Although less than 1% of Australians have significant
issues with their gambling, for each person with
significant gambling issues, around 7.3 ‘significant others’
are adversely affected. Impaired family relationships,
emotional problems and financial difficulties are some
of the most common effects on family members of
people with gambling problems.
The use of Electronic Gaming Machines/pokies (EGMs)
accounts for about 75 – 80% of problem gambling.
The highest concentration of EGMs and the highest
losses per head occur in the most socially and
economically disadvantaged communities in Victoria.
GamblinG and Family Violence FAct Sheet
Family violence is an enormous problem in our
community with 1 in 3 Australian women have
experienced physical violence from a current
or former partner, and 1 in 4 Australian women
having experienced emotional abuse by a current
or former partner.
Whilst there is a clear link between problem gambling
and intimate partner violence, children, parents and
grandparents are also the victims of violence perpetrated
by those with significant gambling problems.
Summary
There is an established link between problem gambling and family violence. Recent international research indicates that people who have significant problems with their gambling are more likely than people without gambling problems to be the victims and perpetrators of family violence.
What is lacking within the current policy
and research environment are long-term
prevention strategies, which are based on a
well conceptualised prevention framework
that recognises the social determinants
of health and how they relate to problem
gambling and family violence.
2 | GamblinG and Family Violence FAct Sheet
There are between 310,000 and 510,000 adults
in Australia who are experiencing moderate or
significant problems with their gambling (Productivity
Commission, 2010, p. 5.1) and on average the lives
of 7.3 ’significant others’ are adversely affected by
every person experiencing gambling related problems
(Productivity Commission,1999, p. 7.34).
The harms from problem gambling include; suicide,
depression, relationship breakdown, lowered
work productivity, job loss, bankruptcy and crime
(Productivity Commission, 2010, p. 16.). In a 2011
Victorian study, the prevalence of problem gambling in
people presenting with acute mental health issues was
found to be four times that of the general population
(de Castella, Bolding, Lee, Cosic, & Kulkarni, 2011).
Common problems reported by family members
of people with gambling problems include: the loss
of household or personal money; arguments; anger
and violence; lies and deception; neglect of family;
negatively affected relationships; poor communication;
confusion of family roles and responsibilities; and the
development of gambling problems or other addictions
within the family (Kalischuk, Nowatzki, Cardwell, Klein,
& Solowoniuk, 2006, cited in Dowling, 2014).
Women are significantly less likely to be problem
gamblers compared to men (0.47% and 0.95%
respectively of the total population) (Department
of Justice, 2012).
The Impacts of Problem Gambling on the Community
Problem gambling is characterised by difficulties in limiting money and/or time spent on gambling, which leads to adverse consequences for the gambler, other individuals, or for the community (Ministerial Council on Gambling, 2005).
GamblinG and Family Violence FAct Sheet | 3
In 2013/14, $2.5 billion was lost to EGM gambling
within Victoria, the equivalent of $4.6 million per
venue, $90,000 per machine, or $549 for every adult
in Victoria, per annum (Brown, 2014; Productivity
Commission, 2010, p. 1.).1 This equates to losses
of up to $500,000 per hour on EGMs during peak
times in Victoria.2
It is estimated that EGMs account for 75 – 80 % of
problem gamblers (Productivity Commission, 2010, p. 13).
Although overall expenditure on EGMs has slowed,
and in some instances decreased across Australia,
expenditure per machine user appears to have
risen, suggesting that those who are using EGMs
are spending more (Productivity Commission, 2010,
p. 2.1). This suggests that the impacts of problem
gambling are concentrated amongst a group of
gamblers that spends a disproportionate amount
on EGM gambling.
In 2013, the Victorian Competition and Efficiency
Commission estimated that in the 2010/11 financial
year the social and economic costs of problem
gambling in Victoria were likely to have been between
$1.5 billion and $2.8 billion.
1 Detailed information of losses for each local council area in Victoria can be found at http://www.greaterdandenong.com/document/18526/statistics-vic-gambling-venues-machines-and-losses
2 http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/500000-an-hour-lost-on-pokies-20120426-1xo2h.html
In Victoria, the most disadvantaged communities tend
to incur the highest gambling losses. In 2013/14, for
instance, gambling losses among EGMs situated in
Greater Dandenong – the least affluent locality in
metropolitan Melbourne – stood at $940 per adult,
over six times higher than the corresponding rate of
$142 in Boroondara – one of the most advantaged
municipalities in the state. Thus the residents of the
community with the highest gambling losses in Victoria
are the least able to bear the financial burden.3
Hume, Whittlesea, Darebin and Monash are local
government areas within the northern and eastern
metropolitan regions of Melbourne which incur high
losses per adult on EGMs.
Most gambling losses are funded not by savings,
but by reduced spending on other goods (South
Australian Centre for Economic Studies, 2005,
cited in Brown, 2014).
3 See Greater Dandenong statistics in Footnote 1 above.
Gambling in Victoria
Gambling is a major industry in Australia, generating losses in excess of $19 billion annually (Productivity Commission, 2010, p. 6.). EGMs account for more than half the total losses from all gambling (Brown, 2014).
