+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Genetics of Affective Disorders - Robert b Wesner Md (1)

Genetics of Affective Disorders - Robert b Wesner Md (1)

Date post: 16-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: maka
View: 8 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Genetics of Affective Disorders
43
Transcript
  • GeneticsofAffectiveDisorders

    ROBERTB.WESNER,MDandGEORGEWINOKUR,MD

  • e-Book2015InternationalPsychotherapyInstitutefreepsychotherapybooks.org

    FromDepressiveDisorderseditedbyBenjaminWolberg&GeorgeStricker

    Copyright1990byJohnWiley&Sons,Inc.

    AllRightsReserved

    CreatedintheUnitedStatesofAmerica

  • TableofContents

    TWINSTUDIES

    ADOPTIONSTUDIES

    FAMILYSTUDIES

    GENETICMARKERSTUDIES

    SUMMARY

    REFERENCES

  • GeneticsofAffectiveDisorders

    ROBERTB.WESNER,MDandGEORGEWINOKUR,MD

    A regular finding in the study of affective disorders is that persons with

    theseillnessesoftenclusterwithinfamilies.Allmajorpsychiatricdisordersappear

    toresultatleastpartiallyfromaninheritedpredispositionandinthatmannerare

    not unlike othermedical disorders such as diabetes or coronary artery disease.

    The theory that affective disorders and othermedical disorders share common

    geneticmodesoftransmissioncanbeadifficultconcepttofollow,ifoneassumes

    that mental disorders are purely abnormal psychological reactions to

    environmentalevents.Thisisnottosaythattheenvironmentplaysnoroleinthe

    development and course of these disorders. In fact, the environment probably

    playsa large role in thedevelopmentandcourseofmentaldisordersandother

    medicaldisordersaswell.

    For example, it is quite clear that coronary arterydisease runs in families

    (Wolinsky,1979);havingafirst-degreerelativewiththedisorderisconsideredto

    be a risk factor. It is also hypothesized that the environmentmay influence the

    course of coronary artery disease. Smoking, obesity, lack of exercise, and high

    dietary fatcontentareallenvironmentallycontrolled factors thatmay influence

    thecourseoftheillness(Messerli,1986).Apersonwithageneticpredisposition

    to coronary artery disease will have different physiological reactions to these

    Depressive Disorders 5

  • environmental factors that one who does not possess that predisposition. The

    heartandbloodvesselsare then thesubstrate for theenvironment toactupon.

    The physical and metabolic abnormalities that are the product of the genetic

    diathesis (congenital predisposition) will interact with the environment to

    produce the usual features of coronary artery disease (i.e., atheromas, reduced

    coronary blood flow, and angina). Removing or minimizing the environmental

    factors in coronary artery diseasemay stall the onset of the disorder, produce

    clinically insignificant changes, or entirely prevent the development of any

    manifestationofthedisorder.Theunderlyingcongenitalpredisposition,however,

    remainsconstant.

    Theinteractionbetweentheenvironmentandgeneticfactorsmaybeplayed

    outsimilarlyintheaffectivedisorders.Certainenvironmentalorbiologicalevents

    in genetically susceptible persons possibly may lead to episodes of affective

    illness. The combination of environmental and biological genetic factors is the

    liabilitythatagivenindividualwilldevelopanaffectivedisorder.

    Thegeneticsofanymentaldisordercanberesearchedinavarietyofways.

    In this chapter we will discuss four major research paradigmstwin studies,

    adoptionstudies,familystudies,andgeneticmarkerstudies.

