GENDER MAINSTREAMING IN
INDONESIAN HIGHER EDUCATION’S
RESEARCH AND PUBLICATION: CASE OF BOGOR AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY (IPB)
Titik SumartiVice Dean for Academic and Student Affairs, Faculty of Human Ecology – IPB
Vice Head II Assosiasi Pusat Studi Wanita/Gender dan Anak Indonesia (ASWGI)
Conference on Gender Mainstreaming in Higher Education Institutions in ASEAN, Manila, 27-28 November 2017
OUTLINE
Background
Problems
Indonesian Government Policy for Research and Publication
Sex disaggregated data of Indonesian Research and Publications, case of IPB
Closing Noted
BACKGROUND
COMPETITIVENESS 2015-2016 37 (4,5) COMPETITIVENESS 2016-2017 41(4,5)
Pillar/Sub Pillar Rank Score Pillar/Sub Pillar Rank Score
12th Innovation 30 3,9 Innovation 31 4,0
Capacity for Innovation 30 4,7 Capacity for Innovation 32 4,7
Quality of scientific
research institutions
41 4,3 Quality of scientific
research institutions
41 4,4
Company spending on R&D 24 4,2 Company spending on R&D 26 4,4
University-industry
collaboration in R&D
30 4,5 University-industry
collaboration in R&D
28 4,4
Gov’t procurement of advanced
tech products.
13 4,2 Gov’t procurement of advanced
tech products.
12 4,3
Availability of scientists andengineers
34 4,6 Availability of scientists andengineers
38 4,5
PCT patents,
applications/million pop.*
102 0,1 PCT patents,
applications/million pop.*
99 0,1
Switzerland 1(5,76) à1(5,81); Singapor 2(5,68) à2(5,72); Malaysia 18 (5,23) à 25(5,16); Thailand 32 (4,64) à 34(4,64);
Indonesia 37 (4,52) à 41(4,52); Philipines 47 (4,39) à 57(4,36); Vietnam 56 (4,30) à60(4,31);
Source: WEF 2015 & 2016 page28, in Dir R&D, MRT&HE (2016)
PORTRAIT OF COMPETITIVENESS 2015 v 2016
Pola Pertumbuhan PUBLIKASI INTERNASIONAL Terindeks
Scopus (sd Oktober 2016)
Country 2011 2016
Malaysia 46 79
Thailand 26 26
Philippines 13 22
Indonesia 8 25
SCOPUS 25
DOAJ 200
JURNAL Terindeks Scopus
Sumber: Analisis berbagai sumber tahun 2016; dalam Dirjen Risbang Kemenristekdikti (2016)
9.012 (5 Des)
11.893 (5 Des)
22.744 (5 Des)
INDICATORS R&D - PUBLICATIONS
9
The system is thoroughly tested / proven through successful operation
Dev
elo
pm
ent
Res
earc
h
8
The system has been complete and reliable through testing and demonstration
in the actual environment
7
Demonstration of prototype system in the actual environment
3
Proof of concept of functions and / or important characteristics analytically and
experimentally
Bas
ic R
esea
rch
2
Formulation of concept and / or application formulation
1
The basic principles of the technology are researched and reported
6
Demonstration model or prototype system /
subsystem in a relevant environment
Ap
plie
dR
esea
rch
5
Validate components / subsystems in a relevant
environment
4
Validate components / subsystems in a laboratory
environment
9 L
evel
TRL
(Sta
rted
201
7)ONLY + 6% (FROM
15.480 FUNDED) RESULT
OF MIS OF R&CS
>= TRL 7 (DATA 2016)
INDICATORS R&D - TRL
RES
ULT
Researcher
http://forlap.dikti.go.id
RESEARCH FUNDING FROM DRPM
& NON DRPM 30%RESOURCES
SUPPORTING FACILITY
INSTITUTION
RESEARCHStandar procedure 15%
MANAGEMENT
Scientific Forum
Publication on Journal
RESEARCH Speakers 50%OUTPUT
Patents
Textbooks
REVENUE activities contract 5%GENERATING business unit
EVALUATION COMPONENTS CONTIBUTOR 1.447 HE OF TOTAL 3.246
EVALUATION OF R & D PERFORMANCE OF
INDONESIAN UNIVERSITIES
N
o
Eval
uation
Period
(Year)
Plattinum (Mandiri)
Gold (Uta-ma)
Silver (Ma-dya)
Brown (Bina-an)
Total of
Contribu-
tor
1 2007-2009 10 22 71 291 394
2 2010-2012 14 36 79 772 901
3 2013-2015 25 73 160 1.219 1.447
NO HIGHER EDUCATION
GOVERN PRIVATE TOTAL
1 UNDER THE MTRHE 122 3.124 3.246
2 STUDENT 1.962.250 4.156.483 6.118.733
3 LECTURER 68.122 145.798 213.920
Source: Director R&D Strengthening , 2016
PROBLEMS
THE MAIN PROBLEMS OF RESEARCH IN
INDONESIAN HIGHER EDUCATION
Source: Director R&D Strengthening , 2016
The Quality and Quantity of
Researcher:
1. Workload non research >
2. Quality of postgraduate
student
Relevance:
Researcher only with
academic perspective
Technology Readiness Level
(TRL) low
infrastructure and facilities:
1. not standard and obsolete
2. appraisal system still
minimal
Funding Mechanism:
Tied to the Government's
financial management slow
budget disbursement and
complicated liability
The problems of R&D in Higher Education:
Gender Perspective
o Access to: Who (men or women) access to policy interventions
and infrastructure availability of R & D
o Partisipation: Who (men or women) participated in the
interventions process? When not, what are the constraints
faced?
