+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation...

Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation...

Date post: 18-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: tamsin-oliver
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
45
Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK
Transcript
Page 1: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

Genetic Theory

Pak Sham

SGDP, IoP, London, UK

Page 2: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

Theory Model Data

Inference

ExperimentFormulation

Interpretation

Page 3: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

Components of a genetic model

POPULATION PARAMETERS

- alleles / haplotypes / genotypes / mating types

TRANSMISSION PARAMETERS

- parental genotype offspring genotype

PENETRANCE PARAMETERS

- genotype phenotype

Page 4: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

Transmission : Mendel’s law of segregation

A

A

A

A

Paternal

Maternal

AA

AA

A

A A

A

½ ½

½

½

¼

¼

¼

¼

Page 5: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

Two offspring

AA AA AA AA

AA

AA AA

AA AA AA

AA AA

AA AA

AA AA

AA AA

AA AA

AA AA

AA AA

AA AA

AA AA

AA AA

AA AA

AA AA

AA AA

AA AA

AA AA

Sib 2

Sib1

Page 6: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

IBD sharing for two sibs

AA AA AA AA

AA

AA AA

AA 0

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

2

Pr(IBD=0) = 4 / 16 = 0.25Pr(IBD=1) = 8 / 16 = 0.50Pr(IBD=2) = 4 / 16 = 0.25

Expected IBD sharing = (2*0.25) + (1*0.5) + (0*0.25) = 1

Page 7: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

IBS IBD

A1A2 A1A3

A1A2 A1A3

IBS = 1

IBD = 0

Page 8: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

1

2

- identify all nearest common ancestors (NCA)

X Y

- trace through each NCA and count # of meioses

via X : 5 meiosesvia Y : 5 meioses

- expected IBD proportion = (½)5 + (½)5 = 0.0625

Page 9: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

Sib pairs

Expected IBD proportion = 2 (½)2 = ½

Page 10: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

Segregation of two linked loci

Parental genotypes

Likely (1-)

Unlikely ()

= recombination fraction

Page 11: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

Recombination & map distance

2

1 2me

Haldane mapfunction

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

0.5

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Map distance (M)

Re

co

mb

ina

tio

n f

rac

tio

n

Page 12: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

Segregation of three linked loci

(1-1)(1-2)

1 2

(1-1)2

1(1-2)

12

Page 13: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

Two-locus IBD distribution: sib pairs

Two loci, A and B, recombination faction

For each parent:

Prob(IBD A = IBD B) = 2 + (1-)2 =

either recombination for both sibs,

or no reombination for both sibs

Page 14: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

2 )1(2 2)1(

2)1(2 2)1(

)1( )1( )1(21

0

1/2

1

0 1/2 1

at QTL

at M

Conditional distribution of at maker given at QTL

Page 15: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

Correlation between IBD of two loci

For sib pairs

Corr(A, B) = (1-2AB)2

attenuation of linkage information with increasing

genetic distance from QTL

Page 16: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

Population Frequencies

Single locus

Allele frequencies A P(A) = p

a P(a) = q

Genotype frequencies

AA p(AA) = u

Aa p(Aa) = v

aa p(aa) = r

Page 17: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

Mating type frequencies

u v r

AA Aa aa

u AA u2 uv ur

v Aa uv v2 vr

r aa ur vr r2

Random mating

Page 18: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium

u+½v r+½v

A a

u+½v A

r+½v a

u1 = (u0 + ½v0)2

v1 = 2(u0 + ½v0) (r0 + ½v0)r1 = (r0 + ½v0)2

u2 = (u1 + ½v1)2

= ((u0 + ½v0)2 + ½2(u0 + ½v0) (r0 + ½v0))2

= ((u0 + ½v0)(u0 + ½v0 + r0 + ½v0))2

= (u0 + ½v0)2 = u1

Page 19: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

Hardy-Weinberg frequencies

Genotype frequencies:

AA p(AA) = p2

Aa p(Aa) = 2pq

aa p(aa) = q2

Page 20: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

Two-locus: haplotype frequencies

Locus B

B b

Locus A A AB Ab

a aB ab

Page 21: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

Haplotype frequency table

Locus B

B b

Locus A A pr ps p

a qr qs q

r s

Page 22: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

Haplotype frequency table

Locus B

B b

Locus A A pr+D ps-D p

a qr-D qs+D q

r s

Dmax = Min(ps,qr), D’ = D / Dmax

R2 = D2 / pqrs

Page 23: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

Causes of allelic association

Tight Linkage

Founder effect: D (1-)G

Genetic Drift: R2 (NE)-1

Population admixture

Selection

Page 24: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

Genotype-Phenotype Relationship

Penetrance = Prob of disease given genotype

AA Aa aa

Dominant 1 1 0

Recessive 1 0 0

General f2 f1 f0

Page 25: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

Biometrical model of QTL effects

Genotypic

means

AA m + a

Aa m + d

aa m - a

0

d +a-a

Page 26: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

Quantitative Traits

Mendel’s laws of inheritance apply to complex traits influenced by many genes

Assume: 2 alleles per locus acting additivelyGenotypes A1 A1 A1 A2 A2 A2

Effect -1 0 1

Multiple loci Normal distribution of continuous variation

Page 27: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

Quantitative Traits

0

1

2

3

1 Gene 3 Genotypes 3 Phenotypes

0

1

2

3

2 Genes 9 Genotypes 5 Phenotypes

01234567

3 Genes 27 Genotypes 7 Phenotypes

0

5

10

15

20

4 Genes 81 Genotypes 9 Phenotypes

Page 28: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

Components of variance

Phenotypic Variance

Environmental Genetic GxE interaction

Page 29: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

Components of variance

Phenotypic Variance

Environmental Genetic GxE interaction

Additive Dominance Epistasis

Page 30: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

Components of variance

Phenotypic Variance

Environmental Genetic GxE interaction

Additive Dominance Epistasis

Quantitative trait loci

Page 31: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

Biometrical model for QTL

Genotype AA Aa aa

Frequency (1-p)2 2p(1-p) p2

Trait mean -a d a

Trait variance 2 2 2

Overall mean a(2p-1)+2dp(1-p)

Page 32: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

QTL Variance Components

Additive QTL variance

VA = 2p(1-p) [ a - d(2p-1) ]2

Dominance QTL variance

VD = 4p2 (1-p)2 d2

Total QTL variance

VQ = VA + VD

Page 33: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

Covariance between relatives

Partition of variance Partition of covariance

Overall covariance

= sum of covariances of all components

Covariance of component between relatives

= correlation of component variance due to component

Page 34: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

Correlation in QTL effects

Since is the proportion of shared alleles,

correlation in QTL effects depends on

0 1/2

1

Additive component 0 1/2 1

Dominance component 0 0 1

Page 35: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

Average correlation in QTL effects

MZ twins P(=0) = 0

P(=1/2) = 0

P(=1) = 1

Average correlation

Additive component = 0*0 + 0*1/2 + 1*1

= 1

Dominance component = 0*0 + 0*0 + 1*1

= 1

Page 36: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

Average correlation in QTL effects

Sib pairs P(=0) = 1/4

P(=1/2) = 1/2

P(=1) = 1/4

Average correlation

Additive component = (1/4)*0+(1/2)*1/2+(1/4)*1

= 1/2

Dominance component = (1/4)*0+(1/2)*0+(1/4)*1

= 1/4

Page 37: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

Decomposing variance

0AdoptiveSiblings

0.5 1DZ MZ

A

C

E

Covariance

Page 38: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

Path analysis

allows us to diagrammatically represent linear

models for the relationships between variables

easy to derive expectations for the variances and

covariances of variables in terms of the

parameters of the proposed linear model

permits translation into matrix formulation (Mx)

Page 39: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

Variance components

Phenotype

ACE

e ac

D

d

UniqueEnvironment

AdditiveGeneticEffects

SharedEnvironment

DominanceGeneticEffects

P = eE + aA + cC + dD

Page 40: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

ACE Model for twin data

PT1

ACE

PT2

A C E

1

[0.5/1]

e ac eca

Page 41: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

QTL linkage model for sib-pair data

PT1

QSN

PT2

Q S N

1

[0 / 0.5 / 1]

n qs nsq

Page 42: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

Population sib-pair trait distribution

Page 43: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

Under linkage

Page 44: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

No linkage

Page 45: Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.

Theory Model Data

Inference

ExperimentFormulation

Interpretation


Recommended