+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Friction Pendulum Seismic Isolation · 2016. 10. 24. · FEMA 58 Calculations of Seismic Damage (US...

Friction Pendulum Seismic Isolation · 2016. 10. 24. · FEMA 58 Calculations of Seismic Damage (US...

Date post: 01-Feb-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
130
Engineered Solutions Engineered Solutions that that Minimize Seismic Damage Minimize Seismic Damage Minimize Seismic Damage Minimize Seismic Damage Earthquake Protection Systems California, USA
Transcript
  • Engineered SolutionsEngineered Solutionsthatthat

    Minimize Seismic DamageMinimize Seismic Damage

    Earthquake Protection SystemsCalifornia, USA

    Engineered SolutionsEngineered Solutionsthatthat

    Minimize Seismic DamageMinimize Seismic Damage

    Earthquake Protection SystemsCalifornia, USA

  • Continued FunctionalityContinued FunctionalityDesign CriteriaDesign Criteria

    Limit seismic damage toLimit seismic damage toArchitectural, NonArchitectural, Non--Structural, &Structural, &

    StructureStructureto less than 2% of theto less than 2% of the

    replacement costs.replacement costs.

    Continued FunctionalityContinued FunctionalityDesign CriteriaDesign Criteria

    Limit seismic damage toLimit seismic damage toArchitectural, NonArchitectural, Non--Structural, &Structural, &

    StructureStructureto less than 2% of theto less than 2% of the

    replacement costs.replacement costs.

  • Continued FunctionalityContinued FunctionalityDesign ObjectivesDesign ObjectivesMinimize Earthquake DamageMinimize Earthquake Damage

    Minimize Economic LossesMinimize Economic Losses

    Achieve Seismic Resilient FacilitiesAchieve Seismic Resilient Facilities

    Continued FunctionalityContinued FunctionalityDesign ObjectivesDesign ObjectivesMinimize Earthquake DamageMinimize Earthquake Damage

    Minimize Economic LossesMinimize Economic Losses

    Achieve Seismic Resilient FacilitiesAchieve Seismic Resilient Facilities

  • Seismic Design OptionsSeismic Design Options

    1) Ductile Structures1) Ductile Structures

    2) Stronger Structures2) Stronger Structures

    3) Code Compliant Seismic Isolation3) Code Compliant Seismic Isolation

    4) Continued Functionality Seismic Isolation4) Continued Functionality Seismic Isolation

    Seismic Design OptionsSeismic Design Options

    1) Ductile Structures1) Ductile Structures

    2) Stronger Structures2) Stronger Structures

    3) Code Compliant Seismic Isolation3) Code Compliant Seismic Isolation

    4) Continued Functionality Seismic Isolation4) Continued Functionality Seismic Isolation

  • The Problem:The Problem:

    Building codesBuilding codes

    (Conventional &(Conventional & IIsolated Structures)solated Structures)

    allow seismic damage and someallow seismic damage and some

    collapses.collapses.

    The Problem:The Problem:

    Building codesBuilding codes

    (Conventional &(Conventional & IIsolated Structures)solated Structures)

    allow seismic damage and someallow seismic damage and some

    collapses.collapses.

  • Olive View Hospital, California, 1971

  • Olive View Hospital, California, 1994No Structural Damage after the Northridge Earthquake.

  • Non-Structural Damage, 1994 Northridge EQ

  • Non-Structural Damage, 1994 Northridge EQ

  • Storage Racks, 1994 Northridge

  • Code CompliantCode CompliantSeismic Performance CriteriaSeismic Performance Criteria

    “Ensure structure safety to protect the lives“Ensure structure safety to protect the livesof persons inside or on the structures.”of persons inside or on the structures.”

    “Preventing damage or economic losses is“Preventing damage or economic losses isnot the intent of the code provisions.”not the intent of the code provisions.”

    Code CompliantCode CompliantSeismic Performance CriteriaSeismic Performance Criteria

    “Ensure structure safety to protect the lives“Ensure structure safety to protect the livesof persons inside or on the structures.”of persons inside or on the structures.”

