Date post: | 06-Apr-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | lwmcgeorge |
View: | 218 times |
Download: | 0 times |
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 1/47
Survey Results& Analysis
for
AASHTO 2009 Fall IT Survey (FY2010 IT Survey)
Wednesday, November 04, 2009Pow ered by Vovici EFM
www.vovici.com
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 2/47
Executive Summary
This report contains a detailed statistical analysis of the results to the survey titled AASHTO 2009
Fall IT Survey. The results analysis includes answers from all respondents who took the survey in
the 49 day period from Tuesday, September 15, 2009 to Monday, November 02, 2009.
42 completed responses were received to the survey during this time.
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 3/47
Survey Results & Analysis
Survey: AASHTO 2009 Fall IT Survey (FY2010 IT Survey)
Author: Jan Edwards
Filter: Responses R eceived: 42
1) State or Province:
Those states and agencies who provided responses are denoted in green.
Alabama Kentucky North Dakota Alberta
Alaska Louisiana Ohio British Columbia
Arizona Maine Oklahoma Manitoba
Arkansas Maryland Oregon New Brunswick
California Massachusetts Pennsylvania Newfoundland, LabradorColorado Michigan Rhode Island Northwest TerritoriesConnecticut Minnesota South Carolina Nova Scotia
Delaware Mississippi South Dakota OntarioD.C. Missouri Tennessee Quebec
Florida Montana Texas SaskatchewanGeorgia Nebraska Utah Other
Hawaii Nevada Vermont Idaho New Hampshire Virginia
Illinois New Jersey Washington
Indiana New Mexico West Virginia
Iowa New York Wisconsin
Kansas North Carolina Wyoming
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 4/47
2) Contact Information (Agency Name, Contact Name, and Division must be provideas minimum):
(Removed for publication)
3) Please identify the following additional key personnel:
Technical Support Manager
Tech Support Mgr Telephone Tech Support Mgr Email Address
AK Brian Idzik
AL
Princess
Harper
334‐260‐
5266 [email protected]
AR
Sidney
Foggo
501‐569‐
2260 [email protected]
AZ Tami Price
(602) 712
‐
7170 [email protected]
CO
Marion
McLellan
303 757‐
9456 [email protected]
NC David Dietz
919 707‐
2011 [email protected]
DE Vacant N/A N/A
FL
Wilson
Dilmore
850‐414‐
4292 [email protected]
IA
Barb
Espeland
(515) 239‐
1583 [email protected]
IL
IN
Mike
Jenkins
KS
Sue
Swartzman
785‐296‐
3727 [email protected]
KY Jon Clark
502‐564‐
8900 [email protected]
LA
Tyrone
Carter [email protected]
MD Guy Reihl
410 787‐
7739 [email protected]
ME Eric Erskine
207 624‐
3165 [email protected]
MI
Nathan
Buckwalter,
MDIT
517‐335‐
2407 [email protected]
MN
John
Moreland
651‐366‐
5646 [email protected]
MO Jack Morris 573522‐2624 [email protected]
MS
Denise
Jones 6013597419 [email protected]
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 5/47
MT Jeff Sillick 4064447265 [email protected]
ND
Diane
Gunsch 7013284424 [email protected]
NE Joe Kellner
402‐479‐
4650 [email protected]
NJ Keith Hill [email protected]
NM
Louis Garcia
505‐827‐
5228
NY Pat Canaday
518‐457‐
2800 [email protected]
OH
Aditya
Singhal 614.466.7007 [email protected]
OR
Virginia
Alster
503‐986‐
3196 [email protected]
PA
Mike
DeMatt
717‐787‐
