FRANKLIN SCHOOL DISTRICT FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL … · 2013-11-07 · CHA PROJECT NO. 24267...

_____________________________________________________________________________ New Jersey BPU - Energy Audits

FRANKLIN SCHOOL DISTRICT FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

ENERGY ASSESSMENT

for

NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

CHA PROJECT NO. 24267

JULY 2012

Prepared by:

6 Campus Drive

Parsippany, NJ 07054

(973) 538-2120

_____________________________________________________________________________ New Jersey BPU - Energy Audits i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................... 1

2.0 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ............................................................................ 2

3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ..................................................................................................... 3

3.1 Building ‐ General .......................................................................................................................... 3

3.2 Utility Usage .................................................................................................................................. 3

3.3 HVAC Systems ............................................................................................................................... 4

3.4 Control Systems ............................................................................................................................ 4

3.5 Lighting/Electrical Systems ........................................................................................................... 4

3.6 Plumbing Systems ......................................................................................................................... 5

4.0 ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES ........................................................................... 6

4.1 ECM‐1A Replace Steam Boilers with Hot Water Boilers (Using No.2 Fuel Oil) ............................. 6

4.2 ECM‐1B Replace Steam Boilers with Hot Water Boilers (Using Natural Gas) ............................... 6

4.3 ECM‐2 Add VSDs and Premium Motors ........................................................................................ 7

4.4 ECM‐3 Add VSDs to the HV Unit Fans ........................................................................................... 8

4.5 ECM‐4 Implement 55F Unoccupied Setback ............................................................................... 8

4.6 ECM‐5 Improve Domestic Pressure Boosting System ................................................................... 9

4.7 ECM‐6 Replace Windows .............................................................................................................. 9

4.8 ECM‐7 Lighting Replacement/Upgrades ..................................................................................... 10

4.9 ECM‐8 Install Lighting Controls (Occupancy Sensors) ................................................................. 11

4.10 ECM‐9 Lighting Replacements with Lighting Controls (Occupancy Sensors) .............................. 11

5.0 PROJECT INCENTIVES ...................................................................................................... 12

5.1 Incentives Overview .................................................................................................................... 12

5.1.1 New Jersey Pay For Performance Program ......................................................................... 12

5.1.2 New Jersey Smart Start Program ........................................................................................ 13

5.1.3 Direct Install Program ......................................................................................................... 14

6.0 ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SCREENING EVALUATION ................................................ 15

6.1 Solar ............................................................................................................................................ 15

6.1.1 Photovoltaic Rooftop Solar Power Generation ................................................................... 15

_____________________________________________________________________________ New Jersey BPU - Energy Audits ii

6.1.2 Solar Thermal Hot Water Plant ........................................................................................... 16

6.2 Wind ............................................................................................................................................ 17

6.3 Geothermal ................................................................................................................................. 17

6.4 Combined Heat and Power Generation (CHP) ............................................................................ 18

6.5 Biomass Power Generation ......................................................................................................... 18

6.6 Demand Response Curtailment .................................................................................................. 19

7.0 EPA PORTFOLIO MANAGER ........................................................................................... 20

8.0 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................... 21

APPENDICES A Utility Usage Analysis

B Equipment Inventory C ECM Calculations D New Jersey Pay For Performance Incentive Program E Photovoltaic (PV) Rooftop Solar Power Generation F Solar Thermal Domestic Hot Water Plant G EPA Portfolio Manager

_____________________________________________________________________________ New Jersey BPU - Energy Audits iii

REPORT DISCLAIMER

This audit was conducted in accordance with the standards developed by the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) for a Level II audit. Cost and savings calculations for a given measure were estimated to within ±20%, and are based on data obtained from the owner, data obtained during site observations, professional experience, historical data, and standard engineering practice. Cost data does not include soft costs such as engineering fees, legal fees, project management fees, financing, etc. A thorough walkthrough of the facility was performed, which included gathering nameplate information and operating parameters for all accessible equipment and lighting systems. Unless otherwise stated, model, efficiency, and capacity information included in this report were collected directly from equipment nameplates and /or from documentation provided by the owner during the site visit. Typical operation and scheduling information was obtained from interviewing facility staff and spot measurements taken in the field.

_____________________________________________________________________________ New Jersey BPU - Energy Audits Page 1 of 22

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Franklin Borough Board of Education engaged CHA to perform an energy audit in connection with the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities’ Local Government Energy Audit Program. This report details the results of the energy audit conducted for:

Building Name Address Square Feet Construction

Date Franklin Elementary School 50 Washington Ave, Franklin, NJ 07416 115,483 1915

The Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs) identified in this report will allow for a more efficient use of energy and if pursued have the opportunity to qualify for the New Jersey SmartStart Buildings Program and/or Direct Install Program. Potential annual savings of either $78,700 or $180,600 for the recommended ECMs may be realized with a payback of 16.9 or 7.8 years respectively depending on whether ECM-1A or ECM-1B is implemented. A summary of the costs, savings, and paybacks for the recommended ECMs follows:

Summary of Energy Conservation Measures

Energy Conservation Measure

Approx. Costs

Approx. Savings ($/year)

Payback (Years)

w/o Incentive

Potential Incentive

($)*

Payback (Years)

Recommended For

Implementation ($) w/

Incentive

ECM-1A

Replace two steam boilers with oil boilers

489,000 24,000 >20 $

12,000 19.9 X

ECM-1B

Replace two steam boilers with gas boilers

532,000 125,900 4.2 $

12,000 4.1 X

ECM-2 Add VSD’s & Premium Motors to the four 7.5 HP pumps

20,000 7,100 2.8 $

4,600 2.2 X

ECM-3 Add VSD’s to the HV unit fans 15,000 1,000 15.0 $

2,300 12.7

ECM-4 Provide 55 F unoccupied set back from 65 F

1,000 6,300 0.2 $ -

0.2 X

ECM-5 Improve the domestic pressure boosting system

3,000 200 15.0 $ -

15.0

ECM-6 Replace Windows 819,000 36,400 >20 $ -

>20 X

ECM-7 Lighting Replacement / Upgrades

3,000 300 10.0 $

300 9.0

ECM-8 Install Lighting Controls (Occupancy Sensors)

19,000 4,600 4.1 $

2,800 3.5

ECM-9 Lighting Replacements with Lighting Controls (Occupancy Sensors)

22,000 4,900 4.5 $

3,100 3.9 X

* Incentive shown is the maximum amount potentially available per the NJ SmartStart or Direct Install Programs.


2.0 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

The Franklin Elementary School building is an 115,483 square foot facility consisting of three floors, including a basement. The building was constructed in 1915 with an addition or renovations in 1922, 1926, and 1970. The facility includes classrooms, offices, gyms, auditorium, and a media center. Regular school hours are 8:00 am – 3:00 pm Monday through Friday; with various after school activities. The school has approximately 506 students and 75 facility members. New Jersey’s Clean Energy Program, funded by the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities, supports energy efficiency and sustainability for Municipal and Local Government Energy Audits. Through the support of a utility trust fund, New Jersey is able to assist state and local authorities in reducing energy consumption while increasing comfort.


3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS

3.1 Building - General

The 115,483 square foot building, constructed in 1915, includes classrooms, offices, gyms, auditorium, and a media center. Regular school hours are 8:00 am – 3:00 pm Monday through Friday; with various after school activities. The school has approximately 506 students and 75 facility members. The original building, with addition/renovations in 1922, 1926, and 1970, generally consists of a structural steel or pre-stressed concrete structure having brick exterior and interior gypsum wallboard finish. Insulation values vary with age to a potential maximum of R-13. The roof is a single ply rubber over built up rigid insulation. According to the facility manager the windows are original to the time of construction or modification. They are aluminum frame with single pane glass.

3.2 Utility Usage

Utilities include electricity, propane, fuel oil #2, and municipal water. Electricity is supplied by Jersey Central Power & Lighting (JCPL) and delivered by South Jersey Energy. Propane is supplied and delivered by Amerigas. Fuel oil #2 is supplied and delivered by Petroleum Traders Corporation. Water is paid for through the Franklin Board of Public Works. The complex has one electric meter serving the building, and another for the administrative trailer. From March 2011 through April 2012, the electric usage for all the facility was approximately 735,440 kWh at a cost of about $$100,400. Review of electricity bills during this period showed that the complex was charged at the following rates: supply unit cost of $0.119 per kWh; demand unit cost of $6.14 per kW; and blended unit cost of $0.137 per kWh. Electrical usage was generally higher in the summer months when air conditioning equipment was operational. From March 2011 through April 2012, propane-fired equipment consumed about 7,460 gallons of propane. Based on the annual cost of $15,700, the blended price for propane was $2.11 per gallon. Propane gas consumption was highest in winter months for heating. Based on the most recent year of data, fuel oil #2-fired equipment consumed about 38,010 gallons. Based on the annual cost of $122,900, the blended price for #2 fuel oil was $3.23 per gallon. Fuel oil #2 consumption was highest in winter months for heating. See Appendix A for a detailed utility analysis. The delivery component of the electric bills will always be the responsibility of the utility that connects the facility to the power grid or gas line; however, the supply can be purchased from a third party; as is currently the case with electricity. The electricity commodity supply entity will require submission of one to three years of past energy bills. Contract terms can vary among suppliers. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the average commercial unit costs of electricity in New Jersey during the same periods as those noted above was $0.141 per kWh. When compared to the average state values, it is recommended that the present electricity supplier be maintained.


3.3 HVAC Systems

The school was built in three stages 1915 (original), 1920s and 1970s additions. The building is heated by two Cleaver Brooks 150 BHP low pressure steam boilers. The boilers use #2 fuel currently; however, originally #4 heavy oil was used. The boilers supply steam to a shell and tube heat exchanger that converts the steam to hot water. The hot water is pumped throughout the building by four 7.5 HP pumps operating in a lead/lag fashion. Steam condensate is fed back into the boilers by a duplex condensate receiver pump set having two 1/3 HP pumps. The #2 fuel oil is stored in an underground tank and pumped continuously to the burners by a small duplex oil pump set having two ½ HP motors. A propane tank supplies fuel for the burner’s pilots. The heating hot water is supplied to typical classroom unit ventilators, fin tube perimeter radiators, small unit heaters, convectors, and HV units. The HV units serve the gyms and auditorium only. There are two HV units that serve the gyms which have 5 HP motors. The auditorium has a single HV unit with a 5 HP motor. The units provide fresh air through modulating dampers. Toilet rooms are provided with roof mounted exhausts fans. General exhaust fans are provided for pressure relief and summer cooling only. The kitchen hood uses three wall mounted centrifugal exhaust fans. Cooling is provided to classrooms by independent ducted direct expansion (DX) split AC systems. There are also several rooms that use window AC units for summer cooling. A separate modular administration trailer has an independent propane fired boiler with a net input of 150 MBH. This system has two perimeter fintube heating zones controlled by non-programmable thermostats. Specifics on mechanical equipment are provided in the equipment inventory in Appendix B.

3.4 Control Systems

The entire building is controlled by a pneumatic control system. Time clocks are used to index each of the four zones from occupied to unoccupied mode. The facility maintenance manager reported that the night setback temperature is 65-68°F, but a colder setback temperature might be possible. The classrooms are currently maintained at 68-72°F during occupied times. Air conditioned spaces are manually maintained at 74-76°F during warm weather. Window air conditioning units are manually operated by occupants.

3.5 Lighting/Electrical Systems

The facility has upgraded most of the incandescent fixtures to compact florescent lighting (CFLs). Magnetic ballasts have been upgraded to electronic; and classroom, offices, common area, and corridor fixtures have been upgraded to four foot T-8 32W recessed fluorescent fixtures. Some areas still contain compact fluorescent spirals and incandescent bulbs, and metal halides are utilized in the gyms. The majority of lights are switched manually; exceptions are the auditorium and gyms. Parking lot lighting consists of pole mounted high pressure sodium light fixtures which are on a timer. The building exterior utilizes 250W MVR lamps.


3.6 Plumbing Systems

3.6.1 Domestic Hot Water Domestic hot water is produced by a single AO Smith copper tube boiler with a gross input of 670 MBH which heats water to 160°F, then stored in a tank at 130°F. The tank has a capacity of approximately 1,000 gallons. The domestic hot water serves the student and staff toilet rooms and the kitchen sinks and dishwasher. The system is significantly oversized for the current demand as the building was once used as the high school and had student shower rooms that are no longer used. This system has a fractional horsepower recirculation pump that is operated by an aquastat control. 3.6.2 Domestic Cold Water The building is supplied with potable water from the local municipality. The system pressure was inadequate to enable the flush valves to operate on the second floor; therefore, a supplemental pressure boosting system was installed. This system uses a ¾ HP multi-stage pump and a small air compressor to maintain the building water pressure at 50 psig. The pumps and air compressor cycle frequently during occupied times, approximately 1 minute for each 3 minutes, or 20 minutes per hour.


4.0 ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES

4.1 ECM-1A Replace Steam Boilers with Hot Water Boilers (Using No.2 Fuel Oil)

The building is heated using two (2) Cleaver Brooks 150 BHP low pressure steam boilers using #2 fuel oil. The boilers supply steam to a shell and tube heat exchanger that converts the steam to hot water, which is then pumped throughout the building. This ECM replaces the two steam boilers, condensate pump set, and heat exchanger with two similarly sized, oil fired hot water boilers. The conversion to Natural Gas was also evaluated in ECM-1b, below The annual boiler load was calculated from the gallons of fuel oil used annually per utility bills, boiler efficiency, and conversion from fuel oil #2 to MBH. The load was then compared to the proposed fuel oil usage of new boilers at the improved operating efficiency. The difference in fuel usage was the savings. Fuel oil-fired boilers have an expected useful life of 25 years, according to ASHRAE. Although well maintained, the existing boilers are vintage 1957- well past their useful life expectancy. The School district should consider the replacement of the boilers not solely based on the energy savings benefits, but also based on the long term maintenance savings of the new equipment. Replacing the steam boilers and related steam equipment and the heat exchanger will require some re-piping isolated to the boiler room and possibly re-working the boiler breeching. The implementation cost and savings related to this ECM are presented in Appendix C and summarized below:

ECM-1A Replace Steam Boilers with Hot Water Boilers (Using Fuel oil)

Budgetary Annual Utility Savings Estimated Total Potential Payback Payback

Cost Maintenance Savings ROI Incentive* (without (with

Electricity LPG Fuel

Oil #2 Total Savings Incentive) Incentive)

$ kW kWh Gals Gals $ $ $ $ Years Years

489,000 0 0 0 12,500 24,000 0 24,000 0.9 12,000 >20 19.9

* Incentive shown is per the New Jersey Smartstart Program. See section 5.0 for other incentive opportunities. This measure is recommended due to the condition of the boilers.

4.2 ECM-1B Replace Steam Boilers with Hot Water Boilers (Using Natural Gas)

This ECM replaces the two steam boilers, condensate pump set, and heat exchanger with four (4) condensing gas fired hot water boilers. Natural gas is currently not piped to the school building, but is located nearby. This ECM was evaluated to demonstrate the potential additional savings that could be realized if natural gas was made available by the local gas supplier. The annual boiler load was calculated from the gallons of fuel oil used annually per utility bills, assumed boiler/system efficiency, and conversion from fuel oil #2 to MBH. The load was then compared to the proposed natural gas usage of the new boilers at the improved operating efficiency. The difference in fuel usage was the savings. This ECM would be recommended in lieu of ECM-1A if natural gas could be distributed to the building. Condensing gas boilers offer the following benefits over oil fired boilers:


No underground fuel storage tank and associated regulatory issues and insurances. No fuel oil pumps required. Better combustion efficiency and temperature control resulting in less fuel used and lower carbon

emissions. Less maintenance required. Smaller footprint- space savings Direct venting –elimination of masonry chimney

The implementation cost and savings related to this ECM are presented in Appendix C and summarized below:

ECM-1B Replace Steam Boilers with Condensing Gas Hot Water Boilers (Using Natural Gas)



Electricity Natural

Gas Fuel Oil

#2 Total Savings Incentive) Incentive)

$ kW kWh Therms Gals $ $ $ $ Years Years

532,000 0 0 75,600 (71,000) 125,900 0 125,900 9.0 12,000 4.2 4.1

* Incentive shown is per the New Jersey Smartstart Program. See section 5.0 for other incentive opportunities. This measure is recommended do to the condition of the boilers.

4.3 ECM-2 Add VSDs and Premium Motors

The hot water system is served by four 7.5 HP pumps operating in lead-lag. The pumps are constant volume with standard efficiency motors. Larger motors that continuously operate pumps consume unnecessary electrical energy. The hot water system pumps operate at a constant speed (water flow); however, the building load does not require all the flow to maintain temperatures. By adding variable speed drives (VSDs) and inverter duty motors and reducing the flow by slowing the motors down, significant electrical energy can be saved. The calculation used a setpoint of 55F and bin data to estimate annual heating hours, which were 4,427. The assumption of this calculation is that the operating hours, motor horsepower, and capacity stay the same. The energy savings result from operating higher efficiency motors and reducing power draw with the VSDs. VSDs have an expected life of 20 years, according to ASHRAE, and total energy savings over the life of the project are estimated at 1,042,000 kWh and $142,000. The implementation cost and savings related to this ECM are presented in Appendix C and summarized below:

ECM-2 Add VSDs and Premium Motors






20,000 0 52,100 0 0 7,100 0 7,100 6.0 4,600 2.8 2.2

* Incentive shown is per the New Jersey Smartstart Program. See section 5.0 for other incentive opportunities.


This measure is recommended.

4.4 ECM-3 Add VSDs to the HV Unit Fans

The two HV units that serve the gyms have 5 HP motors. The auditorium has a single HV unit that has a 5 HP motor. Larger motors operating fans continuously consume significant electrical energy. The HVs operate at constant speed (air flow) even though the building load does not require all the flow to maintain temperatures. By adding VSDs and inverter duty motors, and reducing the flow by slowing the motors down, significant electrical energy can be saved. Space temperature and carbon dioxide (CO2) sensors are also used to reduce HV flow when space conditions permit. Adding VSDs to the HV unit fans and controlling speed based on setpoint temperature and space temperature will save energy. The calculation used a setpoint of 55F and bin data to estimate annual heating hours, which were 3,129. The assumption of this calculation is that the operating hours, motor horsepower, and capacity stay the same. The energy savings result from operating higher efficiency motors and reducing power draw with the VSDs. VSDs have an expected life of 20 years, according to ASHRAE, and total energy savings over the life of the project are estimated at 144,000 kWh and $20,000.

