+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Gas Sweetening Total

Gas Sweetening Total

Date post: 24-Oct-2014
Category:
Upload: mehdi-alizad
View: 288 times
Download: 67 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
62
Oil & Gas Processing Plants Design and Operation Training Course DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP - 24 th March-4 th April 2003
Transcript
Page 1: Gas Sweetening Total

Oil & Gas Processing Plants

Design and Operation

Training Course

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP - 24th March-4th April 2003

Page 2: Gas Sweetening Total

GAS SWEETENING PROCESSES

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP - 24th March-4th April 2003

Page 3: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 3

GAS SWEETENING

• SALES GAS SPECIFICATION- To meet the H2S content Specification

H2S Content < 4 ppm Vol.

- To increase THE GROSS CALORIFIC VALUE

CO2 Removal

• PROCESS CONSTRAINTS- CRYOGENIC PROCESSES (Ethane extraction, LNG Manufacture) CO2

Solidification at temperatures below - 70/80°C

• CRUDE SWEETENING USING STRIPPING GAS- To remove H2S From the Stripping Gas

Page 4: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 4

GAS SWEETENING PROCESSES

PROCESSES DEPENDING ON CONTAMINANTS TO BE REMOVED :

• CO2 ONLY

• H2S ONLY

• CO2 & H2S SIMULTANEOUSLY

• SELECTIVE REMOVAL OF H2S

Page 5: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 5

GAS SWEETENING PROCESSES

• CHEMICAL ABSORPTION

• PHYSICAL ABSORPTION

• PHYSICO- CHEMICAL ABSORPTION

• PHYSICAL ADSORPTION

• CRYOGENIC PROCESS (CO2 Removal only)

• MEMBRANES

• Direct Conversion To SULPHUR

Page 6: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 6

• CHEMICAL ABSORPTION

Page 7: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 7

CHEMICAL ABSORPTION

Page 8: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 8

CHEMICAL ABSORPTION

Page 9: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 9

CHEMICAL ABSORPTION

Page 10: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 10

CHEMICAL ABSORPTION

Page 11: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 11

CHEMICAL ABSORPTION

Page 12: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 12

Page 13: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 13

DEA PROCESS

• ADVANTAGES :- No degradation by COS & CS2- Absorption of mercaptans- Good stability- low absorption of HC- No reclaimer- reduced vaporization losses- public

• DISADVANTAGES :- Higher circulation rate (lower activity)- Higher utility requirements- Oxydation- No selectivity between H2S & CO2

• UTILIZATION : H2S, CO2, COS, CS2, RSH (up to 20%)

• SPLIT FLOW

• SNEA-DEA : higher concentration

Page 14: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 14

MDEA PROCESS

Page 15: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 15

MDEA PROCESS

Page 16: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 16

CHEMICAL ABSORPTION

Page 17: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 17

HOT CARBONATE PROCESS

• ADVANTAGES :- No degradation by COS & CS2- Good chemical stability- No reaction with air- low absorption of HC- No reclaimer- Low heat requirement (50% of corresponding amine unit)

• DISADVANTAGES :- Low reactivity with H2S- No mercaptans absorption- higher water content of treated gas- licensing fee

• UTILIZATION : HIGH CO2- if H2S in two steps :

K2CO3 + mol. Sieves

K2CO3 + AMINE

• SPLIT FLOW : solution cooling / two stages process / LO HEAT

Page 18: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 18

HOT CARBONATE PROCESS

Page 19: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 19

HOT CARBONATE PROCESS

Page 20: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 20

• PHYSICAL ABSORPTION

Page 21: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 21

PHYSICAL ABSORPTION

• WATER WASH : partial treatment• SELEXOL PROCESS : NORTON (dimethyl ether of polyethylene glycol)

- up to 65% of CO2- light gas sweetening- regeneration by flash

• FLUOR SOLVENT : propylene carbonate

- up to 50% of CO2- Gas dehydration by as solvent and heat regeneration

• PURISOL : LURGI

- Selective process to remove H2S even in case of low H2S/CO2 ratio- Gas dehydration by add solvent and heat regeneration

• RECTISOL : LURGI - Refrigerated solution of MeOH (high selectivity for CO2)

• ESTASOLVAN : UHDE

- Recompression of flashed gas

• SEPASOLV-MPE : BASF

- Recoompression of flashed gas

Page 22: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 22

SELEXOL PROCESS

Page 23: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 23

MORPHYSORB PROCESS

Page 24: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 24

PHYSICAL ABSORPTION

Page 25: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 25

AMINE PROCESS GUIDELINE

Page 26: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 26

PHYSICO-CHEMICAL PROCESS

Page 27: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 27

SULFINOL PROCESS

Page 28: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 28

• CHEMICO-PHYSICAL ABSORPTION

Page 29: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 29

SULIFINOL (SHELL)

Page 30: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 30

SULFINOL (SHELL)

Page 31: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 31

HYBRISOL PROCESS

Page 32: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 32

HYBRISOL PROCESS

Page 33: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 33

• PHYSICAL ADSORPTION

Page 34: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 34

PHYSICAL ADSORPTION

Page 35: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 35

PHYSICAL ADSORPTION

Page 36: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 36

CRYOGENIC PROCESS

Page 37: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 37

CO2 REMOVAL BY CRYOGENICS

Page 38: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 38

SPREX

Page 39: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 39

• PERMEATION (Membranes)

Page 40: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 40

MEMBRANE PROCESS

• MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY For bulk removal of CO2

