+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Genomic imprinting

Genomic imprinting

Date post: 15-Nov-2014
Category:
Upload: drhmpatel
View: 508 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
95
POST-GRADUATE SEMINAR ON Department of animal biotechnology College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry Anand Agricultural University Anand - 388 001. GENOMIC IMPRINTING PATEL HIREN M REG NO. 04-0822-2008 ANBT-699 MAJOR ADVISOR Dr. C. G. JOSHI MINOR ADVISOR Dr. D.N.RANK
Transcript
Page 1: Genomic imprinting

POST-GRADUATE

SEMINARON

Department of animal biotechnologyCollege of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry

Anand Agricultural UniversityAnand - 388 001.

GENOMIC IMPRINTINGPATEL HIREN M

REG NO. 04-0822-2008

ANBT-699

MAJOR ADVISORDr. C. G. JOSHI

MINOR ADVISORDr. D.N.RANK

Page 2: Genomic imprinting

2

Topics to be Discussed Introduction

Evidences that gene are Imprinted

Imprinted genes in Mice

How does Imprinting occur

Imprinting Mechanism

Imprinting Cycle

X-Chromosome inactivation

Imprinted gene in sheep

Imprinting Disorder

Conclusion

Future prospects

Page 3: Genomic imprinting

3

INTRODUCTION People inherit two copies of their genes—one from their mother

and one from their father

Usually both copies of each gene are active, or “turned on,” in cells

Sometime only one of the two copies is normally turned on

Which copy is active depends on the parent of origin

Some genes are normally active only when they are inherited from a person’s father or a person’s mother

Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic phenomenon by which the two parental alleles of a gene are differentially expressed

(Solter, 1988)

Page 4: Genomic imprinting

4

Conti… Genomic imprinting in mice was first deduced from nuclear

transplantation experiments (McGrath and Solter, 1983)

The nonequivalence of maternally and paternally contributed genomes was first identified in elegant nuclear- transfer studies

(McGrath and Solter, 1984) There is conservation of imprinting between mice and

humans, But one exception, the Insulin-like growth factor 2 receptor (Igf-2r)

(Barlow et al., 1991) Imprinted genes are organized in clusters, and two of the

clusters, on mouse chromosomes 7 and 17, contain both maternally and paternally expressed genes

(Zemel et al., 1992)

Page 5: Genomic imprinting

5

Conti… DNA, once methylated, will tend to stay methylated, thus

providing a mechanism for the stable maintenance of an imprint during cell division and differentiation

(Bestor and Verdine , 1994)

Imprinted genes are often characterized by differential DNA methylation regions (DMRs)

In somatic cells, DMRs such that for one parental allele CpGs in a region are methylated, while for the other parental allele they are not

(Shemer and Razin , 1996)

Methylation is further supported by the demonstration that mice deficient in Dnmt1-gene function show a loss of imprinting at almost all loci tested

(Shemer et al,. 1997)

Page 6: Genomic imprinting

6

SCHEMA OF IMPRINTING

Pedigree of imprinted maternally expressed phenotype(Barlow and Stewart, 1991)

Page 7: Genomic imprinting

7

Evidences that gene are Imprinted

Page 8: Genomic imprinting

8

Evidences that gene are Imprinted

NEUCLEAR TRANSPLANTATION

UNIPARENTAL DISOMY

HAIG’S MODEL

Page 9: Genomic imprinting

9

Neuclear Transplantation Studying

An early observation pointing to genomic imprinting was the finding of aberrant development of artificially constructed isoparental embryos in mice

Gynogenetic (two female pronuclei)

Androgenetic (two male pronuclei)

(McGrath & Solter , 1984)

Page 10: Genomic imprinting

10

Neuclear transplantation

Fertilized diploid embryo (zygote) the maternal and paternal nuclei do not fuse for 12 hours

Page 11: Genomic imprinting

11

Neuclear Transfer shows both Parental Genomes needed for Mouse Embryonic Development