3435 [email protected]
RI
Greg
Fraginis 222‐6935 [email protected]
SC Lee Foster (803)737
‐
1044 [email protected]
TN
Dustin
Heath
615‐253‐
6408 [email protected]
TX Mitch Pope
512‐465‐
7558 [email protected]
VA Pam Tauer [email protected]
VT
Jim Wood,
IT
Infrastrature
808‐828‐
2739
WI
Bonnie
Hauke
608‐266‐
8224 [email protected]
WV
Steve
Kimble 3045589526 [email protected]
WY Dave Birge
307‐777‐
3878 [email protected]
Applications Manager
Applications Mgr Telephone Applications Mgr Email Address
AK Steve Rice
AL
Debbie
Hornsby
334‐242‐
6885 [email protected]
AR
Lesa
Frymark
501‐569‐
2491 [email protected]
AZ
Debra
Stroops
(602) 712‐
6723 [email protected]
CO
Frank
Kerstetter
303 757‐
9482 [email protected]
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 6/47
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 7/47
TX
Tim
Jennings
512‐467‐
3837 [email protected]
VA
Ellett
Pollard [email protected]
VT
Shawn
Nailor
802‐828‐
0180 [email protected]
WI
Diana
Longfield
608‐266‐
2433 [email protected]
WV Sush
Pakvasa 3045589522 [email protected]
WY AJ Myers
307‐777‐
4130 [email protected]
GIS Manager GIS Mgr
Telephone GIS Mgr Email Address AK
Kerry
Kirkpatrick
AL
Tonya
Simonton
334‐260‐
5245
AR
Raymond
Leung
501‐569‐
2554 [email protected]
AZ
Debra
Stroops
(602) 712‐
6723 [email protected]
CO
Tammy
Lang
303 757‐
9811 [email protected]
NC John Farley
919 707‐
2151 [email protected]
DE Don Burris
302‐760‐
2629 [email protected]
FL
Jared
Causseaux
850‐245‐
1715 [email protected]
IA Eric Abrams
(515) 239‐
1949 [email protected]
IL Dan Wilcox 2175240031 [email protected]
IN Joel Bump
KS Brian Logan
785‐296‐
4899 [email protected]
KY Will Holmes
502‐564‐
8900 [email protected]
LA Jim Mitchell Jim.Mitchell@gov
MD
ME
MI
Krisanne
McConnell,
MDIT
517‐373‐
7910 [email protected]
MN
Paul
Weinberger
651‐366‐
4121 [email protected]
MO
Arnold
Williams
573‐751‐
7012 [email protected]
MS
Russell
Cooke 6013597413 [email protected]
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 8/47
MT Vacant
ND Brian Bieber 7013282649 [email protected]
NE Rose Braun
402‐479‐
3696 [email protected]
NJ
Mark
Gulbinsky [email protected]
NM
Don Padilla
NY Kevin Hunt
518‐457‐
2800 [email protected]
OH
Dave
Blackstone
614‐466‐
2594 [email protected]
OR
Dave
Ringeisen
503‐986‐
4171
PA
Frank
DeSendi
717‐787‐
3738 [email protected]
RI Steve Kut 222‐6935 [email protected]
SC
Todd
Anderson
(803)737‐
1383 AndersonRT
TN
Kim
McDonough
615‐741‐
4037 [email protected]
TX
Darryl
Zercher
512‐467‐
3782 [email protected]
VA Joe Pugh [email protected]
VT Rick Scott
802‐828‐
3969 [email protected]
WI Mike
Gilchrist 608‐
267‐
3276 [email protected]
WV
Hussein
Elkhansa 3045589657 [email protected]
WY
Vince
Garcia
307‐777‐
4231 [email protected]
Security Manager Security Mgr
Telephone Security Mgr Email Address
AK
Pat
Monagle
AL
Ron
Neslein 334‐242‐6034 [email protected]
AR
Ron
Mitchell 501‐569‐2040 [email protected]
AZ
Thomas
Branham
(602) 712‐
6349 [email protected]
CO
Thom
Rivera 303 757‐9586 [email protected]
NC
Stratton
Lindley 919 707‐2090 [email protected]
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 9/47
DE
Rhonda
Ringer 302‐760‐2607 [email protected]
FL
Joseph
Cipriani 850‐414‐4011 [email protected]
