Date post: | 13-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | nathaniel-cobb |
View: | 218 times |
Download: | 1 times |
27 March 200727 March 2007 D. Swoboda FP420 @ UTAD. Swoboda FP420 @ UTA 22
Services and InstrumentationServices and Instrumentation
Tunnel Structure Working GroupTunnel Structure Working Group– Specify requirements for cabling and pipingSpecify requirements for cabling and piping– Launch integration study in LHCLaunch integration study in LHC– Schedule pre-installation of servicesSchedule pre-installation of services– Reserve installation spaceReserve installation space
Distances detector to near electronics/suppliesDistances detector to near electronics/supplies possible locationspossible locations
Undertake radiation calculations for FP420 sectorUndertake radiation calculations for FP420 sector Cryostat and detector shieldingCryostat and detector shielding
Select adequate instrumentationSelect adequate instrumentation Radiation issuesRadiation issues
27 March 200727 March 2007 D. Swoboda FP420 @ UTAD. Swoboda FP420 @ UTA 33
Tunnel Structure Working GroupTunnel Structure Working Group
11stst meeting on 8 Feb 2007 meeting on 8 Feb 2007 Brainstorming session Brainstorming session
– Present: Detlef, Henning, Paolo, Ada, Peter, Krzysztof, Andrew, Cinzia
– List of services and some volunteers identified– Suggested to split by sub-system; i.e.
Detectors Alignment Positioning system Cooling General power HV/LV …
27 March 200727 March 2007 D. Swoboda FP420 @ UTAD. Swoboda FP420 @ UTA 44
Services InventoryServices InventoryService Identification Characteristics Responsible
cable HV D ~ 10 mm
LV
cameras
O-fibres
Trigger Cu
FEE Temperature Monitoring AD592 (for CAEN A3801)
Detector electronics
Mains 3phase/ 400 V ~500 W
LV 48 V dc Detector service electronics Henning
LHC data exchange TTC, BST Mike
Detector cooling pipes Evaporative? Jaak
Positioning system Motor, drive, electronics, LHC interlock Krystoph
Alignment BPM technology Detlef, Jo
cable Detlef, Jo
BLM Close location Detlef
Detector grounding scheme Sherwood+Scott+Henning
2nd vacuum Pumps, ctrl
AFD Smoke sensors ???
Supervision IR Cameras Light source?
Pwr supply cooling Mixed water
Gas Monitoring & control Local storage? radiation hardness?C4F8
Instrumentation Crates 19” 3 x
27 March 200727 March 2007 D. Swoboda FP420 @ UTAD. Swoboda FP420 @ UTA 55
Sub-systemsSub-systemsSub-system Requirements Location
Gastof 2nd vacuum, gas, FEE, el. Pwr, DAQ, Xmission
Quartic FEE, el. Pwr, DAQ, Xmission
3D Cooling, FEE, el. Pwr, DAQ, Xmission
Cooling Pumps, control, pipingPumps, control, piping
Alignment BPM, BLM, other
Positioning Movement drive, control
Timing TTC,
Interlocks Injection, Beam dump, CIBU
General electrical pwr 400Vac, 230Vac, 48Vdc, UPS?
HV Crates, modules, controls, connections
LV Crates, modules, controls, connections, cooling
Communication F-O, Field-bus XCR XCR FP420 FP420
Miscellaneous Cameras, lights FP420FP420
To be completed
27 March 200727 March 2007 D. Swoboda FP420 @ UTAD. Swoboda FP420 @ UTA 66
Service locations near FP420Service locations near FP420
1.1. Tunnel wall above the QRL.Tunnel wall above the QRL.The space reserved for electronic boxes could eventually be used for electronics/power The space reserved for electronic boxes could eventually be used for electronics/power
supplies. The reserved cross-section is 400 x 320 mm (H x W). However, additional supplies. The reserved cross-section is 400 x 320 mm (H x W). However, additional radiation shielding would certainly be required in these locations.radiation shielding would certainly be required in these locations.
2.2. Underneath adjacent magnets.Underneath adjacent magnets.Throughout the LHC tunnel the space underneath the magnets, mainly in the arc Throughout the LHC tunnel the space underneath the magnets, mainly in the arc
regions has already been reserved for electronics instrumentation because of the regions has already been reserved for electronics instrumentation because of the relatively low radiation dose.relatively low radiation dose.
