173
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Agarwal R (1985) Effectiveness of reception concept attainment model of
teaching for enhancing attainment of science concept. M Ed Dissertation,
Department of Education , Allahabad University.
2. Aggarwal Yash (1995) Quality concerns in the primary education, Where is the
problem. NIEPA, New Delhi
3. Ahmedabad Women’s Action Group(1990) ,An assessment of the school
textbooks published by Gujarat State School Textbooks under NPE”, Paper
presented at the IAWS conference, Calcutta, December 1990.
4. Aiken L R (1970), Attitudes towards mathematics, Review of Educational
Research .Vol. 40 (2), pp 571-596
5. Aiken L R (1971),The effects of attitudes on performances in mathematics,
Journal of Educational Philosophy. Vol.52(1), pp 37-42
6. American Association for the Advancement of Science (1999) AAAS' Project
2061 Evaluation
7. Angrist, Joshua. D. & Victor Lavy. (2001). Does Teacher Training Affect Pupil
Learning? Evidence from Matched Comparisons in Jerusalem Public Schools.
Journal of Labor Economics , Vol. 19(2), pp 343-369.
8. Apple, M. W., & Weis, L. (Eds.) (1983). Ideology and practice in schooling.
Philadelphia Temple University Press.
9. Armanto, D (1993) Teaching Basic Mathematic Skills in the Nine-Year Basic
Education ,Paper presented at the International Seminar on Mathematical
Science, Kuching, Sarawak. September.
10. Artigue M (1999), Teaching and learning of mathematics at the university
level: Crucial questions for contemporary research in education, Notices
American Mathematics Society. Vol 46, pp 1377–1385.
11. Austin J D (1980) When to Allow Student Questions on Homework. Journal for
Research in Mathematics Education, Vol. 11(1) ,pp. 71-75
Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Softwarehttp://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.
174
12. Ball, D (1990). The Mathematical Understanding that Prospective Teachers
Bring to Teacher Education, Elementary School Journal, Vol.90 (4),pp 449-
466.
13. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior
change. Psychological Review, Vol.(84), pp 191-215.
14. Bansal, I.K (1979) A comparative study of the abilities of students of modern
and traditional mathematics, Ph.d. Edu., Delhi U., 1979-3
15. Basavvya D (1995). Students perceptions of Mathematics. School Science, Vol
13 (2), pp 47-50
16. Basavayya D, Basti B C & Ravindra G(2004) Gender Differences and
mathematical Abilities .Journal of Indian Education. Vol.29 (2) pp 113-128
17. Bashir, Sajitha ( 1994) Public versus private in primary education: Comparisons
of school effectiveness and costs in Tamil Nadu. Ph.D. thesis, London School
of Economics.
18. Bashir, Sajitha. (1997). The cost-effectiveness of public and private schools:
Knowledge gaps, new research methodologies and an application in India. In
Marketizing Education and Health in Developing Countries: Miracle or Mirage?
Ed. C. Colclough, chapter 5. Oxford:Clarendon.
19. Behr Anthony N(1973) The Two-Year College Mathematics Journal.Vol. 4(2)
,Spring, 1973, pp. 72-74
20. Benbow C P and Stanley J (1980) Sex differences in mathematical ability-Fact
or Artifact, Science, Vol.210(4475) , pp1262-1264
21. Bernstein, B. (1977).Class, codes and control: Vol. 3. Towards a theory of
educational trans-missions (2nd ed.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
22. Bhatacharya S P (1995). Education in the SAARC countries .Regency
Publications, New Delhi, page 31
23. Bhimsamkaram C V(1979) Mathematics Education, Book Field Centre,
Research Wing, pp 30
24. Bidwell, C.E., Friedkin, N.E. (1988), "The sociology of education", in Smelser,
N.J. (Eds),Handbook of Sociology, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp.449-71.
Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Softwarehttp://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.
175
25. Biggs, J. &Moore P. (1993) The Process of Learning, Australia, Prentice Hall.
26. Billstein / Libeskind / Loth( 1987) A Problem solving approach to Mathematics
for elementary School Teachers. 3rd Edition. Benjamin/ Cummings Publishing
Company. Pages front inner cover, back inner cover, 10, 314
27. Bloom,I.(2001). Curriculum reforms that increase the mathematical
understanding of prospective elementary teachers. Proceedings of the Twenty-
Third Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International
Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Snowbird Utah
28. Bolaji, C. (2005) A study of factors influencing students’ attitude towards
mathematics in the Junior Secondary Schools; Mathematics teaching in Nigeria
.Retrieved oNov.2005 fromhttp:// www2. ncsu. Edu /ncsu /aern / bolajim. html
29. Borasi R (1995) Reconceiving mathematics Instruction :A focus on errors.
Norwood, NJ Ablex Publishers
30. Bossé Michael J. & Damon L. Bahr(2008) The State of Balance Between
Procedural Knowledge and Conceptual Understanding in Mathematics Teacher
Education International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning . ISSN
1473 - 0111
31. Bosker, R. J. & Witziers, B. (1996). The magnitude of school effects or Does it
really matter which school a student attends? Paper presented at the Annual
Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
32. Bright P S, Sood K S (2002) You and your IQ with Intelligence Tests. Bright
Careers’ Institute, Nai Sarak, New Delhi. Pages 47, 62, 79,111
33. Brimer Alan, Madaus George F., Chapman Bernard, Kellaghan Thomas &
Robert Wood (1980),Sources of Difference in School Achievement,
Comparative Education Review, Vol. 24(3), pp. 445-447
34. Brophy, J. E. ;Good, T. L. (1974). Teacher-student relationships: Causes and
consequences. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
35. Brown Byron W (1991),How gender and socioeconomic status affect reading
and mathematics achievement, Economics of Education Review,Vol.10(4), pp
343-357
Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Softwarehttp://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.
176
36. Brown, S. D. Lent, R.W. & Larkin, K. C. (1989). Self-efficacy as moderator of
scholastic aptitude-academic performance relationships. Journal of Vocational
Behavior, Vol. 35, pp 64-75
37. Brownell, W.A. (1945). When is arithmetic meaningful? Journal of Education
Research, Vol.38, pp 481-98.
38. Brownell, W.A. (1947). The place of meaning in the teaching of arithmetic.
Elementary School Journal, Vol. 47, pp 256-65.