IA
Deb
Covington
(515) 239‐
1989 [email protected]
IL
IN
Steve
Swinford
KS
Bill
Kritikos 785‐296‐3727 [email protected]
KY
Laura
Noe 502‐564‐8900 [email protected]
LA
John
Jubin [email protected]
MD
ME
MI
Kendra
Silsby,
MDIT 517‐241‐0019 [email protected]
MN
Linda
Dahlen 651‐366‐4034 [email protected]
MO
Victoria
Harding 573‐522‐1345 [email protected]
MS
Denise
Jones 6013597419 [email protected]
MT
Kristi
Antosh 4064446294 [email protected]
ND
Erv
Zimprich 7013283229 [email protected]
NE
Mark
Neemann 402‐479‐3659 [email protected]
NJ N/A
NM
eric
Roybal 505‐827‐5659 [email protected]
NY
Jim
Thurley 518‐457‐2800 [email protected]
OH
Jack
Taylor 614.387.0725 [email protected]
OR
Karina
Stewart 503‐986‐4397
PA
Joyce
Black
717‐787
‐5575
RI
Ernie
Quaglieri 462‐9202 [email protected]
SC
Kem
Dempsey
(803)737‐
1054 [email protected]
TN
Dustin
Heath
TX
Judy B.
Skeen,
P.E. 512‐465‐7491 [email protected]
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 10/47
VA
Jim
Austin [email protected]
VT
WI
Herb
britsch 608‐267‐2097 [email protected]
WV
Fred
Thomas 3045582841 [email protected]
WY
Jason
Miller 307‐777‐3868 [email protected]
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 11/47
4) If the information is readily available, please provide the following high-levelorganizational information for your agency. If development of theinformation requested in this question is too tim e consuming, or you do notknow a particular item, please leave the item blank/ empty.
Number of individuals
within Agency Overall Agency
Operating Budget ($)
Number of Agency IT individuals
providing application development
Number of Agency IT
individuals providing technical
support Overall Agency
IT Operating Budget ($)
Overall Agency IT
Capital Budget ($)
AK 3,738 530,967,900 30 32 17,601,700 650,000
AL 4300 20 million 100 90 200 thousand
AR 3593 303,643,393 16 11 6,055,000 2,300,000
AZ 4800 54 60 9000000
CO 3,300 $860 million 11 71 $14.5 million $1,075,000
DE 2500 $343,875,500 47 48 $8,843,700 $7,788,000
FL 7426 $6.5B 100 200 $42.5M $1.7M
IA 3,489 $332,218,000 67 56 $29,758,000 $4,995,000
ID 1883 10 20
IL 5500 50 20 25,000,000
IN 40
KS 3113 1547486068 58 37 13000000 3000000
KY 4500 1.9B 20 25 28M Multi year
LA 4700 20 19
MB 3,500 17 6 $14,000,000.00
MD
9,024
320
ME 2200 13 13
MI 2900 $3.6B 75 75 $24M $4.5M
MN 5000 2.2 billion 21 200 22 million
MO 6300 $2.88B 45 45 $20M $16M
MS 3500 1.2 billion 20 47 16.2 million 2.1 million
MT 2250 650000000 30 20 10000000 2000000
NC 15,000 4B 243 95 65M ‐
ND 1052.5 10 8 17 million 6 million
NE 2200 693,000,000 20 65 10,600,000 5,100,000
NJ
3500
7
17
NM 2700 $800M 20 50 $18M 0
NY 8000 100 100 30M
OH 6031 2,878,684,628 41 21 25,330,335 3,000,000 ('sh)
OR 4500 $1.5b/yr 120 60 $55m
PA 12,000 > $6B 85 115 Approx $72M Approx $25M
RI 700+ 8 5
SC 5000 1000000000 30 15 11000000
TN 4,500 30 40 33M
TX 14,710 8.1 billion 617 included 186.2 million 105.8 million
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 12/47
above
UT 1670 275300000 30 27 9424600 0
VA 8,000 $3.5 billion 120 25 $70,000 0
VT 1300 9 30 $2m $12m
WI 3500 83 67
WV 5372 1,522,00,00 20 8 3,600,000 7,200,000
WY 2000 16 20
5) Where is control and/ or support of your IT functions located?
