dium

of In

dic

ato

rs f

or

Chi

ld W

ell-

bein

g 37

mo

dule

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts

wh

o r

ep

ort

eve

r u

sin

g d

rugs

Per

cent

of

ado

lesc

ents

age

d 1

2–1

8 ye

ars

who

rep

ort

that

they

hav

e ev

er u

sed

drugs

. Y

out

h h

ealt

hy

beh

avio

ur

surv

ey;

Smo

king

and a

lco

hol

mo

dule

Thi

s su

rvey

fo

cuse

s on

adole

scen

t’s

know

ledg

e,

atti

tude

s an

d b

ehav

iour.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts

rep

ort

ing t

he

y h

ave

ne

ver

had

se

x

Per

cent

of

ado

lesc

ents

age

d 1

2–1

8 ye

ars

who

rep

ort

nev

er

hav

ing

had

sex

. Y

out

h h

ealt

hy

beh

avio

ur

surv

ey;

Sex a

nd

rela

tio

nsh

ips

mo

dule

Thi

s su

rvey

fo

cuse

s on

adole

scen

t’s

know

ledg

e,

atti

tude

s an

d b

ehav

iour.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts

rep

ort

ing e

arl

y s

ex

ual d

eb

ut

Per

cent

of

ado

lesc

ents

age

d 1

5–1

8 ye

ars

who

rep

ort

hav

ing

had

sex

bef

ore

the

age

of

15.

Yo

uth h

ealt

hy

beh

avio

ur

surv

ey;

Sex a

nd

rela

tio

nsh

ips

mo

dule

Thi

s su

rvey

fo

cuse

s on

adole

scen

t’s

know

ledg

e,

atti

tude

s an

d b

ehav

iour.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts

wh

o u

sed

co

nd

om

in

th

eir

fi

rst

sex

ual in

terc

ou

rse

Per

cent

of se

xual

ly a

ctiv

e ad

ole

scen

ts a

ged 1

2–18

year

s w

ho u

sed

condo

m in

thei

r fir

st s

exual

inte

rco

urs

e.

Yo

uth h

ealt

hy

beh

avio

ur

surv

ey;

Sex a

nd

rela

tio

nsh

ips

mo

dule

Thi

s su

rvey

focu

ses

on

adole

scen

t’s

know

ledg

e,

atti

tude

s an

d b

ehav

iour.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f se

xu

ally

acti

ve

ad

ole

sce

nts

wh

o u

sed

a

co

nd

om

at

last

se

x

Per

cent

of se

xua

lly a

ctiv

e ad

ole

scen

ts a

ged 1

2–18

year

s w

ho

repo

rt u

sing

a c

ond

om

at

last

sex

. Y

out

h h

ealt

hy

beh

avio

ur

surv

ey;

Sex a

nd

rela

tio

nsh

ips

mo

dule

Thi

s su

rvey

fo

cuse

s on

adole

scen

t’s

know

ledg

e,

atti

tude

s an

d b

ehav

iour.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts

wh

o h

ave

ex

pe

rien

ced

se

xu

al ab

use

at

firs

t se

x

Per

cent

of

ado

lesc

ents

age

d 1

2–1

8 ye

ars

who

rep

ort

that

they

ex

per

ience

d s

exual

abuse

(se

x fo

r m

one

y o

r fa

vour

s, s

ex d

ue

to

fear

of co

nseq

uen

ces,

sex

due

to p

hys

ical

or

verb

al t

hre

ats,

or

forc

ed s

ex)

at fir

st s

ex.

Yo

uth h

ealt

hy

beh

avio

ur

surv

ey;

Sex a

nd

rela

tio

nsh

ips

mo

dule

Thi

s su

rvey

fo

cuse

s on

adole

scen

t’s

know

ledg

e,

atti

tude

s an

d b

ehav

iour.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts

wh

o h

ave

ex

pe

rien

ced

se

xu

al ab

use

Per

cent

of

ado

lesc

ents

age

d 1

2–1

8 ye

ars

who

rep

ort

that

they

hav

e ex

per

ienc

ed s

exual

abus

e (s

ex fo

r m

one

y o

r fa

vours

, sex

due

to

fea

r o

f co

nseq

uen

ces,

sex

due

to p

hys

ical

or

verb

al

thre

ats,

or

forc

ed s

ex)

in t

he

past

12 m

onth

s.

Yo

uth h

ealt

hy

beh

avio

ur

surv

ey;

Sex a

nd

rela

tio

nsh

ips

mo

dule

Thi

s su

rvey

fo

cuse

s on

adole

scen

t’s

know

ledg

e,

atti

tude

s an

d b

ehav

iour.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts

wh

o h

ave

ex

pe

rien

ced

Per

cent

of

ado

lesc

ents

age

d 1

2–1

8 ye

ars

who

rep

ort

that

they

ex

per

ienc

ed f

orc

ed s

ex in

the

past

12

mo

nth

s.

Yo

uth h

ealt

hy

beh

avio

ur

surv

ey;

Sex a

nd

rela

tio

nsh

ips

Thi

s su

rvey

fo

cuse

s on

adole

scen

t’s

know

ledg

e,

atti

tude

s an

d b

ehav

iour.

Wo

rld V

isio

n’s

Co

mpen

dium

of In

dic

ato

rs f

or

Chi

ld W

ell-

bein

g 38

forc

ed

sex

m

odule

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts

wh

ose

fir

st e

xp

eri

en

ce w

ith

se

xu

al in

terc

ou

rse

was

forc

ed

Per

cent

of

ado

lesc

ents

age

d 1

2–1

8 ye

ars

who

se fir

st e

xper

ienc

e w

ith

sexua

l in

terc

our

se w

as fo

rced

. Y

out

h h

ealt

hy

beh

avio

ur

surv

ey;

Sex a

nd

rela

tio

nsh

ips

mo

dule

Thi

s su

rvey

fo

cuse

s on

adole

scen

t’s

know

ledg

e,

atti

tude

s an

d b

ehav

iour.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts

wh

o h

ave

had

se

x b

eca

use

of

dri

nkin

g a

lco

ho

l

Per

cent

of

ado

lesc

ents

age

d 1

2–1

8 ye

ars

who

hav

e had

sex

bec

ause

of dri

nki

ng

alco

ho

l. Y

out

h h

ealt

hy

beh

avio

ur

surv

ey;

Smo

king

and a

lco

hol

mo

dule

Thi

s su

rvey

fo

cuse

s on

adole

scen

t’s

know

ledg

e,

atti

tude

s an

d b

ehav

iour.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts

rep

ort

ing h

avin

g s

ex

part

ne

r 1

0 o

r m

ore

ye

ars

old

er

than

th

em

selv

es

Per

cent

of se

xual

ly a

ctiv

e ad

ole

scen

ts a

ged 1

2–18

year

s w

ho h

ave

had

sex

in t

he

prec

edin

g 12 m

onth

s w

ith a

par

tner

who

is

10

or

mo

re y

ears

old

er t

han

them

selv

es.

Yo

uth h

ealt

hy

beh

avio

ur

surv

ey;

Sex a

nd

rela

tio

nsh

ips

mo

dule

Thi

s su

rvey

fo

cuse

s on

adole

scen

t’s

know

ledg

e,

atti

tude

s an

d b

ehav

iour.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts

wit

h a

co

mp

reh

en

sive

k

no

wle

dge

of H

IV a

nd

AID

S

Per

cent

of

ado

lesc

ents

age

d 1

2–1

8 ye

ars

who

bo

th c

orr

ectly

iden

tify

way

s o

f pre

vent

ing

sexua

l tr

ansm

issi

on o

f H

IV a

nd

who

re

ject

maj

or

mis

conce

ptio

ns a

bo

ut

HIV

tra

nsm

issi

on.

Yo

uth h

ealt

hy

beh

avio

ur

surv

ey;

HIV

mo

dul

e

Thi

s su

rvey

fo

cuse

s on

adole

scen

t’s

know

ledg

e,

atti

tude

s an

d b

ehav

iour.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts

wh

o h

ave

be

en

te

ste

d f

or

HIV

an

d r

ece

ived

th

eir

te

st

resu

lts

Per

cent

of

ado

lesc

ents

age

d 1

2-1

8 ye

ars

who

hav

e bee

n t

este

d fo

r H

IV a

nd r

ecei

ved t

hei

r te

st r

esul

ts in

the

past

12 m

onth

s.

Yo

uth h

ealt

hy

beh

avio

ur

surv

ey;

HIV

mo

dul

e

Thi

s su

rvey

fo

cuse

s on

adole

scen

t’s

know

ledg

e,

atti

tude

s an

d b

ehav

iour.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts

wh

o r

ep

ort

avo

idin

g r

isk

y H

IV b

eh

avi

ou

r

Per

cent

of

ado

lesc

ents

age

d 1

2–1

8 ye

ars

enga

ged in

ris

ky

beh

avio

ur

who r

epo

rt a

void

ing

behav

iours

tha

t w

ould

incr

ease

th

e ri

sk o

f H

IV infe

ctio

n.

Yo

uth h

ealt

hy

beh

avio

ur

surv

ey;

Smo

king

and a

lco

hol,

sex

and r

elat

ions

hip

s,

and b

oys

mo

dule

s

Thi

s su

rvey

fo

cuse

s on

adole

scen

t’s

know

ledg

e,

atti

tude

s an

d b

ehav

iour

.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts

wh

o r

ep

ort

pra

cti

sin

g H

IV

risk

beh

avio

ur

Per

cent

of

ado

lesc

ents

age

d 1

2–1

8 ye

ars

who

rep

ort

hav

ing

sex

in t

he

past

12 m

onth

s an

d d

id n

ot

use

co

ndo

m a

t la

st s

ex a

nd/

or

are

boys

and

rep

ort

eve

r hav

ing

sex w

ith

men

and d

id n

ot

use

co

ndo

m a

t la

st s

ex a

nd/

or

repo

rt h

avin

g m

ultip

le s

ex p

artn

ers

and/o

r re

po

rt s

hari

ng a

syr

inge

fo

r in

ject

ing

drugs

.

Yo

uth h

ealt

hy

beh

avio

ur

surv

ey;

Smo

king

and a

lco

hol,

sex

and r

elat

ions

hip

s,

and b

oys

mo

dule

s

Thi

s su

rvey

fo

cuse

s on

adole

scen

t’s

know

ledg

e,

atti

tude

s an

d b

ehav

iour.

Wo

rld V

isio

n’s

Co

mpen

dium

of In

dic

ato

rs f

or

Chi

ld W

ell-

bein

g 39

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f gir

l ad

ole

sce

nts

cu

rre

ntl

y p

regn

an

t o

r alr

ead

y

mo

the

rs

Per

cent

of

girl

s ag

ed 1

2-18

year

s w

ho a

re c

urre

ntly

pre

gnan

t o

r cu

rren

tly

mo

ther

s.

Yo

uth h

ealt

hy

beh

avio

ur

surv

ey;

Gir

ls m

odul

e

Pro

po

rtio

n b

oy a

do

lesc

en

ts

wh

o a

re c

urr

en

tly f

ath

ers

Per

cent

of

boys

age

d 1

2–1

8 ye

ars

who

are

cur

rent

ly fat

her

s.

Yo

uth h

ealt

hy

beh

avio

ur

surv

ey;

Yo

uth s

urv

ey m

odu

le

Thi

s su

rvey

fo

cuse

s on

adole

scen

t’s

know

ledg

e,

atti

tude

s an

d b

ehav

iour.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts

wh

o t

alk

to

th

eir

pare

nts

or

care

giv

ers

ab

ou

t se

x

Per

cent

of

ado

lesc

ents

age

d 1

2–1

8 ye

ars

who

rep

ort

tal

king

wit

h th

eir

par

ents

or

care

give

rs a

bo

ut

sex a

nd s

exual

rel

atio

nsh

ips.

Y

out

h h

ealt

hy

beh

avio

ur

surv

ey;

Sex a

nd

rela

tio

nsh

ips

mo

dule

Thi

s su

rvey

fo

cuse

s on

adole

scen

t’s

know

ledg

e,

atti

tude

s an

d b

ehav

iour.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts

wh

o h

ave

po

siti

ve a

ttit

ud

es

tow

ard

s p

eo

ple

liv

ing w

ith

H

IV a

nd

AID

S

Per

cent

of

ado

lesc

ents

age

d 1

2–1

8 ye

ars

who

res

pond

po

sitive

ly

to s

et s

tate

men

ts r

elat

ing

to p

eople

liv

ing

with H

IV a

nd A

IDS.

Y

out

h h

ealt

hy

beh

avio

ur

surv

ey;

HIV

mo

dul

e

Thi

s su

rvey

fo

cuse

s on

adole

scen

t’s

know

ledg

e,

atti

tude

s an

d b

ehav

iour.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts

rep

ort

ing a

cce

ss t

o H

IV a

nd

A

IDS

ed

uca

tio

n in

sch

oo

l

Per

cent

of

ado

lesc

ents

age

d 1

2–1

8 ye

ars

who

rep

ort

that

at

leas

t o

ne

teac

her

at

thei

r sc

hoo

l te

aches

abo

ut H

IV a

nd A

IDS.

Y

out

h h

ealt

hy

beh

avio

ur

surv

ey;

HIV

mo

dul

e

Thi

s su

rvey

fo

cuse

s on

adole

scen

t’s

know

ledg

e,

atti

tude

s an

d b

ehav

iour.

Wo

rld V

isio

n’s

Co

mpen

dium

of In

dic

ato

rs f

or

Chi

ld W

ell-

bein

g 40

Ou

tco

me: C

hild

ren

an

d t

he

ir c

are

giv

ers

acce

ss e

sse

nti

al h

ealt

h s

erv

ice

s H

igh

ly r

eco

mm

en

de

d

ind

icato

r D

efi

nit

ion

T

oo

l N

ote

s

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f in

fan

ts w

ho

se

bir

ths

we

re a

tte

nd

ed

by

skil

led

bir

th a

tte

nd

an

t

Pe

rce

nt

of

mo

the

rs o

f ch

ild

ren

age

d 0

–23

mo

nth

s w

ho

se

last

bir

th w

as

att

en

de

d b

y a

sk

ille

d b

irth

att

en

dan

t.

Care

giv

er

surv

ey;

W

om

en

mo

du

le

De

fin

itio

n o

f sk

ille

d b

irth

att

en

dan

t to

be

d

ete

rmin

ed

by n

ati

on

al

off

ice.

Use

seco

nd

ary

data

if

ava

ilab

le.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f p

are

nts

or

care

giv

ers

wh

o a

re a

ble

to

p

ay f

or

their

ch

ild

ren

's

he

alt

h c

ost

s w

ith

ou

t ass

ista

nce

Pe

rce

nt

of

pare

nts

or

care

giv

ers

wh

o w

ere

ab

le t

o c

ove

r th

e c

ost

s o

f th

eir

ch

ild

ren

's h

ealt

h (

0–1

8 y

ears

) th

rou

gh

th

eir

ow

n f

inan

cial

me

an

s, w

ith

ou

t ex

tern

al ass

ista

nce

, in

th

e p

ast

12

mo

nth

s.

Care

giv

er

surv

ey;

E

co

no

mic

d

eve

lop

me

nt

mo

du

le

No

t re

levan

t in

co

un

trie

s w

here

healt

h t

reatm

en

t is

fr

ee o

f ch

arg

e.

Ad

dit

ion

al in

dic

ato

r D

efi

nit

ion

T

oo

l N

ote

s

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f w

om

en

wh

o

gave

bir

th t

o t

he

ir y

ou

nge

st

ch

ild

at

a h

ealt

h f

acil

ity

Per

cent

of

mo

ther

s o

f ch

ildre

n ag

ed 0

–23

mo

nths

who w

ere

atte

nded

to b

y a

skill

ed b

irth

att

enda

nt

at lat

est

deliv

ery,

in

a m

ater

nit

y w

ard o

r de

liver

y ro

om

.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey;

Wo

men

mo

dule

D

efin

itio

n o

f hea

lth

faci

lity

to

be

det

erm

ined

by

nat

ional

o

ffic

e.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f m

oth

ers

wh

o

rep

ort

th

at

the

y h

ad

fo

ur

or

mo

re a

nte

nata

l vis

its

wh

ile

th

ey

we

re p

regn

an

t w

ith

th

eir

yo

un

ge

st c

hil

d

Per

cent

of

mo

ther

s o

f ch

ildre

n ag

ed 0

–23

mo

nths

who r

epo

rt

that

they

att

ende

d fo

ur

or

mo

re a

nte

nat

al v

isit

s bef

ore

the

birt

h o

f th

eir

young

est

child

.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey;

Wo

men

mo

dule

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f m

oth

ers

of

ch

ild

ren

age

d 0

–23

mo

nth

s w

ho

re

ceiv

ed

at

least

2 p

ost

-n

ata

l vi

sit

fro

m a

tra

ine

d

he

alt

h c

are

wo

rke

r d

uri

ng

the

fir

st w

ee

k a

fte

r b

irth

Per

cent

of

mo

ther

s o

f ch

ildre

n ag

ed 0

–23

mo

nths

who r

ecei

ved

at lea

st t

wo

po

st-p

artu

m a

nd

post

-nat

al v

isit

s (b

oth

mo

ther

and

ch

ild c

heck

ed)

fro

m a

tra

ined

hea

lth c

are

wo

rker

duri

ng t

he fir

st

wee

k af

ter

the

bir

th o

f th

eir

young

est

child

.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey;

Wo

men

mo

dule

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f m

oth

ers

wh

o

receiv

ed

at

least

tw

o

teta

nu

s va

ccin

ati

on

s b

efo

re

the

bir

th o

f th

eir

yo

un

ge

st

ch

ild

Per

cent

of

mo

ther

s o

f ch

ildre

n ag

ed 0

–23

mo

nths

who w

ere

give

n at

leas

t tw

o d

ose

s o

f te

tanus

toxo

id v

acci

ne

(TT

) w

ithin

the

appro

pri

ate

inte

rval

pri

or

to g

ivin

g bi

rth.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey;

Wo

men

mo

dule

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f m

oth

ers

of

Per

cent

of

mo

ther

s o

f ch

ildre

n a

ged

0-2

3 m

ont

hs w

ho r

epo

rt

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey;

Wo

rld V

isio

n’s

Co

mpen

dium

of In

dic

ato

rs f

or

Chi

ld W

ell-

bein

g 41

ch

ild

ren

age

d 0

–23

mo

nth

s w

ho

re

po

rt t

hat

the

ir

yo

un

ge

st c

hild

was

wra

pp

ed

w

ith

a c

loth

or

bla

nk

et

imm

ed

iate

ly a

fte

r b

irth

that

thei

r yo

ung

est

child

was

dri

ed im

med

iate

ly a

fter

bir

th t

hen

wra

pped

with a

war

m c

loth

or

bla

nke

t im

med

iate

ly a

fter

bir

th.

