+ All Categories
Home > Documents > GENDER GENDER DIFFERENCES Gender and sex “Disadvantaged groups” Participation rate Achievement.

GENDER GENDER DIFFERENCES Gender and sex “Disadvantaged groups” Participation rate Achievement.

Date post: 11-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: barnaby-carter
View: 223 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
33
GENDER GENDER GENDER DIFFERENCES Gender and sex “Disadvantaged groups” Participation rate Achievement
Transcript
Page 1: GENDER GENDER DIFFERENCES Gender and sex “Disadvantaged groups” Participation rate Achievement.

GENDERGENDER

GENDER DIFFERENCESGender and sex“Disadvantaged groups”Participation rateAchievement

Page 2: GENDER GENDER DIFFERENCES Gender and sex “Disadvantaged groups” Participation rate Achievement.

BiologicalGender-segregated educationTeacher expectancy and interactionCognitive variableConfidence and other affective variablesAttribution and fear of successSocial shaping: mathematics as a male domain

Attempted explanations

Page 3: GENDER GENDER DIFFERENCES Gender and sex “Disadvantaged groups” Participation rate Achievement.

1. Females are as good as males in geometry.2. Studying mathematics is just as appropriate for women as for men.3. I would trust a woman just as much as I would trust a man to figure out important calculations. 4. Girls can do just as wells as boys in mathematics.5. Males are not naturally better than females in mathematics.6. Women certainly are logical enough to do well in mathematics.7. It’s hard to believe a female could be a genius in mathematics8. When a woman has to solve a math problem, it is feminine to ask a man for help.9. I would have more faith in the answer for a math problem solved by a man than a woman.10. Girls who enjoy studying math are a bit peculiar.11. Mathematics is for men; arithmetic is for women.12. I would expect a woman mathematician to be a masculine type of person.

Mathematics as a Male Domain

Page 4: GENDER GENDER DIFFERENCES Gender and sex “Disadvantaged groups” Participation rate Achievement.
Page 5: GENDER GENDER DIFFERENCES Gender and sex “Disadvantaged groups” Participation rate Achievement.
Page 6: GENDER GENDER DIFFERENCES Gender and sex “Disadvantaged groups” Participation rate Achievement.
Page 7: GENDER GENDER DIFFERENCES Gender and sex “Disadvantaged groups” Participation rate Achievement.
Page 8: GENDER GENDER DIFFERENCES Gender and sex “Disadvantaged groups” Participation rate Achievement.
Page 9: GENDER GENDER DIFFERENCES Gender and sex “Disadvantaged groups” Participation rate Achievement.

※ males hold more functional beliefs about themselves as learner

※ gender differences more prevalent among older students

※ math viewed as male domain, more so by males

※ confidence is critical in participation ※ females less likely to contribute math success

to ability and failure to lack of effort ※ external influence influences students’ beliefs

Page 10: GENDER GENDER DIFFERENCES Gender and sex “Disadvantaged groups” Participation rate Achievement.

※ womenless math ※ women in math ※ women as a problem in math ※ women as central to math ※ math reconstructed

Page 11: GENDER GENDER DIFFERENCES Gender and sex “Disadvantaged groups” Participation rate Achievement.

CONCRETE

ABSTRACT

SAME PERFORMANCE

CONCRETE

ABSTRACT

SAME PERFORMANCE

NOT AS GOOD PERFORMANCE IN

HIGHER MATH

BETTER PERFORMANCE IN

HIGHER MATH

CONCRETE

ABSTRACT

SAME PERFORMANCE

NOT AS GOOD PERFORMANCE IN

HIGHER MATH

BETTER PERFORMANCE IN

HIGHER MATH

IN-BORN/SOCIAL

SHAPING

Page 12: GENDER GENDER DIFFERENCES Gender and sex “Disadvantaged groups” Participation rate Achievement.

「拒絕『成功』」?

Page 13: GENDER GENDER DIFFERENCES Gender and sex “Disadvantaged groups” Participation rate Achievement.

“Fennema & Sherman (1976, 1978) developed their attitude scales for the purpose of research on gender-related differences in mathematics achievement, but their impact has been felt widely in all research on attitudes towards mathematics” (McLeod, 1994)

- attitude towards success- mathematics as a male domain- confidence- motivation- usefulness

AFFECTAFFECT

Page 14: GENDER GENDER DIFFERENCES Gender and sex “Disadvantaged groups” Participation rate Achievement.

“… almost reducing it (the concept of attitude) to the pseudo-definition ‘attitude is what attitude questionnaires measure’” (Daskalogianni & Simpson, 2000, p. 217 – see Martino, 2003)

Page 15: GENDER GENDER DIFFERENCES Gender and sex “Disadvantaged groups” Participation rate Achievement.

Beliefs- About mathematics- About self- About mathematics teaching- About the social contextAttitudesEmotionsSelf-conceptMathematics anxiety

Re-conceptualisation: from “residual” to Mandler’s theory

Page 16: GENDER GENDER DIFFERENCES Gender and sex “Disadvantaged groups” Participation rate Achievement.

Two basic approaches (Hannula, 2002): - “simple” definition describes it as the degree of affect associated with mathematics- 3-component definition distinguishes emotional response, beliefs, and behaviour as components of attitude

Page 17: GENDER GENDER DIFFERENCES Gender and sex “Disadvantaged groups” Participation rate Achievement.

Attitude in cognitive-emotional terms (Hannula, 2002)

• When engaged in doing math: emotion• When not engaged: emotional disposition, as measured by questionnaire, base on experiences• Respond to questionnaire for a longer period: additional cognitive process• In further discussions: based on cognitive analysis

RepresentationRepresentation

Page 18: GENDER GENDER DIFFERENCES Gender and sex “Disadvantaged groups” Participation rate Achievement.

Local/global affects and pathways

Exploratory Problem-defining heuristicsHeuristics for understanding problem

Useful problem-solving heuristicsChallenge to authority-based problem-solving

Insight (imagistic)

Acceptance of authority-based problem solvingDefense MechanismsHeuristics of avoidance and denial Concealment of Inadequacies

Frustration

Anxiety

Fear/ Despair

Global structures self/mathematics/ science /

technology-hatred

Curiosity

Puzzlement

Bewilderment

Encouragement

Pleasure

Elation

Satisfaction

Global structures specific representation schemata,

general self-concept structure

Emotion – attitude – beliefs – values Influence of beliefs of others/society, societal belief .

Page 19: GENDER GENDER DIFFERENCES Gender and sex “Disadvantaged groups” Participation rate Achievement.

1. Simple definition: attitude is a general emotional disposition toward a certain subject 2. Attitude has three components: an emotional response, the beliefs regarding the subject, the intentional behavior toward the subject 3. Attitude is the pattern of beliefs and emotions regarding a certain subject.

“epistemologically correct attitude” – bidimensional definition

Martino & Zan (2001a, 2002)

Page 20: GENDER GENDER DIFFERENCES Gender and sex “Disadvantaged groups” Participation rate Achievement.

• Ontology: do people actually possess “things” called beliefs ?• Generation: even if people hold and sustain beliefs and attitudes, it is not at all clear that beliefs and attitudes actually generate behaviour.• Revelation: whether such things can be externally observable.

Belief – behaviour

Page 21: GENDER GENDER DIFFERENCES Gender and sex “Disadvantaged groups” Participation rate Achievement.

“The student must:• understand that the new informations are in contradiction with the belief• believe that it’s necessary to overcome the contradiction• want to resolve the contradiction.”

Change of beliefs (Martino, 2003)

Page 22: GENDER GENDER DIFFERENCES Gender and sex “Disadvantaged groups” Participation rate Achievement.

Relationship between affects & achievements

Other related notions- confidence- attribution- motivation- locus of control- fear of success- engagement

Page 23: GENDER GENDER DIFFERENCES Gender and sex “Disadvantaged groups” Participation rate Achievement.

Given

Goal

Process

Open Open Open

Cognitive engagement

Affective engagement

Behavioral engagement

Problem solving abilities

A priori model for path analyses

Page 24: GENDER GENDER DIFFERENCES Gender and sex “Disadvantaged groups” Participation rate Achievement.
Page 25: GENDER GENDER DIFFERENCES Gender and sex “Disadvantaged groups” Participation rate Achievement.

MODELS OF MATHEMATICS LEARNINGMODELS OF MATHEMATICS LEARNING

Fennema (1985)

Page 26: GENDER GENDER DIFFERENCES Gender and sex “Disadvantaged groups” Participation rate Achievement.

Eccles (1985)

Page 27: GENDER GENDER DIFFERENCES Gender and sex “Disadvantaged groups” Participation rate Achievement.

Attitude To Learning Maths (time 1)

Subjective Norm For Learning Maths (tim

e 1)

Behaviour intention To Learn Maths (Time 1

)

Maths Learning Behaviour (time 1)

Maths Achievement (time 1)

Maths Learning (Time 2)

Maths Achievement (time 2

)

Norwich & Jaeger (1989)

Page 28: GENDER GENDER DIFFERENCES Gender and sex “Disadvantaged groups” Participation rate Achievement.

Haladyna, Shaughnessy, & Shaughnessy (1983)

Page 29: GENDER GENDER DIFFERENCES Gender and sex “Disadvantaged groups” Participation rate Achievement.

Walberg, 1984

Page 30: GENDER GENDER DIFFERENCES Gender and sex “Disadvantaged groups” Participation rate Achievement.

Ethington & Wolfle (1986)

Page 31: GENDER GENDER DIFFERENCES Gender and sex “Disadvantaged groups” Participation rate Achievement.

Reynolds & Walberg (1992)

Page 32: GENDER GENDER DIFFERENCES Gender and sex “Disadvantaged groups” Participation rate Achievement.

Papanastasiou (2002)

Page 33: GENDER GENDER DIFFERENCES Gender and sex “Disadvantaged groups” Participation rate Achievement.

Recommended