    Genetics of Affective Disorders 6

  • TWINSTUDIES

    Twinstudiescomparetheconcordanceratesformonozygoticanddizygotic

    twin pairs. Monozygotic twins possess identical sets of genes. Dizygotic twins

    shareonly50percentofthegenestheyinheritedfromtheirparentsandinthat

    manner are exactly the same as other sibling pairs. If a disorder is genetically

    transmitted,thenmonozygotictwinsshouldshowahigherconcordanceratethan

    dizygotictwinsbecauseoftheiridenticalgeneticmaterial.Amajorassumptionin

    these studies is that environmental factors are controlled, since twins raisedby

    their biological parents share identical environments. Although environmental

    influencesmaybeimportant,studiesofpsychologicaltraitsintwinsindicatethat

    monozygotictwinswhohavehighlysimilarenvironmentsdonotonaverageshow

    anygreaterconcordanceforpersonalitytraitsorIQthanmonozygotictwinswith

    lessenvironmentalsimilarity(Loehlin&Nicholas,1976).

    FivetwinstudiesofaffectiveillnessareshowninTable6.1.Thehypothesis

    of a genetic component for affective disorders is supported by the repeated

    findingofahigherconcordanceinmonozygoticthanindizygoticpairs.Poolingthe

    datafromallstudies,anoverallconcordancerateof63.8percentisobservedfor

    monozygoticand14percentfordizygoticpairs.InalargestudyusingtheDanish

    twin register, Bertelsen and colleagues identified 110 same-sex twin pairs in

    whichatleastonehadaffectivedisorder(Bertelsen,1979).Twinswerepersonally

    interviewedandzygocitywasestablishedusingserologicmarkersor,ifbothtwins

    Depressive Disorders 7

  • were not alive, anthropometric methods. Of 55 monozygotic twin pairs, 58.3

    percentwereconcordantforaffectivedisorderwhereasonly17.3percentofthe

    52dizygoticpairswereconcordant.

    In a study of 12monozygotic twin pairs reared apart, using data gleaned

    frompublishedseries,67percentwereconcordantforaffectivedisorder,afigure

    strikinglysimilartothepooledfigureof63.8percent(Price,1968).

    TABLE6.1.ConcordanceRatesforAffectiveIllnessinMonozygoticandDizygoticTwins*

    Study MonozygoticTwins DizygoticTwins

    ConcordantPairs/TotalPairs

    Concordance(%)

    ConcordantPairs/TotalPairs

    Concordance(%)

    Slater(1953) 4/7 57.1 4/17 23.5

    Kallman(1954) 25/27 92.6 13/55 23.6

    Harvald&Hauge(1965)

    10/15 66.7 2/40 5.0

    Allen,Cohen,Pollin,&Greenspan(1974)

    5/15 33.3 0/34 0.0

    Genetics of Affective Disorders 8

  • Bertelsen(1979) 32/55 58.3 9/52 17.3

    Totals 76/119 63.8 28/198 14.1

    *Datanotcorrectedforage.Diagnosesincludebothbipolarandunipolarillness.

    Source:Adaptedfrom:Numberger, J. I.,Goldin,L.R.,&Gershorv,E.S.(1986).Geneticsofpsychiatricdisorders. InG.Winokur&P.Clayton (Eds.),Themedical basis of psychiatry (pp. 486-521).Philadelphia:Saunders.

    Depressive Disorders 9

  • ADOPTIONSTUDIES

    Adoption studies attempt to separate genetic susceptibility from

    environmental factors. A demonstration that offspring reared away from their

    biological parents have higher than expected rates of illness would be a

    persuasiveargumentforinheritance.

    Adoption studies can be carried out in a number of ways. The simplest

    methodistoidentifyagroupofadoptedaffectedindividualsandcomparethemto

    a control group of unaffected adoptees. The adoptive and biological parents of

    bothgroupswouldbestudiedforthepresenceofillness.Ifthebiologicalparents

    of illadopteesshowhigherratesof illnessthanthebiologicalparentsofcontrol

    adopteesandbothsetsofadoptiveparents,thenageneticfactorcanbesaidtobe

    present.Anadoptionstudycanalsobedonebyidentifyingillparentswhoadopt

    away theirchildren.Theseoffspringcanbecompared toadopted-awaychildren

    born to unaffected parents. A complicated adoption study, the cross-fostering

    study, compares children of affected biological parents reared bywell adoptive

    parentstochildrenofwellbiologicalparentsrearedbyilladoptiveparents.

