+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Friends of Log House Landing presentation - Sept 3 2014

Friends of Log House Landing presentation - Sept 3 2014

Date post: 10-Oct-2015
Category:
Upload: stcroix360
View: 347 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Presentation for Scandia city council workshop concerning Log House Landing renovations.
Popular Tags:

of 50

Transcript
  • LOG HOUSE LANDING

  • Chauncey Anderson Hydrologist / Water Quality Specialist

    Steve Bubul Municipal Attorney / Legal Consultant

    Kelli Carlson Petition and Media

    Shane Coen Landscape Architect and Planner

    Stuart Krahn Landscape architect / Engineering firm

    Karen Schik - Senior Ecologist at Friends of the Mississippi. VP of Scandia Parks and Trails

    Lisa Schlingerman Scandia Parks and Trails Board Member

    Pam Smith Log House Landing Spokesperson

    SPEAKERS

  • OBJECTIVES AND CONCERNS

    SOLVE WATER QUALITY AND EROSION, BUT DO THE MINIMUM TO PRESERVE THE RUSTIC, RURAL AND HISTORIC CHARACTER

    Erosion and Water Quality

    Protecting the Natural Environment

    Community Input and Petition

    Context and History

    Access

    Parking

    St. Croix National Park Service Guidelines

    Safety

    Grant Flexibility

    Cost Saving Taxpayer Dollars

    Maintenance

    Liability Issues

    Scandia Comprehensive Plan Goals

    Community Involvement

  • Maintain its unique rural character, agricultural heritage, historic charm, and natural resources Road system retains the ambiance of the countryside.

    - 2030 Scandia Comprehensive Plan

  • DATA SOURCES

    Watershed District monitoring data from creek mouths (multiple samples in 2000-2002; July 2013)

    Minnesota Pollution Control Agency data 2008-2012 Routine monitoring (baseflow) & storm samples

    Watershed District modeling memo for Loghouse Landing

    EROSION AND WATER QUALITY CHAUNCEY ANDERSON, HYDROLOGIST / WATER QUALITY

  • EROSION AND WATER QUALITY CHAUNCEY ANDERSON, HYDROLOGIST / WATER QUALITY SPECIALIST

    05

    101520253035404550

    CON

    CEN

    TRAT

    ION

    (p

    pm) St. Croix R. Benchmark

    Sediment Concentrations in Watershed District Creeks

    Data from CMSCWD

    Log House Landing

    2000-2002 2013

  • EROSION AND WATER QUALITY CHAUNCEY ANDERSON, HYDROLOGIST / WATER QUALITY

    Phosphorus Concentrations in Watershed District Creeks

    0.00

    0.05

    0.10

    0.15

    0.20

    0.25

    CON

    CEN

    TRAT

    ION

    (p

    pm)

    2000-2002 2013

    St. Croix R. Benchmark

    Data from CMSCWD

    Log House Landing

  • EROSION AND WATER QUALITY CHAUNCEY ANDERSON, HYDROLOGIST / WATER QUALITY

  • EROSION AND WATER QUALITY CHAUNCEY ANDERSON, HYDROLOGIST / WATER QUALITY

    Its not about phosphorus Sediment delivery to St. Croix from Gilbertson Creek appears equivalent to other local creeks The primary mitigation issue is sediment delivery to Gilbertson Creek

    Mostly from two locations along Landing road Modeling results should be verified or reevaluated

    Mitigation appears possible with minimally invasive measures Additional considerations

    Invasive Species Shoreline erosion from wakes

  • PROTECTING THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT KAREN SCHIK, SENIOR ECOLOGIST AT FRIENDS OF THE MISSISSIPPI. VP OF SCANDIA PARKS AND TRAILS Natural Resource Inventory - 56 additional trees impacted, ranging from 8 to 45 inches The larger the tree, the more harmful root disturbance. Five most notable trees:

    25 diameter white pine, slated for removal. About 90 ft tall. Roughly 80 (plus) years old. Healthy.

    45 diameter white pine, on the edge of proposed road. About 130 ft tall. Old growth tree. Mostly healthy with some dead branches.

    Three other trees: 24 diameter white pine, 24 sugar maple and a 14 paper birch. All were near the construction edge, and all were healthy.

