+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Fraud Richter August, 2012 edition

Fraud Richter August, 2012 edition

Date post: 05-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: deepak-ehn
View: 216 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 14

Transcript
  • 7/31/2019 Fraud Richter August, 2012 edition

    1/14

    The Fraud Richter, August 2012 Edition

    1 | P a g e

    The Fraud Richter

    Your monthly dose of fraud news

    Compiled by

    The Fraud Richter Team

    [email protected]

    +91-9566083416

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 7/31/2019 Fraud Richter August, 2012 edition

    2/14

    The Fraud Richter, August 2012 Edition

    2 | P a g e

    Gentle Request

    Please do not take a print out of this newsletter. Save paper. Save trees.

    Please think before you print.

    The views expressed in this publication are personal views of the respective authors.

    Dedicated to my beloved brother

    CA KVS RAJANI KANTH

    Compiled by

    The Fraud Richter Team

    August 1, 2012

  • 7/31/2019 Fraud Richter August, 2012 edition

    3/14

    The Fraud Richter, August 2012 Edition

    3 | P a g e

    Inside

    Page Content Author

    3. Inside

    4. Greetings

    5. Case StudyDeviant behaviors of employees at the work-place. Subramanya Bhagirath K

    9. Article - Olympus- The Fraud That Lasted For Two & Half Decades Deepak EHN

    12. Fraud TerminologyA Glossary of fraud terms and words.

    13. Feedback forum

    13. Gentle Request

    13. Disclaimer.

  • 7/31/2019 Fraud Richter August, 2012 edition

    4/14

    The Fraud Richter, August 2012 Edition

    4 | P a g e

    Greetings!!

    It fills my heart with great happiness to know that some of my close friends have

    cleared CA Examinations. I heart fully congratulate them for their success and wish them all

    the best in their future endeavors. And for those who didnt clear, I can say only one thing

    Keep your spirits intact, you will be a success too, if not now, later.

    I am very happy to see the amount of feedback we have been receiving all this month

    about the Pilot Edition Fraud Richter. I really thank you for that. Your encouragement

    makes us do more and more work to make this magazine a successful media for anti-fraudprofessionals and aspirants. It made our Fraud Richter Team to take an important decision.

    We have now decided to release the magazine monthly, instead of every two months as

    planned in the first place. We planned as a by-monthly magazine, as our team is a group of

    professional (CA, MBA, CMA, CWA etc.,) students and it will be difficult for us to balance

    study-work and interests. But, your feedback and appraisals gave us the confidence to face

    it!! Thanks again!!

    Also, I am pleased to say that some new members, young and determined

    professional aspirants have joined our small team. They will be helping our team to collect,

    compile, analyze and edit the recent fraud case studies, articles to feed your fraud fighting

    brains. I heartily welcome them aboard.

    This months edition will introduce you with some new areas of fraud detection, case

    studies, and article about Olympus fraud trial, and lots of fraud stuff!! I also hope that you

    like the new look of the magazine. We dont want you to feel monotonous while reading and

    hence, we will try to change the style in regular intervals.

    So, just explore around to share and learn the fraud education!!

    With Best Regards

    Subramanya Bhagirath K

    Compilor

    Fraud Richter

    01stAugust, 2012.

  • 7/31/2019 Fraud Richter August, 2012 edition

    5/14

    The Fraud Richter, August 2012 Edition

    5 | P a g e

    Article

    Deviant Behaviors of Employees at

    Work-place.

    The Sams Case:

    Sam was working in a Software

    company. He was a young engineer with

    hardly two years of project experience. He

    was very reserved, rarely used to be in

    interaction with his co-techies. He often

    spends his time in his cubicle office space.

    His colleagues never minded his alien

    behavior until one day, when they were

    informed of Cyber fraud alleged to be

    committed by Sam. As the Investigators

    dug through the past of Sam along with

    the data, they noticed astonishing facts.

    Sams colleagues knew the reason for

    sams behavior for a very long time. They

    quoted Sam was a gambler, womanizer

    and an alcohol addict.He used to spend some

    20,000 bucks every

    week on his illicit

    interests. Three

    questions raise from

    this statement. Firstly, how did a regular

    techie, able to spend so much? Secondly,

    Who helped him? And finally, (This is most

    important question) Why did not the

    colleagues reported the deviant behavior

    of Sam beforehand. The answer is simple,

    remember the fraud triangle that we

    discussed in pilot edition (Motive ->

    Opportunity -> Rationalization). Sams

    motive is to earn easy money for his illicit

    interests. His colleagues never cared about

    what he does at office, or what was his

    behavior at the workplace. They simply

    ignored Sam. This is his opportunity as

    there is no one on his back watching him

    about his daily routine. And, when he

    finallyconvicted, he said, I was addicted,

    I could not help it! This is rationalization.