    Adoption studies do not provide information about the mode of

    transmission. They have been criticized because unknown and unquantifiable

    factors such as demographics and selection practices among adoption agencies

    mayplacechildreninenvironmentswherenongeneticriskfactorsareprevalent.

    Genetics of Affective Disorders 10

  • Thefamiliesofadultbipolaradopteesandthreecontrolgroupswerestudied

    by Mendlewicz and Rainer (1977). In addition to the adoptive and biological

    parents of 29 bipolar adoptees, the study included the biological parents of 31

    bipolar nonadoptees, the adoptive and biological parents of 22 unaffected

    adoptees,and thebiologicalparentsof20 individualswhodevelopedpolio.The

    polio group was added to control for the effect of raising a disabled child.

    Interviewswereconductedblindtotheclinicalstatusoftheadoptees.

    Table6.2 shows thediagnosesof the adoptive andbiologicalparents.The

    biologicalparentsofthebipolaradopteesandnonadopteesshowedsimilarrates

    of affective disorder (31 percent vs 26 percent). These same parents showed

    higher rates of affective illness than either the adoptive or biological parents of

    normaladoptees,andhigherratesthantheparentsofpoliopatients.Threemajor

    pointscanbemadefromthisstudy.First,thehypothesisofageneticcontribution

    tobipolaraffectivedisorderissupportedbythesedata.Second,theexcessamount

    ofunipolardisorderseeninthebiologicalparentsofallbipolarpatientssupports

    the notion that unipolar illness in some cases stems from the same genetic

    abnormalityasbipolarillness.Lastly,thedatashowthatunipolarillnessismore

    common in theadoptiveparents thanbipolardisorder. In fact, onlyone caseof

    bipolardisorderwasfoundintheadoptiveparents.

    TABLE6.2.AffectiveIllnessinParentsofBipolarAdopteesandControls

    Group Diagnosisof Adoptive Percent Biological Percent

    Depressive Disorders 11

  • Parent Parents Ill Parents Ill

    BipolaradopteesN=29

    Bipolar 1 4

    Unipolar 6 12% 12 31%

    Otheraffectivedisorder

    0 2

    BipolarnonadopteesN=31

    Bipolar 2

    Unipolar 11 26%

    Otheraffectivedisorder

    3

    NormaladopteesN=22

    Bipolar 0 0

    Unipolar 3 10% 1 2%

    Otheraffectivedisorder

    1 0

    PoliomyelitisN=20

    Bipolar 0

    Unipolar 4 10%

    Genetics of Affective Disorders 12

  • Otheraffectivedisorder

    0

    Data from Adoption Studies Supporting Genetic Transmission in Manic-Depressive Illness by J.MendlewiczandJ.Rainer,1977.Nature,268,326-329.

    This suggests that unipolar disorder is probably a heterogeneous group of

    illnesses, with some being related to bipolar illness and others perhaps not

    geneticallymediatedatall.

    Wender, Kety, and Rosenthal (1986) studied the biological and adoptive

    familiesof71adopteeswithaffectivedisordersand71matchedcontroladoptees

    withnoillness.Biologicalrelativesofilladopteeshadsignificantlyhigherratesof

    affectivedisorder (bipolar andunipolar) compared to thebiological relatives of

    controls. Alcohol abuse and dependence was also seen in greater frequency

    among thebiological relativesof ill adoptees, supportingearlier findings that in

    some cases affective disorders and alcoholism may be genetically related. The

    most significant finding was a striking increase in completed suicide in the

    biologicalrelativesofilladoptees,comparedtothoseofcontrols.

