+ All Categories
Home > Documents > GEC Alang Report (Main document Part II)

GEC Alang Report (Main document Part II)

Date post: 30-Mar-2015
Category:
Upload: somnath-bandyopadhyay
View: 158 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
34
Ecological Restoration and Planning for Alang-Sosiya Ship-Breaking Yard, Gujarat 8 HEAVY METAL POLLUTION Heavy metals are among the best known and most widely studied pollutants in an aquatic system. However, the behaviour of heavy metals in sediments varies according to the physico-chemical nature of the aquatic system. The Gulf of Khambhat (Cambay) represents a semiestuarine condition. When the river-water/surface runoff carrying the pollutants from onshore comes in contact with saline water, a flocculation of the organic and inorganic dissolved species begins as a result of chemical as well as electrostatic interaction (Aston and Chestner 1973; Rasid 1974; Eckert and Sholkovitz 1976; Boyle et al. 1977; Sholkovitz et al. 1978 and others). A general phenomenon during mixing is a large scale removal of dissolved metal species from water. Flocculation of dissolved organic and inorganic matter during the mixing is an important removal mechanism for Fe, Mn, Al, P, Zn, Cu, Ni, Co, Pb and Mo. Accordingly, both suspended and bottom sediments in the Gulf of Cambay act as a sink for most of the pollutants introduced from the mainland. Thus analysis of the sediment and water provide knowledge regarding state of heavy metal pollution in the Gulf around Alang Shipbreaking Yard. 8.1 INTERTIDAL ZONE 8.1.1 Methods Heavy metals were estimated both from water (dissolved) and sediments of intertidal zones at five different sites viz. N-Control, N-ASSBY, M- ASSBY, S-ASSBY and S-Control. Dissolved heavy metals (Fe, Mn and Zn) were estimated using ICP Emission Spectrophotometer. However, 0.01 M HCl were used to extract heavy metals from the < 500 μm fraction of sediments and analysed for Fe, Mn, Zn, Cr, Cu, Pb, Ni and Cd, using Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (AAS). 8.1.2 Heavy metal distribution Higher concentration of Fe and Mn were recorded from the ASSBY areas as compared to the control sites (Table 8.1). This highlights the input of the metals into the intertidal water from the ASSBY activities. However, most of the other dissolved heavy metals were recorded below detection limit of the instrument and thus considered under the safe limits. Table 8.1 Distribution of major dissolved heavy Similarly, relatively high concentration of heavy metals was recorded from the sediments at ASSBY areas than the control sites (Table 8.2). This further substantiate the above view that ship breaking activities are polluting the intertidal zones through the inputs of heavy metals. Sites Fe (μg/l) Mn (μg/l) Zn (μg/l) N-Control 127.4 20.1 51.5 N-ASSBY 248.0 188.5 61.5 M-ASSBY 200.0 61.0 56.0 S-ASSBY 128.8 28.6 30.2 S-Control 124.8 25.7 38.0 100
Transcript

Ecological Restoration and Planning forAlang-Sosiya Ship-Breaking Yard, Gujarat

8

HEAVY METAL POLLUTION

Heavy metals are among the best known and mostwidely studied pollutants in an aquatic system.However, the behaviour of heavy metals insediments varies according to the physico-chemicalnature of the aquatic system. The Gulf ofKhambhat (Cambay) represents a semiestuarinecondition. When the river-water/surface runoffcarrying the pollutants from onshore comes incontact with saline water, a flocculation of theorganic and inorganic dissolved species begins asa result of chemical as well as electrostaticinteraction (Aston and Chestner 1973; Rasid 1974;Eckert and Sholkovitz 1976; Boyle et al. 1977;Sholkovitz et al. 1978 and others). A generalphenomenon during mixing is a large scaleremoval of dissolved metal species from water.Flocculation of dissolved organic and inorganicmatter during the mixing is an important removalmechanism for Fe, Mn, Al, P, Zn, Cu, Ni, Co, Pband Mo. Accordingly, both suspended and bottomsediments in the Gulf of Cambay act as a sink formost of the pollutants introduced from themainland. Thus analysis of the sediment and waterprovide knowledge regarding state of heavy metalpollution in the Gulf around Alang ShipbreakingYard.

8.1 INTERTIDAL ZONE

8.1.1 Methods

Heavy metals were estimated both from water(dissolved) and sediments of intertidal zones atfive different sites viz. N-Control, N-ASSBY, M-ASSBY, S-ASSBY and S-Control. Dissolvedheavy metals (Fe, Mn and Zn) were estimatedusing ICP Emission Spectrophotometer. However,0.01 M HCl were used to extract heavy metalsfrom the < 500 µm fraction of sediments andanalysed for Fe, Mn, Zn, Cr, Cu, Pb, Ni and Cd,using Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer(AAS).

8.1.2 Heavy metal distributionHigher concentration of Fe and Mn were recordedfrom the ASSBY areas as compared to the controlsites (Table 8.1). This highlights the input of themetals into the intertidal water from the ASSBYactivities. However, most of the other dissolvedheavy metals were recorded below detection limitof the instrument and thus considered under thesafe limits.

Table 8.1 Distribution of major dissolved heavy

Similarly, relatively high concentration of heavymetals was recorded from the sediments atASSBY areas than the control sites (Table 8.2).This further substantiate the above view that shipbreaking activities are polluting the intertidalzones through the inputs of heavy metals.

Sites Fe (µg/l) Mn (µg/l) Zn (µg/l) N-Control 127.4 20.1 51.5 N-ASSBY 248.0 188.5 61.5 M-ASSBY 200.0 61.0 56.0 S-ASSBY 128.8 28.6 30.2 S-Control 124.8 25.7 38.0

100

Ecological Restoration and Planning forAlang-Sosiya Ship-Breaking Yard, Gujarat

Table 8.2 Distribution of heavy metals in the sediments of intertidal zone

8.2 OFFSHORE ZONE

8.2.1 Methods

Water and sediments (both suspended and bottom)were collected during April ̀ 97 along five transectsviz., N-Control (Ghogha), N-ASSBY (along plotNo. 156/158), M-ASSBY (along plot No. 1), S-ASSBY (along plot No. 84C) and S-Control(Gopnath). Each transect started from the coastline(0 km) and ran up to 5 km in the sea. In eachtransect, sampling was done at 0, 1st, 3rd and 5thkm point. Bottom sediments were collected by grabsampler, packed in pre-washed polyethylenepackets, sealed and transferred to the laboratory,where they were oven dried at 40 oC. Water withsuspended sediments were collected in 10 litreplastic bottles at 50 to 100 cm depth from the watersurface, and were then allowed to settle. Thesuspended sediments were then separated bydecantation and dried at 40 oC in an oven. Waterfor heavy metal analysis were collected in 250 mlplastic bottles and were acidified with analar gradeHCl acid.Both suspended and bottom sediments were treatedwith deionized distilled water three times, to avoidthe excess sodium chloride. They were then driedto room temperature and grinded in an agatemorter to powder form (<50 µm). The totaldigestion of sediments was done following theprocedure of Loring and Rantala (1992), and thesamples were analysed in the solution form usingAAS at the School of Environmental Sciences,Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. Thesamples were analysed for the following heavy

metals: Fe, Mn, Zn, Cr, Cu, Pb, Ni, and Cd. Thegeostandards used as reference material wereCanadian Soil standards viz., SO-1, SO-2, SO-3and SO-4 (Govindaraju 1994).

8.2.2Nature of sediments

It is widely recognised that various geochemicalcomponents prefer certain grainsize fractions andthat the mineralogy govern the interaction betweensolid phase and the dissolved constituents innatural system (Salomons and Förstner 1984). Theparticle size distribution of sediments and theirmineralogical characteristics are thus the majorvariables to consider in any kind of study relatedto the sediments and their environmentalimplications.

The dominating fraction in the bottom sedimentswere the silt which varied from 60 to 75% of thetotal distribution. The sand fraction was alwaysless than 6%. The clay fraction varied from 15 to30% of the total size distribution in the sediments(Islam 1986).