3.3. Tunnel wall inside.Tunnel wall inside.A proposed alternative is the excavation of cavities on the tunnel wall on the “transport” A proposed alternative is the excavation of cavities on the tunnel wall on the “transport”
side. A 1st inquiry has shown that holes of 75 cm diameter and 100 cm depth could side. A 1st inquiry has shown that holes of 75 cm diameter and 100 cm depth could be drilled [ ]. This solution seems to be theoretically feasible but would also require be drilled [ ]. This solution seems to be theoretically feasible but would also require a good understanding of the radiation level at this location.a good understanding of the radiation level at this location.
4.4. Support beams of cryostat.Support beams of cryostat.Support beams could receive openings to house custom electronics. Probably adequate Support beams could receive openings to house custom electronics. Probably adequate
for trigger devices requiring very short cable length.for trigger devices requiring very short cable length.
27 March 200727 March 2007 D. Swoboda FP420 @ UTAD. Swoboda FP420 @ UTA 77
Services space (1)Services space (1)
We could drill 'cores' through the concrete lining and into the rock up to a depth of 1metre. We would then insert a steel pipe and grout it into position. The maximum finished internal diameter is approx. 75cm.
Assuming no services need to be diverted, no water ingress problems, and the core is at around 1metre above the tunnel floor, an approximate budget cost is :13,000chf per hole = 24no. * 13k = 312,000chf.
27 March 200727 March 2007 D. Swoboda FP420 @ UTAD. Swoboda FP420 @ UTA 88
Services space (2)Services space (2)
L0722023PL
27 March 200727 March 2007 D. Swoboda FP420 @ UTAD. Swoboda FP420 @ UTA 99
Services space (3)Services space (3)
L0722024PL
FP420
27 March 200727 March 2007 D. Swoboda FP420 @ UTAD. Swoboda FP420 @ UTA 1010
Services Space (4)Services Space (4)
Available SpaceAvailable Space– In the region of interest considerable space is already reserved for In the region of interest considerable space is already reserved for
survey and vacuum instrumentation.survey and vacuum instrumentation.– The vacuum installations are mounted in steel frames of 350 mm The vacuum installations are mounted in steel frames of 350 mm
height. But the total height underneath the magnets is ≥ 400 mm.height. But the total height underneath the magnets is ≥ 400 mm.– The free length available varies but is at least equivalent to 1VME The free length available varies but is at least equivalent to 1VME
cratecrate– The closest distance from FP420 is always less than one magnet The closest distance from FP420 is always less than one magnet
length but limited to a couple of crates.length but limited to a couple of crates. Required SpaceRequired Space
– A 6U VME Fantray will have the following outside dimensions:A 6U VME Fantray will have the following outside dimensions:– 482,6mm (incl. 19" rack-mounting profile) x 352mm (8U) x 553mm 482,6mm (incl. 19" rack-mounting profile) x 352mm (8U) x 553mm
(WxHxD).(WxHxD).– Required at each FP420 station are 2 VME crates for Si-3D power Required at each FP420 station are 2 VME crates for Si-3D power
supplies.supplies.
27 March 200727 March 2007 D. Swoboda FP420 @ UTAD. Swoboda FP420 @ UTA 1111
FP420 Services RoutingFP420 Services RoutingLHCf implementation
27 March 200727 March 2007 D. Swoboda FP420 @ UTAD. Swoboda FP420 @ UTA 1212
FP420 BPM requirementsFP420 BPM requirements
Parameter Value Unit
Resolution @ central positon
~ 1 μm
Precision @ central position
~ 1 μm
Acquisition speed 25 nsec
Aperture width Nom. Beam pipe ø + 2 x (Δx) mm
0
0
27 March 200727 March 2007 D. Swoboda FP420 @ UTAD. Swoboda FP420 @ UTA 1313
BPM TechnologiesBPM Technologies
Electrostatic pick up Electrostatic pick up (buffer Amp required)(buffer Amp required)
BW: 1 kHz – 200 MHzBW: 1 kHz – 200 MHz position resolution:10 μmposition resolution:10 μm current resolution: 12 mAcurrent resolution: 12 mA
Button pick upButton pick up BW: 1 kHz – 200 MHzBW: 1 kHz – 200 MHz position resolution: 10 μmposition resolution: 10 μm current resolution: 12 mAcurrent resolution: 12 mA
AM, PM readout electronics, digital readout electronics
BW: 1 kHz – 200 MHz
position resolution: 10 μm
current resolution: 10 mA
BW: 200 MHz, CMRR: ~ 50 dB @ 100 MHz
AM, PM readout electronics, digital readout electronics
BW: 1 kHz – 200 MHz
position resolution: 10 μm
current resolution: 10 mA
BW: 200 MHz, CMRR: ~ 50 dB @ 100 MHz
Courtesy: Marek GASIOR for BDI-PI section
27 March 200727 March 2007 D. Swoboda FP420 @ UTAD. Swoboda FP420 @ UTA 1414
BPM additional infoBPM additional info
1.1. LHC BPM, BLM positionsLHC BPM, BLM positions– BPM dwn stream @ Q11BPM dwn stream @ Q11– BPM up stream next Q10BPM up stream next Q10– BLM can be mounted on feet supported by FP420 cryostat structural beams.BLM can be mounted on feet supported by FP420 cryostat structural beams.
2.2. Tunnel instrumentation for BPMTunnel instrumentation for BPM– Pure analog electronics with Laser diode for transmission.Pure analog electronics with Laser diode for transmission.– Data already pulse width encodedData already pulse width encoded
3.3. BPM type, electronics resolutionBPM type, electronics resolution– LHC electrostatic type: LHC electrostatic type: – With multi bunch measurement: accuracy ~ 100 micron, resolution 2 - 5 micron.With multi bunch measurement: accuracy ~ 100 micron, resolution 2 - 5 micron.– With b-b measurement: accuracy ~ 200 micron, resolution ~ 50 micron.With b-b measurement: accuracy ~ 200 micron, resolution ~ 50 micron.– W. Herr for info on simulation for b-b variation.W. Herr for info on simulation for b-b variation.
Static vs. inductive = question of development time; i.e. easier for static.Static vs. inductive = question of development time; i.e. easier for static.
27 March 200727 March 2007 D. Swoboda FP420 @ UTAD. Swoboda FP420 @ UTA 1515
BPM workshopBPM workshopPlace: CERN, Bldg. 926-1-039Date: 19 April 2007Scope: assess adequate technology for FP420 requirementCriteria: accuracy, resolution, acquisition speed (b-b)
Concept of alignment monitoring and detector positioningDevelopment time/costResources; i.e. available experts for mechanical layout, integration, electronics
Invited:
Institute/Project Name
Totem Gennaro Ruggiero, Marco Oriunno, Ernst Rademaker and Karsten Eggert for info
FP420 Cinzia da Via, Keith Potter, Brian Cox, Joleen Pater, Mike Albrow, Ray Thompson, Steve Watts
UCL Alex Lyapin
FNAL Christoph Royon
DESY Kay Wittenburg
CERN/AB-BI Lars Soby, Marek Gasior, Rhodri Jones, Jeroen Belleman, Uli Raich
CERN/AB-OP Karel Cornelis, Roger Bailey
CERN/TS-SU Jean-Pierre Quesnel; Helene Mainaud Durand
CERN/TS-LEA Detlef Swoboda, Emmanuel Tsesmelis
27 March 200727 March 2007 D. Swoboda FP420 @ UTAD. Swoboda FP420 @ UTA 1616
FP420 BPM WS agendaFP420 BPM WS agenda Indico : Indico : http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=14310http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=14310
Agenda:Agenda:1.1. Welcome addressWelcome address D. Swoboda.D. Swoboda.2.2. Introduction to FP420Introduction to FP420 B. CoxB. Cox3.3. Requirements for FP420 alignment BPMRequirements for FP420 alignment BPM C. da ViaC. da Via4.4. Results of investigations and studies on FP420 alignment and detector Results of investigations and studies on FP420 alignment and detector
positioning systemspositioning systems J. PaterJ. Pater5.5. Beam Position Monitor DesignsBeam Position Monitor Designs L. SobyL. Soby6.6. Signal Processing for Beam Position MonitorsSignal Processing for Beam Position Monitors M. GasiorM. Gasior7.7. FP420 detectors mechanicsFP420 detectors mechanics D. DatollaD. Datolla8.8. FP420 Hamburg beam pipeFP420 Hamburg beam pipe K. K.
PiotrzkowskiPiotrzkowski9.9. ConclusionsConclusions NNNN
27 March 200727 March 2007 D. Swoboda FP420 @ UTAD. Swoboda FP420 @ UTA 1717
InterlocksInterlocks
Risk analysis for beam accident scenariosRisk analysis for beam accident scenarios Fast movement of closed orbitFast movement of closed orbit Control failure of detector positioning system Control failure of detector positioning system
Discussion launched for all LHC Discussion launched for all LHC experiments with LHC machineexperiments with LHC machine
WS planned for June 2007WS planned for June 2007