+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Forensic Archeology.ppt

Forensic Archeology.ppt

Date post: 04-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: navinnaithani
View: 216 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 63

Transcript
  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    1/63

    Forensic Archeology from

    Mass Graves

    Much material obtained from a

    webpage written by Dr. StefanSchmitt, a forensic anthropologist

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    2/63

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    3/63

    The Antemortem Phase

    The recollection of antemortem data, in whichthe survivors are interviewed in order toproportion information that can aid in theidentification of the skeletal remains.

    This is especially important in countries likeGuatemala with no medical records available inthese poor populations.

    The antemortem phase is usually carried outprior or during the second phase, thearchaeological phase.

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    4/63

    The Archeological Phase

    The archeological phase is comprised the

    complete photographic and sketched

    documentation of the exhumation process

    itself.

    All methods and techniques such as used

    in the excavation of historical sites are

    employed to document the point in timewhen these graves were made.

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    5/63

    The Laboratory Phase

    After the remains have been exhumed

    they are cleaned and numbered and

    analyzed with methods employed in

    physical and forensic anthropology.

    This is done to determine cause and

    manner of death and identity of the

    individual remains.

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    6/63

    Special Issues for Mass Graves

    Co-mingled skeletal remains can be

    confusing.

    Which bones go with which skeleton?

    What is the minimum number of individuals

    found?

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    7/63

    MASSACRE AT TUNAJA,

    GUATEMALA

    http://www.acsu.buffalo.edu/~dber

    tuca/Massacres.html

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    8/63

    The Incident

    Tunaja is a small village in the Highlands ofGuatemala with a population of not more than200. It suffered under the military'scounterinsurgency campaign begun during thelatter part of the 1970's and the beginning of the1980's.

    In November of 1992, the Guatemalan ForensicAnthropology Team was asked by one of theIndigenous Human Rights Groups of Guatemalato exhume the remains of several people, whohad been selected out and assassinated by themilitary and its Civil Patrol Unit.

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    9/63

    A total of eight human skeletons were

    exhumed, four of which were located in a

    mass grave.

    Using forensic archeology, the team was

    able to piece together the last moments of

    one man's life.

    His name, according to witnesses, was

    Rosalo Chingo, although he couldnt be

    positively identified.

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    10/63

    His skeletal remains were found partially buried

    in the bed of a creek at the bottom of a deep

    ravine. From the tool marks in the wall beside

    where he was found, it was suggested that it hadbeen caved in, in order to cover up his body.

    Some of this material had been washed away

    and it wasnt possible to recover all of the

    remains. Some bones, such as the ulna(underarm bone) was located approximately 50

    yards downstream.

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    11/63

    What Was Learned and Why?

    How do we know he was a male?

    How old was he?

    What was the cause of death? What was the mechanism of death?

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    12/63

    The Skull

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    13/63

    How do we know he was a male?

    Skull Characteristics: (supraorbital ridge

    marked, forward projecting maxilla, fairly

    robust)

    Possibly clothes or artifacts (buttons,

    jewelry, cigarette lighter) found with the

    body.

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    14/63

    Skeletal Indications of Cause

    of Death

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    15/63

    The skull showed

    sharp force trauma to

    the left cheek, awound that would be

    consistent with a blow

    from a machete - a

    common agriculturaltool and weapon in

    Guatemala.

    This wound wouldprobably not have

    caused his death.

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    16/63

    Further trauma was found

    in the one of the occipital

    condyles (where the skullarticulates with the

    vertebras of the neck).

    A small fracture of this

    articulation suggestedthat this individual also

    had received trauma to

    the neck.

    Unfortunately, they didn'trecover the cervical

    vertebrae.

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    17/63

    A bullet was lodged inthe head of the leftfemur.

    Judging by its sizeand characteristics, itwas a high velocitybullet, such as used

    in assault rifles. The trajectory of thebullet grazed his leftinnominate bone ofhis pelvis, suggestingthat the victim wasshot from behind,possibly whilerunning.

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    18/63

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    19/63

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    20/63

    Finally, the right

    tibias articulate

    surface was fracturedwhere the shin bone

    meets the foot.

