+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A....

Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A....

Date post: 23-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: russell-grant
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
53
Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished Professor of Public Accounting
Transcript
Page 1: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

Fraud and Forensic Accounting

The Basics

October 23, 2008

Economic Crime Institute

Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley

West Virginia University

Tanner Distinguished Professor of Public Accounting

Page 2: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

Opening RemarksOpening Remarks

In God We Trust

Everyone Else, We Examine

Adapted from Michael Connelly’s Void Moon

Ronald Reagan: Trust, but Verify

Page 3: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Definitions and InterrelationshipsDefinitions and Interrelationships

Internal and External

AuditingPlanning

Risk AssessmentInternal controlsAudit Evidence

Reporting

Forensic Accounting

Accounting and Legal Matters

FraudPrevention and Deterrence

DetectionInvestigationRemediation

Page 4: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Intersection of accounting and the lawasset misappropriation

corruption / abuse / conflicts of interest

financial statement fraud (fraudulent representations)

broader legal engagements – civil litigation

Forensic AccountingForensic Accounting

Page 5: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Prevention & DeterrenceDetectionInvestigationRemediation

Fraud ProfessionalFraud Professional

Page 6: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

F/S free from material misstatement

– Planning– Risk Assessment– Internal Controls– Audit Evidence– Reporting

AuditingAuditing

Page 7: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Working knowledge of:AccountingThe legal systemCriminologyInvestigative Techniques

Detail orientedOrganizedThink criticallyExcellent communication skills

Fraud and Forensic Fraud and Forensic Accounting SkillsAccounting Skills

Page 8: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Critical Thinking ExerciseCritical Thinking Exercise

Assuming the following are true statements about a deck of cards, what can a deck of cards be likened to?

12 face cards (excluding ace) 52 cards in a deck 4 suits

Source: Card Games for Smart Kids (Margie Golick, PhD, Sterling Publishing, NY)

Page 9: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Critical Thinking ExerciseCritical Thinking Exercise

What if I provide the following piece of information?

Assume that an ace has a value of 1, jack=11, queen=12 and king=13, add up the value of all 52 the cards and add one for the joker:

1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10+11+12+13=91 91 * 4 = 364 364 + 1 (joker) = 365

Source: Card Games for Smart Kids (Margie Golick, PhD, Sterling Publishing, NY)

Page 10: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Critical Thinking ExerciseCritical Thinking Exercise

Assuming the following are true statements about a deck of cards, what can a deck of cards be likened to?

Source: Card Games for Smart Kids

(Margie Golick, PhD, Sterling Publishing, NY)

365 12 face cards 52 cards in a deck 4 suits

Page 11: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Critical Thinking ExerciseCritical Thinking Exercise

Assuming the following are true statements about a deck of cards, what can a deck of cards be likened to?

Source: Card Games for Smart Kids

(Margie Golick, PhD, Sterling Publishing, NY)

365 12 face cards 52 cards in a deck 4 suits

Days in a year Months in a year Weeks in a year Seasons in a year

Page 12: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Critical Thinking ExerciseCritical Thinking Exercise

Final question about a deck of cards?

Why is the ace, the card with the lowest numerical value, considered more valuable than the king in most cards games?

Source: Card Games for Smart Kids

(Margie Golick, PhD, Sterling Publishing, NY)

Page 13: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Critical ThinkingCritical Thinking

What is the lesson learned?

(1) Persons who commit fraud do not think like us so we need to be flexible in how we approach other people’s worlds! A question of values…

(2) Pull on a thread…sometimes it’s that one little piece of data that makes it all make sense. Keep digging, gathering information until you have an adequate explanation?

Page 14: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Investigating FraudInvestigating Fraud

Page 15: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

What would you do?What would you do?

Thomas Coughlin– Vice-Chairman of Walmart

– Long-time Family Friend of Sam Walton

– Need: Alligator Books, Dog Pen, Hunting Vacations

– Is it OK to Make Walmart Pay for this? Division ofAccounting

Page 16: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

What would you do?What would you do?

Losses?

Income?