Wo

men

mo

dule

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ch

ild

ren

age

d

0–2

3 m

on

ths

wh

o r

ece

ive

d

all

th

ree

co

mp

on

en

ts o

f e

sse

nti

al

ne

wb

orn

care

Per

cent

of

child

ren a

ged 0

–23

mo

nths

who

acc

ord

ing

to m

oth

er’s

re

port

rec

eive

d al

l th

ree

of

the

follo

win

g co

mpo

nents

of es

sent

ial

new

bo

rn c

are:

1. N

ewbo

rn w

as b

reas

t fe

d ea

rly

and e

xclu

sive

ly.

2. N

ewbo

rn w

as k

ept

war

m (

skin

-to

-ski

n c

onta

ct; hea

d

cove

red).

3. N

ewbo

rn’s

co

rd w

as k

ept

clea

n a

nd d

ry.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey;

Wo

men

mo

dule

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

sce

nts

w

ith

un

me

t fa

mil

y p

lan

nin

g

ne

ed

s

Per

cent

of se

xua

lly a

ctiv

e gi

rl a

dole

scen

ts a

ged 1

2–18

year

s w

ho

are

not

curr

ently

usi

ng

a m

etho

d o

f co

ntra

cept

ion a

nd

wan

t to

st

op o

r del

ay c

hild

bea

ring

.

Yo

uth h

ealt

hy

beh

avio

ur

surv

ey;

Gir

ls m

odul

e

Thi

s su

rvey

fo

cuse

s on

adole

scen

t’s

know

ledg

e,

atti

tude

s an

d b

ehav

iour.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts

wh

o k

no

w w

he

re t

o a

nd

can

acc

ess

co

ntr

ace

pti

on

in

th

eir

co

mm

un

ity

Per

cent

of

ado

lesc

ents

age

d 1

2–1

8 ye

ars

who

can

nam

e w

her

e to

go

to

get

co

ntr

acep

tio

n in

thei

r co

mm

uni

ty a

nd r

eport

tha

t th

ey

are

(or

wo

uld

be)

able

to

acc

ess

contr

acep

tio

n t

her

e.

Yo

uth h

ealt

hy

beh

avio

ur

surv

ey;

Sex a

nd

rela

tio

nsh

ips

mo

dule

Thi

s su

rvey

fo

cuse

s on

adole

scen

t’s

know

ledg

e,

atti

tude

s an

d b

ehav

iour.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f w

om

en

p

ract

isin

g b

irth

sp

acin

g

Per

cent

of pre

gnan

t w

om

en a

nd m

oth

ers

of ch

ildre

n a

ged 0

-23

mo

nth

s w

ho a

re a

ged 1

5-4

9 ye

ars

with a

t le

ast

one

oth

er c

hild

ag

ed 0

-59

mo

nths

who r

epo

rt p

ract

isin

g bir

th s

pac

ing

(fam

ily

pla

nnin

g), th

roug

h c

ontr

acep

tio

n o

r tr

aditio

nal

met

ho

ds.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey;

Wo

men

mo

dul

e

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f w

om

en

m

arr

ied

or

in u

nio

n w

ho

are

u

sin

g a

mo

de

rn

co

ntr

ace

pti

ve

me

tho

d

Per

cent

of

mo

ther

s, o

f ch

ildre

n a

ged 0

-23

mo

nths

, ag

ed 1

5–49

year

s w

ho

are

mar

ried

or

in u

nio

n an

d r

epo

rt t

hat

they

are

cu

rren

tly

usi

ng

(or

who

se p

artn

er is

curr

entl

y us

ing)

a m

ode

rn

contr

acep

tive

met

hod

such

as

pills

, co

ndo

ms,

IU

D o

r sp

erm

icid

al

pro

duc

t.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey;

Wo

men

mo

dule

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f w

om

en

wh

o

kn

ow

at

least

tw

o r

isk

s o

f h

avin

g a

bir

th-t

o-p

regn

an

cy

inte

rval

of

less

th

an

24

m

on

ths

Per

cent

of

pre

gnan

t w

om

en a

nd

mo

ther

s o

f ch

ildre

n a

ged 0

–23

mo

nth

s w

ho c

an n

ame

at lea

st t

wo

ris

ks o

f hav

ing

a bi

rth-t

o-

pre

gnan

cy in

terv

al o

f le

ss t

han

24 m

onth

s; i. m

oth

er's

hea

lth—

hel

ps m

oth

er t

o r

egai

n he

r st

reng

th s

o s

he c

oul

d hav

e a

goo

d

del

iver

y an

d a

hea

lthy

bab

y; ii

. fat

her

—if

ther

e ar

e fe

wer

, w

ell-

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey;

Wo

men

mo

dule

Wo

rld V

isio

n’s

Co

mpen

dium

of In

dic

ato

rs f

or

Chi

ld W

ell-

bein

g 42

spac

ed c

hild

ren, t

his

red

uces

hea

vy fin

anci

al b

urd

en; fa

ther

is a

ble

to

fin

d m

oney

to e

duc

ate

child

ren; iii

. yo

ung

child

ren's

hea

lth a

nd

nut

ritio

n—

child

ren a

re w

ell-ca

red fo

r, d

o n

ot

suffe

r fr

om

m

alnut

riti

on

such

as

stunting.

P

rop

ort

ion

of

ad

ole

scen

ts

wh

o k

no

w h

ow

to

acce

ss

he

alt

h s

erv

ice

s in

case

of

an

e

me

rge

ncy

Per

cent

of

ado

lesc

ents

age

d 1

2–1

8 ye

ars

that

kno

w h

ow

to

ac

cess

hea

lth

serv

ices

in c

ase

of an

em

erge

ncy

, in

cludin

g w

here

th

ey w

ould

go

and

who t

hey

wo

uld

ask

fo

r.

Yo

uth h

ealt

hy

beh

avio

ur

surv

ey;

Phy

sica

l vi

ole

nce

m

odule

Thi

s su

rvey

fo

cuse

s on

adole

scen

t’s

know

ledge

, at

titu

des

and b

ehav

iour.

Ava

ilab

ilit

y o

f co

nfi

de

nti

al

HIV

te

stin

g f

or

ch

ild

ren

an

d

yo

un

g p

eo

ple

Num

ber

and

per

cent

of hea

lthy

faci

litie

s in

the

pro

gram

me

impa

ct

area

that

pro

vide

co

nfid

ential

HIV

tes

ting

fo

r ch

ildre

n an

d y

oung

peo

ple

(age

d 0

-18

year

s).

Hea

lth F

acili

ty

Eva

luat

ion

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f in

fan

ts b

orn

to

HIV

-in

fecte

d w

om

en

wh

o

receiv

ed

earl

y d

iagn

osi

s

Per

cent

of

child

ren b

orn

to

HIV

-inf

ecte

d w

om

en in

the

last

12

mo

nth

s w

ho r

ecei

ved a

n H

IV v

iro

logi

cal te

st w

ithin

4-6

wee

ks o

f bir

th.

Hea

lth F

acili

ty

Eva

luat

ion -

se

conda

ry d

ata

Use

clin

ic d

ata

if av

aila

ble

.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f H

IV-i

nfe

cte

d

pre

gn

an

t w

om

en

wh

o

receiv

ed

an

tire

tro

vir

als

(A

RV

)

Per

cent

of

HIV

po

sitive

pre

gnan

t w

om

en w

ho g

ave

bir

th in

the

last

12 m

onth

s w

ho r

ecei

ved a

ntir

etro

vira

ls (

AR

Vs)

pro

phyl

axis

/

pre

vent

ion o

f m

oth

er-t

o-c

hild

tra

nsm

issi

on

or

lifel

ong

AR

T fo

r th

eir

ow

n h

ealt

h.

Hea

lth F

acili

ty

Eva

luat

ion -

se

conda

ry d

ata

Use

clin

ic d

ata

if av

aila

ble

.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f in

fan

ts b

orn

to

HIV

in

fect

ed

wo

me

n w

ho

re

ceiv

ed

AR

V p

rop

hyl

axis

Per

cent

of

infa

nts

born

to

HIV

-inf

ecte

d w

om

en in

the

last

12

mo

nth

s w

ho r

ecei

ved a

ntir

etro

vira

l pr

oph

ylax

is u

ntil

4-6 w

eeks

o

f ag

e.

Hea

lth F

acili

ty

Eva

luat

ion -

se

conda

ry d

ata

Use

clin

ic d

ata

if av

aila

ble

.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f h

ealt

h

faci

liti

es

pro

vid

ing b

asi

c

an

d/o

r co

mp

reh

en

sive

E

me

rge

ncy

Ob

ste

tric

Care

(E

mO

C)

Per

cent

of hea

lth

faci

litie

s pr

ovi

ding

basi

c an

d/o

r co

mpr

ehen

sive

Em

erge

ncy

Obs

tetr

ic C

are

mee

t m

inim

um

suppl

y st

andar

ds:

ava

ilabi

lity/

cove

rage

, ge

ogr

aphi

cal

dis

trib

utio

n, f

unct

iona

lity,

afford

abili

ty, qu

alit

y of

care

and

esse

ntia

l co

mm

oditie

s.

Hea

lth F

acili

ty

Eva

luat

ion

Em

OC

is b

asic

and

com

preh

ensi

ve.

A b

asi

c Em

OC

fac

ility

sh

ould

be

able

to

per

form

th

e fo

llow

ing

funct

ions:

ad

min

iste

r pa

rente

ral

antibio

tics

, oxyt

oci

c dru

gs

and

anti

convu

lsan

ts;

man

ual re

mo

val o

f pla

centa

; re

mo

val of

reta

ined

pro

duct

s; a

nd

assi

sted

vag

inal

del

iver

y.

A c

om

pre

hen

sive

Em

OC

fac

ility

sho

uld

be

able

to

offer

all

the

funct

ions

above

, pl

us

Wo

rld V

isio

n’s

Co

mpen

dium

of In

dic

ato

rs f

or

Chi

ld W

ell-

bein

g 43

Ces

area

n se

ctio

n an

d

blo

od t

rans

fusi

on.

De

nsi

ty o

f h

ealt

h c

are

w

ork

ers

pe

r 10

00

p

op

ula

tio

n

This

ind

icat

or

defin

es t

he

abso

lute

num

ber

of hea

lth c

are

wo

rker

s (H

CW

) per

100

0 po

pula

tio

n.

Hea

lth F

acili

ty

Eva

luat

ion

Fe

es

at

the

po

int

of

serv

ice

fo

r m

oth

ers

an

d c

hil

dre

n

un

de

r fi

ve

Pro

po

rtio

n of

mo

ther

s/ca

regi

vers

of

child

ren a

ged 0

-59

mo

nths

w

ho

pai

d a

fee

fo

r es

sential

ser

vice

s at

po

int

of

acce

ss fo

r M

NC

H

hea

lth

serv

ices

in t

he

past

6 m

ont

hs.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey;

hea

lth

dem

ogr

aphic

s m

odule

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f h

ealt

h

faci

liti

es

wh

ich

re

po

rt n

o

sto

ck

ou

t o

f k

ey p

rim

ary

h

ealt

h c

are

co

mm

od

itie

s

Num

ber

and

Per

cent

of

heal

th fac

iliti

es w

hich

rep

ort

no

sto

ck

out

of ke

y pr

imar

y hea

lth c

are

com

mo

ditie

s re

quir

ed t

o d

eliv

er

the

esse

ntia

l pac

kage

fo

r m

ater

nal

new

born

and c

hild

hea

lth

in

the

last

12

mo

nth

s.

Hea

lth F

acili

ty

Eva

luat

ion

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f p

regn

an

t w

om

en

an

d w

om

en

wit

h

ch

ild

ren

un

de

r 5

wh

o r

ep

ort

st

ock

ou

t o

f an

y k

ey

pri

mary

h

ealt

h c

are

co

mm

od

itie

s

Per

cent

of

preg

nant

wo

men

and

wo

men

wit

h c

hild

ren a

ged

0-59

mo

nth

s w

ho w

ent

to a

hea

lth fac

ility

/po

st in

the

past

12 m

onth

s an

d r

epo

rted

sto

ck o

uts

of ke

y pri

mar

y hea

lth

care

co

mm

odi

ties

.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey;

hea

lth

dem

ogr

aphic

s m

odule

Nu

mb

er

of

reco

mm

en

dati

on

s fr

om

th

e

Co

mm

issi

on

on

In

form

ati

on

an

d A

cco

un

tab

ilit

y f

or

Wo

me

n's

an

d C

hild

ren

's

He

alt

h f

ull

y i

mp

lem

en

ted

Num

ber

of re

com

men

dati

ons

fro

m t

he C

om

mis

sio

n on

Info

rmat

ion a

nd

Acc

oun

tabi

lity

for

Wo

men

's a

nd

Chi

ldre

n's

H

ealth h

ave

bee

n fully

im

ple

men

ted.

Seco

ndar

y D

ata

Nu

mb

er

an

d p

rop

ort

ion

of

co

mm

itm

en

ts m

ad

e t

o t

he

E

ve

ry W

om

an

, E

ve

ry C

hil

d

(EW

EC

) in

itia

tive w

hic

h

have

be

en

fu

lly

imp

lem

en

ted

Num

ber

and

per

cent

of

the

tota

l num

ber

of co

mm

itm

ents

mad

e by

the

gove

rnm

ent

to E

WEC

in

each

co

unt

ry, w

hic

h ha

ve b

een

fully

im

ple

men

ted.

Seco

ndar

y D

ata

Nu

mb

er

of

reco

mm

en

dati

on

s fr

om

UN

C

om

mis

sio

n o

n L

ife

-savin

g

Co

mm

od

itie

s fo

r W

om

en

an

d C

hild

ren

wh

ich

have

b

ee

n f

ully i

mp

lem

en

ted

Num

ber

of th

e 4 r

eco

mm

endat

ions

fro

m U

N C

om

mis

sio

n o

n

Life

-sav

ing

Co

mm

odit

ies

for

Wo

men

and

Child

ren

have

bee

n fu

lly

imple

men

ted b

y th

e go

vern

men

t.

Seco

ndar

y D

ata

Pro

gre

ss t

ow

ard

s m

ee

tin

g

Per

cent

of

the

20

SUN

pro

gres

s in

dic

ato

rs a

chie

ved b

y th

e Se

cond

ary

Dat

a

Wo

rld V

isio

n’s

Co

mpen

dium

of In

dic

ato

rs f

or

Chi

ld W

ell-

bein

g 44

the

co

mm

itm

en

t m

ad

e i

n

favo

r o

f th

e S

cali

ng u

p

Nu

trit

ion

(S

UN

) in

itia

tive

gove

rnm

ent.

Co

ve

rage

of

pri

mary

he

alt

h

un

its

Num

ber

of pr

imar

y hea

lth u

nits

per

10,

000

indiv

idua

ls.

Seco

ndar

y D

ata

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f P

rim

ary

h

ealt

h c

en

ters

me

eti

ng t

he

n

ati

on

al

stan

dard

s o

n h

ealt

h

wo

rkfo

rce

Per

cent

of

Prim

ary

Hea

lth c

entr

es w

hic

h m

eet

the

nati

onal

st

andar

ds o

n t

ype

and

num

ber

of hea

lth c

are

wo

rker

s in

eac

h

faci

lity.

Hea

lth F

acili

ty

Eva

luat

ion

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f th

e o

ve

rall

nati

on

al

bu

dge

t allo

cate

d t

o

he

alt

h

Per

cent

of

the

ove

rall

nat

ional

budg

et a

lloca

ted

to h

ealt

h p

er

year

. Se

cond

ary

Dat

a

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f th

e o

ve

rall

He

alt

h b

ud

ge

t allo

cate

d t

o

pri

mary

he

alt

h c

are

Per

cent

of

the

tota

l annu

al b

udg

et a

lloca

ted

for

hea

lth in

a g

iven

co

unt

ry w

hich

is

allo

cate

d fo

r Pri

mar

y H

ealt

h C

are

acti

vities

. Se

cond

ary

Dat

a

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f O

DA

go

ing t

o

he

alt

h p

er

ye

ar

Per

cent

of

all O

ffic

ial D

evel

opm

ent

Ass

ista

nce

(OD

A)

whi

ch is

allo

cate

d to

war

ds h

ealt

h r

elat

ed p

rogr

amm

es.

