Future-Focused Rewards
Preston J. Handler
Robert E. Rothschild, CCP
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
Your Presenter(s)
Preston Handler, [email protected]
Robert Rothschild, Canon
About Canon
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
About CanonFounded in 1937
Global net sales: $44.9 billion
Global employees: 167,000
Canon USA employees:2,400
Canon Americas employees: 11,000
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
Strength Through Diversification
25% Business Machines 65%
Office Imaging Products
Monochrome NW MFDsOffice color MFDsFull-color copiersPersonal PPCs/MFDsOther products
Cameras Digital camerasDigital video camcordersFilm camerasLensesLCD projectorsOther products
Optical & Other Products
Semiconductor systemsLCD exposure systemsBroadcasting equipmentMedical equipmentOther products
Business Information Products
Document scannersHandy terminalsElectronic dictionaries
10%
2.0%
36%Computer Peripherals
LBP and MFP PrintersInkjet printersInkjet all-in-onesImage scannersOther products
27%
Calculators Other products
$44.9 billion
Source: Canon Annual Report Canon Global
2008 Global Sales Breakdown by Product Category
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
Kyosei philosophy“All people, regardless of race, religion, or culture, harmoniously living and working together into the future”
Seek to foster good relations with customers, communities, nations, and the environment
Contribute to global prosperity and the well-being of humankind
In accordance with the philosophy of kyosei, Canon will continue contributing to society through technological innovation, aiming to be a corporation worthy of admiration and respect worldwide
The Case for (Transformational) Change
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
Why Change Now?To keep up with the changing business world, Canon has to upgrade its business practices and talent profileWe’re not the company we used to be; In just over two decades we went from one billion dollars to twelve billion dollars in net sales While the company is doing well, now is the time to revitalize the HR system, to ensure alignment with changing business drivers and emerging human capital needs
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
Current and Desired States
Current State
• Purveyor of stand-alone products
•
Evolutionary business culture
•
Bias toward stability/equilibrium
•
Reactive to business changes
• Transaction-focused HR function
Desired State
•
Create customized “solutions”
•
Transformational business
culture
•
More bias to action and
reinvention
•
Proactive posture on business change
•
Strategic, customer-focused HR function
Business Character and Culture
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
Current and Desired States
Current State
• Neutral to cultural changes
• Pay-for-pulse culture
•
Internal equity focus
• Collection of loosely related programs
• Complex, hierarchical job structure
• Discrete communication
Desired State
• Support or drive cultural changes
• Pay-for-performance culture
•
External market focus
• Integrated strategy and programs
• Single, defined, flexible job structure
• Clear/comprehensive communications
Character of Pay Programs
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
Human Capital Management (HCM) Framework
Deep Expertise
Longevity
New Skill Sets
Workforce Adaptability
Flexibility
Workforce Mobility
Productivity Quality Innovation Customer Satisfaction
Key Performance Drivers
Economic Value Added
TM / Revenue Growth / Market Share / Stock Performance
Business Results
Human Capital ProcessesCareer Development
Performance Oriented Awards
Succession Planning
Dual Career Tracks
Competency Management
Canon AcademyCareer Bands
Employee Engagement
High Performance Orientation
Human Capital Capabilities
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
Tier 4
The Plan of Attack
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
Corporate Performance
Attract, Retain and Motivate Talent
Our HR StrategyCompetencies
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
Create tools and measures to more objectively and more accurately evaluate employee performance and behavior and serve to identify development needs
Build a high-potential identification, development and succession planning systemFocus on continuous learning as a source of competitive advantage
Develop competitive and motivating rewards that are performance based
Define title hierarchy, job position responsibilities and career paths
Our HR Strategy
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
Project Guiding PrinciplesIf we are to be successful, the outcomes of this project must be:
Carefully integrated—We will need to work closely with the other project teams to create a cohesive HR systemThoroughly validated—We will seek to draw guidance from and build buy-in among those most impacted by the programs we develop
Executive interviews, employee focus groups, frequent Committee updates, Project Team meetings, check-ins with subject matter experts
Extensively communicated—The best design will fail if it is not properly implemented, with adequate time for training and communicationOwned by the line—What we are developing are management tools, not HR programs and policies
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
Guiding Principles of the HR SystemWhen creating the HR system, the guiding principles we used were:
Longevity-based to maintain a culture and environment that encourages employees to stay with Canon
Flexible To meet the unique needs of the individual business units, groups, and employees
Performance oriented to create an accountable, high-performance culture at Canon
The Design Phase
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
Which best characterizes your approach to managing talent?
