FP6 horizontal activities involving smes

8/14/2019 FP6 horizontal activities involving smes

1/48


2/48


3/48


4/48


5/48


6/48

6

KEY FINDINGSThis booklet is designed to provide a statistical overview ofFP6 Co-operative and Collective Research projects. As you

fi"}}D"\}}"\y"z}}"y"}\y{"}}""z\"initiatives. There were over 40 000 total participants fromK"QLO"y"z}|"~"y"y{"]}F"g~"\}D"approximately 4 000 participants from 397 projects in Co-operative Research and 2 000 participants from 80 projectsin Collective Research were selected.

ke]"y{{"~"MK="~"y"y{y""z\"{\}}F""l\}}"}"|{y}"y"\\"}}""\}"y"~"ke]"due to the fact that they have the freedom to choose where\}"fiy""~{"\}"}}y{\D"y|"y}"\}"yz}""

{}"y"{y"y"~"\}"}}y{\"}~~"}}|F"The majority of participating SMEs (77%) had less thanMH"}}}D"}}{"\}"}}|"~"{\"y"{"{\}}D"}}{y"~"y}"}}}F"ke]"yy"in these schemes represent all industrial sectors fromtraditional manufacturing and food production to healthy|"}}"}{\}D"{\"y"}}fiyz}"}}D"y}{\"y|"y}y"{}D"~"}fly}F

[gdd][lan]"j]k]Yj[`"hjgb][lkCollective Research also involves assigning research toj>"}~}F"`fi}}D""\"{y}"\}"z}}""

SMEs are more indirect and the participants involved in aCollective research project are different. The R&D performers|}y}"{}{"y|"}{\{y"}}y{\"y{}""behalf of Industrial Associations or Groupings in order toexpand the knowledge base of large communities of SMEsand thus improve their general standard of competitiveness.These projects are larger and run longer than Co-operativeresearch projects. They run from two to three years. TheIndustrial Associations/Groupings retain the ownership of theresults. Collective Research Projects may address any subjecty{"\}"fi\}"}|"~"{}{}F"Y"]}Efi|}"y}D"

these projects aim for example to:Reinforce the technological basis of sectors;Develop technological tools such as diagnostic methodsand safety equipment;^|"""{"{\y}}"{\"y"~"}}}D"y{\}"fiy{}"y~}"y|y|"and;Carry out pre-normative research to help set]}y!"y|"y|y|F

FP6 allocated a total ofIMH"""[}{}"}{D"with individual project budgets ranging between 2 and M"million each.

brochure.key.2006.print.in

dd

6

1/26/07

9:41:36AM


7/48

OTHER INDICATIVE FIGURES WORTH NOTING:More than two thirds of the participating SMEs have anannual turnover of less than 2 million.

]y{\"ke]"\y"y"y}y}"y{y"{z"~"120 000}"}{F""`}{}D"\}"}"y"z"y"~"\}"yy"}""{\"}}y{\F"l\"}}{"\}""\}"y{}"on EC-funded projects.

l\}"mcD"_}y"y|"ky"\y}"\}"\\}"z}"of participants. Co-operative and Collective research}{"\fi"y""y{y"y}"~"\}"]mIM""comparison with the EU10.

o\"}y|""\}"}|}"zyy{}D"fi}"{y"}}"\y"\}"percentage of women in both Co-operative and Collectiveresearch is consistent with the proportion of women in\}"]mJM"~"y"}}"~"{}"@LL=A"y|"engineers (29%) (source: 2004 Eurostat Labour Force

survey).

Approximately 80% of the participants have private legalyD"}y"\}"}"y}"}""\}"}{F""These funding schemes are generating a large amount ofprivate money for research. This is important with regard tomeeting the goals of the Lisbon strategy.


dd

7

1/26/07

9:41:36AM


8/48

8

FP6 HORIZONTAL ACTIVITIES INVOLVING SMES

Total Number of Participants inproposals submitted and successful projects

Co-operative Research Collective Research

Proposals Submitted Successful Projects Proposals Submitted Successful Projects

Participants

KH"MQJ 3 786 II"MNM I"OLM

Proposals

3 274 397 673 80

l\}"~|"{\}}"y}"~"\\"}}"~"ke]D"indicating the attractiveness of the bottom-up-approach.