    Native Ecology of the Log House Landing - The vegetation and character of the road provide a sense of place that ties in with the cultural history of the landing.

  • COMMUNITY INPUT AND PETITIONKELLI CARLSON, PETITION AND MEDIA

    Preserve the rustic and rural character of the landing and the road Do the minimum to solve the erosion and water quality issues St. Croix is popular because it is unspoiled and undeveloped People from Scandia and all over country love this small scenic road and landing.

    They come here to experience unspoiled nature Petition Over 300 Scandia residents and neighbors signed the petition in 2 weeks Over 200 Visitors from out of state signed the petition

  • COMMUNITY INPUT AND PETITIONKELLI CARLSON, PETITION AND MEDIA

    Log House Landing is a beautiful, rural setting tht leads to a National Park and preserving its natural beauty through less costly mitigations should be our goal.

    -Kathy Ferrin, Scandia

    The St. Croix is a federally protected river and the rustic, wild quality of the river should always be a priority. Once it is changed, it is changed forever. Please limit any work here to what is necessary and respect the character and history of this place. It is a special place.

    - Marna Canterbury, Stillwater

    We use this landing frequently and love the natural setting. We would hate to see it sacrificed for anything more than the most minimalistic road improvements.

    - Dale Anderson, Marine on the St. Croix

  • CONTEXT AND HISTORYLISA SCHLINGERMAN SCANDIA PARKS AND TRAILS BOARD MEMBER

    Location is historic and cultural landmark Connects the River to the history of Scandia and Swedish immigration Road was used over 100 years ago by Swedish immigrants:During the 1850s, steamboats would dock at a point called Log House Landing and immigrants would disembark with their trunks and knapsacks, climbing the steep hill out of the valley and trudging through heavy woods in search of proper sites to build log houses and make a new beginning.

    - Anna Engquists book Scandia: Then and Now.

    National Park Service to provide signage honoring this site and educating visitors about the National Park and the history of Scandia

  • ACCESS,PARKING, AND SAFETY STUART KRAHN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT

    Usage in August: Weekdays: 0-4, averaging 2 Friday afternoons and evenings: 5-8 Saturdays: 12-19 Sundays: 4-11

    Parking requires combination of creative solutions limited by National Park Service recommendation, public desire for narrow rural road, site constraints

    Safety Urban Planners know that increased road width and smooth surfaces increase speeds and risk of accidents

    Traffic Calming Techniques such as narrow roads and aggregate surfaces slow speeds and increase attentiveness

  • There should be no new or expanded boat ramps or car-trailer parking on the Lower St. Croix...State and local units of government are strongly encouraged to restrict parking adjacent to all launch ramps, public and private, on lands under their jurisdiction.

    - 2001 Cooperative Management Plan, Page 67

    NATIONAL PARK SERVICE GUIDELINES

  • GRANT FLEXIBILITYPAM PLOWMAN SMITH FRIENDS OF LOG HOUSE LANDING SPOKESPERSON

    Liability risk with variance would be negligible because no standards exist for this type of road. Engineering judgment is encouraged when determining road width. Municipal attorney to address specifics after alternatives are presented

    DNR likes to see roads that are lower impact and less destructive to the environment --DNR Engineer

    Grant funds can be used for gravel road Grant funds can be used for storm water systems Grant funds can be used for berming and vegetation along roadside Changes to grant application for less expensive gravel road will not jeopardize grant, nor

    require reapplication just a change request No expiration on grant Variance that has good environmental reasons and strong community support likely to be

    approved Variance process for this road (not a State Aid Road) would only require approval from

    DNR and Metro district engineers

  • GRANT FLEXIBILITYPAM PLOWMAN SMITH FRIENDS OF LOG HOUSE LANDING SPOKESPERSON

    DNR engineer will work with and advise City on change requests prior to submission Grant Amount - Current 50% cost share likely to stay the same, saving Scandia and

    Watershed money if costs are reduced May be possible to make the case that Quinnell is part of the access to St. Croix River and

    apply the remaining unused portion of $200k on Quinnell repair.

  • PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND NEW ALTERNATIVESSHANE COEN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND PLANNER

  • Quinnell Ave. N

    Quint Ave. N

    205th St. N

    Gilbertsons Creek

    Log House Landing

    environmentally sensitive area:

    springs & seeps

    daylighted spring

    (polluted by railroad)

    significant specimen

    white pine

    environmentally sensitive wooded area: springs & seeps, many ancient white pine, sugar maples, & oaks

    120 of wide area for parking

    ANALYSIS

  • 2007 BONESTROO PLANCOST: UNKNOWN

    SOUTH NORTHPARKING LANE GRAVEL

    DRIVING LANE ASPHALT

    ROCK SWALE & CHECK DAM

  • 2012 EOR PLANCOST: $180,000

    PARKING LANE GRAVEL

    DRIVING LANE ASPHALT

    ROCK SWALE & CHECK DAM

    SOUTH NORTH

  • 2013 EOR PLANCOST: $210,000

    PARKING LANE POROUS

    CURB & GUTTER

    CURB & GUTTER

    DRIVING LANE ASPHALT

    SOUTH NORTH

  • CURRENT CITY PLAN WITH PARKINGCOST: 400,000

    CURB & GUTTER

    CURB & GUTTER

    DRIVING LANE ASPHALTPARKING LANE ASPHALT

    SOUTH NORTH

  • Quinnell Ave. N

    Quint Ave. N

    205th St. N

    Gilbertsons Creek

    Log House Landing

    ALTERNATIVE PLANSadditional parking pull out

    passingpull out passing

    divert railroad runoff away from daylighted spring

    13 resurfaced gravel road between Quinnell and Quint.

    Road 13-16 resurfaced gravel or 13 paved surfacing from Quint to Landing. Landing resurfaced gravel.

    bio-infiltration pond north

    of trailer parking

    re-grade landing, slope away from river, improve boat landing with cable concrete, 1 ADA parking spot

  • ALTERNATIVE PLAN -PAVED OPTION Road 13 paved bituminous surfacing from Quint to landing Road paved with north cross slope Road 13 gravel surfacing from Quinnell to Quint regraded to slope toward swale Landing gravel surfacing Provide two pull outs for passing and retain Quint egress to the south Continuous 4 rock filled infiltration swale (north side) Bio-filtration facility (pond) located at base of the road Berming on south sections of road and plantings Construct small retaining wall to protect daylighted spring east of railroad tracks Regrade landing to slope away from the river toward pond Parking

    Provide 100 non-trailer parking spaces on landing (one ADA) Provide 120 lineal gravel lane where road naturally widens at base /starting at landing Provide 300 gravel parking on Quinnell north of the intersection to be located away from

    homes Reinforce riverbank with natural rock and plantings Concrete cable boat launch

  • 13

    ROCK INFILTRATIONTRENCH

    GRAVEL SHOULDER

    DRIVING LANE ASPHALT

    SOUTH NORTH

    ALTERNATIVE PLAN -PAVED OPTIONAPPROXIMATE COST: $150,000-$200,000

  • ALTERNATIVE PLAN -GRAVEL OPTION Retain 13-16 current width Retain aggregate surfacing Regrade road with north cross slope Provide two pull outs for passing and retain Quint egress to the south Continuous 4 rock filled infiltration swale (north side) Bio-filtration facility (pond) located at base of the road Berming on south sections of road and plantings Construct small retaining wall to protect daylighted spring east of railroad tracks Regrade landing to slope away from the river toward pond Parking

    Provide 100 non-trailer parking spaces on landing (one ADA) Provide 120 lineal lane where road naturally widens at base /starting at landing Provide 300 parking on Quinnell north of the intersection to be located away from

    homes Reinforce riverbank with natural rock and plantings Concrete cable boat launch

  • 3ROCK INFILTRATIONTRENCH

    DRIVING LANE GRAVEL

    ALTERNATIVE PLAN -GRAVEL OPTIONAPPROXIMATE COST:$120,000 - $140,000

    SOUTH NORTH

  • WHAT WE LIKE ABOUT OUR PLAN

    Addresses erosion and water quality issues Protects trout stream: Moves parking away from south side, does not expand

    road closer to stream edge, does not remove trees shading stream Provides concrete cable boat launch to prevent ramp erosion Maintains native ecology and rural charm Preserves historic access to the river with scenic narrow road and rustic landing Protects river viewshed in all seasons Requires no tree removal along the road and would protect root system of all

    trees in close proximity to the road. (Note all plans will require a few trees removed for the holding pond)

    Single lane with passing pull outs and gravel surface will slow traffic, increases safety on low usage road. Allows for emergency vehicles access.

