GeneticsofAffectiveDisorders
ROBERTB.WESNER,MDandGEORGEWINOKUR,MD
e-Book2015InternationalPsychotherapyInstitutefreepsychotherapybooks.org
FromDepressiveDisorderseditedbyBenjaminWolberg&GeorgeStricker
Copyright1990byJohnWiley&Sons,Inc.
AllRightsReserved
CreatedintheUnitedStatesofAmerica
TableofContents
TWINSTUDIES
ADOPTIONSTUDIES
FAMILYSTUDIES
GENETICMARKERSTUDIES
SUMMARY
REFERENCES
GeneticsofAffectiveDisorders
ROBERTB.WESNER,MDandGEORGEWINOKUR,MD
A regular finding in the study of affective disorders is that persons with
theseillnessesoftenclusterwithinfamilies.Allmajorpsychiatricdisordersappear
toresultatleastpartiallyfromaninheritedpredispositionandinthatmannerare
not unlike othermedical disorders such as diabetes or coronary artery disease.
The theory that affective disorders and othermedical disorders share common
geneticmodesoftransmissioncanbeadifficultconcepttofollow,ifoneassumes
that mental disorders are purely abnormal psychological reactions to
environmentalevents.Thisisnottosaythattheenvironmentplaysnoroleinthe
development and course of these disorders. In fact, the environment probably
playsa large role in thedevelopmentandcourseofmentaldisordersandother
medicaldisordersaswell.
For example, it is quite clear that coronary arterydisease runs in families
(Wolinsky,1979);havingafirst-degreerelativewiththedisorderisconsideredto
be a risk factor. It is also hypothesized that the environmentmay influence the
course of coronary artery disease. Smoking, obesity, lack of exercise, and high
dietary fatcontentareallenvironmentallycontrolled factors thatmay influence
thecourseoftheillness(Messerli,1986).Apersonwithageneticpredisposition
to coronary artery disease will have different physiological reactions to these
Depressive Disorders 5
environmental factors that one who does not possess that predisposition. The
heartandbloodvesselsare then thesubstrate for theenvironment toactupon.
The physical and metabolic abnormalities that are the product of the genetic
diathesis (congenital predisposition) will interact with the environment to
produce the usual features of coronary artery disease (i.e., atheromas, reduced
coronary blood flow, and angina). Removing or minimizing the environmental
factors in coronary artery diseasemay stall the onset of the disorder, produce
clinically insignificant changes, or entirely prevent the development of any
manifestationofthedisorder.Theunderlyingcongenitalpredisposition,however,
remainsconstant.
Theinteractionbetweentheenvironmentandgeneticfactorsmaybeplayed
outsimilarlyintheaffectivedisorders.Certainenvironmentalorbiologicalevents
in genetically susceptible persons possibly may lead to episodes of affective
illness. The combination of environmental and biological genetic factors is the
liabilitythatagivenindividualwilldevelopanaffectivedisorder.
Thegeneticsofanymentaldisordercanberesearchedinavarietyofways.
In this chapter we will discuss four major research paradigmstwin studies,
adoptionstudies,familystudies,andgeneticmarkerstudies.
Genetics of Affective Disorders 6
TWINSTUDIES
Twinstudiescomparetheconcordanceratesformonozygoticanddizygotic
twin pairs. Monozygotic twins possess identical sets of genes. Dizygotic twins
shareonly50percentofthegenestheyinheritedfromtheirparentsandinthat
manner are exactly the same as other sibling pairs. If a disorder is genetically
transmitted,thenmonozygotictwinsshouldshowahigherconcordanceratethan
dizygotictwinsbecauseoftheiridenticalgeneticmaterial.Amajorassumptionin
these studies is that environmental factors are controlled, since twins raisedby
their biological parents share identical environments. Although environmental
influencesmaybeimportant,studiesofpsychologicaltraitsintwinsindicatethat
monozygotictwinswhohavehighlysimilarenvironmentsdonotonaverageshow
anygreaterconcordanceforpersonalitytraitsorIQthanmonozygotictwinswith
lessenvironmentalsimilarity(Loehlin&Nicholas,1976).