Strategy Setting
Career Flexibility
Career Predictability
3
1
2
4
5
Current Future
Rewards programs often are impacted by the degree to which a company develops and promotes its talent by setting relatively stable career paths, or by providing multiple (not always pre-
established) paths for growth and advancement
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
Which best characterizes your approach to managing talent?
Strategy Setting
Career Flexibility
Career Predictability
3
1
2
4
5
Current Future
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
Performance OrientationNonexistent Aggressive Ruthless
No ratings(counter cultural)
Forced
distributionBottom 10%-20%
removed
No differentiationbased on
performance
Top performers
receive 2.0-3.0X of
average performerswith no cap
Top:Avg
>3.0%
(usually a carve–
out for top 5-10%);
no cap; no
position in range
No differentiationbased on
performance
2nd
lowest rating
gets 0%; average
rating gets
nominal increase
Average rating
gets 0%
No individual
component
Individual
component
25-40% of total
opportunity;
formulaic or MBOs
Individual
component
>40% of total
opportunity;
MBOs
Management of
Performance
Ratings
Merit Pay:
High Performers
Lip Service Balanced
Ratings fall as
they mayDistribution
guidelines
Top performers
receive 1-1.5X of
average performers
Top performers
receive 1.6-2.0X of
average performers
Lowest rating
gets 0%2nd
lowest rating
nominal increase
Individual modifier
+/-
5%;
discretionary
Individual modifier
+/-
10-15%;
formulaic
Merit Pay:
Low Performers
Variable Pay
Collaborative Culture High Performance Culture
Paternalistic “Tough Love”Management Style
Work Environment
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
Band ABand ANonNon--ExemptExempt
Band BBand BExemptExempt
Band CBand CSenior Exempt
Band DBand DManagement
Band EBand ESenior Management
Band FBand FExecutive
Canon USA Career Bands
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
HierarchyHierarchies provide clear markers that let us know how far and fast we are climbing the ladder of success
Identity and self-esteem are tied up in our organizational station and title
Hierarchies fulfill our deep need for order and security
Hierarchy is inevitable and necessary in an organization of sufficient magnitude and complexity
Source: “Why Hierarchies Thrive”, Harvard Business Review, March
2003
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
Band DesignSupervisory jobs assigned to bands based on title
Title criteria have been developed
Non-supervisory jobs assigned to bands on basis of FLSA classification and role
Competencies based on bands
Bands do not have pay minimums and maximums; competitive compensation is managed through market clusters
The bands can be used to determine eligibility for certain privileges and to differentiate target award amounts for the incentive plan
Canon Academy participation based on bands
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
Important to Recognize…Broadbanding is not a guaranteed solution
Broadbanding is more of a career management support vehicle than a salary administration tool
Broadbanding helps support organizational change; by itself, it will not be successful in reshaping organizational values
Training and education should not be under-committed; success depends more on implementation than design
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
PromotionsWith the introduction of Broadbanding, Canon USA will recognize and reward three types of career advancement:
Band-to-Band Promotions—Movement to a different job in a higher Band
Within-Band Promotions—Movement to a different job in the same Band
Role Enhancement—Adding significantlymore value within the same role
No distinctions will be drawn between
band-to-band and within-band
promotions from a pay standpoint
Organizations use various
names to describe this kind
of advancement:
Career MoveDevelopment MoveGrowth MoveProfessional DevelopmentRole ExpansionCompetency Progression
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
Career Pathing StrategiesElite Individual
Contributor (IC) Program Dual Career Ladders
Primary DriverRecognize, reward, and retain top IC’s
Advance technology
Advance technologyCreate career path for IC’s
Improve quality of managers
1% of total 30-35% in advanced IC track
Normal promotion processNomination
Role profile criteria and job openings
Based on individual characteristics
Typically remain in expert/ elite technology role
Encouraged to move across tracks
Population SizeHow Chosen
Selection Criteria
Mobility
Secondary Driver
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
Band ABand ANonNon--ExemptExempt
Band BBand BExemptExempt
Band CBand CSenior Exempt
Band DBand DMgmt.