ECM-3 Add VSDs to the HV Unit Fans






15,000 0 7,200 0 0 1,000 0 1,000 0.3 2,300 15.0 12.7

* Incentive shown is per the New Jersey Smartstart Program. See section 5.0 for other incentive opportunities. This measure is not recommended.

4.5 ECM-4 Implement 55F Unoccupied Setback

The entire building utilizes a night setback control system temperature of 65F. Further reducing this setback temperature to 55F was assessed. The annual electricity and #2 fuel oil usage for the facility was taking from the utility bills. According to the US Energy Information Agency (EIA), implementing a night setback system typically saves 5% of a facility’s heating and cooling annual cost. This savings is multiplied by the annual fuel oil and electrical usage and converted to monetary savings using the unit cost of the fuel obtained from the utility analysis. Night setback controls have an expected life of 18 years, according to ASHRAE, and total energy savings over the life of the project are estimated at 14,400 gallons of fuel oil #2, 264,600 kWh, and $81,000. The implementation cost and savings related to this ECM are presented in Appendix C and summarized below:


ECM-4 Implement 55F Unoccupied Setback


Cost Maintenance Saving

s ROI Incentive* (without (with




1,000 0 14,700 0 1,400 6,300 0 6,300 111.8 0 0.2 0.2

* Does not qualify for an Incentive per the New Jersey SmartStart Program. See section 5.0 for other incentive opportunities. This measure is recommended.

4.6 ECM-5 Improve Domestic Pressure Boosting System

The building is supplied with potable water from the local municipality. Due to system pressure being inadequate to allow the flush valves to operate on the second floor, a supplemental pressure boosting system was installed. This system uses a ¾ HP multi-stage pump and a small air compressor to maintain the building water pressure at 50 psig. The pump and air compressor cycle frequently during occupied times, approximately 1 minute for each 3 minutes or 20 minutes per hour. Improving the domestic pressure boosting system was assessed. This measure includes replacing the existing ¾ HP pump motor with a higher efficiency inverter duty unit with variable speed control. The calculation used a setpoint of 55F and bin data to estimate annual heating hours, which were 4,427. The assumption of this calculation is that the operating hours, motor horsepower, and capacity stay the same. The energy savings result from operating higher efficiency motors and reducing power draw with the VSDs. Since this is a ¾ HP motor the savings are minimal. VSDs have an expected life of 20 years, according to ASHRAE, and total energy savings over the life of the project are estimated at 26,000 kWh and $4,000. The implementation cost and savings related to this ECM are presented in Appendix C and summarized as follows:

ECM-5 Improve Domestic Pressure Boosting System






3,000 0 1,300 0 0 200 0 200 0.0 0 15.0 15.0

* Does not qualify for an Incentive per the New Jersey SmartStart Program. See section 5.0 for other incentive opportunities. This measure is not recommended.

4.7 ECM-6 Replace Windows

The facility has 18,192 square feet of window area constructed with wood frames and single pane glazing. Due to age, construction type, and condition, the windows incur excess air infiltration and provide average thermal resistance to heat transfer. An assessment considered installing aluminum frame with double pane glazing to decrease heating energy losses.


The calculation used bin hours to estimate the occupied and unoccupied bin hours. This was converted to energy for the occupied and unoccupied cases using the existing window U-factor and the heating and cooling temperature. The occupied and unoccupied cases are summed together to create the annual utility usage for the baseline. The same method was utilized to calculate the proposed utility usage. The difference between the baseline and proposed conditions results in an annual savings of about 8,900 gallons of oil. Windows have an expected life of 30 years, according to manufacturer, and total energy savings over the life of the project are estimated at 2,130,000 kWh for cooling and 267,000 gallons of #2 oil and $1,152,000. The implementation cost and savings related to this ECM are presented in Appendix C and summarized below:

ECM-6 Replace Windows






819,000 0 71,000 0 8,900 38,400 0 38,400 0.3 0 >20 >20

* Does not qualify for an Incentive per the New Jersey SmartStart Program. See section 5.0 for other incentive opportunities. This measure is recommended due to age of windows.

4.8 ECM-7 Lighting Replacement/Upgrades

The classrooms have upgraded to electronic ballast and utilize 4 foot 32W T-8 fluorescent bulbs. A fluorescent lamp converts electrical power into useful light more efficiently than an incandescent lamp or T-12 bulbs. The gyms also use 400 W metal halides which consume significant electricity. A comprehensive fixture survey was conducted of the entire building. Each switch and circuit was identified, and the number of fixtures, locations, and existing wattage established (Appendix C). Upgrading some of the smaller T-8 U-tube fixtures to linear T-8 fixtures, and metal halides to large T-5 fixtures would provide additional energy reduction. Energy savings for this measure were calculated by applying the existing and proposed fixture wattages to estimated times of operation. The difference between energy requirements resulted in a total annual savings of 1,900 kWh with an electrical demand reduction of about 0.8 kW. Supporting calculations, including assumptions for lighting hours and annual energy usage for each fixture, are provided in Appendix C. Lighting has an expected life of 15 years, according to the manufacturer, and total energy savings over the life of the project are estimated at 28,000 kWh and $4,200. The implementation cost and savings related to this ECM are presented in Appendix C and summarized below:







$ kW kWh Gals Kgals $ $ $ $ Years Years

3,000 0.8 1,900 0 0 300 0 300 (0.4) 300 10.0 9.0

* Incentive shown is per the New Jersey Smartstart Program. See section 5.0 for other incentive opportunities. This measure is not recommended in lieu of ECM-9.

4.9 ECM-8 Install Lighting Controls (Occupancy Sensors)

Review of the comprehensive lighting survey determined that lighting in classrooms, restrooms and various other spaces, are typically operational, regardless of occupancy. Therefore, installing an occupancy sensor in these spaces to turn off lights when the areas are unoccupied was assessed. Using a process similar to that utilized in section 4.7, the energy savings for this measure were calculated by applying the known fixture wattages in the space to the estimated existing and proposed times of operation for each fixture. The difference between the two values resulted in an annual savings of 39,000 kWh. Ceiling mounted occupancy sensors with dimmer control are required for this measure. Occupancy sensors have an expected life of 15 years, according to the manufacturer, and total energy savings over the life of the project are estimated at 585,700 kWh and $80,000. The implementation cost and savings related to this ECM are presented in Appendix C and summarized as follows:






$ kW kWh Kgals Kgals $ $ $ $ Years Years

19,000 0 39,000 0 0 4,600 0 4,600 3.1 2,800 4.1 3.5

* Incentive shown is per the New Jersey Smartstart Program. See section 5.0 for other incentive opportunities. This measure is not recommended in lieu of ECM-9.

4.10 ECM-9 Lighting Replacements with Lighting Controls (Occupancy Sensors)

Due to interactive effects, the energy and cost savings for occupancy sensors and lighting upgrades are not cumulative. This measure is a combination of ECMs-8 and 7 to reflect actual expected energy and demand reduction. The lighting retrofits and controls have an expected lifetime of 15 years, according to the manufacturer, and total energy savings over the life of the project are estimated at 606,800 kWh and $73,200. The implementation cost and savings related to this ECM are presented in Appendix C and summarized below:








22,000 0.8 40,500 0 0 4,900 0 4,900 2.3 3,100 4.5 3.9

* Incentive shown is per the New Jersey Smartstart Program. See section 5.0 for other incentive opportunities. This measure is recommended.

5.0 PROJECT INCENTIVES

5.1 Incentives Overview

5.1.1 New Jersey Pay For Performance Program The facility will be eligible for incentives from the New Jersey Office of Clean Energy. The most significant incentives are available from the New Jersey Pay for Performance (P4P) Program. The P4P program is designed for qualified energy conservation projects applied to facilities whose demand in any of the preceding 12 months exceeds 100 kW. This average minimum has been waived for buildings owned by local governments or municipalities and non-profit organizations, however. Facilities that meet this criterion must also achieve a minimum performance target of 15% energy reduction by using the EPA Portfolio Manager benchmarking tool before and after implementation of the measure(s). If the participant is a municipal electric company customer, and a customer of a regulated gas New Jersey Utility, only gas measures will be eligible under the Program. Available incentives are as follows: Incentive #1: Energy Reduction Plan – This incentive is designed to offset the cost of services associated with the development of the Energy Reduction Plan (ERP).

Incentive Amount: $0.10/SF Minimum incentive: $5,000 Maximum Incentive: $50,000 or 50% of Facility annual energy cost

The standard incentive pays $0.10 per square foot, up to a maximum of $50,000, not to exceed 50% of facility annual energy cost, paid after approval of application. For building audits funded by the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities, which receive an initial 75% incentive toward performance of the energy audit, facilities are only eligible for an additional $0.05 per square foot, up to a maximum of $25,000, rather than the standard incentive noted above. Incentive #2: Installation of Recommended Measures – This incentive is based on projected energy savings as determined in Incentive #1 (Minimum 15% savings must be achieved), and is paid upon successful installation of recommended measures. Electric

Base incentive based on 15% savings: $0.09/ per projected kWh saved. For each % over 15% add: $0.005 per projected kWh saved. Maximum incentive: $0.11/ kWh per projected kWh saved

Gas Base incentive based on 15% savings: $0.90/ per projected Therm saved. For each % over 15% add: $0.05 per projected Therm saved.


Maximum incentive: $1.25 per projected Therm saved Incentive cap: 25% of total project cost Incentive #3: Post-Construction Benchmarking Report – This incentive is paid after acceptance of a report proving energy savings over one year utilizing the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Portfolio Manager benchmarking tool. Electric

Base incentive based on 15% savings: $0.09/ per projected kWh saved. For each % over 15% add: $0.005 per projected kWh saved. Maximum incentive: $0.11/ kWh per projected kWh saved

Gas Base incentive based on 15% savings: $0.90/ per projected Therm saved. For each % over 15% add: $0.05 per projected Therm saved. Maximum incentive: $1.25 per projected Therm saved

Combining incentives #2 and #3 will provide a total of $0.18/ kWh and $1.8/therm not to exceed 50% of total project cost. Additional incentives for #2 and #3 are increased by $0.005/kWh and $0.05/therm for each percentage increase above the 15% minimum target to 20%, calculated with the EPA Portfolio Manager benchmarking tool, not to exceed 50% of total project cost. Under incentive #1 of the New Jersey Pay for Performance Program, the 115,483 square foot facility is eligible for about $1,400 toward development of an Energy Reduction Plan. When calculating the total amount under Incentives #2 and #3, all energy conservation measures are applicable as the amount received is based on site wide energy improvements. Since the overall energy reduction for the complex is estimated to exceed the 15% minimum, the building is eligible to receive monies based on Incentives #2 and #3 as discussed above in section 5.1.1. In total, incentives through the NJ P4P program are expected to total about $44,800 or 11,300 depending on whether ECM-1A or 1B is selected, reducing the total project payback from 17.2 years to 16.6 years for ECM-1A and 7.7 years to 7.7 years for ECM-1B. See Appendix D for calculations. 5.1.2 New Jersey Smart Start Program For this program, specific incentives for energy conservation measures are calculated on an individual basis utilizing the 2011 New Jersey Smart Start incentive program. This program provides incentives dependent upon mechanical and electrical equipment. If applicable, incentives from this program are reflected in the ECM summaries and attached appendices. If the complex qualifies and enters into the New Jersey Pay for Performance Program, all energy savings will be included in the total site energy reduction, and savings will be applied towards the Pay for Performance incentive. A project is not applicable for both New Jersey incentive programs. The facility is eligible for several incentives available under New Jersey Smart Start Programs. The total amount of all qualified incentives is about $19,400 and includes the following:

Replacing the two steam boilers Add VSDs & Premium Motors to the four 7.5 HP pumps Provide 55F unoccupied setback


Replacing Windows Install Replacements with Lighting Controls (Occupancy Sensors)

5.1.3 Direct Install Program The Direct Install Program targets small and medium sized facilities where the peak electrical demand does not exceed 150 kW in any of the previous 12 months. Buildings must be located in New Jersey and served by one of the state’s public, regulated electric utility companies. On a case-by-case basis, the program manager may accept a project for a customer that is within 10% of the 150 kW peak demand threshold. Direct Install is funded through New Jersey’s Clean Energy Program and is designed to provide capital for building energy upgrade projects to fast track implementation. The program will pay up to 70% of the costs for lighting, HVAC, motors, refrigeration, and other equipment upgrades with higher efficiency alternatives. If a building is eligible for this funding, the Direct Install Program can significantly reduce the implementation cost of energy conservation projects. The program pays a maximum amount of $75,000 per building, and up to $250,000 per customer per year. Installations must be completed by a Direct Install participating contractor, a list of which can be found on the New Jersey Clean Energy Website at http://www.njcleanenergy.com. Contractors will coordinate with the applicant to arrange installation of recommended measures identified in a previous energy assessment, such as this document. The facility is potentially eligible to receive funding from the Direct Install Program. The total implementation cost for all ECMs potentially eligible for Direct Install funding is about $88,600 and includes:

Replacing the two steam boilers Add VSDs & Premium Motors to the four 7.5 HP pumps Provide 55F unoccupied setback Replacing Windows Install Replacements with Lighting Controls (Occupancy Sensors)

The program would pay 70% of these initial costs, leaving only the remainder to be paid out of pocket. Direct Install funding has the potential to significantly reduce the payback period of Energy Conservation Measures. For the facility, the Direct Install Program brings the simple payback of all measures from about 7.7 years, to approximately 7.2 years.


6.0 ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SCREENING EVALUATION

6.1 Solar

6.1.1 Photovoltaic Rooftop Solar Power Generation The facility was evaluated for the potential to install rooftop photovoltaic (PV) solar panels for power generation. Present technology incorporates the use of solar cell arrays that produce direct current (DC) electricity. This DC current is converted to alternating current (AC) with the use of an electrical device known as an inverter. The building’s roof has sufficient room to install a large solar cell array. However, there is not sufficient room to size a system to meet the demand of the building. For this analysis we will consider a 50KW system to help reduce usage. The PVWATTS solar power generation model was utilized to calculate PV power generation. The closest city available in the model is Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and a fixed tilt array type was utilized to calculate energy production. The PVWATT solar power generation model is provided in Appendix P. Federal tax credits are also available for renewable energy projects up to 30% of installation cost. Since the facility does not pay taxes this project is not eligible for this incentive. Installation of (PV) arrays in the state New Jersey will allow the owner to participate in the New Jersey solar renewable energy certificates program (SREC). This is a program that has been set up to allow entities with large amounts of environmentally unfriendly emissions to purchase credits from zero emission (PV) solar-producers. An alternative compliance penalty (ACP) is paid for by the high emission producers and is set each year on a declining scale of 3% per year. One SREC credit is equivalent to 1000 kilowatt hours of PV electrical production; these credits can be traded for period of 15 years from the date of installation. The cost of the ACP penalty for 2011 is $600; this is the amount that must be paid per SREC by the high emission producers. The expected dollar amount that will be paid to the PV producer for 2012 is expected to be $95/SREC credit. Payments that will be received from the PV producer will change from year to year dependent upon supply and demand. Renewable Energy Consultants is a third party SREC broker that has been approved by the New Jersey Clean Energy Program. As stated above there is no definitive way to calculate an exact price that will be received by the PV producer per SREC over the next 15 years. Renewable Energy Consultants estimated an average of $487/ SREC per year and this number was utilized in the cash flow for this report. From March 2011 through April 2012, the school had a maximum electricity demand of 166.90 kW and a minimum of 88.8 kW. The monthly average over the observed 12 month period was 148.15 kW. The existing load justifies the use of 50.0 kW PV solar array; where incentives can be applied from a federal tax credit and a New Jersey SREC program. The system costs for PV installations were derived from contractor budgetary pricing in the state of New Jersey for estimates of total cost of system installation. It should be noted that the cost of installation is currently about $8.00 per watt or $8,000 per kW of installed system, for a 50.0 kW system. Other cost considerations will also need to be considered. PV panels have an approximate 20 year life span; however, the inverter device that converts DC electricity to AC has a life span of 10 to 12 years and will need to be replaced multiple times during the useful life of the PV system. The implementation cost and savings related to this ECM are presented in Appendix E and summarized as follows:


Photovoltaic (PV) Rooftop Solar Power Generation – 50.0kW System

Budgetary Annual Utility Savings Total

New Jersey

Renewable

New Jersey

Renewable Payback Payback

Cost Savings Energy

Incentive* SREC** (without

incentive) (with

incentives)

Electricity Natural Gas Total

$ kW kWh Therms $ $ $ $ Years Years

400,000 0 248,200 0 33,900 33,900 0 5,600 11.8 10.1

* 30% federal tax credit ** Estimated Solar Renewable Energy Certificate Program (SREC) for 15 years at $95/1000 kWh

At 100 square feet per kW of PV panels (rule of thumb), the proposed PV power generation system would require 5000 square feet of open space. This measure is not recommended due to space requirements. 6.1.2 Solar Thermal Hot Water Plant Active solar thermal systems use solar collectors to gather the sun’s energy to heat water, another fluid, or air. An absorber in the collector converts the sun’s energy into heat. The heat is then transferred by circulating water, antifreeze, or sometimes air to another location for immediate use or storage for later utilization. Applications for active solar thermal energy include providing hot water, heating swimming pools, space heating, and preheating air in residential and commercial buildings. A standard solar hot water system is typically composed of solar collectors, heat storage vessel, piping, circulators, and controls. Systems are typically integrated to work alongside a conventional heating system that provides heat when solar resources are not sufficient. The solar collectors are usually placed on the roof of the building, oriented south, and tilted around the site’s latitude, to maximize the amount of radiation collected on a yearly basis. Several options exist for using active solar thermal systems for space heating. The most common method involves using glazed collectors to heat a liquid held in a storage tank (similar to an active solar hot water system). The most practical system would transfer the heat from the panels to thermal storage tanks and transfer solar produced thermal energy to use for domestic hot water production. DHW is presently produced by gas-fired water heaters and, therefore, this measure would offer utility savings. The implementation cost and savings related to this ECM are presented in Appendix F and summarized as follows:

Solar Thermal Domestic Hot Water Plant

Budgetary Annual Utility Savings Total Payback Payback

Cost

Savings Federal Tax

Credit (without

incentive) (with incentive)

Electricity Fuel Oil #2 Total

$ kW kWh Gals $ $ $ Years Years

22,000 0 0 1,270 4,100 4,100 0 5.4 5.4

* 30% tax credit.