CO-OPERATIVE RESEARCHAND COLLECTIVE RESEARCH


dd

8

1/26/07

9:41:36AM


9/48

FP6-2002-SME-1 FP6-2002-SME-1-2 FP6-2003-SME-2 FP6-2004-SME-COOP

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

10000

0.00%

2.00%

4.00%

6.00%

8.00%

10.00%

12.00%

14.00%

16.00%

18.00%

20.00%

FP6 HORIZONTAL ACTIVITIES INVOLVING SMESCO-OPERATIVERESEARCH

hy{y'"{{}"y}"z"{y

Successful projectsProposals submitted

Success rate


dd

9

1/26/07

9:41:36AM


10/48


11/48


12/48


13/48


14/48

14

RTD34%

SMEPMP=

Other8%

FP6 HORIZONTAL ACTIVITIES INVOLVING SMESCO-OPERATIVE

RESEARCH

Type of Participants in proposals submittedas a percentage of Total Participants

ke]E}{{"jl"}{"y}"y"~"\\"}}""\}"}}}"y|"}|"}D"\fi"\}}"z"\}"relatively high participation.Different types of participants within RTD-collaborations

are similar to participants of innovative clusters in theirrespective regions.ke]'"jlEy{}"y}"}"~}"\}"|"~{}""new technology pathways.

brochure.key.2006.print.ind

d

14

1/26/07

9:41:38AM


15/48

RTD32%

SMEPMQ=

Other9%


RESEARCH

Type of Participants in successful projectsas a percentage of Total Participants

Balance of participant types is nearly identical for every{D"fi\"\}"y"z}"ke]F"l\""z"a consequence of the economic structure within eachcountry.

Only in Greece and Sweden are RTD-Performers themajority.Share of SMEPs nearly 60% for participants in bothproposals submitted and successful projects.


d15

1/26/07

9:41:39AM


16/48

16

IAG27%

RTD29%

SME Core Group44%

FP6 HORIZONTAL ACTIVITIES INVOLVING SMESCOLLECTIVE

RESEARCH

Type of Participants in proposals submitted for Stage 1as a percentage of Total Participants

High No. of SME Core Group Participants demonstrateshigh interest of SMEs in the Collective Research Scheme.l\"{"\y"\}"{\}}""}y"}y}|"fiy|"SMEs and not only the associations.


d16

1/26/07

9:41:39AM


17/48

IAGJM=

RTD26%

SME Core Group49%


RESEARCH

Type of Participants in successful projectsas a percentage of Total Participants


d17

1/26/07

9:41:39AM


18/48

18

About 80% of the participants have got a private}y"yD"}y"\}"}"y}"}""the projects. The funding scheme is generating a highy"~"y}"}"~"}}y{\D"y"y"

point with regard to the Lisbon strategy.

hy}"gyy"f"h10%

Public CommercialOrganisation2%

GovernmentalOrganisation18%

Private CommercialOrganisation

70%


RESEARCH

Legal status of Participants in proposals submittedas a percentage of Total Participants


d18

1/26/07

9:41:39AM


19/48

hy}"gyy"f"h9%

Public CommercialOrganisation2%

GovernmentalOrganisation16%


73%


RESEARCH

Legal Status of Participants in successful projectsas a percentage of Total Participants


d19

1/26/07

9:41:39AM


20/48

20

The slight difference between the number of proposalssubmitted and successful projects for participants witha private legal status means that some have less privatemoney to complement public grants.

Public Commercial Organisation3%

European EconomicInterest group1%


MK=

hy}"gyy"f"h30%

Governmental Organisation13%


RESEARCH

Legal status of Participants in proposals submitted for Stage 1as a percentage of Total Participants


d20

1/26/07

9:41:40AM


21/48

Public Commercial Organisation7%

European EconomicInterest group1%


49%

hy}"gyy"f"h27%

Governmental Organisation16%


RESEARCH

Legal status of Participants in successful projectsas a percentage of Total Participants

brochure.key.2006.print.indd

21

1/26/07

9:41:40AM


22/48

22

MH"E"JLQ"]}}23%

Sole Trader4% 1 - 9 Employees

31%

10 - 49 Employees42%


RESEARCH

Number of Employees of SME-Participants inproposals submittedas a percentage of total SME-Participants

Majority of partic ipating SMEs (77%) had less thanMH"}}}D""\y"\}"zEE{\}}""~""especially high interest for smaller enterprises.