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 13/47
6) If your agency outsources its IT functions (seat management, development,operations, etc.) to a centralized agency or to an ou tside/ industry company,how successful is the effort? Please provide additional comments (monetarysavings achieved, etc.) if deemed useful.
Comment Responses:
I was concerned with the switch to centralized e‐mail but it has been working out well for us.
Response time much worse on all centralized functions
Functions that we have outsourced are successful; functions we have centralized (from the DOT) are not very
successful.
Iowa is studying going to a central e‐mail service model, either from an internal provider or SaaS.
telephone maintenance
gets to be very costly
Still requires knowledgeable in‐house staff to particpate in planning, upgrades, change management, monitoring,
etc.
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 14/47
TxDOT has not realized cost savings for outsourced functions. Service has degraded and we have experienced data
loss, poor server monitoring, delays in restoring services, and increased windows for hardware and software
procurements and deployments.
We outsource about 50% of IT development.
The state of Florida is undergoing data center consolidation. Currently at the planning stage.
High price ‐ low customer service levels
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 15/47
7) What key performance indicators (KPI ) does your agency use to gauge ITsupport levels?
Other Responses:
Web activity
Customer satisfaction surveys
Follow
Up
satisfaction
surveys
Application development completion time
None.
customer survey
Restre time
Customer satisfaction surveys;
Satisfaction surveys
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 16/47
8) What type of return on investment (ROI) information does your agencyrequire for new IT purchases / projects?
Other Responses:
Based upon project size and scope
no specific, but ROI is documented
We calculate ROI; not controlling factor
Cost-benefit analysis and life cycle cos
Does project help drive business results
Soft Costs
system specific
ROI, Cost Recovery are'nt equvlnt. terms
generally determine ROI inform user
we use roi as a factor in selecting proj
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 17/47
ROI required for projects over $1M.
No formal reqmt - Prioritize ROI & Value
ROI is dependent on life cycle analysis
We do Cost/Benefit -not particularly ROI
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 18/47
9) If your agency requires ROI information, are "soft" costs (time savings inwork producti on, convenience to customer base, e.g.) allow ed in thecalculations?
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 19/47
10) Please list the top one or tw o IT application development orimplementation projects your agency plans to undertake in the next 1 - 2years:
Project 1 Description Project 2 Description
Implement changes in State Peoplesoft ERP system to
meet specific DOT requirements
Right of Way workflow and document management
system.
conprehensive project tracking package construction management
Rewrite of Electronic Accident Form and Accident Records
System
Implementation of a workflow solution for our Highway
Improvement Programming Request form
DMV Workflow system, contracted out MAT, asset management system as an enterprise
application
New state‐wide ERP system. Migration off legacy systems.
New Vehicle
Registration/titling
system.
25M
project
3 yr
duration, .net,c#, Web Based. 3M contractor. Right of Way system. Internal, .net, c#, web based.
Driver License Security Improvements Wis. Motor Carrier Registration systems
Bridge Management System Implementation
On‐Line Bid Submission application. This includes on‐line
advertising, letting and bid‐tabs publication.
Statewide Intelligent Transportation System (ITS)
Management Software (SIMS) Project – The SIMS project
provides the Iowa DOT with an integrated, statewide
Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) software solution,
as part of an Advanced Traffic Management System
(ATMS). This
system
provides
remote
control
of
devices
such as cameras, changeable message boards, and
highway advisory radios for current and planned ITS
deployments.
