From PARCC…
…to PRACTICE
Focus on 2016 – 2017 Goals
Presentation Purpose & Agenda
Objective
To use the PARCC data and CCSSM articulation documents to drive
the idea of focus …
To equip administrators with the PARCC tools needed to (1) LEAD
powerful data team conversations and (2) communicate a standards-
focused schoolwide vision
To use the District’s approved curriculum resources to focus instruction
around PARCC expectations
To instill the idea that teachers need to approach lesson planning
more globally and as mini-research endeavors; making informed use
of data, PARCC/CCSSM-articulation documents, and curriculum
resources
WARM UP
number line is SHOWN BELWO. The numbers 0 and
1 are marked on the line, as are two other numbers
a and b.
Which of the following numbers is a negative?
Choose all that apply. Explain your reasoning.
0 1
a. a – 1
b. a – 2
c. -b
d. a + b
e. a – b
The Need to be intentional and
targeted in our instruction
56% of the variance in district state test scores could be explained by three out-of-school social and demographic variables: percent of students eligible for free- or reduced-lunch, percent of district lone-parent households, and mean annual district household income (Maylone, 2002)
Poverty alone accounts for 56% of the variance among state average test scores in the NAEP-92 Trial State Assessment in mathematics. 89% of those variations were due to poverty and just three other out-of-school demographic factors (number of parents living at home, parents' education, and community type)" (Educational Research Service, 1994)
Based on the results from this study, more than half of the variance in 2009 NJASK3 language arts scores can be explained by out-of-school variables. High-stakes standardized assessment scores are significantly influenced by out-of-school factors. The three factors identified by this study to have the greatest influence are household income, single-parent homes, and level of parental education (Turnamian, 2012)
Question 1: Districtwide, what is the average score for each assessment?
Test Code Mean Performance Level Average
Gain
ALG01 732.92 2 → 3 8.12
ALG02 704.56 1 → 2 6.42
GEO 719.64 2 17.94
MAT03 727.99 2 → 3 10.63
MAT04 723.22 2 0.14
MAT05 726.83 2 → 3 3.60
MAT06 722.02 2 3.18
MAT07 726.51 3 1.38
MAT08 718.66 2 1.09
650- 699 700-724
725-749
The 4 Districtwide Goals for
Mathematics Teaching
Establish mathematics goals to focus learning
Implement tasks that promote reasoning and problem
solving
Use and connect mathematical representations.
Elicit and use evidence of student thinking.
Teachers develop and communicate clear learning goals
and how these ideas build on and relate to each other.
5 Research-based Prompts
The learning goal is the heart of
assessment for learning and
needs to be made clear at the
planning stage…
Research-based Prompts
When teachers start from what it is
they want students to know and
design their instruction backward
from that goal, then instruction is far
more likely to be effective.
(Wiggins and McTighe 2000)
Research-based Prompts
Students cannot assess their own
learning or set goals to work
toward without a clear vision of
the intended learning.
R.Stiggins, J. Arter, J. Chappuis & S. Chappuis, 2006)
Why include students in the
sharing of Learning Goals?
Research suggests that pupils who understand what they are being asked to learn and how they will recognize success are more likely to make learning gains than those who don’t.
This is particularly true for less able pupils.
Why include students in the
sharing of Learning Goals?
Classrooms where students
understand the learning outcomes
for daily lessons see performance
rates 20% higher than those where
learning outcomes are unclear.
Marzano, 2003
Activity
Take 10 minutes to
review each item on the
PARCC End of Year
Released Items for Grade
3.
Based on your review,
describe the 3 areas of
focus for Grade 3.
Activity Take 10 minutes to review each
item on the PARCC End of Year
Released Items for Grade 3.
Based on your review, describe
the 3 areas of focus for Grade 3.
Find 1 problem that reflects (a)
procedural skill/fluency;
(b) application; (c) conceptual
understanding
Represent and solve problems involving multiplication and division.
CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.3.OA.A.1
Interpret products of whole numbers, e.g., interpret 5 × 7 as the total number of
objects in 5 groups of 7 objects each. For example, describe a context in which a total
number of objects can be expressed as 5 × 7.
CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.3.OA.A.2
Interpret whole-number quotients of whole numbers, e.g., interpret 56 ÷ 8 as the
number of objects in each share when 56 objects are partitioned equally into 8 shares,
or as a number of shares when 56 objects are partitioned into equal shares of 8
objects each. For example, describe a context in which a number of shares or a
number of groups can be expressed as 56 ÷ 8.
CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.3.OA.A.3
Use multiplication and division within 100 to solve word problems in situations involving
equal groups, arrays, and measurement quantities, e.g., by using drawings and
equations with a symbol for the unknown number to represent the problem.1
CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.3.OA.A.4
Determine the unknown whole number in a multiplication or division equation relating
three whole numbers. For example, determine the unknown number that makes the
equation true in each of the equations 8 × ? = 48, 5 = _ ÷ 3, 6 × 6 = ?
PARCC Blueprints
Overview of Task Types
Review of PARCC Headers
ITEM TYPES
TOTAL ITEMS
ATTEMPTED ITEMS
START/END TIMES
SCALE
SCORE/PERFORMANCE
LEVEL
CSEM INTERPRETATION
SUB CLAIMS 1 - 4
CODE: TUYVZF
Log into https://new.goformative.com/join to answer the following questions.
What have you done with the results since the Admin PLC to make the results transparent for your teachers?
Which categories are an important aspect of the data conversation?
Which students are likely to regress if the proper supports are not provided?
Which students are likely to grow?
How much time, on average, did Student 5 spend on each question in Unit 1?
On average, about how much time was allotted for each question?
What do the sub-claim categories tell us? How is this information important?
Preparing for Part II
Using the Instructional Practice Guide as a tool for instructional
improvement
http://achievethecore.org/content/upload/IPG_Coaching_Mat
h_k-8.pdf
ACTIVITY I
Review Core Action 1 of the Tool;
Read each indicator
highlight 3-4 words that convey the importance of the indicator
ACTIVITY II
Review Core Action 2 of the Tool
Same activity as above
What can admin do to get
started?
Assess whether or not teachers reviewed the PARCC Released Items for their grade level and connecting grades
Revamp Common Planning Time approaches that encourage a having a focus for each Marking Period…Marking Period I should focus heavily on the results of PARCC, diagnostic and baseline measures and results, and planning for targeted instruction for small groups
NEXT STEPS IN SUPPORT OF GOAL SETTING
What can admin do to get
started?
Help the entire building agree on some common language for the Peer Observation Cycles and Walk Throughs using the Instructional Practice Guide (Core Action 2) and establish 1 theme per Marking Period
Introduce the Instructional Practice Guide during Pre-Observation Planning Conversations (Core Action 1); and upload responses as an artifact
Introduce the Instructional Practice Guide during Post-Observation Debriefing Conversations (Core Action 2); and upload responses as an artifact
What can admin do to get
started?
Ask teachers to target and proudly display in their rooms BIG, MEATY, FOCUSED, TRANSFORMATIVE TRANSFER GOALS based on the standards, per Unit of Study, …A great starting point are the STANDARDS & UNIT PLANS; attaching the goals to challenging problem solving tasks (ex: PARCC Released Items)
Visit as many classrooms as you have time for in a non-evaluative capacity
What can admin do to get
started? Give teachers their own classroom data to determine goals (e.g. How many students will Meet Expectation by the end of the year?)
What data: Item Analysis, Score-related Data)
Purpose of PLCs
Exploration of content focused on the CCSS instructional shifts
Modeling of CCSS-aligned instructional practices
Practicing instructional improvement strategies
Learning data-based decision making habits
Analyzing student work
Analyzing Teacher Practices via Video Viewing Protocols
Planning for CCSS-aligned instruction and assessment
FIRST focused around big ideas, unifying concepts, and enduring
understandings
THEN focused on the development of instructional units and alignment to the
resources: Units of Study (i.e. Scope and Sequence docs), texts and ancillary
materials, modules, meaningful tasks, the 8 Mathematical Practices
Peer Observations
Reflection and Feedback protocol
Cool Down
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdxEAt91D7k
Break Out Rooms
9:50 – 10:30am K – 5
1st Floor Conference Room
Rosa
Cleveland
Lincoln
Forest
6 – 8
2nd Floor Conference Room
Park
Oakwood
Heywood
Malloy
9 – 12
2nd Floor – Powell’s Office