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    21/63

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    22/63

    A reconstruction of what may have

    happened based on the injuries. Rosalo was first attacked with a machete, upon

    which he may have decided to run down the hilltowards the ravine.

    At this point his assailants shot him in the back,

    lodging the bullet in his right femur. He must have managed to jump down the

    ravine, where he landed on his feet, causing thefracture in the tibia and possibly breaking his

    neck. Somebody then went down in the ravine andcaved the wall in over his body.

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    23/63

    Massacre at Ro Negro

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    24/63

    Background

    Ro Negro is a small Ach Indian village. It islocated in the highlands, 250 kilometers north ofGuatemala city in the County of Rabinal,Department of Baja Verapaz.

    Due to the construction of the hydroelectric damin Chixoy an entire fertile valley flooded. Tocompensate the inhabitants of this valley, asmall colony, given the name of Pacux, was builtfor a small portion of the Chixoy valleypopulation on the outskirts of Rabinal.

    Help was provided to build new houses in RoNegro, but these were later destroyed.

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    25/63

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    26/63

    Antemortem Phase

    According to testimony, in the early part of 1982over 70 men, accused of guerilla activities, fromRo Negro were murdered.

    They perished in the hands of the Civil Patrols

    (PAC - "Patrullas de Autodefensa Civil" -paramilitary organizations that are subordinateto the army) from the neighboring village ofXococ.

    Due to this incident the rest of the men fled thevillage in fear that something similar wouldhappen to them.

    They left their women and children behind,assuming nothing would happen to them.

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    27/63

    Antemortem Phase

    On March 13, 1982 some 80 women and100 children were led by the military andCivil Patroller to the top of the mountain,

    where they were brutally killed. Their bodies were thrown into a ravine,

    which drains the rain water during therainy season (from May to August).

    The exhumation was initiated in October of1993 and lasted up to December 1993.

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    28/63

    The Mass Grave Excavation

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    29/63

    Laboratory Phase

    During the investigation conducted in the lab fromDecember 1993 to April 1994, the lab analysisdetermined that the victims were exclusivelywomen and children.

    Most of the skeletal remains were founddisarticulated due to years of erosion andscavenging.

    Therefore, the calculation of the minimum number

    of individuals, which is 143, differs from thenumbers obtained from testimony, whichestimated over 180 people were executed.

    It was particularly difficult to analyze the many

    child and infant remains.

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    30/63

    Skeletal remains of

    one of the infants.

    Infant skeletons arevery prone to rapid

    decay.

    The bones havent

    completely calcified orfused. The cartilage

    is more easily

    degraded in the soil

    than fully calcified

    bones.

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    31/63

    Skeletal Evidence

    The most frequent causes of death were:

    Blows to the neck

    Blows to the cranium

    Gunshot wounds

    Stab wounds from knives and machetes.

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    32/63

    Additional Evidence

    Hardly any of the remains showedevidence of the typical Indian 'Corte' - along piece of elaborately woven fabric

    wrapped around the hips which is veryvaluable. Absence of this materialindicates the possibility of rape.

    Pregnancy was documented in threecases where fetal remains were found inthe pelvic area.

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    33/63

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    34/63

    Why Excavate These Graves?

    A clandestine cemetery is not so much

    hidden as it is officially non-existent.

    There is no possibility to perform the

    rituals associated with death, as it is done

    in any society. The mere existence of

    such mass clandestine graves without

    being able to acknowledge them in aknown way, terrorizes and oppresses the

    communities who have to live with them.

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    35/63

    Why Excavate These Graves?

    The official exhumation of the victims is

    the first step towards peace for these

    communities.

    It is then, that the survivors and victims of

    this mechanism of terror finally become

    activists for their rights.

    The evidence of the crime can be used tobring the perpetrators to justice.

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    36/63

    The Rwandan Genocide

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    37/63

    Some Background

    In 1994 the Rwandan Hutu government

    launched a systematic genocide of their

    minority Tutsi citizens.

    In four months, government forces and

    militia likely murdered 750,000-1,000,000,

    Tutsi and Hutu reluctant to join in the

    slaughter.

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    38/63

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    39/63

    A team of forensic scientists from

    Physicians for Human Rights was brought

    together to exhume and analyze the

    remains of victims that had beenmassacred in April of 1995 in the small

    town of Kibuye in Rwanda.

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    40/63

    This project was carried out on theinitiative of the International CriminalTribunal for Rwanda in its investigation

    and in preparation for the trial of some ofthe perpetrators of this massacre.

    This was carried out on the initiative of theInternational Criminal Tribunal for Rwandain its investigation and in preparation forthe trial of some of the perpetrators of thismassacre.

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    41/63

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    42/63

    The Site

    Kibuye is a small town located on the

    eastern shore of Lake Kivu.

    Rwanda is a hilly country, from which it

    gets its description as the country of the

    thousand hills.

    The Catholic Church which was the site of

    the massacre was located on the top ofone of the hills.

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    43/63

    Antemortem Phase

    When the excavations started behind the KibuyeChurch, it was not clear how many individualshad been buried there.

    Testimonies recollected varied anywhere

    between several hundred and 2,000. Prior to moving the bodies to the mass grave,

    they had lain for several days in the open and inthe church.

    It was six months since the bodies had beenburied, and bulldozers were used to move themin some cases. The workers did not know whatthe stage of decomposition would be.

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    44/63

    The Archeological Phase

    As the excavations progressed it became clear

    that most of the bodies were decomposed to the

    point that on lifting them out of the grave into a

    body bag, they would lose their articulation (i.e.limbs would come off) and many cases were

    partially skeletonized.

    Children and especially infants were badly

    decomposed - to the point that it was difficult torecognize the bodies.

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    45/63

    The Archeological Phase

    From the way the grave appeared to have

    been prepared, it became apparent that a

    bulldozer had been used to fill the grave

    up and top it off with soil.

    This also added to the mangling and

    disarticulation of the bodies.

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    46/63

    The Laboratory Phase

    For the purpose of establishing a minimumnumber of individuals which wererecovered from the grave, the cranium

    was designated as a marker for thepresence of an individual.

    Altogether 460 skulls were counted in themass grave behind the Kibuye Church,indicating that at least 460 individuals hadbeen buried there.

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    47/63

    F" stands for female, "M" for male and "C" for children of undetermined sex.

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    48/63

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    49/63

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    50/63

    Conclusions

    The largest group of the recovered bodies

    consisted of children under the age of 15 - 44%.

    Since the remains of children and infants were

    difficult to identify as such due to disarticulationof the remains, the number of children under the

    age of 15 might have been even greater.

    The great majority were beaten to death - Blunt

    Force Trauma: 65%.

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    51/63

    Cause of Death of an Individual

    One man was found buried underneath a

    banana tree. He was in his 60s when he

    was killed. Since all his teeth were intact

    he was a very healthy person.

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    52/63

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    53/63

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    54/63

    Left leg, ankle height

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    55/63

    Hands with Defense Cuts

    Left Hand Right Hand

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    56/63

    At some point he

    gave up and turned

    face down.

    He received

    several wounds to

    his back, one ofwhich severed his

    right shoulder

    blade in twoplaces.

    Th bl t hi k ll

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    57/63

    The blow to his skull

    was determined as the

    one that eventually led

    to his death.

    A blow with a machete

    to the back of his

    head, fractured his

    skull.

    The red arrow to the

    right of it points to an

    area where themachete glanced of

    his head, shaving a

    piece of bone off.

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    58/63

    Saddam Hussein Trial

    Dr Sonny Trimble Army Corps

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    59/63

    Dr. Sonny Trimble, Army Corps

    of Engineers Archeologist http://www.riverfronttimes.com/2006-09-

    13/news/csi-iraq/

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    60/63

    Clothing Preservation

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    61/63

    Preparing sketches

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    62/63

    Field X-ray unit

  • 8/14/2019 Forensic Archeology.ppt

    63/63

    Backhoe to move Overburden


Recommended