IAPS –Iowa Automated Permitting System – IAPS will be a
web based application that automates the request and
review process for issuing oversize/overweight permits.
IAPS will include functionality from our legacy system of
receiving permit requests via fax and the web, managing
the issuing permit process, billing and reporting
capabilities.
IAPS
will
also
include
the
following
enhancements: automated routing for oversize/overweight
loads, allow web users to manage their own account data
and self issue permits, give all users involved in the
approval process access to permits that requires their
review, and expanded billing and reporting features.
Implement Bid Express. Rewrite District Bookkeeping System.
SiteManager Implmentation. Migration from our current
inhouse developed Construction Management system
over to the SiteManager application.
Roadway Inventory
SAP / Agile Assets implementation Trns.port CRLMS
Business Intelligence
system
Talent
Management
Suite
PIMARS‐ Project Information Management and Reporting
System
AMMO‐ Accountability in Maintenance Management
Operations.
HR Integrated Data ‐‐integrate multiple disparate HR
applications and databases such that users enter data
once and can report across multiple data.
Real Estate Mgmt System ‐‐system to manage Right‐of ‐
Way parcels statewide, using county and MoDOT data,
giving graphical, map based input/output capabilities
Business Intelligence None
Asset Management ‐ comparing Tier I (roads & bridges),
Tier II, and Tier III to determine best use of expenditure.
Travel Information Map ‐ combining multiple layers to one
centric map.
Project Delivery and Development Reporting System. Automated Traffic Management System. Will support
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 20/47
Includes ARRA reporting, for stimulus projects, eventually
extended to all PennDOT project; also includes project
delivery metrics, cash flow and business intelligence
components.
interconnectivity for all regional Traffic Management
Centers and ITS devices, which currently operate
independently and on diverse software and hardware
infrastructures.
IT Assest Management
Data Mart Development ‐ This initiative integrates data
from several mainframe databases into a user friendly
format. It gives users the capabality of running their own
queries and
reports.
Traveler Service Portal ‐ This initiative will provide a wide
range of services to people who commute and simply
travel through Illinois.
Implement Web based Transport tools. Move from MicroStation/V8 to MicroStation/XM.
DMV Technology Modernization Electronic Toll Collection System Replacement
BI replacement Web Transport
FINESS ‐ Capital Improvement Financial System (Federal
Billing)
GIS Web Framework. Develop a programming framework
for incorporating mapping and spatial functionality into
existing MaineDOT applications and to streamline the
process of building new mapping applications.
Enterprise Content Management Data Integration/Business Data Warehouse
Enterprise Asset Management NYS Financial Management System
HOV tolling.
Enhancements to Datawarehouse and integrating of
application systems throughout UDOT. Higher integration
with other state agencies.
DMV System Upgrade ‐ Mainframe migration. New Highways Pavement and Maintenance Management
system.
continued development of the Integrated Transportation
Management System
continued development of the Highway Maintenance
Management System
Enterprise Financial Management System Highway Performance Management System
Data Center Migration ‐ Migrate NJDOT specific hardware
to the
Centralized
State
IT
environment.
Transportation Management System Data
Integration/DataWarehouse‐ Integration of 8
Transportation Management
Systems
into
the
DataWarehouse
Transportaion Operation Center, this is consolodating all
of our dispatch center software packages into one overall
integrated system
Transinfo, this is implementing Exors's asset management
system into ODOT and allowing us to retire two legacy
asset management systems.
Installation of ITS cameras statewide GIS points and implementation
Routebuilder replacement‐ this replace a legacy system
that provides inter and intra state permitting for over the
road truckers.
Program & Project Management System ‐ this will replace a
legacy system that tracks pre‐construction work tasks.
TxDOT is participating in a statewide ERP effort led by the
state comptroller. For more information see
http://www.texaserp.org/.
TxDOT has a major initiative underway to increase
transparancy on department operations to citizens, state
leadership, legislators,
and
other
stakeholders.