McGrath & Solter (1984) Cell 37:179, Surani et al., (1984) Nature 308:548

Page 12: Genomic imprinting

12

Page 13: Genomic imprinting

13

Conti…

Androgenotes

• It have embryonic part small, retarded, or absent

• Extra-embryonic part is OK• After 8 day it dies

Gynogenotes

• Embryonic part OK• Extra-embryonic part is

small, retarded, or absent• Only go to 10 day

Female genome is required for embryonic

developmentMale part is required for extra embryonic

development(Solter, 1988)

Page 14: Genomic imprinting

14

Uniparental Disomy

Uniparental disomy (UPD) occurs when an individual receives both copies of a chromosome from one parent only

Child inherits the genes from one parent only (uniparental)

In mice with certain translocations that produced uniparental disomies for particular chromosomes

(Cattanach and jones, 1994)

One type of cross generated foetuses containing two copies of a large portion of one types of chromosome

Page 15: Genomic imprinting

15

Uniparental Disomy

Page 16: Genomic imprinting

16

Cont… In mice chromosome no 7 shows such types of

translocation

One crossed foetuses containing two copies of a large portion of maternal chromosome no 7 but no copies from paternal side

These mice fetuse were developmentally retarded, small placenta and died in utero at midgestation

Reciprocal cross, resulting in two paternal and no maternal chromosome 7 homologues, conceptuse died much earlier

(Cattanach and jones, 1994)

Page 17: Genomic imprinting

17

Haig's Model

The evolutionary conservation of imprinting suggests that the phenomenon might provide some selective advantage

The challenge is now to determine the function and mechanism of allelic inactivation by imprinting

To date the most compelling model has been provided by Haig and his colleagues

That is know as ‘‘Conflict Theory’’ (Moore and Haig, 1991)

Page 18: Genomic imprinting

18

Haig' Model: Conflict Theory

Imprinting evolved in mammals because of the conflicting interests of maternal and paternal genes within a litter

In non monogamous, the mother provides significant maternal resources to the offspring both during intrauterine and suckling after birth

Successful passage of paternal genes into the next generation is best ensured by having the embryos consume maternal resources

The mother's interests are best served by distributing her resources more equitably among litters

(Moore and Haig, 1991)

Page 19: Genomic imprinting

19

Haig's Model

•Paternally expressed genes promote embryonic growth•Maternal genes act to restrain the use of maternal resources

Haig's model

predicts that:

•Insulin-like growth factor 2 (Igf-2)•H19•Igf-2r

This model is in remarkably good agreement with

the at least three imprinted genes:

Page 20: Genomic imprinting

20

cont…Mouse embryos are sensitive to the levels of the

paternally expressed growth factor insulin-like growth factor II (IGF-2)

(Robertson, 1991)A complete loss of function of the gene encoding

the growth factor, Igf-2, leads to a 40% reduction in birth weight

Fetuses that lack Igf-2r are approximately 30% larger than normal, have elevated circulating levels of IGF-2, and die around birth

(lau and Barlow , 1994)

Page 21: Genomic imprinting

21

Imprinted genes in Mice

Page 22: Genomic imprinting

22

Imprinted Genes in Mice In the early l990s, experiments with either gene “knock-out”

or naturally occurring strains of mice in which the two parental alleles could be distinguished, showed that:

Insulin-like growth factor 2 (Igf2) gene was expressed only from the paternal allele

Insulin-like growth factor 2 receptor(Igf2 R) gene was expressed only from the maternal allele

(DeChaira et al,. 1991)

The maternally expressed H19 gene also functions to lower the concentration of Igf2 by suppressing its transcription on maternal chromosome

(Leighton et al,. 1995)

Page 23: Genomic imprinting

23

Imprinted Genes in Mice

Gene Expression Silent allele References

Igf2 Paternal Maternal (DeChaira et al,. 1991)

H19 Maternal Paternal (Brtolomei et al,. 1991)

Insulin-2 Paternal Maternal (Giddings et al,. 1991)

Snrpn Paternal Maternal (Leff et al,. 1992)

Igf-2r Maternal Paternal (Malscheuer et al,. 1993)

Xist Paternal Maternal (Hayashizaki et al,. 1994)

Mash-2 Maternal Paternal (Guillemont et al,. 1995)

Page 24: Genomic imprinting

24

Mouse Chromosome 7

Page 25: Genomic imprinting

25http://www.mgu.har.mrc.ac.uk/imprinting

Page 26: Genomic imprinting

26

How does Imprinting occur

Page 27: Genomic imprinting

27

How does imprinting occur ?

