+ All Categories

GEO-BML

Date post: 04-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: martin-schweighart-moya
View: 226 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 25

Transcript
  • 7/30/2019 GEO-BML

    1/25

    En ineer Research and Develo ment Center

    A GeoA GeospatialspatialBattle Management LanguageBattle Management Language

    (GeoBML) for Terrain Reasoning(GeoBML) for Terrain Reasoning

    Presented to the 11th International Command and ControlResearch and Technology Symposium

    Paper I-110

    Dr. Michael HiebDr. Mark PullenMartin Kleiner

    Center for C4I

    George Mason University

    Fairfax, Virginia

    [email protected]

    Michael Powers

    Topographic Engineering Center

    US Army Engineer Research and

    Development Center

    Alexandria, Virginia

    [email protected]

  • 7/30/2019 GEO-BML

    2/25

    En ineer Research and Develo ment Center

    Outline

    Assumptions, Requirements and Challenges Geo-Centric

    Force Centric

    Net-Centric

    Necessary Conditions for Success Architectural Framework

    Representational Consistency Battle Management Language Computational

    Semantic

    Implementing Geospatial Information in a Net-CentricEnterprise Development of Net-Centric Geospatial Services

    Focus on Shared Semantics Experimentation with Geospatial Information in a Mission Context

  • 7/30/2019 GEO-BML

    3/25

    En ineer Research and Develo ment Center

    geo-Centric View of Information

    Beliefs and Assumptions1. Possesses a ubiquitous quality across C2

    Use is often very similar

    Stable, sufficient representations is a goal

    2. Deserves the same rigor of quality, consistency of representation appliedto other battlefield information

    Foundation for shared, common awareness

    3a.Terrain and weather are fundamental enabler/constraint to Combatant and non-combatant behavior

    Force, system, sensor and soldier performance

    3b.Military operations and behaviors are not random Basis for relationships among battlespace entities and actors/actions

    Organizing the Battlespace in space, time and tactical intent

    4. Value F(x) of geo information: Knowledge > Information > Data Hierarchy of Abstraction

    Get out of the data ASAPtoo many reasons to count

    Enabling the Commander, Warrior and C2systemsthrough embeddable geospatial information

    Enabling the Commander, Warrior and C2systemsthrough embeddable geospatial information

  • 7/30/2019 GEO-BML

    4/25

    En ineer Research and Develo ment Center

    Battle Command Centric(Geospatial Information, Technology)

    WMI Services Situation UnderstandingPlanning & Preparation

    Battle Command &

    Mission Execution

    RoleManager

    AgentAuthorizer

    IntelligentOperatorMonitor

    Collaborator

    TranslationInterface

    Text-Voice,etc)

