+ All Categories
Home > Documents > FP420 Infrastructure in LHC FP420 @ UTA 27-Mar-2007.

FP420 Infrastructure in LHC FP420 @ UTA 27-Mar-2007.

Date post: 13-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: nathaniel-cobb
View: 218 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
17
FP420 FP420 Infrastructure Infrastructure in LHC in LHC FP420 @ UTA FP420 @ UTA 27-Mar-2007 27-Mar-2007
Transcript

FP420FP420InfrastructureInfrastructure

in LHCin LHCFP420 @ UTAFP420 @ UTA

27-Mar-200727-Mar-2007

27 March 200727 March 2007 D. Swoboda FP420 @ UTAD. Swoboda FP420 @ UTA 22

Services and InstrumentationServices and Instrumentation

Tunnel Structure Working GroupTunnel Structure Working Group– Specify requirements for cabling and pipingSpecify requirements for cabling and piping– Launch integration study in LHCLaunch integration study in LHC– Schedule pre-installation of servicesSchedule pre-installation of services– Reserve installation spaceReserve installation space

Distances detector to near electronics/suppliesDistances detector to near electronics/supplies possible locationspossible locations

Undertake radiation calculations for FP420 sectorUndertake radiation calculations for FP420 sector Cryostat and detector shieldingCryostat and detector shielding

Select adequate instrumentationSelect adequate instrumentation Radiation issuesRadiation issues

27 March 200727 March 2007 D. Swoboda FP420 @ UTAD. Swoboda FP420 @ UTA 33

Tunnel Structure Working GroupTunnel Structure Working Group

11stst meeting on 8 Feb 2007 meeting on 8 Feb 2007 Brainstorming session Brainstorming session

– Present: Detlef, Henning, Paolo, Ada, Peter, Krzysztof, Andrew, Cinzia

– List of services and some volunteers identified– Suggested to split by sub-system; i.e.

Detectors Alignment Positioning system Cooling General power HV/LV …

27 March 200727 March 2007 D. Swoboda FP420 @ UTAD. Swoboda FP420 @ UTA 44

Services InventoryServices InventoryService Identification Characteristics Responsible

cable HV D ~ 10 mm

LV

cameras

O-fibres

Trigger Cu

FEE Temperature Monitoring AD592 (for CAEN A3801)

Detector electronics

Mains 3phase/ 400 V ~500 W

LV 48 V dc Detector service electronics Henning

LHC data exchange TTC, BST Mike

Detector cooling pipes Evaporative? Jaak

Positioning system Motor, drive, electronics, LHC interlock Krystoph

Alignment BPM technology Detlef, Jo

cable Detlef, Jo

BLM Close location Detlef

Detector grounding scheme Sherwood+Scott+Henning

2nd vacuum Pumps, ctrl

AFD Smoke sensors ???

Supervision IR Cameras Light source?

Pwr supply cooling Mixed water

Gas Monitoring & control Local storage? radiation hardness?C4F8

Instrumentation Crates 19” 3 x

27 March 200727 March 2007 D. Swoboda FP420 @ UTAD. Swoboda FP420 @ UTA 55

Sub-systemsSub-systemsSub-system Requirements Location

Gastof 2nd vacuum, gas, FEE, el. Pwr, DAQ, Xmission

Quartic FEE, el. Pwr, DAQ, Xmission

3D Cooling, FEE, el. Pwr, DAQ, Xmission

Cooling Pumps, control, pipingPumps, control, piping

Alignment BPM, BLM, other

Positioning Movement drive, control

Timing TTC,

Interlocks Injection, Beam dump, CIBU

General electrical pwr 400Vac, 230Vac, 48Vdc, UPS?

HV Crates, modules, controls, connections

LV Crates, modules, controls, connections, cooling

Communication F-O, Field-bus XCR XCR FP420 FP420

Miscellaneous Cameras, lights FP420FP420

To be completed

27 March 200727 March 2007 D. Swoboda FP420 @ UTAD. Swoboda FP420 @ UTA 66

Service locations near FP420Service locations near FP420

1.1. Tunnel wall above the QRL.Tunnel wall above the QRL.The space reserved for electronic boxes could eventually be used for electronics/power The space reserved for electronic boxes could eventually be used for electronics/power

supplies. The reserved cross-section is 400 x 320 mm (H x W). However, additional supplies. The reserved cross-section is 400 x 320 mm (H x W). However, additional radiation shielding would certainly be required in these locations.radiation shielding would certainly be required in these locations.

2.2. Underneath adjacent magnets.Underneath adjacent magnets.Throughout the LHC tunnel the space underneath the magnets, mainly in the arc Throughout the LHC tunnel the space underneath the magnets, mainly in the arc

regions has already been reserved for electronics instrumentation because of the regions has already been reserved for electronics instrumentation because of the relatively low radiation dose.relatively low radiation dose.