IN 2013/14,
$2.5 BILLIoN WAS LoST To EGM GAMBLING WITHIN VICToRIA...
4 | GamblinG and Family Violence FAct Sheet
Facts on Gender-based Violence4
The term family (or domestic) violence encompasses
violence between partners and former partners as
well as violence that occurs between other family
members, such as siblings, children or parents, as well
as non-related carers. Family violence is any violent,
threatening, coercive or controlling behaviour.
This includes not only physical injury but direct
or indirect threats, sexual assault, emotional and
psychological torment, economic control, damage
to property, social isolation and any behaviour which
causes a person to live in fear.5
• 1 in 5 Australian women have experienced
sexual violence.
• 1 in 6 Australian women have experienced
physical or sexual violence from a current or
former partner.
• 1 in 4 Australian women have experienced
emotional abuse by a current or former partner.
• 1 in 3 Australian women have experienced
physical violence.
4 Unless otherwise noted, data in this section has been taken from: Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2012). Personal Safety Survey, Melbourne: ABS. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/mf/4906.0
5 http://www.dhs.vic.gov.au/for-individuals/children,-families-and-young-people/family-violence/what-is-family-violence
• Women are most likely to be assaulted by a partner
or former partner. This type of violence is often
referred to as intimate partner violence (IPV).
• Most violence experienced by women and men
is perpetrated by men. For 95% of women and
95% of men who have experienced violence
since the age of 15, their perpetrator was male.
• Men are most likely to be assaulted by men they
don’t know, whereas women are more likely to
be assaulted by someone they know.
• Family violence is a crime in Victoria and family
violence referrals to police have more than
tripled in northern metropolitan Melbourne
since 2009/10. 6
6 http://www.whin.org.au/images/PDFs/NIFVS/FundTheFVSystem-NIFVS_FacthSheet_2014.pdf
Addressing the primary determinants of men’s violence against women – namely gender inequality and
adherence to rigidly defined gender roles – will help to prevent all forms of family violence before it
occurs. A gender equity focus needs to be central to any efforts aimed at preventing family violence.
A number of factors also contribute to family violence when they interact with gender inequality.
Problem gambling is regarded as one of these contributing factors to family violence.
GamblinG and Family Violence FAct Sheet | 5
Current Research on the Co-occurrence of Family Violence and Problem Gambling7
There is now consistent international evidence that gambling is a contributing factor to IPV and family violence more broadly (Dowling et al., 2014; Suomi et al., 2013). Research indicates that people who have gambling problems are more likely than people without gambling problems to be victims and perpetrators of family violence (Dowling, 2014).
Meta-analyses undertaken by Nicki Dowling and her
colleagues (2014), reveal that over one-third of people
with gambling problems report being the victims of
physical IPV (38%) or the perpetrators of physical IPV
(37%), whilst 11% of offenders of IPV report gambling
problems. Furthermore, over half of people with
gambling problems (56%) report perpetrating physical
violence against their children.
Suomi and her colleagues note in their 2013 study
that over half of the family members of problem
gamblers reported some form of family violence in
7 The information regarding the link between FV and PG comes from recent Australian research which has been summarised into the Dowling, N. (2014). The impact of gambling problems on families. AGRC Discussion Paper No. 1 – November 2014. Retrieved from, https://www3.aifs.gov.au/agrc/publications/impact-gambling-problems-families/what-are-impacts-gambling-problems-families
the past 12 months and 34.2% reported that the
family violence was perpetrated by or against at least
one problem gambling family member. They also note
that the participants reported that ‘problem gambling
and family violence were related in over 70% of their
problem gambling family members’ (p.11).
Whilst gambling is clearly identified as a contributing
factor to IPV in current research, the picture is
complex, with Dowling and her colleagues suggesting
in their 2014 paper that several factors are implicated
in the co-occurrence of gambling and IPV. They suggest
that less than full employment and anger problems
seem to exacerbate the co-occurrence of gambling
problems and experiencing IPV, while younger age, less
than full employment, anger problems, impulsivity, and
alcohol and drug use seem to exacerbate the co-
occurrence of gambling and the perpetration of IPV.
Dowling and her colleagues suggest that the findings of their
research highlight the need for public health and treatment
services to routinely screen and assess for a range of issues,
including gambling problems, family violence, alcohol and
drug use problems and mental health issues, and provide
treatments designed to manage this cluster of conditions.
Research by the Women’s Information and Referral
Exchange (2008) into women experiencing problem
gambling and isolation suggests that some women who
are experiencing family violence use EGM venues as
a safe space away from home.
...oVER HALF oF PEoPLE WITH GAMBLING PRoBLEMS (56%) REPoRT PERPETRATING PHySICAL VIoLENCE AGAINST THEIR CHILDREN.
6 | GamblinG and Family Violence FAct Sheet
More research into violence perpetrated against
parents, grandparents and children, as well as other
relatives and care-givers, is also critical.
Currently there is increasing evidence about the health
and wellbeing consequences of gambling (McDonald
& Greenslade, 2014). More research into the social
and financial costs to communities of the impacts of
the co-occurrence of family violence and problem
gambling, including the costs to the health, legal and
welfare systems, is necessary.