    What Sam did was simple, he leaked the

    patented program codes of the

    organization to their competitors for want

    of money. It is a case of Information theft,

    a branch of cyber fraud. The investigatorsalso found some illicit content in the office

    system of Sam. These are all the traces,

    which lead to the motive of Sam. He, sold

    the organizations information for just Rs.

    10,00,000 / - which was actually

    invaluable to the organisation. This might

    look like a small amount, but, the effects

    of this are vast. The company lost

    potential revenue as a

    result of this fraud. The

    employees might get

    sacked, for the loss of

    revenue. If only could

    the colleagues have

    reported of the Sams behavior

    beforehand, the potential disaster could

    have been averted.

    What Loss can Deviant Behavior Cause?

    More serious cases of deviant

    behavior harmful to an organization

    concern is property deviance. Property

    deviance is where employees either

    damage or acquire tangible

    assetswithout authorization. This type

  • 7/31/2019 Fraud Richter August, 2012 edition

    6/14

    The Fraud Richter, August 2012 Edition

    6 | P a g e

    of deviance typically involves theft but

    may include sabotage, intentional errors

    in work, misusing expense accounts,

    among other examples.

    Deviant behavior can be much

    more extreme, involving sexual

    harassmentand even violence. All these

    deviant behaviors create problems for the

    organization. It is costly for an

    organization to pay employees who are

    not working efficiently.

    So, is one of your employeeslooking very tired- out these days,

    although there is no increase in his work-

    volume? Is one of your employees

    behaving differently than before, suddenly

    without any reason? Is one of your

    employees appearance and etiquettes

    had a drastic change these days? If your

    answer is YES, then, YES your organization

    might be in trouble. Not because of low

    workforce performance, but because of

    occupational fraud!! This might be

    surprising to know, but the facts of this

    theory are not as surprising as one might

    expect after reading this article.

    Using deviant behavior as a technique of

    fraud detection:-

    As discussed in the Pilot Edition of

    THE FRAUD RICHTER, the ways of

    committing fraud and miss-appropriation

    of the companys assets had undergone an

    evolution. Along with that, fraud detection

    theories also evolved. Thanks to the rising

    intention towards control of financial

    fraud in the minds of professionals as well

    as the business organizations. But, this is

    not the end, but a beginning of a new era

    of fraud fighting. One such modern

    theories now being used extensively is to

    identify potential fraudsters throughobservation on DEVIANT BEHAVIORS OF

    EMPLOYEES.

    A corrupt employee is as good as a

    disgruntled employee. To be more clearer,

    a corrupt employee has a better motive to

    defraud the organization. Take an

    example of a drunkard. A drunkard leaves

    no exception for dwindling the money to

    get drunk. This instance needs no further

    explanation as this is very common in a

    place like India. The same is the case of a

    fraudster. The fraudsters desire for

    corrupt practices is a sufficient motive to

    commit fraud.

    A drunkard behaves differently, even at

    times of utter soundness. This is because;

    the effects of alcohol are such that it

    leaves a person only at his death in major

    cases. Likewise, a corrupt employee shows

    some behavioral signs at workplace, like

    being too reserved, often trying to be

    alone at work place or not in much

    interaction with colleagues. Of course,

    what is the need to talk to someone whenhe is silently able to milk away the

    organizations assets?

    These kind of fraudsters doesnt want to

    talk to anyone usually. Because, they fear

    they might slip away their tongue.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_harassmenthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_harassmenthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Workplace_violencehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Workplace_violencehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_harassmenthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_harassment
  • 7/31/2019 Fraud Richter August, 2012 edition

    7/14

    The Fraud Richter, August 2012 Edition

    7 | P a g e

    Some Behavioral Signs of deviant

    behavior:-

    1. An employee in a dominating position

    (i.e. holding a top authoritative position in

    an organization), often complained off by

    the colleagues or sub-ordinates.

    2. An employee who has a criminal record

    in the past.

    3. An employee who spends lavishly, even

    though he is not financially sound.

