Date post: | 23-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | russell-grant |
View: | 214 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Fraud and Forensic Accounting
The Basics
October 23, 2008
Economic Crime Institute
Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley
West Virginia University
Tanner Distinguished Professor of Public Accounting
Opening RemarksOpening Remarks
In God We Trust
Everyone Else, We Examine
Adapted from Michael Connelly’s Void Moon
Ronald Reagan: Trust, but Verify
West Virginia University
Definitions and InterrelationshipsDefinitions and Interrelationships
Internal and External
AuditingPlanning
Risk AssessmentInternal controlsAudit Evidence
Reporting
Forensic Accounting
Accounting and Legal Matters
FraudPrevention and Deterrence
DetectionInvestigationRemediation
West Virginia University
Intersection of accounting and the lawasset misappropriation
corruption / abuse / conflicts of interest
financial statement fraud (fraudulent representations)
broader legal engagements – civil litigation
Forensic AccountingForensic Accounting
West Virginia University
Prevention & DeterrenceDetectionInvestigationRemediation
Fraud ProfessionalFraud Professional
West Virginia University
F/S free from material misstatement
– Planning– Risk Assessment– Internal Controls– Audit Evidence– Reporting
AuditingAuditing
West Virginia University
Working knowledge of:AccountingThe legal systemCriminologyInvestigative Techniques
Detail orientedOrganizedThink criticallyExcellent communication skills
Fraud and Forensic Fraud and Forensic Accounting SkillsAccounting Skills
West Virginia University
Critical Thinking ExerciseCritical Thinking Exercise
Assuming the following are true statements about a deck of cards, what can a deck of cards be likened to?
12 face cards (excluding ace) 52 cards in a deck 4 suits
Source: Card Games for Smart Kids (Margie Golick, PhD, Sterling Publishing, NY)
West Virginia University
Critical Thinking ExerciseCritical Thinking Exercise
What if I provide the following piece of information?
Assume that an ace has a value of 1, jack=11, queen=12 and king=13, add up the value of all 52 the cards and add one for the joker:
1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10+11+12+13=91 91 * 4 = 364 364 + 1 (joker) = 365
Source: Card Games for Smart Kids (Margie Golick, PhD, Sterling Publishing, NY)
West Virginia University
Critical Thinking ExerciseCritical Thinking Exercise
Assuming the following are true statements about a deck of cards, what can a deck of cards be likened to?
Source: Card Games for Smart Kids
(Margie Golick, PhD, Sterling Publishing, NY)
365 12 face cards 52 cards in a deck 4 suits
West Virginia University
Critical Thinking ExerciseCritical Thinking Exercise
Assuming the following are true statements about a deck of cards, what can a deck of cards be likened to?
Source: Card Games for Smart Kids
(Margie Golick, PhD, Sterling Publishing, NY)
365 12 face cards 52 cards in a deck 4 suits
Days in a year Months in a year Weeks in a year Seasons in a year
West Virginia University
Critical Thinking ExerciseCritical Thinking Exercise
Final question about a deck of cards?
Why is the ace, the card with the lowest numerical value, considered more valuable than the king in most cards games?
Source: Card Games for Smart Kids
(Margie Golick, PhD, Sterling Publishing, NY)
West Virginia University
Critical ThinkingCritical Thinking
What is the lesson learned?
(1) Persons who commit fraud do not think like us so we need to be flexible in how we approach other people’s worlds! A question of values…
(2) Pull on a thread…sometimes it’s that one little piece of data that makes it all make sense. Keep digging, gathering information until you have an adequate explanation?
West Virginia University
Investigating FraudInvestigating Fraud
West Virginia University
What would you do?What would you do?
Thomas Coughlin– Vice-Chairman of Walmart
– Long-time Family Friend of Sam Walton
– Need: Alligator Books, Dog Pen, Hunting Vacations
– Is it OK to Make Walmart Pay for this? Division ofAccounting
West Virginia University
What would you do?What would you do?
Losses?
Income?
