Campus: U.C.L.A. Building Name: SUNSETCYNREC CAAN ID: 4205A Auxiliary Building ID: Date: 06/27/2019
This Form 1 (March 26, 2019) is to be used in connection with Guidebook, Version 1.3, Section III.A.3.c-g Page 1
FORM 1 CERTIFICATE OF SEISMIC PERFORMANCE LEVEL
UC-Designed & Constructed FacilityCampus-Acquired or Leased Facility
BUILDING DATA Building Name: Sunset Canyon Recreation Center – Main Office & Conference Center Address: 111 Easton Drive Site location coordinates: Latitude 34.075283 Longitudinal -118.451105
UCOP SEISMIC PERFORMANCE LEVEL (OR “RATING”): IV
ASCE 41-17 Model Building Type: a. Longitudinal Direction: W1: Wood Light Frameb. Transverse Direction: W1: Wood Light Frame
Gross Square Footage: 8,290 Number of stories above grade: 2 Number of basement stories below grade: 0
Year Original Building was Constructed: 1965 Original Building Design Code & Year: 1961 UBC Retrofit Building Design Code & Code (if applicable): N/A
SITE INFORMATION Site Class: D Basis: Assumed Geologic Hazards: Fault Rupture: No Basis: Beverly Hills EZRIM Liquefaction: No Basis: Beverly Hills EZRIM Landslide: No Basis: Beverly Hills EZRIM
ATTACHMENT Original Structural Drawings: Seismic Evaluation: Structural Evaluation of UCLA Sunset Canyon Recreation Center, Nabih Youssef
Associates, June 27, 2014, ASCE 31/Tier 1 Retrofit Structural Drawings:
Campus: U.C.L.A. Building Name: SUNSETCYNREC CAAN ID: 4205A Auxiliary Building ID: Date: 06/27/2019
This Form 1 (March 26, 2019) is to be used in connection with Guidebook, Version 1.3, Section III.A.3.c-g Page 2
CERTIFICATION & PRESUMPTIVE RATING VERIFICATION STATEMENT
I, Nabih Youssef, a California-licensed structural engineer, am responsible for the completion of this certificate, and I have no ownership interest in the property identified above. My scope of review to support the completion of this certificate included both of the following (“No” responses must include an explanation):
a) the review of structural drawings indicating that they are as-built or record drawings, or that theyotherwise are the basis for the construction of the building: Yes No
b) visiting the building to verify the observable existing conditions are reasonably consistent withthose shown on the structural drawings: Yes No
Based on my review, I have verified that the UCOP Seismic Performance Level (SPL) is presumptively permitted by the following UC Seismic Program Guidebook provision (choose one of the following):
1) Contract documents indicate that the original design and construction of the aforementionedbuilding is in accordance with the benchmark design code year (or later) building code seismic designprovisions for UBC or IBC listed in Table 1 below.
2) The existing SPL rating is based on an acceptable basis of seismic evaluation completed in 2006 orlater.
3) Contract documents indicate that a comprehensive1 building seismic retrofit design was fully-constructed with an engineered design based on the 1997 UBC/1998 or later CBC, and (choose one ofthe following):
the retrofit project was completed by the UC campus. Further, the design was based on groundmotion parameters, at a minimum, corresponding to BSE-1E (or BSE-R) and BSE-2E (or BSE-C) asdefined in ASCE 41, or the full design basis ground motion required in the 1997 UBC/1998 CBC orlater for EXISTING buildings, and is presumptively assigned an SPL rating of IV.
the retrofit project was completed by the UC campus. Further, the design was based on groundmotion parameters, at a minimum, corresponding to BSE-1 (or BSE-1N) and BSE-2 (or BSE-2N) asdefined in ASCE 41, or the full design basis ground motion required in the 1997 UBC/1998 or laterCBC for NEW buildings, and is presumptively assigned an SPL rating of III.
the retrofit project was not completed by the UC campus following UC policies, and ispresumptively assigned an SPL rating of IV.
1 A comprehensive retrofit addresses the entire building structural system as indicated by the associated seismic evaluation, as opposed to addressing selective portions of the structural system.
