Date post: | 04-Jun-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | geetika-anand |
View: | 217 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 16
8/13/2019 Gaar India Bmr
1/16
Allrightsreserved|Preliminar
y&
Tentative
DRAFT GAAR GUIDELINES (INDIA)
July 12, 2012
In association with
8/13/2019 Gaar India Bmr
2/16
Allrightsreserved|Preliminar
y&
Tentative
GAAR PROVISIONS
8/13/2019 Gaar India Bmr
3/16
Allrightsreserved
Allrightsreserved|Preliminar
y&
Tentative
GAAR A SNAPSHOT
| 3
Effective April 1, 2013 (ie for transactions pertaining to tax year 2013-14)
Doctrine of substance over form codified to deter tax avoidance
No carve out for genuine tax planning
Trigger for GAAR - main purpose or one of the main purpose is to obtain tax benefit
Authority of Advance Rulings (AAR) may be approached for determining applicability of
GAAROnus to prove that transaction meant to obtain a tax benefit on the Indian RevenueAuthorities (IRA)
GAAR panel to approve the application of GAAR
If GAAR invoked, Revenue empowered inter-alia to:
disregard or combine any step in the arrangement
look through the arrangement by disregarding the corporate structure
re-allocate income/ expense, re-characterize equity into debt or debt into equity
treat the place of residence of any party or situs of an asset or transaction other than place orlocation mentioned in the arrangement
8/13/2019 Gaar India Bmr
4/16
Allrightsreserved
Allrightsreserved|Preliminar
y&
Tentative
DRAFT GUIDELINES ON GAAR
| 4
Draft Guidelines issued by Chairman, Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) to giverecommendations and suggest safeguards for proper implementation of GAAR
The Draft Guidelines give a sneak preview into the mindset of the IRA
The legality of the Draft Guidelines can be questioned as they propose to overrule theprovisions of the domestic tax statute and the international tax treaties
Draft Guidelines contain explanation of GAAR provisions and illustrations for applicability of
GAAR
8/13/2019 Gaar India Bmr
5/16
Allrightsreserved
Allrightsreserved|Preliminar
y&
Tentative
| 5
Impact on Foreign Institutional Investors (FII)
Two options given under the proposed safe harbor :
FII to pay tax under the domestic tax law (ie not to avail treaty benefits) or
Avail tax treaty benefits but be open to application of GAAR; however GAAR not to applyto non-resident investors of the FII
Unilateral payment of tax not exactly a safe harbor!
Constitutionality of safe harbor requiring outright payment of tax in lieu of non- application ofGAAR could be questioned
No special treatment for FIIs
No clarity on level of substance required to be established by FIIs / PE Funds and if the levelwould be the same as in case of other holding/operating companies?
More clarity could be expected in the coming months
DRAFT GUIDELINES ON GAAR (CONT)
8/13/2019 Gaar India Bmr
6/16
Allrightsreserved
Allrightsreserved|Preliminary&
Tentative
| 6
Impact on holding company structures / treaty shopping
Use of Mauritius / Singapore as intermediate jurisdictions for future investments?
Kind of substance to be established to defend the treaty benefits not clear:
Substance mentioned in the draft guidelines conclusive to get out of GAAR?
Substance mentioned in the draft guidelines BoD meetings in the country, carrying on
business with adequate manpower, own capital and infrastructure
Beneficial ownership test to be satisfied under GAAR in cases where the Mauritius /Singapore company is only a permitted transferee
Impact on business re-organisations
Merger of two companies with carry forward of loss not subject to GAAR if specific conditionsfor merger satisfied
Buy back of shares subject to taxation under GAAR - inconsistent with principles laid downunder the domestic tax law
DRAFT GUIDELINES ON GAAR (CONT)
8/13/2019 Gaar India Bmr
7/16
Allrightsreserved
Allrightsreserved|Preliminary&
Tentative
| 7
Relevance of Circular 789 in the context of the draft guidelines
GAAR will override Circular 789 Mauritius investments subject to GAAR
Circular 789 (dated April 2000) issued by the CBDT states that the Mauritius tax treatybenefit shall be available if a valid Tax Residency Certificate (TRC) is provided
Therefore, existing and future US investments to be within the GAAR purview
Mauritius looking to negotiate grandfathering of the existing investments?