FivetwinstudiesofaffectiveillnessareshowninTable6.1.Thehypothesis
of a genetic component for affective disorders is supported by the repeated
findingofahigherconcordanceinmonozygoticthanindizygoticpairs.Poolingthe
datafromallstudies,anoverallconcordancerateof63.8percentisobservedfor
monozygoticand14percentfordizygoticpairs.InalargestudyusingtheDanish
twin register, Bertelsen and colleagues identified 110 same-sex twin pairs in
whichatleastonehadaffectivedisorder(Bertelsen,1979).Twinswerepersonally
interviewedandzygocitywasestablishedusingserologicmarkersor,ifbothtwins
Depressive Disorders 7
were not alive, anthropometric methods. Of 55 monozygotic twin pairs, 58.3
percentwereconcordantforaffectivedisorderwhereasonly17.3percentofthe
52dizygoticpairswereconcordant.
In a study of 12monozygotic twin pairs reared apart, using data gleaned
frompublishedseries,67percentwereconcordantforaffectivedisorder,afigure
strikinglysimilartothepooledfigureof63.8percent(Price,1968).
TABLE6.1.ConcordanceRatesforAffectiveIllnessinMonozygoticandDizygoticTwins*
Study MonozygoticTwins DizygoticTwins
ConcordantPairs/TotalPairs
Concordance(%)
ConcordantPairs/TotalPairs
Concordance(%)
Slater(1953) 4/7 57.1 4/17 23.5
Kallman(1954) 25/27 92.6 13/55 23.6
Harvald&Hauge(1965)
10/15 66.7 2/40 5.0
Allen,Cohen,Pollin,&Greenspan(1974)
5/15 33.3 0/34 0.0
Genetics of Affective Disorders 8
Bertelsen(1979) 32/55 58.3 9/52 17.3
Totals 76/119 63.8 28/198 14.1
*Datanotcorrectedforage.Diagnosesincludebothbipolarandunipolarillness.
Source:Adaptedfrom:Numberger, J. I.,Goldin,L.R.,&Gershorv,E.S.(1986).Geneticsofpsychiatricdisorders. InG.Winokur&P.Clayton (Eds.),Themedical basis of psychiatry (pp. 486-521).Philadelphia:Saunders.
Depressive Disorders 9
ADOPTIONSTUDIES
Adoption studies attempt to separate genetic susceptibility from
environmental factors. A demonstration that offspring reared away from their
biological parents have higher than expected rates of illness would be a
persuasiveargumentforinheritance.
Adoption studies can be carried out in a number of ways. The simplest
methodistoidentifyagroupofadoptedaffectedindividualsandcomparethemto
a control group of unaffected adoptees. The adoptive and biological parents of
bothgroupswouldbestudiedforthepresenceofillness.Ifthebiologicalparents
of illadopteesshowhigherratesof illnessthanthebiologicalparentsofcontrol
adopteesandbothsetsofadoptiveparents,thenageneticfactorcanbesaidtobe
present.Anadoptionstudycanalsobedonebyidentifyingillparentswhoadopt
away theirchildren.Theseoffspringcanbecompared toadopted-awaychildren
born to unaffected parents. A complicated adoption study, the cross-fostering
study, compares children of affected biological parents reared bywell adoptive
parentstochildrenofwellbiologicalparentsrearedbyilladoptiveparents.
Adoption studies do not provide information about the mode of
transmission. They have been criticized because unknown and unquantifiable
factors such as demographics and selection practices among adoption agencies
mayplacechildreninenvironmentswherenongeneticriskfactorsareprevalent.
Genetics of Affective Disorders 10
Thefamiliesofadultbipolaradopteesandthreecontrolgroupswerestudied
by Mendlewicz and Rainer (1977). In addition to the adoptive and biological
parents of 29 bipolar adoptees, the study included the biological parents of 31
bipolar nonadoptees, the adoptive and biological parents of 22 unaffected
adoptees,and thebiologicalparentsof20 individualswhodevelopedpolio.The
polio group was added to control for the effect of raising a disabled child.
Interviewswereconductedblindtotheclinicalstatusoftheadoptees.