    ReportGenerator

    I/O Services

    PresentationTailor

    PresentationBuilder

    PresentationManager

    WMIPrimitives

    Visualizer

    TaskIntegrationNetworkEditor

    IntelligentServices

    PresentationServices

    WMIElementServices

    Battle StateAssessor

    WeatherService

    ObjectRefinement

    SituationRefinement

    ThreatRefinement

    ReadinessMonitor

    AssessorServices

    FusionProcessRefinement

    BattlespaceObjectPriority

    Manager

    SUToolset

    SUPresentation

    BSO Understanding

    Services

    SU Tool Services

    AirspacePlanner

    PlanAssessor

    COAPlanner

    Tactical Planning

    Objective

    Planner

    Ground SpacePlanner

    Fires & Effects

    Planner

    SensorPlanner

    ManeuverAssessor

    CommsNetworkPlanner

    Resource Planning

    SurvivabilityPlanner

    SecurityPlanner

    Air DefensePlanner

    Planning Analysis Services

    TerrainAnalyzer

    AARServices

    PPS Support Services

    RehearsalServices Simulation

    IncomingOrder

    Processor

    Policy Editor

    ActionRequester

    Command Services

    Order, Report

    & Authorizer

    TaskOrganization

    Notification

    MannedGroundVehicleRemote

    Operation

    UnattendedMunitionsControl

    UnmannedPayloadsControl

    Common Vehicle Control

    UAVControl

    UGVControl

    TacticalControl

    AirspaceControl

    GroundSpaceControl

    UGSControl

    Fires &EffectsControl

    Embedded

    Sustainment

    PlatformSoldierMission

    ReadinessSystem

    MaintenancePlanner

    AdministrativeServices

    SustainmentInfo Services

    Supply &Distribution

    Planner

    Force HealthProtection

    Planner

    HumanResourceServicesPlanner

    Sustainment

    PlanningServices

    ThreatMonitorService

    SustainmentControlServices

    MaintenanceManager

    HumanResourceServicesManagerSupply

    Manager

    DistributionManager

    Force HealthProtectionManager

    Rear Area

    SecurityManager

    SoS COE

    Interactive / Computational Info ServicesGeo-based Decision Tools

    GeoBML and JC3IEDM

  • 7/30/2019 GEO-BML

    5/25

    En ineer Research and Develo ment Center

    Network Centric Challenges

    Bandwidth

    Design impact on actionable geospatial information products

    Minimize the size of all information products

    Achieve the best ratio of information value to bandwidth

    Minimize the frequency of network transmissions Design a persistent quality into product.responsive to dynamic info

    Design information products with the broadest application/recipient set

    Computation and Storage

    Design impacts

    Computational abstraction..develop base information productssupporting a broad range of applications

    Build information products with the broadest application / recipientset

  • 7/30/2019 GEO-BML

    6/25En ineer Research and Develo ment Center

    Network Centric Challenges(Design Constraints)

    Potential value of a Net-centric force is theoretically N2 Metcalfs Law

    So the bigger the force the better my situational awareness ..right?

    There are some assumptions that must be met

    1. There is real potential in all transactions

    Geo-information product has utility to the functional C4ISR processes of therecipient . automated systems and soldiers

    2. All interactions have positive value As a function of value: Knowledge > Information > Data

    Maximize OHIO / information should be ready to use

    3. N-way interactions create the most value Design geo-information product utility for the broadest set of Battlefield Functional

    Areas (BFAs), their systems and processes

    4. There will be both dense and sparse islands of interaction

    Design for varying organizational topologiesDerived from: Network Centric Warfare, Developing and Leveraging Information Superiority

    Alberts, Garstka and Stein, 1999

  • 7/30/2019 GEO-BML

    7/25En ineer Research and Develo ment Center

    Format / Encoding

    Architectural Framework(Terrain and Weather)

    Format/Encoding Format/EncodingFormat/Encoding Format/Encoding

    Representation Representation Information Knowledge

    Geographic Context Tactical Context

    Exploitation Technology Decision Tools Decision ToolsPhotogrammetry

    And SpectralTechnology

    Net Centric Enterprise ServicesCommercial Joint Mapping Toolkit

    Enterprise GIS Architecture

    Situation Understanding

    Models Models Models Models

    Fusion Level 420 31

    C2 Training / Modeling and Simulation

    C4ISR Sensor Fusion

    Analytic Technologies

    BandwidthActionable Information

    Situational ContextMission Context

    Planning and Preparation

    Battle Command/Mission Execution

    Tier

    1

    Tier

    2

    Tier

    3

  • 7/30/2019 GEO-BML

    8/25En ineer Research and Develo ment Center

    Spatial Objects and Representation(Consistent Computational Representation)

    Battle Compartment

    T0

    Spatially Discrete Organization ofthe Battlespace Physical properties of terrain,

    organized to stable qualities as

    related to: Spatial hierarchy of tactical

    employment within the battlescape OCOKA, compartment or a position of

    advantage

    Positions: Def / Attack , Blocking andBattle; Engagement areas, ambush

    Task or Mission (C2IEDM)

    Temporal / Relational Objects Movement graphs attributes

    Task - to - mission relationships

    Wx Effects-mobility & sensors

    Every 3 Hrs out to 36 Hrs with 12 Hrupdates (IMETS/BFM)

    T+ 3n.

    .

    Geo-Complex OCOKA

    !.

    !.

    Direct Fire

    Positions

    !.

    !.