3.3. Tunnel wall inside.Tunnel wall inside.A proposed alternative is the excavation of cavities on the tunnel wall on the “transport” A proposed alternative is the excavation of cavities on the tunnel wall on the “transport”

side. A 1st inquiry has shown that holes of 75 cm diameter and 100 cm depth could side. A 1st inquiry has shown that holes of 75 cm diameter and 100 cm depth could be drilled [ ]. This solution seems to be theoretically feasible but would also require be drilled [ ]. This solution seems to be theoretically feasible but would also require a good understanding of the radiation level at this location.a good understanding of the radiation level at this location.

4.4. Support beams of cryostat.Support beams of cryostat.Support beams could receive openings to house custom electronics. Probably adequate Support beams could receive openings to house custom electronics. Probably adequate

for trigger devices requiring very short cable length.for trigger devices requiring very short cable length.

27 March 200727 March 2007 D. Swoboda FP420 @ UTAD. Swoboda FP420 @ UTA 77

Services space (1)Services space (1)

We could drill 'cores' through the concrete lining and into the rock up to a depth of 1metre. We would then insert a steel pipe and grout it into position. The maximum finished internal diameter is approx. 75cm.

Assuming no services need to be diverted, no water ingress problems, and the core is at around 1metre above the tunnel floor, an approximate budget cost is :13,000chf per hole = 24no. * 13k = 312,000chf.

27 March 200727 March 2007 D. Swoboda FP420 @ UTAD. Swoboda FP420 @ UTA 88

Services space (2)Services space (2)

L0722023PL

27 March 200727 March 2007 D. Swoboda FP420 @ UTAD. Swoboda FP420 @ UTA 99

Services space (3)Services space (3)

L0722024PL

FP420

27 March 200727 March 2007 D. Swoboda FP420 @ UTAD. Swoboda FP420 @ UTA 1010

Services Space (4)Services Space (4)

Available SpaceAvailable Space– In the region of interest considerable space is already reserved for In the region of interest considerable space is already reserved for

survey and vacuum instrumentation.survey and vacuum instrumentation.– The vacuum installations are mounted in steel frames of 350 mm The vacuum installations are mounted in steel frames of 350 mm

height. But the total height underneath the magnets is ≥ 400 mm.height. But the total height underneath the magnets is ≥ 400 mm.– The free length available varies but is at least equivalent to 1VME The free length available varies but is at least equivalent to 1VME

cratecrate– The closest distance from FP420 is always less than one magnet The closest distance from FP420 is always less than one magnet

length but limited to a couple of crates.length but limited to a couple of crates. Required SpaceRequired Space

– A 6U VME Fantray will have the following outside dimensions:A 6U VME Fantray will have the following outside dimensions:– 482,6mm (incl. 19" rack-mounting profile) x 352mm (8U) x 553mm 482,6mm (incl. 19" rack-mounting profile) x 352mm (8U) x 553mm

(WxHxD).(WxHxD).– Required at each FP420 station are 2 VME crates for Si-3D power Required at each FP420 station are 2 VME crates for Si-3D power

supplies.supplies.

27 March 200727 March 2007 D. Swoboda FP420 @ UTAD. Swoboda FP420 @ UTA 1111

FP420 Services RoutingFP420 Services RoutingLHCf implementation

27 March 200727 March 2007 D. Swoboda FP420 @ UTAD. Swoboda FP420 @ UTA 1212

FP420 BPM requirementsFP420 BPM requirements

Parameter Value Unit

Resolution @ central positon

~ 1 μm

Precision @ central position

~ 1 μm

Acquisition speed 25 nsec

Aperture width Nom. Beam pipe ø + 2 x (Δx) mm

0

0

27 March 200727 March 2007 D. Swoboda FP420 @ UTAD. Swoboda FP420 @ UTA 1313

BPM TechnologiesBPM Technologies

Electrostatic pick up Electrostatic pick up (buffer Amp required)(buffer Amp required)

BW: 1 kHz – 200 MHzBW: 1 kHz – 200 MHz position resolution:10 μmposition resolution:10 μm current resolution: 12 mAcurrent resolution: 12 mA

Button pick upButton pick up BW: 1 kHz – 200 MHzBW: 1 kHz – 200 MHz position resolution: 10 μmposition resolution: 10 μm current resolution: 12 mAcurrent resolution: 12 mA