Seco

ndar

y D

ata

Le

vel o

f H

ealt

h-r

ela

ted

O

ffic

ial

De

velo

pm

en

t A

ssis

tan

ce

in

re

lati

on

to

th

e

Gro

ss N

ati

on

al

Inco

me

Per

cent

of

the

Gro

ss N

atio

nal

Inc

om

e (G

NI)

allo

cate

d t

o h

ealt

h-

rela

ted

Offic

ial D

evel

opm

ent

Ass

ista

nce

(O

DA

).

Seco

ndar

y D

ata

Nu

mb

er

of

parl

iam

en

tary

act

s ad

dre

ssin

g w

om

en

’s

an

d c

hild

ren

’s h

ealt

h

Num

ber

of th

e an

nua

l le

gisl

ativ

e ac

t (law

or

oth

er)

of

the

par

liam

ent

whic

h m

onito

r pr

ogr

ess

on

mat

ernal

, new

bo

rn a

nd

child

hea

lth.

Seco

nda

ry D

ata

An

nu

al vari

ati

on

of

Off

icia

l D

eve

lop

me

nt

Ass

ista

nce

fo

r h

ealt

h

Per

cent

annua

l ch

ange

in

Offic

ial D

evel

opm

ent

Ass

ista

nce

(O

DA

) fo

r he

alth

by

do

no

r co

untr

ies.

Se

cond

ary

Dat

a

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f th

e o

ve

rall

nati

on

al

bu

dge

t allo

cate

d t

o

nu

trit

ion

-rela

ted

pro

gra

ms

an

d p

oli

cie

s

Per

cent

of

the

tota

l annu

al n

atio

nal

bud

get

allo

cate

d t

o n

utr

itio

n-

rela

ted

pro

gram

s an

d po

licie

s. T

his

inc

ludes

any

init

iati

ve w

hic

h su

ppo

rts

child

hoo

d nu

tritio

n t

hro

ugh

dir

ect

feed

ing,

co

mm

uni

ty

bas

ed in

itia

tive

s an

d n

atio

nal

cam

pai

gns.

Seco

ndar

y D

ata

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f th

e o

ve

rall

nati

on

al

bu

dge

t allo

cate

d t

o

WA

SH

-re

late

d p

rogra

ms

an

d p

oli

cie

s

Per

cent

of

the

tota

l annu

al n

atio

nal

bud

get

allo

cate

d t

o W

ater

, Sa

nita

tio

n a

nd

Hyg

iene

(WA

SH)-

rela

ted

pro

gram

s an

d p

olic

ies.

T

his

inc

ludes

any

initia

tive

whic

h s

upp

ort

s W

ASH

thro

ugh

dir

ect

imple

men

tati

on, c

om

munity

bas

ed in

itia

tive

s an

d n

atio

nal

cam

paig

ns.

Seco

ndar

y D

ata

Wo

rld V

isio

n’s

Co

mpen

dium

of In

dic

ato

rs f

or

Chi

ld W

ell-

bein

g 45

Asp

irati

on

: Ed

ucate

d fo

r life

Ou

tco

me: C

hild

ren

read

, w

rite

an

d u

se n

um

era

cy s

kills

Ch

ild

we

ll-b

ein

g t

arg

et

stan

da

rd i

nd

icato

r D

efi

nit

ion

T

oo

l N

ote

s

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ch

ild

ren

wh

o

can

re

ad

wit

h

co

mp

reh

en

sio

n

Pe

rce

nt

of

child

ren

in

Gra

de

6 o

r e

qu

ivale

nt

wh

o c

an

re

ad

an

d c

om

pre

he

nd

a s

tory

F

LA

T (

Fu

nct

ion

al

Lit

era

cy

Ass

ess

me

nt

To

ol)

Base

d o

n P

rath

am

/SC

to

ols

w

hic

h u

se c

on

textu

all

y

ap

pro

pri

ate

mate

rial.

In

dic

ato

r ca

n a

lso

be

measu

red

wit

h L

itera

cy

Bo

ost

or

EG

RA

.

Hig

hly

Re

com

me

nd

ed

in

dic

ato

r D

efi

nit

ion

T

oo

l N

ote

s

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ch

ild

ren

wh

o

are

fu

ncti

on

all

y li

tera

te

Pe

rce

nt

of

child

ren

in

Gra

de

6 o

r e

qu

ivale

nt

wh

o c

an

re

ad

an

d c

om

pre

hen

d a

uth

en

tic

local

mate

rial n

ee

de

d t

o

fun

cti

on

in

eve

ryd

ay l

ife

FL

AT

(F

un

ctio

nal

Lit

era

cy

Ass

ess

me

nt

To

ol)

Base

d o

n P

rath

am

/SC

to

ols

w

hic

h u

se c

on

tex

tuall

y ap

pro

pri

ate

mate

rial.

Ad

dit

ion

al in

dic

ato

r D

efi

nit

ion

T

oo

l N

ote

s P

rop

ort

ion

of

child

ren

ab

le

to r

eco

gn

ise

co

nce

pts

in

p

rin

t

Per

cent

of

youn

g ch

ildre

n (3

-5 y

ears

or

appro

pri

ate

age)

abl

e to

han

dle

a b

oo

k, r

ead lef

t to

wri

te, r

eco

gnis

e le

tter

and

wo

rds.

C

onc

epts

abo

ut

Pri

nt

(SC

) U

se t

he

Save

the

Chi

ldre

n Fu

nd

tool.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ch

ild

ren

wh

o

de

mo

nst

rate

th

ey a

re r

ead

y

for

sch

oo

l

Per

cent

of

pre

-sch

oo

l ag

ed c

hild

ren

(5-6

yea

rs)

who

dem

onst

rate

pre

-lit

erac

y an

d pre

-num

erac

y dec

odin

g sk

ills.

Sc

hoo

l Rea

dine

ss

Tes

t D

evel

ope

d b

y Enf

ants

et

Dev

elop

pem

ent.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ch

ild

ren

ab

le

to r

ead

wo

rds

Per

cent

of fir

st g

rade

aged

chi

ldre

n (

6-8

yea

rs o

r ap

pro

pri

ate

age)

ab

le t

o r

ead 4

out

of 5 w

ord

s co

rrec

tly.

FL

AT

(Fu

nctio

nal

Li

tera

cy A

sses

smen

t T

oo

ls)

Bas

ed o

n P

rath

am t

ool an

d

fam

iliar

voca

bula

ry.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ch

ild

ren

ab

le

to r

ead

to

le

arn

in

lan

gu

age

o

f sc

ho

ol

inst

ructi

on

by e

nd

o

f gra

de

tw

o

Per

cent

of

child

ren w

ho, by

the

end o

f G

rade

2, o

r ea

rly

Gra

de 3

, (t

ypic

ally

age

d 7-9

), c

an r

ead w

ith

com

preh

ensi

on

and

spee

ds o

f 45

wo

rds

per

min

ute

in la

ngu

age

of

scho

ol i

nst

ruct

ion.

Ear

ly G

rade

Rea

ding

Ass

essm

ent

(EG

RA

) -

tim

ed r

eadin

g te

st

Incl

udes

co

mpr

ehen

sion

que

stio

ns.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f p

re-s

cho

ol

ch

ild

ren

wh

o h

ave

acce

ss t

o

toys

in t

he

ir h

om

e

Per

cent

of

hous

eho

lds

wit

h ch

ildre

n a

ged 0

-5 y

ears

who

hav

e 2

or

mo

re c

hild

ren’s

pla

y th

ings

(o

r to

ys)

in t

heir

ho

me.

C

areg

iver

Surv

ey

(Edu

catio

n an

d EC

CD

mo

dule

)

Wo

rld V

isio

n’s

Co

mpen

dium

of In

dic

ato

rs f

or

Chi

ld W

ell-

bein

g 46

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f p

re-s

cho

ol

ch

ild

ren

wh

o h

ave

acce

ss t

o

read

ing m

ate

rials

in

th

eir

h

om

e

Per

cent

of

hous

eho

lds

wit

h ch

ildre

n 0

- 5 y

ears

who

hav

e 3

or

mo

re c

hild

ren’

s bo

oks

in

thei

r ho

me.

C

areg

iver

Surv

ey

(Edu

catio

n an

d

EC

CD

mo

dule

)

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f p

are

nts

an

d

care

giv

ers

wh

o p

rom

ote

re

ad

ing r

ead

ine

ss o

f ch

ild

ren

at

ho

me

Per

cent

of

pare

nts

and c

areg

iver

s o

f ch

ildre

n a

ged

12-5

9 m

ont

hs

(1-5

yea

rs)

who

hav

e en

gage

d in

fo

ur

or

mo

re a

ctiv

itie

s to

pro

mo

te lea

rnin

g an

d s

cho

ol r

eadi

ness

in t

he

past

3 d

ays

Car

egiv

er S

urv

ey

(Edu

catio

n an

d EC

CD

mo

dule

)

Wo

rld V

isio

n’s

Co

mpen

dium

of In

dic

ato

rs f

or

Chi

ld W

ell-

bein

g 47

Ou

tco

me: C

hild

ren

make g

oo

d j

ud

ge

me

nts

, can

pro

tect

the

mse

lve

s, m

an

age e

mo

tio

ns

an

d

co

mm

un

icate

id

eas

Hig

hly

re

co

mm

en

de

d

ind

icato

r D

efi

nit

ion

T

oo

l N

ote

s

Th

e s

tre

ngth

of

the s

oci

al

com

pete

nci

es

ass

et

cate

go

ry

as

rep

ort

ed

by a

do

lesc

en

ts

12

-18

ye

ars

of

age

Th

e m

ean

sco

re i

n t

he

so

cia

l co

mp

eten

cies

ass

et

cate

go

ry

as

rep

ort

ed

by a

do

lesc

en

ts 1

2-1

8 y

ears

of

age

. D

eve

lop

me

nt

Ass

ets

Pro

file

(D

AP

)

Re

pre

sen

ts 1

of

8 a

sset

cate

go

rie

s. T

he

DA

P c

an

be

use

d t

o m

easu

re s

eve

ral

ch

ild

well

-bein

g o

utc

om

es

at

the

sam

e t

ime

.

Ad

dit

ion

al in

dic

ato

r D

efi

nit

ion

T

oo

l N

ote

s

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ch

ild

ren

ab

le

to e

xp

ress

th

em

selv

es

wit

h

co

nfi

de

nce

an

d p

art

icip

ate

act

ive

ly i

n d

iscu

ssio

n

Per

cent

of

child

ren a

ged

6-9 y

ears

who

are

able

to

expr

ess

them

selv

es w

ith c

onf

iden

ce a

nd p

arti

cipat

e ac

tive

ly in

disc

uss

ion

mo

st o

f th

e ti

me.

Life

Ski

lls

Obs

erva

tio

n T

oo

l T

o b

e use

d in

co

njunct

ion

wit

h an

oth

er a

ctiv

ity.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts

ab

le t

o e

xp

ress

th

em

selv

es

wit

h c

on

fid

en

ce a

nd

p

art

icip

ate

act

ive

ly i

n

dis

cu

ssio

n

Per

cent

of

child

ren a

ged 1

0-1

8 ye

ars

who

are

abl

e to

expr

ess

them

selv

es w

ith c

onf

iden

ce a

nd p

arti

cipat

e ac

tive

ly in

disc

uss

ion

mo

st o

f th

e ti

me.

Life

Ski

lls

Obs

erva

tio

n T

oo

l T

o b

e use

d in

co

njunc

tio

n w

ith

anoth

er a

ctiv

ity.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ch

ild

ren

wh

o

de

velo

p a

nd

de

mo

nst

rate

th

e a

pp

lica

tio

n o

f fo

un

dati

on

al li

fe s

kills

th

at

co

ntr

ibu

te t

o t

he

ir o

wn

d

eve

lop

me

nt

Per

cent

of

pre

-sch

oo

l ag

ed c

hild

ren

(3-5

yea

rs)

who

are

dev

elo

pmen

tally

on

trac

k in

75%

of

phy

sica

l, so

cial

, co

gnit

ive,

and

emo

tio

nal

fo

undat

ional

life

ski

ll do

mai

ns.

FELS

A 3

(F

ounda

tio

nal

and

Ess

ential

Life

Ski

lls

Ass

essm

ent)

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ch

ild

ren

wh

o

de

velo

p a

nd

de

mo

nst

rate

th

e a

pp

lica

tio

n o

f e

sse

nti

al

life

sk

ills

th

at

co

ntr

ibu

te t

o

the

ir o

wn

de

velo

pm

en

t an

d

that

of

the

ir c

om

mu

nit

ies

Per

cent

of sc

hoo

l ag

ed c

hild

ren

(6-1

1 ye

ars)

who

are

dev

elo

pmen

tally

on

trac

k in

75%

of

phy

sica

l pe

rcep

tio

ns

and

coo

rdin

atio

n, c

om

munic

atio

n, c

ritica

l th

inki

ng a

nd

emo

tio

nal

m

anag

emen

t es

senti

al li

fe s

kills

.

FELS

A (

Founda

tio

nal

an

d E

ssen

tial

Life

Sk

ills

Ass

essm

ent)

3 A

dap

ted

from

thr

ee f

ram

ewo

rks

for

und

erst

andi

ng

the

evo

lutio

n o

f co

gnit

ive,

phys

ical

, so

cial

and e

mo

tional

dev

elopm

ent

in c

hild

hoo

d: 1

. se

nso

ry i

nteg

rati

on w

hich

re

pre

sents

bra

in m

atur

ity;

2.

Guilf

ord

’s S

truct

ure

of

the

Inte

llect

; an

d 3

. psy

cho

mo

tor

deve

lopm

ent

- co

mbi

nati

on

of

cogn

itiv

e an

d em

oti

onal

inte

llige

nce

to u

se t

he

bo

dy

to e

xpr

ess

inte

ntio

n.

Wo

rld V

isio

n’s

Co

mpen

dium

of In

dic

ato

rs f

or

Chi

ld W

ell-

bein

g 48

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts

wh

o d

eve

lop

an

d

de

mo

nst

rate

th

e a

pp

lica

tio

n

of

ess

en

tial

life

sk

ills

to

le

ad

a p

rod

ucti

ve a

nd

fu

lfilli

ng

life

Per

cent

of sc

hoo

l ag

ed c

hild

ren

(12-1

8 ye

ars)

who

are

dev

elo

pm

enta

lly o

n t

rack

in

75%

of phys

ical

per

cept

ions

and

coo

rdin

atio

n, c

om

munic

atio

n, c

ritica

l th

inki

ng a

nd

emo

tio

nal

m

anag

emen

t es

senti

al li

fe s

kills

.

FELS

A (

Founda

tio

nal

an

d E

ssen

tial

Life

Sk

ills

Ass

essm

ent)

Th

e s

tre

ngth

of

the

com

mit

men

t to

lea

rnin

g ass

et

as

rep

ort

ed

by a

do

lesc

en

ts

12

-18

ye

ars

of

age

The

mea

n s

core

in t

he

com

mitm

ent

to le

arni

ng a

sset

cat

ego

ry

as r

epo

rted

by

ado

lesc

ents

12-

18

year

s o

f ag

e.

Dev

elo

pm

ent

Ass

ets

Pro

file

(DA

P)

Rep

rese

nts

1 of 8

asse

t ca

tego

ries

. The

DA

P c

an b

e use

d to

mea

sure

sev

eral

chi

ld

wel

l-bei

ng

out

com

es a

t th

e sa

me

tim

e.

See

App

endix

1 fo

r m

ore

det

ails

on

the

Dev

elop

men

t Ass

ets

Prof

ile.

Wo

rld V

isio

n’s

Co

mpen

dium

of In

dic

ato

rs f

or

Chi

ld W

ell-

bein

g 49

Ou

tco

me: A

do

lesc

en

ts r

ead

y f

or

eco

no

mic

op

po

rtu

nit

y4

Hig

hly

re

co

mm

en

de

d

ind

icato

r D

efi

nit

ion

T

oo

l N

ote

s

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts

wh

o h

ave

a le

arn

ing

op

po

rtu

nit

y t

hat

lead

s to

a

pro

du

cti

ve l

ife

Pe

rce

nt

of

ad

ole

scen

ts a

ge

d 1

2–1

8 c

urr

en

tly

eit

he

r in

sc

ho

ol o

r att

en

din

g a

sk

ills

or

voca

tio

nal

train

ing c

ou

rse

, o

r e

ngage

d in

an

ap

pre

nti

cesh

ip/l

ive

lih

oo

d w

ith

o

pp

ort

un

itie

s ah

ead

(n

ot

men

ial

wo

rk o

r u

nd

ere

mp

loye

d).

Yo

uth

He

alt

hy

Be

havio

ur

Su

rve

y;

Yo

uth

su

rve

y

mo

du

le

Ad

dit

ion

al in

dic

ato

r D

efi

nit

ion

T

oo

l N

ote

s

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts

wh

o h

ave

th

e m

ean

s to

save

m

on

ey

Per

cent

of

ado

lesc

ents

age

d 1

2–1

8 w

ho

bel

ong

to a

com

muni

ty

savi

ngs

gro

up o

r ha

ve a

sav

ings

acc

oun

t at

a f

inan

cial

inst

ituti

on.

Yo

uth H

ealthy

Beh

avio

ur

Surv

ey;

Wo

rk m

odule

4 A

dditio

nal

out

com

e in

dica

tors

will

be

pro

vided

as

OEC

D p

ubl

ishes

the

ir s

tanda

rds

on

child

fin

ance

. The

se a

re li

sted

in

Appe

ndix

2.

