1
From Telegraph Double DottingTo
Microwave QPRS(Quadrature Partial Response Signalling)
George de WitteVE3AYB
QCWA Sep 20, 2011
2
Background 19th Century Telegraphy
•1837 Wheatstone 5 needle, 6 wire system Euston-Camden Town
•1852 6000 miles of 6 wire Telegraph in UK
•1850 Dover-Calais Single Wire Cable based on Gutta-Perra insulator
•Soon after many other short distance submarine cables in Europe
•1858 First Transatlantic Cable from Ireland to NewFoundland
•It worked for 3 days, it took hours to send a few words
•Unknowns : cable strength, armour, dispersion, HV breakdown
•Cable laying and Cable recovery
•1866 Second Transatlantic Cable
•Recent submarine survey found “plateau” in North Atlantic
•Stronger Cable 1 inch, but weighed 9000 tonnes/ 2300 miles
•Was more successful and inspired many more cables
3
First Route Valentia Harbour,Ireland to Trinity Bay NL
4
The Economic Reality
• The investments were high >1M$ in 1865 $$’s
• A cable laying ship had 2000 men on board (and livestock to feed them)
• A skilled Telegraph Operator was paid as much as a Bank Manager
• Operating Speed was 8 WPM
• Telegram Tariff for 20 words incl address was $150
• Despite all that 21 transatlantic cables by 1928
The incentive to improve speed was phenomenal
5
Key Theoretical Contribution by Lord Kelvin
• The common belief was that higher battery voltage was required
• The first 1858 cable was likely destroyed by High Voltage
• In 1855 he contended that the cable speed was proportional to the square root of the length
• He defined what we today call pulse dispersion
R R R R
C C C
6
Cable Laying Ship The Great Eastern
Cable ship measured ship-shore continuity during laying
7
Shore end of CableStripped
Shore endCross-section
Deep SeaCross-section
8
Nyquist Theory 1928
X(f)=Gt(f)*C(f)*Gr(f)
X(f)=T )X(f)=0 ) -1/2T<f<1/2T
sin πt/Tx(t)= ------------- πt/T
F=1/T is called Nyquist frequency
0
BPF BW=Fnyquist
LPF BW=0.5Fnyquist
Gt(f) C(f) Gr(f)Sampler &Threshold Detector
+Xn Xn
Input Data
Output Data
Transmit Filter
ChannelResponse
ReceiveFilter
X(f)
Noise
9
More Nyquist Theory
( T 0<f<(1-α)/2TX(f)= ( (T/2[1-sin(πT(f-1/2T)/α)] (1-α)/2T <f<(1+α)/2T
sin πt/T cos απt/Tx(t)= ------------- ---------------- πt/T 1-4α2t2/T2
1/2T 1/T
- 6 dB point
10
Eye Pattern 30% Raised Cosine
•In a perfect Raised Cosine Channel the Intersymbol Interference is theoretically zero
•Cable Attenuation is well known to be proportional to sqrt(f*L)
•The sqrt(f) response approximates a raised cosine response with large α
•Therefore the max cable speed is at the 6 dB down cable attenuation ie the Nyquist frequency
11
Duobinary Concept• Doubles the speed• First mentioned by A Lender in 1963 paper. • Also called Partial Response• Easiest implementation is a simple digital filter
Data In 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
Bipolar Data In 1 1 -1 1 1 1 -1 -1 -1 1 -1 1 -1 +
Xn + Xn-1 (3 Level) 2 0 0 2 2 0 -2 -2 0 0 0 0
3 Level 3 Level Encoder OutEncoder Out
+
1 symbol delay T
Nyquist Filter
Σ+
+BinaryTo
Bipolar
1011 1V,-1V 2V,0,-2V
Data In
Xn-1
Xn
12
Data In 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
Bipolar Data In 1 1 -1 1 1 1 -1 -1 -1 1 -1 1 -1
Xn + Xn-1 (3 Level) 2 0 0 2 2 0 -2 -2 0 0 0 0 -Bipolar Data Out 1 -1 1 1 1 -1 -1 -1 1 -1 1 -1
Data Out 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
Duobinary Decoder
ΣSlicerAnd
Sampler
1011
+
-
1 symbol delay T
Nyquist Filter
Σ
1 symbol delay T
+
+BinaryTo
Bipolar
1011
Bipolar to
Binary
1V,-1V 2V,0,-2V 1V,-1V
Data In Data Out
13
Some More Duobinary Theory
Encoder is a Digital Filter
H(f)=1+e-j2πfT
Euler’s Formula : H(f)=cos (πfT)
H(f)=cos (πfT)
1/2Tf
1
0.5
1/3T
1 symbol delay T
Σ+
+
Xn-1
Xn
-2T -T 0 T 2T 3T
- 6 dB point
14
Eye Pattern Duobinary
•Duobinary can also be achieved with a cosine shaped Low Pass Filter
•With a perfectly truncated cosine frequency response the Intersymbol Interference is zero.