Many mechanism for gene stamping

Expressed Not Expressed

Site-specific DNA methylation, has received experimental support to date

(Tycko, 1997)

Page 28: Genomic imprinting

28

DNA Methylation

Covalent modification of the DNA is important for gene silencing

Most genes have GC rich areas of DNA in their promoter regions, These are referred to as CpG islands

Methylation of the C residues within the CpG islands leads to gene silencing

DNA methylation is restricted to C in a 5’-CpG -3’ dinucleotide

(Ariel et al,. 1994)

Page 29: Genomic imprinting

29

DNA Methylation - Players

DNMTs – DNA Methyltransferases

MBDs – Methyl Binding Domain

proteins

Demethylases

Page 30: Genomic imprinting

30

Enzymatic control of DNA MethylationThree mammalian DNA methylases:

DNMT1

• Generally abundant in all cells• Preference for hemi-methylated

DNA• Copies methylation patterns

after DNA replication

DNMT3A, DNMT3B

• de novo enzymes• Tissue-specific expression• Preference for unmethylated

DNA• Induces novel methylation

marks(Bostick et al., 2007)

Page 31: Genomic imprinting

31

Cytosine Methylation 5-methylcytosine

Chemically unstable

Prone to deamination

Resulting in thymine

Inefficient recognition of mismatch by DNA repair mechanisms

Cytosine deamination gives Thymine, which is recognized by DNA repair systems

Page 32: Genomic imprinting

32

Structure of 5-methylcytosine

Page 33: Genomic imprinting

33

DNA methylation in mammals

MT = DNA methyltransferaseHDAC = Histone DeacetylaseMeCP2 = Methyl-CpG-binding protein

Page 34: Genomic imprinting

34

Deamination of 5-methylcytosine

Morgan et al. (2005) Hum Mol Genet 14, 47-58

Page 35: Genomic imprinting

35

DNA Methylation Experiment

Improper or absent of DNA methylation of imprinted gene may lead to abnormal growth

Mouse embryos with a targeted deletion of the DNA methyltransferase gene showed abnormal expression of at least three imprinted gene

(Li et al,. 1993)

DNA methyltrasferase inhibitor ‘5-azacytidine(AzaC)’ can reactivate transcription from this allele

(Tycko, 1997)

Page 36: Genomic imprinting

36

DNA Methylation Experiment

(Li et al., 1993 Nature 266:362)

Page 37: Genomic imprinting

What happens to mouse embryos that lack DNA methylation?

37

Colum P. Walsh, J. Richard Chaillet & Timothy H. Bestor. Nature Genetics 20:116 (1998)

Page 38: Genomic imprinting

38

Imprinting Mechanism

Page 39: Genomic imprinting

39

Mechanism of Imprinted Gene Silencing

To dissect the molecular mechanism of imprinting, we have to focused on a region of approximately 300 kb on the distal portion of mouse chromosome 7

An imprinted region on the distal end of mouse chromosome 7. The positions of the imprinted genes Mash-2, Ins-2, Igf-2 and H19 on mouse chromosome 7

(Guillemot et al,. 1995)

Page 40: Genomic imprinting

40

Molecular Mechanism

1 • DNA Methylation at CpG island

2• Enhancer competition model

• Enhancer deletion• H19 gene deletion

3 • Differentially Methylated Regions (DMRs)

Page 41: Genomic imprinting

41

Molecular Mechanism

4• Imprinting Control Regions (ICRs)