Table6.2 shows thediagnosesof the adoptive andbiologicalparents.The
biologicalparentsofthebipolaradopteesandnonadopteesshowedsimilarrates
of affective disorder (31 percent vs 26 percent). These same parents showed
higher rates of affective illness than either the adoptive or biological parents of
normaladoptees,andhigherratesthantheparentsofpoliopatients.Threemajor
pointscanbemadefromthisstudy.First,thehypothesisofageneticcontribution
tobipolaraffectivedisorderissupportedbythesedata.Second,theexcessamount
ofunipolardisorderseeninthebiologicalparentsofallbipolarpatientssupports
the notion that unipolar illness in some cases stems from the same genetic
abnormalityasbipolarillness.Lastly,thedatashowthatunipolarillnessismore
common in theadoptiveparents thanbipolardisorder. In fact, onlyone caseof
bipolardisorderwasfoundintheadoptiveparents.
TABLE6.2.AffectiveIllnessinParentsofBipolarAdopteesandControls
Group Diagnosisof Adoptive Percent Biological Percent
Depressive Disorders 11
Parent Parents Ill Parents Ill
BipolaradopteesN=29
Bipolar 1 4
Unipolar 6 12% 12 31%
Otheraffectivedisorder
0 2
BipolarnonadopteesN=31
Bipolar 2
Unipolar 11 26%
Otheraffectivedisorder
3
NormaladopteesN=22
Bipolar 0 0
Unipolar 3 10% 1 2%
Otheraffectivedisorder
1 0
PoliomyelitisN=20
Bipolar 0
Unipolar 4 10%
Genetics of Affective Disorders 12
Otheraffectivedisorder
0
Data from Adoption Studies Supporting Genetic Transmission in Manic-Depressive Illness by J.MendlewiczandJ.Rainer,1977.Nature,268,326-329.
This suggests that unipolar disorder is probably a heterogeneous group of
illnesses, with some being related to bipolar illness and others perhaps not
geneticallymediatedatall.
Wender, Kety, and Rosenthal (1986) studied the biological and adoptive
familiesof71adopteeswithaffectivedisordersand71matchedcontroladoptees
withnoillness.Biologicalrelativesofilladopteeshadsignificantlyhigherratesof
affectivedisorder (bipolar andunipolar) compared to thebiological relatives of
controls. Alcohol abuse and dependence was also seen in greater frequency
among thebiological relativesof ill adoptees, supportingearlier findings that in
some cases affective disorders and alcoholism may be genetically related. The
most significant finding was a striking increase in completed suicide in the
biologicalrelativesofilladoptees,comparedtothoseofcontrols.
In a study by Cadoret, 83 adoptees were selected from adoption records
showing evidence that their biological parents had mental disorders (Cadoret,
1978).Forty-threematchedcontrolswerealsoobtained.Alladopteesandatleast
one adoptive parent were interviewed. All data were collected blind to the
Depressive Disorders 13
diagnosis of the biological parents. Eight adoptees were found to have one
biological parent with an affective disorder. Three of these adoptees were
diagnosedashavinganaffectivedisorder,allofwhichwereunipolarillnesses(38
percent). The remaining 75 adoptees in the experimental group and the 43
controlshad four (5percent) and four (9percent) casesofunipolardepression
respectively. The differences in the observed rates of affective illness in the
adopteesofbiologicalparentswithaffectivedisordercomparedtothosewithout
suchadisorderaresignificant.
Inalargestudyof2,966adopteesborninSwedenandadoptedoutpriorto
age three, Von Knorring and colleagues identified 56 adoptees with affective
disorders and 59 with substance abuse (Von Knorring, Cloninger, Bohman, &
Sigvardsson, 1983). Each affected adoptee was matched to one of 115 control
adoptees with no mental illness. Adoptees with affective disorder showed no
higherratesofaffectivedisorderineitherthebiologicaloradoptiveparentswhen
compared to parents of matched controls. There was, however, a trend for
nonpsychoticdepressedadopteestohavemoremotherswithaffectivedisorders
than normal controls. Adoptees with affective disorder did show a significant
increase in biological mothers with substance abuse compared to mothers of
adoptees with no illness. No general concordance of any specific psychiatric
diagnosiswasobservedbetweenadopteesandbiologicalparents.
It should be pointed out that all subjects in this studywere diagnosed by
Genetics of Affective Disorders 14
medical records only. Subjects identified as having no psychiatric illness could
have, in fact, had episodes of illness that were treated but not recorded,
misdiagnosed,ornottreatedatall.Insupportofthis,notoneoftheeightparents
ofadopteeswithpsychoticdepressionwasdiagnosedashavingaffectivedisorder.
Althoughthisispossibleandissimilartotheratefoundinthecontrols,itismuch
lower than the rate observed in studieswhere relatives are directly examined.