Wo

rld V

isio

n’s

Co

mpen

dium

of In

dic

ato

rs f

or

Chi

ld W

ell-

bein

g 50

Ou

tco

me: C

hild

ren

acce

ss a

nd

co

mp

lete

basi

c e

du

cati

on

Hig

hly

re

co

mm

en

de

d

Ind

icato

r D

efi

nit

ion

T

oo

l N

ote

s

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ch

ild

ren

cu

rre

ntl

y e

nro

lled

in

an

d

att

en

din

g a

str

uct

ure

d

learn

ing i

nst

itu

tio

n

Pe

rce

nt

of

child

ren

age

d 6

–18

(o

r n

ati

on

ally a

pp

rop

riate

age

fo

r sc

ho

ol)

en

roll

ed

in

an

d a

tte

nd

ing s

tru

ctu

red

le

arn

ing o

pp

ort

un

ity a

t th

e t

ime o

f th

e s

urv

ey.

Th

is i

ndic

ato

r sh

ou

ld b

e a

cco

mp

an

ied b

y a

mea

sure

of

qu

ality

of

lea

rnin

g a

nd d

ata

(on

acc

ess

& lea

rnin

g o

utc

om

es)

dis

agg

rega

ted t

o s

ho

w i

ncl

usi

ven

ess

an

d e

qu

ity.

Care

giv

er

surv

ey;

E

du

cati

on

an

d

EC

CD

mo

du

le

Use

se

con

dary

data

/

sch

oo

l re

cord

s w

he

re

po

ssib

le.

Ad

dit

ion

al in

dic

ato

r D

efi

nit

ion

T

oo

l N

ote

s P

rop

ort

ion

of

child

ren

wh

o

have

co

mp

lete

d b

asi

c e

du

cati

on

in

a s

tru

ctu

red

le

arn

ing e

nvi

ron

me

nt

Per

cent

of

child

ren a

ge 1

2-1

8 ye

ars

old

who

hav

e co

mple

ted

bas

ic e

duca

tio

n /

pri

mar

y sc

ho

olin

g in

a s

truc

ture

d lea

rnin

g en

viro

nmen

t.

Thi

s in

dica

tor

shou

ld b

e ac

com

pan

ied

by a

mea

sure

of

qual

ity

of

lear

ning

and

dat

a (o

n ac

cess

& lea

rnin

g ou

tcom

es) di

sagg

rega

ted

to s

how

inc

lusive

ness

and

equ

ity.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey;

Edu

catio

n a

nd

ECC

D

mo

dule

Use

sec

ond

ary

dat

a /

school

reco

rds

whe

re p

oss

ible

.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ch

ild

ren

wh

o

have

dro

pp

ed

ou

t o

f sc

ho

ol

Per

cent

of sc

hoo

l ag

ed c

hild

ren

who

wer

e en

rolle

d in

schoo

l but

dur

ing

the

last

12 m

onth

s, d

roppe

d o

ut

and

are

no

long

er

atte

ndin

g.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey;

Edu

catio

n a

nd

ECC

D

mo

dule

Use

sec

ond

ary

dat

a /

scho

ol

reco

rds

whe

re p

oss

ible

.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f p

are

nts

/care

giv

ers

th

at

we

re

ab

le t

o p

ay f

or

the

ir

ch

ild

ren

’s b

asi

c e

du

cati

on

co

sts

wit

ho

ut

ex

tern

al

ass

ista

nce

Per

cent

of par

ents

or

care

give

rs w

ho r

epo

rt t

hat

all

the

schoo

l ag

ed c

hild

ren

in t

he h

ouse

hold

wer

e pr

ovi

ded w

ith t

he

scho

ol

requ

irem

ents

or

lear

ning

mat

eria

ls n

eede

d d

urin

g th

e la

st y

ear,

th

rough

thei

r o

wn

mea

ns

and w

itho

ut e

xte

rnal

ass

ista

nce.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey;

Eco

nom

ic

dev

elo

pmen

t m

odul

e

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f sc

ho

ols

th

at

pro

vid

ed

co

nsi

ste

nt

acc

ess

to

le

arn

ing d

uri

ng a

nd

aft

er

a

dis

ast

er

in t

he

co

mm

un

ity

Per

cent

of sc

hoo

ls w

hic

h pr

ovi

ded c

onsi

sten

t ac

cess

to

a

stru

cture

d le

arnin

g o

ppo

rtuni

ty d

urin

g an

d af

ter

a di

sast

er (

less

th

an o

ne w

eek

mis

sed)

.

Seco

ndar

y da

ta

If n

o s

cho

ol re

cord

s av

aila

ble,

use

key

inf

orm

ant

inte

rvie

ws

wit

h hea

d t

each

ers.

Wo

rld V

isio

n’s

Co

mpen

dium

of In

dic

ato

rs f

or

Chi

ld W

ell-

bein

g 51

Asp

irati

on

: Exp

eri

en

ce love o

f G

od

an

d t

heir

neig

hb

ours

Ou

tco

me: C

hild

ren

gro

w i

n t

heir

aw

are

ness

an

d e

xp

eri

en

ce o

f G

od

’s l

ove i

n a

n e

nvir

on

me

nt

that

reco

gn

ise

s th

eir

fre

ed

om

Hig

hly

re

co

mm

en

de

d

ind

icato

r D

efi

nit

ion

T

oo

l N

ote

s

Ch

ild

ren

gro

w in

th

eir

aw

are

ne

ss a

nd

ex

pe

rie

nce

of

Go

d’s

lo

ve

Ch

ild

ren

are

ab

le t

o d

esc

rib

e s

pe

cifi

c w

ays

in w

hic

h

fam

ilie

s an

d c

om

mu

nit

ies

en

cou

rage

th

em

in

th

eir

p

urs

uit

of

info

rmati

on

, act

ivit

ies

an

d r

ela

tio

nsh

ips,

wh

ich

e

nab

le t

he

m t

o d

isco

ve

r, g

row

in

an

d e

xp

eri

en

ce G

od

's

love

.

Child

ren’

s Fa

ith

Exp

ress

ions

and

Ref

lect

ions

on

CW

BA

3 an

d F

ulln

ess

of Li

fe F

ocu

s G

roup

D

iscu

ssio

n

Fo

r u

se o

nly

wit

h c

hil

dre

n

an

d y

ou

th w

ho

pro

fess

a

Ch

rist

ian

fai

th.

Ad

dit

ion

al in

dic

ato

r D

efi

nit

ion

T

oo

l N

ote

s C

hil

dre

n a

re a

ble

to

ex

pre

ss

the

ir f

ait

h

Child

ren

are

able

to

iden

tify

way

s in

whic

h th

ey e

xpre

ss t

heir

fa

ith

and c

om

mun

icat

e w

ith

Go

d.

Child

ren’

s Fa

ith

Exp

ress

ions

and

Ref

lect

ions

on

CW

BA

3 an

d F

ulln

ess

of Li

fe fo

cus

gro

up

dis

cuss

ion

For

use

only

wit

h ch

ildre

n a

nd

yout

h w

ho p

rofe

ss a

Chr

isti

an

fait

h.

Ch

ild

ren

have a

n

un

de

rsta

nd

ing a

nd

aw

are

ne

ss o

f G

od

Child

ren

are

able

to

des

crib

e ho

w t

hey

expe

rien

ce a

nd k

no

w

Go

d.

Child

ren’

s Per

spec

tive

of

Spir

itual

ity

and W

ell-

Bei

ng fo

cus

gro

up

dis

cuss

ion

Ch

ild

ren

have o

pp

ort

un

itie

s to

dem

on

stra

te G

od

's

pre

sen

ce i

n t

he

ir l

ive

s

Child

ren

can g

ive

exam

ple

s o

f o

ppo

rtuni

ties

wher

e th

ey h

ave

bee

n a

ble

to o

utw

ork

Go

d's

love

in

thei

r o

wn li

ves

and

rela

tio

nship

s w

ith

oth

ers.

Child

ren’

s Fa

ith

Exp

ress

ions

and

Ref

lect

ions

on

CW

BA

3 an

d F

ulln

ess

of Li

fe fo

cus

gro

up

dis

cuss

ion

For

use

only

wit

h ch

ildre

n an

d

yout

h w

ho p

rofe

ss a

Chr

isti

an

fait

h.

Wo

rld V

isio

n’s

Co

mpen

dium

of In

dic

ato

rs f

or

Chi

ld W

ell-

bein

g 52

Ou

tco

me: C

hild

ren

en

joy p

osi

tive r

ela

tio

nsh

ips

wit

h p

ee

rs, fa

mil

y a

nd

co

mm

un

ity m

em

be

rs

Hig

hly

re

co

mm

en

de

d

ind

icato

r D

efi

nit

ion

T

oo

l N

ote

s

Th

e s

tre

ngth

of

the s

up

po

rt

ass

et

cate

go

ry a

s re

po

rte

d

by a

do

lesc

en

ts 1

2-1

8 y

ears

o

f age

Th

e m

ean

sco

re i

n t

he

sup

po

rt a

sse

t cate

go

ry a

s re

po

rte

d b

y a

do

lesc

en

ts 1

2-1

8

ye

ars

of

age

.

De

ve

lop

me

nt

Ass

ets

P

rofi

le (

DA

P)

Re

pre

sen

ts 1

of

8 a

sset

cate

go

rie

s.

Th

e D

AP

can

be u

sed

to

measu

re

seve

ral

ch

ild

we

ll-b

ein

g o

utc

om

es

at

the s

am

e t

ime.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts

wh

o h

ave

a s

tro

ng

co

nn

ecti

on

wit

h t

he

ir

care

giv

er

Pe

rce

nt

of

ad

ole

scen

ts a

ge

d 1

2-1

8 y

ears

w

ho

re

po

rt t

hat

the

y f

ee

l a s

tro

ng

co

nn

ecti

on

to

th

eir

pri

mary

care

giv

er.

Yo

uth

He

alt

hy

Be

havio

ur

Su

rve

y;

Yo

uth

su

rve

y m

od

ule

Op

tio

n 2

fo

r m

easu

rin

g i

ncre

ase

d

level

of

we

ll-b

ein

g C

WB

targ

et:

1 o

f 4

in

dic

ato

rs.

Ad

dit

ion

al in

dic

ato

r D

efi

nit

ion

T

oo

l N

ote

s C

hil

dre

n c

an

po

int

to a

cts

of

love

an

d k

ind

ne

ss f

rom

fa

mil

y, p

ee

rs a

nd

co

mm

un

ity

Child

ren

can d

escr

ibe

way

s in

whic

h o

ther

s ha

ve

dem

ons

trat

ed G

od's

lo

ve b

y ca

ring

fo

r th

em o

r ex

pre

ssin

g lo

ve a

nd

kindne

ss t

o t

hem

.

Child

ren’

s Fa

ith

Exp

ress

ions

and R

efle

ctio

ns

on C

WB

A3 a

nd F

ulln

ess

of

Life

fo

cus

gro

up d

iscu

ssio

n

For

use

only

wit

h ch

ildre

n a

nd

youth

w

ho

pro

fess

a C

hri

stia

n fa

ith.

Ch

ild

ren

fe

el

sup

po

rte

d

wit

hin

fam

ilie

s an

d

co

mm

un

itie

s

Child

ren

can d

escr

ibe

way

s in

whic

h th

ey fee

l su

ppo

rted

by

thei

r fa

mili

es a

nd c

om

mun

itie

s.

Child

ren’

s Fa

ith

Exp

ress

ions

and R

efle

ctio

ns

on C

WB

A3 a

nd F

ulln

ess

of

Life

fo

cus

gro

up d

iscu

ssio

n

Th

e s

tre

ngth

of

the

bo

un

da

ries

an

d e

xp

ect

ati

on

s ass

et

cate

go

ry a

s re

po

rte

d

by a

do

lesc

en

ts 1

2-1

8 y

ears

o

f age

The

mea

n s

core

in t

he

boun

daries

and

exp

ecta

tions

as

set

cate

gory

as

repo

rted

by

ado

lesc

ents

12-

18

year

s o

f ag

e.

Dev

elo

pm

ent

Ass

ets

Pro

file

(DA

P)

Rep

rese

nts

1 of 8

asse

t ca

tego

ries

. T

he

DA

P c

an b

e use

d t

o m

easu

re s

ever

al

child

wel

l-bei

ng o

utco

mes

at

the

sam

e ti

me.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f O

VC

/MV

C

ad

ole

sce

nts

wh

o h

ave

a

stro

ng c

on

ne

cti

on

wit

h t

heir

p

are

nt

or

care

giv

er

Per

cent

of

OV

C/M

VC

ado

lesc

ents

age

d 1

2-1

8 ye

ars

who

rep

ort

tha

t th

ey fee

l a s

tro

ng

conne

ctio

n to

the

ir p

rim

ary

care

give

r.

Yo

uth H

ealthy

Beh

avio

ur

Surv

ey; Y

outh

sur

vey

mo

dule

Wo

rld V

isio

n’s

Co

mpen

dium

of In

dic

ato

rs f

or

Chi

ld W

ell-

bein

g 53

Ou

tco

me: C

hild

ren

valu

e a

nd

care

fo

r o

thers

an

d t

heir

en

vir

on

me

nt

Hig

hly

re

co

mm

en

de

d

ind

icato

r D

efi

nit

ion

T

oo

l N

ote

s

Th

e s

tre

ngth

of

the p

osi

tive

va

lues

ass

et

cate

go

ry

as

rep

ort

ed

by a

do

lesc

en

ts

12

-18

ye

ars

of

age

Th

e m

ean

sco

re i

n t

he

po

siti

ve v

alu

es

ass

et

cate

go

ry a

s re

po

rte

d b

y a

do

lesc

en

ts 1

2-1

8

ye

ars

of

age

.

De

ve

lop

me

nt

Ass

ets

P

rofi

le (

DA

P)

Re

pre

sen

ts 1

of

8 a

sset

cate

go

rie

s.

Th

e D

AP

can

be

use

d t

o m

easu

re

seve

ral

ch

ild

we

ll-b

ein

g o

utc

om

es

at

the s

am

e t

ime.

Ad

dit

ion

al in

dic

ato

r D

efi

nit

ion

T

oo

l N

ote

s C

hil

dre

n h

ave p

osi

tive

valu

es

Child

ren

can g

ive

exam

ple

s o

f ho

w t

hey

dem

ons

trat

e po

siti

ve v

alue

s in

thei

r liv

es.

Child

ren’

s Fa

ith

Exp

ress

ions

and R

efle

ctio

ns

on C

WB

A3 a

nd F

ulln

ess

of

Life

fo

cus

gro

up d

iscu

ssio

n

See

App

endix

1 fo

r m

ore

det

ails

on

the

Dev

elop

men

t Ass

ets

Prof

ile.

Wo

rld V

isio

n’s

Co

mpen

dium

of In

dic

ato

rs f

or

Chi

ld W

ell-

bein

g 54

Ou

tco

me: C

hild

ren

have h

op

e a

nd

vis

ion

fo

r th

e f

utu

re

Hig

hly

re

co

mm

en

de

d

ind

icato

r D

efi

nit

ion

T

oo

l N

ote

s

Th

e s

tre

ngth

of

the p

osi

tive

id

enti

ty a

sse

t ca

tego

ry

as

rep

ort

ed

by a

do

lesc

en

ts

12

-18

ye

ars

of

age

.

Th

e m

ean

sco

re i

n t

he

po

siti

ve iden

tity

ass

et

cate

go

ry a

s re

po

rte

d b

y a

do

lesc

en

ts

12

-18

ye

ars

of

age

.

De

ve

lop

me

nt

Ass

ets

P

rofi

le (

DA

P)

Re

pre

sen

ts 1

of

8 a

sset

cate

go

rie

s.

Th

e D

AP

can

be

use

d t

o m

easu

re

seve

ral

ch

ild

we

ll-b

ein

g o

utc

om

es

at

the s

am

e t

ime.

Ad

dit

ion

al in

dic

ato

r D

efi

nit

ion

T

oo

l N

ote

s

Ch

ild

ren

ex

pre

ss t

hat

Go

d

has

a p

urp

ose

fo

r th

eir

liv

es

C

hild

ren

feel

that

Go

d h

as a

purp

ose

fo

r th

eir

lives

and c

an e

xpr

ess

way

s th

at t

his

purp

ose

will

ben

efit o

ther

s to

o.

Child

ren’

s Fa

ith

Exp

ress

ions

and R

efle

ctio

ns

on C

WB

A3 a

nd F

ulln

ess

of

Life

fo

cus

gro

up d

iscu

ssio

n

For

use

only

wit

h ch

ildre

n an

d y

outh

w

ho

pro

fess

a C

hri

stia

n fa

ith.

Ch

ild

ren

can

nam

e a

n a

du

lt

role

mo

de

l w

ho

in

spir

es

the

ir t

rust

in

Go

d a

nd

n

ou

rish

es

ho

pe

Child

ren

can n

ame

an a

dult

the

y kn

ow

who

pro

vides

a C

hris

tian

ro

le m

ode

l an

d in

spir

es t

heir

tr

ust

in G

od

and

nour

ishe

s th

eir

hope

and v

isio

n

for

thei

r fu

ture

.

Child

ren’

s Fa

ith

Exp

ress

ions

and R

efle

ctio

ns

on C

WB

A3 a

nd F

ulln

ess

of

Life

fo

cus

gro

up d

iscu

ssio

n

For

use

only

wit

h ch

ildre

n an

d y

outh

w

ho

pro

fess

a C

hri

stia

n fa

ith.

Ch

ild

ren

can

ex

pre

ss t

he

ir

vis

ion

fo

r an

d u

nd

ers

tan

din

g

of

life

in

all i

ts f

ull

ne

ss

Child

ren

can e

xpre

ss t

heir

unde

rsta

ndi

ng o

f th

e m

eanin

g o

f ‘li

fe in

all its

fulln

ess’

and

can

iden

tify

w

ays

in w

hic

h t

his

can

be

mea

sure

d.