o Control: Do men and women alike have power over decision-
making regarding the intervention?
o Benefit: Does the intervention really benefit men and women?
or which ones are profitable for men and which ones will
benefit women?
Indonesian Government Policy
for R & P
1. WRITER OF INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATION (PPII) à LPDP
2. VARIOUS AWARD TO RESEARCH à RISTEKDIKTI
AWARDS OR INCENTIVE
TO RESEARCHERS
REGISTERED JOURNAL OF INDONESIA
WITH SCOPUS INDEX 2015PenerbitN
o
1
Nama Jurnal Ilmiah
International Journal of Electrical Engineering andInformatics
Institut Teknologi B
2 Journal of ICT Research andApplications Institut Teknologi
3 Journal of Mathematical and Fundamental Sciences Institut Teknologi
Institut Teknologi4
5
Journal of Engineering and Technological
Sciences Indonesian Journal of Chemistry Universitas Gadjah
Universitas Gadjah6
7
Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business
International Journal of Power Electronics and DriveSystems
Institute of Advanc
8 International Journal of Electrical and ComputerEngineering
Institute of Advanc
andung (ITB)
Bandung
(ITB)
Bandung
(ITB)
Bandung
(ITB) Mada
(UGM)
Mada (UGM)
ed Engineering and Science(IAES)
ed Engineering and Science(IAES)
9 Bulletin of Chemical Reaction Engineering & Catalysis Universitas Diponegoro (UNDIP)
Universitas Indonesia (UI)10
11
International Journal of
Technology Biodiversitas Universitas Negeri
12 Indonesian Journal of AppliedLinguistics Universitas Pendid
13 Agrivita Universitas Brawij
14 Al-Jami’ah UIN Sunan Kalijag
15 TELKOMNIKA Telecommunication Computing Electronics andControl
Universitas Ahmad
16 Biotropia
SEAMEO BIOTROP
17 Critical Care and Shock Indonesian Society
18 Acta Medica Indonesiana
19 Kukila (Bulletin of Indonesianornithology)
Pusat Informasi Li
Sebelas Maret (UNS)
ikan Indonesia
(UPI) aya (UB)
a
Dahlan (UAD)
of Critical Care
Medicine of Internal
Medicine
ngkungan Indonesia (PILI-NGOMovement)
20 Studia Islamica UIN Jakarta
JOU
RN
AL
FAC
ILIT
ATI
ON
PR
OG
RA
M
International-
Journal
Bantuan Internasionalisasi Jurnal Ilmiah
Worksho
pInternasionali
ssi Jurnal
Ilmiah
Langganan basis datae- Jurnal
Sosialisasi, Monitoring,Evaluasi e-Journal
National
Journal
Pelatihan Penggunaan OJS
Akreditasi
Jurnal Ilmiah
Indonesian Society Perbaikan SistemAkreditasi
Pelatihan Pengelolan -
e-Jurnal
SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATION FACILITATION
International Publication
Incentives published article in international journal
International article writing training
International Conference
Organizing in Indonesia
Attending International Conferences
Abroad
National
Publication
Book
incentives
Book writing counseling
Article writing training
University publication maps
OUTPUT TARGETED OF NATIONAL RESEARCH POLICY: Implemented by each university
OUTPUT EXPLANATION
Scientific publications in
national / international
journals
Paper published by scientific journal
Patent The exclusive right granted by the state to the inventor of
his invention
Prototype (laboratory
scale, industrial scale)
The initial physical form of an object (entity) that has
been studied theoretically and validated through a model
test or simulation
Product technology Documents containing efforts or means using existing
resources (means, sciences, methods and others) for the
manufacture of goods / services
Process technology Documents containing descriptions of a series of
interrelated activities that convert inputs into outcomes
SOURCE: DIRECTOR OF R&D, MRTHE, 2016
Sumber: www.simlitabmas.dikti.go.id per 31 Januari 2016 dan www.sciencedirect.com
University Research Mapping Parameters