22

1/26/07

9:41:40AM


23/48


23%

Sole Trader3% 1 - 9 Employees

30%

FP6 HORIZONTAL ACTIVITIES INVOLVING SMES CO-OPERATIVERESEARCH

Number of Employees of SME-Participants insuccessful projectsas a percentage of total SME-Participants

brochure.key.2006.p

rint.indd

23

1/26/07

9:41:40AM


24/48

24

MH"E"JLQ"]}}30%

Sole TraderM= 1 - 9 Employees

JM=



RESEARCH

Number of Employees of SME Core Group Participants inproposals submitted for Stage 1as a percentage of total SME Core Group Participants

Note the slight difference between the size ofenterprises with regard to employees. Only 70%of the SME Core Group Participants have up to 49employees. The reason for the difference: Number only

}~}""ke]"[}"_D"""ke]"y{yF


24

1/26/07

9:41:40AM


25/48

MH"E"JLQ"]}}33%

Sole Trader3%

1 - 9 Employees23%



RESEARCH

Number of Employees of SME Core Group Participants insuccessful projectsas a percentage of total SME Core Group Participants


25

1/26/07

9:41:40AM


26/48

26

< or= 10M22%

> or=""MHe2%

< or= 2M76%


RESEARCH

Turnover in euro of SME-Participants insuccessful projectsas a percentage of total SME-Participants

More than 2/3 of the participating SMEs have anannual turnover less than 2 million. Because of their}|"}D"\}"}""][E~|}|"}{"~"their research.


26

1/26/07

9:41:41AM


27/48

< or= 10M29%

< or=""MHe3%

< or= 2M68%


RESEARCH

Turnover in euro of SME-Participants insuccessful projectsas a percentage of total SME Core Group Participants


27

1/26/07

9:41:41AM


28/48

28

SMEP

OTHERS

RTD

FEMALE

MALE


RESEARCH

Gender of Participants in successful projectsy"y"}{}y}"~"yD"y|"y"z}

2808%

IHMQ31%

JHMK61%

3710%

170LM=

168LM=

KOM10%

339290%

The gender balance is consistent with the"~"fi}""\}"]mJM"~"y"employment (44%) and for scientists andengineers (29%) in 2004.


28

1/26/07

9:41:41AM


29/48


RESEARCHGender of Participants in ul projectssuccessfas a percentage of total, and total numbers

IAG

RTD

SME Core Group

FEMALE

MALE

collective

11424%

31452%

14324%

22

22%

4040%

3838%

100

17%

59883%

male female male/female total


29

1/26/07

9:41:41AM


30/48

30

EU 10IM=

Associated countriesM=

]m"IM"77%

Candidate countries3%


RESEARCHParticipants in proposals submittedas a percentage by groupings of countries


30

1/26/07

9:41:42AM


31/48

EU 1014%

Associated countries4%

]m"IM"78%



RESEARCHParticipants in proposals submittedfor Stage 1as a percentage by groupings of countries


31

1/26/07

9:41:42AM


32/48

32

EU 1012%

Associated countriesM=

]m"IM"81%


FP6 HORIZONTAL ACTIVITIES INVOLVING SMESCO-OPERATIVE RESEARCH

AND COLLECTIVE RESEARCHParticipants as a percentage of total by groupings of countries


32

1/26/07

9:41:42AM


33/48


34/48

34

FP6 HORIZONTAL ACTIVITIES INVOLVING SMESCO-OPERATIVE RESEARCH

AND COLLECTIVE RESEARCHTotal Participants by country and as a percentage of total

ISO CODE Country Part. % TotalAT Austria 148 2.73%BE Belgium 141 2.60%CY Cyprus 12 0.22%CZ Czech Republic 105 1.94%DE Germany 747 13.79%DK Denmark 119 2.20%

EE Estonia 44 0.81%ES Spain 685 12.64%FI Finland 97 1.79%FR France 317 5.85%GR Greece 140 2.58%HU Hungary 94 1.73%IE Ireland 95 1.75%IT Italy 539 9.95%LT Lithuania 41 0.76%LU Luxemburg 0 0.00%LV Latvia 19 0.35%MT Malta 13 0.24%NL Netherlands 265 4.89%

PL Poland 231 4.26%PT Portugal 140 2.58%SE Sweden 158 2.92%SI Slovenia 63 1.16%SK Slovakia 35 0.65%UK United Kingdom 759 14.01%

Subtotal 5007 92. 41%

Total FP6

MemberStates

Both Co-operative and Collective research show a"y{y"y}"~"\}"]mIM""{y"fi\"\}"]mIHD"\fi}}D"\}"y{y"y}"~"Y{y}|"y}""^hM"fiy""N="{y}|""IJ="in FP6.