This measure is not recommended.


6.2 Wind

Small wind turbines use a horizontal axis propeller, or rotor, to capture the kinetic energy of the wind and convert it into rotary motion to drive a generator which usually is designed specifically for the wind turbine. The rotor consists of two or three blades, usually made from wood or fiberglass. These materials give the turbine the needed strength and flexibility, and have the added advantage of not interfering with television signals. The structural backbone of the wind turbine is the mainframe, and includes the slip-rings that connect the wind turbine, which rotates as it points into changing wind directions, and the fixed tower wiring. The tail aligns the rotor into the wind. To avoid turbulence and capture greater wind energy, turbines are mounted on towers. Turbines should be mounted at least 30 feet above any structure or natural feature within 300 feet of the installation. Smaller turbines can utilize shorter towers. For example, a 250-watt turbine may be mounted on a 30-50 foot tower, while a 10 kW turbine will usually need a tower of 80-120 feet. Tower designs include tubular or latticed, guyed or self-supporting. Wind turbine manufacturers also provide towers. The New Jersey Clean Energy Program for small wind installations has designated numerous pre-approved wind turbines for installation in the State of New Jersey. Incentives for wind turbine installations are based on kilowatt hours saved in the first year. Systems sized under 16,000 kWh per year of production will receive a $3.20 per kWh incentive. Systems producing over 16,000 kWh will receive $51,200 for the first 16,000 kWh of production with an additional $0.50 per kWh up to a maximum cap of 750,000 kWh per year. This measure was not looked at due to space and code requirements.

6.3 Geothermal

Geothermal heat pumps (GHP) transfer heat between the constant temperature of the earth and the building to maintain the building’s interior space conditions. Below the surface of the earth throughout New Jersey the temperature remains in the low 50F range throughout the year. This stable temperature provides a source for heat in the winter and a means to reject excess heat in the summer. With GHP systems, water is circulated between the building and the piping buried in the ground. The ground heat exchanger in a GHP system is made up of a closed or open loop pipe system. Most common is the closed loop in which high density polyethylene pipe is buried horizontally at 4-6 feet deep or vertically at 100 to 400 feet deep. These pipes are filled with an environmentally friendly antifreeze/water solution that acts as a heat exchanger. In the summer, the water picks up heat from the building and moves it to the ground. In the winter the system reverses and fluid picks up heat from the ground and moves it to the building. Heat pumps make collection and transfer of this heat to and from the building possible.

To take advantage of a GHP system, the existing mechanical equipment would have to be removed or overhauled; and either a low temperature closed loop water source heat pump system or a water to water heat pump system would have to be installed to realize the benefit of the consistent temperature of the ground.

This measure is not recommended because the extent of HVAC system renovation needed for implementation greatly outweighs the savings over the life of the equipment.


6.4 Combined Heat and Power Generation (CHP)

Combined heat and power, cogeneration, is self-production of electricity on-site with beneficial recovery of the heat byproduct from the electrical generator. Common CHP equipment includes reciprocating engine-driven, micro turbines, steam turbines, and fuel cells. Typical CHP customers include industrial, commercial, institutional, educational institutions, and multifamily residential facilities. CHP systems that are commercially viable at the present time are sized approximately 50 kW and above, with numerous options in blocks grouped around 300 kW, 800 kW, 1,200 kW and larger. Typically, CHP systems are used to produce a portion of the electricity needed by a facility some or all of the time, with the balance of electric needs satisfied by purchase from the grid. Any proposed CHP project will need to consider many factors, such as existing system load, use of thermal energy produced, system size, fuel availability, and proposed plant location. The Municipal Complex has sufficient need for electrical generation and the ability to use most of the thermal byproduct during the winter, thermal usage during the summer months is low. Thermal energy produced by the CHP plant in the warmer months will be wasted. An absorption chiller could be installed to utilize the heat to produce chilled water; however, there is no chilled water distribution system in the building. The most viable selection for a CHP plant at this location would be a reciprocating engine fuel-fired unit. Purchasing this system and performing modifications to the existing HVAC and electrical systems would greatly outweigh the savings over the life of the equipment. This measure is not recommended.

6.5 Biomass Power Generation

Biomass power generation is a process in which waste organic materials are used to produce electricity or thermal energy. These materials would otherwise be sent to the landfill or expelled to the atmosphere. To participate in NJCEP's Customer On-Site Renewable Energy program, participants must install an on-site sustainable biomass or fuel cell energy generation system. Incentives for bio-power installations are available to support up to 1MW-dc of rated capacity.

*Class I organic residues are eligible for funding through the NJCEP CORE program. Class I wastes include the following renewable supply of organic material:

Wood wastes not adulterated with chemicals, glues or adhesives Agricultural residues (corn stover, rice hulls or nut shells, manures, poultry litter, horse manure,

etc.) and/or methane gases from landfills Food wastes Municipal tree trimming and grass clipping wastes Paper and cardboard wastes Non adulterated construction wood wastes, pallets

The NJDEP evaluates biomass resources not identified in the RPS.

Examples of eligible facilities for a CORE incentive include:

Digestion of sewage sludge Landfill gas facilities Combustion of wood wastes to steam turbine Gasification of wood wastes to reciprocating engine Gasification or pyrolysis of bio-solid wastes to generation equipment


* from NJOCE Website This measure is not recommended due to noise issues and because the facility does not have a steady waste stream to utilize as a fuel source.

6.6 Demand Response Curtailment

Presently, electricity is delivered by South Jersey Energy, which receives the electricity from regional power grid RFC. JCP&L is the regional transmission organization (RTO) that coordinates the movement of wholesale electricity in all or parts of 13 states and the District of Columbia including the State of New Jersey. Utility Curtailment is an agreement with the utility provider’s regional transmission organization and an approved Curtailment Service Provider (CSP) to shed electrical load by either turning major equipment off or energizing all or part of a facility utilizing an emergency generator; therefore, reducing the electrical demand on the utility grid. This program is to benefit the utility company during high demand periods and utility provider offers incentives to the CSP to participate in this program. Enrolling in the program will require program participants to drop electrical load or turn on emergency generators during high electrical demand conditions or during emergencies. Part of the program also will require that program participants reduce their required load or run emergency generators with notice to test the system. A pre-approved CSP will require a minimum of 100 kW of load reduction to participate in any curtailment program. From March 2011 through April 2012, Franklin had a maximum electricity demand of 166.90 kW and a minimum of 88.8 kW. The monthly average over the observed 12 month period was 148.15 kW. This measure is not recommended because the facility does not have adequate load to meet the required minimum load reduction.


7.0 EPA PORTFOLIO MANAGER

The EPA Portfolio Manager benchmarking tool was used to assess the building’s energy performance. Portfolio Manager provides a site and source Energy Use Intensity (EUI), as well as an Energy Star performance rating for qualifying building types. The EUIs are provided in kBtu/ft2/year, and the performance rating represents how energy efficient a building is on a scale of 1 to 100, with 100 being the most efficient. In order for a building to receive and Energy Star label, the energy benchmark rating must be at least 75. As energy use decreases from implementation of the proposed measures, the Energy Star rating will increase. The site EUI is the amount of heat and electricity consumed by a building as reflected in utility bills. Site energy may be delivered to a facility in the form of primary energy, which is raw fuel burned to create heat or electricity, such as oil; or as secondary energy, which is the product created from a raw fuel such as electricity or district steam. To provide an equitable comparison for different buildings with varying proportions of primary and secondary energy consumption, Portfolio Manager uses the convention of source EUIs. The source energy also accounts for losses incurred in production, storage, transmission, and delivery of energy to the site, which provide an equivalent measure for various types of buildings with differing energy sources. The results of the Portfolio Manager benchmarking tool are contained in the table below.

Building Site EUI kBtu/ft2/yr Source EUI Btu/ft2/yr Energy Star Rating (1-100)

Franklin ES 65 107 78 The facility has a below average EUI. By implementing the measures discussed in this report, it is expected that the EUI can be reduced even further. The Portfolio Manager account can be accessed by entering the username and password shown below at the login screen of the Portfolio Manager website (https://www.energystar.gov/istar/pmpam/). The account has been shared with the NYSERDABENCHMARKING master account. Username: franklintwpboe Password: energystar A full EPA Energy Star Portfolio Manager Report is located in Appendix H. The user name and password for the building’s EPA Portfolio Manager Account has been provided to William Sabo, Business Administrator.


8.0 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS

The energy audit conducted by CHA at the Franklin Elementary School identified potential ECMs for boiler replacement, lighting control replacement, variable speed drives with high efficiency motors, and unoccupied setback. Potential annual savings of $97,500 may be realized for the recommended ECMs, with a summary of the costs, savings, and paybacks as follows:

ECM-1A Replace Steam Boilers with Hot Water Boilers (Using Fuel oil)






489,000 0 0 0 12,500 24,000 0 24,000 0.9 12,000 >20 19.9


OR

ECM-1B Replace Steam Boilers with Condensing Gas Hot Water Boilers (Using Natural Gas)



Electricity Natural

Gas Fuel Oil

#2 Total Savings Incentive) Incentive)

$ kW kWh Therms Gals $ $ $ $ Years Years

532,000 0 0 75,600 (71,000) 125,900 0 125,900 9.0 12,000 4.2 4.1


ECM-2 Add VSDs and Premium Motors






20,000 0 52,100 0 0 7,100 0 7,100 6.0 4,600 2.8 2.2


ECM-4 Implement 55F Unoccupied Setback


Cost Maintenance Saving

s ROI Incentive* (without (with




1,000 0 14,700 0 1,400 6,300 0 6,300 111.8 0 0.2 0.2

* Does not qualify for an Incentive per the New Jersey SmartStart Program. See section 5.0 for other incentive opportunities.








819,000 0 71,000 0 8,900 38,400 0 38,400 0.3 0 >20 >20

* Does not qualify for an Incentive per the New Jersey SmartStart Program. See section 5.0 for other incentive opportunities







22,000 0.8 40,500 0 0 4,900 0 4,900 2.3 3,100 4.5 3.9



APPENDIX A

Utility Usage Analysis

Borough of Franklin Schools Electric Service

Billing Address: Washington Ave Delivery - JCP&L

Franklin NJ 07416 Supplier - South Jersey Energy Co.

For Service at: Franklin Elementary Main Building

Account No.: 10 00 02 1993 94

Meter No.: G28742802

Consumption Demand Total Delivery Supply Blended Rate Consumption DemandMonth (kWh) (kW) ($) ($) ($) ($/kWh) ($/kWh) ($/kW)

March-11 67,840 160.80 10,192.16$ 3,043.23$ 7,148.93$ 0.15$ 0.14$ 6.07$

April-11 62,640 162.20 9,086.38$ 2,483.19$ 6,603.19$ 0.15$ 0.13$ 6.07$

May-11 46,400 151.80 6,347.36$ 2,044.03$ 4,303.33$ 0.14$ 0.12$ 6.04$

June-11 40,160 134.80 5,582.88$ 1,854.44$ 3,728.44$ 0.14$ 0.12$ 6.43$

July-11 42,640 138.10 5,890.76$ 1,933.84$ 3,956.92$ 0.14$ 0.12$ 6.51$

August-11 34,080 88.80 4,563.04$ 1,394.75$ 3,168.29$ 0.13$ 0.12$ 6.16$

September-11 49,440 143.20 6,706.87$ 2,123.46$ 4,583.41$ 0.14$ 0.12$ 6.46$

October-11 38,480 138.40 5,348.25$ 1,774.59$ 3,573.66$ 0.14$ 0.12$ 6.00$

November-11 52,880 166.90 7,192.29$ 2,291.96$ 4,900.33$ 0.14$ 0.12$ 6.08$

December-11 59,040 156.90 7,863.38$ 2,395.52$ 5,467.86$ 0.13$ 0.12$ 6.06$

January-12 60,160 159.40 8,001.79$ 2,430.75$ 5,571.04$ 0.13$ 0.12$ 6.06$

February-12 58,800 162.50 7,828.82$ 2,383.08$ 5,445.74$ 0.13$ 0.12$ 6.07$

March-12 64,880 157.70 8,442.00$ 2,436.11$ 6,005.89$ 0.13$ 0.12$ 6.06$

April-12 58,000 152.60 7,366.84$ 1,994.80$ 5,372.04$ 0.13$ 0.11$ 6.05$

Total (All) 735,440 166.90 $100,412.82 $30,583.75 $69,829.07 0.137$ 0.119$ 6.14$

Month

March-11

April-11

May-11

June-11

July-11

August-11

September-11

October-11

November-11

December-11

January-12

February-12

March-12

April-12

Charges Unit Costs

0.113

0.111

0.111

0.116

0.111

0.111

0.111

0.093

0.093

0.114

0.114

0.114

0.111

0.112

0.093

SJE SupplyPrice Paid

0.112

0.113

JCP&L Supply "Price to Compare"

0.105

0.105

0.093

0.093

0.093

0.093

0.093

0.093

0.093

0.093

0.093

Utility Data - Franklin ES

Electric Graph

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000

Mar-

11

Apr-

11

May-

11

Jun-1

1

Jul-11

Aug-1

1

Sep-1

1

Oct-

11

Nov-1

1

Dec-1

1

Jan-1

2

Feb-1

2

Mar-

12

Apr-

12

Dem

an

d (

kW

)

Usag

e (

kW

h)

Month

Electric Usage - Franklin Elementary

(kWh) (kW)

Borough of Franklin Schools Propane

Billing Address: Washington Ave Delivery - Amerigas

Franklin NJ 07416 Supplier - Amerigas


Account No.: 200540259

Date Gallons $Total $Rate

Mar-11 256.20 538.88$ 2.10$

Apr-11 1,083.50 2,310.27$ 2.13$

May-11 n/a n/a

Jun-11 616.60 1,328.85$ 2.16$

Jul-11 567.90 1,250.81$ 2.20$

Aug-11 417.00 936.34$ 2.25$

Sep-11 393.80 901.86$ 2.29$

Oct-11 402.30 862.20$ 2.14$

Nov-11 851.20 1,867.42$ 2.19$

Dec-11 774.70 1,588.32$ 2.05$

Jan-12 619.30 1,238.00$ 2.00$

Feb-12 258.70 538.75$ 2.08$

Mar-12 806.30 1,565.40$ 1.94$

Apr-12 407.40 788.81$ 1.94$

7,454.90 15,715.91$ 2.11$

$-

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

$1,600

$1,800

$2,000

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

Apr-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Sep-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Feb-12 Apr-12 May-12

Co

st

($)

Usag

e (

Gallo

ns)

Date

Propane Usage - Franklin Elementary

Gallons $Total

Franklin ES Oil (no. 2 heating oil)

Billing Address: Washington Ave Delivery - Petroleum Traders Corp

Franklin NJ 07416 Supplier - Petroleum Traders Corp


Account No.: 11-000-262-490-002


Nov-10 6,502.00 16,199.73$ 2.49$

Dec-10 6,500.00 17,108.00$ 2.63$

Jan-11 6,501.00 17,770.48$ 2.73$

Jan-11 7,000.00 19,803.00$ 2.83$

Feb-11 6,502.00 19,102.87$ 2.94$

Mar-11 7,500.00 23,849.25$ 3.18$

May-11 5,000.00 15,807.00$ 3.16$

Dec-11 6,501.00 20,373.48$ 3.13$

Jan-12 6,004.00 19,524.41$ 3.25$

Feb-12 6,502.00 21,043.07$ 3.24$

Mar-12 6,500.00 22,333.35$ 3.44$

Total (Last Year) 38,007.00 122,930.56$ 3.23$

Total 71,012.00 212,914.64 3.00$

$-

$5,000

$10,000

$15,000

$20,000

$25,000

$30,000

-

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

Aug-10 Nov-10 Feb-11 Jun-11 Sep-11 Dec-11 Apr-12

Co

st

($)

Usag

e (

Gallo

ns)

Date

Oil Usage - Franklin Elementary

Gallons $Total

Borough of Franklin Schools Water

Billing Address: Washington Ave Delivery - Franklin Board of Public Works

Franklin NJ 07416 Supplier - Franklin Board of Public Works


Account No.: 4703


Q1 2012 785.00 3,755.00$ 4.78$

Q4 2011 1,610.00 7,673.75$ 4.77$

Q3 2011 1,072.00 5,118.25$ 4.77$

Q2 2011 851.00 4,068.00$ 4.78$

Q1 2011 1,089.00 5,199.00$ 4.77$

5,407.00 25,814.00 4.77$


APPENDIX B

Equipment Inventory

Equip Inventory - Franklin Franklin ES

Franklin School District - NJBPUCHA Project #24267Franklin Elementary School

Description QTYManufacturer

NameModel No. Serial No.

Equipment Type / Utility

Capacity/Size /Efficiency LocationAreas/Equipment

ServedDate

Installed

Remaining Useful Life

(years)Other Info.

Pumps 2 B&G - - Heating / Electric 7.5HP; 1760 RPM; 88.5% Boiler Room New wing - Good Condition

Air Compressor 1 Quincy QR02008D00084 20030130-0081 HVAC / Compressed Air Boiler Room School -Cast-Aluminum; Good Condition

Steam Boiler 2 Cleaver Brooks Heating / Fuel Oil #2 Boiler Room School 1956 -Cast-Aluminum; Fair Condition

Domestic Hot Water Heater 1 Bradford White MI4056D513 YD1144776 Heating / Electric 40 Gallon , 4500 W input Mech Room School - Good ConditionPumps 1 Dayton 4YC50 - Heating / Electric 1/3 hp; 1725 rpm Mech Room School - Good ConditionPumps 1 Dayton 4H245 - Heating / Electric 1/2 hp; 1725 RPM Mech Room School - Good ConditionPumps 1 Dayton 4HZ566 06C26024 Heating / Electric 1/3 hp; 1725 rpm Mech Room School - Good ConditionCU-1 1 Trane 2TTB2018A1000AA L323SMHBF HVAC / Electric DX Roof SGI ROOM 2003 11 Good ConditionCU-2 1 Trane TTA042C300A0 L323SMHBF HVAC / Electric DX Roof Library 1996 4 Good ConditionCU-3 1 Trane TTA042C300A1 L323STOBF HVAC / Electric DX Roof Library 1996 4 Good ConditionCU-4 1 Trane HBBA-F0365F WCMM058518 HVAC / Electric DX Roof Main Office - Good ConditionCU-5 1 Trane HBBA-F0365G NOB5663542 HVAC / Electric DX Roof Main Office - Good ConditionCU-6 1 Trane HABA-F024SD WHHP297804 HVAC / Electric DX Roof Main Office - Good Condition


APPENDIX C

ECM Calculations

Franklin School District - NJBPUCHA Project #24267Franklin ES

ECM Summary Sheet

ECM-1A Replace two steam boilers with oil boilers

Budgetary Annual Utility Savings Estimated Total Payback Payback

Cost Maintenance Savings ROI Incentive * (without (with

Electric Electric Fuel Oil #2 Total Savings incentive) incentive)

$ kWh kW Gals $ $ $ $ Years Years

489,000 0 0 12,500 24,000 0 24,000 0.9 12,000 >20 19.9

ECM-1B Replace two steam boilers with gas boilers



Electric Natural Gas Fuel Oil #2 Total Savings incentive) incentive)

$ kWh Therms Gals $ $ $ $ Years Years

532,000 0 75,600 (71,000) 125,900 0 125,900 9.0 12,000 4.2 4.1






20,000 52,100 0 0 7,100 0 7,100 6.0 4,600 2.8 2.2

ECM-3 Add VSD’s to the HV unit fans





15,000 7,200 0 0 1,000 0 1,000 0.3 2,300 15.0 12.7






1,000 14,700 0 1,400 6,300 0 6,300 111.8 0 0.2 0.2






3,000 1,300 0 0 200 0 200 0.0 0 15.0 15.0






819,000 71,000 0 8,900 36,400 0 36,400 0.3 0 >20 >20






3,000 1,900 0.8 0 300 0 300 0.4 300 10.0 9.0






19,000 39,000 0 0 4,600 0 4,600 3.1 2,800 4.1 3.5






22,000 40,500 0.8 0 4,900 0 4,900 2.3 3,100 4.5 3.9

ECM Master Rev 8

Franklin School District - NJBPUCHA Project #24267

Yearly Usage MTCDE 0.137$ $/kWh blended 0.00042021

0.119$ $/kWh supply 735,440 0.000420216.14$ $/kW 166.90 03.00$ $/Gal Oil 71,012 0.005334712.11$ $/Gal LPG 7,455 4.77$ $/kgals 5,407 0

Item Cost Simple Life

kW kWh Gal Oil cooling kWh Therms kgal/yr Gal LPG $ Payback MTCDE Expectancy

ECM-1A Replace two steam boilers with oil boilers 0.0 0 12,532 0 0 0 0 $ 24,000 489,390$ 20.4 66.9 25ECM-1B Replace two steam boilers with gas boilers 0.0 0 (71,012) 0 75,643 0 0 $ 125,900 532,488$ 4.2 -378.8 25ECM-2 Add VSD’s & Premium Motors to the four 7.5 HP pumps 0.0 52,070 0 0 0 0 0 $ 7,100 20,394$ 2.9 21.9 20ECM-3 Add VSD’s to the HV unit fans 0.0 7,230 0 0 0 0 0 $ 1,000 15,102$ 15.1 3.0 20ECM-4 Provide 55 F unoccupied set back from 65 F 0.0 14,709 1,420 0 0 0 0 $ 6,300 1,000$ 0.2 13.8 18ECM-5 Improve the domestic pressure boosting system 0.0 1,302 0 0 0 0 0 $ 200 3,097$ 15.5 0.5 18ECM-6 Replace Windows 0.0 0 8,909 71,019 0 0 0 $ 36,400 818,640$ 22.5 77.4 30ECM-7 Lighting Replacement / Upgrades 0.8 1,868 0 0 0 0 0 $ 280 2,936$ 10.5 0.8 15ECM-8 Install Lighting Controls (Occupancy Sensors) 0.0 39,043 0 0 0 0 0 $ 4,646 19,440$ 4.2 16.4 15ECM-9 Lighting Replacements with Lighting Controls (Occupancy Sensors) 0.8 40,451 0 0 0 0 0 $ 4,871 22,376$ 4.6 17.0 15

Utility Costs

Franklin ESSavings

ECM-1A Replace two steam boilers with oil boilers Note: Replace 2 steam 150 HP boilerswith 2 oil fired 150 HP hot water boilers

Existing Fuel

Proposed Fuel

Item Value UnitsBaseline Fuel Cost 3.00$ / Gal OilProposed Fuel Cost 3.23$ / Gal Oil

Baseline Fuel Use 71,012 Gals #2 Existing Boiler Plant Efficiency 70%Baseline Boiler Load 6,959,176 Mbtu/yrBaseline Fuel Cost 212,915$

Proposed Boiler Plant Efficiency 85%Proposed Fuel Use 58,480 Gals #2 Proposed Fuel Cost 188,892$

*Note to engineer: Link savings back to summary sheet in appropriate column.

Electric Demand

Fuel OilUsage

Nat Gas Usage Maint. Total Savings

( kW ) ( Gal ) ( Therms ) ( $ ) ( $)Savings 0 12,532 0 $0 $24,023

BOILER REPLACEMENT SAVINGS SUMMARY

Estimated -includes boiler and system loss for steam to hot water conversio

Baseline Fuel Use x Existing Efficiency x 140 Mbtu/Gals #2

New Boiler Efficiency-oil fired

Baseline Boiler Load / Proposed Efficiency / 140 Mbtu/Gals #2

Based on historical utility data

Formula/Comments

Anybody's guess -no anticipaded to drop in price

Multipliers Material: 1.10

Labor: 1.35ECM-1A Replace two steam boilers with oil boilers - Cost Equipment: 1.10

MAT. LABOR EQUIP. MAT. LABOR EQUIP.Cleaver brooks 150 HP HW boilers 2 EA 75,000$ 45,000$ 165,000$ 121,500$ -$ 286,500$ Flue Installation 1 LS 15,000.0$ 10,000.00$ 16,500$ 13,500$ -$ 30,000$ Fuel oil piping 1 LS 2,500.0$ 5,000.00$ 2,750$ 6,750$ -$ 9,500$ Miscellaneous Electrical 1 LS 5,000$ 5,000$ 5,500$ 6,750$ -$ 12,250$ Miscellaneous HW Piping 1 LS 5,000$ 10,000$ 5,500$ 13,500$ -$ 19,000$ Demolition of Existing Boilers 1 LS 10,000$ -$ 13,500$ -$ 13,500$

-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

370,750$ Subtotal37,075.00$ 10% Contingency81,565.00$ 20% Contractor O&P

-$ 489,390$ Total

SUBTOTAL COSTSDescription QTY UNIT

UNIT COSTSTOTAL COST REMARKS

ECM-1B Replace two steam boilers with gas boilers Replace 2 steam 150 HP boilers with four (4) condensing gas hot water boilers

Existing Fuel

Proposed Fuel

Item Value UnitsBaseline Fuel Cost 3.00$ / Gal OilProposed Fuel Cost 1.15$ / Gal Oil

Baseline Fuel Use 71,012 Gals #2 Existing Boiler Plant Efficiency 70%Baseline Boiler Load 6,959,176 Mbtu/yrBaseline Fuel Cost 212,915$

Proposed Boiler Plant Efficiency 92%Proposed Fuel Use 75,643 ThermsProposed Fuel Cost 86,990$

*Note to engineer: Link savings back to summary sheet in appropriate column.

Electric Demand

Fuel OilUsage

Nat Gas Usage Maint. Total Cost

( kW ) ( Gal ) ( Therms ) ( $ ) ( $)Savings 0 (71,012) 75,643 $0 $125,925

Based on historical utility data

Formula/Comments

NJ Average Unit cost for NG per EIA

BOILER REPLACEMENT SAVINGS SUMMARY

Estimated or Measured

Baseline Fuel Use x Existing Efficiency x 140 Mbtu/Gals #2

New Boiler Efficiency

Baseline Boiler Load / Proposed Efficiency / 100 Mbtu/Therms


Labor: 1.35ECM-1B Replace two steam boilers with gas boilers - Cost Equipment: 1.10

MAT. LABOR EQUIP. MAT. LABOR EQUIP.3,000 MBH NG Condensing Boiler 4 EA 45,000$ 15,000$ 198,000$ 81,000$ -$ 279,000$ Flue Installation 4 LS 5,000.0$ 2,500.00$ 22,000$ 13,500$ -$ 35,500$ Primary pumps 4 EA 2,000.0$ 1,500.00$ 8,800$ 8,100$ -$ 16,900$ Miscellaneous Electrical 1 LS 2,500$ 5,000$ 2,750$ 6,750$ -$ 9,500$ Miscellaneous HW Piping 4 EA 5,000$ 5,000$ 22,000$ 27,000$ -$ 49,000$ Demolition of Existing Boilers 1 LS 10,000$ -$ 13,500$ -$ 13,500$

-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

403,400$ Subtotal40,340.00$ 10% Contingency88,748.00$ 20% Contractor O&P

-$ 532,488$

REMARKS

Total

Description QTY UNITUNIT COSTS SUBTOTAL COSTS

TOTAL COST


Variable InputsBlended Electric Rate $0.14

Heating System "On" Point 55

VFD Efficiency 98.5%

ECM Description Summary

Pump ID Qty HP Total HP

Existing Motor Motor Eff.

New Motor Motor Eff.

Exist. Motor kW Note 1

New Motor kW Note 2

P-1,P-2,P-3,P-4 4 7.5 30.0 88.5% 92.0% 20.23 19.46

0.0 0.00 0.00

Total: 20.23 19.46

OAT - DB OAT - WB Annual Heating Pump Existing Proposed Speed Proposed ProposedAvg Avg Hours in Hours Load Pump Pump efficiency Pump Savings

Temp F Temp F Bin Bin % kWh kW % kWh kWh(A) (B) (C ) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J)

=IF(A>TP,0,C) =0.5+0.5* =D*AA =BB*E^2.5/CC =D*G =F-H(50-A)/(50-10))

See Note 3 See Note 3 See Note 3 See Note 4 See Note 5

97.5 75 3 0 0% 0 0.0 0.0% 0 092.5 74 34 0 0% 0 0.0 0.0% 0 087.5 72 131 0 0% 0 0.0 0.0% 0 082.5 69 500 0 0% 0 0.0 0.0% 0 077.5 67 620 0 0% 0 0.0 0.0% 0 072.5 64 664 0 0% 0 0.0 0.0% 0 067.5 62 854 0 0% 0 0.0 0.0% 0 062.5 58 927 0 0% 0 0.0 0.0% 0 057.5 53 600 0 0% 0 0.0 0.0% 0 052.5 47 610 610 53% 12,341 4.0 84.1% 2,899 9,44247.5 43 611 611 58% 12,361 5.1 88.8% 3,532 8,82942.5 38 656 656 64% 13,271 6.4 92.7% 4,560 8,71137.5 34 1,023 1,023 69% 20,696 7.9 95.9% 8,474 12,22232.5 30 734 734 75% 14,849 9.6 98.2% 7,194 7,65527.5 25 334 334 81% 6,757 11.5 99.8% 3,853 2,90422.5 20 252 252 86% 5,098 13.6 100.0% 3,426 1,67217.5 16 125 125 92% 2,529 15.9 100.0% 1,987 54212.5 11 47 47 97% 951 18.4 99.7% 868 837.5 6 22 22 100% 445 19.8 99.0% 439 62.5 2 13 13 100% 263 19.8 99.0% 259 4-2.5 -3 0 0 0% 0 0.0 0.0% 0 0-7.5 -8 0 0 0% 0 0.0 0.0% 0 0

8,760 4,427 89,560 37,490 52,070

Notes: 1) Existing motor power was determined using… 2) New motor power is the same as existing motor power adjusted for the new efficiency, if a new motor is proposed. 3) Weather data from NOAA for Newark, NJ 4) The pump load is estimated at 100% at X deg. OAT and 50% at X deg. OAT and varies linearly in between. 5) The required VFD motor draw is based on a 2.5 power relationship to load.

Electric Demand

ElectricUsage

Nat Gas Usage Maint.

Total Cost

( kW ) ( kWh ) ( Therms ) ( $ ) ( $)Savings 0 52,070 0 $0 $7,109

HW PUMP VFD - SAVINGS SUMMARY

PUMP SCHEDULE

SAVINGS ANALYSIS


Labor: 1.35ECM-2 Add VSD’s & Premium Motors to the four 7.5 HP pumps - Cost Equipment: 1.10

MAT. LABOR EQUIP. MAT. LABOR EQUIP.-$ -$ -$ -$

VFD 4 ea 2,021$ 509$ 8,894$ 2,750$ -$ 11,643$ Motor 4 ea 536$ 84$ 2,356$ 454$ -$ 2,810$ Electrical - misc. 4 ls 200$ 150$ 880$ 810$ -$ 1,690$ Duct pressure sensor/transmitter 4 ea 500$ 200$ 2,200$ 1,080$ -$ 3,280$

-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

19,423$ Subtotal971$ 5% contingency

-$ -$

20,394$

REMARKS

Total

Description QTY UNITUNIT COSTS SUBTOTAL COSTS TOTAL

COST

ECM-3 Add VSD’s to the HV unit fans

Utility Costs

Blended Electric Rate $0.14

UNIT HPExisting Motor

Eff (Note 1)New Motor Eff

(Note 1)Existing Motor

kW New Motor kWBuilding Balance

PointHV-1, HV-2 15.0 84.0% 92.0% 10.66 9.73 55.0

10.66 9.73 VFD Eff. (CC) 98.5%

OAT - DB Occupied AHU Existing Existing Fan Proposed Speed Proposed SavingsAvg Bin Hours Hours in Hours in Fan Fan Load Fan efficiency Fan Fan

Temp F Bin Bin Kw kWh % kW % kWh kWh(A) (B) (C ) (D) (F) (F) (E) (G) (H) (I) (J)

102.5 0 0 0 10.7 0 50% 1.23 81.5% 0 097.5 3 1 1 10.7 11 50% 1.23 81.5% 2 1092.5 34 12 12 10.7 129 50% 1.23 81.5% 18 11187.5 131 47 47 10.7 499 50% 1.23 81.5% 71 42882.5 500 179 179 10.7 1,903 50% 1.23 81.5% 271 1,63277.5 620 221 221 10.7 2,360 50% 1.23 81.5% 336 2,02472.5 664 237 237 10.7 2,527 50% 1.23 81.5% 359 2,16867.5 854 305 305 10.7 3,250 50% 1.23 81.5% 462 2,78862.5 927 331 331 10.7 3,528 50% 1.23 81.5% 502 3,02757.5 600 214 214 10.7 2,284 50% 1.23 81.5% 325 1,95952.5 610 218 218 10.7 2,322 52% 1.41 83.7% 367 1,95447.5 611 218 218 10.7 2,326 57% 1.81 87.6% 451 1,87442.5 656 234 234 10.7 2,497 61% 2.28 91.1% 587 1,90937.5 1,023 365 365 10.7 3,894 66% 2.83 94.0% 1100 2,79432.5 734 262 262 10.7 2,794 70% 3.45 96.3% 940 1,85427.5 334 119 119 10.7 1,271 75% 4.17 98.2% 506 76522.5 252 90 90 10.7 959 80% 4.97 99.5% 450 51017.5 125 45 45 10.7 476 84% 5.87 100.0% 262 21412.5 47 17 17 10.7 179 89% 6.88 100.0% 115 637.5 22 8 8 10.7 84 93% 7.99 100.0% 63 212.5 13 5 5 10.7 49 98% 9.22 99.6% 43 7-2.5 0 0 0 10.7 0 100% 9.88 99.0% 0 0-7.5 0 0 0 10.7 0 100% 9.88 99.0% 0 0

TOTALS 8760 3,129 3,129 245 33,342 7,230 26,112

Notes: 1) Existing motor power based on operation with existing motor efficiency, operating at 80% load factor when at full load. Formula: Motor HP x 0.746 x 0.8 / Exist. Motor Eff., New motor power is based on same formula using the new motor efficiency. 2) Weather data from NOAA for Concord, MA 3) Occupied & AHU Bin Hours are based upon existing schedule. 4) The required VFD motor power draw is based on a 3.0 power relationship to load, since system static pressure will not be controlled.

Electric Demand

ElectricUsage


Total Cost

( kW ) ( kWh ) ( Therms ) ( $ ) ( $)Savings 0 7,230 0 $0 $987

INSTALL VARIABLE SPEED DRIVES - SAVINGS SUMMARY


Labor: 1.35ECM-3 Add VSD’s to the HV unit fans - Cost Equipment: 1.10

MAT. LABOR EQUIP. MAT. LABOR EQUIP.5.0 HP VFD 3 ea 1,706$ 431$ 5,631$ 1,744$ -$ 7,374$ 5.0 HP Motors 3 ea 373$ 79$ 1,230$ 319$ -$ 1,549$ Reprogram DDC system 2 ea 100$ 1,000$ 220$ 2,700$ -$ 2,920$ Electrical - misc. 2 ls 200$ 150$ 440$ 405$ -$ 845$ Duct pressure sensor/transmitter 2 ea 500$ 200$ 1,100$ 540$ -$ 1,640$

-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

14,328$ Subtotal774$ 5% contigency

-$ -$

15,102$

REMARKS

Total


COST



735,440 kWh71,012 Gal Oil #2

0.14$ $/kWh3.00$ $/Gal Oil #2

14,709 kWh21,420 Gallons36,267$

1,000$ 4

0.2 years

Assumptions1 2% Approximate electric savings due to night setback2 2% Approximate Fuel Oil savings due to night setback3 Project cost is an estimate, includes cost of replacing non- programmbale thermostats with programmbale 4 control work cost

TOD Electric savingsTOD Fuel Oil savings

Estimated Total Project CostSimple Payback

Total Cost Savings

S A V I N G S

E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N SExisting Facility Total Electric usageExisting Facility Fuel Oil #2 UsageCost of Electricty


Variable InputsBlended Electric Rate $0.14

Heating System "On" Point 55

VFD Efficiency 98.5%

ECM Description Summary

Pump ID Qty HP Total HP

Existing Motor Motor Eff.