The total suspended matter (TSM) in the Gulfvaried from 0.22 to 4.53 g/l (Islam 1986). Apriland July shows the highest TSM. However, thegrain size of suspended sediments were practicallysimilar both spatially and temporally. The grainsize of suspended sediments also showed that siltand clay were the dominating fraction constitutingmore than 90% of the total distribution. Generally,the bottom sediments have coarser fraction slightlyhigher than the suspended sediments. The size

Metals (µg/kg) N-Control M-ASSBY S-Control Pb 90 1230 420 Ni 830 2810 1910 Cd 80 1700 310 Zn 80 1830 700 Fe 860 27860 7590 Mn 540 23320 8180 Cu 960 12380 8410 Cr 370 12300 10920

101

Ecological Restoration and Planning forAlang-Sosiya Ship-Breaking Yard, Gujarat

distribution of sediments (Islam 1986) also showsthat nearly half of the distribution spectrum ofbottom sediments overlaps the distributionspectrum of suspended sediments, which suggeststhat the bottom sediments are also capable ofdemobilisation. The fine grained sediments have alarge surface to mass ratio, and thus provide widespace for metal adsorption. This fine sand, silt andclay size class, as suggested by Mantei and Foster(1991), is fine enough to accumulate higherquantity of metal as well as large enough to resisttransport and have longer residence time in theaquatic system.

The enrichment of heavy minerals and the natureof clay minerals are two significant criteria whichdetermines the abundance of heavy metals in asediment mass. The Gulf of Cambay sedimentsshow that the dominant clay mineral in bothsuspended and bottom sediments ismontmorrilonite. Montmorillonite in suspendedsediments ranges from 76 to 83% of the total clayminerals, while illite constitutes 9 to 18%, chlorite4 to 5% and kaolinite constitutes 3 to 5% (Islam1986). There is an overall homogeneity in thedistribution of clay minerals all over the coast. Thecation exchange capacity (CEC) of different clayminerals are as follows:

High CEC of montmorillonite is due to its highspecific surface area which ranges from 700 to 800X 103 m2/kg, compared with much lower valuesfor kaolinite 15 to 40 X 103 m2/kg. This suggeststhat montmorillonite has the highest scavengingcapacity by ion exchange. The mineral assemblagein the Gulf of Cambay shows that the sedimentspossess significant scavenging potential of heavymetals from sea water.

8.3 HEAVY METALCONCENTRATION INSEDIMENTS

Heavy metal concentration in both bottom andsuspended sediments are presented in Table 8.3to 8.8. The concentration of heavy metals in globalstandard shale is presented in Table 8.9.

Montmorillonite 80 to 150 meq/100 gm Illite 10 to 40 meq/100 gm Kaolinite 3 to 15 meq/100 gm

102

Ecological Restoration and Planning forAlang-Sosiya Ship-Breaking Yard, Gujarat

Table 8.3 Distribution of Fe (µg/g) in the sediments.

Table 8.4 Distribution of Mn (µg/g) in the sediments

Table 8.5 Distribution of Zn (µg/g) in sediments.

Transects Bottom sediments Suspended sediments 0 km 1 km 3 km 5 km 0 km 1 km 3 km 5 km

N-Control 75190 77220 -- -- 81060 75400 76590 79250 N-ASSBY 78200 -- 78480 81550 83510 84980 78060 75050 M-ASSBY 84420 59940 70850 77710 82600 83020 80090 80160 S-ASSBY 79460 66660 78760 71970 82880 75890 84490 69590 S-Control 71550 59240 68190 44620 81410 74700 77500 77570

Transects Bottom sediments Suspended sediments 0 km 1 km 3 km 5 km 0 km 1 km 3 km 5 km

N-Control 1290 1180 -- -- 1290 1510 1460 1920 N-ASSBY 1250 -- 1290 1250 1390 1390 1630 1710 M-ASSBY 1350 1110 1170 1170 1580 1400 1720 1660 S-ASSBY 1320 1690 1340 1210 1250 1740 1220 1320 S-Control 1150 1790 990 1640 1120 1910 1450 1460

Transects Bottom sediments Suspended sediments 0 km 1 km 3 km 5 km 0 km 1 km 3 km 5 km

N-Control 12 20 -- -- 8 22 16 25 N-ASSBY 22 -- 20 23 20 14 14 15 M-ASSBY 26 17 14 15 29 15 14 12 S-ASSBY 12 11 11 12 17 20 12 14 S-Control 15 12 14 15 19 12 22 17

Table 8.7 Distribution of Pb (µg/g) in sediments

Transects Bottom sediments Suspended sediments 0 km 1 km 3 km 5 km 0 km 1 km 3 km 5 km

N-Control 106 84 -- -- 100 112 100 116 N-ASSBY 106 -- 87 77 128 109 106 119 M-ASSBY 186 64 74 90 109 112 116 116 S-ASSBY 106 77 90 71 122 119 116 100 S-Control 109 84 77 61 103 106 93 109

Table 8.6 Distribution of Cu (µg/g) in sediments.

Transects Bottom sediments Suspended sediments 0 km 1 km 3 km 5 km 0 km 1 km 3 km 5 km

N-Control 108 112 -- -- 130 90 112 180 N-ASSBY 120 -- 100 110 203 124 173 129 M-ASSBY 273 73 112 86 391 130 203 147 S-ASSBY 100 98 136 71 163 374 171 108 S-Control 129 81 105 63 140 114 134 120

103

Ecological Restoration and Planning forAlang-Sosiya Ship-Breaking Yard, Gujarat

Table 8.8 Distribution of Ni (µg/g) in sediments.

Table 8.9 Concentration of metals (µg/g) in standard shales.

Source: Turekian and Wedepohl (1961)

Transects Bottom sediments Suspended sediments 0 km 1 km 3 km 5 km 0 km 1 km 3 km 5 km

N-Control 111 69 -- -- 96 87 75 87 N-ASSBY 81 -- 81 63 87 75 81 81 M-ASSBY 84 63 84 72 111 90 81 87 S-ASSBY 66 63 63 72 84 78 87 87 S-Control 84 54 60 63 87 81 78 84

Iron 46700 Manganese 850 Zinc 95 Copper 45 Lead 20 Nickel 68

104

The total metal concentration in the bottomsediments varied from 59200 to 84400 µg/g for Fe,0.10 to 0.18% for Mn, 71 to 273 µg/g for Zn, 64 to186 µg/g for Cu, 11 to 26 µg/g for Pb, and 54 to 111µg/g for Ni. Although most of the off-shore stationsshows a similar distribution pattern of heavy metals,the five coastline stations represented significantdifferences in the concentrations at least for fewelements in the bottom sediments.

Zinc, Cu and Pb were relatively high inconcentration in bottom sediments at 0th km fromthe shoreline at M-ASSBY (Fig. 8.1, 8.2, 8.3respectively). The higher concentration of thesemetals here may be due its location at the veryvicinity of the shipbreaking yard which maycontribute heavy metals to the sediments.

The distribution of heavy metals in suspendedsediments also showed a similar trend like that inbottom sediments. At 0th km from the shoreline ofM-ASSBY, higher concentration of Zn, Pb and Niwere observed compared with other transects (Fig.8.4, 8.5, 8.6 respectively).

Ecological Restoration and Planning forAlang-Sosiya Ship-Breaking Yard, Gujarat

8.1 Zn concentration in bottom sediments

Fig 8.2 Cu concentration in bottom sediments

Fig 8.3 Pb concentration in bottom sediments

0

10 0

20 0

30 0

40 0

N-C o ntro l N-Alan g M-A lan g S -A lan g S -C ont rol

µg

/l

0 th km 1s t km

3 rd km 5th km

0

50

100

150

200

N-C ontrol N-Alang M-Alang S-Alang S-C ontrol

µg/

l

0th km 1st km

3rd km 5th km

0

5

1 0

1 5

2 0

2 5

3 0

N-Co ntro l N-A lan g M-A lan g S -Alan g S -C o ntro l

µg

/l

0t h km 1s t km

3rd km 5th km

105

Ecological Restoration and Planning forAlang-Sosiya Ship-Breaking Yard, Gujarat

Fig 8.6 Pb concentration in suspended sediments

0

1 00

2 00

3 00

4 00

N-C on trol N-Ala ng M-A lan g S -Alan g S -C on trol

µg

/l

0th km 1 st km

3rd km 5 th km

Fig 8.4 Zn concentration in suspended sediments

Fig 8.5 Cu concentration in suspended sediments

0

5 0

10 0

15 0

20 0

N-Co ntro l N-Ala ng M-Alan g S -Ala ng S -C o ntro l

µg

/l

0t h km 1 st km

3rd km 5 th km

0

5

1 0

1 5

2 0

2 5

3 0

3 5

N -C ont ro l N -A lan g M -A lang S -A la ng S -C o nt ro l

µg

/l

0 th k m 1 s t km

3rd km 5 th km

106

Ecological Restoration and Planning forAlang-Sosiya Ship-Breaking Yard, Gujarat

It is to be noted here that at 0th km from the shorelineat M-ASSBY was the longest running shipbreakingplot, and is situated longitudinally at the middle ofthe shipbreaking yard. Thus input from theshipbreaking yard would be significant in this plot.The off-shore stations and other stations along thecoastline shows relatively uniform concentrationof heavy metals due to their well mixing by off-shore currents.

Generally the suspended sediments show higherconcentration of heavy metals compared to that ofthe bottom sediments due to granulometric effectof the sediments.

8.3.1Interelemental relationship

The correlation coefficient matrix for heavy metalsin both bottom and suspended sediments arepresented in Table 8.10 and 8.11.

Table 8.10 Correlation coefficient matrix for bottom sediments

Table 8.11 Correlation coefficient matrix for suspended sediments

Cu Fe Mn Ni Pb Zn Cu 1.00 Fe 0.57 1.00 Mn -0.03 0.45 1.00 Ni 0.45 0.38 -0.28 1.00 Pb 0.49 0.40 -0.13 0.13 1.00 Zn 0.91 0.56 -0.09 0.33 0.55 1.00

Cu Fe Mn Ni Pb Zn Cu 1.00 Fe 0.32 1.00 Mn 0.15 -0.37 1.00 Ni 0.73 0.27 -0.14 1.00 Pb 0.64 -0.01 0.29 0.39 1.00 Zn 0.75 0.21 0.25 0.41 0.50 1.00

107

Ecological Restoration and Planning forAlang-Sosiya Ship-Breaking Yard, Gujarat

Copper shows good positive correlation coefficientwith Fe in bottom sediments (n = 17) suggesting acommon source mineral (viz., Chalcopyrite) forthese elements. Good positive correlation also canbe observed between the pairs Cu-Zn (r = 0.91),Fe-Zn (r = 0.56), and Zn-Pb (r = 0.55) in the bottomsediments. However, in suspended sediments (n =20) good positive correlation has been observedbetween the pairs Cu-Ni (r = 0.75), Cu-Zn (r = 0.75)and Cu-Pb (r = 0.64) which suggest their co-origin.Correlation coefficient between elements, whichare known to behave similarly in sedimentaryenvironment (viz., Fe and Mn) is very poor in thesamples analysed. This suggests that, thesedimentary geochemical behaviour of theelements have been musked by anthropogenicinput in the study area. However, a detail elementalanalysis of the sediments would have revealed thesource of heavy metals in the study area.

8.3.2Quantification of heavy metals

8.3.2.1 Metal ratio

It is common practice to express the metal ratiowith respect to average shale to represent thedegree of pollution (Förstner and Wittmann 1981).Metal ratio with respect to standard shale arepresented in Table 8.12, 8.13 and 8.14, both for thebottom and suspended sediments.

The metal ratio for Fe in almost all bottom and suspended sediments lies between 1 and 2. Themetal ratio for Mn lies between 1.65 to 2.98 in bottom sediments and between 1.86 and 3.20 in suspendedsediments. The ratio for Zn is more than 1 in 70% of bottom and in 95% of suspended sediments.Copper shows the highest of all metal ratios relativeto standard shale in both bottom and suspendedsediments. Lead shows a negative enrichmentexcept at 0th km from the shoreline at M-ASSBYand N-ASSBY. Nickel in all suspended sedimentsshow ratio more than 1, while in 53% of bottomsediments Ni ratio is more than 1.

The metal ratio thus shows a higher concentrationof Cu in sediments. Most of the metals show higherconcentration at 0th km of M-ASSBY.

108

Ecological Restoration and Planning forAlang-Sosiya Ship-Breaking Yard, Gujarat

Table 8.12 Metal ratio for Fe and Mn relative to standard shale

Table 8.13 Metal ratio for Zn and Cu relative to standard shale

Transects Fe Mn 0 km 1 km 3 km 5 km 0 km 1 km 3 km 5 km

N-Control Bottom 1.61 1.65 -- -- 1.52 1.39 -- -- Suspended 1.74 1.61 1.64 1.70 1.52 1.78 1.72 2.26

N-ASSBY Bottom 1.67 -- 1.68 1.75 1.47 -- 1.52 1.47 Suspended 1.79 1.82 1.67 1.61 1.64 1.64 1.92 2.01

M-ASSBY Bottom 1.81 1.28 1.52 1.66 1.59 1.31 1.38 1.38 Suspended 1.77 1.78 1.71 1.72 1.86 1.65 2.02 1.95

S-ASSBY Bottom 1.70 1.43 1.69 1.54 1.55 1.99 1.58 1.42 Suspended 1.77 1.63 1.81 1.49 1.47 2.05 1.44 1.55

S-Control Bottom 1.53 1.27 1.46 0.96 1.35 2.11 1.16 1.93 Suspended 1.74 1.60 1.66 1.66 1.32 2.25 1.71 1.72

Transects Zn Cu 0 km 1 km 3 km 5 km 0 km 1 km 3 km 5 km

N-Control Bottom 1.14 1.18 -- -- 2.36 1.87 -- -- Suspended 1.37 0.95 1.18 1.89 2.22 2.49 2.22 2.58

N-ASSBY Bottom 1.26 -- 1.05 1.16 2.36 -- 1.93 1.71 Suspended 2.14 1.31 1.82 1.36 2.84 2.42 2.36 2.64

M-ASSBY Bottom 2.87 0.77 1.18 0.91 4.13 1.42 1.64 2.00 Suspended 4.12 1.37 2.14 1.55 2.42 2.49 2.58 2.58

S-ASSBY Bottom 1.05 1.03 1.43 0.75 2.36 1.71 2.00 1.58 Suspended 1.72 3.94 1.80 1.14 2.71 2.64 2.58 2.22

S-Control Bottom 1.36 0.85 1.11 0.66 2.42 1.87 1.71 1.36 Suspended 1.47 1.20 1.41 1.26 2.29 2.36 2.07 2.42

Transects Pb Ni 0 km 1 km 3 km 5 km 0 km 1 km 3 km 5 km

N-Control Bottom 0.60 1.00 -- -- 1.63 1.01 -- -- Suspended 0.40 1.10 0.80 1.25 1.41 1.28 1.10 1.28

N-ASSBY Bottom 1.10 -- 1.00 1.15 1.19 -- 1.19 0.93 Suspended 1.00 0.70 0.70 0.75 1.28 1.10 1.19 1.19

M-ASSBY Bottom 1.30 0.85 0.70 0.75 1.24 0.93 1.24 1.06 Suspended 1.45 0.75 0.70 0.60 1.63 1.32 1.19 1.28

S-ASSBY Bottom 0.60 0.55 0.55 0.60 0.97 0.93 0.93 1.06 Suspended 0.85 1.00 0.60 0.70 1.24 1.15 1.28 1.28

S-Control Bottom 0.75 0.60 0.70 0.75 1.24 0.79 0.88 0.93 Suspended 0.95 0.60 1.10 0.85 1.28 1.19 1.15 1.24

Table 8.14 Metal ratio for Pb and Ni relative to standard shale

109

Ecological Restoration and Planning forAlang-Sosiya Ship-Breaking Yard, Gujarat

8.3.2.2 Geoaccumulation Index(Igeo)

The geoaccumulation index proposed by Müller(1979) for the quantification of metal accumulationin sediments was calculated for the sediments ofAlang. The geoaccumulation index is expressedas

Igeo = log2 (Cn/1.5 X Bn)where Cn is the measured concentration, Bn is thebackground value (average shale) of elements n;and 1.5 is the background matrix correction factor.The factor 1.5 is used for variations in thebackground data due to lithogenic effects. Thegeoaccumulation index consists of seven gradesas shown in Table 8.15.

Table 8.15 Igeo class with respect to sediment quality (Müller 1979)

The geoaccumulation indices for different metalsat individual stations are presented in Table 8.16,8.17 and 8.18 for bottom and suspended sediments.With respect to Fe, 70% of bottom sedimentssamples lie within unpolluted to moderatelypolluted category; the remaining samples are notpolluted with respect to Fe. The Igeo values forMn and Cu in all stations lie between unpolluted tomoderately polluted category in both bottom andsuspended sediments. The bottom and suspendedsediments are not polluted with respect to Zn, Pband Ni.

I geo class Sediment quality 0 Unpolluted 1 Unpolluted to moderately polluted 2 Moderately polluted 3 Moderately to highly polluted 4 Highly polluted 5 Highly to very highly polluted 6 Very highly polluted

110

Ecological Restoration and Planning forAlang-Sosiya Ship-Breaking Yard, Gujarat

Table 8.16 Igeo values for Fe and Mn at Alang

Table 8.17 Igeo values for Zn and Cu at Alang

Table 8.18 Igeo values for Pb and Ni at Alang

Transects Fe Mn 0 km 1 km 3 km 5 km 0 km 1 km 3 km 5 km

N-Control Bottom 0.10 0.14 -- -- 0.02 -0.11 -- -- Suspended 0.21 0.11 0.13 0.18 0.02 0.24 0.20 0.59

N-ASSBY Bottom 0.16 -- 0.16 0.22 -0.03 -- 0.02 -0.03 Suspended 0.25 0.28 0.16 0.10 0.12 0.12 0.35 0.42

M-ASSBY Bottom 0.27 -0.22 0.02 0.15 0.08 -0.20 -0.12 -0.12 Suspended 0.24 0.25 0.19 0.19 0.31 0.13 0.43 0.38

S-ASSBY Bottom 0.18 -0.07 0.17 0.04 0.05 0.41 0.07 -0.08 Suspended 0.24 0.12 0.27 -0.01 -0.03 0.45 -0.06 0.05

S-Control Bottom 0.03 -0.24 -0.04 -0.65 -0.15 0.49 -0.37 0.36 Suspended 0.22 0.09 0.15 0.15 -0.19 0.58 0.19 0.20

Transects Zn Cu 0 km 1 km 3 km 5 km 0 km 1 km 3 km 5 km

N-Control Bottom -0.40 -0.35 -- -- 0.65 0.32 -- -- Suspended -0.13 -0.66 -0.35 0.34 0.57 0.73 0.57 0.78

N-ASSBY Bottom -0.25 -- -0.51 -0.37 0.65 -- 0.37 0.19 Suspended 0.51 -0.20 0.28 -0.14 0.92 0.69 0.65 0.82

M-ASSBY Bottom 0.94 -0.97 -0.35 -0.73 1.46 -0.08 0.13 0.42 Suspended 1.46 -0.13 0.51 0.04 0.69 0.73 0.78 0.78

S-ASSBY Bottom -0.51 -0.54 -0.07 -1.01 0.65 0.19 0.42 0.07 Suspended 0.19 1.39 0.26 -0.40 0.85 0.82 0.78 0.57

S-Control Bottom -0.14 -0.82 -0.44 -1.18 0.69 0.32 0.19 -0.15 Suspended -0.03 -0.32 -0.09 -0.25 0.61 0.65 0.46 0.69

Transects Pb Ni 0 km 1 km 3 km 5 km 0 km 1 km 3 km 5 km

N-Control Bottom -1.32 -0.59 -- -- 0.12 -0.56 -- -- Suspended -1.91 -0.45 -0.91 -0.26 -0.09 -0.23 -0.44 -0.23

N-ASSBY Bottom -0.45 -- -0.59 -0.38 -0.33 -- -0.33 -0.70 Suspended -0.59 -1.10 -1.10 -1.00 -0.23 -0.44 -0.33 -0.33

M-ASSBY Bottom -0.21 -0.82 -1.10 -1.00 -0.28 -0.70 -0.28 -0.50 Suspended -0.05 -1.00 -1.10 -1.32 0.12 -0.18 -0.33 -0.23

S-ASSBY Bottom -1.32 -1.45 -1.45 -1.32 -0.63 -0.70 -0.70 -0.50 Suspended -0.82 -0.59 -1.32 -1.10 -0.28 -0.39 -0.23 -0.23

S-Control Bottom -1.00 -1.32 -1.10 -1.00 -0.28 -0.92 -0.77 -0.70 Suspended -0.66 -1.32 -0.45 -0.82 -0.23 -0.33 -0.39 -0.28

111

Ecological Restoration and Planning forAlang-Sosiya Ship-Breaking Yard, Gujarat

8.4 CONCLUSION

Presently deposited unconsolidated bottom andsuspended sediments in and around AlangShipbreaking Yard were composed mainly of finesand, silt and clay, and the clay mineral assemblagewere dominated by the montmorillonite group.These sediments have the potential to trap heavymetals because of their large surface to mass ratioand high cation exchange capacity (CEC). Thestudy area represents a semiestuarine conditionwhere flocculation, adsorption-desorptionprocesses are active due to the presence of highlyionised sea water.

There was higher concentration of Cu in the studyarea. However, all other metals shows a ratio ofaround 1. At 0th km of M-ASSBY, the metals showa relative enrichment. The Igeo values shows that,the sediment quality ranged between unpollutedto moderately polluted category with respect to Fe,Mn and Cu. The sediments were not polluted withrespect to Zn, Pb and Ni concentration.

Thus it can be concluded that although thesediments in and around Alang have the potentialto trap a large quantity of heavy metals, they arestill mostly unpolluted with respect to heavymetals. The sediments may show higher pollutionif kept unmonitored for a long time.

112

Ecological Restoration and Planning forAlang-Sosiya Ship-Breaking Yard, Gujarat

9

SOCIO-ECONOMIC ASPECTS

Impact of ship-breaking activity offshore and onintertidal zones was analysed and discussed inChapter 6 and 7. While it appears that the offshoreimpact - say, at a distance of five kms -has beenminimal so far, the intertidal zone ]is experiencingsome pressure on its environmental quality. Oneof the major contributing factors in polluting theintertidal zone is the discharge of waste generateddue to very large human presence in and aroundASSBY. The situation onshore is worse as we shallpresently see.

The shipbreaking activity, as mentioned in Chapter1, was shifted out of Taiwan and Korea due to itslabour intensive character. When wages shot upin those countries with their burgeoningeconomies, the shipbreaking activity, in search ofcheap labour and with practically no regulatorymechanism, found strong foothold in threecountries of the Indian subcontinent, viz., India,Pakistan and Bangladesh. Among the threecountries, India (and, Gujarat in particular) is in aposition to take a large share of this growingbusiness due to the country's vast unsatiateddomestic market for steel. In this emergingscenario, which has been discussed at length inChapter 3, it is absolutely essential that the humanfactor is given due importance to optimise theeconomic benefits of ASSBY by obtaining lessexpensive steel for non-critical uses with negligiblecapital outlay.

As part of this study social scientists have examinedthe economic impacts of ship-breaking activity onneighbouring villages and on rerolling industry innearby industrial towns and more particularly theonshore environmental impacts due to unplannedgrowth of a large human settlement without properhousing facilities and civic amenities. In thischapter, we shall attempt to deal with the onshoreimpact of the entire ship-breaking activity onresident communities and on overall environment.

9.1 METHODOLOGY

A team of social scientists made frequent visits toASSBY site to gather information from primary andsecondary sources. Data on ship-breaking activityat Alang, composition of labour force, regulatorymechanism, process of breaking, storage andtransportation, etc., was gathered from GMB andthe ship breakers' association. Data relating to livingconditions, life style, health status, etc. of workerswas collected through direct interviews andthrough a detailed questionnaire given at a widelypublicised medical camp. This was reinforced byanother systematic sample survey of socio-economic conditions of workers by a separate teamunder the leadership of an eminent social scientist.Data were collected from workers' settlement as wellas from the eleven villages in the neighbourhood.A firm of consulting architects and planners wasalso retained to help in analysing the currenthaphazard settlement and for evolving futureapproach to the problem. Discussions with theinformed people at the site and empiricalobservation helped in further validating the data.In order to know the economic impact of ASSBY onits neighbouring villages, data was collected fromthe following 11 villages (Table 9.1, Fig. 9.1) fallingwithin its 10 km radius.

113

Ecological Restoration and Planning forAlang-Sosiya Ship-Breaking Yard, Gujarat

The data analysis has been done with the help ofsimple statistical techniques, like, percentage ratios,moving averages, etc. The tools used for thepurpose of data collection are summarised below:

114

Table 9.1 Proximity of villages* to ASSBY

Villages Distance from ASSBY (km)

1 Alang-Manar 0.5 2 Sosiya 0.5 3 Bharapara 3.0 4 Mathavda 4.0 5 Mandva 6.0 6 Jaspara 7.0 7 Padari (Gohil) 7.0 8 Sathara 8.0 9 Kathava 8.0 10 Chopada 8.0 11 Piparla 10.0

* Villages name as spelled in District Census Handbook, Bhavnagar.

Target group Tools used a) Neighbouring Villages i) Village Information Schedule

ii) Impact Assessment Schedule b) Workers i) House Hold Survey Schedule

ii) Health and Hygiene Survey Schedule c) Ship-breakers i) Self-administrated Questionnaire d) Public and Private agencies and leading informants

i) Personal Interview

Ecological Restoration and Planning forAlang-Sosiya Ship-Breaking Yard, Gujarat

Fig. 9.1. Neighbouring villages of ASSBY

115

Ecological Restoration and Planning forAlang-Sosiya Ship-Breaking Yard, Gujarat

9.2 NEIGHBOURING VILLAGES

Different villages were studied for theirdemographic profile, infrastructure facilities andassociation with ASSBY in terms of employmentgeneration.

9.2.1Demography

The demographic profile of the neighbouringvillages (Tables 9.2) shows that except for Alang-

Manar villages, no other village demonstrates anysignificant demographic change over a decade. Thiscould be due to relatively modest availability ofhousing and civic amenities in these villages andmost of the work force having migrated from distantareas, speaking different languages having shownpreference to live close. It should also be notedthat the entire workforce of about 30,000 people inASSBY area was not covered in the 1991 census. Itis obvious, therefore, that the census data do notreflect the true demographic scenario of the site. Inother words different linguistic and culturalbackground of the workforce and the logistic sectorshave led to minimising the direct physical impact ofASSBY on the villages.

Table 9.2 Population change in the neighbouring villages of ASSBY

Village Area No. of Households Population (ha) 1981 1991 1981 1991

Alang-Manar 1745.22 548 1292 3611 8774 Sosiya 778.65 264 316 1869 2115 Bharapara 424.84 087 141 660 1053 Mathavda 813.87 238 298 1570 2110 Mandva 709.00 157 210 1042 1255 Jaspara 1021.60 245 265 1675 1783 Padari (Gohi) 950.19 276 342 1964 2033 Sathara 658.56 331 405 2286 2657 Kathava 411.80 145 232 1203 1608 Piparla 737.18 422 505 2823 3235

Source: District Census Handbook 1991, National Informatics Centre, Rajkot.

9.2.2 Amenities and infrastructure

Along the 8-10 km long coastal strip of the ASSBYmore than 500 service sector establishments havemushroomed on the other side of the service roadsituated at the back of the shipbreaking plots, whichcater to the daily needs of ASSBY workforce. Thesocial infrastructure of ASSBY includes a bankbranch, a police station, a Red-cross dispensary, acouple of public sanitary block, an overhead tankfor water supply and the administrative blocks ofGujarat Maritime Board.

The ASSBY has been developed on the coastalland of Alang and Sosiya villages. But both thesevillages are poorly connected with the major

approach road linking ASSBY with the Bhavnagar-Veraval coastal highway. Several other villages inthe neighbourhood enjoy such road link resultingin better economic benefits from ASSBY largelybecause of relatively easy access to the yard forcommuting people. In this context, it is interestingto note that though Sosiya is less than one kmaway from ASSBY, it lost part of its work force in1991 as compared to that of 1981. It is recently thatthe Sosiya side of ASSBY is linked to the developedcomponent of shipbreaking yard through a bridgeconstructed on Manari river. Similarly, Alang villageis also very poorly connected with the majorapproach road. Though, ASSBY enjoys proximityof Alang as a village site, the whole villagesettlement is situated far away from ASSBY. It islargely because of this that Alang perhaps reflectsrelatively lower economic impact due to growth of

116

Ecological Restoration and Planning forAlang-Sosiya Ship-Breaking Yard, Gujarat

ASSBY.

It is village Manar on the major approach road thathas shown significant demographic change during1981-1991 (No such change is recorded in thecensus handbook for Manar village as it wasmerged with Alang village for the purpose of censusoperation). This suggests that daily commutingfacilities have been a critical factor in transmittingthe impact of ASSBY in favour of its neighbouringvillages.

9.2.3 Employment due to ASSBY

The worker population of almost all villages

117

Source: District Census Handbook 1991, National Informatics Centre,Rajkot.

Table 9.3 Distribution of workers in neighbouring villages of ASSBY

recorded some rise during the decade (Table 9.3).The ASSBY workers are clearly divided into twogroups. The major group comprises of the migrantworkers who are engaged in shipbreaking activity.The other is a relatively minor group whichcomprises of local people engaged in handling andselling of cabin materials salvaged from brokenships and catering to the variety of daily needs ofASSBY workers. This group of workers can be

further divided into wage employment and selfemployment. Table 9.4 gives an account of workersof nearby villages who get wage employment inthe ASSBY related service-sector grown along theapproach road as well as the service road of ASSBY.As shown in the table, approximately 5500 workersof neighbouring villages were found engaged inthe service sector at the time of field survey.

Workers Village Total Cultivators Agricultural

Labours Household Industries

Other Categories

1981 1991 1981 1991 1981 1991 1981 1991 1981 1991 Alang-Manar 1268 5544 601 602 440 492 61 8 166 4443 Sosiya 952 554 379 263 521 174 14 4 38 113 Bharapara 368 548 298 375 63 151 4 0 3 22 Mathavda 526 1041 248 569 211 390 14 7 53 75 Mandva 371 448 135 96 192 237 15 23 29 101 Jaspara 497 559 304 336 120 165 8 9 65 49 Padari 537 764 318 364 160 278 35 12 24 116 Sathara 882 966 449 476 290 254 28 15 115 221 Kathava 463 840 261 541 173 202 12 1 16 96 Piparla 1214 1142 615 532 487 446 38 21 74 143

Ecological Restoration and Planning forAlang-Sosiya Ship-Breaking Yard, Gujarat

118

Table 9.4 Workers of neighbouring villages employed in service sector ofASSBY

It seems that since the 1991 census a sizeablenumber of workers from neighbouring villages havemoved over to the service sector. The larger numbershown for Alang-Manar villages in 1991 censusunder other categories reflect the number of ASSBYworkers who lived in other villages due to betterinfrastructure at Manar.

Table 9.5 provides information on the householdswhich were found engaged in ASSBY related

activity on self employment basis. Approximately400 households of nearby villages were gainfullyengaged in activities like selling cabin materials,running petty shops in ASSBY area, selling water,milk and vegetables to Alang workers and runningsmall artisan activity in making cabin materialsaleable in rural markets. The estimated number ofjobs created by ASSBY for workers of itsneighbouring villages reaches upto 57% of the totalworkforce of these villages.

Table 9.5 Number of households engaged in ASSBY related activities

Villages No. of workers 1 Alang - Manar 1400 2 Sosiya 500 3 Bharapara 450 4 Mathavda 900 5 Mandva 325 6 Jaspara 300 7 Padari (Gohil) 325 8 Sathara 700 9 Kathava 125

10 Chopada 325 11 Piparla 050

Village Artisan Milk Water Selling Petty Misc. Total Activity Supply Supply Cabin Shops Materials

Alang-Manar 4 22 21 15 50 10 132 Sosiya 2 9 11 3 20 4 49 Bharapara 2 5 0 0 25 3 35 Mathavda 1 6 0 25 15 3 50 Mandva 1 10 0 0 17 2 40 Jaspara 1 0 0 6 25 2 34 Padari 2 9 0 22 15 1 49 Sathara 0 8 0 175 75 0 258 Kathava 3 10 0 12 20 0 45 Chopada 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Piparla 1 0 0 0 15 0 16 TOTAL 18 79 32 258 277 27 699

Ecological Restoration and Planning forAlang-Sosiya Ship-Breaking Yard, Gujarat

119

Beyond the ASSBY's neighbourhood of 10 kmradius, if the entire triangle of Alang, Bhavnagarand Sihor is taken into account, the growth ofASSBY may be found to have supported flow ofinvestments in more than 150 downstream industrialunits in re-rolling sector and in manufacturing ofoxygen. Over 6000 workers are employed in thesedownstream industrial units. Besides, over 600trucks daily operate carrying ship-plates to re-rollingmills from Alang and LPG and oxygen cylinders toASSBY. Over 100 trailers and equal number of smallpassenger vehicles operate for the transportationof goods and people to and from ASSBY. All puttogether the transport sector provides employmentto around 5000 people.

9.2.4 Land use pattern

The growth of ASSBY has brought changes in thepattern of land use. It was found during the fieldsurvey that some of the agricultural land parcelswere brought under non-agricultural uses,particularly those adjacent to the road or morefavourably exposed to the site of ASSBY. Forexample, some 15 to 17 plots of agricultural land ofManar village and 125 to 130 plots of Mathavdawere developed for selling the cabin material ofbroken ships. Cultivable and gouchar lands werediverted for these plots. As a result of changinglanduse pattern, the land price in some of the nearbyvillages appreciated significantly (Table 9.6).Maximum price appreciation was noticed in the caseof agricultural land of Alang, Mathavda, Kathava,Sosiya and Mandva villages and more particularlyfor the survey numbers falling on the roadside or

Table 9.6 Change in land prices in neighbouring villages of ASSBY

Village Index of Unit price in 1996 (base year 1981:100)

Alang 1000 Manar 300 Sosiya 650 Bharapara 175 Mathavda 1000 Mandva 650 Jaspara 200 Padari 200 Sathara 150 Kathava 600 Chopada 150 Piparla 150

Ecological Restoration and Planning forAlang-Sosiya Ship-Breaking Yard, Gujarat

120

exposed favourably to the site of ASSBY.Development of ASSBY has not brought anysignificant pressure on the existing stock of housesin nearby villages except in case of Manar. In all,197 housing units were occupied by workersengaged in shipbreaking in four villages. Of these,150 units were occupied in Manar, when the fieldsurvey was undertaken. Manar experiencedappreciation in the property price to the measure ofapproximately 300 percent in 1996 as compared tothe prices prevailing in early 1980s. In other villagesthe land price appreciated marginally.

9.3 PROFILE OF WORKERS

As part of this study, a sample survey wasundertaken, based on reporting at a medical camp,to assess the various facets of human presencesuch as living condition of workers, their agegroups, educational level, status of health, nativestate, factors of motivation, occupational health andsafety. However, this study based on response ofthose who voluntarily came to the speciallyorganised medical camp after due publicity needed

to be validated. Keeping this in view an independentsurvey led by an eminent social scientist was alsoconducted following the random samplingprocedure. The sample for the second survey waslarger. Despite the two different mode of sampling,there was a fair degree of similarity in data collectionin both surveys. Hence, the results presented beloware generated by integrating the findings of boththe studies.

9.3.1COMPOSITION

Mainly four divisions of labour were observedamong workers, viz., Battiwala - the labourers withspecialised skills of gas cutting; Malpani, the skilledlabourers for grading and separating iron, brassand copper; Helper - a person who helps Battiwalaat the time of cutting the plates of ship; and,Platewala, the person who moves cut plates fromwithin the plot to the loading place. Other ancillaryservices are being provided by Jodiwala, CraneOperator, Cleaners, Loaders, Sweepers andChowkidars. Table 9.7 gives break up of categoriesof workers.

Table 9.7 Category of workers involved in ship breaking activity

S.N. Category of Work Percentage 1 Mukadam 7.86 2 Battiwala 39.30 3 Jodiwala 13.10 4 Helper 21.83 5 Crane Driver 2.63 6 Oil Cleaner 0.87 7 Loader 3.49 8 Malpaniwala 4.80 9 Chowkidar 6.12 Total 100.00

Ecological Restoration and Planning forAlang-Sosiya Ship-Breaking Yard, Gujarat

The survey indicates that out of total 361 workerssurveyed, there was preponderance of workers fromthree states, viz., UP. Orissa and Bihar, togetheraccounting for 94.5% (Table 9.8). Although ASSBYis in Gujarat, only two workers from Gujarat were inshipbreaking activity at the time of survey. However,as shown earlier a large number of local people,particularly from nearby villages, are engaged invarious service sector activities.

Most of the workers (94%) have migrated withouttheir families. Majority of the workers belong tofarming families (Table 9.9) with a very low monthlyincome of about Rs. 1200.00 (Table 9.10).

State Number % U.P. 158 43.77 Orissa 106 29.36 Bihar 77 21.33 M.P. 4 1.11 Kerala 3 0.83 Rajasthan 3 0.83 Gujarat 2 0.55 Bengal 2 0.55 No. Resp. 2 0.55 Delhi 1 0.28 Haryana 1 0.28 Nepal 1 0.28 Maharashtra 1 0.28 Total 361 100.00

Table 9.8 Statewise Distribution of workers.

Table 9.9 Worker's occupation at their native places

SN Occupation Category Percentage 1 Farming 72.05 2 Farm Labour 18.35 3 Animal Husbandry 2.61 4 Artisan 5.24 5 Any other 1.75

Total 100.00

121

Ecological Restoration and Planning forAlang-Sosiya Ship-Breaking Yard, Gujarat

Table 9.10 Demography of workers' families at their native places

Further, the majority of the workers comes fromlarge families, i.e., average family size of over ten,and own a kachcha house/hut (Table 9.11 and 9.12).These figures indicate that the workers in theirnative places live under grim poverty.

S. N. Demographic Parameters Average 1 Size of the family 10.5 2 Number of adult males in family 3.9 3 Number of adult females in family 2.8 4 Number of children in family 3.7 5 Number of earning members in family 2.8 6 Family Income (Rs. per month) 1218.0

S. N. Type of Houses Percentage 1 Pucca 17.46 2 Kachcha 51.98 3 Huts 25.76 4 No response 4.80

Total 100.00

Table 9.11 Workers family house types at their native places

Table 9.12 House ownership of workers at their native places

S N Ownership Pattern Percentage 1 Own house 75.98 2 Rented House 20.09 3 No response 3.93

Total 100.0

122

Ecological Restoration and Planning forAlang-Sosiya Ship-Breaking Yard, Gujarat

Majority of workers belong to adult unmarriedgroup (Table 9.13 and 9.14). However, about 2.5%of total workers were found to be below 15 years ofage, undermining the laws against the child labourwhich requires that children below 16 years of ageshould not be engaged in hazardous tasks.

Table 9.14 Marital status of workers

9.3.2 Literacy

Table 9.15 indicates that the literacy rate amongASSBY workers is higher than average literacy rateof India. Further, it was much higher than averageliteracy rate in UP, Bihar and Orissa. This indicatesthat these workers are better qualified and moreenterprising. Obviously this is not the case offorced or 'push' migration. This factor is furthercorroborated when we see the income data.

Age Number % Below 15 9 2.49 15 to 18 2 0.55 18 to 21 81 22.44 Above 21 269 74.53

Table 9.13Age-wise distribution of workers

S.N. Marital Status Percentage 1 Married 26.20 2 Unmarred 73.26 3 Widower 0.44 Total 100.00

Table 9.15 Educational levels of workers.

Education Number % Illiterate 86 23.82 Upto primary 82 22.71 Upto High School 115 31.86 More than H. School 8 2.22 No response 70 19.39 Total 361 100.00

123

Ecological Restoration and Planning forAlang-Sosiya Ship-Breaking Yard, Gujarat

9.3.3 INCOME PATTERNS

Table 9.16 indicates that almost half of the workersearn annual income of Rs. 20,000 to Rs. 25,000, andabout 40% workers earn more than Rs. 25000 peryear. The difference in the income could beattributed to the skill of the labourer.

Table 9.17 Annual savings of workers

The savings figures indicate (Table 9.17) thatmajority of workers save more than Rs. 10,000/- peryear, mainly by restricting their expenditure onhousing. The workers, mainly from Bihar, Orissaand U.P, contributed about 40 to 50% of theirsavings to the families left behind in their nativeplaces.

Income (Rs. per year) Number % Less than 20000 34 9.42 20000-25000 177 49.03 25000-30000 10 2.77 30000-35000 29 8.03 35000-40000 94 26.04 Above 40000 17 4.71

Total 361 100.00

Table 9.16Annual income of workers

Savings (Rs. per year) Number % Upto 1000 29 8.03 1000-2000 6 1.66 2000-3000 6 1.66 3000-5000 10 2.77 5000-10000 77 21.33 Higher 244 62.05 No savings 9 2.49 Total 361 100.00

124

Ecological Restoration and Planning forAlang-Sosiya Ship-Breaking Yard, Gujarat

9.3.4 Living conditions

Though the workers earn more, there is a tendencyto save more by spending less, especially onhousing (Table 9.18, Plate 9.1).

A vast majority (96.2%) of workers live in smallhuts (Table 9.19), each having the size of about 100sq.ft. These huts are like slum dwellings where fiveto six persons live with an average floor space ofabout 22 sq. ft. (Table 9.20). The hut is generallyused only for sleeping purpose and often they sleepin shifts. The hut is a Kachcha structure made from

either log or ferrous scrap gathered from the wasteof the shipbreaking industry. The huts are withoutventilation or adequate air circulation. During therainy season they do not have any protectionagainst wind or rain. No hut has attached toiletfacility. In the same way not a singleaccommodation has either water or sewerage facility.

Table 9.19 Accommodation types used by workers

S. N. Expenditure (Rs. per month) % 1 Below 100 23.58 2 100-200 17.90 3 200-300 10.93 4 300-400 5.68 5 400-500 3.49 6 500 and above 3.49 7 Zero expenditure 34.93 Total 100.00

Table 9.18 Monthly expenditure of workers on housing

Type Number % Kachcha 11 3.2 Pucca 2 0.6 Hut 334 96.2 Total 347 100.00

125

Ecological Restoration and Planning forAlang-Sosiya Ship-Breaking Yard, Gujarat

PLATE 9.1 SLUM DWELLING AROUND ASSBY

126

Ecological Restoration and Planning forAlang-Sosiya Ship-Breaking Yard, Gujarat

Table 9.20 Average floor space available to a worker in a hut

The workers do not purchase much furniture. Only7.2% of workers have one cot each. Rest of themsleep on bare ground. Only a few workers (3.05%)have transistor radio sets and still very less (0.55%)have TV sets. Not a single worker has a cupboardand thus their belongings, mainly clothes, lie openon a string.

The housing scenario is so alarming at Alang thatvery few workers bring their families. It is evidentfrom Table 9.21 that only around 6% workers livedwith their families. Though around 32 percent ofthe workers had their own accommodation atASSBY, they did not find the living environmentconvenient for bringing their families.

The housing situations at Alang, has notdiscouraged respondent workers to the extent thatthey have stopped thinking in favour of bringingtheir families to Alang. When asked whether theywould like to bring their families if a colony is built

for them, about 52 percent of them feel that theywould like to bring their families if a worker's colonyis developed at Alang (Table 9.22).

Table 9.22 Preference of workers for staying with their families in a housingcolony at Alang

S.N. Kholi-type Space (sq. ft.) available 1 Large 33 2 Medium 27 3 Small 22

S.N. Worker's stay Percentage 1 With families 6.1 2 Without families 93.9

Total 100.0

Table 9.21 Workers staying with families at Alang

S.N. Preference Percentage 1 With family 52.28 2 Without family 33.18 3 Uncertain 13.54

Total 100.00

127

Ecological Restoration and Planning forAlang-Sosiya Ship-Breaking Yard, Gujarat

Majority of workers have settled down at ASSBYas approximately 40 percent of them stay at Alangfor more than 6 years (Table 9.23). Only 18 percentworkers have come recently to work in ASSBY.What worries them is perhaps the job security.The information contained in Table 9.24 shows

that more than 85 percent of workers covered underthe survey do not enjoy job security. This has giventhem a status of casual workers and discouragedthem from thinking in favour of settling down inASSBY area permanently.

9.3.5 Victuals

It is rather revealing that the workers in ASSBYspend good amount on their food. Only about 1percent of workers, spend less then Rs. 300/- permonth on their food items. More than 64% of

workers spend between Rs. 600 and Rs. 900 permonth on their food (Table 9.25). Moreover, lookingto the number of vegetables, fish and fruit vendorsand the grocery stores selling food items inferencecan be drawn that workers engaged in shipbreakingdo not stint on food.

Table 9.25 Expenditure of workers on food items

S.N. Period of Stay (years) Percentage 1 Less than 1 17.87 2 1 to 5 42.29 3 6 to 10 21.99 4 More than 10 17.85

Table 9.23 Worker's length of stay at Alang

Table 9.24 Worker's job status

S.N. Job Status Percentage 1 Permanent 14.41 2 Non-permanent 85.59

Total 100.00

S.N. Expenditure (Rs. per month) % 1 Below 300 0.9 2 300-600 13.5 3 600-900 64.2 4 900 and above 21.4

Total 100.0

128

Ecological Restoration and Planning forAlang-Sosiya Ship-Breaking Yard, Gujarat

to caters to the worker's need of these items. Morethan 50 percent of workers, spend more than Rs.200 per month on above items (Table 9.26).

The ASSBY workers - like most others who areengaged in physically demanding as well ashazardous work - are accustomed to spend moreon tea, beatel leaves, tobacco etc., for quickrelaxation during the long laborious and sometimesmonotonous working hours. Against eachshipbreaking plot, an average 3-4 shops are located

Safe drinking water is rare. Between two ship-breaking plots a cement tank is constructed inwhich mobile water tankers refill the water. Someplot owners have dug their own wells, from whichlabourers fetch water manually. There are no propersanitation and drainage facilities; the labourershave to go to closeby open places for toilet.Poor drinking water and drainage facilities lead torecurrence of water borne diseases around ASSBY.Water samples collected from this area recordedthe presence of various pathogens (Table 9.27).Most probable number (MPN) and Standard Plate

Count (SPC) of pathogens in different categoriesof samples was found higher than their safe limitsfor drinking water. The coliform density varies frommere presence (+) to abundant (+++). While salinecoastal and marine areas do not support theirsurvival for more than 24 hours, the estuarine waterat Alang contains a significant number of coliform.This indicates the overloading of faecal materialsin the estuarine water. Other pathogens likeSalmonella spp., Clostridium spp. andStaphylococcus spp. have also been observed inthe coastal and marine water of the study area.

S.N. Expenditure (Rs. per month) % 1 Below 100 18.8 2 100-200 31.0 3 200 and above 50.2

Total 100.0

Table 9.26 Expenditure on refreshment items

Pathogens Drinking Water

Freshwater ASSBY (Marine)

ASSBY (Control)

Average MPN (nos./100ml)

196 612 169 29

Average SPC (x102) 293 11453 172 451 Coliforms ++ +++ ++ + Salmonella spp. + + + + Clostridium spp. + + + + Staphylococcus spp. + - + -

Table 9.27 Pathogens population in the waters of ASSBY

129

Ecological Restoration and Planning forAlang-Sosiya Ship-Breaking Yard, Gujarat

9.3.6 Health and hygiene

Health and Hygiene of those who work and stayat ASSBY need urgent attention. Shipbreaking isprone to occupational health hazards - typical ofthe nature of work of breaking the ships throughthe oxy-acetylene gas cutting method. Loss oflimbs or lives is not uncommon in this industry.Small cuts and burns are received often by workersand rarely a complaint is made for such injuries. Itis believed that such losses are computable andthe laws regarding compensation are more or lessclear. Therefore, shipbreaking at Alang is not aspecial case of occupational risks.

But this is an oversimplification of the problem.We need to look beyond the calculus of loss and

compensation. Though the problem of worker'ssafety is very much at the core, there are severaldiseases which regularly hit the workers at Alang.Our approach, in this study, was not restricted tostudy the cause and effect of occupational hazardsin shipbreaking activity but also to take into accountthe total working and living environment.

The District Leprosy Control Unit of Bhavnagarhas organised four check up camps for ASSBYworkers, between September 1995 and August 1996examining total of 20,000 workers. The highpresence of both MB (infectious) and PB (non-infectious) types of leprosy cases were identifiedamong ASSBY workers (Table 9.28). These casesreflect poor hygienic and cramped living conditionsof workers who share common accommodations.

Table 9.28 Number of leprosy cases among the workers of different states.

Source: Leprosy Control Unit, Bhavnagar District, Bhavnagar

A private qualified medical practitioner hasestablished 10 bed hospital with X-Ray facilitiesin ASSBY area. He supplied detailed informationof incidence of diseases based on 939 casesreported to his hospital during a period of twomonths. Of these, 175 cases of serious nature werereferred to Bhavnagar for further treatment. Hisestimate of deaths of workers due to accidentswhile undergoing shipbreaking activity rangesbetween 2 to 5 per week on an average. Sinceofficial record of such deaths is not available, thiscould be a case of exaggeration. During the studyteam's visits to ASSBY, cases of fatal and non-fatal injuries were mentioned in general terms. Thesame medical practitioner also found high rate ofmorbidity among the employees who worked after5.0 p.m. due to extreme exhaustion. On two

occasions when the team visited his hospital, allthe ten beds were found occupied by patientssuffering from burns, fracture, fever, etc.The team met a few non-qualified medicalpractitioners who have set up their 'clinics' alongthe ASSBY service road. These doctors hail fromU.P., Bihar and Orissa and have a close bond withtheir patients due to common language and regionalbackground. Information drawn from differentsources suggest that unqualified practitioners maybe about 100 in number at ASSBY. They seem tohave thriving practice.

The Red-cross society of Bhavnagar hasestablished a clinic with one doctor. The team wasinformed that this clinic treats 25-30 cases of out-door patients everyday. This clinic has no facilities

Type Orissa Bihar U.P. Other States

Total

MB 28 11 11 02 52 PB 53 35 52 02 142 Total 81 46 63 04 194

130

Ecological Restoration and Planning forAlang-Sosiya Ship-Breaking Yard, Gujarat

for indoor patients. Its expansion was, however, atplanning stage.

Further, during the survey it was recorded that manyof the workers suffered more than one ailments.Different types of ailments and their frequenciesare presented in Table 9.29. The Table shows thatall ailments identified during the camp had no directrelationship with shipbreaking activity. For example,back-pain, chest pain, hydrocil, skin ailment orrespiratory diseases manifest after a long gestationperiod. It is obviously difficult for any worker to

ask for compensation for the loss of theirfunctioning. Inhalation of burnt fumes of carbonmonoxide and carbon dioxide cause respiratoryailments after some time-lag. Falciperum-malaria,typhoid, etc. are caused because of poor hygieneand non-availability of potable water. Tables 9.30and 9.31 record the frequency of diseases andaccidents occurred to workers in the last one year.It is revealing that 78 percent of workers complainedabout the recurrence of ailments in a period of oneyear.

Frequency No. of workers Percentage Once 40 17.47 Twice 179 78.17 Thrice 10 4.36 Total 229 100.00

Table 9.30 Frequency of diseases in last one year

Source : Medical camp, January 12, 1997, Alang

S. N.

Diseases/Ailments No. of affected workers

Percentage of Diseases Affected

workers 1 Alimentary Canal related

diseases 50 26.19

2 Skin Ailments 44 23.04 3 ENT related 41 21.47 4 Pain in waist/back 33 17.28 5 Eye 32 16.75 6 Respiratory 28 14.66 7 Chest pain 21 10.99 8 Orthopaedic 20 10.47 9 Teeth 18 09.42

10 Fever 11 05.76 11 Hydrocil 04 02.09 12 Hb-deficiency 03 01.57 13 Central Nervous system 02 01.05 14 Cardio Vascular 01 00.52

Table 9.29 Incidence of diseases

131

Ecological Restoration and Planning forAlang-Sosiya Ship-Breaking Yard, Gujarat

Table 9.31 Accidents occurred to workers

S. N. Accidents Number Percentage 1 Occurred 90 39.3 2 Not occurred 139 60.7

Total 229 100.0

The team collected data on the body weight statusof workers who reported at the medical camp. Thestandard weight chart was used to know the weightloss caused either by morbidity, hardwork,nutritional deficiency or by all these factors puttogether. Table 9.32 provides information on thehealth status of workers using weight as a proxyvariable. It was interesting to know that 64 percent

of workers were found having normal weight as perthe standard weight chart prescribed with referenceto varying age and height groups. Though onlytwo percent of them had more than normal orstandard weight, almost 34 percent workers werefound having weight below the normal level. Thissituation is relatively better than the nationalaverage.

Table 9.32 Weight status of ASSBY workers by age and height

Age Group Number in different groups Normal Below Above Total Normal Normal

18 to 22 21 12 2 35 23 to 27 24 10 1 35 28 to 32 17 17 1 35 33 to 37 28 6 0 34 38 to 42 22 13 0 35 43 and above 10 6 0 16 Total 122 64 4 190 Percentage 64.21 33.68 2.11 100

Further analysis of intensity of weight loss ofsample workers highlights that 78 percent workerswho suffered weight loss were within the range of1 to 5 kg (Table 9.33). Whereas, remaining 22

percent suffered weight loss within the range of 6to 10 kg. It is also important to note that those whosuffered weight loss, represented relatively youngerage-groups.

Table 9.33 Distribution of workers having below normal weightUnderweight (kg) No. of Workers %

1 13 20.31 2 10 15.63 3 12 18.75 4 7 10.94 5 8 12.50

Sub-total (I) 50 78.30 6 4 6.25 7 2 3.13 8 1 1.56

10 2 3.13 11 1 1.56 13 3 4.69 16 1 1.56

Sub-total (II) 14 21.87 Grand Total (I + II) 64 100.00

132

Ecological Restoration and Planning forAlang-Sosiya Ship-Breaking Yard, Gujarat

9.3.7 Industrial safety

No safety standards are observed either by workersor by plot management. The survey revealed thatabout 4% workers had met with accidents and 3%workers suffered burns atleast twice. Only a minorproportion of workers (0.55%) suffered injuries morethan twice. About 5.3% of workers have reportedorthopaedic injuries. However, it was seen that theinjuries which merit special attention relate only toa few cases of burns.

Working hours are not fixed as about 38% workersworked upto 8 hours; 54% workers worked between8 and 12 hours. About 7 workers have reportedmore than 12 hours of work.

The state of industrial safety was found to be pooras only very few plot owners provide safetyequipments and articles, viz., shoes, cap, gloveseye glasses, etc. Only a little population of workers(2.8%) have reported using helmets as safetymeasures during the work. Only one worker wasreported using gloves, while, only two workers eachreported using shoes and gas masks. Only threeworkers reported having welding glasses. It isnecessary to remember here that gas cutting is theprime work here. While majority of workers haveacquired skills by experience, 8.9% workers reportedthat had some training for such skills.

The nozzles of gas cylinders are made of rubberwhere there is chance of melting due to heat andconsequent explosion. Seldom, shipowners beachthe ship without adequate inspection and start thebreaking process with oil in fuel tanker. The chancesof accident due to fire and explosion thus increase.Controlling fire in the ship beached in water is noteasy. Special skills of fire control on ships have yetto be developed at ASSBY. It is, however, notproposed to make a detailed report of industrialsafety or management practices at Alang since thatwould be outside the scope of this study.

Generally, the ship breaking industry falls underFactories Act which must be followed. Somelabourers responded that the Provident Fund (PF)is deducted by owners but no receipt is given. Theworker rarely knows his accumulation in ProvidentFund (PF). When a labourer resigns or changes hiswork place, his accumulated amount in the PF israrely paid.

It is quite clear from the two surveys that theworkforce is predominantly from three states,namely, UP, Bihar and Orissa, which are generallylower in all India averages of per capita income,agricultural productivity, employment opportunitiesand in general social and economic development.The labour force is predominantly rural, largelydepending on agriculture. A large percentage ofworkers earn about Rs. 2000/- or more per monthand have a tendency to save to assist the largerfamily in the native place. An average worker hasstrong family ties. He goes to his native place atleastonce a year despite long distance, preferably duringthe agricultural season so that he can assist thefamily physically also. He seems to shun all luxuriesand manages to live in sub-human condition. He,however, knows that his main objective to earn andsave depends on his physical fitness and therefore,does not stint on food and generally manages toremain physically fit.

The selection of site at Alang for establishment ofa shipbreaking yard apparently had no reference tothe development of area economy. This is preciselythe reason why ASSBY looks as a graft over theentire sub-region. Nevertheless, growth of ASSBYhas exerted positive impact on nearby villages, moreparticularly, in terms of employment generation. TheASSBY has brought about almost full employmentsituation in its neighbourhood.

133


Recommended