BUKU AJAR/TEKS
1 42 3
5
86
7
Integrating gender into University Research and Publications
The Fact
Sex disaggregated data of Indonesian research and
publications
case of IPB
Areas of Research Focus
Food -Agriculture
Health - Drugs Transportation
Information and
Communication Technology
Defense and Security
Advanced material
Maritime and Marine
Disasters
Source: Directorate of research and
development strengthening, MRTHE, 2017
Social Humanities, Cultural Arts, Education
Table 1. Percentage of Male and Female
according to Basic Research in Indonesia, 2014
60.37 58.54
39.63 41.46
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
JILID 1 JILID 2
LK PR
Basic Research means that the level of technological readiness
is still low.
Data show that Male do basic research is relatively higher than
Female
Table 2. Percentage of Male and Female
according to Applied Research, 2014 Stage 1
46.55 46.28
65.22
53.45 53.72
34.78
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
BIDANG KETAHANAN PANGAN BIDANG KESEHATAN DAN OBAT-OBATAN BIDANG ENERGI DAN TERBARUKAN
LK PR
Applied Research means that the level of technological readiness is
medium.
Data show that Female do more applied research on food security,
health and medicine relatively than Male. On the contrary Male do
more applied research of energy and renewable energy than Female
Table 3. Percentage of Male and Female
according to Applied Research, 2014 Stage 2
80
65.52 66.67
46.51
20
34.48 33.33
53.49
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
BIDANG PERTAHANAN DAN
KEAMANAN
BIDANG TEKNOLOGI
INFORMASI DAN KOMUNIKASI.
BIDANG KEBAHARIAN DAN
KELAUTAN
BIDANG MATERIAL MAJU
LK PR
Data show that Male do more applied research on defense and
security, information and communication technology, maritime
and marine fields relatively than Female; On the contrary Female
do more applied research of advanced material field than Male
Table 4. Percentage of Male and Female
according to Development Research in Indonesia, 2014
69.23
100.00
72.3182.76
75.00 77.65
30.77
0.00
27.6917.24
25.00 22.35
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
KOMPETITIF
NASIONAL
PUNAS HIBAH KOMPETENSI
2014
PENGEMBANGAN
IPTEK
RAPID MP3EI
LK PR
Development Research means that the level of technological
readiness is high.
Data show that Male do development research relatively higher
than Female
Research area focused on Gender,
Women and Child Studies? no specific field of gender, women, and child study
the study entered into other research areas as cross cutting
issue, especially on social humanities, cultural arts and
education research area
there are approximately 350 research focusing on gender,
women and child studies from women's study center / gender
study center/ gender and child’s center (ASWGI, 2016)
Indonesian Association of women/gender and child studies
has proposed to the ministry of research, technology and
higher education that the field of study to be a separate of
research focuses area
PARAMETER
No Data Total
University
No Data Total Data
1 RIP 282 1 RIP 1176
2 Scopus 79 2 Scopus 4527
3 International Journal 202 3 International Journal 5583
4 Accredited Journal
Nasional
97 4 Accredited Journal
Nasional
752
5 Books 185 5 Books 2004
6 Appropriate Technology 52 6 Appropriate Tchnology 294
7 Intellectual Property
Rights (IPR)
82 7 Intellectual Property
Right
874
8 Prototype 32 8 Prototype 154
Table 5: Order of Total University and Number of Data
Source: Director R&D Strengthening , 2016
NoExcellence
RIPJournal
Books IPR Prototype AT
Scopus Internasional Acreditatio
n
Total Rank. Total Rank. Total Rank. Total Rank. Total Rank. Total Rank. Total Rank. Total Rank.