    In a study by Cadoret, 83 adoptees were selected from adoption records

    showing evidence that their biological parents had mental disorders (Cadoret,

    1978).Forty-threematchedcontrolswerealsoobtained.Alladopteesandatleast

    one adoptive parent were interviewed. All data were collected blind to the

    Depressive Disorders 13

  • diagnosis of the biological parents. Eight adoptees were found to have one

    biological parent with an affective disorder. Three of these adoptees were

    diagnosedashavinganaffectivedisorder,allofwhichwereunipolarillnesses(38

    percent). The remaining 75 adoptees in the experimental group and the 43

    controlshad four (5percent) and four (9percent) casesofunipolardepression

    respectively. The differences in the observed rates of affective illness in the

    adopteesofbiologicalparentswithaffectivedisordercomparedtothosewithout

    suchadisorderaresignificant.

    Inalargestudyof2,966adopteesborninSwedenandadoptedoutpriorto

    age three, Von Knorring and colleagues identified 56 adoptees with affective

    disorders and 59 with substance abuse (Von Knorring, Cloninger, Bohman, &

    Sigvardsson, 1983). Each affected adoptee was matched to one of 115 control

    adoptees with no mental illness. Adoptees with affective disorder showed no

    higherratesofaffectivedisorderineitherthebiologicaloradoptiveparentswhen

    compared to parents of matched controls. There was, however, a trend for

    nonpsychoticdepressedadopteestohavemoremotherswithaffectivedisorders

    than normal controls. Adoptees with affective disorder did show a significant

    increase in biological mothers with substance abuse compared to mothers of

    adoptees with no illness. No general concordance of any specific psychiatric

    diagnosiswasobservedbetweenadopteesandbiologicalparents.

    It should be pointed out that all subjects in this studywere diagnosed by

    Genetics of Affective Disorders 14

  • medical records only. Subjects identified as having no psychiatric illness could

    have, in fact, had episodes of illness that were treated but not recorded,

    misdiagnosed,ornottreatedatall.Insupportofthis,notoneoftheeightparents

    ofadopteeswithpsychoticdepressionwasdiagnosedashavingaffectivedisorder.

    Althoughthisispossibleandissimilartotheratefoundinthecontrols,itismuch

    lower than the rate observed in studieswhere relatives are directly examined.

    Despite its shortcomings, the study does suggest that some cases of unipolar

    depressionmaynotbegeneticallytransmitted.

    Depressive Disorders 15

  • FAMILYSTUDIES

    Familystudiesareeasilyappliedtotheresearchofthegeneticsofaffective

    disordersandhavebeenitscornerstone.Studiessuchastheseusuallybeginwith

    anaffectedindividual(proband)andstudyallavailablerelatives.Twobasictypes

    of familyresearcharerecognized.The familyhistorymethod involvesobtaining

    allpedigreeinformationfromtheprobandonly.Studiesofthisnaturehavebeen

    criticized because other affected familymembersmay conceal their illnesses or

    mayhavemilderformsofillnessthatwouldgounnoticedbyothers(Andreasen,

    Endicott,Spitzer,&Winokur,1977).Ingeneral,familyhistorystudiesarebiased

    byunderreporting.Thesecond,morecompletetypeoffamilystudyinvolvesthe

    directexaminationofallavailablerelatives.

    Familystudiesareuseful indelineatingtherangeofdisordersthatmaybe

    associated with a single genetic vulnerability. For example, Winokur

    demonstrated through a series of family studies that unipolar depression,

    alcoholism, and sociopathy cluster in certain kindreds, suggesting that all three

    stem from the same genetic abnormality (Winokur, 1972). When two or more

    disordersappeartobegeneticallyrelated,theyarereferredtoasaspectrum.

    Afamilystudyattemptstoidentifyallaffectedpersons.Inordertoshowthat

    anillnessisfamilial,theratesofillnessintherelativesofprobandsmustbehigher

    than the rates of the same illness in controls. The statistic used to compare

    familiesofprobandstocontrolsiscalledthemorbidrisktheratioofthenumber

    Genetics of Affective Disorders 16

  • ofillrelativesdividedbythetotalnumberofrelativesatriskforthedisorder.The

    calculationofthenumberatriskforthedisordermusttakeintoaccountvariable

    ageofonset. Inordertodothis, thenumberofrelativeswhoare inaparticular

    decadeismultipliedbythepercentageofaffectedpersonswhofirstbecomeillby

    that decade of their lives. This product is called the Bezugziffer (BZ). For each

    decade, BZs are summed and the total number is used in the calculation of the

    morbidrisk(Nurnberger,Goldin,&Gershon,1986).