Campus: U.C.L.A. Building Name: SUNSETCYNREC CAAN ID: 4205A Auxiliary Building ID:
Campus: U.C.L.A. Building Name: SUNSETCYNREC CAAN ID: 4205A.1 Auxiliary Building ID: Date: 06/27/2019
This Form 1 (March 26, 2019) is to be used in connection with Guidebook, Version 1.3, Section III.A.3.c-g Page 1
FORM 1 CERTIFICATE OF SEISMIC PERFORMANCE LEVEL
UC-Designed & Constructed FacilityCampus-Acquired or Leased Facility
BUILDING DATA Building Name: Sunset Canyon Recreation Center – Buenos Ayres Room Address: 111 Easton Drive Site location coordinates: Latitude 34.075283 Longitudinal -118.451105
UCOP SEISMIC PERFORMANCE LEVEL (OR “RATING”): IV
ASCE 41-17 Model Building Type: a. Longitudinal Direction: W1: Wood Light Frameb. Transverse Direction: W1: Wood Light Frame
Gross Square Footage: Number of stories above grade: 1 Number of basement stories below grade: 0
Year Original Building was Constructed: 1965 Original Building Design Code & Year: 1961 UBC Retrofit Building Design Code & Code (if applicable): N/A
SITE INFORMATION Site Class: D Basis: Assumed Geologic Hazards: Fault Rupture: No Basis: Beverly Hills EZRIM Liquefaction: No Basis: Beverly Hills EZRIM Landslide: No Basis: Beverly Hills EZRIM
ATTACHMENT Original Structural Drawings: Seismic Evaluation: Structural Evaluation of UCLA Sunset Canyon Recreation Center, Nabih Youssef
Associates, June 27, 2014, ASCE 31/Tier 1 Retrofit Structural Drawings:
Campus: U.C.L.A. Building Name: SUNSETCYNREC CAAN ID: 4205A.1 Auxiliary Building ID: Date: 06/27/2019
This Form 1 (March 26, 2019) is to be used in connection with Guidebook, Version 1.3, Section III.A.3.c-g Page 2
CERTIFICATION & PRESUMPTIVE RATING VERIFICATION STATEMENT
I, Nabih Youssef, a California-licensed structural engineer, am responsible for the completion of this certificate, and I have no ownership interest in the property identified above. My scope of review to support the completion of this certificate included both of the following (“No” responses must include an explanation):
a) the review of structural drawings indicating that they are as-built or record drawings, or that theyotherwise are the basis for the construction of the building: Yes No
b) visiting the building to verify the observable existing conditions are reasonably consistent withthose shown on the structural drawings: Yes No
Based on my review, I have verified that the UCOP Seismic Performance Level (SPL) is presumptively permitted by the following UC Seismic Program Guidebook provision (choose one of the following):
1) Contract documents indicate that the original design and construction of the aforementionedbuilding is in accordance with the benchmark design code year (or later) building code seismic designprovisions for UBC or IBC listed in Table 1 below.
2) The existing SPL rating is based on an acceptable basis of seismic evaluation completed in 2006 orlater.
3) Contract documents indicate that a comprehensive1 building seismic retrofit design was fully-constructed with an engineered design based on the 1997 UBC/1998 or later CBC, and (choose one ofthe following):
the retrofit project was completed by the UC campus. Further, the design was based on groundmotion parameters, at a minimum, corresponding to BSE-1E (or BSE-R) and BSE-2E (or BSE-C) asdefined in ASCE 41, or the full design basis ground motion required in the 1997 UBC/1998 CBC orlater for EXISTING buildings, and is presumptively assigned an SPL rating of IV.
the retrofit project was completed by the UC campus. Further, the design was based on groundmotion parameters, at a minimum, corresponding to BSE-1 (or BSE-1N) and BSE-2 (or BSE-2N) asdefined in ASCE 41, or the full design basis ground motion required in the 1997 UBC/1998 or laterCBC for NEW buildings, and is presumptively assigned an SPL rating of III.
the retrofit project was not completed by the UC campus following UC policies, and ispresumptively assigned an SPL rating of IV.
1 A comprehensive retrofit addresses the entire building structural system as indicated by the associated seismic evaluation, as opposed to addressing selective portions of the structural system.