Band EBand ESenior Mgmt.
Band FBand FExecutive
ManagerialManagerialTrackTrack
IndividualIndividual
CContributorontributor
TrackTrack
Canon USA Career Bands
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
Role Profiles
Key R
esponsibility & R
ole Criteria
Direct C
ompensation
Perquisites
Benefits
Other B
enefitsExecutive Competencies Perform
ance Managem
ent
Training
Total Rewards
ManagerialManagerialTrackTrack
Individual Individual ContributorContributor
TrackTrack
Sr. Management Competencies
Management Competencies
Supervisor Competencies
Exempt Employee Competencies
Non Exempt Employee Competencies
Competencies in the HR System
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
What are Canon Competencies?
A category of behaviors, knowledge and motivations associated with success or failure in a job family
Competencies define clear and measurable “performance standards” for how an employee must behave in order to reach their objectivesCompetencies provide the glue that integrates and holds together related Human Resources systems and programs
Competencies provide a common language that allows people to talk about what success looks like in an organization
Competency Model Management
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
A Sales B C D E FBand:
The Canon Competency ModelCompetencies Arranged by Career Band
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
Sample Pay Mix
Base Salary, 95%
Bonus, 5% Base
Salary, 94%
Bonus, 6%
Base Salary, 93%
Bonus, 7%
Base Salary, 89%
Bonus, 11%
Base Salary, 80%
Bonus, 20%
A
B
C
D
EPay mix will approximate market (shown),with adjustments made to ensure areasonable band-to-bandprogression of
bonus targets
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
Sample Merit DesignSample Merit DesignProvide a merit increase budget to each division, reflecting market trends and Company/division performance
Provide performance-based merit increase guidelines
Provide training and advice to managers in effectively using the guidelines
Rating C/R Low C/R High
Outstanding N+3 N+2Exceeds Expectations N+2 N+1Meets Expectations N NMeets Some Expectations N-1 0.0
Needs Improvement 0.0 0.0Unacceptable 0.0 0.0
Prior Guidelines
New Guidelines
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
Merit Increase Decisions—Tools for Management
Desired Degree of Differentiation
Man
ager
Com
fort
with
Diff
eren
tiatio
n
Across-the-board increase
Budget
Merit guidance
Relevant data provided
Budget
Relevant data provided
Managers held accountable
Across-the-board increase
Merit Matrix
–Ranges in each cell
–Moderate slope
Manager training
Merit Matrix
–
Ranges in each cell
–
Aggressive slope and/or carve-out
Manager training
Across-the-board increase
Merit Matrix
–
Discrete values
–
Moderate slope
Merit Matrix
–
Discrete values
–
Aggressive slope and/or carve-out
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
Impact of Changing TitlesOrganizations that move to broadbanding frequently consolidate titles
A window of opportunity to “clean house”
Reinforces the new compensation approach
Mirrors the flatter job structure
Effective communication is critical
Will be viewed by someas a personal takeaway
The good news is, few employeesremain negative about titleconsolidation
12%Negative initially
and ongoing
37%Neutral
(No reaction)
8%Positive
43%Negative, then
accepting
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
Implementation of Title Changes
Director & GMDirector & GM
Director & AGMDirector & AGM
Asst. DirectorAsst. Director
Asst. ManagerAsst. Manager
Sr. DirectorSr. Director
Sr. DirectorDirector
Sr. DirectorDirector
DirectorSr. Manager
DirectorSr. Manager
ManagerSr. SpecialistSupervisor
ManagerSr. SpecialistSupervisor
We will continue to have Sr. Director, Director,
Sr. Manager, Manager and Supervisor titles
We will continue to have Sr. Director, Director,
Sr. Manager, Manager and Supervisor titles
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
Title Validation TableTitle Proposed Title Org Layer
Org Criteria Met?
Supervisor TitleSupervisor
Criteria Met?