39. Bruce, C. (1994) Supervising literature reviews, In Zuber-Skerritt, O. and Ryan,
Y. (eds), Quality in postgraduate education, Kogan Page, London.
40. Bryan, T. J. (1999). The conceptual knowledge of pre-service secondary
mathematics teachers: How well do they know the subject matter they will
teach? Issues in the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School
Teachers: The Journal, Vol. (1), pp 1-12
41. Burton G (1979) Regardless of sex. Mathematics Teacher. Vol. 22. pp 261-270
42. Canadian council on Learning Lessons in Learning. Retrieved on 20th May
2006 from www.cclcca.ca/ CCL/ Reports/ LessonsInLearning /LiL1March2006
.htm
43. Cao, Zh. & Bishop, A. (2001) Students’ attributions of success and failure in
mathematics: findings in China and Australia. In J. Bobis, B. Perry and M.
Mitchelmore (Eds.) Numeracy and Beyond, proceedings of the 24th annual
conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia
(MERGA) June 30 - July 4, 2001, held at The University of Sydney, 1, pp.139-
146.
44. Cash, C. (1993). A Study of the Relationship Between School Building
Condition and Student Achievement and Behaviour. D.Ed. Dissertation,
Blacksburg, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
45. Carlson, M. & Bloom, I. (2005). A Multidimensional Framework for Analyzing
Problem Solving Behavior. Educational Studies in Mathematics .Vol. 58, pp 45-
75.
Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Softwarehttp://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.
177
46. Carlson, M. P. (1999). The mathematical behavior of six successful mathematics
graduate students: Influences leading to mathematical success. Educational
Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 40, pp 237-258.
47. Carter J Phillip and Russel K A(2002) I Q Tests to keep you sharp.Orient
paperbacks. Kashmere Gate. Delhi. Pages 35,49,64,73,81,83,98.
48. Cavendish S J (1988) Sex differences related to achievement in mathematics.
Unpublished Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of
Education at the University of Leicester, Leicester
49. Chan, T. (1979). The Impact of School Building Age on Pupil Achievement.
Greenville County, US Department of Health Education and Welfare, National
Institute of Education.
50. Cherian, V. I & Siweya ,J. (1996) Gender and achievement in mathematics by
indigenous African students majoring in mathematics Psychological reports
Vol. 78 (1), pp. 27-34
51. Choudhury R (1999) Some problems in learning mathematics at secondary stage
with relation to high schools in greater Guwahati. Dept Of
Mathematics.PhDThesis. Gauhati University.
52. Cleary, T. A. (1992). Gender differences in aptitude and achievement test
scores. Paper presented at the 1991 ETS Invitational Conference on Sex Equity
in Educational Opportunity, Achievement and Testing. Princeton, NJ.
53. Clewell, B. & Anderson, B,( 1991) Women of Color in Mathematics, Science
and Engineering: A Review of the Literature, Center for Women Policy Studies,
Washington, DC.
54. Cobb, G. S. (1992). Teaching statistics: More data, less lecturing. In L. A. Steen
(Ed.), Heeding the call for change: Suggestions for curricular action, pp. 3-43
Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America
55. Cocking, R. R. & Chipman, S. (1988) Conceptual Issues Related to
Mathematics Achievement of Language Minority Children. In Cocking, R.
R.,and Mestre, J.P(Eds). Linguistic and Cultural Influences on Learning
Mathematics. Hillsdale: Erlbaum. pp. 17-46.
Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Softwarehttp://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.
178
56. Cohen, R., & Kosler, J. (1991). Gender equity in high school math: A study of
female participation and achievement. (Technical Report No. 143). (ERIC
Document Reproduction Service No. 345 935
57. Cohen, S. B. & Hickman, P. (1998,) Linking problem solving to student
achievement in mathematics Paper presented at the annual meeting of NARST,
San Diego, CA. April
58. Cohen, David F & Heather C. Hill. (2000) Instructional Policy and Classroom
Performance: The Mathematics Reform in California. Teachers College Record
Vol.102(2), pp 294-343.
59. Coleman, James S., Ernest Q. Campbell, Carol J. Hobson, James McPartland,
Alexander M. Mood, Frederic D. Weinfeld, and Robert L. York.( 1966).
Equality of Educational Opportunity , Washington, D.C., Government Printing
Office.
60. Collier’s Encyclopedia, Vol 13,The Crowell- Collier Publishing Company, New
York, page 190
61. Cooper, H. & Good, T. L. (1983). Pygmalion grows up: Studies in the
expectation communication process. New York: Longman. p 173
62. Corcoran, Thomas B.(1995). Helping Teachers Teach Well: Transforming
Professional Development. CPRE Policy Briefs. Consortium for Policy
Research in Education. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.
63. Coulter Frank(1979) Homework: A Neglected Research Area. British
Educational Research Journal, Vol. 5(1 ), pp. 21-33
64. Cowan R & Hallam S (1999) What do we know about homework? London
Institute Of Education, Viewpoint 9 Institute of Education. University of
London
65. Das, R. C. & Barua, A. P.( 1968) , Effect of remedial teaching in arithmetic, a
study with grade IV pupils, SIE, Assam, 1968-4
66. Dandapani C (1992) Dimensions of effective teaching of mathematics. PhD
Thesis in Education. Annamalai University.
Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Softwarehttp://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.
179
67. Davis, R. B., Maher, C. A. & Noddings, N. (1990). Suggestions for the
Improvement of Mathematics Education. In R. B. Davis, C. A. Maher, & N.
Noddings (Eds.) Constructivism Views on the Teaching and Learning of
Mathematics .pp 31-47 .Reston, VA: NCTM.
68. Dean T. Jamison, Barbara Searle, Klaus Galda, Stephen P. Heyneman(1981)
Improving elementary mathematics education in Nicaragua: An experimental
study of the impact of textbooks and radio on achievement. Journal of
Educational Psychology, Vol. 73(4), pp 556-567 .
69. DeFranco, T. C. (1996). A perspective on mathematical problem-solving
expertise based on the performance of male Ph.D. mathematicians. In J. Kaput,
A. H. Schoenfeld & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), Research in Collegiate Mathematics
Education, II (pp. 195-213), Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences,
Issues in Mathematics Education, Vol. 6, Providence, RI: American
Mathematical Society
70. Desai D. M. & Roy, S.(1974) Curriculum, methods and textbooks : a trend
report, in M. B. Buch (Ed.). A survey of research in education, CASE, MSU,
Baroda, 1974
71. Dev, S.K (1979)., A critical study of the methods of teaching in the secondary
schools of Nagaland., Ph.D. Education ., Gauhati . University, 1979
72. Dickens, M. N., & Cornell, D. G. (1993). Parental influences on the
mathematics self-concept of high ability adolescent girls. Journal for the
Education of the Gifted, Vol. 17, pp 53-73.
73. Doane B S (1972) The effects of homework and locus on control on arithmetic
skills achievement in the forth grade. Doctoral Dissertation, Abstracts
International 73-8610, New York University.