Division ofAccounting

Page 17: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Estimated Losses to the US Estimated Losses to the US EconomyEconomy

$994 Billion

7% Revenue25% losses > $1M

ACFE 2008 Report to the Nation:

Occupational Fraud

Page 18: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Page 19: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Length of Time With CompanyLength of Time With Company

Less Than 3 Years…………………..26 Percent 3-5 Years……………………………14 Percent 5-10 Years………………………….. 30 Percent 10-20 Years………………………… 20 Percent Over 20 Years……………………… 10 Percent

Page 20: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Perpetrators’ AgesPerpetrators’ Ages

Under 26 Years Old……………...……14 Percent 26-35 Years Old……………………… 28 Percent 36-45 Years Old……………………… 36 Percent 46-55 Years Old……………………… 12 Percent Over 55 Years Old…………………… 10 Percent

Page 21: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Fraud ObservationsFraud Observations

1. ** People who commit fraud never stop. It’s hard to be dishonest the first time; but once one crosses the line, he or she

never stops until caught.

2. Embezzlers seldom save their stolen goods.

3. *** Embezzlers get more greedy and sloppy over time.

Page 22: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Size of Victim OrganizationSize of Victim Organization

Size Percent Dollars

< 100 employees 46% $98,000

100-999 21% $78,500

1,000-9,999 20% $87,500

10,000+ 13% $105,500

Page 23: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Type of FraudType of Fraud

Type Frequency Dollars

Financial Statement Fraud

8% $1,000,000

Corruption 30% $250,000

Theft of Cash / Non-Cash Assets

93% $93,000

Page 24: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

PerpetratorPerpetrator

Perpetrator Percent Dollars

Owner / Executive

12% $900,000

Manager 34% $140,000

Employee 68% $62,000

Page 25: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

DiscoveryDiscovery

Discovery Percent Dollars

Tip / Accident 61% $120,000

Internal Audit 24% $98,000

Internal Control 18% $40,000

External Audit 11% $113,500

Page 26: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Who Commits FraudWho Commits Fraud --DemographicsDemographics

Married Active Church

Members Children

Conclusion:

Good Education First-Time Offenders Good Employees Don’t Abuse Alcohol

Page 27: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

GenderGender

Male……………..53 Percent $160K Female…………. 47 Percent $60K

Page 28: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Why People Commit FraudWhy People Commit Fraud

FraudTriangle

Perceived Pressure

Perceived Opportunity Rationalization

+

+

+

Page 29: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

The Accidental Fraudster

The Predator

Why People Commit Fraud?Why People Commit Fraud?

The Accidental Fraudster

The Predator!

Page 30: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Why People Commit Fraud?Why People Commit Fraud?

MICE

Page 31: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Why People Commit FraudWhy People Commit Fraud

FraudTriangle

Perceived Pressure

Perceived Opportunity Rationalization

+

+

+

Page 32: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Elements of FraudElements of Fraud

The Act

Concealment Conversion

Which element of fraudis easiest to identify?

- The Act- Concealment- Conversion

Page 33: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Elements of FraudElements of Fraud

The Act

Concealment

Conversion

Search for the strongest possible evidence.

1. Surveillance2. Invigilation - baseline3. Physical Evidence

1. Public Records2. Direct3. Indirect: e.g., Net Worth Analysis

1. Fraud Auditing2. Document Examination3. Physical Asset Counts4. Computer Searches

+ Inquiry Methods1. Interviewing/ Interrogation2. Honesty Testing

Page 34: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Fraud DetectionFraud Detection

Page 35: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Professional SkepticismProfessional Skepticism

A recognition that fraud may be present

An attitude that includes a questioning mind and a critical assessment of audit evidence – Pull on the threads!

A commitment to persuasive evidence (whether or not fraud is present) – Go that extra mile

Page 36: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Assuming the Fraud May Be Assuming the Fraud May Be PresentPresent

Process to:

(-) Identify the possibility of fraud

(-) Convincingly resolve any badges, symptoms, red flags of fraud

Page 37: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Consider theConsider theRisk of FraudRisk of Fraud

Brainstorm

Consider how and where financial information might be susceptible to fraud

Consider how and where fraud might be hidden – Targeted Risk Assessment

Exercise professional skepticism!