Direct Subordinates
Total Subordinates Title
Definition met?Exempt Non
Exempt Exempt Non Exempt
Manager, Income Property Tax
Manager, Income Property Tax Department Yes Director,
Income Property Tax Yes 2 1 2 2 Yes
Manager, Supply
Sr. Specialist, Supply Department Yes Senior Director,
Beauty Products Yes 0 0 0 0 No
Director, Telephone Operations
Director, Telephone Operations Sub-Division Yes Vice President,
Local Network Comms Yes 2 4 2 6 Yes
Senior Director, Electronic Supply
Senior Director, Electronic Supply Sub-Group Yes Vice President,
Electronic Equipment Yes 4 0 5 0 Yes
Senior Director, Design
Senior Director, Design Sub-Group Yes Vice President,
Design Yes 2 0 2 6 Yes
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
Title Hierarchy—Non-Managerial Title CriteriaNonexempt Positions Job Factors
Coordinator Brings together several facets of operations to ensure maximum efficiency and effectiveness
Operator Operates computer equipment, peripheral equipment, data entry devices, switchboard, or telephone console
AssistantPerforms duties such as copying data, compiling records, filing,
tabulating, posting, distributing mail, and other clerical duties
Technician Applies to jobs requiring knowledge or certification to perform within a “technical”
function
These titles are assigned based on the nature of the work being performed and are not intended to be hierarchical
Exempt Positions Job Factors
Administrator Oversees the day-to-day execution of programs, policies, and procedures
Analyst Researches, plans, and evaluates the effectiveness and viability
of processes, systems, procedures, or methodologies
Specialist Possesses specialized knowledge or skills in a particular functional area
Architect Defines standards, policies, and procedures for the organization
in area of technical specialization
These titles are assigned based on the nature of the work being performed and are not intended to be hierarchical
Advanced Individual
Contributor Positions Job Factors
Senior Specialist Possesses technical expertise and significant practical experience in a particular functional area
Consultant/AdvisorServes as a subject matter resource within a function, contributing to the development of company concepts and providing creative and effective solutions
Fellow Applies their vast amounts of technical experience to make a significant contribution to the success of CUSA
Distinguished Fellow A rare individual who possesses a certain “je ne sais quoi”; brings CUSA external adulation
These titles reflect a progressively higher degree of experience, expertise and impact. Fellow and Distinguished Fellow only apply to functions with a formal dual career ladder
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
SupervisorSupervisorSales
Manager
Sales
Director
Band ABand ANonNon--ExemptExempt
Administrator/Coordinator/Operator/Assistant/Representative/Technician
Band BBand BExemptExempt
Band CBand CSenior Exempt
Band DBand DMgmt.
Band EBand ESenior Mgmt.
Band FBand FExecutive
Sr. ManagerManager
Sr. Director Director
EVP/SVPVP
ManagerialManagerialTrackTrack
IndividualIndividual
CContributorontributorTrackTrack
AdvisorArchitect
Fellow
Analyst/Engineer/Sales Representative/Specialist
SupervisorSupervisor Sr. Specialist/Sr. AnalystSr. Engineer/Account ExecSr. Specialist/Sr. Analyst
Sr. Engineer/Account Exec
Titles by Band
The Implementation Phase
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
BenchmarkingWhat Is Benchmarking?
A process that organizes, consolidates, and broadly describes all of CUSA’s jobsProcess facilitated by HR; full involvement and accountability on part of functional managementBenchmarking affords CUSA a number of benefits, including:
Simpler, more understandable job documentationEnhanced consistencyPlatform for more effective career pathingCloser alignment with market
An essential first step in CUSA’s hierarchy developmentAvoids “garbage in, garbage out”Enhances credibility
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
BenchmarkingBenchmarking Process
For each functional area, identify sub-functions and job families
Identify Benchmark Jobs for each job family (the goal is to eliminate redundant titles)
Develop role profiles for each Benchmark Job using existing internal position descriptions and external survey definitions
Map current positions to the new Benchmark Jobs
Market price each Benchmark Job to determine pay cluster
Everything will be validated with management…they own it!