Michigan Transport Routing & Internet Permits (MiTRIP) ‐
Application that will provide the department increased
ability to process and manage oversize/overweight
transport permits.
FieldManager Rewrite ‐ Rewrite the application to
automate the approval process for certain FieldManager
reports to include the Construction Pay Estimate Report,
Contract Modification and Contractor Performance.
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
Inspection Report (MDOT form 1126) in addition to
significant user suggested enhancements will be included.
Upgrade of Oracle E‐business suite financials
REAL ID/PASS ID Falcon ‐ Document Management implementation state
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 21/47
wide
New Cash Forecasting System New Intermodal Management System
Enterprise Content Management Data Integration, Data Warehousing
Marine Highway (Ferry) Reservation System Document Management
SiteManager for Materials and Test Statewide Environmental Management System
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 22/47
11.1) Application Development
Comment Responses:
right of way system
Human Resources
Datawarehouse, apps. integration
HPMS Federal Reporting SystemMarine Highway (Ferry) Reservation System
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 23/47
12) Please list the top one or tw o IT infrastructure projects your agency plansto undertake in the next 1 - 2 years.
Project 1
Description
Project 2
Description
VOIP Upgrade server/SAN hardware
Server Virtualization Windows & Upgrade
Office 2007 VM, blade technology
New off ‐site disaster recovery site. Continued build‐out of our ITS systems.
Continued Virtualization Disaster recovery
Server Co‐location
This is now a centraized function, not in DOT's control. This is now a centraized function, not in DOT's
control.
Desktop / Application Virtualization ‐ Compare Microsoft's
desktop virtualization solution as a replacement for Citrix.
Implement winning solution in a server cloud that will support
300 thin client desktops and 1500 desktop users.
WAN
Optimization
and
Upgrade‐
Convert data
lines
from Frame Relay and ATM to Ethernet, replacing
and upgrading older router equipment. Install
Riverbed WAN optimization devices at all large
offices statewide. Install client WAN optimization as
needed.
Upgrade backbone network to 10 GB Ethernet. Implement virtual servers.
Server Consolidation Deployment for the Cleveland/Akron ITS
Server Consolidation Network Upgrade
Server upgrades Office 2007 upgrade
Virtualization VMware Cisco Network Upgrade
Next Generation Desktop (NGD) ‐upgrade 5200
Desktops/Laptops to Windows7, Active Directory 2008, SCCM,
Office 2007 and a first time implementation of Sharepoint 2007,
all enterprise‐wide.
Enterprise‐wide Voice Over IP (VOIP)deployment.
SAP expansion
None due to budget situation and IT consolidation
throughout the Executive Branch.
VoiP and Windows XP to Windows 7 AVL and camera increasement
Statewide Connectivity for TMC's. Includes network solution to
run on Commonwealth network, or build separate; also includes
video distribution and sharing policies and solution.
Web Services for Law Enforcement. Will implement
web service solution to provide driver and vehicle
information to law enforcement entities; includes
replacement of interface to legacy DL and VR
mainframe systems.
Mainframe Upgrade Data Storage Technology Upgrade
Roadway Weather Information Systems VOIP
Implement the Primavera software. Install and Configure updated Engineering Plotters.
Server Consolidation/Virtualization Computer Room Upgrade
New Content Management Environment
Server Migration project ‐ migrate over half the MeDOT Oracle
databases into an Oracle RAC environment.
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 24/47
Desktop Operating System Upgrade Server Virtualization
Consolidation and virtualization of all servers in the State. Integration of data, voice, video networks.
Migration to MPLS on statewide network
continued deployment of a new statewide network
infrastructure in conjunction with the new traffic engineering
system Intelligent Transportation System(cameras,signs,traffic
counters, centralized traffic controllers, tmcs)
complete development of agency Hot Site/ recovery
site.
IT Infrastructure
Transformation
Datacenter Migration/Consolidation
Upgrade network wiring from Category 2 to Category
5e in a local facility.
PC Encryption Windows 7 and Office 2010
VOIP Virtualization
Data Center Consolidation
Texas outsourced server support functions to IBM. In the near
future, TxDOT's servers will be migrated to two central state
data centers. The impact on application performance and
network loads are critical factors that have not been fully
analyzed or
addressed.
TxDOT is reorganizing central and field support
functions. Work loads are expected to be distributed
across virtual teams working in virtual office
environments. This is expected to place a much
greater load on TxDOT's WAN and could lead to
major WAN redesign.
Michigan/1 Active Directory Office Platform Technology (M/1)‐
Move the department to the consolidated enterprise
(statewide) environment which will provide new and more
standardized server and desktop computing as well as
streamlined training, procurement and support services.
Systems Access Manager, aka Identity Management
(SAM/IME)‐ Establish a single/common standard
identity managemement solution across the entire
MDOT enterprise to manage user authentication
and/or user access to all new and existing business
applications.
Exchange Server Enterprise Backup Solution/Disaster Recovery
Moving to virtual environment ‐ XEN server Email replacement ‐ may be centralized at the state
Statewide E‐mail consolidation Statewide data center consolidation
Server Computing
Virtualization
upgrade servers for database and web services upgrade servers for file and print services
Remote Disaster Recovery site implementation
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 25/47
13.1) Infrastructure
Comment Responses:
Disaster Recovery
800 MHz Radio
Help with Project Tracking.
Facility Upgrade
security
SECURITY*** for Project 2
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 26/47
14) Does your agency have a need for new application development oracquisit ion in any of the following business areas?
Other Responses:
Sharepoint implementation across enterprise.
MS Accountability and Transparency Act
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 27/47
15) Is your state considering or pursuing application hosting (software as aservice) for critical line of business appli cations?
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 28/47
16) Is your agency facing software procurement restrictions as a result of Section 508 compliance laws and/ or policies?
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 29/47
17.1) Database(s)
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 30/47
17.2) Database(s)
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 31/47
18) Please describe any major changes in database platforms anticipated byyour agency. Also, please include any supported and/ or preferreddatabases omitted from the above question.
Please describe any major changes in database platforms anticipated by your agency. Also, please include any supported and/or preferred databases omitted from the above question.
We will be moving our remaining LAN databases from DB2 to SQL. One of our last moves will be when the TRNSPort
suite of products is finally moved to SQL.
We are working to completely migrate from DB2.
Slow migration to SQL Server since we have pretty well become a MS environment. Oracle will continue to be
supported.
Migration off Filehandler (an in‐house developed DBMS). Migration off IMS (legacy applications are gorwing
risk/concern.)
No changes planned.
CA‐IDMS installation is being sunset over the next 6 years. No new development on the platform. _DB2 will be sunset
in 2 years.
We support CA Datacom on the mainframe.
Migration from Sybase SQL Server over to Microsoft SQL Server
Increased use of Microsoft SQL Server, will continue to use DB/2 and Oracle.
Change to Microsoft SQL Server.
We are moving from IBM AIX server based Oracle DB's to Intel Linux Oracle RAC
No changes planned.
We still have a number of legacy IMS databases which we support, but will not further develop. We intend to replace
these databases with a relational database through planned re‐engineering projects over the next five years.
None
None
adabas/natural for existing mainframe applications
No major change in db strategy: Major systems will use Oracle, all others will use MS SQL Server
TxDOT's primary mainframe database is ADABAS.
Migrate Oracle to SQL
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 32/47
19) When does your agency intend to util ize 64 bit processing for desktops?
Comment Responses:
A few workstations will be put into production before July 2010. All new systems rolledout in FY11 will be 64 bit.
64-bit is being used on CADD desktops only at this point. We have no plans for non-
CADD desktops.
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 33/47
20) When does your agency intend to implement W indows 7?