Page 38: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Red Flags - ApproachRed Flags - Approach

Page 39: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Targeted Fraud Risk Targeted Fraud Risk Assessment ProcessAssessment Process

Step 1. Identify your business processesStep 2. Consider differences in those processes in foreign operations, as well as among subsidiaries or decentralized divisionsStep 3. Identify the “Process Owner” for each of the identified processesStep 4. Review fraud experience within the company and by processStep 5. Process Owners identify how fraud may occur in each process at each location using Fraud Brainstorming TechniquesStep 6. Identify the Parties who have the ability to commit the potential fraudStep 7. Process owners evaluate the likelihood that each of the identified frauds could occurStep 8. Determine the level of mitigation so as to prevent, detect and deter fraudStep 9. Investigate the characteristics of potential fraud manifestations within each process identifiedStep 10. Quantify Fraud Risk

Page 40: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Obtain information needed to Obtain information needed to identify risk of fraudidentify risk of fraud

Interview ownership, management, internal auditors, clericals – carefully document statements

Consider results of analytical and preliminary examination procedures

Consider badges, symptoms and red flags of fraud

Page 41: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Consider Policies, Procedures and Consider Policies, Procedures and ControlsControls

Understand the internal control environment

Evaluate whether policies, programs and controls are operational

Evaluate whether policies, programs and controls address the identified risks of fraud

Draw conclusions about the risk of fraud

Page 42: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Respond to Results of the Respond to Results of the AssessmentAssessment

As risk increases

Overall response:– More creativity– More non-financial performance metrics

Specific response:– Consider need to gathering additional evidence:

the nature and extent of examination procedures

Page 43: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Evaluate Examination EvidenceEvaluate Examination Evidence

Assess risk of fraud throughout the examination

Evaluate results of analytical and examination procedures performed

Re-evaluate risk of fraud near completion of fieldwork

Page 44: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Draw ConclusionsDraw Conclusions

Obtain explanations for errors, misstatements / omission and other irregularities

Corroborate explanations

Make judgment:– Consult with manager– Consult with Fraud Technical Advisor

Page 45: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Communicate about FraudCommunicate about Fraud

Document findings

Write report

Page 46: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

The Power of Non-Financial DataThe Power of Non-Financial Data

– The power of using non-financial data to corroborate financial information cannot be understated:

Laundromat electricity usage Laundromat cycle time Gas produced Tons of minerals mined Invoice details (beer)

– The Science NORA (Non-Obvious Relationship Analysis) Data mining technique

Page 47: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

The Power of Non-Financial DataThe Power of Non-Financial Data

– The world revolves around p*g:

p = price q = quantities

– - Break down activity into p’s and q’s

Page 48: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Reasons Why Fraud Reasons Why Fraud Investigations FailInvestigations Fail

Lack of Factual Development (not proven intent)

Reliance on “Bad Person” Theory

* Pointing to Frivolous Arguments without Developing Complete Case

Page 49: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

InterviewingInterviewing

Page 50: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

InterviewingInterviewing

Combination of– Good questions!– Careful observations!– Good listening!– Documenting Results!

Page 51: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Judging DeceptionJudging Deception

People are generally poor judges of deception.

Most people only correctly identify about 50% of the lies to which they are exposed.

Page 52: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Remember!!Remember!!

No single symptom or behavior proves anything because even truthful subjects can generate a random symptom that is of no consequence.

Look for a “cluster” of symptoms – two or more behaviors occurring at the same moment

The behaviors should be “timely” in that they should occur or will occur at the same moment the mental and emotional stress level of the subject either peaks or dramatically ceases. 

Page 53: Fraud and Forensic Accounting The Basics October 23, 2008 Economic Crime Institute Dr. Richard A. (Dick) Riley West Virginia University Tanner Distinguished.

West Virginia University

Fraud and Forensic AccountingFraud and Forensic Accounting

Comments and Questions


Recommended