Division ofAccounting
West Virginia University
Estimated Losses to the US Estimated Losses to the US EconomyEconomy
$994 Billion
7% Revenue25% losses > $1M
ACFE 2008 Report to the Nation:
Occupational Fraud
West Virginia University
West Virginia University
Length of Time With CompanyLength of Time With Company
Less Than 3 Years…………………..26 Percent 3-5 Years……………………………14 Percent 5-10 Years………………………….. 30 Percent 10-20 Years………………………… 20 Percent Over 20 Years……………………… 10 Percent
West Virginia University
Perpetrators’ AgesPerpetrators’ Ages
Under 26 Years Old……………...……14 Percent 26-35 Years Old……………………… 28 Percent 36-45 Years Old……………………… 36 Percent 46-55 Years Old……………………… 12 Percent Over 55 Years Old…………………… 10 Percent
West Virginia University
Fraud ObservationsFraud Observations
1. ** People who commit fraud never stop. It’s hard to be dishonest the first time; but once one crosses the line, he or she
never stops until caught.
2. Embezzlers seldom save their stolen goods.
3. *** Embezzlers get more greedy and sloppy over time.
West Virginia University
Size of Victim OrganizationSize of Victim Organization
Size Percent Dollars
< 100 employees 46% $98,000
100-999 21% $78,500
1,000-9,999 20% $87,500
10,000+ 13% $105,500
West Virginia University
Type of FraudType of Fraud
Type Frequency Dollars
Financial Statement Fraud
8% $1,000,000
Corruption 30% $250,000
Theft of Cash / Non-Cash Assets
93% $93,000
West Virginia University
PerpetratorPerpetrator
Perpetrator Percent Dollars
Owner / Executive
12% $900,000
Manager 34% $140,000
Employee 68% $62,000
West Virginia University
DiscoveryDiscovery
Discovery Percent Dollars
Tip / Accident 61% $120,000
Internal Audit 24% $98,000
Internal Control 18% $40,000
External Audit 11% $113,500
West Virginia University
Who Commits FraudWho Commits Fraud --DemographicsDemographics
Married Active Church
Members Children
Conclusion:
Good Education First-Time Offenders Good Employees Don’t Abuse Alcohol
West Virginia University
GenderGender
Male……………..53 Percent $160K Female…………. 47 Percent $60K
West Virginia University
Why People Commit FraudWhy People Commit Fraud
FraudTriangle
Perceived Pressure
Perceived Opportunity Rationalization
+
+
+
West Virginia University
The Accidental Fraudster
The Predator
Why People Commit Fraud?Why People Commit Fraud?
The Accidental Fraudster
The Predator!
West Virginia University
Why People Commit Fraud?Why People Commit Fraud?
MICE
West Virginia University
Why People Commit FraudWhy People Commit Fraud
FraudTriangle
Perceived Pressure
Perceived Opportunity Rationalization
+
+
+
West Virginia University
Elements of FraudElements of Fraud
The Act
Concealment Conversion
Which element of fraudis easiest to identify?
- The Act- Concealment- Conversion
West Virginia University
Elements of FraudElements of Fraud
The Act
Concealment
Conversion
Search for the strongest possible evidence.
1. Surveillance2. Invigilation - baseline3. Physical Evidence
1. Public Records2. Direct3. Indirect: e.g., Net Worth Analysis
1. Fraud Auditing2. Document Examination3. Physical Asset Counts4. Computer Searches
+ Inquiry Methods1. Interviewing/ Interrogation2. Honesty Testing
West Virginia University
Fraud DetectionFraud Detection
West Virginia University
Professional SkepticismProfessional Skepticism
A recognition that fraud may be present
An attitude that includes a questioning mind and a critical assessment of audit evidence – Pull on the threads!