• Cis-acting signal• Insulator model

5• Role of RNA in imprinting

• Non coding RNA• Antisense RNA

6 • Chromatin accessibility Model

Page 42: Genomic imprinting

42

DNA Methylation at CpG island

The clustering of four imprinted genes raised the possibility that, they are controlled by a signal or signals that act over large distances

A search for candidates for the epigenetic mark focused from parent-specific DNA methylation

The best candidate for the epigenetic mark at the H19/Igf-2/Ins-2 locus is paternal-specific DNA methylation of the H19 gene and it’s 5’ flank

(Bartolomei et al,. 1992)

Page 43: Genomic imprinting

43

DNA Methylation at CpG island

Evidence in favor of DNA methylation as the epigenetic mark at the locus comes from a targeted disruption of the DNA methyltransferase gene in mice

Embryos that are homozygous for a null mutation in the gene, and therefore have dramatically reduced levels of DNA methylation, express both alleles of H19 and have silenced both Igf-2 genes

(Li et al,. 1993)

Page 44: Genomic imprinting

44

Enhancer Competition Model The enhancer competition model rests on the premise

that H19 and Igf-2 utilize the same enhancers

Only two enhancers have been identified in the vicinity of the Igf-2 and H19 genes, at + 9 and + 11 kb relative to the start of transcription of the H19 gene

H19 promoter is activated by enhancer, Igf-2 gene is not expressed from maternal allele

H19 is methylated, enhancer is unable to interact with the H19 and Igf-2 gene is expressed from paternal side

(Yoo- Warren et al,. 1998)

Page 45: Genomic imprinting

45

IGF2 H19 E

Insulin-like growth factor receptor 2 non-coding RNA

Endoderm-specific enhancer

E

Enhancer Competition Model

Page 46: Genomic imprinting

46

IGF2 H19

IGF2 H19

OFF

OFF

ON

ON

E E

E E

Enhancer Competition Model

CH3CH3CH3CH3

Page 47: Genomic imprinting

47

TESTING THE ROLE OF ENHANCERS IN IMPRINTING

By deleting Enhancer

By deleting H19 gene

Page 48: Genomic imprinting

48

Deleting EnhancerTo ask whether enhancer are required for expression

of both H19 and Igf-2, a line of mice was generated in which the enhancers were deleted, and the consequence to the expression of H19 and Igf-2 was assessed

(Leighton et al,. 1995)

Page 49: Genomic imprinting

49

Cont…When the enhancer deletion was inherited from

females, decline in H19 RNA in all tissues of endodermal origin

The levels of Igf-2 RNA were unaffected by the maternal deletion of the enhancers, Igf-2 is normally silent

(Leighton et al,. 1995)

Page 50: Genomic imprinting

50

Cont…When the enhancer deletion was inherited from

males, the levels of Igf-2 RNA declined in exactly the same manner as H19 RNA in the maternal heterozygotes, while the levels of H19 RNA were unaffected

(Leighton et al,. 1995)

Page 51: Genomic imprinting

51

Deleting H19 GeneTo test the dependence of Igf-2 imprinting on the

H19 gene, a strain of mice was generated that carries a deletion of the paternal-specific methylation domain, including the structural H19 gene itself and 10 kb of 5' flanking sequence

(Leighton et al,. 1995)

Page 52: Genomic imprinting

52

Cont…Paternal inheritance of the H19 deletion would have

no phenotypic consequenceThis proved, both the maternal H19 allele and the

paternal allele of Igf-2 were unaffected When the H19 deletion was inherited from a female,

the neonatal progeny expressed both paternal and maternal Igf-2 alleles in all tissues examined

(Leighton et al,. 1995)

Page 53: Genomic imprinting

53

Differentially Methylated Regions (DMRs)

Imprinted genes are often characterized by differential DNA methylation

There are two types of DMRs:Primary DMRs- In oocytes and spermSecondary DMRs -after fertilization

For most imprinted genes examined, DMRs are closely associated with CpG islands and direct repeats