    The familial concentration of affective disorders has been clearly

    demonstratedinnumerousfamilystudies.Table6.3showsthelifetimeprevalence

    ofaffectivedisordersinfirst-degreerelativesofpatientsandcontrols.Oftheeight

    studieslisted,eightidentifiedbipolarprobands,sixidentifiedunipolarprobands,

    and two utilized unaffected controls. Bipolar and unipolar probands had more

    relatives ill with either disorder than did normal control probands. The most

    common affective disorder seen in the relatives of either unipolar or bipolar

    probands was unipolar disorder. This suggests that at least in some families

    bipolar and unipolar illnesses are different phenotypic expressions of the same

    geneticillness.

    TABLE6.3.MorbidRiskforBipolarandUnipolarDisordersinFirst-DegreeRelativesofPatientsandControls

    NumberatRisk MorbidRisk(%)

    Depressive Disorders 17

  • Bipolar Unipolar

    Bipolarprobands:

    Angst(1966) 161 4.3 13.0

    Perris(1966) 627 10.2 0.5

    Winokur&Clayton(1967b) 167 10.2 20.4

    Helzer&Winokur(1974) 151 4.6 10.6

    Gershon,Baron,&Leckman(1975) 341 3.8 6.8

    Smeraldi,Negri,&Melica(1977) 172 5.8 7.1

    Taylor,Abrams,&Hayman(1980) 601 4.8 4.2

    Gershon,Goldin,Weissman,&Nurnberger(1981)

    598(572)* 8.0 14.9

    Unipolarprobands:

    Angst(1966) 811 0.3 5.1

    Genetics of Affective Disorders 18

  • Perris(1966) 684 0.3 6.4

    Gershon,Baron,&Leckman(1975) 96 2.1 11.5

    Smeraldi,Negri,&Melica(1977) 185 0.6 8.0

    Taylor,Abrams,&Hayman(1980) 96 4.1 8.3

    Gershon,Goldin,Weissman,&Nurnberger(1981)

    138(133) 2.9 16.6

    Normalprobands:

    Gershon,Baron,&Leckman(1975) 518(411) 0.2 0.7

    Gershon,Goldin,Weissman,&Nurnberger(1981)

    217(208) 0.5 5.8

    *Total number at risk for bipolar illness appears first. The number in parentheses represents thenumberatriskforunipolardisorderwhenknown.

    Source: Adapted from: Gershon, E. S., Hamovit, J., Guroff, J. J., Dibble, E., Leckman, J. F., Sceery,W.,Targum,S.D.,Nurnberger, J. I.,Goldin,L.R.,&Bunney,W.E. (1982).A familystudyofschizoaffective,bipolarI,bipolarII,unipolarandnormalcontrolprobands.Archives ofGeneralPsychiatry,39,1157-1167.

    As seen from Table 6.3, morbid risk figures vary widely among studies.

    Depressive Disorders 19

  • There are many reasons for these observed variations. Diagnostic criteria

    employed, method of data collection, and cultural factors all vary and may be

    responsibleforthedifferencesobserved.Studiesutilizingafamilyhistorymethod

    tend to underestimate prevalences, whereas direct examination of all available

    relativestendstoproduceahigherfigurethatmaybeamorecorrectestimateof

    thetrueprevalence.

    Although each study has its own flaws with respect to methodology and

    cannotbedirectlycomparedtotheothers,eachshowsaclearincreaseinaffective

    disorder among first-degree relatives of ill probands. Taken together, family

    studiessupportthegenetichypothesisinthetransmissionofaffectivedisorders.