    MobilityOverwatch

    Movement Graph

  • 7/30/2019 GEO-BML

    9/25En ineer Research and Develo ment Center

    Current Spatial Objects for geoBML

    Tier 1 Products(Terrain/Military Context)

    Natural ObstaclesConcealment

    Fields of Fire

    Cross Country Movement

    Maneuver NetworkMobility Corridors

    Chokepoints

    Tier 2 products (Mission Context)/Tier 3 products (Planned)

    Avenues of approachAssembly Areas

    Engagement Areas

    Tier 2 Routes

    Battle PositionsAttack positions

    Axis of Advance

    Indirect Fire Firing Position

    Assault PositionsAttack by Fire Positions

    Drop Zones

    Helicopter Landing Zones

  • 7/30/2019 GEO-BML

    10/25En ineer Research and Develo ment Center

    Semantic Consistency(Potential of a Battle Management Language)

    Doctrine

    Proto

    cols

    XMLWeb Services/

    Grid Services

    Formal Language

    with Syntax and

    Semantics

    RepresentationCommand & Control

    Information Exchange

    Data Model (C2IEDM)

    BML

  • 7/30/2019 GEO-BML

    11/25En ineer Research and Develo ment Center

    Why a BML is needed

    Its vocabulary is found in FM 1-02, but it lacks clearlydelineated rules governing its use (semantics andsyntax).

    It is riddled with ambiguity and overlappingdefinitions.

    As such, it is incapable of transitioning to the fullrange of automation that the Army is implementing.

    It will not support the integration of advanced

    modeling and simulation with digitized commandand control.

  • 7/30/2019 GEO-BML

    12/25En ineer Research and Develo ment Center

    Definition

    BML is an unambiguous language used for the command and

    control of forces and equipment conducting military operations.

    BML is being developed as a standard

    representation of digitized C2

    information for executable plans, orders,Requests and reports

    for military units, for simulated forces, and

    for future robotic forces.

    SimulationSystems

    Robotic

    Forces

    C2Systems

    C2Systems

    Semantic Consistency(Potential of a Battle Management Language)

    C d d C t l I f ti

  • 7/30/2019 GEO-BML

    13/25En ineer Research and Develo ment Center

    Command and Control InformationExchange Data Model (C2IEDM)

    Reporting Data

    Object-Item

    Capability

    Object-Type

    Location

    Action Reporting Data

    Object-Item

    CapabilityCapability

    Object-TypeObject-Type

    Location

    Action

    OBJECT-TYPE OBJECT-ITEM

    ORGANIZATION -TYPE

    MATERIAL-TYPE

    PERSON -TYPE

    FACILITY-TYPE

    FEATURE-TYPE

    ORGANIZATION

    MATERIAL

    PERSON

    FACILITY

    FEATURE

    OBJECT-TYPE OBJECT-ITEM

    ORGANIZATION -TYPE

    MATERIAL-TYPE

    PERSON -TYPE

    FACILITY-TYPE

    FEATURE-TYPE

    ORGANIZATION

    MATERIAL

    PERSON

    FACILITY

    FEATURE

    Provides Core C2

    Semantics

    Comprehensive

    Very well

    documented Tables

    Attributes

    RelationsAllows for Extension

  • 7/30/2019 GEO-BML

    14/25En ineer Research and Develo ment Center

    Development of Formal Grammars to SupportCoalition Command and Control:

    A Battle Management Language for

    Orders, Requests and Reports

    Dr. Michael Hieb

    George Mason University

    US

    [email protected]

    Dr. Ulrich Schade

    FGAN-FKIE

    GERMANY

    [email protected]

    Presented to the 11th International Command and Control

    Research and Technology SymposiumPaper I-069

    Semantic Consistency

  • 7/30/2019 GEO-BML

    15/25

    En ineer Research and Develo ment Center

    geoBML is an Unambiguous Language

    Both domain specific and cross-cutting

    Defined by the role of actionable

    geo-information in the C2

    Provides Unificationacross Doctrine and terms

    Explicit vocabulary and grammar

    Specific context mapped to operations, missionsand tasks

    Explicit Representation Consistent extension to the C2IEDM

    Standard framework and exchange model

    Computational structure

    Both necessary and sufficient for

    shared, common understanding

    Protocols Explicit structure for transmission / sharing

    Geo-Environmental Extension toCommand & Control Information

    ExchangeData Model (C2IEDM / JC3IEDM)

    Explicit Computational Representation

    For Actionable GeospatialInformation

    XMLWeb ServiceGrid Services

    Terrain, Weatherand Military Eng

    Terms

    Doctri

    ne

    Representation

    Proto

    colsgeoBML

    Semantic Consistency(geospatial Battle Management Language (geoBML))