(Jeffrey et al,. 2001)

Page 54: Genomic imprinting

54

Differentially Methylated Regions (DMRs)

DMRs acquire their allelic methylation after fertilization

The local spacing and co operativity between DMRs and core DMRs may be important for the propagation of the imprinting signal

Also important for stabilization of specific epigenotypes in imprinting clusters

The disruption of any of these elements could result in failure to maintain or establish a parental epigenotype

(Reik and Walter. 1998)

Page 55: Genomic imprinting

55

Role of Tandem Repeats in Allele Specific Methylation

(+) methylation and (-)de-methylation signals (R) may act as methylation centers Gray/Red disks- The extent of methylation may be limited by counteracting

demethylation signals Trefoilstructures-Trans-acting factors interfere with methylation or its spreading A gradient of methylation is represented by differently shaded circles:

(white circles) lack of methylation (solid circles) complete methylation] (Miguel et al,. 1998)

Page 56: Genomic imprinting

56

Role of Tandem Repeats in Allele Specific Methylation

(+) methylation and (-)de-methylation signals (R) may act as methylation centers Gray/Red disks- The extent of methylation may be limited by counteracting

demethylation signals Trefoilstructures-Trans-acting factors interfere with methylation or its spreading Trans-acting factors (black ovals) may act alternatively in the demethylation

pathway resulting in a dominant demethylation signal, spreading over the entire region (allele 2) (Miguel et al,. 1998)

Page 57: Genomic imprinting

57

Imprinting Control Regions (ICRs)

How does an ICR act to regulate monoallelic expression in somatic cells?

(A) ICRs appear to be gene regulatory elements that

can significantly affect the expression of genes in cis

The Igf2/H19 ICR is a chromatin insulator that blocks the interaction of enhancers with the Igf2 promoter

When H19 gene is methylated, CTCF cannot bind to the insulator, and the activator is able to activate the transcription of the Igf2 gene

(Jeffrey et al,. 2001)

Page 58: Genomic imprinting

58

Imprinting Control Regions (ICRs)

How does an ICR act to regulate monoallelic expression in somatic cells?

(B) These ICR regulatory elements can be turned

“off” on one parental allele and “on” on the other parental allele by the presence and absence of DNA methylation

This brings about allelic activity and inactivity in trans, or monoallelic expression

(Jeffrey et al,. 2001)

Page 59: Genomic imprinting

59

Imprinting Control Regions (ICRs)

(Jeffrey et al,. 2001)

Page 60: Genomic imprinting

60

Role of RNA in IMPRINTING

Imprinted gene clusters contain multiple imprinted mRNA genes and at least one imprinted noncoding RNA (ncRNA)

Two imprinted ncRNAs have now been shown to act as cis-acting domain silencers

This indicate that RNA-mediated silencing may be a central feature of genomic imprinting

(Florian and Denise, 2006)

Page 61: Genomic imprinting

61

Cont… Most imprinted genes are found in clusters

Each imprinted cluster is regulated by one imprint control element or ICE

In an imprinted cluster are imprinted protein-coding mRNA genes; however, at least one is always an imprinted ncRNA

Imprinted ncRNAs is that they show reciprocal parental-specific expression

The reciprocal expression of imprinted mRNAs and ncRNAs has long been thought to indicate that ncRNAs play a role in silencing the mRNA genes in an imprinted cluster

(Florian and Denise, 2006)

Page 62: Genomic imprinting

62

ncRNA- Mediated SilencingTranscription of ncRNAs could induce silencing of

genes laying several hundred kilobase pairs upstream and downstream

Two possibilities could be considered [A] ncRNA transcription could activate a domain

repressor contained within the ncRNA transcription unit

(Florian and Denise, 2006)

Page 63: Genomic imprinting

63

ncRNA- Mediated SilencingTranscription of ncRNAs could induce silencing of

genes laying several hundred kilobase pairs upstream and downstream

Two possibilities could be considered [B] ncRNA transcription could repress a domain

activator contained within the ncRNA transcription unit

(Florian and Denise, 2006)