Campus: U.C.L.A. Building Name: SUNSETCYNREC CAAN ID: 4205A.1 Auxiliary Building ID:
Campus: U.C.L.A. Building Name: SNSTCYNRCSFR CAAN ID: 4205C Auxiliary Building ID: Date: 06/27/2019
This Form 1 (March 26, 2019) is to be used in connection with Guidebook, Version 1.3, Section III.A.3.c-g Page 1
FORM 1
CERTIFICATE OF SEISMIC PERFORMANCE LEVEL UC-Designed & Constructed Facility Campus-Acquired or Leased Facility
BUILDING DATA Building Name: Sunset Canyon Recreation Center – Santa Fe Room Address: 111 Easton Drive Site location coordinates: Latitude 34.075283 Longitudinal -118.451105 UCOP SEISMIC PERFORMANCE LEVEL (OR “RATING”): V ASCE 41-17 Model Building Type:
a. Longitudinal Direction: W1: Wood Light Frame b. Transverse Direction: W1: Wood Light Frame
Gross Square Footage: 1,218 Number of stories above grade: 1 Number of basement stories below grade: 0 Year Original Building was Constructed: 1965 Original Building Design Code & Year: 1961 UBC Retrofit Building Design Code & Code (if applicable): N/A SITE INFORMATION Site Class: D Basis: Assumed Geologic Hazards: Fault Rupture: No Basis: Beverly Hills EZRIM Liquefaction: No Basis: Beverly Hills EZRIM Landslide: No Basis: Beverly Hills EZRIM ATTACHMENT Original Structural Drawings: Seismic Evaluation: Structural Evaluation of UCLA Sunset Canyon Recreation Center, Nabih Youssef
Associates, June 27, 2014, ASCE 31/Tier 1 Retrofit Structural Drawings:
Campus: U.C.L.A. Building Name: SNSTCYNRCSFR CAAN ID: 4205C Auxiliary Building ID: Date: 06/27/2019
This Form 1 (March 26, 2019) is to be used in connection with Guidebook, Version 1.3, Section III.A.3.c-g Page 2
CERTIFICATION & PRESUMPTIVE RATING VERIFICATION STATEMENT
I, Nabih Youssef, a California-licensed structural engineer, am responsible for the completion of this certificate, and I have no ownership interest in the property identified above. My scope of review to support the completion of this certificate included both of the following (“No” responses must include an explanation):
a) the review of structural drawings indicating that they are as-built or record drawings, or that theyotherwise are the basis for the construction of the building: Yes No
b) visiting the building to verify the observable existing conditions are reasonably consistent withthose shown on the structural drawings: Yes No
Based on my review, I have verified that the UCOP Seismic Performance Level (SPL) is presumptively permitted by the following UC Seismic Program Guidebook provision (choose one of the following):
1) Contract documents indicate that the original design and construction of the aforementionedbuilding is in accordance with the benchmark design code year (or later) building code seismic designprovisions for UBC or IBC listed in Table 1 below.
2) The existing SPL rating is based on an acceptable basis of seismic evaluation completed in 2006 orlater.
3) Contract documents indicate that a comprehensive1 building seismic retrofit design was fully-constructed with an engineered design based on the 1997 UBC/1998 or later CBC, and (choose one ofthe following):
the retrofit project was completed by the UC campus. Further, the design was based on groundmotion parameters, at a minimum, corresponding to BSE-1E (or BSE-R) and BSE-2E (or BSE-C) asdefined in ASCE 41, or the full design basis ground motion required in the 1997 UBC/1998 CBC orlater for EXISTING buildings, and is presumptively assigned an SPL rating of IV.
the retrofit project was completed by the UC campus. Further, the design was based on groundmotion parameters, at a minimum, corresponding to BSE-1 (or BSE-1N) and BSE-2 (or BSE-2N) asdefined in ASCE 41, or the full design basis ground motion required in the 1997 UBC/1998 or laterCBC for NEW buildings, and is presumptively assigned an SPL rating of III.
the retrofit project was not completed by the UC campus following UC policies, and ispresumptively assigned an SPL rating of IV.
1 A comprehensive retrofit addresses the entire building structural system as indicated by the associated seismic evaluation, as opposed to addressing selective portions of the structural system.
Campus: U.C.L.A. Building Name: SNSTCYNRCSFR CAAN ID: 4205C Auxiliary Building ID:
Campus: U.C.L.A. Building Name: SNSTCYNFPLRR CAAN ID: 4205G Auxiliary Building ID: Date: 06/27/2019
This Form 1 (March 26, 2019) is to be used in connection with Guidebook, Version 1.3, Section III.A.3.c-g Page 1
FORM 1 CERTIFICATE OF SEISMIC PERFORMANCE LEVEL
UC-Designed & Constructed FacilityCampus-Acquired or Leased Facility
BUILDING DATA Building Name: Sunset Canyon Recreation Center – Family Pool Restrooms Address: 111 Easton Drive Site location coordinates: Latitude 34.075283 Longitudinal -118.451105
UCOP SEISMIC PERFORMANCE LEVEL (OR “RATING”): IV
ASCE 41-17 Model Building Type: a. Longitudinal Direction: W1: Wood Light Frameb. Transverse Direction: W1: Wood Light Frame
Gross Square Footage: 1,044 Number of stories above grade: 1 Number of basement stories below grade: 0
Year Original Building was Constructed: 1965 Original Building Design Code & Year: 1961 UBC Retrofit Building Design Code & Code (if applicable): N/A
SITE INFORMATION Site Class: D Basis: Assumed Geologic Hazards: Fault Rupture: No Basis: Beverly Hills EZRIM Liquefaction: No Basis: Beverly Hills EZRIM Landslide: No Basis: Beverly Hills EZRIM
ATTACHMENT Original Structural Drawings: Seismic Evaluation: Structural Evaluation of UCLA Sunset Canyon Recreation Center, Nabih Youssef
Associates, June 27, 2014, ASCE 31/Tier 1 Retrofit Structural Drawings:
Campus: U.C.L.A. Building Name: SNSTCYNFPLRR CAAN ID: 4205G Auxiliary Building ID: Date: 06/27/2019
This Form 1 (March 26, 2019) is to be used in connection with Guidebook, Version 1.3, Section III.A.3.c-g Page 2
CERTIFICATION & PRESUMPTIVE RATING VERIFICATION STATEMENT
I, Nabih Youssef, a California-licensed structural engineer, am responsible for the completion of this certificate, and I have no ownership interest in the property identified above. My scope of review to support the completion of this certificate included both of the following (“No” responses must include an explanation):
a) the review of structural drawings indicating that they are as-built or record drawings, or that theyotherwise are the basis for the construction of the building: Yes No
b) visiting the building to verify the observable existing conditions are reasonably consistent withthose shown on the structural drawings: Yes No
Based on my review, I have verified that the UCOP Seismic Performance Level (SPL) is presumptively permitted by the following UC Seismic Program Guidebook provision (choose one of the following):
1) Contract documents indicate that the original design and construction of the aforementionedbuilding is in accordance with the benchmark design code year (or later) building code seismic designprovisions for UBC or IBC listed in Table 1 below.
2) The existing SPL rating is based on an acceptable basis of seismic evaluation completed in 2006 orlater.
3) Contract documents indicate that a comprehensive1 building seismic retrofit design was fully-constructed with an engineered design based on the 1997 UBC/1998 or later CBC, and (choose one ofthe following):
the retrofit project was completed by the UC campus. Further, the design was based on groundmotion parameters, at a minimum, corresponding to BSE-1E (or BSE-R) and BSE-2E (or BSE-C) asdefined in ASCE 41, or the full design basis ground motion required in the 1997 UBC/1998 CBC orlater for EXISTING buildings, and is presumptively assigned an SPL rating of IV.
the retrofit project was completed by the UC campus. Further, the design was based on groundmotion parameters, at a minimum, corresponding to BSE-1 (or BSE-1N) and BSE-2 (or BSE-2N) asdefined in ASCE 41, or the full design basis ground motion required in the 1997 UBC/1998 or laterCBC for NEW buildings, and is presumptively assigned an SPL rating of III.
the retrofit project was not completed by the UC campus following UC policies, and ispresumptively assigned an SPL rating of IV.
1 A comprehensive retrofit addresses the entire building structural system as indicated by the associated seismic evaluation, as opposed to addressing selective portions of the structural system.
Campus: U.C.L.A. Building Name: SNSTCYNFPLRR CAAN ID: 4205G Auxiliary Building ID:
Campus: U.C.L.A. Building Name: SNSTCYNFPLLR CAAN ID: 4205H Auxiliary Building ID: Date: 06/27/2019
This Form 1 (March 26, 2019) is to be used in connection with Guidebook, Version 1.3, Section III.A.3.c-g Page 1
FORM 1 CERTIFICATE OF SEISMIC PERFORMANCE LEVEL
UC-Designed & Constructed FacilityCampus-Acquired or Leased Facility
BUILDING DATA Building Name: Sunset Canyon Recreation Center – Park Pool Locker Rooms Address: 111 Easton Drive Site location coordinates: Latitude 34.075283 Longitudinal -118.451105
UCOP SEISMIC PERFORMANCE LEVEL (OR “RATING”): IV
ASCE 41-17 Model Building Type: a. Longitudinal Direction: W1: Wood Light Frameb. Transverse Direction: W1: Wood Light Frame
Gross Square Footage: 4,980 Number of stories above grade: 1 Number of basement stories below grade: 0
Year Original Building was Constructed: 1965 Original Building Design Code & Year: 1961 UBC Retrofit Building Design Code & Code (if applicable): N/A
SITE INFORMATION Site Class: D Basis: Assumed Geologic Hazards: Fault Rupture: No Basis: Beverly Hills EZRIM Liquefaction: No Basis: Beverly Hills EZRIM Landslide: No Basis: Beverly Hills EZRIM
ATTACHMENT Original Structural Drawings: Seismic Evaluation: Structural Evaluation of UCLA Sunset Canyon Recreation Center, Nabih Youssef
Associates, June 27, 2014, ASCE 31/Tier 1 Retrofit Structural Drawings:
Campus: U.C.L.A. Building Name: SNSTCYNFPLLR CAAN ID: 4205H Auxiliary Building ID: Date: 06/27/2019
This Form 1 (March 26, 2019) is to be used in connection with Guidebook, Version 1.3, Section III.A.3.c-g Page 2
CERTIFICATION & PRESUMPTIVE RATING VERIFICATION STATEMENT
I, Nabih Youssef, a California-licensed structural engineer, am responsible for the completion of this certificate, and I have no ownership interest in the property identified above. My scope of review to support the completion of this certificate included both of the following (“No” responses must include an explanation):
a) the review of structural drawings indicating that they are as-built or record drawings, or that theyotherwise are the basis for the construction of the building: Yes No
b) visiting the building to verify the observable existing conditions are reasonably consistent withthose shown on the structural drawings: Yes No
Based on my review, I have verified that the UCOP Seismic Performance Level (SPL) is presumptively permitted by the following UC Seismic Program Guidebook provision (choose one of the following):
1) Contract documents indicate that the original design and construction of the aforementionedbuilding is in accordance with the benchmark design code year (or later) building code seismic designprovisions for UBC or IBC listed in Table 1 below.
2) The existing SPL rating is based on an acceptable basis of seismic evaluation completed in 2006 orlater.
3) Contract documents indicate that a comprehensive1 building seismic retrofit design was fully-constructed with an engineered design based on the 1997 UBC/1998 or later CBC, and (choose one ofthe following):
the retrofit project was completed by the UC campus. Further, the design was based on groundmotion parameters, at a minimum, corresponding to BSE-1E (or BSE-R) and BSE-2E (or BSE-C) asdefined in ASCE 41, or the full design basis ground motion required in the 1997 UBC/1998 CBC orlater for EXISTING buildings, and is presumptively assigned an SPL rating of IV.
the retrofit project was completed by the UC campus. Further, the design was based on groundmotion parameters, at a minimum, corresponding to BSE-1 (or BSE-1N) and BSE-2 (or BSE-2N) asdefined in ASCE 41, or the full design basis ground motion required in the 1997 UBC/1998 or laterCBC for NEW buildings, and is presumptively assigned an SPL rating of III.
the retrofit project was not completed by the UC campus following UC policies, and ispresumptively assigned an SPL rating of IV.
1 A comprehensive retrofit addresses the entire building structural system as indicated by the associated seismic evaluation, as opposed to addressing selective portions of the structural system.
Campus: U.C.L.A. Building Name: SNSTCYNFPLLR CAAN ID: 4205H Auxiliary Building ID:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
••
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•••
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•••
•
••
•
•
•
•
•
•
••
•
•
•
•
•
••
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
••
•
•
•
•
•
•
•••
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
••••
•
•
•
••
•
•
•
•
•
•
••
•
•
•
•
•
••
•
••
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• A-1
ON
TOC
ON
FIR
M H
D A
NC
HO
RH
AS B
EEN
PR
OVI
DED
MIN
IMU
M P
ER F
LOO
R.
ERIF
Y H
OLD
-DO
WN
ON
NEC
TIO
N A
T W
ALL
ND
S. 2
LO
CAT
ION
SN
IMU
MVE
RIF
Y AN
CH
OR
CO
NN
ECTI
ON
TO
CO
NC
RET
E W
ALL
PIER
S 2
LO
CAT
ION
SM
INIM
UM
VER
IFY
HO
LD-D
OW
NC
ON
NEC
TIO
N A
T W
ALL
END
S. 2
LO
CAT
ION
SM
INIM
UM
VER
IFYC
ON
NEC
TIO
NBE
TWEE
N B
UIL
DIN
G D
AND
E
FY C
ON
NEC
TIO
NEE
N B
UIL
DIN
G D
VER
IFY
HO
LD-D
OFO
UN
DAI
TON
CO
FOU
ND
ATIO
N
• A-2
•
•