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
Administration
Describing the organization in this format enables the individual to see how his/her job fits into the structure
Benchmarking: Mapping the OrganizationFunction Sub Function Discipline Job
General Management
Admin. Support
Central Services
Office ServicesOffice Services
Security
Facilities
Facilities Coordinator III
Facilities Coordinator II
Facilities Coordinator I
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
New, Streamlined Job DocumentationRole Profiles
One-page descriptions of what theposition requires the job holder to:
Do (key responsibilities)Display (key competencies)Deliver (expected results)
Help us develop consistent jobdescriptions which are usefulin a variety of situations
Allow us to compare therequirements of the job withthe definitions of the bands tofacilitate band placementContribute to our ability toaccurately benchmarkpositions against the marketProvide managers andemployees with a frameworkfor discussion of performanceexpectations
Replaces current documentation format
Role Profile: Senior Product AnalystCI02
Role Snapshot:
Responsible for investigating business opportunities and developing business plans for the implementation of new products and new markets. Responsible for developing feasibility analyses for collaboration or combination with other companies
Track: Individual Contributor
Band: D
Key Responsibilities (“Do”) Strategic Planning and Corporate Initiatives
⎯ Responsible for targeting and consulting with potential market participants, developing pricing schema and detailed revenue models, and selecting initial product offerings for new markets
⎯ Actively participate in senior-level, highly sensitive discussions involving the strategic direction of CUSA ⎯ Responsible for analyzing the potential impact of collaboration with other markets, or combination with other
entities, for new business ventures New Product Implementation
⎯ Manage design and implementation of CUSA’s new index options marketplace. Responsible for developing project scope and goals, leading large multi-departmental teams, selecting initial products, preparing cost/benefit and break-even analyses for each product, and negotiating all agreements with licensors and vendors
Competitive Intelligence ⎯ Conduct primary market research and prepare comparative analyses of other exchanges, including their financial
performance, products, strategic initiatives, and participants
Key Competencies (“Display”)
Competencies
Knowledge and Skill
In-depth knowledge of professional field requiring intensive academic preparation (college degree) May assist in the development of new methods and procedures
Problem Solving/ Innovation
Resolution of problems requires analysis of facts and general principles Varied courses of action require judgment and adaptation of existing philosophy
Freedom to Act
Freedom to choose methods within defined procedures and standard practices Sets own work schedule to meet established objectives
Impact/ Decision Making
Has a significant impact on small department/function or large work area/sub function Contributes influence to decision making process as an advisor
Interaction Uses skill of persuasion in communication
Information and issues are of complex nature
Results Expected (“Deliver”) Proposals on business strategies Financial models
Other Expectations Creative and independent thinking Drive and ability to work independently as required Strong competitive analysis and financial modeling skills
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
Assigning Jobs to Bands
A key issue to consider1 All jobs are “considered equal”
and share a midpoint2 Bands are segmented into “zones”,
each with its own midpoint3 Each job in the Band has its own
Market Reference Point (“MRP”)
$220K
$160K
$280K
Minimum
Midpoint
Maximum
CFOCHO
CMO$220K
$160K
$280K
$200K
$180K
$240K
$260K
Midpoint
Midpoint
Midpoint
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
ZONE 3
Band F Band F Band F
CFO
CHO
CMO
$255K
$230K
$175K
CFO
CHO
CMO
Hypothetical salary data
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
About Market ClustersCUSA, as with many organizations with broadbands, is assigning its jobs to bands on the basis of role. For example, all directors will be in Band B, and all managers will be in Band C.Competitive compensation levels, however, may vary considerably from role to role within a band, and CUSA needs to react accordingly. Therefore it is establishing “market clusters” to anchor positions to competitive pay levels within the bands.Clusters are “drawn around” jobs that have similar market value within the band. Typically a band has 5-8 clusters, depending on the spread of market values.Clusters provide managers with a useful frame of reference for making pay decisions. They are not intended to be “hard and fast” upper or lower limits of pay.Clusters are typically not communicated to employees (except people managers), lest the clusters be viewed as anything other than a way to organize market data.