    “Preventing damage or economic losses is“Preventing damage or economic losses isnot the intent of the code provisions.”not the intent of the code provisions.”

  • Learning From Recent EarthquakesLearning From Recent Earthquakes

    New Zealand and ChileNew Zealand and Chilecodes require higher seismiccodes require higher seismicdesign forces than the USA.design forces than the USA.

    Learning From Recent EarthquakesLearning From Recent Earthquakes

    New Zealand and ChileNew Zealand and Chilecodes require higher seismiccodes require higher seismicdesign forces than the USA.design forces than the USA.

  • AA Magnitude 6.3 EarthquakeMagnitude 6.3 EarthquakeOccurred at ChristchurchOccurred at Christchurch

    New Zealand in 2011New Zealand in 2011

    185 People Killed185 People Killed

    2 Buildings Collapsed2 Buildings Collapsed

    1200 Buildings Demolished1200 Buildings Demolished$30 Billion in Economic Loss$30 Billion in Economic Loss

    AA Magnitude 6.3 EarthquakeMagnitude 6.3 EarthquakeOccurred at ChristchurchOccurred at Christchurch

    New Zealand in 2011New Zealand in 2011

    185 People Killed185 People Killed

    2 Buildings Collapsed2 Buildings Collapsed

    1200 Buildings Demolished1200 Buildings Demolished$30 Billion in Economic Loss$30 Billion in Economic Loss

  • New Zealand 2011

  • New Zealand 2011

  • Chile 2010 EarthquakeChile 2010 Earthquake

    20 Buildings Collapsed20 Buildings Collapsed

    10,000 Buildings Demolished10,000 Buildings Demolished$30 Billion Economic Loss$30 Billion Economic Loss

    Chile 2010 EarthquakeChile 2010 Earthquake

    20 Buildings Collapsed20 Buildings Collapsed

    10,000 Buildings Demolished10,000 Buildings Demolished$30 Billion Economic Loss$30 Billion Economic Loss

  • Chile 2010

  • In societies having modern seismic codes,In societies having modern seismic codes,for every building that collapses, there arefor every building that collapses, there are

    over 100 other buildings having noover 100 other buildings having nosignificant structural damage, but theysignificant structural damage, but they

    cannot function due to noncannot function due to non--structural andstructural andcontent damage.content damage.

    In societies having modern seismic codes,In societies having modern seismic codes,for every building that collapses, there arefor every building that collapses, there are

    over 100 other buildings having noover 100 other buildings having nosignificant structural damage, but theysignificant structural damage, but they

    cannot function due to noncannot function due to non--structural andstructural andcontent damage.content damage.

  • Worldwide,Worldwide,structures that suffer severestructures that suffer severe

    seismic damage do notseismic damage do notsatisfy owner expectations.satisfy owner expectations.

    Worldwide,Worldwide,structures that suffer severestructures that suffer severe

    seismic damage do notseismic damage do notsatisfy owner expectations.satisfy owner expectations.

  • Owners ExpectationsOwners Expectationsafter an Earthquake.after an Earthquake.

    Facility to Remain Functional toFacility to Remain Functional toServe Intended FunctionServe Intended Function

    Revenue Source UnRevenue Source Un--InterruptedInterrupted

    Owners ExpectationsOwners Expectationsafter an Earthquake.after an Earthquake.

    Facility to Remain Functional toFacility to Remain Functional toServe Intended FunctionServe Intended Function

    Revenue Source UnRevenue Source Un--InterruptedInterrupted

  • Seismic Isolation Design OptionsSeismic Isolation Design Options

    1) Code Compliant Seismic Isolation1) Code Compliant Seismic Isolation

    2) Continued Functionality Seismic Isolation2) Continued Functionality Seismic Isolation

    Seismic Isolation Design OptionsSeismic Isolation Design Options

    1) Code Compliant Seismic Isolation1) Code Compliant Seismic Isolation

    2) Continued Functionality Seismic Isolation2) Continued Functionality Seismic Isolation

  • Will code compliantseismically isolated structuressatisfy owner expectations?

    .

    Will code compliantseismically isolated structuressatisfy owner expectations?

    .