34

1/26/07

9:41:42AM


35/48

BG Bulgaria 35 0.65%HR Croatia 2 0.04%RO Romania 57 1.05%TR Turkey 31 0.57%

Subtotal 125 2.31%

IS Iceland 16 0.30%LI Liechtenstein 0 0.00%NO Norway 170 3.14%MC Monaco 1 0.02%

Subtotal 187 3.45%

CH Switzerland 49 0.90%IL Israel 23 0.42%

Subtotal 72 1.33%

AU Australia 2 0.04%BR Brazil 4 0.07%CL Chile 2 0.04%CN China 1 0.02%

RU Russian Federation 7 0.13%UA Ukraine 4 0.07%US United States 1 0.02%

Subtotal 21 0.39%

BY Belarus 1 0.02%GE Georgia 2 0.04%IR Iran 2 0.04%KR Korea 1 0.02%

Subtotal 6 0.11%

Total 5418 100.00%

Associated

Candidate

Countries

EEA

Countries

S/T

Agree.

ECInte

rnational

Agre

ement

INCO

Countries


35

1/26/07

9:41:43AM


36/48

36


ISOCode

Country Part.%

Total(1)

%Total(2)

AT Austria 944 3.3 3.1BE Belgium 676 2.4 2.2CY Cyprus 131 0.5 0.4

CZ Czech Rep. 763 2.7 2.5DE Germany 4594 16.2 15.0DK Denmark 559 2.0 1.8EE vEstonia 202 0.7 0.7ES Spain 3623 12.8 11.8FI Finland 584 2.1 1.9FR France 1861 6.6 6.1GR Greece 1016 3.6 3.3HU Hungary 551 1.9 1.8IE Ireland 415 1.5 1.4IT Italy 3523 12.5 11.5LT Lituania 170 0.6 0.6LU Luxemburg 62 0.2 0.2LV Latvia 86 0.3 0.3MT Malta 76 0.3 0.2

NL 1422 5.0 4.6PL Poland 1099 3.9 3.6PT Portugal 726 2.6 2.4SE Sweeden 863 3.1 2.8SI Slovenia 486 1.7 1.6SK Slovakia 486 1.7 1.6UK UnitedKingdom 3367 11.9 11.0

Total 28285 100 92.5

TOTAL FP6

TheNetherlands

MemberStates

ISOCode

Country Part.%

Total(1)

%Total(2)

AT AustriaBE BelgiumCY Cyprus

CZ Czech Rep.DE GermanyDK DenmarkEE vEstoniaES SpainFI FinlandFR FranceGR GreeceHU HungaryIE IrelandIT ItalyLT LituaniaLU LuxemburgLV LatviaMT Malta

NL TheNetherlandsPL PolandPT PortugalSE SweedenSI SloveniaSK SlovakiaUK UnitedKingdom

Total

TOTAL FP6 Stage 1

344 3.4 3.0462 4.6 4.022 0.2 0.2

227 2.3 2.01489 14.9 12.9234 2.3 2.055 0.6 0.5

1443 14.5 12.5204 2.0 1.8684 6.9 5.9314 3.1 2.7252 2.5 2.2156 1.6 1.3

1061 10.6 9.253 0.5 0.514 0.1 0.155 0.6 0.515 0.2 0.1

630 6.3 5.4460 4.6 4.0381 3.8 3.3286 2.9 2.5155 1.6 1.378 0.8 0.7

898 9.0 7.8

9972 100 86.2

MemberStates

COLLECTIVE SUBMITTEDCO-OPERATIVE SUBMITTED

CO-OPERATIVE RESEARCH

AND COLLECTIVE RESEARCHParticipants by country and as a percentage of total


36

1/26/07

9:41:43AM


37/48

BG BulgariaHR CroatiaRO RomaniaTR Turkey

Total

IS Iceland

LI LichtensteinNO NorwayTotal

CH SwitzerlandIL Israel

Total

AR ArgentinaAU AustraliaBR BrazilCA CanadaCL ChileCN ChinaEG EgyptIN India JP Japan

MA MorrocoMX MexicoNZ NewZealandRU RussieZA SouthAfricaTN TunisiaUA UkrainiaUS United Statesof America

Total

AM ArmeniaBY BelarusGE GeorgiaGY GuyanaMD

Rep.of Moldova

MK Macedonia

TotalOthers

Total

BlanksTotal

97 27.8 0.810 2.9 0.1

149 42.7 1.393 26.6 0.8

349 100 3.02

15 7.6 0.12 1.0 0.0

180 91.4 1.6

197 100 1.70

131 78.0 1.137 22.0 0.3

168 100 1.45

0 0.0 0.03 7.5 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.01 2.5 0.00 0.0 0.03 7.5 0.00 0.0 0.0