•The 6 dB down frequency is 0.6 * raised cosine case
•For the same cable attenuation, the signalling speed for duobinary is almost double the binary raised cosine case
15
Double -dotting
•In 1898 Gulstad published paper : “Vibrating Cable Relay”
•In hindsight invented Duobinary long before Lender in 1963
•Up until then cables were run at the “natural” speed (ie Nyquist Frequency)
•He proposed doubling the speed, so that a 10101 dotting pattern resulted in almost zero Voltage output on the cable
•As decoder on the Receive side he used a Polarized Relay with 2 extra windings
•Each extra winding was connected with its own battery and RC network
•The battery voltage and RC values were carefully adjusted so that one winding cancelled the second half of a detected + pulse and the second extra winding did the same for a –pulse
•Gulstad called it “Vibrating Cable Relay” because in the absence of a cable signal, it vibrates at the “natural” frequency
16
Gulstad Relay
17
Long Haul Microwave
In US Bell Labs centre of expertise compliments DoD
Radar technology during WWII advanced microwave technology
Post war economic boom demanded intercity TV and telephone
First microwave was TD-2
All vacuum tube, key part 416C planar microwave tube
Operated in 4 GHz band, 240 Voice channels or 1 TV
1950 First Route NYC- Chicago
1958 First Canadian coast to coast route
18
TD-2 1958
19
TD-2 equipment
20
Typical TD-2 Microwave Tower
21
Microwave status mid 70’s
•Equipment all solid state except TWT amplifier (10 watt)
•Telephone companies “owned” 4 GHz common carrier band
•12 RF duplex channels 20 MHz each
•Separate Transmit/Receive antenna’s
•Easy to recognize Bell Type A towers with 2+2 horn reflector antenna's
•Capacity 1 TV or 1200 VF channels
•Modulation FDM-FM (FDM=SSB-SC with 4 KHz spacing)
•Everybody else (CN-CP, Western Union, MCI) “owned” 6 GHz band
•8 RF duplex channels 30 MHz each
•Duplex 10-12 ft parabolic antenna’s
•Capacity 1 TV or 1800 VF Channels
22
Digital World was coming in 1976
•Bell Northern Research was working on DMS digital CO switch
•The “toll” interface was digital
•Technology existed for intra-city digital transmission
•T1 carrier @ 1.544 Mb/s
•Hence a need developed for intercity digital microwave
23
Requirements for a Digital Microwave
•Overbuild on existing 4 GHz network
•CRTC made 8 GHz band available in Canada
•Channel plan was 40 MHz
•VF capacity similar to existing analog FDM-FM ie 1200+
•Digital HierarchyDS-1 1.544 Mb/s 24VF
• DS-2 6.312 Mb/s 96VF
• DS-3 44.736 Mb/s 672 VF
•By default capacity was set at 2 DS-3 (1344VF) or 91 Mb/s
•Modulation efficiency requirement 2.25 bit/sec
•FCC/CRTC defined a spectral emission mask (Spectrum Management)
24
What is optimum Modulation Method?
25
Choice of Modulation Method
•Constraint; cost of TWT amplifier
•Amplitude and phase nonlinearity of TWT
•Modulation candidates
•8PSK very difficult to implement, but constant envelope
•16QAM 4 level PAM on I and Q axis AM vs TWT
•QPRS 2 level QAM on I and Q axis => TWT => filter => QPRS
•Filter can be split between Transmitter and Receiver
•Transmit Filter standard Tchebyshew and meets FCC
I-axis
Q-axis
TWTTrmtFilter
RcvrFilter
4QAMQPRS
μW
4QAM
Baseband
26
FCC Mask
27
QPRS Eye Pattern
I-axis
Q-axis
28
Transmitter Implementation
SerialTo
Parallel
70 MHzOscillator
2 LevelAM
Modulator
2 LevelAM
Modulator
0/90 degPhase
Splitter
0 deg
90 deg
Σ
Data
90 Mb/s
Data
45 Mb/s2L 70MHz I-signal
2L 70MHz Q-signal
8 GHzOscillator
TWTAmp
Up-converter
½QPRSBPF
4QAM
70 MHz
4QAM 8 GHz
29
Receiver Implementation
8 GHzOscillator
DownConverter
70 MHzAGC Amp
70 MHzCarrier
Recovery
2 LevelAM
Demod
2 LevelAM
Demod
0/90 degPhase
Splitter
0 deg
90 deg
½QPRSLPF
½QPRSLPF
ΣData
Detector
1 Symbol delay
+
-
ParallelTo
Serial
ΣData
Detector
1 Symbol delay
-
+
3 Level I-signal
3 Level Q-signal
45 Mb/s I data
45Mb/s Q Data
90 Mb/s
30
Summary
•Field Trial held 1976 Avonmore –Kemptville
•Impact of Propagation much worse than expected
•Added Space diversity with Phase-Adaptive Combiner at 70 MHz
•Added Automatic Amplitude Slope Equalizer
•Commercial Introduction 1978 Toronto-Winnipeg
•Eventually Extended coast-to-coast
•The Worlds First successful Long Haul Digital Microwave
31
THANK YOU