+ All Categories
Home > Documents > From MA Pai to Power Network Science - University Of...

From MA Pai to Power Network Science - University Of...

Date post: 21-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: buithuan
View: 221 times
Download: 5 times
Share this document with a friend
57
David J Hill The University of Hong Kong and The University of Sydney From MA Pai to Power Network Science - reflections on the stability of power systems 1 Symposium in Honour of Prof MA Pai (PaiFest), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 15 October 2015
Transcript

David J Hill

The University of Hong Kong and

The University of Sydney

From MA Pai to Power Network Science ��

- reflections on the stability of power systems�

1

Symposium in Honour of Prof MA Pai (PaiFest), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 15 October 2015 �

Outline �

Prof MA Pai��A story of a simple model��DJH projects (stability)��Conclusion �

2

Professor MA Pai �

§  Berkeley 1978-80 §  Papers on Gij § Meeting about 1979 §  BH papers 1981-3 §  Books (Px2, SP) §  Visits Illinois (+PK, PS) §  Emails ever since §  Editorship Springer

3

Outline �

Prof MA Pai��A story of a simple model��DJH projects��Conclusion �

4

Phase Angle Stability�

Ref: M.A.Pai, Energy Function Analysis for Power System Stability

Basic synchronism issue in power networks

53

5

Network-Reduction Model�

6

Lossless network Kron reduction •  Lossy due to loads

•  Network structure lost

•  Theory for two-machine case rigorous

Multi-machine Network-Reduction Model�

7

Chiang et al., Direct stability analysis of electric power systems using energy function, IEEE Proceedings, 1995

Stability Theory�

8

�i = !i

!i = �Di

Mi+

Pmi

Mi� 1

Mi

X

j 6=i

ViVjBij sin(�i � �j) Gij = 0

•  Use first integrals, Popov (Lure-Postnikov)

•  But these are not well-defined, i.e. path dependent, unless make assumptions

•  The Kron reduction creates the difficulty, i.e. loads become Gij

•  Properties of the original physical network structure are eliminated

Common but bad assumption

Network-Preserving Model�

9

Ref: Bergen and Hill, IEEE PAS,1981; Hill and Bergen, 1983

Network-Preserving Model�

10

•  Generators: second-order differential equations •  Loads: first-order differential equations •  Non-identical nodes with nonlinear interconnections •  Angle stability: (synchronization)

xi = fi(xi) +NX

j=1

aijhi(xi, xj)

Di�i = P 0i �

X

j 6=i

bij sin(�i � �j)

�i = !i

Mi!i = �Di!i + P 0i �

X

j 6=i

bij sin(�i � �j)Generators

Loads/RES

Dynamical Network

!i = !j = !s

�i � �j = cij

No Gij problem!

Dynamic models - Ref: Hiskens and Hill, IEEE TPWRS, 1989�

11

•  Voltage dependence of loads important •  Lyapunov theory for DA systems (Hill and Mareels, 1990)

12

Lyapunov function (Ref: Hiskens and Hill, IEEE TPWRS, 1989) �

Discovered later: More basic version given as first integral by Vasin in St Petersburg journal, 1971 (ten years earlier than NBMs)

13

Energy surfaces�

14

Incompletely solved problems�

•  Rigorous Lyapunov functions for NPMs where the real-power loads

are independent of voltages

•  These Lyapunov (or energy) functions can be expressed in a topological form where the kinetic energy term consists of a sum of contributions from:

•  all generators and the potential energy term similarly consists of a sum of terms across the lines

)(21),( 02

kkL

kiiG

WMVE σσωω −+= ∑∑

line angle differences

Network science ideas�

§  Behaviour determined by interaction of (graph) structure, coupling and node dynamics

§  Concepts of fragility, robustness, vulnerable nodes etc.

§  Results allow for scale, e.g. scale-free relates to granularity

§  Nature finds good motifs so networks can be robust to connection changes (work by Slotine, passivity results)

§  Fits with taxonomies of feeders, dynamics and standardising for plug-and-play (cf. Ilic ideas)

15

Power Network Science Ref: Hill and Chen, 2006�

We should cross fertilise complex networks and power networks: •  Control theory •  Stability theory •  Network science •  Optimization •  Game theory

16

Research questions �

§  Unsolved: Rigorous Lyapunov functions for general voltage dependent real power loads

§  Graph based stability criteria, e.g. conditions on cutsets

§  Extensions to linking synch to structure §  Robustness to all the uncertainty

§  Dependence on structure »  Find the vulnerable points for collapse

§  How to guarantee stability from local checks »  certificates (with some exchange) »  can these be granulated?