  • 7/30/2019 GEO-BML

    16/25

    En ineer Research and Develo ment Center

    Evolving a geoBML

    Assumptions

    1. Cohesive Formations occur to execute a tactical

    task or mission creating a situation

    2. Grouping of objects. So there are subordinate

    forces (children) forces comprising the Force (target)

    3. Cohesive Formation and tasks argue that there areoperational relationships required for the task (e.g.fire: complimenting angles and range fans)

    4. Possible that there is parent to the target force

    (F (+))

    Situation F (+)

    F (+)

    F (T)

    F (-)

    Table of Organization

    and Equipment

    (TO&E)

    Physical Account of the ForceVehicle Type and Count# of units

    Spacing

    Weapons

    Relationships

    Situation F (-)

    Situation F (T) Syntax and Semantics

    1. Understand the elements and qualities of the

    force being evaluated

    Possible Tasks, Activities and Missions C2IEDM

    2. Field Manuals

    TO&E, Physical Conditions and Behaviors

    Universal Joint Task List (UJTL)

    Language of Command Battlefield Operating Systems (BOS)

    Tactical Tasks and Missions

  • 7/30/2019 GEO-BML

    17/25

    En ineer Research and Develo ment Center

    Evolving a geoBML

    What Dynamics Impact the Representation

    1. Weather

    2. Other Battlefield information

    3. Persistence of Operational Value

    Situation F (+)

    F (+)

    F (T)

    F (-)

    Table of Organization

    and Equipment

    (TO&E)

    Physical Account of the ForceVehicle Type and Count# of units

    Spacing

    Weapons

    Relationships

    Situation F (-)

    Situation F (T)

    Computation Constraints

    1. Data and Information Dependencies

    Product Generation Time Sensitivity

    Computational Time Allowed

    1 Time, Intervals or at Run Time

    Sensitivity to locally held data

    C2IEDM Implementation of

  • 7/30/2019 GEO-BML

    18/25

    En ineer Research and Develo ment Center

    C2IEDM Implementation ofSpatial Objects

    object-item

    object-item-id

    category-code

    name

    alternate-identification-text

    symbol-code

    object-item-typeobject-item-id

    object-type-id

    object-item-type-index

    reporting-data-id

    object-type

    object-type-id

    category-code

    dummy-indicator-code

    name

    object-item-category-code

    object-type-category-code

    feature

    feature-id

    category-code

    control-feature

    control-feature-idcategory-code

    feature-type

    feature-type-id

    category-code

    control-feature-type

    control-feature-type-id

    category-code

    spatial-object

    spatial-object-id

    Key

    Currently Exists in C2IEDM

    BML additions

    Additions to capture SOs

    feature-category-code

    control-feature-category-code

    feature-type-category-code

    An OBJECT-TYPE thatencompasses

    meteorological,geographic, and control

    features of military

    significance.

    An individuallyidentified class ofobjects that has

    militarysignificance.

    A nontangible FEATURE-TYPE of military interest that

    may be represented as ageometric figure and is

    associated with the conductof military operations.

    A nontangible FEATURE ofmilitary interest that is

    administratively specified, maybe represented by a geometricfigure, and is associated with

    the conduct of militaryoperations.

    An OBJECT-ITEM that

    encompasses meteorological,geographic, and control

    features of military significance.

    An individuallyidentified object that

    has militarysignificance. A record of the perceived

    condition of a specificOBJECT-ITEM as a

    specific OBJECT-TYPE

    C2IEDM Implementation

  • 7/30/2019 GEO-BML

    19/25

    En ineer Research and Develo ment Center

    object-item-location

    object-item-idlocation-id

    accuracy-quantity

    bearing-angle

    speed-rate

    speed-accuracy-rate

    use-category-code

    reporting-id

    status-code

    C2IEDM Implementation

    spatial-object

    spatial-object-id

    category-code

    access-to-objective-area

    area-of-interest (object item id)

    concealment

    direction-of-attack

    effected-control-measure (action effect item)

    engagement-area (object item id)

    exclusion

    friendly-maneuver-plan (action functional association index)

    geometry

    location (location id)