    Family, twin, and adoption studies, regardless ofmethodological flaws, all

    support the hypothesis of a genetic component for affective disorder. Just how

    affective disorder is transmitted is not known. Segregation analysis of family

    study data has failed to show the exactmode of transmission for any affective

    disorder(Gershon,Bunney,Leckman,VanEerdewegh,&DeBauche,1976).There

    are likely to be several reasons for this, but in order to proceed with this

    discussion two definitions are needed: Genotype is the actual inherited genetic

    material,andphenotypeistheobservedeffectofthegenotype.

    GenotypeandPhenotype

    Sincetheenvironmentmayplayaroleinthedevelopmentofthedisorder,

    Genetics of Affective Disorders 20

  • the absence of critical environmental factors may obscure the mode of

    transmission: Certain individuals with a genetic predisposition (affected

    genotype) and no environmental input may not show the disease (affected

    phenotype) at all. The finding thatmonozygotic twins fail to show 100 percent

    concordance for affective disorders suggests that the diseasemay notmanifest

    itselfinallpersonswhopossessthegene.Reducedpenetrance,thetermapplied

    to this phenomenon,may play a role inmanymental disordersschizophrenia

    andanxietydisorders,aswellasaffectivedisorders.Anygeneticillnesswithlow

    penetrance would clinically appear to be uncommon even though the actual

    frequencyofthediseasegenemaybehigh.Thepossibilitythatmanyindividuals

    could be carriers without overt illness would make it nearly impossible to

    determine the mode of transmission from family study data alone. Reduced

    penetranceimpliesthatthediseasegenedoesnotmanifestitselfatanytimeina

    carrierslifetime,assumingthatthecarrierhaslivedthroughtheentireageofrisk

    forthedisorder.Theacceptedagesofrisk forbipolarandunipolardisorderare

    20-50yearsand20-70yearsrespectively(Paykel,1982).Sinceaffectivedisorders

    have a variable age of onset, the penetrance of a disease gene may be age-

    dependent. In any family study therewill bea largenumberof individualswho

    may be gene carriers but who have not yet reached the age where the illness

    manifestsitself.Theidealfamilyforsegregationanalysiswouldbealargekindred

    withtheyoungestgenerationwellintotheageofriskandwithaclearunilateral

    sourceofillness.Sincefamilystudiesexaminepedigreesonlyatonepointintime,

    Depressive Disorders 21

  • many younger family members who may be carrier would be classified as

    unaffected,therebyobscuringthepathoftransmission.

    Untilnowithasbeenassumedthatasinglediseasegeneleadstoadefined

    singlephenotype.Thisassumptionmaynotbevalidforclinicalpsychiatry;there

    is evidence that phenotypesmay vary fromperson to person even though they

    maycontainthesamegeneticmaterial.Winokurdescribedaclinicalspectrumof

    disorders termed depression spectrum disease, which includes sociopathy,

    unipolardepression,andalcoholism(Winokur,1972).Thisclusteringappearedto

    breed true, and a closer look at the families studied showed that the cases of

    depressionwerecommonlyseeninwomenundertheageof40whohadunstable

    personalities; alcoholism and sociopathy were more commonly seen in males.

    Winokursworksuggestedthatthethreedisordersmaystemfromasinglegenetic

    abnormality that manifests itself differently due to sex effect and/or perhaps

    other undetermined environmental or biological factors. Other clinical studies

    haveshownaffectivedisordertoclusterwitheatingdisordersandpanicdisorder

    in certain families (Cantwell, Sturzenberger, Burrows, Salkin, & Green, 1977;

    Leckman,Weissman,Merikangas, Pauls,& Prusoff, 1983). Even among affective

    disorders, the wide range of possible phenotypes includes bipolar I, bipolar II,

    unipolar,cyclothymia,dysthymia,andschizoaffectivedisorder.Whetherallthese

    disordersstemfromthesamegeneticdiathesisisamatterfordebate,butthefact

    thatmanykindredsdoshowmorethanonetypeofdisordersuggeststhat,forat

    leastsomefamilies,singlegeneticabnormalitiesproduceavarietyofphenotypes.