Page 64: Genomic imprinting

64

Antisense RNAThe Igf2r and Kcnq1 ICRs contain the promoter of an

antisense RNA that may cause repression of the sense transcript in cis

(Florian and Denise, 2006)

Page 65: Genomic imprinting

65

Chromatin Accessibility Model

Imprinted domains must contain particular DNA sequences that distinguish them from the rest of the genome

According to this model open chromatin would allow modification of multiple changes

Methylation of CpG or binding of repressive chromatin proteins or both , lead to compacted chromatin

In compacted chromatin modification is prevented (Benjamin et al,. 1997)

Page 66: Genomic imprinting

66

Hypercondensation over Chromatin Domains causes Transcriptional Silencing

Page 67: Genomic imprinting

67

Chromatin Accessibility Model

Page 68: Genomic imprinting

68

IMPRINTING CYCLE

Page 69: Genomic imprinting

69

Primary imprinting can be divided into three stages:

• Erasure of the previous imprint • Re-imprinting• Maintenance of the new imprint

(Jeffrey et al,. 2001)

Page 70: Genomic imprinting

70

Imprinting Cycle

pm

pm

GERMLINE

GERMLINE

READING

SOMATIC TISSUE

ERASURE ESTABLISHMENT MAINTENANCE ERASURE

Page 71: Genomic imprinting

71

Imprinting Cycle PGCs, like somatic cells, presumably also inherit one

maternally and paternally imprinted genome

They develop and differentiate at 11.5 dpc, both genomes must become maternalized or paternalized according to germ cell sex (new imprints)

For the female germ line, both alleles become fully methylated or maternalized in fetuses at 16.5 days post-coitum (dpc)

The male germ line, both alleles become fully methylated or paternalized by 18.5 dpc

(Jeffrey et al,. 2001)

Page 72: Genomic imprinting

72

Cont…This establishment of ICR methylation in male germ

cells corresponds to the time of genome-wide de novo methylation

This is occurring in germ cells of both sexes from approximately 15.5 dpc to 18.5 dpc

At that time germ line is not dividing(Jeffrey et al,. 2001)

Page 73: Genomic imprinting

73

Imprinting Cycle

(Jeffrey et al,. 2001)

Page 74: Genomic imprinting

74

Cont…

(Jeffrey et al,. 2001)

Page 75: Genomic imprinting

75

DNMTs are active in germ cells

During development of Spermatid and oocyst more amount of DNMTs are find in their nuclei

(Miguel et al,. 1998)

Page 76: Genomic imprinting

76

DNA methylation is dynamic & has sex-specific germ cell patterns

Reik W. et al, Science 293, p1089

Page 77: Genomic imprinting

77

DNA methylation is dynamic & has sex-specific germ cell patterns

Reik W. et al, Science 293, p1089

Page 78: Genomic imprinting

78

X-Chromosome inactivation

Page 79: Genomic imprinting

79

X-Chromosome Inactivation

Many molecular features are shared between genomic imprinting and X inactivation

Both are cis-acting epigenetic silencing mechanismsBoth show a positive correlation between expression of a

ncRNA and silencing (Reik and Lewis, 2005)

It has been suggested that X inactivation was a driving force in the evolution of genomic imprinting

(Lee, 2003)

Page 80: Genomic imprinting

80

X- Inactivation Center (XIC) XIST gene, encoded at site of X inactivation center

It is untranslated RNA in regional silencing in cis

Accumulation of Xist transcripts along the length of the inactive chromosome

(Panning et al,. 1997)

