+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures FRAMCOS-3 ...+ ~o (15) are invariant of stress tensor and...

Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures FRAMCOS-3 ...+ ~o (15) are invariant of stress tensor and...

Date post: 26-Jul-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 3 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
16
Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures FRAMCOS-3 AEDIFICATIO D-79104 253
Transcript
Page 1: Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures FRAMCOS-3 ...+ ~o (15) are invariant of stress tensor and of the stress deviator and: (16) of biaxial compression strength to strength. variations

Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures FRAMCOS-3

AEDIFICATIO D-79104

253

Page 2: Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures FRAMCOS-3 ...+ ~o (15) are invariant of stress tensor and of the stress deviator and: (16) of biaxial compression strength to strength. variations

chemical and physical changes of the micro-structure concrete affect its mechanical behaviour. The major phenomena which identified include the release and evaporation significant amount water that induce pressure gradients under towards the surface through pores. indicate that pore pressure built to spalling of high performance concrete structures at elevated ~~ ... ,, ... ....,.~ ....... ~~ .. (Harmathy 1965, Meyer Ottens 1975, Zhukov 1976, Bazant et 1, Noumowe et al. 1996, Anderberg 1997). spalling phenomena are a major problem in the evaluation of the safety concrete structures such conditions.

The issue of the prediction of pore pressure been investigated by several authors

•. JU.L_. • ..., ...... et al. 1981, and Gluekler 1982, ....,...., ......... '"'"'·•"-+VJ.

Kontani and Shah 1995, Jouhari and analysing spalling phenomena, most the have focused on the possible local mechanisms and are based on qualitative considerations.

numerical modelling of the mechanical of pore pressures on the behaviour of concrete structures at elevated temperatures. framework of finite elements, a numerical been ........ ,'"' ...... '"""t:"""

Majumdar et al ( 1995). this study, to behave elastically and pore pressure was as a direct ......... ..,...., ................ stress, regardless of the actual nature of concrete porous

Following the same general approach, we here the first numerical study which aims at providing a allowing for the non-linear analysis of contribution of pore pressure in spalling 1-1 ....... ..., • .,_,_,.._.._,_...,.u .......

on an extension of a thermo-plasticity elevated temperatures to account for pore

mechanics of porous media.

the proposed approach, the concrete is ....,'"' ...... ...., .... .._._._, ... is a superposition of two interacting VVJ, .................. , ........................ , ............ .

sKE~let:on and a fluid inside considered homogeneous and isotropic, it physical properties can be expressed as effective ........ r, ..... a.,M-•

assumption is that the transfer properties of concrete are considered to dependent on temperature, moisture and pressure.

254

Page 3: Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures FRAMCOS-3 ...+ ~o (15) are invariant of stress tensor and of the stress deviator and: (16) of biaxial compression strength to strength. variations

course rather crude assumptions since damage can strongly affect the permeability and the porosity of concrete and can induce anisotropy of these properties (Gerard et al. 1996). The problem is then solved in two sequences. Temperature and pore pressures are first derived from a heat and moisture transfer analysis and are used as input for the stress analysis.

2.1 Heat and moisture transport calculations Heat and moisture transports in concrete at elevated temperatures are highly coupled mechanisms. The mathematical model used in a previous study by Noumowe et al. (1996) for the coupled heat and moisture transport calculation of the tests presented further is based on the model of Bazant et al. (1981 ). The set of governing equations traducing coupled heat and moisture transport are given as follows. The conservation of mass is represented by:

aw = - div J + Ow ct

at at (1)

where t is the time, w is the free water content and wd is the total mass of free water that has been released into the pores by dehydration of the cement matrix. The mass flux of moisture J is given by the Darcy's law:

J =-a gradp (2)

where a is the water permeability of concrete, and p is the pore water pressure. The conservation of energy is represented by:

ar aw pCat =Ca at +CwJ gradT-divq (3)

where p is the unit mass of concrete, and C, Ca, Cw respectively are the isobaric heat capacities of concrete, adsorbed water and free capillary water. Finally, the heat transfer rate q is given by :

q = -kgradT (4)

where q is the heat flux and k is the heat conductivity of concrete. The material properties introduced are dependent on pore pressure and temperature. These governing equations are complemented by semi­empirical sorption isotherms, relating the free water content w, pressure p and temperature T. The finite element scheme is based on Galerkin method and a step by step solution with iterations is used for time integration of the nonlinear set of variational equations.