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
Value Reference Ranges -
Example
All three jobs in this example are assigned to Band E by virtue of title
All three jobs are in different Value Reference Ranges because of the variance in market values among them
Each Value Reference Range is 75% wide, affording ample room to accommodate growth in employee salaries
Band EBand ESenior Mgmt
$81K$81K $141K$141K
Director, Real Estate Tax(Value: $113K)
(Employee Salary: $118K)Director, Sports Marketing
(Value: $151K)(Employee Salary: $132K)$96K$96K $168K$168K
Sr. Director, Operations(Value: $174K)
(Employee Salary: $158K)$116K$116K $202K$202K
Hypothetical salary data
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
Be Careful of the Message Clusters SendClusters are NOT
grades
Grades Clusters
Grades define the limits of payGrades are typically communicated
Eligibilities are typically tied to grade
Clusters provide market referencesClusters are not communicatedNo eligibilities are tied to cluster
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
Benchmarking Report Benchmarking Report --
ExampleExampleSample TemplateSample Template
Name Location Current Title Band Salary New Title Title Change Type DivisionJones, Bob Lake Success Clerk, Stock A $20 – 35 $27 Assistant, Stock Title Construction Changed Broadcast & Communications
Smith, Peggy Itasca, IL Director, Sales Regional E $88 – 154 $93 Director, Sales Regional N/A Broadcast & Communications
Chen, Stanley Norcross, GA Sr. Manager, Regional D $52 – 90 $57 Sr. Manager, Regional N/A Broadcast & Communications
Value Reference
Range
Hypothetical salary data
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
Introducing the New Canon Human Resources Program
With our engaged, motivated, and talented people,our possibilities
are limitless and our successful future
is assured.
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
Implementation: TrainingIf the employee is a Band D individual contributor:
Your job is in Band D because it is an advanced professional role. You are in the same band as all Managers and Senior Managers, and some other very high level professionals.
Being in Band D recognizes the significant value of your job and your contributions as a professional. As you continue to grow in your field, you may be eligible for a role expansion increase. We can also explore the possibility of moving to the Managerial Track, if that has appeal to you.
Any questions?
If the employee’s title has been reclassified due to title consolidation in a manner that will likely be perceived positively:
As I indicated, we will no longer be using the [Assistant Manager/Assistant Director] title. Everyone that had that title and that does manage people will now be a [Supervisor or Manager/ Senior Manager or Director].
The decision to make your job a [Manager/Director] role is based on a number of factors, including organizational scope, reporting relationships, and market data. Each managerial title lines up with the organization layers (Group, sub-group, division, sub-division, and department).
Please note that this is not a promotion. This is just a title reclassification. Your salary is not being changed. Your current duties, responsibilities and performance expectations are unchanged.
Any questions?
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
RETSRETSLOBLOB
Sr. Software
EngineerSeniorDBA
Program
ManagerSr. Business
AnalystSenior
ResearcherSr. Test
AnalystSr. Capacity
& Perf. EngSr. User X
Specialist
Lateral Moves, Immediate Job Families
Career Map: Senior Software Engineer
Lateral Moves, Extended Job Families
Mgr, SWEng
ApplicationArchitect
BusinessTech. Mgr
Promotion, Managerial Track Promotions, Technical Track
CompetenciesTo Develop Flexibility Teamwork
Anal. ThinkingFlexibilityTeamwork
Flexibility
Anal. ThinkingBias for Action
FlexibilityTeamwork
Coach/Dev Others
Achiev. Orient’nAnal. ThinkingBias for Action
TeamworkImpact/Influence
Achiev. Orient’nAnal. ThinkingBias for Action
TeamworkImpact/Influence
CompetenciesTo DevelopExternal Move External Move
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
AccountingClerk I
AccountingClerk II
AccountingClerk III
Accountant
SeniorAccountant
Tax Analyst
Senior TaxAnalyst
AccountingSpecialist
SupervisorAccounting
ManagerAccounting
DirectorAccounting
VPAccounting
SVPAccounting
SeniorAccountingSpecialist
SupervisorTax Tax Specialist
Manager Tax
Director Tax
VP Tax
SVP Tax
SampleFinance & Accounting
SampleFinance & Accounting
FinancialAnalyst
Senior
FinancialAnalyst
Manager,FinancialReporting
Tax Family Accounting Family Finance Family Tax Family Accounting Family
Management Track Technical Track
Tax Family Accounting Family Finance Family
Wrap-Up
2010 Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition
Post MortemWhat’s Worked Well
Employees have a stronger understanding of CUSA goals and values and what it takes to be successful
Alignment as a basis for all Americas
Ties in all programs and levels the playing field
What…Well…Needs WorkMaintain consistency for the future
Incorporate future companies
Reevaluate regularly
It’s baack: the Titling Nightmare