Comment Responses:
Consolidated central control.
A few workstations will be put into production before July 2010. All new systems rolled out in FY11 will be Windows
7.
1st qtr 2011
Desktop OS and office suite upgrades are planned for FY 2011.
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 34/47
21) Which server operating systems are being supported by your agency?Which products are preferred by your agency?
Comment Responses:
Central support on unix servers
VMS
Windows Server
2000
‐which
is
being
discontinued
Windows 2000
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 35/47
22.1) Production
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 36/47
22.2) % of Production Servers Virtualized
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 37/47
22.3) Test/ Development
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 38/47
22.4) % of Test/ Development Servers Virtualized
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 39/47
23) What solution are you basing your virtualization strategy on? (check allthat apply)
Other Responses:
Virtual Iron
We are evaluating leading solutions.
AIX LPARS
(but
moving
all
to
VMWare
Hyper ‐ V
Citrix
Citrix Xen Server
Sun
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 40/47
24) What new or emerging technologies do you foresee occurring orimplementing in the near future?
What new
or
emerging
technologies
do
you
foresee
occurring
or
implementing
in
the
near
future?
Sharepoint or workplace collaboration.
none
Tapeless backup, SAN mirroring, Riverbed WAN Optimization, wake on LAN
Cloud computing shows some promise if concerns can be worked out.
Increased use of mobile devices for maintenance activities.
1. Click Once 2. Smart Client 3. Model view content (MVC)
Cloud Computing Unified Communications Sharepoint‐Email integration Mobile applications development
4G Wireless will provide greater opportunities with Video Streaming.
Wider use
of
wireless
devices
such
as
wireless
laptops
and
Black
‐berries.
Generally speaking, we don't deploy new technologies. We prefer to wait until technologies have been proven, are
stable, and are less expensive to implement.
A continued shift from Client/Server to Thin Client WEB. MS Sharepoint.
VoIP, desktop virtualization
Sharepoint Collaboration
Business Intelligence
1. Point‐to‐point wireless with ITS. 2. Cellular modems using 4G. 3. Tracking equipment with GPS. 4. Creating models
to support automated machine guidance.
Email Archiving
desktop virtualization; application virtualization
Our hands are tied by our oversight agency standards. Also budget constraints make new technology rather
unattractive at this time.
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 41/47
25) Are you using or considering using web 2.0 social networking technologiesto disseminate information either internally or externally?
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 42/47
26) If so, which social network ing technologies are you using? (Choose all thatapply)
Other Responses:
Our own online community
Google is not a SN, but using in prodctn
SharePoint
and
Wiki
for
internal
use
Flickr
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 43/47
28) Are you designing or modifying applications for mobile devices?
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 44/47
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 45/47
30) If AASHTOWare w ere developed using LDAP for authentication, wou ld itpresent a problem to your agency?
Comment Responses:
Prefer kerberos for authentication
KYTC uses AD, prefer single signon
Not
enough
room
to
comment.
Would prefer AD, but if LDAP ties, OK
Depends on the design and implementation
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 46/47
8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 47/47
32) Please provide any additional information or comments desired; include anyadditional topics/ questions that you would like to see added or changesyou w ould like to see incorporated into this survey.
Please provide any additional information or comments desired; include any additional topics/questions that you would like to see added or changes you would like to see incorporated into this survey. None..
Comments for #30: LDAP compatibility will be mandatory for all Iowa applications which have users who log in from
outside the agency and the preferred method for all users inside the agency.
N/A
None.
NA
AASHTOWare projects should be awarded through an RFP process to ensure competitive pricing and to eliminate
vendor complacency.
Item#1‐ Question #4 needs to ask about the number of non‐State staff (contractors or outsourced) used to augment
State IT staff to get a true picture of IT staffing resources. Also, More and more IT costs are embeded in a centralized
rate so direct capital costs are very limited and hard to identify.
Generated: 11/4/2009 12:16:01 PM