255

Page 4: Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures FRAMCOS-3 ...+ ~o (15) are invariant of stress tensor and of the stress deviator and: (16) of biaxial compression strength to strength. variations

of stress Within the framework of the mechanics porous (Coussy 1995), considering a thermo-porn-plastic

0 -i--i-.a,..,.-r-"''"' stress vector cr' responsible for the can be expressed following general stress vector CT and pressure p:

where Bo is the initial Biot' s tensor. <p 1s a function describing evolution with the deformation of skeleton, pore pressure temperature. E and sP respectively are strain vector

strain vector the skeleton. Considering the isotropy of the and neglecting as a

damage of the skeleton on Biot's tensor, expressed:

1 is identity vector and bo is the porous materials, coefficient is

porosity of the <D , and above 1 :

concrete, the Biot' s coefficient can be assumed to be given <D which has been shown to be temperature .... ....,,__,,.,, _ _._._._"" . ...,-

(Noumowe et 1996). The effective stress vector is expressed by:

=CT+ [1 +

<D0 is the initial porosity of concrete

evolution with pore pressure and temperature. laws in TEMPOR 2 provides the

of concrete 1996).

The evolution

256

Page 5: Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures FRAMCOS-3 ...+ ~o (15) are invariant of stress tensor and of the stress deviator and: (16) of biaxial compression strength to strength. variations

() =

.... .ll,J'._. • .., .. for behaviour of the sm2!ie1mn identified for concrete (Heinfling et al.

true for the skeleton despite the fact that pore to some experimental observations. The

proposed implemented the finite element code by these authors concrete at elevated temperatures, is

analysis behaviour of the solid skeleton.

strains, the total strain rate of concrete f; is

rate e' a plastic strain rate expansion strain rate f: 8 and a thermo-mechanical

rate

(9)

as properties are temperature dependent. Their temperature are irreversible. The elastic strain rate

rate through the temperature dependent elastic which is assumed to be isotropic

(10)

mechanical properties correspond to a phenomenological description of the micro-structural and chemical changes take place heated concrete. drying shrinkage

into account through of coefficient of concrete a= a(T).

1 r1""·"1"1'n' vector:

(11)

tests on plain concrete have shown that the thermal concrete is strongly on the stress applied during

Thelandersson 197 6). Thermo-mechanical to be taken into account. The simple formula,

nrli=>rh.,,,.r<T and (1976) a one dimensionnal to a state stress by de Borst

has been successfully incorporated by Khennane

257

Page 6: Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures FRAMCOS-3 ...+ ~o (15) are invariant of stress tensor and of the stress deviator and: (16) of biaxial compression strength to strength. variations

992) a thermo-mechanical • ..-.-r·a. .. ~l 0 -r 1

effective stress vector , t is material is given :

Dij, Kronecker ...... i ...... ,..i~ ... compression strength

concrete, k

to be equal to 0.285. temperature driven phenomenological

changes of physical properties, ..... u. ......... ..,,,, .....

cement matrix, determine the rate sensitivity of the modifications ..,,, .... ~ ...... q_,, • ..., to be prescribed explicitely by the

is not for structures. However, simulations

rate

Ll!J'-'"'J..1-.LL"'J. .... .._, as as reinforced concrete structures

order to account changing shape with temperature

... t-,:ir-"'' 0 of concrete compression.

258

as:

Page 7: Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures FRAMCOS-3 ...+ ~o (15) are invariant of stress tensor and of the stress deviator and: (16) of biaxial compression strength to strength. variations

criterion is

+ ~o (15)

are invariant of stress tensor and of the stress deviator and:

(16)

of biaxial compression strength to strength. variations of ~ temperature can

biaxial compression tests performed at different The experimental strength envelopes obtained by

( 1985) are shown figure 2 together the model curves. agreement

..-.h•:l!-nrr"" of shape of failure surfaces is captured and the

is acceptable. the predicted and the experimental strength envelopes

Rankine Criterion

varymg

CJI/fc 1.40 1.20 1.00 0.80 0.60 040 0.20 0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60 <.> ~

b 0.80

1.00

1.20

Figure 2: Experimental biaxial compression strength envelopes

compared to the proposed criterion

multi-surface thermo-plasticity theory, .................. 'U •. U of stress cr , hardening parameter

(17)

described this thermo-plasticity framework The isotropic Rankine flow theory proposed

259

Page 8: Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures FRAMCOS-3 ...+ ~o (15) are invariant of stress tensor and of the stress deviator and: (16) of biaxial compression strength to strength. variations

by Feenstra and de Borst (1995) is used. This approach corresponds to an isotropic smeared rotating description of cracking. corresponding to the Rankine criterion are given:

where cr; is the major principal tensile stress and i:1(K1 is an

(1

stress which is given by a softening function of the internal v ........................... ,. .• ..., ..

