Astronomy 423 at UNMRadio Astronomy
AntennasGreg TaylorUniversity of New Mexico
2
G. Taylor, Astr 423 at UNM
Outline
• Fourier Transforms • Interferometer block diagram• Antenna fundamentals• Types of antennas• Antenna performance parameters• Receivers• Dipole Antennas
stationary time series
indefinitely long
but
statistical properties don’t vary with time
time, minutes
assume that we are dealing with a fragment of an indefinitely long time series
timeseries,d
duration, Tlength, N
one quantity that might be stationary is …
“Power”
0
T
0
T
Power
mean-squared amplitude of time series
How is power related topower spectral density ?
write Fourier Series asd=Gm
weremare the Fourier coefficients
now use
now use
coefficients of sines and cosines
coefficients of complex exponentials
Fourier Transformequals 2/T
so, if we define the power spectral density of a stationary time series as
the integral of the p.s.d. is the power in the time series
Example: Atmospheric CO2(after removing anthropogenic trend)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50-4
-2
0
2
4
time, years
CO2,
ppm
0 1 2 3 4 50
1
2
3
frequency, cycles per year
log1
0 ps
d of
CO
2
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
time, years
CO2,
ppm
enlargement
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
time, years
CO2,
ppm
enlargement
period of 1 year
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50-4
-2
0
2
4
time, years
CO
2, p
pm
0 1 2 3 4 50
1
2
3
frequency, cycles per year
log1
0 ps
d of
CO
2
power spectral density
frequency,cyclesperyear
0 1 2 3 4 5 60
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
frequency, cycles per year
powe
r
cumulative power
power in time series
Fourier Transforms 18
G. Taylor, Astr 423 at UNM
Fourier Transforms 19
G. Taylor, Astr 423 at UNM
20
G. Taylor, Astr 423 at UNM
Mixer
Software
Square law detector
Bandpass filter, IF amplifier
21
G. Taylor, Astr 423 at UNM
E.g., pre-upgrade VLA observing
at 4.8 GHz (C band) Interferometer Block Diagram
Antenna
Front End
IF
Back End
Correlator
22
G. Taylor, Astr 423 at UNM
• Antenna amplitude pattern causes amplitude to vary across the source.
• Antenna phase pattern causes phase to vary across the source.
• Polarization properties of the antenna modify the apparentpolarization of the source.
• Antenna pointing errors can cause time varying amplitude andphase errors.
• Variation in noise pickup from the ground can cause timevariable amplitude errors.
• Deformations of the antenna surface can cause amplitude andphase errors, especially at short wavelengths.
Importance of the Antenna Elements
23
G. Taylor, Astr 423 at UNM
Wavelength > 1 m (approx) Wire AntennasDipole
Ae = Gl2/4p Yagi
Helixor arrays of these
Wavelength < 1 m (approx) Reflector antennas
Wavelength = 1 m (approx) Hybrid antennas (wire reflectors or feeds)
Feed
General Antenna Types
24
G. Taylor, Astr 423 at UNM
Effective collecting area A(n,q,f) m2
On-axis response Ae = hAh = aperture efficiency
Normalized pattern(primary beam)A(n,q,f) = A(n,q,f)/Ae
Beam solid angle WA= ∫∫ A(n,q,f) dWall sky
Ae WA = l2
Basic Antenna Formulas
25
G. Taylor, Astr 423 at UNM
f(u,v) = complex aperture field distributionu,v = aperture coordinates (wavelengths)
F(l,m) = complex far-field voltage patternl = sinqcosf , m = sinqsinf
F(l,m) = ∫∫aperturef(u,v)exp(2pi(ul+vm)dudvf(u,v) = ∫∫hemisphereF(l,m)exp(-2pi(ul+vm)dldm
For VLA: q3dB = 1.02/D, First null = 1.22/D, D = reflector diameter in wavelengths
Aperture-Beam Fourier Transform Relationship
26
G. Taylor, Astr 423 at UNM
The Standard Parabolic Antenna Response
27
G. Taylor, Astr 423 at UNM
Primary Antenna Key Features
28
G. Taylor, Astr 423 at UNM
+ Beam does not rotate + Lower cost+ Better tracking accuracy + Better gravity performance- Higher cost - Beam rotates on the sky- Poorer gravity performance- Non-intersecting axis
Types of Antenna Mount
29
G. Taylor, Astr 423 at UNM
Parallactic angle
Beam Rotation on the Sky
30
G. Taylor, Astr 423 at UNM
Prime focus Cassegrain focus(GMRT) (AT)
Offset CassegrainNaysmith
(VLA) (OVRO)
Beam Waveguide Dual Offset(NRO)(ATA)
Reflector Types
31
G. Taylor, Astr 423 at UNM
Prime focus Cassegrain focus(GMRT) (AT)
Offset CassegrainNaysmith
(VLA) (OVRO)
Beam Waveguide Dual Offset(NRO) (ATA)
Reflector Types
32
G. Taylor, Astr 423 at UNM
Effelsberg 100-m telescope near Bonn, Germany
33
G. Taylor, Astr 423 at UNM
DualOffset
Unblocked Aperture(GBT)
Reflector Types
34
G. Taylor, Astr 423 at UNM
VLA and EVLA Feed System Design
35
G. Taylor, Astr 423 at UNM
Example Feed Horn
36
G. Taylor, Astr 423 at UNM
8 x 9Array for2-7 GHz
IvashinaEt al.