Despite its shortcomings, the study does suggest that some cases of unipolar
depressionmaynotbegeneticallytransmitted.
Depressive Disorders 15
FAMILYSTUDIES
Familystudiesareeasilyappliedtotheresearchofthegeneticsofaffective
disordersandhavebeenitscornerstone.Studiessuchastheseusuallybeginwith
anaffectedindividual(proband)andstudyallavailablerelatives.Twobasictypes
of familyresearcharerecognized.The familyhistorymethod involvesobtaining
allpedigreeinformationfromtheprobandonly.Studiesofthisnaturehavebeen
criticized because other affected familymembersmay conceal their illnesses or
mayhavemilderformsofillnessthatwouldgounnoticedbyothers(Andreasen,
Endicott,Spitzer,&Winokur,1977).Ingeneral,familyhistorystudiesarebiased
byunderreporting.Thesecond,morecompletetypeoffamilystudyinvolvesthe
directexaminationofallavailablerelatives.
Familystudiesareuseful indelineatingtherangeofdisordersthatmaybe
associated with a single genetic vulnerability. For example, Winokur
demonstrated through a series of family studies that unipolar depression,
alcoholism, and sociopathy cluster in certain kindreds, suggesting that all three
stem from the same genetic abnormality (Winokur, 1972). When two or more
disordersappeartobegeneticallyrelated,theyarereferredtoasaspectrum.
Afamilystudyattemptstoidentifyallaffectedpersons.Inordertoshowthat
anillnessisfamilial,theratesofillnessintherelativesofprobandsmustbehigher
than the rates of the same illness in controls. The statistic used to compare
familiesofprobandstocontrolsiscalledthemorbidrisktheratioofthenumber
Genetics of Affective Disorders 16
ofillrelativesdividedbythetotalnumberofrelativesatriskforthedisorder.The
calculationofthenumberatriskforthedisordermusttakeintoaccountvariable
ageofonset. Inordertodothis, thenumberofrelativeswhoare inaparticular
decadeismultipliedbythepercentageofaffectedpersonswhofirstbecomeillby
that decade of their lives. This product is called the Bezugziffer (BZ). For each
decade, BZs are summed and the total number is used in the calculation of the
morbidrisk(Nurnberger,Goldin,&Gershon,1986).
The familial concentration of affective disorders has been clearly
demonstratedinnumerousfamilystudies.Table6.3showsthelifetimeprevalence
ofaffectivedisordersinfirst-degreerelativesofpatientsandcontrols.Oftheeight
studieslisted,eightidentifiedbipolarprobands,sixidentifiedunipolarprobands,
and two utilized unaffected controls. Bipolar and unipolar probands had more
relatives ill with either disorder than did normal control probands. The most
common affective disorder seen in the relatives of either unipolar or bipolar
probands was unipolar disorder. This suggests that at least in some families
bipolar and unipolar illnesses are different phenotypic expressions of the same
geneticillness.
TABLE6.3.MorbidRiskforBipolarandUnipolarDisordersinFirst-DegreeRelativesofPatientsandControls
NumberatRisk MorbidRisk(%)
Depressive Disorders 17
Bipolar Unipolar
Bipolarprobands:
Angst(1966) 161 4.3 13.0
Perris(1966) 627 10.2 0.5
Winokur&Clayton(1967b) 167 10.2 20.4
Helzer&Winokur(1974) 151 4.6 10.6
Gershon,Baron,&Leckman(1975) 341 3.8 6.8
Smeraldi,Negri,&Melica(1977) 172 5.8 7.1
Taylor,Abrams,&Hayman(1980) 601 4.8 4.2
Gershon,Goldin,Weissman,&Nurnberger(1981)
598(572)* 8.0 14.9
Unipolarprobands:
Angst(1966) 811 0.3 5.1
Genetics of Affective Disorders 18
Perris(1966) 684 0.3 6.4
Gershon,Baron,&Leckman(1975) 96 2.1 11.5
Smeraldi,Negri,&Melica(1977) 185 0.6 8.0
Taylor,Abrams,&Hayman(1980) 96 4.1 8.3
Gershon,Goldin,Weissman,&Nurnberger(1981)
138(133) 2.9 16.6
Normalprobands:
Gershon,Baron,&Leckman(1975) 518(411) 0.2 0.7
Gershon,Goldin,Weissman,&Nurnberger(1981)
217(208) 0.5 5.8
*Total number at risk for bipolar illness appears first. The number in parentheses represents thenumberatriskforunipolardisorderwhenknown.
Source: Adapted from: Gershon, E. S., Hamovit, J., Guroff, J. J., Dibble, E., Leckman, J. F., Sceery,W.,Targum,S.D.,Nurnberger, J. I.,Goldin,L.R.,&Bunney,W.E. (1982).A familystudyofschizoaffective,bipolarI,bipolarII,unipolarandnormalcontrolprobands.Archives ofGeneralPsychiatry,39,1157-1167.
As seen from Table 6.3, morbid risk figures vary widely among studies.
Depressive Disorders 19
There are many reasons for these observed variations. Diagnostic criteria
employed, method of data collection, and cultural factors all vary and may be
responsibleforthedifferencesobserved.Studiesutilizingafamilyhistorymethod
tend to underestimate prevalences, whereas direct examination of all available
relativestendstoproduceahigherfigurethatmaybeamorecorrectestimateof
thetrueprevalence.
Although each study has its own flaws with respect to methodology and
cannotbedirectlycomparedtotheothers,eachshowsaclearincreaseinaffective
disorder among first-degree relatives of ill probands. Taken together, family
studiessupportthegenetichypothesisinthetransmissionofaffectivedisorders.
Family, twin, and adoption studies, regardless ofmethodological flaws, all
support the hypothesis of a genetic component for affective disorder. Just how
affective disorder is transmitted is not known. Segregation analysis of family
study data has failed to show the exactmode of transmission for any affective
disorder(Gershon,Bunney,Leckman,VanEerdewegh,&DeBauche,1976).There
are likely to be several reasons for this, but in order to proceed with this
discussion two definitions are needed: Genotype is the actual inherited genetic
material,andphenotypeistheobservedeffectofthegenotype.
GenotypeandPhenotype
Sincetheenvironmentmayplayaroleinthedevelopmentofthedisorder,
Genetics of Affective Disorders 20
the absence of critical environmental factors may obscure the mode of
transmission: Certain individuals with a genetic predisposition (affected
genotype) and no environmental input may not show the disease (affected
phenotype) at all. The finding thatmonozygotic twins fail to show 100 percent
concordance for affective disorders suggests that the diseasemay notmanifest
itselfinallpersonswhopossessthegene.Reducedpenetrance,thetermapplied
to this phenomenon,may play a role inmanymental disordersschizophrenia
andanxietydisorders,aswellasaffectivedisorders.Anygeneticillnesswithlow
penetrance would clinically appear to be uncommon even though the actual
frequencyofthediseasegenemaybehigh.Thepossibilitythatmanyindividuals
could be carriers without overt illness would make it nearly impossible to
determine the mode of transmission from family study data alone. Reduced
penetranceimpliesthatthediseasegenedoesnotmanifestitselfatanytimeina
carrierslifetime,assumingthatthecarrierhaslivedthroughtheentireageofrisk
forthedisorder.Theacceptedagesofrisk forbipolarandunipolardisorderare
20-50yearsand20-70yearsrespectively(Paykel,1982).Sinceaffectivedisorders
have a variable age of onset, the penetrance of a disease gene may be age-
dependent. In any family study therewill bea largenumberof individualswho
may be gene carriers but who have not yet reached the age where the illness
manifestsitself.Theidealfamilyforsegregationanalysiswouldbealargekindred
withtheyoungestgenerationwellintotheageofriskandwithaclearunilateral
sourceofillness.Sincefamilystudiesexaminepedigreesonlyatonepointintime,
Depressive Disorders 21
many younger family members who may be carrier would be classified as
unaffected,therebyobscuringthepathoftransmission.
Untilnowithasbeenassumedthatasinglediseasegeneleadstoadefined
singlephenotype.Thisassumptionmaynotbevalidforclinicalpsychiatry;there
is evidence that phenotypesmay vary fromperson to person even though they
maycontainthesamegeneticmaterial.Winokurdescribedaclinicalspectrumof
disorders termed depression spectrum disease, which includes sociopathy,
unipolardepression,andalcoholism(Winokur,1972).Thisclusteringappearedto
breed true, and a closer look at the families studied showed that the cases of
depressionwerecommonlyseeninwomenundertheageof40whohadunstable
personalities; alcoholism and sociopathy were more commonly seen in males.