What is lacking within the current policy and
research environment are long-term prevention
strategies, which are based on a well conceptualised
prevention framework that recognises the social
determinants of health and how they relate to
problem gambling and family violence.
Areas for Future Work that Addresses the Co-occurrence of Family Violence and Problem Gambling
Whilst the research of Suomi, Dowling and their colleagues has provided much needed information on the co-occurrence of family violence and problem gambling, much more data, both quantitative and qualitative is needed. Specifically, more data is required on the prevalence of gambling within families presenting to services for help with family violence issues, and research is also needed into the economic, health and social costs to individuals and families when this co-occurrence exists.
This document has been prepared to provide information to family violence and gambling advocates on the
co-occurrence of family violence and problem gambling. Whilst every care has been taken to provide accurate
and up-to-date information, WHIN and WHE do not take responsibility for the accuracy of data collated from
other sources and recommend that primary sources, as appears in the reference list, should be referred to.
GamblinG and Family Violence FAct Sheet | 7
ReferencesBrown, H. (2014). A review of gambling related
issues. Melbourne: City of Greater Dandenong, p. 1.
Retrieved from http://www.greaterdandenong.com/
document/18237/review-of-gambling-issues
de Castella, A., Bolding, P., Lee, A., Cosic, S., &
Kulkarni, J. (2011). Problem gambling in People
presenting to a public mental health service: Final
report, Melbourne: Department of Justice. Retrieved
from http://www.responsiblegambling.vic.gov.au/__
data/assets/pdf_file/0010/4033/Gambling-in-people-
presenting-public-mental-health-service.pdf
Department of Justice. (2012). A Study of Gambling
in Victoria; Problem Gambling from a Public Health
Perspective, Fact Sheet 4 – Prevalence, Age and Gender,
Melbourne: Department of Justice. Retrieved from http://
www.gamblingstudy.com.au/pdf/FactSheet_4_v2.PDF
Dowling, N. (2014). The impact of gambling problems
on families. AGRC Discussion Paper No. 1 –
November 2014. Retrieved from https://www3.aifs.
gov.au/agrc/publications/impact-gambling-problems-
families/what-are-impacts-gambling-problems-families
Dowling, N., Suomi, A., Jackson, A., Lavis, T., Patford, J.,
Cockman, S., … Abbott, M. (2014). Problem Gambling
and Intimate Partner Violence: A systematic review
and Meta-Analysis. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, p.
1-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1524838014561269
Ferrante, A., Morgan, F., Indermaur, D.& Harding, R.
(1996). Measuring the Extent of Domestic Violence.
Sydney: Hawkins Press.
McDonald, J. and Greenslade, D. (2014). ARC Linkage
Grant Final Report: The impact of the introduction of
poker machines on communities: Health and wellbeing
consequences. Federation University Australia.
Retrieved from http://www.vlga.org.au/site/DefaultSite/
filesystem/documents/ARCLinkageGrantReport14-
LowRes_FinalPrintVersion_21November2014.pdf
Ministerial Council on Gambling. (2005). Problem
Gambling and Harm: Towards a National Definition,
Melbourne: Department of Justice. Retrieved from
http://www.adelaide.edu.au/saces/gambling/publications/
ProblemGamblingAndHarmTowardNationalDefinition.pdf
Productivity Commission. (1999). Australia’s gambling
industries. (No.10). Canberra: Commonwealth of
Australia. Retrieved from http://www.pc.gov.au/
inquiries/completed/gambling/report
Productivity Commission. (2010). Gambling. (No.50).
Canberra: Australian Government. Retrieved from http://
www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/completed/gambling-2009/report
Suomi, A., Jackson, A.C., Dowling, N.A., Lavis,
T., Patford, J., Thomas, S.A, … Cockman, S. (2013).
Problem gambling and family violence: family member
reports of prevalence, family impacts and family
coping, Asian Journal of Gambling Issues and Public
Health, 3, (13), pp. 1-15. Retrieved from http://www.
responsiblegambling.vic.gov.au/information-and-
resources/research/recent-research/problem-gambling-
and-family-violence-family-member-reports-of-
prevalence,-family-impacts-and-family-coping
Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission.
(2013). Counting the cost: inquiry into the costs of
problem gambling, Melbourne: Victorian Competition
and Efficiency Commission. Retrieved from, http://apo.
org.au/node/35566
Women’s Information and Referral Exchange. (2008).
opening doors to women. Melbourne: WIRE.
Retrieved from http://www.wire.org.au/wp-content/
uploads/2010/08/openingDoors.pdf
8 | GamblinG and Family Violence FAct Sheet
Women’s HealtH in tHe nortH680 High Street, Thornbury VIC 3071
t 03 9484 1666 e [email protected] W whin.org.au
Contact
For more information please contact Monique Keel at WHIN on 03 9484 1666 or at [email protected]
WHIN and WHE acknowledge the support of the Victorian State Government.
The Increasing the odds for Safety and Respect Project is funded by the Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation.
the increasing the odds for safety and respect Project is a partnership between the following organisations: