Geeta BatraForeign Investment Advisory Service
The World Bank
FDI-Trends
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
US
$ bi
llion
FDI f low s Portfolio equity f low s Other private f low s
So urce : Wo rld Bank. 2000. Glo ba l Develo pment Finance .
Foreign direct investment (FDI) has come to swamp all other financialflows . For aid programs that promote foreign investment the question isthus whether such promotion activities are a cost-effective pursuit ofpoverty reduction through increased growth.
Beneficial Effects of FDI-Stylized FactsBeneficial Effects of FDI-Stylized Facts
• Promotes Growth through rapid and efficienttransfer and adoption of “best practice” acrossborders. FDI translates this into broad-basedgrowth, not least by upgrading human capital.
• Reduces adverse shocks to the poor resulting fromfinancial instability
• Improves corporate governance.• Improve environmental and labor standards
(contrary to popular criticism), because foreigninvestors tend to be concerned about reputation inmarkets, where high standards are seen asdesirable.
• Finally, FDI generates taxes that support thedevelopment of a safety net for the poor.
Typical Profile of MNCsTypical Profile of MNCs
•Bigger (employ larger numbers of workers)•Invest more in technology and training•More productive (efficient)•Pay higher wages•Raise productivity levels of domestic firms throughspillovers
What Influences the Locational Decision of MNCs?What Influences the Locational Decision of MNCs?Enhanced Access to Domestic or International Markets
Lower costs of Production
A Stable, Low Risk economic and political environment
SKILLED WORKFORCE
Control: They avoid ownership restrictions and governmentownership
Clarity in Laws and Regulations
“Positive Attitude towards FDI: Reflected in Laws and Policies
Tax IncentivesBased on a FIAS Survey of Investors, 1999.
Overall Investment Climate is Important for FDIOverall Investment Climate is Important for FDI
Regulations
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Business
Customs
Labor
Foreign
Environ
Fire
High
Tax
China
India
Financial ConstraintsFinancial Constraints
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Collateral Requirements
Bank Paperw ork
High Interest Rates
Special Connections
Banks lack money to
Access to foreign
Access to non-bank
Access to Specialized
Access to lease
Inadequate Credit
China
India
Quality of Public ServicesQuality of Public Services
Quality of Public ServicesPercent firms ranking poor
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Customs
Courts
Roads
Telephone
Power
Water
Health
Overall Gvt Efficiency
China
India
14
2 4
6
0
10
20
Barriers to GrowthBarriers to Growth
Source: Economic Intelligence Unit
GD
P/c
apit
a
First wave ofFirst wave ofeconomic reformseconomic reforms
Second wave ofSecond wave ofeconomic reformseconomic reforms
Indexed to US = 100 in 1998
1947 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
10%
5.5%4%
GDP growth rate
Productmarketbarriers
• Small scalereservations
• FDI restrictions• Poor regulation• High import
duties• Unequal taxes
2.3
India(Completereforms)
10.1
THREE KEY BARRIERS CONSTRAIN INDIA’S GROWTHTHREE KEY BARRIERS CONSTRAIN INDIA’S GROWTHCAGR (2000-2010)
0.3
Others barriers:• Labour market• Roads & ports
infrastructure
India(Statusquo)
5.5
1.3
Landmarketbarriers
• Unclear titles• Tenancy laws• Low property taxes
and low usercharges
0.7
Governmentownership
• Central PSUs• State PSUs
including power• Municipal services
THREE KEY BARRIERS CONSTRAIN INDIA’S GROWTHTHREE KEY BARRIERS CONSTRAIN INDIA’S GROWTHCAGR (2000-2010)
Productmarketbarriers
• Small scalereservations
• FDI restrictions• Poor regulation• High import
duties• Unequal taxes
2.3
India(Completereforms)
10.10.3
Others barriers:• Labour market• Roads & ports
infrastructure
India(Statusquo)
5.5
1.3
Landmarketbarriers
• Unclear titles• Tenancy laws• Low property taxes
and low usercharges
0.7
Governmentownership
• Central PSUs• State PSUs
including power• Municipal services
REMOVAL OF PRODUCT MARKET BARRIERS LED TODRAMATIC GROWTH IN THE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRYREMOVAL OF PRODUCT MARKET BARRIERS LED TODRAMATIC GROWTH IN THE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRYIndex: India = 100 in 1992-93
1992-93 1999-00
100
356
256%increase
Labourproductivity
100
380
1992-93 1999-00
Output
1992-93 1999-00
111100
11%increase
Employment
Source: Interviews, SIAM, Annual reports
BarriersRemoved
• Licensingabolished
• FDI allowed
280%increase
PRODUCT MARKET BARRIERS HAMPER THE EFFICIENCYOF DOMESTIC APPAREL…PRODUCT MARKET BARRIERS HAMPER THE EFFICIENCYOF DOMESTIC APPAREL…
Note: Asia includes Sri Lanka, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Hong Kong, South China, BangladeshSource: NIFT survey American Apparel Manufacturers Association
Barriers
• Small-scaleindustryreservation inapparel andtextile
• Non-levelexcise dutieson textiles
Average rejection levelPer cent
Low scale
Low scalemachines per factory
India
China
50
500
Comparison between Indian and Chinese manufacturers
Poor qualityof fabric
India
China
3.3
1.8
11.3
38.1
Of top 10quotacountries*
… MAKING INDIAN APPAREL EXPORTS VULNERABLE… MAKING INDIAN APPAREL EXPORTS VULNERABLE
* US, Germany, UK, France, Italy, Belgium, Canada, Spain, Austria, Denmark** Japan, Netherlands, Switzerland, Sweden, Australia, Norway, Singapore, Poland, Korea, Chile
Source: UN International Trade Statistics
Per cent of total apparel imports
Of top 10non-quotacountries**
From China
3.2 1.6
Of top 10quotacountries*
Of top 10non-quotacountries**
From India
-50%
+337%
BAN ON FDI CONSTRAINS GROWTH OF MODERNRETAIL SECTOR …BAN ON FDI CONSTRAINS GROWTH OF MODERNRETAIL SECTOR …
Source: Euromonitor, McKinsey
Per cent; USD billion
8585
4040
15
60 6480 90
98
2210102020
3636
Tha
iland
Indi
a
Chi
na
Traditionalchannel
Modernchannel
100%= 22 55 325 180
US
2325
Bra
zil
Pol
and
100
India’s share of modern retail is low...
Country
FDI presence
Thailand
• 7 of top 10retailers
China
• 3 of top 10retailers
Poland
• 7 foreignhypermarketoperators
• Top 3 players(30% share)
Brazil
… partly because of restrictions on FDI
… LIMITING THEIR BENEFITS THROUGHOUT THE FOODCHAIN… LIMITING THEIR BENEFITS THROUGHOUT THE FOODCHAINTraditional supply chain
Farms
Consolidator
Commission Agent
Trader
Commission Agent
Wholesaler
Traditional Retailer
Supply chain restructuredby modern formats
Farms
Processor
Modern Retailer
Widely sharedWidely sharedgains of moderngains of modernformat retailingformat retailing
•8 million jobs inthe sector*
•10 per centlower prices
•Lower wastagesin the foodchain
•Higher pricesfor farmers
• Investment infood processing
THREE KEY BARRIERS CONSTRAIN INDIA’S GROWTHTHREE KEY BARRIERS CONSTRAIN INDIA’S GROWTHCAGR (2000-2010)
Source: McKinsey analysis
Productmarketbarriers
• Small scalereservations
• FDI restrictions• Poor regulation• High import
duties• Unequal taxes
2.3
India(Completereforms)
10.10.3
Others barriers:• Labour market• Roads & ports
infrastructure
India(Statusquo)
5.5
1.3
Landmarketbarriers
• Unclear titles• Tenancy laws• Low property taxes
and low usercharges
0.7
Governmentownership
• Central PSUs• State PSUs
including power• Municipal services
LAND MARKET BARRIERS LIMIT THE SIZE OF INDIANHOUSING CONSTRUCTION …LAND MARKET BARRIERS LIMIT THE SIZE OF INDIANHOUSING CONSTRUCTION …
Source: NICMAR; CSO; McKinsey Global Institute
Per cent, 1997
Barriers
• Unclear titles
• Low propertytaxes and usercharges
• Rent controllaws
Share ofemployment
3
3
5
5
1
Share of GDP
4
5
6
3
1
US
Korea
Brazil
India
Russia
Sectorcould
create over3 million
jobs in 10years
…RESULTING IN DISPROPORTIONATELY HIGHLAND COSTS……RESULTING IN DISPROPORTIONATELY HIGHLAND COSTS…
Source: Colliers Jardine, Asia Pacific Property Trends (October 1999); The Economist (1996)
KualaLumpur
2 6 7 9 12 13 1322
52
100
115
Indexed to New Delhi = 100; Ratio of land cost per sq. m. to GDP per capita in 1999
Sydney Bangkok Tokyo Singapore Jakarta Seoul Taipei Bangalore MumbaiNewDelhi
THREE KEY BARRIERS CONSTRAIN INDIA’S GROWTHTHREE KEY BARRIERS CONSTRAIN INDIA’S GROWTHCAGR (2000-2010)
Productmarketbarriers
• Small scalereservations
• FDI restrictions• Poor regulation• High import
duties• Unequal taxes
2.3
India(Completereforms)
10.10.3
Others barriers:• Labour market• Roads & ports
infrastructure
India(Statusquo)
5.5
1.3
Landmarketbarriers
• Unclear titles• Tenancy laws• Low property taxes
and low usercharges
0.7
Governmentownership
• Central PSUs• State PSUs
including power• Municipal services