    4. An employee who never takes a leave.(This might sound strange, but, just

    assume, if he is absent in the workplace,

    someone who takes care of his work for

    that day might be able to find out the

    fraud he has been concealing).

    5. An employee who regularly works over

    time and on weekends. (This is a sign of

    payroll fraud).

    6. An employee who skips the periodic

    assessment reviews of the company.

    7. An employee complained by the staff

    that often he involves in non-work related

    issues like Social Networking, chats etc.,

    8. An employee who shows some violent

    and aggressive attitude.

    9. An employee having a record in the past

    for unethical and immoral behavior

    towards collegues.

    These are just a few signs. You can find

    these deviant behaviors in various forms,

    which depends on the organizations work

    culture.

    Now that we know the crux of the theory,

    its time for learning some simple

    preventive measures. Because, as an

    English idiom says, Prevention is better

    than cure.

    Preventive Steps :-

    - Prepare a comprehensive employee

    fraud policy. Make the new hires and the

    existing employees as well to sign and

    agree to the terms. This creates

    awareness in the employees about the

    aftereffects of fraud.

    - Take periodical reviews of the employee

    performances, not only on the

    quantitative parameters but also on the

    qualitative issues.

    - Conduct surprise checks and inspection

    on the office automation systems and the

    organizations assets.

    - Establish fraud hotlines. This is a very

    good source of anonymous tips about

    fraud to the organization. ACFEs Report

    to the nation reports that 49% of the

    frauds are detected through anonymous

    tips and most of them are from

    organizations employees.

    - Also establish an information security

    policy and review them periodically and

    also educate the employees about them

    regularly.

    - Conduct all-round background checks of

    the employees. It is better to conduct a

    due diligence on the employees having

    criminal record before inducting them into

    the organization.

  • 7/31/2019 Fraud Richter August, 2012 edition

    8/14

    The Fraud Richter, August 2012 Edition

    8 | P a g e

    - Keep a track of overtime and weekend

    workouts of the employees. Do PARETO

    analysis on the different teams of

    employees to know the key performance

    indicators and the bottleneck processes.Often fraud is found out in bottle neck

    processes.

    - Take the review of internal controls

    periodically and swap the functions of the

    employees in top authority at regular

    intervals. This controls white-collar crimes.

    - Conduct regular social events in theoffice. This will make the silent employees

    to speak out unintentionally.

    - Establishment of surveillance equipment

    will keep track of the employees at the

    work place, but it is complained by the

    employees that it is compromising their

    working privacy and personal privacy too.

    So, better place them only in key securityconcern places viz., cash vaults, document

    rooms, server rooms etc.,

    Although this new technique or

    new way of fraud detection gives good

    results and path-breaking outcomes, we

    cannot be Assurant about the success of

    this technique in some cases. So, this can

    be an add-on, but cannot be used as aregular procedure of Fraud detection due

    to uncertainity.

    These are some of the excerpts of the

    preventive checklist. But, the list is

    exhaustive. But, again, something is better

    than nothing! Isnt it?

    - Subramanya Bhagirath K

    *****

  • 7/31/2019 Fraud Richter August, 2012 edition

    9/14

    The Fraud Richter, August 2012 Edition

    9 | P a g e

    OLYMPUS- THE FRAUD THAT LASTED FOR

    TWO & HALF DECADES

    Thanks to the whistle blower, ex-CEO

    of the Olympus Corporation, Michael

    Woodford, else the fraud duration wouldve

    been enhanced. We shall now glaze into how

    JPY117.7B of fraud was actually planned and

    implemented. Let us bifurcate the fraud event

    into two major criteria:

    1) Funds outflow 2) Funds inflow.Further, therell be three routes covering both

    the divisions, through which the passage of

    funds can be observed.

