+ All Categories
Home > Documents > freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

Date post: 14-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: uneti
View: 212 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 43

Transcript
  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    1/43

    Seabed irregularities (unevenness) during installation(residual tension on span creation is closely linked to thepipe weight).

    Subsequent scouring(sand wave) and movement.Seabed topography and composition (type of soil), wave

    and current action and pipe properties.

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    2/43

    Type of Span

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    3/43

    End Condition Using in Free SpanFixed- Pinned end condition may be assumed forsingle spans. Fixed- Fixed may only be assumed if

    validated be observed support condition."Fixed/Pinned" in this case is assumed to be theaverage of "Fixed/Fixed and "Pinned/Pinned"bending moments, on the basis that the endfixities of a span are somewhere between the twocases but it is difficult to determine exactly where.

    When calculating permissible span lengths, theassumed end conditions have a large impact on

    the results.The fixed/pinned assumption may not be accurate when, for example, a pipeline spans between tworock ridges. The support conditions might then becloser to pinned/pinned; though the adjacentsections of pipe will provide some restraint so thatthe pipe section is not truly pinned/pinned.

    Analytically, it is only possible to accurately determine these effects with the use of anadvanced finite element analysis to accurately model the span support conditions and axialeffects.It is obviously impractical to perform this type of analysis on every span along the pipeline route.However, it may be possible to build a "typical" FEmodel to determine the magnitude of theseeffects and modify the limiting span criteria.

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    4/43

    II. Criteria for Span Condition

    Static Stress Vortex SheddingInduced Vibration:

    In Line; Cross Flow;

    Bar Buckling Fatigue.

    A. DNV-1981

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    5/43

    1. Static Stress Checked individual stress components, and the totalcombined stress condition is also limited to maximumpercentage of the material SMYS (percentage is variable according to pipeline loading condition).

    2. Vortex Induced Vibration

    VIV dependent upon the pipe and span characteristics, fluid flow around a pipeline span can result in vorticesoccurring on the wake side of the pipe. If vortices areof sufficient frequency, they can produce significantpipeline oscillations.The parameter assessment VIV is Reduced Velocity (V r ).

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    6/43

    0 < Vr < 2.2 symmetric vortex shedding producing "In-Line" oscillations, i.e. parallel to fluid flow.

    2.2 < V r < 3.5 alternate vortex shedding causing "In-Line"oscillations (unstable);

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    7/43

    4.8 < Vr < 12.0 alternate vortex shedding causing CrossFlow" oscillations i.e. perpendicular to fluid flow.

    3. Bar BucklingFor a restrained pipeline, the pressure andtemperature induced axial force (compressive), if of sufficient magnitude, may lead to beam modebuckling of the pipeline

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    8/43

    4. Fatigue As mentioned previously, vortex shedding inducedspan vibrations may be broadly divided into twocategories:

    In-line;

    Cross-flow.Cross flow vibrations by their nature are almost alwayshigh amplitude and consequently their occurrenceshould be avoided at all costs , while in-line vibrations

    are generally of smaller amplitude and may bepermissible. The criteria for permitting in-line vibrations fall within assessment of the pipelinefatigue and fatigue usage requirements.

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    9/43

    III. CalculationPermissible span lengths for a pipeline

    are calculated based on each of thefollowing criteria:

    Static stress

    Vortexshedding (in-

    line vibrations)

    Vortexshedding (crossflow vibrations)

    Bar buckling.

    For each of these criteria the permissiblespan length should generally be calculatedfor each of the following four load cases:

    Empty

    Water filled

    Hydrotest

    Operation

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    10/43

    III. Calculation

    2. Static stressDue to its self-weight and lateral hydrodynamicloading.The combined stresses should be checked againstthe allowable levels of stress given in the relevantcodes, i.e. is not to exceed thepermissible value.

    What are aand b?

    .ep

    = usage factory as defined table below .F = specified minimum yeild strength

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    11/43

    III. Calculation

    Is function likes Operation ?

    How about Functional andenvironmental ?

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    12/43

    III. Calculation

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    13/43

    III. Calculation

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    14/43

    III. Calculation

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    15/43

    III. Calculation3. Vortex Shedding

    a. Cross-Flow Vortex Shedding

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    16/43

    III. CalculationThe Reduced Velocity ( V r ) parameter see figure below:

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    17/43

    III. Calculationb. In-Line Vortex Shedding

    Stability parameter is controlling the motion , K S

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    18/43

    III. CalculationEffective mass (m e) is function of Ca (add mass

    coefficient).

    Submerged Weight(W sub)

    The relationship between V R

    and the stability parameter, K S1

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    19/43

    III. Calculation

    The Reduced Velocity for In-line VortexShedding as figure A. 3 The calculation In-Line Vortex Sheddingmethod is now thesame as for the CrossFlow. i.e.

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    20/43

    Other MethodThe natural frequency based on document ANALYSIS OF SPANS FOR SUBMERGEDPIPELINES (Shell):

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    21/43

    III. Calculation4. Bar Bucking

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    22/43

    III. Calculation5. Fatigue

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    23/43

    B. DNV-F105

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    24/43

    Methodology

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    25/43

    Methodology1. The fundamental natural frequency (first Eigen

    frequency) may be approximated by

    2. The reduced velocity, V R , is defined as:

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    26/43

    Methodology3. Onset Span Lengths :

    Given(for In Line Onset spanLength) finding Leff:

    Given(for Cross flow Onset span Length) finding Leff

    What is this mean Onset ? Check all the MathCAD file , the span length due to onset span length isbigger/smaller span length due to Screening criteria.

    Finding Vr (Reduced Velocity) ?.Reduced Velocity for In Line Flow is defined in section 4.3.5 DNV RP F105Reduced Velocity for Cross Flow is defined in section 4.4.4 DNV RP F105

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    27/43

    Methodology

    4. Screening Fatigue CriteriaThe In-line natural frequencies f n,IL must fulfill:

    The Cross-Flow natural frequencies f n,CF mustfulfill:

    5. Given f 1=f nIL finding maximumfree span length due to Inlineflow. Given f 1=f nCLfinding

    maximum free span lengthdue to CrossFLow.

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    28/43

    Methodology2. Fatigue Criterion

    ??????????3. ULS Criterion(Ultimate Limit State)Local buckling check for a pipeline free span shall be in compliance with the

    combined loading load controlled condition criteria in DNV-OS-F101, Sec.5 orsimilar stress-based criteria in a recognised code. Functional and environmentalbending moment, axial force and pressure shall be accounted for. Simplifications areallowed provided verification is performed by more advanced modeling / analyses incases where the ULS criteria become governing.

    a) Input Data

    Hoop Stress:

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    29/43

    Methodology

    Section D505

    Section D505

    Axial Force

    Where: H = Effective (residual) lay tension pi = Internal pressure difference relative to as laid = Temperature difference relative to as laid

    Characteristic plastic axial force resistance :

    Characteristic plastic moment resistance:

    Drag Force : Where:

    Other parameter is defined in DNV RP F105 , from section 5.4.4 to 5.4.8

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    30/43

    MethodologyInertial Force : Where:

    Other parameter is defined in DNV RP F105 , from section 5.4.10 to 5.4.13

    The pressure containment resistance :F101-Eq5.8Characteristic collapse pressure is finding as :Eq. 5.10

    Plastic Collapse Pressure : F101-Eq5.12

    Elastic collapse pressure, see Eq. 5.11

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    31/43

    Methodologyb) Load-Controlled Combined Loading Check

    Pipe members subjected to bending moment, effective axial force andexternal overpressure shall be designed to satisfy the following equation:

    Applies for D/t2 Pe Where: Msd : The design moment is sum of maximum environmental bendingmoment due to in-line and cross-flow VIV (Dynamic) and static bending moment

    Submerged Weight

    Pcr Critical buckling load (positive sign)

    The stiffening effect of concrete (CSF)coating

    may be accounted for by:

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    32/43

    MethodologyNormalised Moment

    Design effective axial force

    Normalised Effective Force Which calculation using Check?

    .F=Functional Load factor (S4 G201)

    .c=Condition Load factor (S4 G203)

    Applies for D/t2

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    33/43

    aMethodology and Summary

    C. COMPARE TWO METHOD CALCULATION FREE SPANLENGTH

    Coefficient DNV 1981 DNV RP F105

    1. Reduced Velocity

    Interpolate for figure (notaccurate)

    Equation (accurate)

    2. Static

    Stress

    Comparison with Yielding Criteria,

    Von Misses Stress included allparameters as:Bending StressHoop StressHydrodynamic LoadLongitudinal StressThermal StressPoisson Stress

    ULS check (Combined Loading

    Check) based on parameters as:Bending MomentHoop StressHydrodynamic Load Axial Force

    S

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    34/43

    SummaryCoefficient DNV 1981 DNV RP F105

    3. Dynamic Stress Maximum span length based on theexcitation frequency (due to Vr-Interpolatefor figure )

    Maximum span length based on Screeningand Onset criteria

    4. Bar Buckling Maximum span length based on axial force Not required, summary in ULS checks.

    5. Fatigue Check Required (but the sequence calculation of method is not finding)

    Required when Screening Criteria is violated.

    6. Validity Check Not required Check the free span length is smaller140.D, deflection is invalid/Ok, Bucking isnot influence the response/ buckled(Onset Criteria).

    7. Result Bigger (see example free span length 40m) Smaller (i.e the number is smaller

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    35/43

    Example

    E l

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    36/43

    Example

    l ( )

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    37/43

    Supplementary (wave)1. Analytic wave theories

    Wave Theories are developed for constant water depth d. The objective of a wave theory is to determinethe relationship between T and and the water particle motion throughout the flow.

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    38/43

    Supplementary (wave)1. The different of wave theory

    o if Ur

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    39/43

    Supplementary (wave)2. Defined Deep Water

    Deep water waves can be defined as those for whichor more usefully:Shallow water waves can be defined as orIntermediate water as other section.

    Supplementary (wave)

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    40/43

    Supplementary (wave)

    Supplementary (wave)

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    41/43

    Supplementary (wave) All the wave theory: Airy, stocker, Cnoidal and Solitary are regular kinematics wave and waveperiod T remains constant but reality wave always random field.

    I. Classification wave spectrum following s pecific characteristics waveFrequency spectrum;Direction spectrum;Energy Spectrum ;Height Spectrum.

    II. Classification wave spectrum following geographical name or famous man

    Pierson Mosskowitz spectrum first time (P-M);Pierson Mosskowitz spectrum second time;Bretschneider Mitsuyasu spectrum (B-M);

    Jonswap spectrum (Joint North Sea Wave Observation Project);Neumann spectrum;Roll Fisher spectrum;Storckelov spectrum;Burling spectrum;Krulov spectrum;Bretschneider spectrum;Davidan spectrum.

    III. Classification wave spectrum following water depthDeep water;

    Shallow water;

    3. Wave spectrum classification

    S l t ( )

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    42/43

    Supplementary (wave)3. Wave spectrum classification

  • 7/30/2019 freespan-120822234657-phpapp01

    43/43

    Supplementary (wave)4. Jonswap spectrum

    The spectral density function


Recommended