    Genetics of Affective Disorders 22

  • Since affective disorders are not determined from laboratory or other

    biological/physical exams, the diagnosis ismade purely from the description of

    thedisordermadebythepatientandsometimesbyaknowledgeableinformant.

    The absence of objective tests for diagnosismeans that other disorders with a

    different pathophysiology may mimic an affective illness. Examples include

    hypothyroidism, reactivedepression,Cushingsdisease, andbereavement. Cases

    such as these, called phenocopies, may be clinically indistinguishable from

    primary affective disorders. Phenocopies are probably common in studies of

    unipolar depression (depending upon the diagnostic criteria used) and would

    certainlyobscureeffortstofindthemodeoftransmissioninthefamiliesinvolved.

    Heterogeneity

    The last and perhaps most difficult obstacle to uncovering the mode of

    transmissionforanyaffectivedisorderisheterogeneity.Geneticheterogeneityisa

    factor inmanydiseases. For example, diabetes in its varietyof formsmay stem

    fromseveraldifferentgeneticabnormalities.Earlyonset(insulin-dependent)and

    late onset (non-insulin-dependent) have different pathophysiologies and it has

    been demonstrated that non-insulin-dependent diabetes is familial but the

    insulin-dependent form is not (Unger & Foster, 1985). In a study of a

    heterogeneous illness, detecting the mode of transmission would be nearly

    impossible. A variety of genetic mechanisms would be in play and each would

    haveitsownmodeoftransmission.Inanattempttolimittheheterogeneityfactor,

    Depressive Disorders 23

  • familiesshowingX-linkedinheritancehavebeensingledoutforanalysis.Inthese

    cases there is a father-to-son transmission because fathers can pass only a Y

    chromosome on to their sons. It is assumed in these cases that the genetic

    abnormality is limited to the X chromosome, thereby excluding all of the

    autosomes. InX-linkeddominant transmission, femaleswouldbe affectedmore

    oftenbecausetheypossesstwoXchromosomesandthereforehavetwicetherisk

    ofgettingadiseasegene.Winokurandcolleaguesobservedbothanexcessof ill

    femalesandalackofmale-to-maletransmissioninastudyof62bipolarprobands

    (Winokur,Clayton,&Reich,1969).TheypostulatedanX-linkeddominantmodeof

    transmissionforbipolarillnessintheseselectedkindreds.Thesedataandothers,

    however,havebeenreanalyzed,andneitheranX-linkedoranautosomalsingle-

    major-locusmodeloftransmissioncouldexplaintotallythecasesofbipolarillness

    observedinthesefamilies(Bucheretal.,1981;Bucher&Elston,1982).X-linked

    dominanttransmissionwasalsopostulatedbyMendlewiczandFleiss inaseries

    ofbipolarprobandsbutareanalysisofthesedatafoundthattheX-chromosome

    single-major-locusmodeldidnot fit theirdata (Mendlewicz&Fleiss, 1974;Van

    Eerdewegh, Gershon,&VanEerdewegh, 1980).Data from families suggesting X

    linkage remain conflicting and the results obtained vary, based on assumptions

    madeandstatisticalmethodsused.ThehypothesisofanX-linkedformofaffective

    disorderislikelytobeviablebutprobablyaccountsforonlyaminorityofcases.

    Asmentioned earlier, variable phenotypemayhinder segregation analysis

    studiesandtherebyobscurethemodeoftransmission.Thisissuehasbeentaken

    Genetics of Affective Disorders 24

  • upbyanumberofresearchersintheanalysisof familystudydata.Gershonand

    colleagues have hypothesized that unipolar, bipolar I, bipolar II, and

    schizoaffective disorders are all part of a continuum stemming from a common

    geneticbackgroundwithmultiplethresholds(Gershonetal.,1982).Theirfamily

    study data are in support of that model. Further support for the concept of

    variable expressivity comes from work by Winokur. In one study (Winokur,

    1984), themorbid risks foraffectivedisorder in first-degree relativesofbipolar

    and unipolar probands were nearly identical. In another study (Winokur,

    Kadrmas,&Crowe,1986), first-degree relativesof schizoaffectivebipolarswere

    foundtohavemorbidrisks foraffectivedisordersimilar to thoseof first-degree

    relatives of other bipolar probands. Smeraldi, Fiammetta, Heimbuch, and Kidd

    (1981)foundthattheprobandspolaritydidnotpredictillnessinrelatives.