Page 81: Genomic imprinting

81

XIST RNA produced from chromosomethat is inactivated

Figure 7 -78 Molecular Biology of the Cell, 4th Edition

Page 82: Genomic imprinting

82

X-Chromosome Inactivation

P

PPP

P

P

P

P

M

M

MM

M

M

M

M

Zygote

Blastocyst

Embryo

Placenta

Erasure

Erasure

Xa

X

X

Xa

Xa

Xa

Xa

Xi

XiXi Xi

Xi

Xa

Xa

Primordial germ cell

Germline imprinting

Mature gametes

Establishment of imprinting & X-Inactivation

Trophectoderm

Inner cell Mass

Random X-Inactivation

Page 83: Genomic imprinting

83

Imprinted Gene in Sheep

Page 84: Genomic imprinting

84

Imprinted Gene in SheepIn common with other mammals, IGF2, PEG1 and

PEG3 were paternally expressed in the day 21 conceptus

While H19, IGF2R, GRB10 and p57KIP were maternally expressed

GNAS was maternally expressed in the foetus, but paternally expressed in the chorioallantois at day 21

(Alexandra et al,. 2008)

Page 85: Genomic imprinting

85

Cont…Differential methylation of the

H19 CTCF III upstream region - paternaly methylatedIGF2R DMR2- Maternaly methylated

In blastocysts, IGF2R, GRB10 and SASH2 were expressed biallelically

The majority of ovine imprinted genes examined, monoallelic expression does not occur until after the blastocyst stage

(Alexandra et al,. 2008)

Page 86: Genomic imprinting

86

Imprinting Disorder

Page 87: Genomic imprinting

87

Imprinting Disorder

Any type of condition which leads to loss of imprinting may lead to various disease condition

Where the chromosome involved in the UPD is imprinted there may be complication for that individual

In maternal UPD, A condition called Prader Willi Syndrome

In paternal UPD, A condition called angelman syndrome

(Christopher et al,. 1997)

Page 88: Genomic imprinting

88

Cont…The interest in genomic imprinting and epigenetics in

animal husbandry :

occurrence of a fetal overgrowth syndrome during assisted reproduction techniques (ART) in ruminants

This overgrowth is known as "large offspring syndrome" or LOS

It is characterized by A significant increase in birth weight (8% – 50%)Increase in gestational lengthBreathing problems at birthAn increased frequency of perinatal death

(Sinclair et al,. 2000)

Page 89: Genomic imprinting

89

Imprinting Disorder in sheep

There is a link between imprinted genes and muscle development in lamb

Influence of the imprinted IGF2 gene on muscle growth and fat deposition

(van Laere et al,. 2003)An even more prominent effect is seen of the so

called callipyge mutation on the muscle development of the hind legs of sheep

Callipyge lambs are born normal and the first signs of muscular hypertrophy are first detectable in the loin and hindquarters at 4–6 weeks of age

(Takeda et al,. 2006)

Page 90: Genomic imprinting

90

Imprinting Disorder in sheep

Page 91: Genomic imprinting

91

ConclusionMajor reprogramming of the imprints occurs in the

germ lines of developing embryos

Regions of differential methylation have been identified at all imprinted genes

Genome-wide alterations in methylation occur in the pre implantation and early post implantation embryo

Multiple cis-acting sequences are probably required for the creation and maintenance of the methylation state

Page 92: Genomic imprinting

92

Cont…DMRs are CpG-rich and associated with direct

repeats

Imprinted gene clusters should contain at least one ICE

ICE will carry an epigenetic mark on one parental chromosome

Imprinted DNA sequence modified only in one gamete

Page 93: Genomic imprinting

93

Cont…Regulation mechanisms such as antisense

transcription and enhancer competition play an important role in the imprinting process

Mostly imprinted gene are conserved in different species

Imprinting and mutation both prevent gene expression , but in mutation DNA sequence is change while in in printing no change in DNA

The imprinting process is reversible

Page 94: Genomic imprinting

94

Future prospects In animal husbandry our interest is to produce more

producible animal

For achievement of more production we are going for cross breeding

Genomic imprinting may affect the production of traits which is regulated by imprinted gene

Thus the emerging area of epigenetics holds promises of being of interest to both the farmer, the veterinarian and for the area of animal models for the years to come

Page 95: Genomic imprinting

THANK YOU


Recommended