New Motor Motor Eff.

Exist. Motor kW Note 1

New Motor kW Note 2

P-5 1 0.8 0.8 88.5% 92.0% 0.51 0.49

0.0 0.00 0.00

Total: 0.51 0.49

OAT - DB OAT - WB Annual Heating Pump Existing Proposed Speed Proposed ProposedAvg Avg Hours in Hours Load Pump Pump efficiency Pump Savings

Temp F Temp F Bin Bin % kWh kW % kWh kWh(A) (B) (C ) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J)

=IF(A>TP,0,C) =0.5+0.5* =D*AA =BB*E^2.5/CC =D*G =F-H(50-A)/(50-10))

See Note 3 See Note 3 See Note 3 See Note 4 See Note 5

97.5 75 3 0 0% 0 0.0 0.0% 0 092.5 74 34 0 0% 0 0.0 0.0% 0 087.5 72 131 0 0% 0 0.0 0.0% 0 082.5 69 500 0 0% 0 0.0 0.0% 0 077.5 67 620 0 0% 0 0.0 0.0% 0 072.5 64 664 0 0% 0 0.0 0.0% 0 067.5 62 854 0 0% 0 0.0 0.0% 0 062.5 58 927 0 0% 0 0.0 0.0% 0 057.5 53 600 0 0% 0 0.0 0.0% 0 052.5 47 610 610 53% 309 0.1 84.1% 72 23647.5 43 611 611 58% 309 0.1 88.8% 88 22142.5 38 656 656 64% 332 0.2 92.7% 114 21837.5 34 1,023 1,023 69% 517 0.2 95.9% 212 30632.5 30 734 734 75% 371 0.2 98.2% 180 19127.5 25 334 334 81% 169 0.3 99.8% 96 7322.5 20 252 252 86% 127 0.3 100.0% 86 4217.5 16 125 125 92% 63 0.4 100.0% 50 1412.5 11 47 47 97% 24 0.5 99.7% 22 27.5 6 22 22 100% 11 0.5 99.0% 11 02.5 2 13 13 100% 7 0.5 99.0% 6 0-2.5 -3 0 0 0% 0 0.0 0.0% 0 0-7.5 -8 0 0 0% 0 0.0 0.0% 0 0

8,760 4,427 2,239 937 1,302

Notes: 1) Existing motor power was determined using… 2) New motor power is the same as existing motor power adjusted for the new efficiency, if a new motor is proposed. 3) Weather data from NOAA for Newark, NJ 4) The pump load is estimated at 100% at X deg. OAT and 50% at X deg. OAT and varies linearly in between. 5) The required VFD motor draw is based on a 2.5 power relationship to load.

Electric Demand

ElectricUsage


Total Cost

( kW ) ( kWh ) ( Therms ) ( $ ) ( $)Savings 0 1,302 0 $0 $178

PUMP SCHEDULE

SAVINGS ANALYSIS

HW PUMP VFD - SAVINGS SUMMARY


Labor: 1.35ECM-5 Improve the domestic pressure boosting system - Cost Equipment: 1.10

MAT. LABOR EQUIP. MAT. LABOR EQUIP.3/4 HP VSD 1 EA 1,200$ 431$ 1,320$ 581$ -$ 1,901$ 3/4 HP Motors 1 EA 200$ 79$ 220$ 106$ -$ 326$ Controls 1 LS 300$ 400$ 330$ 540$ -$ 870$

-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

3,097$ Subtotal

-$ -$

3,097$

REMARKS

Total


COST


ECM-6 Window Replacement

Window Area 18,192 SF Prop Occupied Htg Temp. 72 °F

Internal Balance Temp. 60 °F Prop Unoccupied Htg Temp. 65 °F

Heating System Efficiency 80% Prop Occupied Clng Temp. 74 °F

Cooling EER 1.2 (Btu/Watt) Prop Unoccupied Clng Temp. 78 °F

Existing U factor 0.87 Btu/(h*sqft*degf) $/ kWh $0.14

Proposed U factor 0.45 Btu/(h*sqft*degf) $/ Gal Oil #2 $3.00

Avg Outdoor

Air Temp. Bins °F

ProposedOccupied Bin

HoursUnoccupied Bin

Hours

Existing Occupied

EnergyMbtu

Existing Unoccupied

EnergyMbtu

Proposed Occupied

EnergyMbtu

Proposed Unoccupied

EnergyMbtu

Heating EnergySavings(Therms)

Cooling EnergySavings(kWh)

TotalCost

Savings

97 11 8 3,909 2,492 2,528 1,289 0 2,154 $29492 43 34 12,238 7,566 6,330 3,914 0 7,967 $1,08887 103 94 21,103 13,348 10,915 6,904 0 13,859 $1,89282 171 207 21,678 13,124 11,213 6,789 0 14,001 $1,91277 209 400 9,918 0 5,130 0 0 3,990 $54572 207 606 0 0 0 0 0 - $067 194 616 15,355 0 7,942 0 0 6,177 $84362 187 573 29,661 27,189 15,342 14,063 0 22,871 $3,12357 172 534 40,901 67,573 21,155 34,952 468 - $1,40252 169 521 53,458 107,210 27,650 55,453 693 - $2,07647 182 505 72,205 143,998 37,347 74,482 932 - $2,79442 199 568 94,719 206,605 48,993 106,865 1,299 - $3,89437 201 639 111,101 282,994 57,466 146,376 1,699 - $5,09332 140 489 88,388 255,530 45,718 132,170 1,482 - $4,44527 78 287 55,901 172,617 28,914 89,285 985 - $2,95322 46 176 36,687 119,742 18,976 61,935 674 - $2,02217 23 95 19,632 71,873 10,155 37,176 394 - $1,18312 8 43 7,479 36,233 3,868 18,741 188 - $5657 2 15 2,486 13,409 1,286 6,936 69 - $2052 0 2 198 1,818 103 941 9 - $26-3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - $0-8 1 1 907 1,487 469 769 10 - $31-13 0 1 120 1,126 62 582 8 - $23

TOTALS 2,346 6,414 698,042 1,545,934 361,562 799,621 8,909 71,019 $36,408

Franklin ES

CHA Project No. 24267

Budgetary Estimated Total New Jersey Payback Payback

Cost Maintenance Savings Incentive

(without

incentive)

(with

incentive)

Savings

$ kW kWh therms $ $ $ $ Years Years

$2,936 0.8 1,868 0 $280 0 $280 $290 10.5 9.4



(without

incentive)

(with

incentive)

Savings


$19,440 0.0 39,043 0 $4,646 0 $4,646 $2,815 4.2 3.6



(without

incentive)

(with

incentive)

Savings


$22,376 0.8 40,451 0 $4,871 0 $4,871 $3,105 4.6 4.0

ECM-8 Install Occupancy Sensors

Annual Utility Savings


*Incentive based on New Jersey Smart Start Prescriptive Lighting Measures

ECM-7 Lighting Replacements




ECM-9 Lighting Replacements with Occupancy Sensors

7/6/2012 Page 1, Summary

Energy Audit of Franklin Elementary School

CHA Project No. 24267 Cost of Electricity: $0.119 $/kWh

Existing Lighting $6.14 $/kW

No. of

Fixtures Standard Fixture Code Fixture Code

Watts per

Fixture kW/Space Exist Control

Annual

Hours

Retrofit

Control

Annual

kWh

Field

Code

No. of

fixtures

before the

retrofit

"Lighting Fixture Code" Example

2T 40 R F(U) = 2'x2' Troff 40 w Recess. Floor 2

lamps U shape

Code from Table of Standard

Fixture Wattages

Value from

Table of

Standard

Fixture

Wattages

(Watts/Fixt) *

(Fixt No.)

Pre-inst. control

device

Estimated

annual hours

for the usage

group

Retrofit

control

device

(kW/space) *

(Annual

Hours)

13 27 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 1.62 SW 2600 C-OCC 4,212






13 6 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 0.36 SW 1000 None 360








13 4 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 0.24 SW 2600 C-OCC 624























110

111

Nurse

116

115

115 TR

118

112

113

221

121

117

Boys TR

122

219

220

120

118

208C

VP

Unique description of the location - Room

number/Room name: Floor number (if applicable)

203

202

Cust Closet

211

213

212

210

EXISTING CONDITIONS

Area Description

214

119

217

207A

205

204

207

206

Psych

208

7/6/2012 Page 2, Existing




No. of


Watts per


Annual

Hours

Retrofit

Control

Annual

kWh

Field

Code

No. of

fixtures

before the

retrofit



lamps U shape


Fixture Wattages

Value from

Table of

Standard

Fixture

Wattages

(Watts/Fixt) *

(Fixt No.)

Pre-inst. control

device

Estimated

annual hours

for the usage

group

Retrofit

control

device

(kW/space) *

(Annual

Hours)



EXISTING CONDITIONS

Area Description





































13 2 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 0.12 SW 2600 C-OCC 312 12

17

16

45 Storage

15 Store

14

16 Storage

36

Storage

Storage

Office

24

33

33 Storage

Boys TR

22

35

Girls TR

Guidance

200A

Storage

Mechanical

Conference

103

104

102

23 Vestibule

23

105B

200 Storage

105A

25

Nurse TR

108B

108B TR

Main Office

107





No. of


Watts per


Annual

Hours

Retrofit

Control

Annual

kWh

Field

Code

No. of

fixtures

before the

retrofit



lamps U shape


Fixture Wattages

Value from

Table of

Standard

Fixture

Wattages

(Watts/Fixt) *

(Fixt No.)

Pre-inst. control

device

Estimated

annual hours

for the usage

group

Retrofit

control

device

(kW/space) *

(Annual

Hours)



EXISTING CONDITIONS

Area Description


































13 107 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 6.42 SW 1000 None 6,420

Admin Offices

Storage

Mechanical

Admin

Girls TR

Girls Locker

Girls Shower

Girls TR

Storage

Storage

Boys Locker

Boys Shower

A-6

A-3

A-4

Boys

Gym Office

Gym Office Vest

Gym Vest

Custodial

Boys TR

Girls TR

A-1

A-2

52

Boys Tr

A-8

A-5

9

51

49

11

10

Corridor




ECM-7 Lighting Replacements $6.14 $/kW

No. of


Watts per

Fixture kW/Space

Exist

Control

Annual

Hours Annual kWh

Number of


Watts per

Fixture kW/Space

Retrofit

Control

Annual

Hours

Annual

kWh

Annual kWh

Saved

Annual kW

Saved

Annual $

Saved

Retrofit

Cost

NJ Smart

Start

Lighting

Incentive

Simple

Payback

With Out

Incentive

Simple

Payback

Field

Code

No. of fixtures

before the

retrofit


2T 40 R F(U) = 2'x2' Troff 40 w

Recess. Floor 2 lamps U shape


Fixture Wattages

Value from

Table of

Standard

Fixture

Wattages

(Watts/Fixt) *

(Fixt No.)

Pre-inst.

control device

Estimated daily

hours for the

usage group

(kW/space) *

(Annual Hours)

No. of fixtures

after the retrofit


2T 40 R F(U) = 2'x2' Troff 40

w Recess. Floor 2 lamps U shape

Code from Table of

Standard Fixture

Wattages

Value from

Table of

Standard

Fixture

Wattages

(Watts/Fixt) *

(Number of

Fixtures)

Retrofit

control

device

Estimated

annual hours

for the usage

group

(kW/space)

* (Annual

Hours)

(Original Annual

kWh) - (Retrofit

Annual kWh)

(Original Annual

kW) - (Retrofit

Annual kW)

(kWh Saved) *

($/kWh)

Cost for

renovations to

lighting

system

Prescriptive

Lighting

Measures

Length of time

for renovations

cost to be

recovered

Length of time for

renovations cost to

be recovered

13 27 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 1.6 SW 2600 4,212 27 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 1.6 SW 2,600 4,212 - 0.0 -$ -$ $0






18 3 T 32 R F 4 (ELE) F44ILL 112 0.3 SW 1000 336 3 T 32 R F 4 (ELE) F44ILL 112 0.3 SW 1,000 336 - 0.0 -$ -$ $0

13 6 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 0.4 SW 1000 360 6 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 0.4 SW 1,000 360 - 0.0 -$ -$ $0

18 8 T 32 R F 4 (ELE) F44ILL 112 0.9 SW 2600 2,330 8 T 32 R F 4 (ELE) F44ILL 112 0.9 SW 2,600 2,330 - 0.0 -$ -$ $0












7 6 2T 32 R F 2 (u) (ELE) Thin Tube FU2LL 60 0.4 SW 2400 864 6 2T 17 R F 2 (ELE) F22ILL 33 0.2 SW 2,400 475 389 0.2 58.21$ 607.50$ $60 10.4 9.4





























1 1 SQ 13 W CF 2 (MAG) CFQ13/2 31 0.0 SW 2000 62 1 SQ 13 W CF 2 (MAG) CFQ13/2 31 0.0 SW 2,000 62 - 0.0 -$ -$ $0


















201 6 T 32 R F 3 (ELE) F43ILL/2 90 0.5 SW 2400 1,296 6 T 32 R F 3 (ELE) F43ILL/2 90 0.5 SW 2,400 1,296 - 0.0 -$ -$ $0















199 1 W 32 C F 1 (ELE) F41LL 32 0.0 SW 2600 83 1 W 32 C F 1 (ELE) F41LL 32 0.0 SW 2,600 83 - 0.0 -$ -$ $0


199 40 W 32 C F 1 (ELE) F41LL 32 1.3 SW 2600 3,328 40 W 32 C F 1 (ELE) F41LL 32 1.3 SW 2,600 3,328 - 0.0 -$ -$ $0









COST & SAVINGS ANALYSIS

15 Store

35

Custodial

Girls TR

Boys TR

36

Zoom Room

23 Vestibule

33 Storage

45 Storage

Storage

Storage

Mechanical

36

Storage

200 Storage

200A

25

OT-PT

22

Mechanical

24

33

23

Vestibule

34

102 TR

Conference

Superintendent

107

105B

104

102

105A

Nurse TR

116

103

17

16

16 Storage

108B TR

108B TR

115

108B

Boys TR

122

110

111

115 TR

118

219

220

Principal Vestibule

Principal

112

Main Office

Guidance

113

Nurse

Office

205

206

204

217

218

117

120

118

119

121

RETROFIT CONDITIONS

Area Description

203

202

EXISTING CONDITIONS

Unique description of the location - Room number/Room

name: Floor number (if applicable)

207

Boys TR

221

216

Social Worker

LDTG

208A

207A

Girls TR

208B

Cust Closet

208

209

Psych

210

211

213

212

214

208C

VP

7/6/2012 Page 5, ECM-7



ECM-7 Lighting Replacements $6.14 $/kW

No. of


Watts per

Fixture kW/Space

Exist

Control

Annual

Hours Annual kWh

Number of


Watts per

Fixture kW/Space

Retrofit

Control

Annual

Hours

Annual

kWh

Annual kWh

Saved

Annual kW

Saved

Annual $

Saved

Retrofit

Cost

NJ Smart

Start

Lighting

Incentive

Simple

Payback

With Out

Incentive

Simple

Payback

Field

Code

No. of fixtures

before the

retrofit


2T 40 R F(U) = 2'x2' Troff 40 w



Fixture Wattages

Value from

Table of

Standard

Fixture

Wattages

(Watts/Fixt) *

(Fixt No.)

Pre-inst.

control device

Estimated daily

hours for the

usage group

(kW/space) *

(Annual Hours)

No. of fixtures

after the retrofit


2T 40 R F(U) = 2'x2' Troff 40


Code from Table of

Standard Fixture

Wattages

Value from

Table of

Standard

Fixture

Wattages

(Watts/Fixt) *

(Number of

Fixtures)

Retrofit

control

device

Estimated

annual hours

for the usage

group

(kW/space)

* (Annual

Hours)

(Original Annual

kWh) - (Retrofit

Annual kWh)

(Original Annual

kW) - (Retrofit

Annual kW)

(kWh Saved) *

($/kWh)

Cost for

renovations to

lighting

system

Prescriptive

Lighting

Measures

Length of time

for renovations

cost to be

recovered

Length of time for

renovations cost to

be recovered

COST & SAVINGS ANALYSISRETROFIT CONDITIONS

Area Description

203

EXISTING CONDITIONS
















196 1 W 32 C F 4 (ELE) F44ILL 112 0.1 SW 2600 291 1 W 32 C F 4 (ELE) F44ILL 112 0.1 SW 2,600 291 - 0.0 -$ -$ $0














12 6 1B 35 C F 2 (MAG) F42EE 72 0.4 SW 2400 1,037 6 1B 35 C F 2 F42SSILL 48 0.3 SW 2,400 691 346 0.1 51.74$ 688.50$ $0 13.3 13.3


201 30 T 32 R F 3 (ELE) F43ILL/2 90 2.7 Breaker 2600 7,020 30 T 32 R F 3 (ELE) F43ILL/2 90 2.7 Breaker 2,600 7,020 - 0.0 -$ -$ $0



196 1 W 32 C F 4 (ELE) F44ILL 112 0.1 SW 2000 224 1 W 32 C F 4 (ELE) F44ILL 112 0.1 SW 2,000 224 - 0.0 -$ -$ $0











9 18 High Bay MH 400 35 Feet High MH400/1 458 8.2 Breaker 2800 23,083 18 C 54 C F 5 F45GHL 200 3.6 Breaker 2,800 10,080 13,003 4.6 1,889.74$ 9,225.00$ $1,800 4.9 3.9
















1,067 63.8 159,102 1,067 6,735 63.0 157,234 1,868 0.8 $280 $2,936 $290

0.8 $58

1,868 $222

$280 10.5 9.4

Admin Offices Girls TR

50

51

52

49

53

15 Store

12

14

13

10

9

Admin Offices Boys TR

49

Admin Offices

12

10 Vestibule

49

46

11

12A

12B

Total savings

kWh Savings

Demand Savings

Total

Admin Offices

Admin Offices

Admin Offices

Storage

Mechanical

Admin

Admin

Auditorium

Stage

Girls TR

Faculty TR

Girls Locker

Girls Shower

Girls TR

Storage

Storage

Boys Locker

Boys Shower

Boys

Gym Office

Gym Office Vest

Gym

Gym Vest

Custodial

Boys Tr

A-8

A-5

A-6

A-3

A-4

Boys TR

Girls TR

A-1

A-2

Storage

Corridor

Stairs (blue, orange, green, purple, and red)

7/6/2012 Page 6, ECM-7



ECM-8 Install Occupancy Sensors $6.14 $/kW

No. of


Watts per

Fixture kW/Space

Exist

Control

Annual

Hours Annual kWh

Number of


Watts per

Fixture kW/Space

Retrofit

Control

Annual

Hours

Annual

kWh

Annual kWh

Saved

Annual kW

Saved

Annual $

Saved

Retrofit

Cost

NJ Smart

Start

Lighting

Incentive

Simple

Payback

With Out

Incentive

Simple

Payback

Field

Code

No. of fixtures

before the

retrofit


2T 40 R F(U) = 2'x2' Troff 40 w



Fixture Wattages

Value from

Table of

Standard

Fixture

Wattages

(Watts/Fixt) *

(Fixt No.)