    Sex differences in the transmission of affective disorders have been

    demonstrated. Winokur and Clayton found that ill mothers more often

    transmittedtheirillnesstodaughtersthantosonswhereasillfatherstransmitted

    their illness with equal frequency to both sons and daughters (Winokur and

    Clayton,1967a).Angst,Frey,Lohmeyer,andZerbin-Rudin (1980)demonstrated

    that first-degree femalerelativesof femaleprobandshadhighermorbidityrisks

    than other relatives. At this point it is clear that the mode of transmission for

    affective disorders is not known and is likely to be complex, even though the

    familialclusteringoftheseillnessesiseasilydemonstrated.

    Depressive Disorders 25

  • GENETICMARKERSTUDIES

    Geneticmarkersposeanewmethodtouncovertheinheritabilityofaffective

    disorders.Itispossiblethatgeneticmarkersmayuncoversubtypesofillnessthat

    are linked to a particular marker, thereby directly addressing the problems of

    heterogeneityandvariableexpressivity.

    The search for genetic markers linked to mental disorders has included

    studies of color blindness, blood group polymorphisms, HLA (human leukocyte

    antigen)types,andDNA(deoxyribonucleicacid)markers.Themethodologyused

    inthesestudiesiscalledlinkageanalysis.Thismethoddeterminestheprobability

    that a geneticmarker andadisease trait are inherited together, suggesting that

    they are physically close to one another on the same chromosome.Marker loci

    mustbepolymorphic;thatis,theymusthaveatleasttwoformssothatoneform

    canbedemonstratedtobelinkedtoaparticulardisease.Additionally,themodeof

    inheritanceforthemarkerlocusmustbeknown.If linkagecanbedemonstrated

    betweenmarkerlocusanddiseaselocus,itisconvincingevidenceforthepresence

    ofageneticcomponent, since it isunlikely thatenvironmental influenceswould

    causesuchanassociation.

    Linkage

    Todemonstrate linkage, it isnecessary toemploymathematicalmodels to

    estimatethelikelihoodoflinkage.Thelod(logoftheoddsratio)scoremethodof

    Genetics of Affective Disorders 26

  • Morton tests the hypothesis of linkage between two loci (marker and disease)

    when the mode of transmission of each locus is known (Morton, 1955). This

    method assumes that the gene frequency and penetrance for the disease and

    markerlociareknown.Itisalsoassumedthatthereisnopopulationassociation

    betweenthemarkeranddiseaselociandthatrandommatingoccurs.Thepattern

    of segregation seen between the marker and disease loci is compared to the

    probabilityofobservingthesamepattern if thetwo lociarenot linked(random

    assortment).Theprobabilityoflinkageisexpressedintermsoftherecombination

    fractioncalledtheta.Onagivenchromosome,genescanrecombineatthetimeof

    meiosis.Genesthat lie farapartwillrecombinemore frequentlythangenesthat

    areclosetogether.Ifamarkerlocusanddiseaselocusaretightlylinked,thenthey

    shouldrecombineinfrequently.Thetatakesonavaluebetweenzeroandonehalf.

    A recombination fraction of one half means that the loci are expected to

    recombine50percentof the time; that is, theysegregate independentlyandare

    notlinked.Attheotherextreme,arecombinationfractionofzeromeansthatthe

    loci are expected never to recombine and always to segregate together. Using

    theserecombinationfractionsalodscoreisdefinedas:

    LODScore=log10 probabilityofobservingafamilyfor


Recommended