This softening function is identified by the tensile strength temperature dependent tensile fracture energy Gf = Gt(T) concrete. yield surfaces corresponding to the compression criterion are

where i:2(K2, T) is an equivalent stress is hardening/softening function of the internal parameter K 2 .

hardening/softening function is identified by the compressive strength and the temperature dependent compressive fracture energy Ge = concrete. The plasticity conditions are imposed on the two surfaces ran ... •ttrr

the plastic flow:

Isotropic hardening and associated plasticity are assumed as well as tension plastic flow. The evolution of the plastic given by the associated flow rule. The ambiguity of direction at the comer is removed according to Maier's considering the contribution of each individual loading surface c.:::>..,. .. a ... ·ci'l'o 11

"1

In the general case where two loading surfaces are active, strain rate is then given:

. p_1 of1 1 ar2 f; -/\, -+/\, -

l OCT 2 aa

where the ii are plastic multipliers that have to comply Tucker conditions:

. . Ai 2:: 0, ~ s 0, Ai~ = 0

260

(21)

Page 9: Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures FRAMCOS-3 ...+ ~o (15) are invariant of stress tensor and of the stress deviator and: (16) of biaxial compression strength to strength. variations

method is employed in order to solve partially the dependency induced by the softening behaviour. An

,....................... related to the mesh size is then introduced in the -r(K, T) laws.

It is assumed the internal mechanical damage the material as reflected in internal parameter K is governed by a work-hardening hypothesis. internal variable is determined by the inelastic work rate

defined by:

(23)

provides us the evolutionary equation the two criteria:

(24)

2.3.b Thermo-plastic return mapping algorithm

backward scheme is used for integration of the thermo-plastic constitutive equations. At the time step n+ 1, the updated effective stress vector cr~+i is obtained by:

{~'A Bf1 +~'A Bf2} 1a , 2a , cr cr n+l (25)

1.u ...... ·.1. .u.iv-.. .- .. u..:n ... ..., predictor 1s obtained by freezing inelastic flow

during

cr' = e

step:

(26)

Considering evolutionary equation (22) and assuming uncoupling compressive hardening, the problem finally consists of the

inelastic incremental multipliers which enforce the ...,..., ................... ...., ..... ..,. at the temperature Tn+i • In the general case where two

are activate, this reads:

)= 0

)= 0 (27)

0 ""'' .. ""•Tl method is used to solve this set of nonlinear updated inelastic incremental is calculated with

1-l,.., ...... ,rton method.

261

Page 10: Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures FRAMCOS-3 ...+ ~o (15) are invariant of stress tensor and of the stress deviator and: (16) of biaxial compression strength to strength. variations

2.3.c Equilibrium equations

equilibrium equations resulting from the are given:

K(i) ~ (i+1) - f f f {i) n+l an+! - exn+I + Pn+l - inn+l

K~~ 1 is the tangent stiffness displacement vector increment and:

is pore pressure load vector, displacement matrix of elements employed, b is at and i is the identity vector,

f. (i) = J BTcrr(i)dV mn+l n+l

v

is internal load vector

+ v s

generalised external load vector of the elements employed and Fv and

traction forces vectors. The subscript refers to internal iteration

set of non Newton-Raphson ............. ,u .. .....,·"""·

3

..... ..., ...... ...,........................ by et al. specimens have been simulated. They axisymmetrical ( l 6cmX3 2cm) specimens ...... .., .... .,..., .....

l°C/min.

262

L'la(i+i) is n+l

1)

rate

Page 11: Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures FRAMCOS-3 ...+ ~o (15) are invariant of stress tensor and of the stress deviator and: (16) of biaxial compression strength to strength. variations

140 1 <)) [)120 2 e...,100 ~ g 80

~~ 60 ~'.; 40

Q 20

tannn,:o.r-::it1n·p. and perfect transfer. Zero imposed on the

to a

1.4

~ 1.2 ro

~ o~ <)) •

~ 0.6 ~ 0.4

p., 0.2

o---~~~~~~~~_._~- 0

0 100 200 300 400 500 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sum terrrmnre (°C) Rafu:>(arY

263

Page 12: Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures FRAMCOS-3 ...+ ~o (15) are invariant of stress tensor and of the stress deviator and: (16) of biaxial compression strength to strength. variations

pressure fields have been element mesh employed for

initial mechanical properties as the

measurements by et al. ( 1996). The results of the calculations a triaxial state of ... ....,.u,_, ...... ....,

part of the 01.J"''"'...,·'".l'-'JL.l,

stresses appear

we can consider that these experiments, mode is initiated by thermal gradient only. Ho'l.xrP''""r

the compared crack propagation a significant role kinetics of

shown in figure 6, -thP.rrn".1 1 ... ,_, ........ u . .1..i;;;..