74. Dorfler Willi (2003) Mathematics and Mathematics Education, Educational
Studies in Mathematics, Vol 54(1) ,pp 165.
75. Dove, L. A. (1986) Teachers and Teaching in Developing Countries: issues in
planning, management and training Croom Helm , Kent
Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Softwarehttp://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.
180
76. Dreeben R (1994) The Sociology of Education: Its Development in The United
States In Pallas AM (Ed),. Research in Sociology of Education and Socialization
(v 10). Greenwich CT: JAI, pp 7-52
77. Dunham, P. H., & Dick, T. P. (1994). Research on graphing calculators. The
Mathematics Teacher, Vol 87, pp 440-445.
78. Dutta D.K. (2002). learning achievement of primary school children under dpep
in six districts of assam, report on terminal assessment survey (tas), dpep phase
ii districts including Karbi Anglong district
79. Eaton Patricia T,Sonia Kidd (2005) Self-conceptualised perceptions of attitude
and ability among student teachers. Paper presented at the Fourth Congress of
the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. Working group 2,
Spain – 17 - 21 February 2005
80. Earthman, G.(1998). The Impact of School Building Condition on Student
Achievement and Behaviour. The Appraisal of Educational Investment
Conference, Luxembourg, European Investment Bank and the Organisation for
Economic Cooperation and Development
81. Eccles J S and Blumfield P (1985) Classroom experiences and student gender-
Are there differences and do they really matter ? In Gender Influences in
classroom interaction. Academic Press. New York pp 79-144
82. Ekstrom, R.B., M.E. Goertz & D. Rock. (1988.) Education and American
Youth. Philadelphia, PA: The Falmer Press.
83. Edwards P (1997) Just how effective is the Mathematics Diagnostic Test and
Follow-up Support Combination ? Teaching Mathematics and its Applications ,
Vol 16(3), pp118-121
84. Edwards, T. G. (1995) Cooperative learning in response to an innovative
curriculum as a manifestation of change in teaching practice. Paper presented at
the annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group
for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Columbus, OH, October 1995.
85. Education Commission. (1966). "Education for Development: Report of the
EducationCommission 1964-1966 (Kothari Commission)." New Delhi:
Government of India.
Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Softwarehttp://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.
181
86. Else-Quest Nicole M, Hyde Janet Shibley, Marcia C. Linn(2010) Cross-National
Patterns of Gender Differences in Mathematics: A Meta-Analysis.
Psychological Bulletin, Vol.136 (1 ), pp 103-127
87. Ernest, P. (1996). Varieties of constructivism: A framework for comparison. In
L. P. Steffe & P. Nesher (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning. Mahwah,
NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 335-350
88. Fennema, E., & Sherman, J. (1977) Sex-related differences in mathematics
achievement, spatial visualization, and affective factors. American Educational
Research Journal, Vol. 14(1), pp 51-71.
89. Fennema, E., & Sherman, J. (1978). Sex-related differences in mathematics
achievement and related factors: A further study. Journal for Research in
Mathematics Education, Vol. 9(3), pp 189-203
90. Fennemma, E (2000), Gender and mathematics: What do I know and what do I
wish was known? Paper presented at the Fifth Annual forum of the National
Institute for Science Education, Detroit, May 2000.
91. Fierros Edward Garcia(1999) "Examining gender differences in mathematics
achievement on the Third International Mathematics and Science Study
(TIMSS)" (January 1, 1999). Boston College Dissertations and Theses. Paper
AAI9961577.
92. Foyle, Harvey C.(1988) Homework: Suggestions for Educators, Paper
presented at a Meeting of the Hutchinson Chapter of Phi Delta Kappa
,McPherson, KS, January 19th , 1988
93. Fullarton, S. & Lamb, S. (2000). Factors affecting mathematics achievement in
primary and secondary schools: Results from TIMSS. In J. Malone, J. Bana &A.
Chapman (Eds.), Mathematics education beyond 2000 . Proceedings of the23rd
annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of
Australasia, 2000. Perth, WA.
94. Fuson, K. C., Stigler, J. W. & Bartsch K. (1988). Grade placement of addition
and subtraction topics in Japan, mainland China, the Soviet Union, Taiwan, and
the United States. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Vol. 19 (5),
pp. 449-456.
Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Softwarehttp://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.
182
95. Gadgil, A. V. (1978) Study of the causes of large failures in mathematics at the
S.S.C. Examination (Std. X) March -1977, Indian Institute of Education, Pune,
1978-3
96. Gakhar, S. C.(1983) Identification of variables of educational environment as
related to the acquisition of mathematical concepts at the junior secondary stage,
Ph.D. Edit., Pan. U., 1981-3
97. Gelfman E, L. Demidova, V. Panchischina (2004) A Text-Book As Means for
Organizing Students' Cognitive Activity. Paper presented at ICME 10,
Discussion Group 14, Copenhagen, Denmark.
98. Gyanani T.C & Agarwal T. (1988) .Effect of classroom climates, teachers’
leadership behaviour and expectations on students’ scholastic achievement.
Psycho-lingua, Vol .28 (1), pp 61-66.
99. Gill, Judith (1999) Shedding Some New Light on Old Truths: Student Attitudes
to School in Terms of Year Level and Gender .Paper presented at the Annual
Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.,
April 4-9, 1994. Eric Document
100. Gold Gerald (2003) Realistic Mathematics Education Research, Educational
Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 54(1) , pp 174
101. Goldstein, A. (1960). Does homework help? A review of research. Elementary
School Journal, Vol. 60(4), pp. 212-224
102. Gopalakrishnan, K.R.(1977) A critical analysis of the new mathematics
syllabus and textbooks used in the upper primary classes in Kerala, Ph.D. Edu.,
Ker. U.. 1977-3, pp 212-224
103. Govinda, R & N. V. Varghese(1993) Quality of Primary Schooling in India: A
Case Study of Madhya Pradesh. Paris,UNESCO: International Institute for
Educational Planning, and New Delhi: National Institute of Educational
Planning and Administration (NIEPA).
104. Griffin P (2007) , Mathematics Achievement of Vietnamese grade 5 pupils
,Asia Pacific Education Review. Vol 8 (2) ,pp 233-249
Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Softwarehttp://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.
183
105. Grouws Douglas A & Sebulla Kristen Grouws (2000). Improving student
achievement in mathematics. Part 1: Research findings. ERIC Clearinghouse for
Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
106. Gutbezahl, J. (1995). How negative expectancies and attitudes undermine
females' math confidence and performance: A review of the literature. Amherst,
MA: University of Massachusetts. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.
ED 380 279
107. Gyanani TC, Agarwal T( 1988). Effect of classroomclimates, teachers
leadership behaviour and expectations, on students’ scholastic
achievement.Psycho-lingua, Vol. 28(1), pp 61-66.
108. Hallam S (2004) Homework the evidence,. London: Institute of Education,
University of London
109. Hanson, Katherine (1992) Teaching Mathematics Effectively and Equitably to
Females. Trends and Issues No 17, Columbia University, New York, N.Y.
Teachers College(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 348 465)
110. Hanushek E A.omson, W.(1996). Assessing the Effects of School Resources on
Student Performance: An Update, RCER Working Papers 424, University of
Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER).
111. Hariharan D (1992) Attitudes of high school students towards homework and
achievement in mathematics. M-Phil, Education.Madurai Kamaraj University.
112. Hatano, G. (1996). A conception of knowledge acquisitio and its implications
for mathematics education. In L.W. Steffe & P. Nesher (Eds.) Theories of
mathematical learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 187-
217
113. Hazma Mukhtar (1952) Retardation in mathematics among grammar school
pupils’, British journal of Educational Psychology, Vol 22, pp 195-198
114. Heyneman (1978) Textbooks and achievement: what we know. World Bank
i. Staff working paper no. 298
Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Softwarehttp://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.
184
115. Heyneman S P (1984) Textbooks in Philippines: evaluation of the pedagogical
impact of nationwide investment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,
Vol. 6(2) pp 139-150. ED179004
116. Heyneman and Loxley (1983) The Effect of Primary-School Quality on
Academic Achievement Across Twenty-nine High-and Low-Income Countries
American Journal of Sociology Vol. 88, No. 6 (May 1983), pp 1162-1194
117. Hoek, D. (1997). The effects of social and cognitive strategies' instruction on
the mathematics achievement in secondary education. Paper presented at the
American Educational Research Association, Chicago, I L. March 24-28, 1997
118. Hopko R. D., Ashcraft, H. M., Gute, J., Ruggiero, J. K.,& Lewis, C(1988)
Mathematics Anxiety and Working Memory: Support for the Existence of a
Deficient Inhibition Mechanism. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, Vol. 12 (4), pp.
343-355.
119. Horak,Viriginia (1979) The Effects of School Environment and Student
Cognitive Characteristics Upon School Achievement in Mathematics. Paper
presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council of Teachers of
Mathematics (57th, Boston, MA, April 18-21, 1979) ED197959.
120. Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in
mathematics: An introductory analysis. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), "Conceptual and
procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics" .Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum. pp 1-27
121. Hiebert, J. & Carpenter, T. P. (1992). Learning and teaching with
understanding. In D.Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics
Teaching and Learning ,New York: Macmillan, pp 65-97.
122. Ho, H., Senturk, D., Lam, A. G., Zimmer, J.M., Hong, S., Okamoto, Y., Chiu,
S., Nakazawa, Y. and Wang, Ch. (2000) The Affective and Cognitive
Dimensions of Math Anxiety: A Cross-National Study. Journal For Research In
Mathematics Education, Vol. 31, pp 362-379.
123. Howley, C. (2003). Mathematics achievement in rural schools.: An assessment
of the evidence. Charleston, WV: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and
Small Schools. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED478348
Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Softwarehttp://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.
185
124. Hungerman A D.(1967) Achievement and attitude of sixth grade pupils in
conventional and contemporary mathematics. Arithmetic Teacher .Vol. 14. pp
30-39.
125. Hyde J. S., E. Fennema, and S. J. Lamon,(1990) Gender differences in
mathematics performance: a meta-analysis, Psychological Bulletin , Vol.10(2),
pp 139-155.
126. Israel, G. D. and Beaulieu, L. J. (2009) The Influence of Social Capital on Test
Scores: How Much Do Families, Schools & Communities Matter? Retrieved on
13th October 2009 at aaaeonline.org/ conference_files /370902.israel. beaulieu.
paper. pdf
127. Jabbal, K. J.( 1983) A study of the development of mathematical concept in
school going children, Ph.D. Edu., Gor. U., 1981- 3
128. Jacob Brian A.,Lars Lefgren (2002)The Impact of Teacher Training on Student
Achievement: Quasi-Experimental Evidence from School Reform Efforts in
Chicago. Working Paper 8916 National Bureau of Economic Research. April
2002
129. Jago, E. and K. Tanner (1999), “Influence of the School Facility on Student
Achievement: Lighting; Color”, Department of Educational Leadership,
Universityof Georgia. www.coe.uga.edu/sdpl/researchabstracts/visual.html.
130. Jain, D. K., A study of significant correlates of high school failures in
mathematics and English with special reference to Jammu division, Ph.D. Edu.,
Jammu U., 1979-3
131. Jamini N (1990) Effect of Teaching Strategies on Conceptual Learning
Efficiency and Retention in relation to Divergent Thinking. Ph D, Delhi.
University of Delhi
132. Jamison, Dean, Barbara Searle, Klaus Galda and Stephen Heyneman. (1981).
Improving Elementary Mathematics Education in Nicaragua: An Experimental
Study of the Impact of Textbooks and Radio on Achievement. Journal of
Educational Psychology , Vol.73(4): pp 556-67.
Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Softwarehttp://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.
186
133. Jayachandran U (2000)Socio-economic determinants of school education in
India. Working paper 103, Centre for Development Economics , Delhi School of
Economics.
134. Jencks, C., Smith, M., Acland, H., Bane, MS, Cohen, D., Gintis, H., Heyns, B.,
& Michelson, S.(1972). Inequality: A reassessment of the effect of family and
schooling in America. New York: Basic Books
135. Jukka Törnroo (2005). Mathematics textbooks, opportunity to learn and student
achievement. Studies in educational Evaluation. Vol.31(4), pp 315-332
136. Kabu, C.L. (1983) A psychological analysis of the mathematically gifted at the
secondary and higher levels of education, Ph.D. Edu., Jammu University., 1980-
3
137. Kapur J N(1967) Some aspects of school mathematics. pp 203
138. Kapur J N(1976) Culture, excitement and relevance of mathematics.
International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology,
1464-5211, Vol.7 (2), pp 161 – 180.
139. Kapur J N (1978) Change in Mathematics Education since the Late 1950's:
Ideas and Realisation: An ICMI Report. Part I Educational Studies in
Mathematics, Vol. 9, No. 2 pp. 245-253
140. Kapur J N(1992) Fifth Survey of Educational research 1988-1992,Trend
Reports. NCERT. New Delhi
141. Karabel, J., & Halsey, A. H. (Eds.). (1977). Power and ideology in
education. New York: Oxford University Press.
142. Katiyar, P.(1979), A study of cognitive functions in relation to achievement in
mathematics at high school stages, Ph.D. Edu., Gor. U., 1979-3
143. Kelly A (1987) Some Notes on Gender Differences in Mathematics .British
Journal of Sociology of Education, Vol. 8(3), pp. 305-311
144. Kennedy, Mary M (1998). Form and Substance in In-service Teacher Education
. Research Report from the National Institute for Science Education. Madison,
WI: University of Wisconsin.
Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Softwarehttp://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.
187
145. Ketterlin-Geller Leanne R. Paul Yovanoff (2009) Diagnostic Assessments in
Mathematics to Support Instructional Decision Making .Practical
Assesment,Research and Evaluation. Vol. 14(16), pp1-11
146. Khalid Madihah (2005) Reform Efforts: Making Mathematics Meaningful to
Students of Continuing Education .Paper presented at 3rd Asia pacific
conference on continuing education and lifelong learning. July 2005
147. Knodel John (1997) The closing of gender gap in schooling: The case of
Thailand Comparitive Education, Vol. 33( 3), pp. 61-86.
148. Kohr Richard L., James R. Masters, J. Robert Coldiron, Ross S. Blust, Eugene
W. Skiffington(1989); The relationship of race, class, and gender with
mathematics achievement for fifth-, eighth-, and eleventh-grade students in
Pennsylvania schools. Peabody Journal of Education, Vol. 66(2), pp147-71
149. Kolhe, S.P(1985). Construction of Attitude Scales and Measurement of
Attitudes of Students of Jalgaon District towards Mathematics, Ph.D., Edu.,
Poona University
150. Koller O and Baumert J (2001) Does Interest Matter? The relationship between
Academic Interest and Mathematics Achievement. Journal for research in
Mathematics Edcucation, Vol 32 (5),pp 448-470
151. Kilpatrick, J. (1992) A history of research in mathematics education. In:
Grouws,D.A., ( Ed) Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and
learning, pp. 3–38. New York, Macmillan.
152. Kingdon, Geeta G. (1994) An economic evaluation of school management-types
in India:A case study of Uttar Pradesh. Unpublished D.Phil. thesis, Economics
Department, Oxford University.
153. Kingdon, Geeta G.( 1996b). The quality and efficiency of public and private
schools: A case study of urban India. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and
Statistics 58, no. 1 (Feb.): 55–80.
154. Kingdon Geeta C (2008) School Sector effects on Student achievement in India
.In Chakravarti R and P Peterson (Eds) School Choice International- exploring
Public-Private partnerships. MIT Press .Chapter 6
Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Softwarehttp://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.
188
155. K. K. Perkins, W. K. Adams(2005) Correlating Student Beliefs With Student
Learning UsingThe Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey. Physics
Education Research Conference Proceedings 2004.
156. Klein David,(2000) Math problems: Why the US Department of Education’s
recommended maths programs don’t add up. American School Board Journal.
Vol.(4) pp 52-57,
157. Kloosterman, P., & Stage, F. K. (1992). Measuring beliefs about mathematical
problem solving. School Science and Mathematics, Vol 92., pp109 115.
158. Krishna Kumari, (1980) An Investigation into the Use of Mathematics Textbook
(Class II) as a Tool of Teaching, SCERT, Haryana,
159. Kolhe, S.P.(1985) Construction of Attitude Scales and Measurement of
Attitudes of Students of Jalgaon District towards Mathematics, Ph.D., Edu.,
Poona U., 1985
160. Kulkarni, S. S., Mohanlal and Naida, C.A.S.(1970), All India survey of
achievement in mathematics (Primary, Middle and High school), NCERT, New
Delhi, 1970-1
161. KulkarnI, S. S. and Kuldip Kumar.(1986), Tests and measurement : a trend
report, in M. B. Buch (Ed.), Third survey of research in education, NCERT,
New Delhi, 1986
162. Kumari N (1983) ,Study of relationship between socio-economic status and
conservation of number and substance in Delhi school children. 1983. Phd
Thesis. Jamia Milia Islamia. New delhi
163. Kumari K., An investigation into the use of mathematics textbook (Class II) as a
tool of teaching, SCERT, Haryana, 1980-4
164. Lalitha Bai T K(1992) A comparative study of the cognitive factor structures of
high, average and low achievers in secondary school mathematics. Phd Edu
.University of Kerala
165. Lalithamma, K N (1983), Formulation of criteria for writing text books in
mathematics and evolution of the mathematics text books prescribed for the
secondary schools of Kerala, PhD,. Dept. of Education ., Kerala University,
1981- 3
Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Softwarehttp://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.
189
166. Lampert, M. (1985). How do teachers manage to teach? Perspectives on
problems in practice. Harvard Educational Review, Vol. 55(2) pp 178-194.
167. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in
everyday life. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge:
168. Leder, G. C, Forgasz, H. J., & Solar, C. (1996). Research and intervention
programs in mathematics education: A gendered issue. In A. J. Bishop et al.
(Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education Netherlands: Kluwer
Academic Publishers. pp. 945-985
169. Little, Judith W. (1993). Teacher’s Professional Development in a Climate of
Educational Reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis Vol.15(2), pp
129-151.
170. Lloyd J, Walsh J, Yaleigh MS (2005 ), Sex differences in performance
attributions, efficacy and mathematics achievement : If I'm so Smart, Why Don't
I Know It? .Canadian Journal of Education, Vol. 3 pp 384-408
171. Lockheed Marlaine ,Barbara Burns(1990) School effects on achievement in
172. Secondary mathematics in Brazil. Policy Research Working Paper 525, The
World Bank
173. Mainka, G.K.(1983), Acquisition of Concept in Mathematics of Pupils at
Primary School Level, and its relation to Some Personal and Environmental
Variables of the Pupils, Ph.D. Education., Bombay University.
174. Manjrekar, N.,(2001) Gender in the mathematics curriculum, Paper presented
at seminar on Mathematics and Science Education in School: Teaching
practices, Learning Strategies and Curricular issues, Zakir HusainCentre for
Educational Studies, JNU, New Delhi, March 2001.
175. Manjunath D (2009) A Study Of The Use Of Mathematics Laboratory For
Teaching Mathematics By Developing A Strategy And Testing Its
Effectiveness. www.ejournal.aiaer.Vol 21(1)
Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Softwarehttp://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.
190
176. Maqsud Muhammad , Chaudhry M. Khalique( 1991)Relationships of some
socio-personal factors to mathematics achievement of secondary school and
university students in Bophuthatswana. Educational Studies in Mathematics
Vol. 22(4).pp 377 - 390
177. Mayer S Patricia and Jones M G(2004) Controlling choice: Teachers, students
and manipulatives in mathematics classrooms. School and Science Mathematics
,Vol 104(1),. pp 17 Jan 2004
178. Mayer, S. E., & Jencks, C. (1989). Poverty and the Distribution of Material
Hardship. The Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 24(1), 88-113.
179. Mcleod D B (1992) Research on affect in mathematics education, a Recognition.
In D A Grows (Ed) Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and
learning(pp. 575-598). New York Macmillan
180. Mcleod D B (1994) Research on affect and mathematics learning in the JRME:
1970 to the present. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.
Vol. 25(6), pp 637 -647.
181. Mishra D D (1996) Testing the effectiveness of new instructional methods in
attaining better achievement in mathematics in the secondary schools of
Arunachal Pradesh. Ph.D. Education ., Gauhati . University
182. Miyan, M.(1983) A study to examine the effectiveness of methods of teaching
mathematics in developing mathematical creativity, Ph.D. Education, JMI,
1982-3
183. Miyan, M.(1983) Research in mathematics education a trend report
.Government Of IndiaMinistry Of Human Resource Development,Department
Of Education
184. Monaghan John (2007) Linking school mathematics to out-of-school
mathematical activities: student interpretation of task,understandings and goals
.International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education. Vol 2( 2), July
2007
185. McSheffrey, K., (1992). Mathematics Experiences of Women and Girls: A
Narrative Inquiry, Master's Thesis, Queen'sUniversity,
Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Softwarehttp://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.
191
186. Mohd. Sahar Sauian(2002), Mathematics education: The relevance of
“contextual teaching” in developing countries, Proceedings of ICMI for
EARCOME2 & SECME9, Singapore,
187. Moore, D. S. (1997). New pedagogy and new content: The case of statistics.
International Statistical Review, Vol. 65(2), 123-165.
188. Muralidharan K, Kremer M (2006)” Public and Private Schools in Rural India.
A Report, Department of Economics , Harvard university Cambridge, MA.
189. Murty V K (2007)A Brief History Of Indian Mathematics.Prabuddha
Bharatawww.esamskriti.com. September.
190. Naik, S. and Subramaniam, K. (2008), Integrating the measure and quotient
interpretation of fractions. In O. Figueras et al. (Eds.) International group of the
psychology of mathematics education: Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of PME
32 and PME-NA XXX (PME29), Vol .4, 17-24, Morelia, Mexico.
191. Naik S P (1998) Socio-economic status, Intelligence and attainment of Higher
Education, Perspectives on Comparitive Education,Anmol Publications,New
Delhi, pp155-156
192. Nalinidevi G.(1976), Development of number concept in young children, Ph.D.
Psychology., SVU, 1976-3
193. NCTM. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics.
Reston, VA: The Council.
194. NCTM (1998 ) Principles and Standards for School Mathematics: Discussion
Draft
195. NCERT, National Curriculum Framework for School Education—2000.
National Council of Educational Research and Training , New Delhi
196. NCERT (1995), Teacher policy, training needs and perceived status of teachers.
Indian Educational Review , special number 1995. National Council of
Educational Research and Training, New Delhi
197. Neal D C (1969) The role of attitudes in learning mathematics. Arithmetic
Teacher. Vol 16. pp 631-640
Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Softwarehttp://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.
192
198. Nebres, B.F (1995) Mathematic Education In An Era of Globalization: Linking
Education,Society and Culture in Our Region; International Conference on
International Collaboration in Math Education, 1995ICMI, Melbourne,
Australia.
199. Newsletter,Maps of India(2008) Azim Premji stresses on the importance of
school education in budget 2008
200. Olatoye, R.A.(2002) A causal model of school factors as determinants of
science achievement in Lagos State secondary schools. Unpublished Ph.D
Thesis,University of Ibadan, Ibadan
201. Olof Bjorg Steinthorsdóttir, Bharath Sriraman (2003) Iceland and rural/urban
girls- pisa examined from an emancipatory viewpoint The Montana
Mathematics Enthusiast, Monograph 1, pp. 169-178
202. Ong Faye (1999) Editor. Mathematics Content Standards for California Public
Schools, Kindergarten Through Grade Twelve .California Department of
Education.
203. Parasnis, H.N.(1985) , To construct and standardize a test for measuring
creativity in mathematics of X standard (Marathi medium) students in Pune,
Ph.D. Edu., SNDTU,1985-4
204. Patel, N.R( 1984) An Investigation into the Mathematical Ability of Pupils of
Classes IX and X in the Context of Some Cognitive and Affective Variables,
Ph.D. Edu., SPU, 1984
205. Patra, K. and Mech, A. (2010) A study on attitudes Towards Mathematics
and Its Impact on the Mathematics achievement of school students.
International Journalof Mathematics Education. Vol.1(1) pp1-12
206. Patra, K. and Mech, A. (2010) The Effect of Gender on Mathematics
Achievement among school students. Bulletin of the Gauhati University
Mathematics association(GUMA ) Vol 11, 2010, pp 121-136
207. Patra, K. and Mech, A. (2011) Relation Between School Environment
Variables and Mathematics Achievement Among students of Bongaigaon
District. Journal of Indian education. NCERT, February 2011
Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Softwarehttp://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.
193
208. Perry, B., Vistro-Yu, C., Howard, P., Wong, N.-Y. and Keong, F.H. (2002)
Beliefs of primary teachers about mathematics and its teaching and learning:
Views from Singapore, Philippines, Mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan and
Australia. In B. Barton, K. C. Irwin, M. Pfannkuch and M. O. J. Thomas (eds.)
Mathematics Education in the South Pacific, proceedings of the 25th annual
conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia
(MERGA) July 7-10, 2002 held at The University of Auckland, 2,pp.551-558.
209. Pettitt, Lisa(1995), Middle School Students' Perception of Math and Science
Abilities and Related Careers, Paper presented at the 61st Biennial Meeting of
the Society for Research in Child Development, Indianapolis
210. Plumley, J. (1978). The Impact of School building Age on the Academic
Achievement of Selected Fourth Grade Pupils in the State of Georgia. D. Ed.
Dissertation, Athens, Georgia, University of Georgia
211. Prabha R N (1992) An investigation into the effectiveness of programmed
mathematics in relation to some socio-academic variables.Phd Edu .Patna
University
212. Radeu M,(2002) Basic Skills Versus conceptual understanding in Mathematics
Education: The Case of Fraction Division. ZDM 2002 Vol. 34 (3) pp 93-95
213. Rajput, A.S. (1984) Study of Academic Achievement of Students in
Mathematics in Relation to Their Intelligence, Achievement, Motivation and
Socioeconomic Status, Ph.D. Education, Pan. University
214. Raj Rani(2005) Professional development of teachers.,Journal of Indian
Education,Vol 30(4),pp 61-71
215. Rastogi, S.(1983), Diagnosis of Weaknesses in Arithmetic as Related to the
Basic Arithmetic Skills and Their Remedial Measures, Ph.D. Edu., Gauhati.
University, 1983
216. Ravindra G, Basavvya D, Basti B C, (August 2004) Gender Differences and
Mathematical Abilities. Journal of Indian Education., Vol.29 ( 2), pp 114
217. Report of the Education Commission (1964-66). Education and National
development. (1966). New Delhi. Government of India
Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Softwarehttp://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.
194
218. Reyes l and Stanic G (1988) Race,sex ,socio-economic status and mathematics”
.Journal for research in mathematics education.Vol 19-I,26-43
219. Rittle-Johnson B and Stiegler R S (1998) The relation between conceptual and
procedural learning in mathematics. A review in “The development of
mathematical skills” pp 75-110 East Sussex UK.The psychological press
220. Roberts, P. (2005). Staffing an empty schoolhouse: Attracting and retaining
teachers in rural, remote and isolated communities. Sydney: NSW Teachers
Federation.
221. Romberg, T.A.(1992) Problematics features of the school mathematics
curriculum,New York:Macmillan
222. Rosaly A (1992) Relationship between attitude of students towards
mathematics and mathematics achievement. MPhil. Madrai Kamraj University
223. Saha, S. (2007) A study of Gender ,Attitude to Mathematics, Cognitive style
and Achievement in mathematics. Experiments in Education .Vol.35(6) pp 35-
39
224. Sali, V.Z.(1977) Question wise analysis of answer books of mathematics and
English of secondary school leaving examination, March, 1977, S R Puna, 1978-
3
225. Samson I (2005) “Why so rather than how to” International Journal for
Mathematics Teaching and Learning ISSN 1473 - 0111
226. Sarala S (1990) Conceptual errors of secondary school pupils in learning select
errors in modern mathematics Phd Edu . University of Kerala
227. Schreiber James B.(2002) Institutional and student factors and their influence on
advanced mathematics achievement .The journal of educational research. Vol.
5, pp. 274-286
228. Schubring, G. (1988). Factors determining theoretical developments of
mathematics education as a discipline: Comparative historical studies of its
institutional and social contexts. In H.-G. Steiner & AVermandel (Eds.),
Foundations and methodology of the discipline mathematics education
(didactics of mathematics)
Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Softwarehttp://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.
195
229. Selta S (1992) The Socio-psychological and educational factors of differential
learning rate in modern mathematics at senior secondary stage. PhD Edu. Punjab
University
230. Shaughnessy, J. M. (1992). Research in probability and statistics. In D. A.
Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning .
New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
231. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. New York: Academic
Press.
232. Schoenfeld,A.H(1992). Learning to think mathematically: problem solving,
metacognition and sense-making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.),
Handbook for Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning New York:
MacMillan Publishing Company. pp. 334-370.
233. Schoenfeld,A.H. (2000) Purposes and Methods of Research in Mathematics
Education. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, Vol. 47(6), pp 2-10.
234. Schommer-Aikins Marlene, Orpha K. Duell, Rosetta Hutter (2005)
Epistemological Beliefs, Mathematical Problem - Solving Beliefs, and
Academic Performance of middle School Students. The Elementary School
Journal Vol.105(3), pp 289-304
235. Schunk, D. H. (1985). Self-efficacy and classroom learning. Psychology in
Schools, Vol.22,pp 208-223
236. Seeley Cathy, Pratt Harold,( 2004) Designing Mathematics or Science
Curriculum Programs. National Academy of Sciences. National Academies
Press, Washington, D.C. pg 19
237. Sharma A K (1978) A critical study of the achievement in mathematics by
pupils of secondary schools with particular reference to the state of Assam.PhD
thasis. Gauhati University.
238. Sherman, J. S., & Fennema, E. (1977). The study of mathematics among high
school girls and boys: Related factors. American Educational Research Journal,
Vol.14(2), pp 159-168.
Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Softwarehttp://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.
196
239. Shukla. S., Garg, V.P., Jain, V.K., Rajput, S. and Arora, O.P. (1994). Attainment
of Primary School Children in India, National Council of Educational Research
and Training, New Delhi.
240. Sidhu Kulbir Singh(1990) The Teaching of Mathematics. Sterling publishers.
New Delhi .pp 17-18,170-171
241. Singh, B(1986) A Study of Some Possible Contributing Factors to High and
Low Achievement in Mathematics of the High School Students of Orissa, Ph.D.
Education ., Sambalpur University.
242. Smith, Z.S., Williams, S.R & Smith, M.E. (2005) Elaborating a Change Process
Model for Elementary Mathematics Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices. Current
Issues in Education, Vol.8 (19).
243. Sreekanthi Y (2004), Grading, what can we learn from other countries. Journal
of Indian Education , Vol. 29(2) ,pp 76-77
244. Stamovlasis D, Georgios Tsaparlis, Charalambos Kamilatos, Dimitrios
Papaoikonomou, and Erifyli Zarotiadou (2005) Conceptual understanding
versus algorithmic problem solving:Further evidence from a national chemistry
examination. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, Vol.6 (2), pp 104-
118
245. Stigler, J.W., Fuson, K.C., Ham, M., and Kim, M.S(1986) An analysis of
addition and subtraction word problems in American and Soviet elementary
mathematics textbooks. Cognition and Instruction, 3(3), 153-171.
246. Stipek, Deborah, Granlinski, Heidi (1991) Gender Differences in Children's
Achievement-Related Beliefs and Emotional Responses to Success and Failure
in Mathematics, Journal of Educational Psychology .Vol. 83 (3), pp. 361-71
247. Subramanium K (2005) Mathematics Education Research: What is it and why is
it important. Learning Curve. Issue V .March 2005
248. Sugiyama, Y. (1987). A comparison of word problems in American and
Japanese textbooks. In J. P. Becker & T. Miwa (Eds.), Proceedings of the U.S.-
Japan seminar on mathematical problem solving, (pp.228-241)
249. Swetman, Daniel, Rural Elementary Students' Attitudes toward Mathematics,
Rural Educator , vol 16(3, )pp. 20-22
Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Softwarehttp://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.