1 Poverty Alleviation 32 14 7 20 12 21 2 17 4 21 1 20 1 10 1 14
2 Climate Change &
Biodiversity
89 5 286 6 199 9 19 11 32 13 12 14 6 10
3 New and renewable energy 80 7 126 8 157 11 2 17 5 20 27 10 6 6 23 5
4 Food security and
Sovereignty
96 4 108 11 156 12 37 7 38 12 25 11 10 4 62 1
5 health, tropical diseases, nutrition and medicine
96 4 876 1 1212 1 151 1 187 5 135 2 11 3 12 9
6 Disaster management & mitigation
29 15 59 13 43 17 3 16 11 17 6 17 1 10 3 12
7 National integrastion & social harmony
110 2 110 10 401 5 99 2 382 1 70 4 2 13
8 Regional autonomy & Decentralitation
16 20 5 21 28 20 14 13 24 15 3 18
9 Art and cuture/ creative industry 105 3 16 17 52 15 39 6 98 9 43 5 9 5 27 4
10 Infrastructure 44 11 53 14 106 14 11 14 23 16 8 15 2 13
11 Transportation 26 16 25 16 47 16 3 16 6 19 2 19 4 8 2 13
12 Defense & security 11 21 6 19 2 19
Table 6. Total and Ranking of Each Excellence based on
Simlitabmas Data as of 31 January 2016
No ExcellenceRIP
JurnalBuku HKI Prototype TTG
Scopus Internasional Akreditasi
Total Rank. Total Rank. Total Rank. Total Rank. Total Rank. Total Rank. Total Rank. Total Rank.
13 Information technology &
communication
126 1 788 2 611 2 14 13 88 10 147 1 46 1 34 3
14 Advanced materials 34 13 166 7 540 3 33 9 4 21 33 9 11 3 4 11
15 Maritime 24 18 8 19 38 18 9 18 7 16 1 10 2 13
16 Human development & nation competitiveness
84 6 296 5 220 8 91 3 223 2 36 7 6 6 16 8
17 Mathematics & natural sciences 39 12 700 3 485 4 41 5 127 7 70 4 5 7 2 13
18 Plant sciences 25 17 120 9 181 10 25 10 47 11 15 12 2 9 17 7
19 Veterinary sciences 17 19 102 12 134 13 55 4 28 14 14 13 2 9 22 6
20 Engineering sciences 46 10 509 4 386 6 16 12 144 6 128 3 28 2 55 2
21 Linguistic sciences 16 20 14 18 33 19 6 15 117 8 14 13
22 Economic sciences 69 8 126 8 385 7 55 4 203 3 42 6
23 Education sciences 67 9 27 15 157 11 36 8 198 4 34 8 11 3 2 13
Table 7. Total and Ranking of Each Excellence based on
Simlitabmas Data as of 31 January 2016
Table 8. Percentage of Male and Female by
Publication Score in Indonesia, 2017
2.56 3.85 0.00 0.00
22.73
0.00
57.69
80.77
0.00
72.73
77.27
0
33.33
10.26
37.18
27.27
0.00
77.27
6.41 5.13
62.82
0 0.00
22.73
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
SCOPUS H-Index GOOGLE H-SCORE SINTA SCORE SCOPUS H-Index GOOGLE H-SCORE SINTA SCORE
Laki-laki Perempuan
Rendah Sedang Tinggi Sanggat Tinggi
Scopus H-index: Google H-index: Sinta Score: Data based on
Low: <5 Low: <10 Low: <15 100 Authors with
Medium: 5-15 Medium: 10-25 Medium: 15-40 the highest score:
High: 16-25 High: 26-40 High: 41-55 Female relatively
Very High:>25 Very High:>40 Very High:>55 lower than Male
Rangking Institution
1 Bandung Institute of Technology
2 Gadjah Mada University
3 University of Indonesia
4 Bogor Agricultural University
5 Brawijaya University
6 Sepuluh November Institute of Technology
7 Airlangga University
8 Hasanuddin University
9 Diponegoro University
10 Padjadjaran University
Indonesian Higher Education Index (HEI) Rangking 2016
Source: Directorate General of
Institutional Afairs for Science,
Technology and Higher Education —
MRTHE 2016 in Nur et.all (2017)
CHARACTERISTIC OF
IPB’S RESEARCHER
Table 9. Percentage of IPB Researcher in 2012-2014
58
43
58
42
64
3638
62
83
18
62
38
5348
5149
22
78
64
36
64
36
57
43
55
45
65
35
62
38
56
44
54
4640
60
68
32
65
35
63
37
53
47
70
30
62
38
60
40
61
39
30
70
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
LK PR LK PR LK PR LK PR LK PR LK PR LK PR LK PR LK PR
FAPERTA FKH FPIK FAPET FAHUTAN FATETA FMIPA FEM FEMA
2012 2013 2014
Data show that for three years (2012-2014) male researchers tend to be
more dominant than female in all faculties, except in the faculty of human
ecology. Also, percentage of male researchers tend to increase compared to
women in three years, except in the faculty of human ecology. There is still
a stereotype that human-related science is more appropriate for women
Table 10. Researcher of Faculty of Human Ecology
– IPB based on Funding Source, 2012-2015
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
LK PR LK PR LK PR LK PR LK PR
Desentralisasi IPB Sumber dana Dikti IB SUMBER DANA KMNRT DEPTAN
2012
2013
2013
2014
2015
Data show that male researchers mostly use funding sources from
decentralized IPB, whereas female researchers use more sources from
outside IPB (ministry of technology and higher education, ministry
of agriculture). Women show more competitiveness in obtaining
funds
Table 11. Total Funding for Researcher of Faculty
of Human Ecology – IPB, 2012-2016
-
200,000,000
400,000,000
600,000,000
800,000,000
1,000,000,000
1,200,000,000
1,400,000,000
1,600,000,000
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
LK
PR
The data shows that there are dynamics in obtaining the amount of
research fund. In 2012, 2013, and 2015 female researchers are more
funded than male researchers, but in 2014 and 2016 the opposite
occurred.
Table 12. Researcher Based on Education
4 4 3 3 3 3 2 2 1 2
3038
2835
2836
2838
2737
6659
6963
6961
7059
7160
1 0 1 1
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
LK PR LK PR LK PR LK PR LK PR
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
S1 S2 S3 sarjana profesi
The data show that most researchers have been educated S3
(doctorate). When compared between men and women,
male researchers are more highly educated doctors.
Table 13. Researcher Based on Functional Status
4 4 3 6 4 8 814
713
14 19 1518
1515 14
14
1414
31
40
19 1128
3528
33
27
33
35
29
29 37
33
30
31
28
31
28
169
34 2920
1220
1221
12
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
LK PR LK PR LK PR LK PR LK PR
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Calon Dosen Asisten Ahli Lektor Lektor Kepala Guru Besar
The data show that most researchers are lector and head lector.
When compared between male and female researchers, male
researcher have more head lector and professor than female
researchers.
Table 14. Researcher Based on Structural Positions
90 10 80 20 8911
8813
8317 100
0
63 38 71 29 9010
5050
90 10 80 20 89
11
7921
80
20100
0
57 43 6338 90
10
63
38
90 10 82 1873
27
81 19
80
20100
0
61 3970
30 83
17
63
38
90 10 80 20 77
23
85 15
0
25100
0
62 38 74
26 74
26
60
40
90 10 81 19 7327
81 19 75 25 100
0
62 38 75 25 7426
7129
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
LK PR LK PR LK PR LK PR LK PR LK PR LK PR LK PR LK PR LK PR
DEKAN DIREKTUR KEP-KAN KEP-PUS KADEPT REKTOR SEKDEPT SEKPUS WADEK WADIR
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
The data shows that over the past five years: there are no female
rectors and vice rectors, 10 percent of female deans, and there is an
increasing number of female vice deans and heads of departments
but not yet 30 percent
Closing Notes The ministry of technology and higher education has provided
access to research and publications for universities, but has not
specifically opened gender, women and child studies as a separate
research focus area
The participation of male researchers is more dominant in basic
and development research, while the participation of female
researchers is more dominant in applied research with excellence
areas of food security and agriculture stereotype
Based on publication scores, female researchers have relatively
lower scores than male researchers
Closing Notes Based on the characteristics of the researchers (IPB case) still
shows the existence of gender issues in the development of research and publications in universities:
➢ The participation of male researchers is more through IPB decentralization funding sources, while female demonstrate competitiveness through external funding sources of IPB
➢ Decision makers included in the research policy and publications are still male-dominated
➢ Publications in reputable international journals are one of the requirements to become professors female get benefit being professor less than male
The importance of association roles in gender mainstreaming in higher education, and enabling female researchers in research and publications
Thank You
“Gender is the smart solution for Knowledge Management in Higher Education”