Winokursworksuggestedthatthethreedisordersmaystemfromasinglegenetic
abnormality that manifests itself differently due to sex effect and/or perhaps
other undetermined environmental or biological factors. Other clinical studies
haveshownaffectivedisordertoclusterwitheatingdisordersandpanicdisorder
in certain families (Cantwell, Sturzenberger, Burrows, Salkin, & Green, 1977;
Leckman,Weissman,Merikangas, Pauls,& Prusoff, 1983). Even among affective
disorders, the wide range of possible phenotypes includes bipolar I, bipolar II,
unipolar,cyclothymia,dysthymia,andschizoaffectivedisorder.Whetherallthese
disordersstemfromthesamegeneticdiathesisisamatterfordebate,butthefact
thatmanykindredsdoshowmorethanonetypeofdisordersuggeststhat,forat
leastsomefamilies,singlegeneticabnormalitiesproduceavarietyofphenotypes.
Genetics of Affective Disorders 22
Since affective disorders are not determined from laboratory or other
biological/physical exams, the diagnosis ismade purely from the description of
thedisordermadebythepatientandsometimesbyaknowledgeableinformant.
The absence of objective tests for diagnosismeans that other disorders with a
different pathophysiology may mimic an affective illness. Examples include
hypothyroidism, reactivedepression,Cushingsdisease, andbereavement. Cases
such as these, called phenocopies, may be clinically indistinguishable from
primary affective disorders. Phenocopies are probably common in studies of
unipolar depression (depending upon the diagnostic criteria used) and would
certainlyobscureeffortstofindthemodeoftransmissioninthefamiliesinvolved.
Heterogeneity
The last and perhaps most difficult obstacle to uncovering the mode of
transmissionforanyaffectivedisorderisheterogeneity.Geneticheterogeneityisa
factor inmanydiseases. For example, diabetes in its varietyof formsmay stem
fromseveraldifferentgeneticabnormalities.Earlyonset(insulin-dependent)and
late onset (non-insulin-dependent) have different pathophysiologies and it has
been demonstrated that non-insulin-dependent diabetes is familial but the
insulin-dependent form is not (Unger & Foster, 1985). In a study of a
heterogeneous illness, detecting the mode of transmission would be nearly
impossible. A variety of genetic mechanisms would be in play and each would
haveitsownmodeoftransmission.Inanattempttolimittheheterogeneityfactor,
Depressive Disorders 23
familiesshowingX-linkedinheritancehavebeensingledoutforanalysis.Inthese
cases there is a father-to-son transmission because fathers can pass only a Y
chromosome on to their sons. It is assumed in these cases that the genetic
abnormality is limited to the X chromosome, thereby excluding all of the
autosomes. InX-linkeddominant transmission, femaleswouldbe affectedmore
oftenbecausetheypossesstwoXchromosomesandthereforehavetwicetherisk
ofgettingadiseasegene.Winokurandcolleaguesobservedbothanexcessof ill
femalesandalackofmale-to-maletransmissioninastudyof62bipolarprobands
(Winokur,Clayton,&Reich,1969).TheypostulatedanX-linkeddominantmodeof
transmissionforbipolarillnessintheseselectedkindreds.Thesedataandothers,
however,havebeenreanalyzed,andneitheranX-linkedoranautosomalsingle-
major-locusmodeloftransmissioncouldexplaintotallythecasesofbipolarillness
observedinthesefamilies(Bucheretal.,1981;Bucher&Elston,1982).X-linked
dominanttransmissionwasalsopostulatedbyMendlewiczandFleiss inaseries
ofbipolarprobandsbutareanalysisofthesedatafoundthattheX-chromosome
single-major-locusmodeldidnot fit theirdata (Mendlewicz&Fleiss, 1974;Van
Eerdewegh, Gershon,&VanEerdewegh, 1980).Data from families suggesting X
linkage remain conflicting and the results obtained vary, based on assumptions
madeandstatisticalmethodsused.ThehypothesisofanX-linkedformofaffective
disorderislikelytobeviablebutprobablyaccountsforonlyaminorityofcases.