197
250. Taori S,(2001) Communication in schools .Regency publications .New Delhi.
Pg 72
251. The International Encyclopedia of Education. , Pergamon ( Vol 6), Pg 3651.
252. The Sentinel(2009, October 18th )Education Dept in an appointment mess,
a. Guwahati, pg 1
253. The Sentinel (2009, November 28th) Most schools withouth power, library and
laboratory, Guwahati, pg 1
254. The Sentinel (2010 April 22nd) Teachers’ training institutes lie idle. Guwahati,
pg1
255. The Sentinel (2010 April 23rd) 12,734 primary teachers posts lying vacant.
Guwahati, pg 1.
256. The Telegraph northeast(2010, August 12th) Training must for teachers,
Guwahati, pg 15.
257. Thiagarajan AP, Krishnan SS, Jeyalatha K (1995). A studyof teaching
competency and achievement. Indian Journal of Psychometry and Education,
Vol.26(1),pp 61-63.
258. Tirosh, D., & Graeber, A. O. (1990). Evoking cognitive conflict to explore
preservice teachers’ thinking about division. Journal for Research in
Mathematics Education, Vol.21(2),pp 98-108.
259. Thakore, B.(1980) Construction of diagnostic tests and preparing remedial
material as well as testing its effectiveness on fractions and decimal fractions for
the students of grade V of Gujarati medium schools in Greater Bombay, Ph.D.
Edu.,
260. Thomas (2006) The effects on student’s achievements and attitudes using
integrated learning systems with co-operative pairs. Journal Educational
Technology Research and Development , Vol.45. 51-64
261. Thompson, A. (1992) Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the
research. In A. D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics learning
and teaching New York: Macmillan, pp. 127–146
Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Softwarehttp://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.
198
262. Thompson Ross A, Zamboanga Byron L(2004) Academic Aptitude and Prior
knowledge as Predictors of Student Achievement in Introduction to Psychology
.Journal of Educational Psychology ,Vol. 96(4), pp 778-784
263. Tooley, James, Pauline Dixon. (2003.) Private schools for the poor: A case
study from India. Reading, U.K.: CfBT.
264. Toutkoushian R, Curtis T (2005)Effects of Socioeconomic Factors on Public
High School Outcomes and Rankings.The Journal of Educational Research,
Vol. 98( 5 ), pp 259 – 271
265. Traub R.E,,Weiss J, C W Fisher ,G Muesella (1972) Closure on Openess,
describing and quantifing Open education. Interchange, Vol. 3, pp 69-84
266. Tsui, M.( 2008),Gender and Mathematics Achievement in China and the United
States. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological
Association Annual Meeting, Sheraton Boston and the Boston Marriott Copley
Place, Boston,
267. Tuli, M.R., (1979) Mathematical creativity as related to aptitude for
achievement in and attitude towards mathematics, Ph.D. Edu., Pan. U., 1979-3
268. Turner, R. (1994) Sex differences in mathematical performance among Chinese
middle school students. In G. Bell, B. Wright, N. Leeson and J. Geake (eds.)
Proceedings of the 17th annual conference of the Mathematics Education
Research Group of Australasia (MERGA): Challenges in mathematics
education: Constraints on Construction,1(2),pp.649-666.
269. Vinson, A. (2002). Inquiry into public education in New South Wales: Second
Report. Retrieved 18th August 2005, from www.pub-edinquiry.org /reports/
final_reports/ 03/
270. W. K Adams, K. K. Perkins(2005) Correlating Student Beliefs With Student
Learning Using The Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey. PERC
Proceedings 2004 .
271. Walavalakar, Y.N.(1971)A critical evaluation of mathematics textbooks for
standards II, III and IV, Government Polytechnic. Rathnagiri, 1971 (MSBTPCR
financed)-3
Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Softwarehttp://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.
199
272. Weisbeck, L. (1992),Teachers’ thoughts about children during mathematics
instruction, PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1992.
273. Wheeler David ( 1982.), Mathematisation Matters, For the Learning of
Mathematics.Vol. 3(1), pp 45 - 47
274. White R K (1982) Relation between socio-economic status and academic
achievement. Psychological Bulletin , Vol 91( 3 ),pp 461-481
275. Wikepedia .en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematics education
276. Williams, J.H. (2005). Cross-national variations in rural mathematics
achievement: A descriptive overview. Journal of Research in Rural Education,
20(5) Retrieved from http://jrre.psu.edu/articles/20-5.pd
277. Willingham, W. W. and Cole, N. S. (1997). Gender and Fair Assessment.
LawrenceErlbaum Associates, Publishers.
278. Willis, P. E. (1977). How working class kids get working class jobs.
Learning to labour: Farnborough, England: Saxon.
279. Willoughby, S. S. (1990). Mathematics education for a changing world.
Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
280. Wiley, David E. and Bokhee Yoon(1995) Teacher Reports on Opportunity to
Learn: Analyses of the 1993 California Learning Assessment System (CLAS).
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis .Vol. 17(3), pp 355-370
281. Wise L L ( 1985), ). Project TALENT Mathematics course participation in the
1960s and its career consequences. In S. F. Chipman, L. R. Brush D. M. Wilson
(Eds.),, Woman and mathematics-balancing the equation . Hillsdale NJ:
Erlbaum, pp 25-58
282. Xin Ma, ,Nand Kishore(1997) Assessing the relationship between Attitude
towards mathematics and Achievement in mathematics---A Meta Analysis
.Journal for research in mathematics education.Vol 28 (1),pp 26-47
283. Xin Ma and Jiangmin Xu (2004) Determining the causal ordering between
attitude towards Mathematics and achievement in Mathematics. American
Journal of Education. Vol 11093), pp 256-280.
Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Softwarehttp://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.
200
284. Yara Philias Olatunde(2009) Students Attitude Towards Mathematics and
AcademicAchievement in Some Selected Secondary Schools in Southwestern
Nigeria. European Journal of Scientific Research.Vol.36 (3), pp.336-341
285. Young, Deidra J (1998). Rural and Urban Differences in Student Achievement
in Science and Mathematics: A Multilevel Analysis. .Eric Document
EJ581479
286. Zhang, D (1992) ,Developments in school mathematics education around the
world: applications-oriented curricula and technology-supported learning for all
students, In I. Wirszup and R. Streit (eds.) Proceedings of the third UCSMP
(University of Chicago School Mathematics Project) International Conference
on Mathematics Education, The University of Chicago, Vol 3, pp.468-480.
287. Zonghru Li, China P R (2004) Characteristics and Issues of China’s Primary
Mathematics Textbooks based on the Current Curriculum Standards. Paper
presented at ICME 10, Discussion Group 14, Copenhagen, Denmark
288. Zhu Yan and Fan Lianghuo(2004 )An analysis of the Representation of Problem
Types in Chinese and US Mathematics Textbooks .Paper presented at ICME 10,
Discussion Group 14, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Softwarehttp://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.