DRAFT GUIDELINES ON GAAR (CONT)
8/13/2019 Gaar India Bmr
8/16
Allrightsreserved
Allrightsreserved|Preliminary&
Tentative
| 8
Onus to prove that a tax benefit was taken on the Revenue
Tax officer to state how / why the arrangement is captured within the GAAR purview
Reasoning given by the Revenue could be general (eg investing through Mauritius for treatybenefit, setting up an entity in India itself etc)
Unreasonable requests for information/documentation by the revenue anticipated
Draft format of the Reference Form prescribed the onus to prove on tax officer not wellread into the same
Practically difficult in arguing before the GAAR panel that the Revenue has not discharged theonus and has only made allegations without reasoning / evidence
DRAFT GUIDELINES ON GAAR (CONT)
8/13/2019 Gaar India Bmr
9/16
Allrightsreserved
Allrightsreserved|Preliminary&
Tentative
KEY TAKEAWAYS
| 9
Negatives
No grandfathering for existing investments under GAAR
Assumedly low monetary threshold for non-application of GAAR
Reference procedure for application to the GAAR Panel reads as if the onus to prove still
on the taxpayer
Examples in the Draft Guidelines unclear
No granular substance requirements provided
Basic treaty benefits sought to be covered within the GAAR ambit
Illustrations are not sophisticated but amateurish
GAAR to override the international tax treaties (no unequivocal statement in respect of
bi-lateral tax treaties made by the Government)
Repatriation of profits by buy back of shares instead of distribution of dividend subject to
GAAR
8/13/2019 Gaar India Bmr
10/16
Allrightsreserved
Allrightsreserved|Preliminary&
Tentative
KEY TAKEAWAYS
| 10
Positives
Reference to tax mitigation made for the first time to be kept outside the GAAR purview
Clarity on LoB clause in the Singapore tax treaty and the kind of expenses which will not be
considered in calculating the threshold limit (eg interest on loan from shareholder)
Declaration of dividend stated to be a business choice
GAAR held not to substitute SAARs
Similarly, in the absence of anti-deferral provisions (ie CFC provisions), GAAR not to be
applied
Choice of raising equity vs debt, again stated as a business choice
In the absence of thin capitalization rules, GAAR cannot be invoked (however, Transfer
Pricing shall apply on interest payments to related parties)
Merger of loss making entity into profit making entity outside GAAR owing to existence of
SAARs in the statute
8/13/2019 Gaar India Bmr
11/16
Allrightsreserved
Allrightsreserved|Preliminary&
Tentative
CONCLUSION
| 11
Sale of shares of Mauritius / Singapore company taxable as indirect transfer under thedomestic tax law expectation of a clarificatory circular on the same
Documentation for each step in a transaction / structure stating the intent of the parties to beclearly captured
Need for supplement documentation with expert reports, legal opinions etc
Need to bring out substance as much as possible to mitigate the GAAR exposure
Preparedness for GAAR to begin now
8/13/2019 Gaar India Bmr
12/16
Allrightsreserved
Allrightsreserved|Preliminary&
Tentative
GAAR THE BMR APPROACH
| 12
BMR THOUGHT LEADERSHIP
Please refer the following links for BMR papers on GAAR
GAAR impact on cross-border structuring
SAAR to GAAR Impact on domestic structures and transactions
Business Standard: A reform approach to the policy debate
Business World: A Strong Case for GAAR
Financial Express: Draft GAAR guidelines step in right direction?
In case of any query, please write to us at [email protected]
8/13/2019 Gaar India Bmr
13/16
Allrightsreserved
Allrightsreserved|Preliminary&
Tentative
Mukesh Butani
| 13
Mukesh is Chairman, an Of counsel to the firm and Managing Partner of BMR Legal. With a specialisationin international tax and transfer pricing, he has over 25 years experience in advising Fortune 500multinationals and Indian business houses on a wide range of matters relating to cross-border taxstructuring, tax controversy and tax policy.
A former national tax Director and international tax Partner at two Big Four firms, Mukesh currently servesas a member of the board of Taxand, the worlds largest independent tax organisation, and as ViceChairman of the International Chamber of Commerce Commission on Taxation. He was recently inductedas member of the Advisory Group on International Tax and Transfer Pricing constituted by the IndianMinistry of Finance. He is also a member of the OECD Business Restructuring Advisory Group.
Mukesh is an acclaimed expert on international tax and transfer pricing and has a number of authorships tohis credit including works published by LexisNexis Butterworths and most recently, a treatise on DisputeResolution for the Cambridge University Press. His other authorships include the Wolters Kluwer CCHonline guide to Transfer Pricing in Asia and titles on Business Restructurings and Customs Valuation, co-authored for the International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation (IBFD). Mukesh participated in the Kelkartask force tax reforms and was a member of the Indian Governments committee on e-commerce taxation.He is presently representing ICC in the Standing Committee on withholding tax.