Asmentioned earlier, variable phenotypemayhinder segregation analysis
studiesandtherebyobscurethemodeoftransmission.Thisissuehasbeentaken
Genetics of Affective Disorders 24
upbyanumberofresearchersintheanalysisof familystudydata.Gershonand
colleagues have hypothesized that unipolar, bipolar I, bipolar II, and
schizoaffective disorders are all part of a continuum stemming from a common
geneticbackgroundwithmultiplethresholds(Gershonetal.,1982).Theirfamily
study data are in support of that model. Further support for the concept of
variable expressivity comes from work by Winokur. In one study (Winokur,
1984), themorbid risks foraffectivedisorder in first-degree relativesofbipolar
and unipolar probands were nearly identical. In another study (Winokur,
Kadrmas,&Crowe,1986), first-degree relativesof schizoaffectivebipolarswere
foundtohavemorbidrisks foraffectivedisordersimilar to thoseof first-degree
relatives of other bipolar probands. Smeraldi, Fiammetta, Heimbuch, and Kidd
(1981)foundthattheprobandspolaritydidnotpredictillnessinrelatives.
Sex differences in the transmission of affective disorders have been
demonstrated. Winokur and Clayton found that ill mothers more often
transmittedtheirillnesstodaughtersthantosonswhereasillfatherstransmitted
their illness with equal frequency to both sons and daughters (Winokur and
Clayton,1967a).Angst,Frey,Lohmeyer,andZerbin-Rudin (1980)demonstrated
that first-degree femalerelativesof femaleprobandshadhighermorbidityrisks
than other relatives. At this point it is clear that the mode of transmission for
affective disorders is not known and is likely to be complex, even though the
familialclusteringoftheseillnessesiseasilydemonstrated.
Depressive Disorders 25
GENETICMARKERSTUDIES
Geneticmarkersposeanewmethodtouncovertheinheritabilityofaffective
disorders.Itispossiblethatgeneticmarkersmayuncoversubtypesofillnessthat
are linked to a particular marker, thereby directly addressing the problems of
heterogeneityandvariableexpressivity.
The search for genetic markers linked to mental disorders has included
studies of color blindness, blood group polymorphisms, HLA (human leukocyte
antigen)types,andDNA(deoxyribonucleicacid)markers.Themethodologyused
inthesestudiesiscalledlinkageanalysis.Thismethoddeterminestheprobability
that a geneticmarker andadisease trait are inherited together, suggesting that
they are physically close to one another on the same chromosome.Marker loci
mustbepolymorphic;thatis,theymusthaveatleasttwoformssothatoneform
canbedemonstratedtobelinkedtoaparticulardisease.Additionally,themodeof
inheritanceforthemarkerlocusmustbeknown.If linkagecanbedemonstrated
betweenmarkerlocusanddiseaselocus,itisconvincingevidenceforthepresence
ofageneticcomponent, since it isunlikely thatenvironmental influenceswould
causesuchanassociation.
Linkage
Todemonstrate linkage, it isnecessary toemploymathematicalmodels to
estimatethelikelihoodoflinkage.Thelod(logoftheoddsratio)scoremethodof
Genetics of Affective Disorders 26
Morton tests the hypothesis of linkage between two loci (marker and disease)
when the mode of transmission of each locus is known (Morton, 1955). This
method assumes that the gene frequency and penetrance for the disease and
markerlociareknown.Itisalsoassumedthatthereisnopopulationassociation
betweenthemarkeranddiseaselociandthatrandommatingoccurs.Thepattern
of segregation seen between the marker and disease loci is compared to the
probabilityofobservingthesamepattern if thetwo lociarenot linked(random
assortment).Theprobabilityoflinkageisexpressedintermsoftherecombination
fractioncalledtheta.Onagivenchromosome,genescanrecombineatthetimeof
meiosis.Genesthat lie farapartwillrecombinemore frequentlythangenesthat
areclosetogether.Ifamarkerlocusanddiseaselocusaretightlylinked,thenthey
shouldrecombineinfrequently.Thetatakesonavaluebetweenzeroandonehalf.
A recombination fraction of one half means that the loci are expected to
recombine50percentof the time; that is, theysegregate independentlyandare
notlinked.Attheotherextreme,arecombinationfractionofzeromeansthatthe
loci are expected never to recombine and always to segregate together. Using
theserecombinationfractionsalodscoreisdefinedas:
LODScore=log10 probabilityofobservingafamilyfor