  • Trans-European Motorway, Bolu TurkeyNew Code Compliant Seismically Isolated HighwayNearly Collapsed during the 1999 Turkey Earthquake

  • Trans-European Motorway, Turkey 1999 EarthquakeBridge Girders Are Not Supported On The Piers

  • Trans-European Motorway, Lateral Shift Damage, 1999 Turkey

  • Broken Energy Dissipation Units Girders Slid Off Bearings

  • All Energy Dissipation Units Broken

  • Friction Pendulum Bearings designed and manufactured by EPS,were used to retrofit the damaged viaduct, and for the design and

    construction of three new Trans-European Motorway viaduct sections.

  • Seismic isolation is a designapproach, not a performance level.

    The seismic performance resultsfrom the design criteria selected.

    Seismic isolation is a designapproach, not a performance level.

    The seismic performance resultsfrom the design criteria selected.

  • Continued FunctionalityContinued FunctionalitySeismic DesignSeismic Design

    1) Absorb seismic displacements in bearings1) Absorb seismic displacements in bearings

    2) Design structures elastically2) Design structures elastically

    3) Limit structure drifts3) Limit structure drifts

    4) Reduce in4) Reduce in--structure accelerationsstructure accelerations

    Continued FunctionalityContinued FunctionalitySeismic DesignSeismic Design

    1) Absorb seismic displacements in bearings1) Absorb seismic displacements in bearings

    2) Design structures elastically2) Design structures elastically

    3) Limit structure drifts3) Limit structure drifts

    4) Reduce in4) Reduce in--structure accelerationsstructure accelerations

  • FEMA 58 is aFEMA 58 is amethodology andmethodology andcomputer programcomputer programthat calculates expectedthat calculates expectedearthquake damage forearthquake damage forbuildings.buildings.

    FEMA 58 is the resultFEMA 58 is the resultof 20 years of Federalof 20 years of FederalFunding.Funding.

    FEMA 58 is aFEMA 58 is amethodology andmethodology andcomputer programcomputer programthat calculates expectedthat calculates expectedearthquake damage forearthquake damage forbuildings.buildings.

    FEMA 58 is the resultFEMA 58 is the resultof 20 years of Federalof 20 years of FederalFunding.Funding.

  • The world’s largestThe world’s largestcorporations rely oncorporations rely on

    EPS EngineeredEPS EngineeredSeismic SolutionsSeismic Solutions

    The world’s largestThe world’s largestcorporations rely oncorporations rely on

    EPS EngineeredEPS EngineeredSeismic SolutionsSeismic Solutions

  • Apple Headquarters, 400,000 Square Meters

  • Exxon Offshore Platform, Russia

  • Texas Instruments Manufacturing Facility150,000 Square Meters

  • Shell Offshore Platform, Russia

  • Over 50 National, State, andOver 50 National, State, andCity Governments rely onCity Governments rely on

    EPS EngineeredEPS EngineeredSeismic SolutionsSeismic Solutions

    Over 50 National, State, andOver 50 National, State, andCity Governments rely onCity Governments rely on

    EPS EngineeredEPS EngineeredSeismic SolutionsSeismic Solutions

  • US Federal Government, San Francisco

  • • •

    CourtroomNo. One

    Preserving Historic Interior Architecture of US Court

  • Pasadena City Hall, California

  • Canadian Government Bridge

  • Mexican Government Building

  • State of California Dumbarton Bridge

  • San Francisco General Hospital

  • TodayToday 27 Countries27 Countriesrely on EPS Technologiesrely on EPS Technologies

    TodayToday 27 Countries27 Countriesrely on EPS Technologiesrely on EPS Technologies

  • Trans-European HighwayEPS Seismic Bearings

  • Turkey High-Speed Railway - EPS Seismic Bearings

  • Greece High-Speed Railway,EPS Seismic Bearings

  • Spain High-Speed Railway - EPS Seismic Bearings

  • Equador Bahia Bridge – EPS Continued Functionality DesignNo Damage During April 16, 2016 Mag 7.8 Earthquake

  • New Zealand FactoryEPS Seismic Bearings

  • China Condominiums – EPS Seismic Bearings

  • 29,729,7

    Taiwan Condominiums - EPS Seismic Bearings

  • Taiwan Performing Arts Center,EPS Seismic Bearings

  • Japan Priceless Artifacts – EPS Seismic Bearings

  • Hermes Statue : Athens, Greece

  • US $1.9 Billion Space Shuttle EndeavorProtected with Multi-Stage Friction Pendulum Bearing

  • IPCU Okemedani Hospital,200,000 Square Meters

  • IPCU Lutfi Kirdar Hospital,300,000 Square Meters

  • Adana Hospital, Turkey550,000 Square Meters

  • OverOver 50 Million Square Feet50 Million Square Feetof Buildings, Bridges, andof Buildings, Bridges, and

    Industrial Facilities rely onIndustrial Facilities rely on

    EPS EngineeredEPS Engineered

    Seismic SolutionsSeismic Solutions

    OverOver 50 Million Square Feet50 Million Square Feetof Buildings, Bridges, andof Buildings, Bridges, and

    Industrial Facilities rely onIndustrial Facilities rely on

    EPS EngineeredEPS Engineered

    Seismic SolutionsSeismic Solutions

  • Stanford University Hospital

  • Mills Peninsula Hospital, CaliforniaEPS Seismic Bearings

  • San Francisco Airport , 1 Million Square FeetEPS Seismic Bearings

  • Turkey Government Airport, 2 Million Square Feet,EPS Seismic Bearings

  • View from southwest

    California State Building, San BernadinoEPS Seismic Bearings

  • Hayward City Hall, CaliforniaEPS Seismic Bearings

  • Catholic Church, Oakland CaliforniaEPS Seismic Bearings

  • Cathedral of Christ the Light, Oakland, California

  • Fixed Isolated

  • IPCU Goztepe Hospital200,000 Square Meters

  • FEMA 58 Calculations of Seismic Damage (US $)for

    Goztepe Hospital Using Different Isolation Bearings

    Probability of BeingExceeded in 50 Years:EQ RecurrenceInterval

    Triple PendulumBearings

    Single PendulumBearings, SameBuilding

    CodeCompliantBearings, SameBuilding

    Same BuildingWithout SeismicIsolation Bearings

    90%: 22 year return $162,000 $797,000 $2,647,00090%: 22 year return $162,000 $797,000 $2,647,000 $5,782,000

    50%: 75 year return $1,224,000 $3,800,000 $10,193,000 $25,143,000

    10%: 475 year return $3,776,000 $8,832,000 $16,365,000 $166,376,000

    2%: 2475 year return $6,228,000 $10,341,000 $34,970,000 $196,717,000

  • Today Over $100 BillionToday Over $100 Billionof Constructed Facilities rely onof Constructed Facilities rely on

    EPS Engineered SolutionsEPS Engineered Solutions

    Today Over $100 BillionToday Over $100 Billionof Constructed Facilities rely onof Constructed Facilities rely on

    EPS Engineered SolutionsEPS Engineered Solutions

  • California State Benicia-Martinez Bridge

  • California State Antioch Bridge

  • Mississippi River Bridge

  • Alaska Bridge

  • California Bridge

  • LNG Tank Construction, Chile 2008

  • 2 Chile Liquid Natural Gas TanksUndamaged By Magnitude 8.8 Earthquake

  • 2 Mexican Liquid Natural Gas Tanks

  • 2 Peru Liquid Natural Gas Tanks

  • 3 Greece Liquid Natural Gas Tanks

  • ARCHITECTURAL

    & MEP ISSUES

    WITH SEISMIC ISOLATION

    IMPLEMENTATION

    ARCHITECTURAL

    & MEP ISSUES

    WITH SEISMIC ISOLATION

    IMPLEMENTATION

  • ARCHITECTURAL IMPLICATIONS

    • Critical Elements : Stairs, Elevators, Exit Ways, etc

    Fully Functional/Operational for Design Basis Earthquake (DBE) andMaximum Credible Earthquake (MCE). Movement +/- 30” to 36”

    • Non-Critical Elements : Moat & Planter Covers, Wall Joints, etc.

    Fully Functional/Operational for DBE. Movement +/- 20” to 24”.Repairable Damage for Earthquakes Exceeding DBE.

    • Location of Isolation Plane:Above foundation LevelAt Ground Level (Cost-Effective)

    • Critical Elements : Stairs, Elevators, Exit Ways, etc

    Fully Functional/Operational for Design Basis Earthquake (DBE) andMaximum Credible Earthquake (MCE). Movement +/- 30” to 36”

    • Non-Critical Elements : Moat & Planter Covers, Wall Joints, etc.

    Fully Functional/Operational for DBE. Movement +/- 20” to 24”.Repairable Damage for Earthquakes Exceeding DBE.

  • California Bridge

  • California Bridge

  • California Bridge

  • California Bridge

  • California Bridge

  • California Bridge

  • Friction PendulumFriction PendulumSeismic IsolationSeismic Isolation

    Was developed in 1985 byWas developed in 1985 by

    Earthquake Protection Systems

    Friction PendulumFriction PendulumSeismic IsolationSeismic Isolation

    Was developed in 1985 byWas developed in 1985 by

    Earthquake Protection Systems

  • Original Friction Pendulum Bearing

  • Original Friction Pendulum TechnologySingle Pendulum Bearing

    STAINLESS STEELCONCAVE SURFACE

    HOUSINGPLATE

    SECTION

    SELF LUBRICATINGCOMPOSITE LINER

    ARTICULATINGSLIDER

    PLATECONCAVE

  • TripleTriple PendulumPendulumSeismic IsolationSeismic Isolation

    Was developed in 2006 byWas developed in 2006 by

    Earthquake Protection Systems

    TripleTriple PendulumPendulumSeismic IsolationSeismic Isolation

    Was developed in 2006 byWas developed in 2006 by

    Earthquake Protection Systems

  • Triple Pendulum Bearing

  • FRICTION PENDULUM CONCEPT

  • TRIPLE PENDULUM BEARING

  • Triple Pendulum and Single Pendulum Sliding Mechanisms

  • ADVANTAGES OF TRIPLE PENDULUM BEARING

  • TENSION CAPABLE FRICTION PENDULUM

  • EPS Manufacturing Facility, California USA30,000 Square Meter Floor Space

    Certified ISO 9001Quality Control System ForSeismic Bearing Design, Manufacture, and Testing

    100% Bearing Manufacture and Testing at One FacilityApproved for the Most Critical Applications of

    Seismic Isolation Worldwide

    EPS Manufacturing Facility, California USA30,000 Square Meter Floor Space

    Certified ISO 9001Quality Control System ForSeismic Bearing Design, Manufacture, and Testing

    100% Bearing Manufacture and Testing at One FacilityApproved for the Most Critical Applications of

    Seismic Isolation Worldwide

  • Triple Pendulum Bearing

  • CONCAVE OVERLAY MATERIAL

    ASTM A240, Type 304Stainless Steel with polishedfinish

    Tensile Strength = 415 MPaYield Strength = 275 Mpa

    Exceptional corrosion andenvironmental resistance

    Large Conacve Thickness = 4.5 mm

    ASTM A240, Type 304Stainless Steel with polishedfinish

    Tensile Strength = 415 MPaYield Strength = 275 Mpa

    Exceptional corrosion andenvironmental resistance

    Large Conacve Thickness = 4.5 mm

  • COMPOSITE BEARING LINER MATERIAL

    The FPB liner is aproprietary compositebearing liner systemdeveloped by EPS foruse in Seismic Isolation

    The FPB liner is aproprietary compositebearing liner systemdeveloped by EPS foruse in Seismic Isolation

  • EPS Manufacturing Capacity : Over 800 tons per month

  • Apple Campus Bearings : 700 Large Size Triple Pendulum Bearings

    (1.3 m displacement capacity) Manufactured in Six Months

  • Testing of Seismic Isolation Bearings

    • Prototype Testing

    • Quality Control

    Testing of Seismic Isolation Bearings

    • Prototype Testing

    • Quality Control

  • Prototype Testing of Isolation Bearings

    ASCE 7 Requires Prototype Testing of Full-Scale Bearingsduring Design Phase (and NOT during Construction)

    ASCE 7 Requires Dynamic Prototype Testing

    Prototype Tests should include

    Shear Load Capacity Tests

    Vertical Load Capacity Tests

    Uplift Displacement Capacity Tests

  • Quality Control Testing of Bearings

    100% QC Testing VERY IMPORTANT

    100% QC Testing Required by AASHTO & ASCE 7-16

    When Testing is Required for 100% of ColumnMaterials (Steel or Concrete), then Why IsolationBearings which support Column Loads are EitherNot Tested or Tested to Certain Percentage (20%)?

  • EPS Prototype Testing

    Dynamic Prototype Testing at Design Phase

    Rated Capacity Tests

    Uplift Capacity Tests

  • EPS Quality Control Testing

    100% of Production Bearings QC Tested Dynamically

  • EPS Large Scale Dynamic Test Machine

  • DYNAMIC OF TRIPLE PENDULUM BEARING

  • EPS Dynamic Quality Control Test, Triple Pendulum Bearing

  • 30 Years ofUSA Extensive University Research

    Testing and Investigations at:

    University of California Berkeley, Earthquake EngineeringResearch Center

    State University Of New York, National Center forEarthquake Engineering Research

    University of California San Diego, CALTRANS SeismicResponse Modification Devise Testing Facility

    30 Years ofUSA Extensive University Research

    Testing and Investigations at:

    University of California Berkeley, Earthquake EngineeringResearch Center

    State University Of New York, National Center forEarthquake Engineering Research

    University of California San Diego, CALTRANS SeismicResponse Modification Devise Testing Facility

  • 5-Story Full-Scale Building Isolated with 9 Full-ScaleTriple Pendulum Bearings with 1 m Displacement Capacity

    E-Defense Shake Table, Japan

  • Over US $100 Billion in Constructed Value ofOver US $100 Billion in Constructed Value of

    Important Buildings, Bridges, andImportant Buildings, Bridges, andIndustrial FacilitiesIndustrial Facilities

    in 27 Countriesin 27 Countries

    Rely on EngineeredRely on EngineeredFriction Pendulum Solutions byFriction Pendulum Solutions by

    Earthquake Protection SystemsCalifornia, USA

    Over US $100 Billion in Constructed Value ofOver US $100 Billion in Constructed Value of

    Important Buildings, Bridges, andImportant Buildings, Bridges, andIndustrial FacilitiesIndustrial Facilities

    in 27 Countriesin 27 Countries

    Rely on EngineeredRely on EngineeredFriction Pendulum Solutions byFriction Pendulum Solutions by

    Earthquake Protection SystemsCalifornia, USA

  • Important Considerations - Seismic Isolation

    Safety

    Manufacturer Qualifications

    100% Testing – Preferably Realistic Condition

    Seismic Performance – “Continued Functionality”

    Safety

    Manufacturer Qualifications

    100% Testing – Preferably Realistic Condition

    Seismic Performance – “Continued Functionality”

  • EPS EngineersEPS Engineershave 30 years experience implementinghave 30 years experience implementing

    Friction Pendulum solutions.Friction Pendulum solutions.

    Victor Zayas, Ph.D., P.E.Victor Zayas, Ph.D., P.E.Stanley Low, M Eng, S.EStanley Low, M Eng, S.E

    Anoop Mokha, Ph.D., S.E.Anoop Mokha, Ph.D., S.E.

    EPS EngineersEPS Engineershave 30 years experience implementinghave 30 years experience implementing

    Friction Pendulum solutions.Friction Pendulum solutions.

    Victor Zayas, Ph.D., P.E.Victor Zayas, Ph.D., P.E.Stanley Low, M Eng, S.EStanley Low, M Eng, S.E

    Anoop Mokha, Ph.D., S.E.Anoop Mokha, Ph.D., S.E.

  • Thank YouThank You

    for considering EPSfor considering EPS

    Continued FunctionalityContinued FunctionalitySeismic SolutionSeismic Solution

    Thank YouThank You

    for considering EPSfor considering EPS

    Continued FunctionalityContinued FunctionalitySeismic SolutionSeismic Solution


Recommended