Pre-inst.

control

device

Estimated

annual hours

for the usage

group

(kW/space) *

(Annual Hours)

No. of fixtures

after the retrofit


2T 40 R F(U) = 2'x2' Troff 40


Code from Table of

Standard Fixture

Wattages

Value from

Table of

Standard

Fixture

Wattages

(Watts/Fixt) *

(Number of

Fixtures)

Retrofit

control

device

Estimated

annual hours

for the usage

group

(kW/space)

* (Annual

Hours)

(Original

Annual kWh) -

(Retrofit Annual

kWh)

(Original

Annual kW) -

(Retrofit Annual

kW)

(kW Saved) *

($/kWh)

Cost for

renovations to

lighting

system

Length of time

for renovations

cost to be

recovered

Length of time for

renovations cost to

be recovered

13 27 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 1.6 SW 2600 4,212.0 27 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 1.6 C-OCC 1950 3,159.0 1,053.0 0.0 $125.31 $202.50 $35.00 1.6 1.3

13 20 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 1.2 SW 2600 3,120.0 20 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 1.2 C-OCC 1950 2,340.0 780.0 0.0 $92.82 $202.50 $35.00 2.2 1.8


13 18 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 1.1 SW 2600 2,808.0 18 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 1.1 C-OCC 1950 2,106.0 702.0 0.0 $83.54



18 3 T 32 R F 4 (ELE) F44ILL 112 0.3 SW 1000 336.0 3 T 32 R F 4 (ELE) F44ILL 112 0.3 None 1000 336.0 0.0 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

13 6 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 0.4 SW 1000 360.0 6 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 0.4 None 1000 360.0 0.0 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

18 8 T 32 R F 4 (ELE) F44ILL 112 0.9 SW 2600 2,329.6 8 T 32 R F 4 (ELE) F44ILL 112 0.9 C-OCC 1950 1,747.2 582.4 0.0 $69.31 $202.50 $35.00 2.9 2.4


18 3 T 32 R F 4 (ELE) F44ILL 112 0.3 SW 1000 336.0 3 T 32 R F 4 (ELE) F44ILL 112 0.3 None 1000 336.0 0.0 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00







13 4 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 0.2 SW 2600 624.0 4 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 0.2 C-OCC 1950 468.0 156.0 0.0 $18.56 $202.50 $35.00 10.9 9.0



7 6 2T 32 R F 2 (u) (ELE) Thin Tube FU2LL 60 0.4 SW 2400 864.0 6 2T 32 R F 2 (u) (ELE) Thin Tube FU2LL 60 0.4 C-OCC 1800 648.0 216.0 0.0 $25.70


7 2 2T 32 R F 2 (u) (ELE) Thin Tube FU2LL 60 0.1 SW 2400 288.0 2 2T 32 R F 2 (u) (ELE) Thin Tube FU2LL 60 0.1 C-OCC 1800 216.0 72.0 0.0 $8.57 $202.50 $35.00 23.6 19.5

18 2 T 32 R F 4 (ELE) F44ILL 112 0.2 SW 2000 448.0 2 T 32 R F 4 (ELE) F44ILL 112 0.2 C-OCC 1500 336.0 112.0 0.0 $13.33 $202.50 $35.00 15.2 12.6


























1 1 SQ 13 W CF 2 (MAG) CFQ13/2 31 0.0 SW 2000 62.0 1 SQ 13 W CF 2 (MAG) CFQ13/2 31 0.0 C-OCC 1500 46.5 15.5 0.0 $1.84 $202.50 $35.00 109.8 90.8








13 6 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 0.4 SW 2600 936.0 6 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 0.4 C-OCC 1950 702.0 234.0 0.0 $27.85










201 6 T 32 R F 3 (ELE) F43ILL/2 90 0.5 SW 2400 1,296.0 6 T 32 R F 3 (ELE) F43ILL/2 90 0.5 C-OCC 1800 972.0 324.0 0.0 $38.56 $202.50 $0.00 5.3 5.3










1 1 SQ 13 W CF 2 (MAG) CFQ13/2 31 0.0 SW 1000 31.0 1 SQ 13 W CF 2 (MAG) CFQ13/2 31 0.0 None 1000 31.0 0.0 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00





199 1 W 32 C F 1 (ELE) F41LL 32 0.0 SW 2600 83.2 1 W 32 C F 1 (ELE) F41LL 32 0.0 C-OCC 1950 62.4 20.8 0.0 $2.48 $202.50 $35.00 81.8 67.7


199 40 W 32 C F 1 (ELE) F41LL 32 1.3 SW 2600 3,328.0 40 W 32 C F 1 (ELE) F41LL 32 1.3 C-OCC 1950 2,496.0 832.0 0.0 $99.01 $202.50 $35.00 2.0 1.7


1 2 SQ 13 W CF 2 (MAG) CFQ13/2 31 0.1 SW 1000 62.0 2 SQ 13 W CF 2 (MAG) CFQ13/2 31 0.1 None 1000 62.0 0.0 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00



206

207A

202

205

204

207

208A

Cust Closet

208B

209

208

210

203


Area DescriptionUnique description of the location - Room


EXISTING CONDITIONS RETROFIT CONDITIONS

36

Zoom Room

Storage

Mechanical

22

Girls TR

Boys TR

36

Storage

17

Mechanical

35

23 Vestibule

23

24

33

34

33 Storage

Custodial

Office

25

102

102 TR

103

Vestibule

200 Storage

200A

OT-PT

Storage

108B TR

105B

105A

104

116

115

115 TR

107

Conference

Guidance

122

Principal

Principal Vestibule

Superintendent

Boys TR

108B

112

113

110

Main Office

119

108B TR

111

Nurse

216

Social Worker

LDTG

Girls TR

118

Nurse TR

220

118

121

117

Boys TR

221

217

120

218

219

5.9 4.9

211

213

212

214

208C

VP

Psych

$202.50 $35.00 3.8 3.1

0.50.7$35.00$202.50

$202.50 $35.00

7/6/2012 Page 7, ECM-8



ECM-8 Install Occupancy Sensors $6.14 $/kW

No. of


Watts per

Fixture kW/Space

Exist

Control

Annual

Hours Annual kWh

Number of


Watts per

Fixture kW/Space

Retrofit

Control

Annual

Hours

Annual

kWh

Annual kWh

Saved

Annual kW

Saved

Annual $

Saved

Retrofit

Cost

NJ Smart

Start

Lighting

Incentive

Simple

Payback

With Out

Incentive

Simple

Payback

Field

Code

No. of fixtures

before the

retrofit


2T 40 R F(U) = 2'x2' Troff 40 w



Fixture Wattages

Value from

Table of

Standard

Fixture

Wattages

(Watts/Fixt) *

(Fixt No.)

Pre-inst.

control

device

Estimated

annual hours

for the usage

group

(kW/space) *

(Annual Hours)

No. of fixtures

after the retrofit


2T 40 R F(U) = 2'x2' Troff 40


Code from Table of

Standard Fixture

Wattages

Value from

Table of

Standard

Fixture

Wattages

(Watts/Fixt) *

(Number of

Fixtures)

Retrofit

control

device

Estimated

annual hours

for the usage

group

(kW/space)

* (Annual

Hours)

(Original

Annual kWh) -

(Retrofit Annual

kWh)

(Original

Annual kW) -

(Retrofit Annual

kW)

(kW Saved) *

($/kWh)

Cost for

renovations to

lighting

system

Length of time

for renovations

cost to be

recovered

Length of time for

renovations cost to

be recovered

203


Area DescriptionUnique description of the location - Room


EXISTING CONDITIONS RETROFIT CONDITIONS

13 8 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 0.5 SW 2600 1,248.0 8 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 0.5 C-OCC 1950 936.0 312.0 0.0 $37.13 $202.50 $3.00 5.5 5.4



7 1 2T 32 R F 2 (u) (ELE) Thin Tube FU2LL 60 0.1 SW 1000 60.0 1 2T 32 R F 2 (u) (ELE) Thin Tube FU2LL 60 0.1 None 1000 60.0 0.0 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $6.00





199 1 W 32 C F 1 (ELE) F41LL 32 0.0 SW 1000 32.0 1 W 32 C F 1 (ELE) F41LL 32 0.0 None 1000 32.0 0.0 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $11.00









196 1 W 32 C F 4 (ELE) F44ILL 112 0.1 SW 2600 291.2 1 W 32 C F 4 (ELE) F44ILL 112 0.1 C-OCC 1950 218.4 72.8 0.0 $8.66 $202.50 $20.00 23.4 21.1














12 6 1B 35 C F 2 (MAG) F42EE 72 0.4 SW 2400 1,036.8 6 1B 35 C F 2 (MAG) F42EE 72 0.4 C-OCC 1800 777.6 259.2 0.0 $30.84 $202.50 $34.00 6.6 5.5


201 30 T 32 R F 3 (ELE) F43ILL/2 90 2.7 Breaker 2600 7,020.0 30 T 32 R F 3 (ELE) F43ILL/2 90 2.7 C-OCC 1950 5,265.0 1,755.0 0.0 $208.85 $202.50 $36.00 1.0 0.8

199 27 W 32 C F 1 (ELE) F41LL 32 0.9 SW 2600 2,246.4 27 W 32 C F 1 (ELE) F41LL 32 0.9 C-OCC 1950 1,684.8 561.6 0.0 $66.83 $202.50 $37.00 3.0 2.5


196 1 W 32 C F 4 (ELE) F44ILL 112 0.1 SW 2000 224.0 1 W 32 C F 4 (ELE) F44ILL 112 0.1 C-OCC 1500 168.0 56.0 0.0 $6.66 $202.50 $39.00 30.4 24.5











9 18 High Bay MH 400 35 Feet High MH400/1 458 8.2 Breaker 2800 23,083.2 18 High Bay MH 400 35 Feet High MH400/1 458 8.2 C-OCC 2100 17,312.4 5,770.8 0.0 $686.73 $202.50 $50.00 0.3 0.2














13 107 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 6.4 SW 1000 6,420.0 107 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 6.4 None 1000 6,420.0 0.0 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $64.00

199 47 W 32 C F 1 (ELE) F41LL 32 1.5 SW 1000 1,504.0 47 W 32 C F 1 (ELE) F41LL 32 1.5 None 1000 1,504.0 0.0 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $65.00

1,067 63.8 159,102 1,067 64 120,059 39,043 0 4,646 $19,440 2,815

0.0 $0

39,043 $4,646

$4,646 4.2 3.6

53

Admin Offices



Admin Offices

Admin Offices

Admin Offices

Storage

Mechanical

13

52

15 Store

14

12

10

12A

12B

12

46

49

49

50

51

49

45 Storage

15 Store

11

9

10 Vestibule

16

16 Storage

Total Savings

Total

Demand Savings

kWh Savings

Admin

Admin

Auditorium

Stage

Girls TR

Faculty TR

Girls Locker

Girls Shower

Girls TR

Storage

Storage

Boys Locker

Boys Shower

Boys

Gym Office

Gym Office Vest

Gym

Gym Vest

Custodial

Boys Tr

A-8

A-5

A-6

A-3

Corridor


A-4

Boys TR

Girls TR

A-1

A-2

Storage

7/6/2012 Page 8, ECM-8



ECM-9 Lighting Replacements with Occupancy Sensors $6.14 $/kW

No. of


Watts per

Fixture kW/Space

Exist

Control

Annual

Hours Annual kWh

Number of


Watts per

Fixture kW/Space

Retrofit

Control

Annual

Hours

Annual

kWh

Annual kWh

Saved

Annual kW

Saved

Annual $

Saved Retrofit Cost

NJ Smart

Start

Lighting

Incentive

Simple

Payback

With Out

Incentive

Simple

Payback

Field

Code

No. of fixtures

before the

retrofit


2T 40 R F(U) = 2'x2' Troff 40 w



Fixture Wattages

Value from

Table of

Standard

Fixture

Wattages

(Watts/Fixt) *

(Fixt No.)

Pre-inst.

control device

Estimated daily

hours for the

usage group

(kW/space) *

(Annual Hours)

No. of fixtures

after the retrofit


2T 40 R F(U) = 2'x2' Troff 40


Code from Table of

Standard Fixture

Wattages

Value from

Table of

Standard

Fixture

Wattages

(Watts/Fixt) *

(Number of

Fixtures)

Retrofit

control

device

Estimated

annual hours

for the usage

group

(kW/space)

* (Annual

Hours)

(Original Annual

kWh) - (Retrofit

Annual kWh)

(Original Annual

kW) - (Retrofit

Annual kW)

(kWh Saved) *

($/kWh)

Cost for

renovations to

lighting system

Prescriptive

Lighting

Measures

Length of time

for renovations

cost to be

recovered

Length of time for

renovations cost to

be recovered

13 27 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 1.6 SW 2600 4,212 27 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 1.6 C-OCC 1,950 3,159 1,053 0.0 125.31$ 202.50$ 35$ 1.6 1.3

13 20 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 1.2 SW 2600 3,120 20 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 1.2 C-OCC 1,950 2,340 780 0.0 92.82$ 202.50$ 35$ 2.2 1.8



13 24 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 1.4 SW 2600 3,744 24 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 1.4 C-OCC 1,950 2,808 936 0.0 111.38$ -$ -$ 0.0 0.0

13 24 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 1.4 SW 2600 3,744 24 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 1.4 C-OCC 1,950 2,808 936 0.0 111.38$ -$ -$ 0.0 0.0

18 3 T 32 R F 4 (ELE) F44ILL 112 0.3 SW 1000 336 3 T 32 R F 4 (ELE) F44ILL 112 0.3 None 1,000 336 - 0.0 -$ -$ -$

13 6 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 0.4 SW 1000 360 6 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 0.4 None 1,000 360 - 0.0 -$ -$ -$

18 8 T 32 R F 4 (ELE) F44ILL 112 0.9 SW 2600 2,330 8 T 32 R F 4 (ELE) F44ILL 112 0.9 C-OCC 1,950 1,747 582 0.0 69.31$ 202.50$ 35$ 2.9 2.4


18 3 T 32 R F 4 (ELE) F44ILL 112 0.3 SW 1000 336 3 T 32 R F 4 (ELE) F44ILL 112 0.3 None 1,000 336 - 0.0 -$ -$ -$





13 18 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 1.1 SW 2600 2,808 18 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 1.1 C-OCC 1,950 2,106 702 0.0 83.54$ 202.50$ -$ 2.4 2.4


13 4 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 0.2 SW 2600 624 4 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 0.2 C-OCC 1,950 468 156 0.0 18.56$ 202.50$ 35$ 10.9 9.0



7 6 2T 32 R F 2 (u) (ELE) Thin Tube FU2LL 60 0.4 SW 2400 864 6 2T 17 R F 2 (ELE) F22ILL 33 0.2 C-OCC 1,800 356 508 0.2 72.35$ 810.00$ 95$ 11.2 9.9



18 2 T 32 R F 4 (ELE) F44ILL 112 0.2 SW 2000 448 2 T 32 R F 4 (ELE) F44ILL 112 0.2 C-OCC 1,500 336 112 0.0 13.33$ 202.50$ 35$ 15.2 12.6


























1 1 SQ 13 W CF 2 (MAG) CFQ13/2 31 0.0 SW 2000 62 1 SQ 13 W CF 2 (MAG) CFQ13/2 31 0.0 C-OCC 1,500 47 16 0.0 1.84$ 202.50$ 35$ 109.8 90.8








13 6 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 0.4 SW 2600 936 6 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 0.4 C-OCC 1,950 702 234 0.0 27.85$ 202.50$ -$ 7.3 7.3










201 6 T 32 R F 3 (ELE) F43ILL/2 90 0.5 SW 2400 1,296 6 T 32 R F 3 (ELE) F43ILL/2 90 0.5 C-OCC 1,800 972 324 0.0 38.56$ 202.50$ -$ 5.3 5.3










1 1 SQ 13 W CF 2 (MAG) CFQ13/2 31 0.0 SW 1000 31 1 SQ 13 W CF 2 (MAG) CFQ13/2 31 0.0 None 1,000 31 - 0.0 -$ -$ -$





199 1 W 32 C F 1 (ELE) F41LL 32 0.0 SW 2600 83 1 W 32 C F 1 (ELE) F41LL 32 0.0 C-OCC 1,950 62 21 0.0 2.48$ 202.50$ 35$ 81.8 67.7


199 40 W 32 C F 1 (ELE) F41LL 32 1.3 SW 2600 3,328 40 W 32 C F 1 (ELE) F41LL 32 1.3 C-OCC 1,950 2,496 832 0.0 99.01$ 202.50$ 35$ 2.0 1.7


1 2 SQ 13 W CF 2 (MAG) CFQ13/2 31 0.1 SW 1000 62 2 SQ 13 W CF 2 (MAG) CFQ13/2 31 0.1 None 1,000 62 - 0.0 -$ -$ -$

13 1 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 0.1 SW 1000 60 1 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 0.1 None 1,000 60 - 0.0 -$ -$ 1$


13 8 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 0.5 SW 2600 1,248 8 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 0.5 C-OCC 1,950 936 312 0.0 37.13$ 202.50$ 3$ 5.5 5.4



7 1 2T 32 R F 2 (u) (ELE) Thin Tube FU2LL 60 0.1 SW 1000 60 1 2T 17 R F 2 (ELE) F22ILL 33 0.0 None 1,000 33 27 0.0 5.20$ 101.25$ 16$ 19.5 16.4

Girls TR

Boys TR

34

Custodial

Zoom Room

Storage

35

22

16 Storage

Storage

36

36

33

33 Storage

45 Storage

17

16

15 Store

200 Storage

25

23 Vestibule

23

24

Mechanical

102

105B

105A

Storage

Mechanical

200A

OT-PT

102 TR

103

Vestibule

Principal

Superintendent

107

Principal Vestibule

Conference

104

108B

108B TR

108B TR

Main Office

Guidance

Office

118

112

122

111

Nurse

Nurse TR

119

120

118

121

115

115 TR

208

206

116

216

Social Worker

LDTG

Girls TR

117

Boys TR

221

218

219

Boys TR

Psych

217

220

113

110

RETROFIT CONDITIONS




Area Description

EXISTING CONDITIONS

202

203

Cust Closet

204

208A

207A

208B

209

210

205

207

211

213

212

214

208C

VP

7/6/2012 Page 9, ECM-9



ECM-9 Lighting Replacements with Occupancy Sensors $6.14 $/kW

No. of


Watts per

Fixture kW/Space

Exist

Control

Annual

Hours Annual kWh

Number of


Watts per

Fixture kW/Space

Retrofit

Control

Annual

Hours

Annual

kWh

Annual kWh

Saved

Annual kW

Saved

Annual $

Saved Retrofit Cost

NJ Smart

Start

Lighting

Incentive

Simple

Payback

With Out

Incentive

Simple

Payback

Field

Code

No. of fixtures

before the

retrofit


2T 40 R F(U) = 2'x2' Troff 40 w



Fixture Wattages

Value from

Table of

Standard

Fixture

Wattages

(Watts/Fixt) *

(Fixt No.)

Pre-inst.

control device

Estimated daily

hours for the

usage group

(kW/space) *

(Annual Hours)

No. of fixtures

after the retrofit


2T 40 R F(U) = 2'x2' Troff 40


Code from Table of

Standard Fixture

Wattages

Value from

Table of

Standard

Fixture

Wattages

(Watts/Fixt) *

(Number of

Fixtures)

Retrofit

control

device

Estimated

annual hours

for the usage

group

(kW/space)

* (Annual

Hours)

(Original Annual

kWh) - (Retrofit

Annual kWh)

(Original Annual

kW) - (Retrofit

Annual kW)

(kWh Saved) *

($/kWh)

Cost for

renovations to

lighting system

Prescriptive

Lighting

Measures

Length of time

for renovations

cost to be

recovered

Length of time for

renovations cost to

be recovered

RETROFIT CONDITIONS




Area Description

EXISTING CONDITIONS

203 13 1 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 0.1 SW 1000 60 1 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 0.1 None 1,000 60 - 0.0 -$ -$ 7$




199 1 W 32 C F 1 (ELE) F41LL 32 0.0 SW 1000 32 1 W 32 C F 1 (ELE) F41LL 32 0.0 None 1,000 32 - 0.0 -$ -$ 11$









196 1 W 32 C F 4 (ELE) F44ILL 112 0.1 SW 2600 291 1 W 32 C F 4 (ELE) F44ILL 112 0.1 C-OCC 1,950 218 73 0.0 8.66$ 202.50$ 20$ 23.4 21.1














12 6 1B 35 C F 2 (MAG) F42EE 72 0.4 SW 2400 1,037 6 1B 35 C F 2 F42SSILL 48 0.3 C-OCC 1,800 518 518 0.1 72.31$ 891.00$ 34$ 12.3 11.9


201 30 T 32 R F 3 (ELE) F43ILL/2 90 2.7 Breaker 2600 7,020 30 T 32 R F 3 (ELE) F43ILL/2 90 2.7 C-OCC 1,950 5,265 1,755 0.0 208.85$ 202.50$ 36$ 1.0 0.8

199 27 W 32 C F 1 (ELE) F41LL 32 0.9 SW 2600 2,246 27 W 32 C F 1 (ELE) F41LL 32 0.9 C-OCC 1,950 1,685 562 0.0 66.83$ 202.50$ 37$ 3.0 2.5


196 1 W 32 C F 4 (ELE) F44ILL 112 0.1 SW 2000 224 1 W 32 C F 4 (ELE) F44ILL 112 0.1 C-OCC 1,500 168 56 0.0 6.66$ 202.50$ 39$ 30.4 24.5











9 18 High Bay MH 400 35 Feet High MH400/1 458 8.2 Breaker 2800 23,083 18 C 54 C F 5 F45GHL 200 3.6 C-OCC 2,100 7,560 15,523 4.6 2,189.62$ 9,427.50$ 1,850$ 4.3 3.5














13 107 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 6.4 SW 1000 6,420 107 S 32 P F 2 (ELE) F42LL 60 6.4 None 1,000 6,420 - 0.0 -$ -$ 64$

199 47 W 32 C F 1 (ELE) F41LL 32 1.5 SW 1000 1,504 47 W 32 C F 1 (ELE) F41LL 32 1.5 None 1,000 1,504 - 0.0 -$ -$ 65$

1,067 63.8 159,102 1,067 63.0 118,651 0.8 4,871 22,376 3,105

0.8 $58

40,451 $4,814

$4,871 4.6 4.0

53

Admin Offices



Total

Admin Offices

Admin Offices

Storage

12A

11

46

12B

13

49

15 Store

51

49

49

50

9

52

10

10 Vestibule

12

12

14

Admin Offices

Total Savings

Demand Savings

kWh Savings

Mechanical

Admin

Admin

Auditorium

Stage

Girls TR

Faculty TR

Girls Locker

Girls Shower

Girls TR

Storage

Storage

Boys Locker

Boys Shower

Boys

Gym Office

Gym Office Vest

Gym

Gym Vest

Custodial

Boys Tr

A-8

A-5

A-6

Storage

Corridor


A-3

A-4

Boys TR

Girls TR

A-1

A-2

7/6/2012 Page 10, ECM-9



Fixture and Control Replacement Cost Lighting Analysis

COST TABLE

NJ

Material Labor Disposal Material Labor Disposal Material Labor DisposalIncentive

(2) 4 2B 34 R F 2 (u) (MAG) FU2EE 72 Replace 2T 17 R F 2 (ELE) F22ILL 33 2 1 $20.00 $45.00 INC $5.00 $5.00 INC $26.25 $25.00 $101.25

7 2T 32 R F 2 (u) (ELE) Thin Tube FU2LL 60 RL/RB 2T 17 R F 2 (ELE) F22ILL 33 2 1 $20.00 $45.00 INC $5.00 $5.00 INC $26.25 $10.00 $101.25

9 High Bay MH 400 35 Feet High MH400/1 458 Replace C 54 C F 5 F45GHL 294 $290.00 $120.00 $102.50 $100.00 $512.50

11 S 34 P F 2 (MAG) F42EE 72 RL/RB C 28 P F 2 F42SSILL 48 2 1 $20.00 $45.00 INC $10.00 $10.00 INC $21.25 $10.00 $106.25

27 XX 7 CF 2 ECF7/2 21 Replace X 1.5C LED ELED1.5/2 3 $50.00 $45.00 INC $33.25 $20.00 $128.25

56 T 34 R F 4 (MAG) F44EE 144 RL/RB T 28 R F 4 F44SSILL 96 $20.00 $45.00 INC $20.00 $20.00 INC $36.75 $10.00 $141.75

78 EP I 100 I100/1 100 Replace CF 26 CFQ26/1-L 27 $5.00 $10.00 INC $5.25 $7.00 $20.25

129 SP 75 I I75/1 75 Replace CF 26 CFQ26/1-L 27 1 $5.00 $10.00 INC $5.25 $7.00 $20.25

246 T 40 R F 3 (MAG) F43SE 136 RL/RB T 28 R F 3 F43SSILL 72 3 1 $20.00 $45.00 INC $15.00 $15.00 INC $33.25 $10.00 $128.25

No

tes Code

Watts per

fixtureStandard Code

Retrofit Cost

(inc. O&P)O.P.& DField Code

Fixture Replacement Ballast ReplacementLamps/FixRetrofit

Lamp ReplacementBall/FixCode

Watts per

fixtureStandard Code

7/6/2012 Page 11, Cost Table



Fixture and Control Replacement Cost Lighting Analysis

Hours/Day Hours/Year Proposed Utilized

16 3648 3648 Y

12 2400 1800 Y

16 3200 3200 Y

1000 1000 Y

10 2000 1500 Y

8 2240 1680 Y

14 2800 2100 Y

13 2600 1950 Y

14 2800 2100 Y

5 1000 1000 Y

Hours of Operation

Bath Room

Cafeteria/Kitchen/Service

Area

Hallways

Offices

Stairway

Storage Areas

Gynasium

Mechanical Room

Locker

Classrooms

7/6/2012 Page 12, Operating Hours


APPENDIX D

New Jersey Pay For Performance Incentive Program

New Jersey Pay For Performance Incentive Program (when ECM-1A is selected)

Note: The following calculation is based on the New Jersey Pay For Performance Incentive Program per April, 2012. Building must have a minimum average electric demand of 100 kW. This minimum is waived for buildings owned by localgovernements or non-profit organizations. Values used in this calculation are for measures with a positive return on investment (ROI) only.

Total Building Area (Square Feet) 115,483 $0.10 $/sqft

Is this audit funded by NJ BPU (Y/N) YesBoard of Public Utilites (BPU)

kWh Therms #2 Fuel Oil LPGExisting Cost (from utility) $100,413 $0 $212,915 $15,716

Existing Usage (from utility) 735,440 0 71,012 7,455Proposed Savings 178,300 0 10,329 0

Existing Total MMBtusProposed Savings MMBtus

% Energy ReductionProposed Annual Savings

$/kWh $/therm $/kWh $/therm $/kWh $/therm $/kWh $/thermIncentive #2 $0.09 $0.90 $0.005 $0.05 $0.11 $1.25 $0.09 $0.93Incentive #3 $0.09 $0.90 $0.005 $0.05 $0.11 $1.25 $0.09 $0.93

Elec Gas Total

Incentive #1 $0 $0 $11,548Incentive #2 $16,620 $0 $16,620Incentive #3 $16,620 $0 $16,620

Total All Incentives $33,240 $0 $44,789

Total Project Cost $1,351,000

Allowable Incentive

% Incentives #1 of Utility Cost* 3.5% $11,548% Incentives #2 of Project Cost** 1.2% $16,620% Incentives #3 of Project Cost** 1.2% $16,620

Total Eligible Incentives*** w/o Incentives w/ IncentivesProject Cost w/ Incentives 17.2 16.6

* Maximum allowable incentive is 50% of annual utility cost if not funded by NJ BPU, and %25 if it is.

** Maximum allowable amount of Incentive #2 is 25% of total project cost.

Maximum allowable amount of Incentive #3 is 25% of total project cost.

*** Maximum allowable amount of Incentive #1 is $50,000 if not funded by NJ BPU, and $25,000 if it is.

Maximum allowable amount of Incentive #2 & #3 is $1 million per gas account and $1 million per electric account; maximum 2 million per project

2,05515.6%

$78,700

Incentive #1Audit is funded by NJ BPU

Annual Utilities

13,135

Achieved Incentive

Incentives $

Project Payback (years)$44,789

$1,306,211

Max IncentiveMin (Savings = 15%) Increase (Savings > 15%)

New Jersey Pay For Performance Incentive Program (when ECM-1B is selected)

Note: The following calculation is based on the New Jersey Pay For Performance Incentive Program per April, 2012. Building must have a minimum average electric demand of 100 kW. This minimum is waived for buildings owned by localgovernements or non-profit organizations. Values used in this calculation are for measures with a positive return on investment (ROI) only.

Total Building Area (Square Feet) 115,483 $0.10 $/sqft

Is this audit funded by NJ BPU (Y/N) YesBoard of Public Utilites (BPU)

kWh Therms #2 Fuel Oil LPGExisting Cost (from utility) $100,413 $0 $212,915 $15,716

Existing Usage (from utility) 735,440 0 71,012 7,455Proposed Savings 178,250 0 -73,214 0

Existing Total MMBtusProposed Savings MMBtus

% Energy ReductionProposed Annual Savings

$/kWh $/therm $/kWh $/therm $/kWh $/therm $/kWh $/thermIncentive #2 $0.09 $0.90 $0.005 $0.05 $0.11 $1.25 $0.00 $0.00Incentive #3 $0.09 $0.90 $0.005 $0.05 $0.11 $1.25 $0.00 $0.00

Elec Gas Total

Incentive #1 $0 $0 $11,548Incentive #2 $0 $0 $0Incentive #3 $0 $0 $0

Total All Incentives $0 $0 $11,548

Total Project Cost $1,394,000

Allowable Incentive

% Incentives #1 of Utility Cost* 3.5% $11,548% Incentives #2 of Project Cost** 0.0% $0% Incentives #3 of Project Cost** 0.0% $0

Total Eligible Incentives*** w/o Incentives w/ IncentivesProject Cost w/ Incentives 7.7 7.7

* Maximum allowable incentive is 50% of annual utility cost if not funded by NJ BPU, and %25 if it is.

** Maximum allowable amount of Incentive #2 is 25% of total project cost.

Maximum allowable amount of Incentive #3 is 25% of total project cost.

*** Maximum allowable amount of Incentive #1 is $50,000 if not funded by NJ BPU, and $25,000 if it is.

Maximum allowable amount of Incentive #2 & #3 is $1 million per gas account and $1 million per electric account; maximum 2 million per project

Achieved Incentive

Incentives $

Project Payback (years)$11,548

$1,382,452

Max Incentive

-9,642-73.4%

$180,600

Min (Savings = 15%) Increase (Savings > 15%)

Incentive #1Audit is funded by NJ BPU

Annual Utilities

13,135


APPENDIX E

Photovoltaic (PV) Rooftop Solar Power Generation

Weather variability The monthly and yearly energy production are modeled using the PV system parameters you selected and weather data that are typical or representative of long-term averages. For reference, or comparison with local information, the solar radiation values modeled for the PV array are included in the performance results.

Because weather patterns vary from year-to-year, the values in the tables are better indicators of long-term performance than of performance for a specific month or year. PV performance is largely proportional to the amount of solar radiation received, which may vary from the long-term average by 30% for monthly values and 10% for yearly values. How the solar radiation might vary for your location may be evaluated by examining the tables in the Solar Radiation Data Manual for Flat-Plate and Concentrating Collectors (http://rredc.nrel.gov/solar/old_data/nsrdb/redbook/).

For these variations and the uncertainties associated with the weather data and the model used to model the PV performance, future months and years may be encountered where the actual PV performance is less than or greater than the values shown in the table. The variations may be as much as 40% for individual months and up to 20% for individual years. Compared to long-term performance over many years, the values in the table are accurate to within 10% to 12%.

System design and operating conditions If the default overall DC to AC derate factor is used, the energy values in the table will overestimate the actual energy production if nearby buildings, objects, or other PV modules and array structure shade the PV modules; if tracking mechanisms for one- and two-axis tracking systems do not keep the PV arrays at the optimum orientation with respect to the sun's position; if soiling or snow cover related losses exceed 5%; or if the system performance has degraded from new. (PV performance typically degrades 1% per year.) If any of these situations exist, an overall DC to AC derate factor should be used with PVWATTS that was calculated using system specific component derate factors for shading, sun-tracking, soiling, and age.

Module choice The PV system size is derived from the nameplate DC power rating. The energy production values in the table are estimated using coefficients relevant to crystalline silicon PV systems, assuming common silicon module designs. Adjusting these coefficients for specific silicon products and/or for thin-film products may result in results varying by as much as ~10%. If the user’s goal is to differentiate performance of specific products, a module-specific calculation must be used.

Net-metering policy and/or customer use habits The cost savings are determined as the product of the number of kilowatt hours (kWh) and the cost of electricity per kWh. These cost savings occur if the owner uses all the electricity produced by the PV system, or if the owner has a net-metering agreement with the utility. With net-metering, the utility bills the owner for the net electricity consumed. When electricity flows from the utility to the owner, the meter spins forward. When electricity flows from the PV system to the utility, the meter spins backwards.

If net-metering isn’t available and the PV system sends surplus electricity to the utility grid, the utility generally buys the electricity from the owner at a lower price than the owner pays the utility for electricity. In this case, the cost savings shown in the table should be reduced.

Besides the cost savings shown in the table, other benefits of PV systems include greater energy independence and a reduction in fossil fuel usage and air pollution. For commercial customers, additional cost savings may come from reducing demand charges. Homeowners can often include the cost of the PV system in their home mortgage as a way of accommodating the PV system’s initial cost.

To accelerate the use of PV systems, many state and local governments offer financial incentives and programs. Go to http://www.nrel.gov/stateandlocal for more information.

Return to RREDC Home Page ( http://www.nrel.gov/rredc )

Cautions for Interpreting the Results

Please send questions and comments to Webmaster Disclaimer and copyright notice.