Child

ren’

s Fa

ith

Exp

ress

ions

and R

efle

ctio

ns

on C

WB

A3 a

nd F

ulln

ess

of

Life

fo

cus

gro

up d

iscu

ssio

n

See

App

endix

1 fo

r m

ore

det

ails

on

the

Dev

elop

men

t Ass

ets

Prof

ile.

Wo

rld V

isio

n’s

Co

mpen

dium

of In

dic

ato

rs f

or

Chi

ld W

ell-

bein

g 55

Asp

irati

on

: Care

d fo

r, p

rote

cte

d a

nd

part

icip

ati

ng

Ou

tco

me: C

hild

ren

care

d f

or

in a

lo

vin

g,

safe

, fa

mily a

nd

co

mm

un

ity e

nvir

on

me

nt

wit

h s

afe

pla

ce

s to

pla

y

Ch

ild

we

ll-b

ein

g t

arg

et

stan

da

rd i

nd

icato

r D

efi

nit

ion

T

oo

l N

ote

s

Th

e s

tre

ngth

s o

f th

e a

sse

ts

an

d t

he

co

nte

xts

in

wh

ich

ad

ole

sce

nts

liv

e, le

arn

an

d

wo

rk a

s re

po

rte

d b

y

ad

ole

sce

nts

12

-18

ye

ars

of

age

Th

e m

ean

to

tal

sco

re o

f in

tern

al an

d e

xte

rnal

ass

et

cate

go

rie

s w

hic

h r

efle

ct t

he

ass

ets

an

d t

he

co

nte

xts

in

wh

ich

ad

ole

sce

nts

liv

e, le

arn

an

d

wo

rk a

s re

po

rte

d b

y a

do

lesc

en

ts 1

2-1

8 y

ears

of

age

.

De

ve

lop

me

nt

Ass

ets

Pro

file

(D

AP

)

Re

pre

sen

ts a

ll 8

ass

et

cate

go

rie

s5.

Th

e D

AP

can

be

use

d t

o m

easu

re

seve

ral

CW

BO

at

the

sam

e t

ime

.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts

wh

o r

an

k t

he

mse

lve

s as

thri

vin

g o

n t

he l

ad

de

r o

f li

fe

Pe

rce

nt

of

ad

ole

scen

ts a

ge

d 1

2–1

8 y

ears

wh

o

ran

k t

he

mse

lve

s as

‘th

rivin

g’

on

th

e ‘

Lad

de

r o

f L

ife’.

Yo

uth

He

alt

hy

Be

havio

ur

Su

rve

y;

Yo

uth

su

rve

y

mo

du

le

Op

tio

n 2

fo

r m

easu

rin

g i

ncre

ase

d

level

of

we

ll-b

ein

g C

WB

targ

et:

1 o

f 4

in

dic

ato

rs.

Ad

dit

ion

al in

dic

ato

r D

efi

nit

ion

T

oo

l N

ote

s T

he

str

en

gth

s o

f th

e a

sse

ts

an

d t

he

co

nte

xts

in

wh

ich

ad

ole

sce

nts

liv

e, le

arn

an

d

wo

rk a

s re

po

rte

d b

y

OV

C/M

VC

ad

ole

sce

nts

12

-1

8 y

ears

of

age

The

mea

n t

ota

l sco

re o

f in

tern

al a

nd

exte

rnal

ass

et

cate

gori

es w

hic

h re

flect

the

ass

ets

and t

he

conte

xts

in

whic

h ad

ole

scen

ts li

ve, le

arn

and w

ork

as

repo

rted

by

OV

C/M

VC

ado

lesc

ents

12-

18

year

s o

f ag

e.

Dev

elo

pm

ent

Ass

ets

Pro

file

(DA

P)

R

epre

sent

s al

l 8 a

sset

cat

ego

ries

. T

he

DA

P ca

n be

use

d t

o m

easu

re s

ever

al

child

wel

l-bei

ng o

utco

mes

at

the

sam

e ti

me.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f O

VC

/MV

C

ad

ole

sce

nts

wh

o r

an

k

the

mse

lve

s as

thri

vin

g o

n

the

lad

de

r o

f li

fe

Per

cent

of

OV

C/M

VC

age

d 1

2–18

year

s w

ho

ran

k th

emse

lves

as

‘thri

ving

’ o

n t

he

‘Lad

der

of

Life

’. Y

out

h H

ealthy

Beh

avio

ur

Surv

ey;

Yo

uth s

urv

ey m

odu

le

Th

e s

tre

ngth

of

the

con

stru

ctiv

e u

se o

f ti

me

ass

et

cate

go

ry a

s re

po

rte

d b

y ad

ole

sce

nts

12

-18

ye

ars

of

The

mea

n s

core

in t

he

cons

truc

tive

use

of t

ime

asse

t ca

tego

ry a

s re

po

rted

by

ado

lesc

ents

12-

18

year

s of ag

e.

Dev

elo

pm

ent

Ass

ets

Pro

file

(DA

P)

R

epre

sent

s 1

of 8

asse

t ca

tego

ries

. T

he

DA

P ca

n be

use

d t

o m

easu

re s

ever

al

child

wel

l-bei

ng o

utco

mes

at

the

sam

e ti

me.

5 S

ee A

ppen

dix

1 fo

r lis

t of

asse

ts.

Wo

rld V

isio

n’s

Co

mpen

dium

of In

dic

ato

rs f

or

Chi

ld W

ell-

bein

g 56

age

P

rop

ort

ion

of

pare

nts

or

care

giv

ers

wh

o b

elie

ve t

hat

ph

ysic

al

pu

nis

hm

en

t is

n

ece

ssary

to

bri

ng u

p a

ch

ild

p

rop

erl

y

Per

cent

of

pare

nts

or

care

give

rs w

ith

child

ren a

ged 0

-18

year

s w

ho b

elie

ve t

hat

the

onl

y w

ay t

o b

ring

up

a ch

ild p

roper

ly is

to u

se p

hys

ical

vio

lenc

e as

pun

ishm

ent.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey:

Child

pro

tect

ion

and

par

tici

pat

ion m

odu

le

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f p

are

nts

or

care

giv

ers

wh

o u

sed

ph

ysi

cal

pu

nis

hm

en

t o

r ab

use

as

a

me

an

s o

f d

iscip

lin

ing t

heir

ch

ild

ren

Per

cent

of

pare

nts

or

care

give

rs w

ith

child

ren a

ged 0

-18

year

s w

ho r

epo

rt h

avin

g dis

cipl

ined

a c

hild

usi

ng

mea

ns

of vi

ole

nce

in

the

pas

t m

onth

.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey:

Child

pro

tect

ion

and

par

tici

pat

ion m

odu

le

Use

s pro

mpt

ques

tio

ns, in

clud

ed n

on-

viole

nt

mea

ns

of

disc

iplin

e.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ch

ild

ren

wh

o

mis

sed

sch

oo

l d

ue t

o w

ork

d

uti

es

Per

cent

of

child

ren w

ho m

isse

d s

cho

ol du

e to

wo

rk

dut

ies

or

who

se w

ork

int

erfe

res

with s

choo

l at

tend

ance

.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey:

Child

pro

tect

ion

and

par

tici

pat

ion m

odu

le

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ch

ild

ren

e

ngage

d i

n c

hil

d l

ab

ou

r Per

cent

of

child

ren

who

wo

rk e

xces

sive

ho

urs

for

thei

r ag

e (a

cco

rdin

g to

UN

ICEF

defin

itio

n).

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey:

Child

pro

tect

ion

and

par

tici

pat

ion m

odu

le

Use

s th

e U

NIC

EF

crit

eria

of ch

ild lab

our

for

spec

ific

age

range

s.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts

en

gage

d i

n c

hil

d l

ab

ou

r Per

cent

of

ado

lesc

ents

age

d 1

2-1

8 w

ho

wo

rk e

xces

sive

ho

urs

for

thei

r ag

e (a

cco

rdin

g to

UN

ICEF

defin

itio

n).

Yo

uth H

ealthy

Beh

avio

ur

Surv

ey;

Wo

rk m

odu

le

Use

s th

e U

NIC

EF

crit

eria

of ch

ild lab

our

for

spec

ific

age

range

s.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f p

are

nts

or

care

giv

ers

wh

o f

ee

l th

at

the

ir c

om

mu

nit

y is

a s

afe

p

lace f

or

ch

ild

ren

Per

cent

of

pare

nts

or

care

give

rs w

ith

child

ren a

ged 0

-18

year

s w

ho fee

l tha

t th

eir

child

ren

are

safe

fro

m

dan

ger

or

vio

lence

in

the

com

munity

“mo

st”

or

“all”

of

the

tim

e.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey:

Child

pro

tect

ion a

nd

par

tici

pat

ion m

odu

le

Use

s a

Like

rt s

cale

.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts

wh

o f

ee

l th

at

the

ir

co

mm

un

ity

is a

safe

pla

ce

Per

cent

of

ado

lesc

ents

age

d 1

2-1

8 ye

ars

who

fee

l th

at

they

are

saf

e fr

om

dan

ger

or

vio

lence

in

the

com

muni

ty

“mo

st”

of th

e ti

me.

Yo

uth H

ealthy

Beh

avio

ur

Surv

ey:

Phy

sica

l vi

ole

nce

m

odule

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ult

s w

ho

w

ou

ld r

ep

ort

a c

ase

of

child

ab

use

Per

cent

of

resp

ond

ents

age

d 18

-49

who

sta

te t

hat

they

wo

uld

rep

ort

a s

uspe

cted

cas

e o

f ch

ild a

bus

e an

d k

now

ho

w t

o d

o s

o.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey:

Child

pro

tect

ion

and

par

tici

pat

ion m

odu

le

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts

wh

o k

no

w o

f th

e p

rese

nce o

f se

rvic

es

an

d m

ech

an

ism

s to

Per

cent

of

ado

lesc

ents

age

d 1

2–1

8 ye

ars

who

kno

w

what

to

do

or

an a

dul

t th

ey w

ould

to

tur

n t

o in

cas

e of

abuse

, neg

lect

, ex

plo

itat

ion o

r vi

ole

nce

, an

d kn

ow

tha

t

Yo

uth h

ealt

hy

beh

avio

ur

surv

ey;

Phy

sica

l vi

ole

nce

Wo

rld V

isio

n’s

Co

mpen

dium

of In

dic

ato

rs f

or

Chi

ld W

ell-

bein

g 57

receiv

e a

nd

re

spo

nd

to

re

po

rts

of

ab

use

, n

egle

ct,

ex

plo

itati

on

or

vio

len

ce

again

st c

hil

dre

n

such

ser

vice

s ex

ist

to p

rote

ct t

hem

. m

odule

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts

wh

o r

ep

ort

havin

g

ex

pe

rie

nce

d a

ny p

hysi

cal

vio

len

ce i

n t

he

past

12

m

on

ths

Per

cent

of

ado

lesc

ents

age

d 1

2–1

8 ye

ars

who

rep

ort

hav

ing

expe

rien

ced a

ny p

hys

ical

vio

lenc

e in

the

12

mo

nth

s pr

eced

ing

the

surv

ey.

Yo

uth h

ealt

hy

beh

avio

ur

surv

ey;

Phy

sica

l vi

ole

nce

m

odule

Thi

s su

rvey

fo

cuse

s on y

out

h kn

ow

ledge

, at

titu

des

and b

ehav

iour.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts

wh

o a

re w

illi

ng t

o r

ep

ort

an

y e

xp

eri

en

ce o

f u

nw

an

ted

se

xu

al act

ivit

y

Per

cent

of

ado

lesc

ents

age

d 1

2–1

8 ye

ars

who

say

they

w

ould

be

will

ing

to r

epo

rt a

ny e

xpe

rien

ce o

f unw

ante

d

sexu

al a

ctiv

ity.

Yo

uth h

ealt

hy

beh

avio

ur

surv

ey;

Sex a

nd

rela

tio

nsh

ips

mo

dule

Thi

s su

rvey

fo

cuse

s on y

out

h kn

ow

ledge

, at

titu

des

and b

ehav

iour.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts

rep

ort

ing t

he

y fe

el

ab

le t

o

say n

o t

o u

nw

an

ted

se

xu

al

ad

van

ce

s o

r act

ivit

y

Per

cent

of

ado

lesc

ents

age

d 1

2–1

8 ye

ars

who

rep

ort

th

ey f

eel ab

le t

o s

ay n

o t

o u

nwan

ted

sexua

l ad

vance

s o

r ac

tivi

ty.

Yo

uth h

ealt

hy

beh

avio

ur

surv

ey;

Sex a

nd

rela

tio

nsh

ips

mo

dule

Thi

s su

rvey

fo

cuse

s on y

out

h kn

ow

ledge

, at

titu

des

and b

ehav

iour.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ch

ild

ren

u

nd

er

18

ye

ars

, m

arr

ied

Per

cent

of

child

ren u

nder

18 y

ears

, m

arri

ed. O

nly

incl

ude

chi

ldre

n p

rese

nt

in t

he

house

hold

. C

areg

iver

surv

ey;

Star

ter

mo

dule

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ch

ild

ren

u

nd

er

18

ye

ars

, m

arr

ied

Per

cent

of

ado

lesc

ents

age

d 1

2-1

8 ye

ars

who

rep

ort

bei

ng o

r hav

ing

bee

n m

arri

ed.

Yo

uth h

ealt

hy

beh

avio

ur

surv

ey;

Yo

uth s

urv

ey m

odu

le

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ult

s w

ho

e

xp

ress

acce

pti

ng a

ttit

ud

es

tow

ard

pe

op

le l

ivin

g w

ith

H

IV/

AID

S

Per

cent

of

resp

ond

ents

age

d 1

8–4

9 ye

ars

expre

ssin

g ac

cepting

attitu

des

to

war

d p

eople

wit

h H

IV, o

f th

ose

w

ho

hav

e hea

rd o

f th

e vi

rus.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey;

Adul

t H

IV/A

IDS

mo

dule

Use

s a

fix s

et o

f qu

esti

ons

and

res

po

nses

to

det

erm

ine

acce

pti

ng a

ttit

udes

.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f p

are

nts

or

care

giv

ers

wh

o a

pp

rove

of

fem

ale

ge

nit

al

mu

tila

tio

n/c

utt

ing

Per

cent

of

pare

nts

or

care

give

rs o

f ch

ildre

n a

ged

0-18

year

s fa

vouri

ng

the

cont

inua

tio

n o

f fe

mal

e ge

nit

al

mutila

tio

n/c

utting.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey:

Child

pro

tect

ion

and

par

tici

pat

ion m

odu

le

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f p

are

nts

or

care

giv

ers

wh

o r

ep

ort

th

at

on

e o

r m

ore

dau

gh

ter

has

be

en

cu

t fo

r fe

male

cir

cum

cis

ion

Per

cent

of

par

ents

or

care

give

rs w

ho

rep

ort

that

one

o

r m

ore

dau

ghte

rs u

nder

18 y

ears

old

hav

e be

en c

ut

for

fem

ale

circ

umci

sio

n/F

emal

e G

enital

Mut

ilati

on

(FG

M/C

).

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey:

Child

pro

tect

ion

and

par

tici

pat

ion m

odu

le

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts

Per

cent

of

ado

lesc

ents

age

d 1

2–1

8 w

ho

agr

ee w

ith a

t Y

out

h h

ealthy

Wo

rld V

isio

n’s

Co

mpen

dium

of In

dic

ato

rs f

or

Chi

ld W

ell-

bein

g 58

wh

o t

hin

k a

hu

sban

d i

s ju

stif

ied

in

hit

tin

g o

r b

eati

ng

his

wif

e u

nd

er

cert

ain

cir

cum

stan

ces

leas

t o

ne s

pec

ified

rea

son

for

a hu

sban

d be

atin

g his

w

ife: i)

bur

ns t

he

foo

d, ii) a

rgue

s w

ith

husb

and, i

ii)

dis

obey

s hi

m, i

v) n

egle

cts

ho

useh

old

cho

res

or

v)

dis

resp

ects

her

in-law

s.

beh

avio

ur

surv

ey;

Phy

sica

l vi

ole

nce

m

odule

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ult

s w

ho

th

ink a

hu

sban

d is

just

ifie

d i

n

hit

tin

g o

r b

eati

ng h

is w

ife

u

nd

er

cert

ain

cir

cu

mst

an

ces

Per

cent

of

resp

onde

nts

age

d 1

8-4

9 y

ears

who

agr

ee

wit

h at

lea

st o

ne

spec

ified

rea

son fo

r a

hus

ban

d b

eati

ng

his

wife

: i)

bur

ns

the

foo

d, ii

) ar

gues

wit

h hu

sban

d, iii)

go

es o

ut w

itho

ut

telli

ng

the

husb

and,

iv)

neg

lect

s th

e ch

ildre

n o

r v)

ref

use

s to

hav

e se

x w

ith h

usban

d.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey:

Child

pro

tect

ion

and

par

tici

pat

ion m

odu

le

Harm

ful

trad

itio

nal o

r cu

sto

mary

pra

cti

ce

s are

no

lo

nge

r th

e n

orm

in

th

e

co

mm

un

ity

Co

mm

unity

mem

bers

, in

clud

ing

child

ren,

rep

ort

that

(a

spec

ific/

conte

xtua

lly r

elev

ant)

har

mfu

l tr

adit

iona

l o

r cu

sto

mar

y pr

actice

whic

h vi

ola

tes

the

righ

ts o

f ch

ildre

n an

d w

om

en, su

ch a

s ea

rly

or

forc

ed m

arri

age,

fem

ale

geni

tal m

utila

tio

n a

nd

gende

r-bas

ed v

iole

nce,

are

no

lo

nger

pra

ctis

ed o

penly

by

ever

yone.

