+ All Categories
Home > Documents > GCP Sub-Committee of Industry Stakeholders Guide to review of GCP course for CPD accreditation...

GCP Sub-Committee of Industry Stakeholders Guide to review of GCP course for CPD accreditation...

Date post: 11-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: julia-mills
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
26
GCP Sub-Committee of Industry Stakeholders Guide to review of GCP course for CPD accreditation 9Feb10
Transcript
Page 1: GCP Sub-Committee of Industry Stakeholders Guide to review of GCP course for CPD accreditation 9Feb10.

GCP Sub-Committee of Industry Stakeholders

Guide to review of GCP course for CPD accreditation

9Feb10

Page 2: GCP Sub-Committee of Industry Stakeholders Guide to review of GCP course for CPD accreditation 9Feb10.

BACKGROUND

• The GCP sub-committee of the National Health Research Ethics Council (NHREC) was formed in 2009 following the perceived industry need to standardize GCP training in South Africa.

• During the course of 2008 it emerged that various ethics committees were not accepting GCP certificates issued by some training providers.

Page 3: GCP Sub-Committee of Industry Stakeholders Guide to review of GCP course for CPD accreditation 9Feb10.

BACKGROUND (CONT) Some of the reasons why some GCP certificates were

not accepted:The training was provided by an unknown provider

to the ethics committee;There was no post test conducted;the learning was e-based or that the course content

did not clearly reflect an adequate incorporation of South African guidelines and terminology.

Page 4: GCP Sub-Committee of Industry Stakeholders Guide to review of GCP course for CPD accreditation 9Feb10.

GCP SUB-COMMITTEE• GCP Sub-Committee of the NHREC was established mid 2009 following a

nomination and industry voting through SACRA.• Current Committee Members:

Savi Chetty-Tulsee: Training Provider, Independent Fathima Amod: Training Provider, Independent Elsabe de Kock: Training Provider, Independent Mohlabane Majoe: Pharma Prof. Lesley Burgess: TREAD Research, MCC Clinical Trial Committee Marijke Geldenhuys: Academic Laurette Bonthuys: Regulatory/MCC – Inspectorate Siza Mphele: CRO Uttam Govind: Academic Mary-Ann Richardson: CRO

Page 5: GCP Sub-Committee of Industry Stakeholders Guide to review of GCP course for CPD accreditation 9Feb10.

GCP Committee The GCP sub committee’s mandate is as follows:

To identify the minimum curriculum requirements for GCP training providers

To set up and manage a database of GCP course providers via the SACRA website

To communicate with stakeholders/ providers the local GCP training provider requirements and the process of review and registration

To review the course overview, review provider trainer experience and qualifications

To communicate to the stakeholders/ providers the NHREC requirement for training providers to be accredited with a Sector Education Training Authority (SETA)

Page 6: GCP Sub-Committee of Industry Stakeholders Guide to review of GCP course for CPD accreditation 9Feb10.

Application form: Minimum requirements

Page 7: GCP Sub-Committee of Industry Stakeholders Guide to review of GCP course for CPD accreditation 9Feb10.

Why is GCP training so important?

Page 8: GCP Sub-Committee of Industry Stakeholders Guide to review of GCP course for CPD accreditation 9Feb10.

Initial Process of review and registration1. The provider details are captured on an excel spreadsheet maintained by

the SACRA administrator2. The provider receives a request to complete the application form and

provide the applicable documentation to allow for the review of the course content, training provider systems and trainers

3. The application is reviewed. 4. The reviewer will submit any questions to the applicant if applicable5. Once the reviewer is satisfied all required conditions are met, the

provider will receive a registration number that will need to be reflected on the GCP certificate

6. An appeals process will be in place. This appeal application will be addressed in a committee meeting.

Page 9: GCP Sub-Committee of Industry Stakeholders Guide to review of GCP course for CPD accreditation 9Feb10.

Problem with this process

Committee not a ETQA or body recognized to accredit

Members of committee have potential for COI

Page 10: GCP Sub-Committee of Industry Stakeholders Guide to review of GCP course for CPD accreditation 9Feb10.

Solution Application to the HPCSA board to include this review

process into the current CPD accreditation process Independent body Annual submission to allow for change in provider and

course material and courses.

Page 11: GCP Sub-Committee of Industry Stakeholders Guide to review of GCP course for CPD accreditation 9Feb10.

Application Process Transferred committee review process to HPCSA CPD

accreditors: Minimum requirements Application form Reviewer checklist Guideline for submission

Page 12: GCP Sub-Committee of Industry Stakeholders Guide to review of GCP course for CPD accreditation 9Feb10.

Minimum requirements for training providers

1. OPERATIONAL PLAN: A generic statement on the organisation /

departments’ objectives or goals.2. HUMAN RESOURCES

Generic information on how trainers are recruited. General concise statement on how they are selected;

Qualifications required, permanent or temporary, how the facilitator is selected etc.

Page 13: GCP Sub-Committee of Industry Stakeholders Guide to review of GCP course for CPD accreditation 9Feb10.

Minimum requirements for facilitators Qualified facilitators: by experience and

qualification – min 2 years experience Qualification refers to but is not limited to

adequate medical, pharmaceutical and/ scientific qualification

Experience refers to but is not limited to at least 2 years of active exposure in GCP environment of clinical research.

Facilitators should either have formal trainer qualifications or at least 2 years experience in lecturing/teaching/training

Page 14: GCP Sub-Committee of Industry Stakeholders Guide to review of GCP course for CPD accreditation 9Feb10.

Minimum requirements for GCP courses Course curriculum outline / agenda

Curriculum to incorporate South African guidelines as well as applicable international guidelines

Learning Plan/Outcomes Beginner training: minimum of 8 hours of training time (excluding

breaks) Refresher training: minimum of 4 hours of training time (excluding

breaks) CPD accreditation

CEU (Continued Educational Units) Level 2Beginner training: General points minimum 6, Ethics

points minimum 2Refresher training: General points minimum 4, Ethics

points minimum 1.

Page 15: GCP Sub-Committee of Industry Stakeholders Guide to review of GCP course for CPD accreditation 9Feb10.

GCP course cont:

Methods of formative and summative assessments• Formative assessments for example quiz, Q&A, case studies, role

play, etc. – Minimum 2 assessments.• Summative test to have a minimum pass rate of 70%

Methods of evaluation of training course, that is, delegate evaluation of the course content and facilitator

GCP certificate• Full name of delegate, Course type (Beginner/Refresher), Date of

course, Test score achievement, CPD accreditation number, level of activity and CEU points, HPCSA/relevant professional board registration number, Signature and name of trainer

• GCP refresher training will be done on a 3 yearly basis

Page 16: GCP Sub-Committee of Industry Stakeholders Guide to review of GCP course for CPD accreditation 9Feb10.

Application form Section 2: details of the training provider Section 3: Application information

Operational plan A generic statement on the organisation/departments’

objectives or goals.

Human ResourceGeneric information on how trainers are recruited.

General concise statement on how they are selected;

(qualifications required, permanent or temporary, how the facilitator is selected etc.)

Page 17: GCP Sub-Committee of Industry Stakeholders Guide to review of GCP course for CPD accreditation 9Feb10.

Section 3: Application information Operational Plan cont.

Curriculum developmentDetailed curriculum is not required but instead,

information on how training needs are established and how curriculum is developed accordingly.

Technology and tools usedStatement of what technology is used in training and in

the process of development of material & how it is delivered?

QMSA statement of policies that govern and support the

conduct of training.

What systems developed ensure the quality of the delivery of your training and the content of training?

Page 18: GCP Sub-Committee of Industry Stakeholders Guide to review of GCP course for CPD accreditation 9Feb10.

Section 3: Application information Facilitators of learning

Evidence of qualification & C.V & Evidence of training qualification

The Facilitator can match their qualification with their experience and C.V: Substantiate your

qualification to do training if facilitator does not have a Science degree.

Substantiate the relevance of qualification to be a GCP Trainer and your highest Tertiary training.

All trainer/ facilitator documents to be provided

Page 19: GCP Sub-Committee of Industry Stakeholders Guide to review of GCP course for CPD accreditation 9Feb10.

Section 3: Application information Course Information

Different types of courses offered and Modules providing the module information.

Objectives and outcome to be provided.

Objective: what the participant should be able to do at the end of this study?

Eg. The participant should be able to describe an adverse serious event

Course content should incorporate South African- GCP as well as international GCP

Page 20: GCP Sub-Committee of Industry Stakeholders Guide to review of GCP course for CPD accreditation 9Feb10.

Section 3: Application information Course Content Evaluation

The applicant conducts a review of each course module to confirm alignment with the applicable local and international guidelines.

Each course should have a learning plan or list of learning objectives

Page 21: GCP Sub-Committee of Industry Stakeholders Guide to review of GCP course for CPD accreditation 9Feb10.

Section 3: Application information

Other application questions relate to Practical exercises Teaching methodologies Course customization Learning outcomes communication Learning and assessment processes

Page 22: GCP Sub-Committee of Industry Stakeholders Guide to review of GCP course for CPD accreditation 9Feb10.

Application supporting documents Documentary evidence as indicated in the form

Operational Plan Facilitator documents: CV, qualification, relevant training

certificates Course outline / agenda Course /module learning plan Course and facilitator evaluation template Current course CPD accreditation details GCP certificate template

Page 23: GCP Sub-Committee of Industry Stakeholders Guide to review of GCP course for CPD accreditation 9Feb10.

Reviewer checklist tool Items Yes No Comment

Registration on SACRA database      

Operational plan explains the training operation of the organization      

Training facilitators have the relevant experience and qualification      

Learning plan available      

Agenda/ course program available      

Is local and international guidelines covered in content      

Course duration appropriate for course type      

Page 24: GCP Sub-Committee of Industry Stakeholders Guide to review of GCP course for CPD accreditation 9Feb10.

Reviewer checklist toolItems Yes No Comment

CPD accreditation available      

Methods of evaluating learners are provided and acceptable      

Methods of evaluating course and facilitator is available      

GCP certificate reflects the criteria as specified in the application form      

Training provider meets all criteria and can be approved and registered      

Page 25: GCP Sub-Committee of Industry Stakeholders Guide to review of GCP course for CPD accreditation 9Feb10.

SUMMARY Provider registers on the SACRA website. This is simply to have a complete list of GCP Training Providers in

South Africa The provider obtains the GCP training CPD application forms either directly from the HPCSA CPD accreditor or

from SACRA website and submits it to a HPCSA CPD accreditor. The CPD accreditor will review the application form and associated documents using the checklist as a guide The CPD accreditor will submit any questions to the applicant if applicable Once the CPD accreditor is satisfied that all required conditions are met, the provider will receive a CPD

accreditation number that will need to be reflected on the GCP certificate Ethics committees and MCC will only accept GCP certificates with a CPD accreditation number obtained from

a HPCSA CPD accreditor The provider will be required to make yearly applications as per the normal CPD accreditation process. GCP beginner and refresher courses must be labeled as such on the certificate and must meet minimum

requirements. Courses of longer duration will still receive the same number of CPD points (capped) Short/modular training provided at various intervals during the year must be outlined in the application and

meet minimum requirements to receive a single CPD accreditation. Only one GCP certificate indicating refresher or beginner GCP training should be generated after the delegate has attended all required modules

Short GCP training activities that are not formally submitted as part of Beginner/Refresher training programs will NOT receive CPD accreditation.

Page 26: GCP Sub-Committee of Industry Stakeholders Guide to review of GCP course for CPD accreditation 9Feb10.

Questions?

Contact information:Barbara SematimbaSACRA Coordinator

011 024 2678083 6308612

[email protected]


Recommended