17

Stability from a (Physics) network science point of view �

§  Power system models �»  Network-reduction model�»  Network-preserving model�

§  Small-signal stability: network-reduction model��

18

Ref: Motter et al., Spontaneous synchrony in power-grid networks, Nature Physics, 2013.

19

X1 = (�01, �02 . . . , �

0n)

>

X2 = (�01, �02 . . . , �

0n)

>

20

↵ > �2/4

21

22

Transient (angle) stability analysis�

Dorfler, Chertkov and Bullo, Sync. in complex oscillator networks and smart grids, PNAS, 2013

23

Questions�

•  What are the conditions on the coupling and the

dissimilarity such that a synchronization behavior emerges?

•  Under which condition on the network parameters and

topology, the current load profile, and power generations does there exist a synchronous operating point

•  When is it optimal, stable, robust?

24

Synchronization condition �

25

Network-Preserving Model�

26

•  Generators: second-order differential equations •  Loads: first-order differential equations •  Non-identical nodes with nonlinear interconnections •  Angle stability: (synchronization)

xi = fi(xi) +NX

j=1

aijhi(xi, xj)

Di�i = P 0i �

X

j 6=i

bij sin(�i � �j)

�i = !i

Mi!i = �Di!i + P 0i �

X

j 6=i

bij sin(�i � �j)Generators

Loads/RES

Dynamical Network

!i = !j = !s

�i � �j = cij

No Gij problem!

Role of graph�

27

Korsak, “On the question of uniqueness of stable load-flow solutions, 1972

Nonlinearity gives multiple equilibria in angle and voltage��Power networks have another possibility: multiple equilibria arising from the graph�

Stability Theory II �

28

What does stability theory look like in terms of dynamical networks and high renewables? People also looking at basic control questions in a more distributed form. Let’s call this Power Network Science?

29

Structure Preserving Model�

Bergen and Hill’s model for angle stability analysis augmented

with inverter-based generators

where Pline refers to power flow across transmission lines, E refers

to incidence matrix of the power network. Subscripts M, R, L refer

to synchronous generators, inverter-based generators and loads,

respectively.

M ✓M +DM ✓M = PM �EMPline(ET✓)

DR✓R = PR �ERPline(ET✓)

DL✓L = PL �ELPline(ET✓)

30

The Active Power Flow Graph�

The active power flow can be expressed as follows

Define G(θ) as the active power flow graph with the diagonal

matrix of edge weights W(θ)=∂Pline(ETθ)/ ∂(ETθ).

The Laplacian matrix of G(θ) is defined as

Pbus = EPline(ET✓)

L(G(✓)) = @Pbus

@✓= EW (✓)ET

31

The Critical Lines and Critical Cutset �

A line is defined as a critical line if the angle difference across it satisfies

Otherwise it is called a non-critical line.

A cutset formed by critical lines is called a critical cutset.

The critical lines induce negative weighted lines in G(θ).

Divide G(θ) into the positive subgraph G+(θ) with positive

weighted lines W+ (θ) and negative subgraph G-(θ) with

negative weighted lines W- (θ) (the critical lines).

32

Main Results�

1. Network topology indicates stability:

2. Critical-line based stability criterion: Define

where is the Moore-Penrose inverse, E- is the

incidence matrix of G-(θ), and is the normalized null space

of , the incidence matrix of a spanning forest of G+(θ) .

Then

33

Remarks�

3. Stability and the type of UEP is determined by the

locations and weights of critical lines

1. Small-disturbance stability related to the properties of

power network topology

2. Instability results from the appearance of critical lines

4. The appearance of critical cutsets directly leads to

instability

Brief History of PNS�§  Early: Russian schools (Gorev in 1930’s, St Petersburg; Venikov in Moscow, ..);

Magnusson, 1947 Energy functions, dynamics, voltage stability §  Lyapunov, Popov methods 1960-70’s: Gorev, Vasin, Pai, Willems, …

§  California 1970’s (Korsak, Smith..) Power flow theory §  USA DOE Systems Eng For Power (Fink) 1980's: (Wu, Varaiya in Berkeley;

Baillieu, Zaborszky, etc) .. Differential geometry, stability, control theory

§  1990's, 2000's: Voltage stability (Andersson, Hill, Varaiya etc) Bifurcation methods