350°C. 4

"T

3,5 6 :::::, 3.5

3 -Nomnwe et al (1995, TEMPOR2)

- - - - Pore pressures considered c:: 0 3

~ 2,5 6 ~ 2 fl'.) fl'.)

£ l,5 d.)

s 1 i:i...

0,5

0

0

- Salrrated Vapor Pressl.re

- - - - Jothni arrl Lalaai (1997)

400

pressure

.B

.5 2.5 .... 2 2

I 0.. 1.5

gjl ·a -E ~ 0.5

264

0 100 200 300 400

Page 13: Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures FRAMCOS-3 ...+ ~o (15) are invariant of stress tensor and of the stress deviator and: (16) of biaxial compression strength to strength. variations

Finite element mesh

A : 2.46. l 0-6 B : 4.22.10·5

c: 5.10.10·5

D: 5.98.10·5

E : 6.85.10·5

F: 7.73.10·5

G : 8.61.10·5

H: 9.49.10·5

100°C on surface

A : 8.84.10-6

B: 1.46.104

c: 2.19.104

D : 2.92.104

E: 3.65.104

F : 4.38.104

G: 5.1 l.104

H: 5.84.104

3 50°C on surface

course strongly influenced by problem. One has

change induced by heating. This volume

cracking if diffusion cannot .,..,,_"""' .. steam to fill the

265

Page 14: Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures FRAMCOS-3 ...+ ~o (15) are invariant of stress tensor and of the stress deviator and: (16) of biaxial compression strength to strength. variations

Within framework of mechanics of porous '"'"""_._ ... ..,,__..,, ..... ....._, a thermo-plastic model to account the analysis of the behaviour of concrete at high ,.,c,..,.-. .... " .... "' 1

'1

' ... '""

This approach, based on simple assumptions is a the of possible

pressures to the spalling concrete and to identify involved this contribution.

This has been applied to strength concrete specimens submitted to high emphasise predicted failure mechanism is experimental observations and

kinetics of this mechanism. These results are of course influenced by the '-'-"""''-'.U .. q...1~ ... VJ.J.u ................. r.,,'"'"',...

the problem. needed in order to account for the effects moisture transfer properties as well as on

as the Biot's tensor. These developments associated an 1 n--iru··""""'m.a.-...i-

plastic allowing to account explicitly an accurate analysis

a closer examination of strain J.v\ ... c:UJ.L..ctu1..11J

diffusive and

5

on Gai the rs burg,

266

Page 15: Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures FRAMCOS-3 ...+ ~o (15) are invariant of stress tensor and of the stress deviator and: (16) of biaxial compression strength to strength. variations

(1981).

Chichester (U.K.):

982). Heat and mass ,_.,.'"''"'""!'-'"' ... within an han-r-c.r1 concrete slab. mass ....... .,.,.....,.,,,. 25,

( 1989). Analysis of concrete structures Mechs. En2n2

267

Page 16: Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures FRAMCOS-3 ...+ ~o (15) are invariant of stress tensor and of the stress deviator and: (16) of biaxial compression strength to strength. variations

Jouhari, L. & Lalaai, I. (1997). A vv ......... H, ...........

chemo-mechanical response of decomposing concrete under high temperature. In

Stresses and Related Topics,

"''"'·'-'·' .............. , 0. & Shah S.P. (1995). Pore pressure sustained high temperatures. Concrete

and loading (Volume .AJ ......................... and O.E. Gjorv, E & FN Span, 1151-11

.......... ..., .. u. ............ ...,. A., Baker, G. (1992). under transient temperature and .......,"' ............ A, 439, 59-80.

Kordina, K., Ehm, C., Schneider, U. (1995). on the high temperature behavior of concrete.

safety Science, Gaithersburg, 281-290.

Majumdar, P., Gupta, A., Marchertas, A. (1995). resulting stress in heated concrete walls. Design, 156, 147-158.

Meyer-Ottens, C. (197 5). Spalling of Ausschu:ss filr Stahlbeton,

Heft 248.

U. & Herbst (1987). concrete structures at high temperatures.

167-172.

V.V. (1976). Reasons of explosive ..,...., .............. ll ... ,..... "'n11 ... 01'""""'.ra Concrete, 3.

268

on

Ernst

concrete


Recommended