Page 1 of 1PVWATTS: Cautions for Interpreting the Results

6/11/2012http://rredc.nrel.gov/solar/calculators/PVWATTS/interp.html

PVWATTS: AC Energy and Cost Savings

http://rredc.nrel.gov/solar/calculators/PVWATTS/version1/US/code/pvwattsv1.cgi[5/29/2012 4:20:41 PM]

* * *AC Energy

&Cost Savings

Station Identification

City: Newark

State: New_Jersey

Latitude: 40.70° N

Longitude: 74.17° W

Elevation: 9 m

PV System Specifications

DC Rating: 50.0 kW

DC to AC Derate Factor: 0.770

AC Rating: 38.5 kW

Array Type: Fixed Tilt

Array Tilt: 40.7°

Array Azimuth: 180.0°

Energy Specifications

Cost of Electricity: 15.0 ¢/kWh

Results

MonthSolar

Radiation(kWh/m 2/day)

ACEnergy(kWh)

EnergyValue

($)

1 3.36 4139 620.85

2 4.05 4469 670.35

3 4.58 5422 813.30

4 4.84 5299 794.85

5 5.30 5838 875.70

6 5.33 5506 825.90

7 5.27 5561 834.15

8 5.25 5503 825.45

9 5.06 5338 800.70

10 4.46 5027 754.05

11 3.15 3588 538.20

12 2.87 3460 519.00

Year 4.46 59150 8872.50

About the Hourly Performance Data*

Saving Text from a Browser

Run PVWATTS v.1 for another US location or an International locationRun PVWATTS v.2 (US only)

Please send questions and comments regarding PVWATTS to Webmaster

Disclaimer and copyright notice

Return to RReDC home page (http://www.nrel.gov/rredc )

http://rredc.nrel.gov/solar/calculators/PVWATTS/interp.html

http://rredc.nrel.gov/solar/calculators/PVWATTS/version1/hourlydata.html

http://rredc.nrel.gov/solar/calculators/PVWATTS/version1/savingtext.html

http://rredc.nrel.gov/solar/calculators/PVWATTS/version1/version1_index.html#map

http://rredc.nrel.gov/solar/calculators/PVWATTS/version2

http://www.nrel.gov/rredc/pvwatts/webmaster.html

http://www.nrel.gov/legal.html

http://www.nrel.gov/rredc



7/3/2012 Page 1, High

CHA Project #24267Franklin ES

Cost of Electricity $0.137 /kWhSystem Capacity 50.0 kWSystem Unit Cost $8,000 /kW

Budgetary Estimated TotalNew Jersey Renewable Payback Payback

Cost Maintenance Savings* Federal Tax

Credit ** SREC(without

incentive) (with

incentive) Savings

$ kW kWh therms $ $ $ $ $ Years Years $400,000 0.0 248,200 0 $33,900 0 $33,900 $0 $5,600 11.8 10.1

** Solar Renewable Energy Certificate Program (SREC) SREC for 2012= $95/1000kwh

Estimated Solar Renewable Energy Certificate Program (SREC) payments for 15 Years from RR Renewable Energy Consultants

Year SREC

AVG 95

Franklin School District - NJBPU

Photovoltaic (PV) Rooftop Solar Power Generation



APPENDIX F

Solar Thermal Domestic Hot Water Plant

Home

What Can I Do? Electric Choice Home Energy FAQs

LEARN Fact Sheets Lesson Plans

PLAY Calculators NETWORK Organizations Businesses Events Calendar

BROWSE Resources Solar Wind Biomass Geothermal Water Projects TX Energy - Past and Present Financial Help

About Us

About SECO

RARE

Interactive Energy Calculators

Our calculators help you understand energy production and consumption in a whole new way. Use them to develop a personal profile of your own energy use. Carbon Pollution Calculator Electric Power Pollution Calculator PV System Economics Solar Water Heating What's a Watt?

Solar Water Heating Calculator

Water heating is a major energy consumer. Although the energy consumed daily is often less than for air conditioning or heating, it is required year round, making it a good application of solar energy. Use this calculator to explore the energy usage of your water heater, and to estimate whether a solar water heater could save you money.

Water Heater Characteristics

Physical Thermal

? Diameter (feet) 5 ? Water Inlet Temperature (Degrees

F)60

? Capacity (gallons) 50 ? Ambient Temperature (Degrees F) 70

? Surface Area (calculated - sq

ft) 44.62 ? Hot Water Temperature (Degrees

F)140

? Effective R-value 5 ? Hot Water Usage (Gallons per Day) 400

Energy Use

10950 ? Heat Delivered in Hot Water (BTU/hr)

624.7 ? Heat loss through insulation (BTU/hr)

Gas vs. Electric Water Heating

Gas Electric

0.8 ? Overall Efficiency 0.9271

0.8456 ? Conversion Efficiency 0.98

13690 BTU/hr ? Power Into Water Heater 11810 BTU/hr

Cost

$ 3.00 /Therm ? Utility Rates $ 0.137 /kWh

$ 3597.732 ? Yearly Water Heating Cost $ 4151.039

How Does Solar Compare?

? Solar Water Heater Cost: $ 22000? Percentage Solar:

70

8.735662 years for gas ? Payback Time for Solar System 7.571253years for electric

More information on solar water heating:

Fact sheet - Solar Water Heaters Fact sheet - Solar Water Heaters for Swimming Pools Kids fact sheet - Heat from the Sun

Return to Top of Page

Page 1 of 2Interactive Energy Calculators

7/6/2012http://infinitepower.org/calc_water.htm

Franklin School District - NJBPU MultipliersCHA Project #24267 Material: 1Franklin ES Labor: 1

Equipment: 1

MAT. LABOR EQUIP. MAT. LABOR EQUIP.

2 EA 3,500$ 1,200$ 7,000$ 2,400$ -$ 9,400$

Piping modifications 1 LS 4,000$ 2,000$ 4,000$ 2,000$ -$ 6,000$

Electrical modifications 1 LS 500$ 500$ 500$ 500$ -$ 1,000$

2 EA 500$ 200$ 1,000$ 400$ -$ 1,400$

1 EA 300$ 80$ 300$ 80$ -$ 380$ -$ -$ -$ -$

18,180$

1,818$ 10% Contingency

1,818$ 10% Contractor O&P

-$ 0% Engineering21,816$

UNIT COSTS SUBTOTAL COSTS TOTAL COST

Total

REMARKS

Synergy Solar Thermal System

200 GallonStorage Tank

10 Gallon Drip Tank

Subtotal

Description QTY UNIT


APPENDIX G

EPA Portfolio Manager

OMB No. 2060-0347

STATEMENT OF ENERGY PERFORMANCEFranklin Elementary School

Building ID: 3215926 For 12-month Period Ending: March 31, 20121

Date SEP becomes ineligible: N/A Date SEP Generated: July 06, 2012

FacilityFranklin Elementary School50 Washington AveFranklin, NJ 07416

Facility OwnerN/A

Primary Contact for this FacilityN/A

Year Built: 1915Gross Floor Area (ft2): 115,483

Energy Performance Rating2 (1-100) 78

Site Energy Use Summary3

Electricity - Grid Purchase(kBtu) 2,079,955 Fuel Oil (No. 2) (kBtu) 4,742,594 Propane (kBtu) 622,406 Natural Gas - (kBtu)4 0 Total Energy (kBtu) 7,444,955

Energy Intensity4 Site (kBtu/ft2/yr) 64 Source (kBtu/ft2/yr) 107 Emissions (based on site energy use) Greenhouse Gas Emissions (MtCO2e/year) 683 Electric Distribution Utility Jersey Central Power & Light Co [FirstEnergy Corp] National Median Comparison National Median Site EUI 86 National Median Source EUI 143 % Difference from National Median Source EUI -25% Building Type K-12

School

Stamp of Certifying Professional

Based on the conditions observed at thetime of my visit to this building, I certify that

the information contained within thisstatement is accurate.

Meets Industry Standards5 for Indoor EnvironmentalConditions:Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality N/A Acceptable Thermal Environmental Conditions N/A Adequate Illumination N/A

Certifying ProfessionalN/A

Notes: 1. Application for the ENERGY STAR must be submitted to EPA within 4 months of the Period Ending date. Award of the ENERGY STAR is not final until approval is received from EPA.2. The EPA Energy Performance Rating is based on total source energy. A rating of 75 is the minimum to be eligible for the ENERGY STAR.3. Values represent energy consumption, annualized to a 12-month period.4. Values represent energy intensity, annualized to a 12-month period.5. Based on Meeting ASHRAE Standard 62 for ventilation for acceptable indoor air quality, ASHRAE Standard 55 for thermal comfort, and IESNA Lighting Handbook for lighting quality.

The government estimates the average time needed to fill out this form is 6 hours (includes the time for entering energy data, Licensed Professional facility inspection, and notarizing the SEP) andwelcomes suggestions for reducing this level of effort. Send comments (referencing OMB control number) to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S., EPA (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.,NW, Washington, D.C. 20460.

EPA Form 5900-16

ENERGY STAR®

Data Checklistfor Commercial Buildings

In order for a building to qualify for the ENERGY STAR, a Professional Engineer (PE) or a Registered Architect (RA) must validate the accuracy of the data underlyingthe building's energy performance rating. This checklist is designed to provide an at-a-glance summary of a property's physical and operating characteristics, as well asits total energy consumption, to assist the PE or RA in double-checking the information that the building owner or operator has entered into Portfolio Manager.

Please complete and sign this checklist and include it with the stamped, signed Statement of Energy Performance.NOTE: You must check each box to indicate that each value is correct, OR include a note.

CRITERION VALUE AS ENTERED INPORTFOLIO MANAGER VERIFICATION QUESTIONS NOTES

Building Name Franklin Elementary School Is this the official building name to be displayed inthe ENERGY STAR Registry of LabeledBuildings?

Type K-12 School Is this an accurate description of the space inquestion?

Location 50 Washington Ave,Franklin, NJ 07416

Is this address accurate and complete? Correctweather normalization requires an accurate zipcode.

Single Structure Single Facility

Does this SEP represent a single structure? SEPscannot be submitted for multiple-buildingcampuses (with the exception of a hospital, k-12school, hotel and senior care facility) nor can theybe submitted as representing only a portion of abuilding.

School (K-12 School)

CRITERION VALUE AS ENTERED INPORTFOLIO MANAGER VERIFICATION QUESTIONS NOTES

Gross Floor Area 115,483 Sq. Ft.

Does this square footage include all supportingfunctions such as kitchens and break rooms usedby staff, storage areas, administrative areas,elevators, stairwells, atria, vent shafts, etc. Alsonote that existing atriums should only include thebase floor area that it occupies. Interstitial(plenum) space between floors should not beincluded in the total. Finally gross floor area is notthe same as leasable space. Leasable space is asubset of gross floor area.

Open Weekends? No

Is this building normally open at all on theweekends? This includes activities beyond thework conducted by maintenance, cleaning, andsecurity personnel. Weekend activity could includeany time when the space is used for classes,performances or other school or communityactivities. If the building is open on the weekend aspart of the standard schedule during one or moreseasons, the building should select ?yes? for openweekends. The ?yes? response should applywhether the building is open for one or both of theweekend days.

Number of PCs 202 (Default) Is this the number of personal computers in theK12 School?

Number of walk-inrefrigeration/freezer

units 1 (Default)

Is this the total number of commercial walk-in typefreezers and coolers? These units are typicallyfound in storage and receiving areas.

Presence ofcooking facilities Yes (Default)

Does this school have a dedicated space in whichfood is prepared and served to students? If theschool has space in which food for students is onlykept warm and/or served to students, or has only agalley that is used by teachers and staff then theanswer is "no".

Percent Cooled 100 % (Default) Is this the percentage of the total floor space withinthe facility that is served by mechanical coolingequipment?

Percent Heated 100 % (Default) Is this the percentage of the total floor space withinthe facility that is served by mechanical heatingequipment?

Months N/A(Optional) Is this school in operation for at least 8 months ofthe year?

Page 1 of 4

High School? No

Is this building a high school (teaching grades 10,11, and/or 12)? If the building teaches to highschool students at all, the user should check 'yes'to 'high school'. For example, if the school teachesto grades K-12 (elementary/middle and highschool), the user should check 'yes' to 'highschool'.

Page 2 of 4

ENERGY STAR®

Data Checklistfor Commercial Buildings

Energy ConsumptionPower Generation Plant or Distribution Utility: Jersey Central Power & Light Co [FirstEnergy Corp]

Fuel Type: Electricity

Meter: Electricity (kWh (thousand Watt-hours))Space(s): Entire Facility

Generation Method: Grid Purchase

Start Date End Date Energy Use (kWh (thousand Watt-hours))

03/01/2012 03/31/2012 64,880.00

02/01/2012 02/29/2012 58,800.00

01/01/2012 01/31/2012 60,160.00

12/01/2011 12/31/2011 59,040.00

11/01/2011 11/30/2011 52,880.00

10/01/2011 10/31/2011 38,480.00

09/01/2011 09/30/2011 49,440.00

08/01/2011 08/31/2011 34,080.00

07/01/2011 07/31/2011 42,640.00

06/01/2011 06/30/2011 40,160.00

05/01/2011 05/31/2011 46,400.00

04/01/2011 04/30/2011 62,640.00

Electricity Consumption (kWh (thousand Watt-hours)) 609,600.00

Electricity Consumption (kBtu (thousand Btu)) 2,079,955.20

Total Electricity (Grid Purchase) Consumption (kBtu (thousand Btu)) 2,079,955.20

Is this the total Electricity (Grid Purchase) consumption at this building including allElectricity meters?

Fuel Type: Fuel Oil (No. 2)

Meter: Oil (Gallons)Space(s): Entire Facility

Start Date End Date Energy Use (Gallons)

03/01/2012 03/31/2012 6,500.00

02/01/2012 02/29/2012 6,502.00

01/01/2012 01/31/2012 6,004.00

12/01/2011 12/31/2011 6,501.00

05/01/2011 11/30/2011 5,000.00

Oil Consumption (Gallons) 30,507.00

Oil Consumption (kBtu (thousand Btu)) 4,231,031.08

Total Fuel Oil (No. 2) Consumption (kBtu (thousand Btu)) 4,231,031.08

Is this the total Fuel Oil (No. 2) consumption at this building including all Fuel Oil (No. 2)meters?

Page 3 of 4

Fuel Type: Propane

Meter: Propane (Gallons)Space(s): Entire Facility

Start Date End Date Energy Use (Gallons)

03/01/2012 03/31/2012 806.30

02/01/2012 02/29/2012 258.70

01/01/2012 01/31/2012 619.30

12/01/2011 12/31/2011 774.70

11/01/2011 11/30/2011 851.20

10/01/2011 10/31/2011 402.30

09/01/2011 09/30/2011 393.80

08/01/2011 08/31/2011 417.00

07/01/2011 07/31/2011 567.90

06/01/2011 06/30/2011 616.60

04/01/2011 05/31/2011 1,083.50

Propane Consumption (Gallons) 6,791.30

Propane Consumption (kBtu (thousand Btu)) 622,406.35

Total Propane Consumption (kBtu (thousand Btu)) 622,406.35

Is this the total Propane consumption at this building including all Propane meters?

Additional FuelsDo the fuel consumption totals shown above represent the total energy use of this building?Please confirm there are no additional fuels (district energy, generator fuel oil) used in this facility.

On-Site Solar and Wind EnergyDo the fuel consumption totals shown above include all on-site solar and/or wind power located atyour facility? Please confirm that no on-site solar or wind installations have been omitted from thislist. All on-site systems must be reported.

Certifying Professional (When applying for the ENERGY STAR, the Certifying Professional must be the same PE or RA that signed and stamped the SEP.)

Name: _____________________________________________ Date: _____________

Signature: ______________________________________ Signature is required when applying for the ENERGY STAR.

Page 4 of 4

FOR YOUR RECORDS ONLY. DO NOT SUBMIT TO EPA.

Please keep this Facility Summary for your own records; do not submit it to EPA. Only the Statement of Energy Performance(SEP), Data Checklist and Letter of Agreement need to be submitted to EPA when applying for the ENERGY STAR.

FacilityFranklin Elementary School50 Washington AveFranklin, NJ 07416

Facility OwnerN/A

Primary Contact for this FacilityN/A

General InformationFranklin Elementary School

Gross Floor Area Excluding Parking: (ft2) 115,483 Year Built 1915 For 12-month Evaluation Period Ending Date: March 31, 2012

Facility Space Use SummarySchool

Space Type K-12 School

Gross Floor Area (ft2) 115,483

Open Weekends? No

Number of PCs d 202

Number of walk-in refrigeration/freezerunits d 1

Presence of cooking facilities d Yes

Percent Cooled d 100

Percent Heated d 100

Months o N/A

High School? No

School District o N/A

Energy Performance ComparisonEvaluation Periods Comparisons

Performance Metrics Current(Ending Date 03/31/2012)

Baseline(Ending Date 01/31/2012) Rating of 75 Target National Median

Energy Performance Rating 78 81 75 N/A 50

Energy Intensity

Site (kBtu/ft2) 64 61 67 N/A 86

Source (kBtu/ft2) 107 103 112 N/A 143

Energy Cost

$/year $ 208,052.49 $ 188,255.12 $ 216,894.80 N/A $ 277,371.05

$/ft2/year $ 1.80 $ 1.63 $ 1.88 N/A $ 2.40

Greenhouse Gas Emissions

MtCO2e/year 683 649 712 N/A 911

kgCO2e/ft2/year 6 6 6 N/A 8

More than 50% of your building is defined as K-12 School. Please note that your rating accounts for all of the spaces listed. The National Median column presentsenergy performance data your building would have if your building had a median rating of 50. Notes:o - This attribute is optional.d - A default value has been supplied by Portfolio Manager.

2012Franklin Elementary School50 Washington AveFranklin, NJ 07416

Portfolio Manager Building ID: 3215926

The energy use of this building has been measured and compared to other similar buildings using theEnvironmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) Energy Performance Scale of 1–100, with 1 being the least energyefficient and 100 the most energy efficient. For more information, visit energystar.gov/benchmark.

This building’sscore

78

100

Most Efficient

This building uses 107 kBtu per square foot per year.*

*Based on source energy intensity for the 12 month period ending March 2012

Date of certification

Date Generated: 07/06/2012

Statement ofEnergy Performance

1

Least Efficient

50

Median

Buildings with a score of75 or higher may qualifyfor EPA’s ENERGY STAR.

I certify that the information contained within this statement is accurate and in accordance with U.S.Environmental Protection Agency’s measurement standards, found at energystar.gov

Date post:	19-Jul-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	1 times
Download:	0 times

FRANKLIN SCHOOL DISTRICT FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL … · 2013-11-07 · CHA PROJECT NO. 24267...

Documents