Functional Regions: Local Labour Market Areas in Italy
Giovanni Barbieri, Sandro Cruciani, Francesca Gambarotto
NESIS Seminar
June 26th, 2003
26 June 2003 Functional regions in Italy 2
Aim of the Exercise To map out local development In Italy Using a very detailed territorial grid Over 25 years
(from the 1971 census to the 1996 intermediate census and beyond)
26 June 2003 Functional regions in Italy 3
Relevance of the Exercise To explore new regional classification
systems To test it in the analysis of sub-national socio-
economic structures To spot trends based on past evolution
26 June 2003 Functional regions in Italy 4
1. Territorial Grid Local Labour Market Areas (LLMAs)
Based on information on commuting between house and workplace across municipalities
Istat (1997). I sistemi locali del lavoro. Argomenti no. 10. Roma.
Features: Geographical: The grid of LLMAs covers the whole
territory of Italy, with no residuals Statistical: Transparent, internationally
acknowledged method Economic: LLMAs from an economic standpoint
approximate self-contained labour markets
26 June 2003 Functional regions in Italy 5
The 1991 Grid The latest available territorial grid is used (based on
the results of the 1991 population census) LLMAs are 784 Kept constant over the whole 1971-1996 period.
Three reasons for this choice: Interest in dynamics The territorial grid itself is affected by growth processes Possible under-estimation of agglomeration
26 June 2003 Functional regions in Italy 6
LLMAs(1991)
26 June 2003 Functional regions in Italy 7
2. Clustering LLMAs Based on sectoral characteristics in the more recent
available industrial census (1996). Namely: The variable considered is employment in local units
(establishments) Industries are broken down in 51 classes The breakdown of manufacturing is more detailed The variable for each LLMA is obtained by aggregation
of municipal data
26 June 2003 Functional regions in Italy 8
Clusters
N on- specia lized
U rban
M ining
Tourism
N on- m anufactu ring
M ade in I ta ly
Textiles
Leather
Eyew ear
L ight
Bu ild ing m ateria ls
Vehicles
Appliances
O ther
M anu facturing
LLMAs
26 June 2003 Functional regions in Italy 9
Non-specialized
26 June 2003 Functional regions in Italy 10
Non-manu-facturing
26 June 2003 Functional regions in Italy 11
Light manu-facturing
26 June 2003 Functional regions in Italy 12
Other manu-facturing
26 June 2003 Functional regions in Italy 13
Main Features of Clusters
LLMAs Population CLUSTERS
Number % Million %
Non-specialized 311 39.7 12.9 22.4
Non-manufacturing 113 14.4 18.7 32.5
Light manufacturing 266 33.9 17.6 30.6
Other manufacturing 94 12.0 8.3 14.5
I taly 784 100.0 57.5 100.0
26 June 2003 Functional regions in Italy 14
3. Classifying LLMAs according to employment rates
Ratio of this choice: in the absence of information on value added
produced in LLMAs, employment rate an indicator of their performance
In fact:
Value added at the LLMA level (1996-2000) has been recently published by Istat (June 17, 2003)
Population
PopWorkingAge
PopWorkingAge
Employment
Employment
GDP
Population
GDP
26 June 2003 Functional regions in Italy 15
Per capita Value added(2000)
26 June 2003 Functional regions in Italy 17
4. Employment Rate Dynamics 1971-1996
A way to introduce the concept of “successful” and “unsuccessful” LLMAs
From a technical point of view, this is done by considering the transition matrix comparing employment rates in 1971 and 1996
For a similar approach, see: OECD, Territorial Review of Italy, 2001
26 June 2003 Functional regions in Italy 18
Employment Rate Dynamicsby Macro-Region
1991 Below the average Above the average
North-Centre 2 North-Centre 295 Mezzogiorno 135 Mezzogiorno 6
Above the average
I talia 137 I talia 301 North-Centre 41 North-Centre 81 Mezzogiorno 213 Mezzogiorno 11
19
71
Below the average
I talia 254 I talia 92
26 June 2003 Functional regions in Italy 19
The Derived Tassonomy
1991 Below average Above average
Above average REGRESS LEADING
19
71
Below average LAGGING PROGRESS
26 June 2003 Functional regions in Italy 20
LLMAsPerformance
26 June 2003 Functional regions in Italy 21
The Data-Base Censuses 1971 through 1991, with updates
to 1996 where possible 5 main areas:
Socio-demographic features Dwellings Employment and labour market Economy and labour market Economy and production
26 June 2003 Functional regions in Italy 22
Socio-Demographic Features
Population density Masculinity rate Dependence rate Turnover of working population Average dimension of households Education rates
26 June 2003 Functional regions in Italy 23
Dwellings Share of occupied dwellings Rooms per dweller Average number of rooms Ownership Time of construction Services
Water WC and bathroom Central heating
26 June 2003 Functional regions in Italy 24
Economy and Labour Market
Employed persons in local units, in total and by 8 sectors of activity
Average size of local units Localization quotients Specialization indexes
26 June 2003 Functional regions in Italy 25
Economy and Production Activity rate (total and by sex) Employment rate (total and by sex) Share of employed persons by sector of
activity Share of employed persons by kind of
occupation (employee/self-employed) Entrepreneuriality rate
26 June 2003 Functional regions in Italy 26
The Results: A Few Examples
Clusters Lagging Regress Progress Leading TotalNon specialized 168 82 18 43 311Non-manifacturing 46 6 21 40 113Light manufacturing 16 44 41 165 266Other manufacturing 24 5 12 53 94Italy 254 137 92 301 784
Clusters Lagging Regress Progress Leading TotalNon specialized 1,67 1,51 0,49 0,36 1,00Non-manifacturing 1,26 0,30 1,58 0,92 1,00Light manufacturing 0,19 0,95 1,31 1,62 1,00Other manufacturing 0,79 0,30 1,09 1,47 1,00Italy 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00
26 June 2003 Functional regions in Italy 27
Population
Clusters Lagging Regress Progress Leading TotalNon specialized 7506 2166 1257 1922 12851Non-manifacturing 11376 582 1822 4923 18703Light manufacturing 1558 1153 1927 12950 17588Other manufacturing 2096 310 377 5537 8319Italy 22536 4211 5383 25331 57461
Clusters Lagging Regress Progress Leading TotalNon specialized 1,49 2,30 1,04 0,34 1,00Non-manifacturing 1,55 0,42 1,04 0,60 1,00Light manufacturing 0,23 0,89 1,17 1,67 1,00Other manufacturing 0,64 0,51 0,48 1,51 1,00Italy 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00
26 June 2003 Functional regions in Italy 28
Density
Clusters Lagging Regress Progress Leading TotalNon specialized 119 110 164 102 118Non-manifacturing 454 254 259 305 370Light manufacturing 221 125 117 220 192Other manufacturing 162 144 60 193 167Italy 209 126 144 207 191
Clusters Lagging Regress Progress Leading TotalNon specialized 0,93 1,41 1,85 0,80 1,00Non-manifacturing 1,12 1,04 0,93 0,76 1,00Light manufacturing 1,05 0,98 0,81 1,06 1,00Other manufacturing 0,89 1,31 0,48 1,07 1,00Italy 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00
26 June 2003 Functional regions in Italy 29
Dependence Rate
Clusters Lagging Regress Progress Leading TotalNon specialized 51 52 48 48 50Non-manifacturing 46 47 46 44 46Light manufacturing 48 53 50 46 47Other manufacturing 49 51 55 47 48Italy 48 52 49 46 47
Clusters Lagging Regress Progress Leading TotalNon specialized 0,99 0,96 0,94 0,99 1,00Non-manifacturing 1,00 0,94 0,99 0,99 1,00Light manufacturing 1,00 1,04 1,03 1,01 1,00Other manufacturing 1,00 0,97 1,11 1,02 1,00Italy 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00
26 June 2003 Functional regions in Italy 30
Education Rate (1991)
Clusters Lagging Regress Progress Leading TotalNon specialized 24 22 30 26 24Non-manifacturing 34 23 29 34 33Light manufacturing 22 20 26 25 24Other manufacturing 27 22 24 28 27Italy 29 21 28 27 28
Clusters Lagging Regress Progress Leading TotalNon specialized 0,92 1,15 1,21 1,08 1,00Non-manifacturing 0,97 0,88 0,87 1,04 1,00Light manufacturing 0,87 1,07 1,07 1,02 1,00Other manufacturing 0,93 1,04 0,89 1,04 1,00Italy 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00
26 June 2003 Functional regions in Italy 31
And so on…
26 June 2003 Functional regions in Italy 32
Preliminary results
Urban LLMAs seem to be the more successful Density is destiny
Diversity seems to be a key to success Overspecialisation not an advantage in the
long run
26 June 2003 Functional regions in Italy 33
Next Steps Profiling successful and unsuccessful LLMAs Discriminant analysis How were characterized in 1971 the dynamic
LLMAs? Which problems face the various types of
clusters? Are there policy lessons to learn?