A commitment to persuasive evidence (whether or not fraud is present) – Go that extra mile
West Virginia University
Assuming the Fraud May Be Assuming the Fraud May Be PresentPresent
Process to:
(-) Identify the possibility of fraud
(-) Convincingly resolve any badges, symptoms, red flags of fraud
West Virginia University
Consider theConsider theRisk of FraudRisk of Fraud
Brainstorm
Consider how and where financial information might be susceptible to fraud
Consider how and where fraud might be hidden – Targeted Risk Assessment
Exercise professional skepticism!
West Virginia University
Red Flags - ApproachRed Flags - Approach
West Virginia University
Targeted Fraud Risk Targeted Fraud Risk Assessment ProcessAssessment Process
Step 1. Identify your business processesStep 2. Consider differences in those processes in foreign operations, as well as among subsidiaries or decentralized divisionsStep 3. Identify the “Process Owner” for each of the identified processesStep 4. Review fraud experience within the company and by processStep 5. Process Owners identify how fraud may occur in each process at each location using Fraud Brainstorming TechniquesStep 6. Identify the Parties who have the ability to commit the potential fraudStep 7. Process owners evaluate the likelihood that each of the identified frauds could occurStep 8. Determine the level of mitigation so as to prevent, detect and deter fraudStep 9. Investigate the characteristics of potential fraud manifestations within each process identifiedStep 10. Quantify Fraud Risk
West Virginia University
Obtain information needed to Obtain information needed to identify risk of fraudidentify risk of fraud
Interview ownership, management, internal auditors, clericals – carefully document statements
Consider results of analytical and preliminary examination procedures
Consider badges, symptoms and red flags of fraud
West Virginia University
Consider Policies, Procedures and Consider Policies, Procedures and ControlsControls
Understand the internal control environment
Evaluate whether policies, programs and controls are operational
Evaluate whether policies, programs and controls address the identified risks of fraud
Draw conclusions about the risk of fraud
West Virginia University
Respond to Results of the Respond to Results of the AssessmentAssessment
As risk increases
Overall response:– More creativity– More non-financial performance metrics
Specific response:– Consider need to gathering additional evidence:
the nature and extent of examination procedures
West Virginia University
Evaluate Examination EvidenceEvaluate Examination Evidence
Assess risk of fraud throughout the examination
Evaluate results of analytical and examination procedures performed
Re-evaluate risk of fraud near completion of fieldwork
West Virginia University
Draw ConclusionsDraw Conclusions
Obtain explanations for errors, misstatements / omission and other irregularities
Corroborate explanations
Make judgment:– Consult with manager– Consult with Fraud Technical Advisor
West Virginia University
Communicate about FraudCommunicate about Fraud
Document findings
Write report
West Virginia University
The Power of Non-Financial DataThe Power of Non-Financial Data
– The power of using non-financial data to corroborate financial information cannot be understated:
Laundromat electricity usage Laundromat cycle time Gas produced Tons of minerals mined Invoice details (beer)
– The Science NORA (Non-Obvious Relationship Analysis) Data mining technique
West Virginia University
The Power of Non-Financial DataThe Power of Non-Financial Data
– The world revolves around p*g:
p = price q = quantities
– - Break down activity into p’s and q’s
West Virginia University
Reasons Why Fraud Reasons Why Fraud Investigations FailInvestigations Fail
Lack of Factual Development (not proven intent)
Reliance on “Bad Person” Theory
* Pointing to Frivolous Arguments without Developing Complete Case
InterviewingInterviewing
West Virginia University
InterviewingInterviewing
Combination of– Good questions!– Careful observations!– Good listening!– Documenting Results!
West Virginia University
Judging DeceptionJudging Deception
People are generally poor judges of deception.
Most people only correctly identify about 50% of the lies to which they are exposed.
West Virginia University
Remember!!Remember!!
No single symptom or behavior proves anything because even truthful subjects can generate a random symptom that is of no consequence.
Look for a “cluster” of symptoms – two or more behaviors occurring at the same moment
The behaviors should be “timely” in that they should occur or will occur at the same moment the mental and emotional stress level of the subject either peaks or dramatically ceases.
West Virginia University
Fraud and Forensic AccountingFraud and Forensic Accounting
Comments and Questions