AM, PM readout electronics, digital readout electronics

BW: 1 kHz – 200 MHz

position resolution: 10 μm

current resolution: 10 mA

BW: 200 MHz, CMRR: ~ 50 dB @ 100 MHz

AM, PM readout electronics, digital readout electronics

BW: 1 kHz – 200 MHz

position resolution: 10 μm

current resolution: 10 mA

BW: 200 MHz, CMRR: ~ 50 dB @ 100 MHz

Courtesy: Marek GASIOR for BDI-PI section

27 March 200727 March 2007 D. Swoboda FP420 @ UTAD. Swoboda FP420 @ UTA 1414

BPM additional infoBPM additional info

1.1. LHC BPM, BLM positionsLHC BPM, BLM positions– BPM dwn stream @ Q11BPM dwn stream @ Q11– BPM up stream next Q10BPM up stream next Q10– BLM can be mounted on feet supported by FP420 cryostat structural beams.BLM can be mounted on feet supported by FP420 cryostat structural beams.

2.2. Tunnel instrumentation for BPMTunnel instrumentation for BPM– Pure analog electronics with Laser diode for transmission.Pure analog electronics with Laser diode for transmission.– Data already pulse width encodedData already pulse width encoded

3.3. BPM type, electronics resolutionBPM type, electronics resolution– LHC electrostatic type: LHC electrostatic type: – With multi bunch measurement: accuracy ~ 100 micron, resolution 2 - 5 micron.With multi bunch measurement: accuracy ~ 100 micron, resolution 2 - 5 micron.– With b-b measurement: accuracy ~ 200 micron, resolution ~ 50 micron.With b-b measurement: accuracy ~ 200 micron, resolution ~ 50 micron.– W. Herr for info on simulation for b-b variation.W. Herr for info on simulation for b-b variation.

Static vs. inductive = question of development time; i.e. easier for static.Static vs. inductive = question of development time; i.e. easier for static.

27 March 200727 March 2007 D. Swoboda FP420 @ UTAD. Swoboda FP420 @ UTA 1515

BPM workshopBPM workshopPlace: CERN, Bldg. 926-1-039Date: 19 April 2007Scope: assess adequate technology for FP420 requirementCriteria: accuracy, resolution, acquisition speed (b-b)

Concept of alignment monitoring and detector positioningDevelopment time/costResources; i.e. available experts for mechanical layout, integration, electronics

Invited:

Institute/Project Name

Totem Gennaro Ruggiero, Marco Oriunno, Ernst Rademaker and Karsten Eggert for info

FP420 Cinzia da Via, Keith Potter, Brian Cox, Joleen Pater, Mike Albrow, Ray Thompson, Steve Watts

UCL Alex Lyapin

FNAL Christoph Royon

DESY Kay Wittenburg

CERN/AB-BI Lars Soby, Marek Gasior, Rhodri Jones, Jeroen Belleman, Uli Raich

CERN/AB-OP Karel Cornelis, Roger Bailey

CERN/TS-SU Jean-Pierre Quesnel; Helene Mainaud Durand

CERN/TS-LEA Detlef Swoboda, Emmanuel Tsesmelis

27 March 200727 March 2007 D. Swoboda FP420 @ UTAD. Swoboda FP420 @ UTA 1616

FP420 BPM WS agendaFP420 BPM WS agenda Indico : Indico : http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=14310http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=14310

Agenda:Agenda:1.1. Welcome addressWelcome address D. Swoboda.D. Swoboda.2.2. Introduction to FP420Introduction to FP420 B. CoxB. Cox3.3. Requirements for FP420 alignment BPMRequirements for FP420 alignment BPM C. da ViaC. da Via4.4. Results of investigations and studies on FP420 alignment and detector Results of investigations and studies on FP420 alignment and detector

positioning systemspositioning systems J. PaterJ. Pater5.5. Beam Position Monitor DesignsBeam Position Monitor Designs L. SobyL. Soby6.6. Signal Processing for Beam Position MonitorsSignal Processing for Beam Position Monitors M. GasiorM. Gasior7.7. FP420 detectors mechanicsFP420 detectors mechanics D. DatollaD. Datolla8.8. FP420 Hamburg beam pipeFP420 Hamburg beam pipe K. K.

PiotrzkowskiPiotrzkowski9.9. ConclusionsConclusions NNNN

27 March 200727 March 2007 D. Swoboda FP420 @ UTAD. Swoboda FP420 @ UTA 1717

InterlocksInterlocks

Risk analysis for beam accident scenariosRisk analysis for beam accident scenarios Fast movement of closed orbitFast movement of closed orbit Control failure of detector positioning system Control failure of detector positioning system

Discussion launched for all LHC Discussion launched for all LHC experiments with LHC machineexperiments with LHC machine

WS planned for June 2007WS planned for June 2007


Recommended