§  2010's: ‘Smart grids’ a.  Modelling issues, stabilization (Ortega, etc) New Lyapunov b.  Cascading collapse, synchronism (Dorfler, Motter etc) Network science c.  Power flow theory (Low, Tse etc) Convexity d.  Distributed control (Johannsson, Hill etc) Control theory

34

Outline �

Prof MA Pai��A story of a simple model��DJH projects��Conclusion �

35

Projects�§  HKU URC PDF/RAP Scheme�

»  Cognitive Technical Systems and Networks�»  Distributed Methods for Stability Analysis and Control of Large

Power Networks �

§  HK RGC GRF�»  Network-based Stability Analysis and Control of Future Power

Grids ($692,894)�»  Problems in Stability Theory for Complex Systems and Networks

($696,029)�

§  HK RGC TBRS�»  Smart Solar Energy Harvesting, Storage, and Utilization (Co-I:

total $60.33M across CUHK, PolyU, HKU) �»  Sustainable Power Delivery Structures for High renewables (PC:

total $47.12M across HKU, HKUST, PolyU)�36

Sustainable power delivery structures for high renewables

PC: Prof David HILL HKU Leader: Future networks team Co-PI: Prof Ron HUI HKU Leader: Smart loads team Co-PI: Prof Victor LI HKU Leader: Information networks team Co-PI: Prof Li QIU HKUST Leader: Decision and control team Co-I Dr. S.C. TAN HKU Member: Smart loads team

37

Proposal�

Mission ��To derive a sustainable structure for the operation, control and protection of future electricity networks delivering harvested renewable energy to consumers who themselves play a demand-side role in the overall system.�

Goals ��§  Develop an integrated approach based on all four key

technical areas, including a novel ‘demand response’ balancing paradigm…; �

38

§  Develop PE based electric springs into universal type smart load controllers..basic balancing (including a storage facility) and stability (frequency and voltage); �

§  Integrate DC and IC strategies to study distributed control algorithms … of the sustainable smart grid including self-healing, reduced peak demand and improved security with optimised wide-area communication and sensor networks; �

§  Integrate the outcomes … on improving the energy efficiency and reliability of power system operation, including the needs for Hong Kong delivery to high buildings, islands and an interconnection to a large changing grid; �

§  Further enabling increased consumer participation in power system operation ….; �

§  Establish a regional research and educational hub in energy harvesting and sustainable grid technology ..�

39

Modelling emphasis�

§  High renewables

§  Full network (granular to loads)

§  New dynamics

§  Distributed control (wider and granular)

§  Connect to cyber network

40

41

Figure 1 An example of power system (reproduced from [11])

Usual power networks model�

42

Basic components of EPS More precisely - Ref: Glover, Sarma and Overbye�

Granulated networks

Cyber-physical analysis�

§  Requires�»  Flexible aggregation (with delays for building on-line)�»  Communications (type, broadcast, P2P etc)�»  Encryption processes�»  Sampling rates�»  Network latency�»  Failures, packet loss etc�»  Raw, filtered or aggregated data�

§  All will interact with physical dynamics and affect stability and control performance�

44

Australian transmission network �

Source: ABARES - Australian Energy Resource Assessment 45

46

Scenarios and Sensitivities�

§  Example (CSIRO FG Forum, 2014)

Ø Scenario: Renewables thrive Ø Sensitivities:

•  Farms vs rooftop •  Demand-response •  EV uptake •  …

•  How to analyse, plan for all these?

47

FG interactions�

48

Research projects�

1.  Demand-side aggregate modeling

2.  Scenario stability analysis

3.  Sensitivity analysis (inertia etc)

4.  Advanced techniques

a)  Vulnerable points b)  Stability margins (risk-based) c)  Stability scanning

49

50

Role of network structure�

S

C

W

S

C

W

•  Generation types�•  Transfers�•  Inertia distribution �•  Load types �

Etc�

FG stability studies�

51

Other subjects�

§  Distributed control over network-based models (frequency, voltage)

§  Tsinghua Research Institute for Energy Internet

§  HKU Big Data Initiative – closing the loop idea (Ref: Le Xie work)

§  Future Grid project in China-HK? »  Beyond planning to scenario analysis

52

Grid2050 Architecture (Bakken et al.)�

53

Consensus in power systems�

54

What structures work for power systems?�How will they be different for the various tasks?�

Outline �

Prof MA Pai��A story of a simple model��DJH projects��Conclusion �

55

56

From Pai�

57

Conclusions�

Thankyou MA Pai

Power network science


Recommended