    1) Europe route2) Singapore route3) Domestic route

    Terms and Companies

    Involved

    If you look intothe receiver funds

    (companies) that were setup for the purpose:-

    1) GCI caymann setup in the caymannislands

    2) Central forest corporation (CFC)3) Quick progress company (QP)4) TEAO limited (TEAO)5) Neo strategic ventures (NEO)6) Twenty first century global fixed

    income fund limited (21C)7) G.C. New Vision Ventures (GCNVV)8) Class fund IT Ventures (ITV)9) Dynamic Dragon II SPC (DD)10)Global Targets SPC (GT)11)SG Bond plus fund (SG Bond)12)Easterside Investments Limited

    (EASTERSIDE)

    13)Creative Dragon SPC (CD)14)PS Global Investable Markets (GIM)15)GPA Investments Limited (GPAI)

    Two of the Olympus subsidiaries involved are:-

    1) Olympus Finance Hongkong limited(OFH)

    2) Olympus Asset Management (OAM)

    The three domestic companies, whose shares

    are transferred by inflating the prices, are:-

    1) Altis2) Humalabo3) News Chef

    Consultancy firms that involved are:-

    1) Axes America (AXES)2) Axam Investments Limited (AXAM)

    As you are

    familiar with the receiver

    funds and the

    terminologies, we shall

    move onto the details of

    origin of loss and

    separation scheme.

    ORIGIN OF LOSS:-

    In the late 1980s, Olympus has

    suffered low operating income due to sharp

    rise in the Japan yen. In the mean time,

    Zaiteku* was prevailing in the Japan. Stock

    and Real estate prices were having a bull run.

    Olympus adopted Zaiteku as principle business

    strategy. However due to the burst of the

    bubble economy in the 1990, the loss has

    increased substantially. Olympus started

    investing in High Risk-High Return financial

    instruments to compensate the huge loss.

    Unfortunately, the financial statements didnt

    pickup and Olympus got struck in the pit of

    losses, which amounted to 100B.

  • 7/31/2019 Fraud Richter August, 2012 edition

    10/14

    The Fraud Richter, August 2012 Edition

    10 | P a g e

    The then president Mr.Kishimoto left the

    problem to the portfolio department. The

    former full time auditor Hideo Yamada and

    the Hisashi Mori took the charge of settling

    the loss.

    During 1997-98, when the unrealized

    loss was reaching the peak, Japan made an

    amendment to the statute, which required thecompanies to recognize the financial

    instruments at fair value rather than the

    historical cost basis. Since the unrealized loss

    would be uncovered, Yamada and Mori

    approached the president of Axes America to

    draft and implement the TOBASHI^ scheme

    and transfer the loss to other receiver funds,

    which need not be consolidated in the

    financial statements of the former one.

    TOBASHI:-

    Tobashi means to fly away. In Tobashi

    scheme, loss bearing financial instruments are

    transferred to fake clients or absorbed by the

    investment firm itself.

    Yamada and Mori, with the assistance

    of the President of Axes America, has setup

    the first receiver fund in caymann

    islands.(Cayman islands is a tax Heaven

    Island). Further they worked out on the routes.

    Lets examine the routes.

    FUNDS OUTFLOW:-

    Yamada and Mori planned of setting

    up receiver funds and transfer the loss by

    incorporating them in the financial

    instruments. For the purpose, receiver funds

    are to be financed.

    EUROPE ROUTE:-

    1. Olympus pledged 35 billionof deposits in LGT bank andobtained a loan and provided

    the same to CFC. Further CFC

    bought the loss bearing

    financial instruments from

    Olympus.

    2. Olympus through OAMinvested 35.5 billion in LGT

    bank. LGT bank provided 31

    billion loan to TEAO and

    further TEAO invested 30billion in NEO, which in turn

    forwarded to QP.QP

    purchased the loss bearing

    financial instruments from

    Olympus.

    Overall, 64 billion of loss was transferred to

    CFC and 32B of loss to QP.

    SINGAPORE ROUTE:-

    Olympus approached

    commerz bank and pledged the bonds and

    forwarded loan to SG Bond, an amount of 45

    billion. But later the scheme was modified and

    the loan was transferred to CFC via,

    EASTERSIDE, Twenty first century global fixed

    income fund limited (21C).

    DOMESTIC ROUTE:-

    Olympus invested 30 billion in

    GCNVV and the entrepreneurial ventures

    invested 9 billion in GCNVV. It was reported

    that there was regular flow of funds between

    QP and GCNVV.

    THE BACKDROP:-

  • 7/31/2019 Fraud Richter August, 2012 edition

    11/14

    The Fraud Richter, August 2012 Edition

    11 | P a g e

    Three domestic companies Altis,

    Humalabo, News chef were setup. The loss

    was to be transformed to goodwill by

    overvaluing the transactions. Further goodwill

    which aroused from the exaggeratedtransactions would be amortized over a period

    or written off considering as an impairment

    loss.