Page 41: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 41

LOW PRESSUREPERMEATE GAS

HIGH PRESSUREGAS MIXTURE RESIDUAL GAS

PERMEATE TUBERESIDUAL GAS

RESIDUAL GAS

HIGH PRESSURECHANNEL SPACER

PERMEATE CHANNEL SPACER

HIGH PRESSURE GAS MIXTURE

MEMBRANE/CLOTH COMPOSITE

HIGH PRESSURE GAS MIXTURE

Figure XI - B18 : SPIRAL WOUND ELEMENT CONSTRUCTION

Page 42: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 42

CO2 RICH GAS

Seal Gasket

Epoxy coating

Aluminium TubeDiam. 3 to 4 cmHolesDiam. 5 to 7 mm

RESIDUE GAS

FibersBundleDiam. 4’’ and 9 1/2’’Length 1 m

FEED GAS

CO2 RICH GAS

(CYNARA)

Figure XI - B19 : HOLLOW FIBER MEMBRANE ELEMENT

Page 43: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 43

FIBER MEMBRANE

Page 44: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 44

FIBER MEMBRANE

Page 45: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 45

FIBER MEMBRANE

Page 46: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 46

TYPICAL ONE STAGE MEMBRANE PFD

Page 47: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 47

MEMBRANE PROCESS

Page 48: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 48

MEMBRANE PROCESS

Page 49: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 49

MEMBRANE PROCESS

Page 50: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 50

MEMBRANE PROCESS

Page 51: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 51

PROCESS COMPARISON

DIRECT CONVERSIONTO SULPHUR

Page 52: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 52

PROCESS COMPARISON

ABSORPTION :

H2S + 2 Fe3+(L) -------> 2 H+ + S° + 2 Fe2+(L)

REGENERATION :

1/2 O2 + H2O + 2 Fe2+(L) ------> 2 OH- + 2 Fe3+(L)

OVERALL :

H2S + 1/2 O2 -------> H2O + S°

Page 53: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 53

SULFINT (IFP)

Page 54: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 54

DIRECT CONVERSION TO SULPHUR

FIELD OF APPLICATIONLOW FLOWRATE• LOW PRESSURE (EXCEPT SULFINT FROM IFP)• LOW H2S CONTENT ( < 1000 ppm )

LICENSORS• US FILTER ( LO-CAT)• IFP with Le Gaz Intégral (SULFINT)• SHELL ( SULFEROX )

Page 55: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 55

PROCESS COMPARISON

GUIDE LINE FOR PROCESS SELECTION

Page 56: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 56

CHEMICAL ABSORPTION

ADVANTAGES DRAWBACKS

Not affected by acid gaspartial pressure

Low absorption of HC

In public domain

Reasonable cost ofsolvent

Extensive industrialreferences

High steamconsumption

Foaming tendency(except hot carbonate)

Boiler water for make-up

Corrosion tendency

Page 57: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 57

PHYSICAL ABSORPTION

ADVANTAGES DRAWBACKS

Low energy requirement

Low corrosion

Remove mercaptans

Low water content inproduced gas

No need of pure watermake-up

Depends on acid gaspartial pressure andtemperature

HC absorption (Clausunit affected)

High cost of solvents

Proprietary processes

Most of conclusions are valide for the physico-chemical processes

Page 58: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 58

PHYSICAL ADSORPTION

ADVANTAGES DRAWBACKS

Low CO2 content in theproduced gas

Low corrosion

May removemercaptans

Combined with waterdrying

Valid for low CO2 initialcontents

High regenerationtemperature (furnace)

Page 59: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 59

MEMBRANE

ADVANTAGES DRAWBACKS

Low energyrequirement

Low corrosion

Low water content inproduced gas

No need of puresolvent make-up

Can be operated un-manned (offshore)

Depends on acid gaspartial pressure andtemperature

High residual CO2content (a few percent)

Sensitive to somecontaminants

Low life time ofmembranes (3 to 5 years)

Proprietary processes

Page 60: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 60

GUIDELINE FOR PROCESS SELECTION

APPLICATION PROCESS NOTE

CO2 ABSORP.

BULKREMOVAL

LOW ACIDGASCONTENT

WATER WASH

MEMBRANE

DEA, aMDEA

HOTCARBONTE

PHYS.SOLVENTS

DEA, aMDEA

SMALLFLOWRATE

SENSIBLE TOCONTAMINANT

NOT WITH H2S

Page 61: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 61

GUIDELINE FOR PROCESS SELECTION

APPLICATION PROCESS NOTE

CO2 AND H2SABSORPTION DEA, a MDEA

PHYSICALSOLVENT

HC ABSORTION(CLAUS UNIT)

SELECTIVE H2SABSORPTION GENERIC

MDEA, ADIP

SULFINOL

HC ABSORTION(CLAUS UNIT)

Page 62: Gas Sweetening Total

DGEP/SCR/ED/ECP 62

GUIDELINE FOR PROCESS SELECTION

APPLICATION PROCESS NOTE

POLISHING

IRON SPONGEZnOCHARCOAL

DIRECTCONVERSIONTO SULPHUR

WASTE SOLIDTO BETREATED

LOW FLOWANDPRESSURE(EXCEPTSULFINT)

SWEETENINGWITHMERCAPTANREMOVAL

AMINE WITHMOLECULARSIEVE

SULFINOL

NOT FULLYREFERENCED

HC ABSORTION(CLAUS UNIT)


Recommended