Car

ed f

or,

pro

tect

ed

and p

arti

cipat

ing

Focu

s G

roup

Dis

cuss

ion;

FG

D

Har

mfu

l Tra

dit

ional

Pra

ctic

es_

Adu

lt,

FGD

Har

mfu

l T

raditio

nal

Pra

ctic

es_

Chi

ld

Co

mm

un

ity a

nd

fam

ily

be

havi

ou

r cre

ate

s a

pro

tect

ive

en

viro

nm

en

t fo

r ch

ild

ren

Co

mm

unity

mem

bers

, in

clud

ing

child

ren, re

port

ch

ange

s in

att

itudes

or

beh

avio

ur

of fa

mily

mem

bers

an

d t

he

com

muni

ty in

gen

eral

whic

h h

ave

favo

ure

d th

e pro

tect

ion o

f ch

ildre

n fr

om

abuse

or

explo

itat

ion.

Car

ed f

or,

pro

tect

ed

and p

arti

cipat

ing

Focu

s G

roup

Dis

cuss

ion: F

GD

C

hild

Pro

tect

ion

Syst

ems_

Adu

lt, F

GD

C

hild

Pro

tect

ion

Syst

ems_

Chi

ld

Co

mm

un

itie

s (i

nclu

din

g

ch

ild

ren

) ca

n i

de

nti

fy,

un

de

rsta

nd

an

d r

esp

on

d

ad

eq

uate

ly t

o v

iola

tio

ns

of

ch

ild

rig

hts

, in

co

ord

inati

on

/part

ne

rsh

ip

wit

h l

ocal

just

ice

m

ech

an

ism

s

Co

mm

unity

mem

bers

, in

clud

ing

child

ren,

rep

ort

that

sy

stem

s o

f in

form

al o

r fo

rmal

pro

tect

ion

or

loca

l ju

stic

e sy

stem

s ar

e fu

nct

ioni

ng t

o p

rote

ct c

hild

ren,

enab

ling

com

munitie

s an

d pa

rtner

s to

res

pond

to

vi

ola

tio

ns o

f ch

ild r

ights

.

Car

ed f

or,

pro

tect

ed

and p

arti

cipat

ing

Focu

s G

roup

Dis

cuss

ion:

FG

D

Child

Pro

tect

ion

Syst

ems_

Adu

lt, F

GD

C

hild

Pro

tect

ion

Syst

ems_

Chi

ld

Co

mm

un

itie

s are

aw

are

of

the

dan

ge

rs o

f tr

aff

ick

ing in

C

om

munity

mem

bers

, in

clud

ing

child

ren,

are

aw

are

of

and c

an d

escr

ibe

the

dan

gers

and

im

pac

t o

f tr

affic

king

/ C

ared

fo

r, p

rote

cted

an

d p

arti

cipat

ing

Wo

rld V

isio

n’s

Co

mpen

dium

of In

dic

ato

rs f

or

Chi

ld W

ell-

bein

g 59

pe

rso

ns

an

d u

nd

ers

tan

d s

afe

m

igra

tio

n

uns

afe

mig

rati

on o

n w

om

en, ch

ildre

n a

nd m

en.

Focu

s G

roup

Dis

cuss

ion: F

GD

M

igra

tio

n an

d H

um

an

Tra

ffic

king_

Adul

ts,

FGD

Mig

ratio

n an

d

Hum

an

Tra

ffic

king_

Child

C

om

mu

nit

ies

kn

ow

th

e

earl

y w

arn

ing s

ign

s an

d

kn

ow

wh

at

to d

o i

n c

ase

of

an

em

erg

en

cy o

r d

isast

er

Co

mm

unity

mem

bers

, in

clud

ing

child

ren,

can

co

rrec

tly

iden

tify

ear

ly w

arni

ng s

igns

of lik

ely

dis

aste

rs in t

he a

rea

and k

now

what

act

ions

to t

ake,

fo

r ex

ampl

e, w

her

e th

e sa

fe p

lace

s ar

e in

the

com

mun

ity

and h

ow

to

sea

rch fo

r an

d r

escu

e o

ther

s.

Car

ed f

or,

pro

tect

ed

and p

arti

cipat

ing

Focu

s G

roup

Dis

cuss

ion: F

GD

D

isas

ter

Pre

par

ednes

s_A

dults,

FG

D D

isas

ter

Pre

par

ednes

s_C

hild

Co

mm

un

itie

s are

co

nfl

ict

sen

siti

ve

an

d k

no

w h

ow

to

b

uild

pe

ace

Co

mm

unitie

s w

her

e m

embe

rs, i

nclu

din

g ch

ildre

n, ar

e aw

are

of an

d c

an d

escr

ibe

the

dange

rs a

nd im

pac

t o

f co

nfli

ct a

nd

kno

w h

ow

confli

cts

can a

rise

and

how

to

bui

ld p

eace

.

Car

ed f

or,

pro

tect

ed

and p

arti

cipat

ing

Focu

s G

roup

Dis

cuss

ion: F

GD

Pea

cebu

ildin

g_A

dult

, FG

D

Pea

cebu

ildin

g_C

hild

Ch

ild

ren

reu

nit

ed

wit

h

fam

ilie

s o

r fo

ste

red

wit

hin

th

e c

om

mu

nit

y aft

er

a

dis

ast

er

or

em

erg

en

cy

situ

ati

on

Per

cent

of

child

ren a

ged 0

–18

year

s se

par

ated

fro

m

thei

r fa

mili

es d

urin

g a

rece

nt

dis

aste

r o

r em

erge

ncy

w

ho

are

reu

nited

with t

hei

r par

ents

or

bei

ng fost

ered

by

oth

er m

ember

s o

f th

e co

mm

uni

ty.

Seco

ndar

y da

ta

Use

pro

ject

do

cum

ents

.

Ex

iste

nce

of

child

pro

tect

ion

b

od

ies

an

d l

aw

s fo

r p

rote

ctio

n o

f ch

ild

ren

Nat

iona

l go

vern

men

ts h

ave

ensu

red t

he

follo

win

g: i)

ratific

atio

n o

f in

tern

atio

nal

and r

egio

nal

leg

al

inst

rum

ents

rel

atin

g to

chi

ldre

n; ii)

pro

visi

ons

in

nat

ional

law

s to

pro

tect

child

ren a

gain

st h

arm

and

explo

itat

ion; iii

) ex

iste

nce

of a

juve

nile

just

ice

syst

em,

Nat

iona

l Pl

an o

f A

ctio

n (

NPA

) an

d co

ord

inat

ing

bo

die

s fo

r th

e im

plem

enta

tio

n o

f ch

ildre

n’s

rig

hts;

iv)

polic

y fo

r fr

ee p

rim

ary

educ

atio

n.

Seco

ndar

y da

ta

Use

an

advo

cacy

focu

s.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f h

ou

seh

old

s Per

cent

age

of

house

hold

s us

ing

soil

cove

r to

mai

nta

in

Car

egiv

er S

urv

ey:

Wo

rld V

isio

n’s

Co

mpen

dium

of In

dic

ato

rs f

or

Chi

ld W

ell-

bein

g 60

that

man

age

th

e q

uali

ty o

f th

eir

so

il

soil

hea

lth.

Agr

iculture

and

N

atur

al E

nvi

ronm

ent

Mo

dule

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f h

ou

seh

old

s an

d c

om

mu

nit

ies

that

man

age

tre

e c

ove

r su

stain

ab

ly

Per

cent

age

of

house

hold

s w

ho r

epo

rt t

hat

the

ir

com

muni

ty is

able

to

build

and

sust

ainab

ly u

se t

hei

r nat

ural

res

our

ce b

ase,

by

mai

nta

inin

g o

r st

ori

ng

tree

co

ver

to fie

lds

and

com

mo

n la

nds

.

Car

egiv

er S

urv

ey:

Agr

iculture

and

N

atur

al E

nvi

ronm

ent

Mo

dule

Wo

rld V

isio

n’s

Co

mpen

dium

of In

dic

ato

rs f

or

Chi

ld W

ell-

bein

g 61

Ou

tco

me:

Pare

nts

or

care

giv

ers

pro

vid

e w

ell f

or

their

ch

ild

ren

Ch

ild

we

ll-b

ein

g t

arg

et

stan

dard

in

dic

ato

r D

efi

nit

ion

T

oo

l N

ote

s

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts w

ith

su

ffic

ien

t acce

ss t

o f

oo

d

Pe

rce

nt

of

ad

ole

scen

ts a

ge

d 1

2-1

8 y

ears

wh

o “

ne

ve

r” g

o

to s

lee

p a

t n

igh

t h

un

gry

Y

ou

th

He

alt

hy

Be

havio

ur

Su

rve

y;

Yo

uth

su

rve

y

mo

du

le

Op

tio

n 2

fo

r m

easu

rin

g

incre

ase

d l

evel

of

we

ll-b

ein

g

CW

B t

arg

et:

1 o

f 4 i

nd

icato

rs.

Hig

hly

Re

com

me

nd

ed

In

dic

ato

r D

efi

nit

ion

T

oo

l N

ote

s P

rop

ort

ion

of

pare

nts

or

care

giv

ers

ab

le t

o p

rovid

e w

ell

fo

r th

eir

ch

ild

ren

Pe

rce

nt

of

pare

nts

or

care

giv

ers

wh

o a

re a

ble

to

pro

vid

e

all

th

e c

hil

dre

n in

th

e h

ou

seh

old

, age

d 5

-18

ye

ars

, w

ith

th

ree

im

po

rtan

t it

em

s, t

hro

ugh

th

eir

ow

n m

ean

s (a

sse

ts/p

rod

uct

ion

/in

com

e),

wit

ho

ut

ex

tern

al ass

ista

nce

(f

rom

ou

tsid

e t

he f

am

ily,

NG

O o

r go

vern

me

nt)

in

th

e

past

12

mo

nth

s.

Care

giv

er

surv

ey;

Sta

rte

r m

od

ule

Th

e s

ugge

ste

d i

tem

s fo

r m

easu

rem

en

t are

: a b

lan

ke

t,

sho

es

an

d t

wo

sets

of

clo

thes.

T

hese

th

ree

ite

ms

sho

uld

be

m

od

ifie

d a

t co

un

try l

evel

if

oth

er

basi

c n

ee

ds

are

co

nsi

dere

d m

ore

im

po

rtan

t (l

ike s

leep

ing m

at,

sh

eets

, sc

ho

ol

bo

oks,

so

ap

an

d m

ore

).

Ad

dit

ion

al in

dic

ato

r D

efi

nit

ion

T

oo

l N

ote

s

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f h

ou

seh

old

s w

he

re

on

e o

r m

ore

ad

ult

s are

earn

ing

an

in

com

e

Per

cent

of

hous

eho

lds

wher

e at

lea

st o

ne

adult is

earn

ing

a co

nsi

sten

t in

com

e, t

o m

eet

hous

eho

ld n

eeds,

thr

oug

h

sale

/exc

han

ge o

f o

wn p

roduce

, la

bo

ur

(sel

f-em

plo

yed)

or

wag

e em

plo

ymen

t (w

ork

ing

for

som

eone

else

).

Car

egiv

er

surv

ey;

Eco

nom

ic

dev

elo

pmen

t m

odule

Co

nsi

sten

t m

eans

is p

aid e

very

wee

k o

r m

ont

h or

oth

er a

ppro

pri

ate

inte

rval

thro

ugh

out

the

past

12

mo

nths

.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f h

ou

seh

old

s vu

lne

rab

le t

o d

ep

riva

tio

n

Per

cent

of ho

use

ho

lds

that

are

vuln

erab

le t

o d

epri

vati

on, b

ased

o

n n

egat

ive

copi

ng s

trat

egie

s, e

spec

ially

sal

e o

r bo

rrow

ing

of

asse

ts t

o m

eet

bas

ic n

eeds

such

as

foo

d.

Car

egiv

er

surv

ey; St

arte

r m

odule

Anal

ysis

of as

sets

ow

ned;

ass

ets

sold

/

reas

on fo

r sa

le; a

nd b

orr

ow

ing

/ re

ason f

or

borr

ow

ing.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f h

ou

seh

old

s ca

rin

g

for

an

orp

han

Per

cent

of ho

use

ho

lds

repo

rtin

g th

e pr

esen

ce o

f o

ne

or

mo

re

orp

han

age

d 0–

18

year

s liv

ing

in t

he

ho

use

hold

. C

areg

iver

su

rvey

; St

arte

r m

odule

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f h

ou

seh

old

s w

ith

a

ch

ron

icall

y i

ll p

are

nt

or

care

giv

er

Per

cent

of ho

use

hold

s w

ith o

ne o

r m

ore

child

ren

unde

r 18

year

s,

wher

e a

par

ent

or

care

give

r is

chro

nic

ally

ill.

Car

egiv

er

surv

ey; St

arte

r m

odule

Chro

nica

lly il

l m

eans

for

3 or

more

m

ont

hs. C

hec

k if

the

house

hold

was

ab

le t

o m

eet

bas

ic n

eeds

(hig

hly

reco

mm

ended

indic

ato

r).

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f h

ou

seh

old

s w

he

re

Per

cent

of

hous

eho

lds

wher

e th

e par

ent

or

care

give

r o

f a

child

in

Car

egiv

er

Chec

k if

the

house

hold

was

abl

e to

Wo

rld V

isio

n’s

Co

mpen

dium

of In

dic

ato

rs f

or

Chi

ld W

ell-

bein

g 62

a p

are

nt

or

care

giv

er

has

pass

ed

aw

ay

in t

he

past

tw

o

ye

ars

the

hous

eho

ld (

unde

r 18

year

s) h

as p

asse

d aw

ay in

the

last

tw

o

year

s.

surv

ey; St

arte

r m

odule

m

eet

bas

ic n

eeds

(hig

hly

reco

mm

ended

indic

ato

r).

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f h

ou

seh

old

s w

ith

a

dis

ab

led

ch

ild

Per

cent

of

hous

eho

lds

wit

h a

disa

ble

d c

hild

und

er 1

8 y

ears

. D

isab

ility

mean

s diff

iculty

mo

ving

any

part

of bo

dy,

hea

ring

or

seei

ng; ep

ilepsy

; in

telle

ctua

l di

sabi

lity

or

men

tal ill

nes

s.

Car

egiv

er

surv

ey; St

arte

r m

odule

Chec

k if

the

house

hold

was

abl

e to

m

eet

bas

ic n

eeds

(hig

hly

reco

mm

ended

indic

ato

r).

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts w

ith

a d

isab

ilit

y Per

cent

of ad

ole

scen

ts a

ged 1

2-18

year

s w

ho r

epo

rt t

hat

they

hav

e m

ode

rate

or

seve

re d

isab

ility

(diff

icul

ty s

eein

g, h

eari

ng

wal

king

or

spea

king

).

Yo

uth H

ealthy

Beh

avio

ur

Surv

ey; Y

outh

su

rvey

mo

dule

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f h

ou

seh

old

s h

ead

ed

by a

ch

ild

Per

cent

of

hous

eho

lds

whic

h ar

e ch

ild-h

eaded

(hea

d o

f ho

useh

old

is

unde

r 18

year

s).

Car

egiv

er

surv

ey; St

arte

r m

odule

Chec

k if

the

house

hold

was

abl

e to

m

eet

bas

ic n

eeds

(hig

hly

reco

mm

ended

indic

ato

r).

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f vu

lne

rab

le

ho

use

ho

lds

Per

cent

of

hous

eho

lds

cons

ider

ed v

uln

erab

le, b

ased

on

anal

ysis

of

resp

ons

es t

o p

rese

nce

of an

orp

han o

r di

sable

d c

hild

, chro

nic

ally

ill

car

egiv

er o

r o

ne w

ho p

asse

d a

way

, hea

ded b

y a

child

, ex

trem

e po

vert

y o

r o

ther

im

port

ant

vuln

erab

ility

typ

e id

entifie

d at

the

com

muni

ty le

vel.

Car

egiv

er

surv

ey; St

arte

r an

d e

cono

mic

dev

elo

pmen

t

mo

dule

s

Thi

s in

dica

tor

is c

alcu

late

d b

ased

on

resp

onse

s to

oth

er in

dica

tor

que

stio

ns.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f vu

lne

rab

le

ho

use

ho

lds

that

receiv

ed

e

xte

rnal

eco

no

mic

su

pp

ort

Per

cent

of vu

lner

able

ho

use

hold

s w

ho r

epo

rt t

hat

the

ho

use

hold

re

ceiv

ed e

xte

rnal

eco

nom

ic s

upp

ort

, in

the

last

3 m

ont

hs.

C

areg

iver

su

rvey

; St

arte

r m

odule

Vul

nera

ble

house

hold

s ar

e ca

lcul

ated

in

anal

ysis

bas

ed o

n im

port

ant

cont

extu

al v

ulne

rabi

lity

fact

ors

, but

wo

uld

typ

ical

ly inc

lude

ho

useh

old

s ca

ring

for

an o

rphan

or

disa

bled

ch

ild, w

her

e a

care

give

r pas

sed

away

o

r is

chr

oni

cally

ill,

chi

ld h

eaded

house

hold

s, h

ous

ehold

s in

po

ore

st

qui

ntile

and

/ o

r ex

trem

ely

vuln

erab

le h

ouse

hold

s.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f h

ou

seh

old

s w

ith

su

ffic

ien

t d

iet

div

ers

ity

Per

cent

of

hous

eho

lds

wher

e fo

od fro

m fo

ur o

r m

ore

fo

od

gro

ups

was

co

nsu

med

in t

he las

t 24

ho

urs

. C

areg

iver

su

rvey

; Fo

od

secu

rity

m

odule

List

of fo

od

type

s pr

ovi

ded

, incl

udi

ng

mac

ro a

nd

mic

ro n

utri

ents

.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f h

ou

seh

old

s w

ith

o

ne

or

mo

re ‘h

un

gry

mo

nth

s’ i

n

the

pre

vio

us

12

mo

nth

s

Per

cent

of ho

use

ho

lds

who r

epo

rt t

hat

ther

e w

ere

one

or

mo

re

hun

gry

mo

nth

s in

the

pre

vio

us

12

mo

nths

, w

here

fo

od

was

sc

arce

or

unav

aila

ble

(lik

e an

em

pty

gran

ary)

.

Car

egiv

er

surv

ey; Fo

od

secu

rity

m

odule

The

seas

on

in w

hich

thi

s in

dica

tor

is

mea

sure

d m

ay a

ffec

t re

call.

If

aske

d ju

st b

efore

har

vest

, ca

n fo

cus

on

the

agri

cult

ural

sea

son.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f h

ou

seh

old

s w

ith

Per

cent

of

hous

eho

lds

sco

ring

low

on t

he

hous

eho

ld h

ung

er s

cale

C

areg

iver

A

ser

ies

of qu

esti

ons

whi

ch m

ake

up

Wo

rld V

isio

n’s

Co

mpen

dium

of In

dic

ato

rs f

or

Chi

ld W

ell-

bein

g 63

insu

ffic

ien

t acc

ess

to

fo

od

an

d c

atego

rise

d as

hav

ing

seve

re h

ous

eho

ld h

ung

er.

surv

ey; Fo

od

secu

rity

m

odule

the

scal

e.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f h

ou

seh

old

s w

ith

ad

eq

uate

fo

od

fre

qu

en

cy

Per

cent

of

hous

eho

lds

wher

e ad

ults

and

child

ren c

onsu

me

two

o

r m

ore

mea

ls p

er d

ay.

Car

egiv

er

Surv

ey; Fo

od

secu

rity

m

odule

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f h

ou

seh

old

s d

ep

en

den

t o

n f

oo

d

co

nsu

mp

tio

n c

op

ing s

trate

gie

s

Per

cent

of

hous

eho

lds

who s

core

d a

bo

ve h

alf o

f th

e m

axim

um

Co

ping

Str

ategy

sco

re.

Car

egiv

er

Surv

ey; Fo

od

secu

rity

m

odule

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f h

ou

seh

old

s w

ho

re

po

rt h

avi

ng a

cce

ss t

o

suff

icie

nt

cre

dit

Per

cent

of ho

use

ho

lds

who r

epo

rt t

hat

they

are

able

to

acc

ess

cred

it fro

m t

hree

or

mo

re s

ourc

es, w

hen

need

ed fo

r in

vest

men

t in

bus

ines

s o

r fo

r ca

sh-f

low

pro

ble

ms

to p

ay f

or

hous

eho

ld n

eeds.

Car

egiv

er

surv

ey;

Eco

nom

ic

dev

elo

pmen

t m

odule

Thi

s def

init

ion n

eeds

to b

e def

ined

lo

cally

.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f h

ou

seh

old

s w

ith

th

e m

ean

s to

save

mo

ne

y Per

cent

of ho

use

ho

lds

who r

epo

rt b

eing

able

to s

ave

mo

ney

in

liquid

fo

rm. F

or

exam

ple

in a

ban

k o

r cr

edit u

nio

n.

Car

egiv

er

surv

ey;

Eco

nom

ic

dev

elo

pmen

t m

odule

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f h

ou

seh

old

s w

ith

a

seco

nd

ary

so

urc

e o

f in

com

e

Per

cent

of ho

use

ho

lds

who r

epo

rt h

avin

g at

lea

st o

ne a

lter

nat

ive

sourc

e of

inco

me

to r

ely

on, o

r sw

itch

to

, sho

uld

the

mai

n

inco

me

sourc

e be

lost

bec

ause

of

a sh

ock

or

dis

aste

r.

Car

egiv

er

surv

ey;

Eco

nom

ic

dev

elo

pmen

t m

odule

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f h

ou

seh

old

s w

ith

se

cu

re t

en

ure

Per

cent

of ho

use

ho

lds

who r

epo

rt t

hat

they

ow

n th

eir

dwel

ling

wit

h th

e ap

pro

pri

ate

lega

l ev

iden

ce o

r ha

ve a

co

ntr

act

fro

m a

la

ndl

ord

and

are

safe

fro

m e

vict

ion.

Car

egi

ver

surv

ey;

Eco

nom

ic

dev

elo

pmen

t m

odule

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f h

ou

seh

old

s li

vin

g

in d

ura

ble

ho

usi

ng

Per

cent

of ho

use

ho

lds

who r

epo

rt t

hat

they

liv

e in

dw

ellin

g st

ruct

ure

s th

at a

re s

afe

and

dura

ble,

bas

ed o

n t

he

cond

itio

n an

d

loca

tio

n o

f th

e dw

ellin

g.

Car

egiv

er

surv

ey;

Eco

nom

ic

dev

elo

pmen

t m

odule

Wo

rld V

isio

n’s

Co

mpen

dium

of In

dic

ato

rs f

or

Chi

ld W

ell-

bein

g 64

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f h

ou

seh

old

s w

ho

fa

ced

a d

isast

er

an

d w

ere

ab

le

to e

mp

loy a

n e

ffe

ctiv

e d

isast

er-

risk

re

du

ctio

n o

r p

osi

tive

co

pin

g s

trate

gy

Per

cent

of

hous

eho

lds

who f

aced

a d

isas

ter

in t

he

past

12 m

onth

s an

d w

ere

able

to

em

plo

y an

effec

tive

dis

aste

r-ri

sk r

educt

ion

or

po

siti

ve c

opi

ng

stra

tegy

to

avo

id d

isas

ter

at t

he

hous

eho

ld lev

el.

Car

egiv

er

surv

ey;

Eco

nom

ic

dev

elo

pmen

t m

odule

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f h

ou

seh

old

s w

ho

fa

ced

a d

isast

er

bu

t w

ere

ab

le

to r

eco

ver

an

d n

ow

liv

e a

t th

e

leve

l th

ey

did

be

fore

Per

cent

of

hous

eho

lds

who f

aced

a d

isas

ter

in t

he

past

12

mo

nth

s, b

ut w

ere

able

to

rec

ove

r an

d no

w h

ave

the

sam

e (o

r bet

ter)

sta

ndar

d o

f liv

ing

as t

hey

did

bef

ore

.

Car

egiv

er

surv

ey;

Eco

nom

ic

dev

elo

pmen

t m

odule

Wo

rld V

isio

n’s

Co

mpen

dium

of In

dic

ato

rs f

or

Chi

ld W

ell-

bein

g 65

Ou

tco

me: C

hild

ren

cele

bra

ted

an

d r

egis

tere

d a

t b

irth

C

hil

d w

ell

-be

ing t

arg

et

stan

dard

in

dic

ato

r D

efi

nit

ion

T

oo

l N

ote

s

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts w

ho

re

po

rt h

avi

ng b

irth

re

gis

trati

on

d

ocu

me

nts

Pe

rce

nt

of

ad

ole

scen

ts a

ge

d 1

2–1

8 y

ears

wh

o r

ep

ort

th

at

the

y h

ave

a b

irth

ce

rtif

icate

or

oth

er

bir

th r

egis

tra

tio

n

do

cum

en

ts.

Yo

uth

He

alt

hy

Be

havio

ur

Su

rve

y;

Yo

uth

su

rve

y

mo

du

le

Op

tio

n 2

fo

r m

easu

rin

g

incre

ase

d l

evel

of

we

ll-

bein

g C

WB

targ

et:

1 o

f 4

ind

icato

rs.

Hig

hly

Re

com

me

nd

ed

In

dic

ato

r D

efi

nit

ion

T

oo

l N

ote

s

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ch

ild

ren

wit

h a

b

irth

ce

rtif

icate

P

erc

en

t o

f ch

ild

ren

age

d 0

–59

mo

nth

s w

ith

a b

irth

ce

rtif

icate

, re

po

rte

d b

y care

giv

er

an

d v

eri

fied

by

ob

serv

ati

on

.

Care

giv

er

surv

ey;

Ch

ild

pro

tecti

on

an

d p

art

icip

ati

on

m

od

ule

Wh

ere

po

ssib

le v

eri

fy

exis

ten

ce o

f b

irth

cert

ific

ate

.

Ad

dit

ion

al in

dic

ato

r D

efi

nit

ion

T

oo

l N

ote

s P

rop

ort

ion

of

child

ren

wh

ose

b

irth

s w

ere

re

gis

tere

d

Per

cent

of

child

ren a

ged 0

–59

mo

nths

who

se b

irth

was

reg

iste

red

wit

h th

e lo

cal au

tho

riti

es a

s re

port

ed b

y th

e par

ent

or

care

give

r.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey;

Child

pro

tect

ion

and

par

tici

pat

ion m

odu

le

Wher

e poss

ible

ver

ify

exis

tence

of bi

rth r

egis

trat

ion

docu

men

t.

Dis

aggr

egat

e by

OV

C s

tatu

s.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f O

VC

ch

ild

ren

w

ith

a b

irth

ce

rtif

icate

Per

cent

of

child

ren a

ged 0

-59

mo

nths

and

iden

tifie

d as

an

OV

C,

who

hav

e a

birt

h ce

rtific

ate.

Ver

ified

by

obse

rvat

ion.

C

areg

iver

surv

ey;

Child

pro

tect

ion

and

par

tici

pat

ion m

odu

le

Bir

th r

egis

tra

tio

n i

s aff

ord

ab

le

for

all

Nat

iona

l an

d/o

r lo

cal go

vern

men

ts h

ave

ensu

red t

hat

the

cost

of

bir

th r

egis

trat

ion d

ocu

men

tatio

n is

affo

rdab

le t

o p

aren

ts o

r ca

regi

vers

, and

easy

to

obta

in. T

his

ind

icat

or

is r

elev

ant

onl

y w

her

e th

e bi

rth

regi

stra

tio

n p

roce

ss is

not

free

or

auto

mat

ic.

Seco

ndar

y D

ata

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f h

ou

seh

old

s w

he

re

ch

ild

ren

are

pre

ve

nte

d f

rom

acc

ess

ing g

ove

rnm

en

t se

rvic

es

be

cau

se o

f a l

ack

of

bir

th

regis

trati

on

Per

cent

of ho

use

ho

lds

who r

epo

rt t

hat

one

or

mo

re o

f th

eir

child

ren a

re p

reve

nted

fro

m a

cces

sing

gove

rnm

ent

serv

ices

suc

h

as e

duca

tio

n, h

ealth c

are

and w

elfa

re s

upp

ort

, bec

ause

of a

lack

of

regi

stra

tio

n do

cum

ent

or

bir

th c

erti

ficat

e.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey;

Child

pro

tect

ion

and

par

tici

pat

ion m

odu

le

Ho

use

ho

lds

wher

e ch

ildre

n d

o

not

hav

e bi

rth

regi

stra

tion

docu

men

tati

on.

Ch

ild

ren

are

cele

bra

ted

at

bir

th

Co

mm

unity

mem

bers

can

des

crib

e ho

w c

hild

ren a

re c

eleb

rate

d

at b

irth

by

thei

r fa

mili

es a

nd c

om

munitie

s.

Car

ed f

or,

pro

tect

ed

and p

arti

cipat

ing

Focu

s G

roup

Dis

cuss

ion: F

GD

C

hild

ren

Cel

ebra

ted

at B

irth

_A

dul

ts

Wo

rld V

isio

n’s

Co

mpen

dium

of In

dic

ato

rs f

or

Chi

ld W

ell-

bein

g 66

Ou

tco

me: C

hild

ren

are

resp

ecte

d p

art

icip

an

ts i

n d

eci

sio

ns

that

aff

ect

their

liv

es

Hig

hly

re

co

mm

en

de

d i

nd

icato

r D

efi

nit

ion

T

oo

l N

ote

s T

he

str

en

gth

of

the

em

po

werm

ent

ass

et

cate

go

ry a

s re

po

rte

d b

y a

do

lesc

en

ts 1

2-1

8

ye

ars

of

age

Th

e m

ean

sco

re i

n t

he

em

po

werm

ent

ass

et

cate

go

ry

as

rep

ort

ed

by

ad

ole

sce

nts

12

-18

ye

ars

of

age

. D

eve

lop

me

nt

Ass

ets

Pro

file

(D

AP

)

Re

pre

sen

ts 1

of

8 a

sset

cate

go

rie

s. T

he D

AP

can

be

u

sed

to

me

asu

re s

eve

ral

ch

ild

well

-bein

g o

utc

om

es

at

the

sam

e t

ime

.

Ad

dit

ion

al in

dic

ato

r D

efi

nit

ion

T

oo

l N

ote

s P

rop

ort

ion

of

child

ren

p

art

icip

ati

ng i

n c

hild

ren

’s c

lub

s o

r gro

up

s

Per

cent

of

pare

nts

or

care

give

rs w

ho

rep

ort

tha

t th

eir

child

ren a

ged

6–18

year

s cu

rren

tly

par

tici

pat

e in

a

child

ren’s

clu

b o

r gr

oup

on a

reg

ula

r bas

is (

at lea

st o

nce

a

mo

nth

).

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey; C

hild

pro

tect

ion a

nd

par

tici

pat

ion m

odu

le

Appro

pri

ate

types

of

clubs

or

gro

ups

can b

e def

ined

loca

lly.

Dis

aggr

egat

e by

life

cycl

e st

age

6–1

1 an

d 12–18

yea

rs.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f h

ou

seh

old

s w

he

re

ch

ild

ren

's id

eas

are

lis

ten

ed

to

an

d a

cte

d o

n w

he

re a

pp

rop

riate

Per

cent

of ho

use

ho

lds

wher

e par

ents

or

care

give

rs a

re a

ble

to c

ite

exam

ple

s of

idea

s pr

opo

sed b

y ch

ildre

n a

ged 6

–18

year

s, w

hic

h w

ere

acce

pted

and

im

plem

ente

d in

pra

ctic

e.

Car

egiv

er s

urv

ey; C

hild

pro

tect

ion a

nd

par

tici

pat

ion m

odu

le

Dis

aggr

egat

e by

life

cycl

e st

age

6–1

1 an

d 12–18

yea

rs.

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts w

ho

re

po

rt t

hat

the

ir v

iew

s are

so

ugh

t an

d i

nco

rpo

rate

d i

nto

th

e d

eci

sio

n-m

ak

ing o

f lo

cal

go

vern

me

nt

Per

cent

of ad

ole

scen

ts a

ged 1

2-18

year

s w

ho fee

l thei

r id

eas

are

valu

ed

by lo

cal g

ove

rnm

ent

and

they

are

able

to

in

fluen

ce d

ecis

ions

in

thei

r ci

ty.

Yo

uth H

ealthy

Beh

avio

ur

Surv

ey;

Co

mm

unity

par

tici

pat

ion m

odu

le

Ch

ild

ren

an

d y

ou

th p

art

icip

ate

m

ean

ingfu

lly a

nd

safe

ly i

n t

he

D

ME

an

d i

mp

lem

en

tati

on

of

co

mm

un

ity

pro

ject

s

Co

mm

unity

mem

bers

, inc

ludin

g ch

ildre

n, r

epo

rt t

hat

yo

uth

hav

e a

mea

nin

gful r

ole

in lo

cal c

om

mun

ity

pro

ject

s, b

eyo

nd

imple

men

tati

on in

to m

onito

ring

and e

valu

atio

n. T

his

mea

ns

that

they

are

at

leas

t co

nsulted

in t

he

plan

nin

g o

r m

onito

ring/

eval

uati

on a

nd c

hild

ren’

s pa

rtic

ipat

ion is

safe

an

d w

ill n

ot

har

m t

hem

by

any

mea

ns. Exa

mple

s ca

n b

e gi

ven

of su

ch r

ole

s in

the

pas

t 12

mo

nths

.

Car

ed f

or,

pro

tect

ed

and p

arti

cipat

ing

Focu

s G

roup D

iscu

ssio

n:

FGD

Adul

ts S

uppo

rt

and E

nco

urag

e C

hild

-Le

d P

roje

ct

Dev

elo

pm

ent_

Adult,

FGD

Mea

nin

gful a

nd

Safe

Par

tici

pat

ion_

Chi

ld

Yo

uth

de

velo

p a

nd

im

ple

men

t o

f th

eir

ow

n p

roje

cts,

wit

h t

he

ap

pro

pri

ate

part

ne

rsh

ip a

nd

su

pp

ort

of

ad

ult

s

Co

mm

unity

mem

bers

, inc

ludin

g ch

ildre

n, r

epo

rt t

hat

yo

uth

par

tici

pat

e m

eanin

gful

ly a

nd

safe

ly in in

itia

ting

acti

viti

es in

thei

r lo

cal co

mm

uni

ty. E

xam

ple

s ca

n be

giv

en o

f su

ch r

ole

s in

the

past

12 m

onth

s an

d h

ow

adults

supp

ort

ed/p

artn

ered

in

the

pro

ject

s.

Car

ed f

or,

pro

tect

ed

and p

arti

cipat

ing

Focu

s G

roup D

iscu

ssio

n:

FGD

Adul

ts S

uppo

rt

and E

nco

urag

e C

hild

-

Wo

rld V

isio

n’s

Co

mpen

dium

of In

dic

ato

rs f

or

Chi

ld W

ell-

bein

g 67

Led P

roje

ct

Dev

elo

pm

ent_

Adult,

FGD

Child

led

and

Adul

t Su

ppo

rted

Pro

ject

s_C

hild

P

are

nts

/care

giv

ers

an

d/o

r co

mm

un

ity

me

mb

ers

acti

vely

e

nco

ura

ge

ch

ild

ren

's i

de

as

an

d

invo

lve

th

em

in

de

cisi

on

s th

at

aff

ect

the

ir liv

es

Co

mm

unity

mem

bers

, inc

ludin

g ch

ildre

n, r

epo

rt t

hat

par

ents

or

care

give

rs o

r ad

ult

com

muni

ty m

ember

s en

cour

age

child

ren t

o s

hare

thei

r id

eas,

list

en t

o t

hem

and

in

volv

e th

em in

dec

isio

ns

that

affec

t th

eir

lives

.

Car

ed f

or,

pro

tect

ed

and p

arti

cipat

ing

Focu

s G

roup D

iscu

ssio

n:

FGD

Adul

ts S

uppo

rt

and E

nco

urag

e C

hild

-Le

d P

roje

ct

Dev

elo

pm

ent_

Adult,

FGD

Adul

t Enc

oura

gem

ent_

Child

Ch

ild

ren

can

art

icu

late

th

e

imp

act

/co

ntr

ibu

tio

n t

heir

ch

ild

ren

’s g

rou

p/c

lub

has

had

on

ch

ild

well

-be

ing

Child

ren’

s gr

oups

/clu

bs

refle

ct o

n th

e ac

tivi

ties

and

im

pac

t th

ey h

ave

had o

n t

he

wel

l-bei

ng o

f ch

ildre

n in

thei

r gr

oup

and c

om

munity.

Car

ed f

or,

pro

tect

ed

and p

arti

cipat

ing

Focu

s G

roup D

iscu

ssio

n:

FGD

Child

Gro

up

Impac

t o

n C

WB

_C

hild

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f ad

ole

scen

ts w

ho

re

po

rt h

igh

le

vels

of

part

icip

ati

on

in

ch

ild

ren

’s

gro

up

s

Per

cent

of ad

ole

scen

ts a

ged 1

2-18

year

s w

ho r

epo

rt t

hat

th

e le

vel of

child

par

tici

pat

ion in

child

ren’s

gro

ups

is a

t th

e le

vel o

f co

nsultat

ion o

r hig

her

.

Yo

uth

Hea

lthy

Beh

avio

ur

Surv

ey:

Co

mm

unity

par

tici

pat

ion m

odu

le

Appendix 1: Search Institute’s Developmental Assets for young people

Search Institute has identified the following building blocks of health development – known as Developmental Assets – that help young people grow up health, caring and responsible.

Ex

tern

al

Ass

ets

Support Family support – family life provides high levels of love and support Positive family communication – young person and her or his parent(s) communicate positively and young person is willing to seek advice and counsel from parents Other adult relationships – receives support from three of more non-parent adults Caring neighbourhood – experiences caring neighbours Caring school climate – school provides a caring, encouraging environment Parent involvement in schooling – parent(s) are actively involved in helping young person succeed in school

Empowerment Community values youth – perceives that adults in the community value youth Youth as resources – young people are given useful roles in the community Services to others – serves in the community one hour or more per week Safety – feels safe at home, school and in the neighbourhood

Boundaries & expectations

Family boundaries – family has clear rules and consequences and monitors the young person’s whereabouts School boundaries – school provides clear rules and consequences Neighbourhood boundaries – neighbours take responsibility for monitoring young people’s behaviour Adult role models – parent(s) and other adults model positive, responsible behaviour Positive peer influence – young person’s best friends model responsible behaviour High expectations – both parent(s) and teachers encourage the young person to do well

Constructive use of time

Creative activities – spends three or more hours per week in lessons or practice in music, theatre or other arts Youth programmes – spends three or more hours per week in sports, clubs or organisations at school and/or in the community Religious community – spends one or more hours per week in activities in a religious institution Time at home – is out with friends ‘with nothing special to do’ two or fewer nights per week

Inte

rnal

Ass

ets

Commitment to learning

Achievement motivation – is motivated to do well at school School engagement – is actively engaged in learning Homework – reports doing at least one hour of homework every school day Bonding to school – cares about her or his school Reading for pleasure – reads for pleasure three or more hours per week

Positive values

Caring – places high value on helping other people Equality and social justice – places high value on promoting equality and reducing hunger and poverty Integrity – acts on convictions and stands up for his / her beliefs Honesty – ‘tells the truth even when its not easy’ Responsibility - accepts and takes personal responsibility Restraint – believes its important not to be sexually active or use alcohol or other drugs

Social competencies

Planning and decision making – knows how to plan ahead and make choices Interpersonal competence – has empathy, sensitivity and friendship skills Cultural competence – has knowledge of and comfort with people of different cultural/racial/ethnic backgrounds Resistance skills – can resist negative peer pressure and dangerous situations Peaceful conflict resolution – seeks to resolve conflict non-violently

Positive identity

Personal power – feels he or she has control over “things that happen to me” Self-esteem – reports having a high self-esteem Sense of purpose – reports that “my life has a purpose” Positive view of future – is optimistic about her or his personal future

Copyright 1997, 2006 by Search Institute. All rights reserved www.search-institute.org

http://www.search-institute.org/


Countries in which the DAP has been translated and adapted The Developmental Assets Profile (DAP) (a short measure of Developmental Assets) has been or is being adapted and utilised to examine the assets of young people in more than a dozen countries, and discussions are underway to bring the survey to several other countries. The list of active and pending DAP countries now includes; Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Bolivia, Brazil, China, Colombia, the Dominican Republic, Egypt, Gaza, India, Iraq, Japan, Jordan, Lebanon, Mexico, Morocco, Nepal, the Philippines, Russia, and Yemen. Moreover, the DAP has been translated into Albanian, Arabic, Armenian, Chinese, French, Japanese, Nepali, Portuguese, Spanish and Tagalog.

Why is the DAP the recommended tool for measuring subjective well-being? The preferred tool for measuring the child well-being target #1 ‘Children report increased levels of well-being’ and several subjective child well-being outcomes is the ‘Development Assets Profile’ (DAP). This is a tool developed and owned by the SEARCH Institute. The power of the DAP lies in its validated asset scales. The validation process takes several weeks and requires external assistance. If you would like to schedule a DAP adaptation, please contact [email protected], director of Child Rights & Development. For more information on the DAP see the ‘Tools’ section at the beginning and read the discussion paper on wvcentral’s Evaluation & Research page: Measuring subjective aspects of child well-being.

mailto:[email protected]

http://tinyurl.com/subjectivecwb

http://tinyurl.com/subjectivecwb


Appendix 2: Education and Life skills Below is further information on the OECD’s new standards on child finance. This approach will be developed into tools for measuring ‘Adolescents ready for economic opportunity’. This will be available with the next version of the Compendium. High level proxy indicator The high level indicator for the economic viability is a child’s ability to use IT search and email functions to build networks and access information. Early Childhood Learner

understands money is used to exchange goods. Early Grade Learner

identifies money denominations

manages basic transactions calculates change.

Intermediate Learner

makes value for money judgments

able to track bank statements

manages borrowing, lending, credit, and interest. Teenager Learner

plans and manages income and wealth

assesses risk and reward

able to follow and assess local financial landscape

able to apply financial knowledge and understanding.


Appendix 3: Feedback on the Compendium and tools Keep the Compendium relevant and up to date - suggest new indicators through your community of practice (CoP)! Send new suggestions with tools by the end of 3rd Quarter (June) each year to the Evaluation and Research team within Global Knowledge Management. Complete the indicator detail sheet below and agree to it with your CoP colleagues. An indicator must meet three high-level criteria to be considered for inclusion in the Compendium: 1. Programmatic link to child well-being: The indicator should demonstrate a logical link to the

Partnership endorsed child well-being outcomes and fit into a WV LEAP-aligned monitoring and evaluation (M&E) plan.

2. Disaggregate data: The indicator must have the ability to be used for disaggregated analysis and reporting by gender and vulnerability status such as orphans, vulnerability, disability and more.

3. Clear assumptions: The explicit and implicit assumptions behind the indicator must be clearly shown in order for community-based staff to evaluate the usefulness of the indicator for a specific project or programme.

Additional criteria for indicators:

relevant to World Vision programmes and projects appropriate for more than one local context

easy and inexpensive to measure

consistent with existing data (for example, UNICEF DHS)

a tool is available to measure it. If the suggested indicator meets these criteria, please complete the form below, share it with your CoP and have it approved by your peers in the CoP. For examples of how to complete the indicator detail sheet below, have a look at existing indicator detail sheets. If the indicator requires a new tool to measure it, please include the tool. Indicators without tools cannot be included in the Compendium. If it can fit onto an existing tool, please indicate which one.


Additional Indicator Proposal for inclusion in the Compendium

Label Required? Information

Indicator Yes Indicator name

Definition Yes Longer details with specific information

CWBA Yes

If the indicator is linked to a CWBO, select the relevant Aspiration. If it is not linked directly to a CWB Aspiration or outcome, select Not applicable.

CWBO Yes After selecting the aspiration, the relevant CWBOs appear in this drop down list. Select the relevant one.

Indicator code System generated

Type Yes (CWB Target, highly recommended and additional)

Level Yes

Outcome or output. Regular monitoring indicators are output. Indicators measured yearly can be output but usually are outcome. Indicators measured at baseline and evaluation are outcome.

Status Yes Select active. Once an indicator is no longer used, it can be made inactive and will not appear in searches.

Frequency of measurement Yes

What is the recommended frequency for data collection? If its one year or more, select yearly. If the indicator is only for measurement every few years, not every year, select 'baseline and evaluation' in the next column

When to measure Optional

If the indicator is measured less than once a year, use this column to specify if its measured at baseline and evaluation or if its measured at evaluation only.

What it measures Yes Describe in brief what this indicator is for - what is the purpose and what does this information tell you.

How to measure it Yes Type in the question asked to measure the indicator, if relevant, or other appropriate information in brief

Question code System generated

How to calculate it (numerator) Yes

Type in the numerator for the indicator calculation - this applies to both outcome and output indicators

How to calculate it (denominator) Optional For percentage calculations, include also the denominator required.

Information for analysis Optional

Is there any important information relating to how this indicator is anlaysed? Any preliminary analysis required or other factors to prepare for the calculation of the indicator?

Contextualise Optional

Any important notes relating to how this indicator should be adapted for use in different contexts within the country? This should not change the meaning of the indicator, but is intended to increase the quality and relevance of the information collected.

Tool Yes

Select the option for national office tool or other tool as relevant. Most of the tools listed are those used in the Compendium of Indicators.

Tool (Other) Optional Here you can specify the name of the tool.

Tool module Optional

The modules are only for indicators from the Compendium of Indicators measured by the Caregiver Survey, the Youth Healthy Behaviour Survey or Cared for, Protected and Participating FGD.


Disaggregate by Optional

If the data should be disaggregated e.g. by sex (boys / girls) select the relevant criteria. If the criteria you want is not listed, select 'other' and specify in the next column

Disaggregate by (Other) Optional Type the disaggregation category here, if you selected 'other'

Target population Yes Specify the target population or unit of analysis for the indicator. Select all those that apply.

Target population (Other) Optional If you selected 'other' write the target population here

Limitations Optional Describe in brief any important strengths or limitations of this indicator and how it is measured.

Project Model Optional If the indicator is linked to an existing project model, select it here. You can choose 'other' and enter the name in the next column

Project Model (other) Optional If you selected 'other' write the name of the project model here

Keyword 1 Yes

Keyword 1, you must select a general grouping. This selection will then populate the rest of the key word drop downs with a new list linked to your selection in keyword 1

Keyword 2 Yes

Select a second key word from the list available. This will help users to find the indicator. If there is a keyword missing that you want, suggest it in the separate worksheet, noting which indicator it relates to and which keyword 1 grouping it should belong to. Or suggest a new keyword 1 (grouping).

Keyword 3 Optional Select all relevant key words




Life cycle stage Optional If the indicator's target population relates to one or more of World Visions life cycle stages, select the relevant one(s) here

International Threshold (Acceptable) Optional

This is for global indicators only, linked to triggers for action and international thresholds for what level of this indicator is considered acceptable.

International Threshold (Action) Optional

This is for global indicators only, linked to triggers for action and international thresholds for what level of this indicator requires action to be taken.

International Threshold (critical) Optional

This is for global indicators only, linked to triggers for action and international thresholds for what level of this indicator is considered critical for immediate action.

Specific Grant Optional If the indicator is linked to a specific grant, select it here or select other and specify the name in the next column.

Specific Grant (Other) Optional If you selected 'other' write the name here

Source Optional If the indicator is validated by an international agency specify the name here or select other.

Source (Other) Optional If you selected 'other' write the name here

Links Optional If there is a relevant web link for more information on this indicator, include that here

Last updated System generated

Indicator template FY14.xlsm


Appendix 4: Frequently asked questions What if I can’t find the indicator I want? If there is no indicator in the Compendium that measures the objective, then add one from another source. Seek guidance first from the DME advisor or technical specialist. You can add additional indicators to the logframe as appropriate.

What if indicator is worded differently than my government’s indicator? You may change the indicator to match the one used by your government. The government is one of the primary duty bearers of children’s well-being, and World Vision should seek to support existing data collection efforts, rather than create a parallel measurement system.

What if I have selected too many indicators or tools? Review the indicators you selected asking yourself the following questions:

Which of these indicators will tell WV the most about change in child well-being?

Are some of the indicators highly correlated? In other words, you don’t need to use a whole series of indicators if one or two will work.

Which indicators fit on the same tools or which tools can be used together?

Where are the economic development or livelihoods indicators? Economic development is essential to well-being in families and communities. However, measuring increased yields or household income, which is notoriously hard to measure, does not give an accurate picture of child well-being. Income can sometimes go up without resulting well-being for children. By measuring well-being outcomes, WV can know if increases in household income or production have translated to a better standard of living for the household, including boys and girls. Therefore, the economic development indicators have been integrated throughout the Compendium, with several under ‘Parents or caregivers provide well for their children’ – but look out for indicators in other areas such as: ‘Proportion of parents or caregivers who were able to cover the education costs of all the children living in the household without any external assistance’.

Why aren’t there more qualitative indicators? As programmes and projects begin designing or redesigning using WV’s Development Programme Approach, collecting and sharing qualitative information and learning from this together becomes a standardised part of engaging with communities. Much qualitative information is collected during the design process, thus less is needed at baseline. Focus group discussions are still suggested for relevant indicators (under development), but these are not a standard tool for every baseline. Information collected at baseline needs to be directly comparable with data collected at evaluation. There are many factors which influence findings in focus group discussions, making it difficult to compare, without creative media such as video. However, programmes are encouraged to innovate and experiment with qualitative approaches and suggest new ideas and tools. Finally, a qualitative step is added after analysis of quantitative data; as community feedback. This is a way to share the information back with the rightful owners of the data, the community members and to provide a space for community members to discuss, dispute or validate the findings and helps WV to interpret the findings.

What about monitoring indicators? Regular monitoring is essential and will also prepare the way for a better evaluation at the end of the project or programme cycle. The Compendium contains outcome indicators, mostly relevant for baseline and evaluation measurements. However, some of the indicators can also be used for regular monitoring. Outcome-focused monitoring helps WV to see what intermediate changes are happening as a result of its work. For example a change in behaviour such as hand washing by caregivers can lead to improved outcomes in child health. Relevant indicators from the Compendium should be included in the monitoring plan. However, the Compendium does not contain indicators only used in monitoring. For monitoring indicators, please refer to the relevant project model or technical sector documentation.

Can I use secondary data or data already collected during assessment and design? Yes – if recent, relevant and reliable data is available, there is no need to duplicate efforts in data collection.


Appendix 5: Alternative approach to measuring ‘Children report increased levels of well-being’ The Youth Healthy Behaviour Survey’s ‘My Well-being’ section can be used to measure the child well-being target #1 ‘Children report increased levels of well-being’. Where the Development Assets Profile (DAP) is not available and not scheduled for adaptation, use the Youth Survey instead. All four items should be measured, which correspond to: child rights, extreme deprivation, cared for and self-assessed well-being:

1. Proportion of adolescents who report having birth registration documents. 2. Proportion of adolescents with sufficient access to food. 3. Proportion of adolescents reporting a positive connection with their parent or caregiver. 4. Proportion of adolescents with high levels of self-reported well-being (ladder of life).

Youth Healthy Behaviour Survey This is a multi-purpose survey for 12-18 year olds that explores some key issues facing young people in the communities where WV works. The survey has several sections which can added/removed according to programme intervention and local context. It includes the four wellbeing questions: 1. Do you have a birth certificate or other birth registration documents?

1. Yes 2. No 3. Don’t Know 2a. In the past month (four weeks), did you go to sleep at night hungry because there was not enough food?

1. Yes 2. No If no skip next question 2b. How often did this happen?

1 = rarely (about once or twice a month) 2 = sometimes (about once a week) 3 = often (about twice a week or more)

3. The person who cares for you the most at home, your parent or main caregiver, does he or she do the following often, sometimes or not at all? (see Youth Survey for full list of items)

Often Sometimes Not at all

Supports and encourages me Gives me attention and listens to me

Shows me affection Praises me Comforts me

Respects my sense of freedom Provides for my necessities

Has open communication with me Spends time with me

4.

Date post:	17-Mar-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	3 times
Download:	5 times