    LOS-to-objective-area

    maneuver-graph

    mobility-network

    objective-area (action objective item)

    observation-field-of-fire

    orientation

    reference-id

    size (unit type size code)

    type-solver

    unit-type (unit type echelon code)

    vehicle-type (equipment type)weapon-type (equipment type)

    weighted-cost

    object-item-association

    subject-object-item-id

    object-object-item-id

    object-item-association-index

    category-code

    subcategory-codetask-id

    spatial-object-status

    spatial-object-status-id

    object-item-status-index

    Etc.

    object-item-status

    object-item-id

    object-item-status-ix

    category-code

    hostility-code

    booby-trap-indicator-code

    emission-control-code

    reporting-data-id

    control-feature-status

    control-feature-status-id

    object-item-status-index

    investigation-status-code

    mine-presence-code

    recirculation-indicator-code

    surface-condition-code

    surface-firmness-code

    control-feature-status-category-code

    (Spatial Objects defined)

    location

    location-id

    location-category-code

    Key

    Currently Exists in C2IEDM

    BML additions

    Additions to capture SOs

  • 7/30/2019 GEO-BML

    20/25

    En ineer Research and Develo ment Center

    SO Product Usage

    Division7 Step MDMP

    Bde

    7 Step MDMP

    Bn TF7 Step MDMP

    Tier 2 SOs

    Tier 2 SOs

    Tier 2 SOs

    Tier 1 Products

    Tier 3 SOs

    Tier 3 SOs

    Tier 3 SOsMDMP Military Decision Making Process

    Demonstration Architecture

  • 7/30/2019 GEO-BML

    21/25

    En ineer Research and Develo ment Center

    Demonstration Architecture(Proof of Concept)

    geoBML

    C2IEDM

    Commanders

    SupportEnvironment

    Battlespace

    TerrainReasoning &

    Analysis

    System

    BML

    GUI

    Web Service Interface

    Route

    Planner

    OTBTasks

    Graphics

    Units

  • 7/30/2019 GEO-BML

    22/25

    En ineer Research and Develo ment Center

    Example Spatial Objects

    Enemy Situation(Tier 2 Engagement Areas)

    Courses of Action(Tier 2 Routes)

    Digital Plan / OPORDER(geoBML)

    Simulation

    C2 System

    Wh t thi f C liti

  • 7/30/2019 GEO-BML

    23/25

    En ineer Research and Develo ment Center

    What this can mean for a Coalition

    MIP Services Layer C/JMTK

    MIPDEM

    BML

    A Common Operational Picture

    C2 Business

    Logic

    Other Business

    Logics

    GML

    Web Services

    HLA / DIS

    Web Services

    HLA / DIS

    Operational DBsGeodatabaseJC3IEDM

    US Systems Coalition

    Systems

    Embedded

    Simulation

    COTS / NGA / CJMTK

    geoBML

    MIP / COTS / DoD

    P i l BML P f li

  • 7/30/2019 GEO-BML

    24/25

    En ineer Research and Develo ment Center

    Partial BML Portfolio

    Growing community of investment Shared belief that BML is a necessary component of Net-Centric Operations

    Challenges

    Technological infrastructure enabling distributed, multi-national developmentand extension of BML Operational Domains and specific requirements of National entities

    Capability to maintain the integrity of the JC3IEDM

    Specification Ground Air Naval Implementation Software Services International

    Coalition BML X X X X X X

    NATO-WG X X X

    JBML X X X X X X

    geoBML X X X

    XBML X X X X

    Army BML X X

    AO BML X X

    MIP/JC3IEDM X X X X X

    S

  • 7/30/2019 GEO-BML

    25/25

    En ineer Research and Develo ment Center

    Summary

    Network-Centric Operations require a change in paradigm for the

    employment of actionable geospatial information

    Digital Maps are not enough

    Move beyond concepts of maps as the wallpaper of the COP

    Actionable geo-information and decision tools need to empower C2 activities

    at the appropriate level of semantic and syntax representation

    BML / geoBML is a formalization of C2 Information and representation

    Allows Commanders to access the right environmental information to accomplish

    their intent

    Spatial Objects forming geoBML will enable reasoning to adapt to both

    changed missions and a variety of terrain and environmental data

    Geospatial information and implementation concepts have achieved a

    state of maturity that merits inclusion in the Net-Centric Enterprise

    Carry the right battlespace knowledgeyou carry the day


Recommended