INCREASE IN CAPITAL PRODUCTIVITY WILLDRAMATICALLY REDUCE INVESTMENT REQUIREMENTSINCREASE IN CAPITAL PRODUCTIVITY WILLDRAMATICALLY REDUCE INVESTMENT REQUIREMENTSIndexed to U.S. (1996) = 100
* Assumes 1 MW of capacity costs $1 million currently** Assumes steel capacity will be put up at 25% higher capacity created with assets; (resulting in a cost per ton of US$ 350 per ton
as compared to US$ 440 per ton in plants put up recently)Source: McKinsey analysis
65
90
Steel
39
100
Power generationCurrentproductivity
Potentialproductivity
Currentproductivity
Potentialproductivity
Total savings= US $52 billion
Telecom
59
100
Currentproductivity
Potentialproductivity
30%
20%
Poverty reduction (1992-94) was higher instates with good investment climates
-20%
0
-10%
10%
Poor
State investment climateGood
UttarPradesh
WestBengal
Kerala
Punjab
TamilNadu
Karnataka AndraPradesh
Gujarat Maharashtra
States with good investment climateshad good growth
FDI Investment Growth
➃ Results of firm surveys completed in 85 countries (controlling forsize, sector):
Financing -2.46*
(0.62)
High Taxes -1.69**
(0.73)
Predictability of Policies -3.75*
(1.47)
Corruption -2.57***
(1.45)
Education 2.78*
(0.76)
Formal Training 2.07*
(0.25)
Enterprise Training by OwnershipEnterprise Training by Ownership
…Training levels vary with level of economic development…MNCs have higher levels of training than domestic firms
Training and Foreign Ownership
00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9
1
Trinida
d and
Tob
ago
Pakist
anIn
done
sia
Haiti
El Salv
ador US
China
Venez
uela
Costa
Rica USArg
entin
aCan
ada
Singap
ore
% F
irm
s T
rain
ing
Domestic Firms Training
Foreign Firm Training
Total
Source: WBES 2000
Enterprise Training by Firm Size
…Across countries training increases with firm size
Formal Training and Firm Size
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
ChinaPak
istan
Mala
ysia
Indo
nesia
Singap
ore
Phillip
ines
Tota
l
% F
irm
s T
rain
ing
Small
Medium
Large
Source: WBES 2000
Source: WBES 2000
…Skilled workers readily hired from other firms, use of maturetechnologies, informal training adequate, high labor turnover are themain constraints to training in LAC.
MARKET FAILURES IN TRAINING?LAC: Principal Constraints to Training (Identified by Firms)-Regional Average
Reasons for little or no training-LAC
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Limited Resources
Labor Turnover
Lack knowledge
Mature Technologies
Skilled Workers readily available
Institutions meet needs
Skeptical about benefits
Informal training adequate
% Firms
…Findings not unique to LAC.Use of mature technologies, informal training being adequate and highlabor turnover cited as key reasons for little or no training in East Asiatoo
EAST ASIA: Principal Constraints toTraining (Identified by Employers)
Reasons for little or no Training-EAST ASIA
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Limited Resources
Labor Turnover
Lack knowledge
Mature Technologies
Availability of workers
Skeptical about benefits
Informal training adequateR
easo
ns fo
r lit
tle
or n
o tr
aini
ng
Percentage of Firms
Source: WBES 2000
KEY ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED• Under-investment in training by enterprises in developing countries
2. In countries which have a payroll levy (Guatemala, Nicaragua)enterprises that contribute to the levy do not benefit from it--most publicinstitution programs are directed at pre-employment programs and theinformal sector; but even here gaps exist
3. Capacity for internal and external generation of technical assistanceand expertise is weak--poor links between technologically
advanced large enterprises and SMEs.
4. Enterprise development is not linked to human resource development--Although enterprises recognize the need for training they have notinvested in it (market failures).
KEY ISSUES …• There is a concentration of training programs within large cities
• Allocation of majority funds from the payroll levy to a single publictraining provider (INTECAP, SENA, INATEC) leads to an insensitivityof supply to training needs and hence makes them less market-driven.
• The Supply of Training is relatively weak and lacks diversity--nosignificant entry of private providers in smaller countries; firms arediscouraged by the double payment involved in using providers otherthan the public training providers.
• What is the role for government?