Mukesh has consistently featured among the leading international tax and transfer pricing advisors inindependent surveys, most notably the International Tax Review, Legal Media expert guide,Asia Law
Leading Lawyers, Chambers & Partners and Legal Whos Who of Corporate Tax Lawyers.
8/13/2019 Gaar India Bmr
14/16
Allrightsreserved
Allrightsreserved|Prelimina
ry&
Tentative
Gokul Chaudhri
| 14IFA Conference - Recent case laws
Gokul is a tax Partner with BMR Advisors, leading the direct tax practice of the firm. He has over 20years experience in tax matters with a focus on the energy sector.
Prior to joining BMR Advisors at its founding in November 04, Gokul was the leader of the Energy,Chemicals and Mining industry and member of the Oil & Gas industry team at a Big 4 f irm.
His professional service experience includes significant engagements for domestic and internationalclients, including multi-billion dollar cross border transactions, privatization initiatives and projectadvisory for large infrastructure assets. In addition, he has extensive experience in structuring andpresenting (possibly over 400 in number) in-bound foreign investment proposals to the Governmentof India. In the early years of the liberalization in India, he was the joint leader for the engagement
commissioned by the Ministry of Industry and Commerce for benchmarking concerns and challengesfaced by foreign investors in India.
Over the past decade, Gokul has been an active speaker at domestic and international seminars.He is a member of the Institute of Petroleum (now The Energy Institute, London) and Federation ofIndian Mineral Industries. He is the Chairman of the Energy committee of PHD Chambers ofCommerce and Industry . He has been a participant and speaker at the investment road shows heldin Europe by the Government of India and was also invited in 2006 by the business forum of theEuropean Commission to speak at Brussels on the reform process in India.
Gokul has been involved in fiscal reform initiatives by the Government of India, and was a memberof the task force on tax reforms for the mining industry. He is currently a member of the executivecouncil of International Fiscal Association North India. He also served as a member of the financesub group for road map for Clean Development Mechanism under the National Action Plan forClimate Change, and technical group for guidance on accounting of carbon credits constituted by theInstitute of Chartered Accountants of India.
Gokul is a graduate in Commerce from the University of Mumbai and qualified as a CharteredAccountant in 1994.
8/13/2019 Gaar India Bmr
15/16
Allrightsreserved
Allrightsreserved|Prelimina
ry&
Tentative
Shefali Goradia
| 15IFA Conference - Recent case laws
Shefali is a Partner with the firms corporate tax practice in Mumbai. With a specialisation in crossborder taxation, she has over 20 years of experience in international tax.
Shefali is extensively involved in advising multinational corporations on a range of issues indesigning global holding and operating structures, structuring inbound and outbound investments,cross border mergers, acquisitions and other corporate reorganizations. She is also involved indeveloping and implementing domestic and international fund structures for leading investment andprivate equity fund houses. In addition, her work covers advice to several pharmaceuticalcompanies, and software and e-commerce companies in the IT industry. Within the financialservices industry, she advises banks in designing structured finance products and works with
several fund houses and asset management companies.
Shefali has most recently been conferred as one of Asias pre-eminent lawyers for taxation in theAsia Law Leading Lawyers Survey 2011 and has featured in the Legal Whos Who of Corporate TaxLawyers and The Private Funds Lawyers for the third consecutive year in 2011. She is a regularwriter and lecturer on international tax topics and has contributed to the India chapter on Is there aPermanent Establishment? for the 63rd IFA Congress in Vancouver, 2009. She is also a member ofthe core group on International Tax of the Bombay Chartered Accountants Society.
Shefali is a graduate in Commerce from the University of Mumbai and qualified as a CharteredAccountant in 1991.
8/13/2019 Gaar India Bmr
16/16
C h a l l e n g e U s
Disclaimer:
This presentation has been prepared for clients and Firm personnel only. It provides general information and guidance as ondate of preparation and does not express views or expert opinions of BMR Advisors. The presentation is meant for generalguidance and no responsibility for loss arising to any person acting or refraining from acting as a result of any materialcontained in this presentation will be accepted by BMR Advisors. It is recommended that professional advice be sought basedon the specific facts and circumstances. This presentation does not substitute the need to refer to the original pronouncements