    Now ITV, NEO came into the action and

    bought the shares of ALTIS and HUMALABO

    for 50000 share and that of news chef for

    200000 share. GCNVV bought the shares from

    NEO and ITV at an escalated price, Altis for

    5.79 Million share, Humalabo for 14.75Million share, News chef for 4.45 Million

    share.

    Also GT and DD bought the

    shares from NEO, pricing

    5.57 Million, 14.1 Million

    , and 4.45 Million for

    Altis, Humalabo, and news

    chef respectively.

    FUNDS INFLOW:-

    Now comes the major part of the scheme.

    Since the loan was to be repaid sooner or

    later, Olympus needs funds to repay. So

    Yamada and Mori made a scheme for the

    reimbursement of the funds. Olympus bought

    the shares of domestic companies at a sum of

    31.9 billion from NEO and 15.2 billion from

    ITV. Further these funds flowed to TEAO

    through QP and NEO. Ultimately, TEAO

    cleared the loan to LGT bank and LGT bank

    released the 15.9 billion bonds of the

    Olympus. Olympus through its subsidiary OFH

    purchased the shares of domestic companies

    from DD for 9.6 billion and GT 4.1 billion.

    These funds finally reached the TEAO through

    EASTERSIDE, CD, GPAI, and CFC. TEAO

    reimbursed the loan to LGT bank and the

    latter one released the 21billion deposits of

    Olympus making the Europe route settled.

    Now the acquisition of Gyrus came into

    light. The mediator and the consultancy firm

    AXAM was paid huge fee ($ 50 Million for the

    FA agreement and $620 Million for the

    purchase of gyrus preference shares) for

    assisting in the acquisition of gyrus, which was

    questioned by the auditor KPMG AZSA LLC.

    The auditor was immediately changed;

    Yamada and Mori discussed the accounting

    issues with the new auditor Ernst and Young

    Shinhon LLC. These funds as per the secretagreement flowed to GPAI, CD. CD forwarded

    the huge amounts of money of 58 billion to

    EASTERSIDE and the latter one forwarded to

    SG Bond, which in turn

    reimbursed to Olympus,

    making the Singapore

    route settled. A part of the

    loss was separated using

    Tobashi scheme and a partof the loss was

    transformed to the goodwill by the

    exaggerated transactions and huge fees to

    mediators in the acquisition. This complex loss

    separation scheme and the receiver funds

    involved and the transactions made this

    117.7 billion scandal, a remarkable one in the

    history.

    - E.H.N. DEEPAK

  • 7/31/2019 Fraud Richter August, 2012 edition

    12/14

    The Fraud Richter, August 2012 Edition

    12 | P a g e

    Fraud terminology

    Note: The Fraud Terminology is extract of Fraud terms from various books and articles

    related to Fraud Investigation and Forensic Accounting. In order to maintain the grace and

    the professionalism of the book authors, the matter is copy pasted instead of re-writing it.

  • 7/31/2019 Fraud Richter August, 2012 edition

    13/14

    The Fraud Richter, August 2012 Edition

    13 | P a g e

    Feedback Forum

    Please send in your suggestions and feedback about the articles and the contents of this

    Magazine [email protected].

    Or you can post your feedback in the face group page of Fraud Richter. Here is the Link:

    https://www.facebook.com/?ref=logo#!/groups/264918233623213/

    Your feedback is important to enhance our service to you in a better way.

    Gentle Request

    Small and little efforts make a big success. Please donate small amounts towards the

    education of poor. Indias future should not be remained in the ruins of poor and illiterate

    citizens.

    Our team plans to establish a small fund towards this objective. You will soon get the details

    about the same.

    Disclaimer

    All the information, contents in this magazine are the personal views of Fraud Richter Team.

    No part of this publication is a copy or imitation of any matter published in any media. Only,

    extracts have been taken for providing the readers with better information.

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.facebook.com/?ref=logo#!/groups/264918233623213/https://www.facebook.com/?ref=logo#!/groups/264918233623213/https://www.facebook.com/?ref=logo#!/groups/264918233623213/mailto:[email protected]
  • 7/31/2019 Fraud Richter August, 2012 edition

    14/14

    The Fraud Richter, August 2012 Edition

    14 | P a g e

    For Subscriptions and Queries, Please contact -

    The Fraud Richter

    Phone : +91-9566083416

    E-mail :[email protected]

    [email protected]

    And

    The Fraud Richter Facebook Page.

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]

Recommended