  • Parking Does not reduce parking, but does relocate some in accordance with the National Park Service Management Plan (provides ADA spot)

    Costs Reduction Much less costly for both capital construction and long-term maintenance

    Scale of road and landing encourage the appropriate watercraft canoes, kayaks, small motorized boats

    Takes community concerns and desires into account - those who use the Log House Landing do so because of the peaceful natural setting. Bigger modern paved launch sites are less than 2 miles away.

    Allows for community participation in the design process

    WHAT WE LIKE ABOUT OUR PLAN

  • 13

    3

    CURRENT PLAN

    ALTERNATIVE PLAN: PAVED OPTION

    ALTERNATIVE PLAN:GRAVEL OPTION

    SECTION COMPARISON

  • COST COMPARISONLOWER COST BREAKDOWN

    COSTS Total Cost Grant City Watershed Current City Plan $400k $200k $100k $100k Paved Plan $150 - $200K $75 - $100K $37.5 $50K $37.5 $50K Gravel Plan $120 - $140K $60 - $70K $30 - $35K $30 - $35K *Assumes that grant cost goes down proportionally for Log House Landing. However, there may be a way to use additional grant money on Quinnell resurfacing (considered part of the access to the River.)

    BEST CASE SCENARIO FULL GRANT FUNDING WITH EXCESS GOING TO QUINNELL REPAIR

    COSTS Total Cost Grant City Watershed Current Plan $400k $200k $100k $100k Plan A - Gravel $120k $200k:

    $60 TO LANDING $140K TO QUINNELL

    $30K $30k

    Plan B - Paved $180K $200k:

    $90 TO LANDING $110K TO QUINNELL

    $45k $45k

    WORST CASE SCENARIO - NO GRANT FUNDING

    COSTS Total Cost Grant City Watershed Current Plan $400k $200k $100k $100k Plan A - Gravel $120k $0 $60k $60k Plan B - Paved $180K $0 $90k $90k

  • MAINTENANCEGRAVEL OPTION LESS COSTLY

    All City amenities will have some associated maintenance costs parks, museums, etc. $3500 estimated annual cost to include grading and pond clean out. Additional $2000

    every 5 years for channel clean out.

    The yearly maintenance costs of gravel roads make them appear inefficient, until you consider the capital improvement costs associated with bituminous roads at the middle and end of their lives, which isnt always reflected in yearly maintenance figures. MPR

    Over its 40-year lifespan, a low-volume paved road will need to be chip sealed twice, undergo overlay once and then reclaim/overlay. Thats about 3 times what it costs to maintain gravel roads in the county. MPR

    Several counties across the country are going back to the Stone Age turning asphalt roads back to gravel, or considering doing so as rising costs outstrip their ability to maintain their pavements. National Association of Counties

  • LIABILITY ISSUESSteve Bubul, Municipal Attorney / Legal Consultant

    There is no State design standard; just a DNR grant condition The DNR standards are genericnot appropriate for this road DNR provides process for smaller road widths, but not a true legal variance City protected by discretionary immunity in any event Council members have no personal liability

  • SECTION COMPARISON

  • Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.356, subdivision 2 provides in relevant part:

    . . .nor shall any capital improvement be authorized by the municipality . . . until after the planning agency has reviewed the proposed . . . capital improvement and reported in writing to the governing body . . .its findings as to compliance of the proposed . . . improvement with the comprehensive municipal plan.

    SCANDIA PLANNING COMMISSION ROLE

  • SCANDIA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN GOALS

    Establish context-sensitive roadway design standards that will protect the narrow and heavily wooded character of identified low-traffic roadways.

    -- Land Use Goal 14.1

    Modify street standards to maintain the visual qualities of identified scenic roads, including allowing a narrower right-of-way and protection of vegetation within that right-of-way.

    -- Land Use Implementation Strategy 14.1.1

    Goals, Policies, and Strategies under Natural Resources - several references to minimizing impervious surfaces and improving and encouraging soil and vegetation for storm water runoff filtration.

  • THANK YOU


Recommended