Focal Plane Arrays
37
G. Taylor, Astr 423 at UNM
Aperture EfficiencyA0 = hA, h = hsf * hbl * hs * ht * hmisc
hsf = reflector surface efficiencyhbl = blockage efficiencyhs = feed spillover efficiencyht = feed illumination efficiencyhmisc= diffraction, phase, match, loss
hsf = exp(-(4ps/l)2)e.g., s = l/16 , hsf = 0.5
rms error s
Antenna Performance Parameters
38
G. Taylor, Astr 423 at UNM
Primary Beam
l=sin(q), D = antenna diameter in contours:-3,-6,-10,-15,-20,-25,wavelengths -30,-35,-40 dBdB = 10log(power ratio) = 20log(voltage ratio)For VLA: q3dB = 1.02/D, First null = 1.22/D
pDl
Antenna Performance Parameters
39
G. Taylor, Astr 423 at UNM
Pointing AccuracyDq = rms pointing error
Often Dq < q3dB /10 acceptableBecause A(q3dB /10) ~ 0.97BUT, at half power point in beamA(q3dB /2 ± q3dB /10)/A(q3dB /2) = ±0.3
For best VLA pointing use Reference Pointing. Dq = 3 arcsec = q3dB /17 @ 50 GHz
Dq
q3dB
Primary beam A(q)
Antenna Performance Parameters
40
G. Taylor, Astr 423 at UNM
Subreflector mount
Quadrupod
El encoder
Reflector structure
Alidade structure
Rail flatness
Az encoder
Foundation
Antenna Pointing Design
41
G. Taylor, Astr 423 at UNM
Surface: s = 25 µmPointing: Dq = 0.6 arcsec
Carbon fiber and invar reflector structure
Pointing metrology structureinside alidade
ALMA 12m Antenna
42
G. Taylor, Astr 423 at UNM
Polarization
Antenna can modify the apparent polarization properties of the source:• Symmetry of the optics• Quality of feed polarization splitter• Circularity of feed radiation patterns• Reflections in the optics• Curvature of the reflectors
Antenna Performance Parameters
43
G. Taylor, Astr 423 at UNM
Cross polarized Cross polarizedaperture distribution primary beam
VLA 4.8 GHzcross polarizedprimary beam
Off-Axis Cross Polarization
44
G. Taylor, Astr 423 at UNM
VLA 4.8 GHz
Far field pattern amplitudePhase not shown
Aperture field distributionamplitude.Phase not shown
Antenna Holography
45
G. Taylor, Astr 423 at UNM
Other Concerns
• Pointing errors, especially at high frequencies• Gain curves• Atmospheric opacity corrections• Ionospheric effects: scintillation, isoplanatic patch size
46
G. Taylor, Astr 423 at UNM
Practical concerns continued• Opacity corrections and tipping scans
– Can measure the total power detected as a function of elevation, which has contributions
Tsys = T0 + Tatm(1-et0a) + Tspill(a)and solve for t0.– Or, make use of the fact that there is a good correlation between
the surface weather and t0 measured at the VLA (Butler 2002):
and apply this opacity correction using FILLM in AIPS
47
G. Taylor, Astr 423 at UNM
Noise Temperature
Pin = kBT Dn ,kB = Boltzman’s constant
When observing a radio source Ttotal = TA + Tsys
Tsys = system noise when not looking at a discrete radio source
TA = source antenna temperatureTA = hAS/(2kB) S = source flux (Jy)
SEFD = system equivalent flux density SEFD = Tsys/K (Jy)
ReceiverGain GB/W Dn
Matched load Temp T (oK)
Pout=G*PinPin
Rayleigh-Jeans approximation
Band (GHz) h Tsys SEFD
1-2 .50 21 236
2-4 .62 27 245
4-8 .60 28 262
8-12 .56 31 311
12-18 .54 37 385
18-26 .51 55 606
26-40 .39 58 836
40-50 .34 78 1290
VLA Sensitivities
Receivers
48
G. Taylor, Astr 423 at UNM
Hertz Dipole
Ae = Gl2/4p G=1.5 for Hertz DipoleG = 2.5 at 20 MHz for LWAG = 4.0 at 60 MHz for LWA
49
G. Taylor, Astr 423 at UNM
LWA Antenna
50
G. Taylor, Astr 423 at UNM
20 MHz 3D
51
G. Taylor, Astr 423 at UNM
E and H-Plane Antenna Pattern
52
G. Taylor, Astr 423 at UNM
Further Reading
http://www.nrao.edu/whatisra/mechanisms.shtmlhttp://www.nrao.edu/whatisra/www.nrao.edu
Synthesis Imaging in Radio Astronomy ASP Vol 180, eds Taylor, Carilli & Perley