1 2.5 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.017 42.5 0.14 10.0 0.03 7.5 0.05 12.5 0.03 7.5 0.0

40 100 0.35

1 6.7 0.01 6.7 0.07 46.7 0.11 6.7 0.02 13.3 0.03 20.0 0.0

15 100 0.13

6 0.05

10747 92.9

818 7.111565 100.0

Associated

Candidate

Countries

EE

A

Coun

tries

S/T

Agree.

ECInternationalAgreement

INCOC

ountries

BG Bulgaria 243 29.3 0.8HR Croatia 23 2.8 0.1RO Romania 389 47.0 1.3TR Turkey 173 20.9 0.6

Total 828 100 2.7

IS Iceland 72 14.2 0.2

LI Lichtenstein 9 1.8 0.0NO Norway 425 84.0 1.4Total 506 100 1.7

CH Switzerland 468 70.2 1.5IL Israel 199 29.8 0.7

Total 667 100 2.2

AR Argentina 4 2.4 0.0AU Australia 2 1.2 0.0BR Brazil 11 6.6 0.0CA Canada 11 6.6 0.0CL Chile 4 2.4 0.0CN China 12 7.2 0.0EG Egypt 0 0.0 0.0IN India 2 1.2 0.0 JP Japan 0 0.0 0.0

MA Morroco 1 0.6 0.0MX Mexico 1 0.6 0.0NZ NewZealand 1 0.6 0.0RU Russie 70 41.9 0.2ZA SouthAfrica 7 4.2 0.0TN Tunisia 3 1.8 0.0UA Ukrainia 29 17.4 0.1US United Statesof America 9 5.4 0.0

Total 167 100 0.5

AM Armenia 1 3.1 0.0BY Belarus 13 40.6 0.0GE Georgia 7 21.9 0.0GY Guyana 1 3.1 0.0MD

Rep.of Moldova 2 6.3 0.0

MK Macedonia 6 18.8 0.0

SO Somalia 1 3.1 0.0SZ Swaziland 1 3.1 0.0

Total 32 100 0.1

Others 38 0.1

Total 30523 99.8

Blanks 69 0.2Total 30592 100

Associated

Candidate

Countries

EE

A

Coun

tries

S/T

Agree.

ECInternationalAgreement

IN

COC

ountries


37

1/26/07

9:41:44AM


38/48

38

12 12

10

17

11

15

13

9

14

15

12

17

11

5

16

15

20

8

1614

0

111111

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

Total No. of participants

0

5

10

15

20

25

Success rate as percentageof total participants

Germ

any

Spain

Italy

Unite

dKi

ngdom

France

TheN

etherlan

ds

Belgi

um

Polan

d

Portu

gal

Austria

Gree

ce

Sweden

Hung

ary

Denm

ark

CzechR

ep.

Finlan

d

Irela

nd

Slovenia

Slovakia

Estonia

Latvi

a

Lithu

ania

Cyprus

Malta

Luxemb

ourg


RESEARCHSuccess rate of Member Statesas a percentage of Total Participants

Successful projects

Proposals submitted

Success rate


38

1/26/07

9:41:44AM

b


39/48

14

1617

20

17

12

14

1817

9

16

11

14

9

8

13

2222

18

25

13

8

5

33

00

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

Germ

any

Spain

Italy

itedKi

ngdom

France

Neth

erlan

ds

Belgi

um

Polan

d

Portu

gal

Austria

Gree

ce

Sweden

Hung

ary

Denm

ark

CzechR

ep.

Finlan

d

Irela

nd

Slovenia

Slovakia

Estonia

Latvi

a

Lithu

ania

Cyprus

Malta

Luxemb

ourg

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Total No. of participantsSuccess rate as percenta

