+ All Categories
Home > Environment > Fuel Price Reforms in Indonesia: Some Lessons

Fuel Price Reforms in Indonesia: Some Lessons

Date post: 15-Jan-2017
Category:
Upload: oecd-environment
View: 233 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
12
Fuel Price Reforms in Indonesia: Some Lessons Teguh Dartanto Head of Poverty and Social Protec2on Research Group, LPEM FEB UI Director of Undergraduate Program in Economics University of Indonesia
Transcript

Fuel  Price  Reforms  in  Indonesia:  Some  Lessons  

Teguh  Dartanto  

Head  of  Poverty  and  Social  Protec2on  Research  Group,  LPEM  FEB  UI  Director  of  Undergraduate  Program  in  Economics  

University  of  Indonesia    

Reasons  for  Reforms  

2  

Sources:  Ministry  Energy  and  Mineral  Resources  and  Ministry  of  Finance  

Energy  Subsidy  in  Indonesia:  Burden  to  the  Budget    

3  

25.3  

9.0  

16.7  

21.2  

4.0  

4.4  

1.9  

1.7  

3.1  

3.8  

2.8  3.0  

4.5  

1.7  

3.4  

3.7  

3.4  

3.9  

0  

0.5  

1  

1.5  

2  

2.5  

3  

3.5  

4  

4.5  

5  

0.0  

5.0  

10.0  

15.0  

20.0  

25.0  

30.0  

2000   2001   2002   2003   2004   2005   2006   2007   2008   2009   2010   2011   2012   2013   2014  

Energy  Subsidy:  Burden  to  the  Budget,  2000-­‐2014  

%  of  central  government  spending   %  of  GDP  (secondary  axis)  

Monthly  Adjustment  Fuel  price  2002-­‐2003  

March  2005-­‐  30%  fuel  price  Adjustment  October  2005  –  67  %    fuel  price  adjustment    

October  2008  –  30  %  fuel  price  adjustment  February  2009  –  back  to  October  2009  price  regime  

June  2013,  44  %  fuel  price  adjustment  

Sources:  Ikhsan,  2014  

550 600 900

16502100

5500

4500

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

10,000Ja

n-00

Jan-

01

Jan-

02

Jan-

03

Jan-

04

Jan-

05

Jan-

06

Jan-

07

Jan-

08

Jan-

09

Jan-

10

Jan-

11

Jan-

12

Die

sel p

rices

(Nom

inal

Rp

per l

iter)

.

Retail price Industry Price MOPS Gasoil

Same  price  for  all  (75%  

of  MOPS)  with  

ceilings  

Same  (fixed)  price  for  all  

Retail:  fixed  at  ceiling  

Industry:  MOPS  +  5%  with  ceiling  

Retail:  fixed  

Industry:  MOPS  +  15%  

Retail:  rule-­‐based  (increase  allowed  if  6-­‐month  average  of  ICP  

rises  15%  above  budget  assump2on  of  

$105/bbl)  

Retail:  fixed  

Industry  50%  of  MOPS  

Indonesia  has  tried  many  types  of  pass-­‐through  Rule-­‐based  (with  trigger)  for  retail;  full  pass-­‐through  for  industry  

Sources:  Ikhsan,  2014  

The  New  Reform:  Formula  of  Fuel  Prices  •  The  Ministry  of  Energy  and  Natural  Resources  through  the  regula2on  No.  

0219  K/12/MEM/2010  and  No.  3784  K/12/MEM/2014  regulates  the  formula  of  HIP.    

 •  Where  HP  is  benchmark  price;  HIP  is  market  price  index;  and  αi  is  profit  

margin  and  transporta2on  costs;  i  is  the  average  of  previous  month  price.  HIP  follows  the  price  of  MOPS  (Mean  of  Plafs  Singapore).    

•  Adjustment  for  every  two  weeks  at  early  stage,  but  now  becoming  every  six  months  (too  long).  

•  In  order  to  speed  up  the  reform  in  the  oil  and  gas  sector,  the  Government  of  Indonesia  had  formed  a  special  taskforce  namely  Oil  and  Gas  Reform  Team  (December  2014-­‐May  2015).      

11/4/15   5  

!"! = !"#! + !!

!"#!"#$%&'( = 0.9842!!"#$!"#$%!"

!"#!"#$#%!!"# = 0.9967!!"#$!"#$%&!!.!"%!!"#$!!"

!"#!"#$%"&" = !"#$!"#!!"#$%"&"

Current  Fuel  Reforms:  Gasoline  

11/4/15   6  

Current  Fuel  Reforms:  Diesel  Fuel  

11/4/15   7  

Fiscal  Impacts  of  Fuel  Subsidy  Reforms  

11/4/15   8  

subsidies  

Fuel  Subsidy  Reform  and  Economic  and  Environmental  Impacts  (Input-­‐Output  Approach)  

11/4/15   9  

1.  S1a:  50%  fuel  subsidy  removal,  redistributed  to  u2lity  sector  (gas  sector);  2.  S1b:  100%  fuel  subsidy  removal,  redistributed  to  u2lity  sector  (gas  sector);  3.  S2a:  50%  fuel  subsidy  removal,  redirected  to  the  poor  (direct  cash  transfer)  4.  S2b:  100%  fuel  subsidy  removal,  redirected  to  the  poor  (direct  cash  transfer);  5.  S3:  50%  fuel  subsidy  removal,  equally  reallocated  to  gas  sector  and  poor  households  (a  

mix  of  scenario  1  and  2);  6.  S4:  50%  fuel  subsidy  removal,  realloca2on  to  several  key  sectors  (i.e.  ’Agriculture,  Hun2ng,  

Forestry  and  Fishing’,  ’food,  beverages,  and  tobacco’,  and  ’government,  defense,  and  educa2on’)  

Fuel  Subsidy  Reform  and  Environmental  Impacts  

11/4/15   10  

Source:  Author’s  esBmaBon  based  on  Dartanto  (2013)  and  Fathurrahman  et  al.  (forthcoming)  

Socio  Economic  Impacts  of  Reforms  

11/4/15   11  

-­‐0.20%  -­‐0.10%  0.00%  0.10%  0.20%  0.30%  0.40%  0.50%  0.60%  0.70%  0.80%  0.90%  

Simula2on  #1   Simula2on  #2  

SimulaQon  #1:  The  cost  of  UHC  is  around  IDR  18.07T  (2008  value):  financed  by  15%  cujng  fuel  subsidies.  The  alloca2ons  of  saved  money  are:  3.3%  (construc2on);  30.2%  (government  services);  4.7%  (educa2on  services),  46.6%  (BPJS  health  sector),  14.6%  (public  health  services).      SimulaQon  #2:  The  cost  of  UHC  is  around  IDR  18.07T  (2008  value):  financed  by  7.5%  cujng  fuel  subsidies  and  voluntary  contribu2on  of  society.  The  alloca2ons  are  as  same  as  SimulaQon  #1.        

Source:  LPEM  FEB  UI’s  esBmate      

 Thank  you  very  much  for  your  afen2ons  

teguh@lpem-­‐feui.org  [email protected]  

11/4/15   12  


Recommended