of total participants


RESEARCHSuccess rate of Member Statesas a percentage of Total Participants

Successful projects

Proposals submitted

Success rate


39

1/26/07

9:41:44AM


40/48


41/48

b fbr


42/48

42

Braunschweig

LneburgOldenburg

Kln

Arnsberg

Mnster Detmold

Neustadt

Koblenz

Trier

Giessen

Kassel

Freiburg

Tbingen

Karlsruhe

Augsburg

Landshut

Regensburg

Ansbach

BayreuthWrzburg

Chemnitz

LeipzigHalle

Dessau

Berlin

Kiel

Hamburg

Bremen

Hannover

Dsseldorf

Mainz

Saarbrcken

Wiesbaden

Stuttgart

Mnchen

Erfurt

Dresden

Magdeburg

Potsdam

Schwerin

24

5

29

11

22

14

655

9

16

15

9

3

3 6

15

15 20

25

8

370

1

9

10

4

34 12

17

6

2

4

93

6

2724

24

45

27

19

Distribution of German Participants"ke]"k}{{"e}y}"^hN

from 1 to 10

from 11 to 20

from 21 to 30

~"KI""MH

~"MI""QH

NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS

UNIT SME (DG RTD) Sept 2006

more than 90

European Commission

rochure.key.2006.print.indd

42

1/26/07

9:41:48AM

Di ib i f I li P i ibro


43/48

Roma

Cagliari

Trieste

Trento

VeneziaMilano

BolognaGenova

Torino

Aosta

Ancona

Perugia

L'Aquila

Firenze

Catanzaro

Potenza

Bari

Napoli

Campobasso

Palermo

1

33

39

116

10

10

52

72

49 21

7

76

4

10

2

10

19

8

Distribution of Italian Participants"ke]"k}{{"e}y}"^hN

from 1 to 10

~"II""JM

~"JN""MH

~"MI""IHH

more than 100



European Commission

ochure.key.2006.print.indd

43

1/26/07

9:41:49AM

bro


44/48

44

Distribution of Polish Participants"ke]"k}{{"e}y}"^hN

ELBASKI

BIALOSTOCKO-SUWALSKI

Warszawa

WARSZAWSKI

BIALSKOPODLASKI

SWIETOKRZYSKI

PODKARPACKIE

NOWOSADECKI

OPOLSKIE

M.WROCLAW

PIOTRKOWSKO-SKIERNIEWICKI

POZNANSKI

KUJAWSKO-POMORSKIE

SZCZECINSKI

GDANSK-GDYNIA-SOPOT

GORZOWSKI

SLASKIE

Lodz

20

1 0

83

6

9

32

20

4

19

1

1

20

1

410

~"H""M

from 6 to 10

from 11 to 20

~"JI""MH

}"\y"MM



European Commission


44

1/26/07

9:41:50AM

bro


45/48

Distribution ofSpanish Participants"ke]"k}{{"Measures FP6

La Corua

Sevilla

Toledo

Mrida

Barcelona

Zaragoza

Logroo

Valladolid

PamplonaVitoria

Murcia

Valencia

SantanderOviedo

Santiagode Compostela

Madrid

CrdobaJan

Almera

Granada

MlagaCdiz

Huelva

Guadalajara

Cuenca

AlbaceteCiudad Real

Cceres

Badajoz

Tarragona

Lrida

Girona

Teruel

Huesca

Segovia

Soria

Salamanca

Zamora

Burgos

Palencia

Len

Alicante

Castell de la Plana

Orense

Pontevedra

Lugo

Donostia San SebastinBilbao

Palma de Malllorca

Avila

5

14

8

5

1

3

2

2

2

1

11

10

5

84

13

32

63

43

3

2

1

10

8

5

166

16

1

13

11

8

1 3 10

7

44 61

7

30

85

from 1 to 10

~"II""MH

~"MI""OM

from 76 to 100

more than 100



European CommissionEuropean CommissionEuropean Commission

ISLAS CANARIAS

San

taC

ruzde TenerifeLas Pal

masde

Gran

Canaria

6


45

1/26/07

9:41:51AM

broc


46/48

46


GLOSSARY

"

ke]h"$"ke]"hy{yR

jl"$"jl"h}~}R

gl`]j"$"g\}"]}}"y|"]|"m}R

aY_"$"a|y"Y{y""_R

SME Core Group:

Proposals submitted:

Successful projects:

Stage 1:

Stage 2:

chure.key.2006.print.indd

46

1/26/07

9:41:51AM


47/48


48/48

European Commission

EUR 06-219 FP6 Horizontal Activities Involving SMEs

dfl}zR"g~{}"~"g~{y"hz{y"~"\}"]}y"[}

JHHN"%"MJ"F"%""JIFH"fl"ILFP"{

ISBN 92-79-03721-8

1/26/07

9:41:51AM

Date post:	30-May-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	dmaproiect
View:	